1 15 4 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange Description An account of the resource <p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;">The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.</p> <p>For more about this collection, <a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a">view the Agent Orange Exhibit.</a></p> Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Box The box containing the original item. 161 Folder The folder containing the original item. 4826 Series The series number of the original item. Series VII Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Wolverton, B. C. R. Richter Sandra M. Lefstad Title A name given to the resource Typescript: Organophosphorus Insecticide Decontaminant Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange Description An account of the resource <p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;">The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.</p> <p>For more about this collection, <a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a">view the Agent Orange Exhibit.</a></p> Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Box The box containing the original item. 147 Folder The folder containing the original item. 4248 Series The series number of the original item. Series VI Subseries III Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Wolverton, B. C. R. Richter Sandra M. Lefstad Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Technology Utilization Ideas for the 70's and Beyond Title A name given to the resource Organophosphorus Insecticide Decontaminant https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/76ef9d1501eb3f62db9f3f80bd46deab.pdf 0928a07e7d087675a9f89af3b4cb67a1 PDF Text Text Item D Number °3936 Author Crews, Richard C. Corporate Author u s Air - - D fjot Scanned Force, Air Force Systems Command, Air Force ROPOrt/ArtiCiO TltlB Water Quality: Streams and Ponds on Selected Test Areas on Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, Final Report for Period November 1974-November 1976 Journal/Book Title Year 1977 Month/Day Ma Color Number of Images v D 31 j Program Element: 62602F; JON: 5066-01 -01 Tuesday, January 08, 2002 Page 3936 of 4009 �AFATL-TR-77-72 WATER QUALITY: STREAMS AND PONDS ON SELECTED TEST AREAS ON EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA ENVIRONICS OFFICE MAY 1977 FINAL REPORT FOR PERIOD NOVEMBER 1974-NOVEMBER 1976 Approved for public release; distribution unlimited AIR FORCE ARMAMENT L A B O R A T O R Y AIR FORCE SYSTEMS COMMAND • UNITED STATES AIR FORCE EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA �UNCLASSIFIED S E C U R I T Y C L A S S ' F I C A T I O N OF T H I S D ^ G E (When Data Entered) RE/»D INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE COMPLETING FORM REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. R E P O R T NUMDER 3. R E C | O T N T " > C A T A L O G NUMBER 5. 2, GOVT A C C E S S I O N NO, T Y P E OF R E P O R T a PERIOD C O V E R E D AFATL-TR-77-72 4. T I T L E (and Subtitle) WATER QUALITY: STREAMS AND PONDS ON SELECTED TEST AREAS ON EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA 6. P E R F O R M I N G ORG. R E P O R T N U M B E R 8, CON! R A C T OR G R A N T NUMBER(s) 7. A U T H O R f s ) Richard C. Crews Sandra M. Lefstad 9. Final Report-November 1974 to November 1976 Gary G. Wyman Charles I. Miller PERFORMING O R G A N I Z A T I O N NAME AND ADDRESS 10. Environics Office Air Force Armament Laboratory P R O G R A M ELEMENT, P R O J E C T , T A S K A R E A f t W O R K UNIT N U M B E R S Program Element: 62602F JON: 5066-01-01 Eglin Air Force Base, Florida 32542 12. REPORT D A T E Air Force Armament Laboratory Armament Development and Test Center Eglin Air Force Base, Florida 32542 13. NUMBER OF P A G E S 14. MONITORING AGENCY NAME & ADDRESS(/f dltterent from Controlling Ollice) 15. SECURITY CLASS, (o! this report) 11. CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME AND ADDRESS May 1977 29 UNCLASSIFIED 15a. 16. D E C L A S S I FIG ATI O N / D O W N G R A D I N G SCHEDULE D I S T R I B U T I O N ST A T E M E N T (ol this Report) Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 17. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (ol the abstract entered in Block 20, It different trom Report) 18. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Available in DDC 19. KEY WORDS (Continue on reverse side if necessary and identify by block number) Water Quality Baseline Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) Hardness Turbidity Salinity Calcium Phosphate Nitrate Eglin AFB Reservation Test Area Streams 20. A B S T R A C T (Continue on reverse side if necessary and identify by block number) Baseline information on water quality was derived for streams and ponds draining or located on 10 test areas on Eglin Air Force Base Reservation, Florida, from November 1974 to November 1976. The water temperature displayed seasonal trends (mean seasonal range 15.5°C to 22.9°C). The dissolved oxygen (DO) values were inversely related to the water temperature. The mean seasonal DO range was 7.6 ppm to 9.0 ppm. 1 JAN M 73 1473 EDITION OF 1 NOV 65 IS OBSOLETE UNCLASSIFIED SECURITY C L A S S I F I C A T I O N OF THIS PAGE (When Data Entered) �UNCLASSIFIED S E C U R I T Y C L A S S I F I C A T I O N OF T H I S PAGEfHTien Date Entered) Item 20 Concluded: The mean seasonal pH was low, range 5.6 to 5.7,displaying no seasonal trends. Also remaining consistently low and displaying no seasonal trends were the calcium, chemical oxygen demand (COD), phosphates, and turbidity. The water was very soft with a mean seasonal hardness range of 3.3 mg/ 1 to 4.4 mg/1. The water quality at the 10 selected was typified by an acid pH, hardness of range of 9.5°C to 31.0°C, a DO range of low levels of other naturally occurring test areas on Eglin AFB was good. It 0.30 mg/1 to 5.69 mg/1, a temperature 3.8 ppm to 11.1 ppm, and relatively constituents. UNCLASSIFIED SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGEfW/ien Data Entered) �PREFACE This technical report discusses a portion of the work performed at the Air Force Armament Laboratory, Armament Development^and Test Center, Eg! in Air Force Base, Florida, under Exploratory Development Project 50660101 fl during the period November 1974 to November 1976. <The sources and manufacturers of materials and equipment used in this study are identified for reference only and do not constitute endorsement of the companies or products by the United States Air Force. This report has been reviewed by the Information Officer (01) and is releasable to the National Technical Information Service (NTIS). At NTIS it will be available to the general public, including foreign nations. This technical report has been reviewed and is approved for publication, FOR THE COMMANDER: A. Farmer Environics Office (The reverse of this page is blank) ��TABLE OF CONTENTS Section I II III IV V Page 1 Title INTRODUCTION DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA MATERIALS AND METHODS . . . . RESULTS SUMMARY REFERENCES 2 4 10 20 21 23 Appendix LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Title Fifty Sampling Stations Selected On Streams Draining Ten Selected Test Areas Or Ponds Located On Or Near These Test Areas Maximum, Minimum, and Mean Temperatures By Season . . Maximum, Minimum, and Mean Dissolved Oxygen By Season Maximum, Minimum and Mean pH By Season Maximum, Minimum and Mean Salinity By Season . . . . Maximum, Minimum and Mean Hardness By Season . . . . Maximum, Minimum and Mean Calcium By Season Maximum, Minimum, and Mean Turbidity By Season. . Comparison of the Mean Dissolved Oxygen (ppm) and Water Temperature (°C) By Seasons (The reverse of this page is blank) Page , , , , , , , , 5 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 . 19 �SECTION I INTRODUCTION Between November 1974 and November 1976 a water quality study was conducted by Air Force Armament Laboratory (AFATL) personnel on the following Eg!in AFB Test Areas (TA): TA B-70, TA B-71, TA C-64(A), TA C-72, TA C-74(L), and TA C-52(N,C,A). These test areas are utilized for the testing of conventional munitions developed by the AFATL. Since many streams and ponds are located either on or traverse these areas, a study was needed to establish background levels of the naturally occurring constituents for future use in monitoring possible changes in the water quality to detect pollutants which could be potentially dangerous to aquatic life. Of additional importance is the fact that several streams studied serve as the habitat for an endangered fish. Water quality on Eglin AFB Reservation is influenced by a wide range of climatological, geological, and land-use patterns. Because these bodies of water are dynamic systems, naturally occurring constituents must be evaluated seasonally. This study was conducted using 6 seasonal periods to include: autumnal (Nov-Dec), hibernal (Jan-Feb), prevernal (Mar-Apr), vernal (May-mid-Jun), aestival (mid-Jun-mid-Sep), and serotinal (mid-Sep-Oct), Establishment of water quality baseline data and subsequent monitoring of such stream parameters as temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, hardness, etc., could give indications of what effects the introduction of a pollutant could have on a particular stream. For example, pH, hardness, and various naturally occurring constituents of the water can influence the toxicity of metallic substances. This study was designed to establish baseline data and to compare seasonal water quality parameters for streams and ponds associated with the test areas previously mentioned. �SECTION II DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA Eg!in AFB Reservation is located in Northwest Florida and extends into Walton, Okaloosa, and Santa Rosa Counties. The study areas encompassed portions of the eastern and western ranges and four major stream drainages. They include Yellow River, East Bay River, Rocky Creek, and Alaqua Creek drainages. Most of the watersheds are sand hills with a pine-oak association. The streams studied were generally clear with moderate to swift flowing water. The bottoms were generally sandy with detritus and leaf litter collecting in eddy areas and around patches of vegetation. Stream depths varied from 6 inches (15.2 cm) to 4 feet (121.9 cm) and were 4 feet (121.9 cm) to 20 feet (609.6 cm) wide. Most of the streams studied were relatively undisturbed except for small bridges or culverts, or where the stream crossed a cleared test area. Eight ponds were sampled during the course of this study. One pond, Allison Pond, is managed by the Natural Resources Division (DEN), Eglin AFB. All others are impounded by culverts due to road construction except Pocosin Pond (70-3) which is a natural formation. Most of the ponds studied were generally clear stream-fed systems margined with aquatic vegetation. The exception to the above description was Pocosin Pond (70-3) which was clear but had a dull orange tint. The three factors most significantly affecting water quality on Eglin AFB are climate, geomorphology and soil condition, and land use patterns. CLIMATE Annual temperatures at Eglin AFB are significantly influenced by the Gulf of Mexico. During the summer the mean daily temperature range is 21.1° to 26.7°C. The winter mean daily temperature range is 10.0° to 21.1°C. The mean monthly precipitation ranges from as low as 3.2 inches (8.1 cm) to as high as 7.2 inches (18.3 cm) for an average of 60 inches (152.4 cm) annually. GEOMORPHOLOGY AND SOIL CONDITION The bedrock at Eglin AFB consists of limestone with the uppermost limestone bedrock occurring at approximately 400 feet (121.9 m). Soils on Eglin AFB are predominately yellow-brown sand of the Lakeland �association with a slightly acid pH. Soil of the Lakeland association makes up approximately 78 percent of the Eg!in AFB Reservation and the remaining 22 percent is as follows: a. b. c. d. St Lucie - Paola association Troup - Lakeland association Chipley - Lakeland - Rutledge association Dorovan - Pamlico association 2 10 4 6 percent percent percent percent Soils of the Lakeland association have a limited capacity to hold water and a low natural fertility causing a low productivity level. LAND USE EFFECTS ON WATER QUALITY A relatively large amount of land on Eg!in AFB Reservation has remained undeveloped. The exception is scattered installations, roads, test areas, and reforestation areas. The most significant impact on the water quality at Eglin AFB results from production and transportation of sediment through land-use practices. The major source of sediment is from clay and sand transported by runoff during heavy rains on the numerous clay roads crossing streams on Eglin AFB Reservation. During periods of heavy rains complete washouts have occurred causing immense amounts of sediment to be transported downstream and eventually settle on the stream bottom. Clearing operations for reforestation and preparation of test areas pose no serious problem. Generally when clearing large tracts of land, the creek flood plains are left undisturbed. This minimizes the threat of water quality degradation from sedimentation during periods of excessive rainfall. �SECTION III MATERIALS AND METHODS DESIGN OF THE INVESTIGATION This water quality study was originally planned for a 1-year duration with the year being divided on a six-season basis. Because of sampling interruptions the study was later extended to a 2-year period in order to adequately cover all 6 seasons. Fifty sampling stations were selected on streams draining 10 test areas in which the water quality could be influenced by test area activities (Figure 1). Two basic types of water environments exist on these test areas, viz., lotic (running water) and lentic (standing water). Water of the lotic environment was monitored before entering and after leaving the test area. Streams originating on the test area were monitored after leaving only. In some instances, streams which originate just off the perimeter of a test area were included in the study due to the potential effects produced from drainage of the test area. Water in the lentic environment was monitored only in permanent lakes and ponds. Semipermanent ponds such as those caused by excessive rainfall were not monitored. All samples from an individual test area were collected on the same day except from TA C-72 and TA C-52 (N,C,A) which were large test areas with numerous streams. Because of the great number of stations on these two test areas, only half could be done on any one day. However, samples from any stream which crossed the test area and had multiple sampling sites were collected on the same day. No monitoring or collecting was performed earlier than 2 days after a rain. This 2-day period was considered to be a minimum time and in some instances it was extended to a much longer time as necessitated by high water levels at the sample site. FIELD PROCEDURE Five water samples were collected from each station using 300 milliliter (ml) borosilicate glass bottles. The bottles were then closed with ground glass stoppers and placed in an ice chest for transport to the laboratory. Dissolved oxygen (DO), pH, and temperature were determined in the field. The DO and temperature were determined directly from the stream using a Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) Company Model 51A DO meter with a YSI Model 5419 Oxygen/Temperature Compensating Probe. The pH of the water was determined by the use of a field portable Sargent-Welch Model PBX pH meter with a Sargent-Welch Number S-30072-15 pH electrode. �Figure 1. Fifty Sampling Stations Selected On Streams Draining Ten Selected Test Areas Or Ponds Located On Or Near These Te^t *,r?^.r' •j (The reverse of this page is blank) ��rrTTvx^.-. „. r !f". / \ -y- - {.- i > £-' > / - NBwiEiS- *, ^> -4rT^:^r;;::;;;il^v -. N tf-.'/ .y'7;KST1\ ( ' ^ ^ X. V7 .«i> ••(•--;' ; Figure 1. Fifty Sampling Stations Selected On Streams Draining Ten Selected Test Areas Or Ponds Located On Or Near These Test Areas (Concluded) (The reverse of this page is blanl- ��LABORATORY ANALYSIS Water samples collected from the streams and transported to the laboratory were stored in a refrigerator (about 4°C) until all analyses were completed. Seven water quality parameters were monitored to include: phosphate, salinity, hardness, calcium, nitrate, chemical oxygen demand (COD), and turbidity. The methods of analysis are as follows: 1. Phosphate (all forms) was determined by the Single Reagent method. The results are expressed in milligrams per liter (mg/1) (Reference 1). 2. Salinity (chloride) was determined by the Argentometric method. The results are expressed as parts per million (ppm) (Reference 2). 3. Hardness (total) was determined by the EDTA Titration method. The results are expressed in mg/1 (Reference 2). 4. Calcium (as calcium carbonate [CaC03]) was determined by the EDTA Titrimetric method. The results are expressed in mg/1 (Reference 3). 5. Nitrate (nitrogen) was determined by the Brucine method. The results are expressed in mg/1 (Reference 1). 6. Chemical Oxygen Demand was determined by the use of the low level procedure. The results are expressed in mg/1 (Reference 1). 7. Turbidity was determined by the use of the Hellige Turbidimeter. The results are expressed in ppm (Reference 1). �SECTION IV RESULTS Data from all sampling stations are presented in the Appendix. Seasonal maximum, minimum, and mean values for temperature, DO, pH, salinity, hardness, calcium, and turbidity are shown graphically in Figures 2 through 8. The water temperatures followed a seasonal trend and varied within an individual season depending upon the time of day when the temperature reading was taken. The seasonal high temperatures ranged from 20.0° to 31.0°C while the seasonal lows ranged from 9.5° to 19.0°C. The seasonal mean went as high as 22.9°C during the aestival season and as low as 15.5°C during the autumnal season. All high-temperature extremes were recorded from ponds. As would be expected the DO showed an inverse relationship with the water temperature (Figure 9). As the water temperature increased, the oxygen holding capacity of the water was reduced. The DO ranged from a high of 11.1 ppm during the autumnal season (water temperature 10.5°C) to a low of 3.8 ppm during the vernal and aestival seasons (water temperatures 31.0° and 25.5°C respectively). Samples from ponds accounted for all low values recorded. Diurnal fluctuations in atmospheric temperature caused corresponding fluctuations in water temperature and DO, thus making these readings generally dependent upon time of day that the readings were taken. The seasonal mean pH ranged from 5.6 to 5.7, the high was 6.6 to 7.1, and the low was 3.7 to 3.9. The low remained extremely constant throughout all seasons and in all cases was recorded at Pocosin Pond (Station 70-3) on the northeast tip of TAB-70. The salinity showed no seasonal trends with the seasonal mean ranging between 15.67 and 23.41 ppm. A seasonal high of 42.48 ppm was recorded from Pocosin Pond (Station 70-3) during the vernal season while a low of 9.77 ppm was recorded from Indigo Creek (Station 70-1) during the autumnal season. The water was found to be extremely soft ranging between 1.3 and 13.1 mg/1 with the seasonal mean ranging between 3.3 and 4.4 mg/1. The hardness showed marked variation between sampling sites but for any given site it remained relatively constant throughout the seasons. The mean seasonal calcium also remained quite constant throughout the reporting period at 1.05 to 1.13 mg/1. The seasonal highs ranged between 3.56 and 5.69 mg/1 while the lows ranged between 0.30 and 0.43 mg/1. The COD had a broad range of values from 168.20 mg/1 to lows below the limits of detectability for this procedure. The COD was generally low with the exception of a few erratic highs. 10 �The phosphates overall were low with a range between 0.61 and 0.01 mg/1. Most of the values were less than 0.18 with over half the determinations during the entire study being less than 0.01 mg/1. The turbidity of the streams remained generally low and constant throughout the entire study. (It should be remembered that samples were not taken until 2 or more days after heavy rains). Three extremely high values were recorded from Stations 74-2 and 74-3 which were subjected to large amounts of siltation from heavy equipment operations on TAC-74. The seasonal mean ranged between 1.70 and 2.39 ppm. The nitrate concentrations remained consistently low throughout the entirety of the study. n �35 Maximum Mean Minimum 30' 25- u o 20 3 •M 03 ex (D 10-J 5 -J o- 1 Autumnal , , ! , Hibernal Prevernal Vernal Aestival Serotinal Figure 2. Maximum, Minimum, and Mean Temperatures By Season 12 �14 ~ 13 12 •Maximum • Mean •Minimum 11 10 0) OC X X c 8' 76- o 00 •H Q \ \ \ 5 4' 3 2 1- I Autumnal Hibernal \ Prevernal Vernal Aestival SerotinaJ Figure 3. Maximum, Minimum, and Mean Dissolved Oxygen By Season 13 �Q I Maximum Mean —"^— •—— •— Minimum I ^ 6-| OH 54 -. I \utumnal I I 1 1 Hibernal Prevernal VernaJ Aest i val Serot in i Figure 4. Maximum, Minimum, and Mean pH By Season 14 �• Maximum 40- 35 e 30- OH P . 2520- 10- i Autumnal r i Hibernal Prevernal Vernal i Aestival i Serot,ina Figure 5. Maximum, Minimum, and Mean Salinity By Season 15 �14- / • Max imum •Mean /* •Minimum / 12- / 1110- 98 tfl If] 7 6_ "O f-t 5_ 4 3 2- 10 T Autumnal Hibernal T T Preyernal Vernal 1 Aestival Serot;nai Figure 6. Maximum, Minimum, and Mean Hardness By Season 16 �Max i mum Mean Minimum / I _ 0- I Autumnal Hibernal I I Prevernal Vernal T Aestival Serotinal Figure 7. Maximum, Minimum, and Mean Calcium By Season 17 �ys » 0 — \M • 1 ^^ 15 . 14 _ 13 - / 12 - I 11 1 -^ E 10 - I ! i 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 CX £? 9- X ^_j Q •H •H & 1-4 : - \ \ \ ~" \ \ -i 7 \ 1 \ 6_ \ 5_ \ 1 \ \ 4 _ . / -.J 3_ ' 2- ' 1_ 1 Autumnal Hibernal 1 1 Prevernal Vernal 1 Aestival 1 Serotinal Figure 8. Maximum, Minimum, and Mean Turbidity By Season 18 �10 - •30 9— -25 8 OH 7 u -20 o 600 X X o -d <D O 10 -15 0) 4- -10 | 3- 1/1 2 -5 •DO •Temp 1 0 I Autumnal Hibernal Prevernal Vernal Aestival Serotinal Figure 9. Comparison of the Mean Dissolved Oxygen (ppm) and Water Temperature (°C) By Seasons 19 �SECTION V SUMMARY Although the water sample collections and analyses were planned for a 1-year period the actual time to complete the project was 25 months. Many delays occurred due to the scheduling of missions on the test areas which prevented sampling when the proper conditions existed. Inclement weather and high water levels also caused many delays in the program. The great amounts of rain experienced during July and August 1975 caused very high water levels which along with fallen trees due to Hurricane Eloise temporarily closed many of our access roads. However, those sampling stations for which samples were not collected during a particular season the first year were collected during the same season the following year. Generally the water quality was good. The water temperature and DO demonstrated seasonal trends. The waters were acid having a mean seasonal pH range of 5.6 to 5.7. The salinity, calcium, phosphate, and nitrates demonstrated no seasonal trends but remained relatively constant and at low levels throughout the reporting period. The waters were very soft showing a slight seasonal trend with seasonal means higher during the vernal, aestival, and serotinal seasons. However, the mean seasonal hardness did remain relatively constant with a range of 3.3 to 4.4 mg/1. The stream waters, being clear sand-filtered systems, had a low turbidity which remained relatively constant during the entire study. The COD was generally low except for the determinations from Station 70-3 (Pocosin Pond) which were excessively high considering the data from all stations. Besides COD, many high and low values were recorded from Pocosin Pond. The pond is considered a special test area and is utilized for airdrops and static detonations of conventional munitions. Consequently, the pond area has been somewhat disturbed which might account for some of the extreme values recorded. Sample Station 52-14 was a duplicate collection of Station 52-2 and was used as a quality control site. 20 �REFERENCES 1. Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, EPA-625/6-74-003, Methods Development and Quality Assurance Research Laboratory, National Environmental Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1974. 2. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 13th Edition, American Public Health Association Inc., 1971. 3. Standards Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 12th Edition, American Public Health Association Inc., 1965. 21 (The reverse of this page is blank) ��APPENDIX SAMPLING STATIONS DATA 23 �Station A 52-1 21.5 20.0 21.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 16.5 18.0 21.0 22.0 20.0 16.5 12.5 14.3 15.0 12.5 16.5 18,0 12.0 16.0 17.0 16.0 17.5 14.5 14.5 12.0 14.0 11.0 13.0 10.5 10.0 52-2 52-3 52-4 52-5 52-6 52-7 52-8 52.9 52-10 52-11 52-12 52-13* 52-14 52-15 64-1 64-2 64-3 64-4 70-1 70-2 70-3* 70-4 71-1 71-2 71-3 71-4 71-5* 72-1 72-2 72-3 72-4 72-5 72-6 72-7 72-8 72-9 72-10 72-11 72-12 72-13 72-14 72-15* 72-16* 72-17* 72-18* 74-1 74-2 74-3* 74-4 74-5 74-6 74-7 H 19.0 17.0 17.0 17.5 16.0 16.0 15.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 16.5 17.0 19.5 18.0 18.5 18.5 17.7 19.0 20.0 14.0 19.0 19.0 18.0 19.0 16.5 17.0 12.0 14.0 12.0 13.5 16.0 16.0 9.5 15.0 12.0 16.0 10.0 16.0 14.0 15.0 17.0 16.0 14.0 18.5 16.0 20.0 21.0 14.0 20.0 16.0 19.0 15.0 13.0 13.5 19.5 15.0 14.0 18.0 15.3 15.0 12.0 14.0 14.0 17.0 15.0 17.0 15.5 15.0 Temp (°C) P V DO (ppm) A e 21.0 22.0 22.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 19.5 21.0 21.0 21.5 21.5 22.0 22.0 22.0 23.0 20.0 19.0 17.0 18.0 18.0 17.5 20.5 21.0 25.0 21.0 21.5 21.0 21.5 25.0 25.0 18.0 21.0 18.0 21.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 19.0 20.0 19.0 22.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 21.0 ..- 19.0 21.0 21.0 18.0 19.0 19.0 19.5 22.0 20.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 23.0 21.0 25.0 22.0 20.0 20.0 20.5 20.0 20.0 20.5 20.0 24.0 22.0 21.0 20.5 22.0 24.0 23.0 20.0 22.0 20.0 21.5 21.5 21.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 21.5 23.0 20.0 21.0 19.0 22.0 20.0 21.0 25.0 27.0 22.0 21.0 21.5 20.0 22.0 21.0 22.0 22.5 24.0 24.5 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 22.0 25.0 22.0 21.0 19.5 20.0 20.0 19.0 22.0 22.0 31.0 22.0 22.0 21.5 22.5 25.5 25.5 24.0 24.0 23.5 23.3 22.0 22.0 21.0 21.5 21.0 22.0 22.0 23.0 24.8 22.0 22.0 21.5 23.5 21.0 25.0 28.0 29.0 23.5 22.0 22.5 22.0 S A H 18.0 16.0 17.0 19.0 20.0 20.0 19.5 20.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 16.5 15.0 16.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 18.5 17.0 20.5 21.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 21.0 22.0 23.5 24.0 17.0 19.0 17.0 17.5 21.0 21.0 19.0 21.0 20.0 19.0 19.5 19.0 20.0 21.0 21.0 20.0 17.5 19.5 19.0 19.5 19.0 18.0 17.5 18.0 18.0 7.1 7.4 7.6 8.8 9.0 8.8 9.6 9.7 8.8 8.8 8.4 7.4 9.0 7.4 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.8 8.6 9.1 9.4 8.4 8.9 8.4 9.0 7.3 8.4 8.9 P V e 8.2 7.9 7.4 7.9 7.8 — 8.1 7.8 7.0 7.9 7.9 7.6 8.4 7 . 7 8.6 8.0 7 . 7 7.6 8.0 7.6 8.0 7.4 8.4 7.3 5.6 7.7 7.4 7.9 ... 7.8 8.5 8.8 9.4 8.6 8.4 8.2 8.3 8.5 8.1 8.2 8.2 8.4 7.6 8.0 8.2 8.5 7.3 8.2 8.4 9.2 9.0 8.4 9.2 8.6 8.4 8.2 8.2 7.9 9.0 9.4 8.2 8.4 8.1 8.0 8.4 8.8 8.6 9.6 7.4 3.8 8.1 8.0 8.2 9.0 9.2 6.6 8.8 9.6 8.6 9.0 8.0 8.6 6.4 10.2 10.6 9.8 9.8 10.6 10.4 9.9 9.6 9.6 9.4 8.8 9.5 8.6 8.3 6.7 9.2 8.6 9.6 9.2 8.2 8.5 7.9 9.8 8.0 8.9 8.4 8,0 7.8 9.2 8.6 7.8 9.0 7.9 9.7 8.5 9.9 8.6 9.6 9.5 9.6 8.8 8.4 9.8 8.8 9.4 8.8 8.6 8.6 7 . 0 8.0 7.8 8,0 6.6 9.0 8.8 8.8 8.4 8.8 8.4 — „_ 8.0 8.2 7.8 7.8 7.8 8.4 5.2 8.4 8.0 — 7.3 7.6 7.0 6.0 5.6 3.8 4.4 7.7 9.0 7.8 8.8 7.8 9.0 8.0 8.8 7.7 8.4 8.4 8.0 8.4 8.4 8.6 8.2 7.8 8.7 8.0 8.2 7.2 7.8 7.0 7.4 6.3 7.4 6.4 9.1 8.0 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 8.6 7.2 7.8 7.6 — 7.6 9.4 9.0 9.0 8.8 9.1 9.4 9.8 8.8 8.8 7.8 8.5 8.4 8.0 9.4 9.0 9.0 8.4 .. . 11.1 9.5 9.3 10.6 11.0 10.0 8.8 10,0 10.2 8.4 PH A S A H 8.4 9.0 8.9 8.6 8.8 8.6 8.7 9.0 8.2 8.4 8.6 8.8 4.0 9.0 9.4 8.8 8.7 7.8 8.3 5.2 6.2 6.6 6.7 5.7 6.3 6.2 6.3 5.8 5.9 6.2 6.1 5.3 6.2 6.0 5.7 5.7 4.8 5.7 5.5 5.4 3.9 5.6 5.6 5,6 5.3 6.0 6.0 5.5 6.0 5.9 5.7 5.8 6.3 5.9 5.5 5.8 5.5 5.3 5.4 5.7 5.4 5.3 5.5 5.7 5.3 5.3 6.7 6.8 5.7 5.2 5.7 5.9 5.8 5.2 5.3 5.2 6.6 5,2 6.7 5.7 8.6 8.8 6.5 8.4 8.6 8.4 7.6 8.4 9.4 9.6 9.2 9.6 8.8 8.8 9.0 8.5 8.6 8.8 8.6 8.4 8.6 8.4 8.4 8.8 9.0 8.6 8.2 8.2 9.2 7.2 8.2 6.5 7.9 7.4 8.4 8.4 9.5 7.4 8.8 7.6 9.1 5.5 6.1 6.2 5.3 5.6 — .. . V A e S 5.0 6.5 6.2 5.4 4.8 5.5 5.9 5.8 4.9 5.4 5.0 6.3 5.0 6.5 6.3 5.7 5.8 5.5 5.6 5.5 5.6 5.6 5.8 5.5 5.4 5.4 5.2 3.8 3.7 5.4 5.4 5.6 6.6 6.6 5.8 5.4 5.9 6.3 6.1 5.7 5.7 5,5 6.5 5.1 6.6 6.6 5.4 5.3 5.3 5.4 5.3 6.4 6.8 5.7 5.7 5.5 6.4 7.1 5.0 5.8 5.4 7.1 4.9 6.4 6,8 5.5 5.5 5.3 6.0 6.0 5.4 5.6 5.5 5.6 5.9 6.0 5.9 5.7 5.9 5.5 5.3 5.2 5.3 5.4 6.0 5.9 5.6 5.7 6.4 6.5 6.0 5.3 5.5 5.3 5.6 5.4 5.6 5.2 6.1 6.1 5.8 5.9 5.9 5.7 5.1 5.6 5.6 4.8 5.4 5.6 5.4 5.6 5.8 4.7 5.5 4.9 5.7 .. . 5.5 5.6 5.2 5.9 6.0 5.6 5.9 5.5 6.3 6.3 5.4 5.7 5.7 5.6 6.2 6.2 6.0 5.5 6.0 5.2 5.2 5.0 5.4 5.6 6.1 5.5 5.6 6.1 5.0 5.0 4.7 5.8 5.8 5.3 5.2 5.3 5.1 6.1 6.0 5.9 5.3 5.8 5.0 4.9 5.4 5.7 5.4 5.9 5.3 4.9 6.1 6.3 6.7 6.1 5.3 5.6 5.3 5.5 5.9 6.4 5.9 5.1 5.4 5.2 5.5 5.9 6.1 5.3 4.8 4.8 4.6 4.8 6.1 6.8 5.5 5,0 5,5 5.1 5.7 Temperature, DO, and pH values of each sample station for the A-Autumnal, H-Hibernal, P-Prevernal, V-Vernal, A e -Aestival, and S-Serotinal Seasons. Sampling stations marked with asterisks are ponds while those unmarked are streams. 24 P 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.4 5.5 5.7 6.2 6.7 5.9 5.8 5.8 6.0 5.7 6.0 6.0 6.3 5,8 6.4 5.6 6.2 5.6 6.4 5.9 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.4 5.2 5.4 3.8 3.8 3.9 5.5 5.2 5.5 5.6 5.9 5.8 5.5 6.3 6.1 6.0 5.7 6.2 5.3 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.9 6.2 5.6 5,3 �Salinity (ppm) Phosphate (mg/1) Station A H P 52-1 52-2 52-3 52-4 52-5 52-6 52-7 52-8 52-9 52-10 52-11 52-12 52-13* 52-14 52-15 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.33 0.20 0.35 0.48 0.17 0.10 0.17 0.27 0.55 0.61 0.03 0.01 <0.01 0.16 0.18 0.12 0.16 0.14 0.14 0.12 <0.01 0.03 0.03 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 <0.01 0.02 <0.01 64-1 64-2 64-3 64-4 70-1 70-2 70-3* 70-4 71-1 71-2 71-3 71-4 71-5* 72-1 72-2 72-3 72-4 72-5 72-6 72-7 72-8 72-9 72-10 72-11 72-12 72-13 72-14 72-15* 72-16* 72-17* 72-18* 74-1 74-2 74-3* 74-4 74-5 74-6 74-7 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.08 0.02 0.02 <0.01 0.03 <0.01 0.03 0.09 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 0.02 0.16 0.18 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.02 <0.01 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.14 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.45 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.02 <0.01 <0.01 0.02 <o.01 < 0 .01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.02 0.02 0.04 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.02 0.04 0.04 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.03 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.03 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.03 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.03 0.04 <0.01 0.08 0.10 0.07 0.14 <0.01 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.07 0.03 0.05 0.08 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.10 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.03 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 0.01 V Hardness (mg/1) A H P V A <0.01 0.01 <0.01 0.02 <0.01 0.02 <0.01 0.01 <0.01 0.01 <0.01 0.01 <0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.03 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 <0.01 0.01 <0.01 0.05 <0.01 0.01 <0.01 0.01 23.83 24.97 22.92 14.85 19.98 19.44 19.71 22.68 22.41 15.66 22.95 22.01 24.97 26.10 25.65 16.20 16.20 16.20 13.41 13.41 13.41 15.08 13.41 13.41 12.29 14.52 12.85 16.20 16.20 20.11 21.56 20.43 21.56 18.72 16.76 16.76 20.67 22.13 22.70 19.55 21.56 19.29 17.02 21.56 21.56 27.09 21.85 27.42 24.53 25.42 23.08 24.86 23.41 25.53 24.53 24.86 22.85 27.31 22.30 25.75 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.07 <0.01 0.02 0.07 0.02 18.85 21.65 19.55 21.65 13.59 15.03 14.58 15.30 21.74 20.63 21.19 21.74 9.77 14.85 15.30 17.10 15.35 Afi 0.05 0.07 0.03 0.03 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.02 0.02 <0.01 <0.01 <0.0,1 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.02 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.03 <0.01 0.03 0.01 0.02 <0.01 S 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.02 0.01 0.04 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 <0.01 0.01 <0.01 0.01 <0.01 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.06 11.16 33.48 13.95 12.56 29.33 39.11 19.55 22.34 26.76 22.30 22.30 21.18 13.85 17.32 13.97 13.97 13.97 21.18 21.18 20.07 22.30 28.37 22.69 23.83 22.30 23.83 18.13 18.85 18.13 19.55 18.13 15.30 15.12 15,39 16.20 17,10 17.10 13.59 17.32 13.97 16.20 17.32 15.39 15.66 16.20 17.10 17.64 19.55 16.76 15.43 20.67 15.93 15.21 15.84 17.32 15.66 A H P 17.82 21.11 19.06 18.16 21.56 16.76 18.72 16.20 16.20 16.76 18.72 20.88 20.65 21.33 19.97 15.61 17.84 17.84 22.30 23.41 22.30 23.41 20.07 20.07 22.30 23.40 18.96 18.96 16.68 18.96 2.3 6.6 6.3 2.2 2.1 2.1 3.3 2.4 3.1 4.0 4.0 9.9 23.83 23.83 24.97 24.97 21.74 20.07 18.40 18.96 20.43 21.56 26.10 24.97 19.29 18.16 18.16 19.29 18.16 17.84 17.84 19.51 20.63 17.02 17.02 15.89 18.16 19.29 20.07 20.63 20.63 22.30 18.16 18.16 19.29 21.19 22.18 27.31 42.48 23.52 26.20 20.07 20.63 21.19 18.40 20.63 18.96 13.95 15.30 14.85 16.65 16.65 S 20.11 16.76 17.32 22.70 19.55 22.13 20.67 e 10.5 12.1 3.2 9.3 11.0 S A e 4.8 3.6 7.6 10.6 9.0 12.6 4.0 3.0 3.6 2.8 3.6 2.8 4.6 5.0 7.2 4.0 4.0 4,2 3.4 3.0 4.2 3.7 6.4 4.2 ' 4.4 2.6 9.8 7.4 8.7 11.2 2.5 3.8 2.4 6.7 9.6 4.2 2.2 2.2 2.9 2.2 2.9 1.6 2.3 6.3 4.1 3.1 2.2 2.2 2.8 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.8 6.1 3.9 10.4 13.1 10.2 11.4 21.19 23.41 21.19 22.30 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 1.6 1.4 1.7 1.9 1.9 1.4 1,9 1.9 3.7 3.9 4.0 4.4 2.4 2.1 2.4 2.4 3.6 2.6 3.2 2.8 19.55 20.11 19.29 19.29 14.50 17.84 22.30 17.84 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.0 2.2 1.4 4.2 2.2 3.5 2.2 2.4 2.5 4.0 3.9 4.2 5.1 3.2 3.0 3.4 4.2 23.63 23.86 25.31 23.63 23.08 18.72 18.72 18.16 18.72 18.16 16.68 17.84 22.30 18.96 17.84 4.0 3.5 3.0 4.0 4.0 2.2 2.2 2.2 3.7 3.5 1.4 1.8 1.8 4.1 5.4 2.2 2.0 2.2 5,0 4.7 3.2 3.7 3.2 9.2 6.3 3.2 3.2 3.6 5.4 5.4 19.29 22.70 19.55 24.97 24.53 22.07 20.07 22.30 23.41 23.83 20.11 19.55 19.29 25.08 23.86 25.19 18.72 23.41 20.67 23.41 19.55 22.30 20.67 20.07 19.29 28.99 22.24 21.19 23.83 21.19 23.83 18.96 22.69 16.68 21.56 18.96 20.67 21.19 20.11 22.30 20.11 20.07 19.29 23.41 24.51 17.84 24.28 16.68 23.83 18.96 19.29 23.41 23.83 14.50 17.32 21.19 18.72 24.53 19.29 23.41 16.76 21.19 16.76 21.19 18.16 22.30 17.32 24.53 4.4 3.6 3.4 3.2 1.8 2.1 1.8 1.3 1.8 4.0 3.4 4.0 3.4 1.5 2.2 1.9 3.6 2.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.5 1.8 2.2 2.5 2.1 2,3 2.8 2.2 2.4 1.8 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.6 2.3 2.3 2.2 1.9 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.0 2.1 2.3 1.9 1.7 2.7 _-- 1.7 2.0 2.1 2.0 2.3 3.0 3.2 2.0 2.6 2.2 2.9 2.2 2.4 2.1 2.7 2.1 2.3 3.0 2.9 2.3 2.6 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.4 1.3 1.7 2.2 2.1 2.8 2.6 1.8 2.2 1.3 2.2 2.5 2.8 3.2 3.0 2.6 2.6 3.8 4.4 3.6 3.6 2.2 3.6 3.8 3.6 3.0 3.6 4.6 3.8 3.8 3.0 7.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 5.5 3.0 2.4 1.9 1.7 2.3 3.1 6.4 2.9 2.8 2.2 1.6 2.0 3.0 6.7 3.0 1.9 3.5 2.8 1.8 3.2 6.8 3.6 2.8 2.8 2.4 2.1 4.2 8.8 4.4 4.2 3.4 2.0 2.8 1.9 ' — Phosphate, Salinity, and Hardness of each sample station for the A-Autumnal, H-Hibernal, P-Prevernal, V-Vernal, Ae-Aestival, and Serotinal Seasons. Sampling stations marked with asterisks are ponds while those unmarked are streams. 25 11.2 V 11.9 2.7 2.5 2.9 4.1 2.5 3.3 2.1 2.6 5.4 4.6 9.7 10.6 �Station 52-1 52-2 52-3 52-4 52-5 52-6 52-7 52-8 52-9 •52-10 52-11 52-12 52-13* 52-14 52-15 64-1 64-2 64-3 64-4 70-1 70-2 70-3* 70-4 71-1 71-2 71-3 71-4 71-5* 72-1 72-2 72-3 72-4 72-5 72-6 72-7 72-8 72-9 72-10 72-11 72-12 72-13 72-14 72-15* 72-16* 72-17* 72-18* 74-1 74-2 74-3* 74-4 74-5 74-6 74-7 A H 0.79 2.29 2.90 0.72 0.56 0.56 1.16 0.84 0.68 0.52 0.84 1.38 0.98 2.33 2.77 0.80 0.80 1.20 1.20 1.60 1.60 2.40 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.20 1.60 2.40 0.56 0.56 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.80 0.56 0.40 0.48 0.56 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.58 0.69 0.93 0.80 0.48 1.20 3.61 0.80 0.80 0.80 1.24 3.36 4.44 1.00 0.80 0.48 0.72 0.64 0.56 0.64 0.60 1.82 1.08 3.44 4.21 0.63 0.53 0.67 0.42 0.51 0.64 1.25 1.01 0.40 0.53 0.66 1.15 1.15 0.52 0.92 0.78 0.60 0.87 1.38 0.69 0.64 0.80 0.48 0.40 0.92 1.12 0.63 0.71 0.63 0.40 0.79 1.04 1.81 1.81 0.74 0.90 0.66 0.82 Calcium (mg/1) P V A0 Nitrate (mg/1) P V A e 1.08 3.33 4.05 1.00 1.24 0.88 1.36 1.08 1.36 1.12 0.84 2.04 1.88 3.53 3.77 0.56 0.55 0.49 0.58 0.76 0.80 1.44 0.84 0.88 1.36 0.60 1.36 1.48 0.43 0.48 0.48 0.42 0.72 0.64 0.60 0.56 0.80 0.47 0.51 0.53 0.56 0.76 0.60 0.72 0.57 0.87 1.94 0.69 0.59 0.83 0.50 0.48 0.85 2.94 3.59 0.85 0.58 1.09 1.24 0.82 1.08 0.44 0.80 1.84 0.92 2.95 3,57 1.50 1.27 0.90 0.91 0.72 0.30 1.28 0.84 0.55 0.79 0.64 1.46 1.28 0.76 0.80 0.60 0.76 0.66 0.79 0.75 0.57 0.64 0.60 0.60 0.56 0.56 0.62 0.86 0.50 0.64 0.91 0.92 3.21 0.92 1.04 0.96 0.72 0.76 S A H 1.07 2.97 3.59 0.72 0.63 0.63 1.25 0.95 1.54 1.06 0.67 1.56 0.90 2.98 3.19 0.60 0.40 0.48 0.44 0.50 0.55 2.42 0.64 0.58 0.59 0.69 2.93 1.65 0.66 0.79 0.66 0.71 0.88 0.80 0.91 0.64 0.74 0.47 0.47 2.45 2.08 0.79 0.88 0.58 0.96 0.91 1.15 0.93 0.64 0.56 0.48 0.80 0.56 1.12 3.37 5.69 0.64 0.64 0.72 1.20 0.56 0.88 0.80 0.72 1.84 1.44 3.21 4.17 0.56 0.64 0.56 0.64 0.40 0.56 3.29 0.64 0.72 0.64 0.64 1.20 1.04 0.56 0.48 0.48 0.40 0.72 0.56 0.56 0.64 0.64 0.72 0.56 0.48 1.44 0.48 0.80 0.72 0.64 0.64 1.04 3.13 0.88 0.96 0.88 0.88 0.64 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.50 0.11 0.23 0.26 0.06 0.08 0.13 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.15 0.32 0.08 0.16 0.17 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.06 0.13 0.22 0.29 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.09 0.27 0.02 0.17 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.21 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 — 0.30 0.24 0.18 0.06 0,39 0.35 2.25 0.36 0.34 0.36 0.39 0.30 0.29 0.09 0.14 0.12 0.18 0.36 0.15 0.16 0.33 0.19 0.09 0.33 0.17 0.28 0.01 0.08 0.09 0.14 0.08 0.38 0.36 0.11 0.05 0.17 0.26 0.12 0.12 0.18 0.23 0.16 0.16 0.21 0.16 0.24 0.06 0.12 0.13 0.05 0.11 0.05 0.13 0.15 0.04 0.14 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.12 0.13 0.12 0.03 0.11 0.04 0.06 0.04 0.06 0.22 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.18 0.11 0.20 0.13 0.12 0.03 0.08 0.01 0.03 0.13 0.14 0.28 0.02 0.02 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.24 0.26 0.16 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.03 0.13 0,09 0.19 0.23 0.11 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.06 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.09 0.16 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.01 0.05 0.09 0.08 0.02 0.13 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.05 0.05 e S A 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.19 0.15 0.19 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.17 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.14 0.06 0.13 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.19 0.14 0.16 0.10 0.12 0.06 0.12 0.15 0.05 0.12 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.02 0,04 0.10 0.30 0.15 0.10 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.15 0.03 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.30 0.07 0.07 0.16 0.09 0.11 0.09 0.08 0.10 0.14 0.10 0.09 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.09 0.16 0.16 0.09 0.18 0.17 0.20 0.16 0,16 0.20 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.08 0.11 0.11 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.06 0.07 0.13 0.06 0.18 0.08 0.03 0.07 0.07 0.03 0.01 0.07 0.10 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.04 3.14 3.92 3.14 LIB 0.34 LIB LTB LTB 7.07 LTB LTB 3.92 5.49 3.92 LTB 81.40 76.60 64.40 81.40 LTB LTB LTB LTB LTB LTB LTB LTB LTB 4.52 2.78 1.74 LTB 91.10 5.19 81.80 LTB 0.97 LTB LTB 1.04 LTB 5.00 5.00 2.70 LTB 4.20 LTB LTB 45.90 4.00 0.70 H COn (mg/1) P V S 1.66 2.88 LTB* 3.60 4.30 2.50 6.00 1.33 3.60 5.04 4.58 0.38 8.80 6.50 3.60 5.83 1.50 3.75 17.10 4.27 7.13 18.00 5.83 10.20 5.63 1.33 LTB 2.50 5.20 4.08 2.00 LTB 3.75 6.10 3.30 2.70 3.30 2.50 5.90 3.30 11.23 12.30 10.42 25.40 8.93 4.99 3.10 5.83 10.20 3.88 1.25 2,70 2.92 2.14 LTB 6.60 0.19 4.32 4.80 10.60 20.20 0.81 5.60 16.21 4.08 4.00 5.04 1.71 5.60 0.70 19.20 4.93 7.20 7.57 3,22 61.68 LTB 2.66 41.76 2.92 53.85 1.40 0.38 35.39 3.38 68.76 26.90 LTB 61.23 1.69 1.90 1.90 49.55 33.37 LTB LTB LTB 0.37 LTB LTB LTB LTB 1.85 LTB 41.60 168.20 108.83 100.75 6.72 0.02 LTB LTB 2.41 3,20 0.74 LTB LTB 1.20 1.85 5.20 LTB LTB 8.90 2.88 2.22 LTB LTB 2.10 5.20 7.80 11.40 4.82 4.16 LTB 5.60 11.60 5.93 39.40 6.83 5.20 8.90 2.52 5,93 4.17 2.00 3.96 6.70 68.90 4.42 3.80 10.00 LTB 62.90 3.54 1,20 43.50 2.52 0.96 LTB 2.00 5.60 4.45 20.80 4.82 LTB LTB 4.40 2.24 LTB 3.70 LTB 6.00 4.48 LTB 8.91 6.00 3.70 4.48 3.98 LTB LTB LTB 1.26 0.51 1.70 5.40 6.90 59.40 0.51 0.60 6.90 4.68 LTB 3.54 4.00 16.70 2.16 LTB 0.25 3.70 4.50 2.16 6.72 5.88 LTB 8.40 4.82 4.48 21.50 2.65 5.20 2.96 3.84 24.01 2.80 5.60 2.96 55.40 0.51 2.60 5.77 5.50 4.16 2.96 3.22 4.00 5.22 2.53 5.04 1.70 LTB 4.91 3.03 LTB 7.57 6.00 4.76 4.80 7.80 10.81 LTB 0.92 4.68 1.90 1.40 LTB 2.30 2.53 3.60 0.90 LTB 5.07 3.29 1.20 LTB 1.80 4.76 6.32 2.16 5.80 6.60 Calcium, Nitrate, and COD of each sample station for the A-Autumnal, H-Hibernal, P-Prevernal, A e -Aestival, and S-Serotinal Seasons. Sampling stations marked with asterisks are ponds while those unmarked are streams. LTB as used above means "less than blank". 26 Ae �Turbidity (pptn) Station S A H P V 52-1 52-2 52-3 52-4 52-5 52-6 52-7 52-8 52-9 52-10 52-11 52-12 52-13* 52-14 52-15 1.10 1.24 1.45 1.00 2.25 1.00 7.80 5.50 1.00 1.60 0.90 2.00 3.00 2.55 2.00 1.35 1.50 2.15 1.30 2.60 0.05 1.00 0.60 0.24 0.29 0.04 0.34 2.40 3.30 1.10 1.25 0.30 0.20 1.35 0.75 3.56 4.40 2.15 1.61 1.24 1.00 1.87 3.15 1.25 0.75 0.90 2.00 0.90 1.25 2.70 1.45 1.60 1.60 3.00 0.45 0.50 1.90 0.90 1.60 0.90 0.50 2.15 0.75 1.00 2.25 1.00 7.80 5.50 1.00 1.60 0.90 2.40 1.10 1.25 2.00 0.50 1.20 1.75 1.00 1.20 2.15 2.40 1.85 2.85 0.50 0.75 1.50 4.20 2.25 0.75 64-1 64-2 64-3 64-4 2.57 0.29 0.29 0.60 ____ 0.65 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.60 1.35 0.90 2.15 2.15 0.75 1.35 0.50 0.35 0.75 1.23 1.45 0.25 0.25 0.65 3.30 0.20 3.30 1.75 1.50 1.25 2.70 1.75 3.80 0.30 1.50 0.75 3.15 1.50 4.00 3.15 2.40 1.90 1.40 1.10 --.»_ 2.70 0.75 0.53 3.45 2.00 1.15 1.60 1.15 1.35 1.35 1.23 2.55 1.00 1.88 1.90 0.95 1.10 0.65 0.75 1.50 70-1 70-2 70-3* 70-4 A e 71-1 71-2 71-3 71-4 71-5* ____ ____ 2.15 1.60 1.20 1.10 1.10 72-1 72-2 72-3 72-4 72-5 72-6 72-7 72-8 72-9 72-10 72-11 72-12 72-13 72-14 72-15* 72-16* 72-17* 72-18* 1.60 3.10 1.90 2.85 2.35 3.06 2.84 0.47 2.14 1.50 1.20 0.50 0.50 1.50 4.00 2.70 1.20 3.00 2.70 3.30 4.00 2.40 4.00 4.15 3.45 1.60 2.85 0.20 0.55 0.32 0.32 1.20 3.30 1.20 1.70 2.15 2.25 2.55 1.75 3.75 2.55 2.55 1.35 1.50 2.27 1.00 1.35 1.10 1.35 4.15 2.27 2.00 2.90 1.88 2.15 2.42 3.14 2.80 2.80 2.80 1.45 1.60 1.24 1.12 1.12 1.24 1.00 3.15 1.60 2.42 4.05 1.60 3.15 3.90 3.90 2.70 2.15 3.75 1.60 1.60 2.20 1.23 2.20 1.12 0.85 3.65 1.35 2.20 2.15 1.15 2.80 2.80 2.00 2.40 1.35 1.75 1.35 0.90 1.15 0.65 0.65 0.50 1.45 3.25 1.90 2.15 1.35 74-1 74-2 74-3* 74-4 74-5 74-6 74-7 2.55 9.05 9.21 1.45 0.91 0.75 2.40 3.25 4.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.25 3.40 4.55 1.25 0.65 1.25 0.65 1.25 2.85 3.58 2.85 1.35 0.75 0.75 0.99 6.00 16.00 1.30 1.90 1.88 1.40 2.70 3.25 11.50 13.70 0.10 1.20 1.20 1.20 Turbidity values of each sample station for the A-Autumnal, H-Hibernal, P-Prevernal, V-Vernal, Ae-Aestival, and S-Serotinal Seasons. Sampling stations marked with asterisks are ponds while those unmarked are streams. 27 (The reverse of this page is blank) ��INITIAL DISTRIBUTION 2 1 1 1 1 1 9 DDC AUL (AUL/LSE-70-239) ASD/ENFEA TAWC/TRADOCLO USAF/SAMI AFATL/DL AFATL/DLODL ADTC/SGPE Hq TAC/DRA Hq USAFE/DOQ Hq PACAF/DOO AFATL/DLODR TAC/INA DDR&E (Tech Lib) ASD/XRP 2 US Army TRADOC Systems Analysis Activity/ATAA-SL 1 1 COMIPAC/I-232 USAFA/DFCBS AFLC (DS) 1 1 Deseret Test Center (Tech Lib) 1 AFLC/MMNO SAAMA/SFQT NWC/Tech Lib 1 1 1 Ogden ALC/MMWM AFIS/INTA Naval Weapons Lab/Tech Lib 1 USDA/Pesticide Coordinator USDA/ARS AFSC/SDW AF/RDP 1 1 1 1 DDR&E (Env & Life Sciences) Edgewood Arsenal (SAMUEA-SA) 1 1 AFSC (DEV) AEDC (DEN) Edgewood Arsenal (SAREA-TS-L) Edgewood Arsenal (SAREA-CL-V) 1 1 1 1 Pacific Rsch and Analysis Office USAF (Environ Health Lab) 1 1 NASA Mississippi Test Facility 1 Univ of West Florida Tall Timbers Rsch Station USDA/Forest Service/Eastern Region 1 2 1 ADTC/CSV ADTC/DLV NWC Env Eng AMD (RD) 1 20 1 1 USA Natick Lab Gulf Breeze EPA 1 1 AMRL/THE 1 AFCEC/EQ 1 Game & Freshwater Fish Com/DeFuniak 1 Archbold Biological Station 1 AMRL/THT ADTC/DEN 1 1 29 (The reverse of this page is blank) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange Description An account of the resource <p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;">The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.</p> <p>For more about this collection, <a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a">view the Agent Orange Exhibit.</a></p> Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Box The box containing the original item. 140 Folder The folder containing the original item. 3936 Series The series number of the original item. Series VI Subseries III Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Crews, Richard C. Gary G. Wyman Sandra M. Lefstad Charles I. Miller Description An account of the resource <strong>Corporate Author: </strong>U.S. Air Force, Air Force Systems Command, Air Force Armament Laboratory, Environics Office, Eglin AFB Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1977-05-01 Title A name given to the resource Water Quality: Streams and Ponds on Selected Test Areas on Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, Final Report for Period November 1974-November 1976 https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/a43524e853447ff25b9c6cdce1df9cc7.pdf eac9e207abbff5e41591d8b44990dc3b PDF Text Text 00172 Author CorporatG Author Kotchmar, George S,, Jr. Flame, Incendiary, and Explosives Division, Air Force Armament Laboratory, Eglin AFB, Florida Metabolism of High Concentrations of the Organophosphorus Insecticide Phorate Applied Foliariy to Selected Plant Species Journal/Book Title Year MOIltll/Day Color February n 54 Project No. 5066 Friday, January 05, 2001 Page 172 of 194 �AFATL-TR-71-22 THE METABOLISM OF HIGH CONCENTRATIONS OF THE O R G A N O P H O S P H O R U S INSECTICIDE PHORATE APPLIED FOLIARLY TO SELECTED PLANT SPECIES PYROTECHNICS BRANCH FLAME INCENDIARY, AND EXPLOSIVES DIVISION TECHNICAL REPORT AFATL-TR-71-22 F E B R U A R Y 1971 Approved for public release; distribution unlimited, AIR FORCE ARMAMENT LABORATORY AIR FOtCE SYSTIMS COMMAND • UNITED STATES AIM FORCE EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA �The Metabolism of High Concentrations of the Organophosphorus Insecticide Phorate Applied Foliarly to Selected Plant Species George S. K o t c h m a r , Jr., Capt, U S A F Billy C. W o l v e r t o r t E l i z a b e t h I. Soothe Sandra M. L e f s t a d Approved for public release; distribution unlimited, �FOREWORD The active Air Force project directly related to the information discussed in this report is Exploratory Development Project 5066. Requests for further detailed information or any comments on this report may be referred to Air Force Armament Laboratory (DLI), Eglin Air Force Base, Florida 32542. Statistical analyses were performed by Booz-Allen Applied Research. The use of trade names is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the United States Air Force. This report has been reviewed and is approved. r ^ ^ { t^ —~z—/- te FRANKIN C. p M E S w i o n e l , USAF KLI Chief, Flame, Incendiary and Explosives Division �ABSTRACT Gas chromatographic and enzymatic analyses (cholinesterase-inhibition SthSr«re used to monitor the metabolism of the organophosphorus insect dde 0,0-diethyl S-[(ethylthio)methyl] phosphorod thioate (Pforate) Ippfied fofiarly to three economically important plants (Homestead tomato, Siley sorg m" and Honey sorghum). The resulting data provided guide ines in predicting toxicity and persistence of metabo ite residues £r high ^binr^r^ei^i^ Ice d'on ass plates located adjacent to treated Plants, indicated the formation of toxic phorate metabolites was without the influence of biological substrates within the plants. There were no statisticaljy s gnificant differences with respect to the rate of increase of cholinesterl e- n ibition percentage values between the sorghum and glass plates, the rate of formation of anticholinesterase oxidized metabolites was predominantly through chemical oxidation on the leaf surface and not by K enzymecatalysis, or at least, the oxidation occurred at_such a ratfas tfmask the enzyme catalysis. The large droplet size in the application^ phorate resulted in higher toxic residue values, especially on the surface of the plant, than would normally be expected. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. m (The reverse of this page is blank) ��TABLE OF CONTENTS Section I II Title Page INTRODUCTION 1 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES 4 MATERIALS AND METHODS 4 STATISTICAL ANALYSES 9 III RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 12 IV SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 40 REFERENCES 43 �LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Title Page Plant Metabolism Pathway of Phorate (Based on Reference 5) 2 Horse Serum Cholinesterase Inhibition Versus Concentration of 0,0-Diethyl S-[Ethylsulfinyl)methyl] Phosphorothiolate.. 8 3 Cholinesterase Inhibition of Homestead Tomato..... 13 4 Cholinesterase Inhibition of Wiley Sorghum 14 5 Cholinesterase Inhibition of Honev Sorqhum (Phorate Applied in May) 15 6 Comparison of Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition for Three Varieties of Plants. 17 7 Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition, Homestead Tomato 19 8 Effects of Passage of Time upon Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition, Homestead Tomato 20 2 9 Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition, Wiley Sorghum 10 Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition, Honey Sorghum.. 11 Percent Chlinesterase Inhibition, Wiley and Honey Sorghum.. 23 12 Effects of Passage of Time Upon Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition, Wiley Sorghum(March) and Honey Sorghum(April).. 24 13 Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition, Wiley and Honey Sorghum (May) 26 Effects of Passage of Time Upon Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition, Wiley and Honey Sorghum (May) 27 14 21 22 15 Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition, Glass Plates 16 Comparison of Percentage Cholinesterase Inhibition for Glass Plates and Wiley Sorghum 33 Comparison of Percentage Cholinesterase Inhibition for Gl ass PI ates and Honey Sorghum 34 17 VI 32 �LIST OF TABLES Table I II III Title Page Plant Parameters Employed With High Concentrations of Phorate. 5 Efficiency of Extraction Technique for Phorate With Tomato and Sorghum 6 Measurement Days by Species and Experiment. 10 IV Gas Chromatographic Analysis for Phorate From Tomato and Sorghum. ,,. V Average Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition, Homestead Tomato 12 VI VII VIII IX Average Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition, Wiley Sorghum (March) and Honey Sorghum (April). Average Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition, Wiley and Honey Sorghum (May). Gas Chromatographic Analysis for Phorate from Glass Plates and Sorghum. " ?R ^ *' Persistence of Phorate Oxygen Analog Sulfoxide Equivalent in Sorghum. ™ vii (The reverse of this page is blank) ��SECTION I INTRODUCTION The research reported in this study constitutes part of a program to elucidate toxicological and ecological hazards associated with repetitive aerial applications and spills of organophosphorus insecticides. Toxicological hazards may exist in plant foliage even after environmental persistence studies determine the absence or safe level of the parent insecticide. These hazards result from the conversion of the parent insecticide to toxic oxidized metabolites. The rate of this conversion determines the nature and magnitude of the toxic residues in the plant tissues. The use of organophosphorus insecticides is increasing because of their wide spectrum of effectiveness (comparable to the chlorinated hydrocarbons) and their short residual action in water, soils, and plants. Any accident involving ultra-low-volume formulations of insecticides could result in a per-unit-area concentration that would be detrimental to agronomic plants because of unacceptable residue levels. For this reason, data relating the tolerance of agronomic plants to repetitive aerial applications of ultra-low-volume formulations of organophosphorus insecticides are of interest to military pest control programs. Guidelines were desired for predicting toxicity and persistence of metabolite residues in plants after application of high concentrations of the insecticide. Insecticides in or under considerations for the Air Force inventory include malathion (dithiophosphoric derivative), naled (phosphoric acid derivative), fenthion (thiophosphoric acid derivative with sulfide linkage), and Dursban^(thiophosphoric acid derivative). Phorate, 0,0-diethyl S-[(ethylthio) methyl] phosphorodithioate, was the insecticide selected because it is a model compound containing oxidation sites analogous to those found in sulfur-containing organophosphorus insecticides. Its toxicity, expressed as an oral 105^ value, is more tnan 100 times as great as the most toxic insecticide presently used by the militaryO). Thus, persistence data on toxic metabloties of phorate should provide a model system of maximum toxic residues on foliage wnich should be unapproachable for insecticides presently used by the military wnen applied at the same concentration. Furthermore, previous studies^' ^» "> ^J have elucidated the plant metabolism pathway (Figure 1) of the insecticide along with solvent-partitioning functions of phorate and its metabolites(2, 4). Conclusive research data are not available concerning insecticide pnytotoxicity; however, it is known tnat plant species exhibit a wide range of tolerance to applications of organophosphorus insecticides ^»'t. 1 �(CH3CH20)PSCH2SCH2CH3 S 0 (CH3CH20)2PSCH2SCH2CH3 0 ^^ II I *r (CH3CH20)2PSCH2SCH2CH3 N. 0 0 X 11 * (CH3CH20)2PSCH2SCH2CH3 (CH3CH20)2PSCH2SCH2CH3 Figure 1. Plant Metabolism Pathway of Phorate (Based on Reference 5} The basis for this phytotoxic resistance or susceptibility is not clear. The experimental procedure used in this study allowed an investigation into the role performed by individual plant chemistries in metabolizing organophosphorus insecticides. Studies of the morphological effects caused by highly concentrated foliar applications of mevinphos and methyl demeton on selected plant species indicated that, in general, brpadleaf plants were more susceptible to the insecticides than were grasses^ 7 /. Severe morphological injuries were observed on soybean, cotton, and tomato plants one day after foliar treatment, w h i l e seven days were required before comparable injuries were noted on corn and sorghum. Coleman and Dean^°' found that resistance of sorghum to methyl parathion was genetically controlled in their studies with a resistant and a susceptible variety, Wiley and Honey, respectively. Thus, differential phytotoxicity to organophosphorus insecticides can be expected between plant species as well as w i t h i n a given species. Differences do occur in the rates of metabolism of insecticides in different plant species. A study^) of the plant metabolism of Di-Syston® (dithioSystoxdD) and phorate indicated that the rates of a reaction may vary slightly from one plant species to another and according to the stage of growth, but the data obtained may be used as a guide to the relative proportions of the metabolites present at intervals after application. In �another study w y the effects of temperature and plant species upon the rates of metabolism of systemically applied Di-Syston®were considered, and s i m i l a r results were obtained. Phorate differs from Di-Syston® due to the presence of an ethylene rather than a methylene group in its side chain. Thus, this study attempted to relate the metabolism of the insecticide to phytotoxic damage among plant species and within a plant species. Oxidation can increase both the water solubility and the anticholinesterase activity of organophosphorus insecticides^"'. The logical approach for monitoring anticholinesterase compounds (toxic phosphorus esters) formed during the metabolism of phorate was a cholinesterasei n h i b i t i o n method. Phorate alone is too weak an inhibitor to be detected in micro amounts, but when applied to plants, it is very rapidly converted to potent anticholinesterase agents. The final unhydrolyzed metabolite (phorate oxygen analog sulfone) in the oxidation series (Figure 1) is the most active i n h i b i t o r ' ^ ' . The 150 value (molarity of i n h i b i t o r which results in 50 percent of the activity of the control) of phorate is approximately 250 times that of the phorate oxygen analog s u l f o n e ' ^ ) . One day after the application of phorate to corn, the residue of phorate sulfoxide, which has an 159 value approximately 1/100 that of phorate, was more than three times that of phorate^. �SECTION II EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES 1. MATERIALS AND METHODS a. Apparatus. A Son/all Omni-mixer^ was used for macerating plants. A gas chromotograph equipped with a flame photometric phosphorus detector and a digital integrator was employed in the phorate analyses. A recording pH stat was used to determine cholinesterase activity. b. Reagents and Solvents. Standards, supplied by the American Cyanamid Company, were technical grade phorate (Thimet® ) of 90-percent purity, analytical grade phorate of 97.8-percent purity, and 94-percent phorate oxygen analog sulfoxide containing 6-percent phorated oxygen analog sulfone. Reagents were anhydrous sodium sulfate, certified A . C . S . ; acetylcholine perchlorate (a "rare and fine" chemical from K and K Laboratories, Inc.); sterile filtered horse serum (Colorado Serum Co.); sodium chloride (crystals), analytical reagent grade; sodium chloride (granular), U.S.P. grade; sodium hydroxide pellets, analytical reagent grade; and potassium hydrogen phthalate, certified A.C.S. acidimetric standard. Solvents were certified A.C.S, acetone, certified A.C.S. hexanes, and vegetable oil. c. Plant Parameters. The representative broadleaf plant selected was Lycopersicon esculenturn mill, var. Homestead 24 (tomato), and the grasses were Sorghum vulgare Pers. var. Wiley (sorghum), and Sorghum vulgare Pers. var. Honey (sorghum). The two varieties of sorghum were selected to represent a variety (Wiley) that was resistant to an organophosphorus insecticide and one (Honey) that was susceptible. The plants were grown in a clear glass greenhouse with a minimum night temperature of 60° to 65°F and a maximum day temperature of 95° to 100°F. Seeds were planted in a soil consisting of a 7:3:1 mixture of sandy loam, peatmoss, and perlite with four pounds of dolomitic limestone and one pound of superphosphate added per cubic yard of soil. The pH of the soil was 6.5. Each tomato plant was transplanted to an individual four-inch plastic pot at the age of four weeks. The sorghum experimental unit consisted of 10 plants per four-inch plastic pot. A 15-15-15 liquid fertilizer was applied bi-weekly. A 2 percent or 1 percent solution of phorate (0.2 milliliter or 0.1 milliliter of technical grade phorate dissolved in 10 mi Hi liters of vegetable oil medium) was applied foliarly as 0.01 milliliter droplets with microsyringe to the tomato and sorghum at the concentrations shown in Table I. This procedure allowed a uniform and exact application to all �TABLE I. PLANT PARAMETERS EMPLOYED WITH HIGH CONCENTRATIONS OF PHORATE Species Age, Weeks Homestead Tomato Date of Application 8 August1969 19 November 1969 Phorate, Concentration, pprrr lb/Ab 19,839 16,630 2.19 1.84 Wiley Sorghum 4 3 2 March 1970 20 May 1970 8,753 (c) 1.26 (c) Honey Sorghum 4 3 8 April 1970 20 May 1970 8,461 (d) 1.22 (d) Concentration of phorate solution based on gas chromatographic analysis with analytical grade phorate. "Concentration applied to plant based on leaf area (pounds of active ingredient per acre). c Same concentration applied as 2 March 1970, but no gas chromatographic analysis. "Same concentration applied as 8 April 1970, but no gas chromatographic analysis. the plants. The levels of phorate applied were adjusted to the maximum amount that would result in minimal visible damage. To insure similarity in plant size at each application, the phorate was applied after three to six weeks of initial plant growth. The varying lengths of time between planting and insecticide application were to compensate for seasonal variation in plant growth. Table I shows the age of the plants with the date of application of phorate. During the March (Wiley sorghum) and April (Honey sorghum) portions of the experiment, the phorate in the vegetable oil medium was applied to glass plates located adjacent to the treated and control plants. d. Extraction Technique. The plants to be sampled were severed at soil level, sectioned, and rinsed in a 400-milliliter beaker containing 25 mi 11 iliters of hexanes and 25 mi Hi liters of acetone in distilled water (60 percent by volume) to remove any residues remaining on the plant surface. The solvent mixture, followed with the plant material, was poured into a cup for the Sorvall Omni-mixer®. The beaker was rinsed with 5 mi 11iliters of hexanes and then by 5 mi 11iliters of acetone in distilled water (60 percent by volume). After the plant material was thoroughly macerated, the macerate was filtered through three layers of 5 �cheesecloth into a separatory funnel. The cup which had contained the macerate was rinsed with 10 milliliters of hexanes and then by 10 millilitars of acetone in distilled water (60 percent by volume). The rinsings were added to the separatory funnel followed by 15 milliliters of a saturated sodium chloride solution which aided in separating the organic and aqueous phases. Acetone was removed from the aqueous layer by use of a rotary evaporator attached to a water aspirator. Complete removal of the acetone was essential because of its ability to inhibit cholinesterase. The aqueous layer was filtered (to remove minute pieces of plant material) through Whatman No. 2 paper into a 50-mi Hi liter volumetric flask and brought to volume with distilled water. The organic phase was placed over 10 grams of anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered into a 50-mi11iliter volumetric flask, and brought to volume with hexanes. If the samples could not be analyzed immediately, they were stored at 5°C. The aqueous layer was analyzed for cholinesterase-inhibiting metabolites and breakdown products. Gas chromatographic analysis of the organic phase for phorate allowed monitoring of the rapidity of breakdown and oxidation. The efficiency of the extraction technique, based on the recovery of phorate in the organic phase, is shown in Table II. TABLE II. EFFICIENCY OF EXTRACTION TECHNIQUE FOR PHORATE WITH TOMATO AND SORGHUM Species Date of Experiment Homestead Tomato August November Wiley Sorghum March Honey Sorghum Apri 1 Efficiency of Extraction, Percent Controls3 Insecticide-Treated Plants^ 3 3 66.2 87.7 32.4 63.2 63.3) [ Qla ss 75.9) pla tesc 46.7 51 .7 ^Concentration of phorate applied to plant placed through extraction scheme. b Phorate-treated plants from day 0 placed through extraction scheme. c Glass surface residues from day 0 placed through extraction scheme. e. Cholinesterase-Inhibition Method. The advantages of using cholinesterase-inhibition methods for determining organophosphorus residues are that (a) the sensitivity is far greater than for chemical methods and (b) the method is particularly suitable when the insecticide undergoes 6 �changes in the plant to produce metabolites with a high inhibitory activity(10,11}_ One of the disadvantages is the lack of specificity or inability to distinguish among different types of cholinesterase inhibitors found within the plant. The persistency of toxic metabolites and breakdown products in the respective plant species was monitored using an automated pH stat method(12) to determine cholinesterase activity. The cholinesterase inhibition for each species and glass plate sample was measured immediately after the application of the insecticide and on various succeeding days for one month. Control plants were treated with only the corresponding amounts of vegetable oil and were similarly measured. The experiment was repeated for each species. The cholinesterase activity of the prepared water sample was recorded with a recording pH stat. A sample (0.2 milliliter tomato or 0.4 milliliter sorghum sample) was placed in a microbeaker containing 5 milliliters of a 0.154-molar saline solution (9.000 grams of analytical reagent grade sodium chloride in 1000 mi Hi liters distilled water) and 0.5 milliliter horse serum. The microbeaker solution was heated to 37.5°C and adjusted to pH 8.0 prior to addition of 0.3 milliliter of the cholinesterase enzyme substrate, 0.110-molar acetylcholine perch!orate (0.675 grams crystalline substrate in 10 milliliters distilled water). The titrant, 0.0100N sodium hydroxide.was standardized with 0.0100N potassium acid phthalate (0.20423 grams acid in 1000 milliliters distilled water). Normal-activity curves (no samples added) and control-activity curves (aqueous samples from control plants) were obtained prior to measuring cholinesterase activity for the aqueous samples from phoratetreated plants. Cholinesterase inhibition of the phorate metabolites and breakdown products was expressed as a percentage value obtained from a ratio of cholinesterase activity (expressed in units of micromoles of acetylcholine hydrolyzed per minute per milliliter of horse serum) of the samples from the phorate-treated plants to samples from the control plants. A second percentage of cholinesterase inhibition was calculated using the normal activity value as the base. f. Calibration Curve. To equate the percentage of cholinesterase inhibition to the concentration of the metabolite extract, a log-linear plot was made of the phorate oxygen analog sulfoxide equivalent, in parts per million (ppm) of 0,0-diethyl S-[(ethylsulfinyl) methyl] phosphorothiolate, versus the percentage of cholinesterase inhibition. Figure 2 contains the calibration curve based on 0.4 milliliter samples of the standard parts-per-million solutions of the phorate oxygen analog sulfoxide. Sample sizes of 0.2 milliliter gave cholinesterase inhibition percentages that were approximately half the values shown in Figure 2. �109 a 76 5 4 uu Ci I—I X o u. 2- co .9- uu 1 !?• .6.5.4- .3.2- JO- 20 Figure 2. 30 50 60 HORSE SERUM CHOIIMESTERASE INHIBITION (PERCENT) Horse Serum Cholinesterase Inhibition Versus Concentration of 0,0»Diethyl S-[(Ethylsulfinyl)methyl] Phosphorothiolate �g. Gas Chromatographic Analysis. Gas chromatography was used to detect unaltered phorate in the organic phase from the plant extracts. A gas chromatograph equipped with a flame photometric phosphorus detector was employed. A six foot by one-fourth inch stainless steel column containing Chromport X X X , 80/90 mesh, coated with 3 percent SE-30, and conditioned for 24 hours at 220°C, was used for the phorate analysis of the August tomato extracts. A retention time of 105 seconds was recorded with the inlet temperature set at 250°C, the column-oven temperature at 200°C, and the detector temperature at 235°C. Gas flow rates in cubic centimeters per minute were nitrogen 80, hydrogen 150, air 20, and oxygen 20. A six foot by one-fourth inch glass column containing Chromosorb id , 80/90 mesh, coated with 3 percent QV-1 and conditioned for 24 hours at 210°C was used for the phorate analysis of the November tomato extracts, March Wiley sorghum extracts, April Honey sorghum extracts, and glass plates. A retention time of 130 seconds was recorded with the inlet temperature set at 245°C, the column-oven temperature at 190°C, and the detector temperature at 185°C. Injection sample sizes 1 for August tomato extracts were 5 microliters, and all others were 2.7 microliters. Concentrations of phorate present in the August analysis were determined by integration of peak area by a digital integrator. Concentrations of all other analyses were determined by peak height. All determinations were expressed in parts per million based on standard curves. 2. STATISTICAL ANALYSES. Before any of the data were analyzed, all of the cholinesterase inhibition percentages were transformed using the arc sine formula: 8 = 2 arcsin P where 6 is the new variable to be analyzed and P is the percent of cholinesterase inhibition divided by 100. Tnis transformation minimized and stabilized the variation of the data and created the homogeneity of variance that was essential to the use of the analysis of variance technique, and the other statistical procedures used for the analysis of these experiments. The results were stated in percentage notations for presentation throughout the report. It was not possiole to analyze all of the cholinesterase inhibition percentages on an experiment-wide basis because the measurements of the three experimental species were taken on various and differing days �during the month following application of the insecticide. To make comparisons that were valid and meaningful, it was necessary to select those days on which all species under consideration were measured. Table III shows the days of measurement for each species. During the first week TABLE III. HEASUREMENT DAYS BY SPECIES AND EXPERIMENT Days After Application 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 26 27 Homestead Tomato August November X X X X X X Wiley Sorghum March May Honey Sorghum April May X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X following application of the insecticide, only those measurements that were made on the same day were compared; during the next three weeks, measurements that were made on contiguous days were also included in the comparison. 10 �Only one measurement of cholinesterase inhibition was made on each of the days for the Homestead tomato experiments and for the March and April Wiley and Honey sorghum experiments. It was not possible, therefore, to test for significance of the interaction between seasonal effects and the number of days following application. Since this interaction would have been used to test the seasonal and time-passage effects individually, an unduly large interaction would have masked significance of the main effects, Paired t-tests with the same or contiguous days' results were used to circumvent this possibility. When nonsignificance of the paired values was determined, an analysis-of-variance technique was used to test for significance of the passage of time upon the cholinesterase-inhibition percentage. In those cases in which these results were significant, Duncan's new multiple range test was used to identify where the differences did, in fact, exist. In the absence of significance, means were computed, and the effects of the passage of time upon the cholinesterase inhibition were studied. Two replicates of measurements were made for the May Wiley and Honey sorghum plants, and it was, therefore, possible to use the analysis of variance technique when only these data were involved in comparisons. Initially, all testing was conducted at the 95-percent probability level (significant). When this proved significant, subsequent testing was conducted at the 99-percent probability level (highly significant). 11 �SECTION III RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Ultra-low-volume formulations of insecticides used by the military involve the aerial application of a low-volume concentrate (0.75 to 10 ounces per acre, undiluted). Phorate is applied with normal formulations at rates of 0.5 to 3 pounds of active ingredient per acre. Table I presents the application rates within this range. However, the defined, directed application of phorate to the leaf surface without spraying resulted in a maximum interface between insecticide droplet (10 microliters) and leaf area. This large droplet size represented the application of high concentrations of phorate; the droplet contained more phorate (0.25 milligram) and is larger than that ordinarily found following routine application of insecticides. The optimum3 diameter for insecticide spray droplets is in the range of 20 microns'' '. The percentages representing the efficiency of the extraction technique employed (Table II) are minimum values because of the volatility of phorate. Phorate is lost from the soil by volatilization and about 25 percent of the loss occurs in the first hour after treatment^'^/. Similar results would be expected on the leaf surface, therefore, the length of time between treatment and initial extraction of the plant would result in a value of phorate present that is slightly less than that which was applied. The time before initial extraction was approximately the same in all cases; however, the extraction of the August tomato after application of phorate during the late morning heat probably accounts to some degree for the lower value in extraction efficiency. Phorate was applied to the other plants in the early morning. A comparison of the percentage of cholinesterase inhibition obtained using the normal-activity value and the percentage obtained using the control-activity value as a base is shown in Figures 3 and 4 for Homestead tomatoes and for Wiley sorghum for each of the two applications of insecticide. A comparison for Honey sorghum is shown in Figure 5 for the May application; however, the April control plants were not usable due to contamination. The results of paired t-tests in analyzing the differences between percentages for each species allowed the use of all the cholinesterase-inhibition percentages based on the normal activity value. Cholinesterase-inhibition values obtained showed no correlation with plant weight. A comparison of the percentages of cholinesterase inhibition during the month following application of the insecticide for each of the three plants, using the analysis of variance technique, indicated that the average for the Homestead tomato was significantly lower than those for 12 �/D fe CJ 50 - uj ex. O t~~t K h~, — UJ -J < nr .? j ( fc to o t~t GO 2:. uj t ^ —c > ---* rf t,^ »/ '• .• " « • ' lc b UJ CO '-=C CJ fti K UJ •< r™"- ••—— • 0 U o^ UJ -5 • CONTROL 25 § O NORMAL 1 I I § o 1 0 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 6 S 10 12 14 U U 20 22 1 1 24 26 21 TIME FROM APPLICATION WS) a. _ Phorate Applied in August 75 iUj | — 50 C±- 8 r^ 0 ft S^ A«s UJ UJ S oo t-i S^ uu o 0 8 • >-~< UJ m ° 8 8 0 8 — h- Oi c/) -< UJ •—• 3: o j. -25 • CONTROL 1 0. I I I I 1 1 1 2 4 6 6 10 12 14 U O NORMAL I 1 1 18 20 22 1 I 24 26 TIME FROM APPLICATION [VMS] b. Phorate Applied _in November Figure 3. Cholinesterase Inhibition of Homestead Tomato 13 2B �/p s- § • A UJ CJ c* 50 UJ O UJ »—1 —1 - » § • 8 » o 8 25 e CO V) ^— 1 1 1 ?5 t—< CO UJ 5ur§ 5t CO CJ tf <c UJ — n U to UJ t—1 —1 • CONTROL -5 — O NORMAL o CJ 1 1 1 1 1 1 f I 6 -25 i 1 1 1 1 « /O 12 14 16 H 20 TIME FROM APPLICATION (PAKS) 22 24 26 28 1 26 21 a. Phorate Applied in March /5 * 8i | 0- O UJ t—t —J \~ •< 50 8 • 8 * ' o • 881$ 8 » 8 UJ o e* UJ 25 t-i CJ CO CO b-< 1—t UJ W "<t UJ •— 1- UJ t—< —1 o 5 — '.r • CONTROL -5( 3: o O NORMAL i ^c 0 i 2 4 i 6 1 B 1 10 1 12 1 14 1 16 1 U 1 20 1 22 1 24 TIME FROM APPLICATION b. Phorate Applied in May Figure 4. Cholinesterase Inhibition of Wiley Sorghum 14 �72 !s UJ 75 ^* o CM UJ (X "~" 50 — 25 i ii o S 8 * • ^k ^k ^ ^fc. - 8 O t—1 — PQ •< 8 8 •t ^2 "» 8 ^h t—t CJ (-1 UJ UJ *-< C/) C/) 5 - So UJ CM UJ t—t —4 O -C o 0 _ 1 * CONTROL O WORMAL I 1 1 i I t I i I i t i I g 10 12 J4 76 JS 20 22 24 26 28 TIME FROM APPLICATIOW (PA^S) Figure 5. Cholinesterase Inhibition of Honey Sorghum (Phorate Applied in May) 15 �the two varieties of sorghum. Figure 6 shows the inhibition percentage values for each of the three plants; the lower level for the tomato plants is evident. Therefore, for statistical purposes, data from the tomato plant experiments were analyzed independent of the sorghum data. Gas chromatographic analysis of the hexanes phase after extraction from tomato and sorghum indicated less than one ppm phorate present by the sixth day (Table IV). A determination of residues of-phorate and five of its netab- TABLE IV. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS FOR PHORATE FROM TOMATO AND SORGHUM Day Tomato August November Concentration of Phorate, ppm Sorq lum March (Wiley) April (Honey) 0 128 42 16 18 1 140 34 9-12 9 28 6-7 5-6 9 <3 1 2 3 23 4 <1 5 4 6 1 <1 elites from various parts of corn plants (treated with one pound of the.insecticide per acre) indicated that phorate was essentially gone in 14 days(4). During this determination, phorate was recovered from fortified samples with 96 percent efficiency using a Soxhlet apparatus in an eight-hour extraction technique. The higher values of phorate in the August tomato samples, as compared to the November samples, were due to the concentration of the sample to 10 milliliters instead of the 50-milliliter final volume of all other samples. Small differences in the data are probably due to the slight variations in extraction efficiencies for each plant. The disappearance of phorate proceeds at approximately the same rate in each plant variety. 16 �75 A D A A 9 50 — O 9 • o A D nc '--' O g «-< o _ =5 °° 0 • * A | > • UjS C/) CO UJ CM ^ A H * • o 00 — D A UJ (X *vl S UJ Q A UJ PuJ t—< —J CO •< n A 1 P * (* ^9 r 5 0 o o —1 o o 0 - HOMESTEAD TOMATO , 0 1 2 i 1 4 i | 6 i 1 8 O.VO I/EMBER WILE/ SORGHUM I3 •AUGUST * MARCH ^ MA/ HO/JE/ SORGHUM i 1 i 1 i 10 12 • APRIL 1 i 1 14 16 D MA/ t 1 20 i 1 IS i TIME FROM APPLICATIO/V (3A/S) Figure 6. Comparison of Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition for Three Varieties of Plants 1 22 i | 24 I 2< �The results of a cholinesterase-inhibition analysis for the Homestead tomato plants for all of the days measured for the August and November applications of insecticide are shown in Figure 7. An analysis of comparable daily measurements in August and November indicated no significant differences between the two application dates or by the number of days after application. The average percentages of cholinesterase inhibition for the days used in the comparison are given in Table V and Figure 8 and are not significantly different at the 95 percent probability level. TABLE V. AVERAGE PERCENT CHOLINESTERASE INHIBITION, HOMESTEAD TOMATO Days After Application Cholinesterase Inhibition, Percent 21,22 27.1 6 24.4 12,13 23.9 4 21.4 9,10 15.9 1 12.4 0 11.3 Figures 9 and 10 show the percentages of cholinesterase inhibition for Wiley and Honey sorghum, respectively. Analyses of the possible daily comparisons for each variety indicated significant differences between the March and May data for the Wiley sorghum and highly significant differences between the April and May data for the Honey sorghum. Similar analyses of those cholinesterase-inhibition percentages which were obtained on the same or contiguous days for Wiley sorghum in March and Honey sorghum in April indicated no significant differences between the two varieties for those two months (Figure 11). An analysis of the differences in cholinesterase-inhibition percentages with respect to the number of days after application of phorate to sorghum during March and April indicated highly significant differences. Table VI shows average daily percentages. In Figure 12, the average values with associated letters are shown graphically. The cholinesterase-inhibition percentage peak was reached by the ninth day following application of phorate, and an 18 �14J C_> {* U-i o « I4J CO O *-» CO U3 2 UU UJ •< CO UJ o o AUGUST APPLICATIOM WOI/&MBER APPLICATION 70 72 74 16 18 TIME FROM APPLICATION (VAVS) Figure 7. Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition, Homestead Tomato O �75 UJ UJ PL. \~ UJ CO t— t\3 25 UJ O )—< UJ CO •<C C_> UJ •< UJ a: «—< —i o » -5 10 n TIME FROM APPLICATION Figure 8. H 14 (VMS) 20 Effects of Passage of Time Upon Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition, Homestead Tomato 24 26 �uj UJ h- UJ t~> —J CQ • < t~< O UJ V) uj »oo O UJ MARCH APPLICATION • APPLICATIOW JO 72 H 16 TIME FROM APPLICATION (VAVS] Figure 9, Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition, Wiley Sorqhum O �fe UJ o Be: UJ R- CQ ™ UJ2 APRIL APPLICATIOW MAV APPLICATION Figure 10. O TIME FROM APPLICATION {DAYS} Percent Cholinesterase I n h i b i t i o n , Honey Sorghum �95 WILEV SORGHUM MARCH APPLICATION HOWE/ SORGHUM APRIL APPLICATION O -25 10 72 14 U TIME FROM APPLICATION (PA/S) Figure 11. Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition, Wiley and Honey Sorghum �Cxi UJ R- 1- UJ 1-1 •—I CO •< l-« CJ K CJ UJ C* V- < TIME FROM APPLICATION Figure 12. Effects of Passage of Time Upon Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition, Wiley Sorghum (March) and Honey Sorghum (April) �average peak level of 63.9 percent Inhibition was maintained until the eighteenth to twenty-first day, when it began decreasing. By the twentythird to twenty-fifth day it had decreased to 31.5 percent. TABLE VI. Days After Application AVERAGE PERCENT CHOLINESTERASE INHIBITION, WILEY SORGHUM (MARCH) AND HONEY SORGHUM (APRIL) Cholinesterase Inhibition , Percent Remarks (Common letter indicates no significant difference at 99-percent Probability Level) 11 67.9 a 16,18 62.5 ab 9 61.1 ab 14 51.0 be 4 49.1 be 7 49.0 be 21,20 42.1 c 25,23 31.5 d 2 18.5 e 0 10.2 e 1 9.8 e Figure 13 shows the percentages of cholinesterase inhibition for Wiley and Honey sorghum on various days during May. The analysis indicated highly significant differences only with respect to the number of days after application; neither the species of sorghum nor the species/day interaction yielded results which indicated any significant effect. The average percentages for the various days after application are shown in Table VII. All averages that are not significantly different at the 99 percent probability level have a common letter. In Figure 14, the average values with associated letters are shown graphically. May Wiley and Honey sorghum plants reached a peak percentage 25 �o H- Uj CQ < 5: <s> 2: t-t UU li? Lu a: Ol l-t UU o WILE/ SORGHUM O WNEV SORGHUM n u TIME FROM APPLICATION Figure 13. Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition, Wiley and Honey Sorghum (May) �UJ (X o l— ul t-i ~j B3 • < »—* O r\> i60 >-' ty uj Si UU Oi h- •< o o -5 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 n 1 1 1 1 n 1 1 1 i 20 1 1 1 1 24 TIME FROM APPLICATION (PAW) Figure 14. Effects of Passage of Time Upon Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition, Wiley and Honey Sorghum (May) 1 1 26 1 �of cholinesterase inhibition by the fourth day and maintained an average peak level of 64.5 percent for the remainder of the month. TABLE VII. AVERAGE PERCENT CHOLINESTERASE INHIBITION, WILEY AND HONEY SORGHUM (MAY) Days After Application Cholinesterase Inhibition, Percent Remarks (Common letter indicates no significant difference at 99-percent Probability Level ) 14 68.8 a 12 68.7 a 8 65.2 a 7 65.1 a 19 64.5 a 4 64.0 a 5 63.1 a 16 60.6 a 21 60.4 a 2 28.9 b 0 -1.5 c With no significant differences existing between the two varieties of sorghum in May or during continuous experiments in March and April, it appeared that the metabolism of high concentrations of phorate proceeded at the same rate in each variety; however, distinct visible differences occurred between the two plant varieties. Despite slight initial visible damage, both sorghum and tomato recovered from insecticide damage within 30 days of treatment. The preliminary data did show, however, that neither variety of sorghum recovered from insecticide damage when exposed to the same concentration of phorate as was used on the tomato plants. This is indicative of the 28 �effects of a high concentration of phorate due to the large droplet size, since any visible damage at the rates used in this experiment would not be expected. With the tomato, minor c u r l i n g of the leaves was observed and many plants had a loss of apical dominance indicating that possibly, at the concentrations of phorate used, there was a change in the auxin content or hormonal distribution w i t h i n the plant. The first injury symptoms for both sorghum varieties were characterized by a localized bleaching of the blade pigments ( i . e . , chlorophyll) to a yellow-green coloration with a s l i g h t l y flaccid condition. These necrotic blotches were more distinct with Honey sorghum as they acquired a red-brown coloration. This characteristic color difference was apparent in the aqueous samples, as Honey samples were much darker than those of Wiley. The flaccid condition was more evident with Honey sorghum. The more v i s i b l e damage to sorghum compared to tomato in preliminary experiments, with both exposed to the same concentration of phorate, may appear to contradict the research reported in Reference 7. However, that report notes that (a) conclusions regarding the possible effects of organophosphorus insecticides, except mevinphos and methyl demeton, could not be made since the experiment was a fixed-effects model and not a random selection of possible organophosphorus insecticides; and (b) differences in plant response (susceptibility or resistance) could be accounted for by a postulation that differences may be related to leaf area interception of the insecticide. The reason for existing differences between March/April and May sorghum can only be postulated. Peak percentages of cholinesterase i n h i bition by the fourth day (64.5 percent) in May versus the n i n t h day (63.9 percent) in March/April indicate a more rapid oxidation of phorate to anticholinesterase metabolites. A s i g n i f i c a n t factor may be the relatively higher mean temperatures in May. In an evaluation of the effects of environmental temperature on Di-Syston©systemically applied to cotton leaves, the oxidation of the s u l f i d e , Di-Syston®, to the sulfoxide occurred so rapidly at temperatures above 70°F that only traces could be detected, even at intervals as short as one hour after treatment'**) The major^component in the leaves during the one-week experiment was the Di-Syston®sulfoxide. The rate of disappearance of sulfoxide was increased approximately 1.86 times for each 10°C rise in temperature (energy of activation of 10 kcal/mole). The i n i t i a l oxidation of phorate in cotton leaves was less rapid than the oxidation of Di-Syston®with traces of phorate found up to three days, although these never.exceeded 5 percent of the total radioactivity in the labeled experiment'^). It was also noted^ that the rate of oxidation of the sulfoxides in the oxidation series (Figure 1) was measurably slower for phorate than for Di-Syston® The sum of the rate constants for the disappearance of phorate sulfoxide due to oxidation is h a l f that of Di-Syston®sulfoxide. This indicates that phorate sulfoxide was probably the major metabolite during the first two weeks of this investigation. Also, when a l f a l f a seed was treated with 29 �treated with phorate or Di-Systorr% the effectiveness for aphid control varied by as much as several weeks depending on the rate of plant grow The rate of metabolism is slower in cooler weather, and the slower the plant growth, the longer the persistence of toxic residues. Tomato behaved similarly to the May sorghum. Tomato maintained a mean percentage value of 19.5 throughout the experiment; sorghum maintained a constant mean value throughout the month after, the third day. Thus, the results indicated that the metabolism of high concentrations of phorate proceeded at approximately the same rate in each species and between plant varieties. These results were not in complete harmony with those from earlier experiments. In previous metabolism studies of phorate and Di-Syston®on various plants such as cotton, alfalfa, lemon, and bean, it was found that the rates of reaction may be expected to vary slightly among pjant species and according to the stage of growth^). Later,, studies\°' specifically oriented toward the metabolism of Di-Syston^in a * variety of plant species, indicated that at 70°F, the metabolism of Di-Syston sulfoxide and hydrolytic decomposition of the toxic products occurred two to three times faster in tomato leaves than in cotton leaves. Differences in results and insecticide application parameters indicated the experimental data resulted from the chemical nature of phorate on the plant surface without the influence of biological substrates. Application methods^ 5 > included topical application of 5 to 25 microliters of insecticide to the base of a young plant or placement of isolated leaves in a water dispersion (0.1 percent solution) of the insecticide to permit the study of the rates of metabolism uncomplicated by the continual accumulation of translocated material. The method of application used in this work was foliar with a definite quantity of phorate aoplied as larae droplets to each intact plant. An earlier study' '^/ with Systox^(similar to phorate in structure) showed that the chemical nature of the surface washes from fruit treated with thiono- and thiolo-isomers changed rapidly upon exposure to light and air. Exposure of the isomers to light and air under controlled conditions on glass plates, uncomplicated by biological substrates, resulted in a surprisingly rapid conversion of the Systox®isomers into compounds which appeared to be chromatographically similar to those found within the plant tissues. Another study'''' showed that the action of air and sunlight on surface residues of Systox®isomers has a rapid effect and appears to promote their oxidation in the same sequence as found in vitro with hydrogen peroxide and in plant tissues. Thin films of phorate exposed to ultraviolet light or sunlight and air gave similar results^» ^8, 19, 20) ^ Exposure to sunlight on paper, glass, and leaf surfaces indicated that the initial stable residues of phorate may not be the original compound or its simple oxidation products; prolonged exposure resulted in the formation of more polar compounds^' 0 '. Results of ultra- 30 �violet irradiation of phorate on the surface of a liquid suggested that the oxidation products are the sulfoxide and sulfone of the parent compound, with the sulfone showing greater persistency and the s p]foxide being in greater quantity during the early stages of irradiation''^» ^0). To substantiate the concept that the experimental results in these investigations were without the influence of biological substrates within the plants, the same concentrations of phorate were applied to glass plates as were applied to the treated plants. The glass plates were located on the greenhouse bench adjacent to the control and treated plants. This was done with Wiley and Honey sorghum, in March and April, respectively, Table VIII shows a comparison of the gas chromatographic data for the plants and glass plates. Within 48 hours, phorate could no longer be detected on the glass plates; the same rapid disappearance was noted with the plants—approximately one ppm detected after 96 hours. TABLE VIII. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS FOR PHORATE FROM GLASS PLATES AND SORGHUM Day Phorate Concentration, ppm March Aoril Wiley Sorghum Glass Plates Honey Sorghum Glass Plates 0 16 22 18 26 1 9-12 5-6 9 5 2 6-7 5-6 4 <3 1 <1 6 The cholinesterase-inhibition percentages obtained from the glass plates for the March and April experiments (Figure 15) were compared with the values obtained for the treated plants (Figure 11). The plots are very similar, with the glass plate cholinesterase-inhibition values being significantly higher on all days considered. However, most noteworthy is that the data through the twentieth day following application exhibited logarithmically linear trends (99 percent probability level) with no quadratic tendencies for both the sorghum and glass plates in March and April. The best-fitting straight lines have been plotted (Figures 16 and 17), and the equations for each of the lines are: 31 �99. Sr hUJ O R3 •< UJ (A) ro CO UJ CJ I UJ o CJ 25 O * Figure 15. n APRIL APPLICATION u TIME FROM APPLICATION (PAKS) Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition. Glass Plates �99.5 UJ CJ c*: o •— l~> UJ co to t"-t 3= <Z 50 *—» UJ CJ SORGHUM, MARCH APPLICATION O GLASS PLATES, MARCH APPLICATION 2 7 TIME FROM APPLICATION (PAVS) (LOGARITHMIC SCALE) Figure 16. Comparison of Percentage Cholinesterase Inhibition for Glass Plates and Wiley Sorghum I 24 29 �99.5 UJ UJ UJ _J t—1 I— •< uj II UJ kV) UJ o • HONEV SORGHUM, APRIL APPLICATION OGLASS PLATES, APRIL APPLICATION I I I I 4 7 3 TIME FROM APPLICATION (VMS) (LOGARITHMIC SCALE) Figure 17. Comparison of Percentage Cholinesterase Inhibition for Glass Plates and Honey Sorghum 79 24 29 �Wiley sorghum, March Y = 0.597 + 0.484 log (X + 1) Glass plate, March Y = 0.922 + 0.626 log (X + 1) Honey sorghum, April Y = 0.489 + 0.480 log (X + 1) Glass plate, April Y = 0.917 + 0.621 log (X + 1) where Y is the arc sine transformation of the percent cholinesterase inhibition and X is the number of days after the application of phorate in vegetable oil. An analysis of comparison of the linear plots gave significant results. The percentage of cholinesterase inhibition increased at the same rate for both varieties of sorghum. The percentages of cholinesterase inhibition for Wiley and Honey sorghum increased at the same rate as did those for the glass plates. The percent of variation explained by the linear trend is as follows: Wiley Sorghum 78.6 Glass Plate, March 89.3 Honey Sorghum 88.2 Glass Plate, April 92.4 The rate of formation of cholinesterase-inhibiting compounds appeared the same between the glass plates and sorghum plants. It appeared that, at least at high concentrations of phorate, formation of anticholinesterase oxidized metabolites was predominantly through a chemical oxidation on the leaf surface, and not plant enzyme catalysis. This took place at least at such a rate as to mask enzyme catalysis. With low concentrations of phorate within sorghum blades, methods similar to those described in References 5 and 8 could distinguish any difference in the rates of metabolism between the two varieties of sorghum. The higher cholinesterase inhibition values for the glass plates, (Figure 15) in comparison with the sorghum (Figure 11), can be attributed to the higher extraction efficiency with the glass plates. However, the phorate plant residue analysis by gas chromatography indicated the presence of phorate 48 hours after it could no longer be detected in samples from 35 �the glass plates. Although the cholinesterase-inhibition analysis Indicates the same rapid oxidation of phorate on leaf and glass plate, phorate could be present witnin certain portions of the leaf, e.g., within stomatal pores, and hence, within a potentially low-oxygen environment. This could explain the gas chromatographic data. An examination of roots resulted in no detectable cholinesterase inhibitors. Metabolism studies with lemon leaves showed the presence of large amounts of intact Di-Syston® accompanied by very slow conversion to other oxidative products(8). This suggested that the oil-soluble esters were being protected from aqueous hydrolysis by the oil content of the leaves. This was confirmed bv a radioautograph which showed nearly all of the radioactivity from P^2 Di-Syston® translocated into a lemon leaf is confined to the oil glands. A similar radioautograph of Systox®-thiol-isomer translocated into lemon leaves showed that, most of the radioactivity was located in the aqueous tissues of the plants^''. These differences were correlated with the relative water solubilities of the compounds, i.e., Di-Syston® 66 ppm and Systox®thipl-isonner 3900 ppm. The water solubility of phorate was recorded as 85 With the rate of formation of cholinesterase inhibitors the same en glass plates and sorghum leaf surfaces, the lower cholinesterase-inhibition percentage values for tomato (Figure 6) are difficult to explain. The values are lower than expected with tomato having received a concentration of phorate double that received by sorghum. Since the gas chromatographic data for tomato and sorghum agree, the distinct differences in cholinesteraseinhibition percentage values could have resulted from poorer efficiency in recovering oxidized metabolites from tomato compared to sorghum. The similarities in graphic plots for May sorghum (Figure 14) and tomato (Figure 8) would support this rationale. Evaluation of the cholinesterase-inhibition percentage values with the calibration curve resulted in values relating the concentration of toxic residues present in and on the plant foliage. Fourteen days after application of phorate to Honey sorghum in April, sample preparation of a foliar rinse of the surface of the plant accounted for approximately 50 percent of the total cholinesterase inhibition of the plant. A lack of detection of phorate within seven days indicated that residues of the oxidized metabolites in sorghum occurred to a very large degree via oxidation of phorate on the leaf surface, absorption within the leaf, and possible translocation within the plant. This is not in agreement with the previous studies presented in References 5 and 9. Other researchers have postulated(S) that the relative rates of absorption and translocation of phorate and Di-Syston® increased as the experiment proceeded because of the formation of more water-soluble oxidative metabolites in the subcuticular layers of olant tissue around the region of application. In Reference 9, the postulation is that the parent compounds were fairly persistent on the surface of the leaves but were metabolized rapidly once they had penetrated. �These variations can be explained by the differences in application method and in insecticide concentration: i.e., a 5 microliter topical application to the base of the stem of a cotton plant versus a 0.2 milliliter application of a 2 percent solution of phorate in vegetable oil to the blades of sorghum. It must be remembered that as the toxic metabolites are forming, they are concurrently being hydrolyzed to nontoxic phosphoric or thiophosphoric acids. Though the oxygen-analogs of phorate can inhibit cholinesterase activity more than their thionpohosphate precursors, they appear to have a higher degree of instability'^' ^'• The phosphorus is considerably more electrophilic in the P=0 compounds, thus weakening the P-S ester bond and facilitating hydrolysis and accelerating phosphorylation of the enzyme'^). Consequently, the presence of relatively large amounts of a highly oxidized metabolite in a plant would result in higher cholinesterase inhibition and higher apparent residue values than would an equivalent amount of a metabolite with less cholinesterase activity in another plant. The higher cholinesterase-inhibition values mean the presence of metabolites which are easily hydrolyzed, resulting in an overall faster rate of metabolic detoxification. The concentrations of phorate metabolites in tomato and sorghum were expressed in parts per million (ppn.) as phorate oxygen analog sulfoxide equivalent via a cholinesterase-inhibition method of analysis. The calibration curve for the residue method is given in Figure 2. It is independent of plant material analyzed and of the sample preparation technique. It reflects none of the losses that may occur in the various steps of sample preparation. A sample calculation follows the formula: .v = parts per million of phorate oxygen analog sulfoxide equivalent in sample analyzed. Where w is the phorate oxygen analog sulfoxide equivalent obtained in the analyses, micrograms. v is the aqueous extract in the determination, mi Hi liters. V is the total solvent in sample extraction, milliliters. W is the sample extracted, grams (fresh weight). The toxic residues present in tomato foliage were based .on the average weight of tomato plants initially after application of phorate (six weeks) and at the conclusion of the experiment (nine weeks), 6 grams and 28 grams, respectively. Thus, residues in the tomato foliage ranged from 1.1 to 5.3 ppm phorate oxygen analog sulfoxide equivalent. 37 �Residue persistence in sorghum (Table X) was higher. The May sorghum had concentrations with a range of 0 to 20.2 ppm. The average residue value after the second day was 17.9 ppm. The March/April sorghum had concentrations with a range of 2.4 to 18.5 ppm. The fourfold increase in residues by the ninth day is comparable to that found by Bowman and Casida'^' in considering the persistence of phorate-P 2 and its metabolites in vegetable crops. The total anticholinesterase activity of greenhouse pea plants, sprayed with phorate at one pound per acre, increased for about the firslv four days and then declined, but inhibitors persisted for 20 to 30 ^ ' Foliage application of 0,0-diethyl S-[(isopropylthio) methyl] phosphorodithioate to pea plants resulted in the appearance of anticholinesterase metabolites within one day and persistence of such metabolites in high concentration for at least nine days with detectable amounts present for 21 days^'. The results of this investigation were comparable: the main difference was higher residue levels. In crops treated with phorate., the ultimate toxic residues are present in a fractional part per million'". When applied to corn at a rate of one pound per acre, phorate was essentially gone in 14 days, while very low levels of its sulfoxide and sulfone (0.1 ppm or less) persisted through the 28-day experimental interval. At harvest time, the plant was essentially 4 free of insecticide, less than 0.01 ' The concentration of phorate metabolite residues present, though high, would probably be at a safe level by harvest time. The ultimate toxic metabolites present in harvest time residues are dependent upon both the interval between application and harvest and the method of application. Older plants having phorate applied at high rates would definitely have to be monitored for toxic residues. The lower residue values for tomato foliage are due in part to a larger daily plant weight—approximately threefold that of sorghum. The result could be a more rapid metabolism and hydrolysis and provides another possibility for the cholinesterase-inhibition percentage values being lower for tomato than for sorghum. Generally, oxidation. in plants never increases the toxicity of an application significantly^"'. However, the large residue values obtained in this study indicate that the toxicity is increased considerably on the surface of the plant when high concentrations are involved. A number of researchers, in speculating upon potential residue problems after various methods of treatment with systemic insecticides, have concluded that persistence curves should be 8 established on different crops grow under different environmental conditions' '. Military application of insecticides at normal rates results in residues which can be monitored with guidance from available literature. Residue breakdown of these organophosphorus insecticides is usually rapid with no persistency problems. However, the result of repetitive 38 �aerial application or spillage of insecticides in cropland areas may result in concentrations higher than usual. This study indicates exposure studies of the respective insecticides on glass plates alone under different environmental conditions would serve as a guide in predicting residues from high concentrations of insecticides. TABLE IX. PERSISTENCE OF PHORATE OXYGEN ANALOG SULFOXIDE EQUIVALENT IN SORGHUM Time From Application, Day 0 1 2 4 5 7 8 9 11 12 14 16 18 19 20 21 23 25 a Concentration, ppm March /April 3 2.4-5.3 2.4-5.3 2.4-5.3 10.3-14.5 10.3-14.5 Mayu 0 8.3 17.1 19.7 18.7 18.5 12.6-18.5 16.0-18.5 10.3-14.5 12.6-18.5 12.6-18.5 16.6 20.2 18.0 15.3 10.3-11.9 10.3-11.9 6.9-7.9 6.9-7.9 17.0 Concentration range is the result of considering the standard deviation for the average plant weight for the entire experimental period in May; this is due to the lack of plant weight values for March/April. Results are averages of two samples, three replications each. 3 Results are averages of four samples, three replications each. 39 �SECTION IV SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Data on the metabolism of foliar applications of high concentrations of the organophosphorus insecticide phorate on Homestead tomato and Wiley and Honey sorghum are reported. The investigation of phorate metabolism, monitored by gas chromatographic and enzymatic analysis, produced the following results: 1. The cholinesterase activity values obtained showed no correlation with plant weight. 2. The disappearance of phorate appeared to proceed at the same rate in each plant species and variety; phorate disappeared more quickly from glass plates than from March/April sorghum under the same experimental parameters. 3. No significant differences were apparent between the two varieties of sorghum in May or during continuous experiments in March and April. It appeared that the formation of anticholinesterase metabolites, after high foliar applications of phorate, proceeded at the same rate in each variety although distinct visible differences occurred between the Wiley and Honey sorghum. 4. The peak percentages of cholinesterase inhibition from sorghum samples by the fourth day in May versus the ninth day in March/April indicated more rapid oxidation of phorate to anticholinesterase metabolites at higher temperatures. 5. The phorate metabolism in tomato was similar to metabolism in the May sorghum; however, actual comparison of percentage values of cholinesterase inhibition during the month for each of the three plants indicated that the average for the Homestead tomato was significantly lower than those for the two varieties of sorghum. 6. The percentage values of cholinesterase inhibition for the Wiley and Honey sorghum increased at the same rate as for the glass plates, indicating that the rate of formation of anticholinesterase-oxidized metabolites was predominantly through chemical oxidation on the leaf surface and not by plant enzyme catalysis; this surface oxidation took place at least at such a rate as to mask enzyme catalysis. 7. The larger droplet size in application technique resulted in higher toxic-residue values for phorate metabolites, especially on the surface of the plant, than would normally be expected. 40 �This study was initiated to find a basis for predicting toxicity and persistence of metabolite residues in plants after application of high concentrations of sulfur-containing oraanophosphorus insecticides during military spray operations. The results indicate that exposure studies of high concentrations of insecticides on glass plates alone, under different environmental conditions, would serve as a guide in predicting residues from repetitive aerial application or spillage of insecticides used by the military in cropland areas. Such studies with a controlled environment would yield toxic-residue-persistence data under various conditions for high concentrations of insecticides. 41 (The reverse of this page is blank) ��REFERENCES 1. Thomson, W.T. Agricultural Chemicals, Book I. Insecticides, Acaricides, and Ovicides. Thomson Publications, Davis, California, 1967. 2. Bowman, J.S. and J.E. Casida. Metabolism of the Systemic Insecticide 0,0-Diethyl S-Ethylthiomethyl Phosphorodithioate (Thimet) in Plants. J. Agr. Food Chem. 5: 192-197, 1957. 3. Bowman, J.S. and J.E. Casida. Further Studies on the Metabolism of Thimet by Plants, Insects, and Hammals. J. Econ. Entomol. 51:838-843, 1958. 4. Bowman, M.C., M. Beroza, and J.A. Harding. Determination of Phorate and Five of Its Metabolites in Corn. J. Agr. Food Chem. 17:138-142, 1969. 5. Metcalf, R.I., T.R. Fukuto, and R.B. March. Plant Metabolism of Dithio-Systox and Thimet. J. Econ. Entomol. 50:338-345, 1957. 6. Coleman, O.H. and J.L. Dean. Inheritance of Resistance to Methyl Parathion in Sorgo. Crop Sci. 4:371-372, 1964. 7. Wolverton, B.C., W.J. Wallace, A.L. Young, and D.D. Harrison. Studies on the Systemic Uptake of Toxic Phosphorus Esters by Plants. Morphological Effects of Foliar Applications of the Organophosphate Insecticides Mevinphos and Methyl Demeton on Selected Plant Species. Air Force Armament Laboratory Technical Report AFATL-TR-69-116, Eg!in Air Force Base, Florida, September, 1969. 8. Metcalf, R.L., H.T. Reynolds, M. Winton, and T.R. Fukuto. Effects of Temperature and Plant Species upon the Rates of Metabolism of Systemically Applied Di-Syston. J. Econ. Entomol. 52:435-439, 1959. 9. Heath, D.F. Metabolism in Plants and Soils. Jm Organophosphorus Poisons, Anticholinesterases and Related Compounds edited by D.F. Heath. Pergamon Press, Mew York, 1961. 10. Archer, T.E. Enzymatic Methods. Jm Analytical Methods for Pesticides, Plant Growth Regulators, and Food Additives, Volume I edited by G. Zweig. Academic Press, New York, 1963. 11. Sutherland, G.L., P.A. Giang, and T.E. Archer. Thimet. I_n Analytical Methods for Pesticides, Plant Growth Regulators, and Food Additives , Volume II edited by G. Zweig. Academic Press, New York, 1964. 43 �12. Nabb, D.P. and Florence Whitfield. Determination of Cholinesterase by an Automated pH Stat Method. Arch. Environ. Health. 15:147-154, 1967. 13. Himel, C.M. The Optimum Size for Insecticide Spray Droplets. J. Econ. Entomol. 62:919-925, 1969. 14. Young, A.L. and B.C. Wolverton. Military Herbicides and Insecticides. Air Force Armament Laboratory Technical Note AFATL-TN-70-1, Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, January, 1970. 15. Reynolds, H.T., T.R. Fukuto, R.L. Metcalf, and R.B. March. Seed Treatment of Field Crops with Systemic Insecticides. J. Econ. Entomol. 50:527-539, 1957. 16. Metcalf, R.L., R.B. March, T.R. Fukuto, and M.G. Maxon. The Nature and Significance of Systox Residues in Plant Materials. J. Econ. Entomol. 48:364-369, 1955. 17. Fukuto, T.R., R.L. Metcalf, R.B. March, and M.G. Maxon. Chemical Behavior of Systox in Biological Systems. J. Econ. Entomol. 48:347-354, 1955. 18. Cook, J.W. and R. Ottes. Note on the Conversion of Some Organophosphate Pesticides to Less Polar Compounds by Ultraviolet Light. J. Assoc. Offie . Agr. Chemists. 42:211-212, 1959. 19. Mitchell, T.H., J.H. Ruzicka, J. Thomson, and B.B. Wheals. The Chromatographic Determination of Organophosphorus Pesticides. Part III. The Effect of Irradiation on the Parent Compounds. J. Chromatog. 32:17-23, 1968. 20. Ruzicka, J.H., J. Thomson, and B.B. Wheals. The Gas Chromatographic Examination of Organophosphorus Pesticides and Their Oxidation Products. J. Chromatog. 30:92-99, 1967. 21. Metcalf, R.L., R.B. March, T.R. Fukuto, and M.G. Maxon. The Behavior of Systox-isomers in Bean and Citrus Plants. J. Econ. Entomol. 47:1045-1055, 1954. 44 �DISTRIBUTION LIST AFSC (DLSW) (SDWM) (SGP) ARPA (TECH INFO) DDR&E (CHEM TECH) (TECH LIB) SAAMA (SFQT) 2 3 3 1 1 5 5 AIR UNIVERSITY LIB HQ DA OACSFOR (FOR CM SR) OPERATIONS RSCH GRP EDGEWOOD ARSENAL (SMUEA-TD-S) (SMUEA-RPRE (2)) (SMUEA-CC) (SMUEA-QS) (SMUEA-CCCR) (SMUEA-TSTI-L) (SMUEA-D) (SMUEA-TS-CF) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 (WPNS DEV & ENGR LABS) ENGR R&D LABS (TECH DOC CTR) ABERDEEN PRV GD (TECH LIB) DESERET TEST CENTER (TECH LIB) CBR AGENCY (CSGSB-ST) USA CHEMICAL SCHOOL (AJMCL-A) NAV AIR SYS COMD (AIR-532G) USN WEAPONS LAB 2 2 1 4 1 1 2 2 USN RESEARCH LAB (CODE 6140) 4525 FTR WPN UG (FWOA) 6570TH AMRL (HEF) DDC 12AF (DMEME) DL DLIP SSLT TAWC (DOD) (DIM) SOC (DFS) HQ USAF (AFRDPA) TAC (DOO-S) SOF-DOR 319SOS-DM TAWC-CB USAFETAC USAF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LAB (Kelly AFB TX) 1 1 1 12 1 1 50 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 45 �DISTRIBUTION LIST (Concluded) USAF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LAB (McClellan AFB CA) 1 USAFEL AFWL (DEE) USAFA (DFLS) DUGWAY PROVING GROUND (TECH LIB) ONR (CODE 440) HQ USACDC (NBC BRANCH) ASD (ENYS) DLOS CDCLNO 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 46 �UNCLASSIFIED Security Classification DOCUMENT CONTROL DATA - R & D (Security classification of title, body of abstract and indexing annotation must be entered when the overall report is ORIGINATING A C T I V I T Y (Corporate author) Flame, Incendiary, and Explosives Division Air Force Armament Laboratory Eqlin Air Force Base, Florida 3 classified) . REPORT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION UNCLASSIFIED 26. GROUP* REPORT TITL.E THE METABOLISM OF HIGH CONCENTRATIONS OF THE ORGANOPHOSPHORUS INSECTICIDE PHORATE APPLIED FOLIARLY TO SELECTED PLANT SPECIES D E S C R I P T I V E NOTES (Type- ot report and inclusive dates) Final Report (May - December 1970) 5 AUTHORCSI (First name, middle initial, Imxt name) George S. Kotchmar, Jr., Capt, USAF3 Billy C. Wolverton, Elizabeth.E. Boothe, Sandra M. Lefstad 6 REPORT D A T E 7«. T O T A L NO. OF PAGES February 1971 8«- C O N T R A C T OR G R A N T NO. &. PROJECT NO. 5066 53 \7t. NO. OF REFS 1 21 9a. ORIGINATOR*^ REPORT NJUMBERfSt AFATL-TR-71-22 9b. OTHER REPORT NO (si (Any other numbers that may oe assigned this report) C. d. 1O. DISTRIBUTION S T A T E M E N T Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. M- S U P P L E M E N T A R Y NOTES Available in DDC 12- SPONSORING M I L I T A R Y A C T I V I T Y Air Force Armament Lauoratory Air Force Systers Command Eglin Air Force Base, Florida 32542 ABSTRACT Gas chromatographic and enzymatic analyses (cholinesterase-inhibition method) were used to monitor the metabolism of the organophosphorus insecticide 0,0diethyl S-[(ethylthio)methyl] phosphorodithioate (phorate) applied foliarly to three economically important plants (Homestead tomato, Wiley sorghum, and Honey sorghum). The resulting data provided guidelines in predicting toxicity and persistence of metabolite residues for high concentrations of insecticides employed by the military. An attempt was also made to relate the metabolism of the insecticide to phytotoxic damage among and within plant species. The data indicated that no plant-variety-dependent distinction exists in the formation of toxic phorate metabolites as shown by in vitro anticholinesterase activity recorded over a four-week period. Further investigation, with the same high concentrations of phorate placed on glass plates located adjacent to treated plants, indicated the formation of toxic phorate metabolites was without the influence of biological substrates within the plants. There were no statistically significant differences with respect to the rate of increase of cholinesterase-inhibition percentage values between the sorghum and glass plates; the rate of formation of anticholinesterase oxidized metabolites was predominantly through chemical oxidation on the leaf surface and not by plant enzyme catalysis, or at least, the oxidation occurred at such a rate as to mask the enzyme catalysis. The large droplet size in the application of phorate resulted in higher toxic residue values, especially on the surface of the plant, than would normally be expected^ DD FORM 1 NOV 65 1473 UNCLASSIFIED Security Classification �UNCLASSIFIED Security Classification 1 14. K EY LINK A LINKS LINK' C WORDS ROLE WT ROLE WT Phorate 0,0-diethyl S-[(ethylthio)methyl] phosphorodithioate Organophosphorus Insecticides Plants Insecticide Residues Insecticide Metabolism UNCLASSIFIED Security Classification ROL E W T � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange Description An account of the resource <p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;">The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.</p> <p>For more about this collection, <a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a">view the Agent Orange Exhibit.</a></p> Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Box The box containing the original item. 016 Folder The folder containing the original item. 0172 Series The series number of the original item. Series II Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Kotchmar, George S., Jr. Billy C. Wolverton Elizabeth E. Boothe Sandra M. Lefstad Description An account of the resource <strong>Corporate Author: </strong>Flame, Incendiary, and Explosives Division, Air Force Armament Laboratory, Eglin AFB, Florida Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1971-02-01 Title A name given to the resource The Metabolism of High Concentrations of the Organophosphorus Insecticide Phorate Applied Foliarly to Selected Plant Species Subject The topic of the resource pesticide testing pesticide toxicology