<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=39&amp;advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&amp;advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Goldberg&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CCreator&amp;sort_dir=a&amp;output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-03-11T07:03:09+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>1</pageNumber>
      <perPage>15</perPage>
      <totalResults>1</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="3198" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1655">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/1a0bf05df109281eff2c486dcfb15fc4.pdf</src>
        <authentication>d669c4eba5fc1f64cf6ddacac31262ea</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63604">
                    <text>Item ID Number

°1837

Author

True, William Ray

Corporate Author
Roport/Artido TltlO Typescript: Prevalence Odds Ratios for Stress
Symptomology Among Vietnam Veterans from a Major
Health Survey

Journal/Book Title
Year

1986

Month/Day

Juno

Color
Number of Images

21
Alvin L Youn filed this item
9
under "Vietnam Veterans
Twin Study." Item includes cover letter from William R.
True ot Alvin L. Young, June 26, 1986.

Wednesday, July 11, 2001

Page 1838 of 1870

�Medical Center

St. Louis, MO 63125

Veterans
Administration
J u n e 26, 1986

Alvin L. Young, LTCOL, USAF, Ph.D.
Senior Policy Analyst for the Life Sciences
Executive Office of the President
Office of Science and Technology Policy
Room 5005, New Executive Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20506
Dear Alvin:
I really enjoyed seeing you in Washington, and thanks again
for lunch. I'm gratified that this project is finally
coming to show some results for all the time and effort that
has gone into it. We also owe you so much for your
significant assistance throughout.
I wanted to get your schedule for your St. Louis trip.
Please have your secretary give us a call as I'd love to
take you to one of our fun Italian restaurants on the hill,
former home of Yogi Berra and Joe Garagiola. My growing
bride will join us, eating for two.
I'm enclosing a copy of the paper I gave last week at the
Society for Epidemlological Research in Pittsburgh. It got
some press which was fun.
Best wishes.

I'll look forward to seeing you.

Sincerely,

William R.- True, Ph.D., M.P.H.
Research Anthropologist (151A-JB)
cc:

Reply Refer To:

Seth Eisen, M.D.

65 7/151A JB

�Prevalence Odds Ratios for Stress Symptomology
Among Vietnam Veterans
from a Major Health Survey

William Ray True, Ph.D., M.P.H.
Research Anthropologist
Psychiatry Service (151A-JB)
VA Medical Center
St. Louis MO 63125
Jack Goldberg, Ph.D.
Epidemiologist
Cooperative Studies Coordinating Center
Hines VA Medical center
Hines IL 60141
Seth A. Eisen, M.D.
Medical and Research Services
VA Medical Center
St. Louis MO 63125

Presented at the Society for Epidemiological Research
June 18-20, 1986
Pittsburgh PA

�I.

Introduction

Many research s t u d i e s

(Figley,

1978) have suggested t h a t

p a r t i c i p a t i o n in the V i e t n a m War is c o r r e l a t e d w i t h psychological
difficulties

presently

reported

by Vietnam

U n d e r a c h i e v e m e n t in e d u c a t i o n a l and employment spheres

veterans.
(Egendorf

et a l . , 1981)/ m a r i t a l and p e r s o n a l i t y problems, and d r u g a n d / o r
d r i n k i n g problems are j u s t a few e x a m p l e s of

symptom c l u s t e r s

which have been a t t r i b u t e d to the c o n f l i c t .
Although the Vietnam War, like other wars, left
with feelings

of danger,

combatants

loss, helplessness, and d i s r u p t i o n

(Laufer,

1985; Y a g e r , 1984), many i n v e s t i g a t o r s h a v e c o n c l u d e d

t h a t the

V i e t n a m e x p e r i e n c e was u n i q u e and t h e r e f o r e w o r t h y of

special r e s e a r c h e f f o r t s .

I n c o n t r a s t w i t h other w a r s , v e t e r a n s

point out t h a t they l e f t the war zone as i n d i v i d u a l s r a t h e r t h a n
as members of m i l i t a r y u n i t s , f a c e d b r o a d - b a s e d o p p o s i t i o n

at

home t o t h e i r p a r t i c i p a t i o n , s u f f e r e d

the f r u s t r a t i o n s

"limited war m e n t a l i t y , " and had to

deal w i t h an a b r u p t

t r a n s i t i o n f r o m a w a r t i m e to a c i v i l i a n e n v i r o n m e n t .

of a

The issue

is f u r t h e r complicated by the perception shared by many v e t e r a n s
t h a t e x p o s u r e t o H e r b i c i d e Orange a n d other p o t e n t i a l l y toxic
substances while in V i e t n a m c a u s e d the
physiologic

disorders

they believe

psychological

and

t h e y a r e n o we x p e r i e n c i n g

( W a d e , 1979; Holden, 1 9 7 9 ) .
While c o n s i d e r a b l e research a t t e n t i o n has been directed
t o w a r d s u n d e r s t a n d i n g t h e long-term p s y c h o l o g i c a l
health effects

and physical

of the Vietnam W a r , the relationship remains

�Vietnam Veterans

3

incompletely defined.

Many clinical studies have had no control

groups, inadequate definition of outcomes,
attention to confounding factors.

and insufficient

Four relatively large scale

epidemiological studies do exist which examine the relationships
between Vietnam service and subsequent health status.

Slide 1

Although t h e s e s u r v e y s c o n s t i t u t e an i m p r e s s i v e body of
knowledge,

some l i m i t a t i o n s u p o n t h e i r

interpretation

Only the H a r r i s (1980) s t u d y is based on n a t i o n a l
sampling t e c h n i q u e s .

exist.

probability

Robins (1974) and Card (1983) both selected

p r e s u m a b l y u n b i a s e d samples based upon c h r o n o l o g i c a l c r i t e r i a :
Robins used Army examinations
positive drug screens

study.

'Legacies...')

servicemen with
1971 a n d

w i t h d r u g - f r e e s o l d i e r s f r o m t h e same

Card selected veterans

follow-up

identify

leaving V i e t n a m in September,

matched these subjects
group;

to

from

The Egendorf

the

1974 P r o j e c t T a l e n t

study

(referred

to

as

i s p o t e n t i a l l y biased b e c a u s e p a r t i c i p a n t s w e r e

selected u s i n g an u n u s u a l "snowball" sampling t e c h n i q u e in w h i c h
a contacted household r e f e r r e d the study personnel to other
v e t e r a n s m e e t i n g study c r i t e r i a .
Further,
objectives,
employed.

the

research

projects had different

thereby accounting for
Thus,

the

variety

of

research
methods

s t u d i e s d e f i n e d c o n t r o l groups a s V i e t n a m o r

n o n - V i e t n a m e x p e r i e n c e d s o l d i e r s , a l t h o u g h t h e r e was considerable

�Vietnam Veterans

4

non-Vietnam experienced s o l d i e r s / a l t h o u g h t h e r e was c o n s i d e r a b l e
v a r i a t i o n i n levels o f w a r t r a u m a e n c o u n t e r e d .
c o n t r o l groups were d e f i n e d as n o n - v e t e r a n s .
Card study,

comparisons were made

reasons for

not being

Alternatively

For example, in the

with non-veterans,

whose

i n t h e m i l i t a r y w o u l d t h e m s e l v e s have

complicated any analysis of t h i s q u e s t i o n .
The
analysis

research
of

r e p o r t e d here is

a major

study,

the

based

on the

Survey of

commissioned by the V e t e r a n s A d m i n i s t r a t i o n .

secondary

Veterans

II,

The s t u d y was

Slide 2

conducted in 1979 by the Census Bureau of the Department of
Commerce on the Current Population
identified themselves
serving since 1917.
Era sub-sample

Survey respondents who had

as veterans of the U.S. Armed Forces

From this study sample of 11,230, a Vietnam

of 2,452 was identified and interviewed.

This

group was divided between 1,036 Vietnam theater and 1,416 Vietnam
Era veterans.
II. Epidemiological Analysis of the SOV II
This sample is particularly important because it was studied
in 1979, a t i m e p r e c e e d i n g

the d e v e l o p m e n t

of the major

controversy about Agent Orange and the considerable
surrounding that issue.

litigation

Therefore the SOV II was an important

benchmark sample against which other current surveys may be
compared.

�Vietnam Veterans

5

The a n a l y s i s of the e f f e c t s
was performed

of war service in t h i s sample

with Mantel-Haenszel p r e v a l e n c e odds

ratios

c o n t r o l l i n g for age, race, length of s e r v i c e , year of release

Slide 3

from service, years of education at discharge, rank, draftedenlisted, and branch of service.

Test-based Confidence Intervals

are presented in lieu of significance levels.

In this analysis,

the controlling variables were adjusted for simultaneously.
Further analysis of the specific associations

of the individual

potential confounding variables with the outcome measures is now
in progress.

The survey did not

include

questions

about

preservice risk factors or youthful liability measures which have
been shown to be important in other studies.
Questions as they were stated on the questionnaire took the
following form:

"Since your LAST release from active military

service, have you...had any problems with your physical health?
/alternatively/. . .had frightening dreams or nightmares?"
items

asked

for overall prevalence

The

during the years since

discharge, and there was no probe for timing of the item.

The

question concerning Vietnam service was phrased as follows:

Were

you stationed in Vietnam, Laos, or Cambodia; in the waters in or
around these countries; or fly in missions over these areas?
The prevalence odds ratios for psychiatric symptom outcomes

�Vietnam Veterans

6

revealed increased prevalence odds ratios for those exposed to
in-country Vietnam Duty.

The striking elevation in prevalence

Slide 4

odds ratios for nightmares was the strongest outcome in the
study, and this nearly four-fold increase did not diminish with
adjustment.

Although sufficient data are not available to make a

presumptive diagnosis of Post-Traumatic

Stress Disorder, we

looked at the evidence relevent to this diagnosis.

Nightmares,

for example, along with confusion, are specifically

included in

the Diagnostic and S t a t i s t i c a l

Manual

III

(APA,

1980)

as

contributing to the diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.
Depression and guilt both have also been included in clinical
descriptions of post-traumatic stress symptomatology
1979).

(Helzer,

Another feature of the clinical presentation of troubling

d r e a m s are n i g h t

terrors, which

are often accompanied by

retrograde amnesia, therefore causing the symptom to be commonly
under-reported.

Consequently, we suspect that although these

findings are quite dramatic, they may still understate this
troubling symptomology.

Slide 5

These psychological

outcomes, including Troubled Memories,

Psychological Problems, and Temper Control also contribute to the

�Vietnam Veterans

7

Post Traumatic Stress Disorder diagnosis.

The diagnosis itself

encompasses two different domains of symptoms, intrusive imagery
and numbing.

intrusive symptoms,

such as the psychological

outcomes displayed, suggest the re-experiencing of the original
trauma.

This may occur through hyper-reactivity to environmental

stimuli such as startle responses

to backfires, i r r a t i o n a l

feelings and actions upon seeing an oriental face, or disturbing
dreams.
Numbing

suggests

constricted

affect,

feelings of

estrangement, deliberate efforts to avoid feelings and activities
which may directly or indirectly resonate with the original
trauma.

Thus, for example, a veteran may avoid sports in spite

of personal interest because the emotional closeness of the team
may recall

the esprit

of the platoon, which may

have been

d e c i m a t e d in combat.

In these data, life goal

indecision

suggests a reflection of the numbing symptomology.
General Problem Outcomes suggest more of the areas

Slide 6

included in the numbing aspect of the Post Traumatic Stress
Disorder diagnosis, although in this study, they do not appear to
be important.

Outcomes relating to job, school and family would

suggest these difficulties.
These findings are increased with measurement of the combat
exposure.

Combat was measured with an additive scale for all

�Vietnam Veterans

Slide 7

Vietnam veterans and was grouped for this analysis
levels: none, low, medium, and high.

into four

The psychiatric outcomes

and combat show the increased prevalence odds ratios for

Slide 8

higher levels of combat.
over a nine-fold

Again, Nightmares for high combat shows

increase.

Prevalence

odds ratios

for all

psychiatric symptoms show highly significant combat effects with
the Test for Trend.
Similar findings are shown for the psychological outcomes.

Slide 9

Troubled memories show almost an eight fold increase, and all
outcomes save Life Goal indecision demonstrate clear stepped
increases with combat.

All trends are highly significant.

Of the General Problem Outcomes, Physical Health shows

Slide 10

increased Prevalence Odds Ratios and highly significant trend
with combat.

This finding is interesting although we cannot

�Vietnam Veterans

9

determine whether the health problems were the result of injuries
from the war itself, or related to the indirect stresses of
combat as these might be hypothesized
or increased risk-taking.

to affect physical health

The other outcomes show modest but

consistent increases and significant trend.
Evidence has been presented

of the presence

of traumatic

stress symptomology for a randomly selected sample of veterans
studied in 1979, a time preceding

recent

increases in the

political sensitivities surrounding the issue of the effects of
the Vietnam War.

That these symptoms are magnified by combat

exposures follows clinical experience and other research already
conducted.

�Vietnam Veterans

10
References

American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual of Mental Disorders III (DSM-III).
Washington, D.C.;
1980.
Card, J.J.: Lives After Vietnam: The personal impact of military
service. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath, 1983.
Egendorf, A., Kadushin, C., Laufer, R.S., Rothbart, C., and
Sloan, L.:
Legacies of Vietnam: Comparative adjustment of
veterans and their peers, a study conducted for the Veterans
Administration, submitted to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs,
U.S. House of Representatives, 1981.
Figley, C.R., ed.: Stress Disorders Among Vietnam Veterans:
Theory, Research and Treatment. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1978.
Harris, L. and Associates, Inc.: Myths and Realities: A Study of
A t t i t u d e s Toward Vietnam Era Veterans.
Conducted for the
Veterans Administration, Washington, D.C., 1980.
Helzer, J.E., Robins, L.N., Wish, E., and Hesselbrock, M. :
Depression in Vietnam veterans and civilian controls.
Am J
Psychiatry 1979; 136:526-529.
t
Holden, C.: Agent Orange furor continues to build.
24:770-772.

Science 1979;

L a u f e r , R.S.: War Stress and T r a u m a : the Vietnam Veteran
Experience. Presented at the American Sociological Association
Meetings, San Francisco, CA 1982. J Health Soc Behavior, 1985.
Robins, L.N., Davis, D.H., Goodwin, D.W.: Drug use by U.S.Army
enlisted men in Vietnam: A Follow-up on their return home. Am J
Epidemiology 1974 (April); 99(4):235-249.
Veterans Administration, Reports and Statistics Service, Office
of the Controller, 1979 National Survey of Veterans II, Summary
Report, 1980.
Wade, N.: Viets and vets fear herbicide health effects.
1979; 25:817.

Science

Yager, T., Laufer, R., and Gallops, M.: Some problems associated
with war experience in men of the Vietnam generation. Arch Gen
Psychiatry 1984; 41:327-333.

�Table 1
Vietnam Veteran Surveys
Study

Question

Population

N

Controls

Robins, 1974

Post service
drug use

Army enlisted
leaving
VN 9/71

495 drug

470 drug

Legacies of
Vietnam, 1981

War effects

Strat prob
sample: 10
sites

350 VN

363 VN

Prob sample

1176 VN

Harris, 1980

War effects

629 Veterans

1388 VN
4073 Veterans

Card, 1979

War effects

Project
Talent

500 VN

500 VN
500 Veterans

SOV II, 1979

War effects

CPS

1036 VN

1416 VN

�Table 2
Study Sample

Survey of Veterans II (1979)
Sponsored by Reports and Statistics Service
Veterans Administration Central Office
Conducted by Bureau of Census
Commerce Department
February to April 1979
Sample size: 11,230 male veterans
(Military Service since 1917)
Bureau of Census Current Population Sample

(CPS)

�Table 3
Potential Confounding Vnrinblon

Age at time of Survey
Race
Length of Service
Year of Release
Years of Education
Rank
Drafted - Enlisted
Branch of Service

�Table 4
Prevalence Odds Ratios for Psychiatric Symptom Outcomes
and Service in Vietnam
Unadjusted

95% C.I.

Adjusted

95% C.I.

Nightmares

3.69

2.91-4.68

3.78

2.85-5.02

Confusion

1.53

1.22-2.19

1.82

1.39-2.39

Depression

1.43

1.20-1.70

1.65

1.35-2.01

Guilt

1.37

1.12-1.68

1.42

1.12-1.81

�Table 5
Prevalence Odds Ratios for Psychological Outcomes
and Service in Vietnam
Unadjusted

95% C.I.

Adjusted

95% C.I.

Troubled Memories

3.31

2.64-4.14

3.52

2.69-4.61

Psychological Problems

1.66

1.29-2.13

1.75

1.30-2.35

Temper Control

1.72

1.39-2.12

1.78

1.38-2.29

Life Goal Indecision

1.43

1.18-1.73

1.53

1.22-1.90

Sleeping Problems

1.51

1.22-1.87

1.46

1.13-1.87

�Table 6
Prevalence Odds Ratios for General Problem Outcomes
and Service in Vietnam
Unadjusted

95% C.I.

Adjusted

95% C.I.

Physical Health

1.42

1.16-1.75

1.30

1.10-1.68

Drug or Drinking

1.58

1.08-2.37

1.81

1.18-2.79

Finding Job

1.29

1.07-1.56

1.36

1.09-1.71

Holding Job

1.43

1.02-2.07

1.57

1.05-2.36

Inadequate Pay

1.19

1.01-1.41

1.18

.97-1.44

Family Trouble

1.26

1.01-1.57

1.27

.97-1.65

Legal Trouble

1.07

.74-1.56

1.27

.81-1.99

School Trouble

1.05

.71-1.55

1.10

.69-1.79

�Table 7
Combat Scale
1

Artillery Unit which fired on the enemy

2

Flew missions over Vietnam/ Laos, and/or Cambodia

3

Stationed at a forward observation post

4

Received incoming fire (artillary, rockets, or mortars)

5

Encountered enemy mines or booby traps

6

Received sniper or sapper fire

7

Ambushed by enemy

8

Engaged the Vietcong, Guerilla, or unidentified
troups in a firefight

9

Engaged the North Vietnamese Army
or other organized military forces in a firefight

Combat Scale equals sum of positive responses to any of the above.
There are two groups: Non-Vietnam and Vietnam (Combat Scale 0 to 9)

�Table 8
Prevalence Odds Ratios for Psychiatric Symptom Outcomes
and Combat Scale
Combat Level
Non-VN

None

Low

Med

High

Test for
Trend

Nightmares

1.00

1.54

2.27

5.47

9.31

203.333***

Confusion

1.00

1.21

1.26

1.85

2.24

22.811***

Expression

1.00

1.13

1.12

1.97

2.05

29.938***

en I II

1,00

.97

1.00

1.77

2 . 2 .1,

22.533***

*** |&gt; &lt; .00

�Table 9
Prevalence Odds Ratios for Psychological Outcomes
and Combat Scale
Combat Level
Test for
Trend

Non-VN

None

Low

Med

Troubled Memories

1 .00

1.68

1.92

7.74

7.94

188.331***

Psychological Problems

1 .00

1. 04

1 .39

1. 93

2 .72

28. 737***

Temper Control

1 .00

1. 05

1 .46

2. 17

2 .75

43. 049***

Life Goal Indecision

1 .00

1. 42

1 .28

1. 70

1 .52

13. 683***

Sleep Problems

1 .00

1. 09

1 .03

1. 90

3 .02

35. 931***

*** p &lt; .001

High

�Table 10
Prevalence Odds Ratios for General Problem Outcomes
and Combat Scale
Combat Level
Non-VN

None

Low

Med

High

Test for
Trend

Physical Health

1.00

.92

1.04

2.18

2.17

26.821***

Drug or Drinking

1.00

.66

1.58

2.07

1.82

8.836**

Finding Job

1.00

1.17

1.13

1.52

1.62

11.165**

Holding Job

1.00

1.05

1.32

1.70

1.78

6.459**

Inadequate Pay

1.00

.97

1.15

1.46

1.22

6.382**

Family Trouble

1.00

.77

1.12

1.69

1.65

11.047**

Legal Trouble

1.00

.67

.98

1.96

1.21

.904

School Trouble

1.00

.58

.91

1.59

1.18

.881

** p &lt; .01

*** p &lt; .001

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="23509">
              <text>068</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="23510">
              <text>1837</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="23513">
              <text>Series III Subseries III</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="23502">
                <text>True, William Ray</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="23504">
                <text>Jack</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="23506">
                <text>Goldberg</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="23508">
                <text>Seth A. Eisen</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="23511">
                <text>1986-06-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="23512">
                <text>Typescript: Prevalence Odds Ratios for Stress Symptomology Among Vietnam Veterans from a Major Health Survey</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="23514">
                <text>Vietnam Experience Twin Study</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="23515">
                <text>PTSD</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
