<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=39&amp;advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&amp;advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Lorris+G.+Cockerham&amp;output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-08-14T15:54:43+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>1</pageNumber>
      <perPage>15</perPage>
      <totalResults>1</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="1328" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1167">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/3f4bef0956a64c1c127a1b2894821266.pdf</src>
        <authentication>3181b7d44f6de47aef9776417196ede7</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63116">
                    <text>Item ID Number

00193

Author

Young, Alvin L.

Corporate Author

Department of Chemistry and Biological Sciences, USA

Report/Article TitlO

Fate of

2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-P-Dioxin (TCCD) in
the Environment: Summary and Decontamination
Recommendations

Journal/Book Titlo
Year
Month/Day
Color
Number of Images

October
[J

49

Monday, January 22, 2001

Page 205 of 341

�USAFA-TR-76-18

FATE OF 2, 3, 7, 8-TETRACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIQXlN (TCDD)
IN THE ENVIRONMENT: SUMMARY AND
DECONTAMINATION RECOMMENDATIONS

CAPTAIN ALVIN L. YOUNG
MAJOR CHARLES E. THALKEN
LT COLONEL EUGENE L. ARNOLD
CAPTAIN JAMES M. CUPELLQ
MAJOR LORRIS G. COCKERHAM
DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY AND BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
USAF ACADEMY, COLORADO 80840

OCTOBER 1976
APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED

Prepared for:
HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE LOGISTICS COMMAND
WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, OHIO 4S433

DEAN OF THE FACULTY
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE ACADEMY
COLORADO 80840

�Editorial Review by Lt Colonel J. M. Shuttleworth
Department of English and Fine Arts
USAF Academy, Colorado 80840

This research report is presented as a competent treatment of
the subject, worthy of publication. The United States Air Force
Academy vouches for the quality of the research, without necessarily
endorsing the opinions and conclusions of the author.
This report has been cleared for open publication and/or public
release by the appropriate Office of Information in accordance with
AFR 190-17 and DODD 5230.9. There is no objection to unlimited
distribution of this report to the public at large, or by DDC to the
National Technical Information Service.
This research report has been reviewed and is approved for
publication.

PHILIP J/QZRDLET Colonel, USAF
Vice Deah of the Faculty

Additional copies of this document are available through the National
Technical Information Service, U. S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port
Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22151.

�UNCLASSIFIED
SECURITY CLASS'FICATION OF THIS »AGE (When Data Entered)

READ INSTRUCTIONS
BEFORE COMPLETING FORM

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE
1. REPORT NUMDER

2. GOVT ACCESSION NO

3. RECIP'FN'T'S CATALOG NUMBER

USAFA-TR-76-18
4. TITLE (and Subtitle)

5. TYFE OF REPORT ft PERIOD COVERED

Fate of 2,3,7,8-TetracMortdibenzo-p--dioxin (TCED)
in the Environment: Surtmary and Decontamination
Recxxtmendations

Summary Report
6. PERFORMING ORG. REPORT NUMBER

8.
7. AUTHOR?.) Alvin L. Young, Capt, USAF, PhD;
Charles E. Thalken, Maj, USAF, VC, DVM, MS; Eugene
L.Arnold, LtCpl, USAF, BSC, PhD; James M, Cupello,
Capt, USAF, PhD; Lorris G. CocTcerham, Maj, USAF, MS

CON1 RACT OR GRANT NUMBERf»&gt;

10. PROGRAM F.LEMENT. PROJECT, TASK
AiHTA ft WORK UNIT NUMBERS

9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION N A M E AND ADDRESS

Department of Chemistry and Biological Sciences
DFCBS-R
USAF Academy, Colorado 80840
t. CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME AND ADDRESS

12. REPORT DATE

October 1976

Department of Chemistry and Biological Sciences
DFCBS-R
USAF Academy, Colorado 80840

13. NUMBER OF PAGES

14. MONITORING AGENCY NAME &amp; ADDRESSf// different from Controlling Otlice)

15. SECURITY CLASS, (of thla report)

44

UNCLASSIFIED
15«. DECLASSIFICATION/DOWNGRADING
SCHEDULE
6. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (ot thla Report)

Approved for public release: distribution unlimited.

7. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (of the abstract entered In Block 20, II different from Report)

8. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

9. KEY WORDS (Continue on reverse aide It necessary and Identity by block number) Animal SUTVey; Aquatic

Studies; Bic&gt;accumulation; Biodegradation of Herbicides; Biodegradation of TCDD;
Ecological Effects; 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D); Fish Studies;
Herbicide; Histopathology; Insect Studies; Maranals; Necropsy; Orange; Reptile
Study; Soil Microbial Studies; TCDD; Teratogenic; 2,3,7,8-tetxochlorodibenzo-pdioxin (TCDD); Test Area C-52A, Eglin AFB Reservation; 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyanifl \rf f ^ * *rf__ jfr f T Vegetative Succession. • —•
irtffrYftrr H-hM HiVfAM ^r^-VT^_ _* ^y VMV^ ^ * ^- - «''*^^ *' -. *"^ ' "
— -..,..-—
———....
,
—,
0. ABSTRACT (Continue on rovora* aide (/ ri «vt** «ry ant/ I ((entity by bjpck number)
.
.
/msmr\\ i*
U.^
Studies on the fate of 2,3,7,8-tetrachiorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) have been
conducted on biodegradation plots and field test areas that have received massive
quantities of Orange herbicide (a 50:50 mixture of the n-butyl esters of 2,4lichlorophenoxyacetic acid [ , 4 D and 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid
2'-]
2,4,5-T]). From the studies reviewed in this report, it is apparent that
1) TCDD may persist (in biotic and abiotic components) for long periods of time
when initially present at extremely high concentrations on the soil surface,
2) TCDD will accumulate in the tissues of rodents, reptiles, birds, fish, and
W

DD , FORM73 1473
JAN

M &gt;l

EDITION OF 1 NOV 65 IS OBSOLETE

Mg

F

i

rs

UNCLASSIFIED

�SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGEfWhen Data Entered)

20. Abstract (Continued)
insects when these organisms are exposed to TCDD contaminated soils (however,
the levels of TCDD in the tissues apparently do not exceed the levels of TCDD
found in the environment), (3) organisms tolerate, i.e., based on no observed
deleterious effects, soil levels between 10-1,500 ppt TCDD, (4) TCDD is degraded
by soil microorganisms, especially when in the presence of other chlorinated
hydrocarbons, (5) TCDD is degraded in the presence of sunlight, (6) movement of
TCDD in the abiotic portions of the environment can be by wind or water erosion
of soil particles, but leaching by water alone does not appear to occur, and
(7) TCDD is probably not readily released or degraded in the environment when
bound to activated coconut charcoal.

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE(Wien Date Entered)

�TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title

Page

Introduction

1

Soil Incxjrporation/Biodegradation Studies

6

Fate of TCDD in an Ecosystem
Geographical and Vegetative Features
Sampling Grids and Herbicide Deposition
Preliminary Ecological Studies
Soil Studies of TCDD Residues
Rodent Studies
Trapping Data/Histopathology

Liver and Pelt Analysis
Burrow and Diet Studies
TCDD Laboratory Uptake Experiment
Hepatic Ultrastructural Study
Reptile Studies
TCDD in Aquatic Organisms
TCDD in Birds of TA C-52A
Vegetative Succession Studies on TA C-52A

17
... 18
18
18
.21
23
23

25
25
26
27
29
30
31
32

Laboratory and Greenhouse Experiments with TCDD

34

Recormiendations

39

�LIST OF TABLES
Number
1
2
3

Page

Analyses of the Top 15-on Layer From Each of the
Soil Biodegradation Sites

7

Descriptions of Three Biodegradation Studies Involving
Use of Herbicide Orange

8

Concentrations of Herbicide Orange and TCDD in Plots
Originally Treated with 4,480 kg/ha, AFLC Test Range
Complex, Utah, at Various Sampling Dates After
Application. (TCDD in parts per billion)

9

4

Concentrations of Herbicide Orange and TCDD in Plots
Originally Treated with 4,480 kg/ha, Garden City,
Kansas, at Various Sampling Dates After Application.
(TCDD in parts per trillion)
. 9

5

Concentrations of Herbicide Orange and TCDD in Plots
Originally Treated at 4,480 kg/ha, Eglin AFB, Florida,
at Various Sampling Dates After Application
10

6

Movement of Herbicide Orange and TCDD in a Soil
Profile, Eglin AFB, Florida. (TCDD in parts per
trillion)

12

7

Comparison of Herbicide Orange Degradation Rates in
Plots at the Eglin AFB, Florida, Site, Receiving
Either Herbicide, Herbicide Plus Soil Amendments, or
Herbicide Plus Amendments and Charcoal
.14

8

Approximate Amounts of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T Herbicides
Applied to Test Area C-52A, Eglin AFB Reservation,
Florida

9
10
11

19

Concentration of TCDD in Soil Profile (1974) of Grid I,
Test Area C-52A, Eglin AFB, Florida
22
Numbers of Beach Mice Collected During the 1973 and
1974 Studies of Test Area C-52A

22

Concentration (Parts Per Trillion) of 2,3,7,8tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in Liver and Pelt
Samples from Beach Mice, Peromyscus polionotus,
Collected from Control and TCDD-Exposed Field Sites,
1973 and 1974

24

11

�UST OF TABLES
(Continued)

Nottogr
12

13

14

Page

Concentration (Parts Per Trillion) of 2,3,7,8tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in Liver and Pelt
Samples from Beach Mice, Peronyscus polionotus,
Dusted with Alumina Gel Containing No TCDD (Control)
or 2.5 Parts Per Billion TCDD (Test)

28

Concentration (Parts Per Trillion) of 2,3,7,8tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in Composite
Samples of Viscera or Trunk from Six-Lined Racerunners, Cnemidophorus sexlineatus, Collected from
Control and TCDD-Exposed Field Sites

28

Degradation of TCDD (Parts Per Trillion) in a
Greenhouse Experiment, Eglin AFB, Florida

37

111

�INTRODUCTION

The heterocyclic organic molecule 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorc-dibenzop-dioxin (TCDD) has received a great deal of attention in the last
6 years because of its highly toxic properties and the possibility
of it being widespread in the environment by the use of products
made from trichlorophenol, especially the herbicide 2,4,5trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T).
Although TCDD may occur as a contaminant in products made
from trichlorophenol, the levels of TCDD found in any given lot of
trichlorophenol is dependent upon the manufacturing process. TCDD
may be produced as a by-product during an alkaline hydrolysis
reaction when the temperature for making 2,4,5-trichlorophenol
from tetrachlorobenzene exceeds 160°C. However, there is less
likelihood of TCDD formation in the manufacturing process which
starts with phenols and chlorinates them to form trichlorophenol
since little or no heat is required in this reaction.
Public interest in TCDD originated in 1970 when the herbicide
2,4,5-T was implicated as a potential teratogen in pregnant rats
( ) Later tests indicated that the teratogenesis may have been
1.
caused by 27 ± 8 ppm of TCDD present as a contaminant in the
2,4,5-T. As more data have been obtained (2), it has become apparent
Courtney, K.D., D.W. Gaylor, M.D. Hogan, J.L. Falk, R.R. Bates,
and I. Mitchell. Teratogenic evaluation of 2,4,5-T. Science
168:864-866, 1970.
2
Schwetz, B.A., J.M. Norris, G.L. Sparschu, V.K. Rowe, P.J. Gehring,
J.L. Oner son, and C.G. Gerbig. Toxicology of chlorinated dihenzo-pdioxins. Biviron. Hlth. Perspect., Experimental Issue No. 5:87-100,
September 1973.

�that TCDD is one of the most toxic chemicals known; the oral LD5Q
for many animal species is in the range of micrograms per kilogram. Purthermore, the known effects of TCDD include anorexia,
severe weight loss, hepatotoxicity, hepatoporphyria, vascular
lesions, chloracne, gastric ulcers, and teratogenicity ( ) The
2.
hazard posed by the presence of even a small amount of this substance in the environment has therefore been of concern.
For a person or animal to be poisoned with TCDD, a rare set
of circumstances would be required. Since present production
methods are able to reduce the TCDD level to less than 0.1 ppm,
it is unlikely that contaminated 2,4,5-T herbicide or even contaminated trichlorophenol would be implicated in such a poisoning.
Nevertheless, two accidental poisoning episodes involving TCDD
have been recently reported. In 1975, Carter et al. (3) identified
TCDD as the apparent cause of an outbreak of poisoning in humans,
horses, and other animals on a horse breeding farm in eastern
•H

.• ,

Missouri in 1971. Exposure to TCDD followed the spraying of contaminated industrial waste oil on riding arenas for dust control.
An investigation concluded that a hexachlorophene (made from
trichlorophenol) factory in southwestern Missouri had accumulated
distillate residues containing 306 to 356 ppm TCDD. It was this
distillate residue that was subsequently disposed of via a
salvage oil company and sprayed on the horse arenas.

3
Carter, C.D., R.D. Kiiribrough, J.A. Liddle, R.E. Cline, M.M. Zack,
Jr., W.F. Barthel, R.E. Koehler, and P.E. Phillips. Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin: an accidental poisoning episode in horse arenas.
Science 188:738-740, 1975.

�The second incident of TCDD poisoning occurred in July 1976
in Seveso, Italy ( ) The source of the TCDD was a chemical
4.
factory that produced trichlorophenol through the alkaline hydrolysis of tetrachlorobenzene. When the temperature in a steamheated reaction vessel rapidly increased, a.safety disk ruptured
sending a plume of trichlorophenol, TCDD anici other products 30 to
50 m high above the factory. The cloud apparently rose into the
air, cooled, and came down over a cone-shaped area about 2 km long
and 700 m wide. An area of 110 hectares (ha) was evacuated after
hundreds of animals had died and many people had reported skin
disorders. Several measurements of TCDD on vegetation in an area
adjacent to the factory were in the 1 to 15 ppm range, with one
reading as high as 51.3 ppm. An Italian government commission (5)
recommended: "removal of topsoil to a depth of 10 cm in an area of
113 ha, the. dismantling of all buildings in the Seveso area, and
the total disruption of all wildlife."
The need for data on the fate of TCDD in the environment is
not confined to solving problems associated with the above two
incidents. During the latter portion of the last decade, a program
of aerial application of herbicides was conducted in Southeast
Asia by the United States Air Force. In 1969, at the conclusion
of this program, considerable amounts of herbicide were left unused.

4
Rawls, R.L., and D.A. O'Sullivan. Italy seeks answers following
toxic release. Chem. Engr. News 54(35):27-35, August 23, 1976.
Itay, A. Toxic cloud over Sevesco. Nature 262(5570):636-638,
August 19, 1976.

�One of the herbicides used extensively in this project was a
herbicide designated "Orange" which was formulated as a 50:50
mixture of the n-butyl esters of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid
(2,4-D) and 2,4,5-T. In 1970, approximately 2.3 million gallons
of this material was placed in storage by the Air Force. An
analysis of TCDD in the Orange herbicide stocks (6) indicated
that the range in concentration was 0.1 to 47 ppm TCDD. The
weighted average concentration of TCDD for the 42,015 55-gallon
drums of herbicide was 1.859 ppm. Because of the TCDD concentration, the herbicide could not merely be declared surplus and
disposed of on the agricultural markets. Many methods have been
evaluated for disposing of this material. However, regardless of
the final method selected for its disposition, the storage sites
where the material is currently stored (Naval Construction
Battalion Center, Gulfport, Mississippi, or Johnston Island,
Pacific Ocean) will need to be decontaminated.
At the request of Headquarters, Air Force Logistics Command,
Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, in April 1972, the Department of
Chemistry and Biological Sciences, United States Air Force Academy,
initiated studies on herbicide Orange and TCDD. The objectives
of these studies were: (1) to investigate soil incorporation/
biodegradation as a disposal method for herbicide Orange; (2) to
investigate the ecological effects associated with past uses of
Department of the Air Force. Disposition of orange herbicide by
incineration. Final Environmental Statement, November 1974, pp.
36-37.

�herbicide Orange; and (3) to investigate the soil persistence and
food chain accumulation of TGDD.
This report documents the available data on TCDD from these
studies. Furtherxnore, using these data, recommendations for decontamination of an area exposed to TCDD are presented.

�SOIL INCORPORATION/BIODEGRADATION STUDIES

One potential method proposed for the disposal of herbicide
Orange was subsurface injection or soil incorporation of the
herbicide at massive concentration rates. The premise for such
studies was that high concentrations of the herbicides and TCDD
would be degraded to innocuous products by the combined action of
soil microorganisms and soil hydrolysis. In order to field test
this concept, biodegradation plots were established in three
climatically different areas of the United States; Northwest
Florida (Eglin AFB), Western Kansas (Garden City), and Northwestern Utah (Air Force Logistics Command Test Range Complex). A
comparison of the soils of the three sites is given in Table 1.
The Utah site had a mean annual rainfall of 15 on, while the
Kansas and Florida sites had 40 and 150 cm, respectively. Table
2 describes the experimental protocol for the three sites to include when the plots were established, the method of herbicide
incorporation, the experimental design and the initial calculated
herbicide concentration, ppm, at the time the plots were established. Further details on the experimental protocol can be
obtained from Young, Arnold and Wachinski ( )
7.
Tables 3, 4, and 5 compare the rate of disappearance of TCDD
with that of Orange herbicide for selected plots at the Utah,
Young, A.L., E.L. Arnold, and A.M. Wachinski. Field studies on
the soil persistence and movement of 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T, and TCDD.
Appendix G. Department of the Air Force. Disposition of orange
herbicide by incineration. Final Environmental Statement,
November 1974.

�TABLE 1. ANALYSES OF THE TOP 15-CM LAYER FROM EACH OF THE
SOIL BIODEGRADATION SITES

ORGANIC
MATTER (%)

SAND
(%)

SILT
(%)

CLAY
(%)

5.6

0.5

91.6

4.0

4.4

Garden City, KS^

7.0

1.7

37

42

21

Silt loam

AFLC Test Range
Complex, UT0

7.8

1.4

27

53

20

Clay loam

LOCATION

pH

Eglin AFB, FLa

SOIL
DESCRIPTION

Sandy loam

located on Test Area C-52A, Eglin AFB Reservation, Florida
T&gt;lots located on the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station, Garden City, Kansas
°Plots located 75 miles west of Salt Lake City, Utah

�TABLE 2.

LOCATION

Eglin AFB,
Florida

CO

Garden City,
Kansas

DESCRIPTIONS OF THREE BIODEGRADATION STUDIES INVOLVING USE OF HERBICIDE ORANGE

DATE
ESTABLISHED

2 Apr 1972

10 May 1972

AFLC Test
2 Oct 1972
Range Complex,
Utah

METHOD OF
INCORPORATION

TREATMENT

CALCULATED INITIAL
HERBICIDE
CONCENTRATION (PPM)C

4,480 kg Herbicide/haa
4,480 kg Herbicide/ha,
plus soil amendments^
4,480 kg Herbicide/ha
plus soil amendments
and activated charcoal

5,000
5,000

Preplant Incorporate (Rototiller)

2,240 kg Herbicide/ha
4,480 kg Herbicide/ha

1,000
2,000 .

Simulated Subsurface Injection
(8 cm band width)

1,120 kg Herbicide/ha
2,240 kg Herbicide/ha
4,480 kg Herbicide/ha

Simulated Subsurface Injection
(30 cm band width)

5,000

10,000
20,000
40,000

of herbicide calculated as active ingredient. Herbicide injected at 10-15 cm level or preplant
incorporated in the 0-15 cm level. All plots duplicated.
xhe amendments included 4.5 kg lime, 13.5 kg organic matter, and 1.4 kg fertilizer (12:4:8 for N,P,K,
respectively) uniformly mixed within the top 0-30 cm of soil in the plot.
°Contained in the top 0-15 cm layer.

�TABLE 3. CONCENTRATIONS OF HERBICIDE ORANGE AND TCDD
IN PLOTS ORIGINALLY TREATED WITH 4,480 KG/HA, AFLC
TEST RANGE COMPLEX, UTAH, AT VARIOUS SAMPLING DATES
AFTER APPLICATION. (TCDD IN PARTS PER BILLION)

DAYS AFTER
APPLICATION

TOTAL
HERBICIDE3
(PPM)

TCDD .,
(PPMxlO )

282

8,490

15.0

637

4,000

7.3

780

2,260

5.6

1,000

2,370

3.2

1,150

1,150

2.5

a

Composite sample from replicated plots,
0-15 on increment

TABLE 4. CONCENTRATIONS OF HERBICIDE ORANGE AND TCDD
IN PLOTS ORIGINALLY TREATED WITH 4,480 KG/HA,
GARDEN CITY, KANSAS, AT VARIOUS SAMPLING DATES
AFTER APPLICATION. (TCDD IN PARTS PER TRILLION)

DAYS AFTER
APPLICATION

TOTAL
HERBICIDE3
(PPM)

TCDD3 ,
(PPMxlO~°)

8

1,950

~b

77

1,070

225

189
362

210

600

40

659
a

490

&lt;:L

—b
—b
—b

42

Composite sampling from replicated plots,
0-15 cm increment
HSbt determined

�TABLE 5. CONCENTRATIONS OF HERBICIDE ORANGE AND TCDD IN
PLOTS ORIGINALLY TREATED AT 4,480 KG/HA, EGLIN AFB,
FLORIDA, AT VARIOUS SAMPLING DATES AFTER APPLICATION

DAYS AFTER
APPLICATION

TOTAL,
HERBICIDE
(PPM)

TCDDa ,
(PPMxlO~b)C

5

4,897

375

414

1,866

250

513

824

75

707

508

46

834

438

-b

1,293

&lt;10

b
—

Composite sample from the plot containing
only herbicide (i.e., no lime, organic
matter, or fertilizer added). Sample
from the 0-15 cm increment.
Analysis not completed.
°TCDD in parts per trillion.

10

�Kansas, and Florida sites, respectively. Although the number of
analyses have been limited, the data have indicated that TCDD
(and phenoxy herbicide) degrade more rapidly in the Kansas soils
(Ulysses Silt Loam) than in the Florida soils (Lakeland Sandy Loam),
and least rapidly in the Utah desert soils (Lacustrine Clay Loam).
The levels of TCDD and herbicide in a soil profile from one
of the Bgl.in AFB, Florida, biodegradation plots are shown in
Table 6. Initially (e.g., day 414), the data indicate that both
the herbicide and the TCDD may be leaching down into the lower
soil increments. However, note that the analysis for herbicide
in a soil profile obtained on day 557 shows no leaching. The
method of collecting soil samples, i.e., by the use of a
soil auger contaminated the lower soil increments whereas the
trenching technique showed no contamination. The analysis of
soil profiles at all three locations for biodegradation indicated
that neither the herbicide nor the TCDD appreciably penetrated
below the 15-30 cm level. Thus, we believe that the disappearance
of the herbicide and the TCDD can be attributed to the action of
soil microorganisms, rather than leaching.
Data for TCDD are not available at this time (analysis in
progress) on the influence of soil amendments (e.g., lime,
fertilizer, and organic matter) on the degradation of TCDD in the
Eglin AFB, Florida, biodegradation study. However, preliminary
indications are that the addition of these amendments in these
Florida soils does appear to slightly enhance herbicide degradation.
On the other hand, the presence of activated coconut charcoal in
11

�TABLE 6. MOVEMENT OF HERBICIDE ORANGE AND TCDD IN
A SOIL PROFILE, EGLIN AFB, FLORIDA. (TCDD IN PARTS
PER TRILLION)
DAYS AFTER APPLICATION3
4l4b

557C
HERBICIDE
(PPM)

DEPTH
(CM)

HERBICIDE
(PPM)

0-15

1,866

250

824

15-30

263

50

11

30-45

290

&lt;25d

&lt;10d

45-60

95

&lt;25d

&lt;10d

60-75

160

&lt;25d

&lt;10d

75-90

20

&lt;25d

&lt;10d

TCDD ,.
(PPMxlO )

a

Composite sample from the plot containing only
herbicide

r~

Increments obtained by use of a soil auger having
cup dimensions of 7.6 x 15.2 on, diameter and
length, respectively
£i

Increments obtained by use of porcelain spatula
from the side of 90 cm deep trench
&lt;

T)etection limit

12

�the Eglin plots, at the 12 on level, prevented degradation of the
herbicide and probably also prevented degradation of the TCDD.
These data are shown in Table 7.
In no instance can it be shown that TCDD levels reached a
non-detectable level (less than 10 parts per trillion) within the
designated time periods (see Tables 3, 4, and 5). Although biodegradation appears to reduce the level of herbicide and TCDD,
the data did not follow simple exponential decay curves. For
the mixture 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T herbicides, disappearance was rapid
initially, but slowed substantially in the later portions of the
test period. With this type of decay kinetics, meaningful half
lives are difficult to calculate; however, a reasonable estimate
appears to be in the range of 150-210 days. The degradation of
TCDD followed a similar decay pattern. However, it appears at
this time that the decreased rate of degradation of TCDD as a
function of time may be even more pronounced than for the
herbicides. One might speculate that the enzymes responsible for
herbicide metabolism are inducible and also are involved in TCDD
breakdown. If this is the case, it is not surprising that TCDD
metabolism slows or ceases when the initial massive concentrations
of herbicide are removed.
Microbial studies have been conducted in the biodegradation
plots in both Utah and Florida ( , ) For the Utah plots,
89.
Q

Stark, H.E., J.K. McBride, and G.F. Orr. Soil incorporation/
biodegrada.tion of herbicide orange. Vol I. Microbial and baseline
ecological study of the U.S. Air Force Logistics Command Test Range,
Hill AFB, Utah. Document No. DPG-FR-C615F, US Army Dugway Proving
Ground, Dugway, Utah 84022, February 1975.
13

�TABLE 7. COMPARISON OF HERBICIDE ORANGE DEGRADATION
RATES IN PLOTS AT THE EGLIN AFB, FLORIDA, SITE,
RECEIVING EITHER HERBICIDE, HERBICIDE PLUS SOIL
AMENDMENTS, OR HERBICIDE PLUS AMENDMENTS AND
CHARCOAL
TREATMENT
HERBICIDE PLUS
HERBICIDE PLUS
AMENDMENTS
3
HERBICIDE
AND CHARCOAL"
AMENDMENTS
DEPTH (CM)
DEPTH (CM)
DEPTH (CM)
DAYS AFTER
0-15 15-30
0-15
15-30
0-15
15-30
APPLICATION
(PPM) (PPM)
(PPM)
(PPM)
(PPM)
(PPM)
5

4,897

302

5,703

232

3,074

134

98

4,280

580

5,422

&lt;50

414

1,866

263

2,015

193

2,767
c

&lt;50
c

463

1,217

222

c

824

11

161
c

c

557

1,796
c

707

508

&lt;10

c

c

2,660
c

&lt;50
c

834

438

&lt;10

184

&lt;10

c

c

1,293

&lt;10

&lt;10

&lt;10

&lt;10

1,556

&lt;10

amendments included 4.5 kg lime, 13.5 kg organic matter, and
1.4 kg fertilizer (12:4:8 for N,P,K, respectively) uniformly
mixed within the top 0-30 cm of soil in the plot.
A 1 cm layer of activated coconut charcoal was applied to the
trench prior to application of the herbicide.

^

°Not determined.

14

�samples were taken three times throughout the year (summer, winter
and spring, 1973-1974), and nacrobial species present (bacteria,
actlncmycetes and fungi) were determined. Bacterial counts were
higher for soils with greater concentrations of the herbicide and
with greater moisture content, but the herbicide, in any concentration, had no significant effect on the mycoflora. For the
Florida plots (9), soil samples were taken from all plots in June
and August 1974, and in April 1975. Although bacterial and fungal
levels were similar for control plots or plots receiving either
herbicide or herbicide plus the soil amendments lime, fertilizer,
and organic matter, the levels were significantly higher in the
plots receiving the activated charcoal. Microorganisms tended to
be concentrated in the level which contained the charcoal (0-15 cm),
but greatly reduced in number at depths immediately below the
charcoal. This effect of increasing the number of microorganisms
may have been due to adsorption of growth promoting substances
(e.g., nutrients and water) on the surface of the charcoal particles.
Although the number of organisms were greater in these plots, the
level of herbicide residue was also greatest (Table 7). Apparently,
the binding of the herbicide by the charcoal prevented it from
being degraded by the microorganisms.
These two microbial studies have shown that the application
of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T at massive rates (5,000-40,000 ppm) not only
Q

Cairney, W.J. Determination of soil microorganism populations in
the Eglin AFB, Florida, biodegradation plots. Department of
Chemistry and Biological Sciences, United States Air Force
Academy, CO, 1975, unpublished.
15

�does not sterilize the soil, but indeed stimulates the growth of
certain rnicroflora. That these bacteria, actinomycetes and
fungi are proliferating to such an extent indicates that they are
probably using the herbicide and TCDD as a carbon source (the
exception being the charcoal plots at Eglin), and, as such, are
conjxibuting to their degradation.

16

�FATE OF TCDD IN AN ECOSYSTEM

The biodegradation plots offered little opportunity to
evaluate the ecological effects associated with the use of
herbicide Orange or to investigate food chain acramulation of TCDD.
Although studies were conducted on the microorganisrns, plants and
dominant resident vertebrate and invertebrate animals on and
adjacent to these plots (8,9), they were limited to studies of
less than 0.5 ha. Therefore, concurrent with the biodegradation
studies/ an investigation was initiated on the much larger ecosystem (terrestrial and aquatic) of a unique military test area
in Northwest Florida.
In support of programs testing aerial dissemination systems,
Test Area (TA) C-52A, Eglin AFB Reservation, Florida, received
massive quantities of military herbicides. The purpose of these
test programs was to evaluate the capabilities of the equipment
systems, not the biological effectiveness of the various herbicides.
Nevertheless, after several applications, test personnel began to
express concern over the potential ecological and environmental
hazards that might be associated with continuance of the test
program. This concern led to the establishment of a research
program in the fall of 1967 to measure the ecological effects
produced by the various herbicides on the plant ccnniunity of TA
C-52A (10).
Ward, D.B. Ecological records on Eglin AFB Reservation—the
first year. AFATL-TR-67-157, Air Force Armament Laboratory,
Eglin AFB, Florida, 1967.
17

�Geographical and Vegetative Features
In 1962, the Armament Development and Test Center (ADTC),
Eglin AFB, Florida, established an elaborate testing installation
designed to measure deposition parameters of aerially applied
herbicides on the Eglin Reservation. The direct aerial application
2
was restricted to an area approximately 2.6 km within TA C-52A in
the southeastern part of the reservation. The entire test area
2
covers approximately 5 km and is a grassy plain surrounded by a
forest stand that is dominated by long leaf pine (Pinus palustris),
sand pine (Pinus clausa), and turkey oak (Quercus laevis). The
actual area of test flight paths and herbicide application is in
4

a mechanically cleared area now occupied mainly by broomsedge
(Andropogon virginicus), switchgrass (Panicum virgatutn), and other
low growing herbaceous vegetation.
Sampling Grids and Herbicide Deposition
Four separate test grids were established on the 2.6 km2 test
area during the 1962 through 1970 testing period. Table 8 indicates
the approximate total amount of herbicides (active ingredients)
applied on each test grid and the time periods of those applications.
Preldmnary Ecological Studies
The first in depth animal survey was initiated on the herbicide
equipment test grids and surrounding area in 1970 ( 1 . This
1)
T&gt;ate, B.D., R.C. Voight, P.J. Lehn, and J.H. Hunter. Animal
survey of test area C-52A, Eglin AFB Reservation, Florida. AFATLTR-72-72, Air Force Armament Laboratory, Eglin AFB, Florida,
April 1972.
18

�TABLE 8. APPROXIMATE AMOUNTS OF 2,4-D AND 2,4,5-T
HERBICIDES APPLIED TO TEST AREA C-52A,
EGLIN AFB RESERVATION, FLORIDA

TEST
GRID

GRID
AREA
(HECTARES)

1

37.25

39,540
(1962-1964)a

39,540
(1962-1964)

2

37.25

15,885
(9416)
16-96

15,885
(1964-1966)

3

37.25

4

97.0

HERBICIDES (KILOGRAMS ACTIVE INGREDIENT)

2,4-D

2,4,5-T

1,263
(97
16)
19,959
(9817)
16-90

19,959
(9817)
16-90

When the major portion of the herbicide was applied.

19

�survey was conducted during the time that aerial spray equipment
was actively being tested. The purpose was to determine species

variation and distribution patterns on the test grids and surround2
ing 28.5 km . Of the 86 species of vertebrate animals observed or
collected, it was concluded that the beach mouse (Beromyscrus
polionotus) and the six-lined racerunner (Cnemidophorus sexlineatus)
were present in sufficient numbers to conduct population studies.
In the spring of 1973, analyses of random soil samples from the
test area indicated that low levels (e.g., parts per billion or
parts per trillion) of TCDD were persisting in areas (i.e., the
flight paths) that had received repetitive aerial applications of
2,4,5-T. Based on the beach mouse populations and the residue
information a study was initiated in the summer of 1973 to obtain
rodents for analysis of TCDD in body tissues and for examination
of TCDD in body tissues and for examination of gross and microscopic evidence of teratogenic and mutagenic effects. A trapping
survey was also conducted to study habitat preference of the beach
mouse to determine if population distribution was related to
vegetative cover. Data from these studies (12) indicated a correlation between the levels of TCDD in rodent liver and soil;
however, there was no evidence of toxic histopathology in any
rodent tissue. It was also found that indeed the population
distribution was related to vegetative cover.
*oung, A.L. Ecological studies on a herbicide-equipment test
area (TA C-52A) Eglin AFB Reservation, Florida. AFATL-TR-74-12,
Air Force Armament Laboratory, Eglin AFB, Florida, 1974.

20

�In the sunnier of 1974 a team of military and civilian
scientists undertook a more extensive investigation of the numerous
components of the ecosystem of TA C-52A. Using the information
from previous studies, they obtained data on the fate of TCDD in
soils, rodents, reptiles, aquatic organisms, birds, and vegetation.
These results have been published by Young, Thalken and Ward (13),
and are summarized in the following sections of this report.
Soil Studies of TCDD Residues
Soil samples (the top 0-15 cm increment) were collected from
all four of the test grids on the test area and analyzed for TCDD.
With the exception of Grid I, TCDD residues were in the range of
&lt;10 (minimum detection limit) to 30 parts per trillion (ppt, 1x10-12)
Soil analysis of 20 separate samples from Grid I detected levels
of TCDD in the range of &lt;10 to 1,500 ppt. This wide fluctuation
in TCDD concentrations was attributable to the locations of the
actual flight paths on the test grid ( . . not all of the 37 ha
ie,
received the same amount of aerially applied herbicide). It was •
also apparent that the massive amounts of herbicides applied to
this area in 1962-1964 contained very high levels of the TCDD
contaminant. Further analysis of a duplicate soil core, obtained
from a site having 110 ppt TCDD, indicated that TCDD was stratified
within this top 0-15 cm of soil (Table 9).
Young, A.L., C.E. Thalken, and W.E. Ward. Studies of the
ecological impact of repetitive aerial applications of herbicides
on the ecosystem of test area C-52A, Eglin AFB, Florida. AFATLTR-75-142, Air Force Armament Laboratory, Eglin AFB, Florida, 1975.

21

�TABLE 9.

CONCENTRATION OF TCDD IN SOIL PROFILE ( 9 4
17)
OF GRID I, TEST AREA C-52A, EGLIN AFB, FLORIDA

SOIL PROFILE

GRID I APPLICATIONS OF
HERBICIDES ( 9 2 1 6 )
16-94
PARTS PER TRILLION ( P ) TCDD
PT

0-2.5 on

150

2.5-5 on

160

5-10 on

700

10-15 on

44

Below (15-90 on)

None detectable

TABLE 10. NUMBERS OF BEACH MICE COLLECTED DURING THE
1973 AND 1974 STUDIES OF TEST AREA C-52A

CONTROL

1973

1974

TOTAL

Male

5

12

17

Female

5

10

15

12

11

33_

Fetuses

Subtotal

65

TEST

1973

1974

TOTAL

Male

26

17

43

Female

18

13

31

Fetuses

25

9

34

Subtotal

108

TOTAL

173

22

�Rodent Studies
TRAPPING DATA/HISTOPATHOLOGY. In the 8 weeks of trapping
beach mice during the summer of 1973 and 6 weeks during the
summer of 1974, 106 specimens were collected from Grid I. Many
of the females were pregnant at the time of collection, providing
67 fetuses for examination. Table 10 indicates the numbers of
males, females and fetuses collected from Grid I during 1973 and

1974.
The only significant lesions seen on histopathologic examinations of 173 adult and fetal beach mice were two instances of
moderately severe, multifocal, necrotizing, hepatitis (one test,
one control animal) and a single test mouse with severe venous
ectasia of the renal veins in one kidney. All other lesions were
of the minor or insignificant type normally observed in microscopic
surveys of large numbers of field animals. The absence of liver
lesions (necrosis and porphyria) in mature animals that had liver
levels of TCDD from 20 ppt to 1,300 ppt (Table 11) is most significant in view of the massive quantities of both 2,4,5-T and TCDD
that must have been applied to the test site. There was no
evidence to indicate that TCDD was mutagenic nor carcinogenic in
the field at the concentrations noted in Table 11. None of the
34 fetuses examined from animals captured on the test grid showed
teratogenic defects. This leads one to the conclusion that the
levels of TCDD encountered in the field failed to induce
observable developmental defects. An analysis of the organ to
body weight ratios of each of the control (males and females) and
23

�TABLE 11. COSfCENTRATiai (PARTS PER TRILLION) OF 2,3,7,8-TETr'RACHLORODIBENZOP-DTOXIN (TCDD) IN LIVER AND PELT SAMPLES FROM BEACH MICE, PEROMySCUS
IE.
IOUONOTLJS, COLLECTED FROM CONTROL AND TCDD-EXPOSED FIELD S T S , 1973 AND :

PELT

TREATMENT

SEX

Control

1973

Male and Female

20a

ND13

Control

1974

Male

51

40a

Control

1974

Female

83

40a

Grid I
to
.fc-

YEAR

1973

Male and Female

540

NDb

Grid I

1974

Male

Grid I

1974

Female

a

Minimum level of detection
determined

LIVER

1,300
960

130
140

�test (males and females) using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test indicated
no statistical differences between field control males and field
test males nor field control females and field test females (P^O.05).
LIVER AND PELT ANALYSIS. The presence of TGDD in the liver
samples of both male and female mice collected from the control
site in 1974 may have been due to high levels in one or more
specimens in the pool of samples. Mice from the test area could
have migrated to the periphery of the grid and wandered into the
area designated as control. The closest point from the control
site to the test area was 200 m. However, it is emphasized that a
mouse (or mice) could have been contaminated in this way, and thus
have contaminated pooled samples analyzed for TCDD. Therefore,
the use of these data as truly control data must be viewed with
caution.
The levels of TCDD in the liver of beach mice collected from
Grid I substantiated bimccumulation of TCDD; i.e., an accumulation
of TCDD in an organism from its environment. In general, levels of
TCDD in the livers were no greater than the most concentrated zones
of TCDD in the soil. There are no data from these studies to
support biomagnification of TCDD; i.e., an increase in concentration of TCDD in successive organisms ascending the trophic food
chain.
BURROW AND DIET STUDIES. In all burrows that contained mice
a consistant finding was a plug of soil pushed up into the tunnel
within the first 2.5 to 25 on of the entrance. Frequently an
"escape tunnel" would extend from the nest area to within 2.5 to
25

�15 on of the soil surface. Although the concentration of TCDD on
the pelts of beach mice from the test area was only 10-15 percent
of that In their livers, Table 11, it was apparent that the mice
were continually contaminating themselves as they repeatedly moved
in and out of their burrows. The soil data, Table 9, substantiated
the presence of a zone of TCDD within the region of the tunnel
entrance. Likewise, the location of the escape tunnel suggested
that even the nest itself may contain detectable levels of TCDD.
An examination of the plant and insect litter within the nests
indicated that the beach mouse diet was made up of about 90
percent seeds (based on caryopsis hulls) and about 10 percent
insects (based on insect exoskeletons and wings). Four composite
seed samples were analyzed for TCDD with no TCDD being detected in
any sample (at a minimum detection limit of 1 ppt TCDD). The
insect remains are currently being analyzed for TCDD.
TCDD LABORATORY UPTAKE EXPERIMENT. Twenty-two beach mice
from the designated control area were brought into the laboratory
and divided into a "control" group of 10 animals and dusted with
100 mg of alumina gel 10 times over a period of 28 days while the
"test" group of 12 animals was dusted with 100 mg alumina gel
containing 2.5 ppb TCDD 10 times over the 28 day period. Table 12
indicates control levels and test levels of TCDD in the composite
liver samples and on the composite pelt samples of the alumina gel
and alumina gel plus TCDD dusted animals.
These animals were given complete histopathologic examinations at the completion of the experiment with no differences being
26

�seen between control and test animals. An analysis of the organ
to body weight ratios of each of the control males to test males
and control females to test females using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum
Test indicated a statistical difference involving only the spleens
of control male and test male animals at the 95 percent confidence
level. This difference was not supported by either histopathological
evidence nor by morphometric data as indicated in the Hepatic
Ultrastructural Study section which follows.
HEPATIC ULTRASTRUCTURAL STUDY. After the liver was removed
from 30 beach mice (15 control and 15 from the test area) and
weighed, a section was taken from the center of the median lobe.
Representative electron micrographs were made from the liver tissue
of each animal and the data obtained from each micrograph using a
stereology technique. This method of quantitative analysis of the
cell ultrastructure used morphometric procedures based on the
techniques developed by Weibel et al. (14), as modified by Buchanan (15)
With this method, a transparent grid of intersecting lines
was placed at random over the micrographs and all the line intersections (points) which were over the required cell structures
were counted. All of the points lying over the mitochondria, the
damaged (swollen and ruptured) mitochondria, the granular
vfeibel, E.R., G.S. Kistler, and W.F. Scherle. Practical stereological methods for morphometric cytology. J. Cell. Biol. 30:
23-38, 1966,
Buchanan, G.M. Effect of high dietary molybodenum on rat
adrenal cortejc. Unpublished thesis. University of Colorado,
Boulder, CO, 1973.

27

�TABLE 12. CONCENTRATION (PARTS PER TRILLION) OF 2,3,7,8TETRACHLORPDIBENZO-P-DIOXIN (TCDD) IN LIVER AND PELT
SAMPLES FROM BEACH MICE, PEROMYSCUS POLIONOTUS,
DUSTED WITH ALUMINA GEL CONTAINING NO TCDD (CONTROL)
OR 2.5 PARTS PER BILLION TCDD (TEST)
TREATMENT

SEX

Alumina Gel

Malea
Female

Alumina Gel + TCDD

Male3
Femalea

LIVER

PELT

NDb

NDC

NDb

NDC

125

45

125

89

a

Male and female livers composited for analysis
Minimum detection level - 10 ppt
detection level - 8 ppt

TABLE 13. CONCENTRATION (PARTS PER TRILLION) OF 2,3,7,8TETRACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN (TCDD) IN COMPOSITE
SAMPLES OF VISCERA OR TRUNK FROM SIX-LINED RACERUNNERS, CHEMIDOPHORUS SEXLINEATUS, COLLECTED FROM
CONTROL AND TCDD-EXPOSED FIELD SITES

LOCATION

VISCERA

Control Site

NDa

Test Site

360

TRUNK

370

a

Minimum detection limit - 50 ppt

Tiinimum detection limit - 40 ppt

28

�endoplastnic reticulum (RER) and the agranular endoplasmic reticulum
(SER) were then counted. The total area of the cytoplasm was
then measured in the same manner.
The volume fraction of each structure was determined to be
the ratio between the point count of that structure and the total
point count of the cytoplasm. In this manner the ratio of mitochondria volume to cytoplasm volume of the hepatic parenchyma!
cell was determined for each animal, as was the ratio of damaged
mitochondria volume to total mitochondria volume, RER to cytoplasm,
SER to cytoplasm, and RER to SER. Using these volume fractions or
ratios as quantitative measurements of the structures in question,
the hepatic parenchymal cells from treated animals were compared
with those from control animals.
Similar data were collected from 22 mice brought from the
field into the laboratory and exposed to 30 days of external
dusting with alumina gel (with or without 2.5 ppb TCDD) .
Analysis of the morpheme-trie data using the Wilcoxon Rank
Sum Test indicated no statistical differences between field control
and field treatment animals, nor were there statistical differences
between the control and treatment animals of the dusting study

Reptile Studies
ANALYSIS OF REPTILE TISSUE. Chemical analysis for TCDD in
body parts of the six-lined racerunner indicated significant
levels of TCDD in both the visceral mass and in the trunk, Table 13.

29

�Gross post-mortem examinations were performed on 19 racerunners
collected from either a control site or from Grid I with no
evidence of gross abnormalities seen in any of the specimens.
TCDD In
Young, Lehn and Mettee (16) conducted species diversities
and food chain studies in two aquatic ecosystems draining TA C-52A.
Erosion of soil occurred in to a pond on the test area and in to
a stream irrmediately adjacent to the area. TCDD levels of 10-35
ppt were found in silt of the aquatic systems, but only at the
point where eroded soil entered the water. Species diversity
studies of the stream were conducted in 1969, 1970, 1973 and 1974.
Insect larvae, snails, diving beetles, crayfish, tadpoles, and
major fish species from both aquatic systems were analyzed for
TCDD. Species diversity studies indicated no significant change
in the composition of ichthyofauna between these dates or a control
stream. Concentrations of TCDD (12 ppt) were found in only two
species of fish from the stream, sailf in shiner (Nbtropis
hypselopterus) and mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) . The sample of
mosquitofish consisted of bodies with heads and tails removed. Two
samples of sailf in shiner were analyzed; one containing viscera
only and the other bodies less heads, viscera, and caudal fins.
Only the viscera contained TCDD. Samples of skin, muscle, gonads,
and gut were obtained from spotted sunfish (Lepomis punctatus)
Young, A.L., P.J. Lehn, and M.F. Mettee. Absence of TCDD toxicity
in an aquatic ecosystem. Weed Sci. See. Amer. Abst. 107, p. 46,
1976.
30

�from the test grid pond. Levels of TCDD in those body parts were
4, 5, 18, and 85 ppt, respectively. Gross pathological observations of the sunfish revealed no significant lesions or
abnormalities.
TCDD In Birds of TA C-52A
Bartleson, Harrison, and Morgan (17) have conducted an
extensive survey of the birds of TA C-52A. Between March 1974
and February 1975, they visited study areas twice each week at
various times of day and night, and observed a total of 77 species
of birds. Of this number, 44 species were observed on Grid I, the
area of greatest TCDD residue. The remaining birds were seen in
the surrounding clearing and bayheads projecting into the clearning.
A small collection of specimens was made for species identification and for TCDD analysis. Only three species could be classified
as residents which nest on the test grids. These were southern
meadowlark (Sturnella magna), morning dove (Zenaidura macroura),
and bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus). TCDD residues were
found in meadowlark livers (100-1,020 ppt) and in the stomachs
and stomach contents (46 ppt) of these same birds. An analysis
of liver and fat tissue from doves indicated concentrations of
50 ppt. An analysis of seed in the crop of the doves showed no
detectable residue of TCDD. Two routes of TCDD contamination
Bartleson, F.D., D.D. Harrison, and J.D.-Morgan. Field studies
of wildlife exposed to TCDD contaminated soils. AFATL-TR-75-49,
Air Force Armament Laboratory, Bglin AFB, Florida, 1975.

31

�were proposed for these birds. The first was through the process
of dusting and subsequent ingestion of contaminated soil while
preening. A second possible route was through the ingestion of
soil-borne insects from the test grid; an analysis of a single
composite insect, sample indicated a concentration of 40 ppt TCDD.
Vegetative Succession Studies on TA C-52A
TCDD analysis of vegetation has been limited to seed samples
collected in support of the rodent diet study. No TCDD was found
in four samples of seeds collected from vegetation on Grids I or
II. The minimum level of detection was 1 ppt. A vegetative
succession study has been conducted by Young and Hunter (18) to
document the re-vegetation of an area denuded first by mechanical
means and then by hundreds of applications of phenoxy herbicides.
Nine months (June 1971) after the last defoliant-equipment test
mission, a detailed survey of the vegetation was initiated. The
area was divided into a grid of 169 sections (each 122 by 122 m),
and within each section the percentage vegetative coverage was
visually ranked as Class 0, 0-5 percent; I, 5-20 percent; II, 2040 percent; III, 40-60 percent; IV, 60-80 percent; and V, 80-100
percent. Three sections within each class were selected at random
and surveyed for dicotyledonous plants. An unsprayed area 0.32 km
northwest of the test area was also surveyed. In June 1973, each
Young, A.L., and J.H. Hunter. A long-term field study of
vegetative succession following repetitive application of phenoxy
herbicides. Weed Sci. Sec. Amer. Abst. 1977.

32

�of these areas was again surveyed, but in addition/ a square-foot
2

(0.093m ) analysis technique was performed in 15 additional
sections. These sections were randomly selected and within each
2
section, nine areas, each 0.093m , ware analyzed for species
composition and ground cover density. Both methods of vegetative
survey were repeated in June 1976. The number of dicotyledonous
species increased from 74 in 1971 to 107 in 1973, and to 123 in
1976. In 1971, 20 percent of the test area had less than 20
percent vegetative cover, while 26 percent of the test area had
more than 60 percent vegetative cover. In 1976, no sections had
less than 20 percent vegetative cover, but over 73 percent of the
test area had a cover of more than 60 percent. The major grass
species were Panicum yirgatum and Panicum lanuginosum. The major
dicotyledon was Diodia tores in 1971, but was replaced by
Chrysqpsis graminifolia in 1976. These data demonstrate the
rapid invasion of dicotyledonous species despite the unusually
heavy applications of phenoxy herbicides.
As a concluding remark, Test Area C-52A, Eglin AFB, Florida,
has offered a unique opportunity to examine the effects of longterm, low-level exposure of biological systems to TCDD. Perhaps
when the herbicide 2,4,5-T (contaminated by TCDD) was first applied
to the test area (1962-1964), the levels of TCDD that accumulated
on the soil may have been sufficiently high to be toxic, although
there is no mention of animal deaths in the records of test
missions for this area. It is of interest to note that in the
33

�Italian TCDD episode, an estimated 0.9 to 4.5 kg TCDD were
2
disseminated on an area of 1.4 km . This is approximately equal
to 6.5 to 32 g/ha. Grid I on Test Area C-52A probably received
between 0.07 and 1.86 kg TCDD on an area of 37 ha, or approximately
2 to 50 g TCDD/ha over a 2-year period. This range of values was
arrived at using the arithmetic mean and maximum concentration of
TCDD contamination of the herbicide Orange presently in the United
States Air Force inventory.

34

�LABORATORY AND GREENHOUSE EXPERIMENTS WITH TODD

Two additional studies have been conducted in support of the
previous investigations of TCDD in field ecosystems. One of these
studies has been conducted by Cupello and Young (19) on the
potential uptake from soil of 14C-TCDD by plants. In this study,
2,240 kg active ingredient Orange herbicide/ha, containing 14 ppm
14C-TCDD, was placed beneath the soil surface in specially designed
growth boxes containing 100 plants of Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare)
per box. The plants were grown under controlled environmental
conditions for 9 weeks; 14-hour photoperiod, diurnal temperature
of 35 ± 2°C and 15 ± 1°C, and a relative humidity of 60 and 85
percent, day and night, respectively. On day 64 the plants were
cut at the soil surface, ground in a Wiley Mill, and extracted
with hexane in a Soxhlet Extraction apparatus for 4 hours. The
TCDD in the extract was then concentrated by using the Dow Chemical
Company Analytical Method ML-AM 73-97.
The "TCDD concentrate" was quantitatively transferred to a
scintillation vial using benzene, and 15 cc of Aquasol added to it.
Analysis of the counting data from a liquid scintillation counter
indicated no significant uptake of hexane extractable 14C-TCDD
activity in the plant material. An analysis was also performed
on the plant tissue prior to hexane extraction, and after hexane
extraction for 4 hours. These plant samples were combusted in a
19Cupello, J.M., and A.L. Young. Radiochemical bioassay of TCDD
uptake in plant material. Department of Chemistry and Biological
Sciences, United States Air Force Academy, CO, 1976, unpublished.
35

�Packard Model 306 sample oxidizer, the OCL collected in Packard
Carbo-Sorb, this solution diluted in Packard Permafluor-V, and
the filler counted in a liquid scintillation counter. These data
indicated the presence of sufficient

C activity in the unextracted

plant material to be equivalent to approximately 430 ppt TCDD in
the plant tissue. This activity was not significantly reduced by

hexane extraction.
This relatively high 14C activity in the plant tissue could
be explained by one of at least four hypotheses. It could
represent the presence of (1) bound (non-hexane soluble) TCDD,
(2) a soil biodegradation product of TCDD that was taken up and
bound by the plant, (3) a metabolic breakdown product of the TCDD
that was formed after incorporation of the TCDD into the plant/ or
(4) a contaminant in the original

C TCDD stock solution that

eventually found its way into the plant either as the original
contaminant or as a metabolic of it.
A second study has been conducted by Bartleson, Harrison, and
Morgan (17) on the effect of tilling TCDD contaminated soil. One
cubic meter of soil was collected from Grid I, TA C-52A, and
removed to the laboratory. Four samples were taken from the
uniformly mixed soil, analyzed and found to contain 1,100 ppt
(2 samples) and 1,300 ppt (2 samples) TCDD. The contaminated
soil was placed in two groups of four pots (20 cm deep and 20 cm
in diameter). The four pots in each group were treated as follows:
two were left outside and exposed to natural elements, and two
were placed in a greenhouse and watered with a nutrient solution.
36

�One of the two containers in each location was left undisturbed,
and the other was stirred (tilled) weekly with a spatula. This
stirring was not complete, and soil in the bottom of the pots was
relatively undisturbed. The soil in each of the pots was emptied
into a clean tray and mixed thoroughly before samples were
collected and analyzed for degradation of TCDD. The data shown
in Table 14 suggest that sunlight, tilling and perhaps increased
temperatures (associated with the greenhouse) may promote more
rapid degradation of TCDD. There also may be an additive effect
from use of nutrients.

37

�TABLE 14. DEGRADATION OF TCDD (PARTS PER TRILLION)
IN A GREENHOUSE EXPERIMENT, EGLIN AFB, FLORIDA

LENGTH OF EXPOSURE

0
(PPT)

9 weeks
(PPT)

23 weeks
(PPT)

Tilled

1,200

1,100

520

Untilled

1,200

1,000

530

Tilled

1,200

640

460

Untilled

1,200

810

530

TREATMENT

Full Sunlight3

Greenhouse

Samples placed outside of greenhouse
Samples watered with a nutrient solution

38

�RECOMiyENDATIONS FOR DECONTAMmTION OF TCDD EXPOSED
FIELD SITES

Although there are many potential options for the decontamination of an area exposed to TCDD (see reference 4), data provided in
this report would suggest that one of the most feasible options
would be soil incorporation/biodegradation. The data base used in
selecting this option is as follows:
1.

TCDD may persist (in biotic and abiotic components)

for long periods of time when initially present at extremely high
concentrations on the soil surface.
2.

TCDD will accumulate in the tissues of rodents,

reptiles/ birds/ fish/ and insects when these organisms are exposed
to TCDD contaminated soils (however, the levels of TCDD in the
tissues apparently do not exceed the levels of TCDD found in the
environment).
3.

Organisms tolerate/ i.e./ based on no observed

deleterious effects, soil levels between 10-1,500 ppt TCDD.
4.

TCDD is degraded by soil microorganisms, especially

when in the presence of other chlorinated hydrocarbons.
5.

TCDD is degraded in the presence of sunlight.

6.

Movement of TCDD in the abiotic portions of the

environment can be by wind or water erosion of soil particles, but
leaching by water alone does not appear to occur.
7.

TCDD is probably not readily released or degraded

in the environment when bound to activated coconut charcoal.

39

�Specific Re&lt;xirntrendations
In locations where accidental TCDD contamination covers
Significant geographical area, e.g., many hectares, an in situ
biodegradation program may be most effective in reducing levels
of TCDD residues. Incorporation of organic material, lime, and
fertilizer to enhance microbial activity may be advantageous. The
biodegradation site should be tilled frequently so as to expose
residue to sunlight. Watering of the site is recommended to
reduce wind movement of contaminated particles and to enhance biodegradation. In locations where a limited area has been exposed
to accidental contamination of TCDD, the top 0-15 cm of soil should
be removed and taken to an isolated area where biodegradation procedures can be conducted. Similar treatments should be applied to
these plots as would be for an in situ program. Protective
clothing should be worn by all site personnel. The contaminated
clothing should be incinerated at an approved incinerator. Following use, all equipment should be rinsed with an organic solvent
(e.g., diesel fuel) to remove TCDD residue. The solvent containing
TCDD residue may be collected in activated coconut charcoal and
either incinerated or placed in an approved sanitary landfill,
although if a sufficiently isolated land area is available, biodegradation may be feasible.
It should be noted that some TCDD residue will remain in a
contaminated site. However, research on the ecosystem at Test
Area C-52A, Eglin AFB, Florida, indicated that organisms do have

40

�a tolerance to low levels of TCDD. Therefore, in those areas having
soil residues below 1 ppb, further efforts to decontaminate the
area are not practical. These areas should, however, be fenced
and posted to prevent livestock and human exposure.

41

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="5876">
              <text>017</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="5878">
              <text>0193</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="5881">
              <text>Series II</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5871">
                <text>Young, Alvin L.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5872">
                <text>Charles E. Thalken</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5873">
                <text>Eugene L. Arnold</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5874">
                <text>James M. Cupello</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5875">
                <text>Lorris G. Cockerham</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5877">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;Department of Chemistry and Biological Sciences, USAF Academy, Colorado</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5879">
                <text>1976-10-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5880">
                <text>Fate of 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-P-Dioxin (TCCD) in the Environment: Summary and Decontamination Recommendations</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5882">
                <text>biodegradation</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5883">
                <text>ecological fate</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5884">
                <text>soil decontamination</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5885">
                <text>Eglin AFB</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
