<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=39&amp;advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&amp;advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Taylor%2C+Gale+D.&amp;output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-09-08T22:25:50+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>1</pageNumber>
      <perPage>15</perPage>
      <totalResults>2</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="5407" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1998">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/23110566ae333eafeb62529c76749ab3.pdf</src>
        <authentication>5d24e730862d31611905c768aab6833c</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63947">
                    <text>ItemDNumber

04244

Author

D

Taylor, Gale D.

USAF Environmental Health Laboratory

RepOrt/ArtlOlB TitlB Typescript: Description of the Proposed Ocean
Dumping Site: Herbicide Orange

Journal/Book Title
Year

°000

Month/Day
Color

D

Number of Images

39

DOSCrlptOll NOtBS

There are three versions of the report. Handwritten
corrections

Wednesday, January 16, 2002

Page 4244 of 4258

�DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED
OCEAN DUMPING SITE: HERBICIDE ORANGE

Presented by:
•Gale D. Taylor, Lt Col, USAF, VC

Chief, Veterinary Ecology/Toxicology Division
USAF Environmental Health,Laboratory
Kelly AFB, TX 78241

�TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION

''

I.

INTRODUCTION

II.

•

•

,

PAGE
,

THE OCEAN ENVIRONMENT

1 .

A.- General

....

.'

• B. Ocean Food Chains
III.

3

A. Location
B. Physical Features

3
..... 3
3
4

1. pH
2. Dissolved Oxygen

Sal inity
Light
Temperature
Wind and Water Currents..."

1. Biomass and Primary Productivity
2. Benthos Abundance

3. Commercial Fishing
SUMMARY...
REFERENCES

,

5
5
6
7
7

C. Biological Features.

IV.

,.:. 1
2

DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DISPOSAL SITE..

3.
4.
5.
6.

1

\

7
-......,. 8

8
10

.'

11

�PROPOSED OCEAN DUMPING SITE
I.

INTRODUCTION

A. Using presently available knowledge of ocean characteristics
and eco.systems, it is possible to develop criteria for acceptable ocean
disposal sites and examine specific locations to determine their
suitability for this use. This presentation lists site criteria and
.describes the area designated for incineration of herb.icide Orange.
B. Pequegnat , in his testimony to EPA concerning the ocean dumping
of incineration waste in the Gulf of Mexico, stated that the general
advantages of offshelf disposal of industrial wastes are:

1) the presence

of great volumes of water, 2) relatively simple water and air currents,
3) Tittle stratification of the water column, and 4) relatively little
productivity in the.area. The area chosen for disposal should possess all
these characteristics. This position statement will show that the area
designated for the disposal of incinerated herbicide Orange is acceptable
in all aspects.
II.

THE OCEAN ENVIRONMENT
A. General

The open ocean provides the best medium for the disposal of
incinerated organic waste. It is one of the least productive areas of the

�world.10 It has the capacity to absorb, without deleterious effects, large
amounts of degradable and inorganic wastes.

What small effect occurs at

the •time of incineration is transient due to internal recovery of .the ecosystem
of the particular area and by immigration from adjacent areas.
Not all marine environments are unproductive.. Estuarine and
inshore waters, unlike the open ocean, are quite productive.

These

ecosystems may double the total production (in biomass) of terrestrial
agriculture under irrigation and produce up to 30 times more than the open
ocean such as the proposed disposal site. Estuaries and inshore waters
have the attributes of lower salinity a.nd higher nutrients due to the
inflow of fresh water and also have the advantage of shallower depths.
Disposal of materials far from land produces the least environmental impact simply because it is being put immediately into an unproductive ecosystem where it can then degrade.

When materials are disposed

of on land, eventually they may move through the hydrologic system to
rivers, estuaries, and inshore waters where severe environmental impact
may be exerted before degradation can take place. Also bioaccumulation
of toxic or hazardous materials could occur with still further adverse
implications.
With the exception of a total recycling system, incineration
in the unproductive open ocean is the most environmentally safe alternative
of waste disposal known.
B. Ocean Food Chains

The primary producers are photosynthetic plankton.
organisms assimilate inorganic materials into organic matter.

These
They consist

�mostly of microscop'ic diatoms and dinoflagellates although in some areas
green and brown algae may predominate. These organisms are found in.the
euphotic zone, which in some instances may extend down to 1000 meters, but
the bulk of the production is in the upper 100 meters.
Crustaceans and protozoa graze upon the phytoplankton, and they
in turn are fed upon by carnivores such as fish. The food chain for
-carnivores is a long, complex and intermingled web.
Below the euphotic zone nearly all the pelagic animals are
predators.

The benthic organisms are scavengers or decomposers feeding on

detritus falling from the zones above them.
III.

DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DISPOSAL SITE

A. Location
The disposal site is,located between 15° 45' to 17° 45' N latitude
and 171° 30' to 172° 30' W longitude. It comprises approximately 911-7 sq
miles. The reported mean depth is between 4937 and 5486 meters with a minimum
depth of 3575 meters an.d a maximum of 5568 meters. It is located approximately
120 miles SW of Johnston Island and 1200 statute miles SW of the Hawaiian
Islands. The area is generally regarded as being one of the least productive
areas in the Pacific Ocean.^» 5 Very little specific data is available for
this particular area but several areas in the Pacific Ocean have been
studied and data can be taken from these studies.
B.

Physical Features

1. pH

. "

High pH in the receiving medium is necessary for adequate
chemical dissolution of the pyrolysis products of incineration. Among these

�products is HC1 which would tend to lower the pH of the receiving water.
Ocean water has.a strong carbonate buffer system along with borate. and silicon
systems. The diffusion of C02 into the upper ocean levels ^and biological
activity at that level give the ocean an alkaline pH strongly resistant to
change. In the Pacific Ocean, the pH profile shows a distinct inflection.
A pH maximum of 8.2 - 8.3 in the first 100 m can be attributed to C02
diffusion.and biological activity. The pH minimum of 7.5 - 7.7 occurs
at 200 - 1200 m and is associated with the minimum oxygen profile and is
attributed to biochemical processes.7 Specific values for surface pH. in
the'area 10° to '20° N and 170° to 180° W range from 7.9 - 8.'3 with the
reading nearest the disposal area being.8.2.
2. Dissolved Oxygen
Dissolved oxygen is, an important factor in oxidizing pyrolysis
products. The presence of-oxygen in sea water is due to contact of the
water with the atmosphere at the sea-air interface and to the metabolism
of photos'ynthetic organisms. The oxygen concentration present at any given
time is the result of a series of biological and physical factors. The
diffusion of oxygen into sea water is dependent on the partial pressure of
the gas in the atmosphere, the concentration gradient in the surface layer,
the atmospheric pressure, temperature and salinity. In most instances there
is a maximum oxygen concentration in the euphotic zone due to diffusion and
photosynthesis, but there is a steady decline.until an oxygen minimum is
reached.7
The vertical distribution of oxygen in the sea can be '
summarized as follows: 1) A well mixed layer in equilibrium with the

�atmosphere and uniform in oxygen content extending to the thermocline, 2)
at lower depths, reactions with organic matter causes a variable decrease
in oxygen concomitant'with increasing depths, the minimum concentration
being found between 700 and 1000 meters, and 3) lower depths may have the
same or higher oxygen content due to sinking colder water originating from
higher latitudes. 8
3. Salinity
The mean surface salinity for the proposed disposal site i-s
34.75 parts per thousand with negligible variation over the course of a
year. This value is not significantly different from average open ocean
salinity taken from other parts of the world.'
4. Light '
Light penetration in the ocean has a great effect on the
vertical position of plankton. The depth of the euphotic zone, in which
the majority of phytoplankton is found, depends primarily on the total
amount of light received and the transparency of the water.

In tropical

regions with high average surface illumination, the vertical distribution
of phytoplankton may extend to depths of about 100 meters.
Diel rhythmic vertical' migration of plankton is also associated
with fluctuations in Light. It is believed that this phenomenon is, caused
by animals 'moving to'a zone of optimum light intensity. This causes an
aggregation within certain strata.

The phases of migration are described

as movement toward the surface in the evening, departure from the surface
at or about midnight, return to the surface near dawn, and a sharp .return
to normal daytime depth as the sunlight begins to penetrate the water. It
is estimated that 3/4 of the zooplankton exhibit diel migration rhythms.8

�In general, pelagic fish follow a diel rhythm in respect
to vertical distribution. During daylight hours they tend to be dee.per
and at night approach the surface to feed. However, due to the low standing
biomass and the generally recognized low productivity, these diel rhythms
are inconsequential as related to significant rhythmic increases of biomass
in the mixing zone.
5.

Temperature
The average surface temperature of the tropical Pacific Ocean
i

between 10° and 20° N latitude is 26.4°C (79.5°F) with an annual range of
about 3°C (difference between temperature recorded in February and August).7
The mean yearly temperature of the surface water in the disposal area is ' •
26.9° (80.4°F) with a,minimum mean of 24.8° (76.6°F) and a maximum mean of
29.0°C (84.2°F). The vertical temperature distribution in the upper layers
consists of an isothermal layer (identical temperatures at different depths),
the thermocline (a layer with maximum decrease per unit depth)., and a thick
lower layer with slowly decreasing temperatures.

The thermocline is formed by

thermal energy received by the surface layer which decreases the-water 'density
thus producing a vertical stratification of progressively increasing stability.
The resulting thermocline restricts vertical heat and water exchange. A
strong thermocline -also inhibits physicochemicaT and biological vertical
exchanges thus greatly affecting both the hydrographical and ecological
'dynamics within the area Concerned. The tropical sea has a steep thermocline which has considerable influence on both vertical exchange and animal
distribution. 8 The thermocline in the proposed disposal area is located at
a depth of about 250-350 feet.1

�Vertical'distribution of marine invertebrates may be affected
by tempera.ture in three ways: 1) Exclusion from water depths with unsuitable
temperature, 2) migration to suitable thermal levels within the vertical
gradient, or 3) passive transport. Accumulation or dissipation due to
hydrographical conditions is vitally important in the vertical distribution
of passively floating pianktonic forms. Many of these individuals would be
lost from the euphotic zone,, thus removed from the reproducing population
except that they are returned to the lighted zone by upward moving water.
At the thermocline these downward movements are sufficiently retarded to '
allow accumulation. Vertical temperature gradients are more pronounced
in the lower latitudes than at the higher latitudes, consequently, vertical
distribution is influenced more by temperature in the tropical and temperate
regions than in polar regions.^
6. Wind and Water Currents
Wind and water currents are favorable in view of mixing and
keeping materials away from land masses.

The proposed disposal area lies

in the westward moving equatorial currents and vthe prevailing winds are
from the east. The nearest land mass, the Marshall Islands, is more than
1200 miles downwind.^
There are no reported upwellings in the area to bring
nutrients to the surface nor does the wake of Johnston Island influence
nutrient levels.5'6,
C. Biological Features
1. Biomass and Primary Productivity
Standing biomass in the proposed disposal area is extremely
low. Secchi disk readings for this area are among the highest recorded in

�A

the Pacific Ocean.

The high Secchi disk readings indicate^extremely clear

water with a sparse population of plankton.

%

No measurement of primary productivity is available from the
proposed disposal area but it is generally regarded as low. The reasons
are the low nutrient levels in the area, low standing biomass, and relatively
low fishing activity..

'

.

2. Benthos Abundance
No data is available for this particular .portion of the
ocean;.however, studies in the Gulf of Mexico estimated the total benthic'
macrofauna biomass, exclusive of fish, to be 0.2 gm/sq meter.11
Some of the organisms reported present on the Pacific Ocean
floor were starfishes, sea cucumbers, sea urchins, echinoderms and brittle
stars. In deeper areas .sponges, barnacles, sea Tillies and sea squirts
were found along with crabs, prawns, isopods and sea spiders. 1
3.

Commercial Fishing

•

The proposed disposal site will have very little 'impact on
commercial fishing. Commercial fishermen from the Republic of Korea, Taiwan',
Japan and Samoa are the ones wh,o frequent this area most with Japanese
fishing vessels comprising the majority of vessels in the area;

Table 1

shows the catch of commercial species of fish in the area 10° 00' to 20° 00'
N latitude and 170° 00' to 180° 00' W longitude as compared to the catch for
the entire Pacific Ocean in 1971 and 1972.3 The northern half of this area
(15° 00' - 20°. 00' 'N latitude), which includes the disposal area, is reported
to be less productive than the southern half.9

�TABLE 1
FISH

•

Report of Japanese long line tuna catch in the Pacific Ocean
in .1971 and 19723.- Figures are given in number of fish caught.
197T
10°QO' to 20°00' N Lat
170°00' to 180°00' W long

1 ,601
24,508
6,886
391

. Albocore Tuna
Bigeye Tuna
• YelTowfin Tuna
Broad-bill Swordfish
. Striped Marl in
Blue Marl in
Black Marl in
Sailfish/Spearfish
Skipjack Tuna

869,000'
1,272,000
1,292,000
175,000
394,000
102,000
19,000
'195,000
59,000

1,383
.2,643
72
682
473

1971
Total of 1,313 sets (1 set = min of 1 ship/day)
Total of 2,733, 925 hooks (2,000 + hooks/set)

1972
Total of 451 sets
Total of 986s 625 hooks

--

1972
-1971
Pacific • 10°00' to 20°00' N Lat
Total • 170°00' tO:180°oo' W Long

— -.

'1,386
8,919
2,579
172
398
1,602
15
451
151

1972

Pacific
Total
788,000 '
1,657,000
1,545,000
170,000
262,000
125,000 '
17,000
189,000
52,000

�IV.

SUMMARY

-

•

.

In view of the facts about the proposed disposal site contained in
this report—sparse productivity, low standing biomass, acceptable physical
and chemical characteristics of the receiving waters, remoteness of the
location, favorable wind and water currents, and relatively little commercial
fishing activity; the proposed site possesses all the characteristics described in the introduction as criteria for an acceptable ocean disposal
site. It is recognized that the addition of any foreign material into a
small portion of a tropical ocean ecosystem may have some effect; however,
this effect will be transient, minimal and inconsequential as it- relates
to that ecosystem as a whole.

�REFERENCES

1. Anon. United States Department of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries
Service, Environmental Impact Statement, Deep Seabed Mining 0 - 25° N
Lat, 110 - 155° W Long.
2. Anon. 1974. 'Disposition of'Orange Herbicide by Incineratiori. USAF
Final Environmental Statement.
3. Anon. 1972. Annual Report of Effort and Catch by Area on Japanese
Longline Fishery, 1972. Research and Development Dept., Fisheries
Agency of Japan.
•
.
4. Anders, F. S. 1975, National Marine Fisheries Service, Terminal
Island CA. (Personal communication).
5.. Barkle.y, R. A. 1975. National Marine Fisheries Service, Honolulu HI.
(Personal communication).
:
6. Barkley, R. A. 1972. Johnston Atoll's Wake. J. Marine Res. 30, 201-216.
7. Home,. R. A. 1969. Marine Chemistry. John Wiley and Sons. New York,
568 pp.
8. Kinne, 0. 1970. Marine Ecology. John Wiley and Sons. New York, 681 pp.
9. Klawe,. Dr. 1975. Inter-American Tropical Tuna Corporation, La Jolla CA.
(Personal communication).
10. Odum, E. P. 1971. Fundamentals of Ecoloy. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.
11. Pequegnat, W. E. 1974. Concerning Disposal of Incineration Wastes,
Western Gulf of Mexico. &lt; Statement to EPA Public Hearing, Houston TX,
4 October 1974.

�u.-«•"

DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED
OCEAN DUMPING SITE: HERBICIDE ORANGE

C

»J«

"1 « f » H *

,

TX

�TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
I.

PAGE

INTRODUCTION ..................................................... 1

II . THE OCEAN ENVIRONMENT ............................................ 1
A. General......................................................1
B. Ocean Food Chains ............................................ 2
III.

DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DISPOSAL SITE ............................ 3

A. Location.....................................................3
B. Physical Features ............................................ 3
1 .2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

pH
.......................................................
3
Dissolved Oxygen.........................................4
Salinity.................................................5
Light....................................................5
Temperature..............................................6
Wind and Water Currents..................................7

C. Biological Features
1. Biomass and Primary Productivity ......................... 7
2 . Benthos Abundance........................................8
3. Commercial Fishing.......................................8
IV .

SUMMARY..........................................................10
REFERENCES

.......................................................

11

�PROPOSED OCEAN DUMPING SITE
INTRODUCTION,,^ - -"
K: The USAE^ha-s-been- tasted^wlth disposing of approximate]
V """"-'"
„-••--""
^^
mi 11 ion gallons of herbicide Orange. The method of disjy&gt;s€T must meet with
all applicabp&lt;{aws, regulatixms-and-pol-ic-ii
B.

The USAF has cwicluded thpfwe method of disposal which is the
7^%^*^

most effective and which wJJLXnaVa^the least environmental impact is incineration of herbicide(P#range at sea. TheHncineration will be accomplished

u^

:~^

on board a shj^^specifical-Ty-designed™for inciner^t^n of^waste materials.2
The prpvposed dispoisa-V-srtteT as designated by EPA, is IS^W^to 17° 45' N
ntuctTand 171° 30' to 172° 30' W longitude.

Pequegnatu, in his testimony to EPA concerning the ocean dumping
of incineration waste in the Gulf of Mexico, stated that the general
advantages of offshelf disposal of industrial wastes are: 1) the presence
of great volumes of water, 2) relatively simple water and air currents,
3) little stratification of the water column, and 4) relatively little
productivity in the area. The area chosen for disposal should possess all
these characteristics.

This position statement will show that the area

designated for the disposal of incinerated herbicide Orange is acceptable
in all aspects.
II.

THE OCEAN ENVIRONMENT
A. General
The open ocean provides the best medium for the disposal of

incinerated organic waste. It is one of the least productive areas of the

�world.10 It has the capacity to absorb, without deleterious effects, large
*/&amp;**•*

(&gt;

^MS^

amounts of degradable and inorganic wastes. What small da-merge \z dotre at
the time of dtmtpwg is transient due to internal recovery of the ecosystem
of the particular area and by immigration from adjacent areas.
Not all marine environments are unproductive. Estuarine and
inshore waters, unlike the open ocean, are quite productive. These
ecosystems may double the total production (in biomass) of terrestrial
agriculture under irrigation and produce up to 30 times more than the open
ocean such as the proposed disposal site. Estuaries and inshore waters
have the attributes of lower salinity and higher nutrients due to the
inflow of fresh water and also have the advantage of shallower depths.11
Disposal of materials far from land produces the least environmental impact simply because it is being put immediately into an unproductive ecosystem where it can then degrade. When materials are disposed
of on land, eventually they may move through the hydrologic system to
rivers, estuaries, and inshore waters where severe environmental impact
may be exerted before degradation can take place. Also bioaccumulation
of toxic or hazardous materials could occur with still further adverse
implications.
With the exception of a total recycling system, incineration
in the unproductive open ocean is the most environmentally safe alternative
of waste disposal known.
B. Ocean Food Chains
The primary producers are photosynthetic plankton. These
organisms assimilate inorganic materials into organic matter. They consist

�mostly of microscopic diatoms and dinoflagellates although in some areas
green and brown algae may predominate. These organisms are found in the
euphotic zone, which in some instances may extend down to 1000 meters, but
the bulk of the production is in the upper 100 meters.
Crustaceans and protozoa graze upon the phytoplankton, and they
in turn are fed upon by carnivores such as fish. The food chain for
carnivores is a long, complex and intermingled web.
Below the euphotic zone nearly all the pelagic animals are
predators.

The benthic organisms are scavengers or decomposers feeding on

detritus falling from the zones above them.1
III.

DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DISPOSAL SITE

A. Location
The disposal site is located between 15° 45' to 17° 45' N latitude
and 171° 30' to 172° 30' W longitude. It comprises approximately 9117 sq
miles. The reported mean depth is between 4937 and 5486 meters with a minimum
depth of 3575 meters and a maximum of 5568 meters. It is located approximately
I Q y 0 ^s^tAAAtAJt-

120 miles SW of Johnston Island and-W98-miles SW of the Hawaiian Islands.
The area is generally regarded as being one of the least productive areas
in the Pacific Ocean.4'5 Very little specific data is available for this
particular area but several areas in the Pacific Ocean have been studied
and data can be taken from these studies.
B. Physical Features
1. pH

High pH in the receiving medium is necessary for adequate
chemical dissolution of the pyrolysis products of incineration. Among these

�products is HC1 which would tend to lower the pH of the receiving water.
Ocean water has a strong carbonate buffer system along with borate and silicon
systems. The diffusion of CC^ into the upper ocean levels and biological
activity at that level give the ocean an alkaline pH strongly resistant to
change. In the Pacific Ocean, the pH profile shows a distinct inflection.
A pH maximum of 8.2 - 8.3 in the first 100 m can be attributed to ( 2
#
diffusion and biological activity. The pH minimum of 7.5 - 7.7 occurs
at 200 - 1200 m and is associated with the minimum oxygen profile and is
attributed to biochemical processes.7 Specific values for surface pH in
the area 10° to 20° N and 170° to 180° W range from 7.9 - 8.3 with the
reading nearest the disposal area being 8.2.
2. Dissolved Oxygen
Dissolved oxygen is an important factor in oxidizing pyrolysis
products. The presence of oxygen in sea water is due to contact of the
water with the atmosphere at the sea-air interface and to the metabolism
of photosynthetic organisms. The oxygen concentration present at any given
time is the result of a series of biological and physical factors. The
diffusion of oxygen into sea water is dependent on the partial pressure of
the gas in the atmosphere, the concentration gradient in the surface layer,
the atmospheric pressure, temperature and salinity. In most instances there
is a maximum oxygen concentration in the euphotic zone due to diffusion and
photosynthesis, but there is a steady decline until an oxygen minimum is
reached.7
The vertical distribution of oxygen in the sea can be
summarized as follows: 1) A well mixed layer in equilibrium with the

�atmosphere and uniform in oxygen content extending to the thermocline, 2)
at lower depths, reactions with organic matter causes a variable decrease
in oxygen concomitant with increasing depths, the minimum concentration
being found between 700 and 1000 meters, and 3) lower depths may have the
same or higher oxygen content due to sinking colder water originating from
higher latitudes.8
3. Salinity
The mean surface salinity for the proposed disposal site is
34.75 parts per thousand with negligible variation over the course of a
year. This value is not significantly different from average open ocean
salinity taken from other parts of the world.
4. Light
Light penetration in the ocean has a great effect on the
vertical position of plankton. The depth of the euphotic zone, in which
the majority of phytoplankton is found, depends primarily on the total
amount of light received and the transparency of the water. In tropical
regions with high average surface illumination, the vertical distribution
of phytoplankton may extend to depths of about 100 meters.
Diel rhythmic vertical migration of plankton is also associated
with fluctuations in light. It is believed that this phenomenon is caused
by animals moving to a zone of optimum light intensity. This causes an
aggregation within certain strata. The phases of migration are described
as movement toward the surface in the evening, departure from the surface
at or about midnight, return to the surface near dawn, and a sharp return
to normal daytime depth as the sunlight begins to penetrate the water. It
is estimated that 3/4 of the zooplankton exhibit die! migration rhythms.8

�In general, pelagic fish follow a die! rhythm in respect
to vertical distribution. During daylight hours they tend to be deeper
and at night approach the surface to feed. However, due to the low standing
biomass and the generally recognized low productivity, these die! rhythms
are inconsequential as related to significant rhythmic increases of biomass
in the mixing zone.
5.

Temperature
The average surface temperature of the tropical Pacific Ocean

between 10° and 20° N latitude is 26.4°C (79.5°F) with an annual range of
about 3°C (difference between temperature recorded in February and August).7
The mean yearly temperature of the surface water in the disposal area is
26.9° (80.4°F) with a minimum mean of 24.8° (76.6°F) and a maximum mean of
29.0°C (84.2°F). The vertical temperature distribution in the upper layers
consists of an isothermal layer (identical temperatures at different depths),
the thermocline (a layer with maximum decrease per unit depth), and a thick
lower layer with slowly decreasing temperatures. The thermocline is formed by
thermal energy received by the surface layer which decreases the water density
thus producing a vertical stratification of progressively increasing stability.
The resulting thermocline restricts vertical heat and water exchange. A
strong thermocline also inhibits physicochemical and biological vertical
exchanges thus greatly affecting both the hydrographical and ecological
dynamics within the area concerned. The tropical sea has a steep thermocline which has considerable influence on both vertical exchange and animal
distribution.8 The thermocline in the proposed disposal area is located at
a depth of about 250-350 feet.1

�Vertical distribution of marine invertebrates may be affected
by temperature in three ways: 1) Exclusion from water depths with unsuitable
temperature, 2) migration to suitable thermal levels within the vertical
gradient, or 3) passive transport.

Accumulation or dissipation due to

hydrographical conditions is vitally important in the vertical distribution
of passively floating planktonic forms. Many of these individuals would be
lost from the euphotic zone, thus removed from the reproducing population
except that they are returned to the lighted zone by upward moving water.
At the thermocline these downward movements are sufficiently retarded to
allow accumulation. Vertical temperature gradients are more pronounced
in the lower latitudes than at the higher latitudes, consequently, vertical
distribution is influenced more by temperature in the tropical and temperate
regions than in polar regions.8
6. Wind and Water Currents
Wind and water currents are favorable in view of mixing and
keeping materials away from land masses. The proposed disposal area lies
in the westward moving equatorial currents and the prevailing winds are
from the east. The nearest land mass, the Marshall Islands, is more than
/ap
i»a
miles downwi nd.ai )4 dowrruur ranW1"*"2"
There are no reported upwellings in the area to bring
nutrients to the surface nor does the wake of Johnston Island influence
nutrient levels.5&gt;6
C. Biological Features
1. Biomass and Primary Productivity
Standing biomass in the proposed disposal area is extremely
low. Secchi disk readings for this area are among the highest recorded in

�the Pacific Ocean. 5 The high Secchi disk readings indicate extremely clear
water with a sparse population of plankton.
No measurement of primary productivity is available from the
proposed disposal area but it is generally regarded as low. The reasons
are the low nutrient levels in the area, low standing biomass, and relatively
low fishing activity.
2. Benthos Abundance
No data is available for this particular portion of the
ocean; however, studies in the Gulf of Mexico estimated the total benthic
macrofauna biomass, exclusive of fish, to be 0.2 gm/sq meter.11
Some of the organisms reported present on the Pacific Ocean
floor were starfishes, sea cucumbers, sea urchins, echinoderms and brittle
stars. In deeper areas sponges, barnacles, sea Tillies and sea squirts
were found along with crabs, prawns, isopods and sea spiders.1
3. Commercial Fishing
The proposed disposal site will have very little impact on
commercial fishing. Commercial fishermen from the Republic of Korea, Taiwan,
Japan and Samoa are the ones who frequent this area most with Japanese
fishing vessels comprising the majority of vessels in the area. Table 1
shows the catch of commercial species of fish in the area 10° 00' to 20° 00'
N latitude and 170° 00' to 180° 00' W longitude as compared to the catch for
the entire Pacific Ocean in 1971 and 1972.3 The northern half of this area
(15° 00' - 20° 00' N latitude), which includes the disposal area, is reported
to be less productive than the southern half.9

�TABLE 1
FISH

Albocore Tuna
• Bigeye Tuna
Yellowfin Tuna
Broad-bill Swordfish
Striped Marl in
Blue Marl in
Black Marl in
Sailfish/Spearfish
Skipjack Tuna

Report of Japanese long line tuna catch in the. Pacific Ocean
in .1971 and 19723. Figures are given in number of fish caught.

1972
1971
.1971
Pacific • 10°00' to 20°00' N Lat
10°00' to 20°00' N Lat
170°00' to 180°00J W long' Total
170°00' to 180°oo' W-Long
.

869,000'
1,272,000
1,292,000
175,000
394,000
.102,000
19,000
195,000
59,000

1,601
24,508
6,886
391
1,383
.2,643
72
682
473

1971

Total of 1,313 sets (1 set = min of 1 ship/day)

Total of 2,733, 925 hooks (2,000 + hooks/set)
1972
Total of 451 sets
—
Total of 986, 625 hooks
--- ••&lt;

•-

1,386.
8,919
2,579
172
398
' 1,602
15
451
151

1972
Pacific
Total
788,000
1,657,000
1,545,000
170,000
262,000
125,000
17,000
189,000
52,000

�IV.

SUMMARY

In view of the facts about the proposed disposal site contained in
this report—sparse productivity, low standing biomass, acceptable physical
and chemical characteristics of the receiving waters, remoteness of the
location, favorable wind and water currents, and relatively little commercial
fishing activity; the proposed site possesses all the characteristics described in the introduction as criteria for an acceptable ocean disposal
site. It is recognized that the addition of any foreign material into a
small portion of a tropical ocean ecosystem may have some effect; however,
this effect will be transient, minimal and inconsequential as it relates
to that ecosystem as a whole.

�REFERENCES

1. Anon. United States Department of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries
Service, Environmental Impact Statement, Deep Seabed Mining 0 - 25° N
Lat, 110 - 155° W Long.
2. Anon. 1974. Disposition of Orange Herbicide by Incineration. USAF
Final Environmental Statement.
3. Anon. 1972. Annual Report of Effort and Catch by Area on Japanese
Longline Fishery, 1972. Research and Development Dept., Fisheries
Agency of Japan.
4. Anders, F. S. 1975. National Marine Fisheries Service, Terminal
Island CA. (Personal communication).
5. Barkley, R. A. 1975. National Marine Fisheries Service, Honolulu HI.
(Personal communication).
6. Barkley, R. A. 1972. Johnston Atoll's Wake. J. Marine Res. 30, 201-216.
7. Home, R. A. 1969. Marine Chemistry. John Wiley and Sons. New York,
568 pp.
8. Kinne, 0. 1970. Marine Ecology. John Wiley and Sons. New York, 681 pp.
9. Klawe, Dr. 1975. Inter-American Tropical Tuna Corporation, La Jolla CA.
(Personal communication).
10. Odutn, E. P. 1971. Fundamentals of Ecoloy. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.
11. Pequegnat, W. E. 1974. Concerning Disposal of Incineration Wastes,
Western Gulf of Mexico. Statement to EPA Public Hearing, Houston TX,
4 October 1974.

�TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION

PAGE

I.

INTRODUCTION ..................................................... 1

II .

THE OCEAN ENVIRONMENT ............................................ 1

A. General ...................................................... 1
B. Ocean Food Chains ............................................ 2
III. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DISPOSAL SITE ............................ 3

A. Location.....................................................3
B. Physical Features............................................3
1. pH.......................................................3

2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

Dissolved Oxygen ........................................ .. 4
Salinity........................................... ...... 5
Light....................................................5
Temperature..............................................6
Wind and Water Currents .................................. -7

C. Biological Features
1 . Biomass and Primary Productivity.........................7
2. Benthos Abundance........................................8
3. Commercial Fishing.......................................8
IV . SUMMARY..........................................................10
REFERENCES

.......................................................

11

�PROPOSED OCEAN DUMPING SITE

I

INTRODUCTION
A. The USAF has been tasked with disposing of approximately 2.3

million gallons of herbicide Orange. The method of disposal must meet with
all applicable laws, regulations and policies.
B. The USAF has concluded that the method of disposal which is the
most effective and which will have the least environmental impact is incineration of herbicide Orange at sea. The incineration will be accomplished
on board a ship specifically designed for incineration of waste materials.2
The proposed disposal site, as designated by EPA, is 15° 45' to 17° 45' N
latitude and 171° 30' to 172° 30' W longitude.
C. Pequegnat11, in his testimony to EPA concerning the ocean dumping
of incineration waste in the Gulf of Mexico, stated that the general
advantages of offshelf disposal of industrial wastes are:

1) the presence

of great volumes of water, 2) relatively simple water and air currents,
3) little stratification of the water column, and 4) relatively little
productivity in the area. The area chosen for disposal should possess all
these characteristics.

This position statement will show that the area

designated for the disposal of incinerated herbicide Orange is acceptable
in all aspects.
II.

THE OCEAN ENVIRONMENT
A. General

The open ocean provides the best medium for the disposal of
incinerated organic waste. It is one of the least productive areas of the

�world.10 It has the capacity to absorb, without deleterious effects, large
amounts of degradable and inorganic wastes. What small damage is done at
the time of dumping is transient due to internal recovery of the ecosystem
of the particular area and by immigration from adjacent areas.
Not all marine environments are unproductive. Estuarine and
I
inshore waters, unlike the open ocean, are quite productive. These
j
ecosystems may double the tptal production (in biomass) of terrestrial
agriculture under irrigation and produce up to 30 times more than the open
ocean such as the proposed disposal site. Estuaries and inshore waters
have the attributes of lowef salinity and higher nutrients due to the
inflow of fresh water and a)so have the advantage of shallower depths.11

.
Disposal of materials far from land produces the least environmental impact simply becaus^ it is being put immediately into an unproductive ecosystem where it ^an then degrade. When materials are disposed
of on land, eventually they may move through the hydrologic system to
rivers, estuaries, and inshore waters where severe environmental impact
may be exerted before degradation can take place. Also bioaccumulation
of toxic or hazardous materials could occur with still further adverse
implications.
With the exception of a total recycling system, incineration
in the unproductive open ocean is the most environmentally safe alternative
of waste disposal known.
B. Ocean Food Chains
The primary producers are photosynthetic plankton. These
organisms assimilate inorganic materials into organic matter. They consist

�mostly of microscopic diatoms and dinoflagellates although in some areas
green and brown algae may predominate. These organisms are found in the
euphotic zone, which in some instances may extend down to 1000 meters, but
the bulk of the production is in the upper 100 meters.
Crustaceans and protozoa graze upon the phytoplankton, and they
in turn are fed upon by carnivores such as fish. The food chain for
carnivores is a long, complex and intermingled web.
Below the euphotic zone nearly all the pelagic animals are
predators.

The benthic organisms are scavengers or decomposers feeding on

detritus falling from the zones above them.1
III.

DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DISPOSAL SITE

A. Location
The disposal site is located between 15° 45' to 17° 45' N latitude
and 171° 30' to 172° 30' W longitude. It comprises approximately 9117 sq
miles. The reported mean depth is between 4937 and 5486 meters with a minimum
depth of 3575 meters and a maximum of 5568 meters. It is located approximately
120 miles SW of Johnston Island and 1000 miles SW of the Hawaiian Islands.
The area is generally regarded as being one of the least productive areas
in the Pacific Ocean.4'5 Very little specific data is available for this
particular area but several areas in the Pacific Ocean have been studied
and data can be taken from these studies.
B. Physical Features
1. pH

High pH in the receiving medium is necessary for adequate
chemical dissolution of the pyrolysis products of incineration. Among these

�products is HC1 which would tend to lower the pH of the receiving water.
Ocean water has a strong carbonate buffer system along with borate and silicon
systems. The diffusion of C02 into the upper ocean levels and biological
activity at that level give the ocean an alkaline pH strongly resistant to
change. In the Pacific Ocean, the pH profile shows a distinct inflection.
A pH maximum of 8.2 - 8.3 in the first 100 m can be attributed to C02
diffusion and biological activity. The pH minimum of 7.5 - 7.7 occurs
at 200 - 1200 m and is associated with the minimum oxygen profile and is
attributed to biochemical processes.7 Specific values for surface pH in
the area 10° to 20° N and 170° to 180° W range from 7.9 - 8.3 with the
reading nearest the disposal area being 8.2.
2. Dissolved Oxygen
Dissolved oxygen is an important factor in oxidizing pyrolysis
products. The presence of oxygen in sea water is due to contact of the
water with the atmosphere at the sea-air interface and to the metabolism
of photosynthetic organisms. The oxygen concentration present at any given
time is the result of a series of biological and physical factors. The
diffusion of oxygen into sea water is dependent on the partial pressure of
the gas in the atmosphere, the concentration gradient in the surface layer,
the atmospheric pressure, temperature and salinity. In most instances there
is a maximum oxygen concentration in the euphotic zone due to diffusion and
photosynthesis, but there is a steady decline until an oxygen minimum is
reached.7
The vertical distribution of oxygen in the sea can be
summarized as follows: 1) A well mixed layer in equilibrium with the

�atmosphere and uniform in oxygen content extending to the thermocline, 2)
at lower depths, reactions with organic matter causes a variable decrease
in oxygen concomitant with increasing depths, the minimum concentration
being found between 700 and 1000 meters, and 3) lower depths may have the
same or higher oxygen content due to sinking colder water originating from
higher latitudes.8
3. Salinity
The mean surface salinity for the proposed disposal site is
34.75 parts per thousand with negligible variation over the course of a
year. This value is not significantly different from average open ocean
salinity taken from other parts of the world.
4. Light
Light penetration in the ocean has a great effect on the
vertical position of plankton. The depth of the euphotic zone, in which
the majority of phytoplankton is found, depends primarily on the total
amount of light received and the transparency of the water. In tropical
regions with high average surface illumination, the vertical distribution
of phytoplankton may extend to depths of about 100 meters.
Diel rhythmic vertical migration of plankton is also associated
with fluctuations in light. It is believed that this phenomenon is caused
by animals moving to a zone of optimum light intensity. This causes an
aggregation within certain strata. The phases of migration are described
as movement toward the surface in the evening, departure from the surface
at or about midnight, return to the surface near dawn, and a sharp return
to normal daytime depth as the sunlight begins to penetrate the water. It
is estimated that 3/4 of the zooplankton exhibit die! migration rhythms.8

�In general, pelagic fish follow a die! rhythm in respect
to vertical distribution. During daylight hours they tend to be deeper
and at night approach the surface to feed. However, due to the low standing
biomass and the generally recognized low productivity, these die! rhythms
are inconsequential as related to significant rhythmic increases of biomass
in the mixing zone.
5. Temperature
The average surface temperature of the tropical Pacific Ocean
between 10° and 20° N latitude is 26.4°C (79.5°F) with an annual range of
about 3°C (difference between temperature recorded in February and August).7
The mean yearly temperature of the surface water in the disposal area is
26.9° (80.4°F) with a minimum mean of 24.8° (76.6°F) and a maximum mean of
29.0°C (84.2°F). The vertical temperature distribution in the upper layers
consists of an isothermal layer (identical temperatures at different depths),
the thermocline (a layer with maximum decrease per unit depth), and a thick
lower layer with slowly decreasing temperatures.

The thermocline is formed by

thermal energy received by the surface layer which decreases the water density
thus producing a vertical stratification of progressively increasing stability.
The resulting thermocline restricts vertical heat and water exchange. A
strong thermocline also inhibits physicochemical and biological vertical
exchanges thus greatly affecting both the hydrographical and ecological
dynamics within the area concerned.

The tropical sea has a steep thermo-

cline which has considerable influence on both vertical exchange and animal
distribution.8 The thermocline in the proposed disposal area is located at
a depth of about 250-350 feet.1

�Vertical distribution of marine invertebrates may be affected
by temperature in three ways: 1) Exclusion from water depths with unsuitable
temperature, 2) migration to suitable thermal levels within the vertical
gradient, or 3) passive transport. Accumulation or dissipation due to
hydrographical conditions is vitally important in the vertical distribution
of passively floating planktonic forms. Many of these individuals would be
lost from the euphotic zone, thus removed from the reproducing population
except that they are returned to the lighted zone by upward moving water.
At the thermocline these downward movements are sufficiently retarded to
allow accumulation. Vertical temperature gradients are more pronounced
in the lower latitudes than at the higher latitudes, consequently, vertical
distribution is influenced more by temperature in the tropical and temperate
regions than in polar regions.8
6. Wind and Water Currents
Wind and water currents are favorable in view of mixing and
keeping materials away from land masses. The proposed disposal area lies
in the westward moving equatorial currents and the prevailing winds are
from the east. The nearest land mass, the Marshall Islands, is more than
1000 miles downwind and downcurrent.1'2
There are no reported upwellings in the area to bring
nutrients to the surface nor does the wake of Johnston Island influence
nutrient levels. 5»6
C. Biological Features
1. Biomass and Primary Productivity
Standing biomass in the proposed disposal area is extremely
low. Secchi disk readings for this area are among the highest recorded in

�the Pacific Ocean.5 The high Secchi disk readings indicate extremely clear
water with a sparse population of plankton.
No measurement of primary productivity is available from the
proposed disposal area but it is generally regarded as low. The reasons
are the low nutrient levels in the area, low standing biomass, and relatively
low fishing activity.
2. Benthos Abundance
No data is available for this particular portion of the
ocean; however, studies in the Gulf of Mexico estimated the total benthic
macrofauna biomass, exclusive of fish, to be 0.2 gm/sq meter.11
Some of the organisms reported present on the Pacific Ocean
floor were starfishes, sea cucumbers, sea urchins, echinoderms and brittle
stars. In deeper areas sponges, barnacles, sea lillies and sea squirts
were found along with crabs, prawns, isopods and sea spiders.1
3. Commercial Fishing
The proposed disposal site will have very little impact on
commercial fishing. Commercial fishermen from the Republic of Korea, Taiwan,
Japan and Samoa are the ones who frequent this area most with Japanese
fishing vessels comprising the majority of vessels in the area. Table 1
shows the catch of commercial species of fish in the area 10° 00' to 20° 00'
N latitude and 170° 00' to 180° 00' W longitude as compared to the catch for
the entire Pacific Ocean in 1971 and 1972.3 The northern half of this area
(15° 00' - 20° 00' N latitude), which includes the disposal area, is reported
to be less productive than the southern half.9

�TABLE 1

1972
1971
.1971
Pacific • 10°00« to 20°00' N Lat
10°00' to 20°00' N Lat
170°00' to 180°00' W long' Total
170°00' to 180°00' W Long

FISH

Albocore Tuna
• Bigeye Tuna
Yellowfin Tuna
Broad-bill Swordfish
Striped Marl in
Blue Marl in
Black Marl in
Sailfish/Spearfish
Skipjack Tuna
1971

Report of Japanese long line tuna catch in the Pacific Ocean
in .1971 and 19723. Figures are given in number of fish caught.

.
•

1,601
24,508
6,886
391
1,383
.2,643
72
682
473

'

Total of 1,313 sets (1 set = min of 1 ship/day)
Total of 2,733, 925 hooks (2,000 + hooks/set)

1972
Total of 451 sets . — -Total of 986, 625 hooks - = ••• --—•-

869,000'
1,272,000
1,292,000
175,000
394,000
.102,000
19,000
195,000
59,000

1,386.
8,919
2,579
172
398
' 1,602
15
451
151

1972
Pacific
Total
788,000
1,657,000
1,545,000
170,000
262,000
125,000
17,000
189,000
52,000

�IV.

SUMMARY

In view of the facts about the proposed disposal site contained in
this report—sparse productivity, low standing biomass, acceptable physical
and chemical characteristics of the receiving waters, remoteness of the
location, favorable wind and water currents, and relatively little commercial
fishing, activity; the proposed site possesses all the characteristics described in the introduction as criteria for an acceptable ocean disposal
site. It is recognized that the addition of any foreign material into a
small portion of a tropical ocean ecosystem may have some effect; however,
this effect will be transient, minimal and inconsequential as it relates
to that ecosystem as a whole.

�REFERENCES

1. Anon. United States Department of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries
Service, Environmental Impact Statement, Deep Seabed Mining 0 - 25° N
Lat, 110 - 155° W Long.
2. Anon. 1974. Disposition of Orange Herbicide by Incineration. USAF
Final Environmental Statement.
3. Anon. 1972. Annual Report of Effort and Catch by Area on Japanese
Longline Fishery, 1972. Research and Development Dept., Fisheries
Agency of Japan.
4. Anders, F. S. 1975. National Marine Fisheries Service, Terminal
Island CA. (Personal communication).
5. Barkley, R. A. 1975. National Marine Fisheries Service, Honolulu HI.
(Personal communication).
6. Barkley, R. A. 1972. Johnston Atoll's Wake. J. Marine Res. 30, 201-216.
7. Home, R. A. 1969. Marine Chemistry. John Wiley and Sons. New York,
568 pp.

8. Kinne, 0. 1970. Marine Ecology. John Wiley and Sons. New York, 681 pp.
9. Klawe, Dr. 1975. Inter-American Tropical Tuna Corporation, La Jolla CA.
(Personal communication).
10. Odum, E. P. 1971. Fundamentals of Ecoloy. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.
11. Pequegnat, W. E. 1974. Concerning Disposal of Incineration Wastes,
Western Gulf of Mexico. Statement to EPA Public Hearing, Houston TX,
4 October 1974.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="40890">
              <text>147</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="40892">
              <text>4244</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="40894">
              <text>Series VI Subseries III</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="40889">
                <text>Taylor, Gale D.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="40891">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;USAF Environmental Health Laboratory</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="40893">
                <text>Typescript: Description of the Proposed Ocean Dumping Site: Herbicide Orange</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2564" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1382">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/674eb29a8a34dfcc39b724dacc6b7981.pdf</src>
        <authentication>cbe0e71cc3544bed2bc4cf57b010783c</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63331">
                    <text>Item ID Number

01527

Author

Taylor, Gale D.

Corporate Author
Report/Article Title Memorandum: from Gale D. Taylor to all USAF OEHL
Division Chiefs, with subject Herbicide Orange,
November 14, 1979.

Journal/Book Title
Year

000

°

Month/Day
Color

n

Number of Images

2

DeSCrlptOU NotOS

Memo directs staff to send all inquires received on
Herbicide Orange to the Public Affairs office. Includes
one attachment: memorandum: from Robert G. Mclver
to all AMD Commanders and Staff Agencies, with
subject Herbicide Orange Study, June 6,1979.

Wednesday, May 23, 2001

Page 1527 of 1608

�DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
USAF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LABORATORY lAFSC)
BROOKS AIR FORCE BASE. TEXAS 78Z35

Memorandum from the Vie* Commandar

14 Nov 79

CIRCULATE
TO:

SUBJECT: Herbicide Orange
TO:

ALL USAF OEHL DIVISION CHIEFS

CHARLES E THALKEN, LtCol, USAF
Chief, Envir mmental Assessment Bror&gt;

New inquiries are coming in regarding Herbicide
Orange. The guidance provided you on 7 June 1979
(Atch 1) still pertains. All inquiries should
be referred to the Public Affairs Office.

GALE D. TAYLOR, col, USAF, vc

1 Atch

Vice Commander

HQ AMD/CC Ltr, 6 Jun 79,
W/USAF ;OEHL Ind.

�DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQU
SRS AEROSPACE MEDICAL DIVISION (AFSC)
BTOOKS AIR FORCE BASE. TEXAS
78235

REPUV TO
ATTN OP:

cc

SUBJECT:

Herbicide Orange Study

6 June 1979

'All AMD Commanders and Staff Agencies
The publicity on Herbicide Orange/"Ranch Hand" Study has left
many questions unanswered in the minds of people who may feel
they should take some action. Because of this, we have already
received several telephone calls in various offices on the base.
To ensure correct information is given, I want all these calls referred to the Information Office at 536-3235.

ROBERT G. MCIVER
Brigadier General, USAF, MC
Commander
1st Ind, USAF OEHL/CV
TO:

7 June 1979"

All USAF OEHL Division Chiefs

Please give the above letter wide dissemination to assure that all
personnel are aware of General Mclver's wishes. Effective immediately,
all calls pertaining to the Epi Division study or other human health
questions regarding Herbicide Orange will be referred to the Information
Office.

GALE D. TAYLOR, Colonel, USAF, VC
Vice Commander

*. ;

'/-" - - . /

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="18115">
              <text>057</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="18116">
              <text>1527</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="18118">
              <text>Series III Subseries III</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18114">
                <text>Taylor, Gale D.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18117">
                <text>Memorandum: from Gale D. Taylor to all USAF OEHL Division Chiefs, with subject Herbicide Orange, November 14, 1979.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18119">
                <text>Air Force Health Study</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
