<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=49&amp;advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&amp;advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=animal+studies&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CTitle&amp;output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-06-15T20:49:15+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>1</pageNumber>
      <perPage>15</perPage>
      <totalResults>5</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="3168" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1641">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/767228c1f655a4baeafc4aebd478867c.pdf</src>
        <authentication>ca6670a2aa1f2bbab2ae204cee969125</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63590">
                    <text>Item D Number

°2211
Silkworth, Jay

CorporatB Author

Division of Laboratories and Research, New York State

RBDOrt/ArtlGlB TltlB Acute Toxicity In Guinea Pigs and Rabbits of Soot From
a Polychlorinated Biphenyl-Containing Transformer Fire

Journal/Book Title
Year

000

°

Month/Day
Color
Number of ImaflBS

D

33

Descrlpton Notes

Thursday, September 20, 2001

Page 2211 of 2293

�ACUTE TOXICITY IN GUINEA PIGS AND RABBITS OF SOOT FROM A
POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYL-CONTAINING TRANSFORMER FIRE

Jay Silkworth, Donald McMartin, Anthony DeCaprio,
Robert Rej, Surendra Kumar and Laurence Kaminsky

Division of Laboratories and Research
New York State Department of Health
Albany, New York

12201

�Acute Toxicity in Guinea Pigs and Rabbits of Soot from a
Polychlorinated 'Biphenyl-Containing Transformer Fire.

Silkworth,

J.B., McMartin, D.M., DeCaprio, A.P., Rej, R., Kumar, S., and
Kaminsky, L.S. (1982).

Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.

00,00-00.

A fire involving a pblychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)-containing
transformer extensively contaminated the State Office Building in.
Binghamton, New York with a soot-like material containing 1 ppm
2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, 50 ppm 2,3,7,8tetrachlorodibenzofuran and high concentrations of numerous other
polychlorinated dibenzodioxins, dibenzofurans, and PCBs.

The

oral LD50 values of the soot and of its benzene extract in female
guinea pigs in 0.75% aqueous methyl cellulose were 410 mg soot/kg
and 327 mg soot equivalent/kg, respectively.

Soot (dose range 1-

500 rag/kg) decreased WBC counts, platelet counts, and percent
neutrophils, and increased percent lymphocytes in females at 100
mg/kg.

Serum triglycerides were elevated in males at 100 and 500

mg/kg and in females at 500 mg/kg.

Alkaline phosphatase andY~

glutamyl transferase were lowered in females at 500 and 100
mg/kg, respectively.

Histopathology revealed dose-related goblet

cell hyperplasia of the pancreatic duct and salivary gland duct
metaplasia in males.
at 500 mg soot/kg.

Body weight loss was observed in both sexes
Thymus weight decreased in both sexes at 100

and 500 mg/kg, and kidney weights decreased in males at 100 and
500 mg/kg.

Dermal application of soot to rabbits for 24 hr

caused no overt toxicity, although hepatic centrilobular hypertrophy was observed in both sexes.

Similar application of soot

extract caused a local serous inflammation in addition to hepatic

�centrilobular hypertrophy.

The oral LDSOs for 2,3,7,8-TCDD in

guinea pigs in aqueous methyl cellulose or corn oil were 19 and
2.5 Vg/kg, respectively.

It was concluded that the soot matrix

alters dermal but not oral toxicity of its components, that the
toxic effects were consistent with those reported following exposure to dibenzodioxins and dibenzofurans, and that the aqueous
vehicle markedly diminished the acute toxicity of 2,3,7,8-TCDD
relative to that in corn oil vehicle.

�On February 5, 1981, a transformer was involved in a fire at
the State Office Building in Binghamton, New York.

The

transformer contained a dielectric fluid (Pyranol) which was
composed of the polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) mixture, Aroclor
1254 (65%) and chlorinated benzenes (35%) together with some
trace additives.

The fire resulted in extensive contamination of

the building with a soot-like material.

.-

Chemical analysis of two soot samples collected in the
stairwells of the 3rd and 4th floors of the building indicated that the highly toxic compounds 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD) and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran (2,3,7,8-TCDF) were present at concentrations of
2.9, 2.8 and 273, 124 ppm respectively (Smith et al.,
1981a).

Based on PCB pyrolysis experiments which indicate

the relative contribution of 2,3,7,8-TCDF to the total
polychlorinated dibenzofurans (Buser etjal., 1978) it was
estimated that the soot possibly contained approximately 0.5%
polychlorinated dibenzofurans.
Both 2,3,7,8-TCDF and 2,3,7,8-TCDD are highly toxic compounds and their toxicity has recently been reviewed (Huff et
a1., 1980).

2,3,7,8-TCDD is lethal at very low concentrations in

certain species (oral LD50 in guinea pigs is 2 ng/kg, in mice 284
vg/kg).

Other effects observed include thymus involution, spleen

weight reduction, bone marrow hypoplasia, liver megalocytosis,
bile duct hyperplasia, testicular degenerabion, renal pelvis
hyperplasia, adrenal cortical atrophy, hemorrhage and cutaneous
lesions.

The most commonly observed dermal effect of both com-

pounds in primates is the formation of acneform lesions. Both

�compounds produce general debilitation and wasting.

2,3,7,8-TCDD

is also a potent teratogen in mice and a carcinogen in rats.
Environmental disasters in Italy and Japan have resulted in human
exposures to both 2,3,7,8-TCDD and 2,3,7,8-TCDF and have provided
some insight into the human toxicity of these compounds (see
references in Huff et al., 1980).
In many environmental contamination accidents the identification and quantitation of the individual compounds of known
toxicity may be sufficient to permit risk assessments of human
exposure to be made.

However, because of the complexity of the

contamination of these soot samples, additional animal toxicology
studies with the soot were essential for such assessments to be
accurate.

Since the soot contains many PCB, dibenzodioxin and

dibenzofuran and biphenylene isomers and congeners in addition to
unknown components, the potential for synergistic or inhibitory
interactions of the toxicity of any component by one or many of
the other components is unknown.

Also, the binding affinity for

the various chemicals to the soot matrix is probably variable and
is unknown.

It is possible that soot particles could be excreted

after ingestion without releasing the tightly bound toxic
materials which would substantially diminish the toxicity.

It

has been demonstrated, for example, that activated carbon, when
administered with 2,3,7,8-TCDD, almost completely prevented the
uptake of the dioxin by rats (Poiger and Schlatter, 1980).

On

the other hand, chemical extraction procedures may not remove all
of the toxic compounds from the soot matrix.

This would result

in a low estimate of the total toxicity of the chemicals present

5

�in the soot.

Animal toxicity studies of the crude soot will not

resolve all of these questions but should provide a clear indication of the overall toxicity of the soot taking these factors
into account.
There are two major aspects of potential human exposure to
the soot and its components:

acute exposure of personnel during

clean-up operations and chronic exposure during any subsequent . - occupation of the building.

The potential pathways of human

exposure to the soot, in both cases, are dermal absorption,
ingestion or inhalation of soot particles and volatilized
components.
Only acute oral and dermal exposures were addressed in the
present study.

The results provided information on such exposure

and provided a basis for dosing during any subsequent subchronic
and chronic studies.

In view of the complex mixture of xeno-

biotics present, the soot was treated as a single entity for the
purposes of the study.
Acute oral exposure was tested in guinea pigs, a species
known to be sensitive to 2,3,7,8-TCDF (Moore et al., 1979),
probably the most hazardous toxic component of the soot because
of the relatively large quantities present.

To model the poten-

tial human exposure by ingestion, the soot was administered as a
powder suspended in an aqueous vehicle containing 0.75% methyl
cellulose to facilitate administration. A similar system has
recently been demonstrated to be a safe vehicle in toxicological
studies (Fritz and Becker, 1981).

Acute dermal exposure was

tested with rabbits which are susceptible to dermal lesions
following direct exposure to polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (Huff

�et al., 1980).

The potential of the soot matrix to diminish

bioavailability of the xenobiotics was also investigated by comparing the toxicity of the soot itself to that of a benzene
extract of the soot.
METHODS

Male and female New Zealand White rabbits (3.5 kg) were used
(H.A.R.E., Hewitt, NJ).

Male and female Hartley guinea pigs

(500-600 g) were obtained from a colony maintained in this Division.

All animals were acclimated on arrival to a 12-hr light

cycle for at least a week.

Room temperature was maintained at

22-24°C, and relative humidity at 40-60%.

Guinea pigs were

housed two per standard rat cage and were identified by individual body markings.

They were fed Certified Guinea Pig Chow

5026 (Purina, St. Louis, MO) and tap water ad libitum.

Rabbits

were housed one per standard rabbit cage and were fed Certified
Rabbit Chow No. 5322 (Purina, St. Louis, MO) and tap water ad.
libitum.
Contaminated soot was collected from the stairwells of the
3rd and 4th floors of the State Office Building in Binghamton,
New York with a vacuum cleaner fitted with clean collection bags.
It was then sieved through #40 wire mesh to remove gross inert
contamination.

An extract of 5.39 g of the soot was prepared by

Soxhlet extraction with benzene for 16 hr and the volume of
benzene was reduced to 5 ml by heating the solution.

2,3,7,8-

TCDD was obtained from the Dow Chemical Co. (Midland, MI) as a
solution in toluene.

The soot was analyzed as previously repor-

ted (Smith et al., 1981b).

�Several investigations were performed and are described
individually,
a)

Acute Oral Toxicity of Soot in Guinea Pigs:
The soot was suspended in aqueous 0.75% methyl cellulose and

administered by gavage to groups of 6 male and 6 female guinea
pigs at doses of 1, 10, .100 or 500 mg soot/kg body weight in
volumes of 0.5 ml/100 g body weight.

Lower doses of soot were

administered in a single dose and the top dose was administered
in three aliquots at approximately 1-hr intervals.
fasted overnight prior to dosing.

Animals were

Control groups received either

0.5 ml aqueous methyl cellulose/100 g, 500 mg activated carbon/kg
in 0.5 ml methyl cellulose/100 g or were untreated.
All animals were observed daily for overt toxicity and
behavioral alterations.

Body weights were recorded 5 days per

week and food consumption was monitored weekly.

All animals,

which survived the 42 day observation period were anesthetized
with an overdose of carbon dioxide, exsanguinated and necropsied.
At necropsy major organ's were weighed and 32 organs and tissues
from each animal were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin.
Tissues were processed by standard paraffin embedding and sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin.

Hematocrit, hemo-

globin, RBC and WBC count and differential cell counts were
determined.

Serum was collected and analyzed for aspartate

aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, Y~§lutamyl
transferase, alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase, and
triglycerides.

�b)

LD50 of Soot and Soot Extract in Guinea Pigs:
. Female guinea pigs in groups of six were administered a

single oral dose of soot of 250, 500, 750, 1000 or 1250 mg/kg
suspended in 0.75% aqueous methyl cellulose, or a benzene extract
of the soot at doses equivalent to 4, 20, 100, 500 or 1000 mg
soot/kg suspended in the same vehicle.

In the latter case the

benzene concentration was adjusted to 18% at all dose levels
including the methyl cellulose control.
was 0.5 ml/100 g.

The volume of all doses

The extract doses were administered in a

single aliquot while the soot doses were administered in two to
four aliquots over a maximum period of 6 hr.

A soot control

group received 1250 mg activated carbon/kg in the aqueous
vehicle. • Body weights were determined three times weekly and animals were observed daily.

All animals which survived the 42

day observation period were sacrificed.

LD50 values were calcu-

lated using a modification of the method of Bliss (Carmines

et

al., 1980).
c)

LD50 of 2,3,7,8-TCDD in Guinea Pigs:
Female guinea pigs in groups of six were administered

2,3,7,8-TCDD by a single gavage administration at doses of 0.1,
0.5, 2.5, 12.5 and 20 Vg/kg as a solution in corn oil (0.5 ml/100
Vg) or in suspension in 0.75% aqueous methyl cellulose (0.5 ml/100
vg).

Body weights were determined twice weekly and animals were

observed daily.

All surviving animals were killed on day 42 of

exposure.
d)

Dermal Exposure of Soot and Soot Extract to Rabbits:
The effect of dermal exposure to soot was determined by
2

applying 500 mg soot/kg to 64.5 cm

of the shaved, unabraded,

�dorsal surface of three male and three female New Zealand White
rabbits for a 24 hr period.

Active carbon, 500 mg/kg, was

applied to one male and one female rabbit as controls.

The soot

and carbon were moistened with sterile saline and held in place
with large adhesive bandages for 24 hr after which the patch was
removed and the area washed free of loose soot or carbon particles.

Disk collars prevented ingestion of soot and were left

on until there were no visible traces of soot (14 days).
The relative dermal toxicity of the extractable components
of the soot was determined by spreading an extract of the soot in
benzene at a dose equivalent to 500 mg soot/kg over a 64.5
area of dorsal skin of one male and one female rabbit.
was protected as described above.

cm 2

The area

Benzene was applied to one

male and one female rabbit as controls.
observed daily and weighed twice weekly.

All rabbits were
All rabbits were sacri-

ficed on day 67 using carbon dioxide and were examined for gross
pathology.

Liver, thymus, kidney and samples of skin from ex-

posed and non-exposed areas were saved for histopathology.

10

�RESULTS
- a)

Acute Oral Toxicity of Soot in Guinea Pigs:

Male and female guinea pigs, were necropsied 42 days after a
single oral administration of Binghamton soot in 0.75% aqueous
methyl cellulose.

At doses of 1 and 10 mg soot/kg there was no

consistent significant dose-related alteration from control
values in body weight gain, liver, spleen, kidney, thymus or
adrenal weights, hematology values or serum chemistry values
(Fig. la,b, Tables 1-3).

However, significant changes were

observed in groups which received 100 and 500 mg soot/kg.
Thirty-three percent mortality was recorded in the females
administered 500 mg/kg (Fig. Ib).

Decreased weight gain occurred

in both sexes at 100 mg/kg and the body weights of both sexes at
500 mg/kg were significantly below control values (Fig. la,b,
Table 1).

The absolute thymus weight and the thymus weight

relative to brain weight were significantly diminished from the
control values in males at the 500 mg soot/kg dose and showed
dose-related decrease in females administered 100 and 5jQG mg
soot/kg.

The absolute and relative kidney weights were decreased

in a dose-related manner in males administered 100 and 500 mg
soot/kg.

The combined adrenal weights were significantly reduced

only in males administered 100 mg soot/kg (Table 1).
Hematology values from male and female guinea pigs administered either 1, 10 or 500 mg'. soot/kg in addition to males
administered 100 mg soot/kg were unaltered from control values
(Table 2).

However the 100 mg soot/kg dose in females resulted

in significant decrease in the WBC count, platelet count and the
percent of neutrophils in whole blood and an increase in the
11

�percent of lymphocytes in whole blood.
Serum chemistry values are shown in Table 3.

There were no

significant alterations from control values in male guinea pigs
administered 1, 10, 100 or 500 mg soot/kg in aspartate aminotransferase, -y^lutamyl transferase, alanine aminotransferase,
alkaline phosphatase or lactate dehydrogenase.

However, trigly-

cerides were significantly elevated in a dose-related manner in
the 100 and 500 mg soot/kg groups.

Female guinea pigs showed a

dose-related elevation in serum aspartate aminotransferase at 100
and 500 mg soot/kg, a decrease in y-glutamyl transferase at
500 mg soot/kg, a decrease in serum alkaline phosphatase at 100
mg soot/kg and an increase in serum triglycerides at 500 mg
soot/kg.
Histologic examination of 32 tissues from both sexes of
control guinea pigs or guinea pigs administered either 1, 10, 100
or 500 mg Binghamton soot/kg indicated that the soot affected
only the pancreas and salivary gland in a clearly dose-related
manner and that the observed microscopic lesions occurred only in
the males (Tables 4a,b,c).

Goblet cell hyperplasia of pancreatic

interlobular ducts was observed in all males administered 500 mg
soot/kg and in one of the six males administered 100 mg soot/kg.
Normal duct epithelium was replaced by a single layer made up
primarily of mucin-secreting cells which resulted in an epithelium of twice normal thickness. Metaplasia of salivary gland
interlobular duct epithelium was observed in 3 of 6 males administered 500 mg soot/kg.

The epithelium was thickened by pro-

liferating epithelial cells which appeared similar to those pre-

12

�sent in the stratum spinosum of skin.

Goblet cells/ which are

present in normal columnar epithelium of the duct, were present
in the superficial layer of many of these thickenings.

There

were no lesions in any animals which indicated cause of death.
Fatty infiltration of the liver was present in two animals
administered 500 mg soot/kg.

These large cytoplasmic vacuoles

were located centrilobularly in one male and periportally in one
female.
Microscopic lesions which occurred in many control and
treatment groups and showed a tendency to be more frequent and/or
severe in treatment groups included bile duct hyperplasia, hepatocellular cytoplasmic inclusions, vacuolation of the adrenal
cortex and focal lacrimal adenitis (Tables 4a,b,c).
Bile duct hyperplasia was observed in 3 of 4 control groups
and in all treatment groups.

A grade of -H was assigned to

livers with one to a few foci of bile ducts per 25 x microscopic
field proliferating 100-200 ym outward from the portal area.
Fibroplasia was present in some of these foci.

A grade of +2

represented 5-15 areas similar to or larger than those graded -i-1.
Lesions graded -J-2 were observed in females administered 10 and
100 mg soot/kg and males administered 500 mg soot/kg.

Hyaline

eosinsophilic spheres and rings were found in hepatocellular
cytoplasm of animals from every control and treatment group.
Vacuolation of adrenal cortical cells was present only in
female guinea pigs.

Cytoplasmic vacuoles ranged in size from

that equal to the nucleus to nearly that of the total cytoplasmic
area.

The size and shape of the vacuoles were compatible with

having been lipid filled.

A grade o£ -fl was assigned to those
13

�adrenals in which about 11-30% of the cortical cells contained
vacuoles.

A grade of +2 was assigned to adrenals in which about

31-50% of cortical cells contained vacuoles.

Only one female

guinea pig from the 500 mg soot/kg received a +2 grade.
Focal inflammation of the lacriiual gland was observed in
every male control and treatment group but only in one female
administered 500 mg soot/kg.

Lacrimal glands graded +1 contained

a few foci containing lymphocytes and a few neutrophils located
in and around acini.

Degeneration of a few acinar cells was

indicated by nuclear pyknosis, karyorrhexis and cytoplasmic
vacuolation.

The most severe (+2) lesion was found in one male

administered 500 mg soot/kg in which 10-50% of the gland was
involved.
Microscopic lesions for which there were no indications of a
relationship to treatment were observed in both sexes in both
control and treatment groups.

These lesions included hepatic

focal coagulative necrosis, hepatic mononuclear cell foci/ focal
interstitial nephritis and renal mineral foci.
Focal coagulative necrosis of hepatocytes occupied areas
from less than 0.2 mm to over 1 cm in diameter.

Inflammatory

reactions were absent from early lesions but later lesions
possessed a basophilic rim of Kupfer cells and other macrophages,
a few lymphocytes, degenerating hepatocytes and fibroplasia.
Proliferating bile ducts were also present in the rim when necrotic tissue was adjacent to a portal area.

A few small (100-150

ym diameter) foci of lymphocytes and a few macrophages were-observed in many livers and were not associated with degenerative

14

�changes of liver tissue.
Focal interstitial nephritis consisted of one to several
foci of inflammatory cells, primarily lymphocytes and a few
neutrophils, located between and occasionally in cortical tubules.

A few cortical tubule cells were undergoing degenerative

changes as indicated by nuclear pyknosis and karyorrhexis.

Many

kidneys also contained one to a few mineral foci beneath the
pelvic epithelium or in the adjacent renal pelvis.

These foci,

which measured about 0.2 mm, were often surrounded by a fibrous
capsule.
b)

LD50 of Soot and Soot Extract in Guinea Pigs:
A single oral dose of either 250 or 500 mg soot/kg to female

guinea pigs resulted in a less than normal rate of weight gain
after an initial 10-day period of weight loss of 12 and 15%,
respectively, of starting weights (Figure Ic).

Deaths occurred

as early as day 12 and as late as day 42 in these groups.

Doses

of 750, 1000 or 1250 mg soot/kg produced losses of 27, 37 and
34%, respectively, of initial body weight during the study.
Deaths occurred as early as day 9 and all animals in each of
these dose groups were dead by day 27.

The 42 day LD50 for soot

was calculated to be 410 mg soot/kg (Carmines et al., 1980).
^

Female guinea pigs administered an extract of the soot
equivalent to 4 mg soot/kg gained weight at the control rate
during the entire observation period (Figure Id).

Doses of

either 20 or 100 mg soot equivalent extract/kg resulted in slower
rate of weight gain than in controls although there were no
deaths at these doses.

Animals administered either 500 or 1000

15

�mg soot equivalent extract lost up to 31 or 36%, respectively, of
their initial body weight during the study.

The cumulative

mortality was 80% and 100%, respectively, in the 500 and 1000 mg
soot equivalent/kg groups.

Deaths occurred as early as day 7 and

as late as day 21 and were preceded by gradual weight loss.

The

42 day LD50 of the soot extract was calculated to be equivalent
to 327 mg soot/kg,
c)

LD50 of 2,3,7,8-TCDD in Guinea Pigs:
Female guinea pigs administered a single dose of either 0.1

or 0.5 yg 2,3,7,8-TCDD/kg in corn oil gained weight at the control rate (Figure le).

Animals administered 2.5 yg 2,3,7,8-

TCDD/kg gained weight at a lower rate than controls after an
initial weight loss of 7%.

Deaths were not observed until day 32

and by the end of the 42 day observation period the cumulative
mortality was 50%.

Groups administered either 12.5 or 20.0yg

2,3,7,8-TCDD/kg lost 34 and 33%, respectively, of their initial
body weight and had reached 100% cumulative mortality by days 16
and 9 respectively.

The 42 day LD50 of 2,3,7,8-TCDD in corn oil

was calculated to be 2.5 yg/kg.
Female guinea pigs administered either 0.1, 0.5, 2.5 or 12.5
2,3,7,8-TCDD/kg in 0.75% methyl cellulose gained weight at the
same rate as controls. .However, animals administered 20.0 yg
\

2,3,7,8-TCDD/kg in methyl cellulose lost up to 15% of their
initial body weight by day 12.

The first death in this group

occurred on day 12 and the cumulative mortality reached 67% by
day 42.

The 42 day LD50 of 2,3,7,8-TCDD in methyl cellulose was

calculated to be 19 yg/kg.

16

�d)

Dermal Exposure of Soot and Soot Extract to Rabbits:
Rabbits dermally exposed to soot for a 24 hr period exhi-

bited no signs of overt toxicity or weight loss during the 65 day
observation period.

Histologic examination of thymus, kidney and

skin from exposed and unexposed areas showed no lesions.

How-

ever, hypertrophy of centrilobular hepatocytes involving 25-75%
of the hepatic lobule was observed in 2 of the 3 exposed males .. .
and 1 of the 3 exposed females.

Large round vacuoles, indicative

of fatty infiltration, were also observed in approximately 25% of
the hepatocytes of the female with centrilobular hepatocyte
hypertrophy.

Rabbits exposed to active carbon were in excellent

condition throughout the study and were histologically normal.
The male and female rabbits which received a single dermal
application of an extract of the soot equivalent to 500 mg
soot/kg each developed a mild inflammatory reaction at the application site which first appeared on day 4 (Figure 2).

The lesion

developed into a serous inflammatory reaction of moderate intensity and 2-3 mm in thickness.

The reaction reached and main-

tained its maximum severity during days 14-34 after application.
Complete healing had occurred by day 41.

Microscopic evaluation

of skin taken from the reaction site on day 67 appeared similar
to control tissues.

Thymus and kidney tissue from the male and

the female rabbits exposed to the extract were normal.

However,

although the liver from the male appeared normal, centrilobular
hypertrophy which involved 51-75% of the hepatic lobule was
observed in the female. There was no weight loss in animals
exposed to the soot extract.

Control animals which received a

dermal application of benzene were in excellent condition
17

�throughout the observation period and were histologically normal.

DISCUSSION
The results of these studies have provided a basis for the
assessment of the acute toxicity of the Binghamton soot by relating its toxicity to that of the known components of the soot and
by addressing the question of the bioavailability of its toxic
components.
Chemical analysis of the soot sample used in these studies
indicated a composition of approximately 1 ppm 2,3,7,8-TCDD, 50
ppm 2,3,7,8-TCDF and 0.5% PCBs in addition to many chlorinated
dibenzodioxin and dibenzofuran congeners.

However, the carbon-

like matrix of the soot presented the possibility that the toxic
components of the soot may be tightly bound, and may prevent
absorption and result in an observed toxicity lower than
expected.

This concept is supported by previous reports that a

charcoal matrix almost completely prevented absorption of
2,3,7,8-TCDD (Poiger and Schlatler, 1980).

The toxicological

findings of this study, in which guinea pigs were administered a
single oral dose of soot, included mortality, decreased weight
gain, immediate and precipitous weight loss after which there
were no cases of survival, thymic atrophy, decreases in kidney
and adrenal weights, decreased platelet and WBC counts and an
increase in serum aspartate aminotransferase.

Pathology findings

indicated that glandular and duct epithelium were primary target
tissues.

These findings are consistent with the findings of

McConnell et al. (1978) in which guinea pigs were administered

18

�various purified chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin congeners, and with
the findings of Moore et . l . (1979) in which guinea pigs were
a.
administered 2,3,7,8.-TCDF and indicate that the soot toxicity is
due to its chlorinated dibenzo components.
The oral LDSOs of the soot and an extract of the soot, 410
mg soot/kg and 327 mg soot equivalent/kg, respectively, indicate
4

that the carbon-like matrix has only a minimal role in decreasing
soot toxicity.

The method used for extraction of the soot has

been demonstrated to be the most effective in the extraction of
chlorinated dibenzodioxins and dibenzofurans from fly ash (Kooke
et al., 1981).
However, our dermal studies with rabbits, although the numbers of animals were not large enough for statistical comparisons, indicated that the soot matrix prevented a local inflammatory reaction even though enough absorption occurred to produce
liver pathology similar to that produced in rabbits exposed to
the extract.

The contrasting absence of hepatocellular hyper-

trophy in our guinea pigs exposed to either soot or soot extract
represents a species difference in the toxic response.
The aqueous vehicle used in the study with guinea pigs was
chosen because it is toxicologically innocuous (Fritz and Becker,
1981), provides a stable suspension of the soot thus facilitating
homogenous dosing, and is more likely to model potential human
oral exposure than would an oil based vehicle.

However, pre-

viously reported acute toxicities of 2,3,7,8-TCDD and 2,3,7,8TCDF (see Huff et al., 1980; McConnell _et al., 1978) have used
oil vehicles.

Therefore, to compare soot toxicity with chlori-

nated dibenzodioxin and dibenzofuran toxicities, an assessment oE
19

�the role of the vehicle was necessary.

Our data with 2,3,7,8-

TCDD (LD50 = 19 yg/kg) indicate that the aqueous vehicle
diminishes acute oral toxicity in guinea pigs by a factor of
approximately 8 relative to that in corn oil (LD50 = 2.5 pg/kg)«
If similar factors apply to other chlorinated dibenzodioxins and
dibenzofvirans, an acute oral exposure to the soot in an aqueous
vehicle would be less hazardous than in an oil vehicle.

The oral
\

LD50 of 2,3,7,8-TCDD in corn oil in our study was consistent with
the literature value (Huff et al., 1980).
Based on the chemical analyses of the soot (Smith et al.,
1981b), the LD50 dose of soot administered to the guinea pigs
contained approximately 0.4pg 2,3,7,8-TCDD/kg and 21 y g 2,3,7,8TCDF/kg.

Therefore, since the LD50 of 2,3,7,8-TCDD in the

aqueous vehicle is 19 yg/kg, the lethal effects of the soot did
not arise from the 2,3,7,8-TCDD but rather from the 2,3,7,8-TCDF
and/or other pollutants.

Two analyses of a sample of soot which

differed from that used in this study, but which was collected
from the same building, revealed relatively high quantities of a
wide variety of other chlorinated dibenzodioxins and dibenzofurans (Stalling, 1981; Rappe, 1981).

The LD50 of 2,3,7,8-TCDF

in guinea pigs has been reported to be 5-10 yg/^3 (Huff et al.,
1980).

If it is assumed that the acute toxicity of 2,3,7,8-TCDF

is also diminished by a factor of 8 when administered in aqueous
vehicle then a major fraction of toxicity of the soot must arise
from components other than the 2,3,7,8- chlorinated compounds.
In summary, our findings indicate that:

the soot matrix

does not significantly alter the oral toxicity of the soot but

20

�does influence its dermal toxicity; the toxic effects produced by
the soot are consistent with previously reported effects produced
by dibenzodioxins and dibenzofurans in guinea pigs; the amounts
of 2,3,7,8-TCDD and 2,3,7,8-TCDF in the soot are, alone, insufficient to account for the observed toxicity and therefore other
dibenzodioxins, dibenzofurans and/or other contaminants are
involved; and the aqueous vehicle used in these studies
diminished 2,3,7,8-TCDD toxicity.

21

�REFERENCES
Buser, H.R., Bosshart, H.P., and Rappe, C. (1978). Formation of polychlorinated dibenzofurans from the pyrolysis of
PCBs. Chemosphere 7, 109.
Carmines, E.L., Carchman, R.A., and Borzelleca, J.F. (1980).
A method for the evaluation of dose-effect data utilizing a
programmable calculator. J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol. 4,
23-30.
,
Fritz, H., and Becker, H. (1981). The suitability of
carboxymethylcellulose as a vehicle in reproductive
studies. Arzn. - Fors. Drug Res. 31, 813-815.
Huff, J.E., Moore, J.A., Saracci, R,, and Tomatis, L.
(1980). Long term hazards of polychlorinated dibenzodioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans. Environ.
Health Perspect. 36, 221-240.
Kooke, R.M.M., Lustenhouwer, J.W.A., Olie, K., and
Hutzinger, 0. (1981). Extraction efficiencies of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans from fly ash. Anal. Chem. 53, 461-463.
McConnell, E.E., Moore, J.A., Haseman, J.K., and
Harris, M.W. (1978). The comparative toxicity of
chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins in mice and guinea pigs.
Toxicql. Apgl. Pharmacol. 44, 335-356.
Moore, J.A., McConnell, E.E., Dalgard, D.W., and
Harris, M.W. (1979). Comparative toxicity of three
halogenated dibenzofurans in guinea pigs, mice and
rhesus monkeys. New York Acad. Sci. 320, 151-163.
Poiger, 'H., and Schlatter, C.H. (1980). Influence
of solvents and absorbents on dermal and intestinal
absorption of TCDD. Fd. Cosmet. Toxicgl. 18,
477-481.
Rappe, C. (1981). Report on the analysis of Binghamton
soot. Report University of Umea, Sweden.

Smith, R.M., O'Keefe, P.W., Hilker, D.L., Jelus-Tyror,
B.L., and Aldous, K. (1981a). Chemical analysis
of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and
2,3,7,8-tetrachlordibenzofuran in a soot sample
from the transformer explosion in Binghamton, New
York. N.Y. State Department of Health Report.
February 20, 1981.

22

�Smith, R.M., Hilker, D.L., O'Keefe, P.M., Kumar, S.,
O'Brien, J., Jelus-Tyror, B.L., and Aldous, K. (1981b).
Analysis of a Binghamton soot sample for
tetrachlorodibenzofurans and tetrachlorodibenzop-dioxins. N.Y. State Department of Health
Report. October 1, 19.81.
Stalling, D. (1981). Chlorinated dibenzofurans and related
compounds in soot formed in a transformer fire, in Binghamton, NY. Preliminary Report, Columbia National Fisheries
Research Laboratory,' U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

23

�TABLE 1
BODY AND ORGAN WEIGHTS FROM GUINEA PIGS 6 WEEKS AFTER A SINGLE
ORAL ADMINISTRATION OF BINGHAMTON SOOT IN 0.75% METHYL CELLULOSE*

Controls
Sex

Untreated

Vehicle

Active Car bonk

Binghamton Soot ng/kR

500 ing/ kg

Parameter

1

10

100

500

723+15

655±33

732+17
692+44

739±24
698425

737+21
667+24

649+34
641+12

522±40e
570+29C

M
F

+202

+213

+196
+115

+200
+126

+186
+78

+100
+45

-3
-31

Brain Wt(g)

M
F

3.75±0.05

3.72±0.08

3.87±0.050
3.75+0.04

3.91+0.12
3.79+0.12

3.75±0.06
3.9340.18

3.65±0.05C
3.68±0.03

3.7440.08
3.61+0.06

Liver Wt(g)

M

31.0041.60

36.00+3.31

29.63+1.65
30.60+3.76

32.01+3.43
30.13+3.21

34.61+1.65
34.01+3.80

30.0842,48
28.1241.86

27,85+2.24
22.71+0.41

Liver Wt/
Brain Wt (%)

M
F

8.28+0.41

9.75+0.97

7.67+0.35
8.17±1.02

8.2440.94
7.91+0.63

9.22+0.38
8.68+0.96

8.29+0.79
7.64±0.52

7.42+0.50
6.296+0.06

Spleen Wt
(g)

M
p

0.58040.025°

0.628±0.043

0.758+0.061
0.74940.108

0.688+0.027
0.941+0.066

0.726+0.050
1.12040.103°

0.650+0.034
1.016+0.073

0.853+0.084
0.818+0.107

Spleen Wt/
Brain Wt (2)

M
F

0. 15540. 007C

0.17040.012

0.196+0.015
0.20+0.03

0.176+0.007
0.285+0.030

0.19440.014
0.28440.019°

0.17940.011
0.276+0.020

0.227+0.020
0.227+0.030

Body Wt
(S)

M

Body Wt Change
During Study (g)

F

:1
b

Data expressed as mean +_ standard error, n »• 4-6 per group.
Active carbon in 0.75% aqueous methyl cellulose served as the control group for statistical evaluation using the Student's t-test.

c

p^O.05
p&lt;0.02
p^O.Ol
p^O.OOl

d
c
f

�TABLE I (Cont'd)
BODY AND ORGAN WEIGHTS FROM GUINEA. PIGS 6 WEEKS AFTER A SINGLE
ORAL ADMINISTRATION OF BINGHAMTON SOOT IN 0.75Z METHYL CELLULOSE*

Controls

Sex

Untreated

Vehicle

Active Carbon'*

Binghamton Soot mg/kfi

500 mg/kg

Parameter

1

10

100

500

Thyr.us Wt
(8)

M
F

0.527+0.029

0.433±0.034

0.598±0.122
0.711+0.058

0.431+0.033
0.693+0.064

0.457+0.014
0.584±0.058

0.327+0.028
0.527+0.015°

0. 250+0. 038C .
0. 368+0. 018f

Thymus Wt/
Brain We (%)

M
F

0.141*0.009

0.117±0.009

0.154*0.030
0.190*0.02

0.112*0.009
0.183*0.013

0.122*0.003
0.151*0.018

0.090*0.009
0.143*0.004°

0. 066*0. 010C
0. 102*0. 006e

Combined
Kidney Wts (g)

M

5.129*0.157

4.810±0.365

5.153+0.249
4.982+0.442

4.923*0.244
5.170*0.428

5.480+0.243
4.658+0.311

4. 218+0. 151e
4.223+0.178

3.955+0.217e
3.671+0.526

Kidney Wt/
Brain Wt (%)

M.
F

1.37140.049

1.296+0.096

1.334+0.053
1.330+0.120

1.267+0.077
1.363±0.090

1.462*0.059
1.204*0.107

1. 159*0. 05C
1.147+0.049

1. 056+0. 045e
1.018+0.015

Combined
Adrenal Wts (g)

M
F

0.256±0.012

0.236+0.023

0.283+0.012
0.282+0.018

0.262+0.010
0.295*0.019

0.272+0.010
0.287+0.022

0.249±0.009C
0.276*0.020

0.237+0.017
0.305+0.035

Adrenal Wt/
Brain Wt

M
F

0.06910.004

0.064+0.006

0.074+0.004
0.075±0.005

0.099+0.033
0.078+0.008

0.073*0.002
0.074+0.008

0.068*0.002
0.075*0.005

0.063+0.005
0.084 ±0.008

F

3
Data expressed as mean + standard error, n - 4-6 per group,
*° Active carbon in 0.75% aqueous methyl cellulose served as the control group for statistical evaluation using the Student's t-test.
c
p^O.05

PlO.OOl

�TABLE 2
HEMATOLOGY VALUES FROM GUINEA PIGS 6 WEEKS AFTER A SINGLE ORAL
ADMINISTRATION OF BINGHAMTON SOOT IN 0.75% METHYL CELLULOSE3

Controls
Parameter

Sex

Untreated

Vehicle

Active Carbon Control" Binghamton Soot mg/kg
500 mg/kg

1

10

100

500

PCV(Z)

M
F

49±1

50±1

45±1
44±2

47+1
46+1

46+1
44+3

47+1
43+2

4112
4112

WBC
(xlQ5/cc)

M
F

4.9±0.8

5.5iO,5

4.5±0.3
10+1.0

5.5+0.7
7.9+1.8

5.0+0.4
9.2+2.1

5.8+1.1
6.610.8C

4.5+0.5
7.2+1.4

RBC
(x!09/cc)

M
F

4.2±0.3

4.8±0.2

5.110.2
5.2+0.5

5.2+0.2
. 5.5+0.2

4.810.3
4.610.2

5.3+2.5
4.910.3

4.5+0.4
5.2+0.2

Platelet
(x!07/cc)

M
F

42+24

50±26

8±3
34+4.7

8+3
24±3.8

9+5
23+13

1114
1413.3d

Lymphocytes
%

M
F

73+6

78±2

73+4
64+6

67+7
65+6

65+1
73+6

7215
80+2C

71+3
66+11

Neutrophils
%

M
F

26+6

21±2

2614
34±6

31+8
34+6

35+2
2315

28+5
2012C .

27+4
33+11

Eosinophils
%

M
F

0.6±0.2

0.7±0.5

0.3+0.2
2.5+0.6

1.0+0.7
2.3+0.8

0.210.2
4. 6+1. -9

0.5+0.2
0.810.3

0.7+0.4
1.4+0.4

Monocytes

M
F

0.3±0.2

0.5±0.2

0.3+0.2
0.5+0.3

0.8+0.5
0.8+0.2

0.510.3
0.3+0.2

0.3+0.2
0.3+0.2

0.7+0.2
0.8+0.2

.

1817
23+9.5

•

a
b

c

Data expressed as mean + standard error, n = 4-6 per group.
Active carbon in 0.75% aqueous methyl cellulose served as the control group for statistical evaluation using
the Student's t-test.

o&lt;0.001

�TABLE 3
SERUM CHEMISTRY VALUES FROM GUINEA PIGS 6'WEEKS AFTER A SINGLE ORAL
ADMINISTRATION OF BINGHAMTON SOOT IN 0.751; METHYL CELLULOSlf

Controls
t

Parameter

Sex

Untreated

Vehicle

Active Carbon11

Binghamton Soot ng/kg

500 mg/kg
Aspartate
M
AT.-! notr.-ir.r; ferase F
(v;M/nd.n/L)

'11.6+4.8

•y-Glutamyl
'!'rar!::rcr,-tr:r(ljM/min/L)

12.411.1

H
p

68.8+11

14.8+2.1

1

10

53.2+5.4
37.313.1

46.7+6.0
44.218.1

53.8111.6 5319

13.111.0
19.0+1.7

.13.511.6
18.0+1.1

500

100

60.6+11.6

51.513. 5^

44.513.0
60.019.3°

14.110.7
13.810.9

13.5+0.7
13.9+1.5

10.9+1.3
11.711.0e

*t

Alan in e
K
.'ur:inotran:;rernse F
(UVsdn/L)

29.7+1.0

25.3+2.1

35.314.6
23.2+1.5

30.713.1
24.5+2.0

35.5+3.1
24.6±2.2

27.0+1. 8
23+2

2613
20+2

Alkaline
Phosphatase
(uM/mirt/L)

M
F

160112

163120

126120
126121

123+13
93112

155+8
77+7

107+6
7217C

11119
85113

' •iC't.ttte
Dohyclrogenase

M
F

590+33

562+17

567148
600+38

741199
638+65

620+87
571137

486+62
567+87

476+98
539+30

M

101122

138+24

87+5
101+17

113+39
114+28

114+32
77121

166+34°
120+29

282+38^
168+10"

(yM/nin/D
Triglycericies
Ong/dL)

Jjata expressed as mean + standard error, n = 4-6 per group.
Active carbon in 0.757. aqueous methyl cellulose served as the control group for statistical evaluation using
the Student's t-test.
C
, p&lt;0.05
d ^ ^ 0,
7
l
' P&lt;"0.05

a

p&lt;_0.001

�TABLE
MICROSCOPIC LESIONS IN CONTROL GUINEA PIGS

everage grade of lesion

Female , Carbon + MC

Z en i, ma Is with lesion

ct

f tissue examined

•e.

Z eainals vith lesion

everage grade of lesion

% eaimals vith lesion

a
3
U)

a

Male, Carbonb+ MC

average grade of lesion

Male, MCa

Male, Untreated

Pancreas ;netaplasia of duct epithelium

Q

6

0

0

6

0

0

6

0

0

6

0

Saiivary gland ;squareou6 mctaplaoin of
duct epithelium

0

6

0

0

6

0

0

6

0

0

6

0

Liver;fatty infiltration

0

6

0

0

6

0

0

6

0

0

6

0

Liver; bile duct hyperplasia

0

6

0

2

6

33

2

6

33

3

6

50 1.0±0

Adreual;cortical vacuolation

0

6

0

0

G

0

0

6

0

3

6

50

Liicriraal gland; focal adenitis

3

6

50

3

6

50

1

6

17

0

6

0

Liver; focal necroaio

3

6

50

3

6

50

4

6

67

1

6

17

Livcr;mononuclear cell foci

1

6

17

5

6

67

2

6

33

3

6

50

Kidney ; focal interstitial nephritis

2

6

33

5

6

83

2

6

33

4

6

67

Kidney jmineral foci

2

6

33

1

6

17

2

6

33

0

6

0

g

VI

o&gt;

•a
u

u
•g
&lt;B

1
8
o
3
ia
(a
•ri

O
•ri
ta
&lt;0
r-i
U

(U
r-i
&lt;M
O

J
ID
0)
H

«

•ri
It
in
r-i
a
H

-a
a
oo
o)
to

8

w
HI

•ri

"0
41

U

S
U)

m
•ri

0)

Lesion

a
b

0.75% sicthyl cellulose, 0.5 ml/100 g body
Active carbon, 500 og/kg body weight

0

1

1.040

1

o
to

•ri

O
r-4

0)

3

•o
OJ

&lt;u
u
to

l.OiO

1

to
w
4-1

ta

1.0 ±0

�TABLE
MICROSCOPIC LESIONS IN MALE GUINEA PICS. AWlNISTKKRDjnMrjIAKrOM. SOOT8..
1 mp,/kR

a
o
wJ

10 mR/kp,

a
0

a
o
1-1

ui

0}
_l

^0
Q)

c

"i

"5
•d
3

ft
01
(U

&gt;M

ta

a
o
IS
4)
(-1

r-i

Q)
r-&lt;

o

"8

«

in

Pancreas ;n:etaplasia of duct epithelium

3
X

t!
3

^
n)

*O
&lt;!)

a

T
*

4)
in

w
H
a

DO

a
rt

"a

*

a

•K,

Lesion

a
o
-rt

f

to
.H
3

"K.

M

oa

!QO wr./kp,

H

la

4)
f-t

a
0

a

-ri
in
O

a
a
^

*M

(U
r-t

i-&lt;

a

g

^t

"S

1*

CO

U

CJ
CO
Q

*v
U
^^

r-i

1
3
^
0)

a
U)

•rl

J3

***

ti
it

"S
a

A
ff
•g

a
t-i
a

to

B
•H

•rl

n
to
41
ta
Qt

ta

U
1-4
»

•rj

4J
a

-K.

a

a
o

4)

4)

0)

*•)
n
vi

3

&lt;H

to

W
3
U)
U)

500 WE/kf r

S

4)

§

Q

a)

H

B)

-ft.

•Si

M

a

•e.

41

4)
t-i

"g

H
V
tl
ta

^
^{
UJ
tH

CO
vt

*H

•S.

g

Tl
(0
41
r-4
V-i
0

1

M

1

&gt;«•

•o

O
•ri
U)

M

3

S

M
CO

0)
CO
0)

&lt;u

^
.

0

7

0

0

.

6

0

1

6

17

6

6

100

Salivary gland ; squamous metaplasia of
duct epithelium

0

7

0

0

6

0

0

6

0

3

6.

50

Liver; fatty infiltration

0

7

0

0

6

0

0

6

0

1

6

17

1

Liver;bile duct hyperplasia

1

7

14

3

6

50

2

6

33

3

6

50

1.7±0.6

Adrenal;cortical vocuolation

0

7

0

0

6

0

0

6

0

0

6

0

Lucrical gland; focal adenitis

2

7

29

2

6

33

2

6

33

5

6

83

Liver; focal necrosis

2

7

29

4

6

67

1

6

17

2

6

33

Liver ;taonosvuclear cell foc^.

5

7

71

2

6

33

0

6

0

3

6

50

Kidney; focal interstitial nephritis

3

7

43

2

6

33

4

6

67

6

6

100

Kidney ;cdneral foci

3

7

43

2

6

33

3

6

50

3

6

50

1

1 ±0

Soot atlninistcred orally in 0.752 aqueous methyl cellulose.

1 ±0

1 ±0

1 ±0

1 ±0

1.2±0.5

�TABLE Ac

a

&amp;4

•Ri

«s«

i
«

0
s

0
o
Tl

n

V

i-l

2 *
* I
$

0

U

CO

ani&amp;als vrlth lesion

tissue exsained

a
5
&lt;a

fin i Mis vith lesioa
Li aion

100 inR/k R

10 niR/kf r

1 inR/fcc

. J!
O
ta

"0

X
a
0)

a
14
u

•rl
01

&lt;u

* :
r-t

&lt;H

*
V)

CD

g

&lt;U

H

ti.

«s«

•H
S
3
fr«

VI
4J

IU
r-i

2

g

A
•s
•g
n

01

t-4

to

«I
a)
3
h

1

3

500 mp,/k R

gs 3
^ :
* i
o
TI

•rl

tissue examined

,

MICROSCOPIC LESIONS IN FEMALE GUINEA PIGS, ADMINISTERED BIKGI^fTOH SOOTa

to
a

ts

m

«

g
H

TI

fl
lu

«K»

•Ki

M

ta

a
o
•rl

g

Tl
10

0

T-i

£
S
u

tl

a
a

U&gt;

rH

r-i

&lt;H

a

u
ri

e&gt;
a

a
o
TI
u
&lt;i)

*
&lt;a

o
u
*o

S
ca

ft)

3

Tl

•M

§

•ta

1
I s s«
s

«S«

M

4&gt;
bO

(a

qt
u

u

1

g

P^:'.crca3;metaplaoia of duct epithelium

0

5

0

0

6

0

0

6

0

0

5

0

Salivary gland ;squasiouG oetaplasia of •'
duct epithelium

0

5

0

0

5

0

0

5

0

0

5

0

L!\'er;fa£ty infiltration

0

5

0

0

6

0

0

6

0

1

5

20

2

Liver; bile duct hyperplasia

3

5

60

1 ±0

3

G

50

6

6

100

1.5±0.7

2

5

40

1 ±0

Adrenal; cortical vacuolation

2

5

40

1 ±0

3

6

50

3

6

50

1 ±0

5

5

100

LucriMl gland; focal adenitis

0

5

0

0

6

0

0

5

0

1

5

20

Liver; focal necrosis

1

5

20

1

6

17

1

6

17

2

5

40

Liver ;rjononuclcar cell foci

3

5

60

3

6

50

3

6

50

2

5

40

Kidney; focal interstitial nephritis

4

5

eo

G

6

100

5

6

83

3

5

60

Kidney ; mineral foci

2

5

40

0

6

0

2

6

33

1

5

20

i

Soot administered orally in 0.75% aqueous methyl cellulose.

1.7±0.6

1 ±0

I

1

1.2+0.5

1

1

�LEGENDS
Fig. 1.

Body weight changes in male and female guinea pigs

administered single, oral doses (Day 0) of Binghamton .soot (A-C)
or soot extract (D) in 0.75% aqueous methyl cellulose, or
2,3,7,8-TCDD in either corn oil (E) or methyl cellulose

(F).

Asterisks indicate individual mortalities during the observation
period.

Fig. 2.

Female rabbit 32 days after dermal application of

1.4 ml benzene extract equivalent to 500 mg Binghamton soot/kg,
showing a serous inflammation at the application site.

�140

DAYS

��</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="23266">
              <text>088</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="23268">
              <text>2211</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="23270">
              <text>Series IV Subseries II</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="23260">
                <text>Silkworth, Jay</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="23261">
                <text>Donald McMartin</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="23262">
                <text>Anthony DeCaprio</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="23263">
                <text>Robert Rej</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="23264">
                <text>Surendra Kumar</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="23265">
                <text>Laurence Kaminsky</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="23267">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;Division of Laboratories and Research, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="23269">
                <text>Acute Toxicity in Guinea Pigs and Rabbits of Soot From a Polychlorinated Biphenyl-Containing Transformer Fire</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="23271">
                <text>BSOB</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="23272">
                <text>animal studies</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="23273">
                <text>dioxin</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2483" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1340">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/f3952984a72c2245626b9dc9b1d87f74.pdf</src>
        <authentication>38e9c40370894bea57b99dfbd68d8cca</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63289">
                    <text>Item ID Number

°1442

Author
Corporate Author
ROpOrt/ArtiOlO TitlO Perspectives on the Safety of 2,4-D

JOUmal/BOOk Title

Comments from CAST

Year

™&amp;

Mouth/Day

December

Color

^

Number of Images

21

Descpipton Notes

Tuesday, May 15, 2001

Page 1442 of 1514

�[AST

ISSN 0194-4096

PERSPECTIVES ON THE SAFETY
OF 2,4-D

COMMENTS from CAST
1987-3
December 1987

Council for Agricultural Science and Technology

�Council for
Agricultural Science and Technology
(CAST)
Member Societies
American Academy of Veterinary and Comparative Toxicology
American Association of Cereal Chemists
American Dairy Science Association
American Forage and Grassland Council
American Meat Science Association
American Meteorological Society
American Peanut Research and Education Society
American Phytopathological Society
American Society for Horticultural Science
American Society of Agricultural Engineers
American Society of Agronomy
American Society of Animal Science
American Veterinary Medical Association
Aquatic Plant Management Society
Association of Official Seed Analysts

Council on Soil Testing and Plant Analysis
Crop Science Society of America
Institute of Food Technologists
North Central Weed Control Conference
Northeastern Weed Science Society
Plant Growth Regulator Society of America
Poultry Science Association
Rural Sociological Society
Society of Nematologists
Soil Science Society of America
Southern Weed Science Society
Weed Science Society of America
Western Society of Weed Science

COMMENTS from CAST
Publications in the COMMENTS from CAST Series
are official letters and other comments of broad
interest, usually written by one person.
Each
COMMENT bears the names of the persons who
prepared it, and they are responsible for the content.
Through representatives on the CAST Board of
Directors, the member societies are responsible for the
policies and procedures followed by the headquarters
office in developing, processing, and disseminating
COMMENTS from CAST, and, depending on the
nature of the publication, the society representatives
nominate qualified persons from their respective
disciplines for participation in the preparation. Aside
from these involvements, the member societies have no
responsibility for the content of any COMMENT.

Authors of COMMENTS from CAST, other than
persons in the headquarters office, serve as scientists
and not as representatives of their employers. They
receive no honoraria but are reimbursed upon request
for travel expenses associated with the preparation.
Their time is contributed by their employers. Costs of
publishing and distributing the COMMENTS are borne
by CAST.
CAST encourages the reproduction of its publications in their entirety for independent distribution, but it
has no responsibility for the use that may be made of
them. CAST does not endorse either products or
services; thus, a reproduction of a publication made in
such a way as to imply an endorsement would be
considered inappropriate.

Headquarters Office
137 Lynn Avenue, Ames, Iowa 50010-7120
Telephone 515-292-2125

�PERSPECTIVES ON THE SAFETY
OF 2,4-D

COMMENTS from CAST
1987-3
December 1987

Council for Agricultural Science and Technology

�Task Force Members
Lawrence J. Fischer (Chair), Center for Environmental Toxicology, Michigan State University,
East Lansing
Donald E. Davis, Department of Botany, Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Auburn University,
Auburn
Judith Marquis, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, School of
Medicine, Boston University, Boston
David B. Marx, Agricultural Statistical Laboratory, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
Wendell R. Mullison, Herbicide Consultant, 1412 North Parkway, Midland, Ml 48640
Gary D. Osweiler, Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Iowa State University, Ames
Stanley H. Schuman, Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina,
Charleston
Robert D. Sweet, Department of Vegetable Crops, Cornell University, Ithaca
Sheldon L. Wagner, Agricultural Chemistry Department, Oregon State University, Corvallis
Robert B. Wallace, Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City

�Foreword
The public faces what it may think are insurmountable
obstacles in dealing with the relationship between human
health and chemicals in the environment. Wide-ranging
opinions exist on the benefits and risks associated with
chemicals used in production agriculture, food processing, home lawn care, and other areas of daily life. Plenty
of evidence exists that chemical use has benefited agriculture and the food supply through the control of pests
and diseases of animals and plants. Yet consumers and
producers alike are asking necessary and critical questions about the impact of these chemicals on human
health.
One chemical used widely to control weeds on farms,
forests, lawns, and golf courses for four decades is 2,4
dichlorophenoxyacetic acid or 2,4-D. It is suspected by
some to cause cancer in humans.
The release of a paper by Hoar et al (1986) implicating
2,4-D in the increased incidence of non-Hodgkin's
lymphoma in a group of Kansas wheat farmers led the
CAST board to initiate a task force review of the 2,4-D
literature. The task force, under the leadership of Dr.
Lawrence J. Fischer and consisting mainly of epidemiologists, toxicologists, and weed scientists, met to review
the situation, agree upon an outline for the report, and
establish a writing protocol. The task force agreed to
focus on epidemiology, exposure to 2,4-D by various
segments of the population, and animal toxicology in the
report. The resulting report, "Perspectives on the Safety
of 2,4-D," addresses public concerns regarding health
risks and use of the herbicide, and explains how animal

toxicity studies are conducted, with specific reference to
2,4-D.
On behalf of CAST, we thank the task force participants, who gave of their time and expertise to prepare
this report as a contribution from the scientific community to greater public understanding of chemical
issues. We thank also the employers of the participants,
who made the time of their staff members available at no
cost to CAST. The members of CAST deserve special
recognition. Their unrestricted contributions in support
of the work of CAST have financed the preparation and
publication of this report.
"Perspectives on the Safety of 2,4-D" is being distributed to all members of Congress; to certain members of
the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the Food and Drug
Administration, and the Environmental Protection
Agency; to media personnel who have asked to receive
CAST publications; and to institutional members of
CAST. Individual members may receive a copy upon
request. The report may be republished or reproduced
in its entirety without permission. However, if the report
is republished, credit to the authors and CAST is requested.
William W. Marion
Executive Vice President

CAST
Billy E.Caldwell
President

CAST

�Contents
SUMMARY

1

INTRODUCTION

2

EPIDEMIOLOGICSTUDIES
The Nature of Epidemiology
Studies of 2,4-D as a Possible Cause of Human Cancer
The Kansas Study
Ongoing Studies

3
3
4
4
6

HUMAN EXPOSURE TO 2,4-D
Manufacturing Personnel
Applicator Exposure
Forestry Applicators
General Public
Environmental Sources of Exposure
Conclusions Regarding Exposure

7
7
7
7
8
9
9

TOXICITY STUDIES IN LABORATORY ANIMALS
Advantages and Limitations of Animal Studies
Toxicity of 2,4-D from Single and Repeated Doses
Cancer Testing Using Laboratory Animals
Carcinogenicity of 2,4-D in Animal Studies

10
10
10
11
12

REFERENCES

15

�Summary
All available information gained from epidemiologic
studies, and from controlled experiments in laboratory
animals should be used in making a judgment regarding
the safety of 2,4-D. Using such an approach, this task
force concludes that 2,4-D, as it is generally used, does
not represent a significant human health threat. However, users should apply it with the care and respect
required of every chemical that can cause harmful effects
in high doses. Many chemicals enjoying wide use, such
as detergents, gasoline, and certain insecticides fall into
this category.
A recent epidemiologic study concluded that human
exposure to 2,4-D related to its use in Kansas agriculture was associated with an increased incidence of
cancer. This finding should not be dismissed as wrong,
nor should it be accepted as a correct reflection of the

safety of 2,4-D. This study, in light of its strengths and
weaknesses, must be evaluated with results from other
studies, which indicate that 2,4-D use does not represent
a significant cancer risk.
A cautious approach dictates that reports of possible
carcinogenic effects of 2,4-D in humans serve to increase
our scientific vigilance and investigation into the issue.
Results from several ongoing epidemiologic studies of
cancer and herbicide use will be available in the near
future. If those results support the findings of the study
conducted in Kansas, then the government should give
serious consideration to restricting the use of 2,4-D.
Should the forthcoming data not indicate a link between
2,4-D exposure and human cancer, then our present conclusion will stand.

�Introduction
Use of the herbicide 2,4-D started about 40 years ago.
It revolutionized weed control practices on farms, forests,
waterways, and lawns. Users continue to apply 2,4-D to
millions of acres because they find it effective. In
general, they perceive it as fairly safe for themselves and
the environment. Periodically, however, questions have
been raised regarding the safety of 2,4-D for humans.
Most recently the "Kansas Farm Worker" study indicated that high exposure to 2,4-D was associated with
one particular type of cancer (Hoar et al., 1986). The
results of this study, conducted by scientists at the
National Cancer Institute (NCI), prompted renewed concern for the safe use of 2,4-D.
An excellent, recent review of the scientific literature
does exist concerning the safety of 2,4-D (Canadian
Centre for Toxicology, 1987). This report will not duplicate that effort. A CAST Task Force met in June of 1987
to discuss the safety of 2,4-D and to develop a report that
would benefit the informed public. The goal of this
document is to place in perspective both the current and
older information relevant to the safety of 2,4-D to
humans. Task force members hope that unwarranted
fears will be laid to rest. At the same time health risks
that may be present, or that have not yet been studied
adequately, will be brought to the public's attention.
Safety evaluations made from partial or narrow

segments of information should be avoided when a large
amount of toxicity data are available. Instead, conclusions should be drawn from all available data. Readers
should understand strengths and weaknesses of the procedures for producing information used in safety
assessment. Consistent with these views, this report will
discuss and integrate a variety of toxicologic information. It addresses the usefulness and conduct of epidemiologic studies in humans and discusses the question
of whether or not 2,4-D exposure is associated with a
higher risk of cancer. The report gives particular attention to the Kansas Farm Worker study. Next, it considers some important issues surrounding the extent of
human exposure to 2,4-D. Finally, a discussion is
presented concerning the relevance of laboratory animal
studies in evaluating the safety of humans exposed to
chemicals in general and to 2,4-D in particular.
Throughout the report, an attempt has been made to
engender an understanding of the methods by which
information regarding chemical safety is generated and
applied to assess human risk. This report should help
readers draw conclusions about the question of 2,4-D
safety. It should also provide the public a better appreciation for the difficulties involved in arriving at final
conclusions regarding the safety of chemicals introduced
into the environment.

�Epidemiologic Studies
The Nature of Epidemiology
Epidemiology is the science that examines the
distribution and causes of disease in populations. When
exposure of humans to certain chemicals is suspected of
causing disease, epidemiologists gather information on
the extent of human exposure to the chemical. They use
statistical methods to link exposure to an increased incidence of the disease. The goal of an epidemiologic study
is to provide an accurate estimate of disease risk associated with an exposure situation.
Readers should understand that no substitute exists
for human epidemiologic studies. However, they are
expensive to conduct, difficult to design, and the results
arc rarely as clear as everyone would wish. Nevertheless,
epidemiologic studies can provide information on
adverse health effects caused by human exposure to
physical, chemical, or infectious agents. Some epidemiologic studies of health effects provide clear and straightforward answers. One example is the association
between cigarette smoking and lung cancer. Another is
the clear-cut association between alcohol drinking and
automobile-related fatalities. A third example is the
harmful effects of radiation such as those produced by
the atomic bombs on the exposed human populations of
Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Little doubt exists about the
cause of disease or death in these studies because of the
severe impact on health caused by smoking, by alcoholrelated impaired driving performance and by high radiation levels.
On the other hand, when we consider whether or not
exposure to a particular pesticide such as 2,4-D causes
adverse health effects, the reader will notice that a clearcut answer is difficult to obtain. Several factors may
contribute to this difficulty. First, the chemical in question may not provide severe enough biological damage to
be easily detected as a causative agent by epidemiologic
methods. In addition, the disease under scrutiny may
have multiple causes that confound the identification of
the pesticide as a contributing factor. Whether or not
low intermittent exposure to a particular pesticide or
chemical over a period of 20 to 30 years, for example, can
contribute to the cause of cancer docs not represent a
simple scientific query. Note that cancer has an incubation period of 10 to 20 years in humans. Any other event
or exposure, in addition to the pesticide, occurring
during the preceding years must also be considered as a
possible cause of the cancer. Exposure to radiation for
treatment of a tumor, occupational exposure to asbestos,
tobacco smoking, and heavy alcohol use, or any

combination of such factors, would make it difficult to
assign the cause of cancer to pesticide exposure alone.
Studying the causes of major long-term illnesses,
scientists in this field usually use two primary methods.
The first is the cohort study in which the emphasis is on
locating and studying an indisputably exposed group of
individuals. The term "cohort" indicates a group of
individuals who share a similar degree of exposure to a
chemical. Factory workers exposed repeatedly to a suspected cancer-causing agent would represent a typical
cohort. A "control cohort" means a group of relatively
nonexposed persons. Researchers compare the incidence
of disease (e.g., cancer) in the exposed cohort to the
incidence of disease in a nonexposed control cohort.
Individuals in the control group are often matched as
closely as possible in age, sex, and lifestyle to the persons
in the exposed group. Time between initiation of
exposure and the measurement of the disease's appearance must be considered. Cancer, as noted above, may
not appear for 10 to 20 years after sufficient exposure has
occurred. Cohort studies tend to be small in terms of
total number of persons involved. Large numbers of exposed persons often are not available, and the number of
exposed persons having a particular disease (e.g., cancer)
may be small indeed.
Another type of study is the case-control study. It is
superior to the cohort study in its ability to detect differences among groups in the total population, in part
because the case-control study can use all cases of a
disease from a large population. The larger the number
of cases, the more accurately scientists can detect causes
of disease. Disease-free persons selected for a control
group are matched by age, sex, race, or other relevant
variables with persons in case groups. Researchers interview individuals in case (disease) groups and control
groups to learn of possible exposures to the suspected
agent (e.g., 2,4-D) in the preceding 10 to 20 (or more)
years. Difficulties do exist in asking questions about exposures which may have occurred repeatedly over the
preceding 20 or more years. Unless exposures were
dramatic, persons in case groups and control groups may
lack accurate recall of events surrounding possible
exposure. Accuracy of recall represents an inherent
problem in most case-control cpidemioiogic studies.
Some persons may forget exposure (under-reporting),
while others may think they were exposed when they were
not (over-reporting). A link between exposure and the
disease is detected when there is a higher than normal
incidence of the disease in groups of individuals exposed
to the chemical. Finally, the epidemiologist must

�INCREASES IN CANCER INCIDENCE

determine that no significant difference other than that
of chemical exposure exists between cases and controls to
explain the increased occurrence of the disease.

WHITE FEMALES, 1975-84

Studies of2,4-D As A Possible Cause of Human Cancer
Swedish epidemiologists reported results from a casecontrol study in the late 1970's indicating that Hodgkin's
disease, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and soft tissue
sarcoma occurred more frequently in forestry workers
and farmers who were regularly exposed to phenoxy
herbicides, including 2,4-D (Hardell and Sandstrom,
1979; Eriksson et al., 1981). It must be said that these
three forms of cancer are not as easy for pathologists to
identify and classify as are some other forms of cancer.
Of the three, Hodgkin's disease (HD) is the most concisely described and defined. Pathologists have more
often disagreed over the identification and classification of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and non-Hodgkin's
lymphoma (NHL). Disease classification difficulties can
lead to problems with interpretation of the results obtained in epidemiologic studies.
The results from Sweden associating phenoxy herbicide exposure in forestry and agricultural workers to an
increased risk for HD, STS, and NHL were severely
criticized in scientific debate. In addition to possible
disease classification problems, criticism focused on a
lack of scientific rigor in the design of the studies. Forestry workers were exposed at that time to multiple pesticides, including 2,4,5-T, which is known to contain a
dioxin contaminant that causes cancer in animals. Other
criticisms included lack of adequate exposure information, bias in the recall of exposure, and lack of a clear
dose response relationship. Despite their deficiencies,
however, the Swedish studies pointed out the need for
further investigations.
After the Swedish reports, case-control studies were
made of New Zealand agricultural workers exposed to
phenoxy herbicides (Smith et al., 1984; Pierce et al.,
1986) and Vietnam veterans possibly exposed to Agent
Orange, a 1:1 mixture of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T (Greenwald
et al., 1984). The results showed no increased risk of
cancer due to exposure. These studies also have been
criticized for some of the same reasons as were the
Swedish studies. A more recent report presents results of
a case-control study in Washington state (Woods et al.,
1987). It shows a small increased risk of NHL in forestry
workers and farmers who may have had prolonged exposure to herbicides and other types of occupational
chemicals, but the results also show that increased risk
could not be associated with any specific phenoxy herbicide product, including 2,4-D.
A number of cohort studies have been conducted using
individuals known to have experienced exposure to

60

WHITE MALES, 1975-84
40

t; 30

10

Hlii......
:-&gt;„

Figure 1. Increases in cancer incidence over a ten-year period in the
United States. (From: 1986 Annual Cancer Statistics Review, December 1986, National Cancer Institute). The large
increase in lung cancer in females is believed to result from a
change in smoking habits many years ago. The cause is unknown for the increase in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL)
in both sexes. Decreases in some forms of cancer have
occurred over this period and are not shown here.

2,4-D. The Ranch Hand report on Air Force Personnel
(Wolfe ct al., 1985), the Ontario Hydro Study on Forestry
Workers (Green, 1986) and a report on manufacturing
personnel (Bond et al., in press) all indicate no link
between 2,4-D exposure and cancer of any type. Although each of these studies contains relatively few
exposed individuals, thus limiting their ability to detect
an association between 2,4-D and the disease, it is persuasive that all three have obtained the same result.
The Kansas Study
For unknown reasons, deaths from NHL have increased 20 to 30% since 1975 across the United States
(Figure 1; National Cancer Institute, 1986). Investigators
assume causes for such an increase may have occurred 10
to 20 years ago. What factors could have contributed to
this steady, gradual rise? National Cancer Institute

�(NCI) epidemiologists questioned whether the introduction of herbicides into general agricultural use after
1946 could be a contributing factor. Geographic frequency maps of these lymphomas suggested possible
higher incidence in agricultural areas in Iowa, Nebraska,
Minnesota, and Kansas (Pickle et al., 1987; Cantor,
1982). These are areas where herbicide use has been
quite intensive.
Realizing that multiple causes of cancers such as HD,
STS, and NHL may exist, NCI investigators launched a
well-designed case-control study in Kansas attempting to
find an association between these cancers and exposure
of farmers to herbicides, including 2,4-D. Scientists used
a statewide cancer registry in which all cases of the three
cancers detected within six years had been recorded.
There were about 200 cases of each of the three types of
cancer. People having these tumors were matched with
control persons who did not have cancer. Researchers
matched control (noncancer) persons using age, sex,
race, and vital status (living or dead), since the study
included both living and deceased cases.
Results of the Kansas study were widely publicized in
the mass media, with news reports leaving the impression
that exposure to 2,4-D produced an increased risk of
cancer. The study did conclude that herbicide exposure
to farmers under certain circumstances produced a
higher incidence of NHL, but unlike the earlier Swedish
studies, researchers found no association between herbicide exposure and STS and HD. Thus, the Kansas study
only partially supported the Swedish results. This lack of
complete agreement between different epidemiologic
studies is not unexpected. A general lack of agreement
among epidemiologic studies attempting to link 2,4-D
and cancer has existed.
The Kansas study results indicate that farmers
exposed to herbicides more than 20 days per year show a
six-fold increased risk of NHL relative to nonfarmers.
Farmers who didn't take protective measures when using
herbicides showed the highest risk. Farmers who used
protective measures or who did not directly apply the
herbicide themselves experienced no increased risk of
NHL. Should other studies confirm these results, it
would indicate that if a true risk of cancer from phenoxy
herbicide exposure exists, users can reduce it to very low
or undetectable levels when they take appropriate care
applying the chemicals.
The Kansas and Swedish studies do agree that there is
a link between herbicide exposure and NHL. Scientists
have argued, however, that the Kansas study contains
several weaknesses which would tend to invalidate its
conclusion that 2,4-D exposure results in an increased
risk of developing NHL. (MacMahon, 1986; Morgan,
1986).
A fundamental problem with a case-control study is
lack of accurate recall in an interview (Bradburn et al.,

Non-Hodgkins
Lymphoma

Colon/Rectum
14.3%

3.4%

Oral
3.2%

Lung
15.7%
Fifteen Other Sites
31.3%

Figure 2. Incidence in 1984 (age-adjusted) of various sites of cancer in
men and women of all races. (Data taken from 1986 Annual
Cancer Statistics Review, National Cancer Institute, U.S.
Public Health Service, page HI-B-19)

1987). Farmers in the Kansas study were asked to
remember details of herbicide application that occurred
over 20 years ago. If a farmer had died of cancer, his
widow or children were asked to recall details such as the
type of herbicide, the number of years of use and the
days used each year. It is unlikely that an accurate
picture of exposure can be gained this way. Certain results of the Kansas study show these inaccuracies. For
example, 75% of farmers or their relatives said they used
no herbicides on their farms. This result cannot be
correct given Kansas agricultural practices. This then is
an example of large scale under-reporting of herbicide
use.
A consistent dose-response relationship docs not exist
in the data obtained from Kansas farmers. Comparing
cancer patients who had used herbicides for more than
26 years with those using them for six years did not show
that longer use caused a higher risk of NHL. Another
criticism is that the number of cancer cases in each
exposure group was small. Often researchers calculated
an increased risk based on the assignment of two to five
cancer cases to a particular exposure group. Because the
degree of exposure was based on memory or recall during
an interview, which is recognized to be a relatively inaccurate process, errors in the assignment of cancer cases
to a particular exposure group are expected. With so few
cases in each exposure group, a small number of inaccurate exposure assignments can invalidate the conclusion that a particular exposure group exhibits a
higher cancer risk.
NHL is a relatively rare form of cancer, representing
3.4% of all cancer cases nationally (Figure 2; National

�Cancer Institute, 1986). The small number of cases in a
farming state such as Kansas makes detection of a
cancer-causing effect of herbicides extremely difficult. If
herbicide exposure in connection with farming causes a
slight increase in NHL, relatively few cases can be expected to occur from this type of exposure. If a cancer
with a higher incidence in the population (e.g., lung or
colon/rectum) were being studied in connection with
2,4-D use, a larger number of cases would be involved
and the likelihood of obtaining a statistically valid conclusion would be increased.
In spite of criticisms, the Kansas study is believed to
represent a useful epidemiologic study. Such studies are
recognized to have inherent problems and limitations
(Colton, 1986), but most experts reviewing the Kansas
study acknowledge the skill, size, scope, and quality
of the investigation. They do not agree with the authors,
however, that it is a strong or specific finding. Where
does this leave the reader and the public? In general,
knowledgeable scientists do not feel confident in connecting NHL and unprotected, prolonged use of 2,4-D.
Nonetheless, it can be acknowledged that a statistical
association has been revealed among a very small subgroup of Kansas farmers who applied herbicides without
protection for an extended period of time. Researchers
did not investigate whether viral infection, family history
of cancer and radiation exposure—all suspected causes

of NHL—could have occurred more frequently in the
herbicide-exposed farmers. Nevertheless, readers must
accept results from the Kansas study as a single piece
of evidence in the solution of a puzzle demanding many
pieces of evidence. It does not represent sufficient proof
that exposure of the public to 2,4-D under its normal use
constitutes a cancer risk. Other evidence is necessary,
and this should become apparent upon reading subsequent sections of this report.
Ongoing Studies
At the present time, two other large case-control
studies are in progress that will yield additional information on phenoxy herbicide exposure as a possible cause of
cancer in humans. These studies are similar to the
Kansas study and are being conducted in Iowa, Minnesota, and Nebraska by investigators from the National
Cancer Institute. Those studies may or may not
eventually confirm results found in Kansas. A preliminary report of results obtained in Iowa and Minnesota
presented at a Soil Science Society of America meeting,
indicates that no increased risk of NHL in farmers
exposed to 2,4-D occurred (Cantor and Blair, 1986). Regardless of the final outcome of these studies, more
definitive information will be available after their completion in 1988.

�Human Exposure to 2,4-D
Consideration of possible adverse human health
effects caused by 2,4-D requires knowledge of the extent
of human exposure to the chemical. Assessing human
exposure is one of the most difficult steps in calculating
human health risks ascribed to chemicals. This section
of the report will consider human exposure to the herbicide 2,4-D as it may occur in factory workers, chemical
applicators, and in the general public.

Manufacturing Personnel
Epidemiologists have conducted studies on the health
of factory workers manufacturing 2,4-D. Most published cohort epidemiological studies on the health of
workers engaged producing 2,4-D do not include information on the amounts of 2,4-D to which they were
exposed. One noteworthy exception is the mortality
study by Bond et al. (1987). That report gives results of
industrial hygiene measurements in 2,4-D-exposed
workers performing different types of manufacturing
operations from 1949 to 1983. Researchers measured
concentrations of 2,4-D in the air surrounding workers.
The highest amount of the herbicide found in the air was
4 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3). This occurred in
1949 and involved operation of a drier. The next highest
level recorded that year was 0.4 mg/m3. These amounts
were reduced over the years in that operation. By 1983
values ranged from none detected to 0.01 mg/m3.
In these workers, no excessive deaths occurred from
cancer or any other disease that scientists could attribute
to 2,4-D exposure. Particular attention was given to
studying the possibility of increased brain tumors, soft
tissue sarcomas and lymphatic cancers in the workers.
Like many cohort epidemiological studies, this one had
relatively small numbers of subjects available for study.
However, the results showing a lack of association
between 2,4-D exposure and cancer conform to those
from other studies of workers engaged in manufacturing
2,4-D (Axelson et al., 1980; Riihimaki et al., 1982;
Wiklund and Halm, 1986). These studies, each containing small numbers of exposed individuals, combine
to give substantial evidence that a cause and effect
relationship between 2,4-D exposure and mortality from
any cause docs not exist.

2,4-D or other herbicides that enter the bodies of applicators. Much of this variation is due to decided differences in applicators' work habits and hygienic practices.
Some did not wash their hands, wore the same clothes all
week long, and cleaned out plugged sprayer nozzles by
blowing through them with their mouths. Others wore
rubber gloves and supervisors made sure they avoided
excessive contact with the herbicide. These workers
washed their hands after contact with herbicides and
changed clothes and showered daily. However, these
reports all agree on the following: (1) inhalation of 2,4-D
from the atmosphere due to spraying operations is
minimal and need not be considered when determining
worker exposure; (2) the major route of exposure is
dermal, especially from hand contamination; (3) only
about 6% of 2,4-D deposited on the skin is absorbed
and the absorption rate is slow; (4) absorbed 2,4-D is
excreted rapidly in the urine; and (5) the total amount of
2,4-D excreted in urine is approximately the same as that
absorbed into the body after herbicide exposure.
Forestry Applicators
An excellent study by Frank et al. (1985) concerned the
exposure of forestry workers engaged in applying 2,4-D
from helicopters at the rate of 1.4 pounds per acre. This
study is of particular interest because herbicide application in forests has been a major concern to some people,
and has generated great attention from the media. The
report includes two noteworthy points. First, from estimates of 2,4-D in urine, the highest dose to any worker
was 0.022 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) of body
weight per day. One method of judging the risk of 2,4-D
exposure to humans is to compare this dosage with an
acceptable daily intake (ADI)a of the herbicide in our
diet. In 1971 the United Nations World Health Organization (WHO) and the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) appointed scientific panels which established
an acceptable daily dietary intake of 2,4-D of 0.3 mg/kg
of body weight per day. Comparing a 0.022 mgAg/day
dose in the highest exposed forestry worker to the ADI
value of 0.3 mg/kg/day, workers could absorb approximately 15 times more 2,4-D before reaching the level
scientists have deemed an unacceptable daily intake.
The second major point of Frank et al. (1985) arose

Applicator Exposure
Applicator exposure to phenoxy herbicides, especially
2,4-D, has been carefully studied in Canada, Europe,
Turkey, Scandinavia, and the United States. Research
results vary considerably as to the actual amounts of

a

An ADI is the estimated maximum amount of a material that people
could eat every day of their lives without harmful effects and is based
on knowledge gained from laboratory animal studies. An ADI value
is calculated using a safety factor to account for sensitivity differences among humans and between humans and laboratory animals.

�8
from results obtained from a human volunteer who stood
directly under the spray swath for a single exposure.
The chemical was applied at a rate of 1.4 Ib of 2,4-D per
acre and from a height of 36.6 feet.
This is
approximately twice the rate that workers would apply to
a lawn. To create a "worst case" situation, spray was
allowed to dry and the volunteer did not shower or
change clothing. The amount absorbed was 0.44% of the
total amount of 2,4-D deposited on the skin and clothing
(shorts, T-shirt and sneakers). It totaled 0.0045 mg/kg of
body weight. In this exaggerated exposure case, the dose
of 2,4-D was only 1.5% of the ADI value for 2,4-D. Using
the latest no-observed-effect-level (NOEL)*3 of 1 mg/kg
for 2,4-D in laboratory animals (Mullison et al., 1986),
this exaggerated human exposure resulted in a dose more
than 200 times below that dose to which rats have been
exposed for a lifetime without showing any adverse
health effects. Since this result was from an exaggerated
exposure situation created around one person, other
researchers may or may not be able to reproduce its results. Nevertheless, the result agrees with other results
indicating that exposure of 2,4-D to applicators or bystanders is not likely to produce overt toxicity.
Kohli et al. (1974) and Sauerhoff et al. (1976) conducted experiments to study the metabolism and excretion of 2,4-D. Human volunteers ingested single doses of
5 mg/kg of 2,4-D without observed ill effects. The rapid
excretion of 2,4-D in the urine found in this study indicates that the chemical will not accumulate in the body
upon repeated exposure. Nash et al. (1982) state that a
50- or 60-year-old, 80 kg (175 Ibs.) farm or forestry
worker with 30 years' exposure to 2,4-D for 30 days each
year, may absorb and excrete 900 mg of 2,4-D in a
lifetime. A lifetime intake in applicators ranging from 36
mg to 2900 mg has been calculated from urinary excretion data as reported by the Canadian Centre for Toxicology (1987). The range of exposures is large because
the extent of lifetime exposure depends upon the total
number of days during which an applicator applies
2,4-D.

General Public
A common use for 2,4-D is to control weeds in turf,
particularly home lawns. What are the health risks when
home "do-it-yourself" applicators treat their lawns?
The answer to this question can be formulated using two
primary factors: First, an estimate of the toxicity of
2,4-D to humans and second, an estimate of the human
exposure resulting from an application to a lawn.
Spraying 2,4-D as a liquid or applying it in a granular
b NOEL is the daily dose that causes no adverse effects when fed to
laboratory animals for extended periods (up to a lifetime).

fertilizer are the two usual methods by which 2,4-D is
applied to lawns. The chances of human exposure are
greater with spraying than with the use of the granular
form because 2,4-D liquid concentrate normally is used
to prepare the actual spray solution that is applied.
Splashes and spills can occur when handling the concentrate, resulting in possible exposure to any part of the
body that is not protected. Applicators may also have
contact with the spray itself unless they wear protective
clothing. By contrast, when the herbicide is applied with
a granular fertilizer, the applicator does not handle a
2,4-D concentrate. Most fertilization is done using small
gravity-fed mechanical devices an applicator pulls or
pushes across the lawn. Since fertilizer particles are
larger and more dense than spray droplets, they are less
likely to be blown by the wind. Furthermore, applicators stand little chance of absorbing 2,4-D from the dry
particles when they walk in shoes on treated grass.
Two other aspects of exposure to 2,4-D when it is used
for weed control in lawns are the length of time required
to treat a lawn and the number of treatments per season.
Estimates show a lawn of moderate size, perhaps 50 feet
x 100 feet, would require a maximum of one hour to treat
whether sprayed or fertilized. Lawns measuring !/2 to %
of an acre probably would not require more than three
hours. For large areas the applicator probably would use
larger and more efficient equipment. Typically, 2,4-D is
applied once or twice during the season, often with ten or
more weeks between applications. A home owner
spraying a large lawn twice a season could have skin exposure for a maximum of six hours. When compared to
exposure commercial applicators and certain agricultural workers experience, this represents a much lower
health risk situation. If homeowners wear protective
clothing—always a prudent precaution when spraying
any pesticide—they increase their margin of safety.
Scientists have collected some data from experiments
measuring the actual human exposure to 2,4-D from a
lawn application. A commercial lawn care company
studied 45 of its employees over a period of three work
weeks to determine the amount of 2,4-D they absorbed
when applying the herbicide (Yeary, 1986). The 45
workers were stationed at five different locations. The
daily amount of 2,4-D that entered their bodies as
estimated from urinary excretion measurements varied
from 0.0025 mg/kg to 0.0035 mg/kg of body weight.
Since the ADI value is 0.3 mg/kg, it was concluded that
an adequate safety margin existed for the lawn care
applicators. Approximately 100 times more 2,4-D would
have to enter a worker's body each day before reaching
the ADI value.
A frequent question people ask concerning 2,4-D is the
extent of exposure that occurs from walking or sitting on
newly sprayed lawns. Data measuring this type of

�exposure are not abundant, but some information is
available from which estimations using an exaggerated
"worst case" situation can be made. Thompson et al.
(1986) provided information indicating the amount of
2,4-D that can be dislodged from a dry, newly sprayed
lawn. Based on their results, a commonly used application rate of 0.75 Ib/acre would give a dislodgeable
residue of 0.35 mg of 2,4-D per square foot of lawn on the
day of application. The imagined situation is one in
which a child plays on a lawn that, unknown to the
parents, has been sprayed with 2,4-D. Assuming that a
22 Ib (10 kg) unclothed baby rolled on 10 square feet of
this lawn, absorbing 6% of the dislodged 2,4-D through
the skin, that child would receive a dose of 0.02 mg/kg of
2,4-D. How does this dose compare to a dose that has
produced no harmful effects (including cancer) in
laboratory animals given 2,4-D in the diet for a lifetime?
Rats and mice have received 1 mg/kg per day in the diet
for a lifetime without measurable changes occurring in
any organs or tissues (Mullison, 1986). Assuming a
similar sensitivity to that of test animals, the baby could
receive a 50-fold higher dose and still not be above a dose
that can be given to animals for a lifetime without
causing adverse effects. For another comparison, the
baby would receive a dose totaling 7% of the ADI, taking
that value as a safe standard. These types of calculations provide some assurance that exposures during or
after lawn treatment with 2,4-D are low. Comparison
with results from animal studies show they represent no
real health concern. However, it would be reassuring to
have substantiating information on exposure derived
from actual measurements of 2,4-D excretion in the
urine of persons who had been in contact with sprayed
lawns. Researchers could construct more accurate estimates if they possessed better information on exposure
resulting from 2,4-D treated lawns.
Environmental Sources of Exposure
It is worthwhile to briefly consider the general public's
exposure to 2,4-D in air, soil, food, and water (Mullison,
1987). The concentration of 2,4-D in the air during spray
application was 2.1 micrograms per cubic meter (ug/m3).
Subsequent dilution in the general air mass reduces the

general public's exposure away from the spraying area to
extremely low amounts.
For many years Food and Drug Administration officials have conducted market basket surveys to determine
pesticide levels in food. From 1965 to 1970, they found
negligible traces of 2,4-D (15,000 times less than the ADI
ofO.3 mg/kg)in the food (Mullison, 1981). From 1971 to
1973, they found an even smaller amount. From 1974 to
1985 they found no trace of 2,4-D. Soil surveys in agricultural use areas have shown little or no 2,4-D, which is
not surprising since 2,4-D undergoes rapid degradation
in soil under good plant growth conditions. Broadleaf
plants are very sensitive to 2,4-D and can show the
chemical's presence in soil. Over the 40 years that 2,4-D
has been applied, under normal use conditions, no
reports of its accumulation or persistence in soil at
concentrations harmful to plant life have been reported
in the scientific literature.
Water is a natural resource that is receiving a great
deal of research attention. Several general surveys have
shown 2,4-D does not accumulate in rivers, lakes, or
groundwater. Traces occasionally have been found
(usually less than 1 part per billion parts of water (ppb)
or 0.001 mg/liter). In light of the large amount of laboratory data on levels of 2,4-D harmful to animals, this low
amount cannot be considered a problem. Federal regulations published in 1975 allow 100 ppb of 2,4-D in
drinking water and a March 31, 1987 EPA health advisory indicates that lifetime exposure should not involve
drinking water containing more than 70 ppb.
Conclusions Regarding Exposure
Information is available on the exposure of farmers,
foresters, pesticide applicators, and the general public to
2,4-D. It shows that persons are not exposed to
hazardous amounts of 2,4-D when label recommendations and prescribed methods of application are used.
This statement can be made in view of the short life of
2,4-D in the environment; its rapid excretion in
mammals, including humans; its moderate acute
toxicity; and except for occasional traces, its virtual
absence from the food we eat, the water we drink, and
the air we breathe.

�10

Toxicity Studies in Laboratory Animals
The potential for 2,4-D to produce harmful effects in
man can be estimated using knowledge gained from
studies of its toxic effects in laboratory animals. Researchers have conducted and reported on animal
toxicity tests throughout the more than 40 years that
2,4-D has been used as a herbicide. Hundreds of
relevant scientific reports have been published. This
report makes no attempt to review them. Rather, we will
provide a discussion of the importance and limitation of
animal studies and summarize the conclusions that can
be drawn regarding the potential toxicity of 2,4-D in
humans.
Advantages and Limitations of Animal Studies
Animal toxicity studies continue to be an integral and
essential part of evaluating human risks. While a variety
of microbial, cellular and tissue systems are available for
screening selected potential effects, a thorough evaluation of the response of a complex mammalian animal
system remains the most comprehensive way to test the
toxicity of a chemical. Part of the science of toxicology is
extrapolating from experimental effects in animals to
human risk. Animal testing presents sonic unique
advantages and some distinct limitations in the risk evaluation process.
An advantage of animal testing is that researchers can
deliver measured dosages of chemicals in a controlled
manner by several exposure routes. They can use appropriate controls at each important phase of research.
Because certain laboratory animals can ingest, absorb,
metabolize, and excrete chemicals similarly to man,
attempts are made to select test animals that handle each
specific tested chemical in a manner most similar to
humans. Thus, the species of test animal is important.
For one chemical mice may make better predictors for
humans, while for a different chemical, rats may be more
predictive.
Increasing response to increasing dosage is another
basic principle of toxicology. Animal dosing studies are
valuable, because controlled chemical administration
can be used to elicit the dose-response relationship in a
predictable manner.
The more predictable and
controlled a test animal's response, the more reliably
researchers can make comparisons to human beings.
Another advantage in using test animals is that researchers can select age, sex, state of health, nutritional
factors and reproductive status, which may facilitate prediction for specific human populations such as the
developing fetus or a malnourished individual. Thus,
prediction is enhanced by being able to target specific
risk factors. In addition, chemical administration can be

selected for short- or long-term evaluation. This can be
done over an animal's entire life, as in cancer studies.
Animals may be given dosages of chemicals substantially beyond the expected human exposure. This fact
allows the fullest expression of adverse response and
increases assurance that the possibility of a toxic
response in humans will not be missed. Commonly, the
lowest dosage in animals causing no observed effect,
NOEL, is used to calculate an ADI for man. Usually, the
NOEL determined in animals is divided by a factor of
100 to 2,000 to calculate an ADI for humans. In this way
a safety factor is introduced to insure that humans are
protected should they be more sensitive to a particular
chemical than arc laboratory animals.
Some inherent limitations of animal studies must be
considered: (1) The genetic makeup of all animals is
unique, and one can never find an animal model that is
exactly the same as the human. (2) Spontaneous disease
in animals may alter the response to chemicals in a way
not duplicated by human disease. (3) Animals usually do
not live as long as humans. (4) Animals possess different
metabolic rates than humans. (5) Anatomical differences
from humans such as placental type may not allow
precise prediction of placental response or fetal susceptibility to chemicals. (6) For cancer studies, spontaneous
tumors in an animal population may be quite different
than in humans. (7) Homogeneity of responses in
animals may not adequately reflect heterogeneity in the
human population. (8) Seasonal and diurnal variables
maybe important in animal studies but not applicable to
a human population. (9) Finally, it should be noted that
animal studies use relatively small numbers of subjects
due to logistical and cost factors. Such studies must
depend on tightly controlled experimental conditions
and statistical evaluation of the results.
Toxicity of 2,4-D from Single and Repeated Doses
Laboratory animal studies evaluating the ability of
2,4-D to cause death after a single high dose have
indicated that the chemical shows moderate acute
toxicity (World Health Organization, 1984). The LDfo
(lethal dose in 50% of the animals tested) ranges between
300 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg, depending on the animal
species and the type of 2,4-D formulation tested (World
Health Organization, 1984). Dogs are slightly more
sensitive than most species to 2,4-D's lethal effect. In
that species the LDso is approximately 100 mg/kg.
Humans have ingested large amounts of 2,4-D in suicide
attempts and have survived single doses on the order of
100 mg/kg (Berwick, 1970). It is not unreasonable to

�11
speculate that the LD$Q in humans is in the same range
as that for the majority of animal species tested.
Lethality studies also have been conducted by
administering smaller doses of 2,4-D each day over a 3to 16- week period. Researchers have tested many
species and compiled the results for review (World
Health Organization, 1984). These studies indicate that
scientists have observed no adverse effects at doses of 30
mg/kg/day in rats or 10 mg/kg/day in dogs. Other
toxicity studies indicate that 2,4-D is not extremely more
toxic when given over a long period of time because the
chemical does not accumulate in the body after prolonged exposure.
Researchers do not know the precise cause of death
after ingestion of large doses of 2,4-D. Damage to
muscles and nerves controlling muscular movement has
been suggested in the acute (single, high dose) toxicity of
the chemical (Singer et al., 1982; World Health Organization, 1984; Wagner, 1983). Recent neurological
studies in laboratory animals, however, do not indicate
an effect of 2,4-D on the nervous system (Toyoshima et
al., 1985; Mattsson, Albee et al., 1986, Mattsson, Johnson et al., 1986). The occurrence of 2,4-D toxicity after a
massive dose in humans represents a rare situation and
detailed information from this type of medical emergency
is not readily available.
Studies of the toxicity of 2,4-D given in single, high
doses may not help to predict human effects from 2,4-D
that might occur when applicators use the chemical as a
herbicide. More relevant are studies in which animals
are exposed to much lower doses of 2,4-D for nearly a
lifetime. Recent results from lifetime feeding tests show
no adverse effects in rats and mice fed 1 mg/kg/day
(Mullison, 1986). Somewhat higher daily doses than
these (e.g., 45 mg/kg) produce a loss of body weight and
slight changes in the kidneys of the animals, while still
higher doses will shorten their lifespan.
Researchers have tested whether or not 2,4-D causes
birth defects and altered reproduction in laboratory
animals. Results from studies in several different species
have been compiled (Wagner, 1983). Doses greater than
80 mg/kg to pregnant animals will cause some fetal
death. Lower doses show lesser effects in offspring (e.g.,
lower birth weight). Doses below 10 mg/kg to pregnant
rats produce no adverse effects on offspring.
Harmful effects of 2,4-D observed in testing laboratory
animals occur at doses that are very high compared to
those occurring in humans using 2,4-D.
Human
exposure to single or multiple life threatening doses of
2,4-D only occurs in an accidental or catastrophic
situation, or due to intentional ingestion. On the other
hand, we know that low doses of some chemicals can
produce cancer. Safety testing of most chemicals
includes animal tests to evaluate their potential for
causing cancer.

Cancer Testing Using Laboratory Animals
Cancer represents a change in normal cells resulting in
their uncontrolled growth and loss of normal function.
Cells in the body that are transformed by cancer can exist
in a particular organ, such as the lung. They may
multiply to produce a tumor which eventually damages
the organ. Cancer cells may spread to other organs,
causing multiple sites of damage. This uncontrolled
growth and spread may continue until death ensues.
The process by which normal cells change into cancer
cells is called carcinogenesis. Both chemicals occurring
in nature and synthetic chemicals may cause cancer.
Viruses, bacteria, other life forms, and radiation may
also contribute to the carcinogenic process.
Normal cells may transform into cancer cells, involving
at least two distinct stages termed initiation and
promotion. Initiation, the first and primary event, involves a change in DNA, the genetic material carried in
all cells of the body. A chemical could cause change by
attaching itself to DNA or by participating in biochemical processes ultimately resulting in abnormal DNA.
Creation of abnormal DNA in a cell also can occur spontaneously, unrelated to the presence of a foreign chemical.
Cells can repair DNA damage, whether it is caused
normally or due to attack from foreign chemicals. However, sometimes the repair system is overwhelmed by an
excess of a DNA-damaging chemical. If a cell does not
repair damaged DNA, it is initiated or primed to change
into a cancer cell. Then the initiated cell undergoes a
chemically-induced change called promotion. A chemical acting as a promoter changes an initiated cell into a
cancer cell. Scientists do not understand the processes
connected with promotion as well as those connected
with initiation. A single chemical can act both as an
initiator and a promoter, producing cancer by itself. In
other cases, two chemicals are involved, one causing
initiation and another causing promotion. Chemicals
that act only as promoters will not damage DNA. They
can only cause cancer if critical DNA damage already
has occurred as the result of naturally-occurring events
or due to the presence of a DNA-damaging foreign
chemical.
Laboratory tests are available to determine whether
chemicals can act as initiators or promoters. Several
procedures are available to examine whether a particular
chemical can damage DNA. These tests often use animal
cells or bacteria and are usually carried out in a test tube.
They require only 1 to 2 days and can detect initiators
(also called genotoxic or mutagenic chemicals). A chemical causing unrepaired DNA damage will produce
detectable mutations in cells growing in a test tube.
This provides a signal that the chemical may cause
cancer. Short-term tests for chemicals that act as pro-

�12
moters are not yet available. Current methods to detect a
promoter require its repeated administration to animals
that have previously received a single dose of a DNAdamaging chemical. Detection of promoters requires
waiting months for animals to develop tumors or lesions
that will become tumors. Tests for initiators (mutagenic
chemicals) are performed regularly, but tests for
chemical promoters are carried out less frequently.
The ability of a chemical to produce cancer (i.e.
tumors) in laboratory animals is usually assessed before
the government approves that chemical for a use that
may involve human exposure. Cancer tests are conducted by exposing rats and mice to the chemical for
nearly a lifetime period (approximately two years). The
chemical is usually placed in the animals' feed, but can
be given by other means. Individual groups of animals
are given different amounts of chemical in their feed. A
control group receives no chemical treatment. Typically,
three different amounts of chemical are given to three
groups of animals for low-, medium-, and high-dose
treated groups. Researchers choose a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for the highest dose. This MTD produces some measurable effect on the animal, such as a
small loss of body weight besides possibly causing cancer.
Lower-dose animal groups may exhibit no obvious effects
from the chemical and may or may not produce cancer as
determined by microscopic analysis. Even the lowest
dose administered usually will be much higher than that
to which humans may be exposed each day. Scientists
must use high doses in these animal tests because their
goal is to detect a chemical's cancer-causing potential.
It would be useless in animal cancer tests to attempt to
mimic expected human exposure. Relative sensitivities
of animals and humans to cancer induction are never
known at the time researchers conduct the test.
After approximately two years of chemical exposure
(about the lifetime of the test animal), the animals are
sacrificed. Using microscopic techniques to visualize
structural details of the tissue, pathologists examine all
major organs for evidence of cancer. The number of cancer sites (tumors) in each animal is recorded. A certain
number of animals in each study group may be sacrificed
after one year of exposure to examine whether tumors are
present at a younger age.
Tumors may be present in some control animals, i.e.,
animals that receive no chemical treatment. These
animals exhibit the normal rate of cancer due to causes
not related to chemical exposure. If significantly more
animals in the treated groups exhibit tumors than in the
control group, the inference is made that the chemical
caused an increased incidence of cancer. More animals
should exhibit cancer as test chemical doses increase.
This dose-related increase in cancer incidence strengthens the conclusion that the chemical causes cancer. A

small increase in cancer incidence observed only in the
animals receiving the highest dose is somewhat less conclusive. Cancer testing also must determine a dose that
docs not produce an increase in tumor incidence. No increase in tumors related to chemical exposure should
appear in animals receiving the lowest test dose of the
chemical.
Attempts to detect cancer-causing properties of
chemicals using relatively high doses in laboratory
animals represent well-accepted procedures in toxicology. Researchers have found many cancer-causing
chemicals this way. They have associated only a small
fraction of these chemicals with cancer occurrence in
humans. Two reasons suggest themselves for why
humans exposed to chemicals that produce cancer in laboratory animals do not show increased cancer rates.
First, epidemiologic methods used to detect causes of
cancer in humans are less sensitive than the animal
testing procedures described above. Next, laboratory
animals are not always identical to humans in their responses to chemicals. Nevertheless, scientists rarely find
a human carcinogen that does not cause cancer in
animals. This degree of predictability provides a basis
for continued use of animal testing procedures to detect
cancer-causing chemicals and to estimate the risk of
chemical-induced cancer in humans.
Carcinogenicity of2,4-D in Animal Studies
Early attempts to determine if certain phenoxy herbicides cause cancer may have been confounded by traces
of dioxin impurities resulting from the chemical manufacturing process. The most notable example was the
presence of a potent, cancer-causing dioxin (2,3,7,8TCDD) in the herbicide 2,4,5-T. Dioxins occasionally
found in 2,4-D are not among the most toxic types of
these persistent chemicals (Environmental Protection
Agency, 1980). This explains why toxic changes observed in laboratory animals treated with high doses of
2,4-D over an extended period of time are not the same
as toxicity occurring from administering potent or nonpotent dioxins (EPA, 1980). Toxicity resulting from large
amounts of 2,4-D exposure in animals can be attributed
to the herbicide and not to dioxin contaminants. It
follows that //2,4-D exposure were to cause cancer in
laboratory animals, this could be attributed to the
herbicide and not to traces of nonpotent dioxins.
Whether or not 2,4-D itself may cause cancer in laboratory animals is not a new question. Oncogenicity
studies in both mice and rats were included in the initial
data for 2,4-D that were required by EPA. While no
carcinogenic effects were evident in rats, mice, or dogs,
the studies were considered insufficient under newer
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)

�13
Pesticide Assessment Guidelines. In 1980 the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) required that these
studies, in addition to many routine acute and chronic
toxicological studies be repeated for product registration
(Office of Pesticide Programs, EPA, 1980).
One of the leading scientific groups charged with the
safety evaluation of chemical substances, including food
additives, pesticides, dyes, and others, is IARC, the
International Agency for Research on Cancer. In both
1977 and 1982 IARC reviewed all available data on
2,4-D. It reported them inadequate for a definitive judgment on whether or not 2,4-D caused cancer in laboratory animals (IARC, 1977 and 1982). This was consistent with the EPA's decision to require additional
data.
Following the EPA call for more data, major manufacturers of 2,4-D formed an industry task force to
sponsor the very expensive studies required to re-register
their products. Two chronic feeding studies were commissioned by that task force. They have recently been
completed and submitted to the EPA. While their
results are subject to differences in interpretation, as
lifetime feeding studies often are, readers should consider results from these two most recent studies along
with previous data to address the question of whether or
not 2,4-D is carcinogenic in laboratory animals.
One of the recent lifetime feeding studies was conducted in Fischer 344 rats at dose levels that were clearly
in compliance with the requirement for an MTD (Hazelton Laboratories, 1986). Changes were seen in the kidneys of rats given highest doses. This satisfied the MTD
requirement. No abnormal changes were observed at the
lowest dose of 1 mg/kg/day. This result provides a
NOEL. Male rats, but not females, fed the highest dose
(45 mg/kg/day) exhibited a statistically higher frequency
than did concurrent study controls of a brain cell tumor
known as an astrocytoma. No increased incidence of
tumors occurred in rats given 1, 5, or 15 mg/kg of 2,4-D
each day. Researchers have argued that the higher
incidence of tumors in rats receiving the highest dose of
2,4-D is due to chance. Fischer 344 rats usually exhibit
tumor development at highly variable rates. Also, an
increased tumor incidence in only the highest dose group
docs not represent a clear dose-response phenomenon
and is not strongly supportive of the hypothesis that
2,4-D causes cancers. A report from the laboratory conducting this study stated, "This finding is, nevertheless,
suggestive of a possible carcinogenic effect at a dose of 45
mg/kg/day." Indeed, 2,4-D may be a weak neurocarcinogen in rats, but this effect has been questioned
because it has not obeen observed previously in
laboratory animals given 2,4-D. It also appears that
animal response characteristics in this study are not the

same as those previously observed in tests with other
neurocarcinogens (Koestner, 1986).
The second recently completed chronic feeding study
was conducted using mice from the cancer-sensitive
B6C3F1 strain (Hazleton Laboratories, 1986). Test
results exhibited no evidence of 2,4-D-related carcinogenicity in any tissue or organ system. Under current
policy for chronic studies submitted to the EPA, this
study did not achieve an MTD. That is, the highest dose
did not produce a loss of body weight or cause other signs
that the animals were not in good health. However, the
highest dose used in this study (45 mg/kg/day) was 600
times the maximum reported human exposure. Even at
this high dose no evidence appeared of increased incidence of cancers, including brain tumors.
Known neurocarcinogens in animals are generally
found to be mutagens. Scientists have conducted numerous mutagenicity studies on 2,4-D, both in vitro and in
vivo. They do not support the generalization that 2,4-D
is genotoxic (mutagenic). Recently, the Canadian Centre
for Toxicology (1987) assembled researchers to review in
great detail all available data from studies on 2,4-D that
pertain to its possible mutagenicity. This expert panel
examined 29 in vitro mutagenicity studies. Nineteen
were negative; of the remaining 10, nearly all resulted in
equivocal data (e.g., effects that were not dose-related or
from test material that was not adequately identified or
defined). Negative results were reported in tests using
both bacterial and mammalian cell lines. Some tests on
both cell lines showed positive results, but in all cases the
studies can be criticized because of the use of cytotoxic
doses, or conditions that in some way compromised their
validity.
In vivo studies on the genetic toxicity of 2,4-D also did
not confirm any suggestion of mutagenicity. Canadian
Expert Panel members reviewed twelve studies. Eight
were negative, one yielded equivocal data and three were
positive only at doses that otherwise are toxic to the
organism. Research has established that 2,4-D is cytotoxic at very high doses. Mutagenicity studies are readily
confounded by cytotoxicity or nonspecific cell damage.
This rather large battery of studies does not provide
convincing evidence that 2,4-D is mutagenic. As mentioned above, neuropathologists agree that neurocarcinogens generally are mutagens. All data showing a
lack of mutagenicity for 2,4-D add further doubt to an
interpretation that it produces an increased incidence of
astrocytomas in Fischer 344 rats.
Results from the most recent cancer studies in rats and
mice do not present a clear answer regarding whether or
not high doses of 2,4-D can cause an increase in tumors
in laboratory animals. These results arc not unexpected
because if a chemical is not carcinogenic, or is an

�14
extremely weak carcinogen in animals, tests often will
show mixed results. Tumors in rats and mice do
normally occur. A positive test requires a slight but
statistically significant increase in the normal tumor rate
as a result of 2,4-D administration. Repeated attempts
to show a slight increase in tumor rates with a noncarcinogen may produce a small percentage of incorrect
results, but the majority of such tests should yield correct
results. In the case of 2,4-D, a number of cancer studies
have been conducted in rats and mice, nearly all of which
have yielded results indicating that the chemical does not
cause an increase in the normal incidence of tumors.
In summary, evidence that feeding 2,4-D to laboratory
animals causes cancer remains very weak. When
assessed together with earlier animal studies, recent data
do not provide sufficient evidence to warrant a serious
concern that 2,4-D is an animal carcinogen. The results
are consistent with those from epidemiologic studies

which to date have not shown 2,4-D to increase the risk
of human cancer. Other scientists who have recently
reviewed available data from animal tests and epidemiologic studies in humans reached the same conclusion.
In March 1987 the Expert Panel on Carcinogcnicity of
2,4-D reported to the Ontario Ministry of the Environment that "the existing animal and human data are
insufficient to support the finding that 2,4-D is a carcinogen" (Canadian Centre for Toxicology, 1987). A Scientific Advisory Panel of the U.S. EPA consisting of
nationally recognized scientists from the academic
community has recommended to the agency that 2,4-D
be reclassified from a possible human carcinogen (Group
Q, to another chemical group (Group D). This reclassification recommendation shows the panel believes that
inadequate human and animal evidence exists for
classifying 2,4-D as a possible carcinogen for humans
(Koestner, 1987; Federal Register, 1986).

�15

REFERENCES
Axelson, O., L. Sundcll, K. Andersson, C. Edline, C. Hogstedt, and H.
Kling. 1980. Herbicide exposure and tumor mortality. Scand. J.
Work Environ. Health 6:73-79.
Berwick, P. 1970. 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid poisoning in man.
Some interesting laboratory and clinical findings. J. Amer. Med.
Assoc. 214:1114-1117.
Bond, G. G., N. H. Wetterstroem, G. L. Rousch, E. A. McLaren, T. E.
Lipps, and R. R. Cook. 1987. Cause-specific mortality among
employees engaged in the manufacture formulation or packaging of
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and related salts. British Journal of
Ind. Med. (in press).
Bradburn, N., L. J. Rips, S. K. Shevell. 1987. Answering autobiographical questions: The impact of memory and inference on surveys. Science 236:157-161.
Canadian Centre for Toxicology. 1987. Expert Panel Report on carcinogenicity of2,4-D. Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Cantor, K. P. 1982. Farming and mortality from non-Hodgkin's
lymphoma: A case-control study. Int. J. Cancer 29:239-247.
Cantor, K. P., A. Blair. 1986. Agricultural chemicals, drinking water,
and public health: An epidemiologic overview. Soil Science Society
of American Workshop Paper No. 2. Madison: Soil Science Society
of America.
Colton, T. 1986. An editorial, herbicide exposure and cancer. J.
American Med. Assoc. 256:1176-1177.
EPA, Residue Chemistry Branch, Hazard Evaluation Division. 1980.
Surveillance Index, Chemistry Data, 2,4-D. Washington, D.C.
Eriksson,M.,L.Hardell,N.O.Berg,T.Moller,and O. Axelson. 1981.
Soft tissue sarcomas and exposure to chemical substances: A case
reference study. Brit. J. Ind. Med. 38:27-33.
Federal Register, Vol. 51, No. 185, September 24,1986, p. 34000.
Frank, R.,R. A. Campbell, and G. J. Sirons. 1985. Forestry workers
involved in aerial application of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid
(2,4-D): exposure and urinary excretion. Arch. Environ. Contain.
Toxicol. 14:427-435.
Green, 1,. M. 1986. Mortality analysis of Ontario hydro forestry
tradesmen cohort 1950-1982. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Health
and Safety Division, Ontario Hydro.
Grecnwald, P., B. Kovasznay, D. N. Collins, and G. Thcrriault. 1984.
Sarcomas of soft tissue after Vietnam service. J. National Cancer
Inst.13: 1107-1109.
Hardell, I,, and A. Sandstrom. 1979. Case-Control Study. Soft tissue
sarcomas and exposure to phcnoxyacetic acids or chlorophenols.
Brit. J. Of Cancer 39:711-717.
Hazlcton Laboratories. 1986. Combined Toxicity and Oncogenicity
Study in Rats; 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid, final report. Vol. I.
Vienna, VA: Hazelton Laboratories America, Inc., Project No.
2184-103.
Hoar, S. K., A. Blair, F. A. Holmes, C. D. Boysen, R. J. Robel, R.
Hoover, and, J. F. Fraumeni. 1986. Agricultural herbicide use and
risk of lymphoma and soft tissue sarcoma. Journal of Amer. Med.
Assoc. 256:1141-1147.
IARC. 1977. 2,4-D and Esters. In: Some Fumigants, the Herbicides
2,4-D and 2,4,5-T, Chlorinated Dibenzodioxins and Miscellaneous
Industrial Chemicals. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man, Vol. 15. Lyon: Int'l. Agency
for Research on Cancer.
IARC. 1982. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans. Chemicals, Industrial Processes &amp; Industries Assoc. with Cancer in Humans. Monographs,
Supplement 4, pp. 101-103. Int'l. Agency for Research on Cancer.

Kocstner,A. 1986. The brain tumor issue in long-term toxicity studies
in rats. Fd. Chem. Toxicol. 24: 139-143.
Koestner, A. 1987. EPA Scientific Advisory Committee Member,
personal communication.
Kohli, J. D., R. N. Khanna, B. N. Gupta, M. M. Dhar, J. S. Tandon,
and K. P. Sircar. 1974. Absorption and excretion of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in man. Xenobiotica 4:97-100.
MacMahon, B. 1986. Review of Hoar et al. and Related Literature.
Response to EPA Purchase Order 6W-3948-NASA. Washington,
DC: Hazard Evaluation Division.
Mattsson, J. L., R. R. Albee, K. A. Johnson, and J. F. Quasi. 1986.
Neurotoxicologic examination of rats dermally exposed to 2,4-d
amine for three weeks. Neurobehavioral Toxicology and Teratology
8: 255-263.
Mattsson, J. L., K. A. Johnson, and R. R. Albee. 1986. Lack of neuropathologic consequences of repeated dermal exposure to 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in rats. Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 6: 175-181.
Morgan, D. P. 1986. Review of Hoar et al. and Related Literature,
September 15, 1986. Response to EPA. Washington, DC: Health
Evaluation Division.
Mullison, W. R. 1981. Public Concerns About the Herbicide 2,4-D.
Proc. Annual Meeting Western Society of Weed Science 34:154-193.
Mullison, W. R. 1986. An Interim Report Summarizing 2,4-D Toxicological Research, Sponsored by the Industry Task Force on 2,4-D
Research Data and a Brief Review of 2,4-D Environmental Effects.
Industry Task Force on 2,4-D Research Data. 7 pp. Washington,
DC: 2,4-D Industrial Task Force.
Mullison, W. R. 1987. Environmental fate of phenoxy herbicides in
the environment. J. W. Biggar and J. N. Seiber, Eds. Agricultural
Experiment Station, University of California-Davis: Division of
Agriculture and Natural Resources; Publ. 3320, pp. 121-131.
Nash, R. G., P. C. Kearney, J. C. Maitlen, C. R. Sell, and S. N. Fertig.
1982. Agricultural applicators, exposure to 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. In J. R. Plimmer, Ed. Pesticide Residues and Exposure.
A.C.S. Symposium Series 182, pp. 119-132.
National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control.
December 1986. 1986 Annual Cancer Statistics Review.
Office of Pesticides Programs. 1980. 2,4-D Fact Sheet. Washington,
DC: EPA.
Pickle, L. W., T. J. Mason, N. Howard, R. Hoover, and J. F. Fraumeni.
1987. Atlas of U.S. Cancer Mortality Among Whites: 1950-1980.
Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute.
Pierce, N. E., A. H. Smith, J. K. Howard, R. A. Shcppard, H. J. Giles,
and C. A. Teague. 1986. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and exposure to
phenoxyherbicides, chlorophenols, fencing work and meat works
employment: A case-control study. Brit. J. Ind. Med. 43:75-83.
Riihimaki, V.,S. Asp, and S. Hernberg. 1982. Mortality of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid herbicide applicators in Finland. Scand. J.
Work Environ. Health 8:37^2.
Sauerhoff, M. W., W. H. Braun, G. E. Blau, and J. E. LeBeau. 1976.
The fate of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) following oral
administration to man. Toxicol. and Appld. Pharmacd. 37:136137.
Singer, R. M., M. Moses, J. Valciukas, R. Lillis, and I. J. Selikoff.
1982. Nerve conduction velocity studies of workers employed in the
manufacture of phenoxy herbicides. Environ. Res. 29:297-311.
Smith, A. H., N. E. Pcarce, D. O. Fisher, H. J. Giles, C. A. Teague, and
J.K.Howard. 1984. Soft tissue sarcomas and exposure to phenoxyherbicides and chlorophenols in New Zealand. J. National Cancer
Inst. 73:1111-1117.

�16
Thompson, D. G., O. R. Stephenson, and M. K. Sears. 1986. Persistence, distribution and dislodgeable residues of 2,4-D following
its application to turfgrass. Pestic.Sci. 15:353-360.
Toyoshima, E., R. F. Moyer, S. R. Max, and C. Eccles. 1985. 2,4dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) Does not cause polyneuropathy
in the rat. Journ. Neuro. Sci. 70: 225-229.
Wagner, S. L. 1983. pp. 153-197. Clinical Toxicology of Agricultural
Chemicals. New Jersey: Noyes Data Corp.
Wiklund, K. and L. E. Halm. 1986. Soft tissue sarcoma risk in Swedish agricultural and forestry workers. J. Nat'l. Cancer Inst. 76:229234.
Wolfe, W. H., G. D. Lathrop, R. A. Albanese, and P. M. Moynahan.
1985. Epidemiologic investigation of health effects in Air Force
personnel following exposure to herbicides and associated dioxins.
Chemosphere 14: 707-716.

Woods, J. A., L. Polissar, R. K. Severson, L. S. Heuser, and B. G.
Kulander. 1987. Soft tissue sarcoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
in relation to phenoxyherbicide and chlorinated phenol exposure in
Western Washington. J. National Cancer Inst. 78:899-910.
World Health Organization. 1984. 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid
(2,4-D). Environmental Health Criteria, 29.
Yeary, R. A. 1986. Urinary excretion of 2,4-D in commercial lawn
specialists. AppliedInd. Hygiene 1:119-121.
World Health Organization. 1984. 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid
2,4-D). Environmental Health Criteria, 29.
Yeary, R. A. 1986. Urinary excretion of 2,4-D in commercial lawn
specialists. Applied Ind. Hygiene 1-119-121.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="17413">
              <text>054</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="17414">
              <text>1442</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="17418">
              <text>Series III Subseries II</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17415">
                <text>Comments from CAST</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17416">
                <text>1987-12-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17417">
                <text>Perspectives on the Safety of 2,4-D</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17419">
                <text>animal studies</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="17420">
                <text>cancer risk assessment</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="17421">
                <text>human exposure</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1535" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="7724">
              <text>029</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="7725">
              <text>0482</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="7729">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7722">
                <text>Belova, R. S.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="7723">
                <text>L. A. Sokolova</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7726">
                <text>Gigienai Sanitariya</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7727">
                <text>1971</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7728">
                <text>Toxicological Evaluation of the Herbicide 2,4-D-Butyric Acid From the Standpoint of Food Hygiene</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7730">
                <text>animal studies</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="7731">
                <text>dioxin</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="7732">
                <text>health effects</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3070" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1586">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/711ac6420f9aff7f3d5a95b56850972a.pdf</src>
        <authentication>74d315fb0c3923814c0c67e4f70b5f20</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63535">
                    <text>°1761

Item ID Number
Author
CorpOratB Author

Center for Environmental Health, CDC

ROpOrt/ArtiClO TltlO Typescript: Detailed Responses to Subcommittee
Questions on Dioxin, for the Record, September 1983

Journal/Book Title
Year

°000

Month/Day
Color

O

Number of Imaoes

31

DOSGTlptOU NotflS

Includes a memorandum from Edward N. Brandt to
PHS Agency Heads introducing the report.

Monday, June 11, 2001

Page 1762 of 1793

�0

STS-

1

0

�Public health Ssivice •'.'

DEPARTMENT. OF HEALTH &amp; HUMAN SERVICES

Date

•v*:-Tr~r: vTi";- •

v' •-. ; ^ :y :
:-:^^

,11 1983

From ' -'."V

'"

''.'' •'•'.'.''•• ' • • ' " , .

-.Assistant Secretary for Health

Subject •••i)'. 1 .'- : ••.»'*- ' ; ' ~ ' - -'-:-'•'•••;'.' ' ''•••''•'•••
1

'•

•'• •

.;-;% PHS Views on Dioxin • • • ' - . • " ' , .
,: ;(.-'«v,:^.1- ."'-,{}"- •'•.• "•'."'X 'i !; . : • : • • ' • _ ' ;

i

•:._'..'

' '"•• -| '"..•'

v

'

;

TO '\-': ^-]-^'"±^\:J^: ;-:•: • • . • • : • ; • ' . -, •;.
. PHS Agency.Heads
.. • .'-. . . , • • '
•!.. OASH Staff Office Directors, : ; ,-...•

;O'.Attached please find an updated copy of the PHS views on' dioxin. It reflects'/:. •;.;''all,"of,the .scientist?s""-vle\ta"i and will be updated periodically.
:;.. • ;;.//(;^: ;

' :.V^ :

;

'' ':;"-'f:iv'-'''''•''-''• ''''••" '''''•''&amp; t.''f-^'-\''i'i^.':-'--''~fi ''•'•'.•

'

v

^''•'^Shouid^'you

'

""•

''•-',-

:':''.•*: .'£1'!fr\'

I will be pleased to 'receive them.•&amp;££-**;?i

:

^;-J'Than!&lt;''y6u^^

•

; :• |.- -:]&amp;K^iMi^&amp;i&amp;^^

•'

':,«&gt;'•:.

.'.';., M""--;'--'.^.** •':•,•..,./...••;.¥•.,", pj'.'-" : &gt;'«.«?•' I " A ' ! ' " /*^

w«i&lt;V *

•1
r'.r?K

:
, . - r :?; i:-. ' " --•• "' • ••
:
'*i
' ;
-

. - • - . ,' : -.''. . ' s ;-,:•,.-•.^.v'-"-iW? ; 'f- J -'^•
"•
,'."" .-•-.' ')"" ••.!''•' •'•[•&gt; •-'^.••;-i&gt;.^ti'

!•. • ''«...j •'{••'. • • ' • : • • • •'. ' •- "• ••:'•-. ..-"• 'if-~ '!f; j-s *'•"••,•:'•
• • • . ; • ' ' • • • ' &gt;~,. .'-. •i ; - - . 7 !...i^ ,-••-.•.•!* :'.'S.::•.¥••:?*•&amp;.•••'&amp;.'•
.
..
. '
. " .'.. . ^» . -ai--*-i.* vi;^ '.. *-- i'
:
i t

%

•:•,--;:,-.•••.-• :::r-/----^;.^-^.;^i.^ ^^r
h

.,
'A;'::'::;'.r:'r"/',

•v'mMisnro'nite'•••;'
i^||ft:^&gt;;::-:Jjl5VV:e^-'-:;^.-^^t'':.
^jg tf £*'y:&amp;\\ Wf^M-^^
I\jriBliS;fv; . ' . - • • ?"i':.:'V;' 7 ;&gt;* • '-^ %-^V-f ?:?fi?.;V

jj^. :.;smplESBRAjCH,;

' W to. 4

- **"

-.; ^iigr; vrf • ; |5||5^ J?|^;;' ^ ff|l
••

•'. : ' ;: :; li^"
I •"•'.• '''^^••'1-'v.'it'?''.ifiii..&gt;.'.•';'.•'' ;.'••• - ^ . ' ^ r ^
j;'- -sr'-: : ..««&gt; . '••.;•• • : • " . ;-;••••'--V--:;-'••'•'••.-•••...••: • • • , ' • • ' •

�.

•M* I

I

'_.-_?

_. •••? '^ ^ J^ ^ _ » "•_

_' ^ •

-. I— —. __1 J * j^ _ T

L' . i. —. ^L J

:_£.!_.— J . _

_ ^ . L . L » _*K

bbta &gt;«L X- j*.

M. uh ^ f c . " ' t t ^ K i i B ^ , ^

I •• .4'3t j"Jh?,JtSii''_ "•- ^- --

::'~j''!'.,':'••!" C v' ' • .: ,.f-.' '•!;" 2 ?''"t ! i-'v*): .!. - • v.?'V*;V:.;,;.-:--U' £;•*.;;. ^Y-!£*~-$\#&gt;
!
V

.•-•.•;.•;•;••••' :'--7.ii^'.''.&gt;}.v--^-fV-*.-/f'S ?'• !-&gt;• ^-^';&gt;^,-:f f «-• 5 !-&gt;&gt; -.'

: :!'' ;: .-/.-.I I •'"'
1

- '

' ••"' • •''*

' v :"Vr. : ••^•'V' :*\" •"-^^•.'••.f •.V^j^ejj^'j;

-'j..' V / C » . ' • • . ' , • .' ; . - ^ i ^ ' v ^ : • • "v,^V;^:^^?^\;;.:^v.^|;^^

:'. pbseryatip^s;;ln;;humans;:are;;lirnited .to .accidental -^^rexposure^of^.^^f^

Lndiyibuals^or'"srnaii^grou^^

• • In .these instances,;, the;'ex?cj::^e^rele:

jf exposuFe'-'-i's'^'siJaliy': e i t H e r ^ u n k n o u J n ' o r j not Ivery'. weilscjejineatedJV ^o^.^hjje^e
m a s^^££#3^^
o n s / as:;ujeii:;;as:b1ecaus^v^:l]ong

animal ; i resejarc-h,^ .^animal^:

studies. 'ajj?e^u|e^2to^pr!edi*^J^^^
• '' eV

$S$-jJfcsH^

''Wr.e^foniej.^n'ce]rtain&lt;:Al^^^
:hereI
•J n
in

the "toxic • effects' v of;,chemicalsi 7sometijne^

/J-i £f At*ti'n£'' c'naV-n a e •&gt;•' * •'•': QXmei "nf' 4-l-io'e o • n » K»-I » 4- T rt n &lt;? , ma U . he

f^SIJSfid

D\J '-'•:''''^"^f-' ';••'':''-.: •'

�•^.".-•••i;, .*•;'•;.'•" \J''i,T;:;VSS'\-vMvt''v vP-'Vv-v-'' "•'li';,:i:'1s*r&gt;i^/C^$)r^.

•';';'*;".:;,'•"/•;;;.!.'~'.;? j v - &lt; : ' ' "{,'\f- '•'"•'. .••'•*•-':'" i •* ' '
• ^'••';Vi'-'^-^''''.i }':'-^'v.'&gt;•'•.'-!J" '?"'''' f'i'" .::'
1
;
-'•i'- -".-'.'.'-i.r.V.i'.S-.-';-,^'v'V.&lt;.7!-J-;.;i »;,'j

'.;.)'--"f -

'•j^-^F.r'^ i^^'^'S'^.^/C-!-'I?;.''
... . •.•.,•(*•-••»&gt;,- t,...r •• • -.

' ' '

W L4 I I vi v J -

I** )

**

f

•

/^*»,

* ^ ** *^ /

.' "*" ^

.

•,"

— .

, —

.

•

~

, .

* . &lt; . . - , • •..'

'

•"•-•-•i,-.:..; ::.;.M ',•-,-'•,-;'..
. %:'C •:* fi(fn -?-i&lt;i:' •

'

.' ••• i.

'£/:/°!''/';
^^^•l:
:••••-.•..-,••-vr^---"".
^ ;.'.'••&gt;'• •7p,-";iv,-'-'
"&lt;-r "

i

•'•: '•.•^&gt;'&lt;-;^3'i'Zj'-'^(*:i:' : "''i'-tvV^':-: ^:..?'^;::.,;-:J':'; 'i-'- 1; :. ! j:;
.-.. ;//:^ : 7V^^H^ : '-^;^!:;^ '''^i ; r:'" i : ;&gt;:: - i I'^'-i-^:/":'/ •-'v : '": :'.i

;
i

•-': f :i|ilS|^
'i|i| ii

^'-&gt;PWgJ;t;H;i|lSlfia^¥
\f ;;• ;'^|^^:;\5/;'^f|^%t

• J'."

•••' .

... - - ^ '•"^^i^'^'-i.- :•
, ""-''*"'. ;^i|":';;:'•; ] 1

:

'$$&amp;$;
m&amp;^-'.

&gt;£.!%£;.^ •-.VH-^iii :ir:ff^--i;:':

$m.
te^i-

�.- • '

'-•f ~ ' ' ' \~"-'* 1 . ' - - ' • - . • • • ' • : • • • - ! • • &lt; . • • ' . - ' . . • • ' •
'••'
-'•'C.'.'.V. .-',..V ' ' • • • ' • - ' ; • . • • - . . • • / ; ' • • • . ' ' i.
' :• ! ' • •••

.-"••-";•
•' • :

.'

'-

' • • - • -."': : • • ;. ; .
v
. ; J . J L ,.-'•• ".i.^w.-V'.".'.-'..'^- : '
' . , . ' • • ' • • • • •- ' ••'•'{• '' I . ' ; - ' " - - ' ' - :- •*••,*•• v;'.™;.-..--;::!,;

• u e s t i o n I;-,;, ^^^"^.ti-] '•',•.'.. '\l2».-^:. 'i:,:'-: •;•'• 1. ../ ••'.:..••.-.; ; -. .-•/•".- : 'J;-.i •:;, jW-''t^ ^:'" ^(^^:^^?W^$(;

,-.'' ?^^&gt;n§.?;iSSKrS;: St'&amp;^f••::S'S;: • • •• : -: i ^^':'•;• ^"l^il^K^'liS^ISp^S
l h a t • is':: currWtl'v/k'hoQjh•: ab'but; : .-tn'e f: 'acute and chronic 1 .-human' 'he'altH •eff ects^e-fg'

'"' :v-:'«*•:';•'^'3^^^
:

••''^•'^n&gt;^-^^^^

•e. prbdij_c .t_iyjB^ erf f e:!c't s Vvimmulie^ s y s tern ;ief f e^cts'/ ; " car ci nbj'epi .c'j ef f e c t s i'^""e't"c1i''V^^tl&gt;?l'
is.soc.la.tedyul.'t.h\:''dipxi'h&lt; ex'po's'ure "and.'..'.'ujhat c a n : be inf err'e.5L.'ab_ouj: 'Vu.
rom

extremitaes/ihaO'eioccurred.
® 1 ^
« | ^
i

Total serum lipids .may be;increased,-anc

1

•^^^U ^^•- f&gt;^^^^

he prothrombin.~timey''may. : ;b^

'(1^0,^1978;-.Bauer- et aly,;.;i9610-^y^j'

leiberg •et:"ai'V;!"'' 1964;'/Jens*en'''arid': W«&gt; l-..-• e.r. ^.- 1 9- .7 2 ..; . : '6l.i'0'er,; ; /l?.75). , f- rPo^phyria:'l::&gt;^:
a k ' . .
; . ,• j&gt;..-..-.^ .,;.•••;..:'.?; fi.-" -j... :•• » •'.*.•-,•-';•..;-• -. *-ii- [.•.'•«• ti..'.-i?-;,-- •••'•.{&gt;!:,.
&gt; • .-••_..(• •..-. .
..*,-?. J . j .;

v

;

.::H.» ,;^:v «.-.!: ;-.;&gt;^-(-, !',,;jr.'?!..-f:i.-' '•s;^,1-';^:. j: -- :•• ..• ,• .-.,:•'-. ./•-..• i- --;-' •. .I ,i &gt;. ;-j::'.,-V, ...'•••.."• .•. ; .s^v;-^; 4 ':-v. i if .'.i; •.•«/.'.'Vi-^v-.
.,'.-.^.;. :-&gt;^v^v.,..;;.1.5..r. f.-.-.^-^^-.vi'-'V-.uvi:! , . w . - •..•..-%- :.-.»,.•- ,. • • . • . ; - . . • vv'j •..•': i'---*'-:f .-.' . i ' * - '(-••'*?'*•' i"- «•" ^^;''^.V:&lt; - "

'a
utahea.tarda (PCT);, ap acquired fprm of porphyria characterized by chronic^, &gt;•
kin lesionis." n « / J

'X4- UX«»" V "ii'mr\V r\m*'

•' V^ a'«» ''. a T&lt;? «

K li X r&gt;

&lt;-&gt; l-i o Q &gt;" 1 1 o rl

/ TT K&gt;a c a !/:' ' 1 0i*7 A • ' anr4 - ..--

leiberg

'number

oma,
issue sarcoma,.. h a y e - be¥n''V6Kdu.c'ted''''i'n'''wor£^
^«;,: .-^*.^;;. ••' ;:-^y.-1.;•;•;&gt;•• tfr;^Vvr'M^v'-i^'j •1 .i'V,[= v/v;--•'• .ji' ; --';'.'V ;?'-x;f -:n:^.?':" ;^v/'-^'r :: ^^^^^iv.r^
' ' * 1 ' - - - ' 1 ' ' ' " ' - ' ' " - - " "'-' i- --"^-'•'•«-'"•'-- ^-^-! ; ---«----J---- ^--^~.v^ .4-^

�-/'-»
; .

"

"

'

'• •"•• •' ."•'&gt;*•
. ' .. • _:"f-»^

,-v-,:V/ ' '.,:';.', .^;'&gt;.Vv" '; ?^V"J"&gt;X-'"** ;^. V-11.- /-••» .;• '•" . &gt; ..^-.v u"1. '•' - .."'&gt;•"•• " ' _/*-•,** i*.*^-!,^,

,ost if not;allVofj;these .studies'; •'• ,1) the; extent of ^exposure; has^pt^been;;rav^
- '• •.--,•:"&gt;' .Vyv-^-A^v^,-^v:^-'&gt;•.'•;" ••..^;--;v:^i^:^l ;:'-ii,A '.-• •'•••V* :.'-.•'.j-'. :iv..' •:'-'ii ••'-" ^^i^-i'^-r^^/ / " - ;* ^ ' : ' ' j . ? ^
4 ^ ^ ; ? t -&amp; . ^ ? v jnted
o c u m e n t e d . ' . jsufficiently," 2) sufficient time 'has . not. elapsed between-th;e;^^i;M-;
;
:
:
v
;

• •--••^'•• &lt;Y^^^

v-i;';^' ;^ v.v -4;;^H^BirfS^ '

x p o s ure ia n d - theQitucly fb'r--"dise'aise. d e v e l o p m e n t , 3) 'a .'population; Jtocj; smail^;fpr; :
re
&gt;:r.^\^^f»^f»;i^i'^1;^^^^^^
•-"•":- ^^^^j^^Vy^^'t^^^c^r^^'T'z^jL--' i-j'i i'^-^^-jv-^-—- ••'» wi,'^'? «•&lt;•-:&gt;«iv-*-^u'i«"=.i'-i-ri^-iVvi-.-v
ne
v ;
ami ria t io nontamihat'iph 6 f;: t H e " ' c brnrner ci a I'-* p r o d u c't' wi t h d i o x i n'••.', T n e: ."c a s e c o'n t irp 1 \• s t'ti d Te s
• .,,. • . '&gt;,V
•/• ^y, "•K-^^.iiA:^;^3);;::':^^r:^:^
^Wr •• • '^••^•-•1 ^^i;^ ;^ ^y:;-''^:""'^-^;
:'. li^'i.'u^r^''5 &gt;s^'.--ij:j^ t?'i'l'i.':'::_ij2.'-'^;X j"l'iL''''i'~'i.'r-ii*. J''- : l'"'-K-4 Jr ^n &lt;4'^ U'/^Ur.U'x"-".i U, 11 -'^^ *-ii'-''-'-.'Jr1 ;•'??;
n elude:
f

' ' ' *. 'V

oft;
erbicidesi-^

h e n o x y.a c e t i c' a c i ch (
. • LI" .** J,'l "&lt;-*. '.' • Jl i ' T '

0

80

. .•ijl«"W.'--. i;*-V.*r

.'

Rational cieatHj. raUs; ;for::men:Cage;d ^O/
..".^.^'^:l:' ; . r "---'•(.-' •••'•y-''- : J'-f'"'Vi/;.-iv'i,. : '-"'. : --'.:-'^t'-:"*J -^•^-^v::s^'-'ao n l y " 0 . 0 7 % o f d'eathViJoijld : h a u e been ^expected . ; ; R^cenUy/;:anot|vepg|Jg

• ' '*:•: • - : .$$ •-:;:-r^-^ -p^i:-. •.il^ife^fSi^H:^;!.-^ ?^4;/;!|i;;-.-' h:-' ^ T^ ^:^^:^v;V^fcf^fe^^-a^:^

srson.
on^in c^'of' &amp;iS'^plur^ip^^

:;^-,- ^^-^-;Sf.^a^"'^c^f&amp;i^»^l^

'

'

'

-

'

V •' • '&gt;&gt;' ;•;"' - ",'/ • ' ! • ! ' i';.; :.:i.'"v ;.• "'•.'•.?•'• :'..^_' '"'; •:''-'-•
•' .: ••"- j" I ' • ' • • • " . ' ' ' • ' ' • ' ' • ' - 1 ' ' •{•''•'' ' • • - : • ' . ' ."'^'•"•"r-.V'j:-"'"^"

�•^ •• -•&gt; ' :•...•' ' .
,~ .

-t

V. : .•:,"

,.- ; ;»••&lt;".''•..-•"••"•-•....'.•,..'•' •'••:'-\~! i&gt;-.'*•''ii
..

••••'.• .-.-;-v;/Ku-l-i.-T" ::r'--.J-' '' "(.-^,

.jorkers.'.
.jo r k e r s:. •i'-i^&amp;- •: r;;;: J-I^/.':--':

(Reggi'ani, :,.!?£

ne ! problem with^all'of 'these'' studies ;;.including;re^
ne
'i:-'.*-i ' J! v:. '-'-'- ''&gt;- '.'-''S-;:. '.;''-' &gt;«'c:T.K T'.-' --j.i-.-'
'i' '.
''•'
' • • • • ' ' J'v'
- *1 • •-;:!-!4,«*-.j;-:4:!-^'.-'^ :•' -ij i^-^-'i'^s;..-- --. . - .&lt;"•' -.-. •",-•;.-:;.• -*••-•'•=• :.:Y.;^^:"-* •••.:;" :«--V' -• :.. Vi^'V '-•:•- &gt;'-i4 J,.*v Si'.'-J?:A:4 ^V
'
..-&gt;
^^^^ ;:'•Jt^-^:•:l^:«v^i•*^^^^tft:
that no 'expos tire .data" are: auailable:, In situations where, no systemic/ health/:

- *.

''

'••

»'. / *i * . '•

v

:

i

t" V • ; &gt; " ' " ' ' ' *•

r

''.•'!

&gt;1

' ./'•' V '/» j^' vi

i:

:

'"-•• ' '""* • I " '

1

''

•

''

•' •' '

" •••'''•

'

', ' ' T'I , '• ' : »'

!

', •

! - ' • . , '• -'

''"

• • ' : - • ^^,. -

f

*V' . .'7* '. ;T*

r

."•* -jkij-''' - ^-^r^' f*"V-

^ffects-'uiere" observed", '•'"absorption /of TCDD ': may ' have, been minimaiv^rjnon^xi^n:

r+,-r-;~;~V!, c^:-&amp;&amp;&amp;W $\f ?'*$&amp;' Q'X* '!£* -V. r-y"::-::"---"- ! '•• i: •V-"'r^:^v-:^^^^^3^^
- or J n s t a n c e !; 'it h e h"iV6es't'-sbil,ievel in'Zone : A in S e v e s o /close .to::; thai factory
- - instance^
=
&lt;: ;
;
;
; ;
:
;

•••.••••,-.:--••.-.• j- • i-^.^--'-A--t^.;';' i-r::-^ -?' . ^-i'"^ • -[':-;..""•.'.••: . . " ; - - . - ; '•- - v " • •.. ^V'r ^?. ~ -&gt; • .:." Si-» ••• .:*-;:/j-^v-Wf-'--^---* -y
: :
!

:^ r:^^^-^ ^ ^^^,^i^ :^^^

•-•-/.^i--^t.^-'-i^,^-t-^'i^^

'. &gt; '•*.

jas ; 5 5 ' ;

-legetation
)f
;he uegetation.-was';&gt;emo^d^early l^moreover; peoplejin ;the&gt;rea cjose to^^he^:

- - -:

' - ' ' -

-

:

i

-

:

•' • *?.'.'..'.-: ['• .. - • ;-.':^^u ' ;;i-^;'v-:' • '•-, &amp;\'£^-:&amp;Ui&amp;%&amp;

• C-s f :.i,H,:t. ': ,-=••;^7^?:' ,^&gt;&gt;;r.:i -•^--^•if^^;K

ivi"^:r-::' '"\ ^^ ' "^S'^^M^^^f^^-

^iWr^-

«R;;

�' -6-.:

;he

s t u d i e s haue;'&gt;'houjri';;that dioxin .''causes '"V M u l t i t u d e of. effects and;; that^it^'rnay^-:
iffect''diff'^renV:'bVgan*. systems';'in|;differment- species of;*animals|.a^though^the-';£;
:hymus'-is" affe^tid^iri^all '";sj5ecies^'testedi ',' Jhe:' mechaniyjn^lopacjt^orj^Qf^
Is hot;''well::;und^^

significant

find|figs^liayef0en.^^cj^

^ I&amp; l ^
^ ' J:
)ind •a/,\recep't4r^'P' y rot6^ ^n.40,?^^'M^n'^y.-Tt^
•i ^d

nay

jome orqanic v c'bmppunds' into;-f qr'ms" which 'can ;: later: iritieract lwithyfjv;^^^^^ 1 ^^'•'- ^. 's:S--;-^VA's^::^! •••'^.iV.^f^^i'-1' K - - •.•"-•.;'!':':' -v- : .'-'.'"- ^"V ; .•.?•^''':• ;:'B•:•:i.v v :^^!^ ; il'^ -,^

�-7-

P e r h a p s b e c a u s e . o f t h i s ' m e c h a n i s m o f a c t i o n , t h e toxic" e f f e c t s ; of''dio.xin
nay be d e l a y e d , • In most small l a b o r a t o r y animals g i v e n , a lethal 'single; dose •;:
-f dioxin/, ^the '"median "time .'to., . d e a t h is 2-3 weeks;

For larger.' 'domestic';'•:.&gt;-'^;T

animals, dogs,;Xrid..monkeys/ A ; ,th.e; m e d i a n time \is_longer^rMany tpjxiVj,''coni^p.Unc?svK

; u c h a s';. n Ic o 'i i n e, / : c y a n i d e V^'.'a rid : bo t iii 1i n urn'" to x i n, '•' are f r a p i d 1 y.^me t a b'oilii ed^^Slpf'

•media ted''.immune. Yep;on;seV; v is;:;toxic;' to .the;' l i v e r , ;a'hjd^causes^

r, ..have 'only' V .;" !:•-*•:.-••.:..:•:.• ;\--v.^.'V. ; ,'i-Vf in • rats : a• n•••:••* f 'micey^.;^•'.;j•-|v^:v^-.^^:1i.;-':-ir'-T^^S •bee'n co*nduct ed *i'"''i. ' • • • » • ••-•• '• d -;'i.. .• "'
.,.;.,-•,,. .j.i.^^y.-:
't--.-- •'•• ,&lt;'•.:-'•'•'.•• '• -H"- '• "-i"" .'•'&lt;:'*
1

•

tr,~'-f' "!;'»•- '- '-

• . ^ . . ' « , A ; ! . . . •;"?.-•••..;•-.. ;;,r---&gt;. [ f.-,*.-. .•!;•'.•••:••••*•- ,',.' ^ w'. ,-. • : - . • - . - , • ; &lt; • ,: ••- . ...; ;.. *- ;-;.i ..f i-;,.-.:-. : :"^4r a'v ,-;';•-•-. ," i:.'^-^^-^ -:

r-.v^l|^MI^S^^s:S^:^M®I^^IW

Kociba; : et al^Xi^ 78 !) n^R 0 ^^?^; si'.5^110'^ i ' n ' w h i c h ^ groups of -50/male^aricr."BO;;: ; 1
emale ;Spr4gue-pa^leyJrats^t§Rar

were fecJ.idiets: .con-taining, 22,-)f

08, arid 2,193 ng/kg"Cna"riogram/^

^This' ; .fs^equiyalent- .t*q;&gt;-^'[,

aily doses t "of. O . O O l V ,0/bi;;/.ancl. 0 , 1 ' ug TCDD/kg bui (micr.ogram TCDD/,kilogr^m;.%:,
ody

L

)T:" 'The.'" controls v'c brisis t e d ' of 86 male and ' 86 'female" rat's'y'Hr^Numerpus'

.^;".-:.;.-xi;?v-i-:-.:^:;&gt;- : r^'^^^^^r--!;..:,.-:;i •• : . ;:-;'• • : ; .!: '.:•:•' .-.;-.,;;'•:.'-:':• .•-,-.. •^^^••''\:?'^^.^^
d^;/^vs&gt;"-- '' - ';: ? :.^ ; -^i;V-i;' ••;.-', , .--' . s.-V--'-v,; .. • :-;-^-:-^-.!-'^-f--./ V^e^^^^-^'^^
;^r;--fv^^^^,--:,,:-,;: .o;,-^,-^:^,.,.; : • ; - . • - ; .
: ,' *: :.. . &gt; } , - j--; V. ' .•« /;.:V ^- ;/.:.,-; XW;. $..;
:

:

�-8r.

.oxicolbgic."effects' "were o b s e r v e d at 0.1 ug dioxin/kg bw/d ( d a y ) , including-; V
n c r e a s e d . rnp.rtality / ' d e c r e a s e d body weight gain, d e p r e s s e d hemat'plogical;,;;V//..
arameter's j l.in.crs'a'sed urine levels of pprphyrins ', 'and" rnbrphological • change's"; i
; £l ft 2 4- *1 f»

T * * r r i * ^ ^ * l * s " * ' ^ &gt;&gt;-J"v* X" X" 1*1 *i **» 5» J* /s w* i» s - • "

tSK\r4

iiia^c^iilstfc**

4- "» j* ** i i j*» ** .

i i l i n v * r f S - " / &gt; t N r » r t w » i i r f ^ ^ « J - ' ' - « k A.""

*J ^'.i.' » —i'^L " * *s :

CDD/kg "bw/,d..vf.pr.;&lt; one.-.'iv* -x-.'-"_-.
year;
. • : • &gt;:T.,,-':' .'-'•i.V.."••'• "Av'«-:v:i

:

. /The' ; inclderiVe/of liver/, tumors' was /significantly ^Increased^inVthe^^^F

;-^*&amp;3&amp;^
--&gt;$s^^

.7-ug-dioxin/kg-bw/d.- group-"- (48% tumor incidence) compa'red. with = that: of."•tn'e"^--f
:
;

.-'•" -•• •'vVRrf-&gt;&lt;&gt;^;v:^v.;::"-:^ vVvA-fci?;^-v.^.r;;\f.^:;. • y.r;'-;-:;.-:^ :..\-:v.. '/•: •';.' .•":;;":;i ';.!;^-.t.. " - l^^-'f^^^.^--^-;

ontrol group^/ClS^l^urnpr^^incid^

'.y, The incidence pf:^liver tumpVs.^oBs';^

Tiue'
hese animals'did : not ; surviu long enough for, tumors to'. 'develop. "".'This study",'
v
^ •&gt;«•;: ' • ; : ^ . ^ . .-.-;;• :; ^;.::- '-i,:. •. ••;,- ' " • • • ;•.•;•••; '•'?•/•;?.•••: '•;'•.•,.-•. ';"\"-''^---:v'^.f /
r:-:;;'

uggested that/TCDD^was carcinogenic at 0.7 ug/kg/d . '• J'|v=;V .?- ": ' •;••.' ••;-V'"' •v'ik-^P?-'rcinogenic at' 0\ 7
-

-

•':!""--'' •• • • - - " ' ' * ^ : - ' " • ' ' '

'

' ':''

'

;

The National;,Tpxicpiogy/Program (NTP. 1982) .also conducted... carcinogenicity
tudies .in '•„••=••• ••;.••..-'.;.'mice! •• brai""administrati6h of --j-i^,:-.-"^.- •.•':*v....--.-i-:.--^-.-!1» .-' -'. -•. •&gt; •*-*.&gt;••-«„-- ?;.--V,
rats 'and .--i-. --':''•-•»•:'•!««•,-•;•.;..•.•.•"• j » &lt;-•-•-•• -v-.-;-"-"I; •!•'-••'•• dibxin "Was investigated r in
-.:

•'. ' ' •'.---:,..'• .':.••••'.'. 'w-v "'-,•'•;• ''••„.'.-;.' yV-i^i^-V.1. *•&lt;*'&lt; '-:.'':.&gt;", J •'••:"- "•'••.•*' ".:•• '.•'••V-1'"1
:

:' '^'.': ;? -^ -V'¥' i'i"-:--""~vj T" v:-::^"V ''•' -•:.' '•'- • V^''*--^;'"' ';5 '•''

roups /of 50''male ';and';''5p' female' Osborne-Mendel. rats'; ancS;/50 male!;, B6C3FltmTcV;/; .

o.oi, 0.65i;';^or';^/5;^
g / k g / w k ) /!./.. Under" the.: conditions /'of it his Vbioas s a y , 'dipxin.was carcindgeriici'for

�•'

. . ' • ' ,

..

*-9—

•

• : - •'"•' r'"' ""'•

-

• • "'

&gt; o t h O s b o r n e - M e n d e l rats and. B 6 C 3 F 1 m i c e , p r o d u c i n g t u m o r s of the liver arid' ' • "
.hyroid.
- - i _ .- -"

I n ' a d d i t i o n , t h e ' c a r c i n o g e n i c i t y of d e r m a l a p p l i c a t i o n s of an.':.TVJ'-.'••
.'.: _' : ._ ; J .. J _-"i'"L

i f -

.1 _• ^ ':. *•'.. '"'L :. .-1 •-• » -i

i- -

&lt; i- '. " - i _• ._ .'. - A

igat'edV^-Simil^

i

-&gt;'.'_

1 /•' ^'/^''-li:' 1 . i " _ " . '".' ' ' i ' ' _ " L .•;.""'•;

one apjaii'catioriL.-.o^'-BQ^u'g'^vf^'l

imethylb'enzanth'ra.'cene*' ( p M B A ) J ' i a : a'cetone , 1. wk r before J: ---"-•'- '•-:-&gt;'-; '^-i"--—•-i-^-'-- i j- . i-I
~ r ~ : ~~ dioxin-'uias .sdminisjte^ed
' .

-.'"

'• • ffi,''-.'''•• '•• '.n',:.'': '•.-:•** ••••' -.ri-'.!--..-! •},"•'%'•'."v"; .--\.!'-' ' ~ '.' -'v!;.;&lt;

•':'••':''

: .',' • •,-""'. _ -* /* '.J '•' » 'V ' i j
-"•-'.. '
i , - ••*•' '"*•«*
- . : .&gt; ;&lt;• , • . . ..^ . -'-.. . i »

. . - . • ' • . • : ;;-V^--':,'-:n:';iv--.-'::-;i^,.-'!-:-:K'4/';j^1^;- •'••••;,•'•.;C' : " - ; '•• r ^ { • " • ^ ,
'f&gt;ma1 pi? ' rr-»r'&lt;a-i upri O O O V " i j a (it nyi n v ^nbl -i r a f T nri^'.V

*• '""•'',-")- '" • •'•'''» &lt; /
••- t-- '"•* .•--i - ""*
»-j " 'V-.-....-,

he ir
In

-:..-•&gt;;.;• &gt;.:,;. ^ ^ ^
^;q
ignif.icantlyVdi
' . ';;./; ^^.i^,:

he controls"',.'' : ^.^/;U *i v'••:: --^'T-H;lH:: i :.r- /:i';; . v , . - ' ; . '--'•,'..',- r '!, '... :^JC^: ; -v;i:^T -'. :.::^ ;•••;/:••'•'•'•"-' • : --,-'):?':••'-,
••}• ''-.: - *i&gt;v''-riv'^&gt;.^" ' ? ^-Vv v tv.tv':'v . :/'•••' •'••'••-.Vi.';/-;•'• ;•. L^iJt^^v.^rj;_.;-w^y;/"5^v-':"-f v ' :
It is' : nbt " y e t : ' k n o w n whethVr 'dioxin is both. a. promoter' 'and/: ari:"initia'i:or;-'.'
;,. .•; .;.*.,.; • *:,.;;:V :.V.., M"^r^;-;;^\ ":;T;i-, / ,,;;: .y:.•. • ,'•.',•' -•;-.., j-v ; i - &gt; • v.'!^. •!r^':: ;^v^-^ ^^.&gt;:
f cancer/"; and;';^jr^Do : th,r w^
predbmina^tes•;'.J Poland ^et-'al.;.;;^:;
1982)^have-^ecehtly "preyerited^ey^
/J

:

dioxiiY jirp^tes^tumoj:^^

:;

^
RS/j Hairless ' mice; •''&gt;ito¥: eValV (1980) '.have "shown dipxiriVto .iDe" a^ .potent; •&gt;:;
;1

-i .'',-xv/.^; i:£. - ''• ^.-" ':.-' - ^;%:&gt; :-^nOiS^-';: '": ; .;r''x'-' : -:J'^'. :;:i-;;:- -.^' ^f^i^v'^'^^V^'^^i^fv^'y^
:
:
1
urnor promofir" in^a' two-s£a'gV' "rriociel fof care indigene's is '.in;;.rat liue'r..'^.. 'V'-v ' ^ '-v'T-'- .

.

' '

V ' ' " - ' - ' • *

: : ;

i'' i

~

!; ;

'

•"

•'

'•

••

;

-'.,••••'-'

. &gt; - " ' - J

. '•

' '.,

" , . ' • ' . '

" • ' . - , ^"0

' •

"- ^

• ' » * ' ^ J ' ,'

'

"'-"

- : '

'

. •;

» • " - ' - " • , ' ' ' ( " " ' ' . - " -

�•10-

The guinea"pig 1 s immune system is extremely sensitive.to.dibxin ,• Weakly'
oc &lt;:&gt; C df

d.ri ."no rH r&gt;Vi n / l / r t

hi it Pr\v*'- ft •' N I A O (/ c

r&lt;e&gt;rn*e&gt;ccorl +-fno 'rte&gt;T a i/ li'rl ' I-. u ri a *•» c-a ri o -!"i."J Ti J 1; •

ose's of l t ug/k'g- bw in. rhesus' monkeys ..; Thus, far,' a, no,-pbseruable-effect:'''1's.ge:
•'";': &gt;•; '-'••: •;:&gt;^--j;&gt;f-^'1'.' ':^T •:•' ": ;:^^-'^i'.\|^r':iK';":: ';!..':'.:' "^i •:" •• • '••'-'•^ "'"•"'••'0 ••"";,••:-^''^^-^^'^^:B
n re pcpduct'JyV'.'6 tit comes i'JT^the;; rheVu's'' monkey has'' not Been'; Reported;' 'nor.^haO'Q":
g-terrri' \].-?\-;,:'•• '.•-.'». •"•"-•'•!'•'•"'.'''. •.•-•'J'-';-.'-^ ;•.'•-.-' •'"••• ;•'•,'•••• '";';' ;;•• '•''•'••.'&gt;; .-'i' b'eeri ^conducted" toVt-^
ny long- ,;:.';&lt;'-!' (s'e'yerall years) • or • multigeneration studies '-,-?'&lt;---::;; ''.-.•..'•.'•;'•••&gt;.-•*'•• ..'S ••:•;.•...•••"••''.-'
etermine .cl'"
ihrpniVJiealth ;effects,-in --the more sensitiyV.species .•^-C'.r'^'^^rii^vf;:
Some health effects haue" been '.'observed in humans which also 'oc.cur.' in-.v :.
xperirnental'tanimals,; including. c'hlqracne, liuer toxicity, including Pp'rphryij

�•.utanea tarda/, (PCT)", an i n c r e a s e in s e r u m l i p i d s , and abonormal liver., f u n c t i o n
~ e s t s . ; ; HbweyerT.lt is not"."clear" whe'ther .other e f f e c t s o b s e r v e d in. anirnals.:;".:,.
&gt; c c u r in hu*manS:)\ :: ''"Recently/"a.7pqsyibie'.'asspciation between exposure'"•'to"'diqxiri'"
• - •/ .-• y:^^:^§^^
£.-«.;?•: •':• ^;;'^,:/}-;;.:-.;'-. :';7..'-.,&gt;S'--'..'---:;:'i::;-.' ^if^-'^-^^-.'S'^
ind phQnoxyl^ne^bi^
products', knci ah i n c r e a f eViri . mesen^c:.h:y1nal:;;;^t
..'•-'.•' '^Vll^Ha&amp;i^
•:'-Tri'l-D:?::- -.'. :^.^-^-^:-/^V;;:;"^'V-^'-^Sr-:;i^'^

lermall'y^to/'di'^

ndmber;'pf:..e'piderpiolq^

ies- a n d ^ h e a l j t h - assessrrients'''',i'rii Kurriahsv.'haue g i u •eL---.:•,'.; negatiue''&gt;e'sults-v.^5^^-^-^fH
n , :--: -tv: .:.••;••&gt; : ' --•-'• .•':...'.-;,•«-^-r •'•:--V^-^-';^^-.^:' ,
. •,---~.-&gt;--~:fi&amp;:i.iy*~w-':v-iu^.-^
*•&lt;-..••;•« - •-• .
1r

•s&amp;^&amp;®W&amp;*&amp;£$%%^

' •
ems , r • • _ • • &gt; • •• • *• ' , ' ' • ' , ' . • ; ( " . ' i - * - ! !:*.*'•*'" i - v •;:••(• •'•.£•--! ':l--;r-i'' • / ? • * • . • • . ; -,3' '•; ^'- — ,•- .' • ' • - • — . ' ' - : ^ s ^. •_ ••..- - -f-.f. ,;•&gt;.•'. V) !: . -' Jl •-• ;•:•.';&gt;
jroblems associated with- epidemiologic 1 studies a f t e r .loto-level. exposure 1 ,.;-.-.-:.;;•.;
••.\;[:.^-ff^j$zj*^^
•^&gt;^r^-'^^Ai: :-^/kr;v^/
BA I^L ^. [&gt;v H xs m «•» '. !?i'w^ /s 'l' «-\ &gt;* ^ • j ' s i M . ^ i t ^ r H ^ B ^ v M • • l*v ^s '** -^. i i ^* A '' JT^ J« i &lt;t« l-i y««' J *^ J- +- *i /* t I I +- "^ j**i i&gt; "*i t^'' m ^v r\ •* I I us. •? »*s »^ "' .. ' ' . '•'-'' • ' « - - .
hes
;

r

J

:xpps
i

t_

.....

_

. -. .

,
.

. ... ^ .„-,,...

, „......-..(,.
.

-t - ..... - , - - . . . . ,

- . - . . - . . . - . - , .-.n.. --

.. - t - -

-

,

. , - . , . _______ ...... -

,,- "-{''-

unction irit"pe'6pie;-.b"ec'aus8^Vxt"eh'siue-' baseline 'dataTf6K^'tKe7g"erieraiVpo''puia^i6n"on
&lt;
:

. . c\l^5^^mi:.;f;ji?^^K^^tr*:r;:--r&lt; ^-(S:M;®%fr?;tfSe?s5;©|S?i5

o not j'exis t^.an^d. lpecau,se ^ small'! differiiences:; in immune,, function r would b'e^.'V.^r&amp;i^V
cult
ifficult to -'prove ...;' Another"; example ,is that effect's on 'reproduction .after^;:: i
ow-leyel exposure '.in. the' general .population, are difficult to detect/ since.;;;
eyel
ther 'confouniding'uariables^^sucH; as"^^^
ational
ecreational drugs, and malnutrition,, outweigh the effects of .dioxin"/; .This" -;;";
i: ;
:j f 1 1
;
•-•• •

• • .' ••• ' • ••• •;' • •. •":'&lt;•'•• '•-'••'•.•'! ; -;v '•' ': "?- ""' - . :.'.•;'•• ' • " • '-"'f. •".' . ' • • , • •-.•

.• • • •

». ••• "';.,'..- '• '. .-, V • '

•' .'•'•' ' " '•^••• '.-

•-'

ld
ould be .so',', .'simply be'cause- exppsure^.to chemicals s u c h , as. alcohol .is m u c h ' m o r '
r e u a l e n t and o'cVurs at. hig'h'er do'sage levels in the g e n e r a l population." &lt;/.•• ' - • ' - '•-••• ' ^ - --' . . . . . . - '
. •
; - &gt; -' ' - - • • • ' ' • •
B e c a u s e 7 "of - t h e s e limitations : !as far as the : general : population. is' : ..-.V:"-l;'
. : - ^ ,;.• ^^v•^^.:H•^.^^;::;^^&lt; l y'!:'V^-ji • ^,l•.'•: 'M -'^ v;v--"".: .".;. '\ •• "• ? "&gt;;! - : 7:-;^V:^v^^-^v^oncerned, v worker;;' population
extensiveiyrr.sin;.ce.';.th'ey
sually hav|y higifer;"exposures ..^ ^Hbueuer,- 1 the", number;, of / w o r k e r s e&gt;&lt;p'psed ; .,tp., \;;.,
:

ioxin d u r i n g productlon'Vro.cesses .'.is ' relatiyel'y
-

'•

'••'•:'.'••.'•
'

'•'••''-*'—•! \- •"'••»'.'
'
'
"
'
'

f

• ' ' • ; ' - ' . :' '~. ,."''
''

.'
'

'•'.'•'•''•',''•'•1 '
' '
'

-i' ", "•••'.£•'.:••':.''
' • "
'
"

' .'

'I* ' "• &gt;"'*•'''. . ' - •
'''
'
' '

t

•'.'.',- ''--. "' --':"!'"• -.;''" •^-''-.'- •"•• :; .
"'
'
''''

�ill industralized nations) and may not be large enough to show small changes..
Jiey are predominantly adult males/.and the literature gives no information"•'•'
ibout the doses,.of, dip'xin ^these workers actually received, nor are the. report1
:lear on how thoroughly these workers were examined.
"t - . - • ' " • ' • * '

•

" - • " ' ' - '.' •', •*'

'

'" ' •:*•
•'

' !'

'
'

•

- ' i

Furthermore, wo'men ancf
.' ' • 'i. '

'•

r

•'

- -'

'

" . . " " • " ' • ' • ,-, fc . '-*J''•»'•••• v •,'•"*&gt;

"i

«

&lt;.

;hild,ren, who make up a large portion of the general population, are not

t

'""

•eally represented in this group. The lack of definitive human da^ta dictates
s
',
&gt; * • * ' '
'
''
-.hat animal data must be used to predict possible human health effects:' r r f&gt;
' "
' '
t
*
I
y
«
\*
lowcver, some animal species are much more sensitive to, the"toxic effects of
^
• '
-' &gt; . f 3
'
, ' " ^a
jioxin than others. In rats in a 2-year feeding study, a daily dietary dose

r

r

v

v

" *r, - \^ vT •"'*'''. ' ' * *

A %Vi

^ '

' r / \&gt; -

.)f 1 ng/kg bw/d has been reported as a no-observable or detectabUe } e'ffe'cjtj'
level. On the ot'her hand, ^i/" monkeys are siuen a s^-n9^e d"ose of I'ug/kg.bV,

:hey cease to reproduce normally '(Mc'Nulty/ 1^982) . ^Although 'the', V7"* ^''^ij!^ *,*'
::pidemiological data seem to suggest that humans are less sensitive than'* I x
**

i

,
»

*l

¥*

*

*

•

&lt;

1

,

,

^ f

* t""

nonkeys, we do not know exactly how sensitive or resistant humans are.'* ^ v f
Moreover, since the human population is heterogeneous some subpopulations 'may
f

*

*

s

*

•&gt;e much more susceptible than others.

In the absence of useful"human data, prudent public health policy
''
i
i
lictates an assumption that,hunans could suffer effects similar to those
"1
'
" '
observed in animals and that preventive public health policy must,be based"'on
vail able ahimalf.dat'a-.

�Question 2:

•Jhat dioxi'n health e f f e c t s re's e a r c h is^cjjrrentlv underway 'and what .'Un.llit '.;

ze 11 ij's about '_the:"njaVu re ;'£md: exte"nt"'of h Urnari health'_-E&gt;rQb 1 emis' as : so'ciateci' &amp;i±fi'V;

. health^ette^tS4pjr^their: expo^sura.^tp^ftgent Orange»-;;;a

The questipn^of'uihethe;r-'',the .'health of people who liye &gt;r have lived'in';'
areas ".con tamina ted' udth.^'aboVe ,'back ground" leu els "of dioxin '(e .g,' Times,
B e a c h X / ' h a s ; JDeen ;'or.^ilt^be;.]af;fected by ' s u c h exposures £ ; , V ;'-\-y; '-^;'%}£?£
- • • - . , "i^*; ;-'^'•(:••/•'•;,'•;* : - . ; ' . ; • " • &gt;'"vT--.V F.:
:

- —. *
•',

The

-•

';•" -'*•'•.,.•••

••• -.••.•'.:.• •

"&lt;;.:•..,-• I •.• •'•••*. -\- »-- 'Vt .;-;-'-^-^:4:' ivl _ i • _ _ . _ L _ S- *• l _•S ,t .. ;. ,' ._• ; • .
*•;,-•'•;.:.;.:
••"•«
" •
y
- "
•*
.J'-_

"•*

dioxin--*
•
••-•

'
'. '-

-•""-.

7

i: ' ' •'

' '"V.;

^

;'

• S"

•„ " ' i'.*.

•-

"'.

*

-•--'--'

'. • • , =1"'

.

'
'

" 'V

'•,'',"•."-'"

'
:

'

•• ,

• f • .".'.'-, ;;.'-""^ - * ~

:

?.:

,

'
j-1

-&gt; '•"

'

"

'

•

, "" '

.' "'

' '

�T h e s e "studies a r e c o n d u c t e d o r . f u n d e d b y ' t h e U . S . A i r F o r c e , t h e
'.dmirdstratio'n,... a n d . The D e p a r t m e n t ; of : Health and H u m a n S e r u i c e s ( C e n t e r s for,
d i s e a s e C o n t r o l / C e n t e r , for ^ E n v i r o n m e n t a l ; H e a l t h / N a t i o n a l I n s t i t u t e " of ,r',;;:;;:.:.""''l-;i
) c c u p a t i o n a l .SaTsty and Health',, ari'd: 'National Institutes^,for. Hea.ltH/NationaTiv'.
'•; ••\v-'.\'!=r^:^-^;-.V^v"!:!;*'l.' 'V i-^/vv^:^i^l ; ^i •.: : ':^:---- ^"' :"-"':::iv.;^;";';/;;T^. : . /.^'^''^^.^f^,;;
i n s t i t u t e of; E p O i r o n m e n t a l ; Health;.Sc.le
• In .addition/.-.the; EnuironV^ntaX..^

em, wi;th;. all^of,; these^tuc^i^'sVis'.^that: \£he^ actual dose ; of ; ^dipx^n^tji^^^^i
:::
^~'*-Zli?-*?n^S
idu&amp;^^ce^yeQ^
&gt;e po'ssibTQ^tQ''mfix .pe^
I

.;•-;•• :^.^m^mmm^
1 * 1 '

;ho did

• •""•" * I-

- ' -'

'-I- **'• _ • • * _ '

...".•-''

y"a"rying : ^amounts 1 of^^ "dioxin :,'with': people--':
• • l_.^-*L'
*

f''_'_^':^'1__-.*^'.*'_

_ ! _ * — . - •

_ _'. . "1 —J

j^ f*. ^ 'k^. •" L. ,— _[ —I .' . ^_. ^_ ';•

^* T—•.'-.' C! "*»'_•• _• ' f * •"• "-^ ••;
"

esults
EI u els'"could'" preVent' "such ;j mis classification and .would at 'the ; same timo;'
lood leuel
"'.• :::/'V^•-:;;.{|-;vi.:V-•^•/r:2':::..-^^ '"^ "''^'iff' •!"•:; • ^:':\^"^.-''': \,^';i-'':V'^r'"''"^|'''"• .,'\-Vi'::i ':;i.-.;"^'••^"'•,^vy"&gt;

iue us

s the
easurements'would be'meaningless;., since the' last exposure would haOe;.occu.rrec
ore than 13 years, ago and since; the general populatiprf-.is exposed. to. minute,,
mounts of dioxin from uarious' sources.

; - T -'/ '

' - ' ' ' •

'

.j

,

• •

,

/ • : '•.-.'

•

.

'.

.

•

i-

" • • • ' . •

:

:

•

.;;';,
:

"

...-'•'•'

'

•

:;;•"/'''.•!'
. • • ' ' .

'

'- ' .-

.'''

. . - ' " * •

• " ' ; ; ' • 'L • * '

S t u d y i n g the; population; 'at;-Times B e a c h , Missouri^:.'still d o e s ' n o t . ' g i u e u s
nformation : about; low-level;';iife'time . : 'e'xpo'sure to dioxin/

Since" it ujculd,bs /;

n e t h i c a l to a d m i n i s t e r dipxiri to-"h'Urnan'sT we"jTiust' rely Von ahlmal'-'studi'is's'-'tp-T^

�•;ake p r e d i i
dictions'about the'toxic effects of dioxin.

Similarly, it' would'not

•ya u s e f u l to look^. for "
"acute subclinical health effects..of dioxin-.in a

;

•opulation" that .had its last, "exposure many years 'ago,, s u c h a's' some.'of, the y^-;v&gt;.
iroduction'.jjjcVrkejrsVJ'. 'Iri'su'sh^a population'; the analysis;-of morbidity^a^rid.^s^vlortality"' • data' 'w'buld' 'ibe' -mo• &gt;re~~• •*f •'•.-'. i t;• f u. -l •;-•'':"••'&amp;•• "t;-:'-. V:, ; ^,. -•;.;•; &gt;•- • ••:-\rJ.^^^.i:\..^.:-#-~-?R^t^:^^&amp;
r u '. . .
'...,
,',i
" ' f ' '.
*
-• "''-"".
-.' '
-."''
•
"
•
.
, " _ - ' * • • • ' i " ' /''•;.,": f".'"'•'•••'"""*, "*t """"-i.'i- i* f !

e

ioxih!"ex'p"b^]j.fe^

;

in ;,Work'ars ; 'occUpatio'nally. 1 exRpss^'t.p::xi^^:^

ioxin^con.t'aminaVpcl * product's i.;^ In 1979 , CDC began^uiorJk,'*pn"X/'registhy . of ; 'uTsv-'' !&lt;
• • . ' "'•'• &gt;^'?^^i-'?^'^'-;^r^^K^;v".::^::"?'v i 1 ;.'•:-.•!."*•" •'.-'i.-v/ ^::'^';^&gt;:^7^;'/^^':i;-'^^'^-^ «•'
&gt;roductioh. r wprkers;.whp. were pptentially exposed,; to;..,dipxinr d u r i n g - the '^synthesis
r formulatipn' of/substa.n'ces';'cphtaminate'd .'.UJith di.oxin^..^;Jh'e^'sub^anc^sVincluide
u c h commonly " u s e d ' productsVas tri.cHldrop'henbl; 2 ' ] 4 , 5';rT;'•'•..'the herbicide which:
i - , : !-.:':' \&gt;-':Ft-j.i^$i;Z'i*&amp;-.&amp;^^

•as .'one comppnehV.'pf-'Agent; Orange'; ''a
. ' " : -;;.' ''": '': V.':^ •:. &gt;V ! l'X ' ,": ."..;:;; - : . V ^ V r - - . ; '.'.-.!:;v i - ;!.."'•': .'i' • • l;" ' :':. ^ i| : ^f.V' i. ' ,'^V&gt; ;' : ;J:? 'V'': ^'"V^ ;'.": f-'". -" ; -'

After .the CDC'registryVis; completed,' qurvfirst, research task,, will..b'ev tq - ;

' : , •;-Vi^'V.O;i=Vj?V-:';:i^A^

ompare^.th'^'^aus^es^of^ide&amp;t^

'' l''l'^!':£:i'*'*';&gt;'. ^^'^^'ii^^-ifc^vW

, S. population,?., We exp'ec^t' to ' inclu'clet about 6 ,000 'wprK'e'rs'''in" ; -this J -;stuHy:;jv-:^G
f July 1, .1983,: 5,000 have;: been: included in. the ' registry'."," Enrollment' will ''bs
ornpleted by December of. 1983 ;' "'we plan to have all. information &gt;elating r tb v v ; '"he status of these wp'rkerV.collected and analyzed by .March 1985"™uieli: b'efor.e
he final -'result's", of ; CDC/ s 'Agent! Orange Epidemiology Stu'dy .will ^.be"'.availabie',;
CDC is exploring'., pthsr/^uses; of: the w o r k e r r e g i s t r y &gt; '.'including, u s e ' i n -• :'-,
tudi.es of certain illne.sses and" 'problems 'wi'tK reproductibn- 1 'a'm6ng^e'xp / osed '•';' V

�o e r s o n s ; . . D e c i s i o n s to' p r o c e e d with t h e s e k i n d s o f s t u d i e s d e p e n d on
scientific, f e a s i b i l i t y and., .the a v a i l a b i l i t y of r e s o u r c e s ,

Since .mos.tof th

wb r^e rV ". n c lud ed in .the; " CDC ; r e gi s try '.we re ^e x^'bV^^jCi-

inq' "the !l?eViVd'Y9'4b^
••*

•

- •

•

-.

• • ' • . -

.:.(•;• •

•'•-•

.,•'.:..

-'* • :' . ' . • . ' • • ' " * '

'

-v ' - . . ": i

: -V i '* '." • :

.

''!• • '•'• :."i? •' . - . "• .-«'.':"•.) .'.•; ..-'••

-''-I

••

••'*-• . •.'• • •

l

. '

oith long latency "periods^be ''.ab*l.e'_'to^ find, t h e m .
:o ' e u a l u a t e ^ f he';&gt;t^ait!i'';'Xt^

• : • ' ' ^r

:

'

'

• ''Workers: ha y«p^e.ire^

• • '_".••'•

•-'.'.'

v '..'..".•"•• T'.:.' ;;V«-'';'J,, i.',;:!., ';.':." -Vi^

.- .• • ;--' ",: '• '.'•'.'•; ' . ' • ' • • ''•, .".:•" ":. • • * '.'•j'.^'-'U.V.'^T'"".?'-

:

HoweJe^&gt;y_we."_plan. i ^^

'&gt;.er&gt;prif at B-yeVr;; inte;rval;0g||:|^|gt|j
!

'

'"'•' '''"- '

• • ' "- " • " ' '

'

'

'reduction;'Rer&gt;^
H'n'nal"-Tn'e'fVf uV*^' "'nf.'-'"p'rfuf^rinm^n^l'

'Meal f K Srn*'4rireV' YfJTTFHSV Ptii$&gt;ri'e&gt;&gt;! -»^:"^i'

acid herbicides and - c o n t a m i n a n t s ii.v.that registry is similar, to. CDCI.sv^rn^*^
l
:
- • - ' -••^•- ttv&gt;*.-.;»^V^

•&gt;:'••: - :;&gt;••&gt;: :^V¥--2-o; :. -^:\.ii^,v^^.-^^:^v^&gt;r

' • • ..'•::;'- 'V^'V^Ci. .* •-:;'4=--. ,..?:;---.V-V;-;,-.;v}.S;(^.i,::;-i '.'•'.^•.tf-:-1. • : • . • •;. -'?-, • ^^ -'::,^ ;..•'i'i.r^^-rV;^^/;-? ^-Y-.'f ^;/.^.:
December 198?';'. ; ,Dr:.,"fatrici^oiichar;^ on '.detail from ;CDC/NIOSH;'±-o-;IARC/V:^ : :c:^'

' ' ••,^rf:^%;°'^/^

';/.^ •'?':•'-'.•' ' • • • ' . ' • • • . : ' - ' ••'^• : : -:-:.-&lt; ; ;;.-- V&gt; .V :;•':' :?'JU'' •":-•;: *?:•'•

;ompleted the.:feas ; ibility a s s e s s m e n t .for .this project.', , Cohorts frorr\ .mor^e-.thai

•20 product! on ,f a c i 1 it i e s&gt; t n r o u g h o'u t; E u r o p e" a n d A u s t r a l i'a "a n d N eui' Z e a i a ri d ' we r &amp;'
k
;
:
:
r. - '::;*-^^^^:^.•«'^7.:•^^ '^•^^'•••^ •t•:~ ^:•,'J.• • rVv'-.'-j. ••:;..••/ ;'-^.;-.-v^.:;:;:;Vv^: yVi.^.-."- -^\'-•rS^V^^-i ;&gt;^-^^
;
;
;
;
;

••v-'.^^-i-^-^v^v^xn^^^^^ii^r.?^* !

i&lt; - vs.'. -:p;' ;::&gt; -•;:•;,•:: 'h..- ;rv-^-:.:':5: ;i-\, •• ".'.^&gt;.' i^«/J-:;?yy:.^;^^i:
:

••'''"" ted', to. ••determine- their" suitability for epiderniologic s t u d y ,

Now-th"a"t ''-"'

:he feasibility" study; ;has\be&gt;n ^completed; a joint l A R C / N I E H S meeting ,:has'";b3:en
s c h e d u l e d , for mid-October" 19.83 'to'' bring together potential"; collaboraiior's^tp-;^
iecide"wheth ; er'to^ontinue; t h e ; project a n d t o . d e f i n e an'."action pis- ' ' ' ' ' • -''"-"

9 7 7 , cases 'of- s o f t - ti's'su^';,sarc6m"a were r e p o r t e d among\;Siue;dish'lumberj's.'cks~'uih

�; ; ',: •". ' . -.;••. :";'- "-^V,';' •:/

. -17-

had been exposed to phenoxy acid .herbicides.

Thi s c l i n i c a l o b s e r v a t i o n . / l e d - ,

researche'rs in Sweden" to cpnduct^.two separate epiderniolocic case-control ;.v
studies;'which; showed; increa,seci, risk.; pf. soft/tissue sarcoma.'. Later, K result;3v&lt;

gather the'"work/."hi stories'-; and ;patholbgic:: s p e c i m e n s for all s e u e n . ' c a s e s - i r ";- ;

.:*^
:A$

e'v a u a e t h e . ;
'
'
'^"^^ *
''
'

'

;

'

'

;

;

r

sarcoma •.cages' !.a'nd';-- to- f pcu's 7 medi cal /expertise''; on .the ' ques.tion: 'of: tji

legitimacy of ...grouping di/ff erent ] types of, sarcomas .;;..:. '.-,*'. .' .;•-.;; ; : ' - ;'-•«;':•':; vC.^-^i'l'•' :':'-'/;i.H'-:'';-^^Vi;;'-:':|v^-^©^^

;i

i

:

' ''••• -; . P- iy^iS,:|-^|| ^:^
. ;; We beiieye'/.trtat'^nfoymatlbn' 1 ^

• • ' • : ; ' ^ : ' ; ; :;, •

''^U ''•'l^'-;:.'':' 1 ' .^..'•''.'•'-^•'••.^ •^,;:";K^

/'!.''•&gt; .•;'-V::/^l&gt;!-:^':"-r'''7"'-!'"-.!';2^!\ ni^v^
as'sbciatipn between^ soft. tiss\

sarcoma i n jiumans^ancf e x p o s u r e - t o 'dioxin-contaminated p r o d u c t s is - . / • • • j r . ; ' : . ;
accumulating.;

I n t e r n a t i o n a l ^ s t u d i e s that fail to, c o n f i r m an association.' :: ';'-. ,

between soft t i s s u e 'sarcprna\in h u m a n s , and e x p o s u r e to d i p x i n - c o n t a m i n a t e d ' j : '•
p r o d u c t s s u f f e r 'froV the; def icienci'es p r e u i o u s l y d e s c r i b e d ' o n page 3. •.'The..;.:
: o n t r o u e r s y : o y e r 'this ;as'sociation is ongoing' w i t h i n t h e j s c i e n t i f i c community.'
r

or these " r e a s o n s ,' Curoful'.-apidemiolpcjic a n a l y s e s a'i?e ' ireeded.

The .quest5 : on o

in association, of s a r c o m a s ; and e x p o s u r e . t o p h e n o x y acids and chlorophenols Is
:eing a d d r e s s e d in the C D C ' D i o x i n R e g i s t r y m o r t a l i t y s t u d y a n d . will be' "•"„;'"•'.
a d d r e s s e d by the I A R C s t u d y .

In a d d i t i o n , o t h e r s t u d i e s , s u c h as case

•• . : .

�-18-

ontrol studies', are being proposed and conducted;.

Epidemiologic.studies . li

hese will further delineate any' association.

•

1.

.

.

-' - - ;.;'-

A number of' case-controT studies : haue either been"propos'ed: or'started;-.-;
;
;
; f;
:
;
;
7

&gt;'./•'^ ^?^ X-;^•'^•.•c• ^ ' •&gt;^:";'^^^•:^'•^^r•i: ••4^•• ^ L•; ••-•n. • ''••'' .- ' • ' • • ^ V - ^ - ^V'v^/ ^^;^--^"^

A N a t i o n a l C a n c sr..: Institute *'*&lt;*T\ &lt;_£'.._&gt;,, will ••^..i.^if.^j.^: &gt;.--•*-'&gt;.•-r-i-.--^-..-^^-.-.1-.--.
e r Institi 1 - L ~ "(NCI) 'study ..---in 'concentrate'" ph Voft^t'is.sVo"
,- ," • ' ,. ..'*" ' 'f • •"'• ~ '- •. '••*:;.' ' •; - '- * ." •.
v
^.;.-^-;i:;^':i^.^-Vf/•:•;'•••;."•- :.;V-;'' :»^-^'-'•'' '•' -•'V:-'''-^-"''-'';;'':' •^^^'•^^'''•^••^''-i
» fc. j* '

3.

'

v^. _r\ &gt;J

*J ih. «1- ^ . Ln'm *^
-

4^1 ^i

I ! I In 'r* J_

( X^ h*t
A

" —*

1&gt;S • *•«» l-v y^i W^
!

«^

t^i 4V •
*

^J J*.' ft &gt;&gt;' ^K

&lt;-i *T

* J« L*i A. jm

&gt;-.

'* * ". ' 1 "&gt;!
.

The Armed.'Fprce's'/ In.'stitute "of. Pathologyl^and ;the .U^S^.^Ueteransv^x/;^^-!^^;;;
ie

ft d mi n i s t r a t i o a wi 11\ a Is o';s c o n d u c t:;; a "c a s e ~ c on tr o 1 , s u &amp; y o f .s o f t. t i's
.|

s a r c prna s r;" Since': "t he s e.'." t u mo r s 'a'r e: r a r e", fmp s t p a t h o 1 o g i s t s " ,'d o'. n 61;: s e ev'm

and.- ha'y.'e diff icul'ty.;iji':diagnosing ] tjVem,,'"." Hans ' Enzan'g'er, of .the: ftir;','For.c
•'•'; • '••''. ^•*^&lt;§:&gt;^--1:;i&amp;^:;.';l'i-:'t$.-^^^S^h^i^^^;'^--!:/''•/•' :-'-"" ':-''^':;^:-ill':V-;.;^l" ;-.lf^&amp;.^#:&amp;£&amp;(&amp;.
. Institute^pf^Pathology ;.-;is"|n; expert ,;in. the' diagnosis; of^. these"; tumors;-'.aji
has 'a"large ;'colle"ctio'n'..'frpm;;around !the country. .', These;, tumors 'uiili'form;,
basis:; pf .the.' study'; '••'/': ';:' -:- 1 ;';,.•.•••' ,f ••.'.'-.

'• '

]' ' ' ''"''

'' '•'"-'•' ' •'•" *•-•"-"^'

CDC has! proposed.;an. additional, study ;using the NCI's Suryeillance , ' . . i r . Epide'miolpgy 'En^ Result's;. (SEER) ^network.;: ;

. ;. '^-,- ••-•. '&lt;;: • • ' - :y .X:.'::,.:;;';,v :.:::-:-;

�Other pertinent ongoing or proposed studies are listed below.

CDC has been conducting an investigation, with support from the Veterans
Adminis'tration and -the; Department of Defense, to determine" whether" 'v'r^irV-

Vietnam'veteran's; haye a higher"risk of fathering 'children with birth'^l^"
defect's. . Data . 'cpllectipnvis to be .completed by the, end of;,-1983 ,", ahcf'vtKe,
J
l
• "
^
/,
-i
;
p r e l i m i n a r y a n a l y s i s is to be d o n e s h o r t l y a f t e r w a r d s .
&lt;
&gt;
*
i
•
,
,
" &lt;•
'i _j
.
,
v r
r
- -*
!v .** • •"
v. *
; ;.' " ^^
CDC has developed a proposal for the Veterans^Administration to* conduct
f

^

&lt;

* i

'

^ ^ m ^"* *•

large epidemiology study in Vietnam Veterans.

Jfi&gt;

' "

i

'' V

i.
-

^

-

"

&gt;5

V

&gt;' i

t

The Veterarjs ^Administration is conducting a mortality study on "personnel
!

,

\

who served in the military during -the Vietnam war,
V

*
.
4

J

**

t

*

*i

'

*

The .Veterans Administration has also' propose'd a. study .of twins, only' one
of whom'ser.v.ed .in "J -^--'-'•••";;•"•': *' - ' '
:

''•' : • • • • • • •

^:"!S:['J&amp;^

.•,.: U.S.'.^ ; x
V ; Air. * ^ .conducting
; ^ For..,ce.is
The
:

• ; - • • • - - : •- .. ,.'•.-• • .^---, ; •:.-•...
•:^^^:^•^^
;;5X^:^?S^

a study

;
vyv^^s- - who '^^f^^^S®.'
-: .conducted/- •
of personnel

spray:' 'in yietnam—the."Ranch Hand Study."
'
'
fing '

_-...,..
Some"results;.of this study

•.,'

Id
should becbme.'.Vvailable, ..during!; 1983 . : iV mortality ., study of .'this 'group
with only a very.rlimited number of death certificates, was negative. .• •

CDC is'.conducting, preliminary studies in selected;Missouri populations
which haue been'e'xposed: to dioxin-cohtaminated.'soil.' Some informationv
c
;

• .' :• "'•^v.'V'. •••'•"* ;:"^.; -•'.-•;-£•'.• ••• • ..';,-•; ;•'•'-•;/..'•.' •'.-: •'• • j'v. •• •• . •• '-.

• .- •

'..'•! -'' 'j • ' •. .•.' •'•".''' '•. "'V • ' '."'.'.•.*•'.","''• - ' " '••'

from'these studies should, become auail.able by the'-'end o'f 19.83. '' ''.-"•",''•":

�Q u e s t i o n 3:

(hat additiojiajl r^
' Animal'r e s ear c h ' nas' established t h a t , oioxin is'"very' toxic;&gt; '-•• t'ha"V:;'it:;is^^
ha s' e s
r

)xi
etotoxi c , " a n d . c a r c i K o g e n i c and that it impairs the celi-mediated;;iffirmjne^^

nse';;?-:'':.p'ioxi^^
respbns

b u t , instea^; : ;isi-'aii vi^Purity^n^iV"
.,"•". A'.'"'number'] of •X t " s ^s^in'. i tH'e^Uni^ed V^-t^

:ertain chlorinated;^
ain

.•' Most :pf : \thisV;^ibxl f ^

StatesVlVaye^jple^
"&gt; -? ^» \j 4 f\ »-i v\ • v ^'X *I T

"i "** "• V «•&gt; r\ m A" i . i K a 4- ''.", *l a t* o . r&gt; i i n «i T ±* KT X

4~ l~i = ^

^K» o d

^4 "! rs v *J

rt

'

A T 4-'!S /M »r^ l*i - ' '*•* *-.l^i"Jsi1' '^ -i •*

: e 7 and'', bi pau ai ]Lab'iii ty.; of :Jdi^i n ' f^r om;;d if f e r e n t"; soils v.;';.e;i:t hej^fjp|r;fcfnanV^.
Dr ani'mais'.'; 'iV-v-' (Wo"te':, ; . .'»•_•-,•;,'. i ' - •;(.•..!•• •••r./ .""---:v.-•-'-•,;,,:••!. .../-•, •-,'.••'".'.•,•,» j -n o••t 'j .yet&gt; •:-" '•,.•=••.:: '-.!' .--•-- &gt; ahimal ::; .'s'i:ud"ies ; 'b\
'"Re'cently: 'completed /.but'- ,'- '
repbKted .'' -.,:',v&gt;i-V •,':•,;,, y \ j . •••-. r i" • •' :•:&gt;
'.!•••• .-'.••- '' • :"r*--'-t•' -£i
:
:
v -^V:&amp; V£?*&gt;rJ-^
-he National foxicolo'gy . Prb'gr'a"m-."b'n: bioauailability.'of ..dibxin in ."cb'ntami'n'atbdT:JI

'

J

'-).:^t^^-£'^v^

5 o il s', i n d i'c a t e •• h i g K ' 1 e u e Is?, of Vd i" o x i n, a re ; b'i'o a.y a il a b 1 e:' 'i n , two 'd i f f ere n t' types
jf soil''.) ^Nv':";v;?;K-{^ft^:|.;-^:;p5:^^

: :

'

•'":•"'' ^ ; "'- -' : '^ "'i'^-viX^"^.^'^'*

To prpuide' answers: 'to/'the "qVestion "of.'whether hii'rian health "has1 bee.n^;1"'';;.
effected by'.dioxin exposure we 'must 'do additional human'epidemiology •studies'',
rhe most useful studies would be. those of.the highest e'xposure to, the largsst
lumber of people for; the. longest" time,"

If those studios showed no affect", it

jould be reasonable to assume', that! nothing .could be gained from studying
ndiuiduals with lower. and:...shqr.ter' exposures;.".. If health effects are.';' :- .';

:':

.dentified in. these "studies'/ ^Investigators', could lo'ok.J;or them .in;,1 e'ss. exocso:
populations^"" •'.'•' -;.; ':'.:; ; .:' ••.'I}':-,''-/.'":-^' '1 :'•' '•- '" ''•• '['"'' • '. • ••. -"-

-'-'v":': ;';'"• .,"• '.;;-", '••':':'•'•?'•=''.• r';"" .-:'

�-21-

For the health effects, data", to be most useful, investigators " should;,;/ &lt;;s.
jetermine ••"."•;'. ••'* '-.-•..: ?.•-.'•' .:.•-•.-. •:'• f burdens*'1V-:'. •*•';'.the study-^ . population.•-•••.•'*.•.•'•"' • ; -U••.'•./:-./;'.'--.^"~- / . • / -•/"
dipxiiy'body '•',••;'*..':-: -';"» in. 'i-' .&gt;."-&gt;-•" •"•.'••''•?• k •?;&gt;•';;• •••-.•'•^ - '. &lt; v&gt;' .....", •' ;.' .&lt;;.*"'' / /^•^^lii":'C-'--''\,"j
' '//
'- - "' •
••'•••'•"•'•' ' '•-' '&gt; '-—••".'"•'••-

:' J '- : ""- •,*•'•.' '

.' .'•'•.:• ••1"..i '"

"•'' " '..'•:""•'!.'

. ' ''-''•"• :'-&gt; '"••••:' :':"-"'-:-

For this reason,,; the ratio .between dioxin leyels in blood ,and acfipose./'.':
tissue should be ; determined ; -The methods for dioxin analysis in blood';and ''*.'•'-''*
;: ;
••" •'.•'A&gt;-=."v- V':" - ' -? : ^ ^
" ; ^1 : - ^
- ,; v;'--^&gt;v-:-^| = ^ V " 0 : - ^ ^
:r"'^v'
adipose tissue; "need ,'t'b be. istandardized ,.. 'and appropriate; ..quality",.cp.ntr. pls~-; and:.
1
• • •':-&gt;•; .'•.•.•*-... -/•;•.••:,:/•••";;.' •"'-' •,i; ^U'VV':;tv,;."?'";':..iv .,;'-- ;&gt; -,r •'.;'.: • ; •.
•:';."'",''• * . . '--v -ir'. "•'.-•••''..•'r,.MV-;...=wi-.'.v^ &gt;^VJ-/-^
'. -.-:f: ' '• •"-f^'-;'X' ••"• •/£-''.:'• •'"/"-.-•/:•' ';'i •:'•'.''',•'• •^'••:,'!v..1.'..".V.::.; .:: ••• • . . . . '.; •'•;;.,• ,..-:'-.-•!' •',;-'-•' V ' ' ^ ' ' ; ; .'.,'!.••"''
; . - V - ^'
;

^u a 1 i t y , a. ss u^ran" c e!s ;;jie e d s" to .;,b e''^e s' t a b'li s h e'd ;•;/' _ For', s c re e ni'ng ' ^u r p p^s e s V.-' we ". h'q p
chat .it. wi.lij'b'e^o^

:

.'lel&gt;el"s .: in -'blood ^^fit^ls^muii^xy

easier a nd
/|.lesS; ' ' " " to collect/ blood 'specimens t:Han"'_to obi:ain.;$ufg'icail
''traumatic""
"'
'
remoyed

t | ^ s i e | /-;3^^
;£i^jv:

The folloming IniF'Qr'iTi'afcon 1 "''relates; ' .the" Subcomrnit't'ee* s:: questions; 'reoa
' ' ' 1 "
'to
"
''*
'
DC's determination

In a.lrVs'k£._as~se^

,.animal/data' .and_ oiV an e'valua.ti'Qr

of how'ind,lviclua:is:; c'arT be/exposed .ta'spil" and Contaminants ':ih soil, ...the/CDC/'
estimated t'hat^ 1'ppb of dioxin" in a residential area u)ould/represent/a risk
.cor human exposure'-'.'tb'/dioxin.

This; assessment was based on a number^of .'"bast

judgment" as sumptions"''for, "which definitive evidence is • not; available •; .' Some/c
chese assumptions deal with the extrapolation from aniipal data.to. humans'and
jjith judgments concerning tha" mode;.; and ^ degree of exposure./; . ;. .

^ ;•'•'';./•/•...

This 'concentration' was'"calculated by^'considering houj much dirt .a..'to(.Jdlc'.i
(child age 1-3 years).''miciiit.eat/how. much dirt, might be picked up by the ski;
during such activities as Gardening, and how much dust.might be inhaled.. It
was also cpnsiderocl that -V//V';/' / //'// \ /'^ •//•.%:: -•'.'

'^--v; M'' .• -"'.V"''/ :'/^/-

�-22-

;oddlers would only eat dirt for.a few years and that gardening would not ba :
^one on a da.ily basis, particularly in the winter.

It was assumed that..if.'. th

iioxin was bound to soil, absorption of dioxin from skin might be 1-10%";''from
he intest'inal; t;Fa:ctv-'30%;:;v.and; from the lungs, 50%. / At 1 ppb. diqxih,'In'jiJieV'.v
oil'(if the-dioxin was bWhdto soil), if a toddler ate 1 gram .of' dirt,''."got''!
•ne gram of soil on his or her skin, and inhaled dust from the .area,, his./bh .,-j
ier total dailyfdose ^uj'ouTcJI'be between 311-400 Vicogramsvp; If; I0\'grams-'of,'dirtiere ingested and .10; gYams 'of; dirt'made' contact', with the'';s'kin","'.th'e"'.'d'b's'V"of?•'-•*:"

( .' ['•£&amp;^£&amp;&amp;;^*-'^

iiSfef'-':!^. -.li"^- -' • '•-. •:.;' - i '*•• !:.\: : -f •; -l^ /:';-^T' \%f^: •'.' ''^&gt;.
4

Therefo.rei^oh^'af.bbdyV.w

for a":..10-kg. (about. 22 ..Ibs;.")';-todd.ler/,-

.he doses 'that'' could';befrece'iued.^

3&gt;.to 4-year.-, per iocT (ages ^:I/2^^.B... ^year?)';; ....p'uring . thJ.s -timef;;the;dq.5fe^ jserj^;-nit of body"weigjit' wouldi^gradually .:.dec'rfa"se,' since^'the; child '"gains':^wei^|ht.^-^'
ihile\hand-moutl^ "activities.; decrease'"','-: The' dose for';'adults ' would .b'e'';iVss'-fonr"a
g bw basis-'.;.-;.•.: ;: '••'']-•-..",vv;:

The no obserVable"" effect leuel 'in 'rats is.1,000 picbgrams""psr kg"bui;v with
i safety factor'of-'. 100, the" daily allowable doso would',be 10 picogram/kg bw •
'or humans for a lifetime.

Additional safety factors should be : added ..because •

if the effects .on reproduction in monkeys at dosage .leuels of. 1', 800 - : , : . ''
• I cog r a m s / k g
kg,
!

because^dioxin causes cancer ;in"rodents, .and because .species^ '

-ary in s e!'nsitiyity.-::\:-Exposyre'would
ns

'not', be for,2^ hour's; a day sOery^'day'/ and

Ithough dioxin;is,extreinely persistent in soil,'soil leucls would"gradualiy

f •..

�iiminish.

If an a d u l t r e c e i v e d a daily d o s e of 4,000 p i c o g r a m s , his or her -

lose on a kg- bw basis "would be — f ^ — o r . a b o u t 57 p i c o g r F , m s / k g / d .

.If he o r . s h e

-eceived ^OO-'picograms', ...the ' d o s e would, be 5 . 7 p i c o g r a r n s / k g / d . . "f Jhese : /cSos'sge';/.
Levels are belouj^the no-obser.yable e f f e c t level in rats ;v houjever ^^they^ dojnp_.t
Qlow a sufficient

safety ;factor,. nor do.,they take .into a c c o u n t .the.' variation.

In 'sensitivity ' between/ s'pecies^;; f : . : ;:--,i.; ;'/•'•".• :;V ' .- ; . ; .-.;.:'• vv^'^r^'--^'^'-^'^.^^:.'.:'^'^^-^^^
Levels; : 'b'el;ouj.i''p!Db' in;Vsoil.:'rnay .^be . f o u n d . in;;inany' areas.- of theVUnit^d .^V^N
States' andVmayyTepfe^

Some of tK^;^ources' : ;pf'-lHV?e^^^

iioxins 'are^combystiojri.' and'^gelneral pollution due" to :us_e' i j j?f""chiorinated; phenol
I . . _L'..

L J ii'jL. ".'«UU.'.'JL .' T O'yl'C.' ; ' " M^,t; - ' m i ' i ' ^ U

n «^A»-.Tn= 4- 4-r\r\

-1C

»I1»^^S&gt;K^A

h n l i l o 11 ftV "'•-'... r\fi

'.:• 7T".,-

The level of.:i"ppb is! not t o ' b e c o n s t r u e d as. a "safe" leuel;...houjsuer;;-it,
.s a leuel .of - c o n c e r n , "developed1 f o r ' o n e ' s p e c i f i c . r e s i d e n t i a l , site ... Levels of
c o n c e r n mus"Cbe".'deyeloped', for .each. site an'd depending upon the various:;;:;^&gt;r,&gt;'
;ircumstances"; 'will _ likely' 1 'be different in differing sites."'

• -^ :_•;''•::'-- ••;-,,; v oO./'^

�-.:•' . . •• . .•••.; . ' v ' . '

"..'• .REFERENCES'

" ":;"

-

v'.

;;;; ';;;;

Allen J R , ; Bcirsq^ti'DA.; Lambre : ckt. : ;LK,:. ; Uan .Miller . J P ' . v ; : , RGp^oductiyi^el^^^or 1
halog'enated : ;aro^tic^hyd^
^979{320: 419-25 ;\/f./";C/ " :'\^:'.^V;v";^ ::•:•:-•'' ' ' I- '-. : • '" '.

'

:

•;»• ••'••• ••'-.::~'. '••"-'• •'••,-. ^'^Ul.iW^

Bauer'H^S^huizKH.^^pieg^
!

: hers teliung°uon^chlprphenol^o^
:
i

-. -'•-• i.^;i;-j ;^^^^^ ^j^!j^K^-j;^;i^;/
i36i-img$Ml^
A

/

«

.

•

•

Bucju

•^•tf.^-tfW

*

Bleiberg ; ^ p ^ |
i
|
|
|^
norDhv'rlW/^V'ArcW^DermVtol;:' 1 :!^!;?
porphyria
l

!

!

;

'i^:'v P.i "; ;&gt;-i :
;

.y^i'^^.j*rl

!
Carter CD, K i m b r o u o h ^ R D , Liddle J A C l i n e R F , Zack MM Jr, Barthel WF, "
j
'\
Koehler RE, Phillips PE. Tetrachlorodibfnzodioxin; An accidental poiconJng
•• ,

*••

episode in horse arenas,

. •

•

j, r &gt;f

Science 1975;188:738-^0.

*r~M

*

&lt;

C o g g o n . D / . A c h e s o n ; . E D . ; ; D o ' p h e n o x y h e r b i c i d e s c a u s e cnncer. in &gt; a n ? : : - Ujl£.ei ,-&gt;.-:.
1982;7:1057 r 1059, /;;';..:7. " • • . ' ^ - . - • V ' - ; - j'';. '"r , : , - ' : ' , . : , '.'.- ,' ' ";
Copk R, Towns end.'J.'' &lt;Jtt NG, a n d ' S i l u e r s t e i n G.

M o r t a i l i t y , e x p e r i e n c e s ' o f , ;.

e m p l o y e e s / e x p o s eiyip?;2 f '3/7^r&gt;Vtrachlorodib
'igcU 1930;22:530--532 : ;:

: Dioxin, chloracheV..and soft "tissue" sarcoma. .' Lancet 1931; 618: 3-14:^

�-25-

Courtney KD,

and Moore JA.

Teratology

studies with

• •" '; '.

.•

. ••';'."-..: •'";;'-'./•'"'

2,4, 5-trichlorophenpxyacetic acid and 2,3,7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p~dioxi.n;^;:: ~
Toxicol. 'XpP.l-v' 'Pharrnacol.' 1.97 1 ;'2Q ; 396-403 .-

-' V.:''•-.''..'

E r i k s s o n ' M , Berg N/Hardell 7 L&gt; Moller: T, ;/ and ftxelson 6,
; ;
;
: ;
:
•

/

r

.-..;-;^,.: , :" 'V.'.i .-;'''"-:- 'V./-UV:: - ' ..:•=;

;

".'t • - - ' •••- - ' ' '• '' '

: '••;

'"'•• "' V;" "^••'!l')-^-:

Soft tissue

",.':.;•-'••^'•'• r '^t-''" -r-^ . -\' ^'

and e x p o s u r e , to''- cherriical, subs.tances , a. c a s e - r e f e r re n t 'stud \/'-.-.'; i' B r ; '•;• J; V I n. ^'j.;.: ''?j
:
'
.•/-'••.'•'•" • ' • • ' . " • • ' • - ' • • • ' "
' - " ' " ' ' ' '"''- ' ! • ': ;' • ' . ; /v""':;';!&gt;i-,"-/;"f; •-'•'.-:. ^"W,^;^^^*'
" ^-^ ^.^^ "• ^' V;Vv;:ftV^.0; ??£tf.\-.
1
•'

indings'-:v' ..'-'.'V '&gt;'^--^.^--;--.i'-'&gt;;l!1^v;'-"; .e'.wA-1u^ ;
and.••indicators.-iof-:heauy:\Vi-•
(•-.-• :• •

i
' -r-- '.'• •; \-"^;-^?1--^'&gt;/:^^::^:^^^-ri^'-::?f:f:t

Hardell LK; and ..Sand.^troni.'ft'/:. Case-control 'study:* Sof ^--tissue 'sarcomas''and ^.;;-.exposure'i" -«------------•--••--'-;:---•-'-

-••-• -»—---.:^.- -T ^&gt;-

1979

Hardell L, Erik'son M',. Lenner P, Lundgren E.

Malignant 1'ymphoma and exposure

to chemical's, especiallyTorganic''solvents' chloroph.eno.ls and phenqxy. acids : -:;
A case control study.

B.rt 'J..._ Cancer - 1981; 43 , (2) : 169-76 . .'•

Honchar P/ and Halper.in W.-

/ : . ; ./,':•'

/;

2, 4, 5~trichlorophenol .'and- sof t Vissue'vsarccma';-^::

Lancet 1981;(1) ; 269 /;. :.:;;'V:."'. .'-. :\ '. -.'• •/;

''

'

::
: .:

' ';^'. ' "" • ' '- ' •• ': t. '_ /';;.:v'"'

�•26-

:ftRC.

Chlorinated dibenzodioxins.

In:

Monographs on the evaluation of the

:arcinogenic risk of chemicals to man. Lyon, France ; WHO, 1978; 15 ;41—102'.. ..:',:;.
Jensen NE,- Walker' ftEv. Chloracne;.. Three cases. .; Proc. 'R . Soc .••' ned;:'.;V.!-4-Hvyv^.;^.X}
. , ' • .:'-&gt;::•. " •'•:.'- ^'^ .^'""- ;'. ;; -V*'-. ' •' • '-•' • ' ~~~~~
[•~^~~^.-"''~7': -:- .'.:T-

.

-''::v y '

lirasek I, Kalensky J, Kubec K, Pazderova J, Lukas E.
-' _

'

Chlorakne, porphyria

4-

;utanea tar da und a n d e r e i n t o x i k a t i o n e n J u r c h h e r b i z ' d e
v

1 9 7 6 - 2 7 328-33.

':'--'.

;

- ,

:

t

i

,

-

4

!isJit^rvjc

*

•

, • .-

'

:

.

i

'.imbrough RD. Halggenated b l p h e n y l s , t e r p h o n y l s , napthalenes dibenzodioxins
I
*' l *
'*
\
' '
t .
j n d related p r o d u c t s . Top; Enuiron.' Healti^ A m s t e r d a m , New Y o r k ; Elsevier N o r t i

f

i

'nuts'on JC;',.1s.nd.:Poland A ;.";•. Keratihization of"mouse teratoma cell line XB:
&gt;roduced by :2&gt; 3 ,7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo~p-dioxin : an iji :.uitjio model of:\
:oxlcit'y^;-'''C'eiV'^

, \ ^.

.-:,);''/..-''',; •"'.; ':':". '\^-;^^i^]..--^^^:.-^i^:^^i

:ociba RJ/ Keyes'DG, ; Beyer;.JE, Carreson RM, Wade EE, Dittenbar DA, Kalmins .RP,
'rauson LF, ..Park _DW/."Barnard SD/ ''Hummel RA, Hurhiston. CGV " Results' of a, tuo-; ;.
.1 • - - • • • ' &lt;

ear chronic tdxicity and."6hcog"enicity study of 2, 3 , 7 , 8~tetrachlor;oa'ib'enzo—
icity
)-dioxin (JCDD) .in raiis. .rToxicol.. Appl. _P_harmacol... 1978; 46: 279-303'.

�'•'..

: ''

Kociba RJ, Sc'hujetz B f t .
£TCDD).

.

'

- '

-27-

' ; .'

' '••

•

T o x i c i t y of 2, 3 , 7 , 8 - t e t r a c h l o r o o ' l b e n z o - p ~ d i o x i n .

D r u g . M e t a b o l i s m Reuieuis 1982; 1 3 ( 3 ) : 387-406.

...;;;/.,.

,

Lamb J C , : Moore 3A,' M a r k s ' T A . - E v a l u a t i o n , . o f 2 , 4 - d i c h l o r o p h e n o x y a c e t i c ' acid..-.-/
( 2 , 4 - D ) , 2;'4', 5 - t r i c h l p r o p h e n o x y a c e t i c acid ( 2 , 4 , 5 - T ) , and

' "'. (••'•'•^:-'^'^^':f:^

1, 3 , 7 , 8 - t e t r a c h l o r o d i b e n z o - p - d 4 o x i n (TCDp) t o x i c i t y in C 5 7 B L / 6 mice: .* ..^•- • '..
R e p r o d u c t i o n " a r i d f e r t i l i t y i n t r e a t e d 'male mice and. e v a l u a t i o n o f " c o n g e n i t a l .
-----' J o i :
n a l f o r m a t i'ons in their o f f s p r i n g . . .fiat 1.". Tox 1 co 1.._ Program', Res'earch T r i a n g l e
institute;'-'. R ©y^eaVV h \.tri a ngl'e.'r. P a r k ' , ' NC..,' Re port Mo.' NTP-80-44/ 57pp.-;/iA;;vv^:v'^r:

lay G.

Chloracne frprh' the a c c i d e n t a l p r o d u c t i o n of tetrachlorocJiben2odioxin
:
:

' ••'

- - ' - • ' &lt; ' • ' •'•- ' - •

•

-

o l - o a r ' h T rM^nrJ-i KdiT»rtri'4 rwi n •"'' a " s i r e n
lay. G.: TetrachloroHib'enzpdioxin':l':a ' "o"iuK»Ivi o y ;' of s u b j e c t s ' ' tenk years

'

af.ter.^^.

• - '. v:^-••^^•^^5.-^v^'^vA-^/;:«::|-i ,;-,j-./ =•;•;: .";••.•&gt;;;:.'V:---?;- ..•• • • • ^^.••^.•.•"•'^P^
:
;
:

x p o s u r e . ' ; -B'r/ J A Ind7' MedV" 1982;'39 :128-135.

": '

'--• • ' • • • . : . - - . '" "•'•':':'":^.

IcConnell EEX; f-'i?-°.r.e^ JA«'.^Haseman^ JK-!, " H a r r i s . MW.- : The..comparafciue; toxic'it;y."".of ^
h l o r i n a t e d ciibenzo-p-'dioxins in mice and g u i n e a p i g s , &lt; TJox,ic.pjU_' A££Lt.', • '' "
h a r m a c o l . ; 1978b;'44:335-356.

• ' : : '.'•''

'. ,.' .

: '•v-.'';.-

-, '

. " : , - . - " ' " ' • . - ' • ' " . ' - .""•'••

i c C o n n e l l EE, Moore JA, Dnlgard DW. " Toxicity of 2, 3 , 7 , 8-t9trachlorociiben;:o-p
iioxin in . R h e s u s " r n p n k ' e y s " ' ( M a c a c a m u l a t t a ) ' following a s i n g l e oral 'dose.; . .,'.;...'
"oxicol. fippl'.-" 'Pharrna'col/; l § 7 6 b ; 4 3 : 175-187.

:'

:

; ? : : ' • ' - . ••• ::-";"'.'".'..' : " ' / ' . . ; •

�'•

cNulty l\'P.

•'"'. •'

.:" •'

:

'

:

- • ' •- •;.•"

:

i :' • ' • '

-28-.

,

• :•

;.,.

:

. • : : .' - . ./'. : : '';'"V

-:. .

'.-'

Rhesus macaques: • Pertinence for'studies on the toxicity of ,.-'•'..

hlorinated hydrocarbon environmental pollutants.

In:

Chiarelli f&gt;B;:v •••"''•••'?
Berlin:".' ..."• ,. ; "- : .- l r '"

arruccini P.S, ea'$V.\ Advanced . Uiews. in Primate Biology,
ipringer-Verlag, 1982.
'•.
"(

"'

: u r r a y FJ, Srnith : FA, • N i t s c h k e K,D, . H u m i s t o n . CG, . K o c i b a R J , Schwetz Bft .'.'VTh'res
' *
i
"&gt;
*(
e n e r a c i o n r e p r o d u c t i o n s t u d y o f r a t s g i v e n 2/3 , 7 , 8 - t e t r a c h l o r o •- ' *
* i
i b e n z o ~ p - d i o x i n (TCDD) i n * the d i e t . Tgxlcol,.. flpg,!^ .Pjia.npac.ol^^
9 7 9 ; 50 241^252^ ,\^ *

'-^!

, V '1

r

&lt;

*4
-

«

'*

ational Toxicology P r o g r a m . C a r c i n o g e n e s i s b i o a s s a y of 2 , 3 , 7 , 8
&gt; "
i.
'
&gt;
• "«•
,
e t r a c h l o r o d i b e n z o - p dioxin (CAS No, 1 1746-01-6) in Sun ss~K'obster mice
i
i
'
^
dermal study)...'.' Natl'-.'.Toxlcol; .Program/ T e c h . Rep,:. S'er'. : 1982a; Issue '201',"' 113

i . ,--

; - .

'

.

•

.

•

•

.

-

.

, ,

ational T o x i c o l o g y P r o g r a m , -,. Car.cinogenesis b i o a s s a y of \, 2 , 3 , 7t 8

:''•'' j - • ' . , . ' :

e t r a c h l o r o d i b e r i z o - p f d i o x i n "(CAS fJo.- 1 1746-01-6) , i n , . O s b p r n e - M e n d e l rats' .a'nd
6C3F1 mice ( g a y a g a s t u d y ) .
982b;Issue/209, 195\pp. •

N a t l .• Tox.ic.ol^^ Prog ram Tjecji^ R'feg.^ Sejv , •
:

-'.•.•''

eal' R f l , Olson Jr', G a s i e w i c s T A , G e i g e r L E .

.

/.

•

The toxicokinetics of.

, 3 , 7 , S-tetrachlor'odib'snzo-p-dioxin in m a m m a l i a n s y s t e m s .
?_ 1982; 13: 355-386. ' , ' • ' . . ' ''.

iliuer RM."

;

. • ' r' ' ' : - •' / '

• •'

Ojrjjg fjet

':- • ' / - ' . ' - . ' -••-'''•'

Toxic' e f f e c t s o f 2 , 3 , 7 , 8 t e t r ^ c h l o r o d i b e n z o 1,4 clioxin " i n • ' ' . • •

aboratory w o r k e r s .

8_r_/ J _._ IncL_ Ked_,. 1975; 32 : 49-53 , ••".

'. :.. ^

�' •'•'-•

/-. ;'

• • ; ' '. -29-

'. •• '••' ;

'

)tt M, Holder B, Olson R. .ft mortality analysis of employees engaged in the'
-imnufac'ture of 2,4,5-t'richlorophehoxyacetic acid.
!- y Ot\Ji j• (, £, i• *r / "^O *
Q f f 9 9 /L7 — ^ v
'* '

5

:

' • • ^7; r" ' ,

' • . - ' ' " . ' ' • • '&lt;• -r.1

•

-

-'-:-• • • • •
•'

• '' ' '••'•

. • -• , . .
"

' - , . ! ' ' :'.':

'••
;•'•";,"

~ •'

- -* • •- .- ..

' ...,'"• • •.'- '.

. - ' . ' . • '

itot HC, 'Goldworthy T, Poland A .

"
: •' -

'

J

.

J. Occup. Med^.

•

V .. •

,

. ' : '. '• • .•

'• •

,

r

.

.

.

',

'

. '' '
'".

. -

.

•

. •'•. •;.

• ' • • ' '• •• • . . . . . . ' . ' ' .- ,• .'-':, •":.-•
•
-.

..''

-

'••

•".!'•-.'.-•'•-•.'.•''.'

Promotion by 2 , 3 ,.7,3-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-

J i o x i n of. h e p a t o c a r c i n o g e n e s i s -:f rom d i e t h y l n i t r o s a m i n e . . : . . C a n c e r Res ,_•• ' '• ;;,; : .'
1980; 40: 3616-20.":;^.. "v^: • '•:'^^^:^'{:^''\': '"•'.'.,•''.. ^, ' •'.- .

..:

.

';.''"•'•.'•'• .'• .' . ''.'.''

'r.

•''.••••"";'

'olahcT.A',' and' ';&lt;ende\A M ;v-V 2^V?\ 8-V2tr«chlorod
mlecular

:ontaminant '5

'robe' •" FecL

ft, Gloyer'^E, .Kende.'ASv. '"St'e.repspec'ific^ h i g h , a f f i n i t y binding;-of. ,- :_| '•
? , 3 , 7 , 8-te'trachp'rodibenz'f3^pi-di^

hepatic, -"cy to'sbl'Jf.Jj. ^SBiolv:'chem;. &lt;: S

,976a;25l74926r4946^^;vV:5P^^1^^
'

•

'

* ..

" - ' ' . •

•.'.'•'

.&gt;'"&gt;!:"

• • . " , * ' ' • ' .

•s • &gt;

. ";

•

,

'

"

-

'

'"

•

„ , ' ' ' • • - " '

•

•

•

-..

d A,. Qr^enliee ,WF&gt;' 'Kende i'ftS.^ .Studies on ^he mechanism .of action of th
inated 'dib^nxd-p-Qioxins "• and related, 'compounds-.

oland A y Palen D, Glouer E.
-.airless mice.

Annj. fU^ LC^J^ ' gcjlV

Tumor promotion by TCDD in skin of HRS/j

Nature 1982; 300: 271-3 . .

oland ftp, Smith' D, Hatter G, Fossick P.

;

A health su'ryey of workers in'a

,4-D and 2, 4, 5--T' plant . AjlpJu - Ejnulronj. • iiealth 197 1; 22; 316-27. .' .

eggiani G.
reas.

.., .-. .'.^

Localized cohtaminatipn with TCDD-Seueso, Missouri and other

Jo£ic_s dji ' Enui rjorV., jlealth i960 ; 4: 303-371 .

,

...

�=••.•.••'",:••
\eggiani G.

'

. ' -3°-

• • .--,

.-..;.'

Acute human exposure, to TCDD in Seveso, Italy.

rnuiron.. Health 1960; 6:27-43. .

'

"

3mith, AH, Fisher DO,.. Pearce N,; "league CA.

.-.'. ,v\'.:

3\_ TpxlcoV^ and- '

. ;.

. "". VV:•-.'.

Do agricultural 'chemicals"", cause':

;oft-tissue', sarcoma? ' r Initial findings of-a case'control, study in f\JeuT' ': , "" '•'.'.
Zealand.

Community "Health Studies . 1982a;6 : 114—119 .

••-' ''

. • , "''-:.••.. •' ; : ' • ; • • . • ; -

Smith' AH ,. Fisher DO/^Giles'/HJ,. Pearc'o N." The New Zealand soft'tissue...sarcoma'
case control study: interview'findings'.''concerning phenoxyacetic acid ';.'• ''I'•;• ;.'J'"-;''''-.'.
trol"
.•""'"^nb'1-^-;:^-^^-'".^^^-^"'1^''. ?•'!'"-' '-••':~:'-•^"•'•' • ' "' •' :'•••• --. "•"- •• '•....''••£'.•'.*: -. .;. v^ "^
sxposure. " ••,-•4P
."• Poster.'ses'sioniw.. 3rd International Symposium on Chlorinated Dio'xins
'.
and Related
Iatedjc6'm^puhds):'..October•\12-14'':.': Salzburg', ftustria.;' lS82b - ;-V&gt; ..••V;,^ r3 .

•^'^^^^^^:^^J'^^ff^-:*J\ ;U(:1 ••'';-':;' •. / :--P'-:-::' '*-.':"'i:i ^&amp;^y^:^\^
:''.'
3mith FA, Schwetz'.Bfl[;' Nitschke.. KDi ^'..Teratogenici'ty of ^••'•••;'•;--.: :-\;---«-.--^ K,h•'- V^'^i &gt;
2,3,7, 8-tetrachlbr,odibenzo-p--dipxin ,in CF-1 mice . Toxicbl. fippl. Pharrnacolv
OO
; 38: 517-23.•'.'- .;'.

' rt-7fi . 5 O . C 1 "7

;:

',

•••'.•••

'•..'•••

- • . • • • . • ' . i '•

'.'•'.

'

•

•••'..-•

:

.'

• : . . ' - - : . . - -...- :
.,•:.•••;•.. .
- . ; . • .. - - - . r : - : . ; v . .
fhiess AM , •.Frentzel-Beyme R, : Link. Ri.. Mortality, s t u d y .of persons exposed. ,y.6 .....
.

trichiorbphenpl-proc'ess
iioxin in a ; trichiorbphenpl-proc'es accident t h a t o c c u r r e d in the BPiSF A G 1 on '
Jouember 17, • 1953 .- ; ''A.fiL

1S82 ; 3 : 179-189 .

'oth K, Sainfai-Kelle S, Sugar 3, D r u c e J.

C a r c i n o g e n i c i t y testing of t h e . ;

lerbicide 2 , 4 , 5 - t r i c h l o r o p h a n o x y e t h a n o l "containing dioxin and of pure r.iioxin
n Swiss m i c e . . WaVurie., 1979;278: 538-549.;

, ,

' / ' . • ' . ; .• ' : '. .

;

••

l

"• - . ' • ' •

�- • •

• • • -si- •

los JG, f-'oore JA,, Zinkl JG.

•

.

Effect of 2, 3 , 7 , 8-tetrachlorodiben2o-p-dioxlry on

'-.he immune' system of laboratory animals,
1973;5:U9-C2; ; •"'•=; 'i^-f^ • V^'vi.^V-"-'''V :''

^nuiron^ H_ejj.t_h £jir_s_^e_ct

.',.•'

* "

' "•' '•

' •'

.

•

'"

•.

••• •'" • '

: e t r a c h l o r o d i b e n 2 o d i o x i n in a t r i c h l o r o p h e n o l 4 p r o c e s s a c c i d e n t . . J,,'
f

ied. 1980;'22;'l'l '-14':. "".;&gt;• -.'

,: .-' '.

HS/PHS/CDC S/33

;

'' .'

. * :. *'•"• \" " •-'"V'''-;i " •

' ; .''-'•'.'::-

r ' ••: ;' ' • :':'"':"'.vv'v\'''^;--'rv-^V'V%^'^'^:.^

Zack'J. Suskind R, The mortality experience of workers exposed to
. • ' • •••"• ' , ; • • ' ' • '- •,.'•':•

•-/ ;. •

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22348">
              <text>066</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22350">
              <text>1761</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22352">
              <text>Series III Subseries III</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22349">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;Center for Environmental Health, CDC</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22351">
                <text>Typescript: Detailed Responses to Subcommittee Questions on Dioxin, for the Record, September 1983</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22353">
                <text>soft tissue sarcoma</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22354">
                <text>animal studies</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3279" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1692">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/6e557b4dd98341b1aa4143c1bdf9bdca.pdf</src>
        <authentication>f94d8d48acca10e633409bc4d569daf9</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63641">
                    <text>Rom D Number

02239

Author

Tumasonis, Casimir

Corporate Author
Report/Article Title Typescript: Preliminary Report: Chick Embryos as a
Probe of the Relative Toxicities of Soot Samples from a
Polychlorinated Biphenyl-Containing Transformer, [nd]

Journal/Book Title
Year

Month/Day
Color
Number of unaoes

n

14

Descriptor) Notes

Thursday, September 20,2001

Page 2289 of 2293

�PRELIMINARY REPORT
CHICK EMBRYOS AS A PROBE OF THE RELATIVE
TOXICITIES OF SOOT SAMPLES FROM A POLYCHLORINATED
BIPHENYL-CONTAINING TRANSFORMER

Casimir Tumasonis and Laurence Kaminsky

Division of Laboratories and Research
New York State Department of Health
Albany, New York 12201

�Chick Embryos as a Probe of the Relative Toxicities of Soot Samples
from a Polychlorinated Biphenyl-Containing Transformer.

Tumasonis, C.

and Kaminsky, L.
The involvement of a polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)-containing
transformer in a fire resulted in widespread contamination of the
State Office Building in Binghamton, New York with a soot-like
material containing 1 ppm 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
(2,3,7,8-TCDD), 50 ppm 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran (2,3,7,8-TCDF),
and relatively high concentrations of PCBs and other polychlorinated
dibenzofurans and dibenzodioxins.

The chick embryo system has been

investigated as a rapid and inexpensive method for assessing the
relative toxicities of large numbers of soot samples derived from
different sites in the building, and as a means of assessing
effectiveness of the clean up procedures.

Samples were administered

to the embryos in an aqueous 0.75% methyl cellulose vehicle via a hole
drilled into the shell over the air sac.

Soot exhibited the greatest

embryo lethality when administered on day 4 of incubation.

There was

a non-linear dose related embryo lethal response with a marked saturation of embryo lethality between the 0.2 and 2.0 mg soot/egg doses.
At 2.0 mg soot/egg administered in 0.1 ml aqueous vehicle approximately 50% of the embryos were dead by day 18 of incubation.

No

deaths were observed with the same quantities of active carbon or
fireplace soot.

Increasing volumes of vehicle increased the embryo

lethal effects of the soot probably indicating that the non-linear
dose response was partially due to a lack of availability of all the
administered soot to the' inner air sac membrane. At doses of 2.0 mg
Binghamton soot/egg some teratological effects were observed in

�embryos surviving to day 18 of incubation. The effects included
curled toes, anophthalmia, exencephaly and edema and occurred at low
frequency and non-reproducibly.

2,3,7,8~TCDD when administered into

the eggs at doses of up to 500 ng/egg in the aqueous vehicle and up to
800 ng/egg in corn oil killed 3 out 15 embryos at the highest dose and
all embryos above 10 ng/egg in the two vehicles respectively.

Further

studies are underway to develop the chick embryo system for use in
investigating the relative toxicities of different soot samples.

�A fire which involved a transformer in the State Office Building
in Binghamton, New York resulted in extensive contamination of the
building with a soot-like material.

The transformer contained a

dielectric fluid (pyranol) which comprised 65% Arochlor 1254 (a polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) mixture), 35% chlorinated benzenes and
trace

additives.
Soot samples collected from two sites in the building were •

contaminated with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD)
and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran (2,3,7,8-TCDF)(Smith et al.,
1981a).

Based on pyrolysis studies with PCBs it was predicted that

the soot would also have relatively large contamination by other
isomers and congeners of the polychlorinated dibenzo dioxins and dibenzofurans (Buser _et al., 1978).
Predictions of the toxicity of the soot based on the known
concentrations and toxicities of 2,3,7,8-TCDD and 2,3,7,8-TCDF are
suspect for a number of reasons:

Not all contaminating components of

the soot can be determined, the toxicities of all polychlorinated
dibenzodioxins and dibenzofurans is not known, the role of the soot
matrix was not known (Silkworth et al., 1981) and the potential for
synergistic or antagonistic effects of the pollutants on the toxicity
of other pollutants is unknown.

Thus there was a requirement for a

toxicological assessment of the soot where it would be treated as a
single compound.
As part of the clean-up procedures in the building, assessments
of the variations in toxicity of soot from different sites and at
different times as the clean-up proceeds will require toxicologic
analysis of numerous samples.

A method was required which would

provide a rapid analysis of large numbers of samples without enormous

�resources of personnel and equipment.
using chick embryos.

These criteria could be met by

In 1966 a group meeting under the auspices of

the World Health Organization recommended that the chick embryo not be
used for screening drugs for teratogenicity since it is "too sensitive
to a wide range of agents and affords no parallel with the anatomical
and physiological relationship existing between a pregnant mammal and
her conceptus" (World Health Organization, 1967).

Subsequently argu-

ments have been raised in favor of the introduction of the use of
chick embryos in teratology most notably by Gebhardt (1972) in the
Netherlands and Wilson (1978) in the USA.

A number of reports have

appeared recently in which the chick embryo method has been used to
investigate the teratogenicity of methylene chloride, trichlorethane,
trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene and toluene (Elovaara et al.
1979), DDT (Swartz, 1980), cholinergic insecticides (Misawa et al.,
1981) and Lambda-Carrageenan (Monis and Ravasio, 1981).

The chick

embryo has also recently been used to evaluate the cardiovascular
teratogenicity of 2,3,7,8-TCDD (Cheung et jal., 1981).
In this paper we report our preliminary investigations on the use
of the chick embryo to investigate the relative toxicities of samples
of soot collected in the state office building.

The main criterion

which will be used is embryo lethality rather than teratogenicity in
view of the controversy associated with interpretation of teratological effects and the relative ease in assessing embryo lethality.

�METHODS
Fertile White-Leghorn chicken eggs (50-60 g) were obtained from
a farm maintained by this Division.

After collection the eggs were

placed into a humidified (65-67% humidity), forced-draft incubator
(Humidaire) and were incubated at 37.5° ±0.32°C to initiate embryo
development.
Contaminated soot was obtained with a vacuum cleaner fitted with
clean collection bags from the stairwells of the third and fourth
floors of the State Office Building in Binghamton, New York.

It was

filtered through a wire gauze to remove gross inert contamination.
Extracts of the soot were prepared by Soxhlet extraction with benzene
for 16 hr.

Benzene was removed by heating the solution.

2,3,7,8-TCDD

was obtained from Dow, Midland, MI as a solution in toluene.

The soot

was analyzed as previously reported (Smith _et al., 1981b).
For administration of samples a small hole was drilled into the
egg shell in the center of the airspace (determined by candling) and
samples injected by a syringe (fitted with an 18g needle) onto the
inner membrane.

The hole was then immediately sealed with paraffin

and the eggs incubated.

At the end of the incubation period eggs were

cracked open and the embryos were removed and evaluated for lethality,
gross malformation, and subcutaneous edema.

Surviving and non-auto-

lized embryos were individually preserved in 10% neutral buffered
formalin.
Studies were performed to determine the optimal day of administration and day of termination, dose response-curve, effect of volume
of vehicle, effect of polarity of vehicle and effect of the soot
matrix on the toxicity of contaminants.

The last study will be per-

formed by comparing the embryo lethality of the soot itself with that

�of the benzene extract of the soot.

Effect of vehicle polarity was

tested using 2,3,7,8-TCDD as the test compound.

The vehicle chosen

for most of the studies is 0.75% aqueous methyl cellulose.

A similar

system has recently been demonstrated to be a safe vehicle in teratological studies (Fritz and Decker, 1981).

This vehicle has also been

used in extensive studies of the toxicity of the soot in guinea pigs
(Silkworth et al., 1981).

�RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Thirty eggs were randomized into three groups of 10 each.

On

each of days 0, 3 or 4 of incubation one of the groups was inoculated
with 2.0 mg spot/egg in 0.75% aqueous methyl cellulose (0.1 ml/egg).
One half of each group was opened on day 14 and the remainder on day
18, and the embryos examined for viability.

Administration on days 0,

3 and 4 resulted in a total of 17, 38 and 78% embryo deaths respectively.

It was thus apparent that administration on day 4 was the

most effective for the expression of soot toxicity in this system and
all subsequent studies incorporate administration on day 4.
In a series of studies designed to determine the dose response
and reproducibility of embryo lethality, eggs were administered 0.02,
0.2 or 2.0 mg soot/egg in aqueous methyl cellulose into the air sac on
day 4 of incubation.

In each study 15 eggs/group were used.

Two

control articles, fireplace soot and active carbon, were also inoculated separately on day 4 into the air sac at doses of 2 mg/egg in the
aqueous vehicle.
lethality.

In no case did the control articles result in embryo

In two separate experiments 2 mg soot/egg led to 53 and

56% dead embryos indicative of the reproducibility of the system.
However, studies repeated at periods over several months showed much
greater variability.

In one of these experiments only one of the

soot-exposed embryo which survived the 18-day incubation exhibited
anophthalmia, exencephaly, toe curl and a short upper beak while four
other embryos exhibited edema.

Toe curl was found for the majority of

the chicks surviving up to the 18th day.

In the duplicate experiment

the only gross teratological effect observed was toe curl.
In Fig. 1 the dose response curve for embryo lethality is shown.
There was a marked saturation in embryo lethality between the 0.2

8

�mg/egg and 2.0 rag/egg close levels.

To explain this we hypothesized

that the aqueous soot-containing vehicle would form droplets on the
inner membrane and that some' of the soot, distant from the droplet
surface exposed to the membrane, would not be available for xenobiotic
release to the embryo.

To test this hypothesis we administered to

groups of 15 eggs, doses of soot in differing volumes of vehicle.
Doses of 1 mg/egg and 0.1 mg/egg were administered in 0.05, 0.10, 0.50
and 1.00 ml aqueous vehicle.

No volume effect was noted at the low

dose but at the high dose lethality increased with increasing volume
until the highest volume where embryo lethality was diminished.

Mor-

talities were 13% at 0.05 ml, 20% at 0.1 ml, 40% at 0.50 ml and 27% at
1.00 ml.

It is thus possible that low vehicle volume prevents com-

plete exposure of the soot to the membrane.
In a recent study (Cheung et al.f 1981) 2,3,7,8-TCDD was administered into the egg white of fertile chicken eggs in a vehicle of acetone/corn oil at doses of 0.003 to 25 ng/egg on day 0 of incubation.
At no dose was there more than 45% lethality.

The soot sample used in

the current study has been reported to contain approximately 1 ppm of
2,3,7,8-TCDD and 50 ppm 2,3,7,8-TCDF (Smith et al., 1981b).

At a dose

of 2 mg soot/egg there was thus approximately 2 ng 2,3,7,8-TCDD/egg
and 100 ng 2,3 ,7 ,8-TCDF/egg.
In an effort to compare the soot embryo lethality with that of
one of its similarly administered components, and to determine the
effect of the aqueous vehicle relative to a more hydrophobic vehicle
2,3,7,8-TCDD was administered to the eggs in aqueous methyl cellulose
or corn oil vehicles.

Groups of 15 eggs received 0.1, 1.0, 5.0, 10.0,

100, 250 or 500 ng TCDD/egg in 0.1 ml aqueous methyl cellulose, or 10,

�50, 100, 250 or 800 ng TCDD/egg in 0.10 ml corn oil, or 0.1 ml of the
vehicles on day 4 of incubation, into the air sac.

With the aqueous

vehicle only the two highest doses were embryo lethal producing 1 and
3 deaths respectively.

In contrast all doses above 10 ng/egg in corn

oil killed all the embryos.

The corn oil vehicle killed 4 embryos.

While this study has not been completed it is apparent that the embryo
lethality of the soot probably does not arise from the bound 2,3,7,8TCDD.
The effect of corn oil itself in killing 27% of the embryos is
consistent with a previous report that olive oil (25 yI/egg) injected
into the air sac on day 3 of incubation killed 27% of the embryos by
day 14 of incubation (Elovaara et al./ 1979).

However, in another

study (Kitos et al., 1981), corn oil when injected into the yolks of
eggs at 50 yl/egg on day 6 of incubation produced no deaths of embryos
by day 18.

In conclusion we have demonstrated that the Binghamton soot
produces embryo lethal effects when administered into the air sacs of
fertile eggs under conditions where active carbon and fireplace soot
have no effect.

The lethal effects are dose dependent and also

dependent on the volume of administration vehicle.

One of the

components of the soot, 2,3,7,8-TCDD, is markedly more toxic when
administered in corn oil-than in an aqueous vehicle and it is possible
that the apparent toxicity of the soot is similarly dependent on
vehicle polarity.

Further studies are underway to develop the chick

embryo method for evaluation of relative toxicities of Binghamton soot
samples.

10

�REFERENCES
BUSER, H. R., BOSSHART, H.-P., and RAPPE, C. (1978).

Formation

of polychlorinated dibenzofurans from the pyrolysis of PCBs.
Chemosphere 7, 109.
CHEUNG, M. 0., GILBERT, E. P., and PETERSON, R. E. (1981).

Cardiovas-

cular teratogenicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodi-benzo-p-dioxin in
the chick embryo.

Toxicol. App1. P h armaco1. 61, 197-204.

ELOVAARA, E., HEMMINKI, K., and VAINIO, H. (1979).

Effects of

methylene chloride, trichloroethane, tetrachloroethylene and
toluene on the development of chick embryos.

Toxicology 12, 111-

119.

FRITZ, H., and BECKER, H. (1981).

The suitability of carboxymethyl-

cellulose as a vehicle in reproductive studies.

Arzn.-Forsch.

Drug Res. 31, 813-815.
GEBHARDT, D. O. E. (1972).
teratology.

The use of the chick embryo in applied

Adv. in Teratology 5_, 97-111.

KITOS, P. A., WYTTENBACH, C. R., OLSON, K., and UYEKI, E. M. (1981).
Precision delivery of small volumes of liquids to very young
avian embryos.

Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 59, 49-53.

MISAWA, M., DOULL, J., KITOS, P. A., and UYEKI, E. M. (1981).
Teratogenic effects of cholinergic insecticides in chick embryos
Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 57, 20-29.
MONIS, B., and RAVASIO, R. A. (1981). Teratogenic effect of lambdaCarrageenan on the chick embryo.

Teratology 23, 273-278.

SILKWORTH, J., MCMARTIN, D., DE CAPRIO, A., REJ, R., KUMAR, S., and
KAMINSKY, L. (1982).

Acute toxicity of soot from a polychlori-

nated biphenyl-containing transformer fire, (in preparation).

11

�SMITH, R. M. , O'KEEFE, P. W., HILKER, D. L. , JELUS-TYROR, B. L. , and
ALDOUS, K. (1981a).

Chemical analysis of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodi-

benzo-p-dioxin and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran in a soot
sample from the transformer explosion in Binghamton, New York.
N.Y. State Dept. of Health Report. Feb. 20, 1981.
SMITH, R. M., HILKER, D. L., O'KEEFE, P. W., KUMAR, S. , O'BRIEN,
J., JELUS-TYROR, B. L., and ALDOUS, K. (1981b).

Analysis of a

Binghamton soot sample for tetrachlorodibenzofurans and tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins. N.Y. State Dept. of Health Report/
October 1, 1981.
SWARTZ, W. J. (1980).

Dissimilarities in the toxic responses of

early chick embryos to DDT administered in different vehicles.
Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 25, 898-901.
WILSON, J. G. (1978).

Review of in vitro systems with potential for

use in teratogenicity screening.

J. Environ. Path. Toxicol. 2,

149-167.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, Techn. Rep. Ser. (1967) No. 364.

12

�Figure Legend
Fig. 1.

The embryo lethality of Binghamton soot as a function of

dose.

Soot was administered to fertile chicken eggs in 0.1 ml

0.75% aqueous methyl cellulose through a hole into the air sac on
day 4 of incubation.

The viability of the embryos was assessed

on day 18 of incubation.

13

�PERCENT LETHALITY
f&gt;0

O

CO

a
a
^-s b

O

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24228">
              <text>090</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24229">
              <text>2289</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24231">
              <text>Series IV Subseries II</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24226">
                <text>Tumasonis, Casimir</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24227">
                <text>Laurence Kaminsky</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24230">
                <text>Typescript: Preliminary Report: Chick Embryos as a Probe of the Relative Toxicities of Soot Samples from a Polychlorinated Biphenyl-Containing Transformer, [nd]</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24232">
                <text>BSOB</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24233">
                <text>PCBs</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24234">
                <text>animal studies</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
