<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=39&amp;advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&amp;advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Young%2C+Alvin+L.&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CTitle&amp;page=2&amp;output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-10-09T13:38:24+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>2</pageNumber>
      <perPage>15</perPage>
      <totalResults>137</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="5890" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="44600">
              <text>222</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="44603">
              <text>6554</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="44607">
              <text>Series X</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="44597">
                <text>Young, Alvin L.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="44605">
                <text>Alvin Young Oral Interview and Transcript, April 27, 2001</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2221" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="14838">
              <text>047</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="14839">
              <text>1168</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="14843">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14837">
                <text>Young, Alvin L.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14840">
                <text>Human and Environmental Risk of Chlorinated Dioxins and Related Compounds</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14841">
                <text>1983</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14842">
                <text>An Overview of Laboratory and Waste Management Guidelines For Toxic Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Dibenzofurans</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14844">
                <text>toxic wastes</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="14845">
                <text>herbicide disposal</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="14846">
                <text>protective clothing</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="14847">
                <text>safety</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2441" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="17008">
              <text>053</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="17009">
              <text>1400</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="17012">
              <text>Series III Subseries II</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17007">
                <text>Young, Alvin L.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17010">
                <text>1983</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17011">
                <text>Analysis of Dioxins and Furans in Human Adipose Tissue</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17013">
                <text>human testing</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="17014">
                <text>adipose tissue testing</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="17015">
                <text>veteran health and hygiene</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6262" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="46810">
              <text>172</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="46811">
              <text>5114</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="46815">
              <text>Series VII</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="46809">
                <text>Young, Alvin L.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="46812">
                <text>Pesticides: Minimizing the Risks</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="46813">
                <text>1987</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="46814">
                <text>Chapter 1: Minimizing the Risk Associated with Pesticide Use: An Overview</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="5134" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1971">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/54d952c42dd5d2605929e62dd76e3710.pdf</src>
        <authentication>1b0bf285df219033db287b04820239aa</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63920">
                    <text>Item n Number

04178

Author

D

Young, Alvin L.

Corporate Author
Report/Article TitlB Chapter 10: Long-Term Degradation Studies: Massive
Quantities of Phenoxy Herbicides in Test Grids, Field
Plots, and Herbicide Storage Sites

TftlB

Year

Treatment and Disposal fo Pesticide Wastes: based on

1984

Month/Day
Color
Number of Images

D

19

Descriptor! Notes

Wednesday, January 16, 2002

Page 4178 of 4258

�10
Long-Term Degradation Studies
Massive Quantities of Phenoxy Herbicides in Test Grids, Field Plots,
and Herbicide Storage Sites
ALVIN L. YOUNG'
Agent Orange Projects Office, Veterans Administration, Washington, DC 20420

Three long-term studies have been conducted on the
fate of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and
2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T) when
applied in high concentrations to field sites in
selected geographical locations. The first study,
initiated in April 1970, was of a 208-ha herbicide
equipment-testing area (Test Area C-52, Eglin Air
Force Base, Florida) that received more than 73,000
kg 2,4,5-T and 76,000 kg 2,4-D during the years
1962-1970. The second study, initiated in 1972, was
on the biological degradation of the herbicides when
soil incorporated at rates as high as 4,480 kg/ha
in plots established in three climatically
different areas of the United States; Northwest
Florida, Western Kansas and Northwestern Utah. The
third study, initiated in 1977, was on the fate of
the two herbicides in the soils of two 5-ha sites
(Gulfport, Mississippi; and Johnston Island, Pacific
Ocean) used for the long-term storage of more than
8.4 million L of surplus phenoxy herbicide. The
environmental fate of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T is compared
between the individual studies.

From January 1962 to April 1970, a program of aerial application
of herbicides was conducted in Southeast Asia by the United States
Air Force (USAF). At the conclusion of this program, considerable
amounts of herbicide were left unused.
One of the herbicides used extensively in this project was a
herbicide designated as "Agent Orange" which was formulated as a
'Current address: Office of Science and Technology Policy, Executive Office of the
President, Washington, DC 20506
This chapter not subject to U.S. copyright.
Published 1984, American Chemical Society

�162

TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF PESTICIDE WASTES

50:50 mixture of the n-butyl esters of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic
acid (2,4-D) and 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T). In
1970, approximately 8.4 million L of this material were placed in
storage by the Air Force. An analysis of the herbicide stocks
revealed that it contained the highly toxic contaminant
2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). The concentration of
the TCDD ranged from &lt;0.02 to 47 ppm TCDD in the 492 random
samples taken from the 40,310 208-L drums: the weighted average
concentration of TCDD for the inventory was determined to be
approximately 2 ppm (_y.
Because of the TCDD concentration, the herbicide could not
merely be declared surplus and disposed of on the agricultural
markets. Hence, the Air Force initiated an extensive research
program to find suitable disposal methods that would be both
ecologically safe and economically feasible. Although a major
method extensively investigated was soil incorporation and biodegradation, the final disposal method was at-sea incineration,
a project conducted in 1977. However, in the course of
investigating the feasibility of soil biodegradation, experimental
plots were established and sites were studied where the herbicide
had been extensively sprayed in the course of developing the
spray equipment for Vietnam. When the herbicide was removed
from the two storage sites at the time of its destruction, a
study of the contamination of those sites was initiated. This
paper focuses on the three areas of study that provided data
on the environmental fate of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T in situations
where the soil was massively contaminated.

Herbicide Spray Equipment Test Grids

The Eglin Reservation in Northwest Florida has served various
military uses, one of them having been the development and testing
of aerial dissemination equipment in support of military
defoliation operations in Southeast Asia. It was necessary
for this equipment to be tested under controlled situations
that would simulate actual use conditions as near as possible.
For this purpose an elaborate testing installation, designed
to measure deposition parameters, was established on the Eglin
Reservation with the place of direct aerial application restricted
to an area of approximately 3 km^ within Test Area C-52A in
the southeastern part of the reservation. Massive quantities
of herbicides, used in the testing of aerial defoliation spray
equipment from 1962 through 1970, were released and fell within
the instrumented test area. The uniqueness of the area prompted
the United States Air Force to set aside the area in 1970 for
research investigations. Numerous ecological surveys have
been conducted since 1970. As a result, the ecosystem of this
unique site has been well studied and documented ( , )
23.

�10. YOUNG

Degradation Studies of Phenoxy Herbicides

163

Although the total area for testing aerial dissemination
equipment was approximately 3 km^, the area actually consisted
of four separate testing grids. The primary area was located in
the southern portion of the testing area and consisted of a 37 ha
instrumented grid. This was the first sampling grid and was in
operation in June 1962. It consisted of four intersecting
straight lines (flight paths) arranged in a circular pattern,
each path being at a 45° angle from those adjacent to it.
Although this grid was used from 1962 to 1964, this grid (called
Grid I) received 39,550 kg of 2,4-D and 39,550 kg 2,4,5-T as
the Herbicide Purple formulation (50 percent n-butyl 2,4-D,
30 percent n-butyl 2,4,5-T and 20 percent iso-butyl 2,4,5-T).
Two other testing grids were sprayed with Herbicide Orange.
Grid II was an area of 37 ha and located immediately north of
Grid I. Grid II received 15,890 kg 2,4-D and 15,890 kg 2,4,5-T
from 1964 through 1966. Grid IV was the largest and final
grid established on Test Area C-52A. It was approximately 97
ha and received 20,000 kg 2,4-D and 17,570 kg 2,4,5-T from
1968 through 1970. Grid III was an experimental circular grid
that received 1,300 kg 2,4-D from 1966 through 1970. Thus,
for the four spray equipment calibration grids, a total of
approximately 73,000 kg 2,4,5-T and 77,000 kg 2,4-D were aerially
disseminated during the period 1962-1970. These data are
summarized in Table I.

Table I. Approximate Amount of 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D Applied to Test
Area C-52A, Eglin AFB Reservation, Florida, 1962-1970

II

37

III

37

IV

97

17,570
(1968-1970)

2,4-Da
(fcg)
39,550
(1962-1964)
15,890
(1964-1966)
1,300
(1966-1970)
20,000
(1968-1970)

208

73,010

76,740

Test
Grid
I

Total
a

Grid
Area (ha)
37

2,4,5-Ta
(kg)
39,550
(1962-1964)^
15,890
(1964-1966)
-

Amount of 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D calculated on weight of active
ingredient in the military Herbicides Orange and Purple.
^Years when the specific grid received the herbicide.

�164

TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF PESTICIDE WASTES

Residue Studies. Despite excellent records as to the number of
missions and quantity of herbicide per mission, there was no way
to determine the exact quantity of herbicide deposited at any
point on the instrumented grids. The first residue studies of
Test Area C-52A involved analyses of soils for phenoxy herbicides
by both chemical and bioassay techniques. These studies,
published by Young (2) in 1974, showed that residues of the
phenoxy herbicides rapidly disappeared. However, problems were
encountered in these residue studies because of the heterogeneity
of the test grids. Not only were there small geologic differences
(soil types, contours, organic matter and pH), and differences
in vegetation density and locations of water, but most important
the herbicides had been sprayed on specific test arrays (i.e.,
along dictated flight paths) over a span of years. An obvious
disparity also existed between bioassay data and chemical
analyses because the latter analysis for 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T alone
could not account for all the biologically active phytotoxic
components. The last application of Agent Orange was applied
in December 1969 at a rate of 28 L/ha. Chemical analyses of
soil cores from the treated areas showed that levels of total
2,4-D and 2,4,5-T in the top 15 cm of soil averaged 2.82 ppm
in April 1970 and less than 8.7 ppb in December 1970.
In October 1973, soil samples collected from Grids 1 and
II were analyzed and found to contain significant levels of
TCDD. Highest TCDD residues (740-1,500 parts per trillion, ppt)
were found on Grid I, the area sprayed with Herbicide Purple
in 1962-1964. Subsequent soil samples confirmed TCDD
contamination throughout three of the four test grids. The
persistence of TCDD in the soils of Test Area C-52A has recently
been described by Young, 1983 (_4).
Vegetative Studies. To demonstrate the rapid dissappearance
of phenoxy herbicides from the environment of the test grids,
a vegetative succession study was conducted of the dicotyledonous
species. Nine months (June 1971) after the last defoliantequipment test mission, a detailed survey of the vegetation
was initiated. The 3.0 km^ area was divided into a grid of
169 sections (each 122 by 122 m), and within each section the
percentage vegetative coverage was visually ranked as Class 0,
0-5%; I, 5-20%; II, 20-40%; III, 40-60%; IV, 60-80%; and V
80-100%. Three sections within each class were selected at
random and surveyed for dicotyledonous plants. An unsprayed
area located 0.3 km northwest of the test area was also surveyed.
In June 1973, each of these areas was again surveyed, but in
addition in 15 sections, nine randomly selected areas, each
0.093 m, were analyzed for species composition and ground
cover density.
Vegetative coverage maps prepared in 1971 and 1973 (Figures
1 and 2 respectively) confirmed that rapid re-vegetation occurred
immediately after herbicide applications ceased. Table II

�10. YOUNG

Degradation Studies of Phenoxy Herbicides

165

shows the percent coverage that each vegetative class occupied
in June 1971 and in June 1973.

Table II. Percent of Vegetative Cover Occupied by Vegetative
Class for the 3 km2 Test Area
Vegetative Class
0 (0-5%)
I (5-20%)
II (20-40%)
III (40-60%)
IV (60-80%)
V (80-100%)

June 1971

June 1973

4
14
29
25
21
4

0
4
12
18
42
23

From June to September 1971, 74 dicotyledonous species were
collected on the 3 km2 Test Area, and 33 additional species were
found during the June 1973 survey. The most important
dicotyledonous plants found invading the test area were rough
buttonweed, Piodia teres Walt; poverty weed, Hypericum
gentianoides L.; and common polypremum, Polypremum procumbens L.
The studies of soil residues and vegetative succession
of Test Area C-52A confirmed that massive quantities of
phenoxy herbicides rapidly disappeared following the termination
of an aerial spray equipment testing program.

Soil Incorporation/Biodegradation Plots

One potential method proposed for the disposal of Herbicide
Orange was subsurface injection or soil incorporation of the
herbicide at massive concentrations. The premise for such
studies was that high concentrations of the herbicides and TCDD
would be degraded to innocuous products by the combined action
of soil microorganisms and soil hydrolysisv In order to field
test this conceptj biodegradation plots were established in
three climatically different areas of the United States;
Northwest Florida (Eglin Air Force Base), Western Kansas (Garden
City) and Northwestern Utah (Air Force Logistics Command Test
Range Complex). A comparison of the soils of the three sites
is given in Table III. The Utah site had a mean annual rainfall
of 15 cm, while the Kansas and Florida sites had 40 and 150 cm,
respectively. Table IV describes the experimental protocol for
the three sites to include when the plots were established, the
method of herbicide incorporation, the experimental design and
the initial calculated herbicide concentration, ppm, at the

�166

TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF PESTICIDE WASTES

80 to 100%

2

5 to 20%

60 to 80%
1

40 to 60%

20 to 40%

0 to 5%

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1 0

1 1

1 2

1 3

1 4

Figure 1. The May 1971 Vegetation Density Map of the 169
sections (each 122 m x 122 m) that constituted the 2.5 km2
area that received more than 69,300 kg 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T
between June 1964 and December 1969, Test Area C-52A, Eglin
AFB, Florida.

�10. YOUNG

167

Degradation Studies of Phenoxy Herbicides

80 to 100 %

40 to 60%

5 to 20%

Figure 2. The June 1973 Vegetation Density Map of the 169
sections (each (122 m x 122 m) that constituted the 2.5 km2
area that received more than 69,300 kg 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T
between June 1964 and December 1969, Test Area C-52A, Eglin
AFB, Florida.

�168

TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF PESTICIDE WASTES

time the plots were established. Further details on
experimental protocol can be obtained from Young, et al
(_5), 1974, and Young et al ( ) 1976.
6,

Table III. Comparison of the Characteristics of the Top 15 cm
Layer From Each of the Soil Biodegradation Sites
Location

Organic
Sand
£E Matter (%) __(%_)_

Eglin AFB, PL*
Garden City,KSb
AFLC Test Range
Complex, UTC

5.6 0.5
7.0 1.7
7.8 1.4

91.6
37
27

Silt
4.0
42
53

Clay
4.4
21
20

Soil
Description
Sandy loam
Silt loam
Clay loam

a

Plots located on Test Area C-52A, Eglin AFB Reservation,
Florida,
kplots located on the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station,
Garden City, Kansas.
c
Plots located 120 km west of Salt Lake City, Utah.
Table V compares the degradation of total 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T
(n-butyl esters and acids) over six years of observations in the
Kansas and Florida locations. Although the rates of application
were similar, the method of application, preplant incorporation
versus subsurface injection, resulted in significant differences
in the initial concentrations of herbicides in the plots. The
acid of 2,4,5-T comprised most of the total residue after the
first two years. Although some residues were recovered,
especially in later years, at depths below 15 cm, the majority
(90 percent) of residue was confined to the top 15 cm of soil
profile. The addition of soil amendments such as lime, organic
matter and fertilizer did not appreciably increase the overall
rate of disappearance of the herbicide. The addition of
activated coconut charcoal, however, significantly decreased
the rate of disappearance of herbicide. Six years after the
charcoal plots were established, residues (primarily 2,4,5-T
acid) were still present.
Microbial studies were conducted on the biodegradation plots
in Florida. Soil samples were taken from all plots in June
and August 1974 (2 years) and in April 1975 (3 years). Although
bacterial and fungal levels were similar for control plots or
plots receiving either herbicide or herbicide plus the soil
amendments lime, fertilizer, and organic matter, the levels
were significantly higher in the plots receiving the activated
charcoal. Microorganisms tended to be concentrated in the level
which contained the charcoal (0-15 cm), but greatly reduced in

�Table IV.

Descriptions of Three Soil Biodegradation Studies Involving Use of Herbicide Orange

Location
Eglin AFB,
Florida

Date
Established
4/'2/72

Method of
Incorporation
Simulated Subsurface Injection
(30cm band width)

§
z
o

Calculated Initial
Herbicide
Concentration (ppm)c
Treatment
4,480 kg Herbicide/haa
4,480 kg Herbicide/ha,
plus soil amendments*"
4,480 kg Herbicide/ha
plus soil amendments
and activated charcoal

5,000
5,000
5,000

I
I

§
Garden City,
Kansas

5/10/72

AFLC Test
Range Complex,
Utah

10/2/72

a

Preplant Incorporate (Rototiller)

2,240 kg Herbicide/ha
4.A80 kg Herbicide/ha

1,000
2,000

Simulated Subsurface Injection
( cm band width)
8

1,120 kg Herbicide/ha
2,240 kg Herbicide/ha
4,480 kg Herbicide/ha

5,000
10,000
20,000

Rate of herbicide calculated as active ingredient. Herbicide injected at 10-15 cm level
or preplant incorporated in the 0-15 cm level. All plots duplicated.
^The amendments included 4.5 kg lime, 13.5 kg organic matter, and 1.4 kg fertilizer
(12:4:8 for N,P,K, respectively) uniformly mixed within the top 0-30 cm of soil in the plot.
c
Contained in the top 0-15 cm layer.

�170

TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF PESTICIDE WASTES

Table V. Concentration (ppm) of Total 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T
(Herbicide Orange) Over a Six-Year Period in Field Plots in
Kansas and Florida
Florida1*
Herbicide
Time After
Application
(years)
Day 5
0.25
0.5
1
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0

Kansas3

Herbicide

1,950
1,070
490
210
40
&lt;10

4,900
4,280
e
1,870

Herbicide
+
Amendments0
5700
5420

Amendments
+
Charcoal^
3,075
2,770

2015
2,660

508
440

184

52
30
12

8
3

120
360

a

Garden City, Kansas. Plots established 10 May 1972, 4,480 kg/ha
preplant Incorporated. Data are means of replicate plots,
0-15 cm soil increment.
b
Eglin AFB, Florida. Plots established 2 April 1972, 4,480 kg/ha
simulated subsurface injection. Data are means of replicate
plots, 0-15 cm soil increment.
c
The amendments included 4.5 kg lime, 13.5 kg organic matter,
and 1.4 kg fertilizer (12:4:8 for N,P,K, repectively) uniformly
mixed within the top 0-30 cm of soil in the plot.
^A 1 cm layer of activated coconut charcoal was applied to the
trench prior to application of the herbicide.
e
Not analyzed.
number at depths immediately below the charcoal. This effect
of increasing the number of microorganisms may have been due
to adsorption of growth promoting substances (e.g., nutrients
and water) on the surface of the charcoal particles. Although
the number of organisms were greater in these plots, the level
of herbicide residue was also greatest. Apparently, the binding
of the herbicide by the charcoal prevented it from being degraded
by the microorganisms.
Table VI shows the concentration of herbicide in two of the
three sets of field plots established in Utah in 1972. It was
only after the plots were established and the first soil samples
analyzed that it became apparent that the herbicide formulation

�10. YOUNG

Degradation Studies of Phenoxy Herbicides

171

placed in these plots was different than that used in Florida
or Kansas. Indeed, an analysis of the formulation confirmed
the presence of roughly a 50:50 mixture of the n-butyl and
isooctyl esters of both 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T. Note from Table VI
that the n-butyl ester of either 2,4-D or 2,4,5-T disappeared
more rapidly than the isooctyl ester. The hydrolysis of the
isooctyl ester to the acid, probably microbially mediated,
accounts for the presence of the acid.

Table VI. Concentrations (ppm) of the Acid and n-Butyl and
Isooctyl Esters of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T Placed Subsurface in Utah
Plots
2,4^D

Rate/Date

n-Butyl

2,4,5-T

Acid Isooctyl

1,120 kg/ha
Initial (1972) 1280a &lt;10b
1975
&lt;10 440
1978
&lt;10 250
4,480 kg/ha
Initial (1972) 5900 &lt;10
1975
10 1970
1978
&lt;10 1060

n-Butyl

Acid

Isooctyl

560
&lt;10
&lt;10

770
&lt;10
&lt;10

&lt;10
930
900

1230
40
20

2640
470
95

3590
72
&lt;10

&lt;10
1740
2900

5790
3000
1080

a

Data are means of replicated plots.
^Detection limit was generally 10 ppm.
Microbial studies have also been conducted on the biodegradation plots in Utah and have been published by Stark et al,
1975 (_7_)« Samples were taken three times throughout the year
(summer, winter, and spring, 1973-1974), and microblal species
present (bacteria, actinomycetes and fungi) were determined.
Bacterial counts were higher for soils with greater moisture
content, but the herbicide, in any concentration, had no
significant effect on the microflora.
As with the studies on the herbicide spray equipment testing
grids at Eglin AFB, Florida, the studies of the biodegradation
plots confirmed the presence and persistence of TCDD. Analysis of
soil samples collected from the Utah plots in 1978 indicated
that 85 percent of the amount of TCDD originally extracted in
1972 could be recovered, suggesting that TCDD applied subsurface
was minimally disappearing.

�172

TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF PESTICIDE WASTES

Studies of Herbicide Storage Sites

During the summer of 1977 the USAF disposed of 8.4 million L
of Herbicide Orange by high temperature incineration at sea.
This operation, Project PACER HO, was accomplished under the
very stringent criteria set forth in an United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ocean dumping permit.
Among the numerous conditions of the EPA-approved disposal
operation was the requirement for the USAF to conduct extensive
environmental and occupational monitoring of the land-transfer/
loading operations, shipboard incineration operations and
subsequent storage site reclamation and environmental monitoring.
Details of the proposed site monitoring programs were prepared
and approved prior to the disposal of the herbicide. The plan
recommended that soil samples from the storage areas at both
the Naval Construction Battalion Center (NCBC), Gulfport,
Mississippi and Johnston Island, Pacific Ocean, be collected
and analyzed for Herbicide Orange after the completion of
transfer operations. These analyses were to aid in the
establishment of a schedule for future monitoring.
In July 1977, following the completion of Project PACER
HO dedruming and subsequent site clean-up operations at NCBC
and Johnston Island, Air force scientists initiated an extensive
site monitoring program. The objectives of this program were:
1. To determine the magnitude of Herbicide Orange
contamination on the storage areas.
2. To determine the soil persistence of the two phenoxy
herbicides contained in Herbicide Orange and the
dioxin contaminant.
3. To monitor for any movement of residues from the sites
into adjacent water, sediments and biological
organisms.
In July 1977, a preliminary sampling study was initiated.
This consisted of assessing the heterogenity of the soils on the
sites and the heterogenity of the herbicide concentrations. The
studies conducted on the biodegradation plots showed that
movement of the herbicide components and the TCDD was low; thus
surface sampling, e.g., the top 8 cm of soil, constituted the
primary sampling depth. Twelve sites were selected for sampling
at each location; six were in areas of obvious spills and six in
areas that showed no spill. Not only were the spills discernible
by sight but also by smell. Winston and Ritty (_8) had previously
found that the olfactory senses can detect a butyl ester
formulation of 2,4,5-T at levels of 0.4 ppb. The results of
this first sampling after Project PACER HO (1977) are shown
in Table VII. Significant concentrations of herbicides, phenols
and TCDD were detected in soils from spill sites. Variation
in concentrations and in the portion of acids to esters
suggested that the spills were from different time periods.

�10. YOUNG

Degradation Studies of Phenoxy Herbicides

173

Accordingly, a more extensive protocol was proposed for future
sampling.

Table VII. Concentration (ppm) of Total Herbicides, Total
Phenols, and TCDD in 12 Soil Samples Collected July 1977 from
the Herbicide Orange Storage Areas, Johnston Island and
Naval Construction Battalion Center, Gulfport, Mississippi

Location

Number
of Sites

Total
Herbicides3
(ppm)

Total
Phenolsb
(ppm)

TCDD
(ppm)

Spill Sites
8
Johnston Island
58,000+42,000 135+120
0.073+0.07
NCBC, Gulf port
6
78,000+42,000
152+ 90
0.24 +0.27
No Spill Sites
4
Johnston Island
26+15
NAC
3+2
14.2+12.4
NA
NCBC, Gulf port
6
a
Total herbicides refers to concentration of acid and all esters
detected of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T herbicides. Samples consisted of
top 8 cm of soil.
blotal phenols refers to concentration of dichlorophenol and
trichlorophenol.
c
NA=Not Analyzed.

&lt;r

1978 Protocol. The sites within the two storage areas for
monitoring of residue were determined by whether a spill had
occurred or not occurred at that specific location. The basis for
determining a spill was whether a herbicide stain was discernible
(heavy, light, absent) and whether a herbicide odor was detectable
(strong, mild, absent). Thus, within the storage area numerous
locations were found that had a heavy stain and strong odor
(labeled H/H, presumably representing a recent spill); a light
stain and mild odor (labeled L/L, presumably representing an
older spill); and no stain and no odor (labeled 0/0, presumably
representing an uncontaminated area). Fourteen replications of
each treatment were then randomly selected to represent the
storage area (thus a total of 42 permanently marked sampling
locations at both NCBC and Johnston Island). Twelve of these
locations had been tentatively located and marked in July 1977
with the remaining 30 located and marked in January 1978 with
sampling being conducted on these dates, as well as in November
1978. In collecting the soil samples, a 8 cm square was marked
15 cm away from the site marker pin. At each sampling time soil
was taken from a different "point of the compass" with reference
to the marker pin to insure a fresh and undisturbed profile. At

�174

TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF PESTICIDE WASTES

the designated site a 8X8X8 cm cube of soil was removed with a
ceramic spatula which was rinsed with acetone between uses to
prevent carry-over of residue and microorganisms. Wherever
possible, sediment samples were collected from the drainage
areas in a similar manner.
Results. A summary of the analytical results for the 42 sites
sampled in January and November 1978 for the storage area at
Gulfport, Mississippi is shown in Table VIII. A statistically
significant decrease in the levels of total herbicides and
total phenols was found to occur between the two dates. There
was also a downward trend in TCDD levels, but it was not
statistically different ( . 5 . This trend in decreasing
P0)
levels of TCDD (as well as in herbicides and phenols) is even
more pronounced when the July 1977 data for spill sites (Table
VII) are compared to the 1978 data. Unfortunately, because of
differences in site delineation between 1977 and 1978, data
for spill vs no spill between the 2 years cannot be "paired"
and statistically analyzed. Similar levels of herbicides,
phenols, and TCDD have been found in selected soils of the
Herbicide Orange Storage Area on Johnston Island. Table IX
compares the trends in these compounds over four sampling dates
(August 1977, January and October 1978, and August 1979) from
four sites heavily contaminated with phenoxy herbicide (new
spill sites in 1977). Although herbicide levels significantly
decreased over the periods of sampling, trends for disappearance
of TCDD were not as well defined. The data for these four sites
illustrate the inherent weakness of the sampling protocol. When
a spill occurred on a site, the concentration of chemicals
varied significantly within the spill perimeter. Although the
marker pin for permanently locating the site was placed as near
the center of the spill as possible, that did not necessarily
define the zone of greatest soil contamination. Soil samples
collected over time were collected at different "points-of-thecompass" around the marker pin. Nevertheless, data for samples
collected at the same site and between other spill sites are
generally of similar magnitude.
Studies on the penetration of the herbicides and on the
microbial content of the samples were conducted at both the
Naval Construction Battalion Center and Johnston Island. The
results of these studies have been described by Young, et. al.
in 1979 and 1983 ( , 0 . The data indicated that although
91)
penetration of herbicide and TCDD had occurred throughout the
soil profiles sampled (8 cm increments down to 32 cm), the
bulk of the chemicals remained near the surface. Data from the
microbial analyses of soil samples collected from the Herbicide
Storage Areas confirmed that proliferation of certain microflora
occurred under high levels of herbicide residue.

�10. YOUNG

175

Degradation Studies of Phenoxy Herbicides

Table VIII. Mean Concentrations (ppm) of Total Herbicides,
Phenols and TCDD in Soils Collected in January and
November 1978 from Selected Sites on the Herbicide
Orange Storage Area, Naval Construction Battalion
Center, Gulfport, Mississippi

Location

Number
Total
of Sites Herbicides
Sampled9
(ppm)b

Total
Phenols
(ppm)c

TCDD
(ppm)

"No" Spills ( / )
00d
14
32*e
ND(4)f
3.5*
January 1978
November 1978
1A
3t
NAS
0.4t
"Old" Spills (L/L)
14
1,202*
January 1978
86*
0.0364(3)
November 1978
14
492t
23t
0.0438(3)
"New" Spills (H/H)
January 1978
437*
14 51,285*
0.2064(10)*
November 1978
0.1444(11)*
14 30,005t
253t
a
Each soil sample consisted of a cube of soil (8X8X8 cm) removed
adjacent to a designated marker.
^Total herbicides refers to the concentration of acid and all
esters of both 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T.
c
Total phenols refers to total concentration of both
dichlorophenol and trichlorophenol.
d
The coding 0/0, L/L and H/H are described in the text.
e
Means within columns within subtitles followed by the same
symbols are not significantly different at the 0.05 probability
level.
For the statistical analysis, the Wilcoxon Paired-Sample Test was
used. A test for a one-tailed hypothesis with paired samples was
used in the procedure for nonparametric data since it could not
be assumed that the levels of residue detected were from a normal
distribution and it was expected that the residues would decrease
with time.
*ND=Not Detected; the number of samples analyzed is in
parentheses. The detection limit was generally 0.0002 ppm
(200 ppt).
SNA=Not Analyzed.

�176

TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF PESTICIDE WASTES

Table IX. Concentration (ppm) of Total Herbicides, Total Phenols
and TCDD in Soil Samples from Four Selected Spill
Sites for Four Dates from the Herbicide Orange Storage
Area, Johnston Island
Sample Date
and
Sample Site
25 August 1977
5C
9
10
12
8 January 1978
5
9
10
12
18 October 1978
5
9
10
12
8 August 1979
5
9
10
12

Total
Phenolsb
(ppm)

TCDD
(ppm)

38,000
52,270
135,250
76,080
75,400

93
205
460
172
233

0.0330
0.0417
0.1960
0.1780
0.1122

38,980
70,090
141,300
57,000
76,840

123
181
477
110
223

0.0340
0.0220
0.2300
0.0800
0.0915

31,440
60,530
159,700
42,840
73,630

34
111
456
47
T62

0.0191
0.0286
0.2350
0.1110
0.0984

Total
Herbicides3
(ppm)

ND
3,560
0.0410
149
003
.50
44,230
48,660
136
0.1300
54
0.0810
18,430
28,720
TT3(3)d
0.0763
^Total herbicides refers to concentrations of acid and all esters
detected of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T.
^Total phenols refers to concentrations of dichlorophenol and
trichlorophenol.
c
The sample consisted of a cube (8X8X8 cm) of soil removed from
near the center of an area designated as a spill.
^Refers to number of samples included in obtaining the means.

�10. YOUNG

Degradation Studies of Phenoxy Herbicides

111

Discussion and Conclusions
The amount of phenoxy herbicides applied or spilled on a kg/ha
basis in the above studies can only be described as "massive."
Although Grid 1 on the Eglin AFB spray equipment testing grids
received the herbicides primarily during 1962 and 1963, the
total amount aerially applied was 2,140 kg/ha. Because the
herbicides in this situation were applied from an aircraft, the
time between repetitive applications and the environmental
factors greatly influenced the amount that was incorporated
into the soil profile. Thus, residues were continually disappearing and accumulation and persistence were minimal. However,
in the biodegradation plots and in the Herbicide Storage Areas,
high concentrations of herbicides were applied in a short time
period and incorporated immediately into the soil profile, and
hence, the long persistence time. Nevertheless, these studies
do show that the soil chemistry and the soil microbial populations
can effectively combine to degrade massive concentrations of the
phenoxy herbicides and that recovery of the sites occur as
documented by the re-establishment of the vegetative community.
The major conclusions from long-term degradation studies of
massive quantities of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T in test grids, field
plots and herbicide storage areas are:
1. The method of application has significant impact on the
amount applied per unit area and hence on residue persistence:
spills &gt;^ soil incorporation &gt; aerial application.
2. The herbicide 2,4,5-T is more persistent in the soil than
2,4-D.
3. The formulation of the herbicide has significant impact
on its persistence:
isooctyl ester &gt; n-butyl ester &gt; acid
4. The addition of coconut charcoal increases persistence of
phenoxy herbicide residues, especially residues of 2,4,5-T.
5. The appearance of dichlorophenol and trichlorophenol in soils
treated with 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T suggests that they are
degradation products of the herbicides.
6. The massive concentration of herbicides found in these
studies do not sterilize the soils. Indeed, the data suggest
that microbial populations respond both quantitatively and
qualitatively to the presence of high concentrations of
herbicides and may play a major role in their degradation.
7. The contaminant 2,3,7,8-TCDD has a long persistence time
in soils (years) and may be a major consideration in the
use of soil biodegradation as a disposal option for
"unwanted" phenoxy herbicides or TCDD-contaminated chemical
wastes.

�178

TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF PESTICIDE WASTES

Acknowledgments

I am indebted to Drs. Eugene Arnold and Mason Hughes for the
analyses of the phenoxy herbicides, phenols and the TCDD
contaminant.

Literature Cited

Young, A. L., J. A. Calcagni, C. E. Thalken and J. W.
Tremblay, 1978. "The Toxicology, Environmental Fate and
Human Risk of Herbicide Orange and Its Associated Dioxin."
Air Force Technical Report OEHL-TR-78-92. 247p. Document
available from NTIS, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA
22161.
Young, A. L., 1974. "Ecological Studies on a HerbicideEquipment Test Area (TA C-52A), Eglin AFB Reservation,
Florida." Air Force Technical Report AFATL-TR-74-12.
141p. Document AD-^80 517, available from NTIS, 5285 Port
Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161.
Young, A. L., C. E. Thalken and W. E. Ward, 1975. "Studies
of the Ecological Impact of Repetitive Aerial Applications
of Herbicides on the Ecosystem of Test Area C-52A, Eglin,
AFB, Florida." Air Force Technical Report AFATL-TR-75-142.
127p. Document AD-A032 773, available from NTIS, 5285 Port
Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161.
Young, A. L., 1983. "Long-Term Studies on the Persistence
and Movement of TCDD in a Natural Ecosystem." Environ.
Sci. Kes_. 26:173-190.
Young, A. L., E. L. Arnold, and A. M. Wachinski, 1974.
"Field Studies on the Soil-Persistence and Movement of
2,4-D 2,4,5-T, and TCDD." Appendix G. Disposition of
Orange Herbicide by Incineration. Final Environmental
Statement, November 1974. Department of the Air Force,
Washington, D.C.
Young, A. L., C. E. Thalken, E. L. Arnold, J. M. Cupello,
and L. G. Cockerham. 1976. "Fate of 2,3,7,8Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in the Environment:
Summary and Decontamination Recommendations." Air Force
Technical Report USAFA-TR-76-18. 44p. Document AD-A033 491,
available from NTIS, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA
22161.
Stark, H. E., J. K. McBride, and G. F. Orr, 1975. "Soil
Incorporation/Biodegradation of Herbicide Orange. Vol I.
Microbial and Baseline Ecological Study of the U.S. Air
Force Logistics Command Test Range, Hill AFB, Utah."
Document No. DPG-FR-C615F, US Army Dugway Proving Ground,
Dugway, Utah 84022, February 1975.

�10. YOUNG

Degradation Studies of Phenoxy Herbicides

179

8. Winston, A. W. and R. M. Ritty, 1971. "What Happens to
Phenoxy Herbicides When Applied to a Watershed Area."
Ind. Vegetation Manage. 4(1):12-14.
9. Young, A. L., C. E. Thalken, and W. J. Cairney, 1979.
"Herbicide Orange Site Treatment an Environmental Monitoring:
Summary Report and Recommendations for Naval Construction
Battalion Center, Gulfport, Mississippi." Air Force
Technical Report OEHL-TR-79-169. 36p. Document AD-A062
143, available from NTIS, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield,
VA 22161.
10. Young, A. L., W. J. Cairney and C. E. Thalken, 1983.
"Persistence, Movement and Decontamination Studies of
TCDD in Storage Sites Massively Contaminated with Phenoxy
Herbicides." Chemosphere 12(4/5): 713-726.
RECEIVED May 1, 1984

Reprinted from ACS SYMPOSIUM SERIES, No. 259
TREATMENT &amp; DISPOSAL OF PESTICIDE WASTES
Raymond F. Krueger and James N. Seiber, Editors

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="38800">
              <text>145</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="38801">
              <text>4178</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="38805">
              <text>Series VI Subseries III</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="38799">
                <text>Young, Alvin L.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="38802">
                <text>Treatment and Disposal fo Pesticide Wastes: based on a symposium sponsored by the Division of Pesticide Chemistry at the 186th meeting of the American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., August 28-September 2, 1983</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="38803">
                <text>1984</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="38804">
                <text>Chapter 10: Long-Term Degradation Studies: Massive Quantities of Phenoxy Herbicides in Test Grids, Field Plots, and Herbicide Storage Sites</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="5906" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="44704">
              <text>229</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="44705">
              <text>6564</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="44709">
              <text>Series X</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="44703">
                <text>Young, Alvin L.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="44706">
                <text>Dioxins in the Environment</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="44707">
                <text>1985</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="44708">
                <text>Chapter 11: Fate of TCDD in Field Ecosystems - Assessment and Significance for Human Exposures</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2452" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="17108">
              <text>053</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="17109">
              <text>1411</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="17113">
              <text>Series III Subseries II</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17105">
                <text>Young, Alvin L.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="17106">
                <text>H. K. Kang</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="17107">
                <text>B. M. Shepard</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17110">
                <text>Chlorinated Dioxins and Dibenzofurans in the Total Environment II</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17111">
                <text>1985</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17112">
                <text>Chapter 13: Rationale and Description of the Federally Sponsored Epidemiological Research in the United States on the Phenoxy Herbicides and Chlorinated Dioxin Contaminants</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17114">
                <text>herbicide toxicology</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="17115">
                <text>AOWG</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2453" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="17120">
              <text>053</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="17121">
              <text>1412</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="17125">
              <text>Series III Subseries II</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17116">
                <text>Young, Alvin L.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="17117">
                <text>M. R. Flicker</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="17118">
                <text>H. K. Kang</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="17119">
                <text>B. M. Shepard</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17122">
                <text>Chlorinated Dioxins and Dibenzofurans in the Total Environment II</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17123">
                <text>1985</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17124">
                <text>Chapter 14: Health Surveillance of Vietnam Veterans Claiming Agent Orange Exposure</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17126">
                <text>dioxin</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="17127">
                <text>Agent Orange controversy</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="17128">
                <text>VA</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="17129">
                <text>Agent Orange Registry</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2223" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="14862">
              <text>047</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="14863">
              <text>1170</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="14867">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14859">
                <text>Young, Alvin L.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="14860">
                <text>Han K. Kang</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="14861">
                <text>Barclay M. Shepard</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14864">
                <text>Environmental Science and Technology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14865">
                <text>1983</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14866">
                <text>Chlorinated Dioxins as Herbicide Contaminants</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="14868">
                <text>Vietnam</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="14869">
                <text>soft tissue sarcoma</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="14870">
                <text>congenital birth defects</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="14871">
                <text>veteran health and hygiene</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6460" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="2291">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/6120d57649c8ba8db8b570075d209158.pdf</src>
        <authentication>651f91607242ddd9ef5ae98075ea89f1</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="64240">
                    <text>Item D Number

05«2

Author

D MotScannBfl

Young, Alvin L

United States District Court, Eastern District of New Yor

RODOrt/ArtlOlO Tltlfl Declaration of Alvin L. Young, In re: "Agent Orange"
Product Liability Litigation, All Cases, August 30,1984

Journal/Book Title
Year

000

°

Month/Day
Color
Number of bnagos

D

°

Descrlpton Notes

Friday, March 15, 2002

Page 5482 of 5571

�UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

I-» "RE T|fAGENT ORANGE

)

PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION

)

ALL CASES

)

fc

DECLARATION OF ALVIN L. YOUNG
I, Alvin L. Young, being duly sworn, depose and state that
based on the records, files and documents to which I have access,
control and supervision, the following is true to the best of my
knowledge, information and belief:
(1)

I am a Senior Staff Scientist (AFSC 2616) with the United
States Air Force, currently detailed as Senior Policy Analyst,
Office of Science and Technology Policy, Executive Office
of the President, Washington, D.C.

Since 1968, I have

served as an expert for the government in areas of science
related to the military herbicide Agent Orange.

Specific

areas of expertise include formulation, equipment design,
application, military use, dioxin contamination, environmental
fate, toxicology and human risks to exposure.

(2)

Agent Orange, as formulated and procurred for the Department
of Defense, consisted of approximately a 50:50 mixture of
the normal-butyl esters of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic
and 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid.

acid

The product was

formulated to contain approximately 8.6 pounds active
ingredient (acid equivalents of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T) per
gallon of liquid.

Thus the product contained roughly

4 pounds of each herbicide in the acid

form.

�(3)

The herbicides 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T have been commercially
available and widely used since the late 1940's.

Numerous

formulations including the iso-butyl and normal-butyl
formulations were used commercially

ester

in the United States

prior to, during, and after the use of Agent Orange in
Vietnam.

In the 1960 Farm Chemicals Handbook, formulations

of the normal-butyl ester of 2,4-D containing 4 and 6 pounds
per gallon active ingredient were recommended
control

in wheat and other field grains.

for weed

In the same

handbook, formulations of the normal-butyl esters of both
2,4-D

and 2,4,5-T (as a mixture) were recommended for brush

control on rangelands and in reforestation.

Typically these

latter formulations contained the active ingredient at 4
and 6 pounds per gallon.

As late as 1980 normal-butyl

esters of 2,4-D were commercially available (DOW ESTERON
76BE) containing 6 pounds (acid equivalents) per gallon.
4.

Analyses in the early 1970's of archived samples of commercial
formulations of 2,4,5-T and archived samples of Agent Orange
showed similar levels of dioxin (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-pdixoin) contamination (See Young, A.L. et al. 1978.

The

Toxicology, Environmental Pate, and Human Risk of Herbicide
Orange and Its Associated Dioxin, Air Force Technical
Report OEHL - 78-92).

I declare under penalty of perjury that the ^above ijs true and
correct.

�CD

». ( / &gt;

ACTIVE INGREDIENT:
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid, Butyl Esters
INERT INGREDIENTS:
2,4-D Acid Equivalent 63.2%-6 pounds per gallon
E.P.A. Registration No. 464-279 ^

SB 8

tug

USE DIRECTIONS
Use ESTERON 76 BE herbicide to control bitterweed, croton, dandelion, docks, galinsoga,
henbit, kochia, lambsquarters, morshelder, mustards, peppergrass, pigweed, plantains,
ragweed, shepherdspurse, thistles, vetch, wild radish, and many other broadleaf weeds,
without injury to most established grasses; also for control of 2,4-0 susceptible woody
plants such as coastal sage, sandsage, elderberry, hazel, locust, poison oak, sumac and
willow. Use in small grains, corn, sorghum, grass seed crops, pastures, rangeland and in
non-crop areas.
Apply ESTERON 76 BE as a water or oil spray during warm weather when weeds or brush
are actively growing. Application under drought conditions often will give poor results.
Use low spray pressure to minimize spray drift. On cropland and along roadsides, do not
exceed 20 psi pressure. Apply enough spray volume to provide uniform coverage of weeds
and brush, usually 5 to 20 gallons per acre by ground equipment and 3 to 5 gallons by aircraft. Higher gallonage may be used if desired to improve spray coverage and to reduce the
hazard from spray drift.
Generally, the lower dosages recommended on this label will be satisfactory for young,
succulent growth of sensitive weed species. For less sensitive species and under conditions
where control is more difficult, the higher dosages will be needed. For crop uses, do not mix
with oil or other adjuvants unless specifically recommended on this label. Deep-rooted
perennial weeds such as Canada thistle and field bindweed and many woody plants usually
require repeated applications for maximum control. Do not apply ESTERON 76 BE where
spray drift may contact nearby susceptible crape or other desirable plants or may contaminate water for irrigation or domestic use. Do not apply in the vicinity of 2,4-D sensitive crops or ornamental plants since vapors from this product may cause injury to such
crops or plants. Read and follow all Use Precautions given on this label.
NOTE: If there are uncertainties concerning special local use situations or specific crop
variety tolerances to 2,4-D, consult local Extension Service or University Specialists for advice.
TO PREPARE THE SPRAY: (1) Fill the spray tank about half full with water, then add the required amount of ESTERON 76 BE, with agitation, and finally the rest of the water. NOTE:
ESTERON 76 BE in water forms an emulsion which tends to separate unless the mixture is
kept agitated. (2) If oil is added, first mix the ESTERON 76 BE and the oil and then add this
mixture to the water with agitation. However, with adequate agitation, the oil can be added
after the ESTERON 76 BE is mixed in the water if strong agitation is provided. (3) If straight
oil is used, a solution is formed and separation does not occur. Do not allow any water to get
into the oil-herbicide mixture to avoid formation of an invert emulsion.
WEED CONTROL IN SMALL GRAINS NOT UNDERSEEDED WITH A LEGUME: NOTE: Water is
recommended to make up the spray. If oil is used, there is a greater risk of crop injury and
of spray drift. Do not permit dairy animals or meat animals being finished for slaughter to
forage or graze treated grain fields within 2 weeks after treatment.
Spring Wheat and Barley: Apply Va to % pint per acre by air or ground equipment. A '/2
pint per acre rate of ESTERON 76 BE is an average dosage, effective on many weeds. Spray
when grain is in full tiller stage (usually 4 to 8 inches tall) but before the boot stage and
when weeds are small. Do not apply before the tiller stage nor from early boot to the dough
stage. Higher rates (up to IVs pints per acre) may be required to control certain weeds but
crop injury may result.
Winter Wheat and Rye: Apply &gt;/3 to Vz pint per acre in the spring at the full tiller stage
but before the early boot stage. See more complete use directions under Spring Wheat
and Barley.
Spring Seeded Oats: Apply '/3 pint per acre at the full tiller stage but before the early
boot stage. Oats are less tolerant to 2,4-D than wheat or barley and are more likely to suffer
some injury, especially if higher rates (Vi to 2/3 piAt) are used to control difficult weeds.
Preharvest Treatment: Apply 3/3 to l'/3 pints per acre when grains are in the hard dough
stage to control large weeds that may interfere with harvest. Best results will be obtained
when soil moisture is sufficient to cause succulent weed growth. NOTE: Do not feed treated
straw to livestock.
WEED CONTROL IN CORN: Use one of the following three programs: Preemergence: Apply
1'/3 to 22/3 pints per acre to soil anytime after planting but before corn emerges. Do not
use on light sandy soil. Emergence: Apply 2/3 pint per acre just as corn plants are breaking
ground. Postemergence: After emergence of corn, use '/3 pint per acre. Application of '/2
to 2/3 pint per acre may be needed for maximum control of some weeds but such rates are
more likely to injure the corn. If corn is over 8 inches tall, use drop nozzles to keep the spray
off the corn foliage as much as possible. Do not apply from the tasseling to dough stage. Do
not use with oil, atrazine or adjuvants. Crop injury is more likely to occur if corn is growing
rapidly under high temperature and high soil moisture conditions. To reduce breakage of
stalks from temporary brittleness caused by 2,4-D, delay cultivation for 8 to 10 days after
treatment. NOTE: Hybrids vary in response to 2,4-D and some are easily injured. Spray only
varieties known to be tolerant to 2,4-D. Contact seed company and Extension Service Weed
Specialists for this information.

1
U
X
*

"O J3 O
£ 0.2
o

130

o
oc
U
J

rt
"O 4- O
rc c o
O (0U
££.£

h
(
0
U
J

a&gt;
t: «o to
osS.
«i«
fl) C M)

4= 2 8

SPECIMEN
LABEL

79.2%
20.8%

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="47952">
              <text>194</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="47954">
              <text>5482</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="47956">
              <text>Series VIII Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="47951">
                <text>Young, Alvin L.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="47953">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;United States District Court, Eastern District of New York</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="47955">
                <text>Declaration of Alvin L. Young, In re: "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation, All Cases, August 30, 1984</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="2">
        <name>ao_seriesVIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2442" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="17017">
              <text>053</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="17018">
              <text>1401</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="17022">
              <text>Series III Subseries II</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17016">
                <text>Young, Alvin L.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17019">
                <text>Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17020">
                <text>1984</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17021">
                <text>Determination and Measurement of Human Exposure to the Dibenzo-P-dioxins</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17023">
                <text>dioxin</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="17024">
                <text>asbestos</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="17025">
                <text>chloracne</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="17026">
                <text>VA/EPA TCDD Assay</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1242" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1126">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/f7dec7f13438a6e941502d236acb5f7d.pdf</src>
        <authentication>d5c0136a345740e328a4041a78dbd405</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63075">
                    <text>Item ID Number:

00090

Author

Young, Alvin L.

CorpOPatB Author

Environics and Flame Munitions Branch, Flame,
Incendiary and Explosives Division, Air Force
Armament Laboratory, Eglin AFB, Florida

Roport/Artido Tltlfl Ecological Studies on a Herbicide-Equipment Test Ares (TA C-52A) Eglin AFB
Revervation, Florida; Final Report: January 1967 to November 1973

Journal/Book Title
Year

1974

Month/Day

January

Color
Number of Images

144

DOSGrlptOn NOteS

Program No. 5154-02

Friday, December 01, 2000

Page 90 of 91

�TECHNICAL REPORT AFATL-TR-74-12

ECOLOGICAL STUDIES

ON A
HERBICIDE-EQUIPMENT TEST AREA
(TA C-52A)
EGLIN AFB RESERVATION/FLORIDA

JANUARY 1974

FINAL REPORT: January 1967

to November 1973

Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.

ENVIRONICS AND FLAME MUNITIONS BRANCH
FLAME, INCENDIARY AND EXPLOSIVES DIVISION

AIR FORCE ARMAMENT LABORATORY
AIR FORCE SYSTEMS COMMAND » UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA

�UNCLASSIFIED
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (When Data Entered)

READ INSTRUCTIONS
BEFORE COMPLETING FORM

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE
1. REPORT NUMBER

2. GOVT ACCESSION NO

3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER

AFATL-TR-74-12
4. T I T L E (and Subtitle)

5. TYPE OF REPORT &amp; PERIOD C O V E R E D

Final Report
January 1967 - November 1973

ECOLOGICAL STUDIES ON A HERBICIDE-EQUIPMENT
TEST AREA (TA C-52A) EGLIN AFB RESERVATION,
FLORIDA

6. P E R F O R M I N G ORG. REPORT N U M B E R
8. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBERfs.)

7. AUTHORfs.)

Alvin L. Young, Captain, USAF, Ph.D.

9. PERFORMING O R G A N I Z A T I O N NAME AND ADDRESS

10. PROGRAM ELEMENT, PROJECT, TASK
AREA &amp; WORK UNIT NUMBERS

Flame, Incendiary and Explosives Division. (DLIP)
Air Force Armament Laboratory
Eglin Air Force Base, Florida 32542

5154-02
12. REPORT DATE

11. CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME AND ADDRESS

January 1974

Air Force Armament Laboratory
Air Force Systems Command
Eglin Air Force Base, Florida 32542

13. NUMBER OF PAGES

141

14. MONITORING.AGENCY NAME &amp; ADDRESSf/f different from Controlling Office)

IS. SECURITY CLASS, (of this report)

Unclassified

Air Force Systems Command (SDWC)
Andrews Air Force Base
Washington D. C. 20334

15a. DECLASSIFICATION/DOWN GRADING
SCHEDULE

16. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (of this Report)

Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.

17. D I S T R I B U T I O N STATEMENT (of the abstract entered In Block 20, It different

from Report)

18. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

Available in DDC
19. KEY WORDS (Continue on reverse side If necessary and Identity by block number)

Algal Survey
4-Amino-3,5,6-Trichloropicolinic
Amphibians
Animal Survey Studies
Bioassay

Acid

Blue
Defoliant Testing
Birds
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid
Dimethylarsinic Acid

20. ABSTRACT (Continue on reverse side if necessary and Identify by block number)

This report attempts to answer the major questions concerned with the ecological consequences of
applying massive quantities of herbicides (346,117 pounds), via repetitive applications, over a period
of eight years, 1962 - 1970, to an area of approximately one square mile. Moreover, the report
documents the persistence, degradation, and/or disappearance of the herbicides from the Test Area's
soils and drainage waters and their subsequent effects (direct or indirect) upon the vegetative,
faunal, and microbial communities. The active ingredients of the four military herbicides (Orange,
Purple, White, and Blue) sprayed on Test Area C-52A were 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D),
(continued)
FORM
73

DD , JAN

1473

EDITION OF 1 NOV 65 IS OBSOLETE

UNCLASSIFIED
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (When Data Entered)

�IIMPI
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGEfHTien Data Entered;

Item 19. Continued
Ecological Investigations
Fish
Herbicide
Herbicide Equipment Test Grid
Histology
Mammals
Microbial Survey
Military Defoliation Program
Necropsy
Orange
Purple
Reptiles
TCDD
Teratogenic
Test Area C-52A, Eglin AFB Reservation
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyaetic Acid
Vegetative Coverage Survey
White
Item 20.
2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T), 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic
acid (picloram), and dimethylarsinic acid (cacodylic acid). It is probable that the 2,4,5-T
herbicide contained the highly teratogenic (fetus deformina) contaminant 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). Significant herbicide residues were found in 1969. However, analysis
of soil cores in 1971 indicated residues of 2,4rD, 2,4,5-T, picloram, and arsenic to be in the parts
per billion range; no TCDD was found at this detection limit. Soil samples collected in June and
October 1973 showed TCDD (or a TCDD-like chemical) levels ranging from less than 10 parts
per trillion (ppt) to 710 ppt. Direct effects of the herbicides on the vegetative community
were temporary. With the disappearance of residue, vegetative succession was initiated. By
1973, the majority of the test area could not be distinguished from control sites. Analysis
of sample animal populations indicated that no histological or gross abnormalities were
present in adults or their progeny.

UNCLASSIFIED
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGEfWhen Data Entered)

�PREFACE
The Air Force project directly related to the information in this report is Air Force Systems
Command Project 5154-02, Ecological Survey of Test Area C-52A, Eglin AFB Reservation, Florida.
This report documents five years of ecological investigations performed between 1967 and 1973.
The assistance provided during portions of this report by the Air Force Environmental Health
Laboratory, Booz-Allen Applied Research, Dow Chemical U.S.A., United States Air Force Academy,
United States Department of Agriculture, University of Alabama, University of Florida, and Vitro
Services is gratefully acknowledged.
Information on the test grid monitoring system and types and amounts of defoliants disseminated on Test Area C-52A from July 1962 to April 1969 was obtained from Armament Development and Test Center working papers, "Defoliant History of Test Area C-52A", by Helen Biever.
After April 1969, this same information was obtained from Vitro Services, Vitro Corporation of
America. Information on soils of Test Area C-52A was obtained from a July 1969 soil survey
of Eglin AFB Reservation prepared by the Soil Conservation Service of the United States
Department of Agriculture.
This technical report hasjpeen reviewed and is approved.

F. RAMON BONNANO, Lt Colonel, USAF
Chief, Flame, Incendiary and Explosives Division

�LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS
Kenneth M. Ayers, Captain, USAF, VC, Staff Veterinarian, Veterinary Pathology Division, Armed
Forces Institute of Pathology
William J. Cairney, Captain, USAF, BSC, Assistant Professor of Life Sciences, Department of Life
and Behavioral Sciences, United States Air Force Academy
Robert W. Clegern, Captain, USAF, BSD, Ph.D., Research Entomologist, Air Force Environmental
Health Laboratory
John H. Hunter,Ph.D., Field Research and Development Specialist, Dow Chemical, U.S.A.
P. Jeffery Lehn, B.A., Biologist, Somerville, New Jersey
John W. Sigler, 1 Lt, USAF, M.S., Project Scientist, Flame Incendiary and Explosives Division,
Air Force Armament Laboratory
Charles E. Thalken, Major, USAF, VC, Assistant Professor of Life Sciences, Department of Life
and Behavioral Sciences, United States Air Force Academy
William E. Ward, Lt Colonel, USAF, Ph.D., Tenure Professor, Department of Life and Behavioral
Sciences, United States Air Force Academy
Edwin A. Woolson, Ph.D., Pesticide Chemist, Pesticide Degradation Laboratory, United States
Department of Agriculture
Alvin L. Young, Captain, USAF, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Life Sciences, Department of Life
and Behavioral Sciences, United States Air Force Academy

�TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section

Page
SUMMARY

I

5

INTRODUCTION
1. Description of Geographical and Environmental Factors
2. Description of the Test Facility
3. Descriptions of Samplings Grids and Herbicide Deposition
4. Description of Pesticides

10
10
12
19
23

BIOASSAY AND CHEMICAL RESIDUE STUDIES OF THE SOILS
OF TEST AREA C-52A
1. Synopsis of Bioassay Research, 1969 - 1970
2. Synopsis of Bioassay Research, 1970 - 1971
3. Results and Discussion
4. Conclusions
5. Chemical Analyses of Soil Cores

28
28
31
33
42
42

III

STUDIES OF THE VEGETATION OF TEST AREA C-52A
1. Synopsis of Taxonomic Studies, 1966 - 1969
2. Synopsis of Growth of Sand Pine, 1969 - 1970
3. Synopsis of Histological Study of Yucca, 1970
4. Current Vegetative Succession Studies

52
53
54
56
57

IV

STUDIES OF THE ANIMALS OF TEST AREA C-52A
1. Synopsis of Qualitative Animal Surveys, 1970 - 1973
2. Current Studies on Animals
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results and Discussion
5. Conclusions

76
76
78
82
83
91

V

INSECT DENSITY AND DIVERSITY STUDIES ON TEST AREA C-52A 92
1. Synopsis of Previous Research, May - June 1971
92
2. Materials and Methods
92
3. Results and Discussion
93
4. Summary and Conclusions
109

II

VI

VII

AQUATIC STUDIES OF TEST AREA C-52A
1. Synopsis of Previous Research, 1969
2. Current Studies of Aquatic Organisms
3. Conclusions

110
110
116
125

STUDIES ON THE MICROFLORA OF TEST AREA C-52A
1. Synopsis of Previous Research, 1967 - 1970
2. Current Studies on Microflora
3. Literature Review
4. Materials and Method
5. Results and Discussion
6. Current Studies on Survey of Aquatic Algae
7. Conclusions
3
(The reverse of this page is blank)

128
128
130
130
133
135
135
139

��SUMMARY
In support of programs testing aerial dissemination systems, a one square mile test grid
on Test Area (TA) C-52A, Eglin AFB Reservation, Florida, received massive quantities of
military herbicides. The purpose of these test programs was to evaluate the capabilities of
the equipment systems, not the biological effectiveness of the various herbicides. Hence,
it was only after repetitive applications that test personnel began to express concern over the
potential ecological and environmental hazards that might be associated with continuance
of the test program. This concern led to the establishment of a research program in the fall
of 1967 to measure the ecological effects produced by the various herbicides on the plant
and animal communities of TA C-52A. This report documents 6 years of research (1967 - 1973)
on TA C-52A and the immediately adjacent streams and forested areas.
This report attempts to answer the major questions concerned with the ecological consequences of applying massive quantities of herbicides (346,117 pounds), via repetitive applications, over a period of 8 years (1962 - 1970) to an area of approximately one square mile.
Moreover, the report documents the persistence, degradation, and/or disappearance of the
herbicides from the soils and drainage waters of TA C-52A, and the subsequent effects (direct
or indirect) of the herbicides upon the vegetative, faunal, and microbial communities.
The active ingredients of the four military herbicides (Orange, Purple, White, and Blue)
sprayed on TA C-52A were 2,4-dichlorophenoyxacetic acid (2,4-D), 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic
acid (2,4,5-T), 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid (picloram), and dimethylarsinic acid
(cacodylic acid). It is probable that the 2,4,5-T herbicide contained the highly teratogenic
(fetus deforming) contaminant 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). From 1962 to
1964, 92 acres of the test grid received 1,894 pounds 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T per acre while, in 1964
to 1966, another 92 acres received 1,168 pounds per acre. From 1966 to 1970, a third distinct area of over 240 acres received 343 pounds per acre of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T, and 6 pounds
per acre of picloram; and from 1969 to 1970, this same area received 53 pounds per acre of
cacodylic acid (28 pounds per acre of arsenic as the organic pentavalent form; calculated on
weight of Blue applied per acre).
From the rates of herbicides that were applied during the years of testing spray equipment,
it was obvious that TA C-52A offered a unique opportunity to study herbicidal persistence
and soil leaching. Yet the problem of how best to assess the level of herbicide residue was a
difficult one. The herbicides could be chemically present but because of soil binding might
not be biologically active. Thus, both bioassay techniques and analytical analyses were
employed. The first major bioassay experiment was conducted in April 1970. By considering
the flightpaths, the water sources, and the terracing effects, it was possible to divide the one
square mile test grid into 16 vegetation areas. These areas formed the basis for the random
selection of 48 soil cores taken from the surface to a depth of 3 feet. Soybean bioassays
indicated that 27 of the 48 cores were significantly different from control cores (95% probability level). The results indicated that soil leaching or penetration was much more prevalent
along the dissemination flightpaths than in other areas of the test grid. Efforts to quantitate
(chemically) the bioassay were confined to only the top 6 inch increment because of withincore variations. By considering that all phytotoxic effects resulted from 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T,
the average value for the top 6 inches of the eight cores showing greatest herbicide concentration was 2.82 ppm (parts per million) herbicide. Chemical analyses of soil cores collected
from the eight sites showing greatest phytotoxic concentrations were performed in December

�1970. Results indicated that the maximum concentration of either 2,4-D or 2,4,5-T was 8.7
ppb (parts per billion). A 1970 analysis of soil cores from areas receiving the greatest quantities
of Blue indicated maximum arsenic levels of 4.70, 1.30, and 0.90 ppm, respectively, for the
first three 6 inch increments of the soil profile. These same increments were again collected and
analyzed in 1973, and the levels of arsenic were 0.85, 0.47, and 0.59 ppm for the three consecutive 6 inch increments. Leaching of the arsenical from the soils may have occurred. In November
1969, picloram analysis of soil cores from areas receiving greatest quantities of White indicated
maximum levels of 2.8 ppm picloram present in the 6 to 12 inch increment. An analysis of the
same sites in 1971 indicated the picloram had leached further into the soil profile but concentrations were significantly less (ppb). The analyses of soil cores in 1971 showed no residue of TCDD
at a minimum detection limit of less than 1 ppb, even in soils previously treated with 947 pounds
2,4,5-T per acre. However, data from soil analysis (via mass spectrometry) of four total samples
collected in June and October 1973 indicated TCDD levels of &lt;10, 11, 30, and 710 parts per
trillion (ppt), respectively. These levels were found in the top 6 inches of soil core. The greatest
concentration (710 ppt) was found as a sample form the area that received 947 pounds 2,4,5-T
in the 1962 - 1964 test period.
A comparison of vegetative coverage and occurrence of plant species on the one square
mile grid between June 1971 and June 1973 showed that areas with 0 to 60% vegetative cover
in 1971 had a coverage of 15% to 85% in June 1973. Those areas having 0 to 5% coverage
in 1971 (areas adjacent to or under flightpaths used during herbicide equipment testing) had
15% to 54% coverage. The rate of coverage seemed to be dependent upon soil type, soil
moisture, and wind. There was no evidence to indicate that the existing vegetative coverage
was directly related to herbicide residue in the soil: some dicotyledonous or broadleaf plants
that are normally susceptible to damage from herbicide residues occurred throughout the entire
one square mile grid except in a few irregularly spaced barren areas. The square-foot transect
method of determining vegetative cover indicated that the most dominant plants on the test area
are the grasses - switchgrass (Panicurn virgatum). woolly panicum (Panicum lanuqinosum). and the
broadleaf plants - rough buttonweed (Diodia teres). poverty weed (Hypericum gentianoides). and
common polypremum (Polypremum procumbens). In 1971, 74 dicotyledonous species were
collected on the one square mile grid; in 1973, 107 dicotyledonous species were collected. All of
the plant species collected were pressed, mounted, and placed in the Eglin AFB Herbarium.
An evaluation of the effects of the spray equipment testing program on faunal communities
was conducted from May 1970 to August 1973. The extent of any faunal ecological alteration
was measured by assessing data on species variation, distribution patterns, habitat preference
(and its relationships to vegetative coverage), and the occurrence and incidence of developmental
defects as well as gross and histologic lesions in postmortem pathological examinations.
A total of 73 species of vertebrate animals (mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians)
were observed on TA C-52A and in the surrounding area. Of these 73 species, 22 were observed
only off the grid, 11 were observed only on the grid, and 40 were observed to be common to
both areas. During the early studies, no attempts were made to quantitate animal populations
in the areas surrounding the grid; however, in 1970 preliminary population studies by trap-retrap
methods were performed on beach mouse (Peromyscus polionotus) populations for a 60 day
period to confirm the hypothesis that it was the most prevalent species on the grid. The
hypothesis was supported by the capture of 36 beach mice from widely distributed areas on
the grid, except in areas with less than 5% vegetation. Eight pairs of eastern harvest mice were taken
to the laboratory and allowed to breed. Six of the eight pairs had litters totaling 24 mice.
These progeny were free from any gross external birth defects. During February - May 1971,
population densities of the beach mouse were studied at eight different locations on the grid
and in two different areas off the grid which served as controls. Populations were estimated

�on the basis of the trap-retrap data. There was no difference in mouse population densities in
herbicide treated and untreated control areas affording comparable habitats. All indications were
that any population differences in other animal species between the test area and the surrounding
area were due to differences caused by the elimination of certain plants, and therefore, certain
ecological niches, rather than being due to any direct toxic effect of the herbicides on the animal
populations present on TA C-52A.
During the last day of the 1971 study, 9 mice were captured and taken to the laboratory for
postmortem pathological examination. There were no instances of cleft palate or other deformities.
Histologically, liver, kidney, and gonadal tissues from these animals appeared normal. In the 1973
study, several different species of animals were caught, both on and off the test grid. These included
beach mice (Peromyscus polionotus), cotton mice (Perorrjyscus gossypinus), eastern harvest mice
(Reithrodontomys humulis), hispid cotton rats (Signodon hispidus), six-lined racerunners
(Cnemidophorus sexlineatus), a toad (Bufo americanus), and a cottonmouth water moccasin
(Ankistrodon piscivorus). A total of 89 animals were submitted to the Armed Forces Institute of
Pathology, Washington, D. C., for complete pathological examination including gross and microscopic studies. Liver and fat tissue from 70 rodents were forwarded to the Interpretive Analytical
Services, Dow Chemical, U.S.A., for TCDD analyses. The sex distribution of the trapped animals
was relatively equal. The ages of the animals varied, but adults predominated in the sample. No
gross or histological developmental defects were seen in any of the animals. Several of the rats
and mice from both groups were pregnant at the time of autopsy. The stage of gestation varied
from early pregnancy to near term. The embryos and fetuses were examined grossly and microscopically, and no developmental defects or other lesions were observed. Gross necropsy lesions
were relatively infrequent and consisted primarily of lung congestion in those animals that had
died from heat exhaustion prior to being brought to the laboratory. The organ weights did not
vary significantly between the test and control animals when an animal with lungs and kidneys
showing inflammatory pathological lesions was removed from the sample. Histologically, the tissues
of 13 of the 26 control animals and 40 of the 63 animals from the test grid were considered normal.
Microscopic lesions were noted in some animals from both groups. For the most part, these were
minor changes of a type one expects to find in any animal population. One of the most common
findings was parasites. A total of 11 controls and nine grid animals were affected with one or more
classes of parasites. Parasites may be observed in any wild species, and those in this population were
for the most part incidental findings that were apparently not harmful to the animal. There were
exceptions however; protozoan organisms had produced focal myositis in one rat and were also
responsible for hypertrophy of the bile duct epithelium in a six-lined racerunner.
Moderate to severe pulmonary congestion and edema was seen in several rats and mice. All
of these animals were found dead in the traps before reaching the laboratory, and the lung lesions
were probably the result of heat exhaustion. The remainder of the lesions in both groups consisted
principally of inflammatory cell infiltrates of various organs and tissues. These lesions were usually
mild in extent and although the etiology was not readily apparent, the cause was not interpreted
as toxic. The analysis of TCDD from the rodents collected in June and October 1973 indicated
that TCDD or a chemically similar compound accumulated in the liver and fat of rodents collected
from an area receiving massive quantities of 2,4,5-T. However, based on the pathological studies,
there was no evidence that the herbicides produced any developmental defects or other specific
lesions in the animals sampled or in the progeny of those that were pregnant. The lesions found
were interpreted to be of a naturally occurring type and were not considered related to any
specific chemical toxicity.

�In 1970, beach mice were not found on the more barren sections of the grid (0 to 5%
vegetative cover). However, some areas of the grid had a population density that exceeded
that of the species most preferred habitat as reported in the literature. In 1973, in an attempt to
correlate distribution of the beach mouse with vegetative cover (i.e., habitat preference) a
trapping-retrapping program of 8 days duration was conducted. The majority of animals (63)
were found in areas with 5% to 60% vegetative cover: Within this range, the greatest number
of animals trapped (28) was from an area with 40% to 60% cover. A similar habitat preference
has been observed along the beaches of the Gulf Coast. In this study, it appeared that the
beach mouse used the seeds of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) and woolly panicum (Panicum
lanuginosum) as a food source.
Trapping data from 1971 and from 1973 were compared to determine whether an increase
in the population of beach mice had occurred. The statistical evidence derived from that study
showed that the 1.64 beach mice per acre population (based on the Lincoln Index for 1973)
was slightly higher than the 0.8 and 1.4 mice per acre reported for a similar habitat. The population of beach mice was also higher in 1973 than in 1971 in the area of the test grid. The
apparent increase in beach mouse population on the grid for 1973 over 1971 was probably
due to the natural recovery phenomenon of a previously disturbed area (i.e., ecological
succession). Some areas of the test grid have currently exceeded the preferred
percentage of vegetative coverage of the beach mouse habitat, and other areas were either
ideal or fast developing into an ideal habitat. If the test grid remains undisturbed and
continues toward the climax species, a reduction in the number of beach mice will probably
occur simply due to the decline of preferred habitat.
A 1973 sweep net survey of the Arthropods of TA C-52A resulted in the collection of
over 1,700 specimens belonging to 66 insect families and Arachnid orders. These totals
represented only one of five paired sweeps taken over a one mile section of the test grid.
A similar study performed in 1971 produced 1,803 specimens and 74 families from five paired
sweeps of the same area using the same basic sampling techniques. A much greater number
of small to minute insects were taken in the 1973 survey. Vegetative coverage of the test
area had increased since 1971. The two studies showed similarities in pattern of distribution
of arthropods in relation to the vegetation, number of arthropod species, and arthropod
diversity. Generally, the 1973 study showed a reduction of the extremes found in these
parameters during the 1971 study. This trend was expected to continue as the test area
stabilizes and develops further plant cover, thus allowing a succession of insect populations
to invade the recovering habitat.
Two classes of aquatic areas are associated with TA C-52A; ponds actually on the one
square mile area and streams which drain the area. Most of the ponds are primarily of the
wet weather type, drying up once in the last 5 years; however, one of the ponds is spring
fed. Three major streams and two minor streams drain the test area. The combined annual
flow of the five streams exceeds 24 billion gallons of water. Seventeen species of fishes
have been collected from the major streams and three species from the spring fed pond on
the grid. Statistical comparisons of 1969 and 1973 data of fish populations in the three
major streams confirm a chronologically higher diversity in fish populations. However, the
two control streams confirm a similar trend in diversity. Nevertheless, from examining all
of the aquatic data, certain observations support the idea that a recovery phenomenon is
occurring in the streams draining TA C-52A. These observations are difficult to document

8

�because of insufficient data. For example, in 1969 the southern brook lamprey (Ichthyomyzon
gagei) was never collected in one of the streams immediately adjacent to the area of the grid
receiving the heaviest applications of herbicides; however, in 1973 this lamprey was taken in
relatively large numbers. These observations may or may not reflect a change in habitat due
to recovery from herbicide exposure. Residue analyses (1969 to 1971) of 558 water samples,
68 silt samples, and 73 oyster samples from aquatic communities associated with drainage
of water from TA C-52A showed negligible arsenic levels. A maximum concentration of 11 ppb
picloram was detected in one of the streams in June 1971, but this level had dropped to less
than 1 ppb when sampled in December 1971. TCDD analysis of biological organisms from streams
draining TA C-52A or in the ponds on the test area were free from contamination at a detection
limit of less than 10 parts per trillion.
In analyses performed 3 years after the last application of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T herbicides,
the test grid exhibited population levels of soil microorganisms identical to those in adjacent
control areas of similar soil and vegetative characteristics not exposed to herbicides. There
were increases in Actinomycete and bacterial populations in some test site areas over levels
recorded in 1970. This was possibly due to a general increase in vegetative cover for those
sampling sites and for the entire test grid. No significant permanent effects could be
attributed to exposure to herbicides.
Data on aquatic alga populations from ponds on the one square mile grid (previously exposed
to repetitive applications of herbicides) indicated that the genera present were those expected in
warm, acid (pH 5.5), seepage, or standing waters.

�SECTION I
INTRODUCTION
The Eglin AFB Reservation has served various military uses, one of them having been the
development and testing of aerial spray equipment (e.g., herbicide spray equipment). It was
necessary for this equipment to be tested under controlled conditions that were as near to being
realistic as possible. For this purpose a testing installation was established in 1962 on the Eglin
Reservation with the place of direct aerial application restricted to an area approximately one
mile square within Test Area C-52A (TA C-52A) in the southeastern part of the reservation.
In support of programs testing aerial dissemination systems, TA C-52A received massive
quantities of military herbicides. The purpose of these test programs was to evaluate the
capabilities of the equipment systems, not the biological effectiveness of the various herbicides.
After repetitive applications, personnel involved with the test program expressed concern about
potential ecological and environmental hazards that might be associated with continuance of
these test programs. This concern led to the establishment of an "Environmental Pollution
Control and Monitoring System Task Team". One of the purposes of this report is to document
the efforts of this task team and other personnel who were assigned to or were associated with
the Air Force Armament Laboratory and the Armament Development and Test Center. Their
efforts should serve as an indication of the interest and concern on the part of the Air Force
for pollution abatement as an integral part of weapon systems development. In view of the
controversy associated with the use of herbicides, TA C-52A offers a unique opportunity
for evaluating the ecological effects of repetitive applications of herbicides. Data obtained during
the past six years of research, plus the current research effort, may be of significance in dictating
future programs involving herbicides in military programs, civic action applications, and the public
acceptance of herbicides for continued use in weed and brush control programs.
1. DESCRIPTION OF GEOGRAPHICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
a. General Area
The Eglin AFB Reservation is located in Northwest Florida where it occupies a portion
of Santa Rosa Island, Okaloosa Island, the southeastern part of Santa Rosa County,
the southern half of Okaloosa County, and the southwestern quarter of Walton County. It
covers an area of approximately 750 square miles. To the south the Reservation is adjacent to
Choctawhatchee Bay and the Gulf of Mexico, while to the north and east it is bordered roughly
by the Yellow River and Alaqua Creek.
The Reservation lies on generally level or gently rolling terrain, all under 300 feet elevation
and sloping to sea level on the west and south. It is drained by small tributaries of the Yellow
River and Alaqua Creek and by smaller streams that flow directly into Pensacola Bay and
Choctawhatchee Bay. The valleys of these streams often are steep sided and terminate abruptly.
The soil of most of the Reservation consists of somewhat excessively drained, deep, acid sands
of the Lakeland series. In the stream bottoms, and particularly along the Yellow River, the soils
are much more heavily organic.
b. Test Area C-52A
Test Area C-52A is located in the southeastern part of the Eglin Reservation. It covers
an area of approximately three square miles (Figure 1-1) and is a grassy plain surrounded by a
forest stand that is dominated by longleaf pine (Pjnus palustris). sand pine (Pinus clausa), and

10

�c 138
HARPSITE

TO C 106

A
B
C
D
E

QA LABORATORY
TEST GRID
300 FOOT TOWER
CONCRETE APRON
CONTROL TOWER
CONTRAVES
INACTIVE

ASKAN1A

SPOTTING TOWER
CONTROL
=—=
=

5,280 FEET

BLDG.

RAVED ROAD
CUtf R040

====

SAM) ROAD

O

TOWER
MTERAN6E BOUNDARr LINE

Figure 1-1. Map of Test Area C-52A, Eglin AFB Reservation, Florida

�turkey oak (Quercus laevis). The actual area for test operations which occupies an area of
two square miles, is a cleared area occupied mainly by broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus).
switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), and low growing grasses and herbs. Much of the center of the
range was established prior to 1960, but the open range as it presently exists was developed in
1961 and 1962.Figures l-2(a)and I-3 are aerial photographs of the one square mile test grid and
the immediate adjacent area as it appeared on 16 March 1971 and 14 June 1973, respectively.
The test grid is approximately 93 feet above sea level with a water table of six to ten feet. The
major portion of this test area is drained by five small creeks whose flow rates are influenced
by a 60.4-inch average annual rainfall (Table 1-1). The average temperature for the area is 64.9°F
(Table I-2). The average maximum and minimum temperatures (°F) by month for the test area
are shown in Table I-3. For the most part, the soil of the test grid is a fine white sand on the
surface changing to yellow beneath. The profile composition for a typical 3-foot soil core is
shown in Table I-4. The soils of the range are predominantly well drained, acid sands of the
Lakeland Association with 0 to 5% slope. Figure l-2(b) shows the location of the
Lakeland, Chipley, and Rutledge sand series of the Lakeland Association as found on the one
square mile grid. The Lakeland sand that covers most of the grid area forms excessively drained
thick deposits that extend to a depth of about seven feet. This sand is characteristically very dry,
even with 60 inches of annual rainfall. The Chipley sand is moderately well drained,and the
water table in this soil may rise to within 20 to 40 inches of the surface for three months during
the year. The Rutledge sand is poorly drained, strongly acid (pH 4.5 to 5.0) soil. The water
table in this sand is within ten inches of the surface for several months during the year.
2. DESCRIPTION OF THE TEST FACILITY
a. Description
Test Area C-52A, the southern most portion of the TA C-52 range complex, is a 3 square
mile cleared area on which a one square mile micrometerological and aerosol/particulate sampling
grid was located (Figure 1-1). Test Site C-1, on the western edge of TA C-52A, was the control
center for operation of the sampling instrumentation, grid support and test data assessment. Test
Site C-102 at TA C-52 Central, provided cinetheodolite time-space-position support and fixed and
mobile communications for TA C-52A mission aircraft control. This test area was closed January
1971.
b. Capabilities and Uses
Test Area C-52A was used for assessing the dissemination and deposition characteristics
of aerially delivered liquid and particulate materials from spray tanks and other systems of a
similar nature. Micrometeorological conditions existing below 300 feet over the test area were
continuously described by the Automatic Meteorological Data Acquisition and Processing
System (AMDAPS) which included wind, temperature, and dew point sensors on a 300-foot tower
at grid center and wind sensors on 12-foot masts located at each of the four corners of the one
square mile grid. A complex of defoliant-grids, intersecting near the central AMDAPS tower and
oriented to eight major compass headings, provided 16 discrete sampling grids which could be
selected for the most advantageous wind conditions prior to and during mission time. These
grids employed glass plates and Kromekote cards for physical collection of test materials in
droplet form. Each of the 250 permanent sampling stations of the TA C-52A basic grid array
employed a wide variety of sampling devices including the above but were also equipped with
individual commercial power and sequencing control lines for remote operation of automatic
vacuum type samples which collected small particle and aerosol test materials. These sampling
stations were arranged on 400-foot centers to form the one square mile grid (see sampling
station array in Figure I-4). Remotely controlled, battery operated, portable samplers were also
available to gather data in special purpose grid configurations anywhere in a 10 square mile area.

12

�(a) Photograph of the One Square Mile Grid Taken at 5,000 Feet Above Ground Level on 16 March 1971
Figure I-2. Test Area O52A

�'-:**. £ * '

&gt;£$ 'A
i£%^

&amp;

p.f\3 4 S 6 f'^9 l
y % *" '/
#"*•

^^/\
".
**. *

%

¥\v;

'%
LAKELAND SAND

* &lt;\ v*

K&gt; CHIP LEY SAND

* v *'/*
r*- &lt;
'* *i * v/ • " t- YI *
\
f
%»\
t

RUTLEDGE SAND

* . '-*^ *,
'*•
,»
^V/
% »\V" 'f*-&gt;

',,j
*

(b) Soil Types of the One Square Mile Grid on Test Area C-52A

Figure 1-2. Concluded
14

�Figure 1-3. Photograph of the One Square Mile Grid Taken at 4,300 Feet Above
Ground Level on 14 June 1973

15

�TABLE 1-1.

ANNUAL TOTAL PRECIPITATION FOR EGLIN AFB AND
NICEVILLE, FLORIDA, FROM 1964 TO 1969

YEAR

PRECIPITATION, Inches
EGLIN AFB
NICEVILLE

1964

68.10

72.68

1965

61.85

65.29

1966

51.10

66.95

1967

62.76

73.05

1968

31.68

42.33

60.01

68.96

55.92

64.88

1969
3

Average
a

Average of the two locations is 60.40 inches

TABLE I-2. AVERAGE MONTHLY TEMPERATURES (°F) FOR FOUR YEARS AT
NICEVILLE, FLORIDA
YEAR

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

1966

45.4

50.1

56.1

65.3

73.8

76.1

81.7

79.3

77.1

67.7

56.6

49.6

1967

49.4

48.9

60.8

70.6

72.2

79.2

78.7

72.4

63.5

55.2

56.8

65.4

1968

48.7

45.9

54.5

67.9

72.3

79.9

79.2

81.5

75.5

66.6

55.0

49.3

1969

49.8

52.0

52.1

66.9

73.2

80.5

81.2

78.1

75.2

69.6

54.5

49.2

Average3 48.3

49.2

55.9

67.7

72.9

78.9

80.2

78.3

72.8

64.8

55.7

53.4

3

Average temperature for 4 years is 64.9° F

16

�TABLE 1-3. AVERAGE MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM TEMPERATURES (°F) BY MONTH
FOR FOUR YEARS (1966 - 1969) TAKEN FROM THE SIX FOOT LEVEL
AT THE CENTER TOWER OF TEST AREA C-52A, EGLIN AFB, FLORIDA
MONTH8

TEMPERATURE, °F
MINIMUM
40.05
40.55
48.15
59.96
62.67
68.38
68.82
71.04
66.90
54.24
46.09
42.08

January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
a

MAXIMUM
58.86
60.69
68.32
81.52
82.15
86.04
87.48
87.71
84.06
77.41
68.03
61.67

Average temperature for 4 years is 65.54°F

TABLE 1-4. SOIL PROFILE (6-INCH INCREMENTS) FOR TEST AREA C-52A, EGLIN
AFB RESERVATION, FLORIDA 8
DEPTH, Inches

CLAY, %

O.M., %b

C.E.C.C

SAND, %

SILT, %

1 -6

91.6

4.0

4.4

0.46

1.19

6- 12

90.1

4.3

5.6

0.20

0.81

12- 18

92.1

4.3

3.6

0.20

0.73

18- 24

92.9

3.5

3.6

0.00

0.69

24-30

93.1

2.8

4.1

0.07

0.69

30- 36

92.8

3.6

3.6

0.07

0.69

a

As determined by the Soils Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Soil sample taken within 50 feet of K-9 permanent sampling station.

'-'Percent organic matter.
C

C.E.C. (cation exchange capacity) is the ability of a cation to be displaced or exchanged
from the soil by another cation. The cation exchange capacity of a typical greenhouse
potting soil is 11.43. A soil with a cation exchange capacity of 1 can "bind" or "fix"
10 ppm of a given cation (s).

17

�2
O

A O

3

4

5

6

9

10

II

12

13

14

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

B

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

c

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

D

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

E

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

F

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

G

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

rv_i-_
O — 0-

1

T(

TR

400 FEET

H

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

J

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

K

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

L

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

M

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

N

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

500

1000

1500

2000

GRAPHIC SCALE-FEET

Figure 1-4. Location of the Permanent Sampling Stations on the One Square
Mile Grid

18

�Fixed and portable illuminated flight line markers were available for missions during hours of
darkness. A Quantitative Assessment Laboratory facility, collocated with the Test Site C-1
control center, received the collected samples and performed appropriate chemical analysis or
biological assays providing data for assessment of test item performance. Micrometeorological
data from TA C-52A was both recorded at the AM DAPS master station located at Test Site C-1
and transmitted to the main base Staff Meteorologist Control Center, Eglin AFB, via teletype
on a 24-hour basis.
3. DESCRIPTIONS OF SAMPLING GRIDS AND HERBICIDE DEPOSITION
Descriptions of the sampling grids located on TA C-52A and individual mission data including
herbicide and total gallons sprayed have been compiled by Biever .
a. Grid Descriptions
Figure I-5 shows the location of the various herbicide grids that were located on TA C-52A.
The original sampling grid (Grid!) for spray equipment testing became operational in June 1962.
It consisted of four intersecting straight lines in a circular pattern, each line being at a 45° angle
from those adjacent to it. This grid was discontinued after two years. It was located immediately
south of the one square mile grid.
The second sampling grid (Grid 2) consisted of three parallel lines intersected at right angles
by another set of three parallel lines. These lines were 800 feet apart, thus forming four equal
quadrants. The southwest corner of this grid corresponded to the southwest corner of the one
square mile grid. The parallel line grid was operational during the period May 1964 to November
1965.
The third sampling grid (Grid3) consisted of three concentric circles, with respective
diameters of 1200, 1600, and 2000 feet. This grid was located in the northeast quadrant of
the one square mile grid. The concentric circles grid was operational between October 1967 and
April 1968; however, difficulty in interpreting data from this sampling array caused use of this
grid to be discontinued.
The fourth sampling grid (Grid 4) is a one square mile grid, the center of which was marked
by a 300-foot tower. This was the last testing grid used on TA C-52A and its inwind and crosswind sampling arrays extended into Grid 2 and Grid 3. Figures I-6, I-7, I-8, and I-9 show various
views of Grid 4 at the time the grid was under construction.
The two inwind and four crosswind sampling arrays of Grid 4 became operational in
May 1968. Each inwind array consisted of three parallel rows spaced 400 feet apart, with 297
sampling stations per row. The aircraft flight path crossed the midpoints of the sampling lines.
The crosswind sampling arrays consisted of three parallel rows 400 feet apart, with 253 sampling
stations per row.
b. Deposition Rate
The total amounts of chemicals (including herbicides, insecticides, oils, and simulants)
applied to TA C-52A are shown in Table I-5. All of these materials were disseminated during
the period from June 1962 to December 1970 (Figure 1-10). The total pounds of actual herbicides
^Defoliant History of Test Area C-52A, Working Papers, Vitro Corporation of America and
Armament Development and Test Center, Eglin AFB, Florida, December 1969.

19

�1
A *

2
•

3
•

4
•

5
•

6
•

7
•

8
•

* UOO feet

400 feet

Boundary of major aircraft
flight paths over grid
Boundary of minor aircraft
flight paths over grid
Grid Boundary
2000 feet

Figure 1-5. Location of Test Grids and Major Flight Paths Used during Dissemination
of Herbicides Over Test Area C-52A
20

�Figure 1-6. A View of Grid/Number 4 Looking from the Southeast to the Northwest,
1964

Figure 1-7. A View of Grid Number 4 Looking from East to West, 1964

21

�Figure 1-8. A View of Grid Number 4 Looking from North to South, 1964

Figure I-9. A View of the Western Portion of Grid Number 4 Looking from the
Southeast to the Northwest, 1964

22

�14,000 '

C=3 PURPLE
rUH FUEL OIL
•
• ORANGE

nnnni WHITE

10,000

-

ECS BLUE

-

c
_o
j? 6,000

-

Ul

-

5

.
-

O
^
2,000

3

p

3

1

-

1962

/

a_ ilJa_

.1
63 64 65 66 67 68

^

/

69

70

YEAR

Figure 1-10. Annual Dissemination of Herbicides on Eglin AFB Test Area C-52A
•
deposited on the test area (total of all grids) is shown in Table I-6. The approximate
deposition rate of herbicides, pounds active ingredient per acre, for each grid is shown in
Table I-7.
4. DESCRIPTION OF PESTICIDES
As closely as possible the equipment utilized on TA C-52A was tested under realistic yet
controlled conditions. Most testing programs involving military herbicides and insecticides
actually included the pesticides themselves rather than simulants. The low toxicity associated
with these pesticides was the salient justification for such action.
4

a. Orange
Orange was a reddish-brown to tan colored liquid soluble in diesel fuel and organic solvents, but insoluble in water. One gallon of Orange contained 4.21 pounds of the active ingredient
of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and 4.41 pounds of the active ingredient of 2,4,5trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T). Orange was formulated to contain a 50:50 mixture of the
n-butyl esters of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T. The percentages of the formulation were:
n-butyl ester of 2,4-D
free acid of 2,4-D
n-butyl ester of 2,4,5-T
free acid of 2,4,5-T
inert ingredients (e.g., butyl
alcohol and ester moieties)

49.49%
0.13%
48.75%
1.00%
0.62%

Some of the physical, chemical, and toxicological properties of Orange are listed in Table I-8.

23

�TABLE 1-5. APPROXIMATE TOTAL VOLUME OF HERBICIDES,
INSECTICIDES, AND/OR SIMULANTS APPLIED TO
TEST AREA C-52A, EGLIN AFB RESERVATION,
FLORIDA, 1962- 1970
CHEMICAL

GALLONS DISSEMINATED

19,807

Orange
Purple3
White
Blue
Stull Bifluidb
Fuel Oil
Orange Simulant0
Malathion Insecticide

16,164
4,172
4,395
1,716
10,863
1,460
215
Total

58,792

a

Purple was a mixture of n-butyl 2,4-D (50%), n-butyl 2,4,5-T (30%), and isobutyl
2,4,5-T (20%). The isobutyl portion was included as a measure to depress the
freezing point of 2,4,5-T. This mixture was eventually replaced by Orange.

"Stull Bifluid consisted of Orange (85%) plus a chemical additive, which when mixed
in the spray system pump during agent dissemination produced a gel defoliant.
C

0range simulant consisted of glycerine (68%), sodium thiosulfate (16.8%), and
water (15.2%).

TABLE I-6. TOTAL POUNDS OF ACTIVE INGREDIENTS OF HERBICIDES
DISSEMINATED ON TEST AREA C-52A, EGLIN AFB RESERVATION,
FLORIDA, JUNE 1962 - DECEMBER 1970
HERBICIDE

POUNDS ACTIVE INGREDIENT

2,4-D

169,292

2,4,5-T

160,948

Picloram

2,253
13,624

Cacodylic Acid and
Sodium Cacodylate

24

�TABLE 1-7. APPROXIMATE DEPOSITION RATE OF HERBICIDES APPLIED TO TEST AREA C-52A,
EGLIN AFB RESERVATION, FLORIDA
TEST
GRID 3

1

GRID
AREA b ,
Acres
92

HERBICIDE (POUNDS ACTIVE INGREDIENT/ACRE)

2

584
(1964-1966)

3

92

30
(1967)

4
CJ7

92

240

183
(1968-1969)

PICLORAM

CACODYLIC ACID

8
(1967)

2,4-D
2,4,5-T
947
947
( 1962-1 964)d (1962-1964)

11
(1968)

6
(1969-1970)

53
(1969-1970)

ARSENIC 0

584
(1964-1966)

160
(1968-1969)

6
28

a

The test grids are described in text

^In actuality, grids 2 and 3 fall within the confines of the 640 acre grid 4. However, the positioning of the test arrays on
grid 4 has resulted in most of the herbicide being disseminated within a 240 acre area, with only slight infringement on the
original sites of grids 2 and 3.
°Pounds per acre of arsenic as the organic pentavalent form; calculated on weight of Blue applied per acre.
°Years when the majority of the herbicide was applied.

�TABLE 1-8. PHYSICAL, CHEMICAL, AND TOXICOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF THE THREE MAJOR
HERBICIDES AND ONE MAJOR INSECTICIDE
CHEMICAL

SPECIFIC
DENSITY
(25C)a

VJSCOSITY
CENTIPOISE
(23C)

MOLECULAR
MASS

WEIGHT OF
FORMULATION
(Ibs/gal)

SOLUBLE
WEIGHT
ACTIVE
IN
INGREDIENT
WATER
(Ibs/gal)

RELATIVE SPECIFIC
TOXICITY TOXICITY
FOR WHITE
RATS
(mg/kg)

Orange

1.282

43

618

10.7

8.62

No

Low

White

1.120

125

1,173

9.4

2.54

Yes

Very Low

3,080

Blue

1.324

14

296

10.9

3.10

Yes

Very Low

2,600

Malathion

1.232

36

328

10.3

9.74

No

Low

1,375

NJ

a

As determined by the Air Force Armament Laboratory

566

�b. White
White was a dark brown, viscous liquid that was soluble in water but insoluble in organic
solvents and diesel fuel. One gallon of White contained 0.54 pound of the active ingredient of
4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid (picloram) and 2.00 pounds of the active ingredient of 2,4-D.
White was formulated to contain a 1:4 mixture of the triisopropanolamine salts of picloram and
2,4-D. The percentages of the formulation were:
triisopropanolamine salt of picloram
triisopropanolamine salt of 2,4-D
inert ingredient (primarily the
solvent triisopropanolamine)

10.2%
39.6%
50.2%

Some of the physical, chemical, and toxicological properties of White are listed in Table I-8.
c. Blue
Blue was a clear yellowish-tan liquid that was soluble in water, but insoluble in organic
solvents and diesel fuel. One gallon of Blue contained 3.10 pounds of the active ingredient
dimethylarsinic acid (cacodylic acid). Blue was formulated to contain both cacodylic acid
(as the free acid) and the sodium salt of cacodylic acid (sodium cacodylate). The percentages
of the formulation were:
cacodylic acid
sodium cacodylate
surfactant
sodium chloride
water
antifoam agent

4.7%
26.4%
3.4%
5.5%
59.5%
0.5%

Some of the physical, chemical, and toxicological properties of Blue are listed in Table I-8.
It should be noted that cacodylic acid and sodium cacodylate contain arsenic in the form of
the pentavalent, organic arsenical. This form of arsenic is essentially nontoxic to animals as
can be noted by the LD§Q value for white rats. Of the total formulation, 15.4% is arsenic
in the organic form, only trace quantities are present in the inorganic (toxic) form.
d. Malathion
Malathion insecticide (0,0-dimethyphosphorodithioate) was a clear brown to colorless
liquid withia slight characteristic odor. The ultra-low-volume (ULV) formulation was very
slightly soluble in water (145 ppmw). Malathion ULV had a minimum purity of 95%. One
gallon of ULV malathion contained 9.74 pounds active ingredient and 0.51 pound inert ingredients.
Some of the physical, chemical, and toxicological properties of malathion are listed in Table I-8.

27

�SECTION II
BIOASSAY AND CHEMICAL RESIDUE STUDIES
OF THE SOILS OF TEST AREA C-52A
From the rates that were applied during the years of testing spray equipment, it was obvious
that Test Area C-52A at Eglin AFB Reservation offered a unique opportunity to study herbicidal
persistence and soil leaching. Yet, the problem of how best to assess the level of residue was a
difficult one. The herbicides could be chemically present but because of soil binding might not
be biologically active. Moreover, as noted in Section I, many chemicals were applied to the test
area, and a biological assessment might be the result of two or more chemicals interacting. Thus,
both bioassay techniques and analytical analysis were employed. The results of the bioassay studies
by A. L. Young and J. H. Hunter have not been published; however, the methodology developed and
the results obtained have played a major role in understanding the ecological succession of the plant
and animal communities on the test area. Thus, a detailed synopsis of their work is included in
this report.
1. SYNOPSIS OF BIOASSAY RESEARCH, 1969 - 1970
In the late summer of 1969, six 5-foot cores were randomly collected from an area known to
intersect spray flight paths used for missions involving the herbicide designated as Orange. The
samples were taken to the laboratory and subsampled for bioassay and analytical results. The
bioassay technique employed the use of soybean (variety Clarke 63) for detecting phenoxy-herbicide
residue. The experiments were conducted under greenhouse conditions. No standard herbicide
concentrations were included; instead, cores from treated areas were compared to control cores
and the relative differences noted. Comparisons for each depth were made against control plants
for the particular depth.
These initial bioassay studies indicated two things. First, significant concentrations of herbicides
(or phytotoxic materials) were present on the test grid; and second, these herbicides were definitely
leaching or penetrating into the soil (at least to a depth of 3 feet). Moreover, the bioassay analysis
indicated different relative concentrations of herbicides both between cores and within a given core.
As noted earlier, the area of interest was an area greater than one square mile. Obviously,
this area was too large to completely bioassay or to subject to chemical analyses. Therefore, it was
decided to find the areas of greatest herbicide concentration and follow up with detailed bioassay
and chemical analyses. To find these specific areas, it was necessary to design an experiment that
would allow inferences about herbicidal persistence for the entire test area. Consulting statisticians
assisted in designing the experiment and in analyzing the results.
In order to properly evaluate herbicidal persistence and soil leaching, a vegetation chart of the
test grid was prepared on 26 March 1970. The greatest amounts of vegetation were found near the
water sources of the grid. There were two areas that supported very dense vegetation. A terracing
effect of diminishing amounts of vegetation away from these two areas was apparent. The effects
of repeated spray could be seen along the flightpaths most frequently used in test programs. In
these strips, vegetation occurred only near the water sources and even there it was scant. By considering the flightpaths, the water sources, and the terracing effects, it was possible to divide the
test grid into 16 vegetation areas. These areas formed the base for the random selection of soil
samples. The statistical null hypotheses that were to be investigated included the following:
1. There were no herbicide concentration differences among the soils of the various
vegetative areas.

28

�2. There were no differences in herbicide content among soil depths down to 3 feet.
3. There were no interactions between the vegetative areas and the soil depths.
In order to conduct an experiment that would provide reliable evidence with respect to these
hypotheses, three random 3 foot soil cores were taken from each of the vegetative units and three
from a control area, an area 0.2 mile northwest of the square mile grid. Figure 11-1 shows the sites
for the random sampling of these soil cores. These cores provided the replication for the experiment. Because of the time involved in taking the soil cores and the possible effects of the soil
drying out if left unplanted for several days, it was necessary to apply the technique of blocking
over the days of soil core removal and planting. The experiment was initiated 1 April 1970. Again
the bioassay organism was soybean (five seeds per cup and one cup per 6 inch increment of soil
core), and the experiment was conducted in a greenhouse.
A series of standards for herbicide Orange was included in this experiment (range of standards
was 0.25 to 4.00 ppm Orange). All standards were prepared in soil taken from the top 6 inch
increment of control soil. The results indicated that therewereherbicidal persistence and leaching;
of the 48 treatment cores collected and bioassayed, 27 cores were significantly different from control
cores (95% probability level). The results indicated that soil leaching or penetration was much more
prevalent along the dissemination flightpaths than in other areas of the test grid. Moreover, there
were differences among the soils of the various vegetative areas within a given flightpath. Likewise,
differences were found in herbicide content among the increments of many of the soil cores. This
was probably due to both the elapsed time since herbicide application and to such factors as
rainfall frequency and organic matter content of the soil. It is interesting to note that there were
no statistical evidences of differences between wet and dry soils that received approximately the
same amounts of herbicide. Efforts to quantitate the bioassay were confined to only the top 6
inch increment because of within-core variations. By considering that all phytotoxic effects were
from Orange, the approximate concentration was 2.82 ppm herbicide. This was an average value
for the top 6 inches of soil core for the eight cores showing greatest herbicide concentration.
In reference to the statistical null hypothesis, all three were rejected: (1) there were differences
in herbicide concentration between cores; (2) there were differences in herbicide content within cores;
and, (3) there were interactions between the sampling areas and the soil depths (this indicated nonuniformity in soil strata).
Sixteen of the soil cores (one from each vegetation type) were subsampled for arsenic concentration (hence, a measure of Blue). The arsenic was extracted by a cold-acid extraction technique and analyzed by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Four of the 16 locations contained
arsenic levels above 1.0 ppm in the top 6 inches of soil. A further analysis for arsenic in the
soil profile indicated that arsenic readily (and almost uniformly) leached throughout the soil profile.
In areas receiving repetitive applications of Blue, the top 6 inches of soil contained arsenic levels
of 1.4 ppm, and the additional 6 inch increments down to 5 feet contained from 0.70 to 1.2 ppm
arsenic.
From the bioassay study, it was evident that some areas of the test grid contained high levels
of phytohormonal herbicide residue (i.e., residue showing plant responses similar to those caused
by 2,4-D; 2,4,5-T; and picloram). Thus, 5 foot cores were collected from two areas (dry soils)
exhibiting highest herbicide residue. Each core was divided into 6 inch increments, placed in
amber bottles, and immediately shipped to the United States Department of Agriculture, Pesticide
Degradation Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland, for analysis of 2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-dibenzo-p-dioxin
(TCDD). No TCDD was found in either soil core (the Pesticide .Degradation Laboratory reported
a detection limit capability of 0.0005 ppm TCDD).

29

�f
B

F
G
H
J
K

M
N

1

2

3

8

4

9

10

11

12

Figure 11-1. Collection Sites for the Random Sampling of 3 Foot Soil Cores
For Residue Analyses

30

13

14

�2. SYNOPSIS OF BIOASSAY RESEARCH, 1970 - 1971
a. Introduction
A follow-up bioassay experiment of six of the field locations studied in the previous bioassay
experiments was initiated in December 1970. Three of the samples were selected because they
showed leaching to a depth of 36 inches, two because of leaching to 30 inches, and the remaining
sample because of leaching to 18 inches. In addition, two samples were obtained from grid 1
(the 1962 - 1964 grid). These samples had not been previously bioassayed, but because of prior
history, it was expected that data on persistence could be obtained from both a bioassay and a
chemical analysis.
Since the preliminary work indicated that although equal amounts of Orange were introduced
into soil cores, the varying organic composition of the soil at different depths influenced the amount
of Orange available to the plants. This investigation attempted to determine if differences in amounts
of herbicides and in soil composition do affect plant growth and, if so, the magnitude of this effect.
This information was then used to estimate the concentration of Orange in the selected sites.
b. Method and Materials
In order to calculate the effects of herbicide concentration upon plant growth and to
study the effects of soil depth on herbicide activity, a soil core was taken from a control site 0.2
mile northwest of the one square mile test area. This core was collected in 6 inch depth segments
down to 3 feet. After being dried, sieved, and weighed, each depth-segment unit was divided into
seven parts and treated so that soil samples from each unit contained the following concentrations
of Orange: 0.028 part per million (ppm), 0.057 ppm, 0.113 ppm, 0.226 ppm, 0.454 ppm, and
0.908 ppm; one soil unit was not treated and so had 0.0 ppm concentration of Orange. These
soil samples were then used as standards.
Each of these samples was thoroughly mixed and distributed among six cups. Five soybean
seeds were planted in each of three of the cups and five cucumber seeds were planted in each of
the remaining three cups for each concentration. All bioassays were conducted in an ISCO E-3
environmental chamber maintained at a diurnal temperature regime of 90° to 70°F, a diurnal
humidity regime of 65% to 85%, and a 14-hour daylength. The length of the cucumber plants from
the root tip to the end of the epicotyl was measured after 6 days. The soybeans were harvested
10 days after planting, and the root length of each plant was recorded.
Samples of soil were also collected from six selected sites on the test grid. These locations
were coded using the coordinate of the grid marker and the direction with respect to that marker
in which the cores were taken. These six locations were B-14 SW, C-9 SW, J-3 NE, M-8 SW,
N-12 NW, and 0-7 NE. A composite of three soil cores, 2-1/2 feet apart, was collected from each
site at a distance 50 feet from the designated grid marker and on an imaginary line perpendicular
to the specified direction for sampling. These cores were collected in 6-inch segments down to
3 feet, and the soil from the corresponding depth segments for each of the three cores collected
from a specified site were throughly mixed. A control soil sample was collected in a similar manner
from the same location that the soil for the standards was taken. The soil from each site/depth
segment-unit was distributed among six cups and a bioassay was conducted in the same manner as
that described above for the Orange concentration standards. Again both cucumber and soybeans
were used as the test organisms.
This same procedure was used to collect and bioassay soil samples from sites 50 yards
south of grid markers O-5 and 0-8 which are on the southern border of the present test area (and
in the old grid 1 area). Control soil was collected for this bioassay also from the same site as the
other controls and the standards, and soybeans and cucumbers were used as the test organisms.

31

�In addition, soil samples from many locations on the test grid were collected and analyzed for
organic matter content. Samples were analyzed by the use of a muffle furnace (total combustion
of organic matter).
c. Statistical Methods
General. Except as noted, statistical analyses were conducted to test for significant
differences at the 0.95 probability level. If a significant difference was indicated at this level,
further testing was conducted at the 0.99 probability level.
Wide variations .occurred among the measurements of the plants within the
individual cups. The seeds actually belonged to two populations: (1) those seeds that would
germinate under proper conditions and (2) those seeds that would not germinate. It was impossible
to determine which population an individual seed belong to in all cases, and the extreme values
(zero length when a seed did not germinate) would have biased the results had the arithmetic mean
been used as a representative cup value. Therefore, the median measurement of the plants within
a cup was used as the cup value, and the cup became the experimental unit.
Calibration of Standards. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) technique was employed to
study the effects upon the plants grown in the soils treated with the standard concentrations of
the defoliant Orange. This was done to determine those concentrations which affected plant
growth in a significantly different manner. Also, it was hypothesized that because of soil composition variations with depth, a different percentage of the applied defoliant would be bound to
the soil or in other ways unavailable to the plants. If this were the case, different standard curves
would have to be developed for each depth group.
A test for homoscedasticity indicated unacceptable differences in variances. The
transformation:
x = Iog10 (x' + 1)
Where :
x = the transformed data
x' = the original cup value
provided homogeneity of variance.
Both the concentration levels and the depth increments were arbitrarily selected
and thus are parametric factors. Since each corresponding site/depth-segment was treated alike,
the experiment has a cross-classified design, and the statistical model can be expressed:
Yijk = a + c, + dj + (cd)jj + e jjk
Where:
a = the overall effect
Cj = the effect of the itn concentration (i = 1,2,...,m)
dj = the effect of the jtn depth-segment (j = 1,2,...,n)

32

�Gjjk = the error factor for the ktn replicate of the itn concentration and the jtn
depth-segment
yp = the cup value for the ktn replication of the itn concentration and the jtn
depth-segment
The ANOVA technique employed was based on this model. In each instance that a significant
difference was indicated between the levels of a factor or when a significant interaction was
indicated, Duncan's new multiple range test was used to separate the levels into homogenous groups.
A mathematical expression of the form

y = a + bx
which approximated the relationship between the defoliant concentration and the cup value was
determined for each homogenous group by the method of least squares. To find such a relationship a correlation study was undertaken which compared the standard data and square root and
logarithm transformations of both the concentration and cup values. Once the proper form of the
data was selected, regression analysis was used to study the mathematical expressions. This
included tests of the following hypotheses:
(1) The data does not fit the curve (lack of fit test).
(2) One regression line can be used for all the depth groups.
(3) The regression coefficients for the different depth groups are equal.
(4) If all the regression coefficients are equal, the elevations (Y-intercepts) are equal.
Analysis of the Grid Samples. The concentration of Orange present in the soil from each
site/depth-segment taken from the testing area was estimated by using the calibration curves
developed for the standard concentrations. The bioassay of the standard Orange concentrations
and the bioassay of the grid soil samples were done at different times; therefore, an adjustment of
the data was necessary to eliminate the bias and confounding introduced by this procedure. Since
control plants were grown with each group, the grid soil bioassay data was weighted according to
the ratio of the average of the controls for the test area data to the average of the zero standard
concentration data. (A paired-observations t-test of these groups indicated they were significantly
different at the 0.95 probability level.)
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
a. Calibration of Standard Curves
The results of the ANOVA was the same for both soybeans and cJcumbers. The interaction
effect between concentration and depth-segments was non-significant; therefore, this effect was
pooled with the residual term. The effects of both concentration and depth were highly significant
(at a probability level greater than 0.99). These ANOVA tables are presented in Table 11-1 along
with the means and the results of Duncan's new multiple range tests.
The multiple range tests indicated that for both soybeans and cucumbers each concentration
level was significantly different from every other concentration level, and the range of the standard
curve could include all the concentration levels tested, i.e., from 0.0 ppm to 0.908 ppm. The

33

�TABLE 11-1. ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE.- ORANGE STANDARDS
Concentration

6

5.3013

0.8836

152.343

3.0419

0.5070

144.869

Depth

5

0.6875

0.1375

23.71a

0.7185

0.1437

41.069

30

0.1195

0.0040

0.1620

0.0054

1.93

Residual

84

0.5389

0.0064

0.2314

0.0028

Adj Error

114

0.6584

0.0058

0.3934

0.0035

Cone, x Depth

---

Indicates significance at the 0.99 probability level.
DUNCAN'S NEW MULTIPLE RANGE TEST
Soybean Data Results Cone. Mean Values:
1.06

0.97 0.92 0.80 0.73 0.59 0.43

Depth Mean Values:

0.85 0.78 0.74 0.71

0.91

0.70

Cucumber Data Results Cone. Mean Values:
1.17

1.04 0.99 0.93 0.83 0.75

Depth Mean Values:

0.93 0.91 0.87 0.85

1.07

0.69

0.85

Note: Common underscoring indicates homogenous groups at 0.95 probability level.

depth-segment groupings for soybeans were somewhat different that those for cucumbers. At the
0.95 probability level, three distinct depth groups were indicated from the cucumber data set.
The groupings indicated by the soybean data set were not as clearcut, and the 18 to 24 inch
depth-segment could be placed into two different groups. Since the cucumber data set indicated
that this depth-segment should be placed in the last (deepest) depth group, a similar decision was
made in the case of the soybean data. These depth groupings are as follows:
Depth, inches
Group

Cucumber

Soybean

I

0 to 6

0 to 6

II

6 to 18

6 to 12

III

18 to 36

12 to 18

IV

---

18 to 36

In the correlation analysis, the necessity for transformation of both the Orange concentration
values and cup values were studied. In addition to the untransformed data, square root and
logarithmic transformations were included. The correlation matrices for both the soybean and the
cucumber data sets are presented in Table II-2. In both cases, the best correlation (soybeans:
-0.8896; cucumbers: -0.8335) was

logiQ(cup value + 1) x

vconcen1:ration (PPm)

34

�TABLE 11-2. CORRELATION MATRICES
CUP VALUES

CONCENTRATION (ppm)
NO TRANS

LOGin(x+y)

SQUARE ROOT

No Trans:

-0.7423

-0.7761

-0.9353

Log10(x+y)

-0.8405

-0.8637

-0.8896

Square Root

-0.8085

-0.8363

-0.8758

No Trans:

-0.6547

-0.6908

-0.7703

Log10(x+y)

-0.7399

-0.7728

-0.8335

Square Root

-0.7049

-0.7385

-0.8094

SOYBEAN DATA

CUCUMBER DATA

The method of least squares was used to determine the best fitting linear expression of
the relationship between these two transformations for each of the four depth groups identified
for the soybean standards and the three depth groups identified for the cucumber standards.
These preliminary mathematical equations along with the square root of the percent of deviations
from the mean explained by the regression equation (correlation coefficient) are presented in
Table II-3.
TABLE II-3. PRELIMINARY MATHEMATICAL RELATIONSHIPS FOR
STANDARD CONCENTRATIONS

CORR: COEFF.

DEPTH, in.

REGRESSION EQUATION

I

0 to 6

Y = 1.15- 0.59X

0.86

II

6 to 12

Y = 1.11 - 0.64X

0.86

III

12 to 18

Y = 1.06 - 0.69X

0.98

IV

18 to 36

Y = 1.01 - 0.72X

0.98

GROUP
SOYBEAN DATA

CUCUMBER DATA

I

0 to 6

Y = 1.27 - 0.49X

0.86

II

6 to 18

Y = 1.13- 0.52X

0.87

III

18 to 36

Y = 1.06 - 0.50X

0.92

Where:
Y = lo 3^rj(cup value + 1)

x-

2

\concentration

35

�F-tests were employed to further analyze these results as follows:
Hypothesis Tested
Soy Bean Data
(1) The data does not fit the curve:
Depth Group I
Depth Group II
Depth Group III
Depth Group IV

F-Value
Cucumber Data

a

55.49
353.92
a
420.24
a
1,184.46

(2) One regression equation can represent
all depth groups

a

58.14
271.84
a
320.00
a

a

11.26

(3) All the regression coefficients are equal

14.00

0.98
a

(4) The elevations are equal

a

28.39

0.04
a

36.82

Indicates significant at the 0.99 probability level; hypothesis rejected.
Except for the hypothesis that all the regression coefficients are equal (which was not rejected),
these hypotheses were rejected at the 0.99 probability level for both the soybean and cucumber
data sets. Thus within each data set, the slope of the regression equations for the different
depth groups is equal. However, rejection of the last hypothesis indicates that the intercept for
each depth group is different. A common regression coefficient was computed for each data
set, and the final equations are as follows: (These equations are plotted in Figures II-2 and II-3).
Depth Group

Regression Equation for Root Lengths
Soybeans
Cucumbers

I

Y = 1.18467 - 0.68076-X

Y = 1.27936 - 0.50374-X

II

Y = 1.12705 - 0.68076-X

Y = 1.12775 - 0.50374-X

III

Y = 1.05610 - 0.68076-X

Y = 1.06402 - 0.50374-X

IV

Y = 0.99721 - 0.68076-X

Where:
Y = log-|Q(cup value + 1)
2
X = &gt;/ concentration Tppm)
and

0.0 &lt;X &lt; VO908
b. Analysis of Grid Samples

Using the relationships expressed in the previous paragraph, estimates were made of the
concentration of herbicide Orange in the soil samples taken from the defoliant testing area. These
estimates along with the limits of the 95% confidence intervals are presented in Table II-4.
Analysis for organic matter content are presented in Table II-5. A comparison of organic
matter content within selected cases is presented in Table II-6.

36

�DEPTH
GROUP 1

O)

o

(0

c
(Q

E
o

z
UJ

ORANGE

(ppm)

Trans.:

Figure II-2. Concentration Calibration Curves for Soybean Bioassay [see text for
description of depth groups]

37

�DEPTH
GROUP 1

O)

o

O.9
(0

c

CO

0.7

E
u
*

0.5

O

z

UJ

0.3

0.

0.8

ORANGE

(ppm)

Trans. =

Figure II-3. Concentration Calibration Curves for Cucumber Bioassay [see text for
description of depth groups]

38

�TABLE 11-4. CONCENTRATION ESTIMATES OF ORANGE AND 95%
CONFIDENCE INTERVAL LIMITS VIA BIOASSAY ANALYSES

Cucumber Data

Soybean Data

Site

Depth
Segment

Lower
Limit

Concentration
Estimate (ppm)

Unper
Limit

Lower
Limit

B-14

1

0.0000

.0113

.1638

0.0000

.0032

.1526

B-14

2

0.0000

.0730

.3413

0.0000

0.0000

.0358

B-14

3

0.0000

.0138

.0593

0.0000

0.0000

.0363

B-14

4

.0003

.0130

.0450

0.0000

0.0000

.0344

B-14

5

.0012

.0175

.0528

0.0000

0.0000

.0341

B-14

6

.0148

.0475

.0987

0.0000

.0000

.0341

C-9

1

.0693

.3034

.7030

.0087

.1652

.5183

C-9

2

.0535

.2975

.7389

0.0000

.0161

.0932

C-9

3

.0765

.1579

.2684

0.0000

.0079

.0723

C-9

4

.0344

.0791

.1420

0.0000

0.0000

.0333

C-9

5

.0344

.0791

.1420

0.0000

0.0000

.0326

C-9

6

.0293

.0712

.1315

0.0000

.0003

.0389

,1-3

1

.0814

.3297

.7447

.0136

.1851

.5532

.1-3

2

.0214

.2094

.5912

0.0000

.0050

.0632

J-3

3

.0263

.0805

.1645

0.0000

.0025

.0540

.1-3

4

.0057

.0297

.0725

0.0000

0.0000

.0391

J-3

5

0.0000

.0017

.0196

0.0000

0.0000

.0387

J-3

6

0.0000

0.0000

.0105

0.0000

0.0000

.0393

M-8

1

.0814

.3297

.7447

.0017

.1260

.4473

M-8

2

.0222

.2120

.5957

0.0000

.0032

.0567

M-8

3

.0700

.1485

.2562

0.0000

..0098

.0778

M-8

4

.0367

.0824

.1464

0.0000

0.0000

.0331

39

Concentration Upper
Estimate (ppm) Limit

�TABLE 11-4. CONCLUDED
Cucumber Data

Soybean Data
Site

Depth
Segment

M- 8

5

Lower
Limit
.47
07

M- 8

6

.0426

.0911

N-12

1

•0814

.3297

.7447

N-12

2

•0183

.1993

5738

0.0000

.0044

. 6 3
0 1

N-12

3

•°567

-1289

.2304

0.0000

.0039

.0594

N-12

4

•0691

.1282

.2054

0.0000

.0005

.0406

N-12

5

.0985

.1672

.2540

0.0000

0.0000

.0339

N-12

6

•0593

.1147

.1883

0.0000

0.0000

.0326

0- 7

1

•°169

-1718

.4885

0033

.1377

.4689

0- 7

2

•°183

-19"

.5738

0.0000

.0111

.0812

0- 7

3

.0441

.1097

.2046

0.0000

.0262

.1151

0- 7

4

•0344

. 7 1
0 9

.1420

0.0000

.0022

.0507

0- 7

5

.0247

.0640

A217

0.0000

.0007

.0423

0- 7

6

•0293

.0712

&lt;1315

0.0000

0.0000

.0326

0- 5

1

0.0000

.0321

.0184

.2020

.5826

0- 5

2

0.0000

.Oi96

0.0000

.0209

. 0 0
1 4

0- 5

3

0.0000

.ooio

.0259

.0025

.0508

. 6 5
1 0

0- 5

4

0.0000

. 0 8
0 1

.0202

000
.00

.06
02

.56
02

0- 5

5

o.oooo

.0102

0.0000

.0116

.0806

0- 5

6

0.0000

.0012

.0180

0.0000

.0252

.1110

0- 8

1

0.0000

.0249

.2040

0.0000

.0047

.1611

0- 8

2

0.0000

.0029

.1489

0.0000

0.0000

.0385

0- 8

3

o.oooo

0.0ooo

.0178

0.0000

0.0000

.0347

0- 8

4

000
.00

o.oooo

. 1 3
0 0

0.0000

0.0000

.0369

0- 8

5

o.oooo

o.oooo

,0103

0.0000

0.0000

.0370

0- 8

6

0.0000

.0007

. 1 0
0 6

0.0000

0.0000

.9354

Concentration
Upper
Estimate (ppm) Limit
.95
08
&lt;1675
157g

.2225
&gt;2142

o.oooo

40

Lower
Limit

Concentration
Upper
Estimate (ppm) Limit

000
.00

000
.00

.33
04

0.0000

0.0000

-0330

.0005

.1136

.4243

�TABLE 11-5. PERCENT ORGANIC MATTER OF SOIL FROM TEST AREA C-52A
[Samples Collected between December 1970 and June 1971]
SAMPLE
A-11
B-8
B-14
C-11
D-7
E-3
E-6
F-12
J-1
L-10
N-5
N-8
N-12
0-2
CONTROL (0.2 mile NW of grid)
C-9
C-9
C-9
C-9
C-9
C-9
G-11
G-11
G-11
G-11
G-11
0-7
0-7
0-7
0-7
0-7
0-7
CONTROL (0.2 mile NW of grid)

a

DEPTH, Inches
0-6
0-6
0-6
0-6
0-6
0-6
0-6
0-6
0-6
0-6
0-6
0-6
0-6
0-6
0-6
0-6
6-12
12-18
18-24
24-30
30-36
0-6
6-12
12-18
18-24
24-30
0-6
6-12
12-18
18-24
24-30
30-36
0-6
6-12
12-18
18-24
24-30
30-36

ORGANIC MATTER'
0.68°
1.05a
1.13a
0.55a
0.87a
0.73b
0.37b
1.31a
0.85a
0.68b
0.76a
0.41b
0.72a
0.45b
1.25b 1.99
0.96
0.71
0.72
0.67
0.87
0.41
1.65b 1.99
1.04
1.61
1.49
1.06
0.57
0.52
0.56
0.62
0.54

0.59

2.03a
1.35a
0.86a
0.73a
0.83a
0.71a

Average of three replicates.

b

Determined by the Wakley-Black wet digestion method; all others analyzed by weight
loss after 30 minute heating in tared crucible.

c

Samples designated by the closest permanent sampler station. Samples taken 50 feet
from sampler.

41

�TABLE 11-6. PERCENT ORGANIC MATTER WITHIN TREATMENT AND
CONTROL CORES TAKEN FROM TEST AREA C-52A
DEPTH, inches

CONTROL

ORGANIC MATTER, %
G-11

C-9

0-7

Oto 6

2.03

0.96

1.99

0.57

6 to 12

1.35

0.71

1.04

0.52

12 to 18

0.86

0.72

1.61

0.56

18 to 24

0.73

0.67

1.49

0.62

24 to 30

0.83

0.87

1.06

0.54

30 to 36

0.71

0.41

0.96

0.59

4. CONCLUSIONS
The varying effects of different concentrations of herbicide Orange and the changes in soil
composition associated with different depths are clearly indicated by the ANOVA and multiple
range tests on the bioassay of the standard concentrations. Thus, it should be expected that
the same concentration of Orange in different types of soils will be reflected by different plant
growth patterns.
An obvious disparity exists between the soybean data and cucumber data estimates of Orange
concentration at various test area sites. Confounding occurred because parts of this experiment
were conducted at different times without statistical balancing. The attempt to adjust for those
differences by weighting the data to reflect the differences in the control plants was not successful.
Evidently the differences in the environments could not be explained by such a simple adjustment.
5. CHEMICAL ANALYSES OF SOIL CORES
As a result of the bioassay analyses previously discussed, those soil samples collected in
November 1969 and in April and December 1970, which caused the greatest growth inhibition,
were analyzed chemically for 2,4-D; 2,4,5-T; picloram; arsenic; and the contaminant TCDD.
a. Methods and Materials
A 25 to 50 gram soil sample was weighed, acidified, and extracted with 1:1 hexane:
acetone (see Figure II-4). The hexane:acetone was made basic and the aqueous phase saved for
extraction by ether after acidification, butylation via boron trichloride, and the subsequent
determination of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T. The hexane phase was gently shaken repeatedly with sulfuric
acid until the sulfuric acid was clear. The hexane phase was then condensed and the extract
representing 50 - 100 mg of soil was injected on a 5% OV-225 gas chromatographic (GC) column.
The GC was equipped with a Ni"^ electron capture detector. If a peak was found within.+. 10%
of the retention time of TCDD, the sample was irradiated with ultraviolet light for 16 hours.
Column chromatography was also employed.
A gas chromatograph trace of the TCDD samples is shown in Figure II-5. This figure
shows an unaltered and a spiked soil sample before and after ultraviolet light treatment for
three different soil samples. In no case was any TCDD detected. Notice also that the added
TCDD was completely destroyed by UV irradiation.

42

�CONDENSE
5 ml

EXTRACT

50 g SOIL

HEXANE ACETONE

1
GO

EXTRACT
WATER PHASE

KOH, H20

HCI

ETHER
EXTRACT

IRRADIATE
TCDD DESTROYED

ETHER
n - BuOH
BCI3

INJECT 10,\a= 100 mg
LLDb = 0.001 ppm

DETERMINE
BUTYL ESTERS
a
b
c

Lambda = A
LLD = Lower Limit of Detection
p value = Partition Value

Figure ii-4.

p - VALUE 0
0.51 ±0.06
HEXANE:
ACETONITRSLE

Analysis Flow Chart for the Extraction of 2,4-D; 2,4,5-T; and TCDD from Lakeland Sand

�50 mgSOIL INJECTED

-UNALTERED SOIL
5 ppb TCDD ADDED

I
N

160 POUNDS 2,4,5-T/A APPLIED
5 ppb TCDD ADDED
I UNALTERED SOIL

I

UV

UV

\

584 POUNDS 2,4,5-T/A APPLIED

\
\ 5 ppb TCDD ADDED
UNALTERED SOIL

i
UV

1

2

UV

&lt;
3

4

5

6 CONTROL SOIL

Figure II-5. Gas Chromatograph Traces of TCDD Samples. (The Traces
Represent 50 mg of Extracted Soils from Grids 2 and 4.
See Table I-7)

44

�The soils were analyzed for arsenic using 6 mis of 1:1 h^SC^/HCK^ per 10 g, followed
by reductive distillation and development of a molybdenum blue color. Nine soil cores (to the
36-inch depth) were analyzed for picloram by Dow Chemical U.S.A. The minimum detection
limit for picloram was 5 ppb.
Additional soil samples were collected in June and October 1973 from near sampler
sites C-9, F-6, and 0-7 and from the center of Grid 1 located approximately 1000 feet south of
sampler station 0-7 (see Figure I-5). These soil samples were analyzed for TCDD by the
Interpretive Analytical Services, Dow Chemical,. U.S.A., Midland, Michigan. The method of
analysis reported by the Interpretive Analytical Services is as follows:
10 gms of soil were extracted with 1:1 acetone-hexane, and the hexane
recovered from the extract by the addition of water. (J. Assoc. Offic. Anal.
Chemists 56. 728 (1973). (Initially, the soil extracts were subjected to
separation procedures involving only silica gel column chromatography, but
too many interferences were found for best sensitivity. Hence, all samples
were treated by a modification of the techniques developed by Baughman
and Meselson, "An Analytical Method for Detecting Dioxin", National
Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Conference on Dibenzo-dioxins
and Dibenzo furans, Research Triangle Park, NC, April 1973, published in
Evnironmental Health Perspectives, No. 5, August 1973). The modified
procedure is as follows:
Hexane extracts from above washed with successive 10 ml portions of
concentrated H2S04 until H2SC&gt;4 is colorless (4 - 5 washings).
Hexane evaporated to 0.5 ml, and passed through a silica gel column.
Dioxins eluted from the column and 1:5 benzene-hexane. Eluate evaporated
to a small volume, and taken up in 0.5 ml hexane. (This step is in addition
to the Baughman-Meselson procedure, and was found necessary to achieve
best sensitivity.)
Hexane solution from above placed on an Al 20o column. PCB's eluted
with 1:4 CC^-hexane. Dioxin eluted with 1:4 CH2Cl2-hexane. Eluate
evaporated to small volume and injected directly into an LKB-9000 gas
chromatography-mass spectrometer combination.
Column Conditions: 6 ft x 1/8 inch stainless steel packed with 3%
OV-3 on 80/100 mesh Gaschrom. Z, isothermal at 230°C. Retention
time ~ 6.5 min.
Detector: mass spectrometer set to monitor m/e = 320 and 322
simultaneously.
b. Results and Discussions
Table II-7 shows the results of all analyses for soils collected during the period 1969 through
1971. Notice the persistence of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T in soil core J-3NE from April to December 1970.
However, it should be emphasized that if no herbicide degradation had occurred, a concentration
of approximately 80 ppm 2,4,5-T might be expected within the top 6 inches (see Table II-7,

45

�assuming the weight of a one acre 6-inch increment weighs 2 million pounds). Notice that
cores M-8SW, N-12SW, and 0-5S show leaching of 2,4-D, and 2,4,5-T. This particular region
of the grid received 1,168 pounds per acre of Orange from 1964 to 1966. Moreover, 0-5S may
have received heavy concentrations of herbicides when Grid 1 was in use (1962 to 1964). Table
II-8 compares chemical and bioassay data for the same core (M-8S), collected in December 1970
and subsampled for analyses. These data suggest that chemical analysis for 2.4-D and 2,4,5-T
alone may not account for all the biologically active phytotoxic components (e.g., degradation
products and/or fuel oil residue). Note that the trend is reasonably similar between methods
of analysis.
No TCDD residues were found by the Pesticide Degradation Laboratory in any of the
soil samples at a minimum detection limit of less than 1 ppb. Recent analyses of drums of
Orange in storage suggest that the average concentration of TCDD in Orange may be 2 ppm .
If it is assumed that all the 2,4,5-T sprayed on TA C-52A was contaminated with 2 ppm TCDD,
then approximately 0.5 pound of TCDD was disseminated in this test area. However, the
analyses of TCDD in the part per trillion (ppt) range would be required for detection of
potential residue. The results of soil samples collected in June and October 1973 and analyzed by
Interpretive Analytical Services, in the parts per trillion range, did in fact indicate the presence
of TCDD or a TCDD-like chemical compound. These data are shown in Table 11-10. The
greatest concentration of TCDD was found in the soil core from the center of Grid 1. This grid
received 0:1 the average 947 pounds 2,4,5-T per acre in the period 1962-1964. The levels
detected in the 6 to 12 and 12 to 18 inch depths were probably due to contamination at
the time of sample collection. These data suggest that TCDD or a TCDD-like compound may
persist for an extended period of time. Moreover, it would appear that the Orange (Purple)
disseminated on this test grid was significantly contaminated with this compound.
Significant levels of picloram were found in November 1969 near Sampler K-9. Notice
that at this date the residue was confined to the top 12 inches. However, by May 1970 picloram
may have moved to the lower increments within the soil profile.
Table II-7 also shows the levels of arsenic found in selected soil cores. From the data
in this table, it is evident that there is no appreciable build-up of arsenic in the soil. Perhaps
this is due to leaching or possibly to the reduction and volatilization of dimethylarsine from the
cacodylic acid. These observations are further verified by data on arsenic levels from sites
J-3NE, C-9SW, K-9N, and 0-8S collected and analyzed in June 1973. Table II-9 compares the
arsenic levels from these sites collected in 1970 and again in 1973.
c. Conclusions
Small amounts (in parts per billion) of 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T, and picloram were found persisting
on the test area in June 1971. The last application of Orange was December 1969, while the last
application of White was May 1970. The last application of Blue was in September 1970; nevertheless, no significant build-up of arsenic has been noted. However, leaching of the arsenical from
the soils may have occurred. Significant TCDD residue (or a TCDD-like compound) has been
detected in the parts per trillion range from Grid 1.
o

^Personal communication with Dr. Walter Melvin, February 1973, Air Force Environmental
Health Laboratory, Kelly AFB, Texas.

46

�TABLE 11-7. RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR PICLORAM; 2,4-D;
2,4,5-T; 2,3,7,8-TCDD; AND ARSENIC IN SOIL SAMPLES FROM
EGLIN AFB RESERVATION TEST AREA C-52A
SOIL
SAMPLE3

DEPTHb

TCDDd,
ppb

ARSEN!Cd,
ppm

PICLORAMC,
ppb

2,4-D,
ppb

1e

34,21

1.2

2.8

&lt;1.0

2.24

2

21, 11

7.0

2.0

&lt;1.0

0.86

3

&lt;10, 6

0.1

0.8

&lt;1.0

0.90

4

&lt;10, 5

0.1

0.6

&lt;1.0

0.52

5

&lt;10, &lt;5

0.1

0.9

&lt;1.0

0.62

6

&lt;10,&lt; 5

0.1

0.3

&lt;1.0

0.54

1

ND

1.7

1.2

&lt;1.0

0.55

2

ND

1.7

1.0

0.34

3

ND

0.1

1.0

&lt;1.0
&lt;1.0

4

ND

0.1

1.0

&lt;1.0

0.41

5

ND

ND

ND

&lt;1.0

ND

6

ND

0.1

0.7

&lt;1.0

0.52

2,4,5-T,
ppb

NOVEMBER 1969
K-9N

6 APRIL 11
370
T3RE"

"

0.41

10 DECEMBER 1970

1

&lt;10

&lt;0.1

2.4

&lt;0.1

4.70

2

&lt;10

&lt;0.1

1.8

&lt;0.1

1.30

3

&lt;10

&lt;0.1

1.1

&lt;0.2

0.90

4

&lt;10

&lt;0.1

0.7

&lt;0.2

0.55

5

J3NE

&lt;10

&lt;0.1

1.0

&lt;0.2

1.13

&lt;0.1

0.3

&lt;0.2

0.90

ND

1.6

5.9

&lt;1.0

3.21

2

ND

1.1

0.1

&lt;1.0

0.48

3

ND

0.1

0.7

&lt;1.0

0.20

4

ND

0.1

0.4

&lt;1.0

0.27

5

ND

0.1

0.3

&lt;1.0

0.27

6

ND

0.1

0.4

&lt;1.0

0.20

6

&lt;10

1

6 APRIL 1970
J-9SE

47

�TABLE 11-7. CONTINUED
SOIL
SAMPLE3

b

DEPTH

PICLORAMC,
ppb

2,4-D,
ppb

2,4,5-T,
ppb

TCDDd,
ppb

ARSENICd,
ppm

10 DECEMBER 1970

1

&lt;10

&lt;0.1

0.6

&lt;0.1

0.55

2

&lt;10

2.4

0.4

&lt; 0.1

0.55

3

&lt;10

0.6

0.4

&lt;0.1

0.55

4

&lt;10

&lt;0.1

0.2

&lt;Q.2

0.58

5

&lt;10

&lt;0.1

&lt;0.1

&lt;0.3

0.41

6

&lt;10

&lt;0.1

&lt;0.1

&lt;0.1

0.48

1

&lt;10

&lt;0.1

1.8

&lt;0.4

1.64

2

&lt;10

&lt;0.1

1.2

&lt;0.3

0.88

3

&lt;10

&lt;0.1

0.3

&lt;0.2

0.48

4

&lt;10

&lt;0.1

0.3

&lt;0.1

0.48

5

&lt;10

&lt;0.1

&lt;0.1

&lt;0.2

0.55

6

&lt;10

&lt;0.1

0.4

&lt;0.4

0.52

1

&lt;10

5.6

7.0

&lt;0.2

0.90

2

&lt;10

5.8

1.4

&lt;0.2

0.48

3

&lt;10

7.6

2.8

&lt;0.2

0.34

4

&lt;10

15.0

5.6

&lt;0.1

0.41

5

&lt;10

5.0

2.8

&lt;0.5

0.34

6

&lt;10

13.2

6.8

&lt;0.2

0.55

1

&lt;10

7.6

2.2

&lt;0.2

1.86

2

&lt;10

10.0

1.0

&lt;0.2

1.05

3

&lt;10

11.8

1.2

&lt;0.2

0.76

4

&lt;10

4.8

1.4

&lt;0.3

0.69

5

&lt;10

6.0

2.6

&lt;0.2

0.69

6

B-14SW

&lt;10

7.0

3.0

&lt;0.2

0.76

10 DECEMBER 1970
C-9SW

10 DECEMBER 1970
M-8SW

10 DECEMBER 1970
N-12SW

10 DECEMBER 1970
0-5S

1

ND

0.8

1.2

&lt;0.1

0.90

2

ND

0.6

0.6

&lt;0.1

0.80

3

ND

0.6

1.2

&lt;0.2

0.76

4

ND

0.6

0.6

&lt;0.2

0.41

5

ND

&lt;0.1

8.4

&lt;0.7

0.69

6

ND

0.6

1.4

&lt;0.1

0.55

48

�TABLE 11-7.
SOIL
SAMPLE3

DEPTH

b

PICLORAMC,
ppb

CONTINUED
2,4-D,
ppb

2,4,5-T,
ppb

TCDDd,
ppb

ARSENICd,
ppm

10 DECEMBER 1970
0-7NE

1

&lt;10

ND

6.6

&lt;0.2

2

&lt;10

2.8

0.2

&lt;0.3

3

&lt;10

3.6

0.4

&lt;0.2

4

&lt;10

0.8

2.6

&lt;0.2

5

&lt;10

5.6

2.6

&lt; 0.2

6

&lt;10

1.2

0.2

&lt;0.6

1.52
0.76
0.76
0.62
0.62
0.62

10 DECEMBER 1970
1

1.2

&lt;0.1

ND

&lt;0.1

2.6

&lt;0.1

ND

&lt;0.1

0.8

&lt;0.1

4

ND

&lt;0.1

0.6

&lt;0.1

5

ND

&lt;0.1

1.2

&lt;0.1

2.70
0.58
0.62
0.20
0.41

6

ND

&lt;0.1

0.6

&lt; 0.2

0.07

1e

ND

0.1

8.7

&lt;1.0

1

ND

0.1

3.2

&lt;1.0

2

17,7

ND

ND

ND

3

&lt;10, 5

ND

ND

ND

4

11, &lt;5

0.1

0.1

&lt;1.0

4

ND

0.1

ND

&lt;1.0

5

&lt;10,&lt;5
10, 5

ND

ND

ND

6

0.1

0.9

1.0

6

13 MAY 1971
G-9N

&lt;0.1

3

13 MAY 1970
K-9N

ND

2

0-8S

ND

0.1

1.0

1.0

3.94
4.25
ND
ND
0.41
0.41
ND
0.41
0.48

2

92, 160

ND

ND

ND

ND

10 DECEMBER 1970
CONTROL

1

&lt;10

&lt;0.1

&lt;0.1

&lt;0.2

0.55

2

&lt;10

&lt;0.1

&lt;0.1

&lt;0.3

3

&lt;10

&lt;0.1

&lt;0.1

&lt;0.2

4

&lt;10

&lt;0.1

&lt;0.1

&lt;0.4

5

&lt;10

&lt;0.1

&lt;0.1

&lt; 0.4

6

&lt;10

&lt;0.1

&lt;0.1

&lt; 0.5

0.41
0.55
0.24
0.41
0.48

r

°
f
8 APRIL 1971f

49'

�TABLE 11-7. CONCLUDED
a

Samples designated by the nearest permanent air sampler station on the one square mile
test grid. All samples were taken 50 feet from a certain air sampler, except control site
was 0.4 mile from the one square mile grid.

b

Samples taken with a core borer in 6 inch increments. Depth 1 = 0 to 6 inches; 2 = 6 to
12 inches; 3 = 12 to 18 inches; 4 = 18 to 24 inches; 5 = 24 to 30 inches and 6 = 30 to
36 inches. Each increment was uniformily mixed prior to sampling for chemical analysis.

G

Picloram analysis was performed by International Research and Development Corporation
and/or The Dow Chemical Company; Dow Chemical Method ACR 69.10, modified.

^Analysis performed by E. A. Woolson, Pesticide Degradation Laboratory, United States
Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland.
e

Two samples from same depth were taken 10 feet apart.
f,Control soil for picloram analysis taken 8 April 1971, and other analyses performed
after 10 December 1970 sampling.

TABLE II-8. A COMPARISON OF CHEMICAL AND BIOASSAY DATA FOR SOIL
CORE M-8a COLLECTED DECEMBER 1970
DEPTH,
Inches

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS,
ppbb

BIOASSAY ANALYSIS0
LOWER LIMIT,
UPPER LIMIT,
ppb
ppb
80
745

0-6

12.6

6-12

7.2

22

596

12-18

10.4

70

256

18-24

20.6

37

146

24-30

7.8

48

168

30-36

20.0

43

158

a

Sample collected 50 feet southwest of air sampler station M-8.

b

Total concentration of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T.

c

Data from soybean bioassay (see Table II-4)

50

�TABLE 1 -9. A COMPARISON OF ARSENIC LEVELS IN SOIL CORES COLLECTED
IN 1970 AND 1973 FROM TA C-52Aa
LOCATION

nCDTU
Utr I n,

J-3NE

C-9SW

b

1970

1973

1970^

1973

ON!
1970
1973

0-6

4.70

0.85

1.64

1.68

3.94

0.62

2.70

1.46

6-12

1.30

0.47

0.88

0.56

4.25

0.54

0.58

0.42

12-18

0.90

0.59

0.48

0.60

&lt;MD

0.41

0.62

0.45

I nches

a

Analysis performed by E. A. Woolson, Pesticide Degradation
Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland.

0-8S
1970
1973

Laboratory, United States

"Samples collected 50 feet in the designated direction (e.g., NE) from the permanent air
sampler station.
C

ND = not determined.

TABLE 11-10. LEVELS (PARTS PER TRILLION) OF 2,3,7,8 TETRACHLORODIBENZOp-DIOXIN (TCDD) IN SOIL FROM TA C-52A COLLECTED IN JUNE OR
OCTOBER 1973a
DEPTH,
Inches
0-6

6-12
12-18
18-24
24-30
30-36

LOCATION
C-9

&lt;10b
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND

F-7

11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND

0-7

GRID 1

30
&lt;10
&lt;10
&lt;10
&lt;10
&lt;10

710
140
72
&lt;10
&lt;10
&lt;10

a

Method described in text.
'-'Lower limit of detection in parts per trillion TCDD.
c
Probable interference from excessive organic matter.

51

CONTROL
&lt;20C
&lt;10
&lt;10
&lt;10
&lt;10
&lt;10

�SECTION III
STUDIES OF THE VEGETATION OF TEST AREA C-52A
The first studies of Test Area C-52A were those concerned with vegetation. Testing of
aerial spray equipment began in June 1962, and following heavy applications of materials in
1963 and 1964, vegetation surrounding the test site showed changes suggestive of herbicidal
damage. In the fall of 1966, concern about the extent of this damage led to the establishment
of a contract with the University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. The purpose of the contract
was to conduct a taxonomic study that would quantitatively measure changes in density of
vascular plants in the area adjacent to the test grid (References 111-1, III-2, and III-3).
Observations of tree growth rings in those reports prompted studies (Reference III-4)
concerned with assessment of spray drift upon the forest trees adjacent to the test area. A
third study (Reference IM-5) was concerned with the histological examination of a plant
species growing in the flight lines on the test grid. Synopses of Reference 111-1 to IM-5 are
included in this section. The last report, and the one most concerned with the current research
effort (Reference III-6), will be summarized and referred to in this report within the section
on current studies.

References:
111-1. Ward, D. B.: Ecological Records on Eglin AFB Reservation - - the First Year.
AFATL-TR-67-157, Air Force Armament Laboratory, Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, 1967.
Unclassified.
III-2. Ward, D. B.: Ecological Records on Eglin AFB Reservation - - the Second Year.
AFATL-TR-68-147, Air Force Armament Laboratory, Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, 1968.
Unclassified.
III-3. Ward, D. B.: Ecological Records on Eglin AFB Reservation - - Conclusions.
AFATL-TR-70-55, Air Force Armament Laboratory, Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, 1970.
Unclassified.
III-4. Hunter, H. H. and B. M. Agerton: Annual Diameter Growth of Conifers Adjacent to
Eglin Reservation Test Area C-52A as Related to the Testing of Defoliant Spray Equipment.
AFATL-TR-71-52, Air Force Armament Laboratory, Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, 1971.
Unclassified.
III-5. Sturrock, T. T. and A. L. Young: A Histological Study of Yucca filamentosa L. from
Test Area C-52A, Eglin Reservation, Florida. AFATL-TR-70-125, Air Force Armament
Laboratory, Eglin Air Force Base, Florida. 1970. Unclassified.
III-6. Hunter, J. H. and A. L. Young: Vegetative Succession Studies on a Defoliant-Equipment
Test Area, Eglin AFB Reservation, Florida. AFATL-TR-72-31, Air Force Armament Laboratory,
Eglin Air Force Base, Florida. 1970. Unclassified.

52

�1. SYNOPSIS OF TAXONOMIC STUDIES, 1966 - 1969
a. General Observations
In the fall of 1966, turkey oak, Quercus laevis. adjacent to the test clearing was severely
affected, apparently by herbicide driftage; and the large proportion of the trees of this species
gave the entire forest an abnormal aspect. Upper branches of all trees had apparently been
completely defoliated, and many or even most of the twigs were killed. On the lower trunks a
proliferation of small branchlets had appeared; in all cases, these branchlets began growing in
the spring of 1965, as determined by the number of bud scale scars present.
Blue-jack oak, Quercus incana. and sand live oak. Quercus germinata. were also heavily
damaged near the test clearing but appeared undamaged as little as 1.1 miles from the clearing
in an area where turkey oak still exhibited signs of damage.
Longleaf pine, Pinus palustris. and sand pine, Pinus clausa. adjacent to the test clearing
appeared unaffected. Needle length and internode length were normal, as compared with
similar plants away from the test area.
A sampling was made of the growth rates of four tree species as indicated by width of annual
growth rings. Blue-jack oak, turkey oak, and long-leaf pine produced growth rings that appeared
to vary independently of spray applications to the adjacent TA C-52A. Sand pine seemingly
showed a positive correlation with a marked increase in growth in the years immediately after
the 1963 - 1964 period of heavy spray application.
Extensive observation of the vegetation in all directions from TA C-52A indicated a rapid
disappearance of damage attributable to spray driftage. The maximum distance that damage
was definitely detected was 5 miles, seen on trees at the upper end of Range 52, north of the
test area.
Observations made later in this project failed to disclose damage at any distance from the
test area that was not attributable to the 1963 - 1964 period of activity. Following a testing
period in 1969, particular attention was given to the oaks, pines, and herbaceous plants in
various directions from TA C-52A. A few sand pines along the south edge of the test area had
visible abnormalities in their early spring growth, but this had largely disappeared by early
August. Other vegetation appeared normal, suggesting that herbicide driftage, if any, from the
1969 series of tests was significantly less than in earlier years.
b. Quantitative Sampling
In the fall of 1966, a program was devised to permit the quantitative measurement of
changes in density of stand of vascular plants in the area adjacent to TA C-52A. Since changes
in the herbaceous plants might be more subtle and more difficult to detect than those in the
larger woody plants, an experimental design was developed that would disclose differences of
slight magnitude but of statistical significance.
Five stations were selected in apparently homogeneous woodland east of the test area, and
at each station four parallel transects of 50 meters were laid out at right angles to an imaginary

53

�radius from the center of TA C-52A. The first of these sets of transects was immediately
adjacent to the test clearing, and the fifth was at a distance of 2.0 miles. All plants intercepted
by the transects were counted and listed. The resulting data were interpreted by a conventional
analysis of variance and F-test.
The 2157 plants of 54 species intercepted by the 1000 meters of transect were found (with
a few exceptions) not to differ significantly in their frequency with distance from the test area.
This was taken to mean that the supposedly higher spray driftage near the test area had not had
a significant effect on the viability of individuals of most species.
A few species were found to differ significantly with distance from the test area. Eleven
species fluctuated significantly in number of individuals at varying distances from the test area,
but upon examination, these differences were found to result from natural heterogeneities in
the supposedly homogeneous woodland. They could not be attributed to spray effects.
Three species were found to be absent near the test area and to increase significantly away
from this area. These species were the small, upright legume, I^h_rQais..nQoJiriL the persimmon,
Djospyros virgmiana. and the weeping haw, Crataegus lacrimata. Again, since the legume is a
perennial with a deeply buried rootstock and the other two are trees which would have left
evidence in the form of dead trunks, it is probable that these species were not exterminated
by spray driftage near the test area, but rather reflect an original and natural heterogeneity in
their distribution.
Only in the case of four species was there clear evidence of influence by proximity to the
test area. The number of individuals of four herbs - hjyp.gricym gentianoides, Solidago odora.
Warea sessilifolia, and Rhynchosia cytisoides - decreased significantly away from TA C-52A.
More meaningfully, the number of individuals of these species increased significantly adjacent to
the test site. These four species are noted for their ability to rapidly colonize cleared land. The
observed variation in number of individuals is best explained by these species utilizing the opening
in the canopy resulting from the spray-induced loss of foliage by the oaks.
By early August 1969 the oaks in the area of the five transect stations again had normal
foliage. At that date, it was not possible to find individuals of the Hypericum. the Warea. or
the Rhynchosia. and the Solidago was very reduced in number. The presumption is that the
spray-induced damage of 1963 - 1964 to the forest surrounding the test site had largely
disappeared and that by 1969 the vegetation of the area was again essentially normal.
2. SYNOPSIS OF GROWTH OF SAND PINE, 1969 - 1970
a. General Comments
One of the observations noted in Reference 111-1 was that the growth of sand pine,
Pin'us cjausa, was seemingly related (positive correlation) to the periods of heaviest testing
of spray equipment. This observation prompted an investigation, conducted between March
1969 and June 1970, into the growth of tree rings.
The species of trees selected for sampling were sand pine, longleaf pine, P. palustrjs. and
turkey oak, Quercus Jaeyjs. A total of 18 sand pines were cut along with two longleaf pines
and two turkey oaks. Sand pines were cut at ground level, and all others were cut 2 to 3 feet
above ground level. A cross section was cut from the end of each trunk and was sanded so
that the annual growth rings could be measured - to the nearest 0.1 mm.

54

�An examination of the relative amount of annual herbicide delivery on TA C-52A revealed
that the greatest amount of defoliant drift probably occurred in the following increasing order
of years: 1967, 1966, 1962, 1965, 1969, 1968, 1964, and 1963. This order is based primarily
on the amount, type, and formulation of materials sprayed per year. The amount of drift and
defoliant damage that occurred would also have depended upon climatic and flight conditions.
For example, probably very little drift damage occurred in 1967 because relatively little testing
was done and all testing occurred during winter months (the time of a reduced level of plant
growth). Likewise, damage would have been expected in 1964, not only because of the many
Orange missions, but also because all testing occurred from May through July and some of the
missions were flown at altitudes greater than the usual 150 to 200 feet.
b. Results
An initial examination of the annual diameter growth data indicated that possibly the
growth of some trees was directly or indirectly stimulated by spray drift from defoliant testing.
However, an analysis of the data did not substantiate this hypothesis. Growth obtained by
trees during individual years of testing was often no greater than growth obtained in some
previous year before defoliant spraying started. When the total annual diameter growth for
individual pines during years of defoliant testing was compared with the same number of years
before testing, no significant differences were apparent. Five of nine treatment trees (those
close to TA C-52A) and three of six control trees made less total growth during the years of
testing. For longleaf pine, one sample showed a decrease and the other an increase between
1962 and 1968.
Several of the pines located close to TA C-52A made less annual growth in 1963 - 1964
(period of expected greatest damage) when compared to the annual diameter growth of other
years of defoliant testing. However, the reduced amount of growth did not seem to be related
to defoliant spraying because three control trees also grew less in 1963 than any other year
between 1962 and 1969. In addition, the amount of diameter growth in 1963 for trees close
to TA C-52A was often no less than the diameter growth for some year previous to defoliant
testing.
Difficulties were encountered in measuring annual diameter growth in turkey oak. The
older increments could be easily differentiated, but the last three to five increments were not
discernable. Gross observations of the diameter growth of the turkey oak sampled close to
TA C-52A indicated the tree had grown less during the years of defoliant testing. As discussed
in Reference III-3, the annual diameter growth of two turkey oaks that had grown within a few
hundred yards of TA C-52A was measured, but without a clear indication that annual diameter
growth was inhibited by defoliant testing. The greatest amount of tree defoliation around
TA C-52A had been noticed on turkey oak, and a reduction in annual diameter growth was
expected to be most evident in individuals of this species. However, the small amount of
sampling showed no indication of a general reduction of annual diameter growth during the
years of testing.
An attempt was made to relate annual diameter growth to rainfall and temperature. An
analysis of average, maximum, and minimum monthly temperatures recorded since 1949 at
IMiceville, Florida, revealed a high degree of uniformity for the same months from year to
year. Rainfall for each month, however, varied greatly over the years; and many attempts

55

�were made to discover what combinations of monthly rainfall data correlated with annual
growth. While the combination of April and May rainfalls yielded the highest correlation
of any two other months, only one sample showed a significant probability (95 percent
confidence level) of this rainfall being related to annual diameter growth. Therefore, the
rainfall data available could not be used to explain the annual growth patterns of the trees
observed.
3.

SYNOPSIS OF HISTOLOGICAL STUDY OF YUCCA, 1970
a. General Comments

The military herbicides Orange (2,4-D and 2,4,5-T) and White (2,4-D and picloram)
function as growth regulators in their herbicidal behavior. A study was undertaken to
determine whether structural (histological) changes were evident in a plant species (Yucca
filamentosa) found in a high herbicide residue area of TA C-52A.
Observations have confirmed that the largest bulk of the various chemicals used in the
testing of aerial defoliation spray equipment was released and fell within the instrumented test
area (TA C-52A). As a result of these repetitive applications, many plant species (i.e., the
dicotyledonous plants) were selectively eliminated. The vast majority of the remaining plant
life was monocotyledonous with the only distinct plant association being broomsedge
(Andropogon virginicus). switchgrass (Panicum virgatum). and yucca (Yucca filamentosa).
Field observations indicated that yucca was the most persistent species occuring in the
flight-line areas of the test grid. Observations on gross morphology indicated no differences
between plants occurring on and off the test grid; however, crownal areas (the plant part at the
soil surface) appeared to be different.
Specimens of yucca were selected from areas of high herbicide residue and from an
area sufficiently distant from the treated area to preclude contact with the herbicides and/or
herbicide residues. Tissue samples obtained from the crown area of these plants were prepared for microscopic observation.
b. Results
Both cross and radial sections of treated and control plants were examined. The control
plants were used to establish the normal development of this species. Yucca is different from
most monocotyledonous plants in that it has some secondary growth and develops a peridermlike structure. In addition, repeated divisions of parenchyma cells and the suberization of
their products produces tangential bands of cork progressing inward and including some of
the fibrovascular bundles which have an uncharacteristic forked habit of growth. All of these
structures were quite evident in both the control and the treated samples.
Based on these studies, there is no apparent difference in the formation of structures
in Yucca filamentosa specimens obtained from an area subjected to repetitive applications
of military herbicides and specimens from an area not receiving the herbicides. Both samples
followed the normal structure for this species, as described in the scientific literature.
While these observations were conducted on a very small sample of the plants which did
persist in the heavily treated area, no evidence of malformations was found. A larger sample and
many more observations of different tissues of the plants might detect abnormalities in this

56

�species under these conditions, and it is also possible that a larger sample of untreated plants
would similarly produce individuals with malformations - - such anomalous structures are
often found in many species of plants grown under different environmental conditions.
4. CURRENT VEGETATIVE SUCCESSION STUDIES
a. Introduction
The first complete survey of the vegetation existing on the herbicide test grids was
initiated in 1971 (Reference III-6). The 1971 survey established a base line from which
future observations or surveys could proceed to determine the rate and type (plant species
involved) of plant succession on the test grids.
The June 1973 studies of vegetation are a continuation of the 1971 survey and provide
precise data and photographs to illustrate changes that have occurred during a 2-year period.
b. Materials and Methods
In May 1971, the one square mile grid (Figure I-4) was divided into 169 sections (each
400 by 400 feet). The percentage pla.nt cover in each 160,000 ft^ section was visually estimated,
and a vegetative coverage map resulted. In June 1973, the same technique was used to construct
another vegetative coverage map. Coverage was ranged into five classes as follows: Class O = 0
to 5% cover, Class I = 5 to 20% cover, Class II = 20 to 40% cover. Class III = 40 to 60% cover.
Class IV = 60 to 80% cover, and Class V = 80 to 100% cover.
In June 1971, three 400 by 400 foot sections from each coverage class were randomly
selected for a detailed collection of dicotyledonous (broadleaf) plant species. A diagonal transect starting 20 feet within the northwest corner of each section was walked to the southeastern
boundary. Plants were collected along the transect, and the results were tabulated for the number
of dicotyledonous plants occurring in each section. A control area 0.2 mile northwest of the
one square mile grid and an area in the center of the plot formerly occupied by Grid 1 were
also surveyed. In June 1973, each of these areas was again surveyed by the same method. A
square-foot analysis was performed on (1) 15 additional 400 by 400 feet sections, (2) the
control area used in 1971, (3) a new control area west of the one square mile grid, and (4) a
160,000 ft^ section in the center of area occupied by Grid 1. The additional 15 sections were
randomly selected, and within each section, nine areas, each measuring one square foot, were
analyzed (Figure 111-1). The square foot sampling sites were selected by dividing the 400 by
400 foot sections into three strips, each 133 feet wide. A line was drawn in center of each
strip and three one-square-foot areas were selected by generating d-j, ^ anc' ^3 as distances
to be walked. The distances were generated by a random number generator which included
constraints that assured one sampling area from each one-third of the transverse with the
sampling area being random within the one-third area. After each distance was walked-off,
the metal square-foot measuring device was placed, and the percent coverage for each plant
species was visually estimated.
d. Results and Discussion
The 1971 and 1973 vegetative coverage maps are shown in Figures III-2 and III-3,
respectively. Table 111-1 shows the percent coverage that each vegetative class occupied in
June 1971 and in June 1973.

57

�-Figure 111-1. Square-Foot Measuring Device in Use During Vegetation Survey - June 1973

TABLE 111-1. PERCENT OF VEGETATIVE COVER OCCUPIED BY VEGETATIVE
CLASS FOR THE 1 SQUARE MILE GRID
VEGETATIVE CLASS

JUNE 1971

JUNE 1973

0 (0 to 5%)

4%

0%

I (5 to 20%)

14%

4%

II (20 to 40%)

29%

12%

III (40 to 60%)

25%

18%

IV (60 to 80%)

21%

42%

V (80 to 100%)

4%

23%

58

�80 to 100%

40 to 60%

5 to 20%

60 to 80%

20 to 40%

0 to 5%

8

A

9

10

11

12

13

14

B
C
D
E
F
G
H
J

M

N
O

Figure III-2. Vegetative Coverage of the One Square Mile Grid on Test Area C-52A,
May 1971

59

�80 to 100%

40 to 60%

5 to 20%

60 to 80%

20 to 40%

0 to 5%

12

13

14

Figure III-3. Vegetative Coverage of the One Square Mile Grid on Test Area C-52A,
June 1973

60

�After a 2 year period, no vegetative class O areas were judged to remain on the one square
mile grid. All class O areas had developed into class I or II areas. The greatest change in number
of individual areas occurred from class II to IV (14% of total) and class III to IV (17% of total).
For those areas with less cover than class V, 19 class IV areas, two class III areas, four class II
areas and four class I areas did not change in percent cover during the 2 year interval.
Examples of vegetative cover changes are illustrated in Figures III-4 to 111-13 by comparing the 1971 and 1973 photographs of identical areas. All of these photographs represent
changes from one coverage class to another, except for area IM-5 (Figures III-6 and III-7).
Although an increase in vegetative coverage can be seen for N-5, this increase was not enough
to place the area in Class II. Figure 111-14 and Figure 111-15 illustrate an increase in number
of shrubs for a Class IV area.
In 1971, data on number of dicotyledonous or broadleaf species were assembled, and
the same 400 by 400 feet areas were again surveyed in 1973. Table III-2 shows the increase
in numbers of broadleaf plants after 2 years. The numbers of broadleaf plants are still
significantly increasing in all areas, including Control Area 1. As is expected, the greatest percent change occurs in those areas with the smallest amount of vegetation because these areas
have open sections where seeds can germinate free of competition from other plant species.
However, these areas are relatively dry, windblown sites, and vegetative succession will continue
to be relatively slow as compared to areas on the grid that have more poorly drained soils,
and therefore, more available soil moisture. An indication of relative rate of succession for
different areas of the one square mile grid is illustrated by observing the speed with which class
0, I, II, and III areas change to other classes. For example, all 1971 class 0 areas on the
northern section of the grid are now in class II, but 1971 class O areas in the southern portion
of the grid only changed to class I in the 2 year interval.
From June to September 1971, 74 dicotyledonous species were collected on the one
square mile grid, and 33 additional species were found during the June 1973 survey. Table
III-3 contains a complete list of all species that have been found on the grid. The relative
frequency of occurrance of all new species collected in 1973 was rare or infrequent except for
Euphorbia maculata and Polygonella gracillis. Plants that were found in Control Area 2 but not
found on the grid were rosinweed (Silphium ovatifolium). hairy bedstraw (Galium pilosum).
sun flower (Helianthus sp.), and flax (Linum floridanum).
Because the square-foot analysis technique is a more accurate method of determining
vegetative cover, the results of the two methods are compared in Table III-4. This shows that
visual estimations of 400 by 400 foot areas were 8% to 30% higher than the more accurate
square-foot technique. However, class rankings for the two methods are the same except for
areas found to have 40% to 60% vegetative cover by the square-foot analysis. The most
significant comparison of the two methods is that which shows Control Site 2 and Grid 1 area
to be in class III instead of class IV.
As a result of the square-foot analysis, the most important plants on the grid in terms
of coverage are the grasses, switchgrass (Panicum virgatumHFigure 111-16), and, woolly panicum
(£. lanuginosum) (Figure 111-17). These two grasses were found to comprise from 44% to 64%
of the existing coverage for all vegetative classes. The most important dicotyledonous plants
are rough buttonweed (Diodia teres) (Figure 111-18), poverty weed (Hypericum gentianoides)
(Figure 111-19), and common polypremum (Polypremum procumbens). These three dfcots
occupy from 3% to 17% of the existing cover in all classes on the grid.

61

�*&amp;%'•••'• ****$*£ * ~Zff' .'•*^i,"*: 4,%'T"^'W;*'i ^ j&gt;«*r-*,'**'L,}^^T~^?fc'^V'&amp;2.&gt; *-. ..*'. 2r
•&amp;&amp;*"*•%' '-»--'-„-.-•:.. ~ * ,*-*•.'• * ,
-'^w" -v r •»Awi«&gt;'A*i:&lt;ii«r^-**
i

.;.=, ••"j^, -^' v"„-.-..^.. 4 i.v /•-,
^ *»*» ^ ^,.v ? .-»•*
v

:

v

:

•"4,:-^ / . i-^^'^S-'^ijatt.-,
. c: ^&gt;ti-ir ^L^**

. • &gt; -. .." * - . " ' • : :.'-f -- -^' ' /'-4^ -"**-*- «
r-. - Apfc's-tu:'»" *.*u.i .T ~ .. jal:&lt;^ . ^-,AA^«.. •
;::-.*»•

•

Figure IM-4. Area N-8, June 1971, Looking SE from Samp,er N-;
8

; '\ , '*? • i •,:; :^ -^
^*

"*

\

-^ &lt;• *

-

.^ -y^
i-t #

Figure II.-5. Area N-8, June 1973, Same View as Figure IM-4 After 2 Years
62

»«^

�Figure IH-6. Area N-5, June 1971, Looking SE from Sampler N-5

Figure 111-7. Area N-5, June 1973, Same View as Figure HI-6 After 2 Years

63

�Figure 111-8. Area L-10, June 1971, Looking SE from Sampler L-10

Figure III-9. Area L-10, June 1973, Same View as III-8 After 2 Years

64

�Figure 111-10. September 1971 View of North-South Flightpath on One Square Mile
Grid from Sampler A-9

Figure 111-11. June 1973 View from Same Position as Figure 111-10 After 2 Years

65

�.*,,!«Vi v;;v '•£

&lt;*. ,t&gt;*' Hs^-r

Figure 111-12. April 1969 Looking South Near Sampler G-5

Figure 111-13. July 1973, Same View as Figure III-12 After 4 Years

66

�Figure 111-14. Area D-7, June 1971, Looking SE From Sampler D-7

Figure 111-15. Area D-7, July 1973, Same View as Figure 111-14 After 2 Years
(Notice increase in number .-of shrubs after 2 years)

67

�Figure 111-16. Switchgrass (Panicum virgatuml

Figure 111-17. Woolly panicum (Panicum lanuginosum)

68

�Figure 111-18. Poorjoe or Rough Buttonweed (Diodia teres)

Figure 111-19. Poverty Weed (Hypericum gentianoidesl

69

�TABLE II 1-2. VEGETATIVE COVER CHANGES AND DICOTYLEDONOUS
PLANT SPECIES CHANGES BETWEEN JUNE 1971 AND
JUNE 1973
400 BY 400 FT
AREAS SURVEYED

CLASS RANKING
1971

1973

NUMBER OF
DICOTYLEDONS
COLLECTED
1971

1973

PERCENT
INCREASE
1971 TO
1973

B-8, M-7, N-8

0

I, II

%

a

10

100

L-10, N-5, M-2

I

I, II, III

a

6

a

13

116

II

IV

a

13

a

23

76

D-9, K-13, J-1

III

IV

a

a27

59

D-7, C-6, E-3

IV

V

a

19

a

37

94

E-6, F-12, H-11

V

V

a24

a

37

54

Grid I Area

IV

IV

17

27

59

Control Area 1

V

V

28

39

39

Control Area 2

ND

IV

ND

44

ND

D-12, A-11, C-11

17

a

Average of the three 400 by 400 ft areas

70

�TABLE 111-3. SPECIES OF DICOTYLEDONOUS SHRUBS AND HERBS COLLECTED
ON TA C-52A ONE SQUARE MILE GRID IN SUMMER 1971 AND 1973
SPECIES

COMMON NAME

VEGETATIVE CLASS AND
FREQUENCY OF
OCCURENCE

SHRUBS
*Baptisia ellipitica
*Baptisia hirsuta
Callicarpa americana
Diospyros virqiniana
Ilex qlabra
Ilex opaca
Lespedeza sp.
Pinus clausa
Pinus palustris
Quercus laevis
Quercus sp.
Quercus sp.
Quercus sp.
Quercus sp.

wild indigo
wild indigo
American beautyberry
common persimmon
gal I berry
American holly
sand pine
longleaf pine
turkey oak

V; rare
V; rare
IV; rare
IV; infrequent
V; infrequent
IV; infrequent
III; rare
IV; rare
IV; rare
III, IV, V; frequent
V; infrequent
IV; infrequent
III, IV; infrequent
IV, V; infrequent

HERBS
Acanthospermum australe
Achillea millefolium
Aqaloma discoidalis
* AgaJims djyar icata.
Ambrosia artemisiifolia
*Arenaria caroliniana
Asclepia humistrata
*Asclepias tuberosa
*Asvrum hvpericoides
*Baccharis halimifolia
*Balduina anqustifolia
Biqelowis nudata
Cassia fasciculata
Centella asiatica
*Chenopodium sp.
Chrysobalanus oblonqifolius
*Chrysoma pauciflosculosa
*Chrysopsis aspera
Chrvsopsis graminifolia
Chrvsoosis mixta
*Clitoria fragrans
Cnidoscolus stimulosus
Crotalaria maritima
Crotalaria sagittalis

paraquay bur
common yarrow
foxclove
common ragweed
Carolina sandwort
common milkweed
butterfly weed
St Andrews cross
groundsel baccharis

partridgepea senna
goosefoot
gopher apple
golden-aster
grassleaf golden-aster
golden-aster
pigeonwings
risky treadsoftly
rattlebox
arrow Crotalaria

*Collected only in June 1973

71

III; frequent
III; infrequent
II, III; frequent
IV, V; infrequent
II, III, V; frequent
II, IV, V; rare
IV; rare
IV; rare
IV; rare
IV, V; rare
V; infrequent
0,l,ll,lll; frequent
V; rare
V; rare
III, V; frequent
V; rare
II; infrequent
II; infrequent
V; rare
III, IV; infrequent
III, IV, V; infrequent
V; rare

�TABLE 111-3. CONTINUED
SPECIES

COMMON NAME

VEGETATIVE CLASS AND
FREQUENCY OF
OCCURENCE

HERBS Continued
*Croton arqvranthemus
Croton qlandulosus
*Cuphea so.
Diodia teres
Erechtites hieracifolia
*Eriqeron annuus
Erioqonum tomentosum
Eupatorium capilifolium
* Euphorbia maculata
Euphorbia supina Raf.
Froelichia floridana
Galactia microphylla
Gnaphalium falcatum
Gnaphalium obtusifolium
Gnaphalium purpurem
Hedyotis procumbens
Hedvotis uniflora
*Heterotheca subaxillaris
Hypericum qentianoides
*Hypericum myrtifolium
*Kalmia harsuta
*Kraqia virqinica
Lechea patula
*l_echea villosa
*Liatris secunda
*Liatrisqracilis
Lithospermum caroliniense
Lobelia brevifolia
Lugwigia virgata
Lupinus diffusus
Lupinus nuttallii
Molluqo verticillata
Oxalis stricta
Paronychia patula
Petalostemon caroliniense
Phlox flotidana
*Physalis heterophylla
Pluchea rosea
Polyqala nana
Polyqala polyqama
Polygala sp.
*Pnl\/nnnellq gracilis

tropic croton
cuphea
rough buttonweed
fireweed
annual fleabane
wild buckwheat
dogfennel
spotted spurge
prostrate spurge
Florida snakecotton
milkpea
cudweed
fragrant cudweed
purple cudweed

camphor telegraph plant
poverty weed
St Johns-wort
sandhill kalmia
pinweed
hairy pinweed
pinkscale gayfeather
slender gayfeather
Carolina gromwell
lobelia
false loosestrife
sandhills lupine
carpetweed
yellow woodsorrel
nail wort
prarie-clover
Florida phlox
clammy groundcherry
bachelor button
bitter polygala
polygala
jointweed

*Collected only in June 1973

72

V; rare
III; rare
IV; rare
all classes; common
V; infrequent
IV,V; frequent
II, IV; infrequent
II, III, IV; frequent
1, 1 1, 1 V,V; frequent
I; infrequent
I; infrequent
1 1, 1 1 1; infrequent
IV; infrequent
IV,V; frequent
1 1 1, IV; infrequent
V; rare
V; rare
IV; rare
II, III, IV; frequent
V; infrequent
V; rare
IV; rare
1 1 1,IV; frequent
IV; rare
V; infrequent
V; infrequent
l,lll; infrequent
V; frequent
V; rare
0,l,lll; infrequent
I; rare
I; rare
III; rare
1, 1 1, 1 1 1; frequent
I; infrequent
II; infrequent
V; rare
V; rare
IV,V; infrequent
II, III, IV,V; frequent
III; infrequent
1. 1 I.I V; frequent

�TABLE 111-3. CONCLUDED
SPECIES

COMMON NAME

VEGETATIVE CLASS AND
FREQUENCY OF
OCCURENCE

common polypremum

IV; infrequent
V; rare
IV; frequent
V; frequent
V; rare
V; rare
V; rare
1, 1 1, IV; frequent
V; rare
III; infrequent
IV,V; rare
1 1, 1 1 1, IV; frequent
V; rare
IV,V; infrequent
1 1, 1 V,V; frequent
I V,V; frequent
0,l; rare
III; rare
III; rare
all classes; common
IV; rare
V; rare
V; rare
V; rare
IV; infrequent
1 1 1, IV; infrequent
1 1 1, IV; infrequent

HERBS Concluded
Polypremum procumbens
*Pterocaulon undalatum
Rhexia alifanus
*Rhexia lutea
* Rhexia mariana
* Rhexia salicifolius
* Rhexia virginiana
Rhvnchosia aalactioides
Rhynchosia reniformis
Rubussp.
*Rudbechia hirta
Rumex acetosella
*Sabatiaangularis
Schrankia microphylla
*Smilax sp.
Sophronanthe hispida
Stylisma villosa
Stylosanthes biflora
Tephrosia so.
Tithymalus soaerospermus
Tragia linearifolia
Tragia smallii
*Traqia sp.
* Verbena carnea
Vernonia angustifolia
Wahlenberaia merginata
Wareasessilifolia

meadowbeauty
yellow meadowbeauty
Maryland meadowbeauty
common meadowbeauty
pinebarrenpea
dollarleaf rhynchosia
blackberry
blackeyed coneflower
red sorrel
rosegentian
littleleaf sensitive brier
greenbrier

twin pencilflower
common euphorbia
noseburn
noseburn
noseburn
verbena
ironweed
rockbell

*Collected only in June 1973

73

�TABLE 111-4. DATA COMPARISON OF PERCENT VEGETATIVE COVER BY
VISUAL OBSERVATION OF OVERALL PLOT VERSUS THE
SQUARE-FOOT TRANSECT METHOD, 1973 DATA
VEGETATIVE
CLASS/SITE

VEGETATIVE CLASS
CRITERIA

VISUAL
ESTIMATE9

SQUARE-FOOT
TRANSECTb

Class I

5 to 20%

19

11

Class II

20 to 40%

29

19

Class III

40 to 60%

60

41

Class IV

60 to 80%

76

67

Class V

80 to 100%

89

80

Control Site 2C

75

45

Grid 1 d

75

47

a

Average of 12 estimates

b
c

Average of 27 transects

Located 0.1 mile west of Sampler E-1

d

Center section of Grid 1 located 1000 feet south of Sampler 0-7

74

�e.

Conclusions

A comparison of vegetative coverage and occurrence of plant species on the one
square mile grid between June 1971 and June 1973 has shown that areas with 0 to 60%
vegetative cover in 1971 have a coverage of 15% to 85% in 1973. Those areas having 0 to 5%
coverage in 1971 (areas adjacent to or under flightpaths used during herbicide equipment
testing) now have 15% to 54% coverage. The rate of change in the coverage seems to depend
on soil type, soil moisture, and wind; there is no evidence to indicate that existing vegetative
coverage is in any way related to herbicide residue in the soil. Dicotyledonous or broadleaf
plants that are normally susceptible to damage from herbicide residues presently occur throughout the entire one square mile grid.

75

�SECTION IV
STUDIES OF THE ANIMALS OF TEST AREA C-52A
In May 1970, a survey was initiated to determine the animal species composition of the sprayequipment testing grid on TA C-52A and within the adjacent 11 square mile area. The purpose
of this survey was to determine the extent of faunal ecological alteration that occurred in the
test area due to repetitive applications of military herbicides.
It was expected that application of military herbicides would temporarily alter the faunal
ecology of an area, primarily due to the changes in the vegetation. It had been postulated that
the animals living in a sprayed area would either be killed outright by herbicides or would receive
doses via water or food that would affect their reproductive processes. Laboratory studies dealing
with the teratogenic and embryotoxic effects of TCDD, a contaminant found in 2,4,5-T, have
been reported (Reference IV-1). It had also been suggested that animals would totally avoid a
sprayed area either due to the lack of food, the offensive appearance or taste of the vegetation,
or odors produced by the herbicides or their degradation products.
The objectives of this animal survey were to determine species variation, distribution patterns,
migration, and relative population sizes as found on the test grid or immediately adjacent to it.
Methods of study included early morning, midday, and night field trips for identification and
collection of mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians. Many species collected were brought into
the laboratory where they were photographed and either preserved or mounted, and these now serve
as a reference collection to facilitate identification for subsequent studies.
The results of the 1970 animal survey were reported in Reference IV-2. A synopsis of the
1972 report and comments concerning its correlation to the 1973 studies are included in this report.
1. SYNOPSIS OF QUALITATIVE ANIMAL SURVEYS, 1970 - 1973
A total of 18 mammal species were observed off the test grid with 12 of these species also being
found on the grid. All of the animals sighted on the grid used the area for foraging or as a source
of drinking water except the beach mouse and the hispid cotton rat, which were using the area as
their habitat. The hispid cotton rat was first seen on the grid during the 1973 study. Table IV-1
lists the mammals observed both on and off the grid. The most important economic population in
the area was the deer herd. Night field trips yielded average counts of from 24 to 36 deer on the
grid and within the immediate area. Close inspection of aquatic areas on the grid during early morning field trips revealed extensive activity the previous nights. In addition to the deer herd a sizable
herd of feral hogs earlier crossed with Russian Boars, also inhabited the area. The hogs frequented
the marshy areas, drinking and rooting for food.
During the spring of 1970, a red fox was frequently observed close to the grid and its den was
found approximately 100 yards from the edge of the grid. Five kits were found in the den and based
upon gross observations, they appeared healthy and normal.
The most common rodents found off the grid in 1970 along the streams that drain the area
were the cotton mouse and the hispid cotton rat. In the fields surrounding the grid, the eastern
References:
IV-1. Report of the Advisory Committee on 2,4,5-T to the Administrator of the Environmental
Protection Agency, 7 May 1971
IV-2. Pate, B. D., R. C. Voigt, P. J. Lehn, and J. H. Hunter: Animal Survey Studies of Test Area
C-52A, Eglin AFB Reservation, Florida. AFATL-TR-72-72, Air Force Armament Laboratory,
Eglin AFB, Florida, April 1972. Unclassified.

76

�TABLE IV-1. MAMMALS FOUND ON THE 1 SQUARE MILE GRID AND .WITHIN THE
ADJACENT 11 SQUARE MILE AREA
SPECIES

AREA WHERE OBSERVED

COMMON NAME

ON GRID
Canis familiaris

wild dog

Dasypus novemcinctus

armadillo

Didelphis marsupialis

opossum

Geomvs pinetis

southeastern pocket gopher

Lynx rufus

bobcat

Mephitis rnephitis

striped skunk

Odocoileus
virginianus

whitetail deer

Oryzomys paulustris

rice rat

Peromyscus gossypinus

cotton mouse

Peromvscus polipnotus

beach mouse

Reithrodontomys
humulis

eastern harvest mouse

Procyon jotqr

racoon

Sciurus carolinensis

eastern gray squirrel

Sciurus niger

eastern fox squirrel

Sigmodon hispidus
Sus scrofa

hispid cotton rat

Sylvilagus floridanus

eastern cottontail rabbit

Vulpes fulva

red fox

OFF GRID

b,c

b,c

b,c

b,c

wild pig

a

Species found on or off grid for first time, 1973 data

b

Dominant species; sighted during 80% of the field trips, 1973 data

c

Dominant species; sighted during 80% of the field trips, 1970 data

77

�harvest mouse was common. Eight pairs of the eastern harvest mouse were taken into the
laboratory and allowed to breed. Six of the eight pairs had litters totalling 24 offspring which
were normal in size and free from any apparent birth defects.
During the 1973 study, only two cotton mice and two eastern harvest mice were found.
The cotton mice were caught near a stream draining the grid, and the eastern harvest mice were
captured on the grid. There were eight beach mice captured off the grid in areas along streams
and in open fields.
The most common rodent species on the grid was the beach mouse. Trapping studies during
the summer of 1970 showed that this species was widely distributed throughout the grid, except
in areas with less than 5% vegetative cover. In the 1973 study, the beach mouse was found
predominantly in the areas of 5% to 60% vegetative cover.
At least 25 species of birds were observed in the area immediately adjacent to the grid or
feeding within its boundaries. Many more species than those listed in Table IV-2 are found
in the more densely forested areas near the outer limits of the 2 mile radius.

In 1970, seven species of water birds and waders were sighted repeatedly in the aquatic
areas on or off the grid. The most common birds on the grid were the meadow lark and
the mourning dove. It seems significant that all birds sighted, with the single exception
of a grasshopper sparrow (caught in a live animal trap) were medium to large species.

In I973, the first sightings of red-wing blackbirds and little blue heron occurred on the grid.
In 1970, the meadow lark was the predominant species of bird found, while in 1973, frequent
and repeated sightings of night hawks, bobwhite quail, Mississippi kites, mourning doves and
meadow larks were reported.
Eighteen species of reptiles were collected or observed, with 10 species recorded on the
grid and 12 species from the surrounding area (Table IV-3). Differences in faunal species
composition on and off the grid due to vegetation differences can best be illustrated with the
reptiles. Those species that are adaptable and occupy a variety of niches were found both on
and off the grid in large numbers. The dominant species on the grid was the six-lined racerunner,
and it was also one of the dominant species in the wooded area surrounding the grid. Those
species whose habitat is characterized by definite vegetative type cannot adapt to the open
habitat of the grid. The green anole and southern fence lizard are two of these. There are
also species which occur in the forest areas but are more plentiful in the open areas, such as
the eastern coachwhip. In 1973, the first softshelled turtle was seen on the grid.
Twelve species of amphibians were collected (Table IV-4). The amphibian population on
the grid centered mainly around the aquatic areas with the exception of the two toad species,
which were also found in the dry areas. There were breeding populations throughout most of the
year in the aquatic areas on the grid: the southern cricket frog, the southern toad, the oak toad,
the barking tree frog, the southern leopard frog, and the squirrel tree frog. The slimy salamander
is one of the dominant species in the surrounding forest but does not occur on the grid, presumably
because of its need for sufficient moist ground cover. The squirrel tree frog and the hog-nosed
waterdog were first reported on the grid in the 1973 study.
2. CURRENT STUDIES ON ANIMALS
In the 1970 animal survey, 73 species of vertebrates were observed on and off the test grid.
The most frequently observed species on the grid was the beach mouse Peromyscus polionotus

78

�TABLE IV-2. BIRDS FOUND ON THE 1 SQUARE MILE GRID AND WITHIN THE
ADJACENT 11 SQUARE MILE GRID
SPECIES

COMMON NAME

AREA WHERE OBSERVED
ON GRID

Accipiter striatus
velox
Aqelaius phoeniceus

OFF GRID

sharp-shinned hawk
red-wing blackbird

a

+

+

Ammodramus savannarum grasshopper sparrow
Bubulcis ibis

cattle egret

Botaurus lentiginosus

American bittern

Buteo jamaicensis

red -tailed hawk

Buteo liniatus

red-shouldered hawk
eastern green heron

Butorides virescens
virescens
Caprjmulgus vociferus

eastern whippoorwill

Casmerodius acbus
egretta

American egret

Cathartes aura

turkey vulture

Chordeiles minor

night hawk

b+

b+

Co!jn us. virginlanus

bobwhite quail

b+

b+

Coragyps atratus

black vulture

Con/us brachyrhynchos

American crow

Florida caerulea

little blue heron

Elanoides forficatus
forficatus

swallowtail kite

Falco sparverius

sparrow hawk

Ictinia misisipoiensis

Mississippi kite

Sturnella maqna

meadow lark

b,c +

b+

Turdus migratorius

robin

Zenaidura macroura
Unidentified Duck

mourning dove

b+

b+

Unidentified Goose
Unidentified Grebe
a

Species found on grid for the first time, 1973 data

boominant species; sighted during 80% of the field trips, 1973 data
c

Dominant species; sighted during 80% of the field trips, 1970 data

79

�TABLE IV-3. REPTILES FOUND ON THE 1 SQUARE MILE GRID AND WITHIN THE
ADJACENT 11 SQUARE MILE AREA
SPECIES

COMMON NAME

AREA WHERE OBSERVED
ON GRID

Agkistrodon piscivorus

eastern cottonmouth

Alligator
mississippiensis

American alligator

Anolis carolinensis
carolinensis

green anole

Cnemidophorus
sexlineatus

six-lined racerunner

Coluber constrictor
priapus

southern black racer

Crotalus adamanteus

eastern diamondback rattlesnake

Elphae guttata guttata

corn snake

Ferox sp.

soft-shelled turtle

Heterodon platyrhinos

eastern hognose

Lampropeltis doliata
doliata

scarlet kingsnake

Lygosoma laterale

ground skink

Masticophis flagellum
flagellum

eastern coachwhip

Matrix sipedon
pictiventris

Florida water snake

Pituophis melanoleucus
mugitus

Florida pine snake

Pseudemys scripta
scripta

yellow-bellied turtle

Sceloporus undulatus
undulatus

southern fence lizard

Sistrurus miliarius
barbouri

dusky pigmy rattlesnake

Sternotherus minor
minor

loggerhead musk turtle

OFF GRID

a

+

b,c

a

Species found on grid for the first time, 1973 data

^Dominant species; sighted during 80% of the field trips, 1970 data
c

Dominant species; sighted during 80% of the field trips, 1973 data

80

b,c

�TABLE IV-4. AMPHIBIANS FOUND ON THE 1 SQUARE MILE GRID AND WITHIN THE
ADJACENT 11 SQUARE MILE AREA
SPECIES

COMMON NAME

AREA WHERE OBSERVED
ON GRID

Acris sryllus gryllus

southern cricket frog

Bufo quercicus

oak toad

Bufo terrestris

southern toad

Eurycea bislineata
cirrigera

southern two-lined salamander

Gastrophryne
caroljnensis

eastern narrow-mouthed toad

Hermidactylium
sccutatum

four-toed salamander

Hyla qratiosa

barking tree frog

Hyla squirella

squirrel tree frog

Necturus beyeri

hog-nosed waterdog

Plethodon glutinosus
glutinosus

slimy salamander

Rana clamitans
clamitans

bronze frog

Rana pipiens/
sphenocephala

southern leopard frog

b+

a,b+

a

Species found on grid for first time, 1973 data

bA breeding population

81

OFF GRID

b+

�and the six-lined racerunner Cnemidophorus sexlineatus. These two species were suggested as
candidates for future studies of population distribution. During the months of February, March,
and May 1971 a trapping study was performed on the test area for three, 4-day periods in each
month (Reference IV-3). A total of 38 beach mice were captured during the three trapping
periods. Thirty beach mice were captured during the February-March periods, and of these,
six from the test grid and three from a control area were examined for gross deformaties.
Sections of liver, kidney, and gonads were free of abnormalities, and no cleft palates were
observed.
The primary purpose of the present study was two fold. First (Test Program I), animals
were to be obtained for examination of gross and microscopic lesions, since it has been
reported (Reference IV-1) that TCDD produces teratogenic and embryotoxic effects under certain
experimental conditions. Second (Test Program II), the trapping survey discussed in the previous
paragraph was to be expanded in an attempt to correlate habitat preference for the most prevalent
mammal observed on the grid in order to determine if the population distribution is related to
vegetative cover.
3. MATERIALS AND METHODS
Traps used for this study were Havahart traps (Havahart Traps, Department 1, P.O. Box 551,
Ossining, N.Y. 10562) numbers 0 and 1 for small mammals. Traps were baited with peanut
butter and oatmeal.
In June 1973, Test Program I was initiated by placement of traps on the square mile grid
in two patterns. At first, one trap was placed in every other plot (400 by 400 foot areas) in every
other row. For example, Row A had one trap each in plots 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13. Row C
had one trap each in plots 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12. Four to eight traps were placed in these areas.
A total of 90 traps were emplaced. Traps were checked daily and the trapping duration was one
week. A second portion of Test Program I utilized four sampling plots with distinct physical
characteristics and involved the placement within each plot of 25 traps in five rows of five traps
each, 20 paces apart, in each plot. Historically, these areas were exposed to low or high concentrations of herbicide . Traps were checked daily, and the trapping was carried out for 7 days. In
October 1973, a third portion of Test Program I was conducted on Grid 1 exclusively (Figure I-5).
Grid 1 was divided into equal quadrants North-South and East-West, and was numbered upper left
(Area 1), lower left (Area 2), lower right (Area 3), and upper right (Area 4). Twenty-five traps
were placed in each area in two rows of 10 traps per row and one row of five traps with 15 paces
between traps. The rows were located at 250, 500, and 750 feet from the center of the grid on
the ordinate. Traps were checked daily for 7 days.
Mice, rats, and reptiles were taken to the laboratory for gross examination and prepared for
histologic examination. The majority of the animals were alive on arrival but some had succumbed
to the intense heat and confinement in the trap.
Live animals were subjected to a euthanasic procedure using ether. All animals were photographed, weighed, measured, and examined for develqpmental defects such as cleft palate, cleft
lip, polydactyly, and micro-ophthalmia. All internal organs were examined for gross lesions, and
individual organ weights were recorded. Representative sections of each tissue were placed in
^Personal .communication with Donald King, Department of Zoology, University of Minnesota,
Minneapolis, Minnesota.

82

�neutral 10% buffered formalin and processed for microscopic study by the Veterinary Pathology,
Washington, D.C. 20305. All remaining control and grid rat liver tissue and mouse fat and liver
tissues were collected, placed in clean glass jars, frozen, and sent to the Interpretive Analytical
Services Laboratory, Dow Chemical U.S.A., for TCDD analysis. The method of analysis was as
described in Section II with the following exceptions: Ten grams of tissue were added to 10 ml
ethanol and 20 ml 40% aqueous KOH and refluxed 2 hours. The resulting mixture was extracted
with four 10 ml portions of hexane. The hexane extracts were combined, subjected to h^SC^
extraction and the same subsequent steps as in analysis of the soil samples.
Recovery studies using blank fish, beef liver, and soil averaged 70+% at the 10 to 25 part
per trillion level.
In Test Program II, eight mouse traps were placed by computer randomization in areas
which were classified according to vegetative coverage. Five vegetative areas were classified
as follows: 5% to 20% coverage; 20% to 40% coverage; 40% to 60% coverage; 60% to 80%
coverage; 80% to 100% coverage (see Section III, Figure III-3). Three of the 400 by 400 foot
plots for each of Classes 1 to 5 were chosen at random. Eight pairs of coordinates were generated
using the library random number generator for the Wang 720C programmable calculator. Each
trap was placed in accordance with these coordinates. A total of 120 traps were utilized. Animals
thus trapped were ear tagged with size 1, sequentially numbered, fingerling tags (National Band
and Tag Company, Newport, Kentucky, 41071) and species, sex, and trap location was recorded.
They were examined for external abnormalities and released. Traps were checked daily during
the 8 days this study was conducted, and records were kept of original capture and the recapture
of individual animals.
4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
During Test Program I, several different species of animals were caught, both on and off the
test grid (Table IV-5). The sex distribution of the trapped animals was 23 male and 14 female
beach mice, eight male and eight female cotton rats, two female eastern harvest mice, one male
and one female cotton mice, ten male and seven female six-lined racerunners, one male eastern
cotton mouth, and one male toad.

TABLE IV-5. TOTAL NUMBER AND LOCATION OF ANIMALS COLLECTED DURING
1973 TEST PROGRAM I
CLASS

COMMON NAME

OFF GRID

ON GRID

Mammalia
beach mouse
cotton rat
eastern harvest mouse
cotton mouse

8
10
0
2

42
6
2
0

six-lined racerunners
eastern cottonmouth

4
1

13
0

toad

1

0

Reptilia

Amphibia

83

�The age of the rodents was determined by histological examination of the gonads based on
the presence or absence of sperm or ova (gametes) in the gonads. Animals with gonads showing
gametogenesis were classified as adults and those with gonads showing no gametogenesis were
classified as immature. The age of the animals varied, but adults predominated in the sample,
55 adults, 33 immature. Nine pregnant mice and five pregnant rats were found in the adult
female animals. The stage of gestation varied considerably from early pregnancy to near term.
Fifty-four embryos and fetuses were examined grossly and microscopically. No developmental
defects or other lesions were seen.
Gross necropsy lesions were relatively infrequent in the test population and consisted primarily of lung congestion in those animals that died prior to being brought to the laboratory.
No developmental defects were seen in any of the adult animals.
Histologically, the tissues of 13 of the 26 control animals and 40 of the 63 animals from
the test grid were considered normal. Microscopic lesions were noted in some animals from
both groups. For the most part, these were minor changes of a type that would be expected in
any animal population. One of the most common findings was parasites. A total of 11 controls
and 9 grid animals were affected with one or more classes of parasites. These are summarized
in Table IV-6.
Parasites may be observed in any species, and those in this population were for the most part
incidental findings that were apparently not harmful to the animal. There were exceptions
however. Protozoan organisms had produced focal myositis in one rat and were also responsible
for hypertrophy of the bile duct epithelium in a six-lined racerunner.
Moderate to severe pulmonary congestion and edema were seen in several rats and mice. All
of these animals were found dead in the traps before reaching the laboratory, and the lung lesions
were probably the result of heat stroke. The remainder of the lesions in both groups consisted
principally of inflammatory cell infiltrates of various organs and tissues. They were usually mild
in extent, and although the etiology was not readily apparent, the cause was not interpreted as
toxic.
It was highly improbable that any of the mice trapped during this study were alive during the
final phase of herbicide dissemination (September 1970), although the life span of the beach
mouse has been reported to be 5 years in captivity (Reference IV-3). A portion of the grid
population was certainly made up of offspring of these animals present in 1970. Emigration from,
or immigration to, the test grid could occur, especially on the fringe areas, since it has been
reported that the area traveled by an individual beach mouse during its daily activities may extend
to 5 acres (Reference IV-4).
An analysis of the ratios of organ weight to body weight, and organ weight to body length
for mice captured off the grid versus mice captured on the grid was conducted within the severe
constraints of limited data (June 1973 data). Female mice were not considered due to the fact all
References:
IV-3. Benton, A.H. and W. E. Werner, Jr. Field Biology and Ecology. McGraw Hill, New
York, 1966.
IV-4. Andrewartha, H.G. Introduction to the Study of Animal Populations. University of
Chicago Press, 1961.

84

�control females were pregnant and showed large individual body weight and organ weight
variations. Only two of 11 female mice from the grid were pregnant. There were five control
males (three mature and two immature) and 18 males (ten mature and eight immature) captured
on the grid. Complete organ data were available only for 13 of the 18 grid males (nine
mature and 4 immature).
It is recognized that the mature and immature mice will likely show different characteristics;
however, combination of these two groups was necessary to produce any reasonable sample size.
The t test for unpaired samples was used on 16 different factors (Table IV-7). These factors
are as designated below:
FACTOR

DESCRIPTION

A

=

Total organ weight/body length

B

=

Total organ weight/body length

C

=

Sum of lung, heart, kidney, and brain/body weight

D
E

=
=

Sum of lung, heart, kidney, and brain/body weight
Lung weight/body weight

F

=

Heart weight/body weight

G

=

Spleen weight/body weight

H

=

Liver weight/body weight

I

=

Kidney weight/body weight

J

=

Brain weight/body weight

K

=

Lung weight/body length

L

=

Heart weight/body length

M

=

Spleen weight/body length

N

=

Liver weight/body length

0

=

Kidney weight/body length

P

=

Brain weight/body length

Formula for the procedure used:

sx 2
~N~2

r

r
I

9

iA
sx.,^

1

sx.,
ITf

(2X1)2+

Ml

w.2
~X2

-2

Where
IS!-) + N 2 ¥ 2

85

&lt;SX2&gt;"1
N2

rN 1 + N 2 i
.

N

1N2 J

�TABLE IV-6. PARASITES FOUND IN RODENTS COLLECTED FROM CONTROL
AND TEST AREA SITES, JUNE 1973

LOCATION
Control
Test Area
a

NUMBER OF
ANIMALS
EXAMINED

NUMBER OF
PARASITES
ANIMALS
EFFECTED
NEMATODES CESTODES PROTOZOAN?

20
3

11

9

1

5

50

g

4

0

7

Animals trapped on Grids 2, 3, and 4

TABLE IV-7. SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF ORGAN WEIGHT TO BODY WEIGHT,
AND ORGAN WEIGHT TO BODY LENGTH FOR MICE OFF THE
GRID VERSUS MICE ON THE GRID (HEOn-Grid and Off-Grid
Samples are from the Same Population)

v = 16
FACTOR

t

P (exceeding t. Given H)

A

0.1863

0.43

B

0.8859

0.19

C

0.9750

0.17

D

0.1025

0.45
a

b

E

1.6618

F

0.2750

0.38

G

1.1025

0.14

H

0.7077

0.06

(0.05)

0.25
a

b

I

2.2228

J

0.2363

0.41

K

0.6500

0.27

L

0.5659

0.29

M

0.4979
1.0214

0.32

1.1034

0.14

1.1647

0.13

N
0
P

0.02

(0.10)

0.16

Significant at p &lt; 0.05
"Value when control animal with lung and kidney lesions is removed from sample

86

�When the ratios of average body weight to average organ weight of various visceral organs
were compared between the male mice captured on the grid and the male mice captured off the
grid it was found that on the average, the control animals had lung and kidney weights that
varied significantly at the 95% confidence level. The lung variation just being significant. When
this information was compared to the pathological work-up, it was found that one male control
animal had multifocal subacute pneumonitis and multifocal subacute nephritis. When this animal
was removed from the sample, the ratio of kidney weight/body weight between the control and
grid animals no longer varied significantly. The lung weight/body weight variation became slightly
more significant. It is felt this variance is due to the difference in ratio of mature to immature
animals between the two groups, i.e., controls 3:2 compared to 9:4 for the grid animals.
The analyses for TCDD from rodents collected in June and October 1973 are shown in Table
IV-8. An initial interpretation would be that TCDD does in fact accumulate in liver and fat
of tissue from rodents living on the test grid. Data from soil analysis (Table 11-10, Section II)
confirm the presence of TCDD in soils of the test area. Discrepancy of levels of TCDD between
soils and tissues suggest the potential for bio-magnification of this compound. These data do not
correlate with previously published research (Reference IV-5). Such levels encounted in the
animals reported herein would be suspect of teratogenic or pathologic abnormalities. Such
abnormalities, however, were not encountered in this study. It would appear that analytically,
via mass spectrometry, the chemical detected is of a very similar nature to TCDD, but biologically
does not behave in the manner characterized for TCDD (Reference IV-5).
TABLE IV-8. CONCENTRATION (PARTS PER TRILLION) OF 2,3,7,8-TETRACHLORODIBENZO-p-DIOXIN (TCDD) IN LIVER AND FAT SAMPLES FROM
RODENTS COLLECTED FROM CONTROL AND TEST SITES ON
TA C-52A, JUNE OR OCTOBER 1973a
RODENT

TISSUES

CONTROL

LOCATION
GRIDS 2, 3,4

Rats

Liver, Fat"

&lt;20

210

Mice

Liver, Fatb

&lt;20

300

GRID 1
No Sample0
540d

a

Analysis for TCDD was performed by the Interpretive Analytical Services, Dow
Chemical U.S.A., Midland, Michigan
"Tissues represent a composite from all animals collected at the respective location
c
Rats do not frequent dry areas.
d
Sample collected in October 1973.

Reference:
IV-5. Conference on Dibenzodioxins and Dibenzofurans, Environmental Health Perspectives,
Experimental Issue Number Five, September 1973, National Institute of Environmental
Health Science, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

87

�The beach mouse was reported in Reference IV-2 as the most common rodent species
on the grid in 1970. Observations in the field indicate that the beach mouse remains the most
common rodent on the grid.

The 1970 study (Reference IV-2) also indicated that the beach mouse was widely distributed throughout the grid except in areas of less than 5% cover. In an attempt to correlate
distribution of the beach mouse with vegetative cover, a second test program (Test Program II)
was initiated with a total of 83 animals being trapped during an 8 day period, 28 June to
3 July 1973. The majority of animals (63) were found in areas with 5% to 60% vegetative
cover; within this range, the greatest number of animals trapped (28) was from an area with
40% to 60% cover (Figure IV-1). A similar habitat preference has been observed along the
beaches of the Gulf Coast (Reference IV-5). In this study, it appears that the beach mouse
utilizes the seeds of switchgrass, (Panicim virgatum) and woolly panicum (Panicum lanuginosum)
for a food source, and these are two of the most dominant plants on the grid (see photographs
in Section III). Seed husks of these plants have been observed in areas of mouse activity. It
is possible that another prominant plant, broomsedge bluestem (Andropogon virginicus).
also provides food for the beach mouse.
In an attempt to compare the trapping data from 1971 with those data obtained in the
1973 study and, hence, to determine whether an increase in the population of beach mice
has occurred, the following assumptions were made:
a. It was assumed that the traps, the bait, and the methods employed for setting
and placing the traps were equally as effective and similar in the 1971 and 1973 studies.
b. It was assumed that the density of trap placement was equally as effective and
similar in the 1971 and 1973 studies.
c. It was assumed that traps should be no further apart that approximately 1-1/2
times the mean random travel distance of the animal being trapped. For beach mice, this
distance is approximately 300 feet (Reference IV-5).
d. On the other extreme, it was assumed that the traps should not be so dense as
to impede animal movement nor disrupt animal habits.
All trapping experiments involved in this study were conducted within these extremes.
In order to produce an estimate of the population density of the beach mouse in the
herbicide treated area, it was necessary to determine what portion of that area was effectively
surveyed. It was also necessary to normalize the areas sampled for comparison based on the
mean random travel of the beach mouse from the 1973 recapture data. A tabulation was
made of the distances between the trap where initial capture occurred and the trap location
of the recapture farthest from the initial capture point. These distances represent the
distances that the mice from the sample were known to have traveled and were assumed to be
random samples from the population of habitat radii. The longest radius observed was 3,200
feet, the next longest was 285 feet, and the shortest was 45 feet. The 3,200-foot distance
was disregarded as a freak occurence because such a number appeared only once out of a sample

88

�30

S 20
&lt;D
I 15
01

5-

20

40

60

100

Vegetative Cover, %
Figure IV-1. Relationship of Animals Trapped to Vegetative Cover

of 18 and it is more than 11 times as large as the next largest distance which is, itself, only
6.3 times as large as the smallest distance observed. The mean distance, 194 feet, of the
remaining 17 distances was used as the average habitat radius. Circles with 194-foot radii were
drawn using the traps of 12 randomly selected 400 by 400 foot plots as centers. The envelope
area around the traps was estimated using a triangle, rectangle, or circle according to the fit
which, by inspection, appeared to be the best. The average of the 12 areas measured was 8.3
acres with a standard deviation of 1.69, a maximum of 10.45, and a minimum of 5.17. The
estimate, 8.3 acres, was used as the effective survey area for each group of eight traps.
a. Variation of the Lincoln Index
The Lincoln Index may be stated mathematically as:

Pi =

- R)

Where
PI = first population estimate

89

�N-| = pre-census sample
N2 = total census sample
R = number of recaptures
Using the catch of 26 June and considering only the tagged animals, NI = 13. Using the
catch of 27 June, N2 = 18 and R = 1. According to this information, the first estimate is
PI = 222. Enough uncertainty is introduced, however, such as how a dead animal should be
counted in the pre-census sample, that an alternative method of estimation was desirable.
The following equation was used to calculate the second estimate of the population.

8

RJ + 1
'max " '

Where
N.|i = the catch from the ith day
N2 + 1 = the catch from the (i + 1)th day
RJ + 1 = the recaptures from the (i + 1)th day which were captured on the (ith)day also
The values for RJ + 1 were corrected for the influence of mice no. 18, recaptured six times;
no. 27. recaptured four times; no. 28, recaptured four times; no. 41, recaptured four times;
no. 45 recaptured three times; and no. 50, recaptured three times. These mice were considered to be trap addicts. From the data available, P2 = 152.
A third method was used for calculating P% in which the first catch was considered to be
the pre-census and the second catch the census. A computer program to simulate the
trapping of mice was developed with inputs of average sample size, Sa, and true population
size, Pt. Twenty-five runs were made at specific values of Sa and Pt, and the estimated
population was calculated with the Lincoln Index and averaged over the 25 trials. The average
recapture number, Ra was also calculated. Pt was changed until Ra was equal to the observed
recapture rate and Sa was equal to the observed sample size. Pt at these values is considered
to be the best estimate of the population, i.e., Pt is the number most likely to produce the
results which were observed in the real case. P% by this method was 191. This is not grossly
different from the 222 and 152 estimated from P-| and Po. The average of P l f P2, and Po
is probably the best overall estimate of the population. This average is approximately 189
total population - approximately 1.64 mice per acre.

90

�5. CONCLUSIONS
Based on the pathologic findings of the Test Program I study, it was concluded that there
was no evidence that the herbicide contaminant in question (TCDD) had produced any developmental defects or other specific lesions in the animals sampled or in the progeny of those that
were pregnant. The lesions found were interpreted to be of a naturally occurring type and were
not considered related to any specific chemical toxicity. The organ to body weight and organ
to body length comparisons for the grid versus the control animals did not vary significantly when
age and pathological lesions were considered. Chemical analysis of composite rodent liver and
fat tissue indicated that there was an accumulation of TCDD-like chemical in tissue. If these data
are valid (an assumption that may be challenged), what is the source of the TCDD? Seeds of
switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) were found in abundance in the stomachs of beach mice. Samples
of such seed collected from the test area were analyzed for TCDD. Results indicated no residue
of TCDD at a minimum detection limit of less than 10 parts per trillion.

Based on information provided by the Test Program II study, it was concluded that the
beach mouse forms a natural, integral part of the ecosystem of the Lakeland Sand Complex
utilizing the dominant plants on the grid for food. The beach mouse continues to inhabit
areas of 5% to 60% cover, with a preference for areas of 40% to 60% vegetative cover. This
is indeed similar to the habitat preference of the beach mouse in other locations.
The statistical evidence derived from the Test Program II study shows that the 1.64 beach
mice per acre population (based on the Lincoln Index for 1973) is slightly higher than the
0.8 and 1.4 mice per acre found on Santa Rosa Island (Reference IV-6). It was also concluded
that the population of beach mice was higher in 1973 than in 1971 in the area of the test grid.
Even though the first trial of the 1971 data reflected a higher count of mice per acre trapped,
the low capture count on the second trial in 1971 indicates a lower actual population based on
the Lincoln Index assumptions than the 1973 data. The apparent increase in beach mouse
population on the grid in 1973 over 1971 was probably due to the natural recovery phenomenon
of a previously disturbed area. Some areas of the test grid have already exceeded the preferred
percentage of vegetative coverage of the beach mouse habitat, and other areas are either ideal
or fast developing into an ideal habitat. If the test grid remains undisturbed and continues
toward the climax species, a decline in the number of beach mice will probably occur simply
due to his habitat preference.

Reference:
IV-6. Blair, W. F., Population Structure, Social Behavior, and Environmental Relations in
Natural Populations of the Beach Mouse (Peromyscus polionotus leucephalus). Contribution
from the Laboratory of Vertebrate Biological, University of Michigan, Number 48:1-47, June 1951.

91

�SECTION V
INSECT DENSITY AND DIVERSITY STUDIES
ON TEST AREA C-52A

During 1970 and 1971, an initial survey of the arthropod populations of Test Area C-52A,
Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, was accomplished, and the results were published in Reference V-1.
1. SYNOPSIS OF PREVIOUS RESEARCH, MAY - JUNE 1971 (Reference V-1)
A sweep net survey of the insects on a 1 mile linear transect of Test Area C-52A resulted in
the collection of more than 1,800 specimens belonging to 74 insect families and two non-insect
arthropod orders. Eighteen of the taxa collected accounted for 97 percent of the collection, and
of these, six taxa accounted for 72 percent of the collection: order Araneida (spiders), insect
families Cicadellidae (leafhoppers), Elaterjdae (click beetles), Asilidae (robber flies), Hygaeidae
(lygaeid plant bugs), and Pentatomidae (stink bugs). Spiders and robber flies are carnivores,
stink bugs are carnivores or herbivores, and the other families are herbivores.
As plants were eliminated by the herbicides, those insects which fed specifically upon those
plants disappeared; however, no direct effects of residue on the insects were observed.
The objective of the present study was to duplicate the techniques of the 1971 study as closely
as possible in order to evaluate populations along the same grid line 2 years later. Qualitative and
quantitative comparisons were drawn to indicate the changes in variety and number of arthropods
(especially insects) that had become established on the grid since the aerial dispersal tests were
terminated in 1970.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
The techniques used in the study discussed in this report were the same as those outlined in
Reference V-1 except as discussed in the following paragraphs.
Time and manpower limitations precluded general, non-systematic sampling of the grid, therefore
the bulk of this comparative study was based on sweep net surveys along sampler row 8 of the
test area. This allowed a quantitative comparison of results while non-systematic net sampling of
grid areas did not lend itself to such analysis. A total of five paired sweep net surveys were performed on the mornings of June 14, 16, and 18; these dates being approximately 2 years and 2
weeks after the study discussed in Reference V-1. A given "paired sweep" (200 sweeps made by
2 individuals using 15-inch diameter nets) was taken across the grid and then back to the starting
point. The simultaneous sweeps were 20 feet apart. At the end of each 400 foot transect, rather
than using killing jars, the net contents were emptied into a paper bag into which a vial of ethyl
acetate had been placed. These bags were then tightly folded and placed in a large sack that was
carried out to the same taxonomic level as in the 1971 study. Exceptions to this classification
scheme included the listing of Acalypterate muscoid flies as a group and the listing of certain

Reference:
V-1. Valder, S. M.: Insect Density and Diversity Studies on Test Area C-52A, Eglin AFB
Reservation Florida. AFATL-TN-72-4, Air Force Armament Laboratory, Eglin AFB, Florida.
January 1972. Unclassified.

92

�undetermined insects only to order. Table V-1 represents a full listing of the arthropods found
in the sweep net survey. The undetermined insects (112 specimens) for the most part were
either immatures or only partial specimens. The identifications were based on information in
Reference V-2.
Finally, due to time limitations, only one full set of sweep net survey samples had been
identified at the time of this report. Therefore, while the 1971 report discussed the results of
five 2-mile sweeps of sampler row 8 (essentially 10 replicates), the present study considers data
only from one 2-mile sweep of the same sampler row (essentially two replicates of each 400 foot
transect of the row). Representative specimens of the identified samples are in the reference
collection of the Biological Studies Branch, USAF Environmental Health Laboratory, Kelly AFB,
Texas.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Those taxa or arthropods that were collected in numbers exceeding one percent of the total
number of specimens collected are listed in Table V-2. This table was formatted for comparison
with Table V-3 (from Reference V-1). (The various taxa are treated as families for simplicity.)
Such a comparison indicated that even though the 1973 data are based on only one sweep of the
grid, the total number of identified arthropods equaled 1,614 as compared to a total of 1,803
specimens from five sweeps in 1971. These data would then indicate that if the one 1973 sweep
were representative of all five sweeps taken during this second study, the total number of insects
caught would likely be greater than four times the number taken during the 1971 study. Further
analysis of the data indicates that the 1973 survey found great numbers of very small insects as
compared to the 1971 study. The majority of the Chrvsomelid beetles were very small insects,
and the Qcalvptrate muscoids, Psocoptera, Thysamoptera, Sminthuridae, Ocarine, and Chalcidoidea
also fall into this small to minute category. Table V-1 represents a listing of all arthropods collected
during the 1973 survey, and is compared to Table V-4 (from Reference V-1). Reference V-1,
however, lists not only those arthropods collected in 1971, but also those groups only observed
in 1970 and 1971. Therefore, the tables are not fully comparable either in taxa listed or in the
number of specimens reported. Comparison of this second set of tables again shows a relatively
large number of small insects found in the 1973 study. This discrepancy may simply represent a
difference in sampling/separation techniques or it may indicate an influx of populations of these
smaller arthropods as the vegetation and other environmental characteristics of the transects have
developed since the spray program was terminated.
Figures V-1 and V-2 represent arthropod/vegetation comparisons on Test Area C-52A for both
the 1971 and 1973 surveys. There exists a similarly vegetative distribution, and a slightly greater
plant coverage is indicated in 1973. The extreme differences in the numbers of arthropods found
on the transects during the 1971 study are shown as being reduced in 1973, and further replication
as well as time would likely reduce these differences more. Comparisons of the arthropod populations have to take into consideration the fact that Figure V-1 is based on the total observed and
collected specimens from Table V-4, while Figure V-2 is derived from only the identified specimens
of a single sweep of the 1973 study. Therefore, although the graphs representing the number of
arthropod "families" in both figures are relatively similar, and there is a tendency toward reduction
of extreme differences in the 1973 transect data, further discussion and comparison might be spurious.
Similar comments pertain to comparisons of the arthropod diversity graphs, even though basic

Reference:
V-2. Pate, B. D., P. J, Lehn, R. C. Voigt, and J. H. Hunter: Animal Survey Studies on Test Area
C-52A, Eglin AFB Reservation, Florida. AFATL-TR-72-72, Air Force Armament Laboratory,
Eglin AFB, Florida. April 1972. Unclassified.

93

�TABLE V-1. ANTHROPODS COLLECTED ON TEST AREA C-52A, EGLIN AFB
RESERVATION, FLORIDA, JUNE 1973
TAXON

COMMON NAME

CLASS: ARACHNIDA
ORDER: Araneida (Spiders)
ORDER: Acarine (Mites)

TOTAL
SPECIMENS
144
46

NUMBER OF SPECIMENS COLLECTED ON TRANSECT
AB BC CD DE EF FG GH HJ JK KL LM MN NO

4

9

9
2

16
2

18
3

36
27

18
7

1

1

7

6

6
2

8
3

2

1

1

4

1

3

CLASS: INSECTA
ORDER: Coleoptera (Beetles) 275 Specimens collected
Anthicidae

Antlike Flower Beetles

3
1

Carabidae

Ground Beetles

Chrysomelidae

Leaf Beetles

219

Cicindellidae

Tiger Beetles

7

Coccinellidae

Lady Beetles

1

Curculionidae

Snout Beetles

5

1

Elateridae

Click Beetles
Blister Beetles
Mycetaeid Fungus Beetles
Shining Flower Beetles

12
1

1

Meloidae
Mycetaeidae
Phalacridae
Tenebrionidae

Darkling Beetles

7

Undetermined larvae
and adults

6

1
1

1

1

84

35

2

1

1

5

69

18
1

1
1
1

1

2
2

1
1

1

2

53

1

1

1

1

1
12

1
11
2

1
1

2

1

1

2

3

14

12

1

ORDER: Collembola (Springtails) 53 Specimens collected
Sminthuridae

2

7

3

7

9

1

�TABLE V-1. ARTHROPODS COLLECTED ON TEST AREA C-52A, EGLIN AFB
RESERVATION, FLORIDA, JUNE 1973 (Continued)

NUMBER OF SPECIMENS COLLECTED ON TRANSECT
TOTAL
SPECIMENS AB BC CD DE EF FG GH HJ JK KL LM MN NO
ORDER: Diptera (Flies) 165 Specimens collected

TAXON

COMMON NAME

Acalyptrate
Asilidae

Muscoids
Robber Flies

Bombiliidae

Bee Flies

1

Cecidomyiidae

Gall Midges

3
1

1

14

2

Ceratopogonidae Biting Midges

2

2

6

6 21

14

7

3

7

1

8

3

3
1
1

1
1
1

2

Muscid Flies

2

1

1

Pipunculidae

Bigheaded Flies

3

1

1

Sarcophagidae

Flesh Flies

4

Syrphidae

Flower Flies

2

Tachinidae

Tachina Flies

10

Tipulidae

Crane Flies

Midges

Culicidae
en

9

5
1

Chironomidae

CO

86

Mosquitoes

Muscidae

Undetermined Adults

1

2

1

5

4

1
1

1

1

1

Burrowing Mayflies

33

2

2

4

4

6

1

1

1

5

1

ORDER: Hemiptera (True Bugs) 183 Specimens collected
Corimelaenidae
Corizidae

Corimelaenid Bugs
Grass Bugs

6
3

1

1

ORDER: Ephemeroptera (Mayflies) 1 Specimen Collected
Epnemeridae

1

1

1
2

1

1

1

1

2

2

4

4

2

�TABLE V-1.

TAXON

ARTHROPODS COLLECTED ON TEST AREA C-52A, EGLIN AFB
RESERVATION, FLORIDA, JUNE 1973 (Continued)

COMMON NAME

TOTAL
SPECIMENS

NUMBER OF SPECIMENS COLLECTED ON TRANSECT
AB BC CD DE EF FG GH HJ JK KL LM MN NO

ORDER: Hemiptera (True Bugs) Continued
Lygaeidae
Lygaeid Bugs
Miridae
Plant Bugs

6

1

33

2

Nabidae

Damsel Bugs

33

Neididae

Neidid Bugs

1

Pentatomidae

Stink Bugs

1

2

7

1
3

1 13
3

5
1

3
2

5

1

7

2

4

3

1

1

2

3
1

1

12

6

11

1

Assassom Bugs

19

Scutellerid Bugs

13

2

Usidetermined
Nymphs

68

2

2

1

2

3
1

10

3

3

6
1

1
10

2

4

3

Homoptera (True Bugs) 454 Specimens collected

Aleyrodidae

Whiteflies

1

Aphidae

Plantlice

5

Cercopidae

Spittlebugs

Cicadellidae

Leafhoppers
Scale Insects

Membracidae

6

1

Scutelleridae

Coccoidea
Fulgoridae

1

1

Reduviidae

ORDER:

4

Fulgorid Planthoppers
Treehoppers

1
1

43

1

400
1

21

3
1

27

3
81
2
1

25
41

3
1
32

1
4

28

27
1

1
36
1

4

28

31

3
22

1
8

18

�TABLE V-1. ARTHROPODS COLLECTED ON TEST AREA C-52A, EGLIN AFB
RESERVATION, FLORIDA, JUNE 1973 (Continued)

TAXON

COMMON NAME

TOTAL
SPECIMENS

NUMBER OF SPECIMENS COLLECTED ON TRANSECT

AB BC

CD DE EF

FG JGH HJ

JK

KL LM MN NO

ORDER: Hymenoptera (Bees, Wasps, Ants) 167 Specimens collected
Andrenidae

2

Bethylidae

Bethylids

2

Braconidae

Braconid Wasps

2

Chalcidoidea
Cynipoidea

Chalcids

Dryinidae
CO

Mining Bees

Dryinids

Formicidae

Ants

Halictidae
Ichneumonidae

Sweat Bees
Ichneumon Wasps

9
1

Mutillidae
Pompilidae

Velvet Ants
Spider Wasps

3
2

Undetermined Adults

5

Gall Wasps

40
1

1

1
1

1
2

3

7

1
3

1
99

1

3
1

9

6

3

1

2

1

28

8

10

9

4

15

4

2

1

1
3

4

2

4

10

1

1

1
1

12

1

1
2

1

1

1

1

4

2

1

1

1

1

2

1

ORDER: Neuroptera (Nerve Winged Insects) 1 Specimen collected
Myrmeleonidae

Antlions

1

1

1

ORDER: Lepidoptera (Butterflies and Moths) 13 Specimens collected
Microlepidoptera Several Families
Noctuidae
Owl Moths

2

1

�TABLE V-1. ARTHROPODS COLLECTED ON TEST AREA C-52A, EGLIN AFB
RESERVATION, FLORIDA, JUNE 1973 (Concluded

TAXON

COMMON NAME

TOTAL
SPECIMENS

NUMBER OF SPECIMENS COLLECTED ON TRANSECT

AB BC

CD DE EF

FG GH HJ

JK

KL LM MN NO

ORDER: Odonata (Dragonflies and Damselflies) 12 Specimens collected
Coenagrionidae

Damselflies

12

2

3

7

5

1

13

3

1

6

7

3

11

3

3

2

3

7

1

7
1

5

2

3

1

ORDER: Psocoptera (Psocids) 66 Specimens collected
Family not determined

66

2

7

10

15

6

3

1

2
2

1

ORDER: Orthoptera (Grasshoppers and Crickets) 92 Specimens collected
Acrid idae
Gryllidae

Grasshoppers

36

Crickets

34

Mantidae

Mantids

Phasmidae

Walkingsticks

14
1

Tettigoniidae

Katykids

2
1

1

2

6

1

1

7

1

1

5

ORDER: Thysanoptera (Thrips) 54 Specimens collected
Family not determined
TOTAL ARTHROPODS
TOTAL IDENTIFIED ARTHROPODS

54

1

1726

57

1614

55

9

6

2

19

9

1

81 253 190 128 357 184 104 92
70 248 185 123 339 172 98 77

1

4

92 118

2
37

33

81 103 33

30

�TABLE V-2. TAXA COLLECTED IN NUMBERS EXCEEDING ONE
PERCENT OF THE TOTAL SPECIMENS COLLECTED3,
JUNE 1973
FAMILY

COMMON NAME

Cicadellidae

Leafhoppers

Chrysomelidae

Leaf Beetles

219

13.6

38.4

Araneida

Spiders

144

8.9

47.3

Formicidae

Ants

99

6.1

53.4

Acalyptrate Muscoid

Flies

86

5.3

58.7

Psocoptera

Psocids

66

4.1

62.8

Thysanoptera

Thrips

54

3.3

69.4

Sminthuraidae

Springtails

53

3.3

72.3

Acarina

Mites

46

2.9

72.3

Cercopidae

Spittlebugs

43

2.7

75.0

Chalcidoidea

Chalcid Wasps

40

2.5

77.5

Acrid idae

Grasshoppers

36

2.2

79.7

Gryllidae

Crickets

34

2.1

81.8

Miridae

Plant Bugs

33

2.0

83.8

Nab idae

Damsel Bugs

33

2.0

85.8

Reduviidae

Assassin Bugs

19

1.2

87.0

a

Total equals 1,614 identified specimens:

NUMBER
PERCENT CUMULATIVE
COLLECTED OF TOTAL PERCENT OF
TOT A Ic
24.8
400
24.8

1 percent of the total equals 16 specimens

"As discussed in the text, several of the taxa represent ordinal or super family levels of
classification rather than family.
c

Cumulated percent of total is derived by the progressive summation of the figures in the
percent of total column.

99

�TABLE V-3.

TAXA COLLECTED IN NUMBERS EXCEEDING ONE PERCENT
OP THE TOTAL SPECIMENS COLLECTED3, JUNE 1971
PERCENT OF
TOTAL

FAMILY-COMMON NAME

CUMULATIVE PERCENT
OF TOTALb

Cicadelliclae - leaf hoppers

31.7

31.7

Araneida - spiders '(order)

18.6

50.3

Lygaeidae - lygaeid bugs

7.7

58.0

Elateridae - click beetles
Pentatomidae - stink bugs

4.7

62.7

4.5

67.2

Asilidae - robber flies

4.2

71.4

Nabidae - damsel bugs

3.9

75.3

Acrididae - grasshoppers

3.2

78.5

Reduviidae - assassin bugs

2.7

81.2

Sphecidae - sand wasps

2.6

83.8

Tenebrionidae - darkling beetles

2.4

86.2

Chrysomelidac - leaf beetles

2.2

88.4

Scutelleridae - scutellerid bugs

2.1

90.5

Coenagrionidae - dragonflies

1.4

91.9

Halictidae - sweat bees

1.4

93.3

Mydaidae - mydas flies
Tettigoniidae - katydids

1.3

94.6

1.3

95.9

Myc e t oph i 1 i dae - mycetophilid flies

1.0

96.9

Total equals 1803 specimens: 1 percent of the total equals 18
.specimens
Cumulated percent of total is derived by the progressive summation of
the figures in the percent of total column

100

�TABLE V-4.

INSECTS AND ARACHNIDS COLLECTED OR OBSERVED ON TEST AREA C-52A, EGLIN AFB
RESERVATION, FLORIDA, JUNE 1971

ARACHNIDS
ORDER
Araneida
Phalagida

NUMBER OF SPECIMENS COLLECTED ON TRANSECT
COMMON NAME

Spiders
Harvestmen

TOTAL
SPECIMENS

355
1

AB

BC

CD

4

3

25

DE

EF

FG

GH

HJ

JK

KL

LM

MN

NO

8 30 188

26

28

7

4

8

2

2

NUMBER OF SPECIMENS COLLECTED ON TRANSECT
FAMILY

COMMON NAME

TOTAL
SPECIMENS

AB

BC

CD

DE

EF 1 FG

GH

HJ

JK

KL

LM

MNJ NO

ORDER: COLEOPTERA (BEETLES) 206 Specimens Collected
Anthicidae

1

Buprestidae

Ant like Flower Beetles
Seed Beetles
Metallic Wood Borers

Carabidae

Ground Beetles

Cerambycidae

Long Horned Beetles

4
1

Chrysomelidae

Leaf Beetles

Cicindellidae

Tiger Beetles

Coccinellidae
Curculionidae
j-j

Lady Beetles

Bruchidae

Snout Beetles

1

1

43
2

1
2
4

4

1
1

1
1

1

8

6

Click Beetles

Gyrinidae"

Blister Beetles
Tumbling Flower Beetles

6

Passalidae

Passalid Beetles

4

4

2

4

2

4

2

10

3

Mordellidae

6

Whirligig Beetles

Meloidae

5
1

Predacious Diving Beetles

Elateridae

1

1

10

Dytiscidae"

1

Sighted but not collected in 1971
'sighted or collected in 1970

84

12

10

15

5

13

10

2

5

2

1

2

4

1

1

7

3

�TABLE V-4. CONTINUED

NUMBER OF SPECIMENS COLLECTED ON TRANSECT
FAMILY
ORDER:

TOTAL
SPECIMENS

COMMON NAME

Scarabaeidae

Scarab Beetles

Staphylinidae

Rove Beetles

Tenebrionidae

Darkling Beetles

ORDER:

BC

CD

DE

EF

FG

GH

HJ

KL

LM

MN

NO

7

3

6

9

3

2

6

JK

1

2
1
43

1

1

2
1

1

1
1

2

2

10

3

3

4

9

2

1
14

2

1

DERMAPTERA (EARWIGS) 1 Specimen Collected

Forficulidae
ORDER:

1

Forficulid Earwigs

DIPTERA (FLIES) 211 Specimens Collected

Anthomyiidae

Anthomyiidid Flies

14

Asilidae

o
ro

AB

COLEOPTERA (Continued)

Robber Flies

76

1

4

4

8 11

10

4
2
8

3

2

Midges

7

1

• 4

Blow Flies

1

Bibionidae

March Flies

Bombiliidaea&gt;b

Bee Flies

Calliphoridae
Chironomidae
Chloropidae"
Culicidaea'u

Mosquitoes

Dolichopodidae

Long-Footed Flies

Drosophilidae
Mycaidae

Vinegar Flies
Fungus Gnats
Mydas Flies

Muscidae

Muscid Flies

Pipunculidae

Bigheaded Flies

Mycetophilidae

4

4

Chloropid Flies

3
16

2

2

3

1

18
23
:

17
3

1

4
1

3
2
1

1

16

1

2
2

2

2
9

1
1
3
2

1

4

|..

_

1

�TABLE V-4. CONTINUED

!NUMBER
COMMON NAME

FAMILY
ORDER:

TOTAL
SPECIMENS

AB

BC

OF SPECIMENS COLLECTED ON TRANSECT

CD

Tabanidae

Sepsid Flies
Flower Flies
Horse Flies, Deer Flies

Tachinidae

Tachina Flies

Tipulidae

Crane Flies

1
1

Tripetidae

Trypetid Flies

4

Syrphidae

ORDER:

11

3

9
1

GH HJ

JK

KL

LM

MN

NO

5

1

2

9

7

1

1
1

)
1 |

3

I

1

HEMIPTERA (TRUE BUGS) 390 Specimens Collected

Belastomatidae
CO

FG

DIPTERA (FLIES) (Continued)

Sepsidae

o

EF

DE

Giant Water Bugs

Coreidae

Coreid Bugs

3

2

Corimelaenidae

Corimelaenid Bugs

5

5

Cydnidae

Cydnid Bugs

2

Gerridae*

Water Striders

Lygaeidae

Lygaeid Bugs

Miridae
Nabidae

Plant Bugs

Xeididae

Neidid Bugs

Nepidae

N'otonectidae

Water Scorpions
Backswimmers

Pentatomidae

1

138

2

4 38

10

19

40

6 19
1

1

8 15

3

,3

9 14

2

7

5

4 18

1 |

71
1

2

Stink Bugs

82

2

Reduviidae

Assassin Bugs

49

1

Scutelleridae

Scutellerid Bugs

37

Damsel Bugs

7

1

2

4

1

7 22
1 11
2

3

13

14

1

12

ft
1 13

6
2

4
1

1

7
2

1

�TABLE V-4. CONTINUED

NUMBER OF SPECIMENS
TOTAL
SPECIMENS AB BC CD DE EF
FAMILY
COMMON NAME
ORDER: HOMOPTERA (TRUE BUGS) 360 Specimens Collected
1
4
Aphidae
Plantlice
1 2 1
Cercopidae
Spittlebugs
9
Cicadellidae
10 30 46 54 41
Leafhoppers
343
a b
Coccidae '
Scale Insects
Fulgoridae
1
Fu Igor id Planthoppers
Membracidae
3
Treehoppers
ORDER: HYMENOPTERA (BEES, WASPS, ANTS) 125 Specimens Collected
Apidae
1
Apid Bees
Bombidae"
Bumble Bees
1 1 1 2
Braconidae
Braconid Wasps
11
Chalcididae
2
Chalcids
Chrysididae
1
Cuckoo Wasps
Cynipidae
Gall Wasps
2
Formicidae
1 2
12
Ants
Halictidae
2 1
Sweat Bees
3 1
25
Ichneumonidae
Ichneumon Wasps
3
Megachilidae
Leafcutting Bees
2
1
Mutillidae
Velvet Ants
4
3
Pamphiliidae
1
1
Webspinning Sawflies
5
Pompilidae
Spider Wasps
6

COLLECTED ON TRANSECT
FG

GH HJ

JK

KL

1
1 1
1 1 3
80 21 29 10 10

2

LM MN

NO

2

2

10

1
1
1

1
1
1

3
1

2

2
6
12

2
5

1
1
1

2

1

1
1
2

1

1

1

2.
1

�TABLE V-4. CONTINUED

NUMBER OF SPECIMENS COLLECTED ON TRANSECT
TOTAL
AB BC CD DE EF FG GH HJ JK KL LM MN NO
COMMON NAME
SPECIMENS
FAMILY
ORDER: HYMENOPTERA (BEES, WASPS, ANTS) (Continued)
1
1
Scoliidae
Scoliid Wasps
1 2 4 6 2
2 2
1
Sphecidae
Sand Wasps
46
6 20
4
Tiphiid Wasps
4
Tiphiidae
Carpenter Bees
Xylocopidae
ORDER: ISOPTERA (TERMITES) Observed Only
Rhinotermitidae Subterranean Termites
ORDER: LEPIDOPTERA (BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS) 38 Sp-cimens Collected
Danaidae
Milkweed Butterflies
Geometridae '
Geometrid Maths
a D
Lycaenidae '
Blues and Coppers
Hesperiidae '
Skippers
Microlepidopter* Several Families
23
5 3
Noctuidae
1
1
Owl Moths
a b
Nyrophalidae '
Brushfooted Butterflies
Papilionidae ' Swallowtail Butterflies
Pieridae*'11
Sulfurs
*
~
Psychidae
Bagworm Moths
Pyralidae
Pyralid Moths
14
3 1 2 1

i

'Several families in this group, but identified no further

�TABLE V-4. CONCLUDED

NUMBER OF SPECIMENS COLLECTED ON TRANSECT
THTiT

FAMILY
ORDER:

Green Lacewings
Brown Lacewings
Ant lions

CD

DE

EF

FG

GH

HJ

JK

KL

LM

1

1

MN

5

NO

1

8

Dragonflies
Damselflies
Dragonflies
Damselflies
Dragonflies

1

25

2 21

15

1

1

1

1

14

ORTHOPTERA (GRASSHOPPERS AND CRICKETS) 74 Specimens Collected

Acrididae
Grasshoppers
Gryllidae
Crickets
Gryllotalpidae* '"Mole Crickets
Mantidae
Mantids
Tettigoniidae
Katykids
Trydactylidae
Pygmy Mole Crickets
ORDER:

BC

ODONATA CDRAGONFLIES AND DAMSELFLIES) 40 Specimens Collected

Aeshnidae
Coenagrionidae
Corduliidae0
Lestidaeb
Libel lulidae
ORDER:

AB

NEUROPTERA (NERVE WINGED INSECTS) 9 Specimens Collected

Chrysopidae
Hemerobaeidae
Myrmeleonidae
ORDER:

SPECIMENS

COMMON NAME

TRICHOPTERA (CADDISFLIES)

Family not determined

58

Observed Only

1

6
1

6

8 16

1

3

6

3

6

4

2

4
23
7

1

4
7

7
1

4
1

5

1

1

1

1

1

�s?
o

&lt; 100.
cc

90

—
t-

40
-

£

20.

2
&gt;

0

70

ZP- ?P-i

nnni1ft
40

Ti n
30

AB BC

CD

DE

EF

500.
450.
Q 400 .

FG

GH HJ

JK

40

KL

LM

MN NO

52
i

| l

§ 350.
K 300.
I
£ 250.
&lt; 200 .
u. 150
O
. 100 .

o&lt;trt
A

50.' 50
0

"n

i

90

!0

&gt; 80.
R
u 60-

AB

r

J£

\

BC

n

96

Ifl
V

147

CD

DE

1fi|

FiFiflrin
EF

FG

GH

jJ4_

HJ

JK

KL

LM

MN

NO

48

U)

%

50.

I
£
Q
O
O

40-

fE
CC

20.

u.
O

10.

31
M.
22.
-18

2i

AB

BC

^1

nnnf

5
113
n

17

CD

DE

EF

FG

GH HJ

JK

17 ,

KL

LM

MN

NO

9.

U

8.
t

7

6.9
•*__

-

(A

5.9
Q

4.4

0
cc

z

KCC

4.6

5-

4

4.2

—

„„ «
'

•JL

-

3.8

iZ

4.1
f"

3.

P
i

0

2 1 -

0

AB

BC

CD

DE

EF

FG

GH

HJ JK

KL

LM

MN

NO

400 FOOT GRID TRANSECTS ON SAMPLER ROW 8

Figure V-1. Arthropod/Vegetation Comparisons on TA C-52A, 1971 Study
107

�Ul

0
K
Ul

10Q.

&gt;
0

ui

90

80
6Q

3D

60_

UL

Bj

§' ff °

I1V13D3A

^

70

OS,

SO
p
i

40 40

JK

KL

LM

98

77

81

J23.

HJ

JK

KL

LM

40

AH

BC

CD

DE

EF

FG

GH HJ

nnnn*
MN

NO

MN

NO

CO

O 400.

2

339

§300.
X
N

248

&lt; 200.

21

LL
0

n ft

d ioo- ' 55

z

o

AB

BC

CD

DE

n
EF

172.

FG

GH

to

Ul

i
£ 40.
0

2
0
cc

36
29
fl

30 -

X

I- 20 .
K

nL

Ul

&gt;

_
27 ^

27

BC

CD

DE

EF

FG

76-

__

5.6
5.1

§

££J

KL

LM

MN

NO

5.6

!^

4.4

3-

cc

JK

pa

4.2

Q

4-

MM

GH HJ

6.8
•—

5_

Q

21

121

19

AB

&gt;
H
tt

28

31
m

.

n

"~

4.6
^^

f*1

A
r^

2.9
~*

I 2 .
1 1.

AB

BC

CD

DE

EF

FG

GH HJ

JK

KL

LM

2.4

MN

NO

Hn

400 FOOT GRID TRANSECTS ON SAMPLER ROW 8

Figure V-2. Arthropod/Vegetation Comparisons on TA C-52A, 1973 Study
108

�similarities exist. The diversity index used was that of Margalef:

In N
Where
d = diversity
S = number of Taxa
N = number of specimens
In = natural log
This formula has been used in previous diversity studies on Test Area C-52A (References V-3
and V-4), and it is used elsewhere in the present report. The greatest diversity of Arthropods as
indicated by this formula was in transect GH in both surveys, even though the adjacent transect
FG showed equal or greater amounts of vegetation (due to the presence of standing water in this
area). The greater diversity in GH is due to a large number of taxa relative to the total number of
Arthropods present. This large number of different organisms is likely due to the existence of a
wider variety of available niches in transect GH, which includes influences of the adjacent aquatic
area, dry sandy areas, and areas more disturbed by man. (The central sampling tower of the test
area is located in this transect.)
Other factors would be of interest in comparisons of the 1971 and 1973 data, such as the relationship of Arthropod population biomass to vegetative cover. While this biomass-vegetation comparison would ideally show a close correlation, two factors make it impractical. First, the influence
of randomly caught large insects (especially the grasshoppers) on biomass data would be quite
confounding until a great deal of replication had produced a representative sampling of these
animals. Second, the 1971 insect survey considered factors other than biomass, so there is no
direct basis for comparisons. Many of the other topics that were discussed in the 1971 study
hold equally true at this time. Experimental biases of the sweep net technique factors affecting
plant distribution, and plant-insect relationships are discussed in Reference V-1.
4. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
A sweep net survey of the Arthropods of Test Area C-52A on the Eglin AFB Reservation
resulted in the collection of over 1,700 specimens belonging to 66 insect families and Arachnid
orders. These totals represent only one of five paired sweeps taken over a one-mile section of the
test grid. A similar study performed in 1971 produced 1,803 specimens and 74 families from
five paired sweeps of the same area using the same basic sampling techniques. A much greater
number of small to minute insects were taken in the 1973 survey. Vegetative coverage of the test
area had increased since 1971. The two studies showed similarities in distribution pattern of
vegetative Arthropod numbers, number of Arthropod \ varieties, and Arthropod diversity. Generally,
the present study showed a reduction of the extremes found in the above parameters in the 1971
study. This result is expected to continue as the test area stabilizes and develops further plant
cover, thus allowing a succession of animal populations to invade the recovering habitat.

References:
V-3. Boror, D. J. and D. M. DeLong: An Introduction to the Study of Insects. New York,
Rinehart. 1952.
V-4. Lehn, P. J., A. L. Young, N. A. Hamme, and B. C. Wolverton: Studies to Determine the
| Presence of Artificially Induced Arsenic Levels in Three Freshwater Streams and its Effects of
I Fish Species Diversity. AFATL-TR-70-81, Air Force Armament Laboratory, Eglin AFB, Florida.
August 1970. Unclassified.
109

�SECTION VI
AQUATIC STUDIES OF TEST AREA C-52A
One of the major parameters involved in the process of herbicide movement and/or
persistence in soils is the adsorptive capacity of the soil. The adsorptive capacity, or
the cation exchange -capacity (i.e., the ability of a cation to be displaced or exchanged from the
soil by another cation), is closely associated with the inorganic colloids (e.g., clay particles)
and organic colloids (e.g., organic matter) of the soil. A soil with a large cation exchange
capacity could bind within its colloidal system a large concentration of herbicide. Soils with
a low cation exchange capacity do not retain cationic herbicides (e.g., cacodylic acid or sodium
cacodylate), and thus, soil leaching of these herbicides would be expected. From June 1969
to October 1970, 4,395 gallons of military herbicide Blue were disseminated on TA C-52A
(Table I-7). Approximately 13,624 pounds of cacodylic acid and sodium cacodylate were
sprayed onto an area of less than one square mile. The soil of the test area has a low cation
exchange capacity of approximately 0.8 mg exchangeable cation per 100 g of soil (Table I-4),
while the annual precipitation of the area is high (Table 1-1). Data from the analyses of soil
cores for arsenic (Table II-9) confirm the movement and/or disappearance of arsenic from
the test grid. Moreover, Table II-7 suggests that picloram, a component of the herbicide
White, has moved within the soil profile and is apparently rather residual in nature.
Test Area C-52A is drained by five streams: Mullet, Trout, Basin, Grassy, and Pucker
Creeks (Figure VI-1). The combined annual flow from these streams exceeds 24 billion
gallons of water. However, only Mullet, Trout, and Basic Creeks are closely associated with
the test grid. The mean daily flow rate for these three streams is shown in Table VI-1. As
previously noted, studies on the movement of arsenicals and picloram indicated the possibility of herbicides contaminating the three freshwater stream communities draining the test
grid. Since arsenical residues may concentrate in the tissue of fish, and particularly in the
tissue of oysters, studies were conducted in 1969 and 1970 to determine (1) whether arsenic
residues were entering the streams from the test grid and (2), if so, whether these residues
were having adverse effects on the fish populations in the streams or were accumulating in
oysters found at the mouth of streams adjoining Choctawhatcheee Bay. Synopses of these
studies (Reference VI-1) are included in this report.
1. SYNOPSIS OF PREVIOUS RESEARCH, 1969
a. Fish Study
To assess the effects of possible arsenic residues, a diversity index study of the fish
populations of Mullet, Trout, and Basin Creeks was initiated 3 months prior to the aerial
spraying of Blue and continued for approximately 4 months after spraying.
Of the three streams under investigation, Trout Creek seemed the most likely to receive
herbicide residues from the grid area. The headwaters of the stream are at the bottom of steepReference:
VI-1. Lehn, P. Jeffery, A.
the Presence of Artifically
on Fish Species Diversity.
Force Base, Florida, 1970.

L. Young, N. A. Hamme, and B. C. Wolverton: Studies to Determine
Induced Arsenic Levels in Three Freshwater Streams and its Effects
AFATL-TR-70-81, Air Force Armament Laboratory, Eglin Air
Unclassified.
110

�1 MILE

LITTLE
BASIN
CREEK

\
)

BASIN

SPRAY FLIGHT PATH

|BAS IN
BAYOU

EAGLE
CRtEK

CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY

Figure VI-1. Map of Test Area Showing Streams in Relation to Test Grid and Location
of Sampling Stations Used in Arsenic Monitoring Study
111

�TABLE VI-1. CHARACTERISTICS OF SAMPLING SITES ON
STREAMS DRAINING TEST AREA C-52A
NAME

Temperature,
Range, °C

Mean
PH

Width,
Feet

Depth,
Feet

Bottom
Material

Mean Flow Rate,
gal/day

Basin Creek

16-23.5

5.8

to 12

to 4

Sand

39,073,000

Mullet Creek

14-23.0

6.0

to 10

to 2

Sand

3,648,000

Trout Creek

13-23.5

6.1

to 15

to 2

Sand

5,870,000

Little Basin
Creek3
(Control Stream)

15-22.5

6.0

to 8

to 3.5

Sand

3,450,000

a

Does NOT drain TA C-52A

sided bayheads adjacent to the edge of the grid and directly in line with the lower extremities
of the repeatedly used spray flightpath (Figure VI-1). From its headwaters, the stream flows
approximately 2 miles directly south into Choctawhatchee Bay. As the stream nears the bay,
it deepens to several feet and has a heavy deposit of leaves and other organic matter on the
bottom.
Mullet Creek has portions of its headwaters originating in steep-sided bayheads within
0.5 mile of the west boundary of the spray grid and flows south for approximately 2.5 miles
into Choctawhatchee Bay, deepening near its mouth with a heavy deposit of leaves and other
organic matter on the bottom (Figure VI-1).
The headwaters of Basin Creek originate several miles to the north of the spray grid.
The stream flows southeast within 0.25 mile of the northeast corner of the grid and joins
with a small tributary originating at the north margin of the grid, continues east for approximately 3.5 miles, and turns south for 2.25 miles emptying into Basin Bayou and Choctawhatchee
Bay (Figure VI-1).
Six sampling stations were established on the three streams: One on Mullet Creek, two
on Basin Creek, and three on Trout Creek (Figure VI-1). The selection of sampling station
locations was determined mainly by their accessibility, variation of habitat within the station,
and apparent fish populations. Because of the number of stations and time involved, they were
not all sampled on the same day.
On each sampling date, observations were made in an effort to detect any gross changes
in the population levels of the following selected benthic organisms: crayfish (Orconectes sp.).
dragonfly naiad (Gomphus sp.), freshwater snail (Neritian sp.), and an unidentified immature
freshwater clam. Observations were also made to detect any morphological effects that may
have occurred to eelgrass (Vallisneria americana). the only species of vascular aquatic plant common
to all stations.
112

�Fish were collected with a variety of seines ranging in length from 4 to 15 feet and in
mesh size from 1/8 to 1/4 inch. All represented habitats within each station were sampled
randomly, and the time of day that the samples were taken was also varied. For the first
several weeks of the survey, the fish were returned to the stream after the total catch was made
and counted; however, for the remainder, and majority, of the survey, the fish were preserved in
10% formalin and counted in the laboratory. In conjunction with the stream sampling, two
ponds on the test grid were sampled using dip nets.
b. Residue Sampling
Samples were routinely collected at 11 stations on the streams and in Choctawhatchee
Bay after each rainfall following herbicide missions, or, if no missions had been flown, samples
were collected monthly. Water from these streams was sent to the Regional Environmental
Health Laboratory, Kelly AFB, Texas, where it was analyzed for arsenic. Detritus (bottom)
samples were taken monthly with an Eckman dredge at three randomly selected water sampling
locations. After appropriate pretreatment, these were assayed in the same manner as the water
samples.
In addition to water and detritus sampling, oysters were used to monitor changes in
arsenic level. Because these mollusks are filter feeders, the arsenic content of their bodies was
correlated with that of their environment.
Oyster racks were established in Choctawhatchee Bay at the mouths of Basin, Trout,
Grassy, Mullet, and Rucker Creeks. A control rack was also located in the bay at the mouth
of Eagle Creek, which does not drain the grid area (Figure VI-1). Each rack contained
approximately 2,000 oysters in the 1 to 3 inch diameter range, and these were sampled
periodically. The small size of the oysters was intended to discourage removal from the racks.
Samples obtained from the racks were frozen and taken to the laboratory for analysis. There
the sample was acidified, hydrolyzed, and neutralized before undergoing standard atomic
absorption analysis for arsenic (Reference VI-2).
Water samples were collected for picloram analysis from a small bayhead of Basin
Creek just north of sampler station A-11. The bulk of herbicide White was disseminated on
Grid 3, with the remainder being sprayed on Grid 4 (see Section I, Figure I-5 and Table I-7).
Thus, most of picloram was probably concentrated around the northern portion of the one square
mile area. Other water samples for picloram analysis were collected in the bayhead of Long
Creek, which is located approximately 3 miles northwest of the one square mile grid and which
has a water source not associated with TA C-52A.
c. Results
Twenty-one species of fishes were collected, with three species occurring within the
boundaries of the one square mile grid and 20 species from the surrounding streams (Table
VI-2). Habitat and spatial isolation seemed to be the major limiting factors on the grid.
Reference:
VI-2. Hamme, N. A., A. L. Young, J. H. Hunter: A Rapid Analysis of Soil and Water by
Atomic Absorption. AFATL-TR-70-106, Air Force Armament Laboratory, Eglin Air Force
Base, Florida, 1970. Unclassified.
113

�TABLE IV-2. FISH SPECIES FOUND IN PONDS AND DRAINAGE AREAS OF THE
ONE SQUARE MILE GRID AND IN BASIN, MULLET, AND TROUT
CREEKS
SPECIES AND COMMON NAME

AREAS WHERE COLLECTED
ON GRID

1

Amhlnplitfis rupflstris - snnthfirn rnnk hass

-

2. Anguilla rostrata - American eel

OFF GRID

+B
+BT

3. Aphredoderus sayanus - pirate perch

-

+BT

4. Elassoma okefenokee - Okefenokee pigmy sunfish

+T

5. Erimyzon sucetta - lake chubsucker

+*

6. Esox arpericanus - red-fin pickerel

-

+B

7. Esox niger - chain pickerel

-

+B

8. Etheostoma edwini - brown darter

-

+BT*

9. Fundulus nottj - starhead topminnow

-

+T

10. Gambusia affinis - mosquito fish

-

+BMT*

11. Ichthyomyzon gagei - southern brook lamprey

-

+BM

12. Ictglurus natalis - yellow bullhead

+

-

13. Lepomis punctatus - spotted sunfish

+

+BMT

14. Micropterus punctulatus - spotted bass

-

+T

15. Minytrema melanops - spotted sucker

-

+B

16. Notropis hypselopterus - sailfin shiner

-

+BMT*

17. Notropis texanus - weed shiner

-

+B

18. Noturus funebris - black madtom

-

+T

19. Noturus gyrinus - tadpole madtom

-

+T

20. Noturus leptacanthus - speckled madtom

-

+BMT*

21. Percina nigrofasciata - blackbanded darter

-

+BMT*

* Denoted large population in area.
B = found in Basin Creek
M = found in Mullet Creek
T = found in Trout Creek

114

-

�The lake chubsucker was abundant in one of the ponds on the grid but was not found in the
three streams within a 2 mile radius of the center of the grid, however, the species occurs
several miles downstream in more sluggish waters. The employment of a diversity index
(i.e., a statistical comparison of the fish populations before and after the spray missions,
representing a time period of 8 months) showed a population change in one fish species at one
of the six stations studied. This change, however, was probably due to an unidentified variable
(e.g., variation in collecting techniques) rather than to arsenic residue. The arsenic analyses for
588 water samples and 68 silt samples were negligible (less than 1 ppm and not significantly
different from control streams). A comparison of arsenic contents of 73 oyster samples taken
from sampling stations established in Choctawhatchee Bay showed no significant differences
from control samples taken elsewhere in the bay at the 95% probability level (1.32 ppm
arsenic versus 1.45 ppm).
The results of water samples collected from Basin, Trout, and Long Creeks, and
analyzed for picloram content are shown in Table VI-3. Picloram residues were still being
detected in the small bayhead north of sampler station A-11 as late as December 1971.
The last mission with herbicide White was in May 1970.

TABLE IV-3. RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES FOR
PICLORAM, 1971 DATA
SAMPLE LOCATION
DATE COLLECTED
PICLORAM8, ppb
Basin Creek, North of Sampler
Station A-11 in NE Corner of
one square mile grid

11 Jun 1971

11

Trout Creek, South of Sampler
Station 0-11 in SE Corner of
one square mile grid

11 Jun 1971

2.4

Basin Creek, same as
June 1971 location

3 Dec 1971

11, 9.4

Trout Creek, same as
June 1971 location

3 Dec 1971

1.4

Control; Long Creek,
approximately 3 miles from
one squane mile grid

11 Jun 1971

&lt;0.1

a

Analysis performed by the Dow Chemical Company; Method ACR 68-14

115

�2. CURRENT STUDIES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS
The objectives of the current studies were (1) to reaccomplish the 1969 - 1970 aquatic
studies and to compare population and diversity data, (2) to accomplish an in-depth survey
of the aquatic organisms in the test grid ponds, and (3) to obtain samples of aquatic vertebrates
from streams and grid ponds for arsenic and TCDD residue analyses.
a. Methods and Materials
Sampling of the ponds on TA C-52A was accomplished using dip nets and, where aquatic
vegetation permitted, a 4 by 15 foot seine and a variable mess gill net. Sampling of the ponds
was performed twice with identical collection methods employed both times. Tadpoles (Rana
pipens subsp. sphenocephala Hyla gratiosa) and lake chubsuckers (Erimyzon sucetta) were
frozen for arsenic and TCDD residue analyses. Those aquatic organisms caught only for species
diversity and relative quantity were preserved in 10% formalin. Tadpoles were also collected
at a control pond (north of TA C-52A) and were frozen for TCDD residue analysis.
Sampling of the streams draining TA C-52A (Mullet, Trout, and Basin Creeks) and the
control stream (little Basin Creek) was accomplished also using the 4 by 15 foot seine. Approximately 100 yards of each stream was worked for 2 hours. The identical sampling technique was
employed, and each stream was sampled three times. (This technique was that described in
Reference VI-1). Species collected only for diversity and relative quantity were preserved in
10% formalin. Crayfish (Ordonectes sp.), speckled madtoms (Noturus leptacanthus). brown and
blackbanded darters (Etheostoma edwini) and (Percina nigrofasciata) and any larger fish, e.g.,
redfin pickerel (Esox americanus) and spotted sunfish (Lepomis punctatus). were frozen for
subsequent analysis of TCDD and arsenic residue. The selection for residue analyses of the crayfish and smaller fish species was based on the fact that they are bottom feeders or primary/secondary
consumers and thus likely to ingest organic matter containing TCDD and arsenic. The larger fish
were selected for residue analysis because they had been in the stream for a longer time and were
predators, filling niches at the top of the aquatic food web - hence, a greater likelihood of residue
accumulation taking place if bio-magnification was occurring. In addition to these species, oysters
were collected for arsenic analysis from the mouth of Mullet and Trout Creeks where they drain
into Choctawhatchee Bay. The samples collected for TCDD analysis were sent to the Interpretive
Analytical Services Laboratory, Dow Chemical U.S.A., while the samples collected for arsenic
analysis were sent to the Pesticide Degradation Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture. The analysis of arsenic was by atomic absorption of arsine generated with N2BH4All of the streams that were sampled for fish were also sampled for aquatic invertebrates.
Benthic samples were taken near the stream margins and in mid-stream at each station using a
modified Surber Sampler with number 15 mesh. The margins were covered with a thin layer of
organic debris and entangled with the root systems of neighboring plants, while the center of the
stream bed was composed almost entirely of sand. The sampler was sunk about 6 inches into the
stream bottom with the net on the downstream portion; then, the sand and debris enclosed by
the sampler were placed in the net - going down about 6 inches into the stream bottom. The
netting was taken to a deep spot on the stream and washed so that sand and debris would pass
out through the netting. The remaining contents in the mesh were transferred into an enamel pan.
The debris was examined, and all invertebrate organisms were removed and placed in plastic bottles
containing water from the stream. The bottles were labled and taken to the laboratory. There,
the organisms were placed in boiling water for 5 minutes, transferred to containers with 70%
ethanol solution, classified, and counted.
116

�Ten-foot strip samples of the aquatic areas of the grid were taken by using an insect
net to make a 10 foot linear scoop along the bottom of the pond. The debris collected was
then sorted for invertebrate organisms. Figure IV-2 shows the location of the major bodies
of water at the time of survey, June 1973. It should be noted that the first 6 months of
1973 were abnormally high in rainfall, and thus, the 1973 survey showed more water on the
grid than observed in 1969 to 1971. The three aquatic invertebrate samples were taken from
the ponds located near sampler stations F-7, F-13, and G-13.
Biological specimens were forwarded to Dow Chemical U.S.A., Midland, Michigan for
determination of TCDD levels. Analysis was accomplished using a modification of the technique
of Baughman and Meselson (Reference VI-3).
b. Results and Discussion
Table VI-4 compares those fish species caught in the streams (draining TA C-52A) in
1969 (Reference VI-1) and those caught in 1973. The methods of collection and the sampling
stations were the same for both studies.
In order to compare the fish populations caught in 1969 with fiose caught in 1973, three
assumptions were made:
(1) That fish caught per sampling is proportional to the total fish population at that
site, so long as the methods employed are sufficiently similar.
(2) That the sampling methods remained sufficiently similar to justify assumption
one during all seining operations both in 1969 and 1973.
(3) That the frequency distribution of fish caught per sampling is approximately normal.
The data for fish populations per sampling for 1969 and 1973 can be shown as:
Sampling Period

Number of
Observations

Mean Number
of Fish Per
Sampling

Standard
Deviation

Before Spraying Blue
(Mar 1969)

36

84

29.6

After Spraying Blue
(Oct 1969)

16

84

49.2

1973 Sampling

13

141

60.2

As can be seen from these data, the fish caught per sampling before and immediately after
the dissemination of Blue in 1969 remained constant. Moreover, a significant increase in
fish caught per sampling occured in 1973 as compared to 1969. If the control stations
(Little Basin and Fox Creeks) are compared for population changes during this time period,
the following data are obtained.
Control Stations
Little Basin Creek
Fox Creek

1969 Means Per Sampling
81
83

1973 Means Per Sampling
94
84

Reference:
VI-3. Report Number IAS-405, Dow Chemical U.S.A., Midland, Michigan
117

�N

I
8

5

9

10

11

12

13

14

"W

B

•

G
H

r
•

•

*

'

•

*

sr

*

- •*

r^ •

•
TOWER X

• • I
——W»

V

M

N

Figure VI-2. Location of Water and Major Drainage Ditches on the One Square
Mile Grid of TA C-52A, 1973 Data

118

�TABLE VI-4. FISH SPECIES COLLECTED IN 1969 AND 1973 FROM THREE STREAMS DRAINING
TA C-52A AND A CONTROL STREAM
COMMON NAME

TROUT CREEK

MULLET CREEK

BASIN CREEK LITTLE BASIN^

1969

SPECIES

1973

1969

1969

1973

1969

1973

1973

Notropis
hvpselopterus

sailfin shiner

+°

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

Gambusia affinis

mosquito fish

+

+

+

blackbanded darter

+
+

+

Percina
niorofasciata

+
+

+

+

+

+

+
+

+
+

Etheostoma edwini

brown darter

+

+

+

spotted sunfish
speckled madtom

+

+

+

+

+

+

+
+
+

+

Lepomis punctatus
Noturus
leptacanthus

+
+
+

+

+

+
+
+

+
+
+

Ichthvomvzon
gagei

southern brook
lamprey

-c

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

Notropis texanus

weed shiner

+

+

Esox niqer

chain pickerel

+

—

Aphredoderus
savanus

pirate perch

+

+

+

+

+

+

Esox americanus

redfin pickerel

—

+

Anquilla rostrata

American eel

+

—

Minvtrema
melanops

spotted sucker

—
+

.+
+
+

+
+
—

a

Control Stream

D

Species Present (+)
Species Absent (— )

G

+

+

_u

—

—

+
+

�TABLE VI-4. CONCLUDED
SPECIES

southern rock bass

TROUT CREEK

MULLET CREEK

BASIN CREEK

1969

Ambloplites
rupestris
Muqil ceohalus

COMMON NAME

1969

1969

—

—

common mullet

Ictalurus
natalis

yellow bullhead

Micropterus
punctulatus

spotted bass

+

to
o

Control Stream

1973

1969

1973

—

+

+

+
—

1973

+

—

a

1973

LITTLE BASIN3

+

—

�There is no significant change in the fish populations at the control sites. There are insufficient
data on other variables (e.g., nutrient fluctuations), on other environmental factors, or on food
chain growth data to warrant pinpointing the direct cause of the fish population increase other
than that it appears to be associated with the general recovery phenomenon of vegetation,
animal, and insect populations as noted in other sections of this report.
The species diversity was determined by the same method employed in the 1969 study
(Reference VI-1). The mean diversity for 1969 (before and after the spraying of Blue) and
1973 for the control sites are:
Control Sites

Number of
Samplings

Mean
Diversity

Standard
Deviation

Variance

Before Blue, 1969

36

0.9779

0.3049

0.0930

After Blue, 1969

16

1.3286

0.4903

0.2404

1973 Sampling

13

1.5934

0.1952

0.0381

The 1973 sample size of 13 may be too different from that of 1969 to compare diversity
indices. The dependence of the diversity index (d) on the number of samples taken (N) may
exist in such a way as to bias d when large or small values of N are used. If the diversity
index is plotted as a function of N (using actual data) then the difference in d values before
and after spraying Blue (and hence, the 1973 data) is too greatly dependent on N to use
without either correcting for the sample size difference or re-sampling (thus using nearly the
same sample sizes) A correction technique was employed. A description of this method is
included and is in fact an analysis of the diversity of species using Monte Carlo normalized
diversity indices.
In attempting to make comparisons between d values it appeared desirable to
factor out the influences of N by making all N's the same. A small simulation was
undertaken in which the observed frequency of species was assumed to be the
expected value. A sample size of 80 was chosen as the common sample size because
it is near the mean of the actual sample taken. Then, using the observed distribution
to establish the probability of the occurrence of each species, 80 "fish" were drawn
from the population. This closely simulated the process in which fish are captured
until exactly 80 were caught in each sample and then the specimens classified and
the data tabulated. One source of error for the simulation is the fact that the number
of species, S, cannot exceed the S value for the observed case; i.e., if a species did
not appear in the original sample, then the probability of its appearance in the
"redrawn" sample is zero. This error, however, should be insignificant in cases where
the original sample size was 30 or larger.
In a further effort to make comparisons of diversity more meaningful, the
expected values of sample size, Ne, and expected number of species, Se, were
calculated assuming that the variety of fish life had not decreased; i.e., the d value
now is no worse than the d value for the time period before the herbicide was applied.
A comparison of Ne and Se were made with the respective observed values N0 and S0.
121

�The equations used are:

and

S e = d log e (N + 1 )
The d values were calculated for the redrawn samples. The only tendency, if any, was
for the diversity index to increase after spraying. Linear correlation coefficients between
d and average sample size compared to distances of the sampling stations from the
center of the spray area were very small and insignificant. The Se and Ne values for
1969 both before and after spraying were compared to those for 1973 using the two
control sites to establish the expected diversity index. In both cases S0 was 10 to 20
percent higher than Se, and Ne was grossly larger than NQ. These observations both
tend to imply that the collecting sites considered to be within the spray zone are
richer in fish life than the control sites outside the spray zone.
By using the correction technique on the mean diversity for the control sites only,
a chronologically higher diversity in fish is evidenced from before spraying Blue in 1969,
through the after spray period, to the 1973 sampling.
Control Sites

Before Blue
1969 Diversity

After Blue
1969 Diversity

1973 Diversity

Little Basin

1.324

1.806

1.770

Fox Creek

1.138

1.212

1.580

This same trend was noted for the streams draining'the test area. However since the control
sites are assumed to be either too far away from the grid area to be affected by the herbicides or are experiencing the recovery phenomenon noted for TA C-52A, no significant changes
are evident in the diversity of fish life from 1969 to 1973.
In order to compare the species proportions for the 1969 data to the 1973 data, the
following assumptions were made:
(1) That the average of the percentages of a given species found in the sample is
a reasonable estimate of the actual percentage of that species in the fish population in the
stream.
(2) That the percentages of rare species found in the samples are not valid for
comparisons because sample sizes are not large enough for a sufficiently high confidence in
the percentages.

122

�Using these assumptions, only the two most common species were compared from the 1969
and 1973 data for significant changes. The rare species, therefore, were treated as part of
the general diversity analysis.
Table VI-5 compares the 1973 mean percentages for the sailfin shiner (Notropis
hypselopterus) and the mosquito fish (Gambusia affinis) to the 1969 data of before and after
spraying of Blue and the combined mean for 1969. The significance of the differences was
tested using the t test. The sailfin shiner had a significant decrease in its proportion of the
fish population in 1973 as compared to the before spray (March 1969) fish populations, but
the difference was not significant when 1973 data were compared to after spray data
(October 1969). For the overall comparison, however, of 1973 data to 1969 data (combined)
no significant difference existed. If data for the sailfin shiner are compared only for the
control sites a significant decrease occurs in the percent of the population between the
March 1969 data and the 1973 data. However, such a significant decrease does not occur
when 1973 data is compared to October 1969 data.
Control Station

March 1969 Means

1973 Means

October 1969 Means

Little Basin

0.869

0.623

0.788

Fox Creek

0.928

0.714

0.758

As a result of these data, it is apparent that some factor (unrelated to the herbicide or
recovery phenomenon) was at work between the spring of 1969 and the fall of 1969. As
a result, it is more prudent to assume no significant proportional changes existed between
spring 1969 and 1973 for the most abundant species.
The three aquatic areas on the grid were observed to be areas of 80% to 100%
vegetative cover with the vegetation chiefly composed of grassy plants. The pond at station
F-7 is located on Rutledge Sand, and the ponds at F-12 and G-13 have Chipley Sand underlying them. The F-7 pond had a pH reading of 5.51 and was heavily congested with algae
and aquatic grasses. The two other ponds had a pH reading of 6.39 and were much less
overgrown with aquatic grasses and algae. Both of the ponds were known to be intermittent;
partially drying up once in the last 5 years. An alligator was sighted in F-7 pond and two
6-inch lake chubsuckers (Erimyzon sycetta) were taken from it. In the east grid ponds (F-12
and G-13), sightings were made of turtles, but no fish were taken from these ponds. The
results of bottom sampling these ponds for specimens of invertebrate are shown in Table VI-6.
The dominant order is Odonata. Without exception, the members of this order are predacious;
therefore, their supply in these ponds must be relatively extensive.
The Serber sampling of the streams is shown in Table VI-7. Fox Creek yielded very
few aquatic organisms, either invertebrate or vertebrate. The yields of invertebrates were so
few, in fact, that Fox Creek was considered too different from Basin, Trout, or Mullet Creeks
to effectively serve as a control stream. Perhaps the low yield in organisms in Fox Creek is
related to its depth (mean depth of 18 inches with pools reaching to five feet) and/or
swiftness. The majority of the organisms found in the other three streams were caddis fly
larvae and snails. The caddis fly larvae are omnivores, while the snails are herbivores.
Presumably, there is an extensive food web associated with these invertebrates that was not
sampled by the Serber sampler.
123

�TABLE VI-5. POPULATION CHANGES IN THE TWO MOST COMMON FISH
SPECIES (ALL SITES ARE GROUPED TOGETHER) 1969 AND
1973 DATA
SPECIES

DATE

NUMBER OF
OBSERVATIONS

MEAN

STANDARD PROBABILITY OF
DEVIATION CHOOSING SAMPLES
WITH MEANS
HAVING THIS OR
GREATER
DIFFERENCE

Notroois
hypselopterus
Mar 1969

8

0.79

0.117

0.0 1a

Oct 1969

8

0.58

0.172

0.94

16

0.69

0.179

0.91

Jun 1973

5

0.51

0.161

Mar 1969

8

0.102

0.101

0.92

Oct 1969

8

0.188

0.132

0.99

16

0.145

0.122

0.96

5

0.182

0.194

Combined
1969

Gambusia
affinis

Combined
1969
Jun 1973
a

95% level of significance

TABLE VI-6. NUMBER OF AQUATIC INVERTEBRATE SPECIMENS
COLLECTED FROM BOTTOM SAMPLING THREE PONDS
ON TEST AREA C-52A8
ORDER

LOCATION OF PONDSb

COMMON NAME
F-7

F-13

G-13

Coleoptera

scavenger beetle

0

1

0

Hemiptera

backswimmers
giant water bugs

3
0

10
1

6
0

Odonata

dragonflies/
damsel flies

10
2

8
17

1
9

Trichoptera

caddis flies

1

0

0

16

37

16

Total Specimens
a

Each sample represents three collections with a 1 -square foot Serber Sampler

"Ponds designated by the closest permanent sampler station
124

�TABLE VI-7. NUMBER OF AQUATIC INVERTEBRATE SPECIMENS
COLLECTED FROM BOTTOM SAMPLING THE STREAMS
DRAINING TEST AREA C-52A8
ORDER

COMMON NAME

CREEK
FOXb

MULLET

TROUT

BASIN

10

11

10

1

5

8

1

1

19
1

0

48

96

15

0
0

Annelida

aquatic earthworms

Coleoptera
Decopoda

beetles
crayfish

Gastropoda

snails

Odonata

dragonflies

0

0

2

2

Plecypoda

freshwater clams

0

0

9

0

Trichoptera

caddis flies

51

75

158

49

115

202

202

53

Total Specimens
a

Ten-foot strip sample from bottom of pond using a 15-inch insect net

'•'Control station
The results of residue analysis for arsenic in aquatic organisms are shown in Table
VI-8. The level of arsenic in the oysters svas considerably lower than those values reported
for oysters in 1970 - 1971 (average of 0.28 ppm arsenic versus 1.32 ppm, respectively). The
lower levels of arsenic in 1973 may be due to the employment of different analytical procedures or to the increased stream flow noted this year, and hence, to a greater purging of
the arsenic by the large volumes of freshwater entering Choctawhatchee Bay. No control
tadpoles were analyzed for arsenic content, but presumably the level of arsenic was probably
higher than it would be in control samples. This would be evident from data of the arsenic
levels in 1973 grid soils as shown in Table II-7 (Section II).
The results of residue analysis of aquatic organisms for TCDD are shown in Table VI-9.
The analysis were performed by the Interpretive Analytical Services, Dow Chemical U.S.A.,
Midland, Michigan. The duplicate samples were analyzed independently by high resolution
mass spectrometry (see Section II for methods and materials). Duplicate samples of all
biological specimens were also submitted to the Pesticide Degradation Laboratory, Agricultural
Environmental Quality Institute, Beltsville, Maryland, for an independent check on results.
However, none of the methods employed by the Degradation Laboratory could lower the limit
of detection below 0.1 - 0.2 ppb TCDD.
3. CONCLUSIONS
From examining the data, certain observations support the idea that a recovery phenomenon
is occurring in the streams draining TA C-52A. These observations are difficult to document
because of insufficient data. For example, in 1969 the southern brook lamprey (Ichthyomyzon
gagei) was never collected in Trout Creek, yet in 1973 it was taken in relatively large numbers.
It now appears that the lamprey is breeding in Trout Bayhead south of sampler station 0-11.
Moreover, all of the specimens of lamprey collected this year in Trout Creek are immature
125

�TABLE VI-8. CONCENTRATION OF ARSENIC IN BIOLOGICAL SPECIMENS
COLLECTED ON OR ADJACENT TO TA C-52A
BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN3
(Common Name)

LOCATION COLLECTED
(June 1973)

Oyster

Mouth of Trout Creek

Oyster

Mouth of Mullet Creek

0.44
0.12

Blue Crab

Mouth of Trout Creek

0.32

Blue Crab

Mouth of Mullet Creek

0.32

b

CONCENTRATION OF
ARSENIC
( ^ g As/gram Fresh Tissue)

Crayfish

Little Basin Creek

Crayfish

Trout Creek

Black-banded Darters

Little Basin Creekb

0.29
0.30
0.75

Black-banded Darters

Trout Creek

0.15C

Speckled Madtom

Little Basin Creekb

0.30

Speckled Madtom

Trout Creek

0.38

Redfin Pickerel

Trout Creek

0.23

Tadpoles

Grid Pond (F-7)

1.47

a

Samples for analysis were either aliquots of homogenates or the entire homogenate
depending on sample size.

"Control Samples
c

Part of the tissue was lost in digestion of sample.
TABLE VI-9. CONCENTRATION OF 2,3,7,8-TETRACHLORODIBENZO-p-DIOXIN
(TCDD) IN BIOLOGICAL SPECIMENS COLLECTED ON OR ADJACENT
TO TEST AREA C-52A
BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN9
(Common Name)

LOCATION
COLLECTED

Cub Sucker
Crayfish
Crayfish
Oyster
Rock Bass
Spotted Sunfish
Spotted Sunfish
Tadpole
Tadpole

Mouth of Trout Creek
Trout Creek
Control
Mouth of Trout Creek
Trout Creek
Trout Creek
Controlb
Grid Pond (F-7)
Control

CONCENTRATION OF TCDD
(parts per trillion)

a

&lt;10
&lt; 10
&lt;10
&lt;10
&lt; 10
&lt;10
&lt;10
&lt;10
&lt;10

AII samples were run in duplicate and analyzed independently by high resolution mass
spectrometry.
b
Control locations are noted in text.
126

�indicating that the population was recently established (within the past two years). However,
statistical comparisons of 1969 and 1973 data confirm a chronologically higher diversity in fish
populations for even the control streams. Thus, the presence of the lamprey may or may
not reflect a change in the habitat due to recovery from herbicide exposure.
The data on picloram in waters draining from the test grid would support the need for
production studies of these streams. However, a review of toxicological data, for picloram
(Reference VI-4) suggests that concentrations of 1000 ppb do not seem to effect aquatic
organisms. Moreover, the lack of baseline data and adequate control streams would probably
make such studies futile or of doubtful value.
It is apparent from the results of samples analyzed for TCDD that representative organisms
living in streams draining Test Area C-52A or in the ponds on the test area were free from TCDD
contamination at a lower detection limit of less than 10 ppt. These data are not unexpected
knowing the low solubility of TCDD in water and its apparent lack of movement in the soil
profile (Reference IV-1).

Reference:
VI-4. Pimentel, David: Ecological Effects of Pesticides on Non-Target Species. Executive Office
of the President, Office of Science and Technology, June 1971.

127

�SECTION VII
STUDIES ON THE MICROFLORA OF TEST AREA C-52A
The soil persistence of herbicides is influenced by many environmental and biological factors.
Perhaps one of the most important of these is that of the presence or absence of microorganisms.
In an area such as Test Area C-52A, Eglin AFB Reservation, where the soils were subjected to repetitive
applications of four different herbicides (2,4-D, 2,4,5-T picloram, and cacodylic acid) over a
period of 8 years (1962 - 1970), the organisms had to either adapt to the presence of the chemicals
or be adversely affected (i.e., reduction in population). For this reason, studies were initiated to
examine population levels of various microflora found occurring on the one square mile grid.
The initial studies '° were conducted from 1967 to 1969. These studies provided data on the soil
algal populations and are included as a synopsis in this report. In June 1970, a survey was conducted®
of the soil bacterial, fungal, and Actinomycete populations found at specific sites on the grid and
in control areas. The data from this study (identified in this report as the 1970 study) have been
the basis for comparisons in the current study. In addition, the current studies also include a
preliminary examination of aquatic algae found in the ponds in the center of the one square mile
grid.
1. SYNOPSIS OF PREVIOUS RESEARCH , 1967 - 1970
In 1967, three areas were soil sampled for algal flora. Area I was Grid 1 located immediately
south of the present one square mile grid. This area received a total accumulative concentration
of 1,894 pounds of 2,4-D,and 2,4,5-T from June 1962 through July 1964. Area II was Grid 2
located in the southwest portion of the present grid. This area received a total accumulative
concentration of 1168 pounds of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T from May 1964 through September 1966.
Area III was a control area and was located 3 miles northwest of the present grid. (See Figure I-5).
Samples were taken from two levels in the soil. The first level included the surface litter
and the first centimeter of soil. The second level samples included an amalgam of the soil between
one and 15 cm. Two methods of culture were used. In the first, sterile filter paper was placed
in sterile Petri dishes, after which approximately 10 gm of the sample soil were added. The
cultures were moistened with sterile Bristol's solution and placed under fluorescent lights with
an intensity of 300 Ht-candles. The second method of culture preparation was identical to the
first, except an additional piece of sterile filter paper was placed directly on the soil and moistened
with the nutrient solution.
The number of algae was found to be low but no significant differences could be noted
between the sprayed area and plots that had not received herbicides or only minimal amounts due
to drift (Table VI1-1). Only green and bluegreen algae were considered for identification. A
total of 38 organisms were identified (Table VII-2). At least one species of Chlamydomonas.
Chlorococcum. Chlorella. Micrococcus. Nostoc. Oscillatoria and Schizothrix was in every sample.
In the majority of cases, Chlorococcum. Nostoc. and Schizothrix were represented by two or
more species. Most of the other algae were located sporadically through the sampling period, and
few were not universally distributed in all samples. A species of Sponiococcum was the only alga
found repeatedly in a single location. The most frequently located alga was Schizothrix calcicola.
4

Arvik, J. H.: Soil Algae of the Eglin AFB Defoliant Test Range and the Response of Selected
Species to Militacy Herbicides. Air Force Armament Laboratory Unpublished Data. 1969.
Unclassified.
5Arvik, J. H. and J. H. Hunter. Soil Algae of a Herbicide Test Area, Eglin AFB, Florida, and
-the Response of Selected Species to Military Herbicides. Air Force Armament Laboratory
Unpublished data. 1971. Unclassified.
6 Hunter, J. H. Soil Microorganism Study of TA-C52A, Eglin AFB, Florida. Air Force Armament
Laboratory Unpublished Survey. 1970. Unclassified.
128

�TABLE VIM.

NUMBER OF SOIL ALGAE FOR GRAM OF SOIL FROM GRIDS 1 AND
II, TEST AREA C-52A, AND THE CONTROL AREA, 1967 DATA

SAMPLING AREA

SOIL pH

SURFACE ( 0 - 1 cm) CORE (1 - 15 cm)

Grid I (Area I)

2,360a

820a

Grid II (Area II)

5.2

2,243

567

Control
a

5.4
5.3

2,468

570

Data are averages of three samples and three replications taken 30 days apart from
September 1967 through November 1967.

TABLE VII-2. SOIL ALGAE FOUND ON OR NEAR TEST AREA C-52A, EGLIN AFB
RESERVATION
CHLOROPHYTA
Characium ambiguum Herm
Characium sp.
Chlamydomonas pyrenoidosa Deason and Bold
Chlamydomonas typica Deason and Bold
Chlorella vulgaris Beyer
Chlorella sp.
Chlorococcum ellipsoideum Deason and Bold
Chlorococcum Jiplobionticujm Hern
Closteridium sp.
Cylindrocystic brebissonii Meneg.
Euglena sp.
Homidium subtillissimum Mattox and Bold
Hormidium flaccidum Mattox and Bold
Protococcus viridis C. A. Agardh.
Spongiococcus bacillaris Naeg.
Ulothrix tenerrima Kuetz.
Zygogonium ericetorum Kuetz.
CYANOPHYTA
Anacystis marina Drouet and Daily
Arthrospira brevis (Kuetz.) Drouet
Calothrix parictina (Naeg.) Thuret.
Coccochloris aeruginesa Drouet and Daily
Coccochloris peniocystis Drouet and Daily
Fischerella ambigua (Naeg.) Gom.
Microcoleum lyngbyaceus (Kuetz.) Crouan
Microcoleus vaginatus (Vauch.) Gom.
Nodularia sp.
Nostoc commune Vauch
Nostoc ellipsosporum (Desmaz.) Raben.
Nostoc muscorum Ag.
Oscillatoria lutea Ag.
Oscillatoria submembranaceae Ard. and Straff
Porphyrosiphon Natarisii (Menegh.) Gom.
Rivularia sp.
Schizothrix arenaria (Berk.) Gom.
Schizothrix calcicola (Ag.) Gom.
Schizothrix friezii (Ag.) Gom.
T29

�2. CURRENT STUDIES ON MICROFLORA
In the June 1970 study, soil samples were selected for microbial analysis from sites which had
been separated into four general areas on the basis of a prior bioassay experiment to determine
phenoxy herbicide residues. The four areas were as follows: (a) relatively moist soil with high
residue, (b) relatively moist soil with low residue, (d) relatively dry soil with high residue, and
(d) relatively dry soil with low residue. The lowest fungal counts were obtained from Area c:
4 x 103 to 7 x 103 propagules per gram of soil. The highest fungal counts were obtained from
Area b: 4 x KT' to 1 x 1CP propagules per gram of soil. Actinomycetes and bacteria were
considerably higher on wet sites than on dry sites, but the amount of herbicide residue did not
seem to affect the count.
The objective of the present study was to analyze the microflora in the C-52A Test Grid
(population levels of bacteria, fungi, and Actinomycetes, and identification of predominant
genera) and then compare the results with a microfloral analysis of an adjacent non-treated
area (control) and with a similar C-52A Test Grid analysis carried out in the 1970 study.
3. LITERATURE REVIEW
The general role of microorganisms in the biodegradation of herbicides has been thoroughly
investigated and well documented. As part of the study, a literature review was conducted
of the items listed in Table VII-3. Most research has centered around the biodegradation of various
commercial herbicides by fungi and bacteria, both alone and in combination (Table VII-3,
items 2 to 9, 11 to 14, 16, 17, 20, 21, and 27 to 31). In many such efforts, various soils have
been used to effect the breakdown of herbicides with little attention paid to the microbial genera
involved in the process. Total numbers, rather than types of organisms, have been stressed
(Table VII-3, items 12 to 14, 16, 17, 20, 21, 27, and 30 to 32).
Pfister has investigated the role of soil organisms in biodegradation of pesticides, especially
the breakdown of halogenated hydrocarbons (Table VII-3, item 27). In that study, soil fungi,
Actinomycetes, and bacteria are implicated in the breakdown of various pesticide compounds.
Kearney has extensively studied the role of microorganisms in the soil degradation of halogenated
hydrocarbons and has likewise concluded that they do function in the breakdown of these
products. Kaufman, Kearney, Sheets, and Beall have been involved in elucidating the role of
total bacterial count and individual enzymes in the breakdown process (Table VII-3, items
20 to 23).
Bollag has researched the biochemical transformation of pesticides by soil fungi, and considers the fungi to be an important group of organisms in this transformation process (Table
VII-3, item 7). He implicates specific organisms, particularly Geotrichum candidum, in
connection with polymerization of an aniline compound to an azo-derivative.
Tyagny-Ryadno, in determining the effect of heroicides on the microflora and agrochemical
properties of the soil, concludes that some herbicides actually increased bacterial populations
(2,4-D was a notable exception). He states also that some herbicides promote the growth of
fungi, but seem to inhibit Actinomycetes. In his experiments, Simazine caused the greatest
increase in populations of Clostridium pasteurianum (Table VII-3, item 32).
In investigating the action of 2,4-D on Azotobacter spp. in sugarcane soils, Colmer concludes
that the population levels of these organisms are not affected if herbicide application rates are
within those normally recommended for sugarcane (Table VII-3, item 1). Johnson and Colmer
have included in their work the effect of 2,4-Diand 2,4,5-T on metabolic activities of various
.bacteria including specific Azotobacter organisms, Bacillus cereus and Pseudomonas fluorescens
(Table VII-3, items 11, 18, and 19). Johnson and Colmer have determined that concentrations
of 2,4-D less than 5,000 ppm have little effect on Pseudomonas fluorescens.
130

�TABLE VII-3. LITERATURE REVIEWED IN 1973 STUDY
1. Adams, A. P. and A. M. Wachinski. 1973. Microbial Assessment of Soil Samples from Desert
Soil Treated with 2,4-D/2,4,5-T herbicide. Presented to the Ad-hoc subcommittee of the U. S.
Scientific Advisory Board. 22 - 23 February 1973.
2. Alexander, M. and M. I. H. Aleem. 1961. Effect of Chemical Structure of Microbial
Decomposition of Aromatic Herbicies. Ag. and Food Chem. 9:44-47.
3. Audus, L. J. 1950. Biological Detoxification of 2,4-dicblorophenoxyacetic Acid in Soils:
Isolation of an Effective Organism. Nature 166:356.
4. Audus, L. J. and K. V. Symonds. 1955. Further Studies on the Breakdown of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid by a Soil Bacterium. Ann. App. Biol. 42:174.
5. Bell, G. R. 1960. Some Morphological and Biochemical Characteristics of a Soil Bacterium
Which Decomposes 2,4-D. Can. J. of Microbio. 3:821-840.
6. Bell, G. R. 1960. Studies on a Soil Achromobacter which Degrades 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic
Acid. Can. J. of Microbiol. 6:325-337.
7. Bollag, J. M. 1972. Biochemical Transformation of Pesticides by Soil Fungi. CRC Critical
Reviews in Microbiology. 2(1):35-37.
8. Bollag, J. M., G. G. Briggs, J. E. Dawson, and M. Alexander. 1968. Enzymatic Degradation
of Chlorocatechols. J. Agr. Food Chem. 16(5):829-833.
9. Bollag, J. M., C. S. Helling, and M. Alexander. 1968. Enzymatic Hydroxylation of
Chlorinated Phenols. J. Agr. Food Chem. 16(5):826-828.
10. Cairney, W. J. 1973. Summary of Results: Populations of Soil Microorganisms from
Desert Soil Treated with 2,4-D/2,4,5-T Herbicide. Presented to Ad-hoc subcommittee of the
U. S. Scientific Advisory Board. 22 - 23 February 1973.
11. Colmer, A. R. 1953. The Action of 2,4-D upon the Azotobacter of Some Sugarcane
Soils. Applied Microbiology 1:184-187.
12. Fletcher, W. W. 1966. Herbicides and the Bio-activity of the Soil. Invitation lecture
given at Wageningen at meeting organized by the Dutch Working Party for Weed Control.
22 March 1966.
13. Fletcher, W. W., and J. E. Smith. Herbicides and Soil Microbes. New Scientist 24:527-528,.
14. Hirsch, P. and M. Alexander. 1960. Microbial Decomposition of Halogenated Propionic
and Acetic Acids. Can. J. of Microbiol. 6:241-249.
15. Hunter, J. H. and A. L. Young. 1972. Vegetative Succession Studies on a DefoliantEquipment Test Area, Eglin AFB Reservation, Florida. AFATL-TR-72-31. Air Force
Armament Laboratory, Eglin Air Force Base, Florida. February 1972. Unclassified.
16. Jensen, H. L. 1957. Decomposition of Chloro-substituted Aliphatic Acids by Soil Bacteria.
Can. J. of Microbiol. 3:151-164.
131

�TABLE VI1-3. Concluded.
17. Jensen, H. L. 1957. Decomposition of Chloro-organic Acids by Fungi. Nature 180:1416.
18. Johnson, E. J. and A. R. Colmer. 1955. I. The Effect of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid
on some Phases of the Nitrogen Metabolism of Bacillus cereus. Applied Microbiology 3:123-126.
19. Johnson, E. J. and A. R. Colmer. 1955. II. The Effect of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid
on some Phases of the Nitrogen Metabolism of Pseudomonas fluorescens and the Microorganisms
of a Soil Suspension. Applied Microbiology 3:126-128.
20. Kaufman, D. D., P. C. Kearney, and T. J. Sheets. 1963. Simazine: Degradation by Soil
Microorganisms. Science 142:405.
21. Kaufman, D. D., P. C. Kearney, and T. J. Sheets. 1965. Microbial Degradation of
Simazine. J. Agr. Food Chem. 13:238.
22. Kearney, P. C. 1965. Purification and Properties of an Enzyme Responsible for Hydrolyzing
Phenylcarbamates. J. Agr. Food Chem. 13:561.
23. Kearney, P. C., D. D. Kaufman, and M. L. Beall. 1964. Enxymatic Dehalogenation of
2,2-dichloroproprionate. Biochem. Piophys. Research Commun. 14:29.
24. Lamartinere, C. A., L. T. Hart, and A. D. Larson. 1969. Delayed Lethal Effect of
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid on Bacteria. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxic. 4(2): 113-119.
25. Magee, L. A. and A. R. Colmer. 1955. III. The Effect of some Herbicides on the
Respiration of Azotobacter. Applied Microbiology 3:288-292.
26. Pate, B. D., R. C. Voigt,. P. J. Lehn, and J. H. Hunter. 1972 Animal Survey Studies of
Test Area C-52A, Eglin AFB Reservation, Florida. AFATL-TR-72-72. Air Force Armament
Laboratory, Eglin Air Force Base, Florida. April 1972. Unclassified.
27. Pfister, R. M. 1972. Interactions of Halogenated Pesticides and Microorganisms: A Review.
CRC Critical Reviews in Microbiology 2(1): 1-34.
28. Rogoff, M. H. and J. J. Reid. 1956. Bacterial Decomposition of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic
Acid. J. Bacteriol. 71:303-307.
29. Smith, N. R., V. T. Dawson, and M. E. Wenzel. 1945. The Effect of Certain Herbicides
on Soil Microorganisms. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 10:197-201.
30. Steenson, T. A. and N. Walker. 1956. Observations on the Decomposition of Chlorophen^
oxyactic Acids by Soil Bacteria. Plant and Soil. 8:17-32.
31. Thiegs, B. J. Fall 1962. Microbial Decomposition of Herbicides. Down to Earth.
18(z):7-10.
32. Tyagny-Ryadno, M. G. 1967. Effect of Herbicides on the Microflora and Agrochemical
Properties of the Soil. Trudy Kamenetzpodolsk. sel',-khoz. Inst. 9:43-48.

132

�Two recent studies, however, have indicated that the 2,4-D/2,4,5-T herbicide combination has
a short term effect on levels of soil microorganisms, especially bacteria (Table VI1-3, items 1 and
10). Analyses of desert soil to which herbicide had been applied three months earlier have
revealed that bacteria levels are still considerably reduced from levels in control soil samples.
Fungal levels were also affected but not to the same degree as the bacteria.
4. MATERIALS AND METHOD
Samples were taken from the C-52A Test Grid on 13 June 1973. Eight sampling sites
were selected to correspond with those sampled in the 1970 study. Three samples were taken
from each of the eight 400 by 400 foot grid areas according to the pattern in Figure VII-1.
Samples were taken from depths of 0 to 6 inches and from 6 to 12 inches at each
site. Four control samples were taken from the same depths in an area 1/4 mile distant from the
C-52A site, but similar to it in soil and vegetative cover. The control area was upwind from
prevailing wind patterns, upstream from natural test grid water drainage, and never subjected
to concentrated herbicide application.
In selecting areas for sampling within the 400 by 400 foot grid squares, an attempt was
made to sample sites with varying vegetative cover. A system was devised to approximate
cover which employed a rank ordering of the sites from 0 to 5; 0 indicated a 0 to 5% vegetative
cover, 1 a vegetative cover of 5 to 20%, 2 a cover of 20 to 40%, 3 a cover of 40 to 60%, 4 a
cover of 60 to 80%, and 5 a cover of 80 - 100%.
In obtaining the samples, a shovel was used to bare a slightly more than one foot deep
vertical cross section of soil. The side of the cross section was marked at the 6 and 12 inch
points. Soil was skimmed from the side of the hole, first from the 0 to 6 inch depth, then from
the 6 to 12 inch depth. Samples were placed in plastic bags and labelled. The soil was kept
at 4°C for no more than 2 days before plating on media for microorganism analysis.
Three media were used to enumerate microorganisms. Potato dextrose agar medium plus
Tergitol NPX (100 ppm) and chlorotetracycline (40 ppm) was used for maximum development of
soil fungi. Nutrient agar plus 150 ppm Actidione was used for development of bacteria. Sodium
caseinate medium (DIFCO Actinomycete Isolation Agar) plus 50 ppm Actidione was used for
determination of Actinomycetes.
Thirty grams of each sample to be analyzed were blended with 300 ml of sterile distilled
water for one minute. Dilution series were made using subsequent sterile distilled water blanks
to achieve dilutions of 10"^, 10 , and 10" . Dilutions were dispensed in three media in sterile
petri plates with three replicates per dilution for each sample. All plated samples were
incubated at 25°C.
Potato dextrose agar plates were examined for fungi after 3 days. Nutrient agar plates were
examined for bacteria after 4 days, and the sodium caseinate agar plates were examined for
Actinomycetes after 6 days. Counts were made from each plate and predominant organisms were
isolated in pure culture for subsequent identification.
In addition to enumeration of microorganisms, 10 samples (0 to 6 inch depth) were
analyzed for water content. Samples were selected on the basis of Hunter's previous estimations
of relatively high or relatively low water content of a given area of the C-52A Grid and on the
basis of relative vegetative cover (0 to 5). Samples tested were as follows: (1) five from
relatively high moisture areas, (2) two from areas with a vegetative cover of 1, (3) one from an
area with a vegetative cover of 3, (4) two from areas with a vegetative cover of 5, (5) five
samples from relatively low moisture areas, (6) three from areas with zero vegetative cover, and
(7) two from areas with a vegetative cover of 1.
133

�A

I
I

B

J
I

C

D

I
I
1

E

123

I

1
i
1

F
3

21

1

G

32,

1
\
I

X

T

H

_ x

2

2

1

l
1

,1

12

|

3

1

K

1
I
1

L 3''

1

1

23

1

IV

1
1

M

12=1

n
1

2

3

A

E&gt;

6

7

1
1

8

g

1C)

11

12

Figure VI1-1. Schematic of the Test Area C-52A Grid Showing Soil
Sampling Pattern (also see Figure I-5)
134

13

14

�5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The average number of organisms per gram of soil are shown in Tables VI1-4 and VI1-5.
Table VI1-4 indicates the average number of bacteria, fungi, and Actinomycetes for each grid
location sampled. Table VII-6 indicates the average number of organisms per gram of soil in terms
of relative vegetative cover. Table VI1-5 is a summary of the data from the 1970 study arranged
for comparison with Table VII-4. Table VII-7 is a summary of the data from the 1970 study
arranged for comparison with Table VII-6. Tables VII-8 and VII-9 show water content and percent organic matter, respectively, for each of the samples analyzed.
There were no large differences in the numbers of Actinomycetes, bacteria, or fungi between
the sampling sites on the grid for the 0 to 6 inch depth. Comparing these data with the 1970
population levels shows an increase in the average number of Actinomycetes in the J-9 and K-2
locations and an overall increase in the number of bacteria in all sampling areas. In the K-2 area,
particularly, the number of bacteria per gram of soil shows an order of magnitude increase over
the 1970 level. This increase might be partially explained by the marked increase in overall
vegetative cover around J-9 and K-2 since 1970.
Differences in microorganism levels in 1970 correlated to an extent with vegetative cover,
the lower populations existing where cover was minimal (see Table VII-7). The 1973 data
(Table VII-6) shows a significant increase in microorganisms in poorly covered areas. The 1973
data indicates no strong correlation between vegetative cover and microorganism populations.
Control areas had population levels similar to those found for the grid.
Predominant bacteria isolated from the test grid were Bacillus sp. and Pseudomonas sp..
Predominant fungi were Penicillium spp., Aspergillus spp., and Fusarium spp.. In addition,
Nigrpspora sp., Helminthosporium sp.f Pullulariasp., and Curvularia sp. were recovered. The
predominant Actinomycetes were Strepjomyces sp. and Nocardia sp.
Although number of organisms from the 6 to 12 inch depth were not tabulated for this report,
the numbers of fungi were approximately 40 to 50% reduced from the corresponding 0 -to 6 inch depth averages. The average numbers of Actinomycetes and bacteria were about the same as those
from the corresponding 0 to 6 inch depth.
Water content varied very little in the 10 samples tested; the range being 0.35% to 1.22%.
The average for all samples was 0.54%. There was no correlation between microorganism population levels and the slight differences in water content.
Organic matter variation was also minimal . Percent organic matter variations did not
correlate with differences in microorganism populations.
6. CURRENT STUDIES ON SURVEY OF AQUATIC ALGAE
The role of phytoplankton in the productivity of both soil and aquatic ecosystems is well
documented. Algae have been identified (Reference VI1-1) as being important in the initial
7

This confirms data from personal communication between A. L. Young with the Department
of Life and Behavioral Sciences, United States Air Force Academy, Colorado, 1973.
Reference:
VII-1. Shields, L. M., and L. W. Burrell, 1964. Algae in Relation to Soil Fertility, Bot. Rev.
30:90-128.
135

�TABLE VII-4. AVERAGE NUMBER OF ORGANISMS PER GRAM OF SOIL
FOR EACH GRID LOCATION SAMPLED (0 - 6 INCHES DEPTH) 1973
GRID LOCATION

ACTINOMYCETES

BACTERIA

FUNGI

C-13

394,000

870,000

58,750

G-13

366,670

722,500

30,000

G-7

255,000

630,000

24,375

H-8

290,000

980,000

60,000

J-9

360,000

575,000

39,909

K-2

285,000

428,000

55,000

L-6

353,330

ND

20,710

0-7

363,000

468,000

32,166

TABLE VII-5. AVERAGE NUMBER OF ORGANISMS PER GRAM OF SOIL
FOR EACH GRID LOCATION SAMPLED (0 - 6 INCHES DEPTH), 1970
GRID LOCATION

ACTINOMYCETES

BACTERIA

FUNGI

C-13

440,000

ND

23,400

G-13

612,000

ND

78,750

G-7

460,000

173,000

74,500

H-8

536,000

224,000

27,500

J-9

21,465

ND

17,968

K-2

54,333

29,000

11,366

L-6

276,000

ND

10,315

0-7

NOT SAMPLED IN 1970

136

�TABLE VII-6. AVERAGE NUMBER OF ORGANISMS PER GRAM OF SOIL (0 - 6
INCH DEPTH), VEGETATIVE COVER, 1973
VEGETATIVE COVER

ACTINOMYCETES

~\

BACTERIA

FUNGI

5

310,000

1,015,000

50,000

4

300,000

1,070,000

110,000

722,500

30,000

3

1,860,000

2

283,330

890,000

32,166

1

357,000

416,000

30,800

0

326,360

529,000

25,800

CONTROL 5

235,000

ND

48,370

CONTROL 4

370,000

810,000

55,000

CONTROL 3

303,000

740,000

51,000

TABLE VII-7. AVERAGE NUMBER OF ORGANISMS PER GRAM OF SOIL (0 - 6
INCH DEPTH), VEGETATIVE COVER, 1973
VEGETATIVE COVER

ACTINOMYCETES

BACTERIA

FUNGI

5

460,000

173,000

74,500

5

612,000

3

536,000

2
1

ND

78,750

440,000

224,000
ND

23,400

54,333

29,000

11,366

0

21,465

ND

17,968

0

276,000

ND

10,315

137

27,500

�TABLE VI 1-8. WATER CONTENT OF TEN C-52A SOIL SAMPLES (0 TO 6 INCH DEPTH)

SAMPLE

VEGETATIVE
COVER

GRID LOCATION

PERCENT WATER

1

5

G-13

1.22

2

1

C-13

0.45

3

5

C-13

0.63

4

3

G-13

0.52

5

1

C-13

0.48

6

0

K-2

0.35

7

0

L-6

0.40

8

1

J-9

0.44

9

0

0-7

0.41

10

1

J-9

0.47

TABLE VII-9. ORGANIC MATTER OF SIX C-52A SOIL SAMPLES (0 TO 6 INCH DEPTH)

SAMPLE

VEGETATIVE
COVER

GRID LOCATION

PERCENT ORGANIC
MATTER

1

0

K-2

0.75

2

0

J-9

0.81

3

1

J-9

4

1.19

G-13

4

a

a

5

5

C-13

6

3

G-13

a

2.58
4.29
1.88

Samples taken from directly beneath a clump of panicum grass and contained root
material.

138

�ecological succession of barren areas. Other investigations (Reference VI1-2) have
indicated the effects pesticides have on algae (Reference VI1-3).
Grab samples were obtained from the pond located near the one square mile grid. Two types
of samples were collected: Sample One was a collection of the suspended and precipitated algal
material in the pond and Sample Two was a collection of the dense algal mat which occurred just
beneath the surface of the water. The one liter samples were returned to the laboratory for algal
genera identification.
Seven genera of algae were identified from the samples collected (Table VI1-9). All genera
were present in both samples: Sample Two being predominantly Zygnema and Sample One
being predominantly Zygnema and Tripjoceras. The seven genera represent two divisions,
Chlorophyta, the green algae, and Chrysophyta, the yellow-green or yellow-brown algae.
Data collected during the course of this study included some physical data. Of interest
specifically with respect to the aquatic algae is the pH which was found to be 5.51, or slightly
acid. Genera represented in the samples collected are those expected to be found under conditions
of this type^.
The previous study, conducted from September to November 1967 was more extensive
than the current study and encompassed the periodicity of algal species with time. In the
previous study, genera representative of two divisions were found. Representative of
Chlorophyta (green algae) and Cyanophyta (blue-green algae) were identified. The present
study, based on a single collection time, would be expected to identify less diversity of orders
and families. No genera were found to be common to the two studies. The previous study,
however, addressed only Chlorophyta (green) and Cyanophyta algae (blue-green). These data
do not however necessarily indicate changes in algal populations as the previous.study dealt
exclusively with soil populations.
7. CONCLUSIONS
In tests performed 3 years after the last application of 2,4-D/2,4,5-T herbicide, the Test
Area C-52A grid, Eglin AFB Reservation, exhibits a population level of soil microorganisms
identical to that in an adjacent control area of similar soil and vegetative characteristics not
exposed to massive quantities of herbicide. There are increases in Actinomycete and bacteria
populations in some test site areas over levels recorded in 1970. This is possibly due to a general
increase in vegetative cover for those sampling sites and for the entire test grid. No significant
permanent effects could be attributed to the presence of herbicides.
Data on aquatic algae populations from ponds previously exposed to repetitive applications of
herbicides indicate that the genera present are those expected in warm, acid (pH 5.5), seepage,
or standing waters.

o

°Personal Communication with R. Lynn, Utah State University, Department of Botany,
Logan, Utah, 1973.
References:
VII-2. Schluter, M. 1966. Investigations of the Algacidal Characteristics of Fungicides and
Herbicides. Int. Rev. Gestamten Hydrobiol. 51:521-541.
VII-3. Wolf, F. T. 1962. Growth Inhibition of Chlorella Induced by 3-amino, 1,2,4, Triazole,
and its Reversal by Purines. Nature, 193:901-902.

139

�TABLE VII-10.

AQUATIC ALGAE* FROM PONDS OF TEST AREA C-52A

DIVISION

CLASS

ORDER

FAMILY

GENERA

Chlorophyta

Chlorophyceae

Zygnematales

Desmidiaceae

Closterium
Cosmarium
Triploceras

Chlorophyta

Chlorophyceae

Zygnematales

Zygnemataceae

Z.ygnema

Chlorophyta

Chlorophyceae

Tetrasporales

Palmellaceae

Asterococcus

Chrysophyta

Bacillariophycaeae

Pennales
Suborder:
Fragilarineae

Fragilariaceae

Asterionella

Chrysophyta

Bacillariophyceae

Navjculaceae

Navicula

Naviculineae

*Smith, G. M. 1950. The Fresh-Water Algae of the United States. McGraw-Hill. 2nd. Ed. 709 pp.

�INITIAL DISTRIBUTION
AFSC (SOW)
AFSC (VN)
AF (RDP)
DDR&amp;E (Env &amp; Life Sciences)
DDR&amp;E (Tech Lib)
USA FA (DFLS)
AF (SAFILE)
AFLC (MMNO)
AFLC (DS)
DDC
Deseret Test Center (Tech Lib)
EA (SAREA-TS-L) (Tech Lib)
EA (SAREA-CL-V)
USAMC (AMCRD-WB/AFSC-SDWC)
OOAMA (MMNO)
SAAMA (SFQT)
USNWC (Tech Lib)
USNWL (Tech Lib)
USDA (Agriculture Resch Serv)
CINCPAC (J3A1)
USAF(Environ Health Lab)
ARL (ARC)
USDA (ARS)
USAF (SAMI)
ASD (ENYS)
AUL (AUL-LSE-70-239)
TRADOC (TAWC-DO)
AFATL (DL)
AFATL (DLOSL)
AFATL (DLIF)

2
2
2
10
5
200
10
2
10
12
5
2
5
10
2
2
2
2
25
5
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
2
100

141
(The reverse of this page is blank)

��</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="5005">
              <text>010</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="5007">
              <text>0090</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="5010">
              <text>Series II</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5004">
                <text>Young, Alvin L.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5006">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;Environics and Flame Munitions Branch, Flame, Incendiary and Explosives Division, Air Force Armament Laboratory, Eglin AFB, Florida</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5008">
                <text>1974-01-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5009">
                <text>Ecological Studies on a Herbicide-Equipment Test Area (TA C-52A) Eglin AFB Reservation, Florida; Final Report: January 1967 to November 1973</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5011">
                <text>ecological impact</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5012">
                <text>herbicide application</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5013">
                <text>dioxin</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6073" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="45667">
              <text>167</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="45668">
              <text>4973</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="45671">
              <text>Series VII</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="45666">
                <text>Young, Alvin L.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="45669">
                <text>1982</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="45670">
                <text>Environmental Fate of TCDD -- Conclusion from Three Long-Term Field Studies, Part I</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="5113" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="38663">
              <text>145</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="38664">
              <text>4157</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="38667">
              <text>Series VI Subseries III</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="38661">
                <text>Young, Alvin L.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="38662">
                <text>E. L. Arnold</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="38665">
                <text>1983</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="38666">
                <text>Environmental Fate of TCDD: Conclusion from Three Long-Term Field Studies</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="5092" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1965">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/4c732920305667aaa4d12c34317c6a96.pdf</src>
        <authentication>641f8eae8bd89d3719467687a79f6161</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63914">
                    <text>Item D Number

°4133

Author

Young, Alvin L.

D fjnt scanned

Corporate Author
Report/Article Title ^ate °f 2,3,7,8-TCDD in an Ecosystem Treated with
Massive Quantities of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T Herbicides

Journal/Book Title
Year

1982

Month/Day

January 21

Color
Number of Images

D

7

Descriptor! Notes

Wednesday, January 16, 2002

Page 4136 of 4258

�FATE OF 2,3,7,8-TCDD IN AN ECOSYSTEM TREATED WITH MASSIVE
QUANTITIES OF 2,4-D AND 2,4,5-T HERBICIDES

by
Alvin L. Young*

PRESENTATION TO THE
CALIFORNIA WEED CONFERENCE
Town and Country Convention Center
San Diego, California
21 January 1982

Address Inquiry to: Major Alvin L. Young, USAF, Ph.D.
Office of Environmental Medicine (102)
Veterans Administration
810 Vermont Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20420
Phone: (202) 389-5411

�FATE OF 2,3,7,8-TCDD IN AN ECOSYSTEM TREATED WITH MASSIVE
QUANTITIES OF 2,4-D AND 2,4,5-T HERBICIDES

A. L. Young, Veterans Administration,
Washington, D.C.*

Since 1970 hundreds of laboratory studies have been conducted on the toxic
contaminant 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) found in trichlorophenol.
Although numerous commerical products are made from trichlorophenol, including
the herbicide 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5,-T), controversy remains
as to what extent the TCDD found in these products has impacted humans or their
environment.
Laboratory data for rodents strongly suggest a correlation between
histological lesions in the liver and lymphatic system and the amount of TCDD
ingested. Unfortunately, data relating to any actual effects on wild populations
or their natural habitat are lacking•

The problem of finding a field site where

a wide population of animals has been exposed to significant quantitites of TCDD
is improbable because of (1) low levels of TCDD (&lt; 0.1 ppm) found in currently
produced phenoxy herbicide, and (2) low rates of 2,4,5,-T applied for brush
control on rangeland or for reforestation ( . to 2.2 kilogram (kg)/hectare
11
(ha)). This presentation summarizes the effects of residual TCDD on the ecology
of a unique test site: a site previously treated with massive quantities of
2,4,5-T and 2,4-D herbicides and located on the Eglin Air Force Base
Reservation, Florida.
The Eglin Reservation has served various military uses, one of them having
been the development and testing of aerial dissemination equipment in support of

*0ffice of Environmental Medicine (102), 810 Vermont Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20420

�military defoliation operations in Southeast Asia. It was necessary for this
equipment to be tested under controlled situations that would simulate actual
use conditions as near as possible. For this purpose an elaborate testing
installation, designed to measure deposition parameters, was established on the
Eglin Reservation with the place of direct aerial application restricted to an
2
area of approximately 3 square kilometers (km ) within Test Area C-52A in the
southeastern part of the reservation.

Massive quantities of herbicide, used in

the testing of aerial defoliation spray equipment from 1962 through 1970, were
released and fell within the instrumented test area.
has prompted continued ecological surveys since 1967.

The uniqueness of the area
As a result, few

ecosystems have been so well studied and documented.
Description of Field - Test Area C-52A (TA C-52A) covers an area of

2
approximately 8 km

and

is a grassy plain surrounded by a forest stand that is

dominated by longleaf pine (Pinus palustris), sand pine (Pinus clausa), and

turkey oak (Quercus laevis). The actual area for test operations occupies an
2
area of approximately 3 km and is a cleared area occupied mainly by
broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus), switchgrass (panicum virgatum), woolly
panicum (Panicum lanuginosum) and low growing grasses and herbs. Much of the
center of the range was established prior to 1960, but the open range as it
presently exists was developed in 1961 and 1962. The test grid is approximately
28 m above sea level with a water table at 1.5 to 3 m. The major portion of
this test area is drained by five small creeks whose flow rates are influenced
by an average rainfall of 150 cm.

The mean annual temperature for the test area

is 19.7C while the mean annual relative humidity is 70.8 percent.

For the most

part, the soil of the test grid is a fine white sand on the surface, changing to
yellow beneath. The soils of the range are predominantly well drained, acid

2.

�sands of the Lakeland Association with a 0 to 3 percent slope. A typical
one-meter soil core contained approximately 92 percent sand, 3.8 percent silt,
and 4.2 percent clay with an organic matter content of 0.17 percent an average
pH of 5.6, and a cation exchange capacity of 0.8.
Although the total area for testing aerial dissemination equipment was
2
approximately 3.0 km f the area actually consisted of four separate testing
grids.

The primary area was located in the southern portion of the testing area

and consisted of a 37 ha instrumented grid. This was the first sampling grid
and was in operation in June 1962.

It consisted of four intersecting straight

lines in a circular pattern, each being at a 45 angle from those adjacent to
it. Although this grid was discontinued after 2 years, it received the most
intense testing program. From 1962 to 1964, this grid (called Grid I received
39,550 kg 2,4-D and 39,550 kg of 2,4,5-T as the Herbicide Purple formulation (50
percent n-butyl 2,4~D, 30 percent n-butyl 2,4,5-T and 20 percent iso-butyl
2,4,5-T). Two other testing grids were sprayed with Herbicide Orange (50
percent n-butyl 2,4-D and 50 percent n-butyl 2,4,5-T). Grid II was an area of
37 ha and located immediately north of Grid I. Grid II received 15,890 kg 2,4-D
and 15,890 kg 2,4,5-T from 1964 through 1966.

Grid IV was the largest and final

Grid established on Test Area C-52A. It was approximately 97 ha and received
20,000 kg 2,4-D and 17,570 kg 2,4,5-T from 1968 through 1970.

Grid III was an

experimental circular grid that received 1,300 kg 2,4-D from 1966 through 1970.
Thus, for the four spray equipment calibration grids, a total of 73,000 kg
2,4,5-T and 77,000 kg 2,4-D were aerially disseminated during the period
1962-1970. No residues of 2,4,5-T or 2,4-D were detected (detection limit of 10
ppb) in any soil samples collected during 1971-72.
Results - Analysis of archived samples of the formulations sprayed on the
calibration grids indicated that approximately 2.8 kg 2,3,7,8-TCDD were applied

3.

�as a contaminant of the herbicide.

However, 2.6 kg of this TCDD were applied to

a 37 ha test grid (Grid I) from June 1962 through July 1964.

Levels of &lt; 10 to

1,500 parts per trillion (ppt) could be found in the top 15 cm of soil 14 years
after the last application of herbicide on this site. Nevertheless, analysis of
61 soil samples suggested that less than 1 percent of the TCDD remained on the
test area. Photodegradation at the time of and immediately after aerial
application probably accounted for much of the disappearance of TCDD, although
wind and water erosion and biological removal may have also contributed to its
disappearance. Probably, the most startling observation about Test Area C-52A,
is that biological organisms are abundant. The composition of species is
diverse and the distribution extensive. In February 1969, a "list of species"
was initiated for the test grids. Whenever a species was observed on or
associated with the grids, that species was recorded. Over the years of
observation, approximately 341 species or organisms have been observed and
identified as associated with the test area. The sheer number of species
testifies to the extensiveness of the ecological studies that have been
conducted on this unique area.

To date 290 biological samples (plants and

animals) have been analyzed for TCDD.

TCDD residues have now been found in a

wide spectrum of animals collected from the test area. Approximately one-third
(21) of the different species examined for TCDD residue have been positive. In
general, the levels of TCDD in the organisms appeared to be close to the mean
levels of TCDD found in the soils.
The ecological survey extending over a 5-year period (1973-1978) documented
the presence of at least 123 different plant species, 77 bird species, 71 insect
families, 20 species of fish, 18 species of reptiles, 18 species of mammals, 12
species of amphibians and 2 species of mollusks. No TCDD was found in any of
the seeds of the plant species examined.

However, TCDD was found in nine

4.

�species of animals including two rodent species: beachmouse (300-2,900 ppt,
liver) and hispid cotton rat ( 10-210 ppt, liver); three species of birds:
(
meadowlark (100-1,020 ppt, liver), mourning dove (50 ppt, liver), and Savannah
sparrows (69 ppt, liver); three species of fish: spotted sunfish (85 ppt,
liver), mosquito fish (12 ppt, whole body) and sailfin shinner (12 ppt, whole
body); two reptiles: six-lined racerunner (360-430 ppt, muscle), and the Eastern
coachwhip (150 ppt, fat); and one amphibian (Southern toad, 1,360 ppt, whole
body) . In addition ground-borne spiders ere positive for TCDD (115 ppt) as were
crickets (18-25 ppt) and insect grubs (240 ppt). These data verify that both
bioaccumulation and bioconcentration of TCDD occurs. Indeed, in a special
examination of liver tissue from 36 individual beachraice, a close relationship
between soil and liver levels of TCDD was observed, i.e., high liver levels of
TCDD were consistent with high soil levels of TCDD. Moreover, for beachmice
bioconcentration factors (mean liver concentrations divided by mean soil
concentrations) ranged from 6 for females to 18 for males. Whole body analysis
of fetuses from test area females indicated apparent placental transport of
TCDD. Histopathological examinations were performed on 255 adult or fetal
beachmice from the test area and a control area. Examinations were performed on
the heart, lungs, trachea, salivary glands, thymus, liver, kidneys, stomach,
pancreas, adrenals, large and small intestine, spleen, genital organs, bone,
bone marrow, skin and brain.

Initially the tissues were examined on a blind

study basis. All microscopic changes were recorded including those interpreted
as minor or insignificant. The issues were then re-examined on a control versus
test basis, which demonstrated that the test and control mice could not be
distinguished histopathologically. The mean number of fetuses per observed
pregnancy was 3.1 and 3.4 for the test area and a control area, respectively. A
single female beachmouse is capable of producing a litter every 26 days. At

5.

�this frequency, the animals collected in 1978 could have been 50 generations
removed from the population studies in 1973.

A two-factor (treatment and year)

disproportional analysis of covariance of organ weights revealed that liver
weights for pregnant beachmice from the test area were significantly heavier
(P ( 0 ) than liver weights of pregnant females from the control area, and these
.1
differences were consistent over the 5 years of observation. These studies
suggest that long-term, low level exposure to TCDD under field conditions has
had minimal effect upon the health and reproduction of the beachmouse.

6.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="38511">
              <text>144</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="38512">
              <text>4136</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="38515">
              <text>Series VI Subseries III</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="38510">
                <text>Young, Alvin L.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="38513">
                <text>January 21 1982</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="38514">
                <text>Fate of 2,3,7,8-TCDD in an Ecosystem Treated with Massive Quantities of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T Herbicides</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
