|
Manitoba Agriculture and Food,
Fusarium Head Blight,
Fact
Sheet
Donald Hershman
Head Scab of Small Grains in Kentucky,
PPA-38
McMullen and Stack, Fusarium
Head Blight of Small Grains, NDSU State Extension
Service
Administrative Regions of China
Agricultural Regions of China
|
Since no single measure can provide adequate
protection of wheat from WHS, integrated management strategies
have been employed (Bai and Chen et al., 1999). In addition to
development and utilization of resistant cultivars, as mentioned
above, some cultural practices have been applied in China to
reduce disease severity. These practices include draining wheat
fields to lower the water table and create an environment unfavorable
to WHS; plowing fields to bury crop residues or removing crop
residues before sowing to reduce the primary inoculum; and changing
the sowing date to avoid climate conditions that are favorable
for WHS at the flowering stage (Liu, 1990; Xu and Chen, 1993).
However, utilization of resistant cultivars and application of
fungicides have been the most common and effective disease control
methods. Because no highly resistant cultivars with high yield
potential are available to date, moderately resistant cultivars
with better agronomic traits have been widely used for commercial
wheat production. Under favorable conditions at the flowering
stage, these cultivars may become infected and, thus, application
of fungicides is necessary to protect these moderately resistant
cultivars and susceptible cultivars from the disease. Biological
control by using antagonistic organisms is a promising approach
to reduce the loss due to WHS, but much work is needed before
its application in the field.
Biological Control
Biological control with antagonistic microorganisms
has been shown to successfully suppress some fungal diseases
of wheat. Biological control strategies also have the potential
to suppress WHS. Tests of WHS control by antagonistic organisms
have been conducted in the laboratory and in experimental plots,
but, to date, successful applications on a large scale have not
been reported in China.
Strains of Bacillus spp. have shown potential as useful
antagonistic microorganisms for biological control of WHS (Shi
and Wang, 1991; Huang and Li et al., 1993). Strain A014 of B.
subtilis showed a significant inhibitory effect on F.
graminearum when the two organisms were co-cultured (Wang
and Liu et al., 1992). Application of B. subtilis strain
A014, and Bacillus spp. Isolate-2 and Isolate 8-2 by spraying
bacterial suspensions over wheat spikes decreased visible symptoms
of WHS by approximately 50% in the greenhouse and in field plots
(Shi and Wang, 1991; Wang and Liu et al., 1992). Several possible
mechanisms for the antagonism of Bacillus spp. to F.
graminearum have been identified. Twenty-two of 184 strains
of Bacillus spp. isolated from wheat leaves and spikes
were inhibitory to F. graminearum in culture and induced
production of large numbers of chlamydospores near the inhibition
zone (Shi and Wang, 1991). Bacillus spp. Isolate-2 induced
sectored growth, Isolate 91-2 induced hyphal lysis of the pathogen,
and Isolates 5-1 and 5-2 induced granular condensation of the
hyphal cytoplasm in F. graminearum. Some microbial
metabolites may also play a role in controlling WHS. An antibiotic
isolated from a strain of Streptomyces roseoalutaceus
var. pallidus gave 80 to 97% control of WHS in experimental
plots, but further characterization of this antibiotic has not
been reported (Jin, 1989). Other biological control studies have
used nutritionally competitive microbes that are epiphytes of
flowers of healthy plants. When applied on wheat spikes, nutritionally
competitive microbes reproduce and occupy potential infection
sites for F. graminearum. Nutritionally competitive microbes
(13 bacterial strains and three yeast strains) have been isolated
from flowers of white gourd, maize, cucumber, towel gourd, morning
glory, hot pepper, Chinese rose, and chrysanthemum in China (Dai
and Zhou, 1995). A wide range of microbes (118 bacterial strains
and five actinomyces strains) that are antagonistic to F.
graminearum in culture have also been isolated from samples
of wheat seeds, spikes, and leaves, from rice stubble, and from
a variety of field soils (Dai and Zhou, 1995). Among the 139
isolates tested, only three bacterial strains (YN1 and GJ6 from
soils, and Y-12 from flower of Chinese rose) gave a high level
of WHS control both in greenhouse tests and in field tests, reducing
visible symptoms by 60 to 70%. These strains, however, have not
been identified to the species level or characterized further.
Much work is needed to develop these potentially useful strains
to control WHS under field conditions.
Application of Fungicides
Application of fungicides has been a common
practice to control WHS in China. Effective systemic fungicides
include carbendazim, thiophanate-methyl, and diniconazole. Carbendazim
has been the most effective and has been widely used in China
to control WHS since 1972 (Xu and Chen, 1993). The timing of
fungicide application is critical for effective control. Fungicides
are applied once or twice from the heading stage to the flowering
stage, depending on the environmental conditions and the susceptibility
of wheat cultivars. Spraying carbendazim at the heading or flowering
stages of wheat generally gives 80 to 90% control of visible
symptoms (Xu and Chen, 1993). Spraying carbendazim before the
heading stage or after the flowering stage may not protect wheat
from fungal infection (Xu and Chen, 1993). Diniconazole was recently
reported to be as effective as carbendazim, but verification
of its efficacy is needed (Jing and Shang et al., 1996).
To reduce application costs in practice, carbendazim is usually
applied in mixtures with other fungicides, such as triadimefon,
and/or insecticides. Pesticide mixtures are used widely to control
a range of fungal diseases of wheat, such as WHS, powdery mildew,
and rusts, and to control insects, such as aphids (Xu and Li
et al., 1990; Gao and Tan et al., 1991; Zhai and Liao et al.,
1991 Chen and Chen et al., 1991; Ye and Zhu et al., 1996; Zhu
and Ye et al., 1997; Yu and Wang, 1998).
Table 2 Percentage of Carbendazim Resistant Isolates of Fusarium
graminearum in the Field in Zhejiang, Jiangsu, and Shanghaia
|
Year |
Zhejiang
Province |
Jiangsu
Province |
Shanghai
Municipality |
|
1992 |
0.25(1/405)b |
0(0/547) |
0(0/154) |
|
1993 |
1.25(13/1040) |
0(0/529) |
-c |
|
1994 |
1.81(17/940) |
0.29(1/343) |
- |
|
1995 |
0.79(15/1900) |
0(0/136) |
- |
|
1996 |
2.16(17/788) |
0(0/144) |
- |
|
1997 |
2.76(27/978) |
0.45(2/444) |
- |
|
1998 |
18.86(109/578) |
0.88(5/565) |
- |
|
1999 |
25.60(193/754) |
1.77(9/509) |
3.19(3/94) |
- a Data from Zhou, Ming-Guo
et al. (1999, personal communication)
b Percentage of resistant isolate (number of resistant
isolates / number of isolates tested)
c Not surveyed
Resistance to Fungicides
Resistance to benzimidazole fungicide can
develop rapidly, due in part to their single major target site,
ßtubulin. In most cases, after two to three years' exposure to
benzimidazole fungicides, pathogens become resistant to the fungicides.
However, despite widespread use of carbendazim to control WHS
for more than 20 years both in China and in other countries,
no carbendazim-resistant isolates of F. graminearum were
identified among field isolates until 1992 (Xu and Chen, 1993;
Lu and Zhou et al., 1998). In 1991, a carbendazim-resistant isolate
of F. graminearum was obtained in the laboratory by UV
induction (Zhou and Ye et al., 1995). One year later,
the first naturally-occurring, carbendazim-resistant isolate
was found in the field in Haining County, Zhejiang Province (Zhou
and Ye et al., 1994). Thereafter, additional resistant isolates
were isolated in Jiangsu Province, in Wuxian county in 1994,
and in Tongzhou county in 1997 (Yang et al., 1998). Monitoring
carbendazim resistance in recent years has shown that the proportion
of resistant isolates in the pathogen population has been increasing
rapidly. In a survey in 1999, the proportion of carbendazim-resistant
isolates in Zhejiang Province was over 25% (Table 2) (Lu and
Zhou et al., 1998; Zhou, M-G, 1999, personal communication).
If this trend continues in the near future, a large proportion
of the pathogen population is expected to become resistant to
carbendazim, and application of benzimidazole fungicides may
no longer be effective in controlling the disease. To date, there
have no reports of large-scale failure of carbendazim application
to control WHS in the field. Chinese scientists are searching
for additional fungicides that are as effective as carbendazim
in controlling WHS.
Application of mixtures of fungicides with different target sites
or with different mechanisms of action appears to block or slow
the development of resistance. Kangjunling, a new mixture of
carbendazim, triadimefon, and thiram, has been more effective
than carbendazim alone in field trials at various sites in China
(Shao and Liu et al., 1998; Xu and Pan, 1998; Wu, 1998). This
mixture is especially suitable for regions where carbendazim-resistant
isolates have been found (Shao and Liu et al., 1998). Diniconazole
may also be used instead of carbendazim wherever necessary (Jing
and Shang et al., 1996).
The carbendazim resistance mechanism in F. graminearum
may be different from that found in other fungi. In benzimidazole-resistant
isolates of Aspergillus nidulans and Neurospora crassa,
amino acid at sites 6, 50, 134, 165, 198, 200, and 257 of ß-tubulin
have been changed (Lu and Zhou et al., 1998). The resistance
in F. graminearum was also considered to be related
to changes in amino acids of ß-tubulin, but preliminary studies
showed that carbendazim resistance in F. graminearum is
not associated with changes in amino acids of ß-tubulin at sites
from 135 to 407 (Lu and Zhou et al., 1998). Other proteins may
also be involved in carbendazim resistance in F. graminearum
(Lu and Zhou et al., 1998). Much research is needed to clarify
the unique mechanism of resistance to carbendazim in F. graminearum.
.gif) |
USDA, ARS, National Agricultural
Library
10301 Baltimore Ave.
Beltsville, MD 20705-2351 USA
TEL (301)504-5755, TDD (301)504-6856, FAX (301)504-6927
E-mail: agref@nal.usda.gov,
http://www.nal.usda.gov |
|