<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=49&amp;advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&amp;advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=health+studies&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CCreator&amp;output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-07-18T12:43:22+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>1</pageNumber>
      <perPage>15</perPage>
      <totalResults>86</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="1536" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="7740">
              <text>029</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="7742">
              <text>0483</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="7745">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7733">
                <text>Beljan, John R.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="7734">
                <text>Nelson S. Irey</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="7735">
                <text>Wendell W. Kilgore</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="7736">
                <text>Kazuo Kimura</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="7737">
                <text>Raymond R. Suskind</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="7738">
                <text>Jaroslav J. Vostal</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="7739">
                <text>R. H. Wheater</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7741">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;American Medical Association, Council on Scientific Affairs, Advisory Panel on Toxic Substances</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7743">
                <text>October 1 1981</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7744">
                <text>The Health Effects of "Agent Orange" and Polychlorinated Dioxin Contaminants</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7746">
                <text>health studies</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="7747">
                <text>industrial exposure</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="7748">
                <text>human exposure</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="7749">
                <text>veteran health and hygiene</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2400" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="16621">
              <text>051</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="16623">
              <text>1357</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="16626">
              <text>Series III Subseries II</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16614">
                <text>Beljan, John R.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16615">
                <text>Nelson S. Irey</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16616">
                <text>Wendell W. Kilgore</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16617">
                <text>Kazuo Kimura</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16618">
                <text>Raymond R. Suskind</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16619">
                <text>Jaroslav J. Vostal</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16620">
                <text>R. H. Wheater</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16622">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;American Medical Association, Council on Scientific Affairs, Advisory Panel on Toxic Substances</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16624">
                <text>October 18 1983</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16625">
                <text>The Health Effects of "Agent Orange" and Polychlorinated Dioxin Contaminants</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16627">
                <text>health studies</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16628">
                <text>human exposure</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16629">
                <text>veteran health and hygiene</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16630">
                <text>industrial exposure</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2435" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1326">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/b5a1cdf71121edc4ae4ac1b2dbfb57fe.pdf</src>
        <authentication>f4a4f9a983def9e0b95c6ce4295856c7</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63275">
                    <text>Item ID Number

01394

Author

Beljan, John R.

Corporate Author

American Medical Association, Council on Scientific Affa

Roport/Artldo TltlO

The

Health Effects of "Agent Orange" and
Polychlorinated Dioxin Contaminants: an Update, 1984,
Technical Report

Journal/Book Title
Year

1984

Month/Day

October 1

Color

n

Number of Imauos

58

DOSCrlptOU NOtflS

See items 483 and 1357 for earlier versions.

Thursday, May 03, 2001

Page 1394 of 1403

�Reprinted by the Veterans Administration
with permission of AM A

THE HEALTH EFFECTS OF "AGENT ORANGE" AND
POLYCHLORINATED DIOXIN CONTAMINANTS:
AN UPDATE, 198*

American Medical Association
Chicago, Illinois

�THE HEALTH EFFECTS OF "AGENT ORANGE" AND
POLYCHLORINATED DIOXIN CONTAMINANTS:
AN UPDATE, 198*

Technical Report

Prepared by the Council on Scientific Affairs'
Advisory Panel on Toxic Substances
John R. Beljan, MD, Chairman
Nelson S. Irey, MD
Wendell W. Kilgore, PhD
Kazuo Kimura, PhD, MD
Raymond R. Suskind, MD
Jaroslav 3. Vostal, MD, PhD
R.H. Wheater, MS, Secretary
Environmental and Occupational Health Program
October 1, 1984

American Medical Association
Chicago, Illinois

�Contents
Preface
Acknowledgements

1

Introduction
Historical Perspective
Summary of AMA's 1981 Report
Chemistry of Dioxins
General Structure
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
Formation of Chlorinated Dioxins
Occurrence of Chlorinated Dioxins
In 2,4,5-T (2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxy Acetic Acid)
In Chlorophenols
In Hexachlorophene
Decomposition of Chlorinated Dioxins
Analysis
Extraction
Detection
Toxicological Evidence of a Health Hazard in Animals
General Discussion
Mutagenicity
Oncogenicity
Teratogenicity
Reproductive Effects
Studies of Human Populations
Introduction
Vietnam Veterans (Studies Complete or Partially Complete)
Ranch Hand Program
CDC Birth Defects Study
Estimate of Vietnam Troop Exposure
VA Agent Orange Registry
Agent Orange Biopsy Registry of the Armed Forces
Institute of Pathology
Single Case Reports
Of "Dedrumming" Personnel
Australian Birth Defects Study
Vietnamese Epidemiologic Study
Vietnam Veterans (Studies in Progress)
VA Identical Twin study (Vietnam Experience Twins
Study, VETS)
Vietnam Ground Troops Study
VA Mortality Study
VA Case-Control Study of Soft Tissue Sarcoma
VA Retrospective Study of Dioxins and Furans in
Adipose Tissue
Australian Mortality Study
State-Sponsored Programs
Workplace Exposures
Monsanto (Nitro, West Virginia)
Dow Chemical (Midland, Michigan)
Diamond Alkali (New 3ersey)

2

d56:contents (revd. 5-29-85)

4
6
7
8

9
10
13
14
15
16

18
19
20
21

22

23

24
25

�BASF AG (Ludwigshafen, Germany)
NV Philips (Netherlands)
Spolana (Czechoslovakia)
Coalite (United Kingdom)
Vertek Chemical (Jacksonville, Arkansas)
NIOSH Dioxin Registry
NIEHS-IARC International Phenoxy Herbicides Registry
Isolated Exposures to TCDD
Exposed Herbicide Users
Swedish Railway Workers
Other Swedish Workers
Finnish Railway and Forestry Workers
New Zealand Birth Defects Study
Long Island Railroad Birth Defects Study
General Population
Seveso, Italy
Times Beach, Missouri
Missouri Pilot Study
St. Louis, Missouri (Trucking Employees)
Alsea, Oregon
Review of Alsea II by Oregon State University
Review of Alsea by FIFRA's Scientific Advisory
Panel
Review of Alsea II by Others
Canadian Review of TCDD's Health Hazards
Cancer Studies
.
CDC Selected Cancers Study
NIOSH Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study
NCI Case-Control Study of Lymphoma and Soft Tissue
Sarcoma
New Zealand Soft Tissue Sarcoma Case-Control Study
Finland
US, Pacific Northwest
New York State
Michigan State Department of Public Health
Italy
Denmark
Immunological Response to TCDD
In Animals
In Humans
Conclusions

26
27
28

29

31
32
33
34
35

36
.38
39
40

•
41

References

R-l

Appendix
List of States with Vietnam Veteran Commissions or Programs

A-l

d56:contents (revd. 5-29-85)

�The Health Effects of "Agent Orange'1 and
Polychlorinated Dioxin Contaminants: Update,
Preface
This report represents the second comprehensive study by the American Medical Association on the subject of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), a topic that has been
of considerable interest to the lay public and the medical community alike. In late 1980,
the AMA's Council on Scientific Affairs directed its Advisory Panel on Toxic Substances
to review and assess the available scientific information on Agent Orange and its
associated contaminant, TCDD, and to develop objective information based on their
findings. The outcome in October 1981 was a broadly accepted and widely distributed
publication entitled, "The Health Effects of 'Agent Orange' and Polychlorinated Dioxin
Contaminants." A summary version of the Panel's report also appeared in the 15 October
1982 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).
In brief, The Panel found that,
"In spite of the voluminous data on the biological effects of the phenoxy-type
pesticides and their associated chlorinated dioxins, which oftentimes co-exist as
contaminants of the pesticide formulations, there is still very little substantive
evidence for many of the alleged claims that have been made against these
compounds. The most serious of these allegations assert that Agent Orange, or
compounds of a like nature, have caused malignant tumors, spontaneous abortions
and birth defects. Although data from studies on experimental animals tend to
support some of these claims, it is not certain that animal data are extrapolatable
to man. No laboratory animal can fully substitute for man; we must, therefore,
depend on the results of ongoing epidemiologic studies on persons who are known to
have been exposed."
In the interim following publication, there has been a disquieting and continuing
controversy both here and abroad over the long-term consequences of exposure to
TCDD. The concern has not been limited to the military who served in Vietnam, but it
has also extended to countless nvimbers of the general population who were believed to
have been exposed to TCDD in the careless and oftentimes unwitting disposal of toxic
wastes. Inasmuch as several important human epidemiologic studies have been underway
since 1981, the AMA's House of Delegates called for an update of the Council's original
report. Once again, the same Panel of experts was called upon to review the new
studies, to consider the more recent and relevant scientific information, and to issue its
conclusions and recommendations.
Acknowledgements
In the process of review, a number of principal investigators who were involved in
ongoing human studies were invited to meet with the Panel and to brief it on the progress
or results of their work. We are, therefore, indebted to the following persons and
organizations for their cooperation:
Ralph R. Cook, MD (Dow Chemical USA); H. Denny Donnel, MD, MPH (Centers for
Disease Control); Marilyn A. Fingerhut, PhD (NIOSH); William R. Gaffey, MD
(Monsanto Co.); Sheila Hoar, ScD (National Cancer Institute); Richard E. Hoffman,
MD, MPH (Missouri Division of Health); Renate Kimbrough, MD (Centers for
Disease Control); George D. Lathrop, MD (US Air Force); Vern May, PhD (Dow
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 1

�Chemical USA); D. Franco Merlo (Department of Epidemiology, National Cancer
Research Institute, Genoa, Italy); Kenneth W. Sell, MD (National Institutes of
Health); Barclay M. Shepard, MD (Veterans Administration); Robert F. Willis, PhD
(Chairman, Joint Health and Welfare Canada/Environment Canada, Expert Advisory
Committee on Dioxins); Alvin L. Young, PhD (White House Office of Technology
Policy).

Introduction
Historical Perspective
Phenoxy herbicides were introduced into commerce and agriculture in the mid-40s with
the advent of 2,4-D, followed by 2,4,5-T in 1948. Both were used extensively and
uneventfully in the control of woody and broadleaf vegetation in croplands, forests,
rights-of-way, and turf until 1969, when public concern was raised over the human health
hazards of 2,4,5-T and/or its contaminant, TCDD. As this concern mounted, the
Secretary of Agriculture suspended applications of the herbicide in areas where humans
might encounter greatest exposure to TCDD. In 1971, the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) initiated cancellation proceedings against certain other uses of 2,4,5-T.
This notice was subsequently withdrawn, and EPA initiated a plan to develop necessary
data for their decision-making processes. In April 1978, EPA issued a notice of
Rebuttable Presumption Against Registration (RPAR), an intensive benefit/risk review to
ascertain the desirability of continued registration and unrestricted use of 2,4,5-T.
One year later, the RPAR process was interrupted by an emergency ban on the use of
2,4,5-T in pastures, forests, rights-of-way, home gardens, and for aquatic weeds and
other applications, excluding its use on rangeland and rice fields. This suspension was
prompted by reports of spontaneous abortions in humans in Alsea, Oregon attributed to
use of herbicides by the US Forest Service. Two studies done by the EPA—Alsea I and
Alsea II—were criticized severely for insufficient evidence to support the alleged
claims. Inasmuch as the EPA believed that silvex (or 2-2(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)propionic acid) was related closely to 2,4,5-T and also apt to be contaminated with
TCDD, the Agency suspended silvex as well.
During the US involvement in Vietnam, herbicidal mixtures of 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T, picloram,
and cacodylic acid were widely employed as defoliants; these mixtures were variously
identified as Agents Orange, White, Blue, Purple, Pink, and Green. The most widely used
was Agent Orange, a 50:50 mixture of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T; early formulations of the agent
were heavily contaminated with as much as 47 ppm (a weighted mean concentration of
1.98 ppm) of 2,3,7,8-TCDD (Young et al, 1978).
After termination of defoliation operations in Vietnam in 1970, two reports by Dr.
Ton-That Tung (1971, 1973) linked Agent Orange with increases in liver cancer, abortion,
and birth defects. Although hard scientific evidence for that conclusion was lacking in
Tung's reports, a variety of other studies clearly demonstrated that TCDD was extremely
toxic to laboratory animals.
A large number of US personnel in Vietnam who may have been exposed to herbicides are
greatly concerned that Agent Orange could be responsible for the deleterious health
effects that they and their offspring are experiencing. As a consequence, a class action
suit was filed in 1979 against five herbicide manufacturers (Dow Chemical, Monsanto,
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 2

�Hercules, Diamond Shamrock, and Thompson-Hayward); the suit was extended to "all
American servicemen whose health has been damaged because of contact with Agent
Orange." The companies, in turn, filed a third-party action against the US government,
passing the responsibility for alleged harm to the government for its "negligent misuse"
of the chemicals. A similar class action suit was filed in January 1981 against the
Veterans Administration and the Department of Defense.
Some 2.4 million Vietnam veterans, including 1,200 Operation Ranch Hand personnel, and
20 civilians involved in destroying surplus Agent Orange, are presumed to have been
exposed. The news media have stated that potential "plaintiffs" will exceed 2.5 million
people and suggest that 40,000 veterans may become ill or die; an additional 2,000 or
more children also will suffer "catastrophic" birth defects. More than 1,250 lawyers
from 150 law firms in the United States have been involved in the litigation as of 1980
(Elson, 1980). The suit was scheduled to go to trial in Brooklyn, New York in May 1984.
The corporation defendants, however, came to an out-of-court agreement; without
admitting culpability, they set aside $180 million for distribution to claimants and their
respective heirs. An equitable means for assessing and awarding damages remains to be
established. Many persons are not satisfied with the outcome and may still seek redress
in the courts. Meanwhile, the veterans, their heirs, and the general public anxiously
await medical evidence that will either support their allegations of harm from the
chemical or prove convincingly that dioxin has no serious health consequence.
To date, at least 579 industrial workers are also known to have been exposed to TCDD.
The first of several accidental releases of TCDD during the manufacture of 2,4,5-trichlorophenol (TCP) or 2,4,5-T occurred in 1949; a larger number of employees were also
exposed to the manufacturing process from 1948-69. A suit has been filed against the
Monsanto Chemical Company on behalf of former Monsanto employees and representatives of deceased persons who worked in the company's Nitro, West Virginia plant.
One of the first large-scale exposures of the general population to TCDD occurred near
Seveso, Italy in 3uly 1976; the compound was released accidentally at the ICMESA
(Industrie Chimiche Meda Societa Anonima) trichlorophenol synthesis plant. Approximately 500 acres of surrounding countryside were contaminated to varying degrees.
Some people in the most highly contaminated area became ill immediately, while others
experienced chemical burns of the skin, abdominal pain, and internal hemorrhage.
Although there were deaths of small animals and vegetation, there were no documented
human deaths. Approximately 511 of the 736 evacuees were allowed to return to their
homes within a year (Homberger, 1979). Meanwhile, cleanup of the contamination in
Seveso has been completed. Seven-million cubic feet of the dirt were scraped from 115
acres and sealed in a reservoir outside the town. All houses in the immediate area were
destroyed and the area planted with trees; former residents have been forbidden to
return to their former homesites (Anon, 1984).
In the early 1970s, dioxin-conlaminated waste oil was widely applied to certain areas of
Missouri to suppress dust, most notably near the town of Times Beach and at three horse
arenas in Lincoln County. Reports were to follow of animal deaths and complaints of
human illness that sparked a national concern, which was further fueled by the news
media: the town of Times Beach was purchased by the government, other extensively
contaminated sites were discovered in eastern Missouri and elsewhere in the US, and new
rule-making by the EPA was established for the disposal of dioxin-contaminated wastes.
Meanwhile, several reports from Scandinavia indicated a possible link between exposure
to dioxin and cancer, especially soft tissue sarcomas. These reports were soon followed
by discovery of a number of soft tissue sarcomas among an industrial population in the
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 3

�US. An apparent increase in the number of deaths due to connective tissue cancers
among white women was then perceived in the Midland, Michigan area; this news
received wide publicity by environmental groups when dioxin contamination was
discovered in the Tittabawassee and Saginaw Rivers, Saginaw Bay, and the grounds of
Dow Chemical Company. The Michigan Department of Health investigated the situation,
the outcome of which is presented below.
In May 1983, a representative action was brought by several Nova Scotian residents
against a forest industry company that operated in their area. Plaintiffs were seeking an
injunction that would prevent the company from further spraying of 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T, and
mixtures thereof. A major part of the documentary evidence and testimony of
environmentalists and medical experts related to the alleged adverse health effects of
these compounds and dioxin. Quoting from the opinion of the trial judge (Nunn, 1983),
who denied the injunction for lack of evidence that the spray operation constituted an
unreasonable risk to health:
"...on the whole of the evidence, where risk to health is claimed in any study, the
circumstance has been one of massive exposure and such are not of significant
probative value in light of the actual low possible exposure here. ...most of the
more highly publicized studies in these situations are regarded in the wider
scientific community as flawed...particularly...the Alsea II study. Where risk to
health might be expected, for example, ...at Seveso, which caused a massive dioxin
exposure, none have found. ...the evidence of risk assessments clearly indicates that
any risk here in Nova Scotia, if, indeed, there is a risk at all, is infinitessimally
small and many, many times less than one in a million...(whereas,) the risk of
cancer to a smoker is 1 in 800, and for a non-smoker continuously in the same room
with smokers it is 1 in 100,000...this court is of the opinion that these spraying
operations can be carried out in safety and without risk to the health of the citizens
of the province. (Nunn DM: Judicial decision in the trial of Palmer et al vs Stora
Kopparbergs Bergslags Aktiebolag (or Nova Scotia Forest Industries), Supreme
Court of Nova Scotia (15 Sep 1983)).
The general public continues to be concerned about the possible adverse health effects of
dioxin, especially those of a long-term nature; eg, cancer, birth defects and reproductive
abnormalities. However, this concern is best addressed by scientific facts, not fanciful
conjecture.
Summary of AMA's 1981 Report

Before discussing newer developments, it would be well to review the salient points of
the 1983 report.
*

Agent Orange, as used in Vietnam, was a 50:50 mixture of the n-butyl esters of
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid
(2,4,5-T), together with a minor amount of the free acid 2,4,5-T (1% of the
total mixture) and varying amounts of the contaminant 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD).

*

Commercial formulations of 2,4,5-T, as well as silvex (or 2-2(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)propionic acid) may contain TCDD as a contaminant. At one time, the
amount of TCDD was as much as 70 ppm; present methods routinely produce
levels below 0.01 ppm. TCDD may form as a by-product in the synthesis of
2,4,5-trichlorophenol (a precursor of 2,4,5-T). It may also be produced by the
pyrolysis of certain chlorinated compounds in industrial or municipal wastes and

d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 4

�.by the burning of vegetation that has been sprayed with the chlorinated
phenoxy acid herbicides. Note that 2,4-D, a phenoxy herbicide closely related
to 2,4,5-T, is not normally contaminated with TCDD.
*

In addition to the marked variations in the sensitivity and susceptibility of
animal species to all toxic substances, there are significant differences
between some of the toxic effects of TCDD in experimental animals and the
human experience; thus, the animal data cannot be translated directly to man.

*

One of the more pronounced biological effects of TCDD, as well as a number of
other chlorinated aromatic compounds, is a tendency to cause chloracne in
certain animals and man. This skin disease is, in fact, regarded as the clinical
marker for TCDD exposure. Systemic disorders in man from exposures to
TCDD are unlikely to occur in the absence of chloracne. Such signs and
symptoms as impaired liver function, nephropathy, gastroenteritis, myopathy,
neuropathy, and central nervous system manifestations have been reported
after exposure to large amounts of TCDD; however, they have not been
progressive and have always cleared with time (the nephropathy and myopathy
have not been proven).

*

Other toxic effects of TCDD in experimental animals appear as pathological
effects in the liver, peripheral nerves, and hematopoietic and
reticuloendothelial systems. TCDD is a very powerful enzyme inducer. In
addition to altering normal enzyme activity, it may potentiate the harmful
action of other toxins or even render an otherwise innocuous agent toxic.

*

TCDD promotes car ci no genesis or induces cancer in some strains of rats and
mice. In contrast to other chemical carcinogens, however, this carcinogenicity
is always accompanied by considerable systemic toxicity. By itself, 2,4,5-T
does not presently appear to be a carcinogen, nor has it been shown to cause
genetic changes in any animal species.

*

A consensus of studies utilizing high prenatal doses of 2,^,5-T with 0.1 ppm or
less of TCDD showed cleft palate in mice (but no other species) and
embryotoxicity in the mouse, rat, hamster, sheep, monkey, and rabbit. TCDD
does induce genetic changes by the Ames test with S. typhimurium and E. coli.
However, dominant lethal and cytogenetic evaluations in rodents do not
confirm that such changes also occur in other animals, especially man.

*

While 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D pesticides have been used in agriculture, forest
management, and commercial and residential landscaping for over 30 years,
there is still no conclusive evidence that they and/or TCDD are mutagenic,
carcinogenic, or teratogenic in man, nor that they have caused reproductive
difficulties in man.

*

Both 2,4-D and 2,^,5-T undergo rapid decomposition in the soil and are,
therefore, of little environmental concern. TCDD does persist in soil longer
than 2,4,5-T but, in general, ... in the presence of ultraviolet light, it breaks
down rapidly when present as a thin film on plants, water, and the surface of
soil. (Its half-life in deep soil is now known to be much longer than one year.)

d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 5

�Chemistry of Dioxins
General Structure
Of late, the term "dioxin" has been applied—though incorrectly—to any of a number of
polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and more specifically to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (or "TCDD" as it is usually but inappropriately called for brevity). More
precisely, a dioxin is any of a group of dibenzo-p-dioxins whose structure consists of two
benzene rings interconnected by two oxygen atoms as shown below:

Dioxins differ only in the nature and position of their substituents; ring positions 1
through 4 and 6 through 9 can be occupied by hydrogen or halogen atoms, or various
organic radicals. Theoretically, there can be 75 different chlorinated dioxins; 40
different chloro- isomers have been prepared and identified to date (Buser, 1975; Buser
et al, 1978; Poland et al, 1972; Bolton, 1978), while five others have been identified but
not separated from their accompanying compounds (Buser, 1975; Buser et al, 1978;
Rappe, 1978). Dow Chemical Company has synthesized all 22 tetrachloro (TCDD)
isomers (US EPA 1980).
2,3,7 ? 8-tetrachlorpdibenzo-p-dioxjn
Of the 22 tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins, the 2,3,7,8- isomer—wherein chlorine has been
substituted for hydrogen in the 2,3,7 and 8 positions in the dibenzo-p-dioxin structure
shown above—has received the most attention because of its adverse health effects in
experimental animals and its potential hazard to humans. It is structurally represented
as:

TCDD

2,3,7,8-TCDD is a colorless, crystalline solid at room temperature, chemically stable and
extremely lipophilic. It is only sparingly soluble in water and most organic liquids. Some
of its physical properties, along with those of 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
(OCDD), another chlorinated dioxin with twofold symmetry, are listed in Table 1
(Crummett et al, 1973; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1977).

d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 6

�Table 1 — Physical Properties of Two Chlorinated Dioxins,
2,3,7,8-TCDD and 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-Octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (OCDD)
Property

2,3,7,8-TCDD

Empirical formula

C

OCDD

c12cigo2

12H4C14°2

Percent by weight

C
O
H
Cl

31.3
7.0

44.7
9.95
1.25
44.1

61.7

322

459.8

305°C

130°C

Above 700°C

Above 700°C

1.* g/liter
0.72
— _

1.83 g/liter

Molecular weight
Melting point
Decomposition temperature
Solubility
o-Dichlorobenzene
Chlorobenzene
Anisole
Xylene
Benzene
Chloroform
n-Octanol
Methanol
Acetone
Dioxane
Water

1.73
3.58

0.57
0.37
0.048
0.01
0.11
-—
0.2 ppb

0.56
— _

0.38

Adapted from the US Environmental Protection Agency (1980).
Formation of Chlorinated Dioxins
One route to the formation of chlorinated dioxins begins with certain chlorinated organic
chemicals. 2,4,5-Trichiorophenol, for example, can condense to form a phenoxyphenate
or substituted diphenyl ether (a "predioxin") (Buser, 1978; Jensen et al, 1972; Moore,
1979; Nilsson et al, 1974) as shown here:
cl

ONa
Cl

cl
CH^OH
NaOH

1,2,4,5-tetraehlorobenzcne

ClCH 5 CO.&gt;Na

Cl
Cl

2,4,5-trich'orophenoI
I

TCD0

d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 7

Cl
2,4,5-T

�"Predioxins" have been found in waste sludges and commercial products, as well as in
some products of laboratory scale reactions (Jensen et al, 1972, 1973; Arensault, 1976).
Chlorinated dioxins also can be formed during the combustion of various substances. For
example, Olie et al (1977) reported the occurrence of chlorinated dioxins in the fly ash
and flue gases of municipal incinerators in the Netherlands, while Buser et al (1978)
found chlorinated dioxins in fly ash from a municipal incinerator and in an industrial
heating facility in Switzerland; the levels ranged from 0.2 ug/g to 0.6 ug/g of ash. Buser
(1979) also reported that chlorinated dioxins were formed by the pyrolysis of
chlorobenzenes in the presence of air. Other studies have shown that chlorinated dioxins
are to be found in cigarette smoke, fireplace soot, and in the burning of wood (Dow
Chemical Company, 1978; Nestrick et al, 1982).
Occurrence of Chlorinated Dioxins
acid)

The levels of TCDD in drums of Herbicide Orange placed in storage in the US and in the
Pacific before 1970 varied from 0.1 to 47 ug/g (Firestone, 1978). Since Herbicide Orange
was formulated as a 1:1 mixture of the butyl esters of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T, it is
conceivable that the levels of TCDD in individual 2,4,5-T formulations for agricultural
and residential use in the 1960s could have been as high as 100 ug/g. After the
enactment of government regulations, the amounts of TCDD in 2,4,5-T formulations
should be less than 0.1 ug/g.
In C hi or ophenol s
The most important use for chlorinated phenols, such as pentachlorophenol, 2,3,4,6-tetra-, and 2,4,6-trichlorophenols, is as a preservative of wood. These chlorophenols can
contain a variety of contaminants, including polychlorinated di ben zo-p- dioxins (PCDDs)
as well as dibenzofurans (PCDFs) (Nilsson et al, 1978). There can be several positional
isomers of PCDDs and PCDFs, and since the relative ratios of PCDF to PCDD depend on
the particular route of synthesis for the chlorophenol in question, the ratio of
PCDFs/PCDDs can range from about 1 to greater than 20. Usually the level of
2,3,7,8-TCDD is relatively low, although a Scandinavian preparation of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol contained 0.5 ppm of 2,3,7,8-TCDD (Rappe et al, 1979).
In Hexachlorophene
Hexachlorophene is a bactericide and, like 2,4,5-T, is synthesized from 2,4,5-trichlorophenol.
However, after extensive purification, the amount of 2,3,7,8-TCDD in
hexachlorophene is usually less than 0.03 ug/kg (Rappe et al, 1979).
Decomposition of Chlorinated Dioxins
Photodegradation, or photolysis, is the process whereby chemical bonds are broken by
means of photons of light. As applied to chlorinated aromatics, such as chlorinated
dioxins, photodegradation usually proceeds by progressive loss of chlorine to create a
free-radical, or a loss of chlorine through a nucleophilic displacement in the presence of
a solvent or substrate molecule. According to Crosby (1982), three requirements must be
met if degradation is to proceed: 1) light energy must be absorbed by the compound, 2)
light of the appropriate wavelength must be available at a meaningful intensity, and 3) a
source of excess reducing agent (proton donor) must be present, inasmuch as the reaction
involves reductive dechlorination.
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 8

�There is clear experimental evidence to show that dioxins may be photodegraded in the
environment by natural sunlight. The maximum absorption of ultraviolet light for
chlorodioxins is in the range of 290 to 320 nm; 2,3,7,8-TCDD absorbs maximally at
307 nm. Crosby et al (1971) studied photolysis rates of 2,3,7,8-TCDD dissolved in
methanol using both natural and artificial sunlight of 100 mW/cm intensity and at the
absorption maximum of 2,3,7,8-TCDD. Complete photolysis to less chlorinated dioxin
isomers occurred in 24 hours under natural sunlight, while 6 hours of artificial light
destroyed almost 50% of the original 2,3,7,8-TCDD.
Irradiation had no effect on a crystalline water suspension of 2,3,7,8-TCDD. Apparently
the crystalline state may prevent the loss of chlorine or abstraction of hydrogen atoms
(Plimmer, 1978). On the other hand, irradiation reduced the dioxin content of a benzene
solution of 2,3,7,8-TCDD added to water and stabilized with a surfactant (Plimmer et al,
1973). Crosby (1971) also found that, when 2,3,7,8-TCDD was applied to dry or moist
soil, irradiation caused no change after 96 hours. In addition, no degradation occurred
when the substance was applied to a glass plate and irradiated for up to 14 days.
When Crosby et al (1977) exposed on glass petri dishes thin layers of Herbicide Orange
containing 15 ppm of 2,3,7,8-TCDD to summer sunlight, approximately 60% of the TCDD
disappeared after 6 hours. A commercial herbicide composed of butyl esters of 2,4-D
and 2,4,5-T and 10 ppm 2,3,7,8-TCDD was exposed in the same manner; after 6 hours,
only about 30% of the initial TCDD content remained. Herbicide Orange was also
applied to excised rubber plant leaves and to the surface of Sacramento loam soil and
then exposed to sunlight; no TCDD was detected on the leaves after 6 hours at an
application rate of 6.7 mg/cm 2 of leaf surface, while about 30% remained after 6 hours
when applied at 1.3 mg/cm . About 90% of the TCDD remained after 6 hours when the
dioxin was applied to soil at a rate of 10 mg/cm . According to the authors, partial
shading of the lower layers by soil particles accounted for the lesser degree of photolysis.
Analysis

Extraction
Since 2,3,7,8-TCDD has been found in a variety of substances, a number of different
extraction procedures have been developed to separate the compound from its substrate
and to reduce the sample volume to a manageable size. Generally, these procedures take
place in either a neutral or highly basic (alkaline) medium. Contaminants, such as
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and dichlorodiphenylethane (DDE) isomers, are
frequently present in the extracts in relatively high amounts compared to the likely
amount of 2,3,7,8-TCDD. It is now possible to isolate and quantitatively determine
2,3,7,8-TCDD in the presence of the other twenty-one tetrachloro- isomers.
The basic extraction procedures were developed first for the detection of 2,3,7,8-TCDD
in environmental samples (Baughman et al, 1973 a,b; Crummett et al, 1973). After
digestion with alcohol and a strong base, a sequence of extractions with various organic
solvents (eg, ethanol, petroleum ether, methylene chloride, hexane) separates the TCDDs
from the alkaline mixture. The resulting extracts are combined, washed with distilled
water and a strong acid, then treated to remove any traces of water and passed through
one or more chromatographic columns for the partial removal of contaminants.
The neutral extraction procedure was developed primarily to avoid a possible
base-catalyzed formation of chlorodioxins within the mass spectrometer. In this process,
developed by O'Keefe et al (1978) and modified by Albro et al (1977), the sample is first
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 9

�extracted with hexane; the extract is then passed through a series of chromatographic
columns—the first being magnesia-Celite 545, followed by an alumina minicolumn, and
finally a Florisil minicolumn. The Florisil column is eluted with methylene chloride and
the product then condensed for analysis. This technique is particularly effective for fish
tissues and human milk.
Detection
Technological advances in analytical chemistry permit the detection of dioxin
concentrations at least as low as one part per trillion (1 ppt). However, relatively few
analytical laboratories are capable of identifying, much less quantifying, individual
isomers at such a low level. Then too, regulatory agencies can only speculate as to the
safest levels that should be allowed for human exposures.
Most of the current methods for the detection of 2,3,7,8-TCDD employ gas chromatography (GC) and/or mass spectrometry (MS) and even tandem mass spectrometry
(MS/MS).
Other procedures—electron spin resonance spectroscopy (ESR), lowtemperature phosphorescence emission spectroscopy (LTE), and ultraviolet spectroscopy
(UV)~have been used, but their usefulness is limited by poor selectivity and sensitivity.
For the present, a combination of gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GCMS)--both low- and high-resolution—is used almost exclusively for the detection and
quantitative analysis of TCDDs. In the low-resolution scheme, fragment ions at nominal
mass: energy ratios (m/e) of 320 and 322 are monitored and measured as the TCDDs
emerge from the gas chromato graph. To differentiate these compounds from those with
nearly identical mass, such as pentachlorinated biphenyls, high-resolution mass
spectrometry can distinguish the dioxin component with an exact mass of 321.8936.
Toxicological Evidence of a Health Hazard in Animals
General Discussion
2,3,7,8-Tetrachloro-dibenzo-p-dioxin is still considered to be one of the most powerful
poisons for lower animals and the most toxic of all tetrachloro- isomers. The large
differences in acute toxicity among animal species have not been satisfactorily
explained; toxicity levels for higher animals, such as the dog, are estimated to be
between 300 and 3000 ug/kg of body weight (BW) (Schwetz et al, 1973). Acute toxicity
symptoms develop after a latent period of 7 to 10 days; the animals experience a rapid
loss in body weight and depletion of adipose tissue. The loss of body mass is only
partially related to the reduced food intake~"wasting syndrome." The final mechanism
responsible for death is unknown, but the general clinical appearance of the animals
suggests general exhaustion of energy reserves (McConnell et al, 1978).
Significant reduction in the size of the thymus dominates the postmortem findings in all
animal species (Buu-Hoi et al, 1972; Gupta et al, 1973; Vos et al, 1973), but the animals
do not die from infection secondary to immune suppression (Greig et al, 1973).
Pathological changes in other organs are characteristic for a given species; eg, hepatic
lesions are striking in mice, rats and rabbits but relatively minor in guinea pigs, monkeys,
cattle and horses. The organ manifestation may be related to the distribution of the
compound in the body; mice and rats retain several times more of the compound in the
liver, while guinea pigs have much lower concentrations in this organ (van Miller, 1976).
Mucosal changes, particularly cellular hyperplasia or metaplasia, have been observed in
the gastric, intestinal, and urinary tracts of primates and cattle but were not reported in
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 10

�the rat, mouse, and guinea pig.
Similar hyper plastic epidermal changes~ie, chioracne—are the most characteristic
lesions observed in exposed human populations. Corresponding lesions do not, however,
appear in many laboratory species; ie, rats, hamsters, guinea pigs.
In mice,
characteristic epidermal changes occurred in hairless strains but not in the ordinary
laboratory or wild types of animals i(lnagami et al, 1969; Knutson et al, 1982). It is
interesting to note that the absence of the hair follicle is not a prerequisite for the skin
changes; the symptoms were not produced by TCDD directly applied to areas without
hair (ear) in laboratory mice (Poland et al, 1982). Local application of TCDD did produce
characteristic changes in the ear of the rabbit (Kimmia et al, 1957; Vos et al, 1971).
Specific epidermal changes also have been observed after systemic administration in
rabbits and primates (Allen et al, 1977; McNulty, 1977; McConnell et al, 1978; McNulty
et al, 1980, 1981).
The presence of TCDD increases keratinization in epidermal cell tissue cultures in spite
of the simultaneous partial inhibition of DNA synthesis. This observation suggests that
TCDD can stimulate differentiation of human epidermal cells in culture (Osborne et al,
1984).
The exact mechanisms by which TCDD produces its toxic action are still unknown.
Biochemical studies indicate that TCDD is a very potent inducer of aryl hydrocarbon
hydroxylase (AHH), as well as the mixed-function oxidases and the cytochrome P.-450
(P-448) enzymes of the liver, lung, placenta, and kidney of the mouse and rat. However,
Poland et al (1982) do not believe that the induction process is directly responsible for
TCDD's toxicity; they attribute the pleiomorphic clinical symptomatology to the
presence of an intracellular receptor with high binding affinity for TCDD and other
aromatic hydrocarbons (Ah locus) (Nebert et al, 1972). Poland et al (1976) identified a
stereospecific TCDD receptor in the hepatic cytosol of laboratory mice. The receptor
has a maximum binding capacity of approximately 8 x 10
TCDD mol/mg of cytosol
protein, or approximately 5 x 10 TCDD binding sites per cell. The receptor binds other
aromatic hydrocarbons with enzyme induction properties, but the binding affinities in
these instances are only 1/3 to 1/30 that for TCDD. Enzyme-inducing compounds other
than aromatic hydrocarbons do not compete for this particular receptor.
The receptor is a high-molecular-weight protein that serves as a carrier in the nuclear
uptake of TCDD (Carlstedt et al, 1979; Greenlee et al, 1979; Okey et al, 1979, 1980;
Weaver, 1980). Once within the nucleus, the TCDD receptor complex binds to a specific
set of genes in the Ah locus, which initiate the production of RNA responsible for the
synthesis of new cytochrome P-45Q enzymes.
Since the hepatic receptor affinity and the enzyme induction potency of individual TCDD
isomers correspond to their LD5Q and since the presence of the Ah locus is necessary for
expression of TCDD toxicity, Poland et al (1982) have postulated that the TCDD response
is mediated by its binding to the induction receptor. However, the sole presence of the
Ah locus, although essential, is not sufficient for the full expression of toxicity. Many
tissues respond to TCDD by enzyme induction but not all with an adverse reaction and,
while animal species vary widely in their sensitivity to TCDD, they do not differ in their
liver receptor concentration or affinity. The authors suggest that TCDD can induce
enzymes in all tissues that contain the receptor, but activation of an additional battery
of genes to control the expression of a fully developed toxic response only occurs in some
tissues. The composition of these additional genes may vary in different tissues but their
presence is essential for the manifestation of TCDD toxicity; thus, enzyme induction
may be only a secondary sign not directly related to the toxicity of TCDD.
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 11

�Analytical assays were developed for the quantification and characterization of the
TCDD cytosolic receptor (Gasiewicz et al, 1982; Mason et al, 1982; Gasiewicz et al,
1984); they confirm that the hepatic cytosolic receptor in the Sprague-Dawley rat is
similar to the one described in the "responsive" genetic strains of mice (Poland et al,
1976). Genetic strains that are nonresponsive to TCDD toxicity have very low or
unmeasurable levels of the receptor in the liver (Poland et al, 1976; Okey et al, 1979;
Gasiewicz et al, 1982). High concentrations of the receptor are localized in the liver,
lung, intestine, and kidney, which produce the highest levels of induced AHH activity in
all tested animal species (Nebert et al, 1969). Gasiewicz et al (1984) reported that the
receptor concentrations in the liver and lung of the Sprague-Dawiey rat rapidly increase
after birth then decline after 21 days of age; levels in the thymus, on the other hand,
remain constant between 2 and 70 days. In the adult rat, the thymus contains the highest
concentrations of the receptor.
Recent laboratory data indicate that the thymic epithelium and its differentiation is the
primary and most sensitive site of TCDD toxicity. Administration of TCDD produced
genetically dependent thymic atrophy in mice (Poland et al, 1980) and suppressed a
variety of lymphocytic functions (Voss et al, 1973; Faith et al, 1977; Faith at al, 1979).
Clark et al (1981) found that thymic generation of cytotoxic lymphocytes (CTX) is
particularly sensitive to inhibition, since it occurs at a dose level that is 10 to 100 times
lower than the dose required for enzyme induction in the liver (weekly dose of 0.001
ug/kg BW). However, TCDD is not toxic when added directly to a culture of thymic
cells, and an indirect mechanism was postulated for its suppressive effects on the
immune system (Knutson et al, 1980; Clark et al, 1981). Mason et al (1982) reported the
presence of TCDD cytosol receptor in the murine thymus, and Clark et al (1983)
suggested that TCDD produces immunosuppression by acting on the differentiating
process of lymphoid cell population within the thymus rather than on mature
immunocompetent cells in the peripheral lymphoid organs. Recently, replacement of
peripheral lymphocytes in the irradiated bone marrow of mice with a genetically
different sensitivity to TCDD indicated that the immunosuppressive effect of TCDD on
the thyrnic generation of allospecific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTL) is predetermined by
the sensitivity of the radio-resistant tissue of the host, not by the grafted lymphomyeloid
cells. Although the impaired generation of CTL was accompanied by increased activity
of suppressor T-cells, the authors concluded that TCDD acts indirectly through receptors
in the thymic epithelium rather than on the lymphomyeloid tissue (Nagarkatti et al,
1984). Their results were confirmed by Greenlee et al (1984), who co-cultivated
thymocytes with thymic epithelium in the cell culture. Subsequent treatment with
TCDD altered the capacity of the thymic epithelium to support the intrathymic
differentation of T-lymphocytes.
Since the symptoms of TCDD toxicity resemble manifestations of thyroid dysfunction—
eg, loss of body weight, alopecia—the role of the thyroid gland in mediating the toxicity
of TCDD has been suggested (Bastomsky, 1977; Neal et al, 1979). However, Gasiewicz et
al (1980) observed unchanged mortality in euthyroid rats given the lethal dose of TCDD
and maintained at constant or increasing body weight by parenteral nutrition. In
contrast, administration of the same lethal dose resulted in no mortality in athyroid
(thyroidectomized) animals in spite of the fact that their body weight losses were not
different from the TCDD-treated euthyroid animals. Supplementation of thyroidectomized animals with thyroid hormone (T4) brought mortality to the level of the
control group 31 days after injection (Rozman et al, 1984 a) but to only one-half of the
control group at 90 days (Rozman et al, 1984 b). Triiodothyronine (T3) was equally
effective (Scheufler et al, 1984).

d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 12

�The whole body half-life of TCDD is between 20 and 30 days in the rat (Rose et al, 1979)
and guinea pig (Gasiewicz, 1979; Nolan, 1979), and 10 to 12 days in the hamster (Olson et
al, 1980). Differences in the rates of elimination cannot completely explain differences
in toxicity: guinea pigs and rats have identical half-lives but their susceptibilities to
TCDD (LDtQ ) are different. The discrepancy is more striking in the Syrian hamster
whose elimination rate is nearly the same as that of the guinea pig and rat but its
resistance to TCDD toxicity is larger by several orders of magnitude.
Similarly, the accumulated body burden of TCDD does not seem to be related to toxicity,
for the Syrian hamster can tolerate up to 5,000 ug of TCDD per kg of tissue without signs
of liver toxicity.
Some investigators think that the more resistant animal species, such as the beagle dog,
convert TCDD to metabolites at a higher rate (Poiger et al, 1982). Weber et al (1981)
found the toxicity of the crude canine biliary metabolite to be at least 100 times lower
than that of TCDD. The detoxification process occurs primarily through hydroxylation
and methylation of the tetrachloro- molecule to the trichloro- metabolite and finally
cleavage of one or both ethereal bridges in the dioxin molecule (Poiger et al, 1982).
TCDD metabolites, however, differ among individual animal species; for example,
different biotransformation products were identified in the laboratory rat (Poiger et al,
1982). Olson et al (1983) found that most of the metabolites in the hepatocytes, bile, and
urine of the Syrian hamster are glucuronic acid conjugates; the 1-hydroxy derivative of
the tetrachloro- isomer was the most abundant metabolite in the hepatocytes.
Administration of P-45Q cytochrome inhibitors, such as SKF-525, slightly decreased the
metabolic rate of TCDD (Neal, 1983). This is consistent with previous findings wherein
pretreatment with enzyme inducers decreases the lethality of TCDD, but administration
of P-450 blockers increases it (Beatty et al, 1978).
Mutagenicity
No conclusive evidence of mutagenicity has been observed in microbial assay studies of
TCDD. Of more relevance to man are the results on mammalian cells--ie, HeLa; Balb3T3, normal mouse fibroblasts; SV101, virus (SV^O)-transformed 3T3 mouse fibroblasts;
human foreskin fibroblasts and normal human lymphocytes (Beatty et al, 1975). There
was no significant growth inhibition in the cell cultures, nor were there discernible
ultrastructural changes under electron microscopy.
Rogers et al (1982) examined the mutagenicity of TCDD in L-5178Y mouse lymphoma
cells.
Doses of 0.1 to 0.5 ug TCDD/ml induced significant mutations in the
methotrexate-, excess of thymidine-, and thioguanine-selection systems. No induced
mutations were noted in the ouabain or cytosine-arabinoside systems. The authors
concluded that mutagenic effects of TCDD show similarities with proflavin and other
acridines, its genotoxicity being exerted by DNA intercalation (Wassom et al, 1978).
In baby hamster kidney cells (BHK cell transformation system), 2,3,7,8-TCDD was also
positive, the dichloro- and trichloro- isomers were weakly positive, and the octachloroand unsubstituted dioxins were negative; unfortunately, the authors provided no specific
information on the test concentrations (Hay et al, 1983).
Tests for chromosomal aberrations in bone-marrow cells of laboratory rats were negative
after a single administration of TCDD (Green et al, 1975) but positive after 13 weeks of
chronic dosage (Green, 1977). Similarly, single doses of TCDD did not induce dominant
lethal mutations (Khera et al, 1973).

d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 13

�It may be concluded that the positive data on the mutagenic activity of TCDD are
isolated in the literature and refer mainly to high TCDD concentrations in closed
laboratory systems. The positive findings contrast sharply with data of Poland et al
(1979) who examined the in vivo covalent binding of TCDD to rat liver macromolecules
using minimal levels of TCDD to interact with DNA. Although 18% to 64% of the
administered dose accumulated in the liver, virtually all of the deposited radioactivity
was extractable. Only 6 pmol of TCDD per mol of nucleotide residuum was associated
with the DNA. This represents a binding level that is four to six orders of magnitude
lower than that of most chemical carcinogens, and it contradicts the probability that
covalent binding of TCDD to DNA and subsequent somatic mutation is responsible for the
oncogenic potency of TCDD.
Oncogenicity
Several investigators have examined the tumor-initiating and -promoting potencies of
TCDD on mouse skin. DiGiovanni et al (1977) found little or no tumor-causing or tumorpromoting properties of TCDD, and Berry et al (1978, 1979) found an inhibitory effect on
skin tumors in mice.
In contrast, dermal application of TCDD was carcinogenic in Swiss-Webster mice (NTP
Rept 80-32, 1980); the females had integumentary fibrosarcomas, while results from the
males were inadequate. Poland et al (1982) tested the capacity of TCDD to promote
tumor formation in the skin of hairless and haired HRS/3 inbred mice, which have a
genetically different sensitivity for TCDD. The authors found a powerful promoting
effect of TCDD in the "responsive" hairless mouse but not in the resistant heterozygote
(haired) strain. This effect was 100 times stronger than that of tetradecanoyl-phorbol
acetate (TPA). It is important to note that TCDD produces acneiforme changes in the
skin of a hairless mutant that are identical to those observed in human skin (Knutson et
al, 1982).
In 1982, the International Agency for Cancer Research (IARC) reviewed all studies in
which TCDD was tested orally in mice and rats and dermally in mice; the agency
declared that the evidence for TCDD's carcinogenicity in animals was sufficient (IARC,
1982). The experimental evidence came primarily from two sources: 1) chronic feeding
studies where only the highest administered level (0.1 ug TCDD/kg BW per day) produced
an increased incidence of hepatocellular carcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas of the
lung, hard palate/nasal turbinates, or tongue in the Sprague-Dawley rat (Kociba, 1973,
1978), and 2) studies by the National Toxicology Program (NTP) in which TCDD given by
gavage was carcinogenic in the B6C3F1 mouse; hepatocellular carcinomas were observed
in both sexes of mouse but only female mice and male rats developed follicular cell
thyroid adenomas (NTP-Rept 80-31).
The positive initiating effects of TCDD in the chemical carcinogenesis process conflict
with indications that neither TCDD nor its metabolites form covalent adducts with
cellular DNA. Poland et al (1979) found no significant DNA binding in vivo after
administration of radioactive labeled TCDD; similar results were reported for in vitro
TCDD binding (Piper et al, 1973; Vinopal et al, 1973; Ghiasuddin et al, 1975; Rose et al,
1976; Nelson et al, 1977).
Pitot et al (1980) tested TCDD's potential for promoting hepatocarcinogenesis following
partial hepatectomy and a single initiating dose of diethylnitrosamine (DEN); TCDD was
thereafter administered subcutaneously at two levels every two weeks for seven
months. The higher dose (1.4 ug/kg BW) produced five hepatocellular carcinomas,
whereas the animals treated only with DEN had no carcinomas and only a few enzymed57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 14

�altered foci. The authors concluded that TCDD is a potent promoter of hepatocarcinogenesis. Similar conclusions were reported in TCDD promotion studies on the skin
of the "responsive" strain of the HRS/3 hairless mouse (Poland et al, 1982).
Teratogenicity
2,4,5-T containing 30 ppm of TCDD in two strains of mice (C57BL/6 and AKR) and one
strain of rats, produced increased incidences of cleft palate in mice and cystic kidney in
the rat (Courtney et al, 1970); when comparably dosed with a sample containing only 1
ppm of TCDD, teratogenesis was not evident (Emerson et al, 1971). A gavage dose in the
rat of 0.125 ug/kg/day from the 6th-15th days of gestation showed only a slight effect
that was much pronounced at the level of 0.5 ug/kg/day (Sparschu et al, 1971).
In utero exposure of mice to TCDD during the final half of the gestation period produced
fetuses with poorly developed lymphatic systems and fatty infiltrates in the liver
(Neubert et al, 1973).
Prenatally, TCDD causes hydronephrosis, which according to Gibson (1976), may be only
a sign of delayed maturation and not permanent damage inasmuch as the test animals
were taken by cesarean section. Gibson did find altered PAH transport from kidney
slices of neonate animals even where there was no evidence of a lesion; the significance
of these data in the adult is unknown. TCDD also caused postnatal hydronephrosis in a
suckling pup whose foster mother had been dosed beforehand with the compound (Moore
et al, 1973).
A low proportion of kidney abnormalities also was found in the rabbit; Giavini (1982)
considers the kidney to be the target organ of TCDD's effect in many animal species. No
other severe teratological effects from TCDD have been described in the literature.
Reproductive Effects
It is still unclear whether TCDD affects spermatogenesis in lower animals (Wassom et al,
1977, 1978) and primates (Allen, 1979) by a direct action on testicular parenchyma or
only secondarily as a result of cachexia produced by the high level of exposure. The
maternal and embryofetal toxicity of TCDD is comparable among the various species; eg,
0.1 ug/kg BW was a "no effects" level in the mouse (Smith et al, 1976), rat (Sparschu et
al, 1971), and rabbit (Giavini et al, 1982).
Pregnant female rabbits were treated orally with 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 ug TCDD/kg BW
on the 6th to 15th days of gestation. No abortions occurred at the lowest dose of 0.1
ug/kg; two, five, and three dams aborted at the higher doses of 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0,
respectively. The high abortion rate was ascribed to severe maternal toxicity and the
incidence of total resorptions, which increased at the higher doses. No living fetuses
were found at term in the group with the highest exposure. No external malformations
occurred, and histological examination did not reveal any signs of teratogenicity (Giavini
et al, 1982).
More recent data (McNulty, 1983) on pregnant Rhesus monkeys treated with 0.2, 1.0, and
5.0 ug TCDD/kg BW between 20 to 40 days of pregnancy revealed no increase in abortion
rate or maternal toxicity from the lowest dose. At 1.0 ug/kg BW, however, there were
three abortions out of four animals. Maternal toxicity symptoms were recorded in 50%
of the animals and one out of four mothers died. Abortions and maternal deaths occurred
in all animals fed 5.0 ug/kg BW. Inasmuch as the Rhesus monkey seems to be particularly
sensitive to TCDD and the administered doses greatly exceeded the potential levels of
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 15

�environmental exposure, the pharmacokinetics of TCDD during pregnancy—particularly
the transfer of the toxin to placenta and fetus—must be investigated further. The
fetuses were reported dead before the abortion, with no abnormalities except for small
changes in the sebaceous glapds.
Studies of Human Populations
Introduction
The most significant information about the acute and long-term effects in man of Agent
Orange, 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T, and their toxic contaminants is provided by the clinical,
epidemiological, and pathological studies of the personnel who handled and sprayed the
defoliant in Vietnam, as well as those who dedrummed the defoliant at the close of the
conflict. The populations that were most heavily exposed were industrial workers
exposed during routine manufacture and use, and in several instances when the reaction
process went out of control. These workers provide critical information regarding the
acute, chronic, and long-term effects of the parent herbicides, as well as their
contaminants, especially 2,3,7,8-TCDD. Approximately 18 distinct industrial populations
of record have been exposed, and several of these as a result of such "runaway"
reactions. In some instances, workers have beeen exposed both to a trichlorophenol
runaway reaction as well as the routine production and use of trichlorophenol. In both
situations, 2,3,7,8-TCDD has been the major toxic contaminant.
Another source of data is workers who formulated or sprayed 2,4,5-T or were exposed to
areas where the herbicide had been applied. This chlorophenoxy compound, later known
to contain varying amounts of TCDD, was widely used from 1948 - 1970 in large scale
farming, family gardens, forest management, and weed control along roadsides and
railroad rights-of-way. A gauge of the extent of such human exposure in the US is
provided by the production figure in 1964 for domestic use alone—9.8 million pounds.
Recently, both scientific and lay communities have become concerned about contamination of the environment by the inappropriate use and disposal of the phenoxy herbicides
and of TCDD-containing materials, such as in Missouri. As a consequence, pilot studies
have been carefully designed to determine the health effects of TCDD and its related
compounds in at least one heavily contaminated area.
In studies of all populations, the critical components are proper design of the study,
carefully defined population cohorts, and suitable controls. It should be recognized,
however, that in the study of industrial populations, which are likely to be the most
heavily exposed, it is often not: possible to satisfy completely the requirements for
randomization, for percent participation, or for knowledge of exposure levels. This is
particularly true for long-term follow-up investigations.
Vietnam Veterans (Studies Complete or Partially Complete)
—Ranch Hand Program

According to Lathrop et al (1984), the personnel who filled the tanks and flew the
missions in Operation Ranch Hand are currently the most relevant human population for
study. The purpose of the Ranch Hand (RH) program, an ongoing, two-phase, highly
sophisticated epidemiological investigation of this population, has been to determine
whether there are long-term health effects from occupational exposure to Agent Orange
and other herbicides during military service in Vietnam. The matched cohort design in a
nonconcurrent prospective setting has incorporated mortality, morbidity, and follow-up
studies on 1,174 Air Force "Ranch Hand" personnel who were involved in the actual spray
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 16

�operations; these men are being compared to a matched control group of Air Force C-130
cargo personnel who had no exposure to Agent Orange. The first phase, a mortality study
(USAF, 1983) published 30 3une 1983, has shown no unusual findings that can be
attributed to the herbicide, though the number of deaths is not substantial at present.
The second phase of the study, released in February 1984, is designed to determine
morbidity incidence. The 270-page report is a myriad of detailed findings, including
investigations of many of the major categories of disease and of most of the human organ
systems; such as malignancies, neurological and psychological assessments, fertility
dysfunction, and evaluations of hepatic, dermatologic, cardiovascular, immunologic,
hematologic, pulmonary, renal, and endocrine functions. Considered a baseline, it too
has shown no definitive clinical endpoints, such as soft tissue sarcoma, porphyria cutanea
tarda, or chloracne. Information has been derived from two sources: 1) a specially
designed questionnaire given to the 2,706 respondees, who were about equally divided
between the RH group and its controls, and 2) a physical examination on a total of 2,269
individuals, again about equally divided between Ranch Hand personnel and controls.
Positive findings included significantly more minor birth defects (eg, birth marks) in the
RH group compared to the controls. The fertility and reproductive results are
preliminary, based largely upon subjective self-reports that await medical record and
birth certificate verification. Although an excessive number of neonatal deaths and
physically handicapped children occurred in the RH group, the data—from unverified
subjective questionnaire reporting—must be confirmed from medical records and birth
certificates. A large number of basal cell carcinomas of the skin were reported in the
RH group, but these data were not adjusted for sunlight exposure, the recognized primary
cause of these cancers. A more complete analysis of this data is planned for the first
follow-up examination. Although biochemical differences between the RH and control
groups existed, the results were still within normal limits.
Negative findings indicated that there were no significant differences between the RH
and control groups with respect to the occurrence of systemic cancers; clinically
significant blood abnormalities; or cardiovascular, renal, pulmonary, hepatic, and
neurologic effects. Among the exposed, the absence of chloracne, soft tissue sarcomas,
and porphyria cutanea tarda was noted.
Periodic follow-up examinations—at 3-, 5-, 15-, and 20-year intervals—will be compared
to the baseline information. The preliminary nature of this report is repeatedly
emphasized. Many of the group differences were based largely upon recall or elicited
through the questionnaire and subjective data; although a subtle effect of differential
reporting is suggested, the data have not been fully evaluated.
Additional work on the baseline data is still required, including data-base refinement,
establishment of follow-up examination requirements, and collaboration with other dioxin
research projects.
While it is premature to accept these findings as conclusive, they "should be reassuring to
Ranch Handers" because "no major clinical health problems" have surfaced and the men
are "overall (in) good general health for (their) age."

On 11 February 1985, the US Air Force released a second mortality report (Wolfe et al,
1984). Like the first mortality study, which appeared in 3anuary 1983, this report did not
reveal any statistically significant differences in the number of deaths between the
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 17

�Ranch Hand group and its comparison members. Ranch Hand officers and flyers had
slightly lower death rates and RH ground personnel had a slightly higher death rate than
their respective comparisons; none of the differences was statistically significant and
there was no apparent relationship between exposure and mortality. Compared to US
white males, the RH officers and enlisted men, as well as their comparisons, are living
significantly longer than expected; the pattern is similar to the patterns of the DOD
retirees and civil service personnel. There is presently no evidence of increased
mortality in persons exposed to herbicides during the Ranch Hand operations in Southeast
Asia. Though the elapsed time has been sufficient for the development of clinically
significant conditions, it may still be too early to see the development of conditions that
might be attributable to herbicide exposure.
—CDC Birth Defects Study
Aimed at determining if there is any possible association between Vietnam service and
subsequent male parentage of congenitally malformed offspring, this case-control study
by the Centers for Disease Control was based on the experiences of parents of selected
babies born during 1968 through 1980. From among 13,000 live- and stillbirths registered
with the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program (MACDP), 7,133 cases with
serious or major birth defects according to the International Classification of Disease,
8th revision (ICD-8), were chosen; a serious defect was defined as being associated with
premature death, the cause of a substantial handicap, or the need for surgery or
extensive medical care. These cases were matched with 4,246 controls according to
race, year of birth, and hospital of birth.
The results (Erickson et al, 1984) provide "strong" evidence that Vietnam veterans are at
no greater risk than other men for siring babies with all types of serious structural birth
defects combined. The evidence for Agent Orange-associated risks is weak; if there is
any risk from exposure, it is either small or it is limited to select groups of veterans or
to specific types of defects. There is no explanation for the likely association between
Agent Orange exposure and spina bifida, cleft lip with or without cleft palate, or
congenital neoplasms; these associations may be an element of chance or the result of
some unknown bias or uncontrolled confounding factor.
—Estimate of Vietnam Troop Exposure
In an effort to evaluate the possible toxic effects of the dioxin in Agent Orange on
Vietnam veterans, Stevens (1981) calculated a minimum toxic dose (MTD) from animal
and human data, an intake transfer factor (from human data), and from data on the
spraying operation of Agent Orange in Vietnam, he calculated the fraction of the MTD to
which a soldier would have been exposed. The calculation of the MTD (0.1 ug/kg) was
based on primate studies of TCDD exposure and human studies of Yusho oil contaminated
with tetrachlorodibenzofuran (TCDF). The average intake transfer factor (1:2,050) was
based on the calculation of data from an individual exposed to TCDD in a Missouri horse
arena and approximately 75 individuals exposed in zone A of Seveso, Italy. From
available information on the spraying operation (Operation Ranch Hand) in Vietnam, it
was calculated that a 70 kg man would have been exposed to 1/14,000 of the MTD, or
0.1 ug/kg. Thus, if a veteran had been exposed to 8 ug of TCDD/m2/day/one year tour of
duty, his cumulative intake would have been 1.4 ug, or 0.02 ug/kg. This amount, Stevens
concluded, could not be responsible either for the veterans' alleged systemic illnesses or
the birth defects in their offspring.
Interlaboratory analyses for 2,3,7,8-TCDD in the adipose tissue from Vietnam veterans
indicated a correlation between the degree of exposure to Agent Orange and the tissue
levels of TCDD. For example, the "heavily" exposed subjects had the highest levels of
TCDD--greater than 20 ppt (Gross et al, 1984).
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 18

�—VA Agent Orange Registry
The Registry was established by the Veterans Administration in 1978 as an index to the
records of those Vietnam veterans who have come to the VA for Agent Orange-related
examinations. It is essentially an extract of the veteran's complete records: his name
and address, examination center, brief information about military service, estimated
herbicide exposure, and elements of the findings of the physical examination. Besides
serving as a means of identifying and contacting the veteran about developments and the
possible need for further testing, it also provides a means of detecting health trends and
other characteristics about the group.
Inasmuch as the information is supplied
voluntarily, any comparisons that are made are not statistically valid.
As of 31 December 1983, there were 130,220 initial examinations and 31,471 follow-ups.
Thus far, there is no unusual morbidity or mortality associated with either Vietnam
service or Agent Orange exposure.
There have also been attempts to compare the distribution of malignant neoplasm cases
in the Registry with a reference population. Subjects in the SEER (Surveillance
Epidemiology End Results) program, representing about 10% of the entire US population
and being fairly representative agewise, have been selected for reference; from these,
the number of malignant neoplasm cases diagnosed between 1973-1977 among US males
of ages 25 to 39 is expected to include most Vietnam-era veterans. As yet, there have
been no significant differences in the proportion of cancers of various sites and the
proportions of soft tissue sarcomas and skin cancer, though some differences—marginal,
yet statistically significant—were noted for lymphomas and cancers of the buccal cavity
and pharynx (Shepard, 1983; Shepard et al, 1983).
—Agent Orange Biopsy Registry of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology
The Agent Orange Registry (AOR), in the Department of Environmental and DrugInduced Pathology of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP), was begun in
1978. Its objective is to attempt to establish whether or not there is a link between
Vietnam exposure to Agent Orange and the current illnesses of these veterans. Any
unusual features in the findings would suggest the need for further study. A linkage
might be suggestive if there were such unusual features based on past experience with
some environmental diseases that have had rather selective anatomic targets and a
rather limited number of induced diseases (eg, asbestos and mesothelioma, vinyl chloride
and hemangiosarcoma of the liver). To date, the AOR has been unable to show any
unusual disease patterns, including cancer.
Biopsy and autopsy specimens for the Registry project are received primarily from the
Veterans Administration and Armed Forces. Two phases will be carried out: Phase I is
to collect and evaluate the morphologic findings of veterans or active duty personnel who
served in Vietnam during 1962-1973, while Phase II will be concerned with veterans or
active duty personnel who had not served in Vietnam and who will serve as a matched
control set for cases in Phase I.
The Phase I group is being closely scrutinized for: 1) any clustering or peaks that
represent similar organ-diagnosis combinations, 2) any clustering of pathologic findings
that are unusual for a site or organ, and 3) any unusual age of occurrence for a particular
diagnosis.
As of March 1983, pathologic diagnoses and demographic data have been tabulated on
1,200 veterans who had service in Vietnam. Over 300 different diagnoses, involving 84
different organs or anatomic sites, were made.
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 19

�No clusters of medical significance have appeared; in other words, there have been no
persistent patterns of adverse health effects.
Two clusters of relatively trivial
lesions—lipomas (79 cases) and epidermal inclusion cysts (96 cases)--were noted, but both
were benign and of no serious prognostic significance. The relatively large incidences of
these lesions may be due to their superficial locations in or on the skin; being visible or
palpable, there is more concern to have them removed.
Six cases with unusual features occurred singly, not as diagnostic clusters: 1) mucinous
adenocarcinoma of the colon with unusual features; 2) adenocarcinoma of the jejunum
with metastases, in which both site and age were unusual for a 37-year-old black male; 3)
large cell undifferentiated carcinoma of the lung, probably primary in the lung, unusual
for age 31; 4) anaplastic adenocarcinoma of the lung (diagnosed in 1978) and welldifferentiated prostatic carcinoma (diagnosed in 1980); metachronous malignancies—the
only metachronous combination out of the total 1,200 cases—two tumors of different
histologic types and different sites and types; 5) carcinoma of the prostate (age 44) at an
unusually young age; and 6) gonadoblastoma of the testis, sarcoma of the epididymis, and
metastatic carcinoma of the inguinal lymph node.
These 1,200 cases in the Agent Orange Registry have failed to reveal "unusual" features
of apparent significance, which may be a premature conclusion because: the small
number of cases may not reflect rare yet significant events, and environmental factors,
which may produce unusual lesions in unusual sites, also may be associated with the more
common lesions in common sites.
In order to guard against missing the more common lesions, the AOR is now entering
Phase II. A matched set of control cases is being developed, having as a major criterion,
"no service in Vietnam." These cases will come from the same VA hospitals and from the
same time period (ie, 1978-1984) as the bulk of cases in Phase I, and will be matched by
age, sex, and race. The anticipated size of the Phase II groups will be about 4,000 cases.
—Single Case Reports
Isolated cases of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) among non-Ranch Hand veterans from
Vietnam who were exposed to Agent Orange have been reported (Sarma et al, 1982;
Schacter et al, 1984). Whether the STS cases are related to service in Vietnam or other
unrelated events is yet to be determined.
—of "Dedrumming1 Personnel
Approximately 200 civilians were assigned by the military to destroy the contents of
about 40,000 55-gallon drums (2.22 million gallons) of surplus Agent Orange at the close
of the Vietnam war.
In addition to environmental monitoring during this operation, pre- and postexposure
physical examinations, including x-rays, neurological examinations, and extensive clinical
chemical tests, were performed on all workers. Military personnel revealed no apparent
physical effects (Young et al, 1978).
—Australian Birth Defects Study
An extensive survey of Australian veterans was conducted to examine the impact on
birth rates of those who served in Vietnam. Entitled "Case-Control Study of Congenital
Anomalies and Vietnam Service (Birth Defects Study)," it is the first such study of its
kind to be completed. Included in the study population were Vietnam veterans,
contemporary Army personnel who had not been in Vietnam and members of the
community who did not serve in the Army during this period. The records of 34 hospitals
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 20

�and four cytogenetic laboratories were used to identify 8,517 subjects with birth defects
and an equal number of matched controls, which consisted of healthy infants that were
delivered in the same hospitals. The size of each group was reduced to 127 infants with
defects and 123 normals when the service records of the fathers were taken into account
(Donovan et al, 1983).
No association between exposure and adverse pregnancy outcomes was found, and the
risk of siring a malformed child was no higher for either the Vietnam or the non-Vietnam
veteran than for other Australian males, including the National Service and Australian
Regular Army Vietnam veterans (Armstrong, 1983; Lipson, 1983; Minister of Veteran
Affairs, 1983).
—Vietnamese Epidemioiogic Study
A major Vietnamese epidemiological study has been described in the news section of
Science magazine. Among some 40,000 families in North Vietnam, there was reportedly
an increased incidence of congenital abnormalities in the offspring of fathers exposed to
herbicides during the Vietnam war. In addition, children born of South Vietnamese
women who were directly exposed to the spraying are said to have a suggested increase
in birth defects, including neural tube defects, deformities of the sensory organs and
limbs, Siamese twins, and cleft lip. No definite link between Agent Orange spraying and
the anomalies has been ascertained (Norman, 1983).
Vietnam Veterans (Studies In Progress)
—VA Identical Twin Study (Vietnam Experience Twins Study, VETS)
Still in the design phase, this series of complex comparisons of identical twins may make
it possible to establish whether or not Vietnam service has affected morbidity. The
mental and physical health status of the subjects will be surveyed by means of a five-day
battery of psychological, physiological, and biochemical tests.
The study will be conducted by the VA's St. Louis facility; examinations are to be done
under contract. The VA has requested the Medical Follow-up Agency (MFUA) of the
National Academy of Sciences' Commission on Life Sciences to develop the registry to be
used in this project. MFUA has maintained a comparable registry since 1967 of 15,000
male pairs of twins from the WWII US Armed Forces, from which useful epidemiologic
studies on schizophrenia and diabetes have been obtained. It is hoped that the new
registry will also be about 15,000 strong. The VA wants about 600 pairs of twins: 100
pairs in which both twins served in Vietnam, another 100 in which neither served there,
and 400 pairs in which only one served in Vietnam. A computerized list of candidates is
to be furnished by the Department of Defense, state twin registries, birth records of
certain states (ie, those that paid a bonus to their Vietnam veterans), VA in-patient
hospital records, and VA compensation and pension records. Once compiled, the registry
will be useful for future investigations into the relationships between genetic and
environment and disease (CLS Lifelines :2, Spring 1984).
NRC expects to complete the entire registry early in 1987.
—Vietnam Ground Troops Study
The VA was directed by Congress in January 1979 (PL 96-151) to conduct an
epidemiologic study of Vietnam ground troops who may have been exposed to Agent
Orange and to determine if there have been long-term effects from such exposure. The
scope of the investigation was later expanded (PL 97-27 of November 1981) to include
other factors, such as medications and environmental hazards or conditions, in the
Vietnam experience. In January 1983, the Congress designated the Centers for Disease
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 21

�Control to conduct the work for the Veterans Administration under an interagency
agreement.
CDC proposes two retrospective cohort studies and one case-control study. One cohort
of male US Army veterans of Vietnam conflict is to be compared with male Army
Vietnam-era veterans who did not serve in Vietnam—hereafter referred to as "Vietnam
Experience" study; the other cohort will be male Vietnam veterans who differ in their
probable level of exposure—to be referred to as the "Agent Orange" study. Each of the
two cohort studies will have mortality assessment, health interview, and clinical and
laboratory assessment.
The case-control study is to evaluate the risk of contracting STS and lymphoma among
Vietnam veterans—designated as the "Selected Cancers," or "Sarcoma/Lymphoma,"
study—and will be limited to males of draftable age during the Vietnam conflict and to
veterans from all branches of the military. This study will involve a health and exposure
interview. Malaria was the most significant medical complaint in Vietnam; by 1970,
neuropsychiatric disorders became the second leading disease. Diarrheal, skin, and
venereal diseases were also significant (US DHHS, 1983).
Inasmuch as this will be a massive piece of research, consisting of interviews and
physical examinations of several thousand veterans, its rate of progress cannot be
predicted. However, CDC expects to have final reports for the Agent Orange and
Vietnam Experience Studies completed by 30 September 1988 and for the Selected
Cancers Study by 30 September 1989 (US CDC, 1984).
Females should be studied separately, inasmuch as they would require different sampling
strategies and emphases in interviews and medical examinations. Furthermore, too few
women were involved for any meaningful case-control study (US DHHS, 1983).
—VA Mortality Study

This work, begun in 1982, is analyzing death certificates for rates and causes of death of
some 60,000 deceased Vietnam veterans and comparing the data with those of nonVietnam veterans. By the end of 1984, the collection and coding of data should be
completed, at which time the analytical phase can commence.
—VA Case-Control Study of Soft Tissue Sarcoma
Individuals with soft tissue sarcomas, as drawn from the files of the Armed Forces
Institute of Pathology, will be compared to those without such tumors, taking into
account service in Vietnam and probable exposure to Agent Orange. As of March 1984,
221 hospitals have agreed to cooperate in providing two matched controls for each case
of sarcoma, one of which is to be a neoplastic disease other than STS. The study is
expected to be completed in 1986.
—VA Retrospective Study of Dioxins and Furans in Adipose Tissue
Since 1970, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been collecting human
adipose tissue from the general population to be analyzed for residues of certain
pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). The bank of approximately 8,000
samples contains specimens from approximately 524 males born between 1937 and 1952,
the Vietnam veteran age group. It is highly probable that many of these men served in
the military during the Vietnam era and very likely that some actually served in
Vietnam. The veteran status, especially Vietnam service status, for each will be
established from military and VA databases. Chemical analyses of these specimens for
selected chlorinated dioxins and dibenzofurans will provide data on background levels of
2,3,7,8-TCDD in the US male population and will determine if duty in the military or
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 22

�service in Vietnam has affected the levels of TCDD in adipose tissue.
—Australian Mortality Study

According to a three-part retrospective study by the Australian Commonwealth Institute
of Health, which compared the death rates among 19,209 Vietnam-era veterans with
26,957 non-Vietnam veterans, the Australian Vietnam veteran is not dying at any faster
rate than his counterpart who did not serve there; nor are the causes of death from
diseases that have been suggested as being linked to phenoxy herbicides. Neither was
there a statistically significant difference in the rates from soft-tissue sarcoma or nonHodgkin's lymphoma (US VA, 1985). These findings are similar to those of earlier ones
reported in 1983.
—State-Sponsored Programs

Nineteen states—identified in the Appendix—currently have commissions or programs
designed to assist their residents who were Vietnam veterans. The activities of these
commissions and programs vary considerably, from registries to university-based clinical
studies.
Workplace Exposures
—Monsanto (Nitro, West Virginia)

A process accident, or "runaway reaction," in the manufacture of 2,4,5-T occurred in the
Monsanto Chemical plant at Nitro, West Virginia in March 1949. Those employees
involved in the clean-up and repair of equipment experienced acute symptoms that were
characterized by skin, eye, and respiratory tract irritation, headache, dizziness, and
nausea.
Soon after the accident and on three occasions during 1949-1953, Ashe and Suskind (1949,
1950) and Suskind (1953) examined 12 of the workers who were severely affected with
chloracne; an additional 26 persons with chloracne who were not connected with the
accident were examined in 1953. The most frequent clinical symptoms were acneiforrn
lesions followed by severe muscle pains in the upper and lower extremities, shoulders,
and thorax; fatigue; nervousness and irritability; decreased libido; dyspnea; vertigo; and
intolerance to cold. In addition to one case of sensory loss in the foot, there were four
instances of hepatomegaly and other signs of liver impairment. Upon re-examination of
several of the above workers in 1953, there was marked improvement in the skin lesions
and a general subsidence of the noncutaneous symptoms. Some persons had persistent
but inexplicable complaints of pains in the back and lower extremities, nervousness,
excess fatigue, and dyspnea.
Of the 122 persons identified as having had chloracne following the accident in 1949, 121
were selected for a cohort mortality study (Zack et al, 1980). The results of the
standardized mortality analysis revealed that the 32 actual deaths (from all causes) were
less than the 46.41 expected deaths; this SMR of 0.69 was the only statistically
significant value among the collected data. Nor was there any apparent excess of deaths
from malignant neoplasms or circulatory diseases. Of the nine deaths from malignant
neoplasms, five were due to lung cancers—four of them in cigarette smokers—three were
from neoplasms of the lymphatic and hematopoietic tissue; one was a rare form of skin
cancer, a fibrous histiocytoma, which can be classified as a soft tissue sarcoma.
A clinical epidemiological follow-up study of 367 current or former employees of the
plant was reported by Suskind et al (1984). The two cohorts in this investigation
consisted of 204 subjects who were clearly exposed to the 2,4,5-T process at some time
from 1948-1969, and 163 subjects with no exposure to 2,4,5-T. Clinical evidence of
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 23

�chloracne persisted in 53% of the exposed subjects, while no cases of chloracne were
observed in the unexposed group. An association was found between the persistence of
chloracne and the presence and severity of actinic elastosis of the skin, as well as
between exposure and a history of gastrointestinal ulcer. Pulmonary function values of
exposed workers who currently smoked were lower than values for unexposed workers
who currently smoked. There was a greater frequency of low HDL cholesterol values
among those with persistent chloracne. No significant differences were detected
between the exposed and nonexposed groups for abnormal laboratory values of alkaline
phosphatase, SCOT, SGPT, and GGPT. There were also no differences in these same
parameters between the exposed who never had chloracne and those who had chloracne
currently or in the past. And finally, there was neither evidence of increased risk of
cardiovascular disease, hepatic disease, renal damage, central nervous system (CNS) or
peripheral nervous system disorders, reproductive disorders, or birth defects nor
differences in nerve conduction velocity measurements.
A health survey in 1979 by Moses et al (1984) of 226 current or former employees at
Nitro between 1948 and 1977 found a history of chloracne in 52% of the 226 workers; the
mean duration for residual chloracne was 26 years. An increase of abnormal gammaglutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) was reported, with a higher mean GGT in those with
chloracne compared to those without. There was a statistically significant decrease in
"sensation to pin prick" in 11 of 60 subjects with current or past chloracne but none in
the 34 who never had chloracne. No mention is made of age differences or other factors
that could account for this finding.
—Dow Chemical (Midland, Michigan)

Ott et al (1980) examined the mortality experiences of a group of 204 workers who had
been exposed to 2,4,5-T during its production from 1950-1971. Many of the workers were
also potentially exposed to a number of other chemicals during this period. Only 19
episodes of acute exposure were noted during 1954-1970, which consisted largely of
irritant exposures to the eyes and skin. No cases of chloracne or porphyria cutanea tarda
were evident, and mortality of this limited sample was stated to be comparable to that
of US white males, as well as to the "background mortality experience" at this location.
A mortality study of 61 employees who had been engaged in the production of
trichlorophenol and who had been accidentally exposed in 1964 to TCDD did not disclose
an elevated mortality rate; there were four actual deaths from all causes vs 7.8
expected. Overall cancer deaths were elevated (3 vs 1.6 expected), but no particular
tumor type predominated. None of the findings was statistically significant (Cook et al,
1980). Of these workers, 49 developed chloracne. The three cancer deaths (identified as
an adenocarcinoma, a fibrosarcoma, and a glioma with metastases) were slightly above
the expected number (3 vs 1.6), but they could not be ascribed to any predominant tumor
type or particular organ/tissue site (Cook et al, 1980).
In another Dow study, information was obtained from an interview questionnaire of 715
wives of men who worked in the Michigan division. It revealed no statistically significant
differences in occurrences of miscarriages, stillbirths, and fetal deaths or
malformations. The two groups (ie, 370 wives of men with exposure to TCDD and 345
controls, wives of men without possible exposure) were matched closely for husbands'
dates of hire. Nine variables were considered to be potential confounders in some or all
of the analyses: maternal age, birth control method, conditions during pregnancy,
complications in labor and delivery, medications or treatments during pregnancy, alcohol
consumption, smoking during pregnancy, gravidity and mother's occupation. Most of the
analyses considered the conceptus as the observational unit. If a conception occurred
prior to the worker's dioxin exposure, the corresponding conceptus was classified among
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 24

�the "unexposed" control group. Thus, of the 1,503 total conceptions of the 370 wives,
only 737 occurred after their husbands' first exposure and constituted the "exposed"
conceptuses. The remaining 766 conceptuses (ie, 1,503 - 737) were combined with the
1,274 occurring among wives of the "never exposed" employees; also, 9 induced abortions
within the latter group were excluded, giving a total of 2,031 "unexposed" conceptuses
(Cook et al, 1983; Townsend et al, 1982).
In a report on the findings of a cross-sectional medical and morbidity surveillance of
employees considered potentially exposed to TCDD from 1976-1978, few differences
between cohorts were noted. An increased frequency of radiographically documented
ulcer and other digestive diseases was reported in the cohort of workers who were
engaged at some time in the production of 2,4,5-T and who probably had low exposure to
TCDD. These effects did not occur in the "high" exposure group, which indicates that
dioxin is not likely associated with digestive effects (Bond et al, 1983).
—Diamond Alkali (New Jersey)

Porphyria cutanea tarda (PCT), of varying degrees of severity, and elevated urinary
uroporphyrins were discovered in 11 of 29 workers exposed to 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T during
the manufacturing process; they were examined because of chloracne (Bleiberg et al,
1964). Hyper pigmentation was more prevalent in Negroes and was said to vary in degree
according to the severity of chloracne. The degree of hirsutism was related to the
severity of chloracne. Of 26 workers whose urine was tested for uroporphyrins, eight had
elevated uroporphyrins and 19 had chloracne. Three of those with elevated uroporphyrins
had no chloracne. The porphyria cutanea tarda was assumed to be chemically induced as
a result of damage or insult to the liver and not of genetic origin. The skin
manifestations of PCT—ie, epidermal fragility, vesiculobullous eruptions—occurred on
areas of the face, ears, and hands that were exposed to sun or pressure.
A follow-up of Bleiberg et al was made in the same plant by Poland et al (1971) on 73
male workers. Moderate to severe chloracne was prevalent in only 13 out of 73 (18%) of
the cases; again, it varied in degree and was accompanied by scarring, hyperpigmentation, hirsutism, and eye irritation. There was no evidence of porphyria cutanea tarda and
only one case of uroporphyrinuria. The authors have inferred that porphyria cutanea
tarda and chloracne are independent syndromes, although they may have the same
etiologic agent. There was either no acne or only minimal lesions in 82% of employees.
Occurrence of chloracne, likewise, was not significantly greater in Negroes than whites,
and was seemingly not related to job location or duration of employment (hence, level of
exposure); cardiovascular findings were unremarkable except for three persons with a
history of myocardial infarction. The porphyria observed by Bleiberg also was observed
in a heavily exposed population in Czechoslovakia. It has never been seen in populations
exposed to trichlorophenol or 2,4,5-T processing alone.
—BASF AG (Ludwigshafen, Germany)

In 1953, seventy-five workers in a trichlorophenol plant were exposed to reactor products
during an accident and its subsequent cleanup. Most of them suffered chloracne; 42
suffered severely and 21 of these persons also had systemic damage to internal organs or
CNS disturbances. Polyneuritis, impaired senses, and liver damage were most prominent.
In 1978, a mortality study was conducted on the cohort: Of the 17 deaths (from 11 to 25
were expected, depending on the choice of control population), six were due to cancer
(three from stomach cancer), five from cardiovascular diseases, one from cirrhosis of the
liver, and one from urogenital disease; all other deaths were either accidental or suicidal
(Huff et al, 1980). No miscarriages or abortions were reported among the wives of
exposed employees who were still at work in the plant (IARC, 1977).
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 25

�A mortality study was conducted by Thiess et al (1982) 27 years after the trichlorophenol
process accident at the BASF AG plant. The exposed group of workers (74), matched by
age and date of entry into the factory, was compared with two internal groups and three
external groups. Although there were relatively few reported deaths, malignant
neoplasms were consistently above expectation but beyond chance only for stomach
cancer, which has a latency of 15 years.
~NV Philips (Netherlands)
In this 1963 explosion at a 2,4,5-T plant, 106 workers were probably exposed to TCDD (or
related polychlorodibenzofurans). The two operators were exposed to TCDD largely by
way of inhalation. Other workers, who were either part of the regular adjoining work
force or were part of the clean-up and rebuilding crews, were outfitted in protective
gear; they may have had only dermal contact. Chloracne occurred in 44 persons. Liver
damage was not apparent, but there were a few complaints of fatigue. Of the eight
deaths, one was from a pancreatic tumor and one was due to a myocardial infarction (at
age 69); five other deaths also could have been from infarctions.
—Spolana (Czechoslovakia)

3irasek et al (1973, 1974) have reported from Czechoslovakia on what is probably the
most thoroughly documented group of exposed workers. From 1965-1969, 78 persons
were affected by their contact with the sodium salt of 2,4,5-T, the butyl ester of 2,4,5-T
and pentachlorophenol; 76 of them developed acne (sic), hypertrichosis, and hyperpigmentation. Complaints included fatigue, weakness and pain in the extremities, sweating, and
headache; many had polyneuropathy. Clinical findings revealed hepatomegaly, porphyria
cutanea tar da, and increases in ALA and alkaline phosphatase (Suskind, 1980). The tenyear follow-up of 55 workers by Pazderova-Vejlupkova et al (1980, 1981) emphasized the
nonuniformity of TCDD's effects on individual organs and the development of illness that
affects virtually every important organ system. Complete recovery is rare, except for
anxiety and depression, and persistence of impaired metabolism of fats and
carbohydrates can be a major cause of premature arteriosclerosis. Children who were
born to exposed individuals were not adversely affected.
—Coalite (United Kingdom)

The Coalite episode, which occurred in Derbyshire, UK in April 1968, was first described
by May (1973). This also involved an overheated reactor used to synthesize TCP; the
explosive rupture of the kettle was accompanied by detonation of the released glycol and
chlorobenzene vapors. Seventy-nine cases of chloracne were initially recorded; many
were severe but resolved within four to six months. There was no evidence of depression,
weight loss, malignancies, or liver, kidney, or cardiac impairment. The epidemiological
survey of 1977-1978 covered only 41 of the 90 exposed workers and revealed some
abnormalities in blood chemistry and immune function. There were no chromosomal
abnormalities in the circulating lymphocytes. The levels of serum cholesterol and
triglycerides were elevated, while the gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase was abnormally
high. Both IgD and IgM were lower than the controls. Twenty-nine of the original 41
workers were re-examined, but immune globulins were not measured.
No statistically significant differences between groups were reported when chromosomal
aberration and sister chromatid exchange studies were performed on blood samples of
workers who were exposed, possibly exposed, or not exposed to TCDD (Blank et al, 1983).
Sell (1983) reviewed for AMA's Advisory Panel on Toxic Substances a report on the
outcome of an industrial accident at the Coalite plant. In his opinion, there were no
immunologic differences between the three groups of workers; ie, 1) those exposed to
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 26

�TCDD and with chloracne, 2) those exposed to TCDD but without chloracne, and 3) those
who were unexposed and had no chloracne.
—Vertek Chemical (Jackonville, Arkansas)
This plant was involved in the production of 2,4,5-T and 2,4,-D since 1957. The recent
discovery of toxic wastes leaking from drums stored above ground at the plant led to a
health survey in 1979 of 190 current or former workers. Nerve conduction velocity
(NCV) measurements were done on 55 workers who were prescreened for a negative
history of diabetes, neurological disease, or excess alcohol consumption; all 55 were
considered to be at risk for exposure to phenoxy herbicides. There were no concurrent
exposures to other possible neurotoxic agents in any of the 190 workers, although prior
exposure to such agents was reported in nine workers and prior exposure to 2,4-D was
reported in two. The control group was similarly prescreened and found to have had no
significant exposure to neurotoxic agents. NCV measurements of the median motor,
median sensory, and sural nerves were performed without knowledge of a subject's
employment history. Limb temperature also was measured. Slowed NCV in one or more
nerves was reported in 46% of the study group compared to 5% of the controls. The
conduction velocities of the median motor and sural sensory nerves were significantly
slower in the study group vs the control group. In addition, slowed sural sensory velocity
correlated significantly with duration of employment (Singer et al, 1982).
It is appropriate to note that neurologists and neurotoxicologists regard NCV
measurements as a useful research procedure when carried out in connection with a
thorough neurological examination.
The ambient conditions and technical skill
requirements, however, are such that it has limited use as a field study examination.
—NIOSH Dioxin Registry
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health has established a dioxin
registry to analyze causes of death among workers at 14 manufacturing sites for dioxincontaining products (Fingerhut, 1984a). The Registry was established in late 1979 to
identify male workers exposed to substances such as TCP, 2,4,5-T, silvex, and pentachlorophenol that might contain polychlorinated dioxins and to describe the processes for
manufacturing these compounds. The first use of the Registry data is a mortality
analysis, which is expected to be completed in 1985. In this mortality study, a subcohort
of persons who had chloracne will be analyzed separately.
One value of the Registry is its exposure matrix, which will characterize exposure
conditions for the specific processes and will then delineate both high- and low-exposure
populations. The factors that will be taken into account in the exposure matrix include
the product, the process, the operating conditions, temperatures and solvents, job duties,
and analyses of dioxin concentrations in products.
A strict definition of exposure has been utilized. The Registry includes only production
workers assigned to the processes of interest, maintenance personnel assigned to those
departments and clean-up workers or others identified by the companies as being
involved in process accidents and who may not have their work assignments documented.
The Registry has already identified 6,000 production workers at 14 companies. The
quantity and quality of the records, which date back as far as the 1930s, vary
tremendously; included are personnel records, payroll records, union records, medical
records, insurance records, workers' compensation records, and Social Security records.
--NIEHS-IARC International Phenoxy Herbicides Registry
In 1981, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences of the NIH initiated
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 27

�support for a feasibility study on the development and maintainence of an international
registry—exclusive of the USA—of phenoxy herbicide-exposed populations.
The
populations were to include production workers, formulators, and users. Workers' records
and environmental data from' more than 25 plants are under consideration. Some
European countries are reluctant to release their health and environmental data, and
there are still questions about the pooling of data from different sources and the
assembling of a sufficient number of records for an estimate of excess frequency of
outcomes.
—Isolated Exposures to TCDD

Oliver (1975) described three laboratory workers who were exposed to "pure" TCDD.
Two of the three had typical chloracne. All had abnormal serum cholesterol levels but
without porphyria. Two had gastrointestinal symptoms, one complained of blurred vision
and impaired muscular coordination, and another complained of "neuralgia of the left
thigh." Two years after the exposure, two of the men experienced personality changes,
neurological disturbances, and hirsutism.
Exposed Herbicide Users
—Swedish Railway Workers

The first study of this group, who had worked with both phenoxy acid (2,4-D and 2,4,5-T)
and arnitrole herbicides (Axelson et al, 197*0, indicated that amitrole was probably solely
responsible for an excess of tumors. A case-control analysis of the data later revealed
the possibility of a masked tumor-inducing effect of the phenoxy acids (Huff et al, 1980).
—Other Swedish Workers

Follow-up on an earlier line of investigation led Hardell and coworkers to additional
cases of soft tissue sarcomas, which again seemed related to occupational exposures to
phenoxy acids or chlorophenols. Malignant histiocytic lymphomas* were clustered among
a group of hospital admissions in Sweden from January to September 1978; 14 of 17
patients were in occupations that utilized phenoxy acids or chlorophenols (eg, forestry,
wood and paper mills, farming). Inasmuch as both 6-fold tumor increases (Hardell, 1977,
1979) were attributed to impurities, such as TCDD, a case-control (case-referrent) study
by Eriksson et al (1981) was launched; their objective was to confirm the previous
findings and to clarify whether the impurities were causative. The new risk ratio (5.7)
for soft tissue sarcomas from exposure to phenoxy acids or chlorophenols was of the
same order of magnitude as before; furthermore, a risk ratio of 4.2 was obtained for
other phenoxy acids that are free of dioxins, such as MCPA, 2,4-D, mecoprop, and
dichlorprop.
In a review of the occupational histories of patients with malignant lymphomas, Olsson et
al (1981) reported a possible relationship between non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the skin
and exposure to phenoxy acids.
In another investigation by Hardell et al (1981), exposure to organic solvents,
chlorophenols, and/or phenoxy acids resulted in a relative risk factor of 4.1 for malignant
lymphoma compared to a risk factor of 0.9 in the unexposed control group. These results
seem to indicate an increased risk for malignant lymphoma in workers exposed to
phenoxy acids, chlorophenols, or organic solvents.

* Neoplasm sites included frontal sinuses, bladder, ileum, retroperitoneal, parotid and
submandibular areas, femur, and groin.
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 28

�Yet another investigation by Hardell et al (1982) reported a sevenfold increase in the
incidence of nasal and nasopharyngeal cancers, particularly among woodworkers, due to
chlorophenols. Cabinet makers, with no exposure to chiorophenols, had a doubled (but
insignificant) risk of nasal cancer. Exposure to phenoxy acids resulted in a doubled (but
insignificant) risk of nasal and nasopharyngeal cancer.
Analysis of geographical clusters of malformations in Sweden failed to identify any one
etiological factor responsible for the clustering (Ericson et al, 1983).
—Finnish Railway and Forestry Workers

A similar group of 30 workers in Finland, who were exposed to TCDD-containing
herbicides, will be compared to a matched control group to see if there are any longterm effects from their exposures. Thus far, no differences are apparent (Huff et al,
1980).
—New Zealand Birth Defects Study

Smith et al (1982b) surveyed by questionnaire the pregnancy outcomes of 548 New
Zealand professional sprayers and their wives, who were also occupationally exposed to
phenoxy herbicides, comparing them with a control group of 441 agricultural
contractors. Inasmuch as the authors' preliminary results showed little difference in
rates of congenital defects between cases and controls, this study redefined the extent of
exposure by subdividing the group of sprayers; there was still no suggestive evidence that
2,4,5-T adversely affected pregnancy outcomes. Although the men had an increased risk
(1.19 times) of siring children with defects, the wives' risk of miscarriage was only 0.89;
the differences were not statistically significant and no other effect on the women's
reproductive cycle was apparent. The several inherent sources of bias in the study were
explained, but even when they were excluded the results were unchanged.
—Long Island Railroad Birth Defects Study

In 1979, NIOSH investigated a reported excess of birth defects among the children of
about 1,400 maintenance workers of this New York railroad who were exposed to
2,4,5-T. Of 170 live births in the study, there were less than the expected number of all
combined major defects but a significant excess of minor defects. The latter, however,
is believed to be due to diagnostic bias (Honchar, 1982).
General Population
—Seveso, Italy Inhabitants

In 1976, an explosive release of TCDD from a trichlorophenol reactor at the ICMESA
plant occurred in the vicinity of Seveso, Italy. This is the largest single population—over
37,000 persons—to have been potentially exposed to varying doses of this compound. Two
years after the incident, the acute and mid-term, health effects were assessed; mild
chloracne, mainly in a small group of children, healed quickly. Subclinical peripheral
nerve impairment was reported; there also was liver involvement but without apparent
functional disorders.
Immunoresponse was not altered nor was susceptibility to
infectious diseases increased (Reggiani, 1979). This incident has been described more
fully in AMA's 1981 report.
The long-term epidemiologic survey of the 220,000 residents of the Seveso area is
expected to go on for many years. A progress report emphasized the preliminary nature
of the findings and reiterated the above conclusions of Reggiani (Pocchiari et al, 1979;
Huff et al, 1980). Except for the skin, no organs or body functions were impaired. No
derangement of gestation, no fetal lethality and loss, no gross malformations, no growth
d57:update (revd. .5-29-85) - page 29

�retardation at term, and no cytogenetic abnormalities have yet occurred.
Analysis of the livers of 144 sheep which died in the Seveso area following the accident
disclosed that tympanism was the cause of death, not TCDD (Anon, 1980).
The primary biological effect on the inhabitants was skin irritation, largely as the result
of alkali mist. However, up to the end of a year and over a six-month period, about 200
cases of chloracne were identified, primarily among children. It is interesting to note
that no cases of chloracne were observed among the ICMESA workers either prior to or
following the accident, including workers involved in clean-up operations.
Spontaneous abortions and birth defects were monitored by the Birth Defects Registry
(established in 1978), but except for hemangiomas and benign neoplasms, the data did not
show an association between malformations and TCDD exposure.
A controlled study of children with chloracne was not completed because too few of the
affected children wished to participate. An Occupational Health Surveillance study was
established soon after the accident and a large amount of data was collected between
1976-1980; however, the "lack of adequate study designs" and the difficulties in coping
with "prevailing clinic characteristics" precluded any definitive conclusions.
Nevertheless, the high incidence of "abnormals" in the liver function test declined
markedly during the four-year surveillance period.
Neurologic studies by the Clinica del Lavoro Luigi Devoto of Milan revealed only three or
four cases of suspected neuropathy in which either the motor or sensory nerve conduction
velocity was reduced. These findings and "subclinical signs of neuropathy" in 16 other
subjects could not be evaluated properly because there was no control group and no
information on alcohol intake and history of diabetes.
In late 1980, a cross-sectional study was designed to evaluate hepa toxic and neurotoxic
effects in 188 ICMESA workers compared to an unexposed control group of 305 workers
from the metallurgical and mechanical industries outside the Seveso area. The battery
of laboratory tests included lung function tests (FVC, FEV), SPE and ulnar nerve
electromyography, SCOT, GGT, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, cholesterol serum
level, triglycerides, total serum protein and electrophoresis, prothrombin time,
hematocrit, hemoglobin, WBC and differential, and total urinary porphyrin. No
statistically significant differences between the two groups were found.
Thus, five years after the accident, no significant adverse health effects were detected
in the ICMESA workers. Likewise, both the mortality study and Cancer Registry have
yielded very little conclusive information, though eight cases of soft tissue sarcoma were
found in the group of 222,000 residents living in the buffer zone outside of the more
highly contaminated zones A and B.
Merlo (1983), who was associated with the Seveso data analysis group from 1979-83, said
that,
"... knowledge of the TCDD health effects comes from animal studies and human
occupational exposures occurring during the manufacture of trichlorophenol. Shortterm effects have been identified. Long-term effects are still under study.
Unfortunately, due to the lack of proper studies in the early phase of the 'Seveso
Program,1 reevaluation of these data— such as has been done with Hiroshima and
Nagasaki records— has to be excluded. Only well designed epidemiologic studies
carried out carefully will enable us to draw conclusions about the occurrence of
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 30

�chronic health effects and their relationship with TCDD exposure."
Tenchini et al (1983) performed a cytogenetic analysis of maternal and fetal tissues from
induced abortions in TCDD-exposed and nonexposed women. They found a statistically
significant increased incidence of aberrant cells and a greater number of aberrations per
damaged cell in the dioxin-exposed group vs controls. While some effect of maternal
exposure to the toxic agent cannot be ruled out, variations in cell culture growth are
more likely to be the cause of the observed cell changes.
—Times Beach, Missouri
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) was called in by the State of Missouri to find an
explanation for the unusual occurrence of animal deaths and reports of family illness
near a horse riding arena in Missouri (Donnel et al, 1983; Kimbrough, 1983). In 1973, the
toxic agent was identified as TCDD, which was later traced to TCDD-contaminated stillbottom waste from a TCP process in Verona, Missouri. It seems that, in 1971,
approximately 29 kg (64 pounds) of TCDD-contaminated waste from a chemical plant in
southwest Missouri was mixed with waste oils and applied to soil for dust control at 241
sites in the eastern part of the State. At one site, the Shenandoah horse stables, as much
as 35,000 ppb of TCDD was measured in the soil. In addition to several other horse
arenas, there was an urban residential area with a population of 2,100, later referred to
as "site-21," or "Times Beach." The situation in this town came to light when a flood
struck the major portion of the town and led to a near-total evacuation of the
community. As early as 1971, the unpaved streets of the town also had been sprayed
with TCDD-contaminated oil. Soil samples taken in the aftermath of the flood from both
the shoulder of the road and the ditches contained TCDD. While they did not have the
greatest degree of TCDD contamination in Missouri, they reached a peak of 98 ppb.
Since there was no established rationale or methodology in Missouri for determining
"safe" levels of TCDD in soil, the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (DNR) in
collaboration with CDC and EPA reviewed environmental sampling data and the
Remedial Action Marker Plan (RAMPS); they jointly recommended appropriate strategies
for intervention. Hence, on 23 December 1982, CDC advised that the evacuated
residents of the town should not return to their homes until additional samplings were
carried out.
Contaminated Times Beach soils were given by gavage to guinea pigs and rats by
McConnell et al (1984) to determine the degree of bioavailability of dioxin on soil. A
characteristic clinicopathologic syndrome developed in the guinea pig, AHH was induced
in the rat and both species of animals had TCDD in their livers. Hence, TCDD in soil was
believed to have a "high biological availablity after ingestion." Kimbrough has cited the
bioavailability of TCDD to be as much as 30% to 50% of the original amount contained
on the soil matrix. CDC based its risk assessment on a "decision of prudence" and
several assumptions that were presumed to be in the best interests of the public's health
and safety. One such assumption was that a child would be most vulnerable to the
contamination and might ingest as much as 1 to 10 g of soil. Thus, from the chronic
animal toxicity data of Kociba and the National Toxicology Program, the safe human
dose was judged to be in the picogram range, and "1 ppb of dioxin in soil is a reasonable
level at which to begin consideration of action to limit human exposure for contaminated
soil" (Kimbrough et al, 1984). (The EPA has meanwhile published a methodology for
estimating human exposure and cancer risk associated with five different pathways of
exposure to 2,3,7,8-TCDD contaminated soil (Schaum, 1984).)
The Missouri Department of Health and CDC decided, after a review of animal data and
consultation with other health professionals, that there would be a risk of developing
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 31

�"adverse health effects" if there were continued residential exposure to soil having more
than 1.0 ppb of TCDD. The two agencies then went on to initiate four public health
actions in January 1983 that would provide:
—health education of the medical and public health communities, as well as the
general public, regarding current understanding of health effects of dioxin
exposures;
—dermatologic screening clinics for the general public;
—a registry for potentially exposed individuals; approximately 2,000 interviews
were conducted; and
—the design and implementation of a "highest risk" cohort.
—Missouri Pilot Study
An investigation by questionnaire of two groups of residents was conducted; one group of
68 persons was at risk, having been exposed agriculturally to dioxin, while the control
group of 36 had little or no history of exposure. Both were matched by age; sex;
socioeconomic status; history of alcohol, tobacco, and pesticide usage; and according to
their relative proportion of work in a hazardous occupation. The medical examination
included separate neurologic and dermatologic examinations and a broad range of
laboratory tests, one series of which was intended to assess cell-mediated immunity.
An initial review of data did not indicate any statistically significant differences
between the high-risk and low-risk study groups. No consistent indications of increased
disease prevalence was found in the dioxin-exposed group, although there was an
apparent trend of urinary tract abnormalities and some immune function changes (T^:Tg
cell ratios were less than 1.0). Functional tests of the immune system did not indicate
any overall abnormalities. No cases of chloracne or porphyria cutanea tarda were
reported. Follow-up studies were recommended (Donnel et al, 1983; Webb et al, 1984).
And finally, the authors of the report entitled "Missouri Dioxin Health Studies,"
(published by the Missouri Division of Health and CDC in collaboration with St. Joseph's
Hospital of Kirkwood, Missouri and St. Louis University Hospital) stated that,
"... it is conceivable that uptake of dioxin from contaminated soils was generally
less than estimated for this study group or that chronic exposures to environmental
TCDD have actually induced little or no adverse health effects as measured in this
study."
The Missouri Department of Natural Resources has meanwhile added to its registry of
uncontrolled hazardous waste sites three new locations that are contaminated with
dioxin: Minker-Stout and Lacy Manor sites in Jefferson County and Erxleben site in St.
Louis County.
—St. Louis, Missouri (Trucking Employees)
A recent survey of present and former workers employed at trucking terminals that had
been sprayed for dust abatement with TCDD-contaminated oil disclosed a 59-year-old
man with a sarcoma and porphyria cutanea tarda (PCT). A truck driver for 21 years, he
had worked at one of the contaminated terminals for several years; he also was exposed
to TCDD while unhooking trailers in the terminal. The PCT improved with treatment;
however, in February 1983, a sarcoma in the proximal right femur and pelvis involving
the adjacent soft tissue was diagnosed. It was not possible to determine whether the
tumor originated in the bone or in the soft tissue (Hope et al, 1984).

d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 32

�—Alsea, Oregon

In the Alsea basin of Oregon, 2,4,5-T and silvex were used on a seasonal basis to
eradicate unwanted vegetation from forest lands. In 1978, there was some concern that
such spraying was responsible for a number of spontaneous abortions in the area. All
told, 13 miscarriages were reported from nine women. As a result of much publicity and
public concern, the EPA conducted a study—Alsea I—to assess the facts and to determine
whether the spraying was indeed responsible.
EPA concluded that there was no
relationship between the spraying and the incidence of miscarriage; the rate was within
the expected limits. The study was harshly criticized because the exposures were not
documented and the statistical treatment was improper. Thus, Alsea II was begun in
October 1978, to study a much larger area and population than Alsea I and to compare
miscarriages within the first 20 weeks of pregnancy with the spraying of 2,4,5-T. A high
probability of an elevated miscarriage rate shortly after spraying was reported to the
press, but this claim was proved to be without merit.
review of
conducted
al, 1979).
contended

Alsea II by Oregon State University—A critical analysis of Alsea II was
by an interdisciplinary team of Oregon State University scientists (Wagner et
It did not support any of EPA's conclusions in the Alsea II study. The team
that:

there was no control population in the study;
data on miscarriages were unreliable and inaccurate;
medical practices were profoundly different in the three areas under consideration;
information on use of 2,4,5-T was inaccurate and incomplete;
variations in hospitalized miscarriages
expectations;

in all the areas were well within

differences existed in topography, climate, and demography;
data collection was incomplete and failed to account for patterns of and
differences in medical practice among areas.
The panel termed the EPA's hospitalized spontaneous abortion indices (HSAI) values to be
unreliable because:
there was substantial variation in the magnitude of the HSAIs for any one month
among the six years, and
the peak HSAI in June was due to a single large excursion only in 1976, while the
seasonal cyclic peaks were consistent with random variations.
Furthermore,
alleged increase in the use of 2,4,5-T was actually due to more complete collection
of spray data;
there was no statistically significant cross-correlation except for the apparent
increase in the June HSAI—deletion of the single June 1976 HSAI value removed the
significant correlation; and
d57: update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 33

�the HSAI increase in 3une 1976 was identified only with a location where human
exposure was least likely to have occurred.
Hence, according to the OSU panel, there was:
no significant correlation between 2,4,5-T use and the HSAI, and
EPA's study was seriously flawed because of incomplete and inaccurate data.
review of Alsea by FIFRA's Scientific Advisory Panel—This panel of the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act reviewed the evidence and found neither
immediate nor substantial threat to human health or the environment when silvex or
2,4,5-T was applied to rice, rangeland, orchards, or sugarcane and when used for certain
non-crop purposes.
review of Alsea n by others—Lamm (1979) also declared the Alsea II study to be epidemiologically unsound and the report useless. Both statistically and epidemiologically,
the report does not support any relationship between herbicide spraying and
miscarriages. Lamm (1980) has since claimed that only four of the ten women cited by
EPA in the Alsea II study underwent spontaneous abortions; the remainder were
hospitalized for other reasons.
New Zealand's Allan H. Smith (1979) termed the Oregon study of highly doubtful validity.
Robinson (1979) of Australia emphasized that the EPA information in no way confirmed a
hazard to human health from 2,4,5-T when it was used in a careful manner and according
to label instructions on the container. A comprehensive review by the Australian
Department of Health (1977) concluded that there was no evidence that 2,4,5-T caused
human birth defects.
Canadian Review of TCDD's Health Hazards
Canada's Expert Advisory Committee on Dioxins has evaluated the available published
information and concluded that:
Epidemiological data on the effects of dioxins on Canadian populations, when taken
in isolation, are insufficient to prove any significant association with disease.
Considering that it is impossible to prove the absolute safety of a substance—not to
mention the multiplicity of dioxin sources and its mixtures with other chemicals,
and the small size of the Canadian population—additional epidemiological studies
solely on a Canadian population would be unlikely to provide a definitive
identification of dioxin-associated diseases. Therefore, risk assessments associated
with dioxin exposure must rely on world-wide epidemiological data in conjunction
with toxicological studies on laboratory animals.
Similarities between the signs and symptoms in humans and laboratory animals
justify the concern about human exposure to dioxins; hence, a "virtually safe dose"
for 2,3,7,8-TCDD was calculated from animal data. The corresponding dose for a
one-in-a-million lifetime risk of cancer in humans ranged from 0.02 to 0.07 pg/kg
(mean = 0.03) of body wt/day. Another estimate of cancer risk assumed a dose
threshold, for humans was estimated to be between 0.2 and 1 pg/kg of body wt/day,
based on dividing the "no observed effect level" (or NOEL) from animal studies by
an arbitrary safety factor, usually 5,000 or 1,000.
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 34

�The potential risks of adverse effects on human reproduction were also evaluated
from animal data, inasmuch as epidemiological data on reproductive toxicity and
teratogenesis were of such poor quality that no association could be determined.
Fetotoxicity and teratogenicity in laboratory animals occurs at doses near those
which cause maternal toxicity. A 1000-fold safety factor was arbitrarily applied to
the NOEL for reproductive effects in animals, thereby resulting in an "acceptable
daily intake" of 1 pg/kg of body wt/day. This estimate is not much higher than the
level to which some high-risk groups in Canada are exposed (Willis, 1983).
Cancer Studies
CDC Selected Cancers Study
See under "Vietnam Veterans (Studies in Progress), —Vietnam Ground Troops Study."
NIOSH Review of Reports of Soft Tissue Sarcoma and Dioxin Exposure in Seven Chemical
Workers
According to Fingerhut (1983), the first suggestion of an association between these
tumors and TCDD began with clinical observations in Sweden in 1977 and two published
studies of Hardell and others. Four separate studies of industrial populations were then
reported in the United States in 1980. The mortality analyses, which were conducted by
Monsanto and Dow epidemiologists, included workers exposed during process accidents as
well as during the uneventful processing of TCP to 2,4,5-T. The authors indicated that
there was no excess of mortality due to dioxin exposure. Honchar and Halperin (1981)
reviewed the studies and noted that of the total 105 deaths, three were reported to be
due to soft tissue sarcomas—a frequency of 2.9%, which contrasts with 0.07% for the
general population. Subsequently, a fourth person from the Dow cohort was reported to
have STS (Cook, 1981), and Johnson et al (1981) and Moses et al (1981) provided case
reports of three additional cases of soft tissue sarcoma in chemical workers.
Fingerhut and others (1984b) undertook an effort to evaluate the accuracy of reports of
dioxin exposure and soft tissue sarcoma pathology in these seven chemical workers.
Tissue specimens of the persons with alleged soft tissue sarcomas were examined by two
STS pathologists, Dr. Franz Enzinger at the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology and Dr.
William Russell. Of the four cases in the Dow and Monsanto cohorts, whose causes of
death were derived from death certificates, only two were found to have soft tissue
sarcomas, and these two also had chloracne. The three other individuals were confirmed
as cases of soft tissue sarcoma, but one was a truck driver who had been a clerk and
maintenance worker but with no recorded assignment to dioxin-contaminated processes.
The other two cases were a father and son. The son was never assigned to a dioxincontaminated process during his 2.5 years of employment before he died; the father, a
utility worker who worked for 11 days in the pentachlorophenol process area, had a
generalized liposarcoma.
This review of seven cases neither affirmed nor rejected the association alleged by the
Swedish workers because there was no adequate comparison group that could be used. In
this country, we have no mortality rates for soft tissue sarcomas that are based on
pathologic review of tissue specimens; the only available rates are derived from death
certificates. According to a review by Percy et al (1981), the death certificate does not
accurately estimate the diagnosis of STS. The authors, from NCI's Biometry Branch,
have shown that only around 50% of STS cases list STS on the death certificates, while
only around 50% of the death certificates listing STS also have a corresponding diagnosis
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 35

�from hospitals during 1970-1971, 252 reported soft tissue sarcomas, but only 54.8% of
these were confirmed by pathologists of soft tissue sarcomas. On the other hand, only
56.3% of the pathology diagnoses of soft tissue sarcoma were recorded as such on death
certificates.
There are several other dilemmas in the study of these tumors: Not only is the death
certificate inadequate as a source of diagnostic information, but the tumors are often
misclassified because of the anatomic-based rules for the International Classification of
Disease (ICD) System. For example, if a sarcoma occurs in either the stomach or liver,
it will not be classified under ICD-171 for soft tissue sarcoma but as a tumor of the
stomach or liver. Only 60% of the histological diagnoses of STS in the Swedish studies
are listed under ICD-171, the remaining 40% are in other ICD categories.
Fingerhut and others (1984b) suggest that the diagnosis of the original pathologist may
not be accurate; thus, experts in soft tissue pathology may be needed necessary to
confirm original diagnoses. Additionally, the histological subtypes of STS are difficult to
diagnose. Among the above seven cases reviewed by expert pathologists, there was
agreement by the experts that five were soft tissue sarcoma. However, the experts
themselves disagreed on the subtypes subtypes for two persons.
A causal relationship between soft tissue sarcoma and dioxin exposure has not yet been
confirmed or excluded. Since the incidence of soft tissue sarcoma in the general
population is very low, most of the study designs require a very high relative risk for the
sarcoma to be detected (Coggen et al, 1982).
NCI Case-Control Study of Lymphoma and Soft Tissue Sar com a
According to Hoar (1983), the first disclosure of herbicide-related cancers was that of
Swedish railroad workers exposed to amitrole, 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T, which showed elevated
rates of cancer incidence (Axelson et al, 1974). Next in line were the case-control
studies by Hardell and his collaborators wherein associations were described between
phenoxyacetic acid or chlorophenol exposure and soft tissue sarcomas (STS), nonHodgkin's lymphomas (NHL), and Hodgkin's disease (HD). Risks for all three cancers
were increased five- to sixfold, irrespective of the presence of polychlorinated
dibenzodioxins or dibenzof urans as contaminants.
A five- to sixfold increase in risk is a remarkable finding for epidemiologists;
furthermore, such an increase is of especially great concern because there is widespread
potential for exposure to phenoxyacetic acids and chlorophenols. Apart from their use as
herbicides, these compounds act as blue-stain retardants in lumber, as slime control
agents in cutting oil fluids and in the paper and pulp industry, as wood preservatives, and
as water-proofing agents for leather and textiles. Thus, if the epidemiologic associations
suggested by the Swedish research are proven to be causally related, these agents could
be responsible for a large share of STS, NHL, and HD cases in the United States.
The National Cancer Institute (NCI) consequently is comparing herbicide exposure among
reported cases of soft tissue sarcoma and lymphoma in Kansas; subjects have been
matched with a control group of similar age, sex, and county of residence. The work is
expected to be completed in late 1984 or early 1985.
NCI has considered various approaches for further investigations. Cohort studies of
pesticide applicators are underway. A duration-related association between lung cancer
and employment as an applicator has already been reported by Blair et al (1983).
Unfortunately, these cohorts are far too small for conclusive evidence in a disease as
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 36

�rare as STS. A case-control study of STS, NHL, and HD with particular attention to
herbicide exposure was planned, with concentrated effort on agricultural uses; for
example, on wheat, corn, sorghum, soybeans, alfalfa, and pasture land. Inasmuch as
herbicides are often accompanied by extremely heavy applications of insecticides, which
could confound the results of the study, the choice of crop was narrowed down to
wheat. Wheat requires a large amount of herbicide but comparatively little insecticide
and fungicide application.
Kansas, a major wheat-producing state, was chosen as the site for the study. The
herbicide most commonly used there has been 2,4-D; nevertheless, substantial amounts of
2,4,5-T also have been used in addition to a number of other chemicals. According to a
1981 report of the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center entitled
"Pesticide Use on Major Crops in the North Central Region," about 5.2 million pounds of
2,4-D and 1.3 million pounds of 2,4,5-T were applied in 1978—amounts far greater than in
any of the other North Central states. Kansas also has a population-based cancer
registry, from which figures for cancer incidence can be obtained without having to rely
on death certificates; as noted above, the reporting of sarcomas and lymphomas on death
certificates is known to be extremely inaccurate.
The study population consists of white males, aged 21 and older, who have been diagnosed
with STS, NHL, or HD during residence in Kansas. From 1976-1982, there were 200 with
STS and 173 with HD; a sample of 200 was selected from those diagnosed with NHL
during 1979-1981.
The control group consists of white males from the general population of Kansas. Three
controls were selected for each case, matched on age (+_ 2 years) and vital status.
Controls for live cases, aged 65 years or older, were selected from the Medicare file;
controls aged 64 years or younger were selected by random-digit telephone dialing. For
deceased members, the controls were selected from Kansas state mortality files, with an
additional match on the year of death; excluded were those persons whose cause of death
was STS, NHL, HD, a malignancy of an ill-defined site (ICDA code 195), homicide, or
suicide. In the case of deceased subjects, the next-of-kin were interviewed. One-half of
the STS and NHL and one-third of the HD cases died before the study could be initiated.
The same controls are intended to be used for comparing the three different series—ie,
sarcomas, NHL, and HD cases—thus, only 1,008 controls are needed instead of
approximately 1,700. Seventy men who were diagnosed with colon cancer in 1981 were
chosen as a "cancer control series" in order to evaluate the possibility of recall-bias
among cancer patients.
Pathology specimens are being reviewed to confirm the diagnosis of STS, NHL, or HD,
which is important because these conditions are difficult to diagnose accurately; also,
the original pathologists used a variety of schemes for categorizing the tumors into
subgroups. Not only are consistent diagnoses a requisite, but there must also be
agreement on the subgroup terminology. Subgroups may be important with respect to
etiology; some subgroups may be associated with herbicide use, while others may not.
After about 45% of the specimens had been reviewed, it was noted that some cases
belonged to other series in the study—a so-called NHL is actually an HD or an HD should
be an STS. Then too, a few instances of malignancies have been found that are not
eligible; for example, one multiple myeloma was considered to be benign and an STS was
rediagnosed as nodular fasciitis. If the number of such misclassifications is large enough,
it may be possible to evaluate observation- and recall-bias in these situations with
conditions that may be unrelated to herbicide exposure.

d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 37

�Each telephone interview has taken from about 25 minutes to one hour. Corroborative
evidence of the self-reported herbicide exposure will be obtained from farm suppliers by
asking them about the kinds of crops grown and the purchases of herbicides and
insecticides. Such verification is an important step, giving a crude evaluation of
potential observation-bias—a criticism of the Swedish studies. All interviews and
verification were to have been completed in the early part of December 1983. The data
were to be analyzed by computer and reported by summer of 1984.
New ZealandI Soft Tissue Sarcoma Case-Control .Study
In addition to the Swedish studies, a case-control study of STS has been reported by
researchers from New Zealand, where phenoxy herbicides were used extensively for many
years. A preliminary report by Smith et al (1982a) found no association between soft
tissue sarcoma and the use of phenoxyacetic acid pesticides. None of the persons with
soft tissue sarcoma in the study had worked as a licensed herbicide applicator. In this
study 102 males with STS, as indicated from the New Zealand Cancer Registry between
1976-1980, and 306 controls (with cancers other than STS) were matched by age and year
of registration.
The 102 STS cases, or their next-of-kin, and "other cancer" controls were interviewed by
telephone for information concerning their occupations. No excess of STS was seen in
the category for agriculture and forestry (odds ratio = 1.03, 90% confidence limits = 0.9,
1.8); farmers showed a slight excess of 1.45 (0.8, 2.7) despite extensive use of phenoxy
herbicides, but this excess may be due to misclassification. Neither complete work
histories nor histories of actual herbicide use are available. Although misclassification
of exposure status may dilute the risk estimates, the amount of misclassification cannot
explain the differences between the Swedish and New Zealand studies.
Lifetime work histories for 82 of the New Zealand STS cases and their 92 controls with
other types of cancer were taken by telephone. The results of the interviews showed a
60% increase in risk of STS if the probable or definite exposure to phenoxy herbicides for
more than one day occurred at least five years prior to the cancer registration; there was
a 30% increase in risk if exposure was at least a total of 5 days and occurred more than
10 years prior to registration. Increases in risk for chlorophenol exposure were 50% and
60%, respectively. Little control for potential confounding factors was done (Smith et
al, 1984).
Finland
No deaths from STS or lymphomas were revealed from a survey of mortality data on
1,926 herbicide sprayers employed from 1955-1971, although exposures were admittedly
low and of short duration (Anonymous, 1983; Riihimaki et al, 1982).
US, Pacific Northwest
In the Pacific Northwest, there is a case-control study of approximately 280 STS cases,
540 NHL cases, and 125 liver cancer cases, all diagnosed between 1980-1983. The cases
originated in 13 counties in western Washington state, where phenoxy herbicides and
chlorophenols are used extensively in agriculture, forestry, and the wood products
industry. Cancer incidence data are available from a population-based cancer registry.
Approximately 1,100 subjects were selected by random-digit dialing to serve as controls
for each of the three types of cancer. In-person interviews of cases and controls, or
their next-of-kin, were used to collect detailed residential and occupational histories and
other risk factor information. Information on geographical area and extent of herbicide
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 38

�application will be combined with the residential histories to construct exposure
indices. Occupational exposures will be ranked and given an exposure index value. The
estimated time of completion is 1985.
An update was provided by its principal investigator (Milham, 1982), who concluded that
the mortality patterns of 200 white males, ages 20 and above, from 1950-1979 do not
support a link between soft tissue sarcomas, Hodgkin's disease, and non-Hodgkin's
lymphornas and exposure to phenoxy herbicides or chlorophenols.

Several herbicide-related studies have been conducted in New York State. One of these
was of 281 males diagnosed with STS during 1962-1980 and who were between 18 and 29
years of age during 1962-1971. A living control was selected for each case from drivers'
license registration files matched on age, sex and place of residence. For each deceased
case, a second deceased control was obtained from the New York State mortality files,
matching year of death, age, years of education, sex, race and health systems area.
Cancer deaths were excluded. The telephone interviews with the subjects or their nextof-kin focused on exposure to herbicides while in military service; other factors, such as
occupation, histology and anatomic site of the tumors, were also examined. No
statistically significant association was found between STS and Vietnam service or
military service in general, or any other variable that could relate to herbicide exposure
(Greenwald et al, 1984).
Another investigation (Lawrence et al, 1985), using the mortality odds ratio (MOR),
compared the causes of death among New York State veterans who had served in
Vietnam with those of that era who had not served there. The study group excluded New
York City and consisted of 1,496 Vietnam-era veterans, 555 of which had been in
Vietnam. The highest MORs involved "non-motor vehicular injuries of transport" (2.18),
other accidents and burns (1.37) and homicide (1.59); no association was shown between
herbicide exposure and cause of death.

A high and increasing death rate due to connective tissue cancers among white women
was observed in 9 widely dispersed Michigan counties. For Midland County, the location
of a Dow Chemical facility, a total of 13 deaths due to these cancers occurred over a
period of 20 years, but there were none among white women during 1980 and 1981. In
some instances, the onset of the disease had begun before the subjects had moved to
Midland; then again, it is unclear whether the apparent increase was real or an artifact
of death certification and coding. A case-control study will include all patients with a
biopsy-proven diagnosis of STS from 1970-1983 -with the exception of mesotheliomas— in
the specified eight counties. Three hospital patients without a history of cancer will be
selected as controls for each case, matching on sex, race, and five-year age period.
Interviews will cover occupational and residential history, smoking habits, hobbies,
medical history, family history of malignancy, and diet. The report is estimated to be
completed by October 1985.
A preliminary finding by the Michigan Department of Public Health in 1983 did not
establish a link with any factor in the environment, including TCDD. Though there were
increases in mortality due to connective and soft tissue cancers in some of the 28 other
US counties where TCDD might occur as a result of chemical manufacturing, as
compared to other counties that were suspected of being devoid of the contaminant,
there was no predominant pattern of excesses. One might expect a predominant excess
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 39

�if TCDD were responsible.
Italy
A case-control study of 100 cases of STS identified from hospital pathology department
logs from 1981-1983 and 300 controls is being conducted in three counties where phenoxy
herbicides have been used in the growing of rice. Both sexes will be included due to the
large number of women who have worked in the rice fields. Two controls per case will
also be identified from the pathology logs and will be matched on sex, age, and province
of residence; other cancer patients have been excluded. A second control group for cases
from larger towns will be drawn randomly from the general population and from death
records. A reasonable completion date is 1985.
Denmark
First, there will be a cohort study of workers at a plant where phenoxy acids have been
produced since 1947. Workers from newer plants may also be included. After its
completion, a case-control study of STS similar to the Swedish studies is planned.
Imrnunological Response to TCDO
In Animals
Sell (1983) reviewed for AMA's Advisory Panel on Toxic Substances the available
literature that might pertain to TCDD's effect on the immune system. It is known that
rats and mice develop atrophy of the thymus gland when fed even "safe" doses of TCDD;
their T-cells become cytotoxic, and eventually the animals die.
T-cells, or
T-lymphocytes, are the "policemen of the immune system" and are involved in the
regulation of the immune system. Antibodies are identified according to the function of
the T-cells and B-cells or their subsets. It is important to learn why these cells are
activated. The most sensitive immune system test is based on the production of
cytotoxic T-lymphocytes. Immunosuppresive drugs, such as cyclosporine, interfere with
interleukin-2 and inhibit the growth of T-helper cells.
Published data from animal, studies, however, are meager and conflicting, which makes
their interpretation difficult. For example, the administered dose, usually dissolved in
acetone, often may be given with no indication of what the animal actually received.
Nevertheless, an NIH study on mice given high doses of TCDD (5 ug/kg of body wt, or 0.1
ug/mouse) for 270 days revealed no defects; moreover, an examination of the thymus,
spleen, and lymphocytes revealed no abnormalities, and their antibody response was
satisfactory.
In Humans
Information about TCDD's action on the human immune system is even more scarce,
although imrnunologic research has been carried out by the National Institutes of Health
since 1976. According to Sell, there is presently no conclusive evidence that TCDD
adversely affects the human immune system. Reggiani reported earlier (Arch Toxicol
(Suppl 2):291-302 (1979)) that immunoresponse was not altered nor was susceptibilty to
infectious diseases increased among the inhabitants of Seveso, Italy.
Sell also reviewed a report on the outcome of an industrial accident at the Coalite plant
in Bolshover, England. In his opinion, there were no imrnunologic differences between
three groups of workers; ie, 1) those exposed to TCDD with chloracne, 2) those exposed
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 40

�to TCDD without chloracne, and 3) those who were unexposed and had no chloracne.
Conclusions
The studies to date on the human health effects of Vietnam exposures to Agent Orange
do not reveal a clear relationship between serious illness and exposure. A number of
important studies are still in progress; until they or others that may be deemed necessary
are completed, no final conclusions can be drawn.
Workplace exposures, on the other hand, have involved components of Agent Orange,
especially 2,4,5-T and its contaminant TCDD, and represent a different level of biologic
experience. Definable and measurable effects on specific organ systems can be
described for acute, subchronic, and long-term exposures. Chloracne is the marker for
biologically effective exposure in humans, and it may persist for as long as 30 years.
A wide range of adverse reactions in animals has been observed, which are speciesdependent. For example, the guinea pig is most sensitive to TCDD, while the hamster is
one of the least sensitive. Adverse reactions in animals include thymic atrophy in all
species, induction of hepatic enzymes in the mouse and rat, and teratogenicity and
reproductive effects in rodents and non-human primates. Except for chloracne, however,
TCDD has not demonstrated comparable levels of biologic activity in man; that is to say,
no long-term effects on the cardiovascular and central nervous systems, the liver, the
kidney, the thymus and immunlogic defenses, and the reproductive function -in the male,
female or offspring—have been demonstrated.
The final answers concerning military exposures to Agent Orange, as well as exposures
during the production and application of phenoxy herbicides in general, will require
additional, carefully designed morbidity and laboratory studies using all of the sensitive
technical strategies of modern science. The answers will come only through the
objective, well designed and scholarly approaches of the community of scientists.

d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page

�References
Albro PW, Corbett BJ: Extraction and clean-up of animal tissues and subsequent
determination of mixtures of chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans.
Chemosphere 1977;7:381.
Allen 3R, Barsotti DA, Van Miller JP, et ah Morphological change in monkeys consuming
a diet containing 500 ppt of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Food Cosmet
Toxicol 1977; 15:401-10.
Allen 3R, Barsotti DA, Lambrecht LK, et ah Reproductive effects of halogenated
aromatic hydrocarbons on nonhuman primates. Ann NY Acad Sci 1979;320:419-25.
Anonymous: More Seveso tests. Chem Week 1980(Dec) :21.
Anonymous:
Agent Orange research update; soft-tissue sarcomas.
AO Rev
1983(Apr);2(l).
Anonymous: Toxic Materials News 1984(Aug 1 0:222.
Arensault RD: Pentachlorophenol and contained chlorinated dibenzodioxins in the
environment. American Wood Preservers Association, 1976.
Armstrong B: Australians report no link between service in Vietnam and birth defects
among off spring. Epidemiol Monit 1983(Mar);3(4):l.
Ashe WF, Suskind RR: Reports on chloracne cases, Monsanto Chemical Co., Nitro, West
Virginia. Reports of the Kettering Laboratory, Dec 1949 and Apr 1950.
Australian Dept of Health: 2,4,5-T and human birth defects. Report of the Division of
Public Health, Department of Health, Australia, 1977.
Axelson O, Sundell L: Herbicide exposure, mortality and tumor incidence; an
epidemiological investigation on Swedish railroad workers. Work-Environ Health
1974;11:21.
Balarajan R, McDowall M: Congenital malformations and agricultural workers. Lancet
Bastomsky CH: Enhanced thyroxine metaboism and high uptake goiters in rats after a
single oral dose of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.
Endocrinology
1977; 101:292-296.
Baughman RW, Meselson M: An analytical method for detecting TCDD (dioxin); levels of
TCDD in samples from Vietnam. Envl Hlth Persp 1973a;5:27-35.
Baughman RW, Meselson M: An improved analysis for tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. In:
Chlorodioxins — Origin and Fate. EH Blair (ed), American Chemical Society,
Washington, DC, 1973b.
Beatty PW: Studies on the metabolism and possible mechanisms of toxicity of 2,3,7,8tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). Doctoral thesis, Vanderbilt University, 1978.
Beatty PW, Lembach K3, Holscher MA, et ah
Effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-dibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) on mammalian cells in tissue cultures. Toxicol
Applied Pharmacol 1975;31:309-312.
Beatty PW, Vaughn WR, Neal RA: Effects of alteration of rat hepatic MFO activity on
the toxicity of 2,3,7,8-TCDD. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1978;45:513-519.
Berry DL, Slaga TJ, DiGiovanni 3, et ah Studies with chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins,
polybrominated biphenyls and polychlorinated biphenyls in a two-stage system of
mouse skin tumorigenesis; potent anticracinogenic effects. Annals NY Academy of
Sciences 1979;320:405-414.
Berry DL, Slaga T3, Wilson, NM, et ah Transplacental induction of mixed-function
oxygenases in extraOhepatic tissues by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.
Biochem Pharmacol 1977;26: 1383- 1388.
Blair A, Grauman DJ, Lubin 3H, Fraumeni Jr JF: Lung cancer and other causes of death
among licensed pesticide applicators. JNCI 1983;71(l):31-38.
Blank CE, Cooke P, Potter AM: Investigations for genotoxic effects after exposure to
crude 2,4,5-trichlorophenol. Br 3 Indus Med 1983;40:87-91.
d57:reprefs (revd. 5-24-85) - page R-l

�Bolton L: Seveso dioxin; no solution in sight. Chem Eng 1978;85(22):78.
Bond GG, Ott MG, Brenner FE, et al: Medical and morbidity surveillance findings among
employees potentially exposed to TCDD. Br d Indus Med 1983;40:318-324.
Buser HR: Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin; separation and identification of isomers by
gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. 3 Chromatography 1975;114:95-108.
Buser HR: Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans; formation, occurrence
and analysis of environmentally hazardous compounds. Department of Organic
Chemistry, University of Umea, Sweden and Swiss Federal Research Station,
Waedenswill, Switzerland, pp 9-21, 1978.
Buser HR, Bosshardt HP: Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofurans and benzenes
in fly ash of municipal and industrial incinerators. Mitt Geb Lebensmittelsunters
Hyg 1978;69(2):191-199.
Buser HR, Bosshardt HP, Rappe C: Identification of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin
isomers formed in fly ash. Chemosphere 1978;7(2):165-172.
Buser HR: Formation of polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs) and dibenzo-p-dioxins
(PCDDs) from the pyrolysis of chlorobenzenes. Chemosphere 1979;6:415-424.
Buu-Hoi NP, Chanh PH, Sesque G, et al: Organs as targets of dioxin (2,3,7,8tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin) intoxication. Naturwissenschaften 1972;59:174-175.
Carlstedt-Duke JMB: Tissue distribution of the receptor for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in the rat. Cancer Res 1979;39:3172-3176.
Clark DA, Gauldie J, Szewczuk MR, et al: Enhanced suppressor cell activity as a
mechanism of immunosuppression by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Proc Soc
Exp Biol Med 1981; 168:290-299.
Clark DA, Sweeney G, Safe S, et al: Cellular and genetic basis for suppression of
cytotoxic T cell generation by haloaromatic hydrocarbons. Immunopharmacol
1983;6:143-153.
Coggen D, Acheson ED: Do phenoxy herbicides cause cancer in man? Lancet
1982; 1:1057-1059.
CookRR: Dioxin, chloracne and soft tissue sarcoma. Lancet 1981; 1:618-619.
Cook RR, Bodner KM: Dioxin and reproductive events. In: Tucker RE, Young AL and
Gray AP (eds): Human and Environmental Risks of Chlorinated Dioxins and Related
Compounds. Plenum Press, New York, 1983, pp 593-604.
Cook RR, May V: Dow Chemical worker and environmental studies. Presentation at
meeting of AMA's CSA Advisory Panel on Toxic Substances, 24 October 1983.
Courtney KD, Gaylor DW, Hogan MD, Falk HL: Teratogenic evaluation of 2,4,5-T.
Science 1970; 168:864-866.
Crosby DG: Photodecomposition of chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins. Science 1971;73:748749.
Crosby DG, Wong AS: Environmental degradation of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
(TCDD). Science 1977; 195:1337-1338.
Crosby DG: Methods of photochemical degradation of halogenated dioxins in view of
environmental reclamation. In: Accidental Exposure to Dioxins; Human Health
Aspects. F. Coulston and F. Pocchiari (eds), Academic Press, New York, 1982.
Crummett WB, Stehl RH:
Determination of chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and
dibenzofurans in various materials. Envl Hlth Persp 1973;5:15-25.
DiGiovanni JA, Viaje A, Berry DL, et al:
Tumor initiating ability of 2,3,7,8tetrachlorodiobenxo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and Aroclor 1254 in a two-stage system of
mouse skin carcinogenesis. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 1977; 18:522-557.
Donovan JW, Adena MA, Rose G et al: Case-control study of congenital anomalies and
Vietnam service (birth defects study). Report to the Minister for Veterans' Affairs,
January 1983, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.
Dow Chemical Company: The trace chemistries of fire — A source and route for the
entry of chlorinated dioxins into the environment. The Chlorinated Dioxin Task
Force, Michigan Division, Dow Chemical, USA, 1978.
d57:reprefs (revd. 5-24-85) - page R-2

�Elson M: Lawyers map strategy here for vast Agent Orange suite. Chicago Trib,
5 October 1980.
Emerson JL, Thompson D3, Strebing R3, et al:
Teratogenic studies of
2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid in the rat and rabbit. Food Cosmet Toxic
19719:395- 404.
Ericson A, Kallen B, Westholm P: Clusters of malformations in Sweden; a study with
central registers. Envl Resch 1983;30:466-479.
Eriksson M, Hardell L, Berg NO, et al: Soft-tissue sarcomas and exposure to chemical
substances; a case-referrent study. Br 3 Indus Med 1981;38:27-33.
Faith RE, Luster MI: Investigations on the effects of 2,3,7,8-TCDD on parameters of
various immune functions. Ann NY Acad Sci I979;320:564-57l.
Faith RE, Moore 3A: Impairment of thymus-dependent immune functions by exposure of
the developing immune system to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). 3
Toxicol Environ Health 1977;3:451-464.
Fingerhut MA: NIOSH dioxin registry. Presentation at meeting of AMA's CSA Advisory
Panel on Toxic Substances, 17 November 1983.
Fingerhut MA, Marlow DA, Honchar PA, Halperin WE: The NIOSH Occupational Dioxin
Registry. In: Public Health Risks of the Dioxins. Proceedings of symposium, 19-20
October 1983 at The Rockefeller University. Lowrance W (ed), William Kaufman
(Los Altos, Calif.) 1984a.
Fingerhut MA, Halperin WE, Honchar PA, Smith AB, Groth DH, Russell WO: An
evaluation of reports of dioxin exposure and soft tissue sarcoma pathology in US
chemical workers. Scand 3 Work Environ Health (in press) 1984b.
Firestone D:
The 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin problem; a review.
In:
Chlorinated Phenoxy Acids and their Dioxins; Mode of Action, Health Risks and
Environmental Effects. C. Ramel (ed), Ecol Bull (Stockholm) 1978.
Gaffey WR: Monsanto worker studies. Presentation at meeting of AMA's CSA Advisory
Panel on Toxic Substances, 17 November 1983.
Gasiewicz TA, Holscher MA, Neal RA: The effect of total parenteral nutrition on the
toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in the rat. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol
1980;54:469-488.
Gasiewicz TA, Neal RA:
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin tissue distribution,
excretion and effects of clinical chemical parameters in guinea pigs. Toxicol
Applied Pharmacol 1979;51(2):329-339.
Gasiewicz TA, Neal RA: The examination and quantitation of tissue cytosolic receptors
for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin using hydroxylapatite.
Anal Biochem
1982; 124:1-11.
Gasiewicz TA, Ness WC, Rucci G: Ontogeny of the cytosolic receptor for 2,3,7,8tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in rat liver, lung and thymus. Bioch Biophys Res
Commun 1984;118:183-190.
Ghiasuddin SM, Nelson 3O, Mehzer RE, et al:
Comparative metabolism of
environmentally significant chlorinated aromatic compounds in hepatic microsomal
systems. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1975;33:152-153.
Giavini E, Prati M, Vismara C: Rabbit teratology study with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzop-dioxin. Environ Research 1982;27:74-78.
Gibson JE: Perinatal nephropathies. Environ Health Perspect 1976; 15:121-130.
Green S, Moreland F, Sheu C: Cytogenetic effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
on rat bone marrow cells. FDA By-lines 1977;6:292-294.
Greenlee WF, Dold KM, Irons RD: 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) inhibits
the induction by thymic epithelial cells of T-lymphocyte nitrogen responsiveness.
The Toxicologist 1984;4(4):188.
Greenlee WI, Poland A: Nuclear uptake of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in
C57BL/63 and DBA/23 mice. 3 Biol Chem 1979;254:9814-9821.
Greenwald P, Kovasznay B, Collins DN, Therriault G: Sarcomas of soft tissue after
d57:reprefs (revd. 5-24-85) - page R-3

�Vietnam service. 3NCI 1984;73:1107-1109.
Greig JB, 3ones G, Butler WH» et al: Toxic effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachloridibenzo-pdioxin. Food Cosmet Toxicol 1973; 11:585-595.
Gupta BN, Vos 3G, Moore 3A, et al: Pathologic effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-pdioxin in laboratory animals. Environ Health Perspect 1973;5:125-40.
Gross ML, Lay 3O, Lyon PO, et al: 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin levels in adipose
tissue of Vietnam veterans. Envl Resch 1984;33:261-268.
Hardell L: Malignant mesenchymal tumors and exposure to phenoxy acids; a clinical
observation. Lakartidningen 1977;74:542-546.
Hardell L: Soft-tissue sarcomas and exposure to phenoxyacetic acids and cancer.
Lakartidningen 1977;74:2735.
Hardell L: Malignant lymphoma of histiocytic type and exposure to phenoxyacetic or
chlorophenols. Lancet 1979;I:55-56.
Hardell L, Eriksson M, Lenner P, et al: Malignant lymphoma and exposure to chemicals,
especially organic solvents, chlorophenols and phenoxy acids; a case control study.
Brit 3 Cancer 1981;43:169-176.
Hardell L, 3ohansson B, Axelson O: Epidemiological study of nasal and nasopharyngeal
cancer and their relation to phenoxy acid or chlorophenol exposure. Am 3 Indus
Med 1982;3:247-257.
Hay A: Dioxin hazards; secrecy at Coalite. Nature 1981;290:729.
Hay A, Ashby 3, Styles 3A, et al: The mutagenic properties of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Abstract, American Chemical Society meeting, Washington, DC,
August 1983.
Hoar S: Presentation at meeting of AMA's CSA Advisory Panel on Toxic Substances, 24
October 1983.
Hoffman RE, Donnel HD: Pilot study Times Beach, Missouri. Presentation at meeting of
AMA's CSA Advisory Panel on Toxic Substances, 13 December 1983.
Homberger E, Reggiani G, Sambeth 3, et al: The Seveso accident; its nature, extent and
consequences. Ann Occup Hyg 1979;22:327-370.
Honchar PA, Halperin WE: 2,4,5-T, trichlorophenol and soft-tissue sarcoma. Lancet
1981;I(8214):268-269.
Honchar P: Health Hazard Evaluation Report HETA-80-039-1179. National Institute for
Safety and Health, Cincinnati, 1982.
Hope W, Lischwe D, Russell W, et al: Epidemiologic notes and reports; porphyria cutanea
tarda and sarcoma in a worker exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzodioxin —
Missouri. MMWR 1984;33(8):113-114.
Huff JE, Moore 3A, Saracci R, Tomatis L: Long-term hazards of polychlorinated
dibenzodioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans. Environ Health Perspect
1980;36:221-240.
Inagami K, Koga T, Kikuchi M, et al: Experimental study of hairless mice following
administration of rice oil used by a "Yusho" patient. Fukuoka Acta Medica
1969;60:548-553.
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Some fumigants, the herbicides
2,4-D and 2,4 5-T, chlorinated dibenzodioxins and miscellaneous industrial
chemicals. IARC Monograph 15: Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals
to Man, 1977.
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Chemicals, industrial processes
and industries associated with cancer in humans. Evaluation of the Carcinogenic
Risk of Chemicals to Humans. Monograph Suppl 4 1982; pp 238-243.
Jensen S, Renberg L: Contaminants in pentachlorophenol; chlorinated dioxins and
predioxins. Ambio 1972;l(2):62-65.
Jensen S, Renberg L: Chlorinated dimers present in several technical chlorophenols used
as fungicides. Envl Hlth Persp 1973;5:37-41.
Jirasek L, Kalensky 3, Kubec K: Acne chlorina and porphyria cutanea tarda during the
d57:reprefs (revd. 5-24-85) - page R-4

�manufacture of herbicides. Cesk Dermatol 1973;48:306-317.
Jirasek L, Kalensky 3, Kubec K, et al: Acne chlorina and porphyria cutanea tarda, other
manifestations of general poisoning, during the manufacture of herbicides. II. Cesk
Dermatol 1974;49:145-157.
3ohnson FE, Kugler MA, Brown SM: Soft-tissue sarcomas and chlorinated phenols.
Lancet 1981;II:40.
3RB Associates: Review of Literature on Herbicides, Including Phenoxy Herbicides and
Associated Dioxins, vols 1 and 2. Prepared for the Veterans Administration, Dept
of Medicine and Surgery, Washington, DC, 1981.
Khera KS, Ruddick 3A: Polychlorodibenzo-p-dioxins; perinatal effects and the dominant
lethal test in the Wistar rats. In: Chlorodioxins--Origin and Fate. Advances Chem
Series 120, Blair EH (ed), American Chemical Soc, Washington, DC, pp 70-84.
Kimbrough R: Soft tissue sarcomas. Presentation at meeting of AMA's CSA Advisory
Panel on Toxic Substances, 17 November 1983.
Kimbrough R, Falk H, Stehr P: Health implications of 2,3,7,8-tetrachloridibenzo-pdioxin (TCDD) contamination of residential soil.
3 Toxicol Environ Health
1984; 14:47-93.
Kimmig 3, Schultz KH: Berufliche Akne durch chlorierte aromatische zyklische ftther
Dermatologica 1957; 115:540-546.
Kimmig 3, Schultz KH: Chlorinated aromatic cyclic esters as the cause of chloracne.
Naturwissenschaften 1957;*4:337-338.
Knutson 3C, Poland A: Response of murine epidermis to 2,3,7,8-tetrachloridibenzo-pdioxin; interaction of the Ah and hr loci. Cell 1982;30:225-234.
Knutson 3C, Poland A: 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin; failure to demonstrate
toxicity in twenty-three cultured cell types. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1980;5*:377383.
Lamm SH: An epidemiologic assessment of the Alsea II report, 6 August 1979.
Lamm SH: (Cited in "Toxic Materials in Brief") Toxic Materials News :339, 10 Dec 1980.
Lathrop GD, Wolfe WH, Albanese RA, Moynahan PM: An epidemiologic investigation of
health effects in Air Force personnel following exposure to herbicides; baseline
morbidity study results. USAF School of Aerospace Medicine, Brooks AFB, 24
February 1984.
Lawrence CE, Reilly AA, Quickenton P, Greenwald P, Page WF, Kuntz A3: Mortality
patterns of New York State Vietnam veterans.
Am 3 Public Health
1985;75:277-279.
Lipson A, Gaffey WR, LaVecchio F: Agent Orange and birth defects. N Engl 3 Med
(Letters to the Editor) 1983;309:491-492.
Mason ME, Okey AB: Cytosolic and nuclear binding of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-pdioxin on the Ah receptor in extra-hepatic tissues of rats and mice. Eur 3 Biochem
1982;123:209-215.
May G: Chloracne from the accidental production of tetrachlorodibenzodioxin. Br 3 Ind
Med 1973;30:276-283.
McConnell EE, Moore 3A, Haseman 3K, et al: The comparative toxicity of chlorinated
dibenzo-p-dioxins in mice and guinea pigs. Toxicol Applied Pharmacol 1978;**:335336.
McConnell EE, Lucier GW, Rumbaugh RC, Albro PW, Harvan D3, Hass 3R, Harris MW:
Dioxin in soil; bioavailablity after ingestion by (female Sprague-Dawley) rats and
(male Hartley) guinea pigs. Science 1984;223; 1077-1079.
McNulty WP: Toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin for Rhesus monkey. Bull
Environ Contam Toxicol 1977; 18:108-189.
McNulty WP: TCDD Teratogenicity and Fetotoxicity. Rockefeller University Symposium on Public Health Risk of the Dioxins, New York, New York, 19-20 October
1983.
McNulty WP, Becker GM, Cory HT: Chronic toxicity of 3,4,3,4 - and 2,5,2,5d57:reprefs (revd. 5-24-85) - page R-5

�tetrachlorobiphenyls in Rhesus Macques. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1980;56:182-190.
McNulty WP, Pomerantz I, Farell T: Chronic toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran
for Rhesus Macaques. Food Cosmet Toxicol 1981; 19:57-65.
Merlo F: Adverse health effects in human populations exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in Seveso; an update. Presentation at meeting of AMA's CSA
Advisory Panel on Toxic Substances, 13 December 1983.
Michigan Department of Public Health: Evaluation of Soft and Connective Tissue Cancer
Mortality Rates for Midland and Other Selected Michigan Counties Compared
Nationally and Statewide, 4 May 1983.
Milham S 3r: Herbicides, occupation and cancer. Lancet 1982;I:1464-1465.
Minister of Veterans' Affairs: Case-control study of congenital anomalies and Vietnam
service (birth defects study). Australian Government Publishing Service, January
1983.
Moore 3A, Gupta BN, Zinkl 3G, et al: Postnatal effects of maternal exposure to
2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo~p-dioxin (TCDD). Environ Health Perspect 1973;5:81-85.
Moore JA: A pesticide. Science 1979;203(4382):741-742.
Moses M, Lilis R, Crow KD, et al: Health status of workers with past exposure to
2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in the manufacture of 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid; comparison of findings with and without chloracne. Am 3 Indus Med
1984;5:161-1S2.
Moses M, Selikoff 13: Soft tissue sarcomas, phenoxy herbicides, and chlorinated
phenols. Lancet 1981;!: 1370.
Nagarkatti PS, Sweeney GD, Gauldie 3, et al: Sensitivity to suppression of cytotoxic
T-cell generation by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) is dependent on
the Ah genotype of the murine host. Toxicol Appl Pharm 1984;72:169-176.
National Toxicology Program (NTP): (Rep 80-31) — Carcino genesis bioassay of 2,3,7,8tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (CAS No. 1746-01-6) in Osborne-Mendel rats and
B6C3F1 mice (gavage study). Technical report series No. 209, NIH publication No.
82-1765, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1982.
National Toxicology Program (NTP): (Rep 80-32) — Carcinogenesis bioassay of 2,3,7,8tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (CAS No. 1746-01-6) in Swiss-Webster mice (dermal
study). Technical report series No. 201, NIH publication No. 82-1757, Research
Triangle Park, NC, 1982.
Neal RA: Spectrum of metabolic effects of TCDD in animal experiments. Rockefeller
University Symposium on Public Health Risk of the Dioxins, New York, New York,
19-20 October 1983.
Neal RA, Beatty PW, Gasiewicz TA: Studies on the mechanism of toxicity of 2,3,7,8tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). Ann NY Acad Sci 1979;320:204-213.
Nebert DW, Gielen 3E: Genetic regulation of aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase induction in
the mouse. Fed Proc 1972;31:1315-1327.
Nebert DW, 3ensen NM: The Ah locus; genetic regulation of the metabolism of
carcinogens, drugs, and other environmental chemicals by cytochrome P-450
mediated monooxygenases. CRC Grit Rev Biochem 1979;6:401-437.
Nelson 3O, Menzer R, Kearney PC: 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin; in vitro binding
to rat liver microsomes. Bull Environ Comtam Toxicol 1977;18:9-13.
Nestrick TJ, Lamparski LL: Isomer-specific determination of chlorinated dioxins for
assessment of formation and potential environmental emission from wood
combustion. Anal Chem 1982;54:2292-2299.
Neubert D, Dillmann I: Embryotoxic effects in mice treated with 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Naunyn-Schmiedberg's
Arch Pharmakol Exp Pathol 1972;272(3):243-264.
Neubert D, Zens P, Rothenwallner A, Merker H3: A survey of the embryotoxic effects of
TCDD in mammalian species. Environ Health Perspect 1973 (Exptl issue 5):233-40.
Nilsson CA, et al: Chromatographic evidence for the formation of chlorodioxins from
d57:reprefs (revd. 5-24-85) - page R-6

�chloro-2-phenoxyphenols. 3 Chromatography 1974;96:137-147.
Nilsson CA, Norstrom A, Andersson K, Rappe C: Pentachlorophenol; Chemistry,
Pharmacology and Environmental Toxicology. K. Ranga Rao (ed), Plenum, New
York, 1978.
Nolan R3, Smith FA, Hefner 3G: Elimination and tissue distribution of 2,3,7,8tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in female guinea pigs following a single oral
dose. Toxicol Appl Ppharmacol 1979;48:A162.
Norman C: Vietnam's herbicide legacy; recent studies in Vietnam have found long-term
environmental damage and a possible rise in birth defects from US spraying.
Science 1983;219: 1196-1 197.
Nunn DM: Trial between Palmer et al vs Nova Scotia Forest Industries. Transcript of
judicial decision, 1983.
O'Keefe PW, Meselson MS, Baughman RW:
Neutral clean-up procedures for
2, 3,7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin residues in bovine fat and milk. JAOAC
1978;61:621-626.
Okey AB, Bondy GP, Mason ME, et al: Regulatory gene product of the Ah locus
characterization of the cytosolic inducer-receptor complex and evidence for its
nuclear translocation. 3 Biol Chem 1979;25*: 11636- 11648.
Okey AB, Bondy GP, Mason ME, et al: Temperature-dependent cytosol-to-nucleus
translocation of the Ah receptor for 2,3,7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in
continuous cell culture lines. 3 Biol Chem 1980;255:11418-11422.
Olie L, Vermeulen PL, Hutzinger O: Chlorodibenzo-p-dioxins and chlorodibenzofurans
are trace components of fly ash and flue gas of some municipal incinerators in the
Netherlands. Chemosphere 1977;8:455-459.
Oliver RM: Toxic effects of 2,3,7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in laboratory workers.
Br 3 Ind Med 1975;32:49-53.
Olson 3R, Gasiewicz TA, Geiger LE, et al: The metabolism of 2, 3, 7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. In: Mammalian Systems in Accidental Exposure to Dioxins;
Human Health Aspects, Coulston F and Pocchiari F (eds), Academic Press, New
York, 1983.
Olson 3R, Gasiewicz TA, Neal RA: Tissue distribution, excretion and metabolism of
2, 3,7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in the Golden Syrian hamster. Toxicol
Applied Pharmacol 1980;56:78-85.
Olsson H, Brandt L: Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the skin and occupational exposure to
herbicides. Lancet 1981;2:579.
Osborne R, Greenlee WF: Altered regulation of human epidermal cell proliferation and
differentiation by 2, 3,7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). The Toxicologist
1984;Ml):188.
Pazderova-Vejlupkova 3, Lukas E, et al: Chronic poisoning by 2, 3,7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. PracovLek 1981;32:204-209.
Pazderova-Vejlupkova 3, Nemcova M, Pickova 3, et al: The development and prognosis
of chronic intoxication by tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in men. Arch Environ Health
Percy C, Stanek E, Gloeckler L: Accuracy of cancer death certificates and its effect on
cancer mortality statistics. Am 3 Public Health 1981;71(3):242-250.
Piper WN, Rose 3Q, Gehring P3:
Excretion and distribution of 2,3,7,8tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in the rat. Environ Health Perspect (Exptl issue 5)
1973;241-244.
Pitot HC, Goldsworthy T, Campbell HA, et al: Quantitative evaluation of the promotion
by 2, 3,7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin of hepatocarcino genesis from diethylnitrosamine. Cancer Res 1980;40:36 16-3620.
Plimmer 3R, Klingebiel UI, Crosby DH, Wong AS: Photochemistry of dibenzo-p-dioxins.
In: Chlorodioxins — Origin and Fate. E. Blair (ed), American Chemical Society,
Washington, DC, pp 44-54, 1973.
d57:reprefs (revd. 5-24-85) - page R-7

�Plimmer JR: Approaches to decontamination or disposal of pesticides; photodecomposition. In: Disposal and Decomposition of Pesticides. MV Kennedy (ed), ACS
Symposium Series 73, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 12-23, 1978.
Pocchiari F, Vittorio S, Zampieri A; Human health effects from accidental release of
tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) at Seveso, Italy. In: Health Effects of
Halogenated Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Nicholson W3 and Moore 3A (eds), Ann NY
AcadSci 1979(May);320:311-320.
Poiger H, Buser HR, Weber H, et ah Structure elucidation of mammalian TCDDmetabolites. Experientia 1982;38:484-86.
Poiger H, Weber H, Schlatter C: Special aspects of metabolism and kinetics of TCDD in
dogs and rats. In: Chlorinated Dioxins and Related Compounds, Hutzinger O et al
(eds), Pergamon series. Env Sci 1982;5:317-323.
Poland A, Glover E: 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin: segregation of toxicity with
the Ah locus. Mol Pharmaool 1980; 17:86-94.
Poland A, Glover E: An estimate of the maximum in vitro covalent binding of 2,3,7,8tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin to rat liver protein, ribosomal RNA and DNA. Cancer
Res 1979;39:3341-3344.
Poland A, Glover E, Kende AS: Stereospecific high affinity binding of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin by hepatic cytosol. 3 Biol Chem 1976;251:4936-4946.
Poland A, Knutson 3C: 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and related halogenated
aromatic hydrocarbons; examination of the mechanism of toxicity. Ann Rev
Pharmacol 1982;22:517-554.
Poland A, Palen D, Glover E: Tumour promotion by TCDD in skin of HRS/3 hairless
mice. Nature 1982;300:271-273.
Poland A, Yang GC: Preparation and characterization of chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin. 3
Agric Food Chem 1972;20:1093-1099.
Rappe C: 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) introduction. In: Dioxin —
Toxicological and Chemical Aspects. F. Cattabeni, A Cavallaro and G Galli (eds),
SP Medical and Scientific Books, NY, pp 9-11, 1978.
Rappe C, Buser HR, Bosshardt HP: Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and
dibenzofurans (PCDFs); occurrence, formation and analysis of environmental
hazardous compounds. CIPC Symposium, Baltimore, Maryland, 5-6 3une 1979.
Rappe C, Buser HR, Kuroki H, Masuda Y: Chemosphere 1979.
Reggiani G: The estimation of the TCDD toxic potential in the light of the Seveso
accident. Arch Toxicol (Suppl 2) 1979;291-302.
Riihimaki V, Asp S, Hernberg S: Mortality of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and
2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid herbicide applicators in Finland. Scand 3 Work
Environ Health 1982;8:37-42.
Robinson BD: Safety aspects of 2,4,5-T herbicides. Technote No. 5/79. Dept of
Agriculture and Fisheries, Adelaide, Australia, 1979.
Rogers AM, Andersen ME, Back KC: Mutagenicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells. Mutation Res 1982; 105:445-449.
Rose JQ, Ramsey 3C, Wentzler TH, et al: The fate of TCDD following single and
repeated oral doses to the rat. Toxicol Applied Pharmacol 1976;36:209-226.
Rozman K, Rozman T, Greim H: Effect of thyroidectomy and thyroxine on 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) induced toxicity.
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol
1984;72:372-376.
Rozman T, Rozman K, Greim H: Role of thyroid function in TCDD induced toxicity.
The Toxicologist 1984;&lt;Kl):189.
Sarma PR, 3acobs 3: Thoracic soft tissue sarcoma in Vietnam veterans exposed to Agent
Orange. N Engl 3 Med 1982;306(18):1109.
Schacter L, Crum E, Abbound S, et al: Adenocarcinoma of the lung in Vietnam veterans
younger than 35 years. 3AMA 1984;251(5):604.
Schaum 3: Risk Analysis of TCDD Contaminated Soil. US Environmental Protection
d57:reprefs (revd. 5-24-85) - page R-8

�Agency, EPA/600/8-84/03 1.
Scheupler E, Rozman K, Pazdernik T, et al: Effect of thyroxine (T4) and triiodootyrosine
(T) on TCDD toxicity in thyroidectonized rats. The lexicologist 1984;*(1):189.
Schwetz BA, Norris 3M, Sparschu GL, et al: Toxicology of chlorinated dibenzo-pdioxins. Environ Health Perspect 1973;5:87-99.
Sell KW: Immunology. Presentation at meeting of AMA's CSA Advisory Panel on Toxic
Substances, 13 December 1983.
Shepard BM: A summary of current information on the VA's Agent Orange Registry.
Presented before the Division of Environmental Chemistry, American Chemical
Society, Washington, DC, 30 August 1983.
Shepard BM, Young AL: Twins study, soft tissue sarcomas, porphyria cutanea tarda.
Presentation at meeting of AMA's CSA Panel on Toxic Substances, 23 September
1983.
Singer R, Moses M, Valciukas 3, et al: Nerve conduction velocity studies of workers
employed in the manufacture of phenoxy herbicides. Envl Rsch 1982;29:297-311.
Smith AH: Seasonal analysis of Oregon data on spontaneous abortions and 2,4,5-T
spraying. Presented at ANZSERCH, Annual Conference; Dunedin, New Zealand,
August 1979.
Smith AH, Fisher DO, Pearce N, Teague CA: Do agricultural chemicals cause soft tissue
sarcoma? Initial findings of a case-control study in New Zealand. Community
Health Stud 1982a;6:114-119.
Smith AH, Fisher DO, Pearce N, Chapman C3: Congenital defects and miscarriages
among New Zealand 2,4, 5-T sprayers. Arch Environ Health 1982b;37: 197-200.
Smith AH,Pearce NE, Fisher DO, Giles H3, Teague CA, Howard 3K: Soft tissue sarcoma
and exposure to phenoxyherbicides and chlorophenols in New Zealand. 3NCI
Smith FA, Schwetz BA, Nitschke KD: Teratogenicity of 2,3,7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-pdioxin in CF-mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1976;38:5 17-523.
Sparschu GL, Dunn FL, Rowe VK: Study of teratogenicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Food Cosmet Toxic 1971;9:405-412.
Stevens KM: Agent Orange toxicity; a quantitative perspective. Human Toxicology
1981;l:31-39.
Suskind RR: Clinical manifestations of 2,4,5-T exposures. Paper presented at the
International Workshop on Chemical and Epidemiological Follow-up After Areawide
Chemical Contamination, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, 1980.
Suskind RR, Hertzberg VS: Human health effects of 2,4,5-T and its toxic contaminants.
JAMA 1984;251(18):2372-2380.
Tenchini ML, Crimaudo C, Pacchetti G, et al: A comparative cytogenetic study of cases
of induced abortions in TCDD-exposed and nonexposed women. Envl Mutagenesis
1983;5:73-85.
Thiess AM, Frentzel-Beyme R, Link R: Mortality study of persons exposed to dioxin in a
trichlorophenol-process accident that occurred in the BASF AG on 17 November
1953. Am 3IndusMed 1982;3:179-189.
Townsend 3C, Bodner KM, Van Peenen PFD, et al: Survey of reproductive events of
wives of employees exposed to chlorinated dioxins. Amer 3 Epid 1982;115(5):695713.
Tung TT, An TT, Tarn NE, et al: Le cancer primaire du foie au Vietnam. Chirurgie
1973;99:427-436.
Tung TT, Tugen BQTKA, Tra DX, et al: Clinical effects of massive and continuous
utilization of defoliants on civilians. Vietnamese Studies 1971;29:53-81.
US Air Force (USAF) School of Aerospace Medicine: Project Ranch Hand II. An
epidemiologic investigation of health effects in Air Force personnel following
exposure to herbicides; baseline mortality study results. USAF School of Aerospace
Medicine, Brooks AFB, 30 3une 1983.
d57:reprefs (revd. 5-24-85) - page R-9

�US Centers for Disease Control (CDC): Agent Orange projects (press release).
11 December 1984.
US Department of Health and Human Services (US DHHS): Protocol for epidemiological
studies of the health of Vietnam veterans. CDC Public Health Service, November
1983.
US Veterans Administration (US VA): Australia issues mortality report on Vietnam
veterans. Agent Orange Rev 1985;4(1):4.
US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA): Dioxins. Cincinnati, Ohio, 1980.
Van Miller JP, Marlar R3, Allen 3R: Tissue distribution and excretion of tritiated
tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in non-human primates and rats. Food Cosmet Toxicol
Vinopal JH, Casida 3E: Metabolic stability of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in
mammalian liver microsomal systems and in living mice. Arch Environ Contamn
Toxicol 1973;1:122-132.
Voss JG, Beems RB: Dermal toxicity studies of technical polychlorinated biphenyls and
fractions thereof in rabbits. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1971; 19:617-633.
Voss JG, Moore 3 A, Zinkl 3G: Effect of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin on the
immune system of laboratory animals. Environ Health Prespec 1973;5:149-162.
Wagner SL, Witt 3M, Norris LA, et al: A Scientific Critique of the EPA Alsea II Study
and Report. Environmental Health Sciences Center, Oregon State University,
Corvallis, Oregon, 1979.
Wassom 3S, Huff 3E, Loprieno N: A review of the genetic toxicology of chlorinated
dibenzo-p-dioxins. Mutation Res 1977/78;47:141-160.
Weaver D, Amos A, Tierney B, et al: Interaction of DNA with cytosolic 3-methylcholanthrene binding proteins from either rat or mouse liver. Carcinogenesis 1980; 1:481486.
Webb K, Ayres S, Slavin R, et al: Results of a pilot study of health effects due to
2,3,7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzodioxin contamination - Missouri. MMWR 1984;33(5):5461.
Weber H, Poiger H, Schlatter C: Acute oral toxicity of TCDD metabolites in male
guinea pigs. Toxicol Lett 1982;!*: 117- 122.
Willis RF: Canadian review of human and animal studies and dioxin sources as a basis for
recommendations on government regulations. Presentation at meeting of AMA's
CSA Advisory Panel on Toxic Substances, 13 December 1983.
Wolfe WH, Michalek 3E, Albanese RA, Lathrop GD, Moynahan PM: Project Ranch Hand
II. An epidemiologic investigation of health effects in Air Force personnel
following exposure to herbicides; mortality update - 1984. USAF School of
Aerospace Medicine, Brooks AFB, 10 December 1984.
Young AL, Calcagani 3A, Thalken CE, et al: The Toxicology, Environmental Fate and
Human Risk of Herbicide Orange and its Associated Dioxin. USAF Occupational
and Environmental Health Laboratory, Technical Report No. TR-78-92, Final
Report, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas, 1978.

d57:reprefs (revd. 5-24-85) - page R-10

�List of States with Vietnam Veteran Commissions or Programs
California

California Division of Veterans Affairs
P.O. Box 1559
Sacramento CA 95814
(916) 445-9518

Connecticut

Vietnam Veterans Herbicide Information
Commission
Veterans1 Office
Southern Connecticut University
501 Cresent Street
New HavenCT 06515
(203 297-4329

Georgia

Agent Orange Program
Georgia Department of Human Resources
47 Trinity Avenue, S.W.
Atlanta, GA 30334
(404)656-4764

Hawaii

Agent Orange Program
Hawaii Department of Health
P.O. Box 3378
Honolulu, HI 96801

(808) 548-8705

Indiana

Agent Orange Program
Department of Veterans' Affairs
707 State Office Building
Indianapolis, IN 46204
(317)232-3910

Iowa

Agent Orange Program
Iowa Department of Health
Lucas State Office Building
Des Moines IA 50319

(515) 281-8220

Kansas

Agent Orange Program
Kansas Department of Health/Environment
Forbes Field
Topeka, KS 66620
(913) 862-9360

Maine

Bureau of Health
State House, Station 11
Augusta, ME 04333

(207)298-3201

Agent Orange Program
100 Cambridge Street
10th Floor, #1001
Boston, MA 02202

(617)722-1107

Massachusetts

Minnesota

d57:states (revd. 5-29-85) - page A-l

Agent Orange Program
Department of Veterans' Affairs
Veterans Service Building
(612) 297-4217
St. Paul, MN 55155

�New Jersey

(609)984-7397

Agent Orange Program
Ohio Board of Regents
30 East Broad Street
Columbus, OH 43215

Ohio

Agent Orange Commission
Broad Street Bank Building
1*3 East State Street
Trenton, NJ 08608

(614)466-6000

Oklahoma

Agent Orange Assistance Program
Oklahoma Department of Health
P.O. Box 53551
Oklahoma City, OK 73152
(405) 271-4200

Oregon

Agent Orange Program
Department of Veterans' Affairs
Veterans Service Division
700 Summer Street, N.E., Suite 150
Salem, OR 97310-1270
(503)378-6839

Pennsylvania

Vietnam Herbicides Information Commission
Pennsylvania Department of Health
P.O. Box 8380
Health and Welfare Building, Room 912A
Harrisburg, PA 17105
(717) 787-1708

Rhode Island

Agent Orange Commission
242 Prairie Avenue
Providence, RI 02907

(401)521-6710

Agent Orange Program
Texas Department of Health
1100 West 49th Street
Austin, TX 78756

(817)458-7251

Texas

West Virginia

Agent Orange Program
West Virginia Department of Health
Office of Community Health Services
1800 Washington Street East
Charleston, WV 25303
(304)348-3210

Wisconsin

Agent Orange Program
Wisconsin Department of Health &amp; Social
Services
Division of Health
P.O. Box 309
Madison, WI 53701
(608) 266-1253

* . . GOVERHMEIB IKIHTING OFFICE : 1985 0 4 1 8 0 3 6 1
BS
-6-9/55

d57:states (revd. 5-29-85) - page A-2

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="16952">
              <text>052</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="16954">
              <text>1394</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="16957">
              <text>Series III Subseries II</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16945">
                <text>Beljan, John R.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16946">
                <text>Nelson S. Irey</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16947">
                <text>Wendell W. Kilgore</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16948">
                <text>Kazuo Kimura</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16949">
                <text>Raymond R. Suskind</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16950">
                <text>Jaroslav J. Vostal</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16951">
                <text>R.H. Wheater</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16953">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;American Medical Association, Council on Scientific Affairs, Advisory Panel on Toxic Substances</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16955">
                <text>October 1 1984</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16956">
                <text>The Health Effects of "Agent Orange" and Polychlorinated Dioxin Contaminants: an Update, 1984, Technical Report</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16958">
                <text>health studies</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16959">
                <text>human exposure</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16960">
                <text>industrial exposure</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16961">
                <text>veteran health and hygiene</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1556" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="7980">
              <text>030</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="7981">
              <text>0503</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="7985">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7979">
                <text>Bogen, Gilbert</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7982">
                <text>Journal of the American Medical Association</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7983">
                <text>November 30 1979</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7984">
                <text>Letter to the Editor: Symptoms in Vietnam Veterans Exposed to Agent Orange</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7986">
                <text>health effects</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="7987">
                <text>health studies</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2364" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="16272">
              <text>050</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="16274">
              <text>1321</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="16277">
              <text>Series III Subseries II</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16270">
                <text>Bogen, Kenneth</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16271">
                <text>Geraldine M. Carr</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16273">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;Science Policy Research Division, Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16275">
                <text>May 12 1981</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16276">
                <text>Agent Orange: Veteran's Complaints Concerning Exposure to Herbicides in South Vietnam</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16278">
                <text>dioxin</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16279">
                <text>health studies</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16280">
                <text>risk assessment</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16281">
                <text>veteran health and hygiene</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2326" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="15933">
              <text>049</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="15935">
              <text>1274</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="15939">
              <text>Series III Subseries II</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15925">
                <text>Budd, M. L.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="15926">
                <text>N. S. Hayner</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="15927">
                <text>H. E. B. Humphrey</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="15928">
                <text>J. R. Isbister</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="15929">
                <text>H. Price</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="15930">
                <text>M. S. Reizen</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="15931">
                <text>G. Van Amburg</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="15932">
                <text>K. R. Wilcox Jr.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15934">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Michigan Department of Public Health</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15936">
                <text>Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15937">
                <text>April 7 1978</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15938">
                <text>Polybrominated Biphenyl Exposure - Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15940">
                <text>human exposure</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="15941">
                <text>health studies</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1631" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1257">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/bb3b2e854afbbc1197cdafdddc181e61.pdf</src>
        <authentication>6e9735a9c96a014fc47e12c23a1c99ff</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63206">
                    <text>Item ID Number

00578

Author

Custis, Donald L

Corporate Author
Report/Article TltlB Typescript: Statement of Donald L. Curtis, M.D., Chief
Medical Director, Department of Medicine and Surgery,
Veterans Administration, Before the Subcommittee on
Oversight and Investigations, Committee on Veterans'
Affairs, House of Representatives, September 15,1982

Journal/Book Title
Year
Month/Day
Color
Number of Images
DeSCrlptOII NotOS

n
20

Alvin L Your|

gfiled tnis item under the category
"Human Exposure to Phenoxy Herbicides and TCDD"

Tuesday, February 20, 2001

Page 578 of 680

�I.

; - i «PV ' u, - , &gt; ..v?../.^J^T.of, , .,,,
'

.'

•.

,

DONALD L.CUSTIS.M.D.,

1
1

. -.,
'

CHIEF MEDICAL DIRECTOR,

T

*V

DEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY

{

V

(

, , * ir:^TER/^ ^^WAT!9N

^*&gt;

^;-(

, _

*

,v ^

f

r

'."-•,'

^BEFORE THE

,

t

SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND INVESTIGATIONS,
COMMITTEE ON VETERANS'AFFAIRS
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

September 15, 1982
&lt;

I

*

&gt;

*

»

,

/

f

1

&lt; r "t

',

»

*

'1

t,

*&lt;t

i*

"

'

t

V

'

*

•

&gt;

'

'

.

*
'

'*'

'»

.1

Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee:
f tv

t"*, s

Good morning.

1

»

&lt;

'»

•&gt;

*.»

,

v

'

.

On behalf of the Veterans Administration, we are pleased to have the

Opportunity to appear before you today to provide an update on the status of both VA's
Agent Orange-related activities and the Readjustment Counseling Program.

We are

continuing efforts to resolve the complex medical and scientific questions concerning
Agent Orange. In the interim, we are providing medical care and treatment, as well as
information to Vietnam veterans. We believe that a great deal of progress has been
mode in both areas since we last appeared before this committee on May 6, 1981.

Mr. Chairman, we are aware that both the Agent Orange issue and readjustment to
civilian fife remain key concerns for many Vietnam veterans. A great deal still needs to
be done to resolve both of these concerns.

Let me reemphasize, however, that the

Veterans Administration has never lost sight of the special needs of the Vietnam veteran.

�2.

\
V,,

.

*?fr

Aoent Oronge Program
T

\rT* • l " * w ' ' *;/-

.

IT?-

;

\

&lt;;«v "
, ^

' *

On June 30, 1982, Robert P. Nimmo, Administratpr
approved a revised Department of Medicine and Surgery program of Agent Orangerelated activities. The most significant activity which was approved is a pilot study as a
preliminary to the full epidemiological study provided for by Congress. Other major
efforts included are the Vietnam veterans identical twin study, a mortality study, and
specially-related research projects.

Approval was also given for the establishment of the Agent Orange Projects Office
within the Department of Medicine and Surgery. This office will coordinate and monitor
a variety of epidemiological projects.

Efforts are now underway to identify key

epidemiologic staff who will be responsible for these efforts.

The core staffing will

consist of an Epidemiologist, Biostatistician, Statistical Programmer, Health Science
Specialist for Quality Assurance, on Administrative Assistant and supporting clerical
staff.

In addition, approval was given for continuation and improvement of the Agent Orange
Registry, chloracne activities, a follow-up to the literature analysis, a monograph series,
establishment of a Vietnam service indicator in the Patient Treatment File (RTF), and a
retrospective study of dioxins and furans in human adipose tissue.

STATUS OF VA EPIDEMIOLOGY STUDY;

The epidemiology protocol submitted to the VA by the UCLA School of Public Health on
April 29, 1982, has now been reviewed by the VA Advisory Committee on Health-Related

�3.
Effects of Herbicides, the Agent Qronge Working Group (AOWG) and the Office of
Technology Assessment. The protocol is currently being reviewed by a committee of the
.Academy of Sciences (MAS). The VA has been advised that HAS is now in the
jes of this review process. It |s expected that the report will be completed and

&gt;

''

- , f\

forw.a/jted to. tjh$ Veterans Administration shortly*

Following incorporation of the

.yarjous ^eYlewers/ comments, we will solicit bids for a contract for the conduct of a pilot

*

*

*

» ' *-,

study. We anticipate having that solicitation in place before this December.

"

i

'

«u

The purpose of the pilot.study w|U be to permit us to "fine-tune" the protocol for the
conduct of the frjll-^cale epidemiology study which will study a population of
approximately 18,000 veterans. The pilot study has become the focal point of recent
activity by the VA, the Army Agent Orange Task Force (AAOTF) and the AOWG.

&lt;

The AOWG has appointed a subcommittee of its Science Panel to establish procedures
for cohort selection for the epidemiology pilot study.

The VA has brought in

bipstatistica) consultants to work with this subcommittee and with the AAOTF.

The

Subcommittee is now in the process of preparing its final report to the Science Panel.

Health Care

Tr« Veterans, Administration is implementing the medical core and treatment provisions
of Public Low 97-72, the "Veterans' Health Care, Training, and Small Business Loan Act
of 1^81." Shortly after the law was signed, interim guidelines for the implementation of
»
'
..
these provisions were issued to all VA health care facilities. Those guidelines were also
'-

.

. ••

.

'

"-'

• „ - ' • '

-i ' • ' , - •

'f-

' ' . .

y

published In in the Federal Register on December 5, 1981, to provide Vietnam veterans
and the general public with the opportunity to comment.

�. •

.

.

.

.

.

.

. . . , .

Under the provisions of the guidelines, each veteran who served in the Republic of
• ' ' . . '

.'

. &lt;&gt;..

".'•.-' • • . . - . .

• .

-

;

.'" ' • ' • , .

: -

, • •

Vietnam and who requests VA medical care Is being provided a complete medical history,
physical examination and appropriate diagnostic studies/When it is determined that a
condition

exists requiring treatment, the responsible staff

physician makes a

determination as to whether the condition resulted from a cause other than the specified
exposure to Agent Orange. The guidelines include a description of those conditions
which I determined cannot ordinarily be considered to be due to such exposure.
•

'

* .'

.

•: •

' . - . . •

:

'i

-

-

'

-'

•• • •

Ultimately, it is left to the treating physician to exercise professional judgment in
determining whether the veteran should be provided care under this authority.

Agent Orange Registry
'•

-• • •

. , - • ' ' -:•

;••• ' • ' -

:

•&gt;' : . ' • : • . • • ' . ft.

.:•

'

:

.'•

r.

"

:

':•

Since the initiation of the Agent Orange Registry in 1978, approximately 91,000 veterans
•

•

" •

•

- . . • • •

'

f

', •

have received an Agent Orange examination at VA health care facilities. The VA has
provided approximately 20,000 follow-up examinations for Agent Orange.

The basic

registry process involving a comprehensive physical examination, completion of a
questionnaire and informing the veteran of the results of the examination verbally and in
writing, are continuing to be followed by all health care facilities.

The monthly report, transmitted by VA health care facilities and compiled at VA Central
Office, is still an effective tool in measuring the numbers of examinations (initial and
follow-up) being performed at the facilities and the number of pending examinations.
*

.

The4 Environmental Medicine Office is continuing to monitor the numbers of pending
examinations to assure that the veteran is provided the Agent Orange examination and
related treatment in a timely manner. Facilities reporting •Vjut-of-line" situations, that
.:.'•••

'

-.,

r

••

.

. -.SV' '.;•

• .:.

•

r

'

. '

-

"

'

'.• ,

is, facilities with examinations pending more than 30 days or having more than 50

. , '

' . . ' • ' . • • * • * .-- ; ' • • - k •'»•.'• '

:

•'••••

• • ; : ' • : • '•"•"'•

.-;.^'&lt;

• .••

'••(••

examinations pending during any reporting period ore contacted by program officials at

�5.
V^A Central Office and directed to'take Immediate action to reduce the number of
pending examinations to comply with Central Office guidelines.
•ij^iSj,.^

i H i'

1 ^ t~ ** s £ i I* r ^- / 5 *** '

w

^5

t

tsT^^j)*'^

£,

{ ij T**

' J$ ^

~***

** i,

'

*

*

'Improvements In our registry procedures will enable the VA to match Agent Orange
Registry records with records of hospitalization in the Patient Treatment File (PTF)
system so that correlations can be made regarding the types of diagnoses Vietnam
V

'» * ! « ' » ' • *

f

&gt;

«'

s

'«

1'

ii»'l»'J*

H

' '

"

•

!'

veterans are fpresenting forf treatment at VA health care facilities.
t
»
-si j
f
*'
*A*
The VA is cooperating with the Department of Defense with regard to Agent Orange
examinations for active duty personnel. Instructions will be mailed to all VA health care
facilities for processing an active duty service member's request for an examination and
for processing the forms. The results from this examination will be entered into the
Agent Orange Registry.

Twins Study

j\
"
\" /
&lt; • &lt; ' &lt; •
&gt;'
• •
'.
The VA has recently given approval for the development of a comprehensive protocol

i

that will involve studying identical twins. The proposed study would involve identical
twin veterans where one twin served In Vietnam during the period of Herbicide Orange
spraying and where the twin sibling did not serve in Southeast Asia. This study will be
designed to investigate whether the current psychological and physical health of Vietnam
veterans was adversely affected by their military experience in Vietnam.

Veterans

Administration researchers at our St. Louis VA Medical Center have proposed the study
and ore currently developing the protocol. We would anticipate that If the protocol
survives the scrutiny of appropriate scientific reviews, we will launch into the physical
examinations of some 450 pairs of identical twins in late 1983 and should have an initial
report of findings by October 1984.
.. :

.c

T

i, •

. *.- • ' . i j &gt; .

..••„•

/ •

•

: .

-

•"

•

.-

• i ••

'

. .•

. . .•" i '• ..'-••

•: '..

�Vietnam. yeteranJAortality Studies

•

• • , . . . • &lt; ••"••. '^^-t&amp;ffi&amp;S^

":"'

. ' "•'.'.• ' "

A carefully-designed and well-executed mortality analysis of Vietnam" veterans will
provide background to many questions raised by the Agent Orange exposure issue in
particular as well as the possible health effects of service in Vietnam in general,

the

Vietnam Mortality Study is designed to analyze and compare cteatH rates arid cause-ofdeath profiles of veterans with service in Vietnam and comparable veterans with no
service in Vietnam.

The studies will use existing computer records to assemble a cohort of veterans and
. ' . . - • • ' • ' • •

"'"-.

v",/;.•••• ' • ' ' : ; - • • • " '"*!'•••'•;.-j

'••

,.

. •,.

.

-•(.•'•i--

'

': , • ' : ; ' - • : :

••*,

determine their mortality experience. It should be noted that the mortality studies will
provide mortality information which may prove useful primarily in suggesting areas for
further scientific study. These mortality studies will be conducted by researchers at the
Veterans Administration Central Office in Washington, DC. The collection and coding of
death certificates and the abstracting of military records will be done by VA
contractors. We are currently evaluating submitted proposals and hope to sign contracts
for these efforts shortly. It is anticipated that it will take approximately two years to
complete the mortality studies.

Retrospective Study of Dioxins and Furons in
"Adipose Tissue of Vietnam-Era Veterans
The Environmental Protection Agency has been collecting adipose tissue from the U.S.
general population.

This National Adipose Tissue Bank was initiated in 1968 and now contains specimens
from approximately 6,000 individuals. Represented within this bank is adipose tissue
from approximately 3dO males born between 1938 and 1952.

It is estimated that

�7.
approximately 200 of these males may have served in the U.S. military during the
,'i&amp;V&amp;&lt;'-iU^,'"Ti£l^

Vietnam"erei and that as many as 70 may have lervecl in Vietnam.

.

~
:

fef M%fi^^

••'^'" •^'^•:

"We are currently developing an agreement by which the VA would support an interogency
iludy to be conducted at theJ^PA 6ioxin Laboratory in Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. This
K^:!&gt;!M?^ V*n^

' - . - • '--'"&gt;;?"&lt;^ ^•••'^(''

will be a retrospective study of chlorinated aioxins and furans in human adipose tissue.
The study is designed to establish 'background levels of 2, 3, 7, 8-TCDD in the U.S. male
population. In addition, this study may serve as a means of determining whether service
in the military and especially in Vietnam has had an effect on the levels of TCDD in the

^.J^'i '

-

JM

&gt; , ! &lt; , &gt; «

f?''V«, ' • * , * &lt; "

'»f

i *&gt;

' '

'

'"^ '

adipose tissue.
if' „

\t

r

&lt; i
t ?.

'«V * * '

'

V i

,

*

I"

•'

^v

i

»

" '

"

'

The proposed effort would involve a jointly-funded program between the VA and EPA to
&amp;

£*_ 1

•

f

-

y

*

*

*

1

!

A

3

"

i *.*

!

i

#

^

^

develop the research protocol and appropriate sampling and analytical methods. The
actual analyses of the human tissues will be costly and time consuming. Data should be
forthcoming within two-three years.
«

,»

^

&lt;

••••• • .; ' •'

'

; • : • • • •

Chloracne Activities

The review of skin conditions to identify questionable cases which may be chloracne is
•' • •'•-••':'••-:•

':,'•: '• .•'•: : i--&gt; v 'v.'' : -'.';. ; • '

continuing.

•''

' .'•;• •.'

,

." ' : .

.

•'•...

Over 3,200 Rating Decision Sheets on skin condition claims have been

reviewed by VA Central Office physicians. The medical records of questionable cases
were reviewed by a dermatologist consultant at the Washington VA Medical Center who
tentatively identified 12 cases requiring a further clinical review which will include a

. • ; r': : ' : ' -•-' •• : ' v -••-.'••• •

• •

physical examination of those individuals.

••-.-.

'

.. •
I

.&gt;.. . •

. . • • • • • . : • . &lt; • ! : ( : • ' ; : - . t / V K - ''•

We are now In the process of making arrangements for the physical examinations,
•,i

i

'

; • . ' » - • • : ' . . - - ' • ;•;•:'./ . ; - , ' :

.-•

including dermatology examinations, of these individuals at selected non-VA clinics. I

r-:. ^.;-,;-:;- •;;£..;•;&lt;*'^'.-^^V^/v^^U-' ^ ' J ^ v »^ .-•»:•-•:.: • }• • r.f-- ':.&lt; ?'• •". . '•'•'• : 0,

anticipate that these examinations will be conducted during October.

&gt;, •"••"..&lt;. ,&lt;'

�8.
•-• • ••&gt;..-"•' •- "Tt '•

'-,.'•

,

V i

'%

•

}.-

&gt;•

J t ;»•-&lt;

We intend to continue our review of Rating Decision Sheets provided by VA Central
'
Office Compensation and Pension Service to determine possible chlorocne cases and
recommend selected claimants for special dermatojogical examination. Additionally, we
will review and analyze Agent Orange Registry data relating to types of skin conditions
being reported by participants.

-.- ••

••.-..••

' ',

*

'

ij. i

• i&lt; &lt; f

' '

I am confident that our current emphasis on chloracne-related activities will assist us in
more effectively identifying and treating skin conditions which may be the result of
exposure to Agent Orange.

Vietnam Service Indicator for Patient Treatment File

The Patient jreatment File (PTF) maintained by the Department of Medicine and
Surgery has great potential for epidemiological research related to Vietnam veterans. A
major problem with this automated, file is that there has been no entry to identify those
veterans who actually served in Vietnam.
.' •

.

"

-s"

The establishment of such an indicator, in most instances, will require a hand search of
the individual veteran's service record. This would best be accomplished by a contract
with an organization which has a proven record of expertise with this type of effort.
' ' " . " . '

\

We intend to conduct a study to determine the feasibility and cost of obtaining a
V A - K - - . . . . . . . . • •- ; •-.•!•• , ., - ' . ' - • " , • . . • • • . - • .
- . - • • • • ' • • • • • • • "• : ; .
veteran's service history. Based upon the results obtained, we will then decide whether
to obtain this information for all Vietnam-era veterans in the PTF.

�Speciolly-Solicited Reseorch Activities

*r* c-r— j ^ r i

r~

~

Medical Research Services has recently approved 10 new Agent Orange research studies
f

*"

t

•*

that will investigate the impact on basic biological processes of low levels of exposure to
Mfr

?

*

**T^

*

*

*

'

.

.

-

components of Agent Orange. Two other ongoing studies address these issues also. The
Studies include analysis of the impact of Agent Orange components on:

o

Over cell function

'"

t, v I

j -I

f

ii

s

jr.

0
(

f

Skin cell chemistry relating to chloracne

o

*

Neurobehavioral function
'

•,

t

f

* &gt; « '«!, '

.

-x

V

» " •

'

The basis of the design( of each of these biological studies includes exposing a test

........

"'

.

'

*•

i ,

biological system to one or more components of Agent Orange, and subsequently
•3 • '••?*••.! . ; ' ; : ^ ;, - £*.••:'•:* •- ' ' * *"'• 'f.\::t^ ;'r' •••'•

'.':. • , . . : . . , . . _ •

measuring abnormalities of biological function.
~f\

-^ " - ' ; • . • • • • . . . . • • "

••'&lt;-.

: :

': •";'• ;"i.-!:^^;-,y V-' '.•.'•*' . i r . . . y ' v &lt; - . , •.. •X^:.;{j,4;:&gt;:.-- .--s ,; ; v/*

-• ... ',,:?;;•,'',.;.-; ;.y&gt;/. N j i : ^ :.-.;-v:: rn :•.•

..' •

The chemicals used in these experiments which are the main component parts of Agent
'• ''.'• ' '- • ' ' l ' *

:

'

• U. :••"'.'• V-",&gt; •/"•!•»:•''«•" yV'-C-V;!

• :.!Vi''.'&gt;V '.-;. ' ,: ',' ? (• ':•:'

:

'•''•••'.'•l^..? ' ! ' • - • •

. ; ' • ' ' &lt; - . . „ ' .''"fi'v •'. v i* -&lt;i '.^ Jl'*'!*,'* i'-. '

t •'. '. - ' '• " ''

Orange are: 2.4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and 2,4,5-trichiorophenoxyocetic

" ; s- {. . .-' : * -i 'i .; f i -^ . ,. ; V-. ' 5 • * ^ , - ; , : • ^VU-i.

'i .^ .

,

.

.

.

.

acid (2,4,5,-T). In addition to these chemicals, Agent Orange (and some other herbicides
used less frequently in Vietnam) contained varying amounts of a contaminant commonly
referred to as TCDO (dioxin) which will also be a focus of studies to determine whether
and how delayed toxicity is manifested after low-dose exposure. Such studies may
provide clues for clinicians as to what medical tests would best identify delayed, toxic
effects, if any, of exposure of veterans to herbicides in Vietnam.

The biological systems thought to be affected by exposure to TCDD are:

6

Liver function; When animals are exposed to TCDD and related compounds,
these chemicals are stored in the liver and produce acute liver damage. It

]'
•

.

. ^-

�10.

would appear likely that any delayed harmful effects of exposure to low closes
of »uch compounds would be manifested by subtle changes fn the biochemistry
•«f the liver.

Seven of the funded research studies will investigate the

delayed impact of exposure to

Agent Orange components and the

contaminant TCDD on various aspects of liver cell functions in a variety of
•'•'".-.•
species. t'

o

' '

,
"

,-

'

•
' , ,' • -.. . ' . • - - • -• ;,

• •

. ' .• •. . .' .. • . . .' • . • .. •. • .

.

•• -, .

Skin: Chloracne is the one documented effect of low-dose exposure to Agent
Orange in humans. One study will analyze the underlying biochemical events
that lead to ch lor acne in a mouse model and in human tissue culture cells.

o

the nervous systems: Acute accidental poisoning with TCDD in man has led
• j- '

•- •

• • ' ? ' ' ' • ' • ' . " ' • • • •- '•• • • .'

• .'•*•*"' • .' • ' r&lt;

. i .

, .

.'

-

';j

f

to a variety of usually-acute neuromuscular abnormalities. Four studies will
;

•..

V.

•

-

• ; , , - , - • : • •

••'

&gt; i . , • .

•• •'

'

•'• •

•'•

, '. ' "

*iiV : • ' ' • ; ' • •

systematically investigate the effect of the components of Agent Orange on
neuromuscular function, sleep and behavior in a variety of animal models.

A new effort to solicit and support research on the special health problems facing
Vietnam veterans has just begun.

The Research and Development Office has sent

forward to all VA medical facilities a solicitation for research studies dealing with
disorders affecting Vietnam veterans and their families.

It is anticipated that a

significant number of new studies submitted in response to this solicitation will be
supported in Fiscal Year 1983.

• • - • - - • . • • &gt; ' • . ..

.- - - / : - i

:

Monograph Series
- .-•. ' &gt;,••• -•• "' .;«:. -:.-, ..,-. • ;•;.. • „ • ' • • ;, ••

/• :/: • • . , . • * ' - . " ; • • , •

Funding has been provided during FY 1982 for the preparation of a monograph series
designed to provide useful scientific information on environmental factors that may have
affected the'health of military personnel serving in Vietnam.

�II.

-&amp;#!^^^ ore planned on the following subjects:
Monographs
:^/ri;* •'wf1^^
Literoture Anolysis

•

-|V.i.' :,. .

chloracne, birth defects and genetic
'

../; ' --;.-N.-:-••--t^:. ....

.::•.., .

',-v;v. ' '

v:•

^l^^fc^^^V^^
;.«:4^;-;;utf,^*^feM]tt^:^
..,.. :
Mr. Chairman, as you may know, the comprehensive literature review of worldwide
scientific literature on Agent 6range and other phenoxy herbicides used in Vietnam has
*'•:•'."'',

• ;•»' . • ' • ' •

'

•

'

-

' - - . . •

• • .

been completed in accordance with the provisions of Public Law 96-151,
...

'

.-., .

;,.

..

•..

.

,. , - •

.

'.',•;..•:

.-&lt;*..• - v.-',,..-...'., •;•''; - • : .

.. ,

.-,, . . . . . . .

We have

.!••.; '

distributed this two-volume report (which includes an annotated bibliography and analysis
of1,200i scientific papers)^widelyWithin imeVA.

Copies have also been provided .to rnembers of the White-House established Agent
Orange Working Group, the Advisory Committee on Health-Related

Effects of

Herbicides, the National Academy of Sciences, the Office of Technology Assessment, the
Departments of Agriculture and Defense, Surgeon General of the U.S. Air Force, Library
of Congress, the Centers for Disease Control and other individuals, organizations, and
scientific research groups. The successful completion of this review represents a step
forward on the Jong road to understanding the complex health issues related to the use of
herbicides.

It will undoubtedly serve as an invaluable scientific resource which will

assist scientists and others in identifying areas suitable for additional research.

We jntend to periodically update this report and to augment it with a detailed critical
assessment of all publications addressing herbicide exposure with particular emphasis on
health consequences in humans.

It is estimated that about 400 publications have

appeared since October 1981. A critical review of these recent reports is needed in
-•,•••• •.•;,!'.. • • :*&gt; .:.-•=..-.'-, : --•:. • :•• ••-:,,".^;„. •!:^f,'.-.. : --:--r-' -•
••
'
,
'
order to keep this effort current. The Veterans Administration will take necessary steps
to ensure that the literature review and analysis remains as current as possible.

�12.
Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP)

The Veterans Administration Is continuing to cooperate with the Armed Forces Institute
of Pathology in providing biopsy and autopsy materials for analysis to the Institute. This
special registry was established in 1978 with the purpose of analyzing tissue samples to
determine what diseases Vietnam veterans are suffering from, as reflected in biopsies or

The VA has repeatedly emphasized the importance of the AFIP Registry and will
continue to urge VA health care facilities to send pathological material obtained from
any Vietnam veteran.

.

;

v:

Education Activities

Mr. Chairman, our environmental physicians, as Agent Orange coordinators at our major
VA health care facilities, remain the key link in examining and advising the veteran
concerned about exposure to Agent Orange. In order to ensure that these health care
staff remain completely abreast of the latest developments, nationwide conference calls
ore held on a regular basis. When required, special conference calls are scheduled on
significant developments requiring their immediate attention.

In addition to the conference calls, relevant Agent Orange-related literature is
periodically sent to the immediate attention of environmental physicians. Staff support
within the Environmental Medicine Office is available to assist in the explanation of
.specific documents. or to answer questions which may be raised by the information
received from VA Central Office.

�13.

Environmental physicians ore encouraged to participate in important scientific meetings

: '• "

--• , - * •

•

I&lt;in Ag«nt Orange and other environmental substances in order to keep abreast of
scientific «nd medical developments.

Members of our own VA Central Office staff

*

i

played a key role In the planning and organizing of an "International Symposium on
' ,, .
- &lt;
'
" *
•. ,
.Chlorinated Dioxins and Related Compounds" which was held in Arlington, Virginia, on
October 25-29, 1981. On October 12-1 A, 1982, Or. Barclay M. Shepard, my special
assistant, and Dr. Alvin L. Young will actively participate in the "3rd International
t

*

Symposium on Chlorinated Dioxins and Related Compounds" which will be held in
Salzburg, Austria. ) hove been advised that several of our environmental physicians are
/also planning to attend. Through such participation I am confident that our health care
'ftaff will remain professionally current with the latest findings on the short and longrange effects of Agent Orange and other environmental substances.

VA Public information Activities

As part of our effort to inform Vietnam veterans, their families, and other concerned
individuals and organizations about Agent Orange and the assistance provided by the VA,
we produced and distributed to all VA field stations a videotape entitled "Agent Orange:
'&lt; A Search for Answers."

'* • ,

While a recent internal survey indicated that many thousands of people have viewed the
program on television or in numerous groups of individual showings, we are encouraging
grepter use of the film.

' :

'

'

We are very pleased to report that this videotape has received considerable acclaim from
critics.

The Health Education Communication Association and the Network for

Continuing Medical Education presented an award of merit to the VA for Outstanding

�14.
i

t,

. . - , . ,

• . : , . ' ; •

,.'•;•••

/.',•• . ,

-••• . ' '

• " ' •••'.

ochievement in the use of television for education in the health sciences."

The

International Television Association (ITVA) awarded its Golden Reel of Excellence for
the vltteotape's "highly-effective form of communication, which helped Ifie user
,&gt;;;l&gt;i';•• ,: • ' •''•••. • ••'.\ . ..:•••: ..• •'•'•&gt;&gt;.'.w ft)$-.;::, •';''•:i.?W^'ify^.-lc-1'; •^i~::*';p-^*i^&gt;\}•:*£,•: f ';"• ;•:-. •

organization better achieve its stated goals." the program also was cited by ITVA for
• • .-. : • . • • ' • • • • •:-,•• . ' • . : -;;:.,- ''fe v -!i;-v;-fjK^:i^^^':^ ; i.-3. : ';^ ^ : |pv»v v !^».••;&gt;:•'/•; i;.i^l;/,.;,&lt; • ' . : .
creativity, innovative techniques, and high-production value. In addition, the program
also received an Emmy Award from the National Academy of television Arts and
Sciences.

We are delighted by this recognition and encourage all interested individuals to view this
program.
*

The VA takes seriously its obligation to keep veterans informed about Agent Orange. We
have also pursued other avenues to provide information and education to concerned
Vietnam veterans and their families and VA employees on matters related to Agent
Orange.

.

Early this year, an automated mailing list was developed from the Agent Orange
Registry. In June, letters were sent to these veterans along with the first two of a new
series of printed information material on Agent Orange. One of these pamphlets was
devoted primarily to Public Law 97-72. A third pamphlet has been issued and a fourth is

,-, • .. .

i, . :. - . ,

.. . -&lt;:•...... - • '

;.-. ••;.:..•:•:;

. - ....-• , , • • ••-&lt; ' , . - . . . - . . . ' -•• r • • . .-=.-.

in production.

VA officials have participated in public seminars, news media interviews and other public
forums dealing with the subject of Agent Orange.
5,.

;/. ..-• ' • • " ' : . . , • : • • • &lt; • ; ' • •

•

:;c;.-x •'

• •'••...

•''-•

•

.'.'

• • •

•

•

;.?;

•

•

"':-'-•.

•+-*\v

• • . • ' • - &lt;•;,.',

VA Liaison with State Agent Orange Activities

At the present time, 18 states have initiated programs directly related to the Agent
Orange issue.

The VA is continuing its efforts to maintain an effective, ongoing

�15.
J »

' ,

,,• ,

"

•

. . ' ; . ' •

relationship with each of these state programs. One of the prime responsibilities of our
Agent Orange Research and Education Office is to insure that current and accurate
information regarding VA Agent' Orange-related activities is disseminated on a timely
* *

*

&lt;, '

']

'

' 1

'

r

-t

"

. ' ' • ' • '•'

basis to the various states,' as well as to veteran service organizations, government
agencies, and interested parties. We consider }t to be an essential part of our program to
* - "'
" I
• ••" ; • insure that the veteran population as a whole, and those who serve them at all levels, are
fully Informed both with regard to the current body of knowledge regarding the possible
adverse effects of dioxins, as well as the status of VA Agent Orange programs.

V" - ': ;'

"

' i'V* ' ' ^

.1

,""'.''

To this end, the VA has provided the states with copies of all pertinent Agent Orange
materials and we have extended to officials from all of these states an open invitation to
attend the VA Advisory Committee meetings. Several of the states sent delegations to
' . ' • • , - ' ' , •

.

'

'

'

'

/

'

.

"

.

.

.

'

•

•" . . -i, •

the meeting held on August 31.

The efforts are of a continuous nature and are beneficial to all concerned parties. As
new states become involved in the Agent Orange issue, VA will include them in its
information exchange program.

White House Agent Orange Working Group (AOWG)

We are pleased to report that the Veterans Administration is continuing to play an active
role in the White House Agent Orange Working Group and its Science Panel.

This committee was established in July 1981 when the Interogency Group to Study the
Possible Long-Term Health Effects of Pnenoxy Herbicides and Contaminants was
expanded and elevated in status to the Cabinet Council level.

�$"'

16.

.v
*&gt;,

The AOWG brings together policy officials and scientists from throughout the federal
:
•

r _,

"

&gt;;'.,,, •." , . - • - r • " - . . • '

.'. *-*.-.- . . - • • • . .

:

-.'•• •-•-v.%»*i. . :..;'"'&lt;• •',;••'',•• ;...•,&gt;•', ,.v &gt;"'•'; :" ••"

• •

',

'

;

,.•

•

•••"••

' '" establishment to identify ongoing research activities on Agent Orange and related
(*• " matters and to develop and organize the means to carry out additional needed scientific
\ - research.
£ *

'&gt; &gt;

• • • • •'-••'•

••••• •'/•&gt;»• :•:•;-:

;

:V r -i;y :••.;•&gt;.

K .-.i:-'7'-:%tf^H-:f:/ v,;.

':• -V^ i'. •:. v^,...:. ,1,-,^

,-U-' . ^ , j v . i ;, ^ 4.,t!,s.;
'

The Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) is the lead agency in the working
/

group.

•

'

••

- . • . • • • • • • • : . , . . . - \ ; . . • ' . • - ' • • • . . : -/-&gt;,,^,,'f'- . • ; . • ' . . : = .

;..-

:•,.,

I',.,,--;.:,..,

i.!

,-

y - ,.

:

In addition to DHHS and VA, the AOWG includes representatives from the

Departments of Defense, Agriculture, and Labor, Environmental Protection Agency,
• ••

•'

•'• • .

'

•••'•-

•

;

• • : • : • •••::.'=• ' :

•

.

.

'

.

•^ • Office of Management and Budget, Council of Economic Advisors, Office of Science and
Technology and Office of Policy Development.

The AOWG has been very helpful to the VA in the review of our planned epidemiological
study, mortality study, and other important research efforts.

Through the AOWG

mechanism, the VA also has been able to contribute to the success of Agent Orange
research efforts conducted or sponsored by other federal departments and agencies. The
more important of these research efforts are the U.S. Air Force's "Operation Ranch
Hand" study and the Centers for Disease Control's Birth Defects Study.

We view our participation as vital to the scientific process and as fully consistent with
&gt; • • • • . . ••&gt;.&gt;-:•,.-,..••. , , .-•:,•,.•,, ,-,. ;.;.,:•:,,-,. .•.',.:;-..,,*•.•••?&gt;•• •..;:.1,^., v -, , ( . ••, •.-•:;... u: ,...,....,.
the President's goal of ensuring "... that the full resources of the federal government
.

.-,,. .. ,.„,.,..;-x

&gt; •:.i,r-: *•:

' ' - y ...!.ys.

.•-. .

;

are available to support the working group's continuing efforts."

i.

Advisory Committee on Health-Related Effects of Herbicides

This committee, established in 1979, continues to meet quarterly at VA Central Office
for the purpose of assembling and analyzing information which the VA needs to
formulate medical policy and procedures on"the complex questions surrounding veterans'
herbicide exposure.

�17.

During recent meetings the committee has discu&amp;sed the VA epidemiological study and
herbicide Ijterdture review,' the VA-*olicited in-house research program regarding Agent
1
/• ^
, iilj
Orange and Agent Blue, the VA mortality study, international dioxin symposiums, the Air
Force t^ealth'Study, the CDC Birth Defects &amp;udy, the proposed VA Twin Study/the
*

*

'

*

,

t

r

AFIP Agent Orange' ftetfistry, the VA rVioribg/aph series, and many'btheir-research
f-

*-,

'

.

activities and rrtottersdf concern to Vietnam veterans dnd scientists searching for
answers to the (difficult qUeirfions1 raised oi&gt;obt'the possible human health effects of
herbicides.
"'&gt;•• : ':'':';".&gt;-v,-;'1, ^^v^-i^^'^^^^'^f^^V^^Sv!^?;'-/.1''' • ; . • • " ' ' : ; ' : - ' • ' ! • ;•••

"•&lt; '- ; .-'-'^ • ' • "

:

""; ' %- •

The committee 'has been particularly helpful in advising the VA on the literature review
and the epidemiological study. The literature review, published October 1981, was the
subject of several sessions and considerable time and attention have been devoted to a
critique of the proposed epidemiological study design.

Verbatim transcripts are prepared and made available to appropriate government offices
and interested organizations and individuals. A copy of each transcript also is sent to all
environmental physicians.

;

;:;

Policy Coordinating Committee

In recognition of the importance of the Agent Orange issue, the Administrator has
reorganized and elevated in status the Policy Coordinating Committee (PCC) which was
*

*

•

.

.

.

.

.

'

thCjAgency's central coordinating point for Agent-Orange related activities. The PCC
develops policy for review and approval by the Administrator. It now is composed of the
top leadership of the major departments and staff offices within the VA. Mr. Everett
Alvarez, Jr., Deputy Administrator, chairs the PCC.

�18.
I wish to conclude this port of my testimony on Agent Orange, Mr. Chairman, by again
expressing the total commitment of the Veterans Administration to attempting to
resolve the many issues relating to Agent Orange. Although there is no way that we, or
anyone, can guarantee that ultimate and conclusive answers will be found to the
extremely-complex medical and scientific issues stemming from the use of the defoliant
Agent Orange in Vietnam, nevertheless, we will continue to vigorously pursue the search
for those answers. These efforts will center not only on our own research initiatives, but
will be closely interfaced with the intensive research now underway by other federal,
public and private institutions.

Readjustment Counseling

The Vietnam-era Veterans Readjustment Counseling Program has seen a number of
important developments in recent months.

In January, the Veterans Administration vested responsibility for this program in a new
independent professional service—the Readjustment Counseling Service—and established
that service on the same administrative level as Medical, Surgical, Nursing, Prosthetics,
etc.

A new program director was appointed by the Administrator of Veterans Affairs on
February 10, 1982, following an intensive and thoughtful search and selection process.
The±new Director of the Readjustment Counseling Service, psychiatrist, Arthur S. Blank,
Jr., M.D., too Vietnam veteran and has been psychiatric consultant to the program since
its earliest planning stages in 1979.

�19.
A^third leadership jnitjative ^was taken on Jun? |f, 198?, when a new position was created,
C^hief pf^CpMn^eling Services, andean «*per4t clinician Dr. Raymond M.

Scurfield from

the Brentwood VA Medical Center was hired for this position.
w

Underscoring the significance

»

the^., A^n^jr^is^rator attaches to _the Readjustment
/

rj

Counseling Program Is ;|he establishment |n November 1981 of a high-level Agency wide
'

°"

&lt;

i

stee/ing commijtee tp.monitpr the^program,

,

,

j-f

^

Improving the management. and^prganlzatjpn. :of the Vet Center Program has been one of
our top priorities. In addition to augmenting our Central Office program management
group, we have taken steps to strengthen the offices of pur six Regional Coordinators
who oyers.ee.

Vet

Center

operations in tl)eir .respective regions.

During

the

developmental phase of the program, each of these important offices was staffed by a
Regional Coordinator and a single secretary. Each Regional Office now has an Assistant
Coordinator for Administrative Services, and we are further strengthening the Regional
Coordinators' staffs with the appointment of an Assistant Coordinator for Clinical
Services and an additionalI secretary.

From an organizational standpoint, the most important development of recent months
has been the publication of a new program circular, which clarifies lines of authority and
responsibility. It contains several key elements:

~a. The responsibilities of the Director and the Readjustment Counseling Service
;.•.:../

' • . . ' • . • ' • ' • ' • . - : • ' ' , • :•*'•'

'"'•.•'•

'•

' "

.-

•

.;•

•'.••'•'.".

•-

.-•

•

...

. •;.'..".••,.«:

."..:..

Staff In Central Office for overall supervision and management of the program are
. spelled out. The Director and his staff have direct operational control of the Vet
Center system through the Regional Coordinators and, within Central Office,
,„

report to the Deputy ACMD for Professional Services and to the Chief Medical
Director through the Associate Deputy Chief Medical Director.

�20.
b. The responsibilities of the Regional Coordinator's staff are also clarified. We
have established clear lines of authority and responsibility from Vet Centers to the

. : • ' 'V
;•-• . :,-. ••^vi^'-,-.^.. •
Regional Coordinator's staff to the Readjustment Counseling Service in Central
Office. The Regional Coordinators are responsible for selection and all supervision
, of the Team Leaders, and the program director is responsible for selection and all
supervision of the Regional Coordinators. We have also spelled out the relationship
(.

•

•

$

*

"

&gt;

"

"

- ' '•-

^

'

between Vet Centers and their local VA Medical Center parent facilities. The
:

. ••

• . ' •

•

-

;

-

. ..." '• -: •':"'

•i

•;:'. &gt; .

"••;]'.•?•'. V

•;•'•'.

•,'•

•'

•

circular directs that the parent VA medical center is responsible for providing the
Vet Center all required support services.

On professional matters, the medical

center's role with respect to the Vet Center operations is to be consultative and
collaborative only.
;

' '

'TV

'

.

•:

.

'

.

.

.

.

'

.

.

•

\-

'

; ' ' • • ' '••

, .

..

..'''.-

-•'.

' '.

:,.'

-

;•

. . . . .

As part of our reconstituting of the management and organization of the readjustment
counseling program, we have instituted financial and accounting procedures which track
all program funds and maintain their earmarked character at the local level.
1

'• •

••

''• ' * . . ' •

••'

'

" • ' • ' , • • ' • ' '

,•

• '

• ,

i

'

'

t

* '

' '•

' • . . ' ':• . * • • ' • " '

.'*• . ' • ' &gt; - ' , ' .

'

•'

.•

:

•

-. .
'

*•

.
•

"

. "

. . - . " "

As you know, Mr. Chairman, we have also established a mechanism to contract with
private sector providers to furnish readjustment counseling services to Vietnam-era
- '

'.

^ ' . . . • '

'

'

• •

-• • ~

•

.

.

.

veterans who do not have access to one of our Vet Centers. We are using a decentralized
model with a contracting committee at each of 122 medical centers. The contracting
committee includes two members of a Vet Center staff in each instance.

As of August

31, over 300 contracts had been awarded. We are currently evaluating the quality and
effectivenss of this new mode of service delivery.
£

"

•

•

'

.

_

_

That concludes my statement, Mr. Chairman. I will be pleased to answer any questions
you or members of the committee may have.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8735">
              <text>031</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8736">
              <text>0578</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8738">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8734">
                <text>Custis, Donald L.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8737">
                <text>Typescript: Statement of Donald L. Curtis, M.D., Chief Medical Director, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Veterans Administration, Before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, Committee on Veterans' Affairs, House of Representatives, Septe</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8739">
                <text>VA</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="8740">
                <text>Agent Orange Registry</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="8741">
                <text>health studies</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="8742">
                <text>AOWG</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1642" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1259">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/bcc6c17157f0a97a565050a554e38d09.pdf</src>
        <authentication>5eb7456a98e018827f84bdc312ff1a75</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63208">
                    <text>Item ID Number

°0589

Author

Davis, Miriam

Corporate Author

Tne Llbrar

y of Congress Congressional Research Servic

Report/Article TltlO Agent Orange: Veterans' Complaints and Studies of
Health Effects, Issue Brief Number IB83043

Journal/Book Title
Yeer
Month/Day
Color

March 3

n

Number of Images

19

DeSCrlptOU NOtOS

Alvin L. Young filed this item under the category
"Human Exposure to Phenoxy Herbicides and TCDD"

Tuesday, February 20, 2001

Page 589 of 680

��AGENT ORANGE:

VETERANS' COMPLAINTS AND STUDIES OF HEALTH EFFECTS
ISSUE BRIEF NUMBER IB83043

AUTHOR:
Miriam

Davis

Environmental Health Fellow
Michael Simpson
Science Policy Research

Division

THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH

SERVICE

MAJOR ISSUES SYSTEM

DATE ORIGINATED 03/03/83
DATE UPDATED 03/03/83

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CALL 287-5700
0304

�CRS- 1

IB83043

UPDATE-03/03/83
I

ISSUE DEFINITION
From 1962 to 1971 the United States Air Force
(USAF) sprayed various
herbicides (chemicals that kill plants) in South Vietnam. The purpose of the
spraying was to defoliate jungle growth and to destroy enemy crops. The most
extensively used of these herbicide mixtures was known as Agent Orange, which
is an equal mix of two common herbicides called 2,4,5-T and
2,4-D
(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid).
A
contaminating chemical present in the mixture in small amounts was TCDD
(2 , 3 , 7 , 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-para-dioxin) , or simply "dioxin." Dioxin is a
contaminant produ-ced in the manufacture of 2,4,5-T.
Its toxic effects to
some laboratory animals are well known, yet its effects on humans are not
fully understood.
Since 1977, veterans have attributed a number of illnesses to Agent Orange
exposure, including skin conditions, cancer, fatigue, nervousness, numbness
in the extremities, vision and hearing impairments, birth defects in
children, and other
ailments.
Veterans
have
urged
the
Veterans
Administration (VA) to provide for medical treatment of these disorders and
many have filed for disability compensation.
Under P.L. 97-72, the Veterans' Health Care, Training, and Small Business
Loan Act of 1981, Congress directed the VA to furnish medical care to Vietnam
veterans, irrespective of age and financial status, for any condition which
might possibly have resulted from exposure to Agent Orange.
However,
disability compensation for the veterans' illnesses has been denied unless it
can be shown that the disabling condition began during the period of service.
This criterion of "service connection" effectively denies claims
for any
latent disorder arising from military service. Until a rigorous scientific
link between Agent Orange exposure and the health problems of the veterans
can be established, the Veterans Administration will probably continue to
deny the majority of veterans' requests for disability compensation.
The VA and other Federal agencies are sponsoring a variety of research
efforts to investigate the connection between Agent Orange and veterans'
health problems. Recent congressional interest has focused on the transfer
of responsibility from the VA to the Centers for Disease Control
for the
legislatively mandated epidemiology study of Vietnam veterans'
health
problems.
The following questions continue to surround the debate
effects of exposure to Agent Orange:

over

-- What are the adverse health effects of Agent Orange,
and what studies are being conducted to answer this
question?
-- How much and what kind of scientific evidence is
required to prove the right to disability compensation
for _the veterans?
-- On whom does the burden of proof lie to establish the
link between Agent Orange exposure and adverse health
effects?

the

health

�CRS- 2
—

IB83043

UPDATE-03/03/83'

What constitutes fair treatment of the veteran until
the scientific studies are concluded?

BACKGROUND AND POLICY ANALYSIS
History
The USAF operated its herbicide spraying program in South Vietnam until
the late 1960s when the National Cancer
Institute released animal
studies
which showed that the herbicide 2,4,5-T caused birth defects in mice. At the
same time, newspapers in Vietnam began to report health problems, including
birth defects, in rural populations which had been exposed to herbicides.
As the USAF was winding down its herbicide spraying program, it was also
recognized that the military supplies of 2,4,5,-T contained amounts of dioxin
suspected of being hazardous. The dioxin, which occurs as'a contaminant in
the manufacture of 2,4,5-T, has been found to be highly toxic to animals. In
fact, the birth defects previously attributed to 2,4,5-T exposure are now
thought possibly to be related to the contaminating dioxins. The average
levels of dioxin in the military Agent Orange were about 2 ppm.
There were
even greater concentrations of dioxin in other military herbicides less
frequently used in South Vietnam: approximately 32.8 ppm in Agent Purple, and
65.6 ppm in Agents Pink and Green.
In October 1969, the Air Force first restricted the use of Agent Orange to
areas remote from populations; then it stopped all airplane spraying of Agent
Orange in early 1970'and all helicopter spraying of Agent Orange by
1971.
All remaining Agent Orange stocks were gathered and stored at naval
facilities in either Gulfport, Mississippi, or Johnston Island in the Pacific
until they were incinerated at sea in 1977 during the PACER HO project.
The total amount of herbicides sprayed in South Vietnam from January
1962
to February 1971 was about 107 million pounds, according to a USAF report.
Approximately 276,000 gallons of Agents Green, Pink, and Purple were sprayed
in South Vietnam prior to 1965 when they were replaced by Agent Orange.
Approximately 11 million gallons of Agent Orange were then sprayed in South
Vietnam -- making it the most widely used herbicide of the war.
Ninety
percent of Agent Orange was sprayed on 2.9 million acres of inland
forests
and mangrove forests for defoliation, 8% was sprayed on enemy crops for crop
destruction, and the remaining 2% was sprayed around base perimeters, cache
sites, waterways, and communication lines.
The Department of Defense initially maintained that only a limited number
of U.S. military personnel could be positively identified as having been
exposed to Agent Orange i'n South Vietnam (i.e., the crews of aircraft that
were used to spray herbicides). However, following the publication of a 1979
General Accounting Office (GAO) report documenting ground troop exposure, the
DoD has acknowledged that greater numbers of ground troops were exposed to
Agent Orange through the USAF spraying program. Most recently, the DoD has
attempted to arrive at an exposure index for individual ground troops.
The American Medical Association has reported that about -2.4 million
Vietnam veterans may have been exposed to herbicides. This figure includes
ground troops, 1,200 flight crewmen who were responsible for the spraying
under Operation RANCH HAND, and 200 U.S civilians who were involved in
destroying the excess quantities of Agent Orange at sea. Details about U.S.
personnel exposures are presented in the following section.

�CRS- 3

IB83043

UPDATE-03/03/83

V

Following reports of various health problems in some 'Vietnam ^veterans
widespread concern about the possible health effects of Agent Orange was
expressed. Many veterans have filed claims for disability compensation with
the VA, basing their claims on Agent Orange effects. In 1979,
a group of
veterans initiated a class action suit against herbicide manufacturers for
negligence and product liability.
The manufacturers include Dow Chemical,
Monsanto, Hercules, Diamond Shamrock, and Thompson-Hayward. This litigation
is still in progress depending, in part, on the outcome of federally
sponsored studies of the health effects of Agent
Orange.
Chemical
manufacturers filed a third-party suit in 1980 against the U.S.
Government
that was later dismissed by a New York Federal District Court.
Personnel Exposed to Herbicides. The early trials that were conducted in
South Vietnam to improve aircraft spray systems were performed by the USAF
Special Aerial Spray Flight Division at Langley Air Force Base, Virginia.
During late 1962 and early 1963, the Crops Division at Fort" Detrick and the
USAF Armament Laboratory at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, were also involved
in efforts to improve spray system components in support of Operation RANCH
HAND.
Most of the personnel involved in the actual handling of herbicide drums
were Vietnamese.
However, a USAF flight mechanic or crew chief was
responsible for ensuring that each aircraft was properly loaded and that the
spray systems were functional.
Each herbicide aircrew consisted of a pilot
and copilot, a flight mechanic, and a spray unit.
The aircrews were
frequently joined by South Vietnamese and U.S. observers.
As noted in a USAF
report: "within the aircraft, it was not uncommon to have herbicide leakage
from around the numerous hose connections joining the spray tank and pumps
with the wing and aft spray booms.
In hot weather, the odor of herbicide
within the aircraft was decidedly noticeable" (Young et ai., 1978: 1-18). It
.is also suspected that, due to destruction of the tanks by enemy fire, crew
members were acutely exposed to herbicides.
In an effort to determine which ground units were'exposed to Agent Orange
after it had been deposited on the ground, the Army Agent Orange Task Force
and the American Cancer Society are attempting independently to correlate
ground unit location with the location of aerial spraying missions. The USAF
has data on 6,542 herbicide spraying missions that took place between August
1965 and February 1971 on its HERBS computer tape. These data were compiled
on a mission-by-mission basis from reports and files in various offices in
the U.S. and South Vietnam. After evaluating
the HERBS data in a
1974
report, the National Academy of Sciences
(NAS)
concluded
that the data
accounted for approximately 86% of all herbicide operations in South Vietnam,
and that "despite certain recognized deficiencies," the HERBS tape is "areliable source for an assessment of the major part of the herbicide
operation in South Vietnam" and "is the best and in fact the only
available
comprehensive computation of the major
part of the herbicide operations
conducted in the Vietnam war."
Since this NAS evaluation,
the Army Agent
Orange Task Force has been in the process of expanding the scope of the HERBS
data to incorporate other herbicide sprays -- including perimeter base
spraying and any unplanned dumping of herbicides from U.S.
aircraft' that
were under enemy attack.
Despite this relative confidence in the location of the aerial and some
ground spraying missions, it is difficult to determine
which particular
ground troops in. a given location were actually exposed and to what extent
they were exposed.
Although aerial
spraying apparatus
was' designed to

�CRS- 4

IB83043

UPDATE-03/03/83

deliver the herbicide in a specified manner to reduce dispersion, no such
standardized equipment was used for perimeter base spraying or other
non-aerial delivery modes. Furthermore, additional
troops may have been
exposed in areas for which military records are incomplete. For example, not
all information is available on helicopter operations flown by the Vietnamese
Air Force before 1968.
Thus, attempts to model the conditions of exposure in
order to determine individual or group exposure levels are jeopardized by the
lack of verifiable exposure information.
When the DoD suspended all use of Agent Orange in South Vietnam, the USAF
was 'left with an inventory of 2.22
million gallons in two locations, in
Vietnam and in Gulfport, Mississippi.
In April 1972,
the stocks in South
Vietnam were transported to Johnston Island in the Pacific
for
storage.
Problems began to arise in both U.S and Pacific locations concerning
leakage
from the drums. After exploring a number of options, the USAF decided to
dispose of the Agent Orange by burning it at high temperatures at sea.
This
operation was performed in 1977 with permission from the EP'A. About 110 USAF
personnel from the Air Force Logistics
command and about 100 civilian
employees hired by a contractor were involved in the destruction process.
Environmental monitoring of the transfer operations was performed by members
of the USAF Occupational and Environmental Health Laboratory.
Extensive
environmental monitoring of the test incineration procedures was performed.
Certain physical parameters of the actual incineration
process
were
monitored.
Physical' examinations
of personnel involved in the actual
incineration procedures, administered both before and after these procedures,
revealed no adverse health effects.
Health Effects of Dioxin and Phenoxyherbicides
There are as yet no conclusive scientific studies on the long-term human
health effects of Agent Orange exposure. In their absence, an understanding
of health effects must rely on animal and/or human occupational
exposure
studies of dioxin and phenoxyherbicides. The following paragraph
summarizes
what is known about the health effects of these constituents of Agent Orange.
Workers exposed to high concentrations of dioxin and/or 2,4,5-T
(as well
as other chemicals) are commonly found to have a painful skin condition known
as chloracne. Chloracne can appear weeks to months after initial exposure
and in some cases persists up to many years after exposure.
Chloracne,
however, can result from exposure to other chlorinated
compounds besides
2,4,5-T. Studies of exposed workers have indicated a variety of other health
problems; yet, there is not enough information at this time to establish a
cause and effect relationship between phenoxyherbicides and these disorders.
Soft-tissue sarcoma, a form of 'cance.r/ has been reported among Swedish
workers who were exposed to phenoxyherbicides. Reports from a variety of
sources associate
dioxin and herbicide exposure with stomach
cancer,
neuromuscular weakness, liver enlargement, and liver enzyme abnormalities.
Birth defects were first reported in South Vietnamese refugees living in
North Vietnam, but, due to the difficulty of conducting studies in a war-torn
country, the research on these reports was widely believed to be improperly
executed. In animal studies, only certain strains of pregnant mice exposed
to dioxin show fetotoxicity and birth defects in offspring.
Exposed male
mice do not have deformed offspring.
Current Use. The EPA has registered 2,4-D for widespread domestic use on
such crops as corn, grain, and sugar cane, as well as on non-crop areas;
2,4,5-T
is currently used on rangelands, rice fields, and industrial
vegetation sites, whereas approval for its other domestic uses -- forests,

�CRS- 5

IB83043

UPDATE-03/03/83

rights-of-way, pastures' -- was suspended by the EPA in 1978.
registered use of '2,4,5-T depends on negotiations that began in 1979
Dow Chemical and the EPA.

Future
between

Herbicides 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D are commercially available either alone or in
combination.
The combination mixture (under Dow's Trademark, Esteron)
differs from Agent Orange primarily in the level of dioxin.
Existing Dow
inventories of 2,4,5-T contain less than 0.1 parts per million (ppm) dioxin,
whereas previous formulations of 2,4,5-T used in Agent Orange contained about
2 ppm dioxin. Although standards for dioxin levels in 2,4,5-T have not been
officially set by the EPA, the EPA's Science Advisory Committee recommended
in 1971 a level of 0.1 ppm.
Veterans' Complaints and Veterans Administration Efforts
Veterans who believe they have been exposed to Agent Orange have
complained of a variety of illnesses for which they seek 'medical treatment
and disability compensation.
These illnesses include:
skin conditions,
cancers, nervousness, numbness in extremities, vision
and/or
hearing
impairments, birth defects in their offspring, and reduced libido.
Veterans
have also complained about the paucity of scientific information available on
the health effects of Agent Orange and about the sluggishness with which the
VA has responded to their concerns.
Specifically, the General Accounting
Office (GAO) has recently reported that over half of the veterans responding
to their questionnaire were dissatisfied with the amount of information they
had received from the VA about Agent Orange.
To fill the perceived
information gap, various State 'governments, including New York and New
Jersey, have attempted to disseminate information on Agent Orange to State
veterans.
&lt;

The VA maintains that it
outset by initiating health
exposed and by implementing
description of the research

has responded
to veterans' concerns from the
programs to identify veterans who may have been
research projects on health effects. A detailed
projects is provided later in this brief.

Since 1978 the VA has provided a physical examination for Vietnam veterans
who thought they were exposed to Agent Orange. The VA maintains a registry
of all the veterans who have come to VA hospitals and health care facilities
for the exam. The registry also contains information collected
during the
examination.
As of Dec. 1, 1982, 101,721 veterans had received the initial
exam, and about 80% of the records had been coded into the computer.
The
idea behind the registry is to determine whether veterans have a higher
incidence of particular diseases.
GAO auditors have investigated
the effectiveness of the v Agent Orange
examination program. The findings are summarized in an October 1982
report,
"The V A ' s Agent Orange Examination
Program: Actions Needed
To
More
Effectively Address Veterans' Health Concerns." The report is 'critical of the
exam for being incomplete, poorly designed, and for being administered by
physicians who were not familiar with the reported health effects of Agent
Orange. In an appendix to the report, the VA challenges these findings by
citing improvements that 'have taken place since the evaluation; however, the
GAO disagrees with the VA rebuttal in the same appendix. The GAO report is
also critical of the registry because it cannot
be used to determine the
incidence of specific illnesses among veterans -- a major purpose for which
the registry was supposedly designed.
Medical Treatment: P.L. 97-72.

Before the enactment

of

P.L.

97-72

in

�CRS- 6

IB83043

UPDATE-03/03./83

1981, 'veterans who complained of Agent Orange-related illnesses were in a
ranking of the lowest priority for medical treatment at VA hospitals.
This
is because these illnesses were defined as not being "service-connected." To
have qualified at all for this treatment at this low-priority level, the
veteran had to be destitute. The "Veterans' Health Care, Training, and Small
Business Loan Act of 1981" (P.L. 97-72) elevated Vietnam veterans' priority
status for treatment at VA hospitals for any Agent Orange-related problem.
Veterans who complain of such problems are now considered for treatment
irrespective of age or finances with the same priority
status as former
prisoners of war and ahead of veterans with "non-service
connected"
conditions.
The Vietnam veterans' contention of exposure is acceptable in
the absence of evidence to the contrary. It is the duty of a '"responsible
staff physician (to) make a determination as to whether the condition
resulted from a cause other than the specified exposure." To aid the staff
physician, the VA has developed guidelines which identify conditions that are
not considered to be related to Agent Orange exposure (Federal Register, Nov.
17, 1982).
The VA contends that P.L.
97-72
is
being
implemented
successfully, yet veterans' advocates and State Agent Orange commissions
allege that veterans are uninformed about the new legislation and that
treatment is still difficult to obtain at certain VA medical centers. The VA
has initiated a new system to monitor the impact of P.L.
97-72 on Vietnam
veterans' medical treatment.
P.L. 97-72 also extended the readjustment counseling program for Vietnam
veterans for another three years.
The counseling programs are currently
located in "Vet Centers," which are distinct from VA medical facilities.
Disability Compensation. As of Jan. 3, 1983, veterans had filed 16,102
disability claims with the VA for disorders they attribute to Agent Orange
exposure. The vast majority of these claims have been denied because they
are not considered as being "service connected." The policy of the VA is
that a disability is considered "service-connected" if it arises during or is
aggravated by military service.
"Service-connection"
establishes temporal
correspondence with military service, not causation, as the determinant for
disability payments. Chronic conditions arising before discharge or within
one year after discharge are presumed to be "service-connected."
The policy implies that for a veteran to receive disability payments for
ailments possibly related to Agent Orange exposure, it must be proved that
the condition first appeared during the service or within a year of
discharge.
This precludes disability
for
latent
disorders
because
"service-connection" criteria cannot be met.
The VA acknowledges that the skin disorder, chloracne, is causally related
to Agent Orange exposure. On Apr. 15, 1980, in a statement before the House
Veterans.1 Affairs Subcommittee on Medical Facilities and Benefits, former VA
administrator Max Cleland said that "the relationship between
accidental
human exposure to Agent Orange constituents and the development of long-term
illnesses other than chloracne remains speculative at present." Even though
the VA does view chloracne as an immediate effect
(acute effect) of Agent
Orange exposure, the basis for awarding disability stems from the occurrence
of chloracne during the service. Temporal coincidence with active duty is
the major criterion, irrespective of cause, for chloracne or any other
veteran complaint.
The total of 1237 (15.3%) claims which were granted were awarded primarily
for skin conditions (94%)
and for cancer, psychiatric, and neurological
conditions (6%), among others.

�CRS- 7

IB83043

UPDATE-03/03/83

The VA denied 6,824 claims after there was a confirmed diagnosis of the
disease for which the veteran had filed a claim. The denied claims fall into
the following categories: 4091
for various skin conditions; 2432 for
nervousness and headache, or fatigue; 907 for paralysis or numbness; 791 for
gastrointestinal or genito-urinary conditions; 487 for malignancies which
include leukemia, lymphoma, melanoma, and Hodgkin's disease; 359 for impaired
sexual activity; 463 for eye, ear, nose, a-nd throat pathology; 289 for lung
conditions; 247 for cardiovascular conditions, and 146 claims denied for
miscellaneous conditions.
(Since each claim could fall into a variety of
different categories, the category figures do not equal 6,824.)
The VA policy is that the resolution of disability claims
for conditions
that are now defined as "non-service connected" (and therefore denied) will
depend on the results of scientific studies which are described below. Since
it is expected that these studies will take years to complete, the Chief
Medical Director of the VA, Dr. Donald Custis, has testified at a hearing of
the House Veterans Affairs Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight on
Sept. 15, 1982, that "It may well be that the Congress cannot wait for
scientific answers in the short term, in which case it may well be that the
sociopolitical aspect of this problem will have to be addressed."
Current...._or. Proposed Studies of ^Health Effects
Many branches of the Federal Government are conducting research on the
health effects of Agent Orange and phenoxyherbicides. Research efforts range
from large-scale epidemiology studies of Vietnam veterans to studies of
cancer among Kansas
residents exposed to herbicides.
The
following
paragraphs provide an overview of research efforts at the Department of
Defense, the Veterans Administration, and the Department of Health and Human
Services.
The impact of the following studies on VA disability policy is not
clear; the VA has not established any formal criteria for how their
policies
might be altered by scientific findings.
Due to the recent transfer of the legislatively mandated
epidemiology
study of Vietnam veterans and to the interest which this study has generated
all along, it will be discussed first.
E p i de m i o 1 o g y Study. The large epidemiology study of Vietnam veterans
exposed to Agent Orange, mandated by P.L. 96-151 in December 1981,
has been
the focus of much of the debate over the health effects of Agent Orange.
P.L. 96-151 directed the VA to perform the study of long-term health
effects
among veterans using' a protocol that was subject to approval by the
congressional Office of Technology Assessment (OTA); in addition, the OTA
director was given the task of monitoring the progress of the study.
The
protocol was reviewed by the OTA, the VA advisory group on the health-related
effects of herbicides, the science panel of the Agent Orange Working Group,
and the National
Academy of Sciences.
P.L.
97-72 allowed for future
expansion of the scope of the study.
The implementation of the study was delayed until October 1982,
at which
time the responsibility for conducting the study was transferred from the VA
to the Centers for Disease Control
(CDC).
The transfer was accomplished
following letters to the VA from the Veterans Affairs Committees of the House
and the Senate. The letters expressed concern over the lack of progress on
the study and concern over the VA's credibility
with the
veterans;
consequently, the VA was urged to relinquish the. study to an independent
research body. While the VA acceded to this request, former VA Administrator

�CRS- 8
Nimmo'attributed the delay of the
protocol review process.

study

IB83043
to

legal

UPDATE-03/03/83

challenges

and

to

the

On Jan. 18, 1983, the CDC formally accepted responsibility for the study
in a written agreement with the VA.
Under the agreement, the VA is to
provide the CDC with $3 million to fund the study, yet the CDC is assured of
autonomy in its design and implementation. The project will actually consist
of two studies, one on the health effects of Agent Orange and the other on
the health effects of the Vietnam experience. The study' designs are expected
to be ready for OTA review in April 1983.
Preliminary reports suggest that
the veterans under study will be divided into three groups (cohorts)
—
one
group made up of those who were likely to have been exposed to Agent Orange,
another group constituting those who were unlikely to have been exposed, and
a final group of veterans who did not serve in Vietnam and who were not
likely to have been exposed. The DoD'is assisting the CDC in establishing
criteria for assigning an individual veteran to a particular
group.
The
selection process will depend on the use of DoD records ' of ground troop
movements relative to herbicide spraying.
Completion of the study is
expected by the end of 1987.
Department of Defense. The Air Force is conducting "The Ranch Hand
Study," an epidemiological study of personnel exposed to herbicides during
the Air Force's aerial spraying program in Vietnam (Operation Ranch Hand).
These personnel were members of flight crews involved in the handling and/or
spraying of herbicides, and they were presumed to have been heavily exposed.
This study population of 1,260 personnel is being compared to a control
population consisting of unexposed flight crew members.
The purpose of the study is to determine whether Ranch Hand flight crews
suffered adverse health effects compared to the control
population.
The
study consists of three parts: a mortality study; a morbidity (disease) study
which includes birth defects in offspring; and a follow-up period of physical
examinations at specific intervals (up to 20 years) from the onset of the
study. Information for the morbidity and follow-up portions is collected by
questionnaires administered in the homes of the participants and by extensive
physical and psychological tests.
These data are collected
by
the
independent contractors Louis Harris and Associates and Kelsey-Seybold
Clinic, respectively. Before data collection began in 1980, the entire study
protocol had been reviewed by the University of Texas
School of Public
Health, the U.S Air Force 'Science Advisory Board, the Armed
Forces
Epidemiological Board and the National Academy of Sciences.
The initial phases of mortality and morbidity data collection
were
completed in December 1982.
For the morbidity study, participation
in the
questionnaire and physical examination has been very high (greater than
95%)
and an interim report is expected by the summer of 1983.
The findings of the
mortality study (due to be released early in 1983) suggest that there are no
differences in the number of deaths between the Ranch Handers and controls.
Periodic reassessment of the mortality findings are planned throughout the
20-year study by the Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine.
While the Ranch Hand Study is expected to provide some
valuable
information about the population of herbicide sprayers, the applicability of
the Ranch Hand Study to the experience of ground troops has been questioned.
For example, the herbicide exposure conditions are thought to differ between
the two groups. The Ranch Handers were heavily exposed at sporadic intervals
(repeated acute exposures) and the exposure was through the skin, through
inhalation, and through ingestion. After the missions, the flight crews were

�CRS- 9

IB83043

UPDATE-03/03/83

required to shower. While the extent and mode of ground troop exposure are
less certain, it is likely that the mode of ground troop exposure was
primarily due to skin contact and to inhalation.
The duration of ground
troop exposure was likely to be for longer periods due to operational
movements through contaminated areas. Thus, because the exposure conditions
of Ranch Hand personnel did not mimic those of ground troops, the general
relevance of the Ranch Hand study is not certain.
One of the criticisms
raised by the National Academy of Sciences in their May 1980
review of the
Ranch Hand protocol was that adverse health effects were not likely to be
found because the sample size was too small and the follow-up period was too
short. In response, the Air Force did extend the follow-up period to 20
years; nevertheless, the problem of sample size makes it unlikely that the
study will detect certain cancers that are relatively rare.
The impact of
Agent Orange exposure on the incidence of these rare cancers
(e.g.,
soft-tissue sarcoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma), may be most appropriately
determined by the case control sutdies in New York State and at.the National
Cancer Institute.
V e t e r ans Adm i n i s t rat ion. The Veterans Administration intends to spend
$6.7 million of the total 1983 medical research budget of $163 million for
projects on the health effects of herbicide exposure and, more generally, the
health effects of combat duty in Vietnam. The majority of these research
dollars ($4.2 million) is destined for the epidemiology study of Vietnam
veterans, a mortality study, and an identical twin sibling study.
Due to
congressional pressure, responsibility for the conduct of the epidemiology
study has been transferred
from the VA to the CDC.
Funding for the
epidemiology study, however, will continue to be provided by the VA.
Both the mortality and the twin study address the impact of the Vietnam
experience rather than Agent Orange in particular.
The purpose of the
mortality study is to examine
the cause-of-death
and the death rate in
Vietnam veterans by comparison to veterans who did not serve in Vietnam. The
idea is to determine whether military service in Vietnam has resulted in
different death profiles since the end 'of the war.
Computer records will
provide the information, and this information will be collected and coded by
contractors for the VA. The project is expected to be finished by 1985.
The Identical Twin Study, -also sponsored by the VA, is designed to
determine whether the current psychological and physical health of Vietnam
veterans has been adversely affected by their service.
In this study, a
group of VA researchers in St. Louis is attempting to study 450 pairs of
identical twins; one twin served in Vietnam during the period of herbicide
exposure, whereas the other twin was not stationed in Southeast Asia.
Initial findings of this study are expected by October 1984.
The VA has also established the Chloracne r Task Force to identify veterans
with skin conditions and then to see if . there are bona fide cases of
Chloracne within this group. Thus far, a dermatologist who is serving as a
consultant at the Washington VA office has found 12 tentative cases of
Chloracne which require further investigation.
Another VA research activity is a study of dioxin in the fat tissues of
veterans. In conjunction with the EPA, the VA intends to find out whether
Vietnam veterans have higher levels of dioxin in their fatty tissues than
non-Vietnam veterans.
Background levels of dioxin in the U.S.
male
population are also to be analyzed. To detect dioxin concentrations in the
fat, tissue is removed surgically from the abdomen and the sample .is analyzed
on gas chromatography/high resolution mass spectrometry instruments.

�CRS-10

IB83043

UPDATE-03/03./83

l

Department of Health and_
Human
Services:
Centers
for
Disease
C o n tr o1/B irth Def e_c t Stu dy. An ambitious epidemiology study is underway in
Atlanta to find out if Vietnam veterans show an increased risk of having
children with birth defects. Using the case-control method, CDC researchers
are interviewing 7000 parents of children with birth-defects and 3000 parents
whose children are normal. The interview process is used to establish the
military history of the parents.
This information will be analyzed
to
determine wheth'er parents who served in Vietnam are at greater risk of
producing children with birth defects. Already one-half
of the interviews
has taken place, with initial findings expected by September 1983.
Sponsors
of the study are DHHS, VA, and DoD.
DHHS:
National Cancer^ I n s t i t u t e / Can c e r Study.
Epidemiologists
are
investigating a Kansas population for the relationship between herbicide
exposure and various cancers. The research question is: do such cancers as
soft tissue sarcoma and various lymphomas result from herbicide exposure?
Kansas residents are considered a good population for studying herbicide
exposure because in this wheat-growing State herbicides are used much more
often than insecticides. In other States, herbicides are frequently used in
combination with insecticides, which are also implicated in producing cancer.
Insecticide exposure would confound the results of such a cancer
study.
Preliminary results of this study are anticipated by the'fall of 1983.
DHHS; National Institute of^Occupational Safety and Health/Dioxin
Worker
Registry.
NIOSH is compiling a ' registry of workers involved in the
manufacture "of 2,4,5-T and related compounds because these compounds
contain
dioxin as a contaminant. Worker exposure records on 3000-5000 individuals,
compiled from all 12 U.S. sites of production, will go back
to the 1940s.
T'he purpose of the registry is to establish whether the mortality
rates
are
higher in this,population of exposed workers than in a comparable
group in
the U.S.population.
The protocol
has been reviewed by an independent
university-affiliated group of scientists, and the analysis of the findings
is due by 1985.
Role of State Commissions or Advisory Groups
Several States have established their own agencies in response to
veterans' complaints of Federal inactivity
on the Agent Orange
question.
Although these organizations
vary in structure, their
functions
are
essentially similar:
to identify State Vietnam veterans and to provide and
coordinate various social services for these veterans. For example, various
State commissions disseminate information on Agent Orange and assist in
scheduling Agent Orange examinations at VA medical centers.
Those States
which have commissions or programs on Agent Orange are as
follows:
California, Connecticut,
Georgia,
Hawaii,
Illinois,
Kansas,
Maine,
Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oklahoma, Ohio, Pennsylvania,
Texas and West Virginia.
(Wisconsin's program has been discontinued.)
Some .of these States are funding their own research programs aimed at
answering questions on the health effects of Agent Orange. In the "spring of
1983, New York is due to release findings of a study on the incidence of
soft-tissue sarcoma among State veterans relative to other State inhabitants.
Soft-tissue sarcoma has been implicated as a possible long-term health effect
of herbicide exposure. New York State has also undertaken a mortality study
to see if death rates are higher among Vietnam veterans than other State
residents of the same age group.

�'

I

CRS-11

IB83043

UPDATE-03/03/83

The New Jersey State Commission on Agent Orange has a variety of pro-jects
underway. One task has been to assemble information on a bacterial infection
called Melioidosis, which may have afflicted veterans who were exposed to the
bacterium while in Vietnam.
The Commission is beginning a project to
determine whether blood tests can be reliably used to measure dioxin levels.
Blood tests would obviate the need for more expensive and painful surgical
procedures now performed for this purpose.
In addition, the New Jersey
Commission on Agent Orange distributes pamphlets on how to fill out VA
disability claims forms.
The role of the State commissions is growing to include advocacy for State
veterans. State representatives have testified at congressional hearings and
at the VA advisory committee meetings to bring attention to veterans'
complaints. At the Nov. 30, 1982, meeting of the VA advisory committee on
the health-related effects of herbicides, the spokesperson for State agencies
endorsed legislation
that
would
establish
the
presumption
of
a
"service-connection" for chloracne and soft tissue sarcoma "so that veterans'
disability claims for these disorders would be awarded.
Because of the lack of State funds, some of the State commissions are no
longer active and others are i.n jeopardy. State commissions have requested
Federal funds on the grounds that they assist in the administration of VA
programs such as the scheduling of Agent Orange examinations and informing
State veterans about Agent Orange exposure.
Previous Congressional Ac^tipn
As previously discussed, two major pieces of legislation have been enacted
in the 96th and 97th Congresses- to provide for Vietnam veterans' medical care
and to mandate studies of the health effects of Agent Orange:
P.L. 96-151,
The Veterans' Health Programs Extension and Improvement Act of 1979; and P.L.
97-72, Veterans' Health Care, Training and Small Business Loan Act of 1981.
The 'legislative proposals of the 96th and 97th Congresses were generally
directed to the status of disability claims that are now denied by the VA
because they are not considered as "service-connected." In Representative
Daschle's proposed 97th Congress bills, H.R.
7146
and H.R. 7110,
the
presumption of service connection would have been legislatively established N
for soft-tissue sarcoma and chloracne, respectively.
The presumption of
service connection would have permitted veterans with these disorders to
collect disability payments because the conditions were presumed to have
arisen during the service. Two other 97th Congress
bills, H.R. 523
(Rep.
Roe) and H.R. 2297 (Rep. Downey), were designed to provide a presumption of
service connection for all chronic conditions specifically related to Agent
Orange exposure which appear later than one year, after discharge.
Existing
law requires that disabling conditions only appearing before discharge or
within one year after discharge are presumed to have arisen during the
service. Finally, a number of bills were introduced to transfer the conduct
of the epidemiology study from the VA to the Department of Health and Human
Services. This was accomplished -- although non-legislatively -- with the
transfer of responsibility to the Centers for Disease Control in the DHHS.
LEGISLATION
H.R. 209 (Long)
Requires the Secretary of Health and Human

Services

to

arrange

for

an

�CRS-12

IB83043

UPDATE-03/03/83

independent epidemiological study of persons exposed to the chemical dioxin,
used in the h.erbicide known as Agent Orange.
Introduced Jan.
3,
1983;
referred to Committee on Energy and Commerce.
H.R. 212 (Long)
Amends Title 38, United States Code, to waive the one-year limitation on
claims for compensation "frojn the Veterans Administration for disabilities and
diseases incurred in or aggravated by military service in the case of claims
by veterans who served in Southeast Asia during the Vietnam era for
compensation for disabilities resulting from exposure to the phenoxyherbicide
known as Agent Orange or other phenoxy herbicides.
Introduced Jan.3,
1983;
referred to Committee on Veterans Affairs.

H.R. 331

(Roe)

Amends Title 38, United States Code, to waive the one-year
limitation on
claims for compensation from the Veterans Administration for disabilities and
diseases incurred in or aggravated by military service in the case of claims
by veterans who served in Southeast Asia during the Vietnam era for
compensation for disabilities resulting from exposure to the
phenoxy
herbicide known as "Agent Orange" or other phenoxy herbicides. Introduced
Jan. 3, 1983; referred to Committee of Veterans Affairs.
H.R. 462

(Applegate)

Amends Title 38, United States Code, to waive the one-year
limitation on
claims for compensation from the Veterans Administration for disabilities and
diseases incurred in or aggravated by military service in the case of claims
by veterans who served in Southeast Asia during the Vietnam era for
compensation for disabilities resulting from exposure to the phenoxyherbicide
known as Agent Orange, or other phenoxy herbicides.
Introduced Jan. 6, 1983;
referred to Committee on Veterans Affairs.
H.R. 509 (Hammerschmidt)
Amends Title 38 of the United States Code to provide that progressive
muscular atrophy or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis developing a 10 per centum
or more degree of disability within seven years after separation from active
service during a period of war shall be presumed to be service connected.
Introduced Jan. 6, 1983; referred to Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
H.R. 1135

(Downey)

Amends Title 38, United States Code, to waive the one-year
limitation on
claims for compensation from the Veterans Administration for disabilities and
diseases incurred in or aggravated by military service in the case of claims
by veterans who served in Southeast Asia during the Vietnam era for
compensation for disabilities
resulting from exposure to the
phenoxy
herbicide known as Agent Orange, or other phenoxy herbicides.
Introduced
Feb. 1, 1983; referred to Committee on Veterans Affairs.
H.R. 1382 (Downey)
Provides that any award by the Veterans' Administration of compensation
for a disease or disability in a veteran resulting from exposure
to Agent
Orange shall be retroactive to the date the veteran first applied to the
Veterans' Administration for compensation for such disease or disability.
I n t r o d u c e d _ F e b . 10, 1983; referred to Committee on Veterans' Affairs.

�CRS-13

IB83043

UPDATE-03/03/83

'*.

i

S. 374

(Specter)

A m e n d s Title 38, United States Code, to provide a presumption of service
connection for the occurrence of certain diseases in veterans who were
exposed to phenoxy herbicides while serving in the Armed Services in
Southeast Asia during the Vietnam era.
Introduced Feb. 2, 1983; referred to
Committee on Veterans Affairs.
HEARINGS
U.S.

Congress. House. Committee on Interstate and Foreign
Commerce. Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.
Agent Orange:
exposure of Vietnam veterans. Hearing,
96th Congress, 2d session.
Sept. 25, 1980.
249 p.
Involuntary exposure to Agent Orange and other toxic
spraying. Hearings, 96th Congress, 1st session. June 26
and 27, 1979.
256 p.

U.S.

Congress. House. Committee on veterans' Affairs. Ad
Hoc Subcommittee on Hospitals and Health Care. Legislation
to improve medical programs administered by the Veterans
Administration (H.R. 2157, H.R. 2953, and H.R. 2999).
Hearing, 97th Congress, 1st session.
Apr. 28, 1981.
54 p.

U.S.

Congress.
House. Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Subcommittee on Medical Facilities and Benefits. Herbicide
"Agent Orange."
Hearing, 95th Congress, 2d session.
Oct. 11, 1978.
62 p.
Oversight hearing to receive testimony on Agent Orange.
Hearing, 96th Congress, 2d session.
Feb. 25, 1980.
121 p.

._

_, oversight hearing to receive testimony on Agent Orange.
Hearing, 96th Congress, 2d session. July 22, 1980.
459 p.
Scientific community report on Agent Orange. Hearing,
96th Congress, 2d session.
Sept. 16, 1980.
145 p.

U.S.

Congress. House. Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations. Current
status of Agent Orange studies. Hearing, 97th Congress,
1st session. May 6, 1981.
385 p.
Federal Agent Orange activities and the vet center program.
Hearing, 97th Congress, 2d session.
Sept. 15, 1982.
164 p.

U.S.

Congress. Senate. Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Agent
Orange update and appendix: Agent Orange activities (part
II) . Hearing, 96th Congress, 2d session.
Sept. 10, 1980.
1368 p.
Oversight on issues related to Agent Orange and other
herbicides. Hearing, 97th Congress, 1st session.
Nov. 18,
1981.
500 p.

�CRS-14

IB83043

UPDATE-03/03,/83

VA health resources and program extensions and appendix:
Agent Orange activities. Hearing, 96th Congress, 1st
session, on S. 741 and S. 196.
Apr. 10, 1979.
462 p.
Veterans' Programs Extension and Improvement Act of 1981.
Hearing, 97th 'Congress, 1st session, on S. 26 (titles II
and III, only), S. 380, S. 458, S. 636, S. 689, S. 872,
S. 914, S. 921, and related bills. Apr. 30, 1981.
685 p.
Vietnam veterans' readjustment. Hearings, 96th Congress,
2d session. - F e b . 21, Mar. 4, and May 21, 1980.
Part 2.
595-2082 p.

i
ADDITIONAL REFERENCE SOURCES
American Medical Association. Council on Scientific Affairs.
Health effects of "Agent Orange" and dioxin contaminants.
1981.
37 p.
Boffey, Philip. Agent Orange: Despite spate of studies, slim
hope for answers. New York Times, 1982.
24 p.
Cookson, Clive. "Emergency" ban on 2,4,5-T herbicide in U.S.
Nature, v. 278, Mar. 8, 1979:
108-110.
Galston, Arthur W. Herbicides:
V. 29, Feb. 1979:
85-90.

a mixed blessing.

Bioscience,

International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC monographs
on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals
to man: 2,5,5-T, v. 15, Aug. 1977.
JRB Associates. Review of literature on herbicides, including
phenoxy herbicides and associated dioxins. Washington,
Veterans Administration, 1981.
2v.
National Research Council. The effects 1 of herbivcides in South
Vietnam: Part A. Summary and conclusions.
Washington,
National Academy of Sciences, 1974.
AD-774-749. 398 p.
National Research Council. The effects of exposure to Agent
Orange on ground troops in.Vietnam. Washington, National
Academy of Sciences, 1982.
24 p.
New Jersey State Commission on Agent Orange.
1982.
54 p.

Legislative Report.

Reggiani, G. Toxicology of TCDD: short review of its formation,
occurrence, toxicology and kinetics, discussing human health
effects, safety measures and disposal. Regulatory Toxicology
and Pharmacology, v. 1, 1981:
211-243.
Rosenblatt, Jean. Compensating victims of toxic substances.
Editorial Research Reports. v. 11, Oct. 1982:
759-772.
Tung, T.T., T.K. Anh, B.Q. Tuyen, D.X. Tra, and N.X. Hugen (1971).
Clinical effects of massive and continuous utilization of

�'V*
1

CRS-15

-*

».
U.S.

IB83043
.

defoliants on civilians.

.

.

.

Vietnamese Studies, 29:

.

UPDATE-03/03/83
.

53-81.

General Accounting Office. U.S. ground troops in South
Vietnam were in areas sprayed with herbicide orange. Nov.
16, 1979.
FPCD-80-23.
VA's Agent Orange examination program: auctions needed to
more effectively address veterans' health concerns. Oct. 25,
1981.
HRD-83-6.

Young, Alvin et al. The toxicology, environmental fate and human
risk of herbicide orange and its associated dioxin.
The
Surgeon General, U.S. Air Force, Washington, D.C.
Oct. 1978.

�APPENDIX
A LISTING OF
FEDERAL ORGANIZATIONS ON AGENT ORANGE
January, 1983
I. Cabinet Council on Human Resources
Agent Orange Working Group (AOWG)
Chairman: James Stockdale (HHS) Alternate: Bart Kull
Members: HHS, VA, DoD, Dept. Agriculture, Dept. Labor, EPA, ACTION
Agency, OMB, OSTP, Council of Economic Advisors, Dept. State
(OTA- Observer Status)
Activities: Moniter and coordinate Federal Research activities on
health effects of Agent Orange.
Science Panel: Dr. Vernon Houk (CDC)
II. Veterans Administration
Advisory Committee on Health Related Effects of Herbicides
Chairman: Dr. Barclay Shephard (VA)
Members: VA, Veterans Groups, FDA, CDC, EPA, Army Medical Corps,
Dept. Agriculture, NIH, private universiites
Activities: Advise Administrator of VA on health effects of Agent Orange
Agent Orange Projects Office
Acting Director: Dr. Barclay Shephard (VA)
Members: In-house administrative and research staff, Dept. of Medicine
and Surgery, VA
Activities: Coordinate and moniter epidemiology projects at VA on
Agent Orange and related research effortsAgent Orange Policy Coordinating Committee
Chairman: Everett Alvarez, Jr. (VA)
Members: In-house staff involved in medical information and medical
claims.
Activities: Review VA policy to make recommendations on Agent Orange
issues to the administrator of the VA.
III. Department of Defense
Army Agent Orange Task Force (AAOTF)
Chief: Richard Christian (Army)
Members: Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, and civilian staff
Activities: Provide VA with information from military records
for the research projects on Agent Orange.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8856">
              <text>032</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8858">
              <text>0589</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8861">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8854">
                <text>Davis, Miriam</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="8855">
                <text>Michael Simpson</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8857">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;The Library of Congress Congressional Research Service, Major Issues System</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8859">
                <text>March 3 1983</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8860">
                <text>Agent Orange: Veterans' Complaints and Studies of Health Effects, Issue Brief Number IB83043</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8862">
                <text>VA</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="8863">
                <text>health studies</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="8864">
                <text>legislation</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1645" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8885">
              <text>032</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8886">
              <text>0592</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8890">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8884">
                <text>DeHart, Roy</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8887">
                <text>Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8888">
                <text>1982-05-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8889">
                <text>Guest Editorial: Herbicide Orange Health Effects</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8891">
                <text>Ranch Hand</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="8892">
                <text>health studies</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1698" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="9466">
              <text>033</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="9467">
              <text>0645</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="9471">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9463">
                <text>Ferry, D. G.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="9464">
                <text>L. R. Gazeley</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="9465">
                <text>I. R. Edwards</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9468">
                <text>Proceedings of the University of Otago Medical School</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9469">
                <text>1982</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9470">
                <text>2,4,5 - T Absorption in Chemical Applicators</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9472">
                <text>dioxin</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="9473">
                <text>herbicide properties</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="9474">
                <text>health studies</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3040" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22057">
              <text>086</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22059">
              <text>2155</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22062">
              <text>Series IV Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22056">
                <text>Finch, James A., Jr.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22058">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;Missouri Dioxin Task Force</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22060">
                <text>October 31 1983</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22061">
                <text>Final Report of the Missouri Dioxin Task Force including Appendices</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22063">
                <text>herbicide damage assessment</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22064">
                <text>health studies</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22065">
                <text>decontamination</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22066">
                <text>clean-up standards</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3277" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1690">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/c2c00f58fb4fdfa7f0fc2780aaf14d95.pdf</src>
        <authentication>d35a4b78d3f7300ed12152d0000b90e0</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63639">
                    <text>Item e Number

02233

Author

Fitzgerald, Edward F.

Corporate Author
Report/Article Titto Typescript: Summary of Binghamton State Office
Building Medical Surveillance Program: Design and
Implementation, [nd]

Journal/Book Title
Year

Month/Day
Color
Number of Images

D

5

Descrlpton Notes

Thursday, September 20, 2001

Page 2288 of 2293

�SUMMARY OF BINGHAMTON STATE O F F I C E B U I L D I N G MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM:
DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION
Prepared by Edward F. Fitzgerald, PhD, and Susan" J. Standfast, MD, New
York State Department of Health
Protocol
A plan was established in June, 1981, to help assess the health consequences of the Binghamton State Office B u i l d i n g (BSOB) fire, which occurred
on February 5, 1981. It was proposed to extend and follow-up p r e l i m i n a r y
efforts conducted by the Broome County Health Department soon after the
fire. The New York State Department of Health administers the BSOB Medical
Surveillance Program and implements the protocol. The supervision and
d i r e c t i o n of the program, howevsr, is the r e s p o n s i b i l i t y of the National
I n s t i t u t e of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).
The plan e n t a i l s a multi-stage process contigent upon an i n d i v i d u a l ' s
probable level of exposure. Anyone who entered the BSOB on or after the
date of the fire was requested to have a series of laboratory tests performed.
Physical examinations and interval medical histories were a d d i t i o n a l l y conducted on those persons who remained in the BSOB for at least 25 hours.
Laboratory tests were, al so offered as a p u b l i c service to those not in the
BSOB since the fire, but who had s i m i l a r tests performed per order of the
Broome County Health Department in February or March, 1981, because they
felt that they nevertheless may have been exposed to contaminants from the
BSOB.
The rationale for this schema is the b e l i e f that if health problems
did occur as a result of exposure to PCB, d i o x i n , or dibenzofurans released
by the fire, they would most probably be apparent among persons who actually
entered the BSOB, since contamination was largely an i n t r a - b u i I d i n g problem.
The l i k e l i h o o d of contamination should also increase w i t h duration of exposure, so the most intensive efforts are focused upon i n d i v i d u a l s who were
in the BSOB for 25 or more hours. A d d i t i o n a l consideration is being given
to a more sophisticated index of exposure, one which w i l l incorporate measures
of intensity (e.q., use of protective gear, date of exposure, floor and location of exposure) as well as duration.
The laboratory tests were performed at Binghamton General Hospital
(BGH), which is operated by United Health Services, Inc (UHS). They
involve a serum biochemistry profile of 20 analyses. Included were 1 i v e r
function tests linked to PCB exposure in the literature (e.g., SCOT and
GGPT), t r i g l y c e r i d e s , and a variety of other procedures. A complete blood
count with platelets and d i f f e r e n t i a l was also conducted. These tests are
nearly identical to those ordered by the Broome County Health Department
and performed at BGH on most of the 'program participants soon after the
fire. They w i l l provide for the examination of change in physiologic processes over time.

�The interval medical history cons i sted of the person's responses to
a nurse-administered questionnaire of 3^ symptoms which he or she may have
first experienced since the date of the fire. I l l u s t r a t i v e items included
skin rash, headaches, swollen eyelids, and other problems which may be
related to- PCB exposure, in addition to control items. The physical
examination was performed at Wilson Memorial Hospital in Johnson City by
licensed physicians board-certified or e l i g i b l e for certification in
internal medicine or family practice and employed by UHS. It focused
upon the skin, since chloracne and other dermatologic conditions have
been linked to PCB exposure in the literature. The nervous system was
also carefully examined, because PCB's may have neural and sensory effects.
The other organ systems, however, were a 1 so reviewed to complete the examination and to reassure the i n d i v i d u a l . The attending physician was encouraged to make recommendations or referrals for any conditions he detects. Referrals for dermatologic or neurologic disorders which the attending physician felt may be related to exposure to contaminants from
the BSOBweremade to specialists provided by NIOSH and the New York State
Department of Health. Al 1 other referral s were made through the workers ~personal physician.
The consulting physician for dermatologic conditions was Dr. Steven
Cohen. He is associated with the Occupational Skin C l i n i c of the Yale
University School of Medicine, and is well experienced in the diagnosis
of chloracne and other skin lesions associated with PCB exposure. Dr.
Jeffrey Ribner is a board-certified neurologist who maintains a practice
in Binghamton, and he provided neurologic consultations.
The protocol also provides for the determination of serum PCB levels.
Serum wassaved from all persons in the program and w i l l be sent to Hazelton
Raltech, Inc., in Madison, W l , a laboratory well-equipped and q u a l i f i e d in
the detection of PCB in human blood. The type of PCB under investigation
is Aroclor 1254, since this was the type contained in the transformer f l u i d
which was released, and the f ype idencified in the soot retrieved from the
BSOB for testing. Samples of serum saved from those drawn in February and
March, 1981, w i l l also be sent for analysis together with the follow-up
samples to provide for an investigation of change in serum PCB levels over
time. All samples w i l l be labelled so that the laboratory is unaware of
when they were drawn and the patient's exposure status. Control samples
w i l l be added without the laboratory's knowledge to provide q u a l i t y assurance,
and all analyses w i l l be conducted d u r i n g the same time period. This assessment of serum PCB levels w i l l provide important objective evidence of exposure, and w i l l be examined in relation to self-reported exposure, laboratory test results, and c l i n i c a l findings.
Program Participants
The most recent enumeration revealed that the target population consists
of 521 i n d i v i d u a l s (Figure 1), This total represents an increase of 42 from
the original estimate of '479. Three hundred and eighteen of this number
actually entered the BSOB during or after the fire. The remaining 203
persons were predominately those who worked in the adjacent City and County
Office B u i l d i n g s and felt that they were exposed through secondary sources.

�One hundred and eighty-five of the 318 persons who had entered the BSOB
remained there for at least 25 hours. This group included approximately
47 employees of the New York State Office of General Services who were
involved in the i n i t i a l clean-up, approximately 33 private electricians
who removed and replaced the destroyed transformer, and 48 professional
p o l l u t i o n control wo'rkers. The latter group are routinely exposed to
.toxic substances as a function of their occupation. Data w i l l be collected
from these i n d i v i d u a l s by their employer (New England Pollution Control
Company), and analyzed separately from the other persons in the program.
The effective size of the target population is therefore reduced to 473The 33 firemen who extinguished the fi.re were also considered e l i g i b l e
for p h y s i c i a l examinations. Although they were not in the BSOB for 25 or
more hours, they were exposed soon after the PCB's were released from the
transformer oil and w h i l e the chemicals were in a v o l a t i l e state. The
unique nature of their exposure warranted their inclusion in the group
receiving physical examinations.
Conduct of Examinations, Histories, and Labortory Tests
The program officially began in September, 1981, with the receipt of
budget approval for five staff positions and for maintenance and operation.
The worker l i s t s were reviewed and updated. Copies were sent to each
person's employer to notify the organization of the program and to assure
that the l i s t s were complete. NIOSH and New York State Department of
Health representatives held an informational meeting in Binghamton to
instruct the panel of examining physicians on the c l i n i c a l effects of
PCB exposure. Certified letters were sent to the workers informing them
of the arrangements and asking them to take part. The l i s t s of workers
were sent to the hospital to arrange for appointments, and the first
persons were scheduled for October 30, 1981.
The majority of physical examinations, interval medical h i s t o r i e s ,
and laboratory tests were completed by the end of January, 1982. The
numbers of examinations and h i s t o r i e s currently performed are 139, and,
for the laboratory tests, the number is 430. These totals represent
94% and 91%&gt; respectively, of the persons e l i g i b l e for these services.
A d d i t i o n a l efforts were made to contact the non-participants and to
g a i n their cooperation. Saturday appointments have been offered to persons
who were unable to v i s i t the hospital for the necessary procedures during
the week. Seven of 14 dermatology and two of three neurology consultations have been performed. Serum samples are currently being prepared
for shipment to Hazelton Raltech for PCB analyses.
Conduct of Interviews
All persons in the program are also being interviewed. The information collected includes sociodemographic characteristics, pervious medical
problems, tobacco and alcohol consumption, medication currently used, and
a l l e r g i e s . The main purpose of the interview, however, is to gather data
concerning the exposure status of each i n d i v i d u a l . They are asked whether

�they entered the BSOB on or after the date of the fire, and if so, the
dates of their entry, the length of their stay, and their activities.
They are also queried concerning the floors of the BSOB they v i s i t e d ,
the use of protective gear, and l i k e l y routes of exposure. S i m i l a r
questions are posed concerning the surrounding C i t y and County B u i l d i n g s
and parking garage. The interview additionally contains the patient's
report of previous or subsequent chemical exposures.
This information is necessary to update, standardize, and extend
s i m i l a r data gathered by the Broome County Health Department last
February and March. Those who received physical examinations were
interviewed in Johnson City as they arrived for their examination and
interval medical history. The remaining patients are interviewed by
telephone from Albany. Approximately 250 interviews have been completed
to date, or more than 50% of those e l i g i b l e .
P u b l i c Servi ces
Copies of the results are sent to the personal physicians of the
persons in the program. The workers are sent letters asking them to
contact their physician and discuss the significance of the findings.
Informational brochures concerning the program and the health effects
of PCB's and dioxin are enclosed with t h i s correspondence. Persons
without a physician a re'referred to'the Broome County Health Department.
The New York State Health Department's Communications Office has compiled
a binder of materials relating to all aspects of the BSOB Project (cleanup, medical surveillance, environmental sampling, animal toxicity experiments, etc.), which is made a v a i l a b l e to the p u b l i c at l i b r a r i e s , the
SUNY campus, and other locations. Meetings have been held with the Broome
County Medical Society and other groups to inform them of the program.
A New York State Department of Health representative travels to Binghamton
from Albany twice a week to serve as a liason between the community and
the State Health Department and to answer quest-ions concerning the program.
Data Management and Analysis
The physical examinations, interval medical histories, and laboratory tests (including those conducted last winter by the Broome County
Health Department) have been coded, keypunched, and placed on computer
tapes. E d i t programs are being developed to detect errors in processing,
logical inconsistencies, duplicate or missing records, and other problems.
The interviews that have been completed are currently being coded and w i l l
shortly be ready for entry into the computer. A plan to analyze the
data is being developed for N I O S H , and w i l l be implemented by the New York
State Department of Health as soon as possible upon receipt,
sd

�Figure 1

Possible Exposure
(N - 521)

Exposure I n s i d e BSOB
(N = 318)

Exposure Outside BSOB
(N = 203)

L
i

Follow-up Blood Screen

Durat ion &lt; 25 Hrs,
(N = 133)

Follow-up Blood Screen

Durat ion &gt; 25 Hrs.
(N = 185)

Follow-up Blood Screen

Physical Exam

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24207">
              <text>090</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24208">
              <text>2288</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24210">
              <text>Series IV Subseries II</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24205">
                <text>Fitzgerald, Edward F.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24206">
                <text>Susan J. Standfast</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24209">
                <text>Typescript: Summary of Binghamton State Office Building Medical Surveillance Program: Design and Implementation, [nd]</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24211">
                <text>BSOB</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24212">
                <text>health monitoring</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24213">
                <text>health studies</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24214">
                <text>NIOSH</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3253" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1682">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/166a877e1bf030dcaa423c05a3719e0b.pdf</src>
        <authentication>681110039e22d9a0e4971ceb7786c4b3</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63631">
                    <text>Item D Number

02269

Author

Gleit Alan

'

Corporate Author
Report/Article Tltte Typescript: Draft Summary Report of the Medical
Surveillance Program for the Binghamton State Office
Building Decontamination Project, August 7,1985

Journal/Book Title
Year

000

°

Month/Day
Color
Number oflmaflss

D

55

Doscrlpton Notes

Thursday, September 20, 2001

Page 2269 of 2293

�DRAFT

Summary Report of the
Medical Surveillance Program
for the Binghamton State Office Building
Decontamination Project

Prepared for
Versar New York, Inc.

By

Alan Gleit, Ph.D.
Versar, Inc.
P.O. Box 1549
6850 Versar Center
Springfield, Virginia 22151
Arnelle 6. Cohen, M.S.
Biometric Research Institute, Inc.
1401 Wilson Boulevard
Arlington, Virginia 22209
Kenneth H. Chase, M.D.
Washington Occupational Health Associates, Inc.
1120 - 19th Street, N.W., Suite 410
Washington, D.C., 20036

August 7, 1985

�Table of Contents

I.

Introduction

1

II.

Materials and Data Sources

2

A.
B.

Study Population
Health Data

2
2

C.

Exposure Data

4

III.

Methods and Procedures

7

A. Exposure Classification

7

B.

9

Statistical Tests

C. Methods for Reviewing Clinical Data
Statistical Results

14

A.

IV.

11

14

Descriptive Statistics

B. Correlation Analysis

16

C.

16

Cumulative Effect of Potential
Exposure

D.

Regression Analysis

19

E.

Discussion of Clinical Data

19

V.

Conclusion

24

VI.

References

26

Tables
Appendix:

Normal Ranges

�I. INTRODUCTION

As

a

result

Binghamton

State

polychlorinated

of

a

transformer

Office

Building

biphenyls

(PCBs),

and tetrachlorodibenzofurans

fire

on

(BSOB)

5

February

was

1981,

contaminated

tetrachlorodibenzodioxins

the
with

(TCDDs),

(TCDFs) apparently produced by the action

of the fire on the transformer fluid.

With the discovery of TCDD and

TCDF, the initial cleanup effort was halted, the building was shut down
as of 26 February 1981,
York

and an expert panel was convened by the New

State Department of Health on 3 April to define the conditions

under

which

clean-up

activities

building could occur.
BSOB decontamination

and

eventual

re-occupancy

of

the

The worker medical surveillance program of the
project forms a part of the health and safety

plans resulting from the recommendations of this panel.

The

purpose

threefold:

of

the

medical

surveillance

(1) to determine the medical suitability

in the BSOB cleanup,

program

has

been

for participating

(2) to periodically monitor the health status of

members of the cleanup crew, both present and future, and (3) to assess
the efficacy
values

for

of the health and safety
PCS

blood

levels

and

plan by establishing

pertinent

clinical

baseline

parameters-'-.

The objectives of this analysis are:

1.

To describe and summarize data collected during the
medical surveillance program for the cleanup of the
BSOB.

2.

To assess the health status of workers at risk of
hazardous exposure during the cleanup.

3.

To evaluate the efficacy of the protective equipment
and

safety procedures used

hazardous exposure.

to minimize

potentially

�-2II. MATERIALS AND DATA SOURCES

A.

Study Population

All persons entering
required

the BSOB as workers

to participate in the medical

participation

includes

an

entrance

or visitors have been

surveillance

examination,

program.

bi-monthly

Such

interval

evaluations, an annual examination, an exit examination and a follow-up
evaluation.

All

participants

are

identification numbers

based

project.

focuses

This

report

on

male.

their
on

Individuals

are

affiliation with

those

employees who

assigned

the overall
were

in the

building during the earliest phase of the cleanup, i.e. 29 September
1981
The

through 31 December 1983, when potential exposure was greatest.
total number

of

participants

for

whom

both exposure

data and

medical data were available during this time period is 193: 24 Versar,
23 Office of General Services, 139 Allwash contract workers, 3 Broome
County personnel, and 4 individuals designated as visitors.

The suitability of each worker
determined

at

the

entrance

to participate in the program is

examination.

Potentially

disqualifying

conditions for participation in the BSOB cleanup include:
dermatitis,
associated

liver
with

disease,

or

and

aggravated

other

by

conditions

potentially

alcoholism,

thought

hazardous

to

be

exposures.

Primary consideration was given to conditions that could interfere with
the

ability

to

use

protective

equipment

under

non-sedentary

work

conditions.

B.

Health Data

All health data are collected at the examination site, either in
Washington, D.C.
York.

or at Wilson or Lourdes

Hospital

in Binghamton, New

Blood chemistries are analyzed at one of three labs, depending

on the examination

site:

Bionetics laboratory, Wilson laboratory, or

Lourdes laboratory, respectively.

Plasma PCB specimens are split and

�-3shipped

to

each

of

the

following

labs:

Professional

Clinical

Laboratories (PCL) in Wilmington, Delaware and Biomedical Reference
Laboratories (BRL) in Burlington, North Carolina. The normal ranges
from these labs for PCB, SCOT, SGPT, GGTP, triglycerides,
and HDL cholesterol
a standard set of
Kenneth Chase of
(WOHA). Dr. Chase

cholesterol

are shown in Appendix A.
Results are recorded on
forms, as described below, and transmitted to Dr.
Washington Occupational Health Associates, Inc.
then delivers the forms, in batches, to Biometric

Research Institute, Inc. (BRI).
BRI has developed a system of processing forms that results in an
accurate and consistent data set. All forms are processed in batches.
Each batch is reviewed manually and any necessary coding is done. The
batch of forms is then keypunched and machine-verified.
After
keypunching, the data are listed by computer and data coordinators
check keypunching against the original form to identify keypunching
errors.

Errors identified in the visual check are corrected in the

computer file.

The objective of this first phase of data processing is

to ensure data are entered into the computer exactly as recorded on the
original forms by the physician.
The second phase of data processing involves computer listings of
the data to identify missing or out-of-range values. These listings
are reviewed at WOHA and

the corrected copy is returned to BRI.

Resolutions are entered into the system and the computer file is
updated. This data bank contains all available information from the
entrance, interval, annual, exit, and follow-up exams.

and

The entrance examination includes a complete medical, reproductive
occupational/environmental history as well as a comprehensive

physical

examination.

Baseline

laboratory

parameters

include

a

complete blood count with differential and platelet count, urinalysis,
chemistry profile (modified SMAC 20), chest x-ray, pulmonary function
tests, EKG, and plasma PCB level.

�-4All

participants

evaluations.
or

not

scheduled

for

bi-monthly

interval

These evaluations include a determination as to whether

there

evaluation,

are

a

has

been

any

determination

unusual
as

to

exposure

the

since

presence

the

of any

previous

unusual

or

unexplained symptoms, a determination as to the presence or development
of

any

pertinent

dermatologic

findings,

and

liver

function

'(alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, SCOT, SGPT, GGTP).

tests

Plasma PCB

levels are drawn on every other interval examination.

Annual examinations consist of all tests performed at the interval
evaluation plus repeat pulmonary function tests and a chest x-ray.

Exit evaluations include all of the procedures described under the
interval

evaluation

but

in

addition

include

serum

triglyceride,

cholesterol and HDL cholesterol levels and plasma PCB level.

A follow-up

examination

is performed approximately three months

following the exit examination and is identical in scope except that
plasma PCB levels are not included.

Another source of data for evaluating the potential health effects
of

participating

incident

in

reports".

the

decontamination

Workers

were

project

required

to

includes

complete

a

"medical
medical

incident report if they were feeling ill or if they felt that any of
their symptoms were potentially associated with their work in the BSOB.
The

safety

officer

on

site,

who

co-signed

these

reports,

was

responsible for noting any signs of skin contamination as well as any
other corroborating signs of illness.

C.

Exposure Data

As part of the overall health and safety plan, a comprehensive
industrial hygiene monitoring program was developed by Versar to assess

�-5contaminant control and worker exposure during the decontamination of
the BSOB.

These data are summarized and discussed in more detail in

periodic reports published by Versar2.

Industrial hygiene air samples

and

periodically

wipe

samples

have been

determine PCS levels.
surfaces

and

collected

and

analyzed

to

Sample selection sites were chosen to represent

locations inside

the BSOB with a high probability of

contamination or potential worker exposure.

According
industrial

to

Versar

hygiene

(Revised

sampling

26

January

program has

1983

indicated

report),

that the

"the

overall

level of control and containment of contamination is quite effective."
"The concentration of PCBs in the air within
BSOB

ranges

from

0.3

to

ug/m3

2.3

for

the upper floors of the
samples

with

measurable

concentrations except for one sample taken from the 18th floor men's
room in September 1982."
fire

occurred,
3

ug/m )."

A

shows

report

Only "the basement mechanical room, where the

consistently
dated

18

collected in the subbasement

higher

levels

(as

1983,

states

that

July

high

as

air

5.6

samples

area had PCB concentrations of 0.43 and

3

0.48 ug/m .

Routine wipe samples collected in selected areas depicted only one
problem area —
up

by

the floor near the wash water dump —

November

of

"samples collected

1982.
from

The
the

July

floors

contain PCB-1254 in the expected

1983
of

range

batch

the

which was cleaned

report

subbasement

states
and

that

Floor-1

of concentrations for

these

areas."

In addition, as part of a monitoring

program jointly conducted by

Versar and the New York State Health Department Center for Laboratories
and Research,

"air

times

the

within

dibenzofurans,
2,3,7,8-TCDF

samples collected
BSOB

have

been

dibenzodioxins

concentration

from

and

at 15 distinct locations and/or
analyzed

for various
o
j

biphenylenes ".

twelve

locations

chlorinated

"The

sampled

average
when

the

�-6-

building's internal air circulation system was operative was 15.0 ± 3.6
pg/m3". Eadon et al.3 developed a system for estimating 2,3,7,8-TCDD
equivalents, and determined that the relative toxicity for air samples
containing mixtures of chlorinated dioxins, furans and biphenylenes to
be equivalent to about 14 pg/m3 of 2,3,7,8-TCDD. This value was within
the range of suggested guidelines for re-entry into the building, as
established by the risk assessment of Kim and Hawley .
An additional, but unquantifiable source of potential exposure
data, is "exposure incident reports" filed by Allwash employees.
Workers were required to report all incidents of potential direct
contact with contaminated soot as well as any malfunction of their
protective equipment (e.g., tear in tyvek suit, tear in glove, or loss
of respirator seal) to the on-site health and safety officer. These
reports were then sent to Washington, D.C. where they were included in
the employee's permanent folder. It was anticipated that working in
sometimes cramped areas with bulky cleanup equipment would occasionally
result in a tear or dampening of the employee's disposable tyvek suit.
The usual procedure was to temporarily "break out" of their garmets,
undergo appropriate personal decontamination and cleaning if necessary,
and then change into a new suit and resume work. Workers were not
penalized or discouraged from filing these reports so it is felt that
this source of data is a fairly reliable means for evaluating the
efficiency of the protective equipment and safety procedures.

�— 7—

III.

A.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

Exposure Classification

When

attempting to classify workers

by potential

occupational

exposure to hazardous substances, it is preferable to assess individual
exposure status rather than grouping employees by crude indices of
exposure, such as general job titles or place of employment.
especially
that the

This is

desirable if industrial hygiene monitoring data suggests
opportunities or routes of potential exposure differ

significantly between workers. In their initial status report for the
BSOB medical surveillance program, the State of New York and NIOSH
investigators created an exposure index score which was computed as a
multiplicative function of five factors:

location in BSOB, type of

activity, whether or not protective clothing was worn by workers,
number of hours in the BSOB, and the actual PCB air levels on various
dates in the BSOB-*. Each factor was weighted by a number reflecting
its relative magnitude, as determined from studies in the literature,
with "number of hours in the BSOB" being the most significant factor.
The feasibility of developing a similar index for workers involved
in the Versar medical surveillance program was investigated by on-site
toxicologists

and

industrial

hygienists.

The

following

factors

mitigate the ability to create a similar exposure index in this study
population:

(1) unlike the initial cleanup crew, all workers were

required to wear full-face respirators and protective clothing when in
the building in addition to taking other precautions to minimize
potential exposure-'-; (2) PCB air levels documented during this time
period (i.e., 9/81 - 12/83), were much lower than those during the
initial fire fighting and immediate cleanup phase^; and (3) although
there may be qualitative differences in the nature and opportunity for

�-8-

PCB exposure between individual workers or specific job duties, workers
in this study were known to rotate on various teams on a daily and
weekly basis and individual job assignments were not available to
confidently group workers on this basis. As part of the medical
surveillance and safety program administered by Versar, the total
number

of hours

actually

spent in the building was collected

on

everyone who entered the BSOB. After careful consideration, this
measurement was determined to be the best available indicator of
potential exposure.
Differential exposure due to type of activity is accounted for by
performing all analyses on two subsets of the population. One group
(N=129) is composed of the Allwash contract employees, workers who have
the greatest likelihood of contact with contaminated soot by virtue of
their
cleanup
activities
(e.g.
scrubbing
ceilings, vacuuming
fireproofing, etc.). The second group (N=64) is comprised of all
"other" participants in the cleanup project, namely Versar, O.G.S.,
Broome County personnel, visitors, and 10 Allwash employees working in
a supervisory capacity. The individuals
in this subset are
predominantly supervisors or short-term visitors whose exposure to
potentially toxic substances per hour spent in the building is likely
to be less than that of the Allwash employees.
Examination of the frequency distribution of number of hours in
the building indicates that reasonable cut-off points can be identified
to represent different exposure categories. The Allwash employees for
whom complete PCB data was available (100/129) were used to determine
these cut-offs.
They were then applied to the two subsets of the
population for statistical analysis.

�-9-

The

population naturally

divides itself

into three groups as

depicted in the histogram shown in Figure 1. These groups have the
following ranges: Group I, 0-400 hours; Group II, 401-979 hours; and
Group III, 980-3500 hours. These ranges hold true for the distribution
of Allwash workers, as well as Other participants (see Figure 2 and 3);
however, a substantial number of participants in the 200-500 hours
range did not have complete PCB data.

For the purpose of statistical

analyses, the "least-likely" exposure category will form Group I, Group
II will be comprised of the "less-likely" exposure group and Group III
will represent the "most-likely" exposure category. The distribution
of exposure category by study subset is depicted in Table 1. Within
each subset, approximately 50% of the population falls into the lowest
exposure category.
Table 2 shows the distribution of study
participants by job classification and exposure category.
B.

Statistical Tests

Adopting similar procedures to those utilized by the New York
State Health Department investigators, some analyses will preserve the
original scaling of hours spent in BSOB, while other analyses will
utilize the distinct exposure categorizations. The advantage of the
first approach is that it maintains the interval nature of the data
which is desirable for assessing time trends and dose-response
relationships. Categorization of potential exposure status by hours in
BSOB allows the use of group means to estimate the significance of
differences between potential exposure status, PCB blood levels, and
biochemical parameters. The data have been analyzed as follows: (1)
descriptive
statistics;
(2) correlation
analysis; (3) possible
cumulative effect of potential exposure; and (4) regression analysis.
Descriptive statistics
Descriptive statistics have been calculated to provide an overview
of the characteristics of the study population as a whole, as well as
by exposure category (as defined

above).

This

stage of

analysis

�-10includes frequency distributions of variables such as age, dermatogical
symptoms, and

history

of alcohol

abuse.

The

chi-square

test

of

association was used to assess significant differences between exposure
groups.
Plasma PCB values, biochemical parameters, and other continuous
variables being analyzed have been tested for normality.
Whenever
appropriate, log transformations of the data have been used. If
neither the original data nor the transformed data approached a normal
distribution, nonparametric methods were applied.
Correlation analysis
In order to evaluate whether potential exposure
to PCB
contaminated soot had subclinical effects on liver function, plasma PCB
levels were compared to the three most sensitive liver function tests,
i.e., SCOT, SGPT and GGTP.

The normal distribution and nonparametric

correlation coefficients between plasma PCB levels and each of these
parameters were analyzed for Allwash employees and Other participants
separately.
Correlation coefficients and probability values were
tabulated using the latest time interval possible.
Cumulative effect of potential exposure
The cumulative effect of potential exposure in the BSOB was
assessed in the following manner.
All analyses described were
performed twice: once for the subset of Allwash workers only, and once
for the subset of Other employees. This analysis compared baseline
values to values on the last exam, whether interval or exit, for each
particular subject by exposure category. Because of the small number
of Other employees, particularly in Group II, Group I and II were
combined for statistical purposes.

Ideally, Group II should have been

�-11combined with Group III, but because of the potential exposure in Group
III it was decided to report on them separately. Thus, for each
parameter considered, five distinct groups of individuals were analyzed
(three Allwash and two Other). The last visit date varies considerably
within the population; however, this method is most likely to assess
the highest cumulative dose. The null hypothesis being tested is that
the difference between the baseline and final test means in each
exposure category equals zero. The mean differences of each group were
statistically compared using paired t-tests.
Another analysis of the cumulative effect of potential exposure
evaluated possible differences in the final examination (interval or
exit) values for various parameters for the three groups of Allwash
employees

and

for

the

two groups

of

Other employees.

The

null

hypothesis being tested is that the mean level of the groups are all
equal. The analysis was performed both parametrically (Analyses of
Variance) and nonparametrically (Wilcoxon).
Regression analysis
Possible time trends in the PCB and biochemical measurements as a
function of the length of time t that individuals spent in the BSOB
were evaluated. For each participant, the final interval or exit
values were used as a proxy for the values when last in the building.
Linear regression was performed to determine
measurements were related to the time t.
C.

whether

these

final

Methods for Reviewing Clinical Data

The most reliable means of monitoring potential health effects is
prompt recognition and reporting of signs and symptoms of illness, both
by the worker himself in the form of self initiated medical incident

�-12reports (with appropriate follow-up) and by the examining physician at
the bi-monthly interval examination. This method identifies all cases
of frank toxicity as well as most cases of immediate concern, such as
grossly abnormal biochemical tests and any cases of elevated plasma PCB
levels.
As mentioned previously in the discussion of the medical
surveillance program, Dr. Chase periodically monitors summary reports
of all clinical data. During this process, employees with moderately
or significantly altered biochemical tests can be identified and
notified for further evaluation. Two employees who were identified as
having significantly altered liver function tests are discussed in
section IV.
Individual records of all 129 Allwash workers employed between 29
September 1981 and 31 December 1983 were reviewed and the symptoms and
signs listed on the medical incident reports were summarized. The
frequency of these symptoms can only be crudely compared to those
listed at the time of baseline examination because unlike the initial
survey, all workers were not asked a standard set of questions at a
given point in time. Instead, workers were instructed to complete a
medical incident report if they felt ill. Although in most cases,
these symptoms can reasonably be presumed to be associated with the
circumstances of their employment on the day the report was filed, it
is also necessary to keep in mind that Allwash employees, like everyone
else, develop seasonal colds and are involved in non-work related
accidents.

These conditions could be aggravated by being garbed in a

full-body

tyvek

suit

all

day

while

working

under

sometimes

environmentally stressful circumstances.
Similarly, individual records of all 129 Allwash workers were
examined, and all exposure incident reports were reviewed and
summarized. The safety officer on-site who was responsible for signing
off on exposure incident reports was obligated to note on the report if

�-13he saw evidence of coverall or skin contamination. The distribution of
Allwash employees filing exposure incident reports was then examined by
exposure category in an effort to determine if workers who quit or
spent few hours in the BSOB may have experienced more intensive
circumstances of exposure. These workers may have filed more incident
reports or may have reported more instances of direct contact.
Alternatively, it would reasonably be expected that workers who were
employed longer would naturally encounter more opportunities for
protective equipment failure. This comparison would also investigate
whether multiple exposure incident reports were filed by few or many
workers.
Many previous studies have demonstrated a positive correlation
between plasma PCB levels and age, length of employment (or exposure)
and intensity of exposure among workers exposed to PCB fluids.6&gt;?&gt;8 jn
lieu of personal PCB air levels, the relationship between the frequency
of exposure incident reports filed by Allwash employees was compared to
the PCB blood level. The hypothesis being tested is that those workers
who filed more exposure incident reports should have higher plasma PCB
levels. The chi square test was then used to test for a statistically
significant difference.
In an effort to identify those individuals thought to be at
highest risk of potential exposure, all Allwash employees who filed
twenty or more exposure incident reports were identified. Their latest
interval or exit laboratory tests were then examined to determine if
there was any evidence of liver toxicity in those individuals who
presumably were at highest risk for direct contact with contaminated
soot.

�-14IV.

STATISTICAL RESULTS

The results will be presented in five sections as described in the
rationale:

(A) descriptive statistics; (B) correlation analysis;

(C)

analysis of the cumulative effect of potential exposure; (D) regression
analysis; and (E) discussion of clinical data.

For Section A through

D, the results for Allwash employees and Other employees are presented
separately.
measurements

In

addition,

were several

two

participants

whose

liver

function

levels of magnitude larger than any others

were excluded from all analyses other than the descriptive statistics
so they would not skew the results.

These two cases are discussed in

Section E.

A.

Descriptive Statistics

The age distribution of Allwash

employees

(Table

3) reveals a

relatively young population, with 88 percent less than 35 years of age.
Only 2 percent of Allwash employees are 45 or older.

This pattern is

generally maintained among individuals in the middle and upper exposure
categories, in which 50 percent of the population is 15 to 24 years old
and 100 percent are younger than 45.

Group I, representing workers who

are least likely to be exposed to PCBs, is more diverse, having fewer
people under 25 (36%)

and over twice as many people age 35 or older

(18% vs. 7% and 3%) than does Group II or III.

Among Other employees (Table 4) most people were 25 to 44 years of
age (64%) with 14 percent under 25 and 22 percent age 45 or older.

The

largest variation among exposure categories occurs in Group II in which
all eight employees
small

number

of

(100%) are under

employees

under

25

35.

Group I has a relatively

(3%),

but

distribution is consistent with that of Group III.

the

overall

age

�-15-

The distribution of age by exposure category among Allwash
employees from whom exposure category was assessed (i.e., those with
complete PCB data) is similar to the subset of total Allwash employees.
This distribution is depicted in Table 5.
As mentioned previously, all employees were asked to complete a
detailed questionnaire at their entrance exam, before entering the
building, which focused on conditions thought to be associated or
aggravated by potentially hazardous exposures. It should be noted that
chloracne, a specific dermatological condition requiring a tissue
specimen and histological diagnosis that has been associated with
exposure to chlorinated hydrocarbons, was grouped with "acne" on the
original baseline questionnaire. Positive responses to this question
do not necessarily imply that some workers had documented chloracne at
the time of beginning work in the BSOB. Furthermore, it should be
appreciated that mere reporting of ever having a history of liver
hepatitis or dermatitis were not disqualifying conditions if they were
not active at the time of physical examination. Baseline symptoms
reported by the employee or examining physician were tested, using
Chi-square, for any association with exposure category. No significant
(p &lt; .05) associations were found, i.e., the groups were about the same
prior to entering the BSOB.
Among Allwash employees, the most commonly self-reported symptoms
at the entrance exam (Table 6) were acne or chloracne in Group I (18%),
thickening in Group II (25%), and both skin irritation or burning and
acne or chloracne in Group III (18%). The baseline symptoms most
frequently reported at the entrance exam by the physician (Table 7)
were thickening in Group I (25%) and rash in Group II (32%) and III
(26%).
Among Other employees, rash was the most frequently self-reported
symptom at the entrance exam in Group I/II (17%). In Group III, rash
was tied with skin irritation or burning and acne or chloracne at 17

�-16-

percent each (Table 8).

Rash was the symptom most frequently reported

by physicians at the entrance exam in both exposure categories (Table
9) with 22 percent in Group I/II and 30 percent in Group III.

The case records of Allwash and Other employees in Group II and
III who reported history of any hepatic-related problems were evaluated
to

assess

their

impact

on

the

results.

The

presence

of

conditions

was not controlled for in the remaining

analyses

very

employees

those

few

reported

these

problems

and

these
because

who

did,

experienced them many years ago without recurrence.

All

participants

reporting

any

unusual

exposure

or

breach of

safety regulations, adverse health effects, or abnormal findings were
identified.

The

frequency

and

nature

of

these

complaints

are

summarized in the discussion of clinical data.

B.

Correlation Analysis

Plasma

PCB

levels

(separately

analyzed

at

PCL

and

BEL

laboratories) were tested for correlation with the three biochemical
parameters

SCOT, SGPT,

and

available time interval.

GGTP.

Data

were used

from the

latest

The possible association of these parameters

was evaluated using the normal Pearson correlation coefficient as well
as

the nonparametric Spearman

correlation coefficient.

results were statistically significant (p &lt;

None of the

.05).

C.

Cumulative Effect of Potential Exposure

The

difference

statistically analyzed
the following

between
(paired

parameters:

baseline

and

final

measurements

t-test) within each exposure group for

plasma PCB (analyzed at PCL Lab and

Lab), SCOT, SGPT, GGTP, triglycerides, cholesterol and HDL.
on the entrance exam

was

was

subtracted from the value

BRL

The value

on the latest

interval or exit exam; therefore, when the mean difference is positive,
the value of the parameter increased over time and when it is negative,

�-17the value of the parameter decreased over time.

The results are

depicted in Tables 10 a &amp; b to 17 a &amp; b. The entrance and last exam
means are based on all available data; the mean difference is based on
results from the paired t-test, and so, may include fewer observations.
PCBs
Baseline and final values for plasma PCB levels were compared to
normal ranges obtained from the laboratories.

All values were within

the normal range; most values were at or below the minimal detection
limits. The ranges and means of PCB values for Allwash employees by
exposure group are as follows:

Exposure, lab

Entrance Exam
Range (Mean)

Last Exam
Range (Mean)

Group I, Pa
Group I, BRL

0 - 15 (5.85)
3 - 13 (5.09)

5 - 1 6 (5.44)
3 - 9 (4.83)

Group II, PCL
Group II, BRL

5 - 9 (5.19)
3 - 9 (4.19)

5 - 5 (5.00)
3 - 6 (3.44)

Group III, PCL
Group III, BKL

5 - 8 (5.09)
3 - 1 1 (4.30)

5 - 8 (5.12)
3 - 8 (4.24)

Plasma PCB values from the PCL Laboratory did not exhibit any
significant differences between baseline and final measurements. Of
the five average differences, however, three are negative, one is
"zero," and only one is positive (Group III Others) from baseline to
final measurements. Plasma PCB values from the BRL Laboratory showed
one significant difference

(Group

I/II Others).

All five of the

average differences were negative and two values (Allwash Group I and
II) were close to significantly (p = .06) negative. Thus, in general,
plasma PCB levels decreased for individuals in this study though, on
average, not significantly.

�-18Other Biochemical Parameters
Average baseline and final values for selected blood chemistry
parameters were compared to normal ranges obtained from the hospitals.
The group means for the liver enzyme parameters SCOT, SGPT, and GGTP
were always well within the normal range. Triglyceride levels were
slightly high for Group III Allwash employees (both baseline and final)
relative to the Bionetics Laboratory scale but were normal for the
Lourdes and Wilson Hospital scales.
Both baseline and final
cholesterol levels were slightly high for Other employees (Groups I/II
and III) relative to the Bionetics Laboratory scale but were normal for
the two hospital scales.
ranges.

The HDL levels were all within the normal

Values for SCOT, SGPT, triglycerides, and HDL did not exhibit any
significant differences between baseline and final measurements.
Average levels sometimes went up and sometimes went down.
GGTP levels changed significantly for Group III employees (both
Allwash and Others) as well as for Group II Allwash employees.
Individuals with high exposure, on average, had much lower values at
the end than at the beginning (mean difference of 12.83 and 9.53
lower). The differences for the other two groups did not exhibit any
consistent pattern.
In general, GGTP levels decreased for study
participants, especially for those with medium or large exposure.
Cholesterol
employees.

levels

changed

significantly

for Allwash

Group I

Allwash individuals with low exposure, on average, had much

lower (average decrease 9.44) cholesterol values at the end than at the
beginning. Also, the averages for all groups of Allwash employees went
down. Group III Others also decreased while Groups I/II Others groups
of Allwash employees went down. Group III Others also decreased while
Groups I/I1 Others remained the same, on average.

Thus, in general,

cholesterol levels declined for all study participants.

�-19Analysis of variance and Wilcoxon tests were performed on the
final measurement values for PCBs (from both labs), SCOT, SGPT, GGTP,
triglycerides, cholesterol, and HDL to determine whether

the mean

levels for the different exposure groups were the same. The only
significant ANOVA was for Allwash employees for PCBs from the BRL Lab.
Furthermore,

the mean levels do not vary linearly with length of

exposure. The only significant Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test result was for
GGTP among Allwash employees.
In addition, the means decrease as
exposure increases.
D.

Regression Analysis

To assess possible time trends in the PCB and biochemical data,
linear regression models were run using time in the BSOB as the
independent variable and final PCB levels (from both labs), SCOT, SGPT,
and GGTP as dependent variables. The only statistically significant
slope occurs for GGTP among Other employees (slope=-0.0003) showing a
slight decline in its level with time spent in the BSOB. Two other
values are almost significant (p=.07 level): these are for PCBs (BRL
Lab) for Others (slope=-0.0006) and SCOT for Others (slope=0.002). All
four slopes for PCBs are negative, both slopes for SCOT are positive,
and both slopes for GGTP are negative (one is significant).
E.

Discussion of Clinical Data

The frequency distribution of symptoms reported by Allwash
employees on the medical incident reports is summarized in Table 20.
The two most prevalent findings were complaints of feeling nauseous and
reports of blunt trauma and minor bruises. The latter findings are not
atypical of any group of industrialized workers.
Because the same
individual could have filed more than one report, or could have listed
more than one chief complaint on the same medical incident report, the
true prevalence of these symptoms among all workers within a particular

�-20-

exposure group cannot be determined.
feeling nauseous

among

34 workers

The reporting of 35 cases

of

in Group III may be attributed to

working longer hours under environmentally stressful conditions or may
be

a manifestation of

toxicity.

the cumulative effects of low level

chronic

In order to adjust for the differences in time spent in the

BSOB as well as differences In the size of the populations, a crude
index of the average number of reported cases per hour spent in the
BSOB was calculated and used to compare across groups.

By dividing the

number of cases of feeling nauseous in Group I and III (6 and 35) by
the average number of hours spent in the BSOB for these same groups
(184 hrs. and 1757 hrs.) it was determined that there were .033 cases
per hour reported for Group I compared to .020

for Group III.

The

results of similar calculations are shown in parentheses in Table 20.
This would suggest that spending longer time in the BSOB, and therefore
presumably at higher risk of potential exposure, is not
associated with a higher incidence of ill symptoms.
in which

the

Group

musculoskeletal pain.

III reports per

hour

were

necessarily

The only instance

clearly

higher

was

Most of these cases were due to low back pain

possibly associated with long hours in the cramped work conditions at
the BSOB.

The frequency distribution of all sources
reported
summarized

by
in

Allwash
Table

employees
21.

in

Clearly,

exposure
the

of equipment failure
incident

most

frequent

reports

is

source

of

"equipment failure" was tear in the outer layer of a glove or tyvek
suit.

If these incidents did not occur during a time when the worker

was actually involved in cleaning up of contaminated soot or were not
associated with evidence of skin or coverall contamination, then they
were listed as such in the incident report.

There were, however, a

total of 44 reported incidents involving the loss of a tyvek suit seal
and a total of 40 cases of a torn glove, all with evidence —
dampened or soiled skin —
of

of skin or coverall contamination.

usually
In all

these cases, however, workers underwent immediate decontamination

procedures and no cases of unresolving contact dermatitis or chloracne

�-21-

have been reported.

Table 21 also demonstrates that, in general, Group

III workers filed more reports in total; however, the number of reports
per hour spent in the BSOB was not higher.

Table 22A demonstrates that individual workers
more

likely

individuals

to

file

multiple

exposure

incident

in Group III were
reports.

Nineteen

in Group III filed 11 or more exposure incident reports.

Again, this occurrence is probably a reflection of the greater number
of hours spent in the BSOB.

In order to investigate the relationship between PCB blood levels
and length of potential exposure, PCB blood levels were compared to the
frequency of reporting potential contact with contaminated soot (Table
22b).

There is no evidence to suggest that the group of workers at

highest risk of exposure
levels.
more

to contaminated

soot had higher plasma PCB

To investigate this further, all those workers who filed 20 or

exposure

interval

incident

or exit

summarized

in

exam

Table

reports

were

identified

PCB blood levels

23.

and

All laboratory

and

their

latest

liver function studies

values

were

within

normal

limits.

As mentioned previously, two Allwash employees were identified who
had grossly abnormal
exit

examinations.

indicates
these

liver enzyme measurements at the time of their
Careful

evaluation

of

these

individuals'

cases

that their work in the BSOB was probably not a cause for

abnormalities.

Unfortunately,

neither

of

these

two

workers

reported for their three month follow-up exam, so it is unknown whether
these enzyme levels have since returned to normal.

Employee number

one is a 22 year

old white

male who had his

entrance examination

in January, 1982, and first entered the building

in February, 1982.

At that time his liver enzyme measurements

well within
IU/liter).

the normal ranges

(SCOT of

were

17 lU/liter and SGPT of 13

There was no indication at that time of any liver problems.

Values for these liver enzyme measurements remained relatively constant
on the interval examinations

on 24 March, 26 May, 3 August, and 28

�-22September 1982. The employee last entered the BSOB in November 1982.
During the time the employee was actively working in the BSOB he filed
numerous minor exposure incident reports, most of which were for torn
gloves and tyvek suit tears. During his March examination he did
report that there had been one incident in which he felt there was
potential for exposure. The exposure report for this incident stated
that charcoal and water had entered the employee's tyvek suit around
the wrists and that "some irritation was noted around the left wrist
and lower left abdomen, but subsided after showering". The examining
physician reported slightly red and swollen eyelids at the employee's
March interval examination but his exam was otherwise unremarkable.
The employee denied any subsequent instances of possible exposure
on his next three interval examinations as well as at the time of his
exit examination.
employee

did

During his exit examination on 12 January 1982 the

complain

of

itching

and

skin

irritation which

the

examining physician at that time described as dermatographia. Liver
enzyme measurements at this time were markedly elevated: SCOT 307
IU/1, SGPT 480 IU/1 and GGPT 184 IU/1. Plasma PCB blood levels as
measured by the Wilmington and Burlington laboratories were 5 and 3
ppb, respectively.

In view of the low PCB blood levels and no report

of possible direct contact with soot for at least 9 months prior to
developing these liver enzyme elevations, it is unlikely that these
abnormalities are the result of any hazardous exposures while working
in the BSOB. Elevated liver enzymes in this ratio are, however,
suggestive of infectious hepatitis which the employee could
developed in the 2 months since his last employment in the BSOB.

have

Employee number two is a 21 year old white male who had his
entrance examination in February, 1983, and first entered the building
in February. At that time his liver enzyme measurements were well
within the normal ranges (SCOT of 23 IU/1). There was no indication at
that time of any liver problems. Values for SCOT remained relatively
constant on the interval examinations in March and May 1983. Incidents

�-23-

with dust in his mask and torn gloves were reported at the May, 1983,
interval examination.

At that May examination the physician reported

no abnormal findings (including liver abnormalities).
the building in July, 1983.

He last entered

At the exit examination in August, 1983,

the value for SCOT jumped by a factor of fifteen to 446 IU/1.

The

employee's

and

Burlington

plasma

PCB

laboratories

levels

as

measured

by

the

Wilmington

were 5 and 7 ppb, respectively.

Although the

employee did report possible contact with some "dust" at the time of
the exit examination,

low plasma PCB levels and the absence of any

history of substantive exposures make it unlikely
was exposed to any hazardous substances.

that this employee

Significantly elevated SCOT

and slightly elevated SGPT liver enzyme values in the absence of any
other

abnormal

liver

function

tests

(e.g.,

bilirubin,

alkaline

phosphatase, GGTP) is frequently seen as a response to short term binge
alcohol comsumption.

�-24-

V. CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the results for specific biochemical parameters are
summarized and an overall explanation of the findings is presented.
Table 19 summarizes the statistically significant results.
o

PCBs (PCL Lab); The t-test indicated that in general there
was a tendency for the serum values to decline from baseline
to final examinations. The regressions indicated a general
decline of values with length of time in the BSOB.

o

PCBs (BRL Lab);

The results are similar to those found using

the BRL data but in this case are more pronounced and
sometimes significant.
o

SCOT; In general, the regressions indicated a slight rise in
values as the length of time increased in the BSOB. The
t-tests offered no clear pattern for possible changes within
groups.

o

GGTP; The t-test indicated a general trend for GGTP values
to decrease from baseline to final examination with
significant

decreases

for

the

high

and

medium

exposure

groups. The regression analyses also indicated a general
trend (significant for Others, suggestive for Allwash) for
lower final examination values for those with more hours in
the BSOB. Finally, the nonparametric Wilcoxon test showed a
significant decline in average GGTP values for the Allwash
employees with time spent in the BSOB (grouped data).

�-25o

Cholesterol; The t-test, in general, showed declining levels
from baseline to final examinations (significantly lower only
for low exposure Allwash employees).

o

SGPT, Triglycerides, HDL; Nothing even suggestive can be
said regarding these biochemical parameters based on our
analysis.

When evaluating the significance of these results, the following
must be considered.
First, even though there were statistically
significant findings, they may be of limited clinical importance due to
the fact that the mean level for every group and every parameter were
well within normal ranges.

Second, the transfer of these results to

other populations may be limited by the fact that the Allwash employees
(and to a lesser extent, the Other employees) were younger and
healthier than the average profile for American adult males. Third,
all statistical tests were performed at the 5% level so that chance
alone would dictate finding about 5% of the comparisons significant if
there were no real effects.
In conclusion, among the employees in this study for whom
protective equipment and safety procedures were used to minimize
potentially hazardous exposure, the health status of the workers was
not substantially affected, overall, by potential exposure to the toxic
contaminants in the BSOB.

�-26-

VI.

REFERENCES

1.

Versar New York Inc., 1981. General health and safety plan for
cleanup of Binghamton State Office Building.

2.

Versar New York Inc., 1983. Revised Summary Report. Industrial
hygiene monitoring to assess contaminant control and potential
worker exposure during cleaning of the Binghamton State Office
Building.

3.

Eadon G, Aldous K, Hilker D, O'Keefe P and Smith R. 1983.
Chemical data on air samples from the Binghamton State Office
Building. Unpublished data by the Center for Laboratories and
Research, New York State Department of Health.

4.

Kim NK and Hawley J. 1983. Revised risk assessment: Binghamton
State Office Building. Draft document by the Division of Health
Risk Control, New York State Department of Health.

5.

Fitzgerald EF, Melius JM, Standfast JJ, Janerich DT, Beckerman BS
and Youngblood LG. 1983. Status report for the Binghamton State
Office Building Medical Surveillance Program.
Division of
Community Health and Epidemiology, New York State Department of
Health.

6.

Smith AB et al. 1982.
Metabolic and health consequences of
occupational exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs).
British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 39:361-369.

7.

Maroni M et al. 1981. Occupational exposure to polychlorinated
biphenyls II, Health Effects.
British Journal of Industrial
Medicine, 38:55.

8.

Chase KH, Wong 0, Thomas D, Berney BW and Simon RK.
1982.
Clinical and metabolic abnormalities associated with occupational
exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls. Journal of Occupational
Medicine, 24:109-114.

�Figure 1
H I S T O G R A M OF NUMBER OF HOURS IN BSOB FOR A L I W A S H EMPLOYEES W I T H PC8 D A T A
(N=100)
FREQUENCY BAR CHART

FREQUENCY Group I t

1

2

0
0

0
0

3
0
0

4
0
0

Group II

5
0
0

6
0
0

7

a

0

0
0

0

Group

9
0
0

1 i
i
n 0
0

0

0

1
2
0
0

III

1
3
0
0

1
4
0
0

1

5

1
t&gt;

0
0

0
0

1 1
7
0
0

8
0
0

1
9
0
0

2
0
0
0

EXPTIME MIDPOINT

2
1
0
0

2
2
0
0

2
3
0
0

2
4
0
0

2

2

5

6
0
0

0
0

2
7
0
0

2
8
0
0

2
9
0
0

3
0
0
0

3
1
0
0

3
2
0
0

3

3

3

3
0
0

4
0
0

5
0
0

�Figure 2
HISTOGRAM OF NUMBER OF HOURS IN BSOB FOH ALLWASH EMPLOYEES
&lt;N=129)
FHEQUENCY BAR CHAPT
FREQUENCY

Group III

Group I

30

15

10

1
0
0

2
0
0

3

0
0

4
0
0

5
0
0

6
0
0

7
0
0

8
0
0

9
0
0

1
0
0
0

1 1
1 2

1

1

1

3

5

0
0

0
0

4
0
0

0
0

0
0

1
6

1

n

7
0

0

0

1 1

ft
0
0

9
0
0

2
0

2
1

2
2

0

0
0

0
0

0

E/PTIME MIDPOINT

2
3
0
0

2
4
0
0

2
5
0
0

2

2

6
0
0

7
0
0

2
8
0
0

2
9
0

0

3
0
0
0

3
1
0
0

3
2
0
0

3
3
0
0

3

3

4

5

0
0

0
0

�Figure 3
HISTOGRAM OF MUMdER OF HOURS IN BSOR FOR OTHER EMPLOYEES
(N=64)
FREQUENCY BAR CHART

FREQUENCY

Group I

Group II

Group III

30

20

15

.10

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 H 9 0 1 2 3 &lt; t b b 7 8 ' 3 0 1 2 3 4 5
O O O O O O O O O O O O O -O O O O O O O O O O O U O O O O O O O O O O

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
EXPTIME MIDPOINT

�Table 1
Distribution of Exposure Category by Study Subset

Subset
EXPOSURE
CATEGORY

Allwash with
PCB Data
//
()
%

Total Allwash
//

()
%

Other

#

()
%

Group I

46

(6
4)

67

( 52)

33

(52)

Group II

20

(20)

28

( 22)

8

(12)

Group III

34

(4
3)

34

( 26)

23

(6
3)

(100)

129

(100)

•64

TOTAL

100

(100) ,

�Table 2
Distribution of Study Participants
By Job Classification and Exposure Category

JOB

CLASSIFICATION

EXPOSURE
CATEGORY
SUBSET
Allwash

N

GO

OTHER

Other

N

()
%

Versar

TOTAL

N

(%)

N

()
%

O.G.S.

N

()
%

Misc.*

Supervisory

N

()
%

N

(%)

Group I

67

( 52) 33

( 52) 100 ( 52) 15

( 62)

9

( 39) 2

( 20)

7

(100)

Group II

28

( 22) 8

( 12) 36 ( 19)

4

( 17) 3

( 13) 1

( 10) 0

( 0)

Group III

34

( 26) 23

( 36)

5

( 21) 11

( 48)

( 70) 0

( 0)

(100)

(100)

7

(100)

TOTAL //(%)

129

(100)

64

(100)

57 ( 29)

193 (100)

24

* Includes 3 Broorae County personnel and 4 visitors

23

7

10

(100)

�Table 3
Age Distribution of Allwash Employees by Exposure Category

Exposure Category
Age (Yrs.)
Group 11

Group I

()
%

//

#

Total

Group III

()
%

(%)

if

f

()
%

15-24

24

(36)

14

(50)

17

(50)

55

. (42)

25-34

31

(46)

.12

(3
4)

16

(47)

59

(46)

35-44

10

-2

( 7)

2

0

1
( 0) .0

( 3) 1.3
2
(0)

(10)

45-54

(1?)
( 3)

( 2)

55-64

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

0

( 0) 0

( 0)

&gt;65

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

TOTAL

67

(100)

2S

(100)

34

(100)

129

(100)

�Table 4

Age Distribution of Other Study Participants by Exposure Category

Exposure Category
Age (Yrs.)
Group II

Group I

//

()
%

15-24

1

( 3)

25-34

9

35-44

Group III

()
%

//

0

Total

()
%

//

()
%

(12)
(8
8)

7

(30)

9

(14)

(27)

1
7

5

(22)

21

(33)

14

(43)

0

( 0)

6

(26)

20

(31)

45-54

5

(15)

0

( 0) . 3

(13)

8

(12)

55-64

3

( 9)

0

( 0) 2

(9)

5

( 8)

&gt;65

1

( 3)

0

( 0)

( 0) 1

( 2)

TOTAL

33

(100)

8

(100)

0

23

(100)

64

(100)

�Table 5
Age Distribution of Allwash Employees by Exposure Category
for Those with Complete PCB Data

Exposure Category
Age (Yrs.)
Group I

()
%

//
15-24

15

25-34

21

35-44

9

45-54

1

Group 11

//

( 33) 11

a)

( 55)

Total

Group III

()
%

//
17
16

43

( 43)
( 46)

55-64

0

9
( 20) 0
0
( 2)
0
( 0)

&gt;65

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

TOTAL

46

(100)

20

(100)

34

(100)

100

(100)

( 45)

( 45)
( 0)
1

' ( 50)

()
%

//

( 0)

0

( 47) 46
( 3)
10
( 0)
1

( 0)

0

( 0)

0

( 1)
( 0)

( 10)

�Table 6
Frequency Distribution of Baseline Symptoms
Reported by Allwash Employees
According to Exposure Category

EXPOSURE CATEGORY

SYMPTOMS

Group I (N=67)
#
(%)

Group II (N=28)
#
(%)

Group III (N=34)
#
(%)

Skin irritation or burning

9

(13)

6

(21)

6

(18)

Rash

6

( 9)

3

(11)

3

( 9)

12

(18)

6

(21)

6

(18)

Thickening

9

(13)

7

(25)

4

(12)

Hyperpigmentation

3

( 4)

3

(11)

2

( 6)

Nail discoloration

2

( 3)

0

( 0)

2

( 0)

12

(18)

9

(32)

5

(15)

Acne or chloracne

Other dermatologic symptoms

Eye irritation or burning

4

( 6)

1

( 4)

3

( 9)

Eye discharge

2

( 3)

0

( 0)

2

( 6)

Swelling of eyelids

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

Other ophthalmic symptoms

2

( 3)

2

( 7)

1

( 3)

Any history of liver dysfunction

2

(3)

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

Any history of hepatitis

2

( 3)

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

Any history of yellow jaundice

2

( 3)

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

Any history of alcohol abuse

1

( 1)

1

( 4)

2

( 6)

Other hepatic symptoms

2

( 3)

0

( 0)

2

( 6)

Persistent body odor

1

( 1)

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

History of hyperlipidemia

1

( 1)

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

History of cancer

2

( 3)

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

�Table 7
Frequency Distribution of Baseline Physical Findings
Reported by Physician for Allwash Employees
According to Exposure Category

EXPOSURE CATEGORY

PHYSICAL FINDINGS

Erythema
Rash

Group I (N=67)
#
()
%

1
12

Group II (N=28)
#
(%)

Group III (N=34)
//
()
%

( 1)

2

( 7)

2

( 6)

(18)

9

(32)

9

(6
2)

Chloracne

0

( 0)

1*

( 4)

0

( 0)

Hyper pigmentation

7

(10)

1

( 4)

1

( 3)

17

(25)

8

(9
2)

4

(12)

( 9)

1

( 4)

4

(12)

23

(68)

Thickening
Nail discoloration

Other dermatologic findings

6

36

(54)

19

(8
6)

Conjunctival Infection

3

( 4)

1

( 4)

0

( 0)

Eye discharge

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

Swelling of lids

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

Jaundice

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

Hepatomegaly

1

( 1)

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

Other hepatic findings

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

*This case was not confirmed by histological diagnosis or by a dermatologist.

�Table 8
Frequency Distribution of Baseline Symptoms
Reported by Other Employees
According to Exposure Category

EXPOSURE CATEGORY

SYMPTOMS

Group I/II (N-41) ; Group III (N-23)
#
#
()
%
()
Z

Skin irritation or burning

5

(12)

4

(17)

Rash

7

(17)

4

(17)

Acne or chloracne

5

(12)

4

(17)

Thickening

1

( 2)

0

( 0)

Hyperpigmentation

1

( 2)

0

( 0)

Nail discoloration

1

( 2)

0

( 0)

Other dermatologic symptoms

5

(12)

2

( 9)

Eye irritation or burning

4

(10)

0

( 0)

Eye discharge

1

( 2)

0

( 0)

Swelling of eyelids

1

( 2)

0

( 0)

Other ophthalmic symptoms

3

( 7)

1

( 4)

Any history of liver dysfunction

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

Any history of hepatitis

1

( 2)

0

( 4)

Any history of yellow jaundice

1

( 2)

0

( 0)

Any history of alcohol abuse

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

Other hepatic symptoms

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

Persistent body odor

1

( 2)

0

( 0)

History of hyperlipidemia

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

History of cancer

0

( 0)

1

( 4)

�Table 9
Frequency Distribution of Baseline Physical Findings
Reported by Physician for Other Employees
According to Exposure Category

EXPOSURE CATEGORY

PHYSICAL FINDINGS

Group I/II (N=41)
//
(%)

Group III (N-28)
#
(%)

Erythema

5

(12)

1

( 4)

Rash

9

(22)

7

(30)

Chloracne

0

( 0)

1*

( 4)

Hyperpigmentation

2

( 5)

1

( 4)

Thickening

3

( 7)

6

(26)

Nail discoloration

4

(10)

0

( 0)

19

(46)

4

(17)

Other dermatologic findings
Conjunctival Infection

2

( 5)

2

( 9)

Eye discharge

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

Swelling of lids

1

( 2)

1

( 4)

Jaundice

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

Hepatomegaly

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

Other hepatic findings

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

*This case was not confirmed by histological diagnosis or by a dermatologist,

�Table lOa
Plasma PCB Levels by Exposure Category
for Allwash Employees

Exposure Category
Plasma PCB
Level
(Lab=PCL)
Group I

Group III

5.85 (62)
5.44 (41)
-0.29

Entrance Exam Mean (N)
Last Exam Mean (N)
Mean Difference

Group II
5.19 (27)
5.00 (19)
- 0.26

5.09 (33)
5.12 (33)
0.03

Table lOb
Plasma PCB Levels by Exposure Category
for Other Employees

Exposure Category
i

Plasma PCB
Level
Group I
Entrance Exam Mean (N)
Last Exam Mean (N)
Mean Difference

*p &lt;0.05
**p &lt; 0 . 0 1
tAnalysis of Variance p &lt;.05
ttWilcoxon p &lt;.05

6.64 (33)
5.97 (29)
- 0.90

Group II

Group III

5.75 (8)
5.25 (8)
- 0.50

4.96 (23)
5.43 (23)
0.48

�Table lla
Plasma PCB Levels by Exposure Category
for Allwash Employees

Exposure Category
Plasma PCB
Level
(Lab=BRL)

Group I
Entrance Exam Mean (N)
Last Exam Mean (N)
Mean Difference

5.09 ( 4
6)
4.83 (46) t
-0.73

Group II

4.19 (27)
3.44 (18) t
-0.94

Group III

4.30 (33)
4.24 (33) t
-0.06

Table lib
Plasma PCB Levels by Exposure Category
for Other Employees

Exposure Category
Plasma PCB
Level
Group I
Entrance Exam Mean (N)
Last Exam Mean (N)
Mean Difference

*p &lt;0.05
**p &lt;0.01
t Analysis of Variance p &lt;,.05
ft Wilcoxon p &lt; . 0 5

6.52 (33)
5.62 (29)
-1.48

Group II

Group III

5.25 (8)
4.50 (8)
-0.75

5.36 (22)
4.57 (23)
-0.86

�Table 12a
SCOT Levels by Exposure Category
for Allwash Employees

Exposure Category
SCOT
Level
Group I

Group III

27.62 (67)
26.94 (67)
-0.68

Entrance Exam Mean (N)
Last Exam Mean (N)
Mean Difference

Group II
26.78 (27)
24.67 (27)
-2.11

25.39 (33)
27.03 (33)
1.64

Table 12b
SCOT Levels by Exposure Category
for Other Employees

Exposure Category
SCOT
Level
Group I

Entrance Exam Mean (N)
Last Exam Mean (N)
Mean Difference

*p &lt; 0 . 0 5
**p&lt; 0.01
tAnalysis of Variance p &lt;.05
ft Wilcoxon p &lt;.05

Group II

Group III

23.33 (33)
25.18 (33)
1.85

21.44 (8)
22.00 (8)
0.56

23.46 (23)
27.26 (23)
3.80

�Table 13a
SGPT Levels by Exposure Category
for Allwash Employees

Exposure Category
SGPT
Level
Group I

Group III

26.33 (66)
26.66 (67)
0.42

Entrance Exam Mean (N)
Last Exam Mean (N)
Mean Difference

Group II
24.56 (27)
21.56 (27)
-3.00

19.39 (33)
22.09 (33)
2.70

Table 13b
SGPT Levels by Exposure Category
for Other Employees

Exposure Category
SGPT
Level
Group I
Entrance Exam Mean (N)
Last Exam Mean (N)
Mean Difference

*p&lt; 0.05
**p&lt; 0.01
tAnalysis of Variance p &lt;.05
ttWilcoxon p &lt;.05

Group II

Group III

27.96 (33)
24.67 (33)
-3.29

19.31 (8)
20.50 (8)
1.19

21.55 (23)
22.70 (23)
1.14

�Table 14a
GGTP Levels by Exposure Category
for Allwash Employees

Exposure Category
GGTP
Level
Group I
27.47 (61)
31.15 (67)tt
4.20

Entrance Exam Mean (N)
Last Exam Mean (N)
Mean Difference

Group 11
33.38 (26)
27.89 (27)tt
-5.88*

Group III
33.70 (30)
20.48 (33)tt
-12.83*

Table 14b
GGTP Levels by Exposure Category
for Other Employees

Exposure Category
GGTP
Level

Entrance Exam Mean (N)
Last Exam Mean (N)
Mean Difference

*p &lt;0.05
**p &lt; 0.01
tAnalysis of Variance p &lt;.05
ttWilcoxon p &lt;.05

Group I

Group II

Group III

25.88 (32)
22.30 (33)
-3.50

17.30 (8)
19.00 (8)
1.70

26.53 (20)
16.87 (23)
-9.53**

�Table 15a
Triglyceride Levels by Exposure Category
for Allwash Employees

Exposure Category
Triglyceride
Level
Group I
Entrance Exam Mean (N)
Last Exam Mean (N)
Mean Difference

Group II

Group III

122.19 (67)
116.91 (32)
14.03

104.63 (27)
73.29 ( 7)
-15.14

153.33 (33)
153.27 (15)
19.20

Table 15b
Triglyceride Levels by Exposure Category
for Other Employees

Exposure Category
Triglyceride
Level
Group I
Entrance Exam Mean (N)
. Last Exam Mean (N)
Mean Difference

*p &lt;0.05
**p &lt;0.01
tAnalysis of Variance p &lt;.05
ftWilcoxon p &lt;.05

113.27 (33)
109.13 ( 8)
-14.50

Group II
75.88 (8)
57.50 (4)
-16.25

Group III
131.57 (23)
113.17 ( 6)
-2.50

�Table 16a
Cholesterol Levels by Exposure Category
for Allwash Employees

Exposure Category
Cholesterol
Level
Group I
Entrance Exam Mean (N)
Last Exam Mean (N)
Mean Difference

Group II

190.57 (67)
179.03 (32)
-9.44*

172.89 (27)
165.14 (7)
-15.00

Group III
•

193.00 (33)
189.35 (17)
-7.12

Table 16b
Cholesterol Levels by Exposure Category
„
for Other Employees

Exposure Category
Cholesterol
Level
Group I
Entrance Exam Mean (N)
Last Exam Mean (N)
Mean Difference

*p &lt;0.05
**p &lt;0.01
t Analysis of Variance p &lt;.05
tt Wilcoxon p &lt;.05

Group II

Group III

218.82 (33)
199.50 ( 8)
-6.75

199.75 (8)
200.00 (4)
15.00

207.30 (23)
201.17 ( 6)
-9.33

�Table 17a
HDL Levels by Exposure Category
for Allwash Employees

Exposure Category

HDL
Level
Group I

49.10 (67)
49.22 (32)
-1.88

Entrance Exam Mean (N)
Last Exam Mean (N)
Mean Difference

Group II
51.04
51.14
-5.43

(27)
( 7)

Group III
50.76 (33)
64.82 (17)
14.41

Table 17b
HDL Levels by Exposure Category
for Other Employees

Exposure Category

HDL
Level
Group I
Entrance Exam Mean (N)
Last Exam Mean (N)
Mean Difference

*p &lt;0.05
**p &lt;0.01
tAnalysis of Variance p &lt;.05
ttWilcoxon p &lt;.05

Group II

Group III

47.54 (33)
48.75 ( 8)
0.54

54.50 (8)
55.25 (4)
2.50

51.46 (23)
47.17 ( 6)
-1.67

�Table 18a
Summary of Regression Analysis for
Allwash Employees

Parameter

PCB (PCL lab)
PCB (BRL lab)
SCOT
SGPT
GGTP

Sample Size

Intercept

92
96
126
126
126

5.33
4.56
26.29
24.77
31.39

Slope

-0.0001
-0.0002

0.0003
-0.0006
-0.0054

Table 18b
Summary of Regression Analysis for
Other Employees
Parameter

PCB (PCL lab)
PCB (BRL lab)
SCOT
SGPT
GGTP

*p &lt; .05

Sample Size

59
59
63
63
63

Intercept

5.88
5.55
23.99
23.03 .
22.25

Slope

-0.0003
-0.0006
0.0021
0.0005
-0.0031*

�Table 19
Summary of Statistically Significant Results (p &lt; .05)
Name of Test
Paired t-test

Subset and Parameter

Sample Size

p Value

Allwash, Group I,
Cholesterol
Allwash, Group II,
GGTP

32

.0483

26

.0230

Allwash, Group III,

30

.0133

Others, Group I/II,
PCS (BRL)

37

.0374

Others, Group III

20

.0001

97

.0257

GGTP

GGTP

Analysis of
Variance

Allwash, PCB (BRL)

Wilcoxon Rank
Sura

Allwash, GGTP

127

.0333

Regression

Others, GGTP

63

.0424

�Table 20
Frequency Distribution of Symptoms Reported by
Allwash Employees on Medical Incident Reports*
According to Exposure Category

EXPOSURE CATEGORY

SYMPTOMS

t

Group I
(*
*)

#

Group II
(**)

#

Group III
(**)

Dermatological :
skin irritation/itching
acne/rash

0
1

( 0)
(.005)

1
0

(.002)
( 0)

2
2

(.001)
(.001)

Ophthalmological :
eye irritation/burning

2

(.011)

3

(.005)

9

(.005)

Respiratory:
dyspnea
chest pain
congestion
sore throat

0
0
0
0

(
(
(
(

0)
0)
0)
0)

1
1
0
0

(.002)
(.002)
( 0)
( 0)

3
3
4
3

(.002)
(.002)
(.002)
(.002)

2
9

(.011)
(.049)

3
0

(.005)
( 0)

4
33

(02
.0)
(.019)

0

( 0)

0

( 0)

25

(.014)

1
6
2
3
1
0

(.005)
(.033)
(.011)
(.016)
(.005)
( 0)

3
6
2
3
4
0

(.005)
(.009)
(.003)
(.005)
(06
.0)
( 0)

9
35
1
5
14
2

(.005)
(.020)
(.001)
(.003)
(08
.0)
(.001)

Musculoskeletal :
lacerations/ abrasions
blunt trauma/bruises
and minor accidents
musculoskeletal pain
Other :
dizziness/lightheadedness
nausea/vomiting
abdominal pain
heat stress/diaphoresis
headache
palpitations

*More than one report may be included for the same individual.
**Number of reports divided by average number of hours in BSOB for each group: 1=184,
11=634, 111=1757.

�Table 21
Frequency Distribution of Sources of Equipment
Failure Reported by Allwash Employees on Exposure Incident
Forms* According to Exposure Category

EXPOSURE CATEGORY

Group I
(*
*)

Group II
#
(**)

TYPE OF
EQUIPMENT FAILURE

#

Tear in Tyvek Suit with
Little Likelihood of Skin
Contact

17

(02
.9)

30

(.047)

74

(02
.4)

Dampening or Soiling
of Tyvek Suit with
No Break in Seal

11

(00
.6)

15

(04
.2)

70

(00
.4)

6

(.033)

12

(.019)

26

(.015)

18

(08
.9)

48

(06
.7)

128

(.073)

6

(.033)

12

(.019)

22

(.013)

Malfunction of Respirator
( . . , loss of seal)
ie

16

(.087)

25

(.039)

60

(04
.3)

Accidental or Deliberate
Removal of Respirator

10

(.054)

19

(00
.3)

26

(.015)

1

(05
.0)

1

(.001)

Tear in Tyvek Suit
with Evidence of
Skin Contact
Tear in Outer Layer
of Glove
Tear in Glove With
Evidence of Skin
Contact

Reported Safety Violation
with No Potential for
Direct Contact

0

(

0)

Group III
#
(*
*)

*More than one report may be included for the same individual.
**Number of reports divided by average number of hours in BSOB for each group:
11=634, 111=1757.

1=184,

�Table 22a
Distribution of Allwash Employees Filing
Exposure Incident Reports According to Exposure Category

Number of Allwash Employees
Number of Exposure
Reports Filed

Group I

Group II

Group III

5

60

15

5

6 - 10

6

10

11

11 - 30

1

3

19

0-

Table 22b
Relationship Between PCS Blood Levels*
and Frequency of Exposure Incident Reports Filed
by Allwash Employees

PCB Blood Level (ppb)
Frequency of Reported
Potential Contact

ND - 5

6-10

10-16

39

18

1

Occasionally (6 - 10)

12

9

0

Frequently (11 - 30)

17

4

0

Rarely (0 -

5)

*PCB blood levels are the highest values reported by either laboratory
at the time of exit exam or most recent interval exam.

�Table 23
Summary of PCB Blood Levels and Liver Function Tests
for those Individuals Filing More Than Twenty Exposure Incident Reports

ID #

# of Hrs.
in BSOB

ALK.
PHOS.

BILI

SCOT

SGPT

GGTP

PCB
(PCL)

PCB
(BRL)

_

3097

2157

44

1.1

22

18

25

3145

759

72

0.5

23

15

16

5

4

3159

2726

42

0.6

33

39

12

-

3

3217

1912

44

0.7

22

18

12

-

-

3269

1349

49

0.4

21

15

9

-

3

3289

1574

46

0.7

20

9

11

6

—

3

�Appendix A
Normal Ranges for Selected Biochemical Parameters

Parameter

Bionetics

Wilson

Lourdes

PCL

PCB (ppb)

N/A

N/A

N/A

0-20

0-30

SCOT (IU/1)

7-46

8-36

8-44

N/A

N/A

SGPT (IU/1)

0-50

2-32

3-38

N/A

N/A

GGTP (IU/1)

8-37

0-42

15-85

N/A

N/A

10-150

47-180

20-200

N/A

N/A

120-200

150-250

150-250

N/A

N/A

30-65

-

25-58

N/A

N/A

Triglycerides (mg/dl)
Cholesterol (mg/dl)
HDL cholesterol (mg/dl)

BRL

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24001">
              <text>089</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24002">
              <text>2269</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24005">
              <text>Series IV Subseries II</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="23998">
                <text>Gleit, Alan</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="23999">
                <text>Arnelle G. Cohen</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24000">
                <text>Kenneth H. Chase</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24003">
                <text>Typescript: Draft Summary Report of the Medical Surveillance Program for the Binghamton State Office Building Decontamination Project, August 7, 1985</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24007">
                <text>BSOB</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24009">
                <text>health monitoring</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24011">
                <text>health studies</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1744" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="9945">
              <text>034</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="9946">
              <text>0691</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="9950">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9944">
                <text>Gunby, Phil</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9947">
                <text>Journal of the American Medical Association</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9948">
                <text>August 17 1979</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9949">
                <text>Plenty of Fuel for Agent Orange Dispute</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9951">
                <text>dioxin</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="9952">
                <text>health studies</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1745" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="9954">
              <text>034</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="9955">
              <text>0692</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="9959">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9953">
                <text>Gunby, Phil</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9956">
                <text>Journal of the American Medical Association</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9957">
                <text>April 6 1979</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9958">
                <text>Dispute Over Some Herbicides Rages in Wake of Agent Orange</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9960">
                <text>EPA</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="9961">
                <text>litigation</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="9962">
                <text>health studies</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
