<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=39&amp;advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&amp;advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Lee+Weatherbee&amp;output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-03-10T21:39:49+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>1</pageNumber>
      <perPage>15</perPage>
      <totalResults>2</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="3077" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1591">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/873afa4efa90b2c9b94828ca63a23588.pdf</src>
        <authentication>dc8a294f981627c6a59dae605d36adfa</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63540">
                    <text>Item ID Number

01768

AllthOT

Kang, Han K.

Corporate Author
Roport/Artldo TltlO Soft Tissue Sarcomas and Military Service in Vietnam:
a Case Comparison Group Analysis of Hospital Patients

JOUrnal/BOOk TltlU

Journal of Occupational Medicine

Yoar

1986

MOUth/Day

December

Color

a

Number of Images

4

Descrlpton Notes

Monday, June 11, 2001

Page 1769 of 1793

�Soft Tissue Sarcomas and Military Service
in Vietnam: A Case Comparison Group
Analysis of Hospital Patients
Hem K. Kong, DrPH; Lee Weatherbee, MD; Patricia P. Breslin, PhD; Yvonne Lee, MS; and
Barclay M. Shepard, MD

The possibility that exposure to Agent Orange or phenoxy
herbicides may have increased the risk of soft tissue sarcomas
has been of genuine concern to Vietnam veterans and their
families. A hospital-based case comparison group study was
undertaken to examine, through a comprehensive review of
medical records and military personnel records, the association between previous military service in Vietnam and soft
tissue sarcomas. The case group comprised 834 Vietnam-era
veteran patients who served in the US military between 1964
and 1975 and were treated in one of the 172 VA hospitals
between 1969 and 1983 with a diagnosis of soft tissue sarcomas. The comparison group consisted of 13,496 patients who
were systematically sampled from the same Vietnam-era veteran patient population from which the cases were drawn.
Military service information, in particular Vietnam service
status, for each case and control patient was obtained from a
review of the patient's military personnel records archived at
the National Personnel Records Center in St Louis, Missouri.
No significant association of soft tissue sarcomas and previous
military service in Vietnam was observed: odds ratio was 0.83
with a 95% confidence interval of 0.63 to 1.09.

suggested
persons reporting exposure to phenoxy herbicides
Twoa Swedishcase-control studies havedevelopingthat
have five- to sixfold higher risk of
soft
tissue sarcomas (STS) compared with persons without
such exposure.1'2 In addition, several cases of soft tissue
sarcomas have been reported in the US among workers
involved in the manufacturing or use of phenoxy herbicides.3-5

Prom the Department of Medicine and Surgery, Veterans Administration, Washington, DC.
Address correspondence to: VA Office of Environmental Epidemiology (10X8B), AFIP, Washington, DC 20306-6000 (Dr Rang, Director).
0096-1736/86/S813-1215$03.00/0
Copyright Cc) by American Occupational Modical Association

These studies have generated much concern in the
United States for Vietnam veterans—concern that, as a
result of their exposure to Agent Orange in Vietnam,
they may be at increased risk for soft tissue sarcomas
in addition to several other medical and psychological
problems. Agent Orange, a mixture of two commercial
phenoxy herbicides, 3,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid
(3,4-D) and 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T),
was the herbicide most comonly used by the US military
in Vietnam. The principal concern over exposure to
Agent Orange stems from the fact that during the
manufacture of 2,4,5-T trace amounts of a highly toxic
dioxin, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-para-dioxin (TCDD),
appeared as a contaminant.
Agent Orange was sprayed in Vietnam for defoliation
and crop destruction from 1965 to 1970 in a military
operation named Ranch Hand. The aerial application of
Agent Orange reached its peak in 1967, leveled off
slightly in 1968 and 1969, and declined rapidly in 1970.
During the five-year period the US Air Force sprayed
more than 11 million gallons of Agent Orange in South
Vietnam. Approximately 2 million US military personnel
served 1-year tours during the same period.
Studies published subsequent to the Swedish studies
have not yet demonstrated the association between soft
tissue sarcomas and either exposure to phenoxy herbicides or military service in Vietnam.6-11 Two of the seven
industrial workers previously reported to be cases of
STS were also found to have not sarcomas but carcinomas.18
In view of the public concern about potential health
risk among Vietnam veterans and conflicting research
findings in the scientific literature, a case comparison
group analysis of hospital patients for soft tissue sarcomas was undertaken to determine the association
between previous military service in Vietnam and soft
tissue sarcomas.

Journal of Occupational Medicine/Volume 28 No. 12/December 1986

1215

�Materials and Methods
The Veterans Administration Patient Treatment File
(PTF) was used to identify all Vietnam era veterans
whose conditions were diagnosed as soft tissue sarcomas
from 1969 through 1983. The PTF is a computerized
hospital data base of inpatient records, including patients' demographic data, surgical and procedural
transactions, and patient movement and diagnoses. A
record is created for each inpatient discharged from one
of the 172 VA medical centers. The Vietnam-era veterans are defined as veterans who served in the US
military sometime during Aug 5,1964, and May 7, 1975.
A total of 418 cases with International Classification
of Diseases (ICD) 171 diagnosis, ie, malignant neoplasm
of connective and other soft tissue, were identified by
computer search of the PTF for Vietnam-era veterans
who were hospitalized between 1969 and 1983. A pathology report for each ICD 171 case was requested
from each treating VA medical center. A review of 394
pathology reports received for these cases was made by
a pathologist (L.W.) who has particular interest and
experience in this group of malignancies. During the
review he had no knowledge of Vietnam service status
of any of the patients.
On the basis of the review of the pathology reports,
151 ICD 171 cases were excluded as not likely being soft
tissue sarcomas because of miscoding or misclassification and nine ICD 171 cases were put in a doubtful STS
category, leaving 234 diagnoses of STS. All diagnoses
were classified according to the World Health Organization classification system for soft tissue sarcomas.13
The comparison group consisted of 14,931 patients
who were systematically sampled from the same Vietnam-era veterans patient population from which the
STS case subjects were identified. Vietnam-era veteran
patients who have predetermined numbers in the last
two digits of their social security numbers were selected
among all Vietnam-era veteran patients.
Military service information, in particular Vietnam
service status, for STS case subjects and control patients
was obtained from a comprehensive review of the patient's military personnel records archived at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) in St Louis,
Missouri. The General Services Administration (GSA),
under an agreement with the Department of Defense,

maintains the military personnel records of veterans,
including those from the Vietnam era. Military personnel records were located and abstracted for all of the
234 STS case subjects and 13,496 of the 14,931 (90%)
control patients.
Results and Discussion
Eighty-six of the 234 STS cases, or 36.8%, had served
in Vietnam. As Table 1 indicates there was no one
predominant type of STS. Distribution of tumor type of
the 234 STS cases was similar to the results from the
recently published New York state study of 281 cases of
soft tissue sarcoma and Vietnam service.7 Greenwald et
al reported that percentage distribution of malignant
tumor of muscle tissue, fibrous tissue, adipose tissue,
and other soft tissue was 23.8, 17.8, 16.4, and 42.0,
respectively, among the men with soft tissue sarcomas
diagnosed from 1962 through 1980, who were between
the ages of 18 and 29 years any time between 1962 and
1971 and in the New York State Cancer Registry.
Age distribution of STS case subjects was similar to
the control group. No unusual influx of STS case subjects
was observed at any interval as indicated by percent
distribution of STS case subjects and control groups by
hospitalization year (Table 2).
Of the sample of 13,469 PTF Vietnam-era patients,
5,544 or 41% had served in Vietnam (Table 3). No
significant association of soft tissue sarcomas and previous military service in Vietnam was observed among
the Vietnam-era veterans who had come to the VA
hospital for inpatient medical care. The odds ratio was
0.83 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.63 to 1.09. This
suggests that the chance of having a diagnosis of STS
among Vietnam veteran patients was not greater than
that among veteran patients who did not serve in Vietnam.
A differential ascertainment of military service status
between the STS case subjects (100%) and the control
patients (90%) should be noted. However, the difference
is primarily a reflection of levels of efforts and manhours allocated for the personnel record search rather
than any difference in availability of the military records
between STS case subjects and control patients, or
Vietnam veterans and non-Vietnam veterans. For ex-

TABLE 1
Soft Tissue Sarcoma Type By Military Service Status

Type

Histology

Tumors of muscle tissue

Rhabdomyosarcoma
Leiomyosarcoma
Fibrosarcoma
Synovial sarcoma
Liposarcoma
Angiosarcoma
Malignant hemangiopericytoma

Tumors of fibrous tissue
Tumors of synovial tissue
Tumors of adipose tissue
Tumors of vascular origin
Others
Total (%)

1216

NonVietnam
Veteran

Vietnam
Veteran

18
8
26
21
19
3
10
43

8
12
13
9
9
1
2
32

148 (63.2)

86 (36.8)

Total (%)

26
20
39(16.7)
30(12.8)
28(12.0)
4
12
75 (32.0)
234 (100)

Soft Tissue Sarcomas and Agent Orange/Kang et al

�TABLE 2
Distribution by Age and Hospital Discharge Year for Soft Tissue Sarcoma
Case Subjects and Comparison Group

TABLE 4
Distribution of Soft Tissue Sarcoma Case Subjects and Comparison Group of
Patients by Branch of Service in Vietnam

Percentage
Category

STS Case
Subjects

Comparison
Group

Age group (yr)
20-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-59
60+

9
18
42
11
4
10
6

6
29
37
11
4
8
5

Hospitalization (yr discharged)
Before 1970
1971-1975
1976-1980
1981-1983

6
35
42
17

7
36
41
16

TABLE 3
Distribution of Soft Tissue Sarcoma Case Subjects and a Comparison Group
of Patients by Vietnam Service Status*
STS Case
Subjects
(%)

Comparison
Group (%)

Total

Yes
No

86 (37)
148(63)

5,544(41)
7,952 (59)

5,630
8,100

Total

234 (100)

13,496 (100)

13,730

Vietnam Service

* Odds ratio: 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.63 to 1 .09); x2: 1 .78

ample, when the same levels of record search efforts
made for the control patients were employed for the
STS case subjects, the military record searchers at the
NPRC were able to locate 214 of the 234 STS cases
(91%); the yield for the control patients was 13,496 of
the 14,931 (90%). Additional time-consuming manual
tracking efforts were made for the 20 STS case subjects
whose Vietnam service status was not determined because their personnel folders were misplaced, missing,
or on loan to other agencies. Of the 20 STS case subjects,
12 did not serve in Vietnam and eight did serve in
Vietnam: a ratio of 5:3.3. Prior to this exhaustive manual search the ratio among the 214 STS case subjects
was 5:2.9.
Even if one makes an extreme assumption, that is,
that all of the remaining 10% of the control patients
(1,435) whose military personnel records were not located did not serve in Vietnam, the conclusion of the
study would not be altered. This assumption results in
the odds ratio of 0.98. The other extreme assumption,
that is, that all of the 1,435 control patients had served
in Vietnam, results in the odds ratio of 0.66.
There seems to be no propensity of ground troops
(Army or Marines) among the STS case subjects compared with the comparison group (Table 4). It has been
suggested that ground troops in Vietnam, by nature of
their military operation through defoliated zones and
by practice of base perimeter spraying, might have a
higher probability of direct or indirect contact with
Agent Orange than Air Force or Navy personnel.

Branch

STS Case
Subjects

Comparison
Group (%)

Army
Air Force
Marines
Navy
Coast Guard

45 (52)
6(7)
14(16)
21 (24)

3,528 (64)
367 (7)
921 (16)
721 (13)

Total

86 (100)

5,544 (100)

The findings of this study are consistent with a case
control study recently published by Greenwald et al.7
Greenwald et al reported no significant association between STS among Vietnam-era veteran-age males and
military service in Vietnam.
Other studies of Vietnam-era veterans published to
date also have failed to find an excess of STS among
Vietnam veterans. A study of Ranch Hand personnel, a
group of approximately 1,260 men who conducted the
fixed-wing aerial herbicide spraying missions in Vietnam from 1962 through 1971, did not reveal a single
death from STS.10 A proportionate mortality analysis of
deaths among New York State Vietnam-era veterans
between 1965 and 1980, exclusive of 1968 and 1969,
also failed to show excess STS deaths among Vietnam
veterans.14 Two of the 555 deaths reported among Vietnam veterans were due to cancer of connective and soft
tissue (ICD 171), whereas three of 941 deaths among
non-Vietnam veterans resulted from the same type of
cancer. The mortality odds ratio (MOR) was 1.09 with
a 95% confidence interval of 0.18 to 6.70. A mortality
study of Australian Vietnam-era veterans reported 260
deaths among 19,205 Vietnam veterans and 263 deaths
among 25,677 non-Vietnam veterans when followed from
the end of their military service to Jan 1, 1982. There
was no statistically significant difference in the death
rates from STS.11 However, in all three mortality studies, it should be recognized that the design of the study
is such that only very high risks for STS were likely to
be detected: the number of person-years followed or
number of deaths available for analysis was too small to
detect moderately elevated relative risks of STS from
Vietnam service.
The absence of positive association between STS and
Vietnam service might be a result of insufficient observation time since Agent Orange exposure in Vietnam.
In general, it takes more than a decade for cancer to
manifest itself if it is induced by a chemical carcinogen.
More than 80% of STS case subjects in the study were
observed less than 10 years after the last troops were
exposed to Agent Orange in Vietnam. Another possibility is that although Agent Orange or dioxin can induce
STS, Vietnam veterans as a group were exposed to such
small amounts that the conventional epidemiologic study
cannot detect the excess risk resulting from Agent
Orange exposure in Vietnam. Or there is the possibility
that Agent Orange does not induce STS in humans after
all.

Journal of Occupational Medicine/Volume 28 No. 12/December 1986

1217

�1. Hardell L, Sandstrom A: Case-control study: Soft tissue sarcoma and exposure to phenoxyacetic acids or chlorophenols. Br J
Cancer 1979:89:711-717.
2. Eriksson M, Hardoll L, Berg NO, et al: Soft tissue sarcomas
and exposure to chemical substances: A case-reference study. BrJInd
Med 1981;38:37-33.
3. Cook RR: Dioxin, chloracne, and soft tissue sarcoma, letter.
Lancet 1981:1:618-619.
4. Honchar PA, Halperin WE: 2,4,5-T, trichlorophenol, and soft
tissue sarcoma. Lancet 1981:1:268-869.
5. Moses M, Selikoff IJ: Soft tissue sarcomas, phenoxy herbicides
and chlorinated phenols. Lancet 1981;1:1370.
6. Riihimaki V, Sisko A, Hernberg S: Mortality of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and 2,4,5-trichloroaeetic acid herbicide applicators
in Finland. Sound J Work Environ Health 1982;8:37-42.

7. Grecnwald P, Kovasznay B, Collins UN, ot al: Sarcomas of soft
tissue after Vietnam service. JNCI 1984:73:1107-1109.
8. Smith AH, Fisher DO, Pearco N, et al: Do agriculture chemicals
cause soft tissue sarcoma? Initial findings of a case-control study in
New Zealand. Community Health Stud 1988:6:114 119.
9. Smith AH, Perace NE, Fisher DO, et al: Soft tissue sarcoma
and exposure to phenoxy herbicides and chlorophenols in New Zealand.
JNCI 1984:73:1111-1117.
10. An epidemiologic investigation of health effects in Air Force
personnel following exposure to herbicide: Mortality update. Epidemiology Division, USAF School of Aerospace Medicine, Brooks AFB,
Texas. December 1984.
11. A retrospective cohort study of mortality among Australian
national servicemen of the Vietnam conflict era. The Commonwealth
Institute of Health, University of Sydney. Canberra, Australian Government Printing Service, 1984.
12. Fingerhut MA, Halporin WE, Honchar PA, et al: An evaluation
of reports of dioxin exposure and soft tissue sarcoma pathology among
chemical workers in the United States. Scand J Work Environ Health
1984:10:299-303.
13. Enzinger FM, Lattes R, Torloni H: Histological typing of soft
tissue tumors, in International Histological Classification of Tumors,
No. 3. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1969.
14. Lawrence C, Reilly AA, Quickenton P, ot al: Mortality patterns
of Now York State Vietnam veterans. Am J Public Health 1986:75:277879.

1218

Soft Tissue Sarcomas and Agent Orange/Kang et al

In conclusion, a study of STS case subjects and a
comparison patients group in VA hospitals did not reveal
a statistically significant positive association between
STS and previous military service in Vietnam.

References

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22434">
              <text>066</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22435">
              <text>1768</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22439">
              <text>Series III Subseries III</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22429">
                <text>Kang, Han K.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22430">
                <text>Lee Weatherbee</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22431">
                <text>Patricia P. Breslin</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22432">
                <text>Yvonne Lee</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22433">
                <text>Barclay M. Shepard</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22436">
                <text>Journal of Occupational Medicine</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22437">
                <text>1986-12-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22438">
                <text>Soft Tissue Sarcomas and Military Service in Vietnam: a Case Comparison Group Analysis of Hospital Patients</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22440">
                <text>cancer risk assessment</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22441">
                <text>dioxin</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3074" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1589">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/9c9f23c26722d230cc07a7c9a8547588.pdf</src>
        <authentication>4624d4d4dae9a614631f333ac701ae0f</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63538">
                    <text>Item ID Number

01755

Author

Kan

9-Han K-

Corporate Author
RopOrt/ArtlOlO TltlO Typescript: Soft Tissue Sarcoma and Military Service in
Vietnam: a Case Comparison Group Analysis of
Hospital Patients, February 1985

Journal/Book Title
Year

000

°

Month/Day
Color

n

Number of Images

14

DoSCrlptOH NotOS

Submitted for publication in the American Journal of
Industrial Medicine.

Monday, June 11, 2001

Page 1766 of 1793

�Soft Tissue Sarcoma and Military Service in Vietnam: A Case Comparison
Group Analysis of Hospital Patients

Han K. Kang, Dr.P.H., Lee Weatherbee, M.D.*, Yvonne Lee, M.S.,
Patricia P. Breslin, Ph.D., Barclay M. Shepard, M.D.
Department of Medicine and Surgery
Veterans Administration
Washington, D.C.

20420

(202) 389-5534

* Laboratory Service, Veterans Administration Medical Center
2215 Fuller Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105

Submitted for publication in the American Journal of Industrial
Medicine. February 1985.

�Abstract -

Soft tissue4 sarcoma and military service in Vietnam: A case comparison
group analysis of hospital patients. The possibility that exposure to
Agent Orange or phenoxy herbicides may have increased the risk of soft
tissue sarcoma (STS) has been of genuine concern to Vietnam veterans and
their families. A hospital-based case comparison group study was
undertaken to examine, through a comprehensive review of medical records
and military personnel records, the association between previous military
service in Vietnam and soft tissue sarcoma. The case group comprised 234
Vietnam-era veteran patients who served in the U.S. military between 1964
and 1975 and were treated in one of the 172 VA hospitals between 1969 and
1983 with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of soft tissue sarcoma.
The comparison group consisted of 13,496 patients who were systematically
sampled from the same Vietnam-era veteran patient population from which
the cases were drawn. Military service information, in particular Vietnam
service status, for each case and control patient was obtained from a
review of the patient's military personnel records archived at the
National Personnel Records Center in St. Louis, Missouri. No significant
association of soft tissue sarcoma and previous military service in
Vietnam was observed: odds ratio was 0.83 with a 95% confidence interval
of 0.63-1.09.

Key word: Agent Orange, dioxin, phenoxy herbicides, TCDD, Vietnam
veterans, and Vietnam era veterans.

�Introduction

Two Swedish case-control studies have suggested that persons
reporting exposure to phenoxy herbicides have a 5 to 6 fold higher risk of
developing soft tissue sarcoma compared to persons without such exposure
(Hardell et al., 1979; Erikson et al., 1981). In addition, several cases
of soft tissue sarcoma have been reported in the U.S. among workers
involved in the manufacturing or use of phenoxy herbicides (Cook, 1981;
Honchar and Halperin, 1981; Moses and Selikoff, 1981).
These studies have generated much concern in the United States for
Vietnam veterans that, as a result of their exposure to Agent Orange in
Vietnam, they may be at increased risk for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in
addition to several other medical and psychological problems. Agent
Orange, a mixture of two commercial phenoxy herbicides
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic
acid (2,4,5-T), was the herbicide most commonly used by the U.S. military
in Vietnam. The principle concern over exposure to Agent Orange stems
from the fact that during the manufacture of 2,4,5-T trace amounts of a
highly toxic dioxin, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-para-dioxin (TCDD),
appeared as a contaminant.
During the five-year period from 1965 to 1970, the U.S. Air Force
sprayed more than 11 million gallons of Agent Orange in South Vietnam.
Approximately two million U.S. military personnel served one-year tours
during the same period.
Studies published subsequent to the Swedish studies have not yet
demonstrated the association between STS and either exposure to phenoxy
herbicides or military service in Vietnam (Riihimaki, 1982; Greenwald et

�al., 1984; Smith, et al., 1982, 1984; U.S. Air Force, 1983; University of
Sidney, 1984). Two of the 7 industrial workers previously reported to be
cases of SI'S were also found to have not sarcoma but carcinomas (Fingerhut
et al., 1984).
In view of the public concern about potential health risk among
Vietnam veterans and conflicting research findings in the scientific
literature, a case comparison group analysis of hospital patients for soft
tissue sarcoma was undertaken to determine the association between
previous military service in Vietnam and soft tissue sarcoma.

Materials and Methods

'Ihe Veterans Administration Patient Treatment File (PTF) was used to
identify all Vietnam era veterans who were diagnosed as having soft tissue
sarcoma from 1969 through 1983. Ihe PTF is a computerized hospital data
base of in-patient records including patients' demographic data, surgical
and procedural transactions, and patient movement and diagnoses. A record
is created for each in-patient discharged from one of the 172 VA medical
centers. The Vietnam era veterans are defined as veterans who served in
the U.S. military sometime during August 5, 1964 and May 7, 1975.
A total of 418 cases with International Classification of Disease
(ICD) 171 diagnosis, i.e., malignant neoplasm of connective and other soft
tissue, were identified by computer search of the FIF for Vietnam era .
veterans who were hospitalized between 1969 and 1983. A pathology report
for each ICD 171 case was requested from each treating VA medical center.
A review of 394 pathology reports received for these cases was made by a
pathologist (L.W.) who has particular interest and experience in this

�group of malignancies. During the review he had no knowledge of Vietnam
service status of any of the cases.
On the basis of the review of the pathology reports, 151 ICD 171
cases were excluded as not likely being soft tissue sarcoma because of
miscoding or misclassification and 9 ICD 171 cases were put in a doutbful
STS category, leaving 234 histologically confirmed diagnoses of STS. All
diagnoses were classified according to the WHO classification system for
soft tissue sarcomas (Enzinger et al., 1969).
The comparison group consisted of 14,931 patients who were
systematically sampled from the same Vietnam era veterans patient
population from which the STS cases were identified. Vietnam era veteran
patients who have predetermined numbers in the last two digits of their
social security numbers were selected among all Vietnam era veteran
patients.
Military service information, in particular Vietnam service status,
for STS cases and control patient was obtained from a comprehensive review
of the patient's military personnel records archived at the National
Personnel Records Center (NPRC) in St. Louis, Missouri. The General
Services Administration (GSA) under an agreement with the Department of
Defense maintains the military personnel records of veterans including
those from the Vietnam era. Military personnel records were located and
abstracted for all of the 234 soft tissue sarcoma cases and 13,496 of the
14,931 (90%) control patients.

�Results and Discussion

Eighty-six of the 234 histoloqically confirmed soft tissue sarcoma
cases, or 36.8%, had served in Vietnam. As Table 1 indicates there was no
one predominant type of soft tissue sarcoma.

Distribution of tumor type

of the 234 STS cases was similar to the results from the recently
published NY state study of 281 cases of soft tissue sarcoma and Vietnam
service (Greenwald et al., 1984). Greenwald et al., reported that
percentage distribution of malignant tumor of muscle tissue, fibrous
tissue, adipose tissue, and other soft tissue were 23.8, 17.8, 16.4 and
42.0 respectively among the men with soft tissue sarcoma diagnosed from
1962 through 1980, who were between the ages of 18 and 29 years anytime
between 1962 and 1971 and in the New York State Cancer Registry.
Age distribution of STS cases was similar to the control group. No
unusual influx of STS cases was observed at any interval as indicated by
percent distribution of STS cases and control groups by hospitalization
year (Table 2).
Of the sample of 13,469 PTF Vietnam era patients, 5,544 or 41% had
served in Vietnam (Table 3). No significant association of soft tissue
sarcoma and previous military service in Vietnam was observed among the
Vietnam era veterans who come to the VA hospital for inpatient medical
care. The odds ratio was 0.83 with a 95% confidence interval of
0.63-1.09. This suggests that the chance of having diagnosis of STS among
Vietnam veteran patients was not greater than that among veteran patients
who did not serve in Vietnam.
A differential ascertainment of military service status between the
STS cases (100%) and the control patients (90%) should be noted. We
believe, however, that the difference is primarily a reflection of levels
of efforts and man-hours allocated for the personnel record search rather
than any difference in availability of the military records between STS

�cases and control patients, or Vietnam veterans and non-Vietnam veterans.
For example, when the same levels of record search efforts as for the
control patients were employed for the STS cases, the military record
searchers at the NPRC were able to locate 214 of the 234 STS cases (91%);
the yield for the control patients was 13,496 of the 14,931 (90%).
Additional time-consuming manual tracking efforts were made for the 20 STS
cases whose Vietnam service status was not determined because their
personnel folder were misplaced, missing or on loan to other agencies. Of
the 20 STS cases, 12 did not serve in Vietnam and 8 did serve in Vietnam:
a ratio of 5:4. Prior to this exhaustive manual search the ratio among
the 214 STS cases was 5:3.
Even if one makes an extreme assumption, that is, that all of the
remaining 10% of the control patients (1,435), whose military personnel
records were not located, did not serve in Vietnam, the conclusion of the
study would not be altered. This assumption results in the odds ratio of
0.98.

The other extreme assumption, that is, that all of the 1,435

patients had served in Vietnam, results in the odds ratio of 0.66.
There seems to be no propensity of ground troops (Army or Marines)
among the STS cases as compared to the comparison group (Table 4). It has
been suggested that ground troops, by nature of their military operation
through defoliated zones and by practice of base perimeter spraying, might
have a higher probability of direct or indirect contact with Agent Orange
than Air Force or Navy personnel.
The findings of this study are consistent with a case control study
recently published by Greenwald et al. (1984). Greenwald et al. (1984)
reported no significant association between STS among Vietnam era veteran
age males and military service in Vietnam.

�Other studies of Vietnam era veterans published to date also have
failed to find an excess of STS among Vietnam veterans. A study of PANCH
HAND personnel, a group of approximately 1,260 men who conducted the fixed
wing aerial herbicide spraying missions in Vietnam from 1962 through 1971,
did not reveal a single death from STS (USAF, 1983). A proportionate
mortality analysis of deaths among New York State Vietnam era veterans
between 1965 and 1980, exclusive of 1968 and 1969, also failed to show
excess STS deaths among Vietnam veterans. Two of the 555 deaths reported
among Vietnam veterans were due to cancer of connective and soft tissue
(ICD 171), whereas 3 of 941 deaths among non-Vietnam veterans resulted
from the same type of cancer. The mortality odds ratio (MOR) was 1.09
with a 95% confidence interval of 0.08-15.09 (Lawrence et al., 1985). A
mortality study of Australian Vietnam era veterans reported 260 deaths
among 19,205 Vietnam veterans and 263 deaths among 24,677 non-Vietnam
veterans when followed from the end of their military service to January
1, 1982. There was no statistically significant difference in the death
rates from STS (University of Sidney, 1984). However, in all three
mortality studies, it should be recognized that the design of the study is
such that only very high risks for STS were likely to be detected: the
number of person years followed or number of deaths available for analysis
was too small to detect moderately elevated relative risks of STS from
Vietnam service.
The absence of positive association between STS and Vietnam service
might be a result of insufficient observation time since Agent Orange
exposure in Vietnam. In general, it takes more than a decade for cancer
to manifest itself if it is induced by a chemical carcinogen. Over 80% of
STS cases in the study were observed less than 10 years after the last
troops were exposed to Agent Orange in Vietnam. Another possibility is
that although Agent Orange or dioxin can induce STS, Vietnam veterans as a

8

�group, were exposed to such small amounts that the conventional
epidemiologic study cannot detect the excess risk resulting from Agent
Orange exposure in Vietnam. Or, of course, there is the possibility that
Agent Orange does not induce STS in humans after all.
In conclusion, a study of STS cases and a comparison patients group
in VA hospitals did not reveal a statistically significant positive
association between STS and previous military service in Vietnam.
\

�References
1. Cook, R. R. (1981). Dioxin, chloracne, and soft tissue sarcoma
(letter). Lancet 1:618-619.
2. Eriksson, M., Hardell, L., Berg, N. 0., Moller, T., Axelson, 0.
(1981). Soft tissue sarcomas and exposure to chemical substances: A
case-reference study. Br. J. Ind. jted^ 38:27-33.
3. Fingerhut, M. A., Halperin, W. E., Honchar, P. A., Smith, A. b.,
Groth, D. H., Russell, W. 0. (1984). Iteview of exposure and pathology
data for seven cases reported as soft tissue sarcoma among persons
occupationally exposed to dioxin-contaminated herbicides. In Lowrance
WW (ed): "Public Health Risks of the Dioxin." The Rockefeller
University, pp 187-216.
4. Greenwald, P., Kovasznay, B., Collins, D. N., Iherriault, G. (1984).
Sarcomas of soft tissue after Vietnam service. JNCI 73:1107-1109.
5. Hardell, L., Sandstrom, A. (1979). Case-control study: Soft tissue
sarcoma and exposure to phenoxyacetic acids or chlorophenols. Br. J.
Cancer 39:711-717.
6. Honchar, P. A., Halperin, W. E. (1981). 2,4,5-T, trichlorophenol, and
soft tissue sarcoma. Lancet 1:268-269.
7. Lawrence, C., Iteilly, A. A., Quickenton, P., Greenwald, P., Page, W.,
Kuntz, A. (1985). Mortality patterns of New York State Vietnam
veterans. Am. J. Public Health (in print).
8. Moses, M., Selikoff, I. J. (1981). Soft tissue sarcomas, phenoxy
herbicides and chlorinated phenols. Lancet 1:1370.
9. Riihimaki, V., Sisko, A., Hernberg, S. (1982). Mortality of
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and 2,4,5-trichloroacetic acid
herbicide applicators in Finland. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health
8:37-42.
10. Smith, A. H., Fisher, D. 0., Pearce, N., Teague, C. A. (1982). Do
agriculture chemicals cause soft tissue sarcoma? Initial findings of
a case-control study in New Zealand. Community Health Stud.
6:114-119.
11. Smith, A. H., Pearce, N. E., Fisher, D. 0., Giles, H. J., Teague, C.
A., Howard, J. K. (1984). Soft tissue sarcoma and exposure to phenoxy
herbicides and chlorophenols in New Zealand. JNCI 73:1111-1117.
12. The Commonwealth Institute of Health, University of Sydney (1984). A
retrospective cohort study of mortality among Australian national
servicemen of the Vietnam conflict era. Australian Government
Printing Service, Canberra.
13. USAF School of Aerospace Medicine, An epidemiologic investigation of
health effects in Air Force personnel following exposure to herbicide.
Baseline mortality study results. Epidemiology Division, USAF School
of Aerospace Medicine, Brooks AFB, Texas. June 1983.
10

�Table 1
Soft Tissue Sarcoma Type By Military Service Status

NDn-Vietnam
Veteran

Vietnam
Veteran

Phabdomyosarcomas

18

8

26

Le iomyosar comas

J8

V2

2£

26

20

46 (19.7)

Type

Histology

Tumors of muscle tissue

Total (%)

Tumors of fibrous tissue

Fibrosarcoma

26

13

39 (16.7)

Tumors of synovia! tissue

Synovial sarcoma

21

9

30 (12.8)

Tumors of adipose tissue

Liposarcoma

19

9

28 (12.0)

Tumors of vascular origin

Angiosarcoma

3

1

4

_1£

2

11

13

3

16 (6.8)

43

32

75 (32.0)

Malignant hemangiopericytomas

Others
Total (%)

148 (63.2)

86 (36.8) 234 (100)

�Table 2
Distribution by Age and Hospital Discharge Year for STS
Case and Comparison Group

Category

STS Cases

Percentage
Comparison Group

Age group, years
20 - 29

9

6

30 - 34

18

29

35 - 39

42

37

40 - 44

11

11

45 - 49

4

4

50 - 59

10

8

6

5

6

7

1971 - 75

35

36

1976 - 80

42

41

1981 - 83

17

16

60+

Hospital ization, year
Before 1970

�Table 3
Distribution of STS Cases and a Comparison Group of
Patients by Vietnam Service Status

Vietnam service

STS Cases (%)

Yes

86 (37)

5,544 (41)

5,630

No

148 (63)

7,952 (59)

8,100

234 (100)

13,496 (100)

13,730

Ibtal

Comparison Group (%)

Odds Ratio: 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.63-1.09)
X2: 1.78 (P&gt;0.1)

Ttotal

�Table 4
Distribution of STS Cases and a Comparison Group
of Patients by Branch of Service in Vietnam

Branch

STS Cases (%)

Comparison Group (%)

45 (52)

3,528 (64)

6 (7)

367 (7)

Marines

14 (16)

921 (16)

Navy

21 (24)

721 (13)

—
86 (100)

7 (*)

Army
Air Force

Coast Guard
Total

*Less than 1%

5,544 (100)

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22398">
              <text>066</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22399">
              <text>1765</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22401">
              <text>Series III Subseries III</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22393">
                <text>Kang, Han K.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22394">
                <text>Lee Weatherbee</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22395">
                <text>Yvonne Lee</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22396">
                <text>Patricia P. Breslin</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22397">
                <text>Barclay M. Shepard</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22400">
                <text>Typescript: Soft Tissue Sarcoma and Military Service in Vietnam: a Case Comparison Group Analysis of Hospital Patients, February 1985</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22402">
                <text>cancer risk assessment</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22403">
                <text>dioxin</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
