<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=39&amp;advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&amp;advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=True%2C+William+R.&amp;output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-09-08T07:06:03+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>1</pageNumber>
      <perPage>15</perPage>
      <totalResults>1</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="3258" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1685">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/cbab1174662d647631846a03a4c59196.pdf</src>
        <authentication>510bf5c8921eebaac2d86b36b5e391ed</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63634">
                    <text>Item D Number

°1856

Author

True Wi||iam

Corporate Author

Veterans Administration

'

R-

Report/Article Title Stress Symptomology Among Vietnam Veterans:
Analysis of the Veterans Administration Survey of
Veterans II

Journal/Book Tltto
Year

°00°

Month/Day
Color

a

Number of hnaaos

37

DOSCdpton NOtBS

Funding from Cooperative Studies Program, Study
#256, Veterans Administration Medical Research
Service. An earlier version of this paper was presented
at the Soceity for Epidemiological Research meetings
in Pittsburgh, PA in June 1986.

Wednesday, July 11,2001

Page 1857 of 1870

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY AMONG VIETNAM VETERANS:
ANALYSIS OF THE VETERANS ADMINISTRATION
SURVEY OF VETERANS II

WILLIAM R. TRUE1, JACK GOLDBERG2, SETH A. EISEN3

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY

True et al.

2

1 Psychiatry and Research Services (151A-JB), VA Medical
Center, St. Louis, MO
2

63125.

(Reprint requests to Dr. True.)

University of Illinois, School of Public Health, and the

Cooperative Studies Coordinating Center, VA Medical Center,
Hines, IL

60141.

3 Medical and Research Services, VA Medical Center, St.
Louis, MO

63125.

Running Head:
Acronym:

STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY

PTSD = Post Traumatic Stress Disorder

Acknowledgement of Funding:

Cooperative Studies Program,

Study # 256, Veterans Administration Medical Research Service
The authors acknowledge the contribution of Dr. A. J. Singh,
Director, Statistical Policy and Research Service, office of
Information Management and Statistics, Veterans Administration,
Washington, D.C. who provided the data tape and documentation,
and consulted with the authors.

Mr. Edward Barnes, programmer at

the Cooperative Studies Coordinating Center, Veterans
Administration Medical Center, Hines, IL, and Dr. Sharon Homan,
Assistant Professor of Community Health, St. Louis University
Center for Health Services Research and Education, St. Louis MO,
provided assistance.

Dr. Joel Royalty, Murray State University,

Murray KY, developed preliminary approaches to the data.
An earlier version of this paper was presented at the
Society for Epidemiological Research meetings in Pittsburgh, PA
in June 1986.

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY

True et al.

3

ABSTRACT

True, William R. (VA Medical Center, St. Louis, MO 63125),
J. Goldberg, and s. A. Eisen. Stress symptomatology among Vietnam
veterans: Analysis of the Veterans Administration Survey of
Veterans II.
In 1979, the Veterans Administration conducted a health
survey of 11,236 veterans.

The present analysis of this data

focuses on the effects of service in Vietnam and combat on stress
symptomatology among the 1,787 Vietnam era veterans who entered
the Army, Navy, Marines, or Air Force between 1965 and 1975. In
the unadjusted analysis, both service in Vietnam and combat were
related to the prevalence of nightmares, sleep problems, troubled
memories, depression, temper control, life goal indecision, guilt
feelings and confusion.

After controlling for length of active

military service, year of discharge, branch of service, rank at
discharge, draft status, age at discharge, race, and educational
attainment at discharge, combat exposure remained strongly
associated with all eight measures of Post Traumatic Stress
Disorder symptomatology.

Because the data were collected prior

to the current controversy about the potential psychological and
physical health effects of exposure to Agent Orange, the
likelihood of response bias is reduced.

The analysis

demonstrates that combat continues to have profound effects on
veterans' psychological health years after the conclusion of
military service.
Stress disorders, post traumatic; Vietnam; Veterans

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY

True et al.

4

Controversy about the effect of war stress on the current
well-being of Vietnam veterans have been prominent in popular,
policy, and scientific literature for some years.

Since the end

of the war, there have been eight major (1-8) studies of the
psychological effects of the Vietnam experience.

Debate about

the validity of their conclusions has turned upon the relative
strength of the research designs, the importance of pre-military
risk factors, and the nature and methods of measuring war stress
experiences and post-service outcomes.
Vietnam experience research studies can be divided into two
major design categories:

those based on convenience or volunteer

samples (1-3) and those based on cross-sectional
of defined target populations
sample is the work of Wilson

(4-8).

random samples

Typical of a convenience

(3) who identified a comprehensive

set of stress symptomatology markers which he related to Vietnam
service and combat exposure.
consisted of a self-selected

However, Wilson's study sample
set of Vietnam era veterans seeking

help for psychological problems.

Of greater methodological

sophistication are the cross-sectional

surveys.

Robins (4) and

Card (8) both selected samples based upon chronological criteria.
Robins used Army examinations to identify servicemen with
positive drug screens who left Vietnam in September,

1971.

Control subjects were drug-free soldiers from the same group.
Card selected veterans and controls from the 1974 Project Talent
follow-up study, a national longitudinal project which in 1960
administered an extensive battery of tests to a randomly selected

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY

True et al.

cohort of 375,000 9th and 12th graders (9).

5

The Egendorf study

(7) used an unusual "snowball" sampling technique in which a contacted household without a qualifying subject referred the study
personnel to veterans in the extended kin network (cousins,
nephews, etc.) who met study criteria.

The Harris (6) survey

used its national panel to identify a sample of Vietnam era
veterans.

While differing dramatically in scope and objectives,

each of these studies has contributed to our knowledge of the
psychological health of Vietnam era veterans.
The present study follows in the tradition of these crosssectional sample surveys of Vietnam era veterans by examining the
association between military service in Vietnam and subsequent
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptomatology in the
national Survey of Veterans II

(5).

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study population;

Survey of Veterans II

The Survey of Veterans II, performed in 1979, was designed
to collect data by self-report on men who were veterans of active
duty military service.

The Veterans Administration and the

Bureau of the Census created an interagency agreement to conduct
the survey.

The Bureau of the Census drew the sample from

households which had been recently retired from the Current
Population Survey, an ongoing random sample of households
throughout the United States.
Men in the Current Population Survey who answered that they

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY

True et al.

6

had served in the United States armed forces further responded to
a detailed personal interview lasting approximately 45 minutes.
The questionnaire covered a wide range of topics related to the
veteran's health and well-being including sources of medical
care, psychological health, pension benefits, education,
rehabilitation, loans and burial benefits.
The sample originally consisted of 11,236 men.

From this

sample, 492 persons were found to be non-veterans, six were outof-scope, and 803 were non-interviews.

Therefore, 9,929 veterans

completed interviews for a response rate of 93 per cent.
Veterans who served during the Vietnam era (August 5, 1965
through May 7, 1975)

identified themselves by their responses to

the question, "What periods did you serve on active duty in the
U. S. Armed Forces?"

The investigators identified a total of

2,458 Vietnam era veterans.

From this group, veterans whose

active military service began prior to August 5, 1965

(650 men)

or who served in the Coast Guard or National Guard (21 men), were
excluded.

Thus, the final study sample of 1,787 servicemen was

limited to veterans of the Army, Navy, Marines or Air Force who
entered service after August 4, 1965.

Measure s of mi1itary service
A variety of approaches exist for measuring the stresses of
war.

The present study used two:

1) the simple dichotomy of

service in the war zone obtained from the question:

"Were you

stationed in Vietnam, Laos, or Cambodia; in the waters in or
around these countries; or fly in missions over these areas?",

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY

True et al.

7

and 2) a multi-dimensional index of exposure to combat as
specified in the responses to a set of nine 'Yes/No1 items asked
of all veterans who served in Vietnam.

These items include the

following combat roles and experiences:

Fired on the enemy, flew

in aircraft over war area, stationed at a forward observation
post, received incoming fire, encountered mines and booby traps,
received sniper or sapper fire, ambushed by the enemy, or was
engaged in a firefight with either Vietcong, guerilla, or North
Vietnamese Army.

These items are quite similar to those used by

Egendorf (7) in the Legacies of Vietnam study.
A summary index of combat exposure was constructed from the
nine questions on combat roles and experiences.
response to an item scored one point.

Each positive

The combat exposure index

is the summation over the nine combat roles and experiences.

The

mean value of the combat exposure index is 3.43 (n=771).
Cronbach's coefficient alpha, used to provide an indication of
the internal consistency of the combat exposure index, was

0.85.

The nine-point scale was coded for analysis into the ordinal
categories: a) non-Vietnam, b) Vietnam-no combat, c) Vietnam-low
combat, d) Vietnam-medium combat, and e) Vietnam-high combat.
Other military experience variables in the Survey of
'Veterans II reflect factors which have been extensively analyzed
in the Vietnam stress literature (10).

These include mode of

entry into service (drafted or enlisted), branch of service (Air
Force, Army, Navy, and Marines), rank or grade at discharge
(officer or non-officer), length of service (coded in the

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY

True et al.

8

original questionnaire as less than two years or 2-20 years), and
year of discharge (before or after 1968).

This last point was

analyzed because of claims (11) that soldiers discharged after
the Tet offensive in 1968 suffered increased stress

reactions.

The variable length of service was more inclusive than would have
been preferred, but further categorization was impossible.
Three further demographic factors were examined in the
analysis of the Survey of Veterans II:

race (white or non-

white), years of education at discharge (less than 12 and at
least 12), and age at discharge (less than 22, 22 to 24, and 25
and older).

This grouping of age at discharge reflects the

evidence in the literature (3) that adolescents exposed to war
stress may suffer from increased PTSD symptoms.
Measures of stress symptomatology
Traumatic stress was measured with a eight-item checklist
using specific symptoms.
form:

Questions were stated in the following

"Since your LAST release from active military service,

have you had . . . a) frightening dreams or nightmares, b) sleep
problems, c) troubled memories, d) depression, e) temper control
problems, f) life goal indecision, g) guilt feelings, h)
confusion?"

The items asked for overall prevalence during the

years since discharge.

There was no probe for timing of the

symptom.
Sufficient data were not available to make a presumptive
diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.

The items included

in the Survey of Veterans II represent the symptom list which in

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY

True et al.

9

1979 was associated in the clinical literature with the
psychological consequences of combat and subsequently have been
largely incorporated as the core criteria for the Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual III (12) diagnosis of PTSD.

These include

nightmares, sleep problems, and guilt feelings.

Implied in the

PTSD diagnosis are the further items of life goal indecision,
troubled memories, confusion, depression and temper control.
Statistical analysis
The statistical analysis of the relationship

between

military service and post-traumatic stress symptomatology is done
in stages.

The first stage uses simple contingency table

analyses to examine whether service in Vietnam, and specifically
exposure to combat, is associated with increased levels of post
traumatic stress symptomatology.

Prevalence odds ratios and 95

per cent confidence intervals are calculated for each measure of
post-traumatic symptomatology.

The second stage of analysis

examines each of the eight measures of post-traumatic stress in
more detail.

in particular, logistic regression is used to

determine if the association between Vietnam service and stress
symptomatology is confounded by military service or demographic
factors.

Factor adjusted logistic odds ratios and 95 per cent

confidence intervals are presented for each of the military
service and demographic variables examined.

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY

True et al.

10

RESULTS
Post traumatic stress disorder symptoms,
Vietnam service and combat exposure
Table 1 presents the relationship between service in Vietnam
and exposure to combat with the eight symptoms of PTSD.

For each

of the eight symptoms a positive association is observed for
Vietnam service.

The most striking findings are found for

nightmares and troubled memories.

Veterans who served in Vietnam

are nearly four times more likely (f

= 3.74, 95 per cent C.I.

2.88-4.87) to have experienced nightmares compared to veterans
who did not serve in Vietnam.

Likewise, Vietnam service veterans

were three and a half times more likely to have reported troubled
memories of military service than non-Vietnam veterans.

Several

other symptoms such as sleep problems, temper control problems,
life goal indecision, and confusion are one and a half to two
times more common in Vietnam service veterans compared to
veterans who did not serve in Vietnam.

The weakest association

(though the 95 per cent C.I.'s do not include unity) with Vietnam
service is found for depression

( f = 1.47) and guilt feelings (f

• 1.39).
The prevalence of each of the eight PTSD symptoms
with increasing levels of combat intensity.

increases

The most dramatic

association with combat exposure was observed for nightmares and
troubled memories.

Veterans who were exposed to high intensity

combat were eight times more likely than veterans who did not
serve in Vietnam to report nightmares since discharge from active

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY
duty.

True et al.

11

Similarly, reports of troubled memories about experiences

in the military were more than seven and a half times more common
in high combat exposure Vietnam veterans compared to non-Vietnam
service veterans.

Odds ratios for the association of combat with

temper control problems, guilt feelings, confusion, sleep
problems, and depression all display a strong trend with combat
exposure.

A minimum of a twofold increase in the prevalence of

each symptom was found with high combat exposed veterans who were
compared to the non-Vietnam veterans.

Only for the symptom life

goal indecision does the high combat exposed group display an
odds ratio of less than two.
A closer examination of the relationship of combat with the
PTSD symptoms is revealing.

For troubled memories, the

prevalence odds ratios increase monotonically and sharply
beginning with the Vietnam service non-combat group.

An equally

steady progression in prevalence is observed for nightmares.
Several of the symptoms such as sleep problems, depression, life
goal indecision, guilt problems and confusion, show a relatively
small increase in prevalence among the Vietnam non-combat group
and Vietnam low combat group.

It is only when combat exposure

reaches the medium and high levels that the prevalence odds
ratios for these conditions rise appreciably.
PTSD symptoms - Multiple logistic regression analysis of
military service and demographic factors
Table 2 presents a multiple logistic regression analysis of
the relationship of nightmares to six military service and three

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY
demographic factors.

True et al.

12

As in the unadjusted analysis, combat

exposure remains strongly associated with the prevalence of
nightmares in Vietnam era veterans; a four unit change in combat
produces nearly an eight-fold increase in the frequency of
reported nightmares.

None of the other military service factors

are associated with the prevalence of nightmares.

Age at

discharge and race demonstrate significant associations with the
prevalence of nightmares.

Non-white veterans are nearly twice as

likely as white veterans to report troubling dreams or nightmares.

Age at discharge displays a negative association with the

frequency of nightmares; men who were discharged after the age of
25 report problems with nightmares 0.64 less often than men
discharged prior to age 22.
The relationship of the military service and demographic
factors with depression is examined in table 3.

Significant

associations are observed for combat exposure, age, race and
education at discharge from active duty.

Combat exposure is

positively related to the prevalence of depression.

Vietnam

service high combat veterans report depression more than twice as
frequently as non-Vietnam veterans.

Though not significant,

veterans who served in the Army, Navy, or Marines show a trend
toward a lower frequency of depression compared to Air Force
veterans, after the adjustment for combat exposure.

Older age at

time of discharge is associated with a diminished prevalence of
depression.

Conversely, the factor adjusted prevalence odds

ratio for race indicates that depression is increased in non-

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY
whites.

True et al.

13

Education is also related to the prevalence of

depression; veterans discharged with less than 12 years of
education are more than one and a half times more likely to
report problems with depression.
Table 4 presents the results of the logistic regression
analysis for the symptom guilt feelings.

The combat exposure

index is significantly related to the prevalence of guilt
feelings, even after adjustment for military service and
demographic variables.

Several of the military service factors

exhibit unexpected relationships with the prevalence of guilt
feelings.

Veterans released after 1968 are less likely to report

guilt feelings than veterans released prior to 1969.

Likewise,

veterans who served in the Army, Navy or Marines display a trend
toward reporting feelings of guilt about activities during
military service less often than veterans who served in the Air
Force, though this is not significant.

Each of the three

demographic factors are associated with the presence of guilt
feelings in veterans.

Age at discharge from active duty displays

an inverse association with the prevalence of guilt feelings; men
who were discharged from active duty after the age of 24 were
0.68 less likely to report guilt feelings compared to men who
were discharged prior to age 22.

Non-white veterans complain of

guilt feelings more frequently than white veterans ( f = 1.59, 95
per cent C.I. 1.11-2.28).

Veterans who had not completed high

school when they were released from active duty are one and a
half times more likely to report guilt feelings compared to

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY

True eh al.

14

veterans who had completed at least a high school education.
Factor adjusted prevalence odds ratios examining the
relationship between troubled memories and the six military
service factors and three demographic factors are presented in
table 5.

Most striking is the strong association

troubled memories and combat exposure.

between

A four unit change on the

grouped combat exposure index produces a more than seven-fold
increase in the prevalence of troubled memories after adjustment
for covariates.

None of the remaining military service factors

are associated with the prevalence of troubled memories.

Of the

demographic factors examined, both age and race are related to
troubled memories.

Men who are discharged at an older age are

less likely to report troubled memories.

Non-white veterans are

more likely to report troubled memories.
Table 6 examines the relationship between military service
and demographic factors and temper control problems.

The combat

index is positively related to the prevalence of temper control
problems which are nearly three times more common in veterans who
experienced high levels of combat exposure compared to nonVietnam service veterans.

Of the military service covariates

examined, only length of service and rank at discharge are found
to be marginally related to the prevalence of temper control
problems.

However, marginal associations are observed for both

length of service and rank at discharge.

For length of service,

veterans who served less than two years are less likely to report
temper control problems than veterans who served between 2 and 20

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY
years.

True et al.

15

A twofold increase in the frequency of temper control

problems is found for veterans discharged as non-officers
compared to veterans discharged as officers.

Of the demographic

factors examined, age and years of education at discharge are
both independently associated with temper control problems.
Older age at discharge (25 or above) is associated with a reduced
prevalence of temper control problems compared to younger age at
discharge (21 and under).

Also, men with less than a high school

education complained of temper control problems more frequently
than those who completed high school.
Factors associated with the prevalence of the PTSD symptom
life goal indecision are examined in table 7.

Combat exposure

demonstrates a positive relationship with the prevalence of life
goal indecision.

High combat Vietnam veterans are 1.85 times

more likely to report problems with life goal indecision compared
to non-Vietnam veterans.

Among the remaining military service

factors, a significant association with life goal indecision is
found for rank at discharge and whether the veteran was drafted
or enlisted.

For branch of service, Marines, Army and Navy

veterans report problems with life goal indecision more commonly
than Air Force veterans; this difference is only marginally
significant (P &lt; 0.10).

Veterans who are non-officers are twice

as likely to complain of problems with life goal
compared to veterans who are officers.

indecision

Veterans who are drafted

into military service are less likely to report problems with
life goal indecision than veterans who enlisted into the

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY
military.

True et al.

16

Both age and years of education at release are related

to the prevalence of life goal indecision.

Age at discharge is

negatively related to life goal indecision, with older age at
discharge associated with a lower prevalence.

Veterans with less

than 12 years of education report life goal indecision problems
more frequently than veterans with at least 12 years of education
( 7 «= 1.44, 95 per cent C.I. 1.01-2.03).
Table 8 presents factor adjusted prevalence odds ratios for
sleep problems.

Combat exposure shows a positive

relationship with reporting of sleep problems.

dose-response

A four unit

change on the grouped combat scale produces a twofold increase in
the prevalence odds ratio.

None of the other military service

factors are significantly associated with the prevalence of sleep
problems.

Of the demographic factors, only years of education is

related to sleep problems.

As was found for many of the

previously examined PTSD symptoms, less education is associated
with a higher prevalence of sleep problems.
marginally associated with sleep problems.

Age at discharge is
Consistent with other

PTSD symptoms, age is negatively related to sleep disorders.
Table 9 presents the results from a logistic regression
analysis of confusion with the military service and demographic
factors.

A positive and significant association

the intensity of combat exposure.

is found with

Age at discharge is negatively

associated with confusion as veterans discharged over the age of
24 complain of difficulties with confusion about half as
frequently as veterans discharged prior to age 22.

Non-white

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY

True et al.

17

veterans are more than twice as likely to report this symptom
compared to white veterans.

Educational level is related to the

prevalence of confusion, with the less educated (under 12 years
of schooling) more likely to report this problem than veterans
with at least 12 years of education.

DISCUSSION
The analysis of the Survey of Veterans II has demonstrated a
marked correlation between eight symptoms of PTSD and military
service and combat experience in Vietnam.

The advantages of this

study include a large random sample (n=l,787) selected from the
total U. S. population, an excellent interview response rate (93
per cent), and the collection of data prior to the recent
controversy surrounding the issue of the health effects of
possible exposure of Vietnam veterans to Agent Orange.

The

analysis excluded men who served in the military prior to 1965;
thus, the results are uncontaminated by military service prior to
the Vietnam era.

An ordinal index of combat exposure was

constructed which demonstrated a high level of internal
consistency.
One disadvantage of the study was the incidence-prevalence
bias of cross-sectional studies.

It was not possible to

determine if the elevation of PTSD symptomatology

found for

Vietnam veterans, and especially for those exposed to combat,
existed prior to military service.

Pre-military service risk

factors, prominent in much of the literature about PTSD (4, 8,

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY

True et al.

11) were unavailable on the survey.

18

Likewise, there were no

measures of post military service traumatic events.

Another

disadvantage is that the measures of PTSD symptomatology included
in the Survey of Veterans II were not sufficiently complete to
make the specific psychiatric

diagnosis.

A summary of the associations among the eight PTSD symptoms
and the nine military service and demographic variables is
presented in table 10.

The relationship of each factor with each

symptom is indicated by a plus or a minus sign.

For nominal

factors the reference category is indicated to assist
interpretation.
Four factors are consistently
symptomatology:

associated with PTSD

combat exposure index, age at discharge, race,

and years of education at discharge.

Only combat was associated

with an increased prevalence in all eight symptoms.

Age at

discharge was found to be inversely associated with the
prevalence of seven stress symptoms.
discharge was inversely associated

Years of education at

with six symptoms.

white) correlated positively with five symptoms.

Race

(non-

None of the

remaining military service factors demonstrated a consistent
association with the PTSD symptoms.

That combat shows such a

positive correlation with all symptoms is consistent with other
studies (8, 6, 7,).

Indeed, the first evidence in the literature

of the presence of marked psychologic symptomatology came in
clinical studies which investigated the influence of combat
These early studies, however, were not controlled.

(13).

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY

True et al.

19

A rnonotonic increase in the prevalence of several PTSD
symptoms was observed with combat exposure in the unadjusted
analysis.

For example, for the symptom nightmares, prevalence

odds ratios increase from 1.32 (no combat) to 2.49 (low combat),
5.49

(medium combat), and 8.19

(high combat).

troubled memories increases from 1.73
combat), to 5.29

Similarly,

(no combat), to 2.02

(medium combat) and to 7.85

(low

(high combat).

The

other symptoms show consistent but lesser magnitudes of change.
Although there is considerable consistency in reporting
strong effects of elevated war stress experiences, some studies
(4, 14, 15) have not found these risks to outweigh the role of
predispositional risk factors.

The original Robins (4) study

included a seven-point combat scale, but as combat did not show
any association with psychological
presented.

outcomes, the data were not

Helzer's work (14, 15) derived from the same cohort,

interviewed veterans one and three years after their return to
the United States.

The study found an association between combat

and depression in the first survey, with 27 per cent of the
Vietnam veterans reporting at least some depression, which had
largely evaporated by the second survey.

in the Helzer studies,

combat was a three-level ordinal scale, and the measurement of
depression covers only a portion of the symptoms now included
under the broader category of PTSD.
Card (8) used a nine-item combat scale, plus a special
measurement for being wounded, and found that 8 of the 10 combat
experiences were significantly associated with the PTSD scale she

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY
devised,

True et al.

20

card scored PTSD as present if two symptoms existed in

each of the symptom categories of re-experiencing trauma,
numbing, and miscellaneous.

This is a somewhat idiosyncratic

definition not conforming with the Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual ill (12).

Further, her analysis of the stress symptoms

was limited because all symptom data were reduced to an additive
scale, thus losing the ability to look at individual symptoms.
Harris (6) also used a nine-point combat index, but the
results of the analysis are not comparable to the Survey of
Veterans II because the study's only symptom is the simple
statement 'Have you had. . Mental or emotional problems?"

While

there were three-fold increases in 'problems' due to combat, no
refined analysis was conducted.
Egendorf et al. (7) used an 11-point combat scale, the most
extensive of the measurements of war stress in the major surveys
using random sampling.

Their major finding was that more than a

third of heavily combat exposed veterans showed significant
stress symptoms compared to less than 20 per cent of other
veterans.

In later analyses of this study, Laufer (16, 17)

focused attention on the importance of exposure to and participation in abusive violence and atrocities, which appear to markedly
enhance stress

reactions.

The importance of the combat exposure index is highlighted
by a comparison to the simple dichotomy of Vietnam versus nonVietnam service.

This comparison can be seen in table 1, where

prevalence odds ratios for Vietnam service are not pronounced for

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY

True et al.

the symptoms such as guilt feelings

(1.39, 95 per cent C.I.

21

1.10-

1.74) and sleep problems (1.53, 95 per cent C.I. 1.20-1.94).
However, a distinct gradient in the prevalence of these symptoms
is observed with increasing levels of the combat exposure index.
Previous studies (7, 8) have found that service in Vietnam itself
did not induce .PTSD

symptoms.

Analysis of the variable race reveals that non-whites have a
pattern of increased risk for suffering PTSD symptoms.

This

pattern was present for five of the eight symptoms, with nonwhites suffering more nightmares, troubled memories, depression,
guilt feelings, and confusion than whites.

Kadushin (18) found

that being white attenuated war stress, and that blacks showed
twice the prevalence of stress symptomatology with exposure to
high combat.

However, Card (8) did not find a correlation

between PTSD (as defined by her) and race.

Card dichotomized

PTSD into present or absent while Kadushin analyzed stress as a
continuous scale.
Veterans discharged from service with less than 12 years of
education are more likely to suffer from sleep problems, depression, temper control problems, life goal indecision, guilt, and
confusion, independent of the effects of combat.

The Legacies

study (18) found that low educational attainments were correlated
with increased stress.

Helzer (14) found a significant correla-

tion in the prevalence of depression at one year after discharge
with educational attainment, defined as in the Survey of Veterans
II.

However, these differences had resolved by the time of the

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY
three-year follow-up.

True et al.

22

Card (8) had the most exhaustive data on

educational attainment, but did not use education at enlistment
or discharge as a covariate in the analysis of war stress and
PTSD symptomatology.
Age at discharge is negatively related to PTSD symptoms,
with older age being protective.

The only symptom not associated

with age at release is sleep problems.

Greater maturity during

war service appears to be protective against later
symptomatology.

Wilson and Krauss (3) found suffering traumatic

stress during the formative late adolescent years to be
especially predictive of higher stress symptom outcomes.
Further support for the increased

psychological

vulnerability of younger Vietnam experienced veterans to the
development of PTSD symptomatology is provided by the postservice mortality study of conducted by the Centers for Disease
Control (19).

The authors found an increased mortality rate in

the 5 years following discharge among Vietnam veterans, and
particularly those discharged before age 21.
causes of death were the following:

The principal

accidents, suicide,

homicide, and poisonings, including drug-related incidents.
The present study did not identify any consistent
association of stress symptoms with enlistment status
(volunteered or drafted), length of service, branch of service,
or rank at discharge.

Year of discharge (before or after 1968—

the Tet Offensive) appears not to have the importance reported by
Laufer (11).

Only the symptom guilt is correlated with year of

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY

True et al.

23

discharge, with post 1968 service suggesting a protective effect
( f

= 0.64, 95 per cent C.I. 0.44-0.93).

Card (8) examined this

point as well, and also found no support for the distinction
between service before and after 1968.
Evidence has been presented of the presence of traumatic
stress symptomatology for a randomly selected sample of veterans
studied in 1979, a time preceding recent controversies about
Agent Orange and war effects.

That these symptoms are magnified

by combat exposure confirms clinical experience and other
research.

�True et al. 24

STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY
TABLE 1
The association of the Vietnam service and combat
exposure with the eight measures of post-traumatic
stress symptomatology

Symptoms of
Post-Traumatic
Stress

Service in
Vietnam ?

No

n
Nightmares
Yes

No
Prevalence Odds Ratios
(95% CI)

85
925
1.00

Yes

Non-Vietnam

Vietnam
No Combat

n

n

n

85
925

Combat Exposure Index
Vietnam
Vietnam
Low Combat
Medium
Combat

13
107

197
573
3.74
(.848)
28-.7

n

60
262

1.00

1.32
(7-.5
.124)

2.49
(1.76-3.53)

160
851

21
99

56
266

n
60
119
5.49
(.678)
38-.1

Vietnam
High
Combat

n
64
85
8.19
(.71.4
57-16)

Sleep Problems

Yes
No
Prevalence Odds Ratios
(95% CI)

160
851
1.00

172
599
. 15
.3
(.019)
12-.4

1*00

1.13
(6-.6
.818)

105
906

20
100

1.12
(8-.6
.015)

43
136
1.68
(.524)
11-.6

52
98
2.82
(.640)
19-.7

Troubled Memories

Yes
No
Prevalence Odds Ratios
(95% CI)

105
906
1.00

220
549
34
.6
(.044)
27-.3

1.00

1.73
(.328)
10-.9

61
260

68
111

2.02
5.29
(.428) (.774)
14-.4
37-.1

71
78
7.85
(5.58-11.05)

Depression

Yes
No
Prevalence Odds Ratios
(95% CI)

312
699
1.00

306
465
1.47
(.117)
12-.9

312
699

41
79

1.00

1.16
(7-.4
.817)

110
212
1.16
(8-.2
.915)

83
96
1.94
(.126)
14-.7

72
78
2.07
(.729)
14-.1

�True et al. 25

STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY
TABLE 1
The association of the Vietnam service and combat
exposure with the eight measures of post-traumatic
stress symptomatology
(Continued)

Symptoms of
Post-Traumatic
Stress

Service in.
Vietnam ?

No

n

Yes

Non—Vietnam

Vietnam
No Combat

n

n

Combat Exposure Index
Vietnam
Vietnam
Low Combat
Medium
Combat

n
15
105

n

n

Vietnam
High
Combat

n

Temper Control Problems

Yes
No
Prevalence Odds Ratios
(95% CD

144
868

176
595

144
868

1.00

1.78
(.022)
14-.7

1.00

0.86
(4-.2
.915)

225
786

231
539

225
786

34
86

62
260

49
130

1.44
2.27
(.419) (.832)
10-.9
15-.8

50
100
3.01
( . 8 4 .36)
20-,

Life Goal Indecision

Yes
No
Prevalence Odds Ratios
(95% CI)

1.00

1.50
(.118)
12-.5

1.00

1.38
(9-.1
.121)

191
821

188
583

191
821

23
97

1.00

1.39
(.017)
11-.4

1.00

1.02
(6-.5
.316)

148
864

163
607

148
864

1.00

1.57
(.320)
12-.0

1.00

92
230

57
122

48
101

1.40
1.63
1.66
1 1 - 4)
( . 5 1 8 ) ( . 6 2 3 ) ( . 5 2. 1
10-.5
11-.1

Guilt Feelings

Yes
No
Prevalence Odds Ratios
(95% CI)

65
257
1.09
(7-.9
.914)

49
130

51
99

2.21
1.62
15-.
( . 3 2 3 ) ( . 4 3 19)
11-.3

Confusion

Yes
No
Prevalence Odds Ratios
(95% CD

19
101
1.10
(6-.5
.518)

60
262
1.34
(9-.6
.618)

44
135

40
109

2.14
1.90
14-.
( . 0 2 7 ) ( . 4 3 18)
13-.8

�STRESS

SYMPTOMATOLOGY

True et al. 26
TABLE 2

Factor adjusted prevalence odds ratios for nightmares

Military Service and

Demographic Factors

Logistic Regression
Beta Coefficients

Factor Adjusted
Prevalence
Odds Ratios

95%
CI

Military Service Factors
Combat Exposure

.5181
1

Non-Vietnam
Vietnam no combat
Vietnam low combat
Vietnam medium combat
Vietnam high combat
Length of Service
2 to 20 years
less than 2 years
Year of Discharge
Before 1968
1968 and after
Branch of Service
Air Force
Army
Navy
Marines

1.00
1.68
2.82
4.73
7.94

(1.53-1.8
(2.33-3.4
(3.55-6.3
(5.41-11.

1.00
.97

( .69-1.3

1.00
1.44

( .87-2.41

1.00
1.07
.75
.98

( .68-1.6}
( .45-1.24
( .56-1. 7j

1.00
1.19

( .61-2.31

1.00
1.00

( .68-1.48

1.00
.80
.64

( .65- .99
( .42- .99

1.00
1.96

(1.31-2.92

1.00
1.28

( .84-1.96

-.0256

.3657

.0649
-.2926
-.0179

Rank of Discharge
Officer
Non-Officer

.1716

Enlisted vs. Drafted
Enlisted
Drafted

.0041

Demographic Factors
Age at Discharge
21 and younger
22 - 24
25 and older
Race
White
Non- white
Years of Education at
Discharge
At least 12 yrs of
education

Less than 12 years

-.2232

.6722

.2490

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY

True et al. 27
TABLE 3

Factor adjusted prevalence odds ratios for depression

Military Service and
Demographic Factors

Logistic Regression
Beta Coefficients

Factor Adjusted
Prevalence
Odds Ratios

95%
CI

Military Service Factors
Combat Exposure
Non-Vietnam
Vietnam no combat
Vietnam low combat
Vietnam medium combat
Vietnam high combat

.1930
1.00
1.21
1.47
1.78
2.16

1.00
.98

( .63-1.25)

1.00
.68
.85
.74

( .50- .94)
( .61-1.19)
( .48-1.13)

1.00
1.53

( .93-2.51)

1.00
1.08

( .80-1.44)

1.00
.77
.60

( .66- .91)
( .43- .82)

1.00
1.57

( 1.13-2.18)

1.00
1.58

(1 .14-2.19)

-.0236

Year of Discharge
Before 1968
1968 and after

( .76-1.25)

1.00
.89

Length of Service
2 to 20 years
less than 2 years

( 1.12-1.31)
( 1.26-1.71)
(1.42-2.24)
( 1.60-2.93)

-.1167

Branch of Service
Air Force
Army
Navy
Marines

-.3831
-.1603
-.3018

Rank of Discharge
Officer
Non-Officer

.4239

Enlisted vs. Drafted

.0740

Enlisted

Drafted
Demographic Factors
Age at Discharge
21 and younger
22 - 24
25 and older
Race
White
Non-white
Years of Education at
Discharge
At least 12 years of
education

Less than 12 years

-.2587

.4508

.4583

�True et al. 28

STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY

TABLE 4
Factor adjusted prevalence odds ratios for guilt feelings

Military Service and
Demographic Factors

Logistic Regression
Beta Coefficients

Factor Adjusted
Prevalence
Odds Ratios

95%
CI

Military Service Factors
Combat Exposure
Non-Vietnam
Vietnam no combat
Vietnam low combat
Vietnam medium combat
Vietnam high combat

.1828
1.00
1.20
1.44
1.73
2.08

Length of Service
2 to 20 years
less than 2 years

-.0800

Year of Discharge
Before 1968
1968 and after

(1.10-1.31)
(1.21-1.71)
(1.34-2.24)
(1.48-2.92)

-.4446

Branch of Service
Air Force
Army
Navy
Marines
Rank of Discharge
Officer
Non-Officer
Enlisted vs. Drafted
Enlisted
Drafted

1.00

.92

( .69-1.23)

1.00

.64

( .44- .93)

1.00

-.3951
-.3524
-.4697

.67
.70
.63

( .47- .96)
( .48-1.03)
( .38-1.02)

.4276
1.00
1.53

( .85-2.78)

-.1096
1.00

.90

( .64-1.26)

Demographic Factors
Age at Discharge
21 and younger
22 - 24
25 and older
Race
White
Non- white
Years of Education at
Discharge
At least 12 years of
education

Less than 12 years

-.1954
1.00

.82
.68

( .68- .99)
( .47- .98)

.4640
1.00
1.59

(1.11-2.28)

1.00
1.50

(1.04-2.15)

.4035

�STRESS

SYMPTOMATOLOGY

True et al. 29

TABLE 5
Factor adjusted prevalence odds ratios for troubled memories

Military Service and
Demographic Factors

Logistic Regression
Beta Coefficients

Factor Adjusted
Prevalence
Odds Ratios

95%
CI

Military Service Factors
Combat Exposure
Non-Vietnam
Vietnam no combat
Vietnam low combat
Vietnam medium combat
Vietnam high combat
Length of Service
2 to 20 years
less than 2 years
Year of Discharge
Before 1968
1968 and after
Branch of Service
Air Force
Army
Navy
Marines

.5015
1.00
1.65
2.73
4.50
7.43

(1.51-1.81)
(2.27-3.27)
(3.43-5.91)
(5.17-10.69)

1.00
.85

( .62-1.17)

1.00
1.26

( .79-2.02)

1.00
1.16
1.20
.97

( .76-1.78)
( .76-1.88)
( .56-1.67)

1.00
1.19

( .65-2.19)

1.00
1.05

( .72-1.51)

1.00
.81
.66

( .66- .99)
( .44- .98)

1. 00
1.56

(1.05-2.32)

1.00
.96

( .63-1.47)

-.1682

.2339

.1513
.1797
-.0353

Rank of Discharge
Officer
Non-Officer

.1727

Enlisted vs. Drafted
Enlisted
Drafted

.0456

Demographic Factors
Age at Discharge
21 and younger
22-24
25 and older
Race
White
Non-white
Years of Education at
Discharge
At least 12 years of
education
Less than 12 years

-.2105

.4472

-.0397

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY

True et al. 30
TABLE 6

Factor adjusted prevalence odds ratios for temper control problems

Military Service and
Demographic Factors

Logistic Regression
Beta Coefficients

Factor Adjusted
Prevalence
Odds Ratios

95%
CI

Military Service Factors
Combat Exposure
Non-Vietnam
Vietnam no combat
Vietnam low combat
Vietnam medium combat
Vietnam high combat

.2695

1.00
1.31
1.71
2.24
2.94
1.00
.75

( .56-1.29)

1.00
1.04
.98
1.09

( .69-1.56)
( .64-1.52)
( .65-1.83)

1.00
2.13

( .99-4.62)

1.00
.93

( .65-1.35)

1.00
.64
.41

( .52- .79)
( .27- .62)

1.00
.69

( .44-1.09)

1.00
1.82

(1.26-2.64)

-.2932

Year of Discharge
Before 1968
1968 and after

( .54-1.02)

1.00
.85

Length of Service
2 to 20 years
less than 2 years

(1.20-1.43)
(1.43-2.05)
(1.71-2.94)
(2.05-4.22)

-.1631

Branch of Service
Air Force
Army
Navy
Marines
Rank of Discharge
Officer
Non-Officer
Enlisted vs. Drafted
Enlisted
Drafted

.0345
-.0186
.0874
.7576

-.0678

Demographic Factors
Age at Discharge
21 and younger
22 - 24
25 and older
Race
White
No n- white
Years of Education at
Discharge
At least 12 years of
education
Less than 12 years

-.4452

-.3652

.6001

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY

True et al. 31
TABLE 7

Factor adjusted prevalence odds ratios for life goal indecision

Military Service and
Demographic Factors

Logistic Regression
Beta Coefficients

Factor Adjusted
Prevalence
Odds Ratios

95%
CI

Military Service Factors
Combat Exposure
Non-Vietnam
Vietnam no combat
Vietnam low combat
Vietnam medium combat
Vietnam high combat
Length of Service
2 to 20 years
less than 2 years
Year of Discharge
Before 1968
1968 and after

.1541
1.00
1.17
1.36
1.59
1.85

(1.08-1.27)
(1.16-1.60)
(1.24-2.03)
(1.34-2.57)

1.00
.82

( .62-1.07)

1.00
1.25

( .84-1.85)

1.00
.92
.80
.0
6

( .66-1.28)
( .56-1.15)
( .47- .76)

1.00
2.00

(1.13-3.55)

1.00
.65

( .47- .90)

1.00
.72
.52

( .60- .86)
( .36- .74)

1.00
1.00

( .69-1.44)

1.00
1.44

i(1.01-2.03)

-.2052

.2207

Branch of Service
Air Force
Army
Navy
Marines
Rank of Discharge
Officer
Non-Officer
Enlisted vs. Drafted
Enlisted
Drafted

-.0878
-.2178
-.5178
.6935

-.4308

Demographic Factors
Age at Discharge
21 and younger
22 - 24
25 and older

-.3281

Race
White
Non-white

-.0015

Years of Education at
Discharge
At least 12 years of
education
Less than 12 years

.3616

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY

True et al. 32
TABLE 8

Factor adjusted prevalence odds ratios for sleep problems

Military Service and
Demographic Factors

Logistic Regression
Beta Coefficients

Factor Adjusted
Prevalence
Odds Ratios

95%
CI

Military Service Factors
Combat Exposure
Non-Vietnam
Vietnam no combat
Vietnam low combat
Vietnam medium combat
Vietnam high combat

.1908

Length of Service
2 to 20 years
less than 2 years

.0961

Year of Discharge
Before 1968
1968 and after
Branch of Service
Air Force
Army
Navy
Marines

1.00
1.21
1.46
1.77
2.15

(1.11-1.32)
(1.23-1.75)
(1.36-2.31)
(1.51-3.05)

1.00
1.10

( .82-1.48)

1.00
.88

( .59-1.32)

1.00
1.17
.85
1.55

( .78-1.75)
( .54-1.33)
( .94-2.56)

1.00
.99

( .56-1.74)

1.00
.93

( .65-1.31)

1.00
.83
.70

( .69-1.01)
( .47-1.03)

1.00
1.28

( .87-1.89)

1.00
1.60

(1.11-2.31)

-.1256

.1578
-.1621
.4397

Rank of Discharge
Officer
Non-Officer

-.0142

Enlisted vs. Drafted
Enlisted
Drafted

-.0774

Demographic Factors
Age at Discharge
21 and younger
22 - 24
25 and older
Race
White
Non-white
Years of Education at
DischargeAt least 12 years of
education
Less than 12 years

-.1816

.2474

.4726

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY

True et al. 33
TABLE 9

Factor adjusted prevalence odds ratios for confusion

Military Service and

Demographic Factors

Logistic Regression
Beta Coefficients

Factor Adjusted
Prevalence
Odds Ratios

95%
CI

Military Service Factors
Combat Exposure
Non-Vietnam
Vietnam no combat
Vietnam low combat
Vietnam medium combat
Vietnam high combat

.2057

Length of Service
2 to 20 years
less than 2 years

.1174

Year of Discharge
Before 1968
1968 and after
Branch of Service
Air Force
Army
Navy
Marines
Rank of Discharge
Officer
Non-Officer.
Enlisted vs. Drafted
Enlisted
Drafted

1.00
1.23
1.51
1.85
2.28

(1.12-1.35)
(1.25-1.82)
(1.41-2.45)
(1.57-3.29)

1.00
1.12

( .83-1.53)

1.00
.82

( .54-1.24)

1.00
.98
1.15
.99

( .65-1.49)
( .74-1.78)
( .58-1.70)

1.00
1.51

( .74-3.04)

1.00
.90

( .62-1.30)

1.00
.74
.55

( .60- .91)
( .37- .83)

1.00
2.09

(1.45-3.03)

1.00
1.75

(1.20-2.54)

-.1950

-.0191
-.1405
-.0081
.4089

-.1030

Demographic Factors
Age at Discharge
21 and younger
22 - 24
25 and older
Race
White
Non-white
Years of Education at
Discharge
At least 12 years of
education

Less than 12 years

-.2974

.7395

.5575

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY

True et al. 34 .
TABLE 10
Summary of analyses of PTSD symptoms
PTSD SYMPTOMS

Military Service
and Demographic
Factors
Combat

Nightmares

***

Sleep
Problems
***

Troubled
Memories
***

Degression

***

Temper
Control
Problems

***

Life
Goal
Indecision
**
*

Guilt
Feelings
***

Confusion

***

Length of
Service
(2-20 yrs)
Year of
Release
(Before 1968)

_*

Branch
(Air Force)
Rank at
Discharge
(Officer)
Drafted
(Enlisted)
Age of
Discharge

Race
(White)
Years of
Education
(M2 yrs)

**

***

***

**

***

**

**

**

**

**

*p£.05
**p£.01
***p£.001
i" Positive and inverse associations between each military service and demographic factor and PTSD symptom are
represented by plus ( ) and minus (-) signs, respectively.
+

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY

True et al.

35

REFERENCES

1 Borus JF. Reentry II. "Making It" Back in the States. American
Journal of Psychiatry 1973;130(8):850-854.
2 Nace EP, O'Brien CP, Mintz J, et al. Stress Disorders Among
Vietnam Veterans. C. R. Figley, New York: Brunner/Mazel,
1978:71-128.
3 Wilson JP, Krauss GE. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and the
War Veteran Patient, in William E. Kelly, New York:
Brunner/Mazel, 1985:102-147.
4 Robins LN, Davis DH, Goodwin DW. Drug Use by U.S. Army
Enlisted Men in Vietnam: A Follow-Up on Their Return Home.
American Journal of Epidemiology 1974;99(4):235-249.
5 Veterans Administration. 1979 National Survey of Veterans,
Summary Report. 1980.
6 Harris L. Myths and Realities: A Study of attitudes toward
Vietnam era Veterans. Washington, DC 1980. Submitted to the
Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
7 Egendorf A, Kadushin C, Laufer RS, et al. Summary of Findings.
New York City: The Center for Policy Research, Inc., 1981. A
Study Conducted for the Veterans Administration.
8 Card JJ. Lives after Vietnam. Lexington, Massachusetts
Toronto: Lexington Books, D.C. Heath and Company, 1983.
9 Wise LL, McLaughlin DH, Steel L. The Project TALENT Data Bank
Handbook.

Palo Alto: American Institutes for Research, 1979.

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY

True et al.

10 Boulanger G and Kadushin C, eds.

36

The Vietnam Veteran

Redefined: Fact and Fiction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates, 1986.
11 Laufer RS, Yager T, Frey-Wouters E, et al. Post-War Trauma:
Social and Psychological

Problems of Vietnam veterans in the

aftermath of the Vietnam War. New York: Center for Policy
Research, 1981. The final report to the Veterans Administration.
12 American Psychiatric Association.

Diagnostic and Statistical

Manual of Mental Disorders III (DSM-III). Washington, DC 1980.
13 Shatan CF. The Grief of Soldiers: Vietnam Combat Veterans'
Self-Help Movement. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
1973;43(4):640-653.
14 Helzer JE, Robins LN, Davis DH. Depressive Disorders in
Vietnam Returnees.

The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

1976;163(3):177-185.
15 Helzer JE, Robins LN, Wish E, et al. Depression in Viet Nam
Veterans and Civilian Controls. American Journal of psychiatry
1979;136(4B):526-529.
16 Laufer RS, Gallops MS, Frey-Wouters E. War Stress and Trauma:
The Vietnam Veteran Experience. Journal of Health and Social
Behavior 1984;25(1):65-85.
17 Laufer RS, Brett E, Gallops MS. Dimensions of Posttraumatic
Stress Disorder among Vietnam Veterans. The Journal of Nervous
and Mental Disease 1985;173(9):538-545.

�STRESS SYMPTOMATOLOGY

True et al.

37

IB Kadushin C, Boulanger G, Martin J. Long Term Stress Reactions:
Some Causes, Consequences, and Naturally Occurring Support
Systems. Center for Policy Research, Inc., 1981.
19 The Centers for Disease Control Vietnam Experience Study.
Postservice Mortality Among Vietnam Veterans. JAMA 1987;257(6).

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24046">
              <text>069</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24050">
              <text>1856</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24054">
              <text>Series III Subseries III</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24040">
                <text>True, William R.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24042">
                <text>Jack Goldberg</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24044">
                <text>Seth A. Eisen</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24048">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;Veterans Administration</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24052">
                <text>Stress Symptomology Among Vietnam Veterans: Analysis of the Veterans Administration Survey of Veterans II</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24055">
                <text>veteran psychological health</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24056">
                <text>PTSD</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24057">
                <text>study protocol</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
