Several independent lines of evidence support the
conclusion that Zea mays originated only in Mesoamerica.
Evolutionary studies indicate that wild species of the
genus Zea, which are found only in Mesoamerica, are
the closest relatives of maize. Botanical studies document
that maize is very widespread and extremely diverse
in the Americas. Fossil records support an ancient date
for domestication of maize in Mesoamerica and nowhere
else. Archaeological records chronicle a long history
of use of maize among Native Americans. In the historical
documents of Europe, Africa, and Asia, there are no
definitive records of maize prior to 1492, but there
are numerous records of maize dating from the late 15th
century. Although some critics have argued for an independent
evolution of maize in Asia, or for pre-Columbian diffusion
of maize to Asia, the evidence consists largely of folklore
and interpretation of ambiguous Indian texts and sculptures.
Some critics have even argued that the supposed primitive
agriculturalists of Asia could not have adopted and
diversified maize in only five centuries, which most
experts agree gives far too little credit to the ingenuity
of Asian farmers (179).
Maize is an American Plant
Because maize originated in one geographical area and
spread to Europe, Africa, and Asia during the past five
centuries, the historical record is an important source
of evidence, even though that evidence is often incomplete.
Due to the authors' limited linguistic abilities, our
access to the historical record has been restricted
to European accounts and to English and French translations
of Middle Eastern, South Asian, and Chinese documents.
For a complete survey of historical records of maize,
we will need to develop collaborations with linguists
or native speakers who are familiar with Middle Eastern
and Asian languages. Due perhaps in part to language
limitations, we have been able to identify few 16th,
17th, and 18th century records of agriculture or of
American crop plants in the Middle East and in far-western
China. In 16th and 17th century India, in contrast,
many European travellers report the American crop plants
tobacco and pineapple, but few travellers mention maize,
even though Indian records document the presence of
maize in western India in the 17th century. Perhaps
because these early travellers were traders, merchants,
and missionaries, they lacked the interest or the botanical
expertise to distinguish maize from the diversity of
sorghums, millets, and other Indian cereal crops that
were unfamiliar to them.
Maize Crossed Asia Within 100
Years
The historical record supports the conclusion that
maize spread from west to east across Eurasia and reached
China within 60 years of its introduction to Spain soon
after 1492. Historical documents and linguistic evidence
support the hypothesis that the earliest introductions
of maize to eastern Asia were along overland routes
of trade between Asian populations and not the result
of direct introduction by Europeans. Once maize was
introduced from the Americas to the Mediterranean region,
it could move rapidly across the west to east axis because
it was already adapted to the latitudes and climates
of the regions in which it was spreading. For example,
the Bahama Islands where Columbus first landed are at
the same general latitudes as Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan,
Nepal, Bangladesh, and Yunnan in southwestern China.
The spread of maize across Eurasia in the 16th century
echoes the well-documented spread of wheat and barley
several thousand years ago from the Middle East to Ireland
in the west and Japan in the east (180). Accounts of
16th century Muslim and Christian travellers document
maize in Ethiopia by the year 1526, and on major trade
routes of the Middle East in the years 1507 and 1574. By the early
17th century, maize was being recorded in western India
as makka or grain of Mecca, the Muslim holy city in
Saudi Arabia. Even three centuries later, variations
of grain of Mecca remained as vernacular names for maize
throughout the Middle East and South Asia. This linguistic
evidence supports a role for Muslim traders in disseminating
maize from the Mediterranean region to India and further
east. Records of the Ming Dynasty document extensive
trade missions in the 16th century from the Middle East
and South Asia along the northwestern trade routes of
the Silk Road through far-western China. However, we
have not found specific references to maize among the
trade goods listed in translations of the Ming documents.
We have not found any eyewitness reports of maize cultivation
along the Silk Road until the early 19th century when
the first British agents were permitted to enter far-western
China. Although Ming Dynasty agricultural histories
support the overland introduction of maize from western
regions of China by 1550-1570, evidence is not sufficient
to determine the relative importance of the northwestern
trade route from the Middle East and the southwestern
trade route from northeastern India.
During the 16th century the Portuguese built a network
of trade settlements in Brazil, Africa, and Asia. They
discovered Brazil in 1500 and introduced maize, from
Brazil or Europe, to the western coast of Africa by
1520-1550 and to the eastern coast by 1620. Variations
of the Portuguese name milho for maize survive in several
African languages. They established the capital city
of their Estado da India in Goa on the western coast
of India in 1510 and small trade settlements at Bengal
on the northeastern coast in 1536. Although the Portuguese
coastal settlements are a likely point of introduction
of maize, we have found no mention of maize in descriptions
of these settlements by 16th and 17th century European
travellers. Furthermore, we have found no evidence that
the Portuguese name milho for maize has survived in
any South Asian language. If maize were introduced from
Portuguese settlements into the Mughal Empire of northern
India, then it could have spread northward to the major
trade routes into China. In their eastward search for
spices, the Portuguese also established trade settlements
on Sumatra, Timor and other islands of the southeast
Asian archipelago, where they introduced maize and other
American crop plants. Among the natives of these islands,
the Portuguese name milho for maize has survived. As
they continued east, Portuguese traders reached the
southern coast of China in 1517, but they did not build
a permanent trade settlement until 1557, which postdates
the first record of maize in inland China. Fifty years
ago, Charles Boxer determined that supposed records
of maize in coastal provinces of China in the 16th century
are mistranslations of the original Portuguese and Chinese
documents. Thus, we have found no reliable historical
record of a maritime introduction of maize to China
by the Portuguese during the 16th century, whereas the
16th century overland introduction of maize into China
is well-documented.
Adaptability of Maize in Asia
The rapid spread of maize in 16th and 17th century
Asia was facilitated by its prior adaptation to the
latitudes and climates of the region and by the presence
of long-established networks of overland trade. The
historical record indicates that maize cultivation initially
did not displace the long-established and productive
irrigated rice systems of coastal India and eastern
China, but instead utilized marginal or new agricultural
lands. Maize was adopted first by aboriginal tribes
and other land-poor farmers in mountainous regions of
South Asia and western China. As Buchanan noted in his
surveys of South Asia around the year 1800, while the
natives of the southern city of Bangalore thought it
absurd to consider maize as a cereal grain, the poor
farmers of the Himalayan mountains in Kangra and Nepal
were already living "much on maize". The extraordinary
diversity and versatility of maize contributed much
to its success as a new crop in complex Asian agricultural
systems with extreme variability in altitude, slope,
rainfall, soil, and agronomic practices. As a result,
in Nepal today, maize is grown on more than 800,000
hectares comprising 30% of the total cultivated land
and remains the staple food of populations in the hill
regions (181). Yields of maize in Nepal, however, remain
very low, averaging less than two metric tons per hectare,
as compared to more than eight metric tons per hectare
in the United States. The main challenge to maize research
in Asia today is to increase the productivity and nutritional
quality of an American crop plant that feeds many of
the poorest human populations in Asia and throughout
the world.