<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=49&amp;advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&amp;advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=industrial+exposure&amp;page=1&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CCreator&amp;output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-03-14T07:58:11+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>1</pageNumber>
      <perPage>15</perPage>
      <totalResults>216</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="3282" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1695">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/bc54fa583efffdef8051d9f49a71404e.pdf</src>
        <authentication>208c08c339cf33fd3b1a079fcdbc1162</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63644">
                    <text>ItomDNunber

°1861

Author

Bangert, Joseph V.

Corporate Author

Commonwealth of Massachusetts Agent Orange Progra

RdDOrt/ArtldO TltlO Health Survey of Massachusetts Vietnam Veterans,
Summary

Journal/Book Title
Year

1986

Month/Day

June

Color

0

Number of Images

12

Descrlpton Notes

Wednesday, July 11, 2001

Page 1862 of 1870

�COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
AGENT ORANGE PROGRAM
Office of the Commissioner of Veteran's Services
100 Cambridge Street
Boston, MA 02202

"Health Survey of Massachusetts Vietnam Veterans"

SUMMARY

June, 1986

�FOREWORD
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Agent Orange Program, a program of the
Office of the Commissioner of Veterans' Services, was provided funding by the
1983 Massachusetts Legislature for the purpose of conducting, "medical and
scientific testing related to the possible health effects of Agent Orange on
Massachusetts Vietnam Veterans."
In January, 1984, the Agent Orange Program, Office of the Commissioner of
Veterans' Services (OCVS) was implemented to survey programmatic, medical
and scientific options. The Agent Orange Program instituted the Agent Orange
Medical /Scientific Advisory Board to provide technical recommendations, oversight and review of proposals and implemented medical and scientific programs
and studies.
In January, 1985, the Massachusetts Agent Orange Program, in cooperation with
the Massachusetts Department of Public Health published the "Mortality Among
Massachusetts Vietnam Veterans, 1972-1983" written by Michael Kogan, M.A., and
Richard Clapp, M.P.H., as the first step in the Commonwealth's attempt to find
some answers to the complex questions surrounding the issue of Agent Orange.
This mortality study provides a stable foundation for our continued ongoing
efforts to provide scientific, technical, verifiable data regarding the effects
of Agent Orange where none had been previously available.
The Massachusetts Agent Orange Program's "Health Survey of Massachusetts
Vietnam Veterans, 1986" is the second step in our program's continuing
efforts to determine the needs of Massachusetts Vietnam Veterans and their
families. This survey utilized the "American Legion," or "Stellman questionnaire,"
with minor modifications. The survey results, contained within, are the result
of over 2,000 Massachusetts Vietnam Veterans and their families, and dependents
who took the time out to complete a rather detailed and complex form. Only
1,500 of the 2,000 questionnaires were included in the Massachusetts survey
as they were chosen on the completedness of the questionnaire, and those
filled out by Massachusetts veterans who had not been in the Vietnam theatre
were excluded.
The analysis of the data collected by the Massachsuetts Agent Orange Program
was compiled and analyzed by Mr. Frank J. Bove, M.S., an epidemiologist and
PhD candidate with Harvard University School of Public Health. We are indebted
to the hard work of this young scientist.
The Massachusetts Agent Orange Program also acknowledges the leadership role
of Governor Michael S. Dukakis of Massachusetts as well as that of Commissioner
of Veterans' Services, John Halachis in their ongoing committment to this
program and its importance for the more than 50,000 Massachusetts Vietnam
Veterans. We also acknowledge the General Court of the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts, and in particular to Senator Fran Doris, Representative Thomas
Vallely and former Representative Tom Lynch who took the leadership in bringing
the Massachusetts Agent Orange Program into being. We would be remiss if
we did not acknowledge the pioneering role of Mr. Christopher Gregory, the
former Director of the Agent Orange Program in getting the program on line.
We shall continue first and foremost to aggressively and independently survey
and test Massachusetts Vietnam Veterans who bore the brunt of battle and will
never be forgotten.

Jsefob/V. Bangert, Director
Massachusetts Agent Orange Program

r

�SUMMARY

Fifteen hundred Vietnam veterans in Massachusetts completed
health questionnaires in January 1985. The respondents were
those who filed a claim against the $180 million proposed out of
court settlement reached by attorneys' representing the seven
chemical manufacturers of Agent Orange and Vietnam veterans.
Although not a random sample of the more than 50,000 Massachusetts Vietnam veterans, the findings indicate a considerable
amount of illness among the respondents including tumors, neurobehavioral problems, reproductive difficulties and birth defects among their offspring. These findings are consistent with
the observed symptoms and disease found among those exposed to
2,4-D, 2,4,5-T and 2,3,7,8-TCDD (Dioxin) in the workplace or the
environment.

INTRODUCTION

Concern about the long-term effects of exposure to Agent
Orange is widespread among Vietnam veterans in the U.S. and Australia, as well as among the citizens of Vietnam. In southern
Vietnam, recent studies report a variety of persistent clinical
problems including recurring bouts of headaches, depression and
anxiety, asthenia, loss of libido, GI disorders and adverse reproductive outcomes. Studies of workers exposed to dioxin contaminated substances have found elevated rates of lymphomas and
soft tissue sarcomas. Neurologic and liver effects have also
been reported. Table 1 lists the findings of some of these occupational studies. Table 2 lists the findings of a Massachusetts
Departments of Public Health and Veterans Services study of mortality among Vietnam veterans. This study found elevated rates
of soft tissue sarcomas, kidney cancer, motor vehicle accidents
and suicides. Table 3 lists findings from other studies of
Vietnam veterans.
This survey of the health of Massachusetts Vietnam veterans
is part of an on-going research program that was sparked by the
findings of previous studies as well as the concerns raised by
veterans. The results of this survey are consistent with those
in the studies mentioned above.

METHODS AND SUBJECTS

In January, 1985, The Massachusetts Agent Orange Program
instituted a large-scale media campaign to alert Vietnam veterans

�of the court-imposed deadline for filing a claim against the proposed $180 million settlement reached by attorneys for the seven
manufacturers of Agent Orange and Vietnam veterans. About 2,000
veterans filed claims during a two day period at the state's
Office of Veterans Services. The American Legion health questionnaire was distributed to those filing claims. In addition,
some 300 questionnaires were mailed to veterans who phoned the
Agent Orange Program requesting to participate in the health
survey. Approximately 1800 questionnaires were returned to the
Agent Orange Program, fifteen hundred of these were selected
based on the criteria of completedness and actual service in
Vietnam.
Staff of the Agent Orange Program as well as trained volunteers, all of whom were Vietnam veterans, assisted respondents
with any questions or difficulties they encountered with the
questionnaire. Concerning the birth outcome data requested by
the questionnaire, if the veterans were not sure of the information being asked, they were provided with a self-addressed envelope and permitted to take the questionnaire home to consult with
their spouses.
RESULTS

Analysis of the questionnaire data was performed using DBASE
III.
Over a quarter of the respondents stated that they were
diagnosed with tumors (cancerous, benign, fatty or other). Nine
were diagnosed with Hodgkins Disease. Nearly 22% of the respondents indicated that one or more of their children had birth defects. Out of 1907 live births reported in the questionnaires,
462 (24%) had at least one birth defect and 160 had more than one
defect. Thirty-seven spina bifida, other brain or spine defects
were reported. Table 4 presents the data on other congenital
malformations.
Nearly one-third of the respondents indicated a decrease in
libido and 22% reported fertility difficulties (see Table 4).
Nearly two-thirds of the respondents indicated persistent problems with tiredness, over half reported persistent headaches and
difficulties with memory or concentration, and almost half reported nervous disorders (see Table 5).
Seventy-three percent of the respondents answered yes to the
question: "Have you or your family ever noticed a personality
change?". Eighty-two percent of the respondents claimed they regularly had at least one of the following problems: depression,
violent rage, anxiety and irritability. Most had more than one
problem. Two hundred and seventy-five respondents reported suffering from mental Illness or a breakdown. Symptoms of peripheral neuropathy in the lower or upper extremities were reported
in over two-thirds of the veterans. Indications of asthenia were
found in over half of the questionnaires (see Table 5).

�Many respondents reported GI disorders. Over a third stated
they had repeated nausea without flu or other sickness. Over 25%
reported repeated bouts with diarrhea. One-third indicated that
they regularly experienced loss of appetite and 20% reported
weight loss.
CONCLUSION

We reemphasize that the questionnaires were not randomly
distributed and were completed on a volunteer basis by a selfselected group of MA veterans. This means that we cannot base a
valid, scientific study on the information contained in these
questionnaires. However, the questionnaires clearly indicate
considerable disease and suffering among a relatively young group
of people (93% under age 45, 80% under age 40). The symptoms and
disease found are consistent with findings from other studies of
people exposed to dioxin, 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T.

REFERENCES

Ashe WF, Suskind RR (1949,1950)tReports on chloracne cases,
Monsanto Chemical Co., Nitro, W.VA.
Baader EW, Bauer AJ (1951):Industrial intoxication due to pentachlorophenol. Indus Med Surg 20:289-290.
Barr MM (1982) :letter to editor. ANZ J. Psych. 16: 88-89.
»

Barr MM (1983): Apparent progressive axonal dying back neuropathy
in Vietnam veterans. Neuroscience Letters, Abstracts
suppl. ll:s.29.
Dugois P, et.al. (1956): Acne chlorlque au 2,4,5-T. Lyon Med
88:446-447.
Erickson JD, et.al. (1984): Vietnam veterans1 risks for fathering
babies with birth defects. JAMA 252:903-912.
Goldman PJ (1973): Schwetst akute chlorakne, eine massenintoxikation durch 2,3,6,7-TCDD. Der Hautarzt 24:149-152.

�Moses M, et.al. (1984): Health Status of workers with past exposure to 2,3,7,8-TCDD in the manufacture of 2,4,5-T: Comparison of findings with and without chloracne. Am J Ind Med
5:161-182.
Pazderova-Vejlupkov J, et.al (1980): Chronic poisoning by
2,3,7,8-TCDD. Prac Lek 32::204-209. NIH Library Translation.
Pazderova-Vejlupkov J, et.al (1981): The development and prognosis of chronic intoxication by TCDD in men. Arch Env
Health 36:5-11.
Poland AP, et.al. (1971): Health survey of workers in a 2,4-D and
2,4,5-T plant. Arch Env Health 22:316-327.
Stellman S, Stellman J (1980): Health problems among 535 Vietnam
veterans potentially exposed to toxic herbicides. Am J Epi
112:444 (abstract).
Susklnd RR (1953): A clinical and environmental survey, Monsanto
Chemical Co., Nitro, W.VA.. Report of the Kettering Laboratory, July.
Suskind RR (1977): Chloracne and associated health problems in
the manufacture of 2,4,5-T. Report to the NIEHS/IARC Joint
Conference, Lyon, France. January.
Telegina KA, Bikbulatova LJ (1970): Affection of the folllcular
apparatus of the skin in workers employed in the production
of the butyl ester of 2,4,5-T. Vestnik Derm Ven 44:35-39.

�TABLE 1
REPORTED OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES TO DIOXIN-CONTAMINATED
SUBSTANCES RESULTING IN HUMAN ILLNESS*

Year,place &amp;
chemical(s)

Type of exposure &amp; number
of cases

Neurological
effects

Other
effects

References

1949 W.VA
TCP, 2,4,5-T

explosion
117
production
111

nervousness,
irritability,
insomnia,
personality
change,depression,
headache,pain
&amp; weakness in
lower extremities, per ipheral
neuropathy

fatigue, [Ashe &amp;
weight
Suskind,
loss,
1949,
weakness, 1950;
decreased Suskind,
libido,im - 1953;
Suskind,
potence
1977] .

1949 Germany
TCP

production,
industrial
lab 17

pain &amp; weakness,paresthesia,polyneuritis in lower
extremities

fatigue,
decreased
libido,
impotence

1952 Germany
TCP

production
31

pain &amp; weakness,paresthesia in lower
extremities,
memory &amp; concentration deficits,sleep
disturbances,
apathy,dulled
emotional response

fatigue,
[Susmyocardial kind,
damage
1977]

1953 Germany
TCP

explosion
55

hearing impairment,
peripheral
neuropathy

fatigue,
[Golddrowsiness, man,
myocardial
1973]
damage

1956 France
TCP

production
17

peripheral
neuropathy

1964 USSR
TCP 2,4,5-T

production
128

headache,memory loss,
sleeplessness

[Baader
&amp; Bauer,
1951]

[Dugois,
et.al.,
1956]
fatigue,
[Telejoint pain gina &amp;
Bikbulatova,
1970]

�TABLE 1 (continued)
Year,place &amp;
chemical(s)

Type of exposure &amp; number
of cases

Neurological
effects

Other
effects References

1965-68
Czechoslovakia
TCP 2,4,5-T

production
80

pain &amp; weakfatigue, [Pazderoness in lower
weight
va-Vejlupkov,
loss
extremities/
somnolence,
et.al.,
1980;
headache, insomnia,peri19811
pheral neuropathy, emotional
&amp; psychiatric
disorders

1969 NJ
TCP 2,4,5-T
2,4-D

production
73

weakness in
lower extremities,hypomania

*adapted from Moses/et.al.,1984

[Poland,
et.al. '
1971]

�TABLE

2

Standardized Proportional Mortality Ratios for Selected Causes of Death for
Vietnam Veterans Compared with Either Non-Vietnam-Veterans or Non-Veteran Males
ICO NO*

CAUSE OF DcATH

OBSERVES
VIETNAM
VETERAN
DEATHS

All Causes

COMPARISON GROUP
NON- VIETNAM
VETERANS
PMR
95% C.I.

NON-VETERAN
MALES
PMR
95% C.I.

840

140-239

All Neoplasms

153-154

Colo-Rectal

162

Lung, Bronchus

171

Connective Tissue

9

880

189

Kidney

9

183 (96,348)

353 (191,651)

139

88 (75,103)

87 (74,102)

28

111 (77,160)

138 (96,199)

•

129

95

(78,115)

112

(94,134)

8

113

(56,228)

85

(42,172)

98 (66,146)

102

(72,145)

25

(513,1510)

473 (262,855)

390-429 'Circulatory System
439-459 (except Cerebrovascular)
430-438 Cerebrovascular
Disease
571
Cirrhosis of the
Liver

29

94 (65,136)

90 (61,132)

•

E800-E999 All external causes

428

108 (98,119)

H3 (103,124)

E810-E825 Motor vehicle accidents

169

110 (95,127)

127 (106,152)

E950-E958 Recorded suicides

102

93 (77,112)

118 (98,143)

799.9,
Estimated suicides*1*
E850-E869,
E950-E958,

163

113 (96,132)

140 (120,163)

31

80 (56,114)

66 (46,94)'

E980-E982

E960-E969 Homicides

International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, code number.
**See reference (6) for discussion of this category. Note that there were
13 deaths in the category 799.9.

�TABLE 3
REPORTS ON THE HEALTH STATUS OF VIETNAM VETERANS

Reference

Exposed

Health Effects

Stellman &amp;

Vietnam Veterans
535

congenital malformations,
GI disturbances,pain in
joints,sleep and psychological disturbances

Barr/1982;
1983

Vietnam Veterans
Australia, 120

peripheral neuropathy,
insomnia,depress ion,
Irritability,lassitude,
memory loss,headaches,
attempted suicides

Erickson,
et.al. 1984

Vietnam Veterans
696

congenital malformations:
spina bifida,cleft lip,
impaired hearing,clubfoot

Stellman,
1980

�TABLE 4
CONGENITAL MALFORMATIONS

Total
Number

Birth Defect

Prevalence *

BDMP Incidence
Rate *

Spina Bifida,other
brain or spine defects

37

195

18.4

clubfoot

24

126

24.5

cleft lip/palate

17

89

13.4

missing, deformed or
extra toes/fingers

31

163

Down's Syndrome

11

58

7.9

hip abnormalities

21

111

27.0

heart defect

60

defect of the
digestive system

35

hearing disorders

63

cerebral palsy

27.2**

6

other skeletal defects
Condition requiring
special education or care

46

122

* per 10,000 live births
** polydactyly and syndactyly

OTHER REPRODUCTIVE PROBLEMS
Problem

Number

%

Loss of libido

487

32.4%

Infertility

330

22.0%

Infertility and saw physician

246

16.4%

low birth weight children

162

8.1%

(under 5.5 Ibs.)

�10

TABLE 5
NEUROBEHAVIORAL DYSFUNCTION

Problem

Number

%

persistent tiredness
(saw physician)

957
270

63.7%
18.0%

persistent headaches
(saw physician)

773
338

51.5%
22.5%

nervous disorders
(saw physician)

684
356

45.5%
23.7%

difficulty with memory
or concentration
(saw physician)

786
165

52.3%
11.0%

mental illness or breakdown
(receiving some disability)

275
132

18.3%
8.8%

1233
1015

82.1%
67.6%

321

21.4%

regularly depressed, get into a
violent rage, anxious or irritable
(more than one behavioral problem)
Sensory symptoms of early stage
peripheral neuropathy
asthenia (need hands to rise from
chair, can't climb stairs without
holding onto railing, unable to do
tasks requiring holding arms at
shoulder level, difficulty grasping
tools)

775

51.6%

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24255">
              <text>069</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24257">
              <text>1861</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24260">
              <text>Series III Subseries III</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24254">
                <text>Bangert, Joseph V.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24256">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;Commonwealth of Massachusetts Agent Orange Program</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24258">
                <text>1986-06-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24259">
                <text>Health Survey of Massachusetts Vietnam Veterans, Summary</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24261">
                <text>state-funded Vietnam veterans study</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24262">
                <text>mortality trends</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24263">
                <text>congenital birth defects</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24264">
                <text>industrial exposure</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1568" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8120">
              <text>030</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8121">
              <text>0515</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8125">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8117">
                <text>Bauer, H.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="8118">
                <text>K.H. Schultz</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="8119">
                <text>U. Spiegelberg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8122">
                <text>Archiv fuer Gewerbepathologie und Gewerbehygiene</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8123">
                <text>May 20 1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8124">
                <text>Occupational Intoxication Occurring in the Production of Chlorophenol Compounds</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8126">
                <text>industrial exposure</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="8127">
                <text>health effects</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1536" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="7740">
              <text>029</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="7742">
              <text>0483</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="7745">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7733">
                <text>Beljan, John R.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="7734">
                <text>Nelson S. Irey</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="7735">
                <text>Wendell W. Kilgore</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="7736">
                <text>Kazuo Kimura</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="7737">
                <text>Raymond R. Suskind</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="7738">
                <text>Jaroslav J. Vostal</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="7739">
                <text>R. H. Wheater</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7741">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;American Medical Association, Council on Scientific Affairs, Advisory Panel on Toxic Substances</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7743">
                <text>October 1 1981</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7744">
                <text>The Health Effects of "Agent Orange" and Polychlorinated Dioxin Contaminants</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7746">
                <text>health studies</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="7747">
                <text>industrial exposure</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="7748">
                <text>human exposure</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="7749">
                <text>veteran health and hygiene</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2400" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="16621">
              <text>051</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="16623">
              <text>1357</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="16626">
              <text>Series III Subseries II</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16614">
                <text>Beljan, John R.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16615">
                <text>Nelson S. Irey</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16616">
                <text>Wendell W. Kilgore</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16617">
                <text>Kazuo Kimura</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16618">
                <text>Raymond R. Suskind</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16619">
                <text>Jaroslav J. Vostal</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16620">
                <text>R. H. Wheater</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16622">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;American Medical Association, Council on Scientific Affairs, Advisory Panel on Toxic Substances</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16624">
                <text>October 18 1983</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16625">
                <text>The Health Effects of "Agent Orange" and Polychlorinated Dioxin Contaminants</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16627">
                <text>health studies</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16628">
                <text>human exposure</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16629">
                <text>veteran health and hygiene</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16630">
                <text>industrial exposure</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2435" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1326">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/b5a1cdf71121edc4ae4ac1b2dbfb57fe.pdf</src>
        <authentication>f4a4f9a983def9e0b95c6ce4295856c7</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63275">
                    <text>Item ID Number

01394

Author

Beljan, John R.

Corporate Author

American Medical Association, Council on Scientific Affa

Roport/Artldo TltlO

The

Health Effects of "Agent Orange" and
Polychlorinated Dioxin Contaminants: an Update, 1984,
Technical Report

Journal/Book Title
Year

1984

Month/Day

October 1

Color

n

Number of Imauos

58

DOSCrlptOU NOtflS

See items 483 and 1357 for earlier versions.

Thursday, May 03, 2001

Page 1394 of 1403

�Reprinted by the Veterans Administration
with permission of AM A

THE HEALTH EFFECTS OF "AGENT ORANGE" AND
POLYCHLORINATED DIOXIN CONTAMINANTS:
AN UPDATE, 198*

American Medical Association
Chicago, Illinois

�THE HEALTH EFFECTS OF "AGENT ORANGE" AND
POLYCHLORINATED DIOXIN CONTAMINANTS:
AN UPDATE, 198*

Technical Report

Prepared by the Council on Scientific Affairs'
Advisory Panel on Toxic Substances
John R. Beljan, MD, Chairman
Nelson S. Irey, MD
Wendell W. Kilgore, PhD
Kazuo Kimura, PhD, MD
Raymond R. Suskind, MD
Jaroslav 3. Vostal, MD, PhD
R.H. Wheater, MS, Secretary
Environmental and Occupational Health Program
October 1, 1984

American Medical Association
Chicago, Illinois

�Contents
Preface
Acknowledgements

1

Introduction
Historical Perspective
Summary of AMA's 1981 Report
Chemistry of Dioxins
General Structure
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
Formation of Chlorinated Dioxins
Occurrence of Chlorinated Dioxins
In 2,4,5-T (2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxy Acetic Acid)
In Chlorophenols
In Hexachlorophene
Decomposition of Chlorinated Dioxins
Analysis
Extraction
Detection
Toxicological Evidence of a Health Hazard in Animals
General Discussion
Mutagenicity
Oncogenicity
Teratogenicity
Reproductive Effects
Studies of Human Populations
Introduction
Vietnam Veterans (Studies Complete or Partially Complete)
Ranch Hand Program
CDC Birth Defects Study
Estimate of Vietnam Troop Exposure
VA Agent Orange Registry
Agent Orange Biopsy Registry of the Armed Forces
Institute of Pathology
Single Case Reports
Of "Dedrumming" Personnel
Australian Birth Defects Study
Vietnamese Epidemiologic Study
Vietnam Veterans (Studies in Progress)
VA Identical Twin study (Vietnam Experience Twins
Study, VETS)
Vietnam Ground Troops Study
VA Mortality Study
VA Case-Control Study of Soft Tissue Sarcoma
VA Retrospective Study of Dioxins and Furans in
Adipose Tissue
Australian Mortality Study
State-Sponsored Programs
Workplace Exposures
Monsanto (Nitro, West Virginia)
Dow Chemical (Midland, Michigan)
Diamond Alkali (New 3ersey)

2

d56:contents (revd. 5-29-85)

4
6
7
8

9
10
13
14
15
16

18
19
20
21

22

23

24
25

�BASF AG (Ludwigshafen, Germany)
NV Philips (Netherlands)
Spolana (Czechoslovakia)
Coalite (United Kingdom)
Vertek Chemical (Jacksonville, Arkansas)
NIOSH Dioxin Registry
NIEHS-IARC International Phenoxy Herbicides Registry
Isolated Exposures to TCDD
Exposed Herbicide Users
Swedish Railway Workers
Other Swedish Workers
Finnish Railway and Forestry Workers
New Zealand Birth Defects Study
Long Island Railroad Birth Defects Study
General Population
Seveso, Italy
Times Beach, Missouri
Missouri Pilot Study
St. Louis, Missouri (Trucking Employees)
Alsea, Oregon
Review of Alsea II by Oregon State University
Review of Alsea by FIFRA's Scientific Advisory
Panel
Review of Alsea II by Others
Canadian Review of TCDD's Health Hazards
Cancer Studies
.
CDC Selected Cancers Study
NIOSH Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study
NCI Case-Control Study of Lymphoma and Soft Tissue
Sarcoma
New Zealand Soft Tissue Sarcoma Case-Control Study
Finland
US, Pacific Northwest
New York State
Michigan State Department of Public Health
Italy
Denmark
Immunological Response to TCDD
In Animals
In Humans
Conclusions

26
27
28

29

31
32
33
34
35

36
.38
39
40

•
41

References

R-l

Appendix
List of States with Vietnam Veteran Commissions or Programs

A-l

d56:contents (revd. 5-29-85)

�The Health Effects of "Agent Orange'1 and
Polychlorinated Dioxin Contaminants: Update,
Preface
This report represents the second comprehensive study by the American Medical Association on the subject of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), a topic that has been
of considerable interest to the lay public and the medical community alike. In late 1980,
the AMA's Council on Scientific Affairs directed its Advisory Panel on Toxic Substances
to review and assess the available scientific information on Agent Orange and its
associated contaminant, TCDD, and to develop objective information based on their
findings. The outcome in October 1981 was a broadly accepted and widely distributed
publication entitled, "The Health Effects of 'Agent Orange' and Polychlorinated Dioxin
Contaminants." A summary version of the Panel's report also appeared in the 15 October
1982 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).
In brief, The Panel found that,
"In spite of the voluminous data on the biological effects of the phenoxy-type
pesticides and their associated chlorinated dioxins, which oftentimes co-exist as
contaminants of the pesticide formulations, there is still very little substantive
evidence for many of the alleged claims that have been made against these
compounds. The most serious of these allegations assert that Agent Orange, or
compounds of a like nature, have caused malignant tumors, spontaneous abortions
and birth defects. Although data from studies on experimental animals tend to
support some of these claims, it is not certain that animal data are extrapolatable
to man. No laboratory animal can fully substitute for man; we must, therefore,
depend on the results of ongoing epidemiologic studies on persons who are known to
have been exposed."
In the interim following publication, there has been a disquieting and continuing
controversy both here and abroad over the long-term consequences of exposure to
TCDD. The concern has not been limited to the military who served in Vietnam, but it
has also extended to countless nvimbers of the general population who were believed to
have been exposed to TCDD in the careless and oftentimes unwitting disposal of toxic
wastes. Inasmuch as several important human epidemiologic studies have been underway
since 1981, the AMA's House of Delegates called for an update of the Council's original
report. Once again, the same Panel of experts was called upon to review the new
studies, to consider the more recent and relevant scientific information, and to issue its
conclusions and recommendations.
Acknowledgements
In the process of review, a number of principal investigators who were involved in
ongoing human studies were invited to meet with the Panel and to brief it on the progress
or results of their work. We are, therefore, indebted to the following persons and
organizations for their cooperation:
Ralph R. Cook, MD (Dow Chemical USA); H. Denny Donnel, MD, MPH (Centers for
Disease Control); Marilyn A. Fingerhut, PhD (NIOSH); William R. Gaffey, MD
(Monsanto Co.); Sheila Hoar, ScD (National Cancer Institute); Richard E. Hoffman,
MD, MPH (Missouri Division of Health); Renate Kimbrough, MD (Centers for
Disease Control); George D. Lathrop, MD (US Air Force); Vern May, PhD (Dow
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 1

�Chemical USA); D. Franco Merlo (Department of Epidemiology, National Cancer
Research Institute, Genoa, Italy); Kenneth W. Sell, MD (National Institutes of
Health); Barclay M. Shepard, MD (Veterans Administration); Robert F. Willis, PhD
(Chairman, Joint Health and Welfare Canada/Environment Canada, Expert Advisory
Committee on Dioxins); Alvin L. Young, PhD (White House Office of Technology
Policy).

Introduction
Historical Perspective
Phenoxy herbicides were introduced into commerce and agriculture in the mid-40s with
the advent of 2,4-D, followed by 2,4,5-T in 1948. Both were used extensively and
uneventfully in the control of woody and broadleaf vegetation in croplands, forests,
rights-of-way, and turf until 1969, when public concern was raised over the human health
hazards of 2,4,5-T and/or its contaminant, TCDD. As this concern mounted, the
Secretary of Agriculture suspended applications of the herbicide in areas where humans
might encounter greatest exposure to TCDD. In 1971, the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) initiated cancellation proceedings against certain other uses of 2,4,5-T.
This notice was subsequently withdrawn, and EPA initiated a plan to develop necessary
data for their decision-making processes. In April 1978, EPA issued a notice of
Rebuttable Presumption Against Registration (RPAR), an intensive benefit/risk review to
ascertain the desirability of continued registration and unrestricted use of 2,4,5-T.
One year later, the RPAR process was interrupted by an emergency ban on the use of
2,4,5-T in pastures, forests, rights-of-way, home gardens, and for aquatic weeds and
other applications, excluding its use on rangeland and rice fields. This suspension was
prompted by reports of spontaneous abortions in humans in Alsea, Oregon attributed to
use of herbicides by the US Forest Service. Two studies done by the EPA—Alsea I and
Alsea II—were criticized severely for insufficient evidence to support the alleged
claims. Inasmuch as the EPA believed that silvex (or 2-2(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)propionic acid) was related closely to 2,4,5-T and also apt to be contaminated with
TCDD, the Agency suspended silvex as well.
During the US involvement in Vietnam, herbicidal mixtures of 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T, picloram,
and cacodylic acid were widely employed as defoliants; these mixtures were variously
identified as Agents Orange, White, Blue, Purple, Pink, and Green. The most widely used
was Agent Orange, a 50:50 mixture of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T; early formulations of the agent
were heavily contaminated with as much as 47 ppm (a weighted mean concentration of
1.98 ppm) of 2,3,7,8-TCDD (Young et al, 1978).
After termination of defoliation operations in Vietnam in 1970, two reports by Dr.
Ton-That Tung (1971, 1973) linked Agent Orange with increases in liver cancer, abortion,
and birth defects. Although hard scientific evidence for that conclusion was lacking in
Tung's reports, a variety of other studies clearly demonstrated that TCDD was extremely
toxic to laboratory animals.
A large number of US personnel in Vietnam who may have been exposed to herbicides are
greatly concerned that Agent Orange could be responsible for the deleterious health
effects that they and their offspring are experiencing. As a consequence, a class action
suit was filed in 1979 against five herbicide manufacturers (Dow Chemical, Monsanto,
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 2

�Hercules, Diamond Shamrock, and Thompson-Hayward); the suit was extended to "all
American servicemen whose health has been damaged because of contact with Agent
Orange." The companies, in turn, filed a third-party action against the US government,
passing the responsibility for alleged harm to the government for its "negligent misuse"
of the chemicals. A similar class action suit was filed in January 1981 against the
Veterans Administration and the Department of Defense.
Some 2.4 million Vietnam veterans, including 1,200 Operation Ranch Hand personnel, and
20 civilians involved in destroying surplus Agent Orange, are presumed to have been
exposed. The news media have stated that potential "plaintiffs" will exceed 2.5 million
people and suggest that 40,000 veterans may become ill or die; an additional 2,000 or
more children also will suffer "catastrophic" birth defects. More than 1,250 lawyers
from 150 law firms in the United States have been involved in the litigation as of 1980
(Elson, 1980). The suit was scheduled to go to trial in Brooklyn, New York in May 1984.
The corporation defendants, however, came to an out-of-court agreement; without
admitting culpability, they set aside $180 million for distribution to claimants and their
respective heirs. An equitable means for assessing and awarding damages remains to be
established. Many persons are not satisfied with the outcome and may still seek redress
in the courts. Meanwhile, the veterans, their heirs, and the general public anxiously
await medical evidence that will either support their allegations of harm from the
chemical or prove convincingly that dioxin has no serious health consequence.
To date, at least 579 industrial workers are also known to have been exposed to TCDD.
The first of several accidental releases of TCDD during the manufacture of 2,4,5-trichlorophenol (TCP) or 2,4,5-T occurred in 1949; a larger number of employees were also
exposed to the manufacturing process from 1948-69. A suit has been filed against the
Monsanto Chemical Company on behalf of former Monsanto employees and representatives of deceased persons who worked in the company's Nitro, West Virginia plant.
One of the first large-scale exposures of the general population to TCDD occurred near
Seveso, Italy in 3uly 1976; the compound was released accidentally at the ICMESA
(Industrie Chimiche Meda Societa Anonima) trichlorophenol synthesis plant. Approximately 500 acres of surrounding countryside were contaminated to varying degrees.
Some people in the most highly contaminated area became ill immediately, while others
experienced chemical burns of the skin, abdominal pain, and internal hemorrhage.
Although there were deaths of small animals and vegetation, there were no documented
human deaths. Approximately 511 of the 736 evacuees were allowed to return to their
homes within a year (Homberger, 1979). Meanwhile, cleanup of the contamination in
Seveso has been completed. Seven-million cubic feet of the dirt were scraped from 115
acres and sealed in a reservoir outside the town. All houses in the immediate area were
destroyed and the area planted with trees; former residents have been forbidden to
return to their former homesites (Anon, 1984).
In the early 1970s, dioxin-conlaminated waste oil was widely applied to certain areas of
Missouri to suppress dust, most notably near the town of Times Beach and at three horse
arenas in Lincoln County. Reports were to follow of animal deaths and complaints of
human illness that sparked a national concern, which was further fueled by the news
media: the town of Times Beach was purchased by the government, other extensively
contaminated sites were discovered in eastern Missouri and elsewhere in the US, and new
rule-making by the EPA was established for the disposal of dioxin-contaminated wastes.
Meanwhile, several reports from Scandinavia indicated a possible link between exposure
to dioxin and cancer, especially soft tissue sarcomas. These reports were soon followed
by discovery of a number of soft tissue sarcomas among an industrial population in the
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 3

�US. An apparent increase in the number of deaths due to connective tissue cancers
among white women was then perceived in the Midland, Michigan area; this news
received wide publicity by environmental groups when dioxin contamination was
discovered in the Tittabawassee and Saginaw Rivers, Saginaw Bay, and the grounds of
Dow Chemical Company. The Michigan Department of Health investigated the situation,
the outcome of which is presented below.
In May 1983, a representative action was brought by several Nova Scotian residents
against a forest industry company that operated in their area. Plaintiffs were seeking an
injunction that would prevent the company from further spraying of 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T, and
mixtures thereof. A major part of the documentary evidence and testimony of
environmentalists and medical experts related to the alleged adverse health effects of
these compounds and dioxin. Quoting from the opinion of the trial judge (Nunn, 1983),
who denied the injunction for lack of evidence that the spray operation constituted an
unreasonable risk to health:
"...on the whole of the evidence, where risk to health is claimed in any study, the
circumstance has been one of massive exposure and such are not of significant
probative value in light of the actual low possible exposure here. ...most of the
more highly publicized studies in these situations are regarded in the wider
scientific community as flawed...particularly...the Alsea II study. Where risk to
health might be expected, for example, ...at Seveso, which caused a massive dioxin
exposure, none have found. ...the evidence of risk assessments clearly indicates that
any risk here in Nova Scotia, if, indeed, there is a risk at all, is infinitessimally
small and many, many times less than one in a million...(whereas,) the risk of
cancer to a smoker is 1 in 800, and for a non-smoker continuously in the same room
with smokers it is 1 in 100,000...this court is of the opinion that these spraying
operations can be carried out in safety and without risk to the health of the citizens
of the province. (Nunn DM: Judicial decision in the trial of Palmer et al vs Stora
Kopparbergs Bergslags Aktiebolag (or Nova Scotia Forest Industries), Supreme
Court of Nova Scotia (15 Sep 1983)).
The general public continues to be concerned about the possible adverse health effects of
dioxin, especially those of a long-term nature; eg, cancer, birth defects and reproductive
abnormalities. However, this concern is best addressed by scientific facts, not fanciful
conjecture.
Summary of AMA's 1981 Report

Before discussing newer developments, it would be well to review the salient points of
the 1983 report.
*

Agent Orange, as used in Vietnam, was a 50:50 mixture of the n-butyl esters of
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid
(2,4,5-T), together with a minor amount of the free acid 2,4,5-T (1% of the
total mixture) and varying amounts of the contaminant 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD).

*

Commercial formulations of 2,4,5-T, as well as silvex (or 2-2(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)propionic acid) may contain TCDD as a contaminant. At one time, the
amount of TCDD was as much as 70 ppm; present methods routinely produce
levels below 0.01 ppm. TCDD may form as a by-product in the synthesis of
2,4,5-trichlorophenol (a precursor of 2,4,5-T). It may also be produced by the
pyrolysis of certain chlorinated compounds in industrial or municipal wastes and

d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 4

�.by the burning of vegetation that has been sprayed with the chlorinated
phenoxy acid herbicides. Note that 2,4-D, a phenoxy herbicide closely related
to 2,4,5-T, is not normally contaminated with TCDD.
*

In addition to the marked variations in the sensitivity and susceptibility of
animal species to all toxic substances, there are significant differences
between some of the toxic effects of TCDD in experimental animals and the
human experience; thus, the animal data cannot be translated directly to man.

*

One of the more pronounced biological effects of TCDD, as well as a number of
other chlorinated aromatic compounds, is a tendency to cause chloracne in
certain animals and man. This skin disease is, in fact, regarded as the clinical
marker for TCDD exposure. Systemic disorders in man from exposures to
TCDD are unlikely to occur in the absence of chloracne. Such signs and
symptoms as impaired liver function, nephropathy, gastroenteritis, myopathy,
neuropathy, and central nervous system manifestations have been reported
after exposure to large amounts of TCDD; however, they have not been
progressive and have always cleared with time (the nephropathy and myopathy
have not been proven).

*

Other toxic effects of TCDD in experimental animals appear as pathological
effects in the liver, peripheral nerves, and hematopoietic and
reticuloendothelial systems. TCDD is a very powerful enzyme inducer. In
addition to altering normal enzyme activity, it may potentiate the harmful
action of other toxins or even render an otherwise innocuous agent toxic.

*

TCDD promotes car ci no genesis or induces cancer in some strains of rats and
mice. In contrast to other chemical carcinogens, however, this carcinogenicity
is always accompanied by considerable systemic toxicity. By itself, 2,4,5-T
does not presently appear to be a carcinogen, nor has it been shown to cause
genetic changes in any animal species.

*

A consensus of studies utilizing high prenatal doses of 2,^,5-T with 0.1 ppm or
less of TCDD showed cleft palate in mice (but no other species) and
embryotoxicity in the mouse, rat, hamster, sheep, monkey, and rabbit. TCDD
does induce genetic changes by the Ames test with S. typhimurium and E. coli.
However, dominant lethal and cytogenetic evaluations in rodents do not
confirm that such changes also occur in other animals, especially man.

*

While 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D pesticides have been used in agriculture, forest
management, and commercial and residential landscaping for over 30 years,
there is still no conclusive evidence that they and/or TCDD are mutagenic,
carcinogenic, or teratogenic in man, nor that they have caused reproductive
difficulties in man.

*

Both 2,4-D and 2,^,5-T undergo rapid decomposition in the soil and are,
therefore, of little environmental concern. TCDD does persist in soil longer
than 2,4,5-T but, in general, ... in the presence of ultraviolet light, it breaks
down rapidly when present as a thin film on plants, water, and the surface of
soil. (Its half-life in deep soil is now known to be much longer than one year.)

d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 5

�Chemistry of Dioxins
General Structure
Of late, the term "dioxin" has been applied—though incorrectly—to any of a number of
polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and more specifically to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (or "TCDD" as it is usually but inappropriately called for brevity). More
precisely, a dioxin is any of a group of dibenzo-p-dioxins whose structure consists of two
benzene rings interconnected by two oxygen atoms as shown below:

Dioxins differ only in the nature and position of their substituents; ring positions 1
through 4 and 6 through 9 can be occupied by hydrogen or halogen atoms, or various
organic radicals. Theoretically, there can be 75 different chlorinated dioxins; 40
different chloro- isomers have been prepared and identified to date (Buser, 1975; Buser
et al, 1978; Poland et al, 1972; Bolton, 1978), while five others have been identified but
not separated from their accompanying compounds (Buser, 1975; Buser et al, 1978;
Rappe, 1978). Dow Chemical Company has synthesized all 22 tetrachloro (TCDD)
isomers (US EPA 1980).
2,3,7 ? 8-tetrachlorpdibenzo-p-dioxjn
Of the 22 tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins, the 2,3,7,8- isomer—wherein chlorine has been
substituted for hydrogen in the 2,3,7 and 8 positions in the dibenzo-p-dioxin structure
shown above—has received the most attention because of its adverse health effects in
experimental animals and its potential hazard to humans. It is structurally represented
as:

TCDD

2,3,7,8-TCDD is a colorless, crystalline solid at room temperature, chemically stable and
extremely lipophilic. It is only sparingly soluble in water and most organic liquids. Some
of its physical properties, along with those of 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
(OCDD), another chlorinated dioxin with twofold symmetry, are listed in Table 1
(Crummett et al, 1973; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1977).

d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 6

�Table 1 — Physical Properties of Two Chlorinated Dioxins,
2,3,7,8-TCDD and 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-Octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (OCDD)
Property

2,3,7,8-TCDD

Empirical formula

C

OCDD

c12cigo2

12H4C14°2

Percent by weight

C
O
H
Cl

31.3
7.0

44.7
9.95
1.25
44.1

61.7

322

459.8

305°C

130°C

Above 700°C

Above 700°C

1.* g/liter
0.72
— _

1.83 g/liter

Molecular weight
Melting point
Decomposition temperature
Solubility
o-Dichlorobenzene
Chlorobenzene
Anisole
Xylene
Benzene
Chloroform
n-Octanol
Methanol
Acetone
Dioxane
Water

1.73
3.58

0.57
0.37
0.048
0.01
0.11
-—
0.2 ppb

0.56
— _

0.38

Adapted from the US Environmental Protection Agency (1980).
Formation of Chlorinated Dioxins
One route to the formation of chlorinated dioxins begins with certain chlorinated organic
chemicals. 2,4,5-Trichiorophenol, for example, can condense to form a phenoxyphenate
or substituted diphenyl ether (a "predioxin") (Buser, 1978; Jensen et al, 1972; Moore,
1979; Nilsson et al, 1974) as shown here:
cl

ONa
Cl

cl
CH^OH
NaOH

1,2,4,5-tetraehlorobenzcne

ClCH 5 CO.&gt;Na

Cl
Cl

2,4,5-trich'orophenoI
I

TCD0

d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 7

Cl
2,4,5-T

�"Predioxins" have been found in waste sludges and commercial products, as well as in
some products of laboratory scale reactions (Jensen et al, 1972, 1973; Arensault, 1976).
Chlorinated dioxins also can be formed during the combustion of various substances. For
example, Olie et al (1977) reported the occurrence of chlorinated dioxins in the fly ash
and flue gases of municipal incinerators in the Netherlands, while Buser et al (1978)
found chlorinated dioxins in fly ash from a municipal incinerator and in an industrial
heating facility in Switzerland; the levels ranged from 0.2 ug/g to 0.6 ug/g of ash. Buser
(1979) also reported that chlorinated dioxins were formed by the pyrolysis of
chlorobenzenes in the presence of air. Other studies have shown that chlorinated dioxins
are to be found in cigarette smoke, fireplace soot, and in the burning of wood (Dow
Chemical Company, 1978; Nestrick et al, 1982).
Occurrence of Chlorinated Dioxins
acid)

The levels of TCDD in drums of Herbicide Orange placed in storage in the US and in the
Pacific before 1970 varied from 0.1 to 47 ug/g (Firestone, 1978). Since Herbicide Orange
was formulated as a 1:1 mixture of the butyl esters of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T, it is
conceivable that the levels of TCDD in individual 2,4,5-T formulations for agricultural
and residential use in the 1960s could have been as high as 100 ug/g. After the
enactment of government regulations, the amounts of TCDD in 2,4,5-T formulations
should be less than 0.1 ug/g.
In C hi or ophenol s
The most important use for chlorinated phenols, such as pentachlorophenol, 2,3,4,6-tetra-, and 2,4,6-trichlorophenols, is as a preservative of wood. These chlorophenols can
contain a variety of contaminants, including polychlorinated di ben zo-p- dioxins (PCDDs)
as well as dibenzofurans (PCDFs) (Nilsson et al, 1978). There can be several positional
isomers of PCDDs and PCDFs, and since the relative ratios of PCDF to PCDD depend on
the particular route of synthesis for the chlorophenol in question, the ratio of
PCDFs/PCDDs can range from about 1 to greater than 20. Usually the level of
2,3,7,8-TCDD is relatively low, although a Scandinavian preparation of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol contained 0.5 ppm of 2,3,7,8-TCDD (Rappe et al, 1979).
In Hexachlorophene
Hexachlorophene is a bactericide and, like 2,4,5-T, is synthesized from 2,4,5-trichlorophenol.
However, after extensive purification, the amount of 2,3,7,8-TCDD in
hexachlorophene is usually less than 0.03 ug/kg (Rappe et al, 1979).
Decomposition of Chlorinated Dioxins
Photodegradation, or photolysis, is the process whereby chemical bonds are broken by
means of photons of light. As applied to chlorinated aromatics, such as chlorinated
dioxins, photodegradation usually proceeds by progressive loss of chlorine to create a
free-radical, or a loss of chlorine through a nucleophilic displacement in the presence of
a solvent or substrate molecule. According to Crosby (1982), three requirements must be
met if degradation is to proceed: 1) light energy must be absorbed by the compound, 2)
light of the appropriate wavelength must be available at a meaningful intensity, and 3) a
source of excess reducing agent (proton donor) must be present, inasmuch as the reaction
involves reductive dechlorination.
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 8

�There is clear experimental evidence to show that dioxins may be photodegraded in the
environment by natural sunlight. The maximum absorption of ultraviolet light for
chlorodioxins is in the range of 290 to 320 nm; 2,3,7,8-TCDD absorbs maximally at
307 nm. Crosby et al (1971) studied photolysis rates of 2,3,7,8-TCDD dissolved in
methanol using both natural and artificial sunlight of 100 mW/cm intensity and at the
absorption maximum of 2,3,7,8-TCDD. Complete photolysis to less chlorinated dioxin
isomers occurred in 24 hours under natural sunlight, while 6 hours of artificial light
destroyed almost 50% of the original 2,3,7,8-TCDD.
Irradiation had no effect on a crystalline water suspension of 2,3,7,8-TCDD. Apparently
the crystalline state may prevent the loss of chlorine or abstraction of hydrogen atoms
(Plimmer, 1978). On the other hand, irradiation reduced the dioxin content of a benzene
solution of 2,3,7,8-TCDD added to water and stabilized with a surfactant (Plimmer et al,
1973). Crosby (1971) also found that, when 2,3,7,8-TCDD was applied to dry or moist
soil, irradiation caused no change after 96 hours. In addition, no degradation occurred
when the substance was applied to a glass plate and irradiated for up to 14 days.
When Crosby et al (1977) exposed on glass petri dishes thin layers of Herbicide Orange
containing 15 ppm of 2,3,7,8-TCDD to summer sunlight, approximately 60% of the TCDD
disappeared after 6 hours. A commercial herbicide composed of butyl esters of 2,4-D
and 2,4,5-T and 10 ppm 2,3,7,8-TCDD was exposed in the same manner; after 6 hours,
only about 30% of the initial TCDD content remained. Herbicide Orange was also
applied to excised rubber plant leaves and to the surface of Sacramento loam soil and
then exposed to sunlight; no TCDD was detected on the leaves after 6 hours at an
application rate of 6.7 mg/cm 2 of leaf surface, while about 30% remained after 6 hours
when applied at 1.3 mg/cm . About 90% of the TCDD remained after 6 hours when the
dioxin was applied to soil at a rate of 10 mg/cm . According to the authors, partial
shading of the lower layers by soil particles accounted for the lesser degree of photolysis.
Analysis

Extraction
Since 2,3,7,8-TCDD has been found in a variety of substances, a number of different
extraction procedures have been developed to separate the compound from its substrate
and to reduce the sample volume to a manageable size. Generally, these procedures take
place in either a neutral or highly basic (alkaline) medium. Contaminants, such as
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and dichlorodiphenylethane (DDE) isomers, are
frequently present in the extracts in relatively high amounts compared to the likely
amount of 2,3,7,8-TCDD. It is now possible to isolate and quantitatively determine
2,3,7,8-TCDD in the presence of the other twenty-one tetrachloro- isomers.
The basic extraction procedures were developed first for the detection of 2,3,7,8-TCDD
in environmental samples (Baughman et al, 1973 a,b; Crummett et al, 1973). After
digestion with alcohol and a strong base, a sequence of extractions with various organic
solvents (eg, ethanol, petroleum ether, methylene chloride, hexane) separates the TCDDs
from the alkaline mixture. The resulting extracts are combined, washed with distilled
water and a strong acid, then treated to remove any traces of water and passed through
one or more chromatographic columns for the partial removal of contaminants.
The neutral extraction procedure was developed primarily to avoid a possible
base-catalyzed formation of chlorodioxins within the mass spectrometer. In this process,
developed by O'Keefe et al (1978) and modified by Albro et al (1977), the sample is first
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 9

�extracted with hexane; the extract is then passed through a series of chromatographic
columns—the first being magnesia-Celite 545, followed by an alumina minicolumn, and
finally a Florisil minicolumn. The Florisil column is eluted with methylene chloride and
the product then condensed for analysis. This technique is particularly effective for fish
tissues and human milk.
Detection
Technological advances in analytical chemistry permit the detection of dioxin
concentrations at least as low as one part per trillion (1 ppt). However, relatively few
analytical laboratories are capable of identifying, much less quantifying, individual
isomers at such a low level. Then too, regulatory agencies can only speculate as to the
safest levels that should be allowed for human exposures.
Most of the current methods for the detection of 2,3,7,8-TCDD employ gas chromatography (GC) and/or mass spectrometry (MS) and even tandem mass spectrometry
(MS/MS).
Other procedures—electron spin resonance spectroscopy (ESR), lowtemperature phosphorescence emission spectroscopy (LTE), and ultraviolet spectroscopy
(UV)~have been used, but their usefulness is limited by poor selectivity and sensitivity.
For the present, a combination of gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GCMS)--both low- and high-resolution—is used almost exclusively for the detection and
quantitative analysis of TCDDs. In the low-resolution scheme, fragment ions at nominal
mass: energy ratios (m/e) of 320 and 322 are monitored and measured as the TCDDs
emerge from the gas chromato graph. To differentiate these compounds from those with
nearly identical mass, such as pentachlorinated biphenyls, high-resolution mass
spectrometry can distinguish the dioxin component with an exact mass of 321.8936.
Toxicological Evidence of a Health Hazard in Animals
General Discussion
2,3,7,8-Tetrachloro-dibenzo-p-dioxin is still considered to be one of the most powerful
poisons for lower animals and the most toxic of all tetrachloro- isomers. The large
differences in acute toxicity among animal species have not been satisfactorily
explained; toxicity levels for higher animals, such as the dog, are estimated to be
between 300 and 3000 ug/kg of body weight (BW) (Schwetz et al, 1973). Acute toxicity
symptoms develop after a latent period of 7 to 10 days; the animals experience a rapid
loss in body weight and depletion of adipose tissue. The loss of body mass is only
partially related to the reduced food intake~"wasting syndrome." The final mechanism
responsible for death is unknown, but the general clinical appearance of the animals
suggests general exhaustion of energy reserves (McConnell et al, 1978).
Significant reduction in the size of the thymus dominates the postmortem findings in all
animal species (Buu-Hoi et al, 1972; Gupta et al, 1973; Vos et al, 1973), but the animals
do not die from infection secondary to immune suppression (Greig et al, 1973).
Pathological changes in other organs are characteristic for a given species; eg, hepatic
lesions are striking in mice, rats and rabbits but relatively minor in guinea pigs, monkeys,
cattle and horses. The organ manifestation may be related to the distribution of the
compound in the body; mice and rats retain several times more of the compound in the
liver, while guinea pigs have much lower concentrations in this organ (van Miller, 1976).
Mucosal changes, particularly cellular hyperplasia or metaplasia, have been observed in
the gastric, intestinal, and urinary tracts of primates and cattle but were not reported in
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 10

�the rat, mouse, and guinea pig.
Similar hyper plastic epidermal changes~ie, chioracne—are the most characteristic
lesions observed in exposed human populations. Corresponding lesions do not, however,
appear in many laboratory species; ie, rats, hamsters, guinea pigs.
In mice,
characteristic epidermal changes occurred in hairless strains but not in the ordinary
laboratory or wild types of animals i(lnagami et al, 1969; Knutson et al, 1982). It is
interesting to note that the absence of the hair follicle is not a prerequisite for the skin
changes; the symptoms were not produced by TCDD directly applied to areas without
hair (ear) in laboratory mice (Poland et al, 1982). Local application of TCDD did produce
characteristic changes in the ear of the rabbit (Kimmia et al, 1957; Vos et al, 1971).
Specific epidermal changes also have been observed after systemic administration in
rabbits and primates (Allen et al, 1977; McNulty, 1977; McConnell et al, 1978; McNulty
et al, 1980, 1981).
The presence of TCDD increases keratinization in epidermal cell tissue cultures in spite
of the simultaneous partial inhibition of DNA synthesis. This observation suggests that
TCDD can stimulate differentiation of human epidermal cells in culture (Osborne et al,
1984).
The exact mechanisms by which TCDD produces its toxic action are still unknown.
Biochemical studies indicate that TCDD is a very potent inducer of aryl hydrocarbon
hydroxylase (AHH), as well as the mixed-function oxidases and the cytochrome P.-450
(P-448) enzymes of the liver, lung, placenta, and kidney of the mouse and rat. However,
Poland et al (1982) do not believe that the induction process is directly responsible for
TCDD's toxicity; they attribute the pleiomorphic clinical symptomatology to the
presence of an intracellular receptor with high binding affinity for TCDD and other
aromatic hydrocarbons (Ah locus) (Nebert et al, 1972). Poland et al (1976) identified a
stereospecific TCDD receptor in the hepatic cytosol of laboratory mice. The receptor
has a maximum binding capacity of approximately 8 x 10
TCDD mol/mg of cytosol
protein, or approximately 5 x 10 TCDD binding sites per cell. The receptor binds other
aromatic hydrocarbons with enzyme induction properties, but the binding affinities in
these instances are only 1/3 to 1/30 that for TCDD. Enzyme-inducing compounds other
than aromatic hydrocarbons do not compete for this particular receptor.
The receptor is a high-molecular-weight protein that serves as a carrier in the nuclear
uptake of TCDD (Carlstedt et al, 1979; Greenlee et al, 1979; Okey et al, 1979, 1980;
Weaver, 1980). Once within the nucleus, the TCDD receptor complex binds to a specific
set of genes in the Ah locus, which initiate the production of RNA responsible for the
synthesis of new cytochrome P-45Q enzymes.
Since the hepatic receptor affinity and the enzyme induction potency of individual TCDD
isomers correspond to their LD5Q and since the presence of the Ah locus is necessary for
expression of TCDD toxicity, Poland et al (1982) have postulated that the TCDD response
is mediated by its binding to the induction receptor. However, the sole presence of the
Ah locus, although essential, is not sufficient for the full expression of toxicity. Many
tissues respond to TCDD by enzyme induction but not all with an adverse reaction and,
while animal species vary widely in their sensitivity to TCDD, they do not differ in their
liver receptor concentration or affinity. The authors suggest that TCDD can induce
enzymes in all tissues that contain the receptor, but activation of an additional battery
of genes to control the expression of a fully developed toxic response only occurs in some
tissues. The composition of these additional genes may vary in different tissues but their
presence is essential for the manifestation of TCDD toxicity; thus, enzyme induction
may be only a secondary sign not directly related to the toxicity of TCDD.
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 11

�Analytical assays were developed for the quantification and characterization of the
TCDD cytosolic receptor (Gasiewicz et al, 1982; Mason et al, 1982; Gasiewicz et al,
1984); they confirm that the hepatic cytosolic receptor in the Sprague-Dawley rat is
similar to the one described in the "responsive" genetic strains of mice (Poland et al,
1976). Genetic strains that are nonresponsive to TCDD toxicity have very low or
unmeasurable levels of the receptor in the liver (Poland et al, 1976; Okey et al, 1979;
Gasiewicz et al, 1982). High concentrations of the receptor are localized in the liver,
lung, intestine, and kidney, which produce the highest levels of induced AHH activity in
all tested animal species (Nebert et al, 1969). Gasiewicz et al (1984) reported that the
receptor concentrations in the liver and lung of the Sprague-Dawiey rat rapidly increase
after birth then decline after 21 days of age; levels in the thymus, on the other hand,
remain constant between 2 and 70 days. In the adult rat, the thymus contains the highest
concentrations of the receptor.
Recent laboratory data indicate that the thymic epithelium and its differentiation is the
primary and most sensitive site of TCDD toxicity. Administration of TCDD produced
genetically dependent thymic atrophy in mice (Poland et al, 1980) and suppressed a
variety of lymphocytic functions (Voss et al, 1973; Faith et al, 1977; Faith at al, 1979).
Clark et al (1981) found that thymic generation of cytotoxic lymphocytes (CTX) is
particularly sensitive to inhibition, since it occurs at a dose level that is 10 to 100 times
lower than the dose required for enzyme induction in the liver (weekly dose of 0.001
ug/kg BW). However, TCDD is not toxic when added directly to a culture of thymic
cells, and an indirect mechanism was postulated for its suppressive effects on the
immune system (Knutson et al, 1980; Clark et al, 1981). Mason et al (1982) reported the
presence of TCDD cytosol receptor in the murine thymus, and Clark et al (1983)
suggested that TCDD produces immunosuppression by acting on the differentiating
process of lymphoid cell population within the thymus rather than on mature
immunocompetent cells in the peripheral lymphoid organs. Recently, replacement of
peripheral lymphocytes in the irradiated bone marrow of mice with a genetically
different sensitivity to TCDD indicated that the immunosuppressive effect of TCDD on
the thyrnic generation of allospecific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTL) is predetermined by
the sensitivity of the radio-resistant tissue of the host, not by the grafted lymphomyeloid
cells. Although the impaired generation of CTL was accompanied by increased activity
of suppressor T-cells, the authors concluded that TCDD acts indirectly through receptors
in the thymic epithelium rather than on the lymphomyeloid tissue (Nagarkatti et al,
1984). Their results were confirmed by Greenlee et al (1984), who co-cultivated
thymocytes with thymic epithelium in the cell culture. Subsequent treatment with
TCDD altered the capacity of the thymic epithelium to support the intrathymic
differentation of T-lymphocytes.
Since the symptoms of TCDD toxicity resemble manifestations of thyroid dysfunction—
eg, loss of body weight, alopecia—the role of the thyroid gland in mediating the toxicity
of TCDD has been suggested (Bastomsky, 1977; Neal et al, 1979). However, Gasiewicz et
al (1980) observed unchanged mortality in euthyroid rats given the lethal dose of TCDD
and maintained at constant or increasing body weight by parenteral nutrition. In
contrast, administration of the same lethal dose resulted in no mortality in athyroid
(thyroidectomized) animals in spite of the fact that their body weight losses were not
different from the TCDD-treated euthyroid animals. Supplementation of thyroidectomized animals with thyroid hormone (T4) brought mortality to the level of the
control group 31 days after injection (Rozman et al, 1984 a) but to only one-half of the
control group at 90 days (Rozman et al, 1984 b). Triiodothyronine (T3) was equally
effective (Scheufler et al, 1984).

d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 12

�The whole body half-life of TCDD is between 20 and 30 days in the rat (Rose et al, 1979)
and guinea pig (Gasiewicz, 1979; Nolan, 1979), and 10 to 12 days in the hamster (Olson et
al, 1980). Differences in the rates of elimination cannot completely explain differences
in toxicity: guinea pigs and rats have identical half-lives but their susceptibilities to
TCDD (LDtQ ) are different. The discrepancy is more striking in the Syrian hamster
whose elimination rate is nearly the same as that of the guinea pig and rat but its
resistance to TCDD toxicity is larger by several orders of magnitude.
Similarly, the accumulated body burden of TCDD does not seem to be related to toxicity,
for the Syrian hamster can tolerate up to 5,000 ug of TCDD per kg of tissue without signs
of liver toxicity.
Some investigators think that the more resistant animal species, such as the beagle dog,
convert TCDD to metabolites at a higher rate (Poiger et al, 1982). Weber et al (1981)
found the toxicity of the crude canine biliary metabolite to be at least 100 times lower
than that of TCDD. The detoxification process occurs primarily through hydroxylation
and methylation of the tetrachloro- molecule to the trichloro- metabolite and finally
cleavage of one or both ethereal bridges in the dioxin molecule (Poiger et al, 1982).
TCDD metabolites, however, differ among individual animal species; for example,
different biotransformation products were identified in the laboratory rat (Poiger et al,
1982). Olson et al (1983) found that most of the metabolites in the hepatocytes, bile, and
urine of the Syrian hamster are glucuronic acid conjugates; the 1-hydroxy derivative of
the tetrachloro- isomer was the most abundant metabolite in the hepatocytes.
Administration of P-45Q cytochrome inhibitors, such as SKF-525, slightly decreased the
metabolic rate of TCDD (Neal, 1983). This is consistent with previous findings wherein
pretreatment with enzyme inducers decreases the lethality of TCDD, but administration
of P-450 blockers increases it (Beatty et al, 1978).
Mutagenicity
No conclusive evidence of mutagenicity has been observed in microbial assay studies of
TCDD. Of more relevance to man are the results on mammalian cells--ie, HeLa; Balb3T3, normal mouse fibroblasts; SV101, virus (SV^O)-transformed 3T3 mouse fibroblasts;
human foreskin fibroblasts and normal human lymphocytes (Beatty et al, 1975). There
was no significant growth inhibition in the cell cultures, nor were there discernible
ultrastructural changes under electron microscopy.
Rogers et al (1982) examined the mutagenicity of TCDD in L-5178Y mouse lymphoma
cells.
Doses of 0.1 to 0.5 ug TCDD/ml induced significant mutations in the
methotrexate-, excess of thymidine-, and thioguanine-selection systems. No induced
mutations were noted in the ouabain or cytosine-arabinoside systems. The authors
concluded that mutagenic effects of TCDD show similarities with proflavin and other
acridines, its genotoxicity being exerted by DNA intercalation (Wassom et al, 1978).
In baby hamster kidney cells (BHK cell transformation system), 2,3,7,8-TCDD was also
positive, the dichloro- and trichloro- isomers were weakly positive, and the octachloroand unsubstituted dioxins were negative; unfortunately, the authors provided no specific
information on the test concentrations (Hay et al, 1983).
Tests for chromosomal aberrations in bone-marrow cells of laboratory rats were negative
after a single administration of TCDD (Green et al, 1975) but positive after 13 weeks of
chronic dosage (Green, 1977). Similarly, single doses of TCDD did not induce dominant
lethal mutations (Khera et al, 1973).

d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 13

�It may be concluded that the positive data on the mutagenic activity of TCDD are
isolated in the literature and refer mainly to high TCDD concentrations in closed
laboratory systems. The positive findings contrast sharply with data of Poland et al
(1979) who examined the in vivo covalent binding of TCDD to rat liver macromolecules
using minimal levels of TCDD to interact with DNA. Although 18% to 64% of the
administered dose accumulated in the liver, virtually all of the deposited radioactivity
was extractable. Only 6 pmol of TCDD per mol of nucleotide residuum was associated
with the DNA. This represents a binding level that is four to six orders of magnitude
lower than that of most chemical carcinogens, and it contradicts the probability that
covalent binding of TCDD to DNA and subsequent somatic mutation is responsible for the
oncogenic potency of TCDD.
Oncogenicity
Several investigators have examined the tumor-initiating and -promoting potencies of
TCDD on mouse skin. DiGiovanni et al (1977) found little or no tumor-causing or tumorpromoting properties of TCDD, and Berry et al (1978, 1979) found an inhibitory effect on
skin tumors in mice.
In contrast, dermal application of TCDD was carcinogenic in Swiss-Webster mice (NTP
Rept 80-32, 1980); the females had integumentary fibrosarcomas, while results from the
males were inadequate. Poland et al (1982) tested the capacity of TCDD to promote
tumor formation in the skin of hairless and haired HRS/3 inbred mice, which have a
genetically different sensitivity for TCDD. The authors found a powerful promoting
effect of TCDD in the "responsive" hairless mouse but not in the resistant heterozygote
(haired) strain. This effect was 100 times stronger than that of tetradecanoyl-phorbol
acetate (TPA). It is important to note that TCDD produces acneiforme changes in the
skin of a hairless mutant that are identical to those observed in human skin (Knutson et
al, 1982).
In 1982, the International Agency for Cancer Research (IARC) reviewed all studies in
which TCDD was tested orally in mice and rats and dermally in mice; the agency
declared that the evidence for TCDD's carcinogenicity in animals was sufficient (IARC,
1982). The experimental evidence came primarily from two sources: 1) chronic feeding
studies where only the highest administered level (0.1 ug TCDD/kg BW per day) produced
an increased incidence of hepatocellular carcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas of the
lung, hard palate/nasal turbinates, or tongue in the Sprague-Dawley rat (Kociba, 1973,
1978), and 2) studies by the National Toxicology Program (NTP) in which TCDD given by
gavage was carcinogenic in the B6C3F1 mouse; hepatocellular carcinomas were observed
in both sexes of mouse but only female mice and male rats developed follicular cell
thyroid adenomas (NTP-Rept 80-31).
The positive initiating effects of TCDD in the chemical carcinogenesis process conflict
with indications that neither TCDD nor its metabolites form covalent adducts with
cellular DNA. Poland et al (1979) found no significant DNA binding in vivo after
administration of radioactive labeled TCDD; similar results were reported for in vitro
TCDD binding (Piper et al, 1973; Vinopal et al, 1973; Ghiasuddin et al, 1975; Rose et al,
1976; Nelson et al, 1977).
Pitot et al (1980) tested TCDD's potential for promoting hepatocarcinogenesis following
partial hepatectomy and a single initiating dose of diethylnitrosamine (DEN); TCDD was
thereafter administered subcutaneously at two levels every two weeks for seven
months. The higher dose (1.4 ug/kg BW) produced five hepatocellular carcinomas,
whereas the animals treated only with DEN had no carcinomas and only a few enzymed57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 14

�altered foci. The authors concluded that TCDD is a potent promoter of hepatocarcinogenesis. Similar conclusions were reported in TCDD promotion studies on the skin
of the "responsive" strain of the HRS/3 hairless mouse (Poland et al, 1982).
Teratogenicity
2,4,5-T containing 30 ppm of TCDD in two strains of mice (C57BL/6 and AKR) and one
strain of rats, produced increased incidences of cleft palate in mice and cystic kidney in
the rat (Courtney et al, 1970); when comparably dosed with a sample containing only 1
ppm of TCDD, teratogenesis was not evident (Emerson et al, 1971). A gavage dose in the
rat of 0.125 ug/kg/day from the 6th-15th days of gestation showed only a slight effect
that was much pronounced at the level of 0.5 ug/kg/day (Sparschu et al, 1971).
In utero exposure of mice to TCDD during the final half of the gestation period produced
fetuses with poorly developed lymphatic systems and fatty infiltrates in the liver
(Neubert et al, 1973).
Prenatally, TCDD causes hydronephrosis, which according to Gibson (1976), may be only
a sign of delayed maturation and not permanent damage inasmuch as the test animals
were taken by cesarean section. Gibson did find altered PAH transport from kidney
slices of neonate animals even where there was no evidence of a lesion; the significance
of these data in the adult is unknown. TCDD also caused postnatal hydronephrosis in a
suckling pup whose foster mother had been dosed beforehand with the compound (Moore
et al, 1973).
A low proportion of kidney abnormalities also was found in the rabbit; Giavini (1982)
considers the kidney to be the target organ of TCDD's effect in many animal species. No
other severe teratological effects from TCDD have been described in the literature.
Reproductive Effects
It is still unclear whether TCDD affects spermatogenesis in lower animals (Wassom et al,
1977, 1978) and primates (Allen, 1979) by a direct action on testicular parenchyma or
only secondarily as a result of cachexia produced by the high level of exposure. The
maternal and embryofetal toxicity of TCDD is comparable among the various species; eg,
0.1 ug/kg BW was a "no effects" level in the mouse (Smith et al, 1976), rat (Sparschu et
al, 1971), and rabbit (Giavini et al, 1982).
Pregnant female rabbits were treated orally with 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 ug TCDD/kg BW
on the 6th to 15th days of gestation. No abortions occurred at the lowest dose of 0.1
ug/kg; two, five, and three dams aborted at the higher doses of 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0,
respectively. The high abortion rate was ascribed to severe maternal toxicity and the
incidence of total resorptions, which increased at the higher doses. No living fetuses
were found at term in the group with the highest exposure. No external malformations
occurred, and histological examination did not reveal any signs of teratogenicity (Giavini
et al, 1982).
More recent data (McNulty, 1983) on pregnant Rhesus monkeys treated with 0.2, 1.0, and
5.0 ug TCDD/kg BW between 20 to 40 days of pregnancy revealed no increase in abortion
rate or maternal toxicity from the lowest dose. At 1.0 ug/kg BW, however, there were
three abortions out of four animals. Maternal toxicity symptoms were recorded in 50%
of the animals and one out of four mothers died. Abortions and maternal deaths occurred
in all animals fed 5.0 ug/kg BW. Inasmuch as the Rhesus monkey seems to be particularly
sensitive to TCDD and the administered doses greatly exceeded the potential levels of
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 15

�environmental exposure, the pharmacokinetics of TCDD during pregnancy—particularly
the transfer of the toxin to placenta and fetus—must be investigated further. The
fetuses were reported dead before the abortion, with no abnormalities except for small
changes in the sebaceous glapds.
Studies of Human Populations
Introduction
The most significant information about the acute and long-term effects in man of Agent
Orange, 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T, and their toxic contaminants is provided by the clinical,
epidemiological, and pathological studies of the personnel who handled and sprayed the
defoliant in Vietnam, as well as those who dedrummed the defoliant at the close of the
conflict. The populations that were most heavily exposed were industrial workers
exposed during routine manufacture and use, and in several instances when the reaction
process went out of control. These workers provide critical information regarding the
acute, chronic, and long-term effects of the parent herbicides, as well as their
contaminants, especially 2,3,7,8-TCDD. Approximately 18 distinct industrial populations
of record have been exposed, and several of these as a result of such "runaway"
reactions. In some instances, workers have beeen exposed both to a trichlorophenol
runaway reaction as well as the routine production and use of trichlorophenol. In both
situations, 2,3,7,8-TCDD has been the major toxic contaminant.
Another source of data is workers who formulated or sprayed 2,4,5-T or were exposed to
areas where the herbicide had been applied. This chlorophenoxy compound, later known
to contain varying amounts of TCDD, was widely used from 1948 - 1970 in large scale
farming, family gardens, forest management, and weed control along roadsides and
railroad rights-of-way. A gauge of the extent of such human exposure in the US is
provided by the production figure in 1964 for domestic use alone—9.8 million pounds.
Recently, both scientific and lay communities have become concerned about contamination of the environment by the inappropriate use and disposal of the phenoxy herbicides
and of TCDD-containing materials, such as in Missouri. As a consequence, pilot studies
have been carefully designed to determine the health effects of TCDD and its related
compounds in at least one heavily contaminated area.
In studies of all populations, the critical components are proper design of the study,
carefully defined population cohorts, and suitable controls. It should be recognized,
however, that in the study of industrial populations, which are likely to be the most
heavily exposed, it is often not: possible to satisfy completely the requirements for
randomization, for percent participation, or for knowledge of exposure levels. This is
particularly true for long-term follow-up investigations.
Vietnam Veterans (Studies Complete or Partially Complete)
—Ranch Hand Program

According to Lathrop et al (1984), the personnel who filled the tanks and flew the
missions in Operation Ranch Hand are currently the most relevant human population for
study. The purpose of the Ranch Hand (RH) program, an ongoing, two-phase, highly
sophisticated epidemiological investigation of this population, has been to determine
whether there are long-term health effects from occupational exposure to Agent Orange
and other herbicides during military service in Vietnam. The matched cohort design in a
nonconcurrent prospective setting has incorporated mortality, morbidity, and follow-up
studies on 1,174 Air Force "Ranch Hand" personnel who were involved in the actual spray
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 16

�operations; these men are being compared to a matched control group of Air Force C-130
cargo personnel who had no exposure to Agent Orange. The first phase, a mortality study
(USAF, 1983) published 30 3une 1983, has shown no unusual findings that can be
attributed to the herbicide, though the number of deaths is not substantial at present.
The second phase of the study, released in February 1984, is designed to determine
morbidity incidence. The 270-page report is a myriad of detailed findings, including
investigations of many of the major categories of disease and of most of the human organ
systems; such as malignancies, neurological and psychological assessments, fertility
dysfunction, and evaluations of hepatic, dermatologic, cardiovascular, immunologic,
hematologic, pulmonary, renal, and endocrine functions. Considered a baseline, it too
has shown no definitive clinical endpoints, such as soft tissue sarcoma, porphyria cutanea
tarda, or chloracne. Information has been derived from two sources: 1) a specially
designed questionnaire given to the 2,706 respondees, who were about equally divided
between the RH group and its controls, and 2) a physical examination on a total of 2,269
individuals, again about equally divided between Ranch Hand personnel and controls.
Positive findings included significantly more minor birth defects (eg, birth marks) in the
RH group compared to the controls. The fertility and reproductive results are
preliminary, based largely upon subjective self-reports that await medical record and
birth certificate verification. Although an excessive number of neonatal deaths and
physically handicapped children occurred in the RH group, the data—from unverified
subjective questionnaire reporting—must be confirmed from medical records and birth
certificates. A large number of basal cell carcinomas of the skin were reported in the
RH group, but these data were not adjusted for sunlight exposure, the recognized primary
cause of these cancers. A more complete analysis of this data is planned for the first
follow-up examination. Although biochemical differences between the RH and control
groups existed, the results were still within normal limits.
Negative findings indicated that there were no significant differences between the RH
and control groups with respect to the occurrence of systemic cancers; clinically
significant blood abnormalities; or cardiovascular, renal, pulmonary, hepatic, and
neurologic effects. Among the exposed, the absence of chloracne, soft tissue sarcomas,
and porphyria cutanea tarda was noted.
Periodic follow-up examinations—at 3-, 5-, 15-, and 20-year intervals—will be compared
to the baseline information. The preliminary nature of this report is repeatedly
emphasized. Many of the group differences were based largely upon recall or elicited
through the questionnaire and subjective data; although a subtle effect of differential
reporting is suggested, the data have not been fully evaluated.
Additional work on the baseline data is still required, including data-base refinement,
establishment of follow-up examination requirements, and collaboration with other dioxin
research projects.
While it is premature to accept these findings as conclusive, they "should be reassuring to
Ranch Handers" because "no major clinical health problems" have surfaced and the men
are "overall (in) good general health for (their) age."

On 11 February 1985, the US Air Force released a second mortality report (Wolfe et al,
1984). Like the first mortality study, which appeared in 3anuary 1983, this report did not
reveal any statistically significant differences in the number of deaths between the
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 17

�Ranch Hand group and its comparison members. Ranch Hand officers and flyers had
slightly lower death rates and RH ground personnel had a slightly higher death rate than
their respective comparisons; none of the differences was statistically significant and
there was no apparent relationship between exposure and mortality. Compared to US
white males, the RH officers and enlisted men, as well as their comparisons, are living
significantly longer than expected; the pattern is similar to the patterns of the DOD
retirees and civil service personnel. There is presently no evidence of increased
mortality in persons exposed to herbicides during the Ranch Hand operations in Southeast
Asia. Though the elapsed time has been sufficient for the development of clinically
significant conditions, it may still be too early to see the development of conditions that
might be attributable to herbicide exposure.
—CDC Birth Defects Study
Aimed at determining if there is any possible association between Vietnam service and
subsequent male parentage of congenitally malformed offspring, this case-control study
by the Centers for Disease Control was based on the experiences of parents of selected
babies born during 1968 through 1980. From among 13,000 live- and stillbirths registered
with the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program (MACDP), 7,133 cases with
serious or major birth defects according to the International Classification of Disease,
8th revision (ICD-8), were chosen; a serious defect was defined as being associated with
premature death, the cause of a substantial handicap, or the need for surgery or
extensive medical care. These cases were matched with 4,246 controls according to
race, year of birth, and hospital of birth.
The results (Erickson et al, 1984) provide "strong" evidence that Vietnam veterans are at
no greater risk than other men for siring babies with all types of serious structural birth
defects combined. The evidence for Agent Orange-associated risks is weak; if there is
any risk from exposure, it is either small or it is limited to select groups of veterans or
to specific types of defects. There is no explanation for the likely association between
Agent Orange exposure and spina bifida, cleft lip with or without cleft palate, or
congenital neoplasms; these associations may be an element of chance or the result of
some unknown bias or uncontrolled confounding factor.
—Estimate of Vietnam Troop Exposure
In an effort to evaluate the possible toxic effects of the dioxin in Agent Orange on
Vietnam veterans, Stevens (1981) calculated a minimum toxic dose (MTD) from animal
and human data, an intake transfer factor (from human data), and from data on the
spraying operation of Agent Orange in Vietnam, he calculated the fraction of the MTD to
which a soldier would have been exposed. The calculation of the MTD (0.1 ug/kg) was
based on primate studies of TCDD exposure and human studies of Yusho oil contaminated
with tetrachlorodibenzofuran (TCDF). The average intake transfer factor (1:2,050) was
based on the calculation of data from an individual exposed to TCDD in a Missouri horse
arena and approximately 75 individuals exposed in zone A of Seveso, Italy. From
available information on the spraying operation (Operation Ranch Hand) in Vietnam, it
was calculated that a 70 kg man would have been exposed to 1/14,000 of the MTD, or
0.1 ug/kg. Thus, if a veteran had been exposed to 8 ug of TCDD/m2/day/one year tour of
duty, his cumulative intake would have been 1.4 ug, or 0.02 ug/kg. This amount, Stevens
concluded, could not be responsible either for the veterans' alleged systemic illnesses or
the birth defects in their offspring.
Interlaboratory analyses for 2,3,7,8-TCDD in the adipose tissue from Vietnam veterans
indicated a correlation between the degree of exposure to Agent Orange and the tissue
levels of TCDD. For example, the "heavily" exposed subjects had the highest levels of
TCDD--greater than 20 ppt (Gross et al, 1984).
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 18

�—VA Agent Orange Registry
The Registry was established by the Veterans Administration in 1978 as an index to the
records of those Vietnam veterans who have come to the VA for Agent Orange-related
examinations. It is essentially an extract of the veteran's complete records: his name
and address, examination center, brief information about military service, estimated
herbicide exposure, and elements of the findings of the physical examination. Besides
serving as a means of identifying and contacting the veteran about developments and the
possible need for further testing, it also provides a means of detecting health trends and
other characteristics about the group.
Inasmuch as the information is supplied
voluntarily, any comparisons that are made are not statistically valid.
As of 31 December 1983, there were 130,220 initial examinations and 31,471 follow-ups.
Thus far, there is no unusual morbidity or mortality associated with either Vietnam
service or Agent Orange exposure.
There have also been attempts to compare the distribution of malignant neoplasm cases
in the Registry with a reference population. Subjects in the SEER (Surveillance
Epidemiology End Results) program, representing about 10% of the entire US population
and being fairly representative agewise, have been selected for reference; from these,
the number of malignant neoplasm cases diagnosed between 1973-1977 among US males
of ages 25 to 39 is expected to include most Vietnam-era veterans. As yet, there have
been no significant differences in the proportion of cancers of various sites and the
proportions of soft tissue sarcomas and skin cancer, though some differences—marginal,
yet statistically significant—were noted for lymphomas and cancers of the buccal cavity
and pharynx (Shepard, 1983; Shepard et al, 1983).
—Agent Orange Biopsy Registry of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology
The Agent Orange Registry (AOR), in the Department of Environmental and DrugInduced Pathology of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP), was begun in
1978. Its objective is to attempt to establish whether or not there is a link between
Vietnam exposure to Agent Orange and the current illnesses of these veterans. Any
unusual features in the findings would suggest the need for further study. A linkage
might be suggestive if there were such unusual features based on past experience with
some environmental diseases that have had rather selective anatomic targets and a
rather limited number of induced diseases (eg, asbestos and mesothelioma, vinyl chloride
and hemangiosarcoma of the liver). To date, the AOR has been unable to show any
unusual disease patterns, including cancer.
Biopsy and autopsy specimens for the Registry project are received primarily from the
Veterans Administration and Armed Forces. Two phases will be carried out: Phase I is
to collect and evaluate the morphologic findings of veterans or active duty personnel who
served in Vietnam during 1962-1973, while Phase II will be concerned with veterans or
active duty personnel who had not served in Vietnam and who will serve as a matched
control set for cases in Phase I.
The Phase I group is being closely scrutinized for: 1) any clustering or peaks that
represent similar organ-diagnosis combinations, 2) any clustering of pathologic findings
that are unusual for a site or organ, and 3) any unusual age of occurrence for a particular
diagnosis.
As of March 1983, pathologic diagnoses and demographic data have been tabulated on
1,200 veterans who had service in Vietnam. Over 300 different diagnoses, involving 84
different organs or anatomic sites, were made.
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 19

�No clusters of medical significance have appeared; in other words, there have been no
persistent patterns of adverse health effects.
Two clusters of relatively trivial
lesions—lipomas (79 cases) and epidermal inclusion cysts (96 cases)--were noted, but both
were benign and of no serious prognostic significance. The relatively large incidences of
these lesions may be due to their superficial locations in or on the skin; being visible or
palpable, there is more concern to have them removed.
Six cases with unusual features occurred singly, not as diagnostic clusters: 1) mucinous
adenocarcinoma of the colon with unusual features; 2) adenocarcinoma of the jejunum
with metastases, in which both site and age were unusual for a 37-year-old black male; 3)
large cell undifferentiated carcinoma of the lung, probably primary in the lung, unusual
for age 31; 4) anaplastic adenocarcinoma of the lung (diagnosed in 1978) and welldifferentiated prostatic carcinoma (diagnosed in 1980); metachronous malignancies—the
only metachronous combination out of the total 1,200 cases—two tumors of different
histologic types and different sites and types; 5) carcinoma of the prostate (age 44) at an
unusually young age; and 6) gonadoblastoma of the testis, sarcoma of the epididymis, and
metastatic carcinoma of the inguinal lymph node.
These 1,200 cases in the Agent Orange Registry have failed to reveal "unusual" features
of apparent significance, which may be a premature conclusion because: the small
number of cases may not reflect rare yet significant events, and environmental factors,
which may produce unusual lesions in unusual sites, also may be associated with the more
common lesions in common sites.
In order to guard against missing the more common lesions, the AOR is now entering
Phase II. A matched set of control cases is being developed, having as a major criterion,
"no service in Vietnam." These cases will come from the same VA hospitals and from the
same time period (ie, 1978-1984) as the bulk of cases in Phase I, and will be matched by
age, sex, and race. The anticipated size of the Phase II groups will be about 4,000 cases.
—Single Case Reports
Isolated cases of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) among non-Ranch Hand veterans from
Vietnam who were exposed to Agent Orange have been reported (Sarma et al, 1982;
Schacter et al, 1984). Whether the STS cases are related to service in Vietnam or other
unrelated events is yet to be determined.
—of "Dedrumming1 Personnel
Approximately 200 civilians were assigned by the military to destroy the contents of
about 40,000 55-gallon drums (2.22 million gallons) of surplus Agent Orange at the close
of the Vietnam war.
In addition to environmental monitoring during this operation, pre- and postexposure
physical examinations, including x-rays, neurological examinations, and extensive clinical
chemical tests, were performed on all workers. Military personnel revealed no apparent
physical effects (Young et al, 1978).
—Australian Birth Defects Study
An extensive survey of Australian veterans was conducted to examine the impact on
birth rates of those who served in Vietnam. Entitled "Case-Control Study of Congenital
Anomalies and Vietnam Service (Birth Defects Study)," it is the first such study of its
kind to be completed. Included in the study population were Vietnam veterans,
contemporary Army personnel who had not been in Vietnam and members of the
community who did not serve in the Army during this period. The records of 34 hospitals
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 20

�and four cytogenetic laboratories were used to identify 8,517 subjects with birth defects
and an equal number of matched controls, which consisted of healthy infants that were
delivered in the same hospitals. The size of each group was reduced to 127 infants with
defects and 123 normals when the service records of the fathers were taken into account
(Donovan et al, 1983).
No association between exposure and adverse pregnancy outcomes was found, and the
risk of siring a malformed child was no higher for either the Vietnam or the non-Vietnam
veteran than for other Australian males, including the National Service and Australian
Regular Army Vietnam veterans (Armstrong, 1983; Lipson, 1983; Minister of Veteran
Affairs, 1983).
—Vietnamese Epidemioiogic Study
A major Vietnamese epidemiological study has been described in the news section of
Science magazine. Among some 40,000 families in North Vietnam, there was reportedly
an increased incidence of congenital abnormalities in the offspring of fathers exposed to
herbicides during the Vietnam war. In addition, children born of South Vietnamese
women who were directly exposed to the spraying are said to have a suggested increase
in birth defects, including neural tube defects, deformities of the sensory organs and
limbs, Siamese twins, and cleft lip. No definite link between Agent Orange spraying and
the anomalies has been ascertained (Norman, 1983).
Vietnam Veterans (Studies In Progress)
—VA Identical Twin Study (Vietnam Experience Twins Study, VETS)
Still in the design phase, this series of complex comparisons of identical twins may make
it possible to establish whether or not Vietnam service has affected morbidity. The
mental and physical health status of the subjects will be surveyed by means of a five-day
battery of psychological, physiological, and biochemical tests.
The study will be conducted by the VA's St. Louis facility; examinations are to be done
under contract. The VA has requested the Medical Follow-up Agency (MFUA) of the
National Academy of Sciences' Commission on Life Sciences to develop the registry to be
used in this project. MFUA has maintained a comparable registry since 1967 of 15,000
male pairs of twins from the WWII US Armed Forces, from which useful epidemiologic
studies on schizophrenia and diabetes have been obtained. It is hoped that the new
registry will also be about 15,000 strong. The VA wants about 600 pairs of twins: 100
pairs in which both twins served in Vietnam, another 100 in which neither served there,
and 400 pairs in which only one served in Vietnam. A computerized list of candidates is
to be furnished by the Department of Defense, state twin registries, birth records of
certain states (ie, those that paid a bonus to their Vietnam veterans), VA in-patient
hospital records, and VA compensation and pension records. Once compiled, the registry
will be useful for future investigations into the relationships between genetic and
environment and disease (CLS Lifelines :2, Spring 1984).
NRC expects to complete the entire registry early in 1987.
—Vietnam Ground Troops Study
The VA was directed by Congress in January 1979 (PL 96-151) to conduct an
epidemiologic study of Vietnam ground troops who may have been exposed to Agent
Orange and to determine if there have been long-term effects from such exposure. The
scope of the investigation was later expanded (PL 97-27 of November 1981) to include
other factors, such as medications and environmental hazards or conditions, in the
Vietnam experience. In January 1983, the Congress designated the Centers for Disease
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 21

�Control to conduct the work for the Veterans Administration under an interagency
agreement.
CDC proposes two retrospective cohort studies and one case-control study. One cohort
of male US Army veterans of Vietnam conflict is to be compared with male Army
Vietnam-era veterans who did not serve in Vietnam—hereafter referred to as "Vietnam
Experience" study; the other cohort will be male Vietnam veterans who differ in their
probable level of exposure—to be referred to as the "Agent Orange" study. Each of the
two cohort studies will have mortality assessment, health interview, and clinical and
laboratory assessment.
The case-control study is to evaluate the risk of contracting STS and lymphoma among
Vietnam veterans—designated as the "Selected Cancers," or "Sarcoma/Lymphoma,"
study—and will be limited to males of draftable age during the Vietnam conflict and to
veterans from all branches of the military. This study will involve a health and exposure
interview. Malaria was the most significant medical complaint in Vietnam; by 1970,
neuropsychiatric disorders became the second leading disease. Diarrheal, skin, and
venereal diseases were also significant (US DHHS, 1983).
Inasmuch as this will be a massive piece of research, consisting of interviews and
physical examinations of several thousand veterans, its rate of progress cannot be
predicted. However, CDC expects to have final reports for the Agent Orange and
Vietnam Experience Studies completed by 30 September 1988 and for the Selected
Cancers Study by 30 September 1989 (US CDC, 1984).
Females should be studied separately, inasmuch as they would require different sampling
strategies and emphases in interviews and medical examinations. Furthermore, too few
women were involved for any meaningful case-control study (US DHHS, 1983).
—VA Mortality Study

This work, begun in 1982, is analyzing death certificates for rates and causes of death of
some 60,000 deceased Vietnam veterans and comparing the data with those of nonVietnam veterans. By the end of 1984, the collection and coding of data should be
completed, at which time the analytical phase can commence.
—VA Case-Control Study of Soft Tissue Sarcoma
Individuals with soft tissue sarcomas, as drawn from the files of the Armed Forces
Institute of Pathology, will be compared to those without such tumors, taking into
account service in Vietnam and probable exposure to Agent Orange. As of March 1984,
221 hospitals have agreed to cooperate in providing two matched controls for each case
of sarcoma, one of which is to be a neoplastic disease other than STS. The study is
expected to be completed in 1986.
—VA Retrospective Study of Dioxins and Furans in Adipose Tissue
Since 1970, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been collecting human
adipose tissue from the general population to be analyzed for residues of certain
pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). The bank of approximately 8,000
samples contains specimens from approximately 524 males born between 1937 and 1952,
the Vietnam veteran age group. It is highly probable that many of these men served in
the military during the Vietnam era and very likely that some actually served in
Vietnam. The veteran status, especially Vietnam service status, for each will be
established from military and VA databases. Chemical analyses of these specimens for
selected chlorinated dioxins and dibenzofurans will provide data on background levels of
2,3,7,8-TCDD in the US male population and will determine if duty in the military or
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 22

�service in Vietnam has affected the levels of TCDD in adipose tissue.
—Australian Mortality Study

According to a three-part retrospective study by the Australian Commonwealth Institute
of Health, which compared the death rates among 19,209 Vietnam-era veterans with
26,957 non-Vietnam veterans, the Australian Vietnam veteran is not dying at any faster
rate than his counterpart who did not serve there; nor are the causes of death from
diseases that have been suggested as being linked to phenoxy herbicides. Neither was
there a statistically significant difference in the rates from soft-tissue sarcoma or nonHodgkin's lymphoma (US VA, 1985). These findings are similar to those of earlier ones
reported in 1983.
—State-Sponsored Programs

Nineteen states—identified in the Appendix—currently have commissions or programs
designed to assist their residents who were Vietnam veterans. The activities of these
commissions and programs vary considerably, from registries to university-based clinical
studies.
Workplace Exposures
—Monsanto (Nitro, West Virginia)

A process accident, or "runaway reaction," in the manufacture of 2,4,5-T occurred in the
Monsanto Chemical plant at Nitro, West Virginia in March 1949. Those employees
involved in the clean-up and repair of equipment experienced acute symptoms that were
characterized by skin, eye, and respiratory tract irritation, headache, dizziness, and
nausea.
Soon after the accident and on three occasions during 1949-1953, Ashe and Suskind (1949,
1950) and Suskind (1953) examined 12 of the workers who were severely affected with
chloracne; an additional 26 persons with chloracne who were not connected with the
accident were examined in 1953. The most frequent clinical symptoms were acneiforrn
lesions followed by severe muscle pains in the upper and lower extremities, shoulders,
and thorax; fatigue; nervousness and irritability; decreased libido; dyspnea; vertigo; and
intolerance to cold. In addition to one case of sensory loss in the foot, there were four
instances of hepatomegaly and other signs of liver impairment. Upon re-examination of
several of the above workers in 1953, there was marked improvement in the skin lesions
and a general subsidence of the noncutaneous symptoms. Some persons had persistent
but inexplicable complaints of pains in the back and lower extremities, nervousness,
excess fatigue, and dyspnea.
Of the 122 persons identified as having had chloracne following the accident in 1949, 121
were selected for a cohort mortality study (Zack et al, 1980). The results of the
standardized mortality analysis revealed that the 32 actual deaths (from all causes) were
less than the 46.41 expected deaths; this SMR of 0.69 was the only statistically
significant value among the collected data. Nor was there any apparent excess of deaths
from malignant neoplasms or circulatory diseases. Of the nine deaths from malignant
neoplasms, five were due to lung cancers—four of them in cigarette smokers—three were
from neoplasms of the lymphatic and hematopoietic tissue; one was a rare form of skin
cancer, a fibrous histiocytoma, which can be classified as a soft tissue sarcoma.
A clinical epidemiological follow-up study of 367 current or former employees of the
plant was reported by Suskind et al (1984). The two cohorts in this investigation
consisted of 204 subjects who were clearly exposed to the 2,4,5-T process at some time
from 1948-1969, and 163 subjects with no exposure to 2,4,5-T. Clinical evidence of
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 23

�chloracne persisted in 53% of the exposed subjects, while no cases of chloracne were
observed in the unexposed group. An association was found between the persistence of
chloracne and the presence and severity of actinic elastosis of the skin, as well as
between exposure and a history of gastrointestinal ulcer. Pulmonary function values of
exposed workers who currently smoked were lower than values for unexposed workers
who currently smoked. There was a greater frequency of low HDL cholesterol values
among those with persistent chloracne. No significant differences were detected
between the exposed and nonexposed groups for abnormal laboratory values of alkaline
phosphatase, SCOT, SGPT, and GGPT. There were also no differences in these same
parameters between the exposed who never had chloracne and those who had chloracne
currently or in the past. And finally, there was neither evidence of increased risk of
cardiovascular disease, hepatic disease, renal damage, central nervous system (CNS) or
peripheral nervous system disorders, reproductive disorders, or birth defects nor
differences in nerve conduction velocity measurements.
A health survey in 1979 by Moses et al (1984) of 226 current or former employees at
Nitro between 1948 and 1977 found a history of chloracne in 52% of the 226 workers; the
mean duration for residual chloracne was 26 years. An increase of abnormal gammaglutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) was reported, with a higher mean GGT in those with
chloracne compared to those without. There was a statistically significant decrease in
"sensation to pin prick" in 11 of 60 subjects with current or past chloracne but none in
the 34 who never had chloracne. No mention is made of age differences or other factors
that could account for this finding.
—Dow Chemical (Midland, Michigan)

Ott et al (1980) examined the mortality experiences of a group of 204 workers who had
been exposed to 2,4,5-T during its production from 1950-1971. Many of the workers were
also potentially exposed to a number of other chemicals during this period. Only 19
episodes of acute exposure were noted during 1954-1970, which consisted largely of
irritant exposures to the eyes and skin. No cases of chloracne or porphyria cutanea tarda
were evident, and mortality of this limited sample was stated to be comparable to that
of US white males, as well as to the "background mortality experience" at this location.
A mortality study of 61 employees who had been engaged in the production of
trichlorophenol and who had been accidentally exposed in 1964 to TCDD did not disclose
an elevated mortality rate; there were four actual deaths from all causes vs 7.8
expected. Overall cancer deaths were elevated (3 vs 1.6 expected), but no particular
tumor type predominated. None of the findings was statistically significant (Cook et al,
1980). Of these workers, 49 developed chloracne. The three cancer deaths (identified as
an adenocarcinoma, a fibrosarcoma, and a glioma with metastases) were slightly above
the expected number (3 vs 1.6), but they could not be ascribed to any predominant tumor
type or particular organ/tissue site (Cook et al, 1980).
In another Dow study, information was obtained from an interview questionnaire of 715
wives of men who worked in the Michigan division. It revealed no statistically significant
differences in occurrences of miscarriages, stillbirths, and fetal deaths or
malformations. The two groups (ie, 370 wives of men with exposure to TCDD and 345
controls, wives of men without possible exposure) were matched closely for husbands'
dates of hire. Nine variables were considered to be potential confounders in some or all
of the analyses: maternal age, birth control method, conditions during pregnancy,
complications in labor and delivery, medications or treatments during pregnancy, alcohol
consumption, smoking during pregnancy, gravidity and mother's occupation. Most of the
analyses considered the conceptus as the observational unit. If a conception occurred
prior to the worker's dioxin exposure, the corresponding conceptus was classified among
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 24

�the "unexposed" control group. Thus, of the 1,503 total conceptions of the 370 wives,
only 737 occurred after their husbands' first exposure and constituted the "exposed"
conceptuses. The remaining 766 conceptuses (ie, 1,503 - 737) were combined with the
1,274 occurring among wives of the "never exposed" employees; also, 9 induced abortions
within the latter group were excluded, giving a total of 2,031 "unexposed" conceptuses
(Cook et al, 1983; Townsend et al, 1982).
In a report on the findings of a cross-sectional medical and morbidity surveillance of
employees considered potentially exposed to TCDD from 1976-1978, few differences
between cohorts were noted. An increased frequency of radiographically documented
ulcer and other digestive diseases was reported in the cohort of workers who were
engaged at some time in the production of 2,4,5-T and who probably had low exposure to
TCDD. These effects did not occur in the "high" exposure group, which indicates that
dioxin is not likely associated with digestive effects (Bond et al, 1983).
—Diamond Alkali (New Jersey)

Porphyria cutanea tarda (PCT), of varying degrees of severity, and elevated urinary
uroporphyrins were discovered in 11 of 29 workers exposed to 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T during
the manufacturing process; they were examined because of chloracne (Bleiberg et al,
1964). Hyper pigmentation was more prevalent in Negroes and was said to vary in degree
according to the severity of chloracne. The degree of hirsutism was related to the
severity of chloracne. Of 26 workers whose urine was tested for uroporphyrins, eight had
elevated uroporphyrins and 19 had chloracne. Three of those with elevated uroporphyrins
had no chloracne. The porphyria cutanea tarda was assumed to be chemically induced as
a result of damage or insult to the liver and not of genetic origin. The skin
manifestations of PCT—ie, epidermal fragility, vesiculobullous eruptions—occurred on
areas of the face, ears, and hands that were exposed to sun or pressure.
A follow-up of Bleiberg et al was made in the same plant by Poland et al (1971) on 73
male workers. Moderate to severe chloracne was prevalent in only 13 out of 73 (18%) of
the cases; again, it varied in degree and was accompanied by scarring, hyperpigmentation, hirsutism, and eye irritation. There was no evidence of porphyria cutanea tarda and
only one case of uroporphyrinuria. The authors have inferred that porphyria cutanea
tarda and chloracne are independent syndromes, although they may have the same
etiologic agent. There was either no acne or only minimal lesions in 82% of employees.
Occurrence of chloracne, likewise, was not significantly greater in Negroes than whites,
and was seemingly not related to job location or duration of employment (hence, level of
exposure); cardiovascular findings were unremarkable except for three persons with a
history of myocardial infarction. The porphyria observed by Bleiberg also was observed
in a heavily exposed population in Czechoslovakia. It has never been seen in populations
exposed to trichlorophenol or 2,4,5-T processing alone.
—BASF AG (Ludwigshafen, Germany)

In 1953, seventy-five workers in a trichlorophenol plant were exposed to reactor products
during an accident and its subsequent cleanup. Most of them suffered chloracne; 42
suffered severely and 21 of these persons also had systemic damage to internal organs or
CNS disturbances. Polyneuritis, impaired senses, and liver damage were most prominent.
In 1978, a mortality study was conducted on the cohort: Of the 17 deaths (from 11 to 25
were expected, depending on the choice of control population), six were due to cancer
(three from stomach cancer), five from cardiovascular diseases, one from cirrhosis of the
liver, and one from urogenital disease; all other deaths were either accidental or suicidal
(Huff et al, 1980). No miscarriages or abortions were reported among the wives of
exposed employees who were still at work in the plant (IARC, 1977).
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 25

�A mortality study was conducted by Thiess et al (1982) 27 years after the trichlorophenol
process accident at the BASF AG plant. The exposed group of workers (74), matched by
age and date of entry into the factory, was compared with two internal groups and three
external groups. Although there were relatively few reported deaths, malignant
neoplasms were consistently above expectation but beyond chance only for stomach
cancer, which has a latency of 15 years.
~NV Philips (Netherlands)
In this 1963 explosion at a 2,4,5-T plant, 106 workers were probably exposed to TCDD (or
related polychlorodibenzofurans). The two operators were exposed to TCDD largely by
way of inhalation. Other workers, who were either part of the regular adjoining work
force or were part of the clean-up and rebuilding crews, were outfitted in protective
gear; they may have had only dermal contact. Chloracne occurred in 44 persons. Liver
damage was not apparent, but there were a few complaints of fatigue. Of the eight
deaths, one was from a pancreatic tumor and one was due to a myocardial infarction (at
age 69); five other deaths also could have been from infarctions.
—Spolana (Czechoslovakia)

3irasek et al (1973, 1974) have reported from Czechoslovakia on what is probably the
most thoroughly documented group of exposed workers. From 1965-1969, 78 persons
were affected by their contact with the sodium salt of 2,4,5-T, the butyl ester of 2,4,5-T
and pentachlorophenol; 76 of them developed acne (sic), hypertrichosis, and hyperpigmentation. Complaints included fatigue, weakness and pain in the extremities, sweating, and
headache; many had polyneuropathy. Clinical findings revealed hepatomegaly, porphyria
cutanea tar da, and increases in ALA and alkaline phosphatase (Suskind, 1980). The tenyear follow-up of 55 workers by Pazderova-Vejlupkova et al (1980, 1981) emphasized the
nonuniformity of TCDD's effects on individual organs and the development of illness that
affects virtually every important organ system. Complete recovery is rare, except for
anxiety and depression, and persistence of impaired metabolism of fats and
carbohydrates can be a major cause of premature arteriosclerosis. Children who were
born to exposed individuals were not adversely affected.
—Coalite (United Kingdom)

The Coalite episode, which occurred in Derbyshire, UK in April 1968, was first described
by May (1973). This also involved an overheated reactor used to synthesize TCP; the
explosive rupture of the kettle was accompanied by detonation of the released glycol and
chlorobenzene vapors. Seventy-nine cases of chloracne were initially recorded; many
were severe but resolved within four to six months. There was no evidence of depression,
weight loss, malignancies, or liver, kidney, or cardiac impairment. The epidemiological
survey of 1977-1978 covered only 41 of the 90 exposed workers and revealed some
abnormalities in blood chemistry and immune function. There were no chromosomal
abnormalities in the circulating lymphocytes. The levels of serum cholesterol and
triglycerides were elevated, while the gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase was abnormally
high. Both IgD and IgM were lower than the controls. Twenty-nine of the original 41
workers were re-examined, but immune globulins were not measured.
No statistically significant differences between groups were reported when chromosomal
aberration and sister chromatid exchange studies were performed on blood samples of
workers who were exposed, possibly exposed, or not exposed to TCDD (Blank et al, 1983).
Sell (1983) reviewed for AMA's Advisory Panel on Toxic Substances a report on the
outcome of an industrial accident at the Coalite plant. In his opinion, there were no
immunologic differences between the three groups of workers; ie, 1) those exposed to
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 26

�TCDD and with chloracne, 2) those exposed to TCDD but without chloracne, and 3) those
who were unexposed and had no chloracne.
—Vertek Chemical (Jackonville, Arkansas)
This plant was involved in the production of 2,4,5-T and 2,4,-D since 1957. The recent
discovery of toxic wastes leaking from drums stored above ground at the plant led to a
health survey in 1979 of 190 current or former workers. Nerve conduction velocity
(NCV) measurements were done on 55 workers who were prescreened for a negative
history of diabetes, neurological disease, or excess alcohol consumption; all 55 were
considered to be at risk for exposure to phenoxy herbicides. There were no concurrent
exposures to other possible neurotoxic agents in any of the 190 workers, although prior
exposure to such agents was reported in nine workers and prior exposure to 2,4-D was
reported in two. The control group was similarly prescreened and found to have had no
significant exposure to neurotoxic agents. NCV measurements of the median motor,
median sensory, and sural nerves were performed without knowledge of a subject's
employment history. Limb temperature also was measured. Slowed NCV in one or more
nerves was reported in 46% of the study group compared to 5% of the controls. The
conduction velocities of the median motor and sural sensory nerves were significantly
slower in the study group vs the control group. In addition, slowed sural sensory velocity
correlated significantly with duration of employment (Singer et al, 1982).
It is appropriate to note that neurologists and neurotoxicologists regard NCV
measurements as a useful research procedure when carried out in connection with a
thorough neurological examination.
The ambient conditions and technical skill
requirements, however, are such that it has limited use as a field study examination.
—NIOSH Dioxin Registry
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health has established a dioxin
registry to analyze causes of death among workers at 14 manufacturing sites for dioxincontaining products (Fingerhut, 1984a). The Registry was established in late 1979 to
identify male workers exposed to substances such as TCP, 2,4,5-T, silvex, and pentachlorophenol that might contain polychlorinated dioxins and to describe the processes for
manufacturing these compounds. The first use of the Registry data is a mortality
analysis, which is expected to be completed in 1985. In this mortality study, a subcohort
of persons who had chloracne will be analyzed separately.
One value of the Registry is its exposure matrix, which will characterize exposure
conditions for the specific processes and will then delineate both high- and low-exposure
populations. The factors that will be taken into account in the exposure matrix include
the product, the process, the operating conditions, temperatures and solvents, job duties,
and analyses of dioxin concentrations in products.
A strict definition of exposure has been utilized. The Registry includes only production
workers assigned to the processes of interest, maintenance personnel assigned to those
departments and clean-up workers or others identified by the companies as being
involved in process accidents and who may not have their work assignments documented.
The Registry has already identified 6,000 production workers at 14 companies. The
quantity and quality of the records, which date back as far as the 1930s, vary
tremendously; included are personnel records, payroll records, union records, medical
records, insurance records, workers' compensation records, and Social Security records.
--NIEHS-IARC International Phenoxy Herbicides Registry
In 1981, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences of the NIH initiated
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 27

�support for a feasibility study on the development and maintainence of an international
registry—exclusive of the USA—of phenoxy herbicide-exposed populations.
The
populations were to include production workers, formulators, and users. Workers' records
and environmental data from' more than 25 plants are under consideration. Some
European countries are reluctant to release their health and environmental data, and
there are still questions about the pooling of data from different sources and the
assembling of a sufficient number of records for an estimate of excess frequency of
outcomes.
—Isolated Exposures to TCDD

Oliver (1975) described three laboratory workers who were exposed to "pure" TCDD.
Two of the three had typical chloracne. All had abnormal serum cholesterol levels but
without porphyria. Two had gastrointestinal symptoms, one complained of blurred vision
and impaired muscular coordination, and another complained of "neuralgia of the left
thigh." Two years after the exposure, two of the men experienced personality changes,
neurological disturbances, and hirsutism.
Exposed Herbicide Users
—Swedish Railway Workers

The first study of this group, who had worked with both phenoxy acid (2,4-D and 2,4,5-T)
and arnitrole herbicides (Axelson et al, 197*0, indicated that amitrole was probably solely
responsible for an excess of tumors. A case-control analysis of the data later revealed
the possibility of a masked tumor-inducing effect of the phenoxy acids (Huff et al, 1980).
—Other Swedish Workers

Follow-up on an earlier line of investigation led Hardell and coworkers to additional
cases of soft tissue sarcomas, which again seemed related to occupational exposures to
phenoxy acids or chlorophenols. Malignant histiocytic lymphomas* were clustered among
a group of hospital admissions in Sweden from January to September 1978; 14 of 17
patients were in occupations that utilized phenoxy acids or chlorophenols (eg, forestry,
wood and paper mills, farming). Inasmuch as both 6-fold tumor increases (Hardell, 1977,
1979) were attributed to impurities, such as TCDD, a case-control (case-referrent) study
by Eriksson et al (1981) was launched; their objective was to confirm the previous
findings and to clarify whether the impurities were causative. The new risk ratio (5.7)
for soft tissue sarcomas from exposure to phenoxy acids or chlorophenols was of the
same order of magnitude as before; furthermore, a risk ratio of 4.2 was obtained for
other phenoxy acids that are free of dioxins, such as MCPA, 2,4-D, mecoprop, and
dichlorprop.
In a review of the occupational histories of patients with malignant lymphomas, Olsson et
al (1981) reported a possible relationship between non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the skin
and exposure to phenoxy acids.
In another investigation by Hardell et al (1981), exposure to organic solvents,
chlorophenols, and/or phenoxy acids resulted in a relative risk factor of 4.1 for malignant
lymphoma compared to a risk factor of 0.9 in the unexposed control group. These results
seem to indicate an increased risk for malignant lymphoma in workers exposed to
phenoxy acids, chlorophenols, or organic solvents.

* Neoplasm sites included frontal sinuses, bladder, ileum, retroperitoneal, parotid and
submandibular areas, femur, and groin.
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 28

�Yet another investigation by Hardell et al (1982) reported a sevenfold increase in the
incidence of nasal and nasopharyngeal cancers, particularly among woodworkers, due to
chlorophenols. Cabinet makers, with no exposure to chiorophenols, had a doubled (but
insignificant) risk of nasal cancer. Exposure to phenoxy acids resulted in a doubled (but
insignificant) risk of nasal and nasopharyngeal cancer.
Analysis of geographical clusters of malformations in Sweden failed to identify any one
etiological factor responsible for the clustering (Ericson et al, 1983).
—Finnish Railway and Forestry Workers

A similar group of 30 workers in Finland, who were exposed to TCDD-containing
herbicides, will be compared to a matched control group to see if there are any longterm effects from their exposures. Thus far, no differences are apparent (Huff et al,
1980).
—New Zealand Birth Defects Study

Smith et al (1982b) surveyed by questionnaire the pregnancy outcomes of 548 New
Zealand professional sprayers and their wives, who were also occupationally exposed to
phenoxy herbicides, comparing them with a control group of 441 agricultural
contractors. Inasmuch as the authors' preliminary results showed little difference in
rates of congenital defects between cases and controls, this study redefined the extent of
exposure by subdividing the group of sprayers; there was still no suggestive evidence that
2,4,5-T adversely affected pregnancy outcomes. Although the men had an increased risk
(1.19 times) of siring children with defects, the wives' risk of miscarriage was only 0.89;
the differences were not statistically significant and no other effect on the women's
reproductive cycle was apparent. The several inherent sources of bias in the study were
explained, but even when they were excluded the results were unchanged.
—Long Island Railroad Birth Defects Study

In 1979, NIOSH investigated a reported excess of birth defects among the children of
about 1,400 maintenance workers of this New York railroad who were exposed to
2,4,5-T. Of 170 live births in the study, there were less than the expected number of all
combined major defects but a significant excess of minor defects. The latter, however,
is believed to be due to diagnostic bias (Honchar, 1982).
General Population
—Seveso, Italy Inhabitants

In 1976, an explosive release of TCDD from a trichlorophenol reactor at the ICMESA
plant occurred in the vicinity of Seveso, Italy. This is the largest single population—over
37,000 persons—to have been potentially exposed to varying doses of this compound. Two
years after the incident, the acute and mid-term, health effects were assessed; mild
chloracne, mainly in a small group of children, healed quickly. Subclinical peripheral
nerve impairment was reported; there also was liver involvement but without apparent
functional disorders.
Immunoresponse was not altered nor was susceptibility to
infectious diseases increased (Reggiani, 1979). This incident has been described more
fully in AMA's 1981 report.
The long-term epidemiologic survey of the 220,000 residents of the Seveso area is
expected to go on for many years. A progress report emphasized the preliminary nature
of the findings and reiterated the above conclusions of Reggiani (Pocchiari et al, 1979;
Huff et al, 1980). Except for the skin, no organs or body functions were impaired. No
derangement of gestation, no fetal lethality and loss, no gross malformations, no growth
d57:update (revd. .5-29-85) - page 29

�retardation at term, and no cytogenetic abnormalities have yet occurred.
Analysis of the livers of 144 sheep which died in the Seveso area following the accident
disclosed that tympanism was the cause of death, not TCDD (Anon, 1980).
The primary biological effect on the inhabitants was skin irritation, largely as the result
of alkali mist. However, up to the end of a year and over a six-month period, about 200
cases of chloracne were identified, primarily among children. It is interesting to note
that no cases of chloracne were observed among the ICMESA workers either prior to or
following the accident, including workers involved in clean-up operations.
Spontaneous abortions and birth defects were monitored by the Birth Defects Registry
(established in 1978), but except for hemangiomas and benign neoplasms, the data did not
show an association between malformations and TCDD exposure.
A controlled study of children with chloracne was not completed because too few of the
affected children wished to participate. An Occupational Health Surveillance study was
established soon after the accident and a large amount of data was collected between
1976-1980; however, the "lack of adequate study designs" and the difficulties in coping
with "prevailing clinic characteristics" precluded any definitive conclusions.
Nevertheless, the high incidence of "abnormals" in the liver function test declined
markedly during the four-year surveillance period.
Neurologic studies by the Clinica del Lavoro Luigi Devoto of Milan revealed only three or
four cases of suspected neuropathy in which either the motor or sensory nerve conduction
velocity was reduced. These findings and "subclinical signs of neuropathy" in 16 other
subjects could not be evaluated properly because there was no control group and no
information on alcohol intake and history of diabetes.
In late 1980, a cross-sectional study was designed to evaluate hepa toxic and neurotoxic
effects in 188 ICMESA workers compared to an unexposed control group of 305 workers
from the metallurgical and mechanical industries outside the Seveso area. The battery
of laboratory tests included lung function tests (FVC, FEV), SPE and ulnar nerve
electromyography, SCOT, GGT, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, cholesterol serum
level, triglycerides, total serum protein and electrophoresis, prothrombin time,
hematocrit, hemoglobin, WBC and differential, and total urinary porphyrin. No
statistically significant differences between the two groups were found.
Thus, five years after the accident, no significant adverse health effects were detected
in the ICMESA workers. Likewise, both the mortality study and Cancer Registry have
yielded very little conclusive information, though eight cases of soft tissue sarcoma were
found in the group of 222,000 residents living in the buffer zone outside of the more
highly contaminated zones A and B.
Merlo (1983), who was associated with the Seveso data analysis group from 1979-83, said
that,
"... knowledge of the TCDD health effects comes from animal studies and human
occupational exposures occurring during the manufacture of trichlorophenol. Shortterm effects have been identified. Long-term effects are still under study.
Unfortunately, due to the lack of proper studies in the early phase of the 'Seveso
Program,1 reevaluation of these data— such as has been done with Hiroshima and
Nagasaki records— has to be excluded. Only well designed epidemiologic studies
carried out carefully will enable us to draw conclusions about the occurrence of
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 30

�chronic health effects and their relationship with TCDD exposure."
Tenchini et al (1983) performed a cytogenetic analysis of maternal and fetal tissues from
induced abortions in TCDD-exposed and nonexposed women. They found a statistically
significant increased incidence of aberrant cells and a greater number of aberrations per
damaged cell in the dioxin-exposed group vs controls. While some effect of maternal
exposure to the toxic agent cannot be ruled out, variations in cell culture growth are
more likely to be the cause of the observed cell changes.
—Times Beach, Missouri
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) was called in by the State of Missouri to find an
explanation for the unusual occurrence of animal deaths and reports of family illness
near a horse riding arena in Missouri (Donnel et al, 1983; Kimbrough, 1983). In 1973, the
toxic agent was identified as TCDD, which was later traced to TCDD-contaminated stillbottom waste from a TCP process in Verona, Missouri. It seems that, in 1971,
approximately 29 kg (64 pounds) of TCDD-contaminated waste from a chemical plant in
southwest Missouri was mixed with waste oils and applied to soil for dust control at 241
sites in the eastern part of the State. At one site, the Shenandoah horse stables, as much
as 35,000 ppb of TCDD was measured in the soil. In addition to several other horse
arenas, there was an urban residential area with a population of 2,100, later referred to
as "site-21," or "Times Beach." The situation in this town came to light when a flood
struck the major portion of the town and led to a near-total evacuation of the
community. As early as 1971, the unpaved streets of the town also had been sprayed
with TCDD-contaminated oil. Soil samples taken in the aftermath of the flood from both
the shoulder of the road and the ditches contained TCDD. While they did not have the
greatest degree of TCDD contamination in Missouri, they reached a peak of 98 ppb.
Since there was no established rationale or methodology in Missouri for determining
"safe" levels of TCDD in soil, the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (DNR) in
collaboration with CDC and EPA reviewed environmental sampling data and the
Remedial Action Marker Plan (RAMPS); they jointly recommended appropriate strategies
for intervention. Hence, on 23 December 1982, CDC advised that the evacuated
residents of the town should not return to their homes until additional samplings were
carried out.
Contaminated Times Beach soils were given by gavage to guinea pigs and rats by
McConnell et al (1984) to determine the degree of bioavailability of dioxin on soil. A
characteristic clinicopathologic syndrome developed in the guinea pig, AHH was induced
in the rat and both species of animals had TCDD in their livers. Hence, TCDD in soil was
believed to have a "high biological availablity after ingestion." Kimbrough has cited the
bioavailability of TCDD to be as much as 30% to 50% of the original amount contained
on the soil matrix. CDC based its risk assessment on a "decision of prudence" and
several assumptions that were presumed to be in the best interests of the public's health
and safety. One such assumption was that a child would be most vulnerable to the
contamination and might ingest as much as 1 to 10 g of soil. Thus, from the chronic
animal toxicity data of Kociba and the National Toxicology Program, the safe human
dose was judged to be in the picogram range, and "1 ppb of dioxin in soil is a reasonable
level at which to begin consideration of action to limit human exposure for contaminated
soil" (Kimbrough et al, 1984). (The EPA has meanwhile published a methodology for
estimating human exposure and cancer risk associated with five different pathways of
exposure to 2,3,7,8-TCDD contaminated soil (Schaum, 1984).)
The Missouri Department of Health and CDC decided, after a review of animal data and
consultation with other health professionals, that there would be a risk of developing
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 31

�"adverse health effects" if there were continued residential exposure to soil having more
than 1.0 ppb of TCDD. The two agencies then went on to initiate four public health
actions in January 1983 that would provide:
—health education of the medical and public health communities, as well as the
general public, regarding current understanding of health effects of dioxin
exposures;
—dermatologic screening clinics for the general public;
—a registry for potentially exposed individuals; approximately 2,000 interviews
were conducted; and
—the design and implementation of a "highest risk" cohort.
—Missouri Pilot Study
An investigation by questionnaire of two groups of residents was conducted; one group of
68 persons was at risk, having been exposed agriculturally to dioxin, while the control
group of 36 had little or no history of exposure. Both were matched by age; sex;
socioeconomic status; history of alcohol, tobacco, and pesticide usage; and according to
their relative proportion of work in a hazardous occupation. The medical examination
included separate neurologic and dermatologic examinations and a broad range of
laboratory tests, one series of which was intended to assess cell-mediated immunity.
An initial review of data did not indicate any statistically significant differences
between the high-risk and low-risk study groups. No consistent indications of increased
disease prevalence was found in the dioxin-exposed group, although there was an
apparent trend of urinary tract abnormalities and some immune function changes (T^:Tg
cell ratios were less than 1.0). Functional tests of the immune system did not indicate
any overall abnormalities. No cases of chloracne or porphyria cutanea tarda were
reported. Follow-up studies were recommended (Donnel et al, 1983; Webb et al, 1984).
And finally, the authors of the report entitled "Missouri Dioxin Health Studies,"
(published by the Missouri Division of Health and CDC in collaboration with St. Joseph's
Hospital of Kirkwood, Missouri and St. Louis University Hospital) stated that,
"... it is conceivable that uptake of dioxin from contaminated soils was generally
less than estimated for this study group or that chronic exposures to environmental
TCDD have actually induced little or no adverse health effects as measured in this
study."
The Missouri Department of Natural Resources has meanwhile added to its registry of
uncontrolled hazardous waste sites three new locations that are contaminated with
dioxin: Minker-Stout and Lacy Manor sites in Jefferson County and Erxleben site in St.
Louis County.
—St. Louis, Missouri (Trucking Employees)
A recent survey of present and former workers employed at trucking terminals that had
been sprayed for dust abatement with TCDD-contaminated oil disclosed a 59-year-old
man with a sarcoma and porphyria cutanea tarda (PCT). A truck driver for 21 years, he
had worked at one of the contaminated terminals for several years; he also was exposed
to TCDD while unhooking trailers in the terminal. The PCT improved with treatment;
however, in February 1983, a sarcoma in the proximal right femur and pelvis involving
the adjacent soft tissue was diagnosed. It was not possible to determine whether the
tumor originated in the bone or in the soft tissue (Hope et al, 1984).

d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 32

�—Alsea, Oregon

In the Alsea basin of Oregon, 2,4,5-T and silvex were used on a seasonal basis to
eradicate unwanted vegetation from forest lands. In 1978, there was some concern that
such spraying was responsible for a number of spontaneous abortions in the area. All
told, 13 miscarriages were reported from nine women. As a result of much publicity and
public concern, the EPA conducted a study—Alsea I—to assess the facts and to determine
whether the spraying was indeed responsible.
EPA concluded that there was no
relationship between the spraying and the incidence of miscarriage; the rate was within
the expected limits. The study was harshly criticized because the exposures were not
documented and the statistical treatment was improper. Thus, Alsea II was begun in
October 1978, to study a much larger area and population than Alsea I and to compare
miscarriages within the first 20 weeks of pregnancy with the spraying of 2,4,5-T. A high
probability of an elevated miscarriage rate shortly after spraying was reported to the
press, but this claim was proved to be without merit.
review of
conducted
al, 1979).
contended

Alsea II by Oregon State University—A critical analysis of Alsea II was
by an interdisciplinary team of Oregon State University scientists (Wagner et
It did not support any of EPA's conclusions in the Alsea II study. The team
that:

there was no control population in the study;
data on miscarriages were unreliable and inaccurate;
medical practices were profoundly different in the three areas under consideration;
information on use of 2,4,5-T was inaccurate and incomplete;
variations in hospitalized miscarriages
expectations;

in all the areas were well within

differences existed in topography, climate, and demography;
data collection was incomplete and failed to account for patterns of and
differences in medical practice among areas.
The panel termed the EPA's hospitalized spontaneous abortion indices (HSAI) values to be
unreliable because:
there was substantial variation in the magnitude of the HSAIs for any one month
among the six years, and
the peak HSAI in June was due to a single large excursion only in 1976, while the
seasonal cyclic peaks were consistent with random variations.
Furthermore,
alleged increase in the use of 2,4,5-T was actually due to more complete collection
of spray data;
there was no statistically significant cross-correlation except for the apparent
increase in the June HSAI—deletion of the single June 1976 HSAI value removed the
significant correlation; and
d57: update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 33

�the HSAI increase in 3une 1976 was identified only with a location where human
exposure was least likely to have occurred.
Hence, according to the OSU panel, there was:
no significant correlation between 2,4,5-T use and the HSAI, and
EPA's study was seriously flawed because of incomplete and inaccurate data.
review of Alsea by FIFRA's Scientific Advisory Panel—This panel of the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act reviewed the evidence and found neither
immediate nor substantial threat to human health or the environment when silvex or
2,4,5-T was applied to rice, rangeland, orchards, or sugarcane and when used for certain
non-crop purposes.
review of Alsea n by others—Lamm (1979) also declared the Alsea II study to be epidemiologically unsound and the report useless. Both statistically and epidemiologically,
the report does not support any relationship between herbicide spraying and
miscarriages. Lamm (1980) has since claimed that only four of the ten women cited by
EPA in the Alsea II study underwent spontaneous abortions; the remainder were
hospitalized for other reasons.
New Zealand's Allan H. Smith (1979) termed the Oregon study of highly doubtful validity.
Robinson (1979) of Australia emphasized that the EPA information in no way confirmed a
hazard to human health from 2,4,5-T when it was used in a careful manner and according
to label instructions on the container. A comprehensive review by the Australian
Department of Health (1977) concluded that there was no evidence that 2,4,5-T caused
human birth defects.
Canadian Review of TCDD's Health Hazards
Canada's Expert Advisory Committee on Dioxins has evaluated the available published
information and concluded that:
Epidemiological data on the effects of dioxins on Canadian populations, when taken
in isolation, are insufficient to prove any significant association with disease.
Considering that it is impossible to prove the absolute safety of a substance—not to
mention the multiplicity of dioxin sources and its mixtures with other chemicals,
and the small size of the Canadian population—additional epidemiological studies
solely on a Canadian population would be unlikely to provide a definitive
identification of dioxin-associated diseases. Therefore, risk assessments associated
with dioxin exposure must rely on world-wide epidemiological data in conjunction
with toxicological studies on laboratory animals.
Similarities between the signs and symptoms in humans and laboratory animals
justify the concern about human exposure to dioxins; hence, a "virtually safe dose"
for 2,3,7,8-TCDD was calculated from animal data. The corresponding dose for a
one-in-a-million lifetime risk of cancer in humans ranged from 0.02 to 0.07 pg/kg
(mean = 0.03) of body wt/day. Another estimate of cancer risk assumed a dose
threshold, for humans was estimated to be between 0.2 and 1 pg/kg of body wt/day,
based on dividing the "no observed effect level" (or NOEL) from animal studies by
an arbitrary safety factor, usually 5,000 or 1,000.
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 34

�The potential risks of adverse effects on human reproduction were also evaluated
from animal data, inasmuch as epidemiological data on reproductive toxicity and
teratogenesis were of such poor quality that no association could be determined.
Fetotoxicity and teratogenicity in laboratory animals occurs at doses near those
which cause maternal toxicity. A 1000-fold safety factor was arbitrarily applied to
the NOEL for reproductive effects in animals, thereby resulting in an "acceptable
daily intake" of 1 pg/kg of body wt/day. This estimate is not much higher than the
level to which some high-risk groups in Canada are exposed (Willis, 1983).
Cancer Studies
CDC Selected Cancers Study
See under "Vietnam Veterans (Studies in Progress), —Vietnam Ground Troops Study."
NIOSH Review of Reports of Soft Tissue Sarcoma and Dioxin Exposure in Seven Chemical
Workers
According to Fingerhut (1983), the first suggestion of an association between these
tumors and TCDD began with clinical observations in Sweden in 1977 and two published
studies of Hardell and others. Four separate studies of industrial populations were then
reported in the United States in 1980. The mortality analyses, which were conducted by
Monsanto and Dow epidemiologists, included workers exposed during process accidents as
well as during the uneventful processing of TCP to 2,4,5-T. The authors indicated that
there was no excess of mortality due to dioxin exposure. Honchar and Halperin (1981)
reviewed the studies and noted that of the total 105 deaths, three were reported to be
due to soft tissue sarcomas—a frequency of 2.9%, which contrasts with 0.07% for the
general population. Subsequently, a fourth person from the Dow cohort was reported to
have STS (Cook, 1981), and Johnson et al (1981) and Moses et al (1981) provided case
reports of three additional cases of soft tissue sarcoma in chemical workers.
Fingerhut and others (1984b) undertook an effort to evaluate the accuracy of reports of
dioxin exposure and soft tissue sarcoma pathology in these seven chemical workers.
Tissue specimens of the persons with alleged soft tissue sarcomas were examined by two
STS pathologists, Dr. Franz Enzinger at the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology and Dr.
William Russell. Of the four cases in the Dow and Monsanto cohorts, whose causes of
death were derived from death certificates, only two were found to have soft tissue
sarcomas, and these two also had chloracne. The three other individuals were confirmed
as cases of soft tissue sarcoma, but one was a truck driver who had been a clerk and
maintenance worker but with no recorded assignment to dioxin-contaminated processes.
The other two cases were a father and son. The son was never assigned to a dioxincontaminated process during his 2.5 years of employment before he died; the father, a
utility worker who worked for 11 days in the pentachlorophenol process area, had a
generalized liposarcoma.
This review of seven cases neither affirmed nor rejected the association alleged by the
Swedish workers because there was no adequate comparison group that could be used. In
this country, we have no mortality rates for soft tissue sarcomas that are based on
pathologic review of tissue specimens; the only available rates are derived from death
certificates. According to a review by Percy et al (1981), the death certificate does not
accurately estimate the diagnosis of STS. The authors, from NCI's Biometry Branch,
have shown that only around 50% of STS cases list STS on the death certificates, while
only around 50% of the death certificates listing STS also have a corresponding diagnosis
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 35

�from hospitals during 1970-1971, 252 reported soft tissue sarcomas, but only 54.8% of
these were confirmed by pathologists of soft tissue sarcomas. On the other hand, only
56.3% of the pathology diagnoses of soft tissue sarcoma were recorded as such on death
certificates.
There are several other dilemmas in the study of these tumors: Not only is the death
certificate inadequate as a source of diagnostic information, but the tumors are often
misclassified because of the anatomic-based rules for the International Classification of
Disease (ICD) System. For example, if a sarcoma occurs in either the stomach or liver,
it will not be classified under ICD-171 for soft tissue sarcoma but as a tumor of the
stomach or liver. Only 60% of the histological diagnoses of STS in the Swedish studies
are listed under ICD-171, the remaining 40% are in other ICD categories.
Fingerhut and others (1984b) suggest that the diagnosis of the original pathologist may
not be accurate; thus, experts in soft tissue pathology may be needed necessary to
confirm original diagnoses. Additionally, the histological subtypes of STS are difficult to
diagnose. Among the above seven cases reviewed by expert pathologists, there was
agreement by the experts that five were soft tissue sarcoma. However, the experts
themselves disagreed on the subtypes subtypes for two persons.
A causal relationship between soft tissue sarcoma and dioxin exposure has not yet been
confirmed or excluded. Since the incidence of soft tissue sarcoma in the general
population is very low, most of the study designs require a very high relative risk for the
sarcoma to be detected (Coggen et al, 1982).
NCI Case-Control Study of Lymphoma and Soft Tissue Sar com a
According to Hoar (1983), the first disclosure of herbicide-related cancers was that of
Swedish railroad workers exposed to amitrole, 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T, which showed elevated
rates of cancer incidence (Axelson et al, 1974). Next in line were the case-control
studies by Hardell and his collaborators wherein associations were described between
phenoxyacetic acid or chlorophenol exposure and soft tissue sarcomas (STS), nonHodgkin's lymphomas (NHL), and Hodgkin's disease (HD). Risks for all three cancers
were increased five- to sixfold, irrespective of the presence of polychlorinated
dibenzodioxins or dibenzof urans as contaminants.
A five- to sixfold increase in risk is a remarkable finding for epidemiologists;
furthermore, such an increase is of especially great concern because there is widespread
potential for exposure to phenoxyacetic acids and chlorophenols. Apart from their use as
herbicides, these compounds act as blue-stain retardants in lumber, as slime control
agents in cutting oil fluids and in the paper and pulp industry, as wood preservatives, and
as water-proofing agents for leather and textiles. Thus, if the epidemiologic associations
suggested by the Swedish research are proven to be causally related, these agents could
be responsible for a large share of STS, NHL, and HD cases in the United States.
The National Cancer Institute (NCI) consequently is comparing herbicide exposure among
reported cases of soft tissue sarcoma and lymphoma in Kansas; subjects have been
matched with a control group of similar age, sex, and county of residence. The work is
expected to be completed in late 1984 or early 1985.
NCI has considered various approaches for further investigations. Cohort studies of
pesticide applicators are underway. A duration-related association between lung cancer
and employment as an applicator has already been reported by Blair et al (1983).
Unfortunately, these cohorts are far too small for conclusive evidence in a disease as
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 36

�rare as STS. A case-control study of STS, NHL, and HD with particular attention to
herbicide exposure was planned, with concentrated effort on agricultural uses; for
example, on wheat, corn, sorghum, soybeans, alfalfa, and pasture land. Inasmuch as
herbicides are often accompanied by extremely heavy applications of insecticides, which
could confound the results of the study, the choice of crop was narrowed down to
wheat. Wheat requires a large amount of herbicide but comparatively little insecticide
and fungicide application.
Kansas, a major wheat-producing state, was chosen as the site for the study. The
herbicide most commonly used there has been 2,4-D; nevertheless, substantial amounts of
2,4,5-T also have been used in addition to a number of other chemicals. According to a
1981 report of the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center entitled
"Pesticide Use on Major Crops in the North Central Region," about 5.2 million pounds of
2,4-D and 1.3 million pounds of 2,4,5-T were applied in 1978—amounts far greater than in
any of the other North Central states. Kansas also has a population-based cancer
registry, from which figures for cancer incidence can be obtained without having to rely
on death certificates; as noted above, the reporting of sarcomas and lymphomas on death
certificates is known to be extremely inaccurate.
The study population consists of white males, aged 21 and older, who have been diagnosed
with STS, NHL, or HD during residence in Kansas. From 1976-1982, there were 200 with
STS and 173 with HD; a sample of 200 was selected from those diagnosed with NHL
during 1979-1981.
The control group consists of white males from the general population of Kansas. Three
controls were selected for each case, matched on age (+_ 2 years) and vital status.
Controls for live cases, aged 65 years or older, were selected from the Medicare file;
controls aged 64 years or younger were selected by random-digit telephone dialing. For
deceased members, the controls were selected from Kansas state mortality files, with an
additional match on the year of death; excluded were those persons whose cause of death
was STS, NHL, HD, a malignancy of an ill-defined site (ICDA code 195), homicide, or
suicide. In the case of deceased subjects, the next-of-kin were interviewed. One-half of
the STS and NHL and one-third of the HD cases died before the study could be initiated.
The same controls are intended to be used for comparing the three different series—ie,
sarcomas, NHL, and HD cases—thus, only 1,008 controls are needed instead of
approximately 1,700. Seventy men who were diagnosed with colon cancer in 1981 were
chosen as a "cancer control series" in order to evaluate the possibility of recall-bias
among cancer patients.
Pathology specimens are being reviewed to confirm the diagnosis of STS, NHL, or HD,
which is important because these conditions are difficult to diagnose accurately; also,
the original pathologists used a variety of schemes for categorizing the tumors into
subgroups. Not only are consistent diagnoses a requisite, but there must also be
agreement on the subgroup terminology. Subgroups may be important with respect to
etiology; some subgroups may be associated with herbicide use, while others may not.
After about 45% of the specimens had been reviewed, it was noted that some cases
belonged to other series in the study—a so-called NHL is actually an HD or an HD should
be an STS. Then too, a few instances of malignancies have been found that are not
eligible; for example, one multiple myeloma was considered to be benign and an STS was
rediagnosed as nodular fasciitis. If the number of such misclassifications is large enough,
it may be possible to evaluate observation- and recall-bias in these situations with
conditions that may be unrelated to herbicide exposure.

d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 37

�Each telephone interview has taken from about 25 minutes to one hour. Corroborative
evidence of the self-reported herbicide exposure will be obtained from farm suppliers by
asking them about the kinds of crops grown and the purchases of herbicides and
insecticides. Such verification is an important step, giving a crude evaluation of
potential observation-bias—a criticism of the Swedish studies. All interviews and
verification were to have been completed in the early part of December 1983. The data
were to be analyzed by computer and reported by summer of 1984.
New ZealandI Soft Tissue Sarcoma Case-Control .Study
In addition to the Swedish studies, a case-control study of STS has been reported by
researchers from New Zealand, where phenoxy herbicides were used extensively for many
years. A preliminary report by Smith et al (1982a) found no association between soft
tissue sarcoma and the use of phenoxyacetic acid pesticides. None of the persons with
soft tissue sarcoma in the study had worked as a licensed herbicide applicator. In this
study 102 males with STS, as indicated from the New Zealand Cancer Registry between
1976-1980, and 306 controls (with cancers other than STS) were matched by age and year
of registration.
The 102 STS cases, or their next-of-kin, and "other cancer" controls were interviewed by
telephone for information concerning their occupations. No excess of STS was seen in
the category for agriculture and forestry (odds ratio = 1.03, 90% confidence limits = 0.9,
1.8); farmers showed a slight excess of 1.45 (0.8, 2.7) despite extensive use of phenoxy
herbicides, but this excess may be due to misclassification. Neither complete work
histories nor histories of actual herbicide use are available. Although misclassification
of exposure status may dilute the risk estimates, the amount of misclassification cannot
explain the differences between the Swedish and New Zealand studies.
Lifetime work histories for 82 of the New Zealand STS cases and their 92 controls with
other types of cancer were taken by telephone. The results of the interviews showed a
60% increase in risk of STS if the probable or definite exposure to phenoxy herbicides for
more than one day occurred at least five years prior to the cancer registration; there was
a 30% increase in risk if exposure was at least a total of 5 days and occurred more than
10 years prior to registration. Increases in risk for chlorophenol exposure were 50% and
60%, respectively. Little control for potential confounding factors was done (Smith et
al, 1984).
Finland
No deaths from STS or lymphomas were revealed from a survey of mortality data on
1,926 herbicide sprayers employed from 1955-1971, although exposures were admittedly
low and of short duration (Anonymous, 1983; Riihimaki et al, 1982).
US, Pacific Northwest
In the Pacific Northwest, there is a case-control study of approximately 280 STS cases,
540 NHL cases, and 125 liver cancer cases, all diagnosed between 1980-1983. The cases
originated in 13 counties in western Washington state, where phenoxy herbicides and
chlorophenols are used extensively in agriculture, forestry, and the wood products
industry. Cancer incidence data are available from a population-based cancer registry.
Approximately 1,100 subjects were selected by random-digit dialing to serve as controls
for each of the three types of cancer. In-person interviews of cases and controls, or
their next-of-kin, were used to collect detailed residential and occupational histories and
other risk factor information. Information on geographical area and extent of herbicide
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 38

�application will be combined with the residential histories to construct exposure
indices. Occupational exposures will be ranked and given an exposure index value. The
estimated time of completion is 1985.
An update was provided by its principal investigator (Milham, 1982), who concluded that
the mortality patterns of 200 white males, ages 20 and above, from 1950-1979 do not
support a link between soft tissue sarcomas, Hodgkin's disease, and non-Hodgkin's
lymphornas and exposure to phenoxy herbicides or chlorophenols.

Several herbicide-related studies have been conducted in New York State. One of these
was of 281 males diagnosed with STS during 1962-1980 and who were between 18 and 29
years of age during 1962-1971. A living control was selected for each case from drivers'
license registration files matched on age, sex and place of residence. For each deceased
case, a second deceased control was obtained from the New York State mortality files,
matching year of death, age, years of education, sex, race and health systems area.
Cancer deaths were excluded. The telephone interviews with the subjects or their nextof-kin focused on exposure to herbicides while in military service; other factors, such as
occupation, histology and anatomic site of the tumors, were also examined. No
statistically significant association was found between STS and Vietnam service or
military service in general, or any other variable that could relate to herbicide exposure
(Greenwald et al, 1984).
Another investigation (Lawrence et al, 1985), using the mortality odds ratio (MOR),
compared the causes of death among New York State veterans who had served in
Vietnam with those of that era who had not served there. The study group excluded New
York City and consisted of 1,496 Vietnam-era veterans, 555 of which had been in
Vietnam. The highest MORs involved "non-motor vehicular injuries of transport" (2.18),
other accidents and burns (1.37) and homicide (1.59); no association was shown between
herbicide exposure and cause of death.

A high and increasing death rate due to connective tissue cancers among white women
was observed in 9 widely dispersed Michigan counties. For Midland County, the location
of a Dow Chemical facility, a total of 13 deaths due to these cancers occurred over a
period of 20 years, but there were none among white women during 1980 and 1981. In
some instances, the onset of the disease had begun before the subjects had moved to
Midland; then again, it is unclear whether the apparent increase was real or an artifact
of death certification and coding. A case-control study will include all patients with a
biopsy-proven diagnosis of STS from 1970-1983 -with the exception of mesotheliomas— in
the specified eight counties. Three hospital patients without a history of cancer will be
selected as controls for each case, matching on sex, race, and five-year age period.
Interviews will cover occupational and residential history, smoking habits, hobbies,
medical history, family history of malignancy, and diet. The report is estimated to be
completed by October 1985.
A preliminary finding by the Michigan Department of Public Health in 1983 did not
establish a link with any factor in the environment, including TCDD. Though there were
increases in mortality due to connective and soft tissue cancers in some of the 28 other
US counties where TCDD might occur as a result of chemical manufacturing, as
compared to other counties that were suspected of being devoid of the contaminant,
there was no predominant pattern of excesses. One might expect a predominant excess
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 39

�if TCDD were responsible.
Italy
A case-control study of 100 cases of STS identified from hospital pathology department
logs from 1981-1983 and 300 controls is being conducted in three counties where phenoxy
herbicides have been used in the growing of rice. Both sexes will be included due to the
large number of women who have worked in the rice fields. Two controls per case will
also be identified from the pathology logs and will be matched on sex, age, and province
of residence; other cancer patients have been excluded. A second control group for cases
from larger towns will be drawn randomly from the general population and from death
records. A reasonable completion date is 1985.
Denmark
First, there will be a cohort study of workers at a plant where phenoxy acids have been
produced since 1947. Workers from newer plants may also be included. After its
completion, a case-control study of STS similar to the Swedish studies is planned.
Imrnunological Response to TCDO
In Animals
Sell (1983) reviewed for AMA's Advisory Panel on Toxic Substances the available
literature that might pertain to TCDD's effect on the immune system. It is known that
rats and mice develop atrophy of the thymus gland when fed even "safe" doses of TCDD;
their T-cells become cytotoxic, and eventually the animals die.
T-cells, or
T-lymphocytes, are the "policemen of the immune system" and are involved in the
regulation of the immune system. Antibodies are identified according to the function of
the T-cells and B-cells or their subsets. It is important to learn why these cells are
activated. The most sensitive immune system test is based on the production of
cytotoxic T-lymphocytes. Immunosuppresive drugs, such as cyclosporine, interfere with
interleukin-2 and inhibit the growth of T-helper cells.
Published data from animal, studies, however, are meager and conflicting, which makes
their interpretation difficult. For example, the administered dose, usually dissolved in
acetone, often may be given with no indication of what the animal actually received.
Nevertheless, an NIH study on mice given high doses of TCDD (5 ug/kg of body wt, or 0.1
ug/mouse) for 270 days revealed no defects; moreover, an examination of the thymus,
spleen, and lymphocytes revealed no abnormalities, and their antibody response was
satisfactory.
In Humans
Information about TCDD's action on the human immune system is even more scarce,
although imrnunologic research has been carried out by the National Institutes of Health
since 1976. According to Sell, there is presently no conclusive evidence that TCDD
adversely affects the human immune system. Reggiani reported earlier (Arch Toxicol
(Suppl 2):291-302 (1979)) that immunoresponse was not altered nor was susceptibilty to
infectious diseases increased among the inhabitants of Seveso, Italy.
Sell also reviewed a report on the outcome of an industrial accident at the Coalite plant
in Bolshover, England. In his opinion, there were no imrnunologic differences between
three groups of workers; ie, 1) those exposed to TCDD with chloracne, 2) those exposed
d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page 40

�to TCDD without chloracne, and 3) those who were unexposed and had no chloracne.
Conclusions
The studies to date on the human health effects of Vietnam exposures to Agent Orange
do not reveal a clear relationship between serious illness and exposure. A number of
important studies are still in progress; until they or others that may be deemed necessary
are completed, no final conclusions can be drawn.
Workplace exposures, on the other hand, have involved components of Agent Orange,
especially 2,4,5-T and its contaminant TCDD, and represent a different level of biologic
experience. Definable and measurable effects on specific organ systems can be
described for acute, subchronic, and long-term exposures. Chloracne is the marker for
biologically effective exposure in humans, and it may persist for as long as 30 years.
A wide range of adverse reactions in animals has been observed, which are speciesdependent. For example, the guinea pig is most sensitive to TCDD, while the hamster is
one of the least sensitive. Adverse reactions in animals include thymic atrophy in all
species, induction of hepatic enzymes in the mouse and rat, and teratogenicity and
reproductive effects in rodents and non-human primates. Except for chloracne, however,
TCDD has not demonstrated comparable levels of biologic activity in man; that is to say,
no long-term effects on the cardiovascular and central nervous systems, the liver, the
kidney, the thymus and immunlogic defenses, and the reproductive function -in the male,
female or offspring—have been demonstrated.
The final answers concerning military exposures to Agent Orange, as well as exposures
during the production and application of phenoxy herbicides in general, will require
additional, carefully designed morbidity and laboratory studies using all of the sensitive
technical strategies of modern science. The answers will come only through the
objective, well designed and scholarly approaches of the community of scientists.

d57:update (revd. 5-29-85) - page

�References
Albro PW, Corbett BJ: Extraction and clean-up of animal tissues and subsequent
determination of mixtures of chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans.
Chemosphere 1977;7:381.
Allen 3R, Barsotti DA, Van Miller JP, et ah Morphological change in monkeys consuming
a diet containing 500 ppt of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Food Cosmet
Toxicol 1977; 15:401-10.
Allen 3R, Barsotti DA, Lambrecht LK, et ah Reproductive effects of halogenated
aromatic hydrocarbons on nonhuman primates. Ann NY Acad Sci 1979;320:419-25.
Anonymous: More Seveso tests. Chem Week 1980(Dec) :21.
Anonymous:
Agent Orange research update; soft-tissue sarcomas.
AO Rev
1983(Apr);2(l).
Anonymous: Toxic Materials News 1984(Aug 1 0:222.
Arensault RD: Pentachlorophenol and contained chlorinated dibenzodioxins in the
environment. American Wood Preservers Association, 1976.
Armstrong B: Australians report no link between service in Vietnam and birth defects
among off spring. Epidemiol Monit 1983(Mar);3(4):l.
Ashe WF, Suskind RR: Reports on chloracne cases, Monsanto Chemical Co., Nitro, West
Virginia. Reports of the Kettering Laboratory, Dec 1949 and Apr 1950.
Australian Dept of Health: 2,4,5-T and human birth defects. Report of the Division of
Public Health, Department of Health, Australia, 1977.
Axelson O, Sundell L: Herbicide exposure, mortality and tumor incidence; an
epidemiological investigation on Swedish railroad workers. Work-Environ Health
1974;11:21.
Balarajan R, McDowall M: Congenital malformations and agricultural workers. Lancet
Bastomsky CH: Enhanced thyroxine metaboism and high uptake goiters in rats after a
single oral dose of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.
Endocrinology
1977; 101:292-296.
Baughman RW, Meselson M: An analytical method for detecting TCDD (dioxin); levels of
TCDD in samples from Vietnam. Envl Hlth Persp 1973a;5:27-35.
Baughman RW, Meselson M: An improved analysis for tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. In:
Chlorodioxins — Origin and Fate. EH Blair (ed), American Chemical Society,
Washington, DC, 1973b.
Beatty PW: Studies on the metabolism and possible mechanisms of toxicity of 2,3,7,8tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). Doctoral thesis, Vanderbilt University, 1978.
Beatty PW, Lembach K3, Holscher MA, et ah
Effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-dibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) on mammalian cells in tissue cultures. Toxicol
Applied Pharmacol 1975;31:309-312.
Beatty PW, Vaughn WR, Neal RA: Effects of alteration of rat hepatic MFO activity on
the toxicity of 2,3,7,8-TCDD. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1978;45:513-519.
Berry DL, Slaga TJ, DiGiovanni 3, et ah Studies with chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins,
polybrominated biphenyls and polychlorinated biphenyls in a two-stage system of
mouse skin tumorigenesis; potent anticracinogenic effects. Annals NY Academy of
Sciences 1979;320:405-414.
Berry DL, Slaga T3, Wilson, NM, et ah Transplacental induction of mixed-function
oxygenases in extraOhepatic tissues by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.
Biochem Pharmacol 1977;26: 1383- 1388.
Blair A, Grauman DJ, Lubin 3H, Fraumeni Jr JF: Lung cancer and other causes of death
among licensed pesticide applicators. JNCI 1983;71(l):31-38.
Blank CE, Cooke P, Potter AM: Investigations for genotoxic effects after exposure to
crude 2,4,5-trichlorophenol. Br 3 Indus Med 1983;40:87-91.
d57:reprefs (revd. 5-24-85) - page R-l

�Bolton L: Seveso dioxin; no solution in sight. Chem Eng 1978;85(22):78.
Bond GG, Ott MG, Brenner FE, et al: Medical and morbidity surveillance findings among
employees potentially exposed to TCDD. Br d Indus Med 1983;40:318-324.
Buser HR: Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin; separation and identification of isomers by
gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. 3 Chromatography 1975;114:95-108.
Buser HR: Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans; formation, occurrence
and analysis of environmentally hazardous compounds. Department of Organic
Chemistry, University of Umea, Sweden and Swiss Federal Research Station,
Waedenswill, Switzerland, pp 9-21, 1978.
Buser HR, Bosshardt HP: Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofurans and benzenes
in fly ash of municipal and industrial incinerators. Mitt Geb Lebensmittelsunters
Hyg 1978;69(2):191-199.
Buser HR, Bosshardt HP, Rappe C: Identification of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin
isomers formed in fly ash. Chemosphere 1978;7(2):165-172.
Buser HR: Formation of polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs) and dibenzo-p-dioxins
(PCDDs) from the pyrolysis of chlorobenzenes. Chemosphere 1979;6:415-424.
Buu-Hoi NP, Chanh PH, Sesque G, et al: Organs as targets of dioxin (2,3,7,8tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin) intoxication. Naturwissenschaften 1972;59:174-175.
Carlstedt-Duke JMB: Tissue distribution of the receptor for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in the rat. Cancer Res 1979;39:3172-3176.
Clark DA, Gauldie J, Szewczuk MR, et al: Enhanced suppressor cell activity as a
mechanism of immunosuppression by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Proc Soc
Exp Biol Med 1981; 168:290-299.
Clark DA, Sweeney G, Safe S, et al: Cellular and genetic basis for suppression of
cytotoxic T cell generation by haloaromatic hydrocarbons. Immunopharmacol
1983;6:143-153.
Coggen D, Acheson ED: Do phenoxy herbicides cause cancer in man? Lancet
1982; 1:1057-1059.
CookRR: Dioxin, chloracne and soft tissue sarcoma. Lancet 1981; 1:618-619.
Cook RR, Bodner KM: Dioxin and reproductive events. In: Tucker RE, Young AL and
Gray AP (eds): Human and Environmental Risks of Chlorinated Dioxins and Related
Compounds. Plenum Press, New York, 1983, pp 593-604.
Cook RR, May V: Dow Chemical worker and environmental studies. Presentation at
meeting of AMA's CSA Advisory Panel on Toxic Substances, 24 October 1983.
Courtney KD, Gaylor DW, Hogan MD, Falk HL: Teratogenic evaluation of 2,4,5-T.
Science 1970; 168:864-866.
Crosby DG: Photodecomposition of chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins. Science 1971;73:748749.
Crosby DG, Wong AS: Environmental degradation of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
(TCDD). Science 1977; 195:1337-1338.
Crosby DG: Methods of photochemical degradation of halogenated dioxins in view of
environmental reclamation. In: Accidental Exposure to Dioxins; Human Health
Aspects. F. Coulston and F. Pocchiari (eds), Academic Press, New York, 1982.
Crummett WB, Stehl RH:
Determination of chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and
dibenzofurans in various materials. Envl Hlth Persp 1973;5:15-25.
DiGiovanni JA, Viaje A, Berry DL, et al:
Tumor initiating ability of 2,3,7,8tetrachlorodiobenxo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and Aroclor 1254 in a two-stage system of
mouse skin carcinogenesis. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 1977; 18:522-557.
Donovan JW, Adena MA, Rose G et al: Case-control study of congenital anomalies and
Vietnam service (birth defects study). Report to the Minister for Veterans' Affairs,
January 1983, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.
Dow Chemical Company: The trace chemistries of fire — A source and route for the
entry of chlorinated dioxins into the environment. The Chlorinated Dioxin Task
Force, Michigan Division, Dow Chemical, USA, 1978.
d57:reprefs (revd. 5-24-85) - page R-2

�Elson M: Lawyers map strategy here for vast Agent Orange suite. Chicago Trib,
5 October 1980.
Emerson JL, Thompson D3, Strebing R3, et al:
Teratogenic studies of
2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid in the rat and rabbit. Food Cosmet Toxic
19719:395- 404.
Ericson A, Kallen B, Westholm P: Clusters of malformations in Sweden; a study with
central registers. Envl Resch 1983;30:466-479.
Eriksson M, Hardell L, Berg NO, et al: Soft-tissue sarcomas and exposure to chemical
substances; a case-referrent study. Br 3 Indus Med 1981;38:27-33.
Faith RE, Luster MI: Investigations on the effects of 2,3,7,8-TCDD on parameters of
various immune functions. Ann NY Acad Sci I979;320:564-57l.
Faith RE, Moore 3A: Impairment of thymus-dependent immune functions by exposure of
the developing immune system to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). 3
Toxicol Environ Health 1977;3:451-464.
Fingerhut MA: NIOSH dioxin registry. Presentation at meeting of AMA's CSA Advisory
Panel on Toxic Substances, 17 November 1983.
Fingerhut MA, Marlow DA, Honchar PA, Halperin WE: The NIOSH Occupational Dioxin
Registry. In: Public Health Risks of the Dioxins. Proceedings of symposium, 19-20
October 1983 at The Rockefeller University. Lowrance W (ed), William Kaufman
(Los Altos, Calif.) 1984a.
Fingerhut MA, Halperin WE, Honchar PA, Smith AB, Groth DH, Russell WO: An
evaluation of reports of dioxin exposure and soft tissue sarcoma pathology in US
chemical workers. Scand 3 Work Environ Health (in press) 1984b.
Firestone D:
The 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin problem; a review.
In:
Chlorinated Phenoxy Acids and their Dioxins; Mode of Action, Health Risks and
Environmental Effects. C. Ramel (ed), Ecol Bull (Stockholm) 1978.
Gaffey WR: Monsanto worker studies. Presentation at meeting of AMA's CSA Advisory
Panel on Toxic Substances, 17 November 1983.
Gasiewicz TA, Holscher MA, Neal RA: The effect of total parenteral nutrition on the
toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in the rat. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol
1980;54:469-488.
Gasiewicz TA, Neal RA:
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin tissue distribution,
excretion and effects of clinical chemical parameters in guinea pigs. Toxicol
Applied Pharmacol 1979;51(2):329-339.
Gasiewicz TA, Neal RA: The examination and quantitation of tissue cytosolic receptors
for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin using hydroxylapatite.
Anal Biochem
1982; 124:1-11.
Gasiewicz TA, Ness WC, Rucci G: Ontogeny of the cytosolic receptor for 2,3,7,8tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in rat liver, lung and thymus. Bioch Biophys Res
Commun 1984;118:183-190.
Ghiasuddin SM, Nelson 3O, Mehzer RE, et al:
Comparative metabolism of
environmentally significant chlorinated aromatic compounds in hepatic microsomal
systems. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1975;33:152-153.
Giavini E, Prati M, Vismara C: Rabbit teratology study with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzop-dioxin. Environ Research 1982;27:74-78.
Gibson JE: Perinatal nephropathies. Environ Health Perspect 1976; 15:121-130.
Green S, Moreland F, Sheu C: Cytogenetic effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
on rat bone marrow cells. FDA By-lines 1977;6:292-294.
Greenlee WF, Dold KM, Irons RD: 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) inhibits
the induction by thymic epithelial cells of T-lymphocyte nitrogen responsiveness.
The Toxicologist 1984;4(4):188.
Greenlee WI, Poland A: Nuclear uptake of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in
C57BL/63 and DBA/23 mice. 3 Biol Chem 1979;254:9814-9821.
Greenwald P, Kovasznay B, Collins DN, Therriault G: Sarcomas of soft tissue after
d57:reprefs (revd. 5-24-85) - page R-3

�Vietnam service. 3NCI 1984;73:1107-1109.
Greig JB, 3ones G, Butler WH» et al: Toxic effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachloridibenzo-pdioxin. Food Cosmet Toxicol 1973; 11:585-595.
Gupta BN, Vos 3G, Moore 3A, et al: Pathologic effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-pdioxin in laboratory animals. Environ Health Perspect 1973;5:125-40.
Gross ML, Lay 3O, Lyon PO, et al: 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin levels in adipose
tissue of Vietnam veterans. Envl Resch 1984;33:261-268.
Hardell L: Malignant mesenchymal tumors and exposure to phenoxy acids; a clinical
observation. Lakartidningen 1977;74:542-546.
Hardell L: Soft-tissue sarcomas and exposure to phenoxyacetic acids and cancer.
Lakartidningen 1977;74:2735.
Hardell L: Malignant lymphoma of histiocytic type and exposure to phenoxyacetic or
chlorophenols. Lancet 1979;I:55-56.
Hardell L, Eriksson M, Lenner P, et al: Malignant lymphoma and exposure to chemicals,
especially organic solvents, chlorophenols and phenoxy acids; a case control study.
Brit 3 Cancer 1981;43:169-176.
Hardell L, 3ohansson B, Axelson O: Epidemiological study of nasal and nasopharyngeal
cancer and their relation to phenoxy acid or chlorophenol exposure. Am 3 Indus
Med 1982;3:247-257.
Hay A: Dioxin hazards; secrecy at Coalite. Nature 1981;290:729.
Hay A, Ashby 3, Styles 3A, et al: The mutagenic properties of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Abstract, American Chemical Society meeting, Washington, DC,
August 1983.
Hoar S: Presentation at meeting of AMA's CSA Advisory Panel on Toxic Substances, 24
October 1983.
Hoffman RE, Donnel HD: Pilot study Times Beach, Missouri. Presentation at meeting of
AMA's CSA Advisory Panel on Toxic Substances, 13 December 1983.
Homberger E, Reggiani G, Sambeth 3, et al: The Seveso accident; its nature, extent and
consequences. Ann Occup Hyg 1979;22:327-370.
Honchar PA, Halperin WE: 2,4,5-T, trichlorophenol and soft-tissue sarcoma. Lancet
1981;I(8214):268-269.
Honchar P: Health Hazard Evaluation Report HETA-80-039-1179. National Institute for
Safety and Health, Cincinnati, 1982.
Hope W, Lischwe D, Russell W, et al: Epidemiologic notes and reports; porphyria cutanea
tarda and sarcoma in a worker exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzodioxin —
Missouri. MMWR 1984;33(8):113-114.
Huff JE, Moore 3A, Saracci R, Tomatis L: Long-term hazards of polychlorinated
dibenzodioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans. Environ Health Perspect
1980;36:221-240.
Inagami K, Koga T, Kikuchi M, et al: Experimental study of hairless mice following
administration of rice oil used by a "Yusho" patient. Fukuoka Acta Medica
1969;60:548-553.
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Some fumigants, the herbicides
2,4-D and 2,4 5-T, chlorinated dibenzodioxins and miscellaneous industrial
chemicals. IARC Monograph 15: Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals
to Man, 1977.
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Chemicals, industrial processes
and industries associated with cancer in humans. Evaluation of the Carcinogenic
Risk of Chemicals to Humans. Monograph Suppl 4 1982; pp 238-243.
Jensen S, Renberg L: Contaminants in pentachlorophenol; chlorinated dioxins and
predioxins. Ambio 1972;l(2):62-65.
Jensen S, Renberg L: Chlorinated dimers present in several technical chlorophenols used
as fungicides. Envl Hlth Persp 1973;5:37-41.
Jirasek L, Kalensky 3, Kubec K: Acne chlorina and porphyria cutanea tarda during the
d57:reprefs (revd. 5-24-85) - page R-4

�manufacture of herbicides. Cesk Dermatol 1973;48:306-317.
Jirasek L, Kalensky 3, Kubec K, et al: Acne chlorina and porphyria cutanea tarda, other
manifestations of general poisoning, during the manufacture of herbicides. II. Cesk
Dermatol 1974;49:145-157.
3ohnson FE, Kugler MA, Brown SM: Soft-tissue sarcomas and chlorinated phenols.
Lancet 1981;II:40.
3RB Associates: Review of Literature on Herbicides, Including Phenoxy Herbicides and
Associated Dioxins, vols 1 and 2. Prepared for the Veterans Administration, Dept
of Medicine and Surgery, Washington, DC, 1981.
Khera KS, Ruddick 3A: Polychlorodibenzo-p-dioxins; perinatal effects and the dominant
lethal test in the Wistar rats. In: Chlorodioxins--Origin and Fate. Advances Chem
Series 120, Blair EH (ed), American Chemical Soc, Washington, DC, pp 70-84.
Kimbrough R: Soft tissue sarcomas. Presentation at meeting of AMA's CSA Advisory
Panel on Toxic Substances, 17 November 1983.
Kimbrough R, Falk H, Stehr P: Health implications of 2,3,7,8-tetrachloridibenzo-pdioxin (TCDD) contamination of residential soil.
3 Toxicol Environ Health
1984; 14:47-93.
Kimmig 3, Schultz KH: Berufliche Akne durch chlorierte aromatische zyklische ftther
Dermatologica 1957; 115:540-546.
Kimmig 3, Schultz KH: Chlorinated aromatic cyclic esters as the cause of chloracne.
Naturwissenschaften 1957;*4:337-338.
Knutson 3C, Poland A: Response of murine epidermis to 2,3,7,8-tetrachloridibenzo-pdioxin; interaction of the Ah and hr loci. Cell 1982;30:225-234.
Knutson 3C, Poland A: 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin; failure to demonstrate
toxicity in twenty-three cultured cell types. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1980;5*:377383.
Lamm SH: An epidemiologic assessment of the Alsea II report, 6 August 1979.
Lamm SH: (Cited in "Toxic Materials in Brief") Toxic Materials News :339, 10 Dec 1980.
Lathrop GD, Wolfe WH, Albanese RA, Moynahan PM: An epidemiologic investigation of
health effects in Air Force personnel following exposure to herbicides; baseline
morbidity study results. USAF School of Aerospace Medicine, Brooks AFB, 24
February 1984.
Lawrence CE, Reilly AA, Quickenton P, Greenwald P, Page WF, Kuntz A3: Mortality
patterns of New York State Vietnam veterans.
Am 3 Public Health
1985;75:277-279.
Lipson A, Gaffey WR, LaVecchio F: Agent Orange and birth defects. N Engl 3 Med
(Letters to the Editor) 1983;309:491-492.
Mason ME, Okey AB: Cytosolic and nuclear binding of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-pdioxin on the Ah receptor in extra-hepatic tissues of rats and mice. Eur 3 Biochem
1982;123:209-215.
May G: Chloracne from the accidental production of tetrachlorodibenzodioxin. Br 3 Ind
Med 1973;30:276-283.
McConnell EE, Moore 3A, Haseman 3K, et al: The comparative toxicity of chlorinated
dibenzo-p-dioxins in mice and guinea pigs. Toxicol Applied Pharmacol 1978;**:335336.
McConnell EE, Lucier GW, Rumbaugh RC, Albro PW, Harvan D3, Hass 3R, Harris MW:
Dioxin in soil; bioavailablity after ingestion by (female Sprague-Dawley) rats and
(male Hartley) guinea pigs. Science 1984;223; 1077-1079.
McNulty WP: Toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin for Rhesus monkey. Bull
Environ Contam Toxicol 1977; 18:108-189.
McNulty WP: TCDD Teratogenicity and Fetotoxicity. Rockefeller University Symposium on Public Health Risk of the Dioxins, New York, New York, 19-20 October
1983.
McNulty WP, Becker GM, Cory HT: Chronic toxicity of 3,4,3,4 - and 2,5,2,5d57:reprefs (revd. 5-24-85) - page R-5

�tetrachlorobiphenyls in Rhesus Macques. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1980;56:182-190.
McNulty WP, Pomerantz I, Farell T: Chronic toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran
for Rhesus Macaques. Food Cosmet Toxicol 1981; 19:57-65.
Merlo F: Adverse health effects in human populations exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in Seveso; an update. Presentation at meeting of AMA's CSA
Advisory Panel on Toxic Substances, 13 December 1983.
Michigan Department of Public Health: Evaluation of Soft and Connective Tissue Cancer
Mortality Rates for Midland and Other Selected Michigan Counties Compared
Nationally and Statewide, 4 May 1983.
Milham S 3r: Herbicides, occupation and cancer. Lancet 1982;I:1464-1465.
Minister of Veterans' Affairs: Case-control study of congenital anomalies and Vietnam
service (birth defects study). Australian Government Publishing Service, January
1983.
Moore 3A, Gupta BN, Zinkl 3G, et al: Postnatal effects of maternal exposure to
2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo~p-dioxin (TCDD). Environ Health Perspect 1973;5:81-85.
Moore JA: A pesticide. Science 1979;203(4382):741-742.
Moses M, Lilis R, Crow KD, et al: Health status of workers with past exposure to
2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in the manufacture of 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid; comparison of findings with and without chloracne. Am 3 Indus Med
1984;5:161-1S2.
Moses M, Selikoff 13: Soft tissue sarcomas, phenoxy herbicides, and chlorinated
phenols. Lancet 1981;!: 1370.
Nagarkatti PS, Sweeney GD, Gauldie 3, et al: Sensitivity to suppression of cytotoxic
T-cell generation by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) is dependent on
the Ah genotype of the murine host. Toxicol Appl Pharm 1984;72:169-176.
National Toxicology Program (NTP): (Rep 80-31) — Carcino genesis bioassay of 2,3,7,8tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (CAS No. 1746-01-6) in Osborne-Mendel rats and
B6C3F1 mice (gavage study). Technical report series No. 209, NIH publication No.
82-1765, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1982.
National Toxicology Program (NTP): (Rep 80-32) — Carcinogenesis bioassay of 2,3,7,8tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (CAS No. 1746-01-6) in Swiss-Webster mice (dermal
study). Technical report series No. 201, NIH publication No. 82-1757, Research
Triangle Park, NC, 1982.
Neal RA: Spectrum of metabolic effects of TCDD in animal experiments. Rockefeller
University Symposium on Public Health Risk of the Dioxins, New York, New York,
19-20 October 1983.
Neal RA, Beatty PW, Gasiewicz TA: Studies on the mechanism of toxicity of 2,3,7,8tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). Ann NY Acad Sci 1979;320:204-213.
Nebert DW, Gielen 3E: Genetic regulation of aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase induction in
the mouse. Fed Proc 1972;31:1315-1327.
Nebert DW, 3ensen NM: The Ah locus; genetic regulation of the metabolism of
carcinogens, drugs, and other environmental chemicals by cytochrome P-450
mediated monooxygenases. CRC Grit Rev Biochem 1979;6:401-437.
Nelson 3O, Menzer R, Kearney PC: 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin; in vitro binding
to rat liver microsomes. Bull Environ Comtam Toxicol 1977;18:9-13.
Nestrick TJ, Lamparski LL: Isomer-specific determination of chlorinated dioxins for
assessment of formation and potential environmental emission from wood
combustion. Anal Chem 1982;54:2292-2299.
Neubert D, Dillmann I: Embryotoxic effects in mice treated with 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Naunyn-Schmiedberg's
Arch Pharmakol Exp Pathol 1972;272(3):243-264.
Neubert D, Zens P, Rothenwallner A, Merker H3: A survey of the embryotoxic effects of
TCDD in mammalian species. Environ Health Perspect 1973 (Exptl issue 5):233-40.
Nilsson CA, et al: Chromatographic evidence for the formation of chlorodioxins from
d57:reprefs (revd. 5-24-85) - page R-6

�chloro-2-phenoxyphenols. 3 Chromatography 1974;96:137-147.
Nilsson CA, Norstrom A, Andersson K, Rappe C: Pentachlorophenol; Chemistry,
Pharmacology and Environmental Toxicology. K. Ranga Rao (ed), Plenum, New
York, 1978.
Nolan R3, Smith FA, Hefner 3G: Elimination and tissue distribution of 2,3,7,8tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in female guinea pigs following a single oral
dose. Toxicol Appl Ppharmacol 1979;48:A162.
Norman C: Vietnam's herbicide legacy; recent studies in Vietnam have found long-term
environmental damage and a possible rise in birth defects from US spraying.
Science 1983;219: 1196-1 197.
Nunn DM: Trial between Palmer et al vs Nova Scotia Forest Industries. Transcript of
judicial decision, 1983.
O'Keefe PW, Meselson MS, Baughman RW:
Neutral clean-up procedures for
2, 3,7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin residues in bovine fat and milk. JAOAC
1978;61:621-626.
Okey AB, Bondy GP, Mason ME, et al: Regulatory gene product of the Ah locus
characterization of the cytosolic inducer-receptor complex and evidence for its
nuclear translocation. 3 Biol Chem 1979;25*: 11636- 11648.
Okey AB, Bondy GP, Mason ME, et al: Temperature-dependent cytosol-to-nucleus
translocation of the Ah receptor for 2,3,7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in
continuous cell culture lines. 3 Biol Chem 1980;255:11418-11422.
Olie L, Vermeulen PL, Hutzinger O: Chlorodibenzo-p-dioxins and chlorodibenzofurans
are trace components of fly ash and flue gas of some municipal incinerators in the
Netherlands. Chemosphere 1977;8:455-459.
Oliver RM: Toxic effects of 2,3,7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in laboratory workers.
Br 3 Ind Med 1975;32:49-53.
Olson 3R, Gasiewicz TA, Geiger LE, et al: The metabolism of 2, 3, 7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. In: Mammalian Systems in Accidental Exposure to Dioxins;
Human Health Aspects, Coulston F and Pocchiari F (eds), Academic Press, New
York, 1983.
Olson 3R, Gasiewicz TA, Neal RA: Tissue distribution, excretion and metabolism of
2, 3,7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in the Golden Syrian hamster. Toxicol
Applied Pharmacol 1980;56:78-85.
Olsson H, Brandt L: Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the skin and occupational exposure to
herbicides. Lancet 1981;2:579.
Osborne R, Greenlee WF: Altered regulation of human epidermal cell proliferation and
differentiation by 2, 3,7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). The Toxicologist
1984;Ml):188.
Pazderova-Vejlupkova 3, Lukas E, et al: Chronic poisoning by 2, 3,7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. PracovLek 1981;32:204-209.
Pazderova-Vejlupkova 3, Nemcova M, Pickova 3, et al: The development and prognosis
of chronic intoxication by tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in men. Arch Environ Health
Percy C, Stanek E, Gloeckler L: Accuracy of cancer death certificates and its effect on
cancer mortality statistics. Am 3 Public Health 1981;71(3):242-250.
Piper WN, Rose 3Q, Gehring P3:
Excretion and distribution of 2,3,7,8tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in the rat. Environ Health Perspect (Exptl issue 5)
1973;241-244.
Pitot HC, Goldsworthy T, Campbell HA, et al: Quantitative evaluation of the promotion
by 2, 3,7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin of hepatocarcino genesis from diethylnitrosamine. Cancer Res 1980;40:36 16-3620.
Plimmer 3R, Klingebiel UI, Crosby DH, Wong AS: Photochemistry of dibenzo-p-dioxins.
In: Chlorodioxins — Origin and Fate. E. Blair (ed), American Chemical Society,
Washington, DC, pp 44-54, 1973.
d57:reprefs (revd. 5-24-85) - page R-7

�Plimmer JR: Approaches to decontamination or disposal of pesticides; photodecomposition. In: Disposal and Decomposition of Pesticides. MV Kennedy (ed), ACS
Symposium Series 73, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 12-23, 1978.
Pocchiari F, Vittorio S, Zampieri A; Human health effects from accidental release of
tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) at Seveso, Italy. In: Health Effects of
Halogenated Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Nicholson W3 and Moore 3A (eds), Ann NY
AcadSci 1979(May);320:311-320.
Poiger H, Buser HR, Weber H, et ah Structure elucidation of mammalian TCDDmetabolites. Experientia 1982;38:484-86.
Poiger H, Weber H, Schlatter C: Special aspects of metabolism and kinetics of TCDD in
dogs and rats. In: Chlorinated Dioxins and Related Compounds, Hutzinger O et al
(eds), Pergamon series. Env Sci 1982;5:317-323.
Poland A, Glover E: 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin: segregation of toxicity with
the Ah locus. Mol Pharmaool 1980; 17:86-94.
Poland A, Glover E: An estimate of the maximum in vitro covalent binding of 2,3,7,8tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin to rat liver protein, ribosomal RNA and DNA. Cancer
Res 1979;39:3341-3344.
Poland A, Glover E, Kende AS: Stereospecific high affinity binding of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin by hepatic cytosol. 3 Biol Chem 1976;251:4936-4946.
Poland A, Knutson 3C: 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and related halogenated
aromatic hydrocarbons; examination of the mechanism of toxicity. Ann Rev
Pharmacol 1982;22:517-554.
Poland A, Palen D, Glover E: Tumour promotion by TCDD in skin of HRS/3 hairless
mice. Nature 1982;300:271-273.
Poland A, Yang GC: Preparation and characterization of chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin. 3
Agric Food Chem 1972;20:1093-1099.
Rappe C: 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) introduction. In: Dioxin —
Toxicological and Chemical Aspects. F. Cattabeni, A Cavallaro and G Galli (eds),
SP Medical and Scientific Books, NY, pp 9-11, 1978.
Rappe C, Buser HR, Bosshardt HP: Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and
dibenzofurans (PCDFs); occurrence, formation and analysis of environmental
hazardous compounds. CIPC Symposium, Baltimore, Maryland, 5-6 3une 1979.
Rappe C, Buser HR, Kuroki H, Masuda Y: Chemosphere 1979.
Reggiani G: The estimation of the TCDD toxic potential in the light of the Seveso
accident. Arch Toxicol (Suppl 2) 1979;291-302.
Riihimaki V, Asp S, Hernberg S: Mortality of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and
2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid herbicide applicators in Finland. Scand 3 Work
Environ Health 1982;8:37-42.
Robinson BD: Safety aspects of 2,4,5-T herbicides. Technote No. 5/79. Dept of
Agriculture and Fisheries, Adelaide, Australia, 1979.
Rogers AM, Andersen ME, Back KC: Mutagenicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells. Mutation Res 1982; 105:445-449.
Rose JQ, Ramsey 3C, Wentzler TH, et al: The fate of TCDD following single and
repeated oral doses to the rat. Toxicol Applied Pharmacol 1976;36:209-226.
Rozman K, Rozman T, Greim H: Effect of thyroidectomy and thyroxine on 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) induced toxicity.
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol
1984;72:372-376.
Rozman T, Rozman K, Greim H: Role of thyroid function in TCDD induced toxicity.
The Toxicologist 1984;&lt;Kl):189.
Sarma PR, 3acobs 3: Thoracic soft tissue sarcoma in Vietnam veterans exposed to Agent
Orange. N Engl 3 Med 1982;306(18):1109.
Schacter L, Crum E, Abbound S, et al: Adenocarcinoma of the lung in Vietnam veterans
younger than 35 years. 3AMA 1984;251(5):604.
Schaum 3: Risk Analysis of TCDD Contaminated Soil. US Environmental Protection
d57:reprefs (revd. 5-24-85) - page R-8

�Agency, EPA/600/8-84/03 1.
Scheupler E, Rozman K, Pazdernik T, et al: Effect of thyroxine (T4) and triiodootyrosine
(T) on TCDD toxicity in thyroidectonized rats. The lexicologist 1984;*(1):189.
Schwetz BA, Norris 3M, Sparschu GL, et al: Toxicology of chlorinated dibenzo-pdioxins. Environ Health Perspect 1973;5:87-99.
Sell KW: Immunology. Presentation at meeting of AMA's CSA Advisory Panel on Toxic
Substances, 13 December 1983.
Shepard BM: A summary of current information on the VA's Agent Orange Registry.
Presented before the Division of Environmental Chemistry, American Chemical
Society, Washington, DC, 30 August 1983.
Shepard BM, Young AL: Twins study, soft tissue sarcomas, porphyria cutanea tarda.
Presentation at meeting of AMA's CSA Panel on Toxic Substances, 23 September
1983.
Singer R, Moses M, Valciukas 3, et al: Nerve conduction velocity studies of workers
employed in the manufacture of phenoxy herbicides. Envl Rsch 1982;29:297-311.
Smith AH: Seasonal analysis of Oregon data on spontaneous abortions and 2,4,5-T
spraying. Presented at ANZSERCH, Annual Conference; Dunedin, New Zealand,
August 1979.
Smith AH, Fisher DO, Pearce N, Teague CA: Do agricultural chemicals cause soft tissue
sarcoma? Initial findings of a case-control study in New Zealand. Community
Health Stud 1982a;6:114-119.
Smith AH, Fisher DO, Pearce N, Chapman C3: Congenital defects and miscarriages
among New Zealand 2,4, 5-T sprayers. Arch Environ Health 1982b;37: 197-200.
Smith AH,Pearce NE, Fisher DO, Giles H3, Teague CA, Howard 3K: Soft tissue sarcoma
and exposure to phenoxyherbicides and chlorophenols in New Zealand. 3NCI
Smith FA, Schwetz BA, Nitschke KD: Teratogenicity of 2,3,7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-pdioxin in CF-mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1976;38:5 17-523.
Sparschu GL, Dunn FL, Rowe VK: Study of teratogenicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Food Cosmet Toxic 1971;9:405-412.
Stevens KM: Agent Orange toxicity; a quantitative perspective. Human Toxicology
1981;l:31-39.
Suskind RR: Clinical manifestations of 2,4,5-T exposures. Paper presented at the
International Workshop on Chemical and Epidemiological Follow-up After Areawide
Chemical Contamination, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, 1980.
Suskind RR, Hertzberg VS: Human health effects of 2,4,5-T and its toxic contaminants.
JAMA 1984;251(18):2372-2380.
Tenchini ML, Crimaudo C, Pacchetti G, et al: A comparative cytogenetic study of cases
of induced abortions in TCDD-exposed and nonexposed women. Envl Mutagenesis
1983;5:73-85.
Thiess AM, Frentzel-Beyme R, Link R: Mortality study of persons exposed to dioxin in a
trichlorophenol-process accident that occurred in the BASF AG on 17 November
1953. Am 3IndusMed 1982;3:179-189.
Townsend 3C, Bodner KM, Van Peenen PFD, et al: Survey of reproductive events of
wives of employees exposed to chlorinated dioxins. Amer 3 Epid 1982;115(5):695713.
Tung TT, An TT, Tarn NE, et al: Le cancer primaire du foie au Vietnam. Chirurgie
1973;99:427-436.
Tung TT, Tugen BQTKA, Tra DX, et al: Clinical effects of massive and continuous
utilization of defoliants on civilians. Vietnamese Studies 1971;29:53-81.
US Air Force (USAF) School of Aerospace Medicine: Project Ranch Hand II. An
epidemiologic investigation of health effects in Air Force personnel following
exposure to herbicides; baseline mortality study results. USAF School of Aerospace
Medicine, Brooks AFB, 30 3une 1983.
d57:reprefs (revd. 5-24-85) - page R-9

�US Centers for Disease Control (CDC): Agent Orange projects (press release).
11 December 1984.
US Department of Health and Human Services (US DHHS): Protocol for epidemiological
studies of the health of Vietnam veterans. CDC Public Health Service, November
1983.
US Veterans Administration (US VA): Australia issues mortality report on Vietnam
veterans. Agent Orange Rev 1985;4(1):4.
US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA): Dioxins. Cincinnati, Ohio, 1980.
Van Miller JP, Marlar R3, Allen 3R: Tissue distribution and excretion of tritiated
tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in non-human primates and rats. Food Cosmet Toxicol
Vinopal JH, Casida 3E: Metabolic stability of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in
mammalian liver microsomal systems and in living mice. Arch Environ Contamn
Toxicol 1973;1:122-132.
Voss JG, Beems RB: Dermal toxicity studies of technical polychlorinated biphenyls and
fractions thereof in rabbits. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1971; 19:617-633.
Voss JG, Moore 3 A, Zinkl 3G: Effect of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin on the
immune system of laboratory animals. Environ Health Prespec 1973;5:149-162.
Wagner SL, Witt 3M, Norris LA, et al: A Scientific Critique of the EPA Alsea II Study
and Report. Environmental Health Sciences Center, Oregon State University,
Corvallis, Oregon, 1979.
Wassom 3S, Huff 3E, Loprieno N: A review of the genetic toxicology of chlorinated
dibenzo-p-dioxins. Mutation Res 1977/78;47:141-160.
Weaver D, Amos A, Tierney B, et al: Interaction of DNA with cytosolic 3-methylcholanthrene binding proteins from either rat or mouse liver. Carcinogenesis 1980; 1:481486.
Webb K, Ayres S, Slavin R, et al: Results of a pilot study of health effects due to
2,3,7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzodioxin contamination - Missouri. MMWR 1984;33(5):5461.
Weber H, Poiger H, Schlatter C: Acute oral toxicity of TCDD metabolites in male
guinea pigs. Toxicol Lett 1982;!*: 117- 122.
Willis RF: Canadian review of human and animal studies and dioxin sources as a basis for
recommendations on government regulations. Presentation at meeting of AMA's
CSA Advisory Panel on Toxic Substances, 13 December 1983.
Wolfe WH, Michalek 3E, Albanese RA, Lathrop GD, Moynahan PM: Project Ranch Hand
II. An epidemiologic investigation of health effects in Air Force personnel
following exposure to herbicides; mortality update - 1984. USAF School of
Aerospace Medicine, Brooks AFB, 10 December 1984.
Young AL, Calcagani 3A, Thalken CE, et al: The Toxicology, Environmental Fate and
Human Risk of Herbicide Orange and its Associated Dioxin. USAF Occupational
and Environmental Health Laboratory, Technical Report No. TR-78-92, Final
Report, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas, 1978.

d57:reprefs (revd. 5-24-85) - page R-10

�List of States with Vietnam Veteran Commissions or Programs
California

California Division of Veterans Affairs
P.O. Box 1559
Sacramento CA 95814
(916) 445-9518

Connecticut

Vietnam Veterans Herbicide Information
Commission
Veterans1 Office
Southern Connecticut University
501 Cresent Street
New HavenCT 06515
(203 297-4329

Georgia

Agent Orange Program
Georgia Department of Human Resources
47 Trinity Avenue, S.W.
Atlanta, GA 30334
(404)656-4764

Hawaii

Agent Orange Program
Hawaii Department of Health
P.O. Box 3378
Honolulu, HI 96801

(808) 548-8705

Indiana

Agent Orange Program
Department of Veterans' Affairs
707 State Office Building
Indianapolis, IN 46204
(317)232-3910

Iowa

Agent Orange Program
Iowa Department of Health
Lucas State Office Building
Des Moines IA 50319

(515) 281-8220

Kansas

Agent Orange Program
Kansas Department of Health/Environment
Forbes Field
Topeka, KS 66620
(913) 862-9360

Maine

Bureau of Health
State House, Station 11
Augusta, ME 04333

(207)298-3201

Agent Orange Program
100 Cambridge Street
10th Floor, #1001
Boston, MA 02202

(617)722-1107

Massachusetts

Minnesota

d57:states (revd. 5-29-85) - page A-l

Agent Orange Program
Department of Veterans' Affairs
Veterans Service Building
(612) 297-4217
St. Paul, MN 55155

�New Jersey

(609)984-7397

Agent Orange Program
Ohio Board of Regents
30 East Broad Street
Columbus, OH 43215

Ohio

Agent Orange Commission
Broad Street Bank Building
1*3 East State Street
Trenton, NJ 08608

(614)466-6000

Oklahoma

Agent Orange Assistance Program
Oklahoma Department of Health
P.O. Box 53551
Oklahoma City, OK 73152
(405) 271-4200

Oregon

Agent Orange Program
Department of Veterans' Affairs
Veterans Service Division
700 Summer Street, N.E., Suite 150
Salem, OR 97310-1270
(503)378-6839

Pennsylvania

Vietnam Herbicides Information Commission
Pennsylvania Department of Health
P.O. Box 8380
Health and Welfare Building, Room 912A
Harrisburg, PA 17105
(717) 787-1708

Rhode Island

Agent Orange Commission
242 Prairie Avenue
Providence, RI 02907

(401)521-6710

Agent Orange Program
Texas Department of Health
1100 West 49th Street
Austin, TX 78756

(817)458-7251

Texas

West Virginia

Agent Orange Program
West Virginia Department of Health
Office of Community Health Services
1800 Washington Street East
Charleston, WV 25303
(304)348-3210

Wisconsin

Agent Orange Program
Wisconsin Department of Health &amp; Social
Services
Division of Health
P.O. Box 309
Madison, WI 53701
(608) 266-1253

* . . GOVERHMEIB IKIHTING OFFICE : 1985 0 4 1 8 0 3 6 1
BS
-6-9/55

d57:states (revd. 5-29-85) - page A-2

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="16952">
              <text>052</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="16954">
              <text>1394</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="16957">
              <text>Series III Subseries II</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16945">
                <text>Beljan, John R.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16946">
                <text>Nelson S. Irey</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16947">
                <text>Wendell W. Kilgore</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16948">
                <text>Kazuo Kimura</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16949">
                <text>Raymond R. Suskind</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16950">
                <text>Jaroslav J. Vostal</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16951">
                <text>R.H. Wheater</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16953">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;American Medical Association, Council on Scientific Affairs, Advisory Panel on Toxic Substances</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16955">
                <text>October 1 1984</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16956">
                <text>The Health Effects of "Agent Orange" and Polychlorinated Dioxin Contaminants: an Update, 1984, Technical Report</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16958">
                <text>health studies</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16959">
                <text>human exposure</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16960">
                <text>industrial exposure</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16961">
                <text>veteran health and hygiene</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1544" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="7829">
              <text>029</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="7830">
              <text>0491</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="7834">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7828">
                <text>Birmingham, Donald J.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7831">
                <text>Skin</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7832">
                <text>1964</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7833">
                <text>Occupational Dermatology: Current Problems</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7835">
                <text>chloracne</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="7836">
                <text>industrial exposure</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3080" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1594">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/623b4cbd8cd7ce67137660edb190fc1d.pdf</src>
        <authentication>772408bd938746d030ed31e62d46c8bf</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63543">
                    <text>Item ID Number

01771

AllthOT

Blair, Aaron

Corporate Author
Typescript: Research Protocol, a Case-Control Study of
Lymphoma and Soft-Tissue Sarcoma: Association with
Herbicide Exposures, [nd]

Journal/Book Title
Year

000

°

Month/Day
Color
Number of Imaoes

:

16

Descrlpton Notes

Monday, June 11, 2001

Page 1772 of 1793

�Research Protocol

A CASE-CONTROL STUDY OF LYMPHOMA AND SOFT-TISSUE SARCOMA:
ASSOCIATION WITH HERBICIDE EXPOSURES

Aaron B l a i r
S h e l i a K. Hoar
E n v i r o n m e n t a l E p i d e m i o l o g y Branch
N a t i o n a l Cancer Institute
Landout 3C06
Bethesda, Maryland

20205

�A Case-Control Study of Lymphoma and Soft-Tissue Sarcoma:
A s s o c i a t i o n w i t h H e r b i c i d e Exposures

I. Introduction

The E n v i r o n m e n t a l E p i d e m i o l o g y Branch of the National
Cancer Institute is p l a n n i n g to conduct an e p i d e m i o l o g i c
case-control i n v e s t i g a t i o n of soft-tissue sarcoma

(STS), non-

Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), and Hodgkin's disease (HD).

The

cases and controls, or t h e i r next-of-kin» w i l l be interv i e w e d by telephone to o b t a i n occupational h i s t o r i e s and
other i n f o r m a t i o n p e r t i n e n t to the o r i g i n s of these cancers.
P a r t i c u l a r attention w i l l be p a i d to h e r b i c i d e exposures.

II. O b j e c t i v e

The objective of t h i s study is to evaluate the effects
of the f o l l o w i n g factors on the development of STS, NHL,
and HD:

1) O c c u p a t i o n a l and non-occupational exposure to
h e r b i c i d e s , in p a r t i c u l a r p h e n o x y a c e t i c a c i d s and
c hloropheno1s.
2) Exposure to p h e n o x y a c e t i c a c i d - c o n t a i n i n g drugs,
eg. c l o f i b r a t e .
3) Other factors such as g e n e t i c syndromes, f a m i l i a l
c l u s t e r i n g , i m m u n o l o g i c d e f i c i e n c y , lymphedema, t r a u m a ,
and exposure to r a d i a t i o n , a r s e n i c , v i n y l
c h l o r i d e , a n d r o g e n i c - a n a b o l i c steroids, a l l e r g e n i c
extract i n j e c t i o n s , and a n i m a l s susceptible to

�sarcoma-inducing viruses.

III. L i t e r a t u r e R e v i e w

Certain h e r b i c i d e s and h e r b i c i d e - c o n t a m i n a n t s
been associated w i t h

teratogenesis,

have

mutagenesis,

and

c a r e i n o g e n e s i s in a n i m a l and b a c t e r i a l e x p e r i m e n t s (Young
AL

et

al.,

1978).

Recent

e p i d e m i o l o g i c s t u d i e s from

Sweden suggest that persons exposed to h e r b i c i d e s may
at

excess

r i s k of cancer.

be

A retrospective cohort study

of r a i l r o a d workers exposed to a m i t r o l e (3-am5no-1»2,4triazole) a n d p h e n o x y a c e t i c a c i d s ( 2 » 4 - d i c h l o r o p h e n o x y a c t i c a c i d
and 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic a c i d ) showed
of cancer
L,

i n c i d e n c e and m o r t a l i t y (Axelson

1974;

Axelson 0 et a l . » 1980).

and

chlorophenols

and

(Hardell L and Sandstrom A,
1979;

Hardell

risks were
whether

L

STS,

1979;

et al., 1981).

to

were

Sundell

phenoxyacetic

N H L , and
Eriksson

M

HD
et

al.,

For all three cancers,

increased f i v e - to s i x - fold,

exposures

0 and

Case-control studies

revealed a s s o c i a t i o n s between exposure
acids

elevated rates

regardless

of

c o n t a m i n a t e d by p o l y c h l o r i n a t e d

d i b e n z o d i o x i n s (PCDDs) and dibenzofurans (PCDFs).

There

is w i d e s p r e a d p o t e n t i a l for exposure to phenoxy-

a c e t i c a c i d s and chlorophenols.

In a d d i t i o n to h e r b i c i d e

f o r m u l a t i o n s these c h e m i c a l s appear
retardants used

in b l u e s t a i n

i n s a w m i l l s , s l i m e control p r e p a r a t i o n s

in paper and p u l p m a n u f a c t u r i n g , c u t t i n g o i l s and
f l u i d s , wood p r e s e r v a t i v e s , waterproofing agents for leather
and t e x t i l e s , and in m e d i c a t i o n s .

Clofibrate, a plasma l i p i d -

�l o w e r i n g d r u g * is a p h e n o x y a c e t i c a c i d - d e r i v a t i v e and has
i n d u c e d h e p a t o c e l l u l a r c a r c i n o m a s and sarcomas
boda and Azarnoff, 1979).

If the reported

in rats

(Svo-

epidemiologic

associations are causal and as strong as suggested by the
Swedish research, these agents could be r e s p o n s i b l e for a
large p r o p o r t i o n of the cases of STS,

NHL, and HD in the

U n i t e d States.

The e t i o l o g y of STS is largely unknown.

A small propor-

t i o n of cases are related to M e n d e l i a n syndromes

and f a m i l i a l

m u l t i p l e - c a n c e r syndromes (Tucker and F r a u m e n i , 1981; Li and
F r a u m e n i , 1969;
associated

Blattner

with

et a l . » 1979).

genetically

Some cases are

determined

i m m u n o d e f i c i e n c y syndromes and i a t r o g e n i c immunosuppressed
states (Hoover and F r a u m e n i , 1973;
Spector et al., 1978).

K i n l e n et al., 19797

C h r o n i c l y m p h e d e m a has been l i n k e d

to sarcomas in case reports (Dubin et al., 1974).

E x t e r n a l r a d i a t i o n therapy and r a d i o i s o t o p e s have also been
associated

w i t h the d e v e l o p m e n t of sarcomas ( K i m et al., 1978).

Thorotrast, used for r a d i o g r a p h i c s t u d i e s of blood vessels
in the l i v e r , resulted
sarcomas

in a n g i o s a r c o m a s of the l i v e r and

at the s i t e of i n j e c t i o n (da Motta et al.,

Falk et al., 1979a).

1979;

Use of the r a d i o isotope, 1-125, for

treatment of t h y r o t o x i c o s i s was followed e i g h t years later
by the d e v e l o p m e n t of a sarcoma
al., 1978).
and suspected

of the larynx ( M c K i l l o p et

Other agents used m e d i c i n a l l y and o c c u p a t i o n a l l y
of b e i n g associated w i t h d e v e l o p m e n t of STS

i n c l u d e ! a r s e n i c , v i n y l c h l o r i d e , a n d r o g e n i c - a n a b o l i c steroids,
i r o n - d e x t r a n i n j e c t i o n s , and a l u m i n u m compounds

(Falk et al.,

�1979b, M c l l l m u r r a y and L a n g m a n , 1978; W e i n b r e n et al.,1978)
V i r u s e s appear to be r e s p o n s i b l e for the i n d u c t i o n of
sarcomas in c h i c k e n s * cats, and m i c e and may play a role
in the causation of human sarcoma (Kufe et a l . » 1972)»
a l t h o u g h there is no e p i d e m i o l o g i c e v i d e n c e to date.

E p i d e m i o l o g i c studies have also suggested possible
l i n k s between these diseases and selected occupations
(Grufferman et al., 1976, Tucker and F r a u m e n i » 1981).
Woodworkers* c l e r i c a l workers, accountants* engineers,
lawyers, judges, p h y s i c i a n s , and t e x t i l e workers
reportedly have an increased r i s k of HD,

Several, but

not a l l , cohort s t u d i e s of c h e m i s t s have demonstrated
excess m o r t a l i t y from HD and NHL (Li et a l . » 1969; O l i n ,
1976; O l i n , 1978; Searle et al., 1978; Hoar and Pell,

1981 ).

Non-occupational factors associated w i t h HD and NHL
i n c l u d e age, race, sex, g e o g r a p h i c a l l o c a t i o n (Cole and
MacMahon, 1968), socioeconomic status, m a r i t a l status,
e t h n i c i t y , r e l i g i o n , o b e s i t y , s m o k i n g h i s t o r y , coffee
d r i n k i n g h a b i t s (Paffenbarger et al., 1977;

Paffenbarger

et al., 1978), f a m i l i a l cancer h i s t o r y , d i a b e t e s (Kalant
and Seemayer, 1979), s y s t e m i c lupus erythematosus

(Green

et al., 1978), i n f e c t i o u s m o n o n u c l e o s i s (Carter et al.,
1977), c e l i a c d i s e a s e (Douglas, 1977), i m m u n o d e f i c i e n c y
syndromes ( F i l i p o v i c h et al., 1980), tonsi1lectomy (Gutensohn et al., 1975), i o n i z i n g r a d i a t i o n , c h e m o t h e r a p y (Krik o r i a n et al., 1979), i m m u n o s u p p r e s s i v e drugs (Hoover and
F r a u m e n i , 1973), and other exposures.

�Many factors h a v e been suggested as c o n t r i b u t i n g to
the d e v e l o p m e n t of STS,

NHL, and HD but need to be further

e v a l u a t e d and q u a n t i f i e d .

In p a r t i c u l a r , the heavy use of

h e r b i c i d e s a n d t h e h i g h cancer r i s k p o s s i b l y associated w i t h
t h e i r exposure underscores the urgent need to conduct an
independent ep i detn i olog i c i n v e s t i g a t i o n of persons exposed
to these p e s t i c i d e s .

IV. Study Subjects

1) The case group w i l l consist of w h i t e men, aged 21 and
older, d i a g n o s e d w i t h STS,

NHL, or HD, from a r e g i o n where

at least 10% of the w o r k i n g w h i t e p o p u l a t i o n has been engaged
in o c c u p a t i o n a l a c t i v i t i e s that i n v o l v e contact w i t h h e r b i cides.

Kansas has been selected

since it is a w h e a t - p r o d u c i n g

area where h e r b i c i d e use is great but use of i n s e c t i c i d e s
and f u n g i c i d e s is c o n s i d e r a b l y less.
The goal is to select 200 cases of each cancer, however
because the study region is sparsely populated and these
are rare tumors, a m i n i m u m of 100 cases of each cancer w i l l
be acceptable.

Cases from the last f i v e years w i l l be

drawn from the U n i v e r s i t y of Kansas M e d i c a l Center Cancer
Data S e r v i c e , a p o p u l a t i o n - b a s e d cancer r e g i s t r y .

Next-of-kin

w i l l serve as respondents for those cases who h a v e d i e d .

2) The controls w i l l be w h i t e men from the general
p o p u l a t i o n of the g e o g r a p h i c area selected for study.
Three controls w i l l be matched to each case on age (+/yearn), v i t a l status, and area of residence (probably a

2

�m u l t i - c o u n t y unit).
For cases who are currently a l i v e , controls aged 65
years or older w i l l be selected from the Health Care F i n a n c i n g
A d m i n i s t r a t i o n f i l e * to be p r o v i d e d by NCI; whereas, controls
aged 64 years or younger could be selected by telephone
t h r o u g h a random d i g i t d i a l i n g t e c h n i q u e .
For cases who have d i e d before the i n i t i a t i o n of the
study* the controls could be selected from Kansas state
m o r t a l i t y files.

In a d d i t i o n to age at death (+/-

2 years)»

these controls would be matched to the cases on year of death.
Persons whose cause of death is STS, NHL, HD, or a m a l i g n a n c y
of an i l l - d e f i n e d s i t e (ICDA code 195) would be excluded.
The next-of-kin w i l l be i n t e r v i e w e d .
The same controls should be used for the three case
series whenever p o s s i b l e .

The goal is that each case h a v e

three s u i t a b l y matched controls for c o m p a r i s o n .

We anti-

c i p a t e that 700 to 1000 controls w i l l be necessary to
meet t h i s r e q u i r e m e n t .

A s s u m i n g an

level of .05 and 10% of the p o p u l a t i o n

exposed to h e r b i c i d e s , a study of 100 cases w i t h a 3:1
m a t c h i n g r a t i o would be able to detect a m i n i m u m odds r a t i o
of 2.7 w i t h 90% power.

V. Pathology R e v i e w

Pathology blocks, s l i d e s , and/or m e d i c a l records w i l l
be o b t a i n e d for c o n f i r m a t i o n of the d i a g n o s i s of STS,
or HD.

NHL,

S p e c i m e n s w i l l be r e v i e w e d by NCI p a t h o l o g i s t s .

�VI. Interv i ew

The cases and controls, or t h e i r next-of-kin,

w i l l be

i n t e r v i e w e d by telephone c o n c e r n i n g the f o l l o w i n g items:
Date of b i r t h
Place of b i r t h
Mar i tal status
Religion
Ethnicity
Height/Weight
Education
O c c u p a t i o n (emphasis on exposure

to p h e n o x y a c e t i c

acids, chlorophenolsi arsenic

compounds,

v i n y l c h l o r i d e , poultry, other b i r d s ,
and cats)
N o n - o c c u p a t i o n a l use of h e r b i c i d e s
Smok i ng
Coffee d r i n k i n g
Fam i 1 i a 1 cancer
Trauma
Present or past m e d i c a l c o n d i t i o n s

(diabetes,

eczema, a l l e r g i e s , chloracne, v a r i c e l l a
[ c h i c k e n pox], s y s t e m i c lupus erythematosus, i n f e c t i o u s m o n o n u c l e o s i s ,
celiac disease, immunodeficiency
syndromes)
M e d i c a l treatments

(phenoxyacetic a c i d - c o n t a i n i n g

drugs, t o n s i l l e c t o m y , i o n i z i n g
r a d i a t i o n , chemotherapy, immunos u p p r e s s i v e therapy, allergy shots,

�vaccines, iron-dextran injections,
a n d r o g e n i c - a n a b o 1 i c s t e r o i d s » Fowler's
solution* amphetamines, diphenylhydanto i n, etc . )

VI. Proposed Study Steps

1. O b t a i n d e m o g r a p h i c , a g r i c u l t u r a l , and i n d u s t r i a l charact e r i s t i c s of the g e o g r a p h i c area from w h i c h the cases
and controls w i l l be selected.

2. Develop an i n t e r v i e w schedule.

Conduct a pretest and make

necessary r e v i s i o n s .

3. O b t a i n necessary clearance for the i n t e r v i e w schedule and
project protocol from the NCI E n v i r o n m e n t a l E p i d e m i o l o g y
Branch T e c h n i c a l E v a l u a t i o n of Projects and Q u e s t i o n n a i r e s
C o m m i t t e e , the Office of Management and Budget,
state v i t a l records offices, and p a r t i c i p a t i n g hospitals.

4. Identify the w h i t e men, aged 21 years or older, who were
d i a g n o s e d w i t h STS, NHL, or HD, and who r e s i d e d in the
g e o g r a p h i c area selected for study.

Select the cases

from the f i v e most recent years.

5. Select three controls per case, m a t c h i n g on age (+/-

2

years), v i t a l status, year of d i a g n o s i s or d e a t h , and
area of r e s i d e n c e (probably a m u l t i - c o u n t y u n i t ) .
p o p u l a t i o n controls u s i n g HCFA f i l e s , random d i g i t
d i a l i n g , and Kansas state m o r t a l i t y f i l e s .

Use the

Draw

�same controls for the three case s e r i e s whenever
possible.

6. O b t a i n c o p i e s of death c e r t i f i c a t e s for deceased cases
and controls.

7. O b t a i n and r e v i e w pathology blocks, s l i d e s , and/or m e d i c a l
records for c o n f i r m a t i o n of the d i a g n o s i s .

8. Develop t r a i n i n g and procedure manuals for s u p e r v i s o r s i
i n t e r v i e w e r s * abstractors* and coders.

9. Locate cases and controls* or t h e i r next-of-kin.

10. Prepare i n t r o d u c t o r y

and informed consent letters

and o b t a i n consent of cases and controls* or t h e i r nexto f - k i n * p r i o r to c o n d u c t i n g i n t e r v i e w s * in accordance
w i t h e x i s t i n g federal, state, and local r e g u l a t i o n s .

1 1 . H i r e a n d t r a i n s u p e r v i s o r s * i n t e r v i e w e r s , abstractors*
and

coders.

12. Conduct telephone i n t e r v i e w s of the cases and

controls,

or t h e i r next-of-kin.

13. O b t a i n c o r r o b o r a t i v e e v i d e n c e of h e r b i c i d e exposure from
resources, such as employers, employees, or a g r i c u l t u r a l
a g e n c i e s , for study subjects suspected of h a v i n g such
exposure.

T h i s i m p o r t a n t step w i l l reduce p o t e n t i a l

observer b i a s i n t r o d u c e d by i n t e r v i e w e r s aware of the

�study hypothes i s

14. R e v i e w , e d i t , and code all completed

15. Analyze the data.

16. W r i t e a f i n a l report

17. Document each step of the study

interviews

�REFERENCES

Axelson 0 and Sundell L: H e r b i c i d e exposure* m o r t a l i t y and tumour
incidence.
workers.

An e p i d e m i o l o g i e s ! i n v e s t i g a t i o n on Swedish r a i l r o a d
Scand J Work E n v i r o n Health 11: 21-28, 1974.

Axelson 0, Sundell L, Andersson K, et al.: H e r b i c i d e exposure and
tumor m o r t a l i t y : An updated e p i d e m 5 o l o g i c i n v e s t i g a t i o n on
Swedish r a i l r o a d workers.

Scand J Work E n v i r o n Health 6: 73-

79, 1980.

Blattner WA, M c G u i r e DB, M u l v i h i l l JJ, et al.: Geneology of cancer
in a f a m i l y .

J A M A 241: 259-261, 1979.

Carter CD, Brown TM, Herbert JT, et al.: Cancer i n c i d e n c e f o l l o w i n g
infectious mononucleosis.

Am J E p i 106: 30-36, 1977.

Cole P, M a c M a h o n B: M o r t a l i t y from H o d g k i n ' s disease in the U n i t e d
States: E v i d e n c e for the m u l t i p l e e t i o l o g y hypothesis.

Lancet:

1371-1376, 1968.

da Motta LC, da S i l v a Horta J, Tavares MH: P r o s p e c t i v e e p i d e m i o l o g i c a l
study of thorotrast-exposed p a t i e n t s in

Portugal.

Environ

Res 18: 152-172, 1979.

Douglas AP: C e l i a c d i s e a s e and l y m p h o m a of i n t e s t i n e s and b r a i n .
N Engl J Med 296: 821, 1977.

D u b i n HV, C r e e h a n EP, H e a d i n g t o n JT: L y m p h a n g i o s a r c o m a and c o n g e n i t a l
l y m p h e d e m a of the e x t r e m i t y .

A r c h Derm 1 1 0 : 608-614, 1974.

�Eriksson M, H a r d e l l L&gt; Berg NO, et al.: Soft-tissue

sarcomas and

exposure to c h e m i c a l substances: A case-referent study,

Brit

J Ind Med 38: 27-33, 1981.

Falk H, Telles NC, Ishak KG, et al.: E p i d e m i o l o g y of thorotrastinduced h e p a t i c a n g i o s a r c o m a in the U n i t e d States.

Environ

Res 18: 65-73, 1979.

Falk H, Thomas LB, Popper H, et al.: H e p a t i c angiosarcoma associated
w i t h a n d r o g e n i c - a n a b o l i c steroids.

Lancet 2' 1120-1123, 1979.

F i l i p o v i c h AH, Spector BD, Kersey J: I m m u n o d e f i c i e n c y in humans as a
r i s k factor in the development of m a l i g n a n c y .
259,

Prev Med 9: 252-

1980.

Green JA, Dauison AA, Walker W:
lymphoma.

Systemic lupus erythematosus

and

Lancet: 753-756, 1978.

Grufferman S, Duong T, Cole P: O c c u p a t i o n and Hodgkin's disease.
J Natl Cancer

Inst 57: 1193-1195, 1976.

Gutensohn N, Li FP, Johnson RE, et al.: Hodgkin's disease, t o n s i l lectomy and f a m i l y size.

N Engl J Med 292: 22-25, 1975.

H a r d e l l L, E r i k s s o n M, Lenner P, et al.: M a l i g n a n t lymphoma
and exposure to c h e m i c a l s e x p e c i a l l y o r g a n i c solvents, chlorophenols and p h e n o x y a c i d s : A case-control
169-176, 1981.

study.

Br J Ca 43:

�H a r d e l l L» Sandstrom A: Case-control study: Soft-tissue sarcomas
and exposure to p h e n o x y a c e t i c a c i d s or chlorophenols.

Br J

Cancer 39: 711-717, 1979.

Hoar SK and Pell S: A r e t r o s p e c t i v e cohort study of m o r t a l i t y and
cancer i n c i d e n c e among chemists.

J Occup Med 23: in press, 1981

Hoover R, F r a u m e n i JF, Jr.: R i s k of cancer in renal-transplant
recipients.

Lancet: 55-57, 1973.

Kalant N, Seemayer T: M a l i g n a n t lymphoma in spontaneously d i a b e t i c
rats.

N Engl J Med 300: 737, 1979.

Kim JH, Chu FC, Woodward HO, et al.: R a d i a t i o n - i n d u c e d soft-tissue
bone sarcoma.

R a d i o l 129: 501-508, 1978.

K i n l e n LJ, S h e i l A G R , Peto J, et al.: C o l l a b o r a t i v e U n i t e d K i n g d o m A u s t r a l a s i a n study of cancer in p a t i e n t s treated w i t h i m m u n o s u p p r e s s i v e drugs.

Br Med J 2: 1461-1466, 1979.

K r i k o r i a n JG, Burke JS, Rosenberg SA, et al.: Occurrence of nonH o d g k i n ' s l y m p h o m a after therapy for H o d g k i n ' s disease.

N Engl

J Med 300: 452-458, 1979.

Kufe D, H e h l m a n n R, S p i e g e l m a n S: Human sarcomas c o n t a i n i n g RNA
related to the RNA of a mouse l e u k e m i a v i r u s .

Science 175:

182-185, 1972.

Li F P , F r a u m e n i J F , Jr.: R h a b d o m y o s a r c o m a i n c h i l d r e n :

Epidemiologic

study and i d e n t i f i c a t i o n of a f a m i l i a l cancer syndrome.

J Natl

�Cancer Inst 43: 1365-1373, 1969.

Li FP, F r a u m e n i JF, J r . , Mantel N, et al.: Cancer m o r t a l i t y among
chemists.

J N a t l Cancer Inst 43: 1159-1164, 1969.

M c l l l m u r r a y MB, Langman MJS: Soft-tissue sarcomas
i n j e c t i o n s : An e p i d e m i o l o g i c a 1 survey.

and i n t r a m u s c u l a r

Br Med J 2: 864-865,

1978.

M c K i l l o p JH, D o i g JA, Kennedy JS, et al.: Laryngeal m a l i g n a n c y
f o l l o w i n g i o d i n e - 1 2 5 therapy for t h y r o t o x i c o s i s .

Lancet 2'

1177-1179, 1978.

O l i n G R : L e u k e m i a a n d H o d g k i n ' s disease among S w e d i s h c h e m i s t r y
graduates.

Lancet i i : 916, 1976.

O l i n GR: The hazards of a c h e m i c a l laboratory e n v i r o n m e n t - A study
of the m o r t a l i t y in two cohorts of Swedish c h e m i s t s .

Am Ind

Hyg Assoc J 39: 557-562, 1978.

Paffenbarger

R S , W i n g A L , Hyde Rf: C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s i n youth i n d i c a -

t i v e of adult-onset H o d g k i n ' s disease.

J Natl Cancer Inst 58:

1489-1491, 1977.

Paffenbarger

R S , W i n g A L , Hyde R T : C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s i n youth p r e d i c -

t i v e o f adult-onset m a l i g n a n t l y m p h o m a s , m e l a n o m a s , a n d
leukemias.

J N a t l Cancer Inst 60: 89-92, 1978.
j

Searle CE, W a t e r h o u s e J A M , Henman BA, et al.: E p i d e m i o l o g i c a l study of
the m o r t a l i t y of B r i t i s h c h e m i s t s .

B r i t J Cancer 38:

192-193,

�1978.

Spector BD, Perry GS, Kersey JH: G e n e t i c a l l y d e t e r m i n e d i m m u n o d e f i c i e n c y diseases (GDID) and m a l i g n a n c y : R e p o r t from the
immunodeficiency-cancer registry.
11: 12-29,

C l i n Immu.nol Immunopath

1978.

Svoboda DT and Azarnoff DL: Tumors in male rats fed ethylchlorop h e n o x y i s o b u t y r a t e , a h y p o l i p i d e m i c drug.

Cancer Res 39:

3419-3428, 1979,

Tucker MA and F r a u m e n i JF, Jr.: Soft tissue in Cancer E p i d e m i o l o g y
and P r e v e n t i o n .

D Schottenfeld and JF F r a u m e n i , Jr. (Eds).

P h i l a d e l p h i a : WB Saunders Company, 1981 (in press).

W e i n b r e n K » Salm R, Greenberg G: Intramuscular i n j e c t i o n s of iron
compounds and o n c o g e n e s i s in man.

Br Med J 1: 683-685,

1978.

Young AL, C a l c a g n i JA, Thalken CE, et al.: The t o x i c o l o g y , e n v i r o n mental fate, and human r i s k of h e r b i c i d e Orange and its
associated d i o x i n .

USAF O c c u p a t i o n a l a n d E n v i r o n m e n t a l Health

Laboratory T e c h n i c a l Report 78-92.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22473">
              <text>066</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22474">
              <text>1771</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22476">
              <text>Series III Subseries III</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22471">
                <text>Blair, Aaron</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22472">
                <text>Sheila K. Hoar</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22475">
                <text>Typescript: Research Protocol, a Case-Control Study of Lymphoma and Soft-Tissue Sarcoma: Association with Herbicide Exposures, [nd]</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22477">
                <text>case referent study</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22478">
                <text>lymphomas</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22479">
                <text>soft tissue sarcoma</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22480">
                <text>industrial exposure</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1552" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="7934">
              <text>029</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="7935">
              <text>0499</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="7939">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7930">
                <text>Bleiberg, Jacob</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="7931">
                <text>Marven Wallen</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="7932">
                <text>Roger Brodkin</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="7933">
                <text>Irvin L. Applebaum</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7936">
                <text>Archives of Dermatology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7937">
                <text>1964</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7938">
                <text>Industrially Acquired Porphyria</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7940">
                <text>chloracne</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="7941">
                <text>industrial exposure</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="7942">
                <text>health effects</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1559" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8020">
              <text>030</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8021">
              <text>0506</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8025">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8016">
                <text>Bond, G. G.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="8017">
                <text>M. G. Ott</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="8018">
                <text>F. E. Brenner</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="8019">
                <text>R. R. Cook</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8022">
                <text>British Journal of Industrial Medicine</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8023">
                <text>1983</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8024">
                <text>Medical and Morbidity Surveillance Findings Among Employees Potentially Exposed to TCDD</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8026">
                <text>industrial exposure</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="8027">
                <text>health effects</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1564" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8078">
              <text>030</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8079">
              <text>0511</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8083">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8076">
                <text>Bowen, Shirley S.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="8077">
                <text>Myles P. Moursund</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8080">
                <text>American Medical Association Archives of Dermatology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8081">
                <text>1957-05-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8082">
                <text>Chloracne in the Manufacture of DDT</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8084">
                <text>health effects</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="8085">
                <text>industrial exposure</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1567" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8109">
              <text>030</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8110">
              <text>0514</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8114">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8108">
                <text>Braun, W.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8111">
                <text>Hautarzt</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8112">
                <text>1959</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8113">
                <text>Clinical Observations on the Origin of Chloracne</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8115">
                <text>industrial exposure</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="8116">
                <text>health effects</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2371" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="16348">
              <text>051</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="16350">
              <text>1328</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="16354">
              <text>Series III Subseries II</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16346">
                <text>Brown, David P.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16347">
                <text>Mark Jones</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16349">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;Center for Disease Control National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16351">
                <text>Archives of Environmental Health</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16352">
                <text>1981</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16353">
                <text>Mortality and Industrial Hygiene Study of Workers Exposed to Polychlorinated Biphenyls</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16355">
                <text>industrial exposure</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16356">
                <text>mortality trends</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="16357">
                <text>PCBs</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2506" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1347">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/c0208aa220ef749ca2646df751f7681e.pdf</src>
        <authentication>c1fd91136b3c2e8c6913738e5cb32d39</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63296">
                    <text>Item ID Number
Author

Brown, Marry D.

Corporate Author
Final

Report/Article TltlB

Report: Herbicide (2,4-D) Applicator Exposure
Measurements

Journal/Book Title
000

Year

°

Month/Day
Color

n

Number of Images

48

DBSCrlptOn Notes

Supported by USDA Agreement No. USDA-TPSU-RU-0191 and New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station
Project No. NJ04502.

Tuesday, May 15, 2001

Page 1466 of 1514

�FINAL REPORT
HERBICIDE (2,4-D) APPLICATOR EXPOSURE MEASUREMENTS

Harry D. Brown
106 Administration Bldg.
New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station
Cook College, Rutgers University
New Brunswick, N.J. 08903

Supported by USDA Agreement No. USDA-TPSU-RU-0-191 and New Jersey Agricul
tural Experiment Station Project No. NJ04502.

�INTRODUCTION

The phenoxy herbicides have been used to control broad-leafed weeds in
crops, water sources, forests, pastures, range lands, gardens, lawns, urban
and industrial sites. Because of the efficiency, economy and safety, the
phenoxy herbicides, especially 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T)
and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), besides other herbicides, remain
essential for agricultural and other uses (Diaz-Colon and Bovey, 1976). Use
of 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D on a large scale to defoliate vegetation has resulted in
controversy about the fate of the chemicals. Many of the hazardous properties
ascribed to 2,4,5-T are to a lesser extent shared by 2,4-D. As a result, a
number of papers dealing with the fate in the environment, toxicological effects on living organisms (Diaz-Colon and Bovey, 1976; Sauerhoff et al., 1977;
Piper et al. , 1973) have been published. Cooper (1974) compared 2,4,5,-T and
2,4-D. He has reported that commercial samples of 2,4-D in mice were teratogenic and embryotoxic. Increasing controversy about their safe use has raised
doubt about their utility in achieving vegetation management objectives.
A Dow Chemical report on Forestry Applicators exposure to 2,4-D has recently been published (Levy, 1980). Nonetheless, in total, only meager information regarding human (e.g. gardeners, small farmers, etc.) exposure to 2,4-D
is available. This study reports an investigation conducted under conditions
characteristic of actual use pattern to determine the quantity of body surface
contact of applicator with the commercial 2,4-D formulation and the quantity
of the chemical measurable in serum and urine.
MATERIALS AND METHODS

Applicator
Eleven healthy young male (ages 19 to 31 years) human volunteers were selected and were examined by the University physician prior to the work. Each
subject was examined for blood pressure, pulse rate and body temperature on
the day of work, both before and after the work period, and similar examinations
were made every morning for the next three days (Table 1). Sterile gauze pads
(size 0.67 sq. ft.) were attached on the back and chest of each volunteer. A
paper cap (area 0.44 sq. ft.) was used to cover the head.
Location
The study was carried out either on the campus of Rutgers University or
near the campus in New Brunswick, New Jersey during the period from May, 1981
to August, 1981. The location was covered with weeds and grass. Each area was
roughly between one-half to one acre.
Spray Material and Equipment
The spraying material consisted of DMA-4 concentrate (obtained as a gift
from Dow Chemical, U.S.A.) which contained 3.8 Ib acid equivalent/gal 2,4-D.
The herbicide was mixed with tap water prior to use and the resulting mixture
was applied at a rate of approximately 1 gal/30 min. by a hand sprayer held at
hip level. A DuPont air sampler was attached to the applicator and was kept
running during the spraying operation. The areas were covered by spraying
six gallons in about three hours as per label instruction.

�Weather Conditions
Weather conditions during this study were moderate, temperature ranging
between 65° to 78° F with humidity from 50 to 89%. Wind was fairly calm
throughout this study except on one occasion, when it gusted to 10 miles per
hour.
Sample Collection for Analysis
• To ascertain body surface exposure, gauze pads and caps were collected
immediately after the work and washed in methanol. Air filter absorbents were
also washed in methanol. Residue separated by methanol was evaporated to dryness and then treated with 15% BF, in methanol. Finally, it was extracted
with n-hexane (Yip, 1975).
Blood samples were drawn before the work and at the end of the day's work.
Three more blood samples were drawn on the following three mornings. Overnight
pooled urine samples were collected before the work and the day's collections
were made during and/or after the treatment. Then the pooled urine samples
were collected twice a day for the next 4 to 7 days. Blood sera and urine samples were treated, extracted and analyzed by the method of Sauerhoff et al.5^
(1977).
Vegetation samples and soil samples from the treated area were collected
before the treatment and then once every 24 hours for the next 4 days after the
treatment. Samples were treated and analyzed by the methods of Davidonis et al.
(1980) and Olson et al. (1978).
Analytical Procedures
2,4-D residue extracted in n-hexane was analyzed on a pas chromatograph
(Tracer Model No. 560, equipped with electron capture detector and a six foot
glass column packed with 3% OV-101 on 80/100 supelcoport).
Clinical determinations on blood serum and urine were made through the
automated procedures of a commercial diagnostic laboratory.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The various data are summarized in tables 1-13 and figures 1-22. At the
end of a day's work, an applicator had an average 2,4-D residue of 49.39 yg/sq.
ft. on the back, 52.41 yg on the head. The average value of 2,4-D residue on
vegetation in the exposed areas was 27.93 yg/g of tissue at the end of the
working day (i.e. first day). The residue fell to 8.57 yg/g tissue after four
days. On the other hand, the average soil residue value was 2.68 yg/g soil at
the end of the first working day, which Increased
to 5v12*yg/soil (87.6%)
on the fourth day.
The average base level for phenolic compounds in serum was 70.7 ng/ml at
zero level exposure. Immediately after the day's work, the value went up to
165.3 ng/ml and again went up to 267.7 ng/ml on the second. The difference
between the base level and the measured level we take to be a specific measurement of the test material, 2,4-D. The value came down to 123.7 ng/ml on the
third day. The average amount of phenolics ranged from 3.45 yg (zero level
exposure) to 7.85 yg (fifth day) for the 12 hours of pooled urine.
*Appendix A is a more extensive discussion of methodology.

�Some changes were noticed in clinical analysis made on blood aerum and
urine.
Analysis of 2,4-D retained by the air monitor filter revealed detectable
residue. The amount of air drawn through the filter was calculated to be 56.6
to 84.96 liters, and the calculated 2,4~D residue was 43.1 to 60.1 parts per
trillion.
Results of this study indicate that there was a considerable amount of
2,4-D in the air, on vegetation and soil surface of the treated areas. An
appreciable quantity of 2,4-D also landed on the body surface, All serum and
urine samples showed measurable 2,4-D residue.
Statistical Analysis *
The clinical residue and weather data were critically scrutinized by both
linear models and regression models. The primary emphasis of the analysis was
to identify the parameters that recorded any significant change. This was accomplished by subtracting the baseling value from the observed value and then
dividing it by the baseline. Analysis of the resulting values revealed highly
significant (a=0.01) changes in the serum creatinine and total protein levels,
and significant ( H . 5 change in the urine specific gravity. It was also seen
o)0)
that the total protein and BUN/creatinine were positively correlated with the
residue on the chest of the volunteers and with their height. When the peak
residue in the body fluids was related with the external factors, it was seen
that the serum residue was positively correlated with the 2,4-D concentration
in the air and the amount of chemical that had landed on the head and back.
Likewise, the urine residue was positively correlated with the air volume and
the height of the volunteers. Precipitation (rainfall-high humidity) was negatively correlated with the serum residue, presumably due to decreased chances
of vaporization and subsequent inhalation.
*Analysis done by Dr. Robert Trout, Statistician for the NJAES.
CONCLUSION
Our observations, therefore, indicate that during normal working conditions, an appreciable amount of 2,4-D can enter into the applicator's body
through inhalation and/or through body surface (dermal) absorption. Lengthy
retention times have been observed in some subjects (Table 6). These findings
are consonant with the report of Levy et al. (1980) for foresters. Clinical
physiology data obtained here are consistent with long retention times for
this chemical. We surmise, but have no specific evidence, that the 2,4-D
molecule or some portion (phenolic), binds to serum protein and is eliminated
as a function of the turnover of the protein molecules. Other than the clinical
(chemical) changes noted above, we have seen no pronounced adverse effect of
2,4-D exposure.
REFERENCES

1. Sauerhoff, M.W., Braun, W.H., Blau, G.E. and Gehring, P.J. (1977). The Fate
of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid (2,4-D) Following Oral Administration to
Man. Toxicology 8:3-11.
2. Piper, W.N., Rose, J.Q., Lang, M.L. and Gehring, P.J. (1973). The Fate of
2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic Acid (2,4,5-T) Following Oral Administration
to Rats and Dogs. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 26:339-351.

�3. Levy, T.L. (1980). Determination of 2,4-D Exposure Received by Forestry
Applicators. Dow Chemical, U.S.A. Report. October, 1980.
4. Diaz-Colon, J.D. and Bovey, R.W. (1976). Selected bibliography of the
phenoxy herbicides. I. Fate in the Environment. MP 1303. Texas Agric.
Exp. Stn., College Station.
5. Cooper, P. (1974). Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 12:418-421.
6. Davidonis, G.H., Hamilton, R.H. and Mumma, R.O. ( 9 0 . Comparative Meta18)
bolism of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid in Cotyledon and Leaf Callus from
Two Varieties of Soybean. Plant Physiol. 65:94-97.
7. Olson, B.A., Sneath, T.C. and Jain, N.C. ( 9 8 . Rapid Simple Procedure
17)
for the Simultaneous Gas Chromatographic Analysis of Four Chlorophenoxy
Herbicides in Water and Soil Samples. J. Agric. Fd. Chem. 26:640.
8. Yip, G. (1975). Analysis for Herbicides and Metabolites. J. Chromatographic Sciences 13:225-230.

�CLINICAL XXX DATA

�Table 1

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION

Temp ( F
°)

Blood Pressure

Pulse Rate

Applicators
0

X

1

2

3

0

X

1

2

3

0

X

1

2

3

No. 1

98.0

98.4 97.8 98.4 98.4

128/74

114/70

120/78

120/60

120/78

76

60

80

78

72

No. 2

97.6

98.0 98.0 98.0 97.8

110/78

118/78

110/78

110/72

120/80

60

72

80

68

64

No. 3

97.4

97.6 97.8 97.0 97.8

112/82

120/70

110/74

118/6?.

120/76

60

72

60

61

64

No. 4

98.2

99.4 97.4 98.0 98.0

90/60

100/68

100/64

96/68

92/60

80

100

76

76

84

No. 5

97.6

98.8 98.0 98.2 98.2

112/74

124/80

120/82

120/80

110/80

72

84

84

80

84

No. 6

97.0

98.6 97.2 97.0 97.4

120/80

110/74

108/78

112/78 112/74

84

88

96

92

100

No. 7

97.4

98.4 97.0 97.0 98.2

104/64

100/60

110/64

120/64

110/70

78

78

80

78

80

No. 8

98.4

98.4 98.6 97.8 98.0

140/76

120/80

112/70

130/68

130/76

80

64

96

80

68

No. 9

98.6

98.4 97.0 98.0 97.2

110/70

110/70

110/80

120/80

120/74

60

60

68

80

64

No. 10

97.8

98.0 97.4 98.2 97.8

104/60

100/70

108/60

112/70

102/60

84

68

84

88

88

No. 11

97.4

9 . 97.2 97.2 97.0
86

120/68

110/70

110/80

112/70

110/76

80

80

80

68

80

Legend
0 = Pretreatment
X = Posttreatment
1-3 = Days after treatment

�Table 2

Detection of 2,4-D Residue
from Gauge Patch (= Body Surface)

yg/sq. ft. 1
Applicator
No.

Head

Chest

Back

1

8.55

7.81

5.10

2

14.06

11.68

10.60

3

7.06

3.37

3.77

4

222.20

171.50

99.63

5

34.22

94.53

41.16

6

141.80

111.50

74.23

7

76.16

68.39

46.64

8

16.99

13.56

11.86

9

19.12

14.58

10.29

10

18.55

31.46

4.46

11

17.80

14.95

18.63

�Table 3
2,*i-D Residue on Vegetation

Treated
Area

2,4-D yg/g Vegetation
0

X

X+1

X+2

X+3

1

0.59

28.85

16.15

16.67

20.16

2

14.74

29.60

22. A3

4.32

2.13

3

00.00

25.35

7.70

1.92

3.44

2.47

X+4

Amount of 2,^-D on Soil Surface

Treated
Area

2,4-D -fjg/g Soil
X+1

X+2

X+3

«*

3.70

1.90

2.80

7.30

-

3.58

4.21

0.72

1.59

7.25

-

0.00

0.13

0.15

0.27

0.80

0.93

0

1

1.24

2
3

X
X
X
X

X

0
X
1
2
3
1»

=
=
=
=
=
*s

Pretreatment
Posttreatment
1 day after treatment
2 days after treatment
3 days after treatment
^ days after treatment

�Table 4
Amount of 2,4-D Residue and Endogenous Phenolic Compounds in Serum

Applicator
No.

1
2

3
k
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

0

2,4-D Residue (ng/ml )
X+1
X

75.1

826.6

114.4

170.1
131.5
112.8

112.3
54.0
93.5
157.8
56.3

221.9

208.3

123.5

44.5
3.5
29.0
19.0

224.4

00.0

00.0

443.2
538.3

19.1
50.2
7.8

496.9
862.9
119.3
55.7
41.8
93.3
55.6

X+2

311.0
250.1
74.6

92.4
169.9
94.3
194.7
43.6
43.0
58.8
27.9

X+3 .

112.3
102.3

479.6
84.2
245.1

674.6
178.6
83.4
25.7
36.3
114.8

•

0 = Pretreatment
X - Posttreatment
X+1 «= 1 day after treatment
X+2 = 2 days after treatment
X+3 = 3 days after treatment

Note: Because phenoxy and other phenolic compounds have liquid chromatographic
migrations similar to that of 2,4-D, there is a variation in the base for specific measurement of the test compound.

�\0

Table 5
Amount of 2,4-D in Serum

Applicator
No.

X

i

X+l

2,4-D (ng/rol)
X+2

714.3

198.7

0

196.1

48.3

2

60.4

116.1

3

128.4

38.0

4

285.4

5

X+3

482.0

—
440.6
654.6

6

—
—
113.6

386.1

—
188.8
466.3

7

179.9

74.8

—
150.2

8

15.6

52.2

40.1

9

21.2

12.8

14.0

10

74.3

39.8

—
17.3

11

55.6

27.9

114.8

Legend
X =
X+l
X+2
X+3

Posttreatment
= 1 day after treatment
= 2 days after treatment
= 3 days after treatment

134.1
79.9

�Table 6

Total Amount of 2,4-D and Endogenous ^henolic Comnounds Excreted in the Urine
yg 2,4-D Excreted per 12 hours

Applicator
No.

0

1

12

2k

36

48

60

1

3.73

7.12

2.38

2.58

6.49

5.70

2.93

21.20

28.96 -

-

-

-

2

3.22

7.17

1.22

2.85

6.00

5.75

4.46

6.44

-

-

-

3

2.85

4.25

10.00

8.87

1.75

0.60

1.33 10.79

1.09 4.07 -

-

-

-

4

8.11

15.44

21.38

7.66

9.56

5

0.32

1.31

1.79

1.60

1.31

6

9.95

7

9.91

8

0.00

0.11

9
10

72

84

96

108

120

132

144

156

-

-

-

-

-

-

30.55 24.87 13.09

6.23

-

-

-

-

2.62

3.32

2.27

7.39

-

-

-

-

-

I*. 56 15.62

5.04 23.39 13.87

6.28

8.46 13.16

10.81 15.25

2.73

3.12

2.89

0.91

5.00

8.84 -

-

-

-

-

0.57

2.77

1.34

3.46

2.84

3.08

5.30

1.97

1.49

2.68

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.75 0,00

0.85

2.46

8.28

6.57

1.46

4.09

1.42

2.10

3.73

2.21

4,31

4.47

0.00

1.9* 1.73

1.63

2.83

2.21

2.73

8.48

4.35 -

0 • Pretreatment
1 • Posttreatment

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

�Table 7
HEMATOLOGY

WBC x 103

liters

0

X

1

RBC x 106

RGB (g/dl)

2

3

0

X

1

2

3

HCT (%)

0

X

1

2

3

0

X

I

2

3

3. 1

6.0

7.1 6.3

7.0

5.5

4.78

j,
4.68

j,
4761

j,
4*50

j.
4.43

15.5

15.1

14.8

14.6

14.6

44.4

43.7

44.8

441.6

441.5

3. 2

5.7

6.8

5.9

5.2

5.2

4.99

5.06

5.15

4.85

4.89

15.9

15.6

16.2

15.0

15.3

43.2

43.8

44.7

42.0

42.4

3. 3

6.7

6.1

5.2

5.6

5.0

4*69

4*64

4*63

4.71

4*65

14.9

14.8

14.5

14.6

14.9

41*2

41*2

41*2

40*9

40*6

!

3. 4

6.5

7.6

6.6

6.7

6.5

5.72

5.76

5.75

5.85

5.50

15.5

15.6

15.3

16.8

14.8

43.9

44.0

43.5

44.6

41*8

!

3. 5

6.3

6.5

5.9

7.0

6.2

5.34

5.22

5.23

5.56

5.27

15.9

15.7

15.7

16.8

15.6

44.6

44.1

44.7

46.5

43.6

D.

6

6.7

7.8

6.7

8.4

6.9

5.39

5.23

5.46

5.43

5.03

16.8

16.9

17.1

17.8

16.2

47.6

46.3

48.5

47.8

44.9

3. 7

6.6

8.1

9.8

8.2

7.9

5.45

5.20

5.42

5.33

5.29

16.5

15.9

16.3

17.0

16.3

48.0

47.3

46.9

46.0

o. 8

8.3 8.3 6.2

6.3

6.1

4.97

4.75

4.99

4.99

5.04

8.1

7.8

5.21

4.76

5.07

5.42

5.14

15.8
413.2

44.1

6.0

15.7
413.9

42.6

6.2

15.7
413.2

42.8

6.1

15.2
412.4

42.9

o. 9

15.8
413.3

44.9
441.0

37*4

40*3

38.1

o. 10

7.8

7.5

8.1

7.6

7.7

4.97

5.06

5.33

5.14

16.4

17.1

16.3

4.8

6.0

6.0

5.9

4.99

4.81

4.95

5.11

14.8

14.4

14.9

14.9

45.0 43.0 45.0
4 - 4 - 4 41.2 37.8 39.3

47.1
4 40.7

45.9

5.0

15.8
•l
13*5

16.5

0.

4.80
44.54

11

Legend
0 = Pretreatment
X = Posttreatment
1-3 = Days after treatment

J.

3877

J.

35*3

X

4,

4-

42.0

J

�Table 7 (cont.)
HEMATOLOGY

MCV ( 3
y)

MCH (yyg)

MCHC (%)

Platelet Estimate

Applicators
0

X

1

2

3

No. 1

93

93

97

92

94

32J4

32^0

No. 2

87

87

87

87

87

3lt7

30.8 3lts

No. 3

88

89

89

87

87

31J8

3ll8

3ll3

No. 4

7*4

7*4

7*3

7*4

7*6

27.0

26t9

26*6

No. 5

81

81

82

81

83

29.6

No. 6

85

85

86

85

89

3l7l

32.2 31.1 32.6

No. 7

85

83

84

85

87

30.2

30.4 40.0 3lt?

No. 8

87

87

87

86

87

30.9

No. 9

7*5

7*5

7*5

7*5

7*5

24*8

No. 10

91

90

90

89

90

No. 11

83

84

83

83

83

A

0
A

X = Posttreatment
1-3 » Days after treatment

A.

2

3

A.

0

X

1

2

3

0

X

1

2

3

A.

34.7

34.3 32.9 34.9 35.1

N

N

N

N

N

31.0 31^2

36.6

35.5 36?1

N

N

N

N

N

30.8 32lO

36.0

35.9 35.1 35.4 36;6

N

N

N

N

N

28.5 27.6

35.2

35.2 34.9 37t4 35.8

N

N

N

N

N

30.0 29.7 30.1 30.3

35.4

35.5 35.0 35.8 36.2

N

N

N

N

N

35.2

36J 3

Dec N

N

N

N

31^4

34.2

35.2 34.3 35.9 35.7

N

N

N

N

3ltl

30.4 30.6 30.1

36.3

36t4

Dec N

N

N

N

25*3

25t2

33.9

34.6 34.6 33.9 34.0

N

N

N

N

N

3itg sitg site 3it2 so. 8

35.7

36.1 35.8 35.6 34.9

N

N

N

N

N

28.8

35.2

35.1 36.0 3etl 35.0

N

N

N

N

N

A

0 = Pretreatment

A,

1

32J9

A

Legend

X

A

32?0

32J3

A

A

35.6 36.0

A

A

24*9

A

A

A

33.0

24*9

28.9 29.1 29.2 28.3

•f

A

34.9 36l9

A

36^4

35.9 3ets 35.2

N

�Table 8
BLOOD CHEMISTRY

Glucose (mg/dl)

BUN (mg/dl)

Creatinine (mg/dl)

Uric Acid (mg/dl)

Applicators
0

X

1

2

3

0

X

1

2

3

No. 1

93

88

79

81

76

12

12

13

11

No. 2

78

83

63* 80

75

18

17

17

19

No. 3

93

94

92

95

87

21

21

22

No. 4

87

112+ 86

92

86

12

14

No. 5

197+ 149+ 166+ 163+ 149+ 13

No. 6

111+

No. 7

81

0

X

1

2

3

0

X

1

2

3

11

0.9

1.0

0.9

0.8

0.8

6.4

6.5

6.1

4.9

5.2

16

1.2

1.3

1.2

1.2

1.0

6.1

6.3

6.6

6.3

5.5

27+ 26+

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.1

0.9

3.8

4.5

3.9

4.8

4.1

12

13

15

1.1

1.2

1.2

1.1

1.1

7.6

7.9

7.5

8.4+ 8.1+

14

12

13

15

1.0

1.0

1.0

0.9

0.9

6.6

7.7

6.6

7.0

6.9

95

91

92

18

19

18

16

18

1.2

1.3

1.2

1.1

1.2

6.3

6.6

6.4

5.8

6.8

137+ 76

88

91

14

15

16

18

15

1.2

1.5+ 1.2

1.1

1.2

7.0

7.1

7.1

7.2

7.3

107

15

15

17

13

13

1.1

1.0

1.0

1.0

0.9

5.6

5.3

5.1

5.4

4.4

81

No. 8

122+ 102

127+ 81

No. 9

118+

90

107

79 122+

17

16

15

17

17

1.1

1.0

1.2

1.0

0.8

5.7

5.8

5.4

6.0

4.9

No. 10

101

84

134+ 99 140+

15

15

16

15

14

1.0

1.1

1.2

1.1

1.0

6.3

7.0

7.3

6.9

5.9

No. 11

148+ 124+ 112+ 98 111+

20

19

17

14

12

1.5+ 1.0

1.0

1.0

0.9

7.3

5.1

4.8

5.0

4.7

Legend
0 = Pretreatment
X = Posttreatment
1-3 = Days after treatment

�Table 8 (cont.)

BLOOD CHEMISTRY

A/G Ratio

Globulin (g/dl)

Calcium4"1" (mg/dl)

Bun/Great

Applicators

1

0

1

0

0

No. 1

2.7

2.6

2.6

2.3

2.3

1.7

1.8

1.8

1.5

2.0

13.3

12.0

14.6

14.5

14.2

4.3

4.3

4.3

4.5

4.2

No. 2

2.5

2.5

2.4

2.5

2.2

1.9

1.9

1.9

1.8

2.1

15.0

13.1

14.2

15.6

16.2

4.3

4.2

4.1

4.1

4.2

No. 3

2.4

2.4

2.3

2.4

2.2

2.1

2.0

2.2

2.0

2.2

21.0

21.0

22.0

24.5

28.5

4.4

4.5

4.5

4.3

4.5

No. 4

2.5

2.5

2.6

2.3

2.2

1.6

1.7

1.6

1.8

1.9

10.5

11.2

9.7

12.0

14.3

4.4

4.4

4.3

4.4

4.3

No. 5

3.2

3.5

3.4

3.2

2.8

1.4

1.3

1.3

1.4

1.7

12.4

13.5

12.8

13.6

16.2

3.8

3.8

3.9

4.0

4.0

No. 6

3.0

2.8

2.9

2.6

2.2

1.6

1.7

1.6

1.8

2.1

14.7

14.1

14.2

14.2

14.5

4.2

4.5

4.3

4.4

4.4

No. 7

3.1

3.1

2.9

2.7

2.5

1.6

1.4

1.5

1.6

1.8

11.7

10.1

13.6

15.7

12.7

4.2

4.2

4.3

4.4

4.3

No. 8

2.5

2.6

2.4

2.4

2.6

1.9

1.4

1.9

2.0

1.7

14.7

15.2

16.9

13.9

15.4

4.3

4.3

4.2

4.4

4.3

No. 9

2.8

2.7

2.5

2.7

2.5

1.6

1.7

1.8

1.7

1.7

15.9

15.6

12.6

17.1 "20.4

4.2

4.1

4.3

4.3

4.2

No. 10

2.8

2.7

2.8

2.5

2.6

1.6

1.8

1.8

2.0

1.8

16.0

13.3

13.4

13.3

14.1

4.2

4.2 4.2

4.4

4.2

No. 11

2.5

2.7

2.8

2.7

3.0

1.9

1.7

1.6

1.7

1.5

13.3

18.3

17.3

14.2

13.7

4.3

4.2

4.3

4.3

Legend
0 = Pretreatment
X = Posttreatment
1-3 = Days after treatment

4.1

�Table 8 (cont.)
BLOOD CHEMISTRY

Applicators

LDH (IU/1)

SCOT (IU/1) '

Alk. Phos. ( U 1
I/)

GGT (IU/1)

T. Bill, (mg/dl)

0

X

1

2

3

0

X

1

2

3

21

160

175

201

140

164

23

23

22

20

22

23

209

224

2$7

2$1

235

16

16

15

25

24

26

151

161

157

177

172

10

10

11

16

16

15

136

152

157

144

164

24

20

23

20

29

28

154

167

153

150

148

70

26

23

23

36

23

166

153

176

146

114

117

28

33

23

26

24

160

148

152

4*4

46

45

31

32

31

20

20

152

154

6*4

80

67

68

32

40

34

33

40

183

96

111

103

99

41

32

34

23

26

58

58

31

32

32

22

24

0

X

1

2

3

0

X

1

2

3

No. 1

42

40

43

45

39

22

22

20

22

No. 2

79

79

80

82

79

25

26

24

No. 3

69

61

71

79

79

22

24

No. 4

64

62

63

63

63

11

No. 5

90

81

88

87

87

No. 6

75

68

76

75

No. 7

116

111

115

No. 8

4*6

5*1

No. 9

5*2

No. 10

6*9

No. 11

116

5*8

6*1

Legend
0 = Pretreatment
X = Posttreatment
1-3 = Days after treatment

!

0

X

1

2

3

20

0.6

0.7

0.4

0.3

0.8

15

15

0.7

0.7 . . 0.7
08

0.6

11

12

12

0.4

0.6

0.5

0.7

0.4

24

24

23

21

0.5

0.5

0.7

0.6

0.4

36

36

36

39

38

0.2

0.2

0.5

0.5

0.5

145

16

15

16

14

14

0.9

0.8

1.0

its

itl

136

129

15

17

14

14

14

0.6

0.9

0.3

0.2

0.2

157

151

154

13

14

13

17

15

0.9

0.7

0.9

0.8

0.5

201

191

2$8

197

10

14

21

18

17

itl

0.8

0.9

0.7

0.9

195

179

187

169

165

16

10

11

14

12

itl

0.8

0.9

0.9

0.8

213

189

202

191

159

10

10

10

13

13

0.5

0.6

0.6

itl

1?3

�Table 8 (cont.)
BLOOD CHEMISTRY

Cholesterol (mg/dl)

T. Protein (g/dl)

Calcium (mg/dl)

Albumin (g/dl)

Applicators
0

X

1

2

3

0

X

1

2

3

0

X

No. 1

179

173

177

1(1)8

169

9.9

9.8

9.7

9.1

9.4

7.3

7.2

No. 2

223 221

215 219

175

9.8

9.6

9.3

9.5

9.3

7.2

7.2 7.0 7.2 6.7

4.7

No. 3

its

its

151

lt7

10.2

10.4 10.3 10.0 10.2

7.4

7.3 7.3

5.0 4.9 5.0 4.9 4.9

No:. 4

170 180

170 172

172

.9.6

9.7

9.4

9.7

9.2

6.7

6.8 6.7 6.6 6.4

4.1

No. 5

202 222 218 218 208

9.0

9.4

9.5

9.5

9.4

7.7

8^2 7.9

4.4 4.7

No. 6

210

208 209 208

192

10.0

9.7

7.7

7.6 7.5 7.3 6.9

4.7 4.8 4.6 4.7 4.7

No. 7

154

152

its

it?

150

10.3

9.9

9.8

9.6

stl

7.4 7.2

7.0 6.8

5to 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.4

No. 8

165

169

170

180

172

9.7

9.9

9.7 10.1

9.7

7.1

7.3

7.2 7.1

4.6

No. 9

153 160

163 163

itg

9.7

9.5

9.6

10.0

9.4

7.3

7.3 7.0 7.5 6.4

4.5 4.6 4.4 4.8 4.4

No. 10

158

168

170

168

155

9.6

10.0 10.0 10.5

9.7

7.3

7.6

7.6

7.5

7.3

4.5

No. 11

161

lt9

160

160

157

9.9

9.9

7.3

7.1

7.3 7.3

7.4

4.8 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.4

its

Legend
0 = Pretreatment
X = Posttreatment
1-3 = Days after treatment

10.6 10.2 10.1

9.6

9.5

9.9

9.9

1

2

7.1 ste

7.1

3
6.7

7.4 7.1

7.8 7.6

0

X

1

2

4.6 4.6 4.6 3t3

3
4.5

4.7 4.6 4.7 4.6

4.3 4.1 4.3 4.2
4.5 4.6 4.7

4.8 4.7 4.8 4.5

4.9 4.9 4.9

4.7

�Table 9
ACID PHOSPHATASE AND HAPTOGLOBIN

HAPTOGLOBIN (mg/dl)

ACID PHOSPHATASE (IU/1)

Applicators

0

X

1

2

3

1

2

3

4

5

No. 1

0.2 0.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

22

17

20

21

25

No. 2

0.3 0.3 0.4

0.0

0.0

24

26

24

25

18

No. 3

0.2 0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

71

89

87

82

85

No. 4

0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0

0.04

92

113

111

76

108

No. 5

0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0

Missing

109

105

108

99

122

No. 6

0.0 0.0 0.0

0.02

0.12

189

197

204

174

238

No. 7

0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0

0.16

87

95

85

118

134

No. 8

0.2 0.0 0.0 Missing Missing

79

157

81

91

72

No. 9

0.0 0.0 0.0 Missing

0.2

90

90

91

165

80

No. 10

0.0 0.0 0.0 Missing

0.1

95

154

173

86

161

No. 11

0.0 0.0 0.0 Missing

0.6

159

114

118

118

128

Legend
0 «= Pretreatment
X = Posttreatment
1-3 «= Days after treatment

�\&lt;\
URINALYSIS

Table 10

pH

Applicators

0

X

la

Ib

2a

2b

3a

3b

No. 1

5.0

6.0

5.0

8.0

6.0

8.0

5.0

5.0 6.0

No. 2

6.0

6.0

5.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

5.0

No. 3

5.0

8.0

6.0

6.0

8.0

5.0

7.0

5.0

6.0

No. 4

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

6.0

5.0

7.0

5.0

6.0

No. 5

7.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

7.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

5.0

No. 6

5.0 6.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

8.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

No. 7

7.0

6.0

6.0

5.0

7.0

5.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

No. 8

6.0

6.0

6.0

5.0

5.0

6.0

6.0

7.0

5.0

7.0

5.0

8.0

No. 9

6.0

6.0

6.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

No. 10

6.0

6.0

6.0

5.0

6.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

6.0

No. 11

6.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

5.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

5.0

Legend
0 = Pretreatment
X « Posttreatment
1-7 = Days after treatment
a « 7:00 a.m. collection
b « 7:00 p.m. collection

4a

4b

5a

5b

6a

6b

7a

5.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

5.0

6.0

—

�Table 11

\ppll:ators
So. 1

Sto. 2
So. 3
No. 4
No. 5
No. 6
No. 7
No. 8
No. 9
No. 10
No. 11

0

Amber
Clear
Amber
Clear
Amber
Clear
Straw
Cloudy
Straw
Clear
Straw
Cloudy
Straw
Clear
Yellow
SI. cloudy
Yellow
Clear
Yellow
Clear
Yellow
Cloudy

URINALYSIS
COLOR

X

la

Ib

Yellow
Clear
Amber
Turbid
Yellow
Turbid
Straw
Clear
Straw
Cloudy
Straw
Cloudy
Straw
Clear
Yellow
Clear
Amber
Clear
Yellow
Clear
Yellow
Clear

Yellow
Cloudy
Amber
Turbid
Amber
Clear
Straw
Clear
Amber
Clear

Yellow
Clear
Yellow
Cloudy
Yellow
Clear
Straw
Cloudy
Straw
Cloudy
Straw
Cloudy
Straw
Clear
Straw
Hazy
Straw
Hazy
Straw
Clear
Straw
Clear

Straw
Clear
Yellow
Hazy
Yellow
Clear
Yellow
Clear
Yellow
Cloudy
Yellow
Clear

Legend
0 = Pretreatment
X = Posttreatment

2a

2b

Yellow Yellow
Clear
Clear
Yellow Yellow
Cloudy Cloudy
Yellow Yellow
Clear
Clear
Straw Yellow
Clear
Cloudy
Yellow Yellow
Cloudy
Hazy
Straw Yellow
Cloudy
Hazy
Straw Yellow
Clear
Clear
Straw Yellow
Cloudy
Hazy
Straw Yellow
Cloudy
Hazy
Straw
Straw
Clear
Clear
Straw
Yellow
Clear
Clear

1-7 = Days after treatment
a = 7:00 a.m. collection

3a

3b

Yellow
Clear
Yellow
Clear
Yellow
Clear
Yellow
Clear
Yellow
Clear
Yellow
Cloudy
Yellow
Clear
Yellow
Clear
Yellow
Clear
Yellow
Clear
Yellow
Clear

Yellow
Clear
Yellow
Turbid
Yellow
Clear
Yellow
Cloudy
Yellow
Cloudy
Yellow
Cloudy
Yellow
Cloudy
Yellow
Clear
Yellow
Cloudy
Yellow
Clear
Yellow
Clear

4a

4b

5a

5b

6a

. 6b

7a

Yellow
i
Clear
Yellow
;—
Turbid
Yellow
—_
Turbid
Yellow
—;_•
Cloudy
Yellow
Cl Dudy
Yellow
Cloudy
Yellow
Cloudy
Yellow Yellow Yellow Yellow Yellow Yellow Yello
Clear
Hazy
Cloudy Hazy
Clear
Clear
Hazy
Yellow Yellow Yellow Yellow Yellow Yellow Yello
Clear
Clear
Clear
Clear Clear
Clear
Hazy
Yellow
Clear
Yellow
Turbid

7:00 p.m. collection

�Table 12
URINALYSIS
SPECIFIC GRAVITY

Applicators

4a

4b

5a

5b

X

la

Ib

2a

2b

No. 1

1.022

1.010

1.026

1.007

1.015

1.010

1.023

1.010

1.015

1.028

1.027

1.028

1.028

1.024

1.024

1.026

1.033

1.028

1.033

1.023

1.030

1.026

1.033

1.020

1.024

1.015

1.022

1.008

1.020

1.020

1.020

1.018

1.024

1.019

1.022

1.018

1.020

1.022

1.022

1. 016

No. 6

1.029

1.028

1.025

1.024

1.026

1.017

1.029

1.024

1.012

1.014

1.016

1.016

1.017

1.014

1.020

1.014

1.026

1.026

1.020

1.022

1.026

1.027

1.027

1.012

1. 015

1.017

1.023

1.024

No. 9

1.013

1.027

1.025

1.025

1.031

1.031

1.030

1.032

1. 015

1.030

1.025

1.020

No. 10

1.017

1.018

1.026

1.007

1.008

1.006

1.021

1.011

1. 018

No. 11

1.025

1.016

1.017

1.020

1.022

1.012

1.016

1.012

1. 025

1.026

1.015

1.023

1.023

1. 012

No. 8

1.026

1. 028

'No. 7

1.030

1. 016

No. 5

_—

1. 030

No. 4

7a

1. 029

No. 3

6a

1. 006

No. 2

6b
— _.

0

Legend
0 = Pretreatment
X = Posttreatment
1-7 = Days after treatment
a = 7:00 a.m. collection
b = 7:00 p.m. collection

3a

3b

.
—

�Table 13

U « I * AL » I I S

Appllcatort

0

1

l a

II

BACTERIA
?ew
CRYSTALS
Calcium
Oxalete

tPITH-.
Occet.
CRYSTALS
vValet

I t

la

CRYSTALS IPITHi
Uric
Rare
acid.
Urates

Jb

3a

CPITH:

fPtTH'

wnc-0-l

1-1

b-r

Jo

tfitiji.

Occet.
IPIIH:
CRYSTALS Occas.

k-» Cal-

It

BACTERIA BACTERIA CRYSTALS CPITNi
CRYSTALS XBCiO-l WBC
Few
Few
Calcium Few
Urates
IVTTHi
Rare
. Oxalate CRYSTALS
TI ' CPITHj
Urates
CRYSTALS TT"^
8-1 Cal- CRYSTALS
clue
0-1 Calctum
OxaUta

1
1

BACTERIA BACTERIA UBC:J-J
Few
Few
rRYS~TAL$
CRYSTALS PROTEIN:
clum
Calcium ~\
Oulata
Oxalata

PROTEIN; (PITHs

UBC:0-I

Few

RaTe

Ful 1

0-1

VBC; 0-1 UBC:0-I

£r*-

WBC: 0-1

WBC:0-t
tpTTHi

V3C:0-I W)C:l-2
laVTTALS IFfTH:

VBC:0-2
trTTrli

WBC:0-1
BTTH:

Few ~*

Few

?S

few

CRYSTALS Celclio

Few

11

IJ

Oxalates.
many
amor-

It

EPITH,
WSC:0-I
few—
CTiYTTALS
CRYSTALS Hi&gt;|c
CRYSTALS CRYSTALS CRYSTALS Calcium acid.
Calcium AmorFew Cal- OxaCalcium
Ouclum
phous
late,
Oxalate
late.
•rates
Oxalate, Uretas
CLUCOSE
Few
CLUCOSE •wny
Trace
amorTrace
phous

0-1

WBC:0-I tf»C:0-l
UBC:0-I UBC:0-t
CRYSTALS EPITH:
CTiV5TAts
Calcium
Few cat - few
Oxalase, CRYSTALS Clum
AmorCalcium Oxalate
phous
Oxa late- CASTS:
0-fc
urates Few.
byline
Amorphous
casts
•rates

tPITH;
Occas.
CRYSTALS
CRYSTALS Phos•
Few cel- phetes
clum
BLOOO:
Oxalate. TI
Few
mucus
threads
WDC:0-I
EPITH:

Few

UBCiO-t WBC:0-I UBC:0-I ViCiO-l UDC:0-t WBC:0-I
tpTTH:
IfTTH:
IFTTB:
Few
Few
FI
BACTERIA
Few
CRYSTALS
Urates
tPTTn:

msa

in—

w«C:0-t
tTTTH: IF7TH:
Rare
CRYSTALS CRYSTALS
Occas. liare
Calcium Calcium
Oxalate
2* Amorphous
Urates.
2» Hucus

VtC:l-l

n w«c!o-i
l^rt

W!C:0-I
t?ll«:
Rare
YSTALS
re
Calcium
Oxalate,

tPITHl
.
Occas.
CRYSTALS

WBC:0-I
|ljre '

W8C:0-I
IPlTH;
Rare

EPITH:
CRYSTALS - .
Occas.
CRYSTALS
Urates

{PITH: WBC-.I-J CRYSTALS .
Occas .
CRYSTALS Urates acid.
Urates
Urates

nvTTALs urn

CRYSTALS WBC:I-J
tfTTHs
phOUS
Occas.
SediCRYSTALS
ments
Urates
JLOOD-.I*

*zr-—

WBC:0-I CRYSTALS CRYSTALS EPITH:
Calcium Occas.
Full
Oxalate BACTERIA
Field
itoJ:
Amor•mount,
phous
SediFew
ment
mucus
threads

CRYSTALS - '

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

RBC:Rara
ITtTH:
Occas.
Few
awicus
threads

rcq&lt;

threads
yjCup-l JSCj.O-1
tflTH:
CPITHi
Rare
Rare
BACTERIA.
Full
field

MliOO
tPITHL
Rare

W1C;0-I

VlCiO-t
ITTTH;
Rare

iTTfHi

m

phous
Urates

MICWft

VtC:0-l VBCJM
I?TlHj. PTfrl:
lire
Rare
BACTERIA
:TERIA

.

Im-

S

V»C:0-1

CRYSTAL!I
f requenlt
Calcium
Oxalate,i
I* IhlCUS 1* rtocuiI
Threads Threads

fit

.

BACTERIA WK:0-t IACTERIA PROTEIN BACTERIA V&gt;C:0-I
1+
Hoderate P.BC:Rare
Many
TRYTTAIS Many
HlYS~TALS
CRYSTALS Calciun CRYSTALS BACTERIA
Few
•
Celclum
Calcium Oulate AmorCRYSTALS
Oxalate.
phous
Oxalate
Amor1* Mucus
Phosthreads .
phates phous
Urates,
Calcium
Oxalate

CRYSTALS YSTALS tPITH: CPITH^ tPITH; CRYSTALS tPITH: tPITH;
OccaOcca- ' Moderate Calcium ! T
P
Calcium
Iclim Few
Oulate CRYSTALS slonal
Oxalate, Oxalate BACTtRIA slonal
Calcium
CASTS; AmorOxalate
Calcium phous
Field
CRYSTALS
Oxalate Sediment
Moderate
PROTEIN;
«t
amount
Calcium
Oxalate.
Few

wfit1 f
frequent

S

IPITH:
CfltH:
Rare
Rare
fRYSTALlHYSTAlS
frequent Rare
Calcium Calcium
Oxalate Oxalate

-

t.|

phous
•rates

amorphous

7a

Occat.

BACTERIA UBCil-J
W»C:»-1 .
ITTTH;
Occas.
CRYSTALS ilralts
CRYSTALS Few
BLOOD I* Urates
Urates
CRYSTALS
PROTEIN
Orates

ITTTH:

JP1

CRYSTALS r^

field
amorphous
•rates

K

»b

«o»

•

VBC:0-I WBClO-l
CTlTTALS

(a

amorewcus •
threads. phous
sperurates
ewto-

CRYSTALS CRYSTALS
Urates &gt;hos-

Ik

Sb

WIT

EPITH;
CftWAlS •
Occas.
Lg. «Mt.
CRYSTALS I
CJTV
amorphous
few uric
«rates, &lt;
few calcium
mulata

tPTTH;
Occas.

vn*

mucus- .
threads

ten

ia

&lt;*-

VBC

'o-i

+1
WBC: 1-2
Occas.
BACTERIA IFfTHl

&lt;*

VBC-

clum
Oulata

i

Ve

VBCiO-l
tMTH!
Rare

tPITH;
tPITH;
Rare
Rare
BACTtRIA
Faw

-

tPITM:
Rare

UO&amp;i.
Bcce llonal

tPITH:

tPITH;
Occa-

CRYSTALS
Calcium

slonal

Oxalate

�Figure 1. 2,4-D and Endogenous Phenolic Compounds Measured in Serum

1.0

_

0.6

_

0.4

0
X
1
2
3

,-

0.8

Subject No. 1

_

&lt;u
CO

C£

0.2 .

Day

= Pretreatment
• Posttreatment
= 1 day after treatment
= 2 days after treatment
= 3 days after treatment

�Figure 2.

2,4-D and Endogenous Phenolic Compounds Measured in Serum

0
X
1
2
3

1.0

0.8

M
&lt;U

Subject No. 2

0.6

cn
Q

0.4
00

0.2

\_
1
Day

«
»
=
=
=

Pretreatment
Posttreatment
1 day after treatment
2 days after treatment
3 days after treatment

�Figure 3.

1.0

2,4-D and Endogenous Phenolic Compounds Measured in Serum

Subject No. 3
0
X
1
2
3

i-

0.8

0)
CO

0.4
60

0.2

1
Day

= Pretreatment
= Posttreatment
= 1 day after treatment
= 2 days after treatment
= 3 days after treatment

�Figure 4. 2,4-D and Endogenous Phenoli: Compounds Measured In Serum

1.0

r.

0.8

0.6
CO

a

0.4
00

0.2

I
1
Day

Subject No. 4
0 = Pretreatment
X « Posttreatment
1 = 1 day after treatment
2 = 2 days after treatment
3 = 3 days after treatment

�Figure 5. 2,4-D rahd Endogenous Phenolic Compounds Measured in Serum

1.0 _

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

1
Day

Subject No. 5
0 = Pretreatment
X = Posttreatment
1 = 1 day after treatment
2 = 2 days after treatment
3 = 3 days after treatment

�Figure 6.

0.8

0.6

p
0.4

0.2

Subject No. 6
0
X
1
2
3

1.0

&lt;u

2,4-D and Endogenous Phenolic Compounds Measured in Serum

-

=
=
=
=
=

Pretreatment
Posttreatment
1 day after treatment
2 days after treatment
3 days after treatment

�Figure 7.

2,4-D and Endogenous Phenolic Compounds Measured in Serum

0 = Pretreatment
X = Posttreatment
1 « a day after treatment
2 * 2 days after treatment
3 = 3 days after treatment

1.0

0.8

to 0.6
en
H
0

00

Subject No. 7

0.4

3.

0.2

1
Day

�Figure 8. 2,4-D and Endogenous Phenolic Compounds Measured in Serum

1.0

0.8

0.6
&lt;u
en

0.4
OC

0.2

1
Day

Subject No. 8
0 » Pretreatment
X = Posttreatment
1 = 1 day after treatment
2 = 2 days after treatment
3 = 3 days after treatment

�Figure 9.

2,4-D and Endogenous Phenolic Compounds Measured in Serum

0 « Pretreatment
X = Posttreatment
1 = 1 day after treatment
2 = 2 days after treatment
3 = 3 days after treatment

1.0

0.8

g
to

Subject No. 9

0.6

0.2

1
Day

�Figure 10.

1.0

0.8

S&gt;

0.6

CO

o
sf
«M

tn

0.4

0.2

2,4-D and Endogenous Phenolic Compounds Measured in Serum

Subject No. 10
0
X
1
2
3

» Pretreatment
» Posttreatment
= 1 day after treatment
= 2 days after treatment
= 3 days after treatment

�Figure 11. 2,4-D and Endogenous Phenolic Compounds Measured in Serum

1.0

0.8

$ 0.6

V)

C5
CM

be

04
.

0.2

Subject No

0
X
1
2
3

11

Pretreattnent
Posttreatment
1 day after treatment
2 days after treatment
3 days after treatment

�Applicator No. 1
0 » Pretreatment
X « Posttreatment

Figure 12. Amount of Total 2,4-D and Endogenous Phenolic Compounds
Excreted in Urine
30

20

12

24

36

48

60
Hour

72

84

96

108

120

132

144

�30

Figure 13. Amount of Total 2,4-D and Endogenous Phenolic Compounds
Excreted in Urine

Applicator No. 2
0 «• Pretreatment
X = Posttreatment

20

o
•ato
* 10

12

24

36

48

60
Hour

72

84

96

108

120

132

144

�30

Figure 14. Amount of Total 2,4-D and Endogenous Phenolic Compounds
Excreted in Urine

20

p
L

10

Hour

Applicator No. 3
0 - Pretreatment
X = Posttreatment

�Figure 15. Amount of Total 2,4-D and Endogenous Phenolic Compounds
Excreted in Urine

Applicator No. 4
0 = Pretreatment
X = Posttreatment

30

20 .

cd

4J

o
CM

t&gt;0

10

12

24

36

48

60
Hour

72

84

96

108

120

132

144

�30

Figure 16. Amount of Total 2,4-D and Endogenous Phenolic Compounds
Excreted in Urine

Applicator No. 5
0 - Pretreatment
X = Posttreatment

20

JC

10

120

Hour

132

144

�Figure 17. Amount of Total 2,4-D and Endogenous Phenolic Compounds
Excreted in Urine

12

24

36

48

72

60

Hour

84

Applicator No. 6
0 Pretreatment
X Posttreatment

96

108

120

132

144

�30

Figure 18. Amount of Total 2,4-D and Endogenous Phenolic Compounds
Excreted in Urine

Applicator No. 7
0 = Pretreatment
X = Posttreatment

20

o

H

CM
00

X

12

24

36

48

60
Hour

72

84

96

108

120

132

i
144

�30

Figure 19. Amount of Total 2,4-D and Endogenous Phenolic Compounds
Excreted in Urine

20

rt
jj
o

6C

10

Hour

Applicator No. 8
0 * Pretreatment
X = Posttreatment

�30r

Figure 20. Amount of Total 2,4-B and Endogenous Phenolic Compounds
Excreted in Urine

Applicator No. 9
0 * Pretreatment
X » Posttreatment

20-

«8
•U

Q
CM

00

10-

X

12

24

36

48

60

72

Hour

84

96

108

120

132

144

�30 r

Figure 21. Amount of Total 2,4-D and Endogenous Phenolic Compounds
Excreted in Urine

Applicator No. 10
0 = Pretreatment
X - Posttreatment

20

O

H

(50

3-

10

I

12

24

36

48

60

72

Hour

84

96

108

120

132

144

�30 r

Applicator No. 11
0 » Pretreatment
X = Posttreatment

Figure 22. Amount of Total 2,4-D and Endogenous Phenolic Compounds
Excreted in Urine

20

10

12

24

36

48

60

72

Hour

84

96

108

120

132

144

�MS*
Appendix

Methodology for 2,4-D Analysis

�Methods for Analysis of 2,4-D
In order to select the most recent analytic techniques for 2,4-D assay
in urine, serum, gauze patches, vegetation and soil samples, a literature
survey was done. The following methods were used in our investigation:
a. Urine: Out of the total volume of urine samples, 10 ml was taken and
2 ml of IN HC1 was added to it. The acidified urine was then mixed with 5 ml
of diethyl ether and was shaken for 10 minutes on a Buchler-Vortex -evaporator
(Vortex setting was kept at 5). This extraction method was followed three
times. The ether extracts were pooled together and evaporated to complete
dryness at a temperature not higher than 45°C. The dry residue was dissolved
in 1 ml of methanol first and then mixed thoroughly with 1 ml of 15% solution
of BF3 in methanol. The resultant mixture was heated in a water bath at 70°C
for 10 minutes for complete methylation. The methylated solution was cooled
and again extracted thrice with 1 ml of n-hexane. N-hexane extracts were either
injected (1 yl) immediately in a G.C. or stored at -20°C.
b. Blood Serum: One ml of isolated serum was diluted with 4 ml of distilled
water and then acidified with 1 ml of IN HC1. The acidified serum was then
treated (i.e. extracted and methylated) in exactly the same manner as was the
urine. One yl of n-hexane extract was injected in a G.C.
c. Gauze Patches: Immediately after the day's work, the patches (from the
front, back and head cover) were soaked separately in 100 ml of methanol and
kept overnight at 4°C. After washing the patches thoroughly with methanol, 50
ml of the wash (from each group) was evaporated to dryness at less than 45°C
temperature. The dry residue was dissolved in 1 ml of methanol and then methylated and finally extracted as above. The methylated compound, however, was
attracted three times with 4 ml, 3 ml and finally 3 ml of n-hexane. The pooled
extractant was diluted when needed before G.C. analysis or stored as before at
-20°C.
d. Air Filter: Each air filter was washed with 50 ml of methanol immediately after the day's work and was kept at 5°C overnight. Clear methanol was
removed and the filter was further rinsed twice with 10 ml of methanol. The
pooled methanol was treated in the same way as the gauze patches.
e. Vegetation: Ten grams of freshly collected leaves were chopped and homogenized in 50 ml of 95% hot ethanol. The homogenate was centrifuged at 5,000
rpm in a fixed angle rotar for 30 minutes. Supernatant was carefully removed
and saved. The pellet was thoroughly washed with 50 ml of 80% hot ethanol and
recentrifuged three times as before. Each supernatant fraction was pooled together in a round bottom flask and was evaporated to bring the final volume to
20 ml. The concentrated supernatant was adjusted to pH 3 by adding exactly
10 drops of H3PO^. This acidified solution was extracted first with 50 ml of
diethyl ether and then with 25 ml and finally with 25 ml of diethyl ether. The
total extractant was evaporated to dryness under a current of nitrogen at 45°C.
The dry residue was again extracted three times with 3ml, 1 ml and 1 ml of
methanol. The combined methanol extract was treated with 1 ml of 15% BF2 in
methanol and kept under a nitrogen atmosphere in a water bath at 70°C until
concentrated to 2 ml. This methylated solution was further extracted with nhexane as described above. N-hexane was diluted when needed for G.C. analysis.

�f. Soil: Fifty prams of soil sample was mixed with 40 ml of IN H^SO, to
prepare a slurr. To the acidified soil, 45 ml of diethyl ether was added and
was taken in a separating funnel for extraction. The separating funnel containing the soil sample was shaken for a total of fifteen minutes, but for not
more than one minute at a time. The solvent layer was decanted and passed
through glass wool and the aqueous layer containing soil particles was rejected.
The clear solvent layer was then mixed with 25 ml of IN NaOH and shaken vigorously in a separating funnel for 1 minute. The organic layer was rejected and
the alkaline aqueous layer was cleaned by partition method with 25.ml chloroform. The clean aqueous layer was further acidified with 1 ml of cone. l^SO^
and extracted with 25 ml of ether. The ether extract was dried completely and
redissolved in 5 ml of methanol. Methylation and final n-hexane extraction
were made as in the case of the vegetation samples.
The following gas chromatographic conditions were used:
Detector, Electron capture Ni 63 temperature: 350°C
Gas: Methane: Argon
(5:95)
Flow rate through the column
25 ml/min
Sample volume injected
1 yl
Column material
3% 0V 101 on 80/100 supelcoport
Length of the column
6 ft
I.D. of the column
2 mm
Column temperature
187°C
Injection port temperature
200°C

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="17622">
              <text>055</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="17623">
              <text>1466</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="17625">
              <text>Series III Subseries II</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17621">
                <text>Brown, Harry D.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17624">
                <text>Final Report: Herbicide (2,4-D) Applicator Exposure Measurements</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17626">
                <text>human testing</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="17627">
                <text>agricultural exposure</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="17628">
                <text>industrial exposure</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1575" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8184">
              <text>030</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8185">
              <text>0522</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8189">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8182">
                <text>Burdygina, M. Ya.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="8183">
                <text>G.Z. Dumkina</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8186">
                <text>Hygiene and Sanitation</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8187">
                <text>1971</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8188">
                <text>Hygienic Evaluation of Different Regimens for Training of Adolescents as Apparatus Operators in a Chemical Factory Under Conditions of Exposure to Chlorine and Chlorinated Hydrocarbons</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8190">
                <text>industrial exposure</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="8191">
                <text>dioxin</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2245" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="15081">
              <text>047</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="15082">
              <text>1192</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="15086">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15079">
                <text>Carlson, Lars A.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="15080">
                <text>Birgitta Kolmodin-Hedman</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15083">
                <text>Acta Medica Scandinavica</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15084">
                <text>1972</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15085">
                <text>Hyper - [alpha] - Lipoproteinemia in Men Exposed to Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Pesticides</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15087">
                <text>industrial exposure</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="15088">
                <text>pesticide toxicology</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="15089">
                <text>human testing</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="15090">
                <text>health effects</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
