<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=39&amp;advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&amp;advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=R.+Smith&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CTitle&amp;sort_dir=a&amp;output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-03-14T09:19:23+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>1</pageNumber>
      <perPage>15</perPage>
      <totalResults>3</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="3128" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1619">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/46d7e8c1116de53f865536a8067e89d2.pdf</src>
        <authentication>63a37902c59369ab5873526d5b2db506</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63568">
                    <text>RBDID Number

°2193

Author

Eadon G

&gt; -

Center for Laboratories and Research, New York State

Report/Article TltlB Comparisons of Chemical and Biological Data on Soot
Samples From the Binghamton State Office Building

Journal/Book Title
Year

1982

Month/Day

March

Color
Number of Images

D

24

Dascrlpton Notes

Thursday, September 20, 2001

Page 2193 of 2293

�Comparisons Of Chemical and Biological Data
on Soot Samples From the Binghamton State
Office Building

G. Eadon, K. Aldous, G. Frenkel, J. Gierthy, D. Hilkerr L.
Kaminsky, P. O'Keefe, J. Silkworth and R. Smith

Center for Laboratories and Research
(
New York\State Department of Health
Albany, N^ 12201

March, 1982

�Soot samples from two separate samplings of the Binghamton
State Office Building (BSOB) have been the objects of a
coordinated interdisciplinary study at the New York State Health
Department. On May 26, 1981, replicate soot samples were
collected from above the ceiling panels of 16 of the 17 floors of
the BSOB.

Each sample was subjected to exhaustive soxhlet

extraction (benzene).

One portion of each extract was analyzed

for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), another for polychlorinated
dibenzofurans (PCDFs) and related compounds.

A third portion of

all extracts not spiked with PCDDs and PCDFs as part of the
chemical analysis procedure was examined using the cell
keratinization assay.
Another set of experiments utilized a much larger soot
sample collected by a vacuum cleaner on the 3rd and 4th floors of
the BSOB shortly after the fire occurred.

The bulk of this

sample has been used in animal toxicology studies.

However/

portions of this soot were extracted and analyzed for PCBs,
PCDFs, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD) and
2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran (2,3,7,8-TCDF).

The cell

keratinization assay was also applied to an extract of this
sample.
The results of each of these studies have been described in
detail in separate reports (Smith et al. , 1981a, 1981b, 1982;
Silkworth et al., 1982; Gierthy et al., 1982).

This

paper will seek comparisons among the various chemical and
biological data sets generated with these samples, and will
attempt to determine whether the results are mutually consistent.

�Chemical Data
The number of samples which could be analyzed for PCDFs and
related trace contaminants is severely limited by the difficulty
of the analytical procedure.

In contrast, the quantitation of

the much more abundant PCBs is a fairly straightforward process;
more than 800 PCB analyses have already been reported on
BSOB-related samples.

If the ratios of PCB to PCDF are

approximately constant then the results of the PCB analyses can
be used to estimate PCDF levels, with a considerable savings in
time and manpower.

Table I contains analytical data relevant to

the PCB and PCDF (tetra through octa chlorinated)

concentrations

on soot samples collected from 16 of 17 floors of the BSOB, and
on the soot sample used in animal toxicology experiments.

The

PCB concentrations vary by nearly 3 orders of magnitude, while
total PCDF levels vary from not detected
approximately 1200 ppm.

«1.0 ppm) to

For the 11 samples in which the ratio of

total PCDFs to total PCBs has been determined, the total PCDFs
measured ranges from 51 ppm to 1200 ppm, and the ratio of PCDF to
PCB averages .066 * .024 (error limits represent one standard
deviation). t Thus, the total PCDF levels correlate with PCB
levels.
More detailed consideration of the data in Table I indicates
that the total concentrations of tetra CDFs, penta CDFs and hexa
CDFs (groupings which include the isomers predicted (see later)
to be most active with respect to acute oral toxicity and
keratinization) relative to the total PCDF concentration is
relatively constant (Table II).

In the 11 samples for which

these ratios have been determined, tetra CDFs constitute 33 + 5%

�of the total PCDF mixture, while penta CDFs constitute 40 + 3%,
and the hexa CDFs constitute 18 ± 7% of the total mixture.

Thus,

the PCB concentration can be used to predict approximate
concentrations of each family of chlorinated dibenzofurans in
these samples.

For illustrative purposes, Table III contains the

measured and predicted concentrations.
Further studies will be required to rigorously validate the
use of PCB analysis as a surrogate for the more elaborate
analytical procedures.

Since concentrations of dibenzodioxins

and biphenylenes (Stalling, 1981) have not yet been determined in
these samples, it cannot be demonstrated that the concentrations
of these compounds correlate with PCB concentrations.

Further,

the samples analyzed to date have all been collected before May,
1981 and have been predominantly obtained from the same location
on the 17 floors.

The validity of the observed correlation must

be tested with more recent samples and with samples taken at
other locations; the similarity of the ceiling panel samples and
vacuum cleaner sample is encouraging in the latter regard.
Finally, the validity of the observed correlation in the very
slightly contaminated samples likely to be generated during the
!

final phases of the clean-up should also be tested.

�Biological Data
Evaluation of the consistency of the chemical data and the
biological data requires knowledge of the concentrations and
toxicities of particular congeners believed to be especially
active.

Because of the very few reference standards available,

the laboratories of the Health Department have produced little
congener-by-congener

analytical data.

Therefore, in the

following discussions it will be necessary to assume that within
a particular isomeric series the relative concentration of a
given isomer is comparable to its concentration in a sample
earlier subjected to congener by congener analysis (Stalling,
1981; Rappe, 1981).
Among the tetra CDFs, the isomer believed to be most toxic
is 2,3,7,8-Tetra CDF (Poland et al., 1977).

Stalling and

Rappe report that this isomer constitutes 68% and 41% of the
tetra CDFs.

Based on these results it will be assummed that

2,3,7,8-TCDF constitutes 50% of the total tetra CDF concentration
in these samples.
Given the greater toxicity of 2,3,7,8-chlorinated isomers
(Poland et al., 1977) the most toxic penta CDF isomers are
predicted to be 1,2,3,7,8- and 2,3,4,7,8-penta CDF.

Stalling and

Rappe report that these congeners comprise together 47% and 53%
of the penta CDF mixture.

A value of 50% will be assumed in

subsequent discussions.
Given the greater toxicity of 2,3,7,8-chlorinated isomers
(Poland et al., 1977), the most toxic hexa CDF isomers are
predicted to be 1,2,3,4,7,8-, 1,2,3,6,7,8-, 1,2,3,7,8,9- and
2,3,4,6,7,8-hexa CDF.

Rappe reports that the total concentration

�of three of these isomers in a BSOB sample was 49% of the total
hexa CDF concentration.

A value of 50% will be assumed here for

the four isomers.
Knowledge of the relative concentrations of dibenzodioxins
and dibenzofurans will also be required for these discussions.
In the soot sample used in animal toxicology experiments, the
2,3,7,8-TCDD/2,3,7,8-TCDF ratio was determined to be .025 (Smith
et al., 1981b).
this sample.

This ratio will be used in connection with

However, since analytical data on the dioxin levels

in the remaining samples is not yet available, an estimate of
these concentrations must be made.

In a sample analyzed by Rappe

and Stalling, Rappe concluded that the tetra through octa
PCDD/PCDF ratio was about .01, and Stalling concluded that it was
less than .02.

In a heavily contaminated soot sample, Smith et

al (1981a) concluded that the 2,3,7,8-TCDD/2,3,7,8-TCDF ratio
averaged .015.

The average ratio observed in the three samples

was .017; this value will be assumed for the ceiling panel
derived soot samples.
Based on Stalling's report (1981), the biphenylene/dibenzofuran ratio in a sample was less than .067.

This value will of

i

necessity be used in subsequent discussions.

Efforts are

presently underway to obtain experimental data on the soot
samples currently under discussion to place these estimates on a
firmer basis.
a.

Animal Toxicology Experiments
It is difficult to rigorously demonstrate consistency

between results obtained via chemical analysis and acute toxicity
data for a number of reasons.

The chemical data is incomplete;

�7
not all classes of toxicants have been quantified,and the
concentrations of individual congeners have not been established.
More important, however, very limited data is available on the
acute oral toxicities of individual PCDFs, PCDDs or
Polychlorinated Biphenylenes.

Nevertheless, despite these and

other difficulties, crude comparison of this data will be
attempted.
A useful first step is to express the observed acute oral
toxicity of the soot in terms of "2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalents",
i.e., the concentrations of 2,3,7,8-TCDD, that, in an inert
matrix, would produce the observed LDgQ. An extract of soot
when administered to guinea pigs in aqueous suspension exhibited
an LD5Q equivalent to 327 mg soot/kg.

When 2,3,7,8-TCDD was

administered under identical conditions, it exhibited an LD50
of 19 ug/kg.

If the soot in fact had contained only 2,3,7,8-TCDD

at 58 ug/g, its extract would be predicted to exhibit an LD,-n
of 327 mg soot equivalents/kg.

Therefore, the "2,3,7,8-TCDD

equivalent" contamination of the soot is 58 ug/g.
The chemical data can then be used to "predict" the
"2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalent" concentration of the soot, based on
known toxicities of the components.

This is a complicated task,

since no data is available on the LDcris of dibenzofurans in
bu
guinea pigs other than 2,3,7,8-tetra CDF, and since very limited
data is available on the PCDDs.

The following assumptions will

therefore be made about the I&lt;DCQS of these compounds:

(1)

The

ratio of the LDcQs of a particular PCDF congener and
2,3,7,8-tetra CDF will be the same as the ratio of the LD5Qs oE
the correspondingly substituted PCDD congener and 2,3,7,8-TCDD.

�8
There is no direct experimental data to support this assumption.
(2)

The LD50s of PCDFs and PCDDs lacking chlorines on all four

lateral positions will be sufficiently high that their influence
can be ignored in this calculation.

This assumption is based on

the LD5Qs in guinea pigs of 2,8-diCDD, 2,3,7-triCDD, and
1,2,4,7,8-penta-CDD.

All have LE&gt;

s more than 450 times

higher than that of 2,3,7,8-Tetra CDD itself (Table IV).

(3)

Introduction of a single additional chlorine substituent on a
2,3,1,8-substituted congener has essentially no effect on the
congener's guinea pig LD

. This assumption is based on

comparison of the LD5Qs of 2,3,7,8-TCDD and 1,2,3,7,8~tetra-CDD
(Table IV).

(4)

Introduction of two additional chlorine

substituents on a 2,3,7,8-chlorinated congener raises its LD,-0
by a factor of at least 29. The assumption is based on comparison
of the LD5Qs of 1,2,3,4,7,8-, 1,2,3,6,7,8-, and
1,2,3,7,8,9-hexa CDD and 2,3,7,8-tetra CDD (Table IV).

(5)

The

LDf-QS of compounds with more than 6 chlorines will be
sufficiently large that their influence can be ignored in this
calculation.

This assumption is based on comparison of the

LD5Qs of 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-hepta CDD and 2,3,7,8-tetra CDD (Table

IV).
These assumptions require that attention be focussed only on
the tetra, penta, and hexasubstituted PCDDs and PCDFs.

The

concentration of 2,3,7,8-TCDF in the sample used in animal
toxicology experiments was measured at 48 ppm; since the data in
Table IV indicates that the LD5Q of 2,3,7,8-tetraCDF is about
three times that of 2,3,7,8-TCDD, this is equivalent in terms of
acute toxicity to a 2,3,7,8-TCDD concentration of ca. 16 ug/g.

�Based on assumption (2), other tetra CDFs can be neglected in
this calculation.

The penta CDFs were measured at 120 ug/g.

If

1,2,3,7,8- and 2,3,4,7,8-penta CDF together constitute 50% of the
penta CDFs, and if their LDcQS are equal to that of
2,3,7,8-TCDF, this is equivalent in terms of acute toxicity to a
2,3,7,8-TCDD concentration of ca. 20 ug/g.

Based on assumption

(2), other penta CDFs can be neglected in this calculation.
hexa CDFs have been measured at 70 ug/g.

The

The isomers believed to

have the lowest LD5Qs (1,2,3,4,7,8-, 1,2,3,6,7,8-, and
2,3,4,6,7,8-hexa CDF) are expected to comprise 50% of the total
hexa CDF mixture.

Since, based on assumption (4), their LD^s

are 29 times higher than that of 2,3,7,8-TCDF, this is equivalent
to a 2,3,7,8-TCDD concentration of 0.4 ug/g.
calculated

Thus, the PCDFs are

to constitute a "2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalent"

concentration of 36 ug/g.
The concentration of 2,3,7,8-TCDD itself has been measured
at 1.2 ppm in this sample.

Other tetrachlorinated dibenzodioxins

are predicted to have much higher LD,-QS and can be ignored.
The concentration of other PCDDs in this sample are unknown, but
are likely to be comparable to the TCDDs.

Thus, the dioxins as a

whole probably have a negligible influence on the soot's
"2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalent" concentration.
Stalling (1981) has reported on the presence of
polychlorinated biphenylenes in a soot sample from BSOB; he cites
unpublished results by Dr. Alan Poland that suggests that the
toxicity of the 2,3,6,7 congener is comparable to that of
2,3,7,8-tetra CDD.

If Stalling's ratio of biphenylene to

dibenzofuran is (.067) is assummed to hold for all of these

�10

compounds, and if it is assummed that the biphenylenes have
acute oral toxicities three times that of the corresponding
dibenzofurans, it can be calculated that the biphenylenes will
contribute about 0.2 times as much "2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalent"
activity as the dibenzofurans. Thus, to a very crude
approximation, the polychlorinated biphenylenes account for a
"2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalent" concentration of 7 ppm.
In summary, the dibenzofurans and the tetra CDDs are
estimated to constitute a "2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalent" activity of
37 ug/g.

Together, the remaining dibenzodioxins and the

biphenylenes probably provide a significant but smaller
"2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalent" activity.

This calculation is in good,

probably somewhat fortuitous agreement with the observed activity
in the soot-equivalent to a 2,3,7,8-TCDD concentration of 58

ug/g.
Since considerable effort has been devoted to animal
toxicology experiments on a single large sample of soot, it is
important to assess whether this sample is reasonably typical.
The data in Table I indicates that the average PCB concentration
in 16 samples collected above the ceiling panels at the BSOB is
(

7200; the PCB concentration in this sample is 5,000 ppm. " The
average total PCDF concentration on 14 such samples was ppm; the
total PCDF concentration in this sample is 320 ppm.

The average

ratio of total PCDF to PCB in the 12 samples for which this is
well defined is .066; the ratio for this sample was .063.

The

proportions of tetra- penta-, and hexa CDFs in this sample are
similar to those in the ceiling panel samples (Table II).
the sample used in animal toxicology experiments appears

Thus,

�11
comparable to the samples collected from above the ceiling
panels, based on presently available data.
b.

Cell Keratinization Assay
Development of the cell keratinization assay based on an in

vitro keratinization model (Knutson et al., 1981) has been
pursued because of its potential use as an alternative or
supplement to chemical analysis.

Both applications demand that

the biological and chemical methods generate mutually consistent
results.

One question can be answered fairly readily.

Do the

two methodologies agree which samples fall into particular broad
categories of contamination?

The samples and blanks run as part

of this program exhibit four broad categories of contamination.
Blanks did not exhibit positive responses in this assay.

A

single sample (floor 1) exhibited activity equivalent to 0.01 0.10 ppm 2,3,7,8-TCDD; chemical analysis detected only 0.2 ppm
Tetra-CDF.

Three samples (floors 4,6, and 14) exhibited

activities near 0.10 - 1.0 ppm; chemical analysis confirmed low
levels of PCDFs in these samples (total PCDFs of 51, 76, and 87
ppm).

The remaining samples in which PCDFs were detected

chemically exhibited activities ranging from 1.1 - 11 ppm to 5.3
!

- 53 ppm.

Chemical analysis confirmed that these samples were

more heavily contaminated (total PCDFs of 410 , 200, 320, 1200,
400, 750, and 670 ppm).
Table V.

These results are collected together in

They suggest that the keratinization assay results

correlate with chemical data.
It is markedly more difficult to determine whether the
activity observed in the cell keratinization assay is
quantitatively consistent with chemical analysis.

Little

�12

published information exists to relate the keratiniation
activities of the various compounds present in the soot to one
another.

However, the following assumptions will be made to

permit a crude calculation:

(1)

The ratios of the activity of a

particular dibenzofuran congener to 2,3,7,8-TCDF is equal to that
of the ratio of the activity of the corresponding dibenzodioxin
congener to 2,3,1,8-TCDD.
assumption.

(2)

There is no direct support for this

2,3,7,8-Tetra CDF is 1/20 as active as

2,3,7,8-TCDD (Knutson et al., 1980).

(3)

Congeners not

substituted at all four lateral positions are sufficiently
inactive to be neglected.

This assumption is based on comparison

of the activities of 2,3-, 2,7-, 1,6-, 1,3,6,8-, 1,3,7,8-, and
2,3,7- chlorodibenzodioxins to 2,3,7,8-tetra CDD.
al., 1980) (Table VI).

(4)

(Knutson et

Introduction of a single

additional chlorine on a 2,3,7,8 chlorinated nucleus decreases
activity by a factor of 2.

This assumption is based on a

comparison of the activities of 1,2,3,7,8-Penta CDD and
2,3,7,8-tetra CDD (Knutson et al., 1980) (Table VI).

(5)

Introduction of two or more chlorines depresses activity
sufficiently to make the activity of such compounds negligible.
This assumption is based on comparison of the activities of
1,2,3,7,8,9-hexa CDD and 2,3,7,8-tetra CDD (Knutson et al.,
1980) (Table VI).

(6)

Polychlorinated biphenylenes are 1/2 as

active as the corresponding dibenzodioxin.

This generalization

is based on comparison of the activities of 2,3,6,7-tetra CB and
2,3,7,8-tetra CDD (Knutson et al., 1980) (Table VI).
As a direct result of assumptions (3) and (5), the bulk of
keratinization activity will reside in tetra- and penta-

�13

chlorinated compounds.

As already discussed, 2,3,7,8-tetra CDF

is predicted to be by far the most active tetra CDF, and expected
to constitute 50% of the tetra CDF mixture.

Since 2,3,7,8-tetra

CDF is 1/20 as active as 2,3,7,8-TCDD, the "2,3,7,8-TCDD
equivalent" activity due to this compound can be obtained by
dividing the total tetra CDF concentration by 40.

Similarly, the

"TCDD equivalent" activity of the two most active penta CDFs can
be estimated by dividing the total penta CDF concentration by 80.
The calculated

"2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalent" activity due to PCDFs is

compared to the experimentally observed value for a number of
samples in Table VII.
The PCDDs will make a significant contribution to the cell
keratinizing activity of these samples; although they are
estimated to be 1/50 to 1/100 as abundant as the PCDFs, they may
be 20 times as potent in the assay.

The polychlorinated

biphenylenes may be even more important factors in this analysis.
Stalling's data suggests that they may be 1/10 to 1/20 as
abundant as the PCDFs.
as active.

However, they are reported to be 10 times

Thus, the calculated values in Table VII are likely

to be below the values that would be calculated if more complete
t

analytical data were available.

However, in view of the large

uncertainties present in these calculations and the data upon
which they are based, the calculated and experimental data are in
fair agreement.
It should be noted that the soot sample used in the animal
toxicology experiments exhibited a cell keratinizing activity of
2-20 ppm "2,3,7,8-TCDD Equivalents", and a calculated activity of
4 ppm due to PCDFs.

This differs from the "2,3,7,8-TCDD

�14

equivalents" calculated and observed in the animal toxicology
experiments

This does not represent a discrepancy in the data.

Rather, it is due primarily to the large difference between the
ratios of the guinea pig LD5Qs for 2,3,7,8-TCDF and
2,3,7,8-TCDD, and the corresponding ratios of cell keratinization
activity.
Conclusions
(1) Available chemical data indicate that the relative
concentrations of PCBs, tetra-, penta-, and hexa-CDFs, and total
PCDF are similar in soot samples taken from above the ceiling
panels of the BSOB, and in a sample collected by vacuum cleaner
during the early stages of the clean-up.

If this relationshiip

is valid for samples collected at other times and from other
locations, the PCB analysis can serve as a useful surrogate for
the more difficult analytical procedures.

(2)

A soot sample

exhibited an LDcQ in guinea pigs equivalent to 58 ppm
2,3,7,8-Tetra CDD.

If certain assumptions are made about the

chemical composition of this sample and the LD

s of the

compounds therein, it can be calculated that the PCDFs, tetra
CDDs, and the biphenylenes should account for ca. 45 ppm
"2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalent" activity.

Since this calculation

ignores other chlorinated dioxins, it is in good (probably
fortuitous) agreement with the observed value.

Based on these

results, there appears to be no basis for proposing unusual
synergistic or antagonistic effects among the components in this
mixture.

(3)

The cell keratinization assay can reliably

distinguish among samples containing widely differing
concentrations of PCDFs.

If certain assumptions are made about

�15

the chemical composition of compounds therein, it can be
calculated that the observed keratinizing activity in these
extracts is generally plausible.

(4)

Chemical analysis and the

cell keratinization assay suggest that the soot used in animal
toxicology studies is fairly typical of the soot samples
collected from above the ceiling pannels of the BSOB.

�TABLE I
Concentrations (ppm) of Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans in. Soot Samples Taken From the Binghamton State Office Building
Floor #
PCBsa
PCDFsb
Tetra CDF

2

28

3

4

1300

1

6

5

840

7

8

9

2800

6600

1800

23000

10

11

12

9600 21000 11000

13

3400

14

15

930 10000

16

9200

17

Ave

3-4*

6500 7200

5000

0.2

&lt;8g

16

220

23

190

70

320

140

250

d

d

32

300

h

220

145

100

Penta CDF

&lt;0.2g

&lt;9g

21

280

36

180

79

440

170

360

d

d

31

310

150h

260

165

120

Hexa CDF

&lt;0.3g

&lt;llg

13

180

14

35

32

290

84

260

d

d

e

56

89h

140

86

70

Hepta CDF

&lt;0.3g

&lt;12g

1.2

62

3

3.7

14

100

6.5

97

d

d

5.8

71

33h

32

31

20

Octa CDF

&lt;0.3g

&lt;14g

1.2

21

0.5

--

3

35

2

31

d

d

2.8

17

llh

15

11

4

51

760

76

410

200

1200

400

1000

—

87

750

670

438

310

.027

.062

.11

.052

.042

.048

.094

.075

.103

.066

.062

Total PCDF
Ratio Total PCDF cone.
PCB c
o
n
e

.

.

0

6

1

(a) quantitated as Arochlor 1254; data uncorrected for recovery
(b) correction for recovery incorporated
( ) not sampled because of dissimilar ceiling construction
c
(d) data not used because of poor recovery of internal

37

C1-Tetra CDF standard (&lt;10%)

(e) data lost because of instrumental malfunction; for purposes of calculation of total PCDF, it is assummed that hexa CDF is % the concentration of penta
( f Table 2)
c.
(f) soot collected by vacuum cleaner and used in animal toxicology studies
(g) detection limits are per congener, not per chlorination number
data not corrected for recovery.

Instrument malfunction caused loss of data on 37C1-Tetra CDF recovery

�Table II

Relative Proportions of Tetra-, Penta-, Hexa-, Hepta- and Octachlorodihenzofurans in Soot Samples
Taken from the Binghamton State Office Buildinga
Floor #

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

14

15

17

Aveb

Tetra CDF

31

29

30

46

35

27

35

25

37

39

33

33 ± 5

32

Penta CDF

41

37

47

44

40

37

41

36

36

41

39

40 ± 3

38

Hexa CDF

25

24

18

9

16

24

21

26

--

7

21

18 ± 7

22

2

8

4

1

7

8

2

10

7

10

5

6 ± 3

6

Hepta CDF

3-4°

_

Octa CDF

&lt;1

3

1

&lt;1

1

3

&lt;!

3

(a) Expressed as percent of total PCDF in sample.'
(b) Error limits represent one standard deviation.
(c)

Soot sample used in animal toxicology studies.

3

2

2

_-—

1

�CO

Table III
Comparison of Predicted3 (and Observed) Concentrations (ppm) of PCDFs in BSOB Soot Samples
Floor #

1

3

4

9

6

10

11

14

15

17

3-4

Jetra CDF

0.6(0.2) 26( 8)

17(16)

56(23)

133(190)

39(70)

60(320)

190(140)

420(250)

19(32)

200(300) 130(220) 100(100)

Penta CDF

0.9(&lt;.2) 30(&lt;9)

19(21)

64(36)

151(180)

45(79)

130(440)

220(170)

480(360)

21(31)

230(310) 150(260) 115(120)

Hexa CDF

0.3(&lt;.3) 16(&lt;11)

10(13)

33(14)

79(35)

23(32)

70(290)

115(84)

250(260)

11C")

120(56)

78(140)

60(70)

Hepta CDF

0.1(&lt;.3) 5.6(&lt;12)

3.6(1.2)
.6(1.2)

12(3)

28(3.7) 8.4(14)

99(100)

41(6.5)

90(97)

5(5.8)

43(71)

28(32)

22(20)

Octa CDF

.04(&lt;.3)

1.3(&lt;1.2) 4.2(0.5)

10(--)

35(35)

15(2)

32(31)

1.4(2.8

15(17)

10(15)

84
()

Total PCDF

1.9

2(&lt;13)
80

51(51)

3(3)

.400(1200)

(a) Prediction based on PCB levels and average ratio calculated in Table I and II

580(400)

1300(1000)

57(87)

610(754) 400(670) 300(310)

�19

Table IV
Influence of Structure and Chlorination Pattern on Guinea Pig
Oral LD5Qs (Male, Hartley, 200-250g)
Compound

LD3 U • &lt;f «—
cn(ug/kg)

2,3,7,8-Tetra CDD

2.5a

2,3,7,8-Penta CDF

5-10b

1,2,3,7,8-Penta CDD

3.1°

1,2,3 ,4,7,8-Hexa CDD

73C

1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexa CDD

60-100°

1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexa CDD

70-100°

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Hepta CDD

&gt;600°

1,2,4,7,8-Penta CDD

1,125°

2,3,7-Tri CDD

29,444°

2,8-Di CDD

730,000°

a

J.B. Silkworth, D. McMartin, A.P. DeCaprio, R. Rej, S. Kumar
and L. Kaminsky (1981). Acute toxicity in guinea pigs and
rabbits of soot from a polychlorinated biphenyl-containing
transformer fire, N.Y. State Dept. of Health Report, January 6,
1982.
J.A. Moore, E.E. McConnell, D.W. Dalgard, and M.W. Harris
(1979). Comparative toxicity of three halogenated dibenzofurans
in guinea pigs, mice and thesus monkeys. NY Acad. Sci. 320,
151-163.
°E.E. McConnell, J.A. Moore, J.K. Baseman, and M.W. Harris
(1978). The comparative toxicity of chlorinated
dibenzo-p-dioxins in mice and guinea pigs. Toxi co 1.
Pharmacol. 44, 335-356.
0

�Table V
o
CSl

Comparison of the Observed Keratinization Activities with Total PCDF Concentrations
Observed
Floor I

"2,3,7,8-TCDD Equivalents(ppm)

Total
PCDF Concentrations

1

. 1 1
0 -

6

0.1-1.0

76

4

.11-1.1

51

14

.12-1.2

87

3

1.2-12

b

9

1.1-11

1200

8

1.6-16

200

3-4a

2-20

310

10

3.2-32

400

15

4.0-40

750

17

4.0-40

670

7

5.3-53

410

a

Soot used in animal toxicology experiments

•L^

Total concentration not defined, (cf. Table I)

b

(ppm)

�21

Table VI
Influence of Structure and Chlorination Pattern on Relative
Activity in the Cell Keratinization Assay3.
Compound

Relative Activity

2,3,7,8-Tetra CDD

1

2,3,7,8-Tetra CDF

0.05

2,3/6,7-Tetrachlorobiphenylene

0.5

1,2,3,7,8-Penta CDD

0.5

2,3,7-Tri CDD

0.01

1,3,7,8-Tetra CDD

0.01

1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexa CDD

0.005

1,3,6,8-Tetra CDD

&lt; .003

1,6,-DiCDD

&lt; .001
i

2.7-DiCDD

&lt; .001

2.3-DiCDD

&lt; .001

(a) Data adapted from J.C. Knutson and A. Poland (1980).
Keratinization of mouse teratoma cell line XB produced by
2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin: an in vitro model of
toxicity, Cell 22, 27-36.

�Table VII
Comparison of the Observed Keratinization Activity in BSOB Soot Samples with Value
Predicted based on PCDF Concentrations

« Floor #

Observed
"2,3,7,8-TCDD equi

Lents" (ppm)

Calculated
"2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalents" (ppm)
PCDFs only

1

.Ol-.l

(b)

6

0.1-1.0

1

4

.11-1.1

1

14

.12-1.2

1

3

1.2-12

(b)

9

1.1-11

10

8

1.6-16

3

3-4a

2-20

4

10

3.2-32

6

15

4.0-40

10

17

4.0-40

9

7

5.3-53

7

(a)
-(b)

Sample used for animal toxicology studies,
PCDFs not detected in chemical analysis.

�;

23
REFERENCES

Gierthy, J.P. and Prenkel, G.D. (1982).

A preliminary report on

the c.,-aluation of an In Vitro assay for the detection of
"dioxin-like" activity using extracts of soot from the Binghamton
State Office Building.

New York State Department of Health

Report, January, 1982.

Knutson, J.C. and Poland, A. (1980).

Keratinization of mouse

cell line XB produced by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzodioxin:

an in

vitro model of toxicity. Cell, 22, 27-36.

Poland, A., and Glover, E. (1977).

Chlorinated biphenyl

induction of aryl hydrocarbon hyudroxylase activity:
the structure-activity relationship.

a study of

Mol. Pharmacol., 13,

924-38.

Rappe, C. (1981) Report on the analysis of Binghamton soot.
Report, University of Umea, Sweden, 1981.

Silkworth, J. , McMartin, D., DeCaprio, A., Re j, R. , O'Keefe, P.,
and Kaminsky, L. (1982).

Acute toxicity in guinea pigs and

rabbits of soot from a polychlorinated biphenyl-containing
transformer fire.
January 6, 1982.

New York State Department of Health Report,

�'&gt; •

I

A

'i

24

i

Smith, R.M., O'Keefe, P.W. , Hilker, D.L., Jelus-Tyror, B.L., and
Aldous, K. (1981a).

Analysis of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran

and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in a soot sample from a
transformer explosion in Binghamton, New York.

New York State

Department of Health Report, February 20, 1981.

Smith, R.M., Hilker, D.L., O'Keefe, P.W., Kumar, S., O'Brien, J.,
Jelus-Tyror, B.L., and Aldous, K. (1981b)

Analysis of a

Binghamton soot sample for tetrachlorodibenzofurans and
tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins.

New York State Department of

Health Report, October 1, 1981.

Smith, R.M., Hilker, D., O'Keefe, P.W., Kumar, S., Aldous, K.,
and Jelus-Tyror, B. (1982).

Determination of polychlorinated

dibenzofurans and polychlorinated dibenzodioxins in soot samples
from a contaminated office building.

New York State Department

of Health Report, March, 1982.

Stalling, D.L., (1981) Chlorinated dibenzofurans and related
compounds in soot formed in a transformer fire in Binghamton,
(

N.Y., Preliminary Report, Columbia National Fisheries REsearch
Laboratory, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22913">
              <text>087</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22915">
              <text>2193</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22918">
              <text>Series IV Subseries II</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22904">
                <text>Eadon, G.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22905">
                <text>K. Aldous</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22906">
                <text>G. Frenkel</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22907">
                <text>J. Gierthy</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22908">
                <text>D. Hilker</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22909">
                <text>L. Kaminsky</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22910">
                <text>P. O'Keefe</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22911">
                <text>J. Silkworth</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22912">
                <text>R. Smith</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22914">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;Center for Laboratories and Research, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22916">
                <text>1982-03-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22917">
                <text>Comparisons of Chemical and Biological Data on Soot Samples From the Binghamton State Office Building</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22919">
                <text>BSOB</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22920">
                <text>PCBs</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22921">
                <text>analytical studies</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="4406" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="33598">
              <text>123</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="33599">
              <text>3441</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="33603">
              <text>Series VI Subseries II</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="33592">
                <text>O'Keefe, P. W.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="33593">
                <text>R. Smith</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="33594">
                <text>C. Meyer</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="33595">
                <text>D. Hilker</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="33596">
                <text>K. Aldous</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="33597">
                <text>B. Jelus-Tyror</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="33600">
                <text>Journal of Chromatography</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="33601">
                <text>1982</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="33602">
                <text>Modification of a High-Performance Liquid Chromatographic-Gas Chromatographic Procedure for Separation of the 22 Tetrachlorodibenzo -p- Dioxin Isomers</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3215" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1667">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/acd6fa44b38089188cb031e79efe0a0f.pdf</src>
        <authentication>0ebcb5f74ee0c653b4933c7c5d068ef0</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63616">
                    <text>Item D Number

02237

Author

Eadon, G.

Corporate Author

Center for Laboratories and Research, New York State

ROpOPt/APtlClO Titlfl Typescript: Chemical Data on Air Samples From the
Binghamton State Office Building

Journal/Book Title
Yoar

Month/Day
Color
Number of Images

1983

J"i y n
D

14

Descriptor) Notes

Thursday, September 20, 2001

Page 2237 of 2293

�Chemical Data on Air Samples
From the Binghamton State Office Building

G. Eadon, K. Aldous, D. Hilker, P. O'Keefe and R. Smith

11 1933
DIRECTOR
HEALTH
Center for Laboratories and Research
New York State Department of Health
Albany, New York

12201

�Abstract
Air samples collected at 15 distinct locations and/or times within
the Binghamton State Office Building have been analyzed for various
chlorinated dibenzofurans, dibenzodioxins and biphenylenes.

The average

2,3,7,8-TCDF concentration from twelve locations sampled when the
building's internal air circulation system was operative was 15.0 +
3.6 pg/m .

Samples collected at six locations under similar

conditions and analyzed using a cleanup methodology designed to recover
the full range of compounds of interest had "total TCDF" and total Penta
O

CDF" concentrations of 143 + 24 pg/m
respectively.

O

and 42 + 10 pg/m ,

"Total hexa CDF" was measured at 4.8 + 3.5 pg/m

three samples collected under these conditions.

in

"Total TCDD"

concentrations at two locations were 1.0 and 1.3 pg/m , while "total
Penta CDD" concentration was &lt; 0.5 pg/m

at both locations.

Measurement of 2,3,7,8-TCDD at two locations gave concentrations of 0.3
&lt;
3
and 0.5 pg/m . "Total tetrachlorobiphenylenes" were estimated at 0.3,
0.5 and 1.3 pg/m

at three locations and "total pentachloro-

biphenylenes" at 1.5 and 2.6 pg/m

in two locations.

A methodology used with apparent success to calculate the
"2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalent" concentration in a sample of soot collected in
the BSOB was applied to this data to estimate that the overall activity
present in the air was ca. 14 pg/m

"2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalents."

�3
The air of the Binghamton State Office Building (BSOB) was sampled
for various chlorinated dibenzofurans, dibenzodioxins and biphenylenes
in November 1982 (Smith et al., 1983), February 1983 (Smith et al.,
1983a) and April 1983 (Smith et al., 1983b).

Detailed descriptions of

the method development and validation, analytical methodologies and
quality control data have already been provided; the intent of this
paper is to summarize the results obtained from the analysis of BSOB air
and to use that data to calculate the approximate "2,3,7,8-TCDD
equivalent concentration" (Eadon et al., 1982) that these results
correspond to.
Chemical Data
Table 1 contains the analytical data generated during the three
samplings of BSOB air.

The samples collected in 11/82 were obtained

with the internal air circulation system inoperative? therefore, these
results will not be referred to in subsequent discussions.

Samples

collected at 12 different locations on 2/83 and 4/83 had average
2,3,7,8-TCDF concentrations of 15.0 + 3.6 pg/m
represent one standard deviation).

(error limits

The relatively small standard

deviation for this large data set for 2,3,7,8-TCDF demonstrates that the
compound is fairly uniformly distributed from floor to floor.

Since

this compound's relevant physical and chemical properties are similar to
those of the other analytes discussed in this paper, it is possible that
they too are rather uniformly distributed.

The more limited data set

contained in Table 1 for other classes of compounds is consistent with
this proposal.

�4
Because 2,3,7,8-TCDF concentrations were determined using an
internal standard technique, all data are considered accurate.

However,

it is believed that "total TCDF" and "total penta CDF" data produced
from the 11/82 and 2/83 samplings may underestimate the actual
concentrations of these compounds; for example, during analyses of the
2/83 samples, it was observed that only two of three penta CDF standards
were adequately recovered during cleanup of spiked samples (Smith et
al., 1983a).

The methodology used in the cleanup of the 4/83 samples

was modified to permit recovery of a broader range of compounds.

These

data now provide the most reliable estimate of the concentrations of the
remaining compounds and groups of isomers of interest and will therefore
be used in subsequent discussions.
Six locations sampled on 4/83 exhibited an average "total TCDF"
o

concentration of 148 + 24 pg/m

and a "total Penta CDF"

concentration of 42 «_ 10 pg/m . Total Hexa CDF averaged 4.8+3.5
+
—
pg/m

at three of the locations.

In three samples collected at two •

locations, "total TCDD" averaged 1.2 + 0.2 pg/m3 and 2,3,7,8-TCDD
3
3
averaged 0.4 + . 1 pg/rn ; "total Penta CDD" was &lt; 0.5 pg/m . Since
no quantitative standards were available for the biphenylenes, only
estimates of their concentrations were generated.

However, three

locations exhibited "total tetrachlorobiphenylene" concentrations of
roughly 0.3, 0.5 and 1.3 pg/m 3 , and two locations exhibited "total
pentachlorobiphenylene" concentrations of 1.5 and 2.6 pg/m .
Several interesting comparisons can be made between the data
produced from these air samples and those produced from soot samples

^

�5
collected from above the ceiling panels on various BSOB floors (Eadon
et al. , 1982).

In 12 soot samples, the ratio of tetra CDFrpenta CDF:

hexa CDF was 1.2 + 0.2:1:0.5 ± 0.2.

The corresponding relationship

produced from the air data summarized above is 3.5 + 0.6:1:0.11 + .02.
This increase in the relative concentrations of the less chlorinated
and thus more volatile congeners suggests that the air contamination may
not be predominantly due to suspended soot particles but may instead be
true vapor-phase material.

Consistent with this hypothesis, when the

particulate material collected using a 0.3 u glass fiber filter was
analyzed separately from the silica cartridge portion of the air
sampling apparatus, only minor amounts of PCDFs were detected.

&gt;For

example, three samples in which the glass fiber filter and silica
cartridge were analyzed separately, the ratio of "total TCDF" in the two
collection media was 0.04 + .01 (Smith et al., 1983a, 1983b).
Air samples collected simultaneously with those used for PCDF
analysis exhibited PCB concentrations of 0.16 + .02 ug/m
(Versar, 1983).

This concentration corresponds to a PCB:"total TCDF"

ratio of 1200; the ratio in soot was 50.

Here, too, the relative

concentration of the more volatile component has been markedly enhanced.
Calculation of "2,3,7,8-TCDD Equivalents"
The assessment of the biological activity of a complex mixture of
chlorinated dibenzofurans, dibenzodioxins, and biphenylenes is
complicated by the lack of definitive knowledge of the toxicities of
most of the individual congeners, by the inability to accurately analyze

�6
all congeners and by the possibility of synergistic or antagonistic
interactions among these compounds.

The most straightforward approach

to this problem is to utilize the techniques of animal toxicology to
compare the biolgoical activity of the mixture to that of a reference
compound.

This approach, when applied to a representative sample of

soot taken from the BSOB led to the conclusion that the acute oral
LD,-n in guinea pigs of the soot was equivalent to that of an inert
matrix containing 58 ug/g of 2,3,7,8-TCDD (Badon et al. , 1982).
Because of the differing chemical composition of the contaminants
present in the air and in the soot, this number has little direct
applicability for estimating the biological activity of compounds
present in the air. Further, the concentrations present in the air are
so low that performing further animal toxicology experiments to estimate
the air's biological activity is impractical.
An alternative approach to this problem is to utilize available
Si

analytical and toxicological data together with necessary assumptions .
and approximations to estimate the number of "TCDD equivalents" due to
particular contaminants, and then summing the overall activity over the
range of toxic compounds.

Although such an approach is obviously only

an estimate, it is notable that, when applied to the soot sample used in
the animal toxicology experiments, it produced an estimate of the "TCDD
equivalent" concentration that agreed remarkably well with the animal
toxicology experimentation. (44 ug/g calculated vs. 58 ug/g observed).
The important conclusion was reached that the acute oral LD

of the

soot could be estimated without the necessity of postulating major
synergistic or antagonistic effects (Eadon et al.r 1982).

�7
Use of chemical data to "predict" the 2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalent"
concentration of the BSOB air is complicated by the fact that no animal
toxicology data is available on the effects of inhalation of these
compounds.

As a consequence, it is necessary to assume that acute oral

guinea pig LD^s can be used to relate the air's overall activity to
2,3,7,8-TCDD.

Another complication is that only limited data is

available on the acute oral guinea pig LD,_0s of dibenzodioxins and no
such data is available on biphenylenes or dibenzof urans other than
2,3 ,7,8-TCDF.

The following assumptions will therefore be made about

the LDcns of these compounds:
(1) The ratio of the LD

s Of a particular PCDP congener and

2,3,7,8-TCDF or of a particular polychlorinated biphenylene congener and
2 ,3 ,6,7-tetrachlorobiphenylene will be the same as the ratio of the
LD5Qs of the corresponding PCDD congener and 2,3,7,8-TCDD.

There is

presently very little experimental data to support this assumption.
\

(2) The LD5Qs of PCDFs , PCDDs and polychlorinated biphenylenes
lacking chlorines on at least one of the four lateral positions will be
sufficiently high that their influence can be ignored in this
calculation.

This assumption is based on the LD5Qs in guinea pigs of

2,8-diCDD, 2 ,3 ,7-triCDD, and 1 ,2,4,7, 8-penta-CDD.

All have LD5Qs more

than 450 times higher than that of 2,3 ,7,8-Tetra CDD itself (Table II).
(3)

Introduction of a single additional chlorine substituent on a

2,3 ,7,8-substituted PCDD or PCDF congener or a 2,3 ,6,7-substituted
polychlorinated biphenylene congener has essentially no effect on the
congener's guinea pig LDcn.

This assumption is based on comparison of

the LD5Qs of 2,3,7,8-TCDD and 1,2,3 ,7, 8-penta-CDD (Table II).

�8
(4)

Introduction of two additional chlorine substituents on a

2,3 ,7 ,8-chlorinated PCDD or PCDP congener or a 2 ,3 ,6 ,7-substituted
polychlorinated biphenylene congener raises its LD5Q by a factor of at
least 29 .

The assumption is based on comparison of the LD^s of

1,2,3,4,7,8-, 1,2,3,6,7,8-, and 1 ,2 ,3 ,7 ,8,9-hexa CDD and 2,3 ,7 ,8-tetra
CDD (Table II).
(5)

The LDcns of compounds with more than 6 chlorines will be
DU

sufficiently large that their influence can be ignored in this
calculation.

This assumption is based on comparison of the LD5Qs of

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-hapta CDD and 2,3 ,7 ,8-teura CDD (Table

II).

These assumptions require that attention be focused only on
2,3 ,7,8-substituted tetra, penta and hexa-substituted PCDDs , PCDFs and
biphenylenes . Measurements of 2,3,7,8-TCDF concentrations at 12
different locations with the internal air circulation system operative
2
gave average concentrations of 15.0 Hr 3.6 pg/m ; since the data in
Table II indicate that the LD5Q of 2 ,3,7,8-tetra CDF is about three •
times that of 2,3 ,7,8-TCDD, the equivalent in terms of acute oral guinea
pig toxicity to a 2 ,3 ,7,8-TCDD concentration is 5 pg/m

(Table III).

Measurements at 6 different locations all taken with the interval air
circulation system operative and using an optimized analytical
methodology yielded total penta CDFs of 42 +_ 10 pg/m .

Based on

earlier soot data, it is conservatively assumed that the most toxic
isomers (1,2,3,7,8- and 2,3 ,4 ,7 ,8-penta CDF) together constitute 50% of
the penta CDFs and that their LD5Qs equal that of 2,3,7,8-TCDF; thus,
o

the penta CDFs contribute 7.0 pg/m

of 2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalents.

Hexa-CDFs were present at total concentrations of 4.8 pg/m
samples.

in three

Based on dioxin studies, the most toxic hexa substituted

�9
dioxins are ca 1/30 as toxic as 2,3,1,8-TCDD; to account for the
differing toxicities of 2,3,7,8-TCDD and 2,3,7,8-TCDF it will be
concluded that the hexa-CDFs contribute less than 0.1 pg/m

TCDD

equivalents, a negligible number in comparison to the contributions of
the tetra- and penta- CDF.
The PCDDs themselves also make only a small contribution to the
"TCDD equivalent" concentrations present in the air of the BSOB.

ThusA
o

2,3,7,8-TCDD was present at an average concentration of 0.4 pg/m ,
corresponding to a contribution of 0.4 pg/m

TCDD equivalent.

Total

Penta CDD was below detection limit (0.5 pg/m ; and therefore can make
only a negligible contribution to the "TCDD equivalent" concentration.
Total tetrachlorobiphenylenes were roughly 'estimated at 0.7
pg/m . If the conservative assumptions are made that the toxic 2,3,6,7
congener constitutes 50% of the mixture and that biphenylenes are as
toxic as

the corresponding dioxins, the tetrachlorinated biphenylenes
^

contribute 0.4 pg/rn3 "2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalents."
Pentachlorobiphenylenes averaged 2.1 pg/m .
are made, this corresponds to 1.1 pg/m

If similar assumptions

"2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalents."

Insufficient sample was available to attempt a measurement of
hexa-biphenylenes; however, in view of the factor of 30 estimated
difference in toxicity between tetra and hexa substituted compounds, the
hexa-biphenylenes

are unlikely to be major contributors to the "TCDD.

equivalents" in the BSOB air.
Based on these calculations, the concentration of "2,3,7,8-TCDD
equivalents" in the BSOB air is estimated at 13.5 pg/m ; ca. 90% of
this estimated activity resides in the tetra and penta CDF isomers
(Table

III).

�10

Conclusions
The concentrations of the principal compounds of concern in the air
of the BSOB have been measured.

These experiments have provided

evidence suggesting that the contamination in the BSOB air is fairly
uniformly distributed throughout the working space of the building in
floors 3-17 and is in the gas phase, rather than particulate bound.
Based on the results of chemical analysis, literature-derived acute oral
guinea pig LDggS and a variety of assumptions, it was estimated that
the air contains ca. 14 pg/m3 "2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalents."

�References
Eadon, G., Aldous, K., Frenkel, G., Gierthy, J., Hilker, D.,
Kaminsky, L., O'Keefe, P., Silkworth, J., and Smith, R. (1982).
Comparison of Chemical and Biological Data on Soot Samples from the
Binghamton State Office Building, New York State Department of Health
Report.
Smith, R.M., Hilker, D., O'Keefe, P., and Aldous, K. (1983).
Determination of TCDFs and TCDDs in Air Samples from the Sixteenth Floor
of the Binghamton State Office Buildng, New York State Department of
Health Report, March 16, 1983.
Smith, R.M., Hilker,

D., O'Keefe, P. .and Aldous, K. (1983a).

Determination of Tetra-Hexa CDFs and Tetra CDDS in Air Samples from the
11,14,16, and 17th Floors of the Binghamton State Office Building, New
York State Department of Health Report, May 16, 1983.
Smith, R.M., Hilker, D., O'Keefe, P. and Aldous, K. (1983b).
Determination of Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans, Dibenzodioxins and
Biphenylenes in Air Samples from the 3rd, 5th, 7th, and 9th Floors of.
the Binghamton State Office Building, New York State Department of
Health Report, in preparation.
Versar New York Inc. (1983).

Determination of the Ratios of Toxic

Chemicals in the Air in the BSOB: PCB Analysis, Versar New York Report,
May 23, 1983.

�Table I Concentrations of Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans, Dibenzodioxins, and Biphenylenes
Determined 1n 11/82, 2/83, and 4/83 Samplings of the BSOB1'2
"TOTAL PENTACDF"
"TOTAL TCDF"
2,3,7,8-TCDF
LOCATION3
DATE
16th, NE
16th, SE
16th, NW
16th, SW
17th, NW
16th, NW
14th, NW
14th, NE
llth, SE &amp; NW
11th, NW
llth, NW

11/82
11/82
11/82
11/82
2/83
2/83
2/83
2/83
2/83
2/83
4/83

14 pg/m3
13 pg/m3
9.2 pg/m3
7,0 pg/m3
11.5 pq/m3
16 pq/m3 11 pq/m3
14 pg/m3
16 pg/m3
23 pq/m3

97
78
55
52
71
118
92
185
133
76

pg/m3
pg/m3
pg/m3
pg/m3
pg/m3
pg/m3
pg/m?
.pg/m3
pg/m3 .
pg/m3

9th, SE
9th, NW

4/83
4/83

14 pq/m3
16 pq/m3

150 pq/m3
14^5 pq/m3

7th, NW
5th, NW
3rd, NW
5th, NE
AVERAGE
CONCENTRATION

4/83
4/83
4/83
4/83

11
11
16
20

pq/m3
pg/m3
pq/m33
pq/ffi

121 'pq/m'
126 pq/m3
151 pq/m3
195 pq/m3

15.0+ 3-6 pg/m3

148+24 Pg/W3

OTHER

"TOTAL TCDD" &lt;1,2 pg/m3
"TOTAL TCDD" &lt;1.3 pg/m3
"TOTAL TCDD" &lt;1,3 pg/m3
17
21
21
13
19
16

pg/m3
pg/m3
ps/ni3
pg/m3
pg/m3
pq/m3

.,

"TOTAL TCDD" 1.0 pq/m3; 2,3,7,8-TCDD 0.3 pq/m3
"TOTAL PENTACDDs" &lt;0.5 pg/m3} "PENTACHLOROBIPKENYLENES 2.5 pq/m3
"TOTAL HEXACDF" 3.7 pg/m3
"TOTAL TCDD" 1.3 pg/m3-, 2,3,7,8'TCDD 0.5 pg/m3
""OTAL PENTACDDs" &lt;0.5 pg/m3} "PENTACHLOR03IPHENYLENES 1.4 pg/m3
"TETRACHLOROBIPHENYLENES" 0.5 pg/m3
"TOTAL HEXACDF" 2,0 pg/m3. 5th. MW; 8.7 pg/m3 'Sth, 'NE
"TETRACHLOROBIPHENYLENES" 1,3 pq/m3
"TETRACHLOROBIPHENYLENES" 0.3 pc;/m3
"TOTAL HEXACDF"4,8i3..5Pg/ni3; "TOTAL TCDD" 1.2 + 0.2 pg/m3
2,3,7,8^TCDD 0.4 + ,1 pg/m3-, "TOTAL PENTACDD" &lt;0.5 pg/m3
"TETRACHLOROBIPHENYLENES" 0.7 +0,5 pg/m3
"PENTACHLOROBJPHENYLENES" 2,1 +, .5 pg/m3

l

Undf!r]incd data were collected with tho building's internal circulation system operative and analyzed using most current methodology. These results are considered to be the most reliable indicators of the building's current condition and are therefore the basis of all subsequent calculations and discussions.
* "^abstracted8 (Sml"!! e^af^T' 8n?lyt1cB] Pro«.dur«» an£i Witty control/quality assurance procedures are detailed in the papers from which these data
3

Average concentrations calculated using underlined (best) values only; error limits equal one standard deviation,

�Table II. Influence of Structure and Chiorination Pattern on Guinea Pi a
Oral LD5Qs (Male, Hartley, 200-250g)
Compound

LD5Q(ug/kg)

2,3,7,8-Tetra CDD
2,3,7,8-Tetra CDF
1,2,3,7,8-Penta CDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexa CDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexa CDD

2.5a
5-10b
3.1C
73C
60-100C

1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexa CDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Hepta CDD

1,2,4,7,8-Penta CDD
2,3,7-TH CDD
2,8-Di CDD

70-100°
&gt; 600C

1,125C
29,444C
730,000°

a

J.B. Silkworth, D. McMartin, A.P. DeCaprio, R. Rej, P. O'Keefe and L. Kaminsky (1982),
Acute toxicity in guinea pigs and rabbits of soot from a polychlorinated biphenylcontaining transformer fire, Toxicol.Appl. Pharmacol. 65, 425-39.
J.A. Moore, E.E. McConnell, D.W. Dalgard, and M.W. Harris (1979). Comparative
toxicity of three halogenated dibenzofurans in guinea pigs, mice and rhesus
monkeys. NY Acad. Sci. 320, 151-163.

C

E.E. McConnell, J.A. Moore, J.K. Haseman, and M.W. Harris (1978). The comparative
toxicity of chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins in mice and guinea pigs. Toxicol. Appl.
Pharmacol. 44, 335-356.

�Table III. Calculation of "2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalents," Due to Various
Dibenzofurans, Dibenzodioxins and Biphenylenes
Relative Activity of
Relative Activity
Compound Class
Due to Chlorine
vs. Dibenzobioxins X
Substitution
=

Best Estimate
of Concentration

X

2,3,7,8-TCDF
15 pg/m3

X

1/3

X

1

5 pg/m3

Penta CDFs
42 pg/m3
2a

X

1/3

X

1

7 pg/m3

Hexa CDFs 3
4.8 pg/m
2a

X

1/3

X

1/30

X

1

X

1

0.4 rg/m3

1,2,3,7,8-Penta CDD
&lt; 0.5 pg/m3
X
2a

1

X

1

&lt; 0.3 pg/m3

2,3,6, 7-Tetrachl orobi phenyl ene
1
0.7 pg/m3
X
2a

X

1

0.4 pg/m3

1 ,2,3,6,7-Pentachlorobiphenylene
1
2.1 pg/m3
X
2a

X

1

2,3,7,8-TCDD
Q.c. pg/m3

=

=

"2,3,7,8-TCDD
equivalents"

&lt; 0.1 pg/m3

&gt; 1 pg/m3

ca. 14 pg/m3

When isomer-specific data are unavailable, it is assumed that 1/2 of the "total"
value corresponds to 2,3,7,8-(dibenzodioxins and dibenzofurans) or 2,3,6,7(biphenylene) substituted compounds.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="23664">
              <text>088</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="23666">
              <text>2237</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="23669">
              <text>Series IV Subseries II</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="23659">
                <text>Eadon, G.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="23660">
                <text>K. Aldous</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="23661">
                <text>D. Hilker</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="23662">
                <text>P. O'Keefe</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="23663">
                <text>R. Smith</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="23665">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;Center for Laboratories and Research, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="23667">
                <text>July 11 1983</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="23668">
                <text>Typescript: Chemical Data on Air Samples From the Binghamton State Office Building</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="23670">
                <text>BSOB</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="23671">
                <text>ambient air sampling</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="23672">
                <text>dioxin</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
