<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=49&amp;advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&amp;advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=legislation&amp;output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-04-21T04:47:25+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>1</pageNumber>
      <perPage>15</perPage>
      <totalResults>11</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="3081" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1595">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/3fa7e18d3b907f3d708fc5867c4c229b.pdf</src>
        <authentication>cd638aeb403ea695e94aa4951cdbec3e</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63544">
                    <text>Item ID Number

01772

Author
Corporate Author
ROpOTt/ArtlClO TltlO Typescript: A Chronology of Events in the
Congressionally Mandated Epidemiologic Study of Viet
Nam Veterans and Projected Dates for the Completion
of Various Tasks in the Design of the Study, revised
July 7,1981

Journal/Book Title
Yoar

0000

Month/Day
Color

D

Number of ImaQes

2

DOSOrlptOU NOtOS

Provides chronology from passage of Veterans Health
Programs Extension and Improvement Act of 1979 to
OTA review of draft protocol by September 21,1981.

Monday, June 11, 2001

Page 1773 of 1793

�A Chronology of Events in the Congressionally Mandated Epidemiclogic Study of
Viet Nam Veterans and Projected Dates for the Completion of Various Tasks in the
Design of the -Study.

December 1979 Congress passes Veterans Health Programs Extension and
Improvement Act of 1979 (PL 96-151). The Act directs
(1) the Administrator of the VA to prepare a protocol (plan)
for the study of Viet Nam veterans who may be experiencing health
effects resulting from exposure to dioxins contained in Agent
Orange;
(2) the Director of the Office of Technology Assessment to. review
and approve the study protocol within 180 days after passage of
Act (that time period ended about June 20, 1980). If the OTA
Director did not approve the plan by then, he was periodically to
report to Congress reasons for the lack of approval.
Dec. 20, 1979 President signs Act into Law.
December 1979

VA decides to use competitive bid procedure to select an epidemiologist to design the study protocol.

Feb. 4, 1980

VA publishes its intention to let contract for design of the protocol in the Commerce Business Daily.

Mar.,19, 1980 VA issues Request for Proposals (RFP).
Apr. 11, 1980 Conference of potential bidders hosted by VA.
May 6, 1980

National Veterans Law Center initiates legal action and bid protest
about procedures used by VA in soliciting bids.

May 8, 1980

Last day for receipt of bids.

May 1980

A selection board of government experts reviews the bids and makes
tentative ranking. No further action is taken because of legal
suit and bid protest pending against VA.

Jun. 13, 1980 Judge Harold H. Green of the DC District Federal Court asked that
GAO make a ruling about the issues raised in the bid protest.

August 1980

OTA begins making periodic reports to the Committees of Congress
about reasons it has not approved the study protocol. At that
time, VA expected to issue contract in September. Subsequent reports kept Congressional Committees informed of continuing legal
delays .

Feb. 2, 1981

GAO finds in favor of VA, and VA can proceed with letting contract.

�Feb/Mar 1981

VA contacts bidders and seeks updated information about their
interest in and capability to design the study protocol.

April 1981

VA reconstitutes selection board of government experts to
examine revised bids.

May 1, 1981

VA selects the School of Public Health, University of, California
at Los Angeles (UCLA) to design the study protocol.

May 1981

OTA begins to assemble panel to review the study protocol.

May 26, 1981

UCLA requests and is subsequently granted a 30-day extension
of the contract.

THESE EVENTS BRING US TO THE PRESENT

Early August
1981

Draft of study plan to be delivered to VA. The draft plan
is to be distributed by the VA to the following organizations
for review:
1. OTA
2. The National Academy of Sciences
3. The Interagency Work Group to Study Possible Long-Term
Effects of Phenoxy Herbicides and Contaminants
4. The Veterans Administration Committee on Health-Related
Effects of Herbicides

OTA expects to complete its review of the draft protocol within 30 days of its
receipt from VA. Assuming that OTA receives the protocol in mid-August,
the review will be finished by mid-September.
Mid-August
1981

Dispatch of the draft protocol to all members of the OTA review
panel.

Week of Sept
7, 1981

Meeting of the review panel to discuss the protocol and consider
what suggestions might be made to UCLA to improve the study plan.

Week of Sept
14, 1981

OTA staff will prepare written report of the review and suggestions
for modification of the study plan.

By Sept 21,

OTA .review document will be delivered to VA.

1981
Following review of the August draft, the reviewers' comments and suggestions
will be forwarded to UCLA. Approximately 30 days will be allowed for those
modifications to be incorporated or rejected with explanation by UCLA.
The revised protocol should reach VA sometime in October. If it requires
review by the 4 organizations listed above, additional time will be required for
completion of the study plan and its review.
After completion of the study .plan, a decision will have to be made about what
organization should carry out the study.

Revised July 7, 1981

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22481">
              <text>066</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22482">
              <text>1772</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22484">
              <text>Series III Subseries III</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22483">
                <text>Typescript: A Chronology of Events in the Congressionally Mandated Epidemiologic Study of Viet Nam Veterans and Projected Dates for the Completion of Various Tasks in the Design of the Study, revised July 7, 1981</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22485">
                <text>study protocol</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22486">
                <text>Agent Orange Exposure Study</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22487">
                <text>legislation</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22488">
                <text>UCLA</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2909" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1551">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/a39b757d31534a68c9eaea6d2d287289.pdf</src>
        <authentication>56f16f4ef5c249e66ba5ae8ee2a0e092</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63500">
                    <text>Item ID Number

01726

Author
Corporate Author
RODOrt/ArtlCle Title

Press

Release: Agent Orange Research, October 27,
1983, UPI, Washington, D.C.

Journal/Book Title
Year

000

°

Month/Day
Color
Numbor of Images

n

1

Doscripton Notes

Monday, June 11, 2001

Page 1727 of 1793

�X

UPI. WASH. DC

October 27, 1983

;:_ _

AGENT ORANGE RESEARCH

.. . . . . . .
._

.

-

..

(X

,-&lt;'V*:.,-7

fiGENT GRfiNGE
HfiSHIKGTON (UPI) - THE SENRTE THuRSDrlV HPFROVED 8 $4Gfl-fiILLIQ«

fiiinnt

fLtr-iirf.!

f. n.— t i n v $: r.

f. r f j

Tt?:" 8 } ttp.r't' 1

TSinT

*"{•»:?%•."'•

~:V~

••».

j-'j-Ji. » ,1 fl r

.-. r .-.•.-..,• j

.-. —

buPPLtntNiriL bPtfitfifoU Dill i n n i miAui/n-d rum^ run n ntt'i'.-ni. o i i / i / Y ur
{{ r .--rir.-iM {I»" T T ?V^ *'•"• ~ y ft ft : T ?• Trt T?!r «.fr«"H r V. i? T sj. :"• T « • T •."••.•••:•.••?V i t i N H f l VtitKfuNo t/&gt;ruoti) i u inc. v c r u L i n n i hutHi UAnnuca
-/ „Tif" r . r i t ••'.-•~r: rt:!~«. t'ii fl U t ' T T ' T f l V . T T
W1 ti T-.* T t( :"• .- C « ~ t • • \ •'.•• \--r-.~: ~'-T
f n t b i L L &gt; firf'KulLv UK n ruU-t f « j i L &gt; t u f t t n i n o 4--.*i ruLu^un run inr:
,v.—s.-T-.— p - .— .-..-. r. r.-..— .-..-..— j*.inm.t}
rs: ."T- ••{•'Tt . "•". •"••'•-r\ ~ *\ .-..•:•!- T-:.-.—
u t f t i t K MjK yii'tni't L - O h i K U L ift :n t L n i t i n i u i.-nKiu u*.»i Jrii:
•"«• rrirfr: ?;V .-••*•••••••••: •.••"{•:••.?•: iir T't-r -~ .&lt;£••?•. \~-~Tt~*:. .-..-.;.:,•:.-« t -!•;•;• *?••• -.-•:•:••;•* r•••••:•.•&gt;:Lf L i ^ c n i U L U U i L - n L oiui-'T ur i n L o u i r c n t y L-niivun~&lt;.-fi'.'-:'ij!U oyc-oinju-ti
n

n

A miLM BILL fiiSSEy SV THE HOUSE CONTAINS JS7 fiiLLIuN FOR THE
STilDV.
ft

ft f it .«i &lt;r f

i &gt; ft .• .• .-s I"

.n.-. t:.—^n .—t».n r-

.^ .•!if.1 iv r T T!~ •""

f-"-T(

•"•"f f

•-»-—••..".» :.'.••

fttt*

h b t K « i t - H U U i E 1-UNrtKtNlt U W i n i T i b t NUN rtkl KtoULVt inc
r. r r*r* r* n .* tr ,*t ?"-^ r* ^* T .•; ~ r*i» T*r?r* ^?«.n « r ? ? *\ .*» •/ n «•?•*•*" *•* A r ir.^ ; .—
.-. ,r i.- ,n .^,*. ij r .-. ^»
D l J - r t K t N t t b B t J W t t W irit IM ekLb hNU btKy H biliUlt* l-UnrKUnU-t
8

VERSION TO THE HOUSE fiND SENfiTE FOR FINfiL fiPPROViiL.
THE fiGENT ORfiNGE STuDY IS TO DETERMINE WHETHER VIETKfiH VETERiiftS

*•?**"!

?•/•"! J f

jf.n :.*r*

rv r-r"t:

r*f r « A A ^«

T.%

T» j?^*

;.•;•*« « r .n r n *~

.". ir «

{ ; f J-T* c .•.». t.*

.*£•{"

T"?~

-.': wi •.••:• 4 •' T

;.•••• v .*•.™. .^ t.-.-i

r *j

f e H Gf i H T 'nttVE ettN t/irO-bhD J U Int h t K t f i H &amp; t * ilNy V i t i W n f i f t i t K H W i i N
.ij-s.:r«:T!
c.~r 5*r •••-.r-'.rrrs nr-/fv* j"~ t"»?{j*J"r« n!.-~ •::•,-•:•,•• T-rrsfr: -{r-.i-: -•:•: -rrrr^r--utfitKrii.* hRt n i urvLn»tr\ K i b K Or o u f r c f u f t u L U N b - J c f t f i ni.nj.in c r r c l i i
•r r! .^ j; ;: ^ T* .*• rs.". i:.". s 11 .• .^. n r « ^f .^ «r .". r- .*•. ? * .~* f i-' ??*•?• T i;."! w
itiriri v'i:fcKh'fto NnU i/iy a u i otK'J't iri V i L i f i n i i .
Tt-rr

: n ~i'-,5 T?"

Sr? :

V.! iT:

T«:"«: {'ftrs* 1

:*: f. •'.

Hit O L J « h » C . b i L L TiLOlj l i i ^ L u v L O 4'DJ J Ol« I* ~ ~

t^J -•. .* st n tt-

t" .*.

^r :.*."•

• .* r n .^ r x

.n ."•

T* : ? r*

.• .* " .*•

.*" •"" s."

r. .—.-, T f .• .1 .-i .1 ?•.•.• r T r .— .r

.•J.^.T

;'~

t lit, nnUyid Uf

.* ? .*"• z t n t:

r .^ .". / .• .^ .^ i .•

•'.

•*• --t.'.-. f.-..-..-.-.

n OLi'ihitiK'0

.-.

.*,- .*. .•, ,•;

y •.•

v.-:.—

briLiifiF — ( U int M i y U s Ur i n t u n i t itfi. HtKKY ^ntniUfo y-«fiifi.
« .•"..•: .1 T-r ii ••"

•*• ^"

rt .f t: r tf.".

«.— .— £.-

.T .-.•.-.-r.r :.-.-..-..•.•

i» 11 r

inE

.- .— j;... —.—

f K h l i l U , Ur rfiriftti yfcriirt U K n i U i U t o hilc- tftfcft tij&amp;iUfiilKr if« int o L f i n i t
FOR aeOUT 125 VEMRS. JHCKSON DIED OF H HEfiRT UTIflCK IN SEPTEKEER.
UPI 18-27-83 07:03 PED

(i)

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="20860">
              <text>064</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="20861">
              <text>1726</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="20863">
              <text>Series III Subseries III</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20862">
                <text>Press Release: Agent Orange Research, October 27, 1983, UPI, Washington, D.C.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20864">
                <text>Agent Orange Exposure Study</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="20865">
                <text>legislation</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2536" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1368">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/ab95496c4c638a5bb49f9afdbf295521.pdf</src>
        <authentication>26f4c9788c35e677e92b4f733907390f</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63317">
                    <text>Item ID Number

°1498

Author

Gough, Michael

Corporate Author
Report/Article TltlO Typescript: Chapter 9: The Political Assessment: A
Congressional View

Journal/Book Title
000

Year

°

Month/Day
Color

n

Number of Images

10

DOSCrlptOH Notes

Tnis

Tuesday, May 15, 2001

manuscript is a draft version of a chapter or section
from the following book: Agent Orange and its
Associated Dioxin: Assessment of a Controversy.
Young, A. L. and G. M. Reggiani, eds. New York:
Elsevier, 1988. This book is available in the NAL
collection, call no.: RA1242 T44 A3.

Page 1498 of 1514

�CHAPTER 9
"THE IMPORTANCE OF AGENT ORANGE AND DIOXIN WAS
ACKNOWLEDGED WHEN THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT BECAME
INVOLVED,"
THE POLITICAL ASSESSMENT:

A CONGRESSIONAL VIEW

MICHAEL GOUGII

In December, 1979, Congress passed and President Carter
signed Public Law 96-151, which instructed the Veterans Administration to carry out a study of possible long-term health
effects resulting from exposure to dioxin-containing herbicides
in Vietnam.
This was not the first time that Congress had considered
Agent Orange. Almost a decade earlier, in 1970, Senator
Philip Hart; of Michigan held hearings about the possibility
that spraying with Agent Orange was causing birth defects in
Vietnam and that the use of the same herbicides could be harmful for the population of the United States. In response to
those hearings, the Department of Health reduced the use of
2,4,5-T in the United States and the Department of Defense
stopped Agent Orange spray missions in Vietnam.
The law that was passed in 1979 mandating the Agent Orange
study resulted from veterans testifying before Congress that
Agent Orange had caused cancer, birth defects, and other health
effects. It directed the Veterans Administration to study
ground troops who had served in Vietnam to see if any long-term
health effects in veterans or their families could be related
to the use of Agent Orange. To prod the Veterans Administration
along, Congress said that the protocol for the study had to be
designed within 180 days or the Congress had to be told the
reason why.

9: 1

�The OTA (Office of Technology Assessment), which is a
technical support office of. Congress, was directed by law to
review and approve the plans for the Veterans Administration
study and to monitor the conduct of the resulting study. The
bulk of my presentation is about OTA's role, but before going
into that, I will discuss other major events in the Agent Orange
issue.
Some results are now available from the Ranch Hand
study, the mortality and morbidity study of the Air Force
personnel who flew the spray missions in Vietnam, which was
well underway in 1979. The Air Force had responded early to
Congressional inquiries and realized that they had an occupational
health problem. They moved ahead on their own without the
intense prodding Congress put on the Veterans Administration
for the ground troop study. George Lathrop has dismissed
those studies.
Also in December, 1979, President Carter established the
Agent Orange Working Group (AOWG), composed of Executive
Branch agencies with programs that touched on possible effects
on health of dioxin, Agent Orange, and herbicides. In February,
1980, the Office of Technology Assessment was invited to sit
with the Agent Orange Working Group as an observer, and it
became an active participant in this group. In August, 1981,
President Reagan placed the Agent Orange Working Group into
the Cabinet Council on Human Resources, elevating and enlarging the scope of the work group.
The Agent Orange Working Group has had profound effects
on Executive Branch efforts to try to better understand dioxin
and Agent Orange. Among the several studies coordinated by
the Agent Orange Working Group (ten major epidemiological
studies scheduled for completion by 1990 and five ongoing
health surveillance projects), one is complete. It is the
9: 2

�Birth Defects Study carried out by the Center for Disease
Control. This study has two conclusions: the tfirst conclusion was that there is no association between service in
Vietnam and birth defects. The second conclusion was th,a,t
there may be an association between opportunities for exposure,
to Agent Orange and a handful of birth defects, As soon a,s the
results of that study were released, at least one bill was
written in the Senate which was to provide compensation to all
veterans who had fathered children with spina bifida, a. colleC"
tion of tumors,and cleft lip with or without cleft palate,
That legislation never left the Senator's office. The
people who had clone the study at the Center for Disease Control, i.e., Dave Hricson and his colleagues, came to Congress.
They talked to congressional staff in great detail about the
structure of the study, its strengths and limits, and how to
draw conclusions from its results. They also went to the
American Legion, the Disabled American Veterans, the Vietnam
Veterans of American, and other veterans organizations, where
they explained the study and convinced those veterans that the
connections that had been shown, although theoretically valid,
woulcl not make a great deal of sense biologically. This was
a great achievement for solid scientific exposition and
convincing people not to be afraid and consequently do something foolish.
Some scientists still argue about the meaning of those
possible connections between exposure to Agent Orange and
birth defects. The Birth Defects Study, like many of the other
Agent Orange studies, was clone for political reasons. Politically, it has been examined and tried. The Congress looked at
the conclusions and decided no harm had been associated with
Agent Orange. So the CDC Birth Defects Study, from the point
of view of politics, is over. The Congress will not reopen it.
9: 3

�It is Interesting to note in this context that in the
Agent Orange lawsuit which was settled in the District Court
of New York in May, 1985, Judge Weinstein also considered the
CDC Birth Defects Study. He reached the same conclusion as
Congress, deciding that the study results were not sufficient
to sustain any association between Agent Orange and birth
defects. Thus, in the judicial system also, the CDC Birth
Defects Study has been weighed and found not to be convincing
in demonstrating any association between Agent Orange exposure
and b i. r th de f e c t s .
These are events which are very important. It should be
kept in mind that here we are not dealing with a purely scientific issue but with very sensitive and complicated political
and social issues. The scientific conclusions, therefore,
\vhile they are very important to us to understand whether or
not: d.i.oxin and Agent Orange cause disease, still are less
important to society than the decisions that are made in the
courtrooms and in the Congressional Hearing Rooms.
To come back to OTA, Congress wrote OTA into the Agent
Orange study because of disagreement between the Senate and
House Committees on Veterans' Affairs. Sensitive to veterans'
complaints that the Veterans Administration was indifferent
to their claims of harm from Agent Orange, the Senate wanted
the study to be carried out by some other agency. The House
Committee, on the other hand, had more faith in the Veterans
Administration and acted to preserve Veterans Administration's
responsibilities for research on veterans' health. The two
committees compromised, giving responsibility for the study
to the Veterans Administration and mandating that the Office
of Technology Assessment make periodic reports to the
committee, keeping Congress informed about progress or lack
o f i t.

9: 4

�This was an entirely new role for the Office of Technology
Assessment, and its constitutionality has been questioned. The
question arose a month after Congress directed the Veterans
Administration to do the Agent Orange study. At that time,
Congress passed another law directing the National Institute
for Occupational Safety and Health to do a study on dioxinexposed workers, and, again, Congress required that the Office
of Technology Assessment review and approve the protocol and
monitor the conduct of the study.
President Carter vetoed that law on the basis that
giving a congressional branch agency--the Office of Technology
Assessment—veto authority over the execution of an Executive
Branch study was a violation of separation of powers doctrine,
Executive Branch lawyers concluded after examining the case
that the bill was unconstitutional. Legislative Branch lawyers,
however, concluded that it was constitutional. Neither branch
has taken the case to court, and the issue is unresolved.
The veto of the NIOSH bill was successful.
President Carter's veto message also instructed the
Administrator of the Veterans Administration to ignore the
provisions of Public Law 96-151 which directed the Veterans
Administration to submit the study plan to the Office of
Technology Assessment for review. However, Senator Alan
Cranston, at that time Chairman of the Senate Committee on
Veterans' Affairs, wrote the Administrator that ignoring the
provision would not be a wise course. He pointed out that
Congress must provide funds for the Veterans Administration
study and that funding depended, on the Office of Technology
Assessment reviewing and approving the study plan. The Office
of Technology Assessment was part of the process, and it has
played an active role in Agent Orange issues ever since.

9: 5

�OTA assembled an Advisory Board to participate in its
Agent Orange activities. The panel includes academics--epidemiologists and statisticians, a toxicologist, a neurologist,
and a gynecologist. Then there are members who represent
stakeholders. There are three representatives from chemical
companies that made the Agent Orange components: Monsanto,
Dow Chemical, and American Cyanamid. They are neatly balanced
by representatives of the American Legion, the Disabled
American Veterans, and the Vietnam Veterans of America.
Despite the congressional requirement that a protocol
be written in 180 days, the Veterans Administration did not
produce one within that time. The Veterans Administration
was sued by veterans' groups because of some of its procedures.
There was a hearing before the General Accounting Office about
the methods used by the Veterans Administration to contract
for the protocol design. All of these events contributed to
the protocol's being late.
When the Office of Technology Assessment received the
first draft of the protocol, we rejected it as inadequate.
The basic plan of the protocol was to compare morbidity and
mortality rates between two groups of veterans, one which had
been exposed to Agent Orange and one which had not been.
In response to OTA's and others' criticisms, the protocol
was revised. The revision process just dragged along. It
was not until September, 1982, two and a half years after
Congress passed the law, that OTA approved the protocol.
By that time the Agent Orange Working Group Science Panel
had become convinced that it was really impossible to separate
exposed from not- exposed veterans, and they were urging that a
study be done to compare the health of veterans who had gone
to Vietnam with the health of veterans who have not gone to
to Vietnam, A study of that type would at least provide a

9: 6

�clue as to whether or not Vietnam veterans in general were
suffering from ill effects as a result of that experience.
The recommendation placed pressure on the Veterans Administration to do a "Vietnam Experience Study" even though the
Administration was planning an Agent Orange study.
Rather than making a decision between the two studies on
its own, the Veterans Administration asked for another review
of their protocol from the National Academy of Sciences. In
September, 1982, all the delay came to a head because Congress
had exhausted its patience. One hundred and: one representatives from the House of Representatives wrote a letter to the
Veterans Administration requesting that the study be transferred from the Veterans Administration to some other agency.
Dr. Vernon Monk of the Centers for Disease Control, in testifying before the House Veterans' Affairs Committee, said that
the Centers for Disease Control was well placed to do the
study. The Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee reaffirmed its
previously held conviction that the responsibility for the
study should be transferred somewhere else. The result was
that the execution of the study was taken from the Veterans
Administration and given to the Centers for Disease Control.
The Centers for Disease Control finally resolved the controversy about whether to do an Agent Orange Study or a Vietnam
Experience Study: they are doing both.
The CDC studies are the largest, probably the most compjLicated, and the most expensive epidemiology studies ever
conceived. They will cost at least $70 million, involve
interviews of 30,000 veterans, and 10,000 physical examinations to be carried out at the Lovelace Clinic.
The Vietnam Experience Study is relatively straightforward. Looking at the records easily establishes whether
or not a veteran went to Vietnam. The two cohorts can thus
9: 7

�be easily assembled, with the men who went to Vietnam on one
side and those who did not on the other; then their health
can be examined. The Vietnam Experience Study is underway and
on schedule. The same cannot be said about the Agent Orange
Study,because it is much harder to say whether or not a
veteran was exposed to Agent Orange. In January, 1985, the
Centers for Disease Control sent the Office of Technology
Assessment a summary of their efforts to resolve the exposure
problem. At that time the Centers for Disease Control were
able to identify the locations of battalions on the ground
in Vietnam,
A battalion is about 1,000 men, four maneuver companies
and a headquarters company. The battalion that the Centers
for Disease Control provided as an example was spread out along
a line of 40 kilometers. It was not possible to know where
the 1,000 men actually were. Were 990 at the middle of the
line or were they at one end? Were they spread out evenly
along the entire line? No one knows. One way to decide that
a battalion was exposed is to declare that any Agent Orange
spray mission within a fixed distance caused exposure. In
practice, AOWG and CDC have accepted that a spray mission at
a distance of two kilometers'might result in exposure.
Now consider an airplane spraying Agent Orange somewhere
within two kilometers of the battalion spread out on the 40
kilometer line. It is very hard to say who of the battalion
was exposed and who was not. Even assuming that exposure
could be ascertained, it is impossible to know how much
exposure took place.
OTA was very critical of the plans to decide a battalion
was exposed on the basis of such data. This criticism was expressed in periodic reports sent to the congressional committees.

9: 8

�Right: now, I think a majority o£ the OTA Advisory Board
feels that the study on Agent Orange should not go on because
of difficulties in deciding who was exposed and who was not.
The panel has not voted on this issue, and I could be wrong,
in my assessment, but I don't think so, If, after seeing
more details about exposure, OTA decides the study is impossible,
Congress could decide not to do the study. That would involve
an act of courage on the part of the Congress because it has
made a commitment that this study would be done. The Veterans'
Affairs Committees of the Senate and of the House may face the
dilemma, having promised the veterans to do the study, that
they have changed their mind. I used to think that, no matter
what the technical problems, the study would be done. I am
no longer so certain.
Congress has considered, over and over again, providing
compensation to veterans who claim ill effects from Agent
Orange exposure. At one time there was a list of over 20
diseases being considered as compensable. Congress finally
passed a law which provides compensation for chloracne and
porphyria cutanea tarda (PCT), if they occurred within one
year after .leaving Vietnam, Although there are very few
cases of either disease, the law was not a hollow gesture
on the part of the Congress. They wanted to do something
to compensate veterans who had been harmed, but, at the same
time, they wanted to limit compensation to diseases that
might be connected with Agent Orange,
Subsequently, Congress directed the Veterans Administration
to set up a special committee to review claims about diseases
resulting from Agent Orange exposure. That committee will
function only until the studies of the Centers for Disease
Control arc complete, because at that moment we expect to
have the answer to our questions.

9: 9

�Summing up, we can say that Congress is working out the
Agent Orange controversy. In 1979, Congress refused to make
a decision about whether or not Agent Orange had caused health,
effects. Instead, Congress directed the Executive Branch
to gather information for making a decision. By now, some
results have come in. The Air Force's studies on Ranch Hand
personnel provide no convincing evidence that Agent Orange
has affected human health. The Birth Defects Study, performed
by the Centers for Disease Control, also failed to provide
convincing evidence of a connection between Agent Orange and
human effects. Congress has directed the Veterans Administration to compensate two conditions which have been related to
dioxin exposure should they appear in Vietnam veterans. The
judge in the Agent Orange class action stated that the veterans
had failed, to prove their case in court that Agent Orange was
the cause of their illnesses. These points are convincing
many people that, regardless of all the fears about Agent
Orange and the toxicity which might reside in the dioxin
molecule, exposure to Agent Orange, if it occurred, has not
harmed the veterans.
However, that is not yet the end of the Agent Orange
controversy. Intellectually and emotionally the veterans
might accept that they have not been able to prove that their
diseases were caused by Agent Orange, but they can always
contend that no one could prove the contrary.
Probably, Agent Orange will pass away as a political
issue. Some veterans will continue to contend they were
harmed, but the decisions already made in Congress and in
the courtroom will convince many people that no detectable
harm was done. As more study results come in, if the results
continue to show no health effects, they will reinforce the
conclusions already made.

9: 10

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="17867">
              <text>056</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="17868">
              <text>1498</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="17870">
              <text>Series III Subseries II</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17866">
                <text>Gough, Michael</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17869">
                <text>Typescript: Chapter 9: The Political Assessment: A Congressional View</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17871">
                <text>legislation</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="17872">
                <text>AOWG</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="17873">
                <text>CDC</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="17874">
                <text>VA</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2013" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="12684">
              <text>041</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="12685">
              <text>0960</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="12689">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12682">
                <text>Pettinati, L.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="12683">
                <text>G. Perrelli</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12686">
                <text>Minerva Medica</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12687">
                <text>1979</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12688">
                <text>Pesticides in Rural Pathology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12690">
                <text>legislation</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="12691">
                <text>industrial exposure</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="12692">
                <text>safety</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1953" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1277">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/bb5999a175d6f193dec6655bd179050a.pdf</src>
        <authentication>01f9121d57b63f750bec84db5ba5c681</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63226">
                    <text>Item ID Number

00900

Author

Meselson, Matthew S.

Corporate Author

Herbicide Assessment Commission of the American Ass

Report/Article TitlO Hearing: Background Material Relevant to
Presentations at the 1970 Annual Meeting of the AAAS

Journal/Book TltlO

War Related Civilian Problems in Indochina, Part 1: Viet

Year

1971

Month/Day
Color

n

Number of Images

49

DOSCrlpton NOtOS

Alvin L

Friday, March 16, 2001

Young filed this item under the category
"Human Exposure to Phenoxy Herbicides and TCDD"
Reprinted in the Congressional Record, Volume 118
(no. 32), 3 March 1972, pp. S3226-3233.

Page 900 of 967

�Reprinted in the Congressional Record, Volume 118 (no. 3 2 ) ,
3 March 1972, pp. S3226-S3233.

HERBICIDE ASSESSMENT COMMISSION OF
THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE
ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE

BACKGROUND MATERIAL RELEVANT TO
PRESENTATIONS AT THE 1970
ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AAAS

MatthewS. Meselson
Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.

Arthur H. Westing .
Windham College, Putney Vermont
John D. Constable
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass,

Contents
1.
2.
3.
4.

Introduction
Land and Peoples of South Vietnam
Military Use of Herbicides in South Vietnam
Herbicide Toxicology: Stillbirths and
Birth Defects

1
8
. . 14
23

The observations and evaluations of the Herbicide Assess
ment Commission are those of its individual participants
and should not be attributed to the AAAS or any of its component organizations.

�INTRODUCTION

Over the past nine years, approximately one-seventh of the
land area of South Vietnam has been treated with chemical herbicides .in
order to reduce vegetation and to destroy food crops in connection with
*
military activities. This large scale application of herbicides has
occasioned concern within'the scientific community that there may be
serious effects on the land and people of Vietnam. Unfortunately, large
areas of ignorance have prevented any satisfactory evaluation of the
possible effects; of their implications for economic and health planning
in Vietnam; and of their broader implications regarding the use of herbicides.
In order to obtain reliable information, the American Association
for the Advancement of Science, the largest organization of scientists in
the United States, has sought to encourage and participate in the conduct
of a systematic on-site study of the effects of herbicides on the ecology
and on human welfare in South Vietnam. As a first phase of such a study,
the AAAS Board of Directors, in December 1969, commissioned the preparation of a detailed operational plan for determining. " . . . the short-term
and long-term consequences of the use of herbicides on the ecology of
South Vietnam and on human welfare." The AAAS Herbicide Assessment
Commission, the name under which this AAAS endeavor is known, began
^Herbicides are chemicals intended to kill or reduce vegetation. When
they cause leaf fall, with or without killing the entire plant, they are
sometimes called defoliants. We shall use the more general term,
herbicides.

\

�its work in February 1970.

Herbicides have been widely used since World War II in many
parts of the world for such beneficial purposes as agricultural and aquatic
weed control, forest, range, and watershed management, and the clearing
of rights of way. In the United States, about 150 million pounds of
synthetic organic herbicides were used in 1965 to treat approximately
140 million acres, one fourteenth of the land area of the country. However,
there are serious difficulties in extrapolating this backlog of experience
to the assessment of the effects of herbicides in Vietnam.
First of all, the choice of areas to be sprayed is based on very
different considerations in the two cases. Domestically, herbicides are
generally used to improve land values. In military applications, land values
are clearly not of primary concern. For example, herbicides are used domestically to improve pine forests by selectively killing less desirable
species. Militarily, the objective of spraying a forest is simply to remove
as much cover as possible. Again, herbicides are used in farming to kill
weeds but in war they are used to destroy food crops.
Beyond the clear difference in objectives between civil and
military applications of herbicides, there are several additional factors
which limit the applicability of domestic experience to the evaluation of
possible effects in Vietnam. Among them are: (i) little experience with

�the application of herbicides in comparable tropical ecosystems; (ii) little
previous attention to the possible ecological consequences of herbicide
application over a very large contiguous area; (iii) limited experience with
the military rate of application, which is more than ten times higher than
the average domestic rate; (iv) a meager backlog of domestic experience
with tv/o of the four herbicides that are used militarily; (v) no monitoring
of the quantities of herbicides or herbicide impurities and breakdown products
that may be entering the Vietnamese diet; and (vi) a need for more information regarding the possible negative medical or ecological side effects of
herbicides even as they are used domestically. In this last regard, it must
be remembered that although the use of herbicides is very widespread it is
also quite recent, more or less paralleling and now exceeding that of
chemical insecticides.
Direct examination of herbicide-treated areas in Vietnam by
qualified scientists has so far been quite limited. However, an important
start on the study of sprayed timber stands was made during 1967 and 1968
by the USAID Forestry Branch. On the basis of aerial observations, it was
estimated that approximately nine thousand square kilometers of forest had
been sprayed by mid-1967. After conducting brief ground inspections at
.three treated sites in early 1968, Dr. Barry Flamm, Chief of the Forestry
Branch, tentatively concluded that while a single spraying causes 10 to 20
percent killing of merchantable trees, two treatments in successive years

�kill 50 to 100 percent in the type of forest studied. An increase in grass
cover was noted in sprayed areas and it was anticipated that bamboo also
would increase. Flamm suggested further studies and recommended that
forest reserves receiving two or more treatments be planned for reforestation.
During 1968 the U . S . Mission in Vietnam conducted a review
of various aspects of the herbicide program. In order to obtain a preliminary assessment of ecological effects, Dr. Fred S. Tschirley of the U. S.
Agricultural Research Service was asked to participate. Tschirley, a
botanist, toured Vietnam from mid-April to mid-March 1968. He made aerial
observations of mangrove forests and semi-deciduous upland forest areas.
He also revisited the three sites established by Flamm and came to the same
conclusions regarding the effects of single and multiple herbicide treatment
on this forest. Tschirley also noted that mangrove species are killed by a
single treatment, and estimated that sprayed mangrove forests might return
to their original condition in approximately twenty years. Tschirley
stressed the need for information on the successional behavior of herbicidetreated Vietnamese forests and strongly urged the initiation of long-term
ecological research after the cessation of hostilities.
In March 1969 two American zoologists concerned with the
ecological impact of herbicides in Vietnam, Dr. Gordon H. Orians of the
University of Washington and Dr. Egbert W. Pfeiffer of the University of
Montana, visited Vietnam for two weeks. They made aerial observations

�of sprayed upland forests and also inspected a mangrove area by motor
launch. They found no evidence of recolonization along the shore line
and reported a near absence of fructivorous and insectivorous birds in the
sprayed areas. They too, strongly recommended a major research effort,
to be conducted jointly with Vietnamese scientists.
Following the establishment of the AAAS Commission, our work
was conducted in several stages including a trip to Vietnam in August and
September 1970. We inspected several types of herbicide-treated areas
in order to acquire information upon which more extensive studies could be
based. Our observations extended into several areas not previously studied
and, in certain instances, significantly differed with prior reports.
Previously, the Commission conducted a survey of the relevant
literature. At the same time, numerous experts and officials in various
fields were consulted for information and advice. A list of questions for
possible study was drawn up and circulated for comment to over 200
individuals and agencies as a means of identifying important problems
and building a base of information. Then, in June, a five-day working
conference was held at Woods Hole, Massachusetts in order to further
define a tractable number of specific problems for systematic study
and to assist in planning the subsequent tour of South Vietnam. The conference was attended by twenty-three specialists in various fields including tropical ecology, forestry, agricultural economics, mircrobiology, soil

�science, plant physiology, herbicide chemistry, photogrametry, medicine,
and anthropology.

Eleven of the participants had various

degrees of experience in Southeast Asia. Although all were present as
private individuals, they included persons from universities in the United
States and abroad, from industry, and from several departments of the
U. S. Government.

In Vietnam, our objectives were to improve our identification
of important problems for study and to determine the facilities, methods,
and geographical areas that would be most suitable for future work. We
attempted to obtain enough specific information and experience to partly
bridge the gap between the very limited picture of the situation available
from reading and consultation in the United States and actual conditions as
they exist in Vietnam. In fact, we were able to make some specific observations that should be of value even at this preliminary stage.
Although we went to Vietnam as independent scientists on behalf
of the AAAS, we were given the full official support of the U. S. Mission and
of the Government of the Republic of Vietnam, who showed their concern with
the problem by supplying letters of introduction and every assistance in
Saigon and in the provinces. Our living quarters, office facilities and ground
transportation were generously and expeditiously provided by the U . S . Agency
for International Development. Extremely valuable helicopter overflights and

�f I

other air trips were arranged by USAID, the American Embassy, and,
especially, by the U. S. Military Assistance Command. However, our
itinerary and daily activities were decided upon solely by ourselves.
We consulted with Vietnamese university and ministry specialists
in botany, zoology, soil science, agronomy, chemistry, forestry, and
medicine. We made several field trips with Vietnamese professors and
graduate students. We interviewed numerous farmers and village officials
for first hand information on herbicide effects. We conducted aerial and
ground inspections of herbicide treated and untreated areas and conducted
studies of possible health and congenital anomoly changes in selected
regions. Food-chain components and human sample materials were collected
and brought back for chemical analysis.

�LAND AND PEOPLES OF SOUTH VIETNAM

South Vietnam occupies the southeastern extremity of the
Southeast Asian Peninsula and has a crescent-shaped area of 170,000
square kilometers. It is about 1,300 kilometers long, extending from 8°33'
to 17° north latitude. Its average width is about 150 kilometers, falling
between about 104° and 109° east longitude. To the west lie Laos and
Cambodia, to the east the South China Sea.
Populations: The 1970 population of South Vietnam is estimated
to be 17.5 million, concentrated in the southern third of the country and in
a narrow strip along the eastern coast. More than 80 percent are ethnically
Vietnamese. The largest minority are the Highlanders of Montagnards, a
group of tribal peoples racially and linguistically distinct from the ethnic
Vietnamese. Estimated to number approximately one million, the Montagnards
are distributed throughout the upland areas in the northern two-thirds of the
country.
Geographic Regions:

South Vietnam is divisible into four main

physiographic regions. The Mekong Delta region constitutes the southernmost quarter, extending over about 40,000 square kilometers with about
5 million inhabitants. Flat and often marshy, it is dissected by the five
arms of the Mekong River, several lesser rivers, and many navigable streams
and canals along which the rural population is concentrated. The rivers are
so sediment-laden that in some places the coastline advances by as much
as 75 meters per year.

�. • The very fertile central part/ where most of the Delta population live/ is the principal rice production area in Vietnam and also is a
- major source of coconut, banana, and other fruits. In the northern portion
of the Delta, extending from the Cambodian frontier, there lies an extensive,
poorly drained marsh, the Plain of Reeds. Mangrove forests line much of
the coast of the Delta and occupy two particularly large areas, the Camau
Peninsula in the far south, and the U Minh Forest in the v/est.
The Mekong Terrace region constitutes a wide band lying north
of the Delta region, extending from Cambodia to the sea. Its area is about
30/000 square kilometers. Somewhat more elevated than the Delta but still
mostly flat, this region is heavily forested in the north and mostly cleared
for fanning in the south. It possesses a wide-variety of soils and drainage
conditions/ supporting not only rice but many other crops, including fruits,
fibres, sugar and rubber. The population is approximately six million,
half of it in Saigon and its environs. Two of the principal rivers of this
region, the Saigon and the Dong Nai, join just south of Saigon and then
branch into a complex of meandering channels in a mangrove forest known
as the Rung Sat. One of these channels is the main shipping route linking
Saigon to the South China Sea.
The 'Highland, region of South Vietnam, occupying about 65,000
square kilometers but containing only about a million people, extends northward from the Terrc.ce region all the way to the demilitarized zone which

�10

divides Vietnam at the seventeenth parallel. On the east it is bounded
by the Truong-Son range, which rises steeply out of the coastal plain, and
on the west by Cambodia and Laos. The Truong-Son slopes gradually to
the west forming an area of rugged mountains and plateaus penetrated in
places by low plains opening into Cambodia.
As recently as twenty years ago this region was inhabited almost
entirely by Montagnards. Even now, after a major influx of lowland Vietnamese, the Montagnards constitute more than half of the population.
Most of the Highland region is forested. There are also large
areas covered with grass, brush, or bamboo. A large fraction of the forest
is kept at an early stage of development by the Montagnard practice known
as sv/idden agriculture. The forest is cut and burned, farmed for rice,
vegetables, and other crops for two or more years until the land loses its
productivity, and then allowed to lie fallow for several years before the cycle
is repeated.
Although most of the inhabitants of the highland region are
subsistence farmers, there is intensive commercial cultivation of vegetables,
fruits, coffee, tea, and rubber in some areas. The large-scale production
of vegetables for the Saigon market in the vicinity of Dalat is particularly
noteworthy.
The Coastal Plains region, covering about 25,000 square kilometers, is a narrow strip located between the mountains and the sea,

�il
extending from the Mekong Terrace region north to the seventeenth parallel.
The strip is constricted in several places where branches of the Truong-Son
range reach nearly to the sea, forming a series of large coastal plains. The
population is approximately four million. Little of the region is forested,
most of it being planted to rice, manioc, sweet potato, peanuts, and
sugar cane.
Climate;

South Vietnam has a warm humid climate. The mean

temperature is 25-27°C and the average yearly precipitation is approximately
150 to 300 cm, depending on location. The seasonal range of temperatures
is not large, less than 5°C in most places. Precipitation, however, is
subject to great seasonal variations. In all regions except the Coastal Plains,
the wetest season occurs in the summer when the prevailing winds are southwesterly, bringing warm humid air from the Gulf of Siam and the Bay of
Bengal. During this time the rains are usually not steady, but occur as
heavy afternoon showers. A pronounced dry season occurs during the
winter, when the wind is generally from the northeast. On the Coastal
Plains, the dry season starts late in the winter and lasts approximately half
the year. In this region, rainfall is highest in the autumn, with serious
flooding in some years. In the late autumn, the entire east coast of South
Vietnam is subject to typhoons coming from the South China Sea.
Land Cover:
be distributed as ibllows:

The cover types of South Vietnam are estimated to

�12

Forest
Hardwood
Mangrove
Rear ma ngrove
Rubber
Pine

Square Kilometers
100,000
2/800
2/000
1/000
1,800

.

Approximate total forest area

107,600

Other
Brush wood/ coffee and tea
plantations
Crops
Savannah
Dune grass and trees
Swamps and marshes
Urban areas

11,000
37,000
1,300
1,100
8,500
1 00

Water and unaccounted
Total area

7,200
.

173,800

Under the designation "forest" are included all lands with trees whose
crowns cover more than twenty percent of the area. Only about half of the
total forest area is stocked with trees of sufficient size for commercial
logging. Thus, the area covered by merchantable hardwoods is approximately 50/000 square kilometers. Of this, about two-thirds is in the Central Highland sand one-third in the Mekong Terrace region in a broad arc
extending across the country north of Saigon.
Administrative Divisionsi__and__Milita_ry^_Reg_ions;

South Vietnam

is administratively divided into forty-four provinces, plus six autonomous

�13

municipalities. Each province is divided into a number of districts which
are subdivided into villages. Each village contains several hamlets.
For military purposes, provinces are grouped into four Military
regions, formerly known as Corps Tactical Zones. Military Regions III and
IV generally correspond to the Meklong Terrace and the Mekong Delta regions,
respectively. The northernmost five provinces comprise Military Region I,
while the twelve remaining provinces to the south make up Military Region II,
both regions include highlands and coastal plains.

�14
MILITARY USE OF HERBICIDES IN SOUTH VIETNAM

The military use of herbicides in South Vietnam began on an
experimental scale in 1961. It became operational in 1962 with the aerial
spraying of twenty square kilometers of forest and three square kilometers
of crop land. Much of the spraying that year was conducted in the mangove forests of the Camau peninsula, at the southern extremity of the
country. In successive years, the use of herbicides grew rapidly, reaching a peak in 1967 and then declining somewhat in 1968 and 1969. Data for1970 is not yet available. An estimate of the area treated in each year
through 1969 is as follows:

Estimated Area Treated with Herbicides
in South Vietnam*
.Acres

Square Kilometers
2
(1 km = 247 acres)

Year

Forest Land

1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970

4,940
24,700
83,486
155,610
741,247
1,486,446
1,267, 110
1,221,415
DATA

741
247
10,374
65,949
101,517
221,312
63,726
65,700
NOT YET

5 , 68 1
24,947
93,860
221,559
842,764
1,707,758
1,330,836
1,287,115
AVAILABLE

Total

4j, 9 84, 95 4

529,566

5,514,410'

Crop Land

Total

Forest Land

Crop. Land

20
100
338
630

Total

3
1
42
267
421
896
258
266

3,422
6, 914
5,388
5,211

2, 154

22,336

3,001
6,018
5, 130
4,945

23
101
380
897

•'

20,182,

*The number of acres treated is calculated by multiplying the gallons of herbicide used by one-third. This procedure is based (cont. on following page)

�15

Herbicides Used in Vietnam. Three different formulations
account for nearly all of the herbicides disseminated in Vietnam. They
are known by the designations Orange/ White, and Blue, corresponding to
the color of the stripe painted around the 55-gallon drums in which they
are shipped from the United States. They are used in Vietnam as received,
without dilution. Their compositions as well as that of agent Purple, an
early formulation very similar to Orange, are shown in Table 1.
Orange has been the most extensively used, accounting for
approximately sixty percent of all herbicide consumption in Vietnam. It is
an undiluted mixture of the n~isobutyl esters of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T. Orange
acts as both a defoliant and a systemic plant killer on broad leafed and
woody vegetation. It has been used mainly for forest clearing and to a lesser

(continued from preceding page) on the fact that the average spraying rate
is taken to be approximately three gallons per acre of defoliated swath produced. The quantity of herbicide used is known rather accurately but the
estimation of the average area of the spray swath could be somewhat in
error. For example, records of actual spray flights suggest that at least
under some conditions approximately 1.4 acres of swath are produced for
each three gallons of herbicide sprayed. The total area estimates given
here are subject to at least two additional corrections. However/ neither
is very great. First, the calculated areas should be increased to take
account of spraying by helicopters and by ground equipment. This is not
included in the estimates given in the table, which refer only to spraying
done by C-123 fixed-wing aircraft. Judging from the reported total amount
of herbicide used by all types of equipment in 1968 and 1969, it appears
that no more than twenty percent was applied by means other than C-123
aircraft. Second, the calculated areas should be reduced by a factor
estimated as at least sixteen percent, because of the fact that some areas
have been treated more than once. As these two corrections tend to cancel
each other, and as neither is very great, they are not taken into account in
the table.

�16

Table 1
MILITARY HERBICIDES

Agent ORANGE: 2,4-D and 2 , 4 , 5 - T
Active Ingredients:
Concentrations:
Application:

Agent WHITE:

2,4-D and Piclorarn

Active Ingredients:
Concentrations:
Application:

Agent BLUE:

A 1:1 mixture of the n-butyl esters of
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and
2 , 4 / 5 -trichlorophenoxya cetic acid.
4.1 and 4 . 4 Ib./gal.
Undiluted at 3 gal./aere.

A 4:1 mixture of the tri-iso-propanolamine salts of
2,4-D and 4~amino-3, 5, 6-trichloro-picolinic acid
in water.
2.0 and 0.54 Ib./gal.
Undiluted at 3 gal ./acre.

Cacodvlic Acid

Active Ingredients:
Concentration:
Application:

A 6:1 mixture of sodium dimethyl arsonate and
dimethyl arsenic acid in water.
3.1 Ib/gal.
Undiluted at 3 gal ./aere.

�17

extent for-crop destruction. In tropical dicotyledenous forests, leaf fall
occurs in three to six weeks after application, with surviving trees or
branches refoliating within a year. Similar formulations are known on the
domestic herbicide market under the generic name of brush killers. One of
these, differing slightly from Orange by containing isobutyl 2,4,5-T as
an additional ingredient was used in Vietnam until 1965 under the name
Purple. The use of Orange was ordered stopped by the Department of Defense
in April 1970, because of concern arising from tests on. laboratory animals
showing commercial samples of 2,4,5-T to be teratogenic.
The next most commonly used herbicide is agent White, a water
solution of the tri-isoprop?nolamine salts of 2,4-D and picloram, together
with surfactants and a rust inhibitor. Accounting for approximately thirty
percent of total herbicide consumption, it was first introduced in quantity
in 1967 when the military demand for Orange outstripped the U . S . production
capacity for 2,4,5-T. White is mainly used for forest clearing, giving somewhat longer lasting results than Orange. Similar formulations are used in
the U.S. for spraying power line rights of way, although picloram is not
permitted for agricultural applications.
Agent Blue is a water solution of the sodium salt of cacodylic
acid (sodium dimethyl arsenate), plus surfactants, rust inhibitor, and antifoam. It makes up somewhat less than ten.percent of all herbicide used.

�18

It acts to desiccate or dry out vegetation with v/hich it comes into contact.
It is more effective on grasses than Orange or White and acts more rapidly,
withering all types of vegetation within a few days. It is used both for
defoliation and for crop destruction, particularly against rice.
Picloram, 2,4-D, and 2,4,5-T are all known as plant growth
regulators and cause similar physiological responses, including defoliation,
stimulation of growth, induction of callus formation, and striking changes
in the shapes of stems, fruits, leaves, and other plant parts. These herbicides may be absorbed either through the leaves or the roots. Under some
conditions, herbicide deposited on the leaves causes them to fall before
enough is transported to cause systemic poisoning of the entire plant. In
such cases the. plant often recovers. The biochemical mechanisms of
action of these chemicals are unknown, in spite of a great deal of research.
However, the main cause of plant death following systemic poisoning appears
to be unbalanced growth of tissue, particularly phloem, resulting in blockage
of nutrient flow, and in the formation of lesions vulnerable to microbial
•

infection.
M ethod .of..Ao pi i cat ion. Herbicide spraying in Vietnam is done
by fixed-wing aircraft, helicopters, and various types of ground equipment.
The principal means of application has been the twin-engine C-123 cargo
aircraft. Between January 1952 and January 1969, C~123s made more than
19,000 individual spray flights. The aircraft is fitted with a 950-gallon tank

�19

from which.the liquid herbicide is pumped at approximately 250 gallons
per minute to spray booms under each v/ing and to a third boom at the tail.
. It is discharged through thirty-two nozzles of 9.5 milimeter internal
*

diameter distributed along the three booms. When the herbicide hits the
airstream, it is dispersed into droplets having a mass mean diameter of
0.35 milimeters. One aircraft produces a rather sharply defined swath
of affected vegetation approximately 85 meters wide and 15 kilometers long,
depending somewhat on operating conditions. Records of individual spray
flights suggest that some swaths ar3 up to 100 meters wide and 18 kilometers
long. Standard operating conditions are~~an air speed of 240 kilometers per
hour and an altitude of 50 meters above tree top level.
In order to minimize inadvertent applications from drift and
volatilization, spraying is not supposed to be done when wind speed exceeds
15 kilomters per hour or temperature exceeds 29°C. Calculations based on
assumed drop size distributions suggest that even with a 15 kilometer per
hour wind, drift should not be an important problem beyond about 3 kilometers
from the line of application. However, the actual drop size distribution for the
C-123 equipment has not been measured in the field.
Aerial spraying by helicopter is done by the UH-1 "Huey" aircraft mounting a 200 gallon tank. For crop destruction missions, the application rate is sometimes reduced to about half the value delivered by C-123,
since even about 1 gallon of Blue per acre is enough to prevent the maturation of rice.

�20

Location of herbicide applications.

No systematic and

detailed information on the locations of herbicide spraying in Vietnam has
been made generally available, However, the U . S . Army Chemical Staff in
Saigon has kept a log for each C-123 mission since July 1965. Records for
spraying before that time may be on file in official archives kept in Omaha,
Nebraska, and St. Louis, Missouri. The log in Saigon includes the data
most relevant to any study of herbicide effects. These are the dates and map
coordinates of spraying, the type of herbicide, and the quantity actually
sprayed. Map coordinates are given to the nearest 100 meters. At present,
this information is classified Confidential.
Although truly satisfactory information is unavailable at present,
it is possible to put together a rough idea of the amount of terrain of different
types that has been sprayed and of the location of the principal areas of
heavy exposure. This has been done on the basis of published information
and aerial observations made by ourselves and by others.
Tropical Hardwoods. The greatest expenditure of herbicides
in Vietnam has been on fairly mature tropical hardwood forest. Flamm
places the area of such forest sprayed through 1969 at 13,500 square kilometers, about a third of it sprayed more than once. Hardwood forests of
one kind or another and in various conditions make up about nine-tenths of
forested land in south Vietnam. The forestry services of the French colonial
government estimated the total area of economically valuable hardwood

�21

forests at 50,000 square kilometers, leaving out forests that were badly
degraded, very young, or located on particularly inaccessible mountain
terrain. A recent estimate of the total hardwood forest estate, based on low
resolution aerial photography and on U. S. Army terrain travel difficulty
maps is 100,000 square kilometers. However, this includes a large
fraction of the forest in the central highlands that is kept at a very early
successional stage by swidden agriculture. An intermediate value, about
75,000 square kilometers, can be estimated from a vegetation map published
by the Government of Vietnam. As a rough approximation then, it appears
that some twenty percent of the relatively mature hardwood forest has been
treated with herbicides, a third of it more than once.

Mangrove and Rear Mancrrove. To the southwest of Saigon, and
along much of the coast of the Delta, are dense mangrove forests covering
about 3,000 square kilometers. According to Tschirley, about one-third of
this forest type had been sprayed by the end of 1967. With continued herbicide operations in the Delta, the proportion is now probably close to one
half. Inland from the mangroves in the western part of the delta are nearly
2,000 square kilometers of forests of Melaleu ca 1 eucadendron, sometimes
called rear mangrove. We are unaware of how much, if any, of this forest
type has been sprayed,

�22

Strip Spraying. Aside from blocks of forest within which herbicides have been extensively applied, a considerable amount of spraying
has been done in short narrow strips scattered v/idely throughout South
Vietnam. Strip (as opposed to bloc) spraying has been done along roadsides,
perimeters of military installations and also in forests. In the Delta, it has
been done along canals and rivers. Although much of it has been accomplished
by C-123s, a large fraction has been done by helicopters and therefore may not
have been systematically recorded.
Crop Destruction.

Finally, somewhat more than 2 , 0 0 0 square

kilometers of cropland is reported to have been sprayed. If little of this area
includes re-spraying, it would represent about five percent of the 38,000
square kilometers of crop land in South Vietnam of which a little over two
percent was sprayed in the peak year of 1967. Being located almost entirely
in the central highlands, rather than on more productive soil, the percentage
of the total national crop production affected would be less than the
percentage of South Vietnamese farmland that has been sprayed. However,
only about a tenth of South Vietnam's farm land is in the highlands, so that
within this region a considerable fraction of the farmland has been sprayed.

�23

HERBICIDE TOXICOLOGY: STILLBIRTHS AND BIRTH DEFECTS
HAC OBSERVATIONS AND PROBLEMS FOR STUDY
The following is an analysis of the work which was done by
the HAC in the evaluation of the feasibility of demonstrating any change in
the pattern of births in Vietnam which might have resulted from the exposure
of some of the Vietnamese population to 2 , 4 , 5 - T , o r its contaminant dioxin, agents
certain animals,
which have been reported to be teratogenic under certain laboratory conditions in /
If indeed any such effects of the 2 , 4 , 5 - T exposure on the
Vietnamese population are to be detected, it would be appropriate to study
these in at least four ways, looking for:
1.

Changes in the occurrence of malformations and/or still
births in a relatively stable population.

2.

Changes in the frequency of any of the more common
identifiable malformations in relation to other common
malformations.

3.

The relatively sudden appearance of an otherwise very rare or
unknown deformity in significant numbers (the classical
previous example being thalidomide induced phocomelia).

4.

Changes in the incidence of specific abnormalities, anatomical
or biologic, that have been shown to result from laboratory
experiments with 2-4-5,T in animals.

Consideration will be given to each of these possibilities. All of them are
somewhat difficult to examine precisely but numbers two and three are, we

�24

believe, subject to relatively precise evaluation even under war time
conditions in Vietnam, while the first and last are a great deal more difficult to elucidate. These methods of study are all subject to very significant limitations, some of which are now presented.
Size and Accessibility of the Population Exposed Directly to
throughout this report,
Herbicides. Although, as frequently noted/precise information as to all the
locations of herbicide spraying has not been made available to the HAC; and
it is therefore, difficult to be certain how much defoliation has in fact been
done in more densely populated areas, it nevertheless appears to be true
that the bulk of Agent Orange used in Vietnam has been sprayed in relatively
remote and sparsely populated areas of mangrove and other forests. This
figure is particularly hard to estimate since the crop destruction program is
carried out in more populated areas and although Agent Blue (without 2,4,5-T)
has been favored for this, Agent Orange has also been used.
The population directly exposed to 2,4,5-T presumably does not exceed
five percent (and may even be one percent or less) of the total population of
Vietnam, although this must be more accurately determined from precise spray
apparent
data. This factor alone strikingly dilutes any/effects of the spraying on birth
when
statistics / those directly exposed are a d d e d to the total statistics of
the country, but this effect is even more accentuated by the fact that most
of this population is necessarily in remote and usually insecure areas and
therefore information regarding medical effects, if any, can only be gradually
expected to filter out from the sites of direct exposure. An unknown proportion, but probably quite significant, of the exposed population, consists of

�25

Montagnard people whose births are normally at home or in villages and
are rarely recorded in the Government of Vietnam medical system or allowed
. for in the GVN statistics.
Status of Records: Availability and Accuracy. In general/
maternity records are in some respects among the most reliable available
to the field investigator in Vietnam. Traditionally/ midwifery in Vietnam has
been strictly independent and, employing female mid wives/ has been rather
less subject to change of personnel than has the rest of the Vietnamese
health system. In all hospitals or dispensaries staffed by a midwife, whether
national or rural, a daily record book is kept in which all deliveries are
recorded.

It is agreed by almost all observers that this record, providing

the original has not been lost/ is reasonably accurate as far as the limited
information it contains. Thus, it is our feeling that almost complete accuracy
is available concerning the number of births, sex of the children, weight of
the newborn and whether or not the infant survived. In theory, obstetrical
abnormalities or infant malfonnations are recorded. If these are positively
noted in a record, then they are reliable, at least within the diagnostic
acumen of the midwife recording them, but, as will be shown subsequently
a negative record is of no significance whatsoever.

It is our belief that

within these simple statistics/ the accuracy of provincial hospitals, district
hospitals, and village dispensaries is comparable. This assumption may not
be strictly true and is subject to factors such as the desirability of registration of living children, which might lead to the concealment of a stillbirth
or neonatal death; or the

reluctance of village or district mid wives to report

�26

large numbers of stillbirths when transfer of difficult cases to the provincial hospital is expected by the Ministry of Health. Nonetheless, the
uniform agreement of numerous Vietnamese doctors and midwives with whom
we consulted that this reporting is usually reliable, supports our opinion.
In the capital area (Saigon-Gia Dinh) modern statistical methods have been
introduced, particularly at Tu-Du, and increasing accuracy is reflected
thereby.
The Vietnamese Health System. The Ministry of Health provision for the medical care of the people of Vietnam is through a system of
rather strictly graded medical facilities. A village will often, but not always,
contain a dispensary of extreme simplicity staffed by a rural health worker
and/or midwife with only a few months training. Nonetheless, in one
province studied by the HAG nearly twice as many births were recorded in
village dispensaries as in the provincial hospital for a comparable period.
All district capitals have a dispensary and at the time of the
visit of the HAG it was reported by the Ministry of Health that all of these
were at least partially staffed. Personnel usually include national health
workers and midwives, many of whom are well trained, but these facilities
do not normally have a doctor available and except for deliveries usually do
not have in-patient facilities. In the province studied in detail by the HAG
the district dispensaries delivered somewhat fewer children than the provincial hospital.

�27

All provincial capitals have a hospital with doctors as well
as nationally trained nurses and mid wives. There is a very wide range of
quality among these facilities and some overlap, with certain district
dispensaries better staffed and equipped than some provincial hospitals.
In addition, there are the medical facilities x in the larger cities, not provincial capitals, including Da-Nang and Saigon. These include specialty
hospitals arid, in general, the best facilities in the country.
Because of their accessibility and concentration of more interesting
patients, most studies of Vietnamese medical statistics have been made at
the level of provincial and city hospitals although most patients, and
particularly a large number of deliveries, are, in fact, cared for at the
district and village level. Records of these smaller facilities show a strikingly lower level of stillbirths and obstetrical difficulties than do provincial
hospitals. This is believed to be a true statement of the facts by Ministry
of Health officials and the HAG, and presumably reflects the referring of "' „
difficult cases to provincial or city hospitals. Military security and
adequacy of transportation will, of course, improve the degree of referral
and tend to increase the differential reported between the two groups of reporting hospitals. In the capital, approximately one quarter of the babies are
delivered at Tu Du, a large teaching hospital devoted exclusively to maternity,
another quarter are delivered at other government hospitals, and about onehalf at private maternities. These latter are very quick to refer patients to

�28

the government hospitals and report essentially no complications for fear of
difficulties with the Ministry of Health. In this respect, it is of interest to
note that nearly one-half of the total maternal deaths reported by Tu Du in
1965 were, in fact, referred "in extremis" from outside hospitals. The
official health statistic report of the government of Vietnam for 1967 states:
"Moreover, private maternities dare not tell the truth on the deaths of who
carne for delivery."
The registration of births in the Republic of Vietnam is still very
incomplete. It is believed that close to all of the births in the capital area
are registered. In the remainder of the country, current government estimates
are that about one-half of all births are registered in any form and, as we shall
see in the case of Tay Ninh, the provincial hospital itself may not be an
accurate reflection of figures for the entire province. Although we emphasize
the accuracy as to birth weights and stillborns of the midwife record books when
they can be consulted in their original form it cannot be over-stressed that
the recording of congenital abnormalities is extremely patchy and seems to
reflect the interest of the midwife at different periods. The midwives from
whom we received such good help in this study nearly uniformly agreed as
to this deficiency.
Even when malformations are recorded, their nature is often
incompletely noted. Only in the capital is cleft palate distinguished from
cleft lip in the records and a number of midwives agreed that the inside of
the mouth of the infants was almost never examined. The nature of fatal
anomalies is very rarely recorded and essentially no autopsies are performed
on stillborns.

�29

Rates of Stillbirths and Reported Congenital Anomalies in the
Capital arid Provinces.

The extensive study of congenital malformations

hydatidiform moles and stillbirths in the Republic of Vietnam 1960-1969
carried out under the auspices of the Department of the Army and the
Vietnamese Ministry of Health by a team headed by Dr. Robert T. Cutting
has row become available and most of the more.limited investigations carried
out by the HAC will be related to this major army undertaking. Unfortunately,
in spite of persistant efforts, this material was not available to the HAC at
the time of their visit to Vietnam.
Saigon. Studies of the records of Tu Du for the last decade,
which include about one-quarter of registered Saigon deliveries and covering
between 12,000 and 30,000 births a year, show a definite decrease in still-

0

birth rates. There was a noteable discontinuity in 1967 when the rate fell W
from 36 per thousand in 1966 and 38 per thousand in 1965 to 26 per thousand
and remained at this lower level for 1968 and at 29 per thousand in 1969.

&lt;• j
''*\^

v

During the same period, there was a slight reduction in the overall rate of
recorded malformations. It is the opinion of the medical staff at Tu Du that
some, at least, of the reduction of the stillbirth rate is from considerably
improved medical care as shown by the fact that in the years 1963-1964 no babies
under a kilogram in weight survived out of 310 being born alive while in .1965
and 1966, 55 survived out of 391 delivered.
The rate of hydatidiformnioles at Tu Du also dropped slightly. It
should be noted that the figures for moles at Tu Du reported by Cutting do

�30

not include choriocarcinomas which at most provincial hospitals are
included in the mole figures and would raise the Tu Du percentage by
nearly twenty percent during the years 1963 and 1964.
Countrywide Data.

The Cutting study reports a general down-

trend in stillbirths during the period 1960-1969, taking all of the data
together. This is shown by the solid line in Figure 1. Grouping these
countrywide data into pre- and light-spraying years (1960-1965) and heavy
spraying years (1966-1969), the stillbirth rates are found to average 36.1 and
32.0 per thousand live births, respectively. Finding a similar downward
trend in moles and deformities, Cutting concludes that "Sorting the data
into two time periods, before (1960-1965) and after (1966-1969) the large
scale military use of herbicides, failed to show any effect of herbicides.
Rather, a downward trend was observed in all categories of abnormal birth
events." However, these trends are caused by the data from the capital
area (Tu Du, Hung Vuong, Bien Hoa), which account for approximately twothirds of the births studied. When the data for the capital are subtracted
the trends are reversed. This may be seen below.

�31

Abnormal Birth Events as Reported by Cutting
Rates per Thousand Llvebirths
Light-spray ing
(1960-1965)

Heavy-spraying
(196C-1969)

Countrywide
Stillbirths
Moles
Malformations

36.1
6.6
5.5

32.0
5.6
4.5

Countrywide minus Capitol
Stillbirths
Moles
Malformations

32.0
3.1
2.3

38.5
5.3
3.1

Plotted year by year, the countrywide data with the capital area
subtracted

shows a decided upward trend, peaking in 1967, as shown by

the dashed line in Figure 1.
Tay Ninh. Rather than attempting to survey the provincial
hospitals from a large number of areas, the HAG concentrated their efforts
on the study of possible changes in malformation and stillbirth rates in the
province of Tay Ninh. Although, as in other areas where agent Orange has
been used mainly for forest defoliation (as opposed to crop destruction)the
total number of directly exposed Vietnamese is probably low, the northern
portion of Tay Ninh has been heavily defoliated and the rivers draining the
areas of defoliants run through the remainder of the province and are a source
of fish for some of the population.
As has been noted by Cutting, the earlier maternity records of
the Tay Ninh City provincial hospital and most of the Tay Ninh district

�32

dispensaries are no longer available but we were fortunate in being able
to study the daily record book in its original form at the provincial hospital
for the years 1968 through 1970, although this was apparently not available
to the army group. Study of these records was of interest and in striking
contrast to the figures reported by Cutting. Although two months (November
and December 1968) are missing from the original data book and only
Ministry of Health summaries could be obtained, a higher rate of stillbirths,
64 per thousand livebirths, was shown from these records in Tay Ninh than
recorded anywhere else by Cutting and his group. The HAC noted 351 stillbirths in the years 1968 and 1969, the years for which Cutting reports 208.
The data for Tay Ninh City provincial hospital are as follows:

Year

1968
1969
1970 (7 mos.)

Livebirths
2,765
2,361
1,688

Stillbirths

Rate per
1,000 Livebirths

161
190
171

58.0
80.5
101.0

It was very striking that among 2,551 births recorded in 1969,
not a single specific congenital deformity or malformation was noted. The
nudwives, the chief of whom had been there for ten years, agreed that a
fair number of deformities had been seen but had not been, in fact, recorded.

*It was noted that in 1969, while 184 stillbirths were reported in the summaries
given at the end of each month in the data book if every birth registered was
individually examined, 190 stillbirths were noted.

�33

We were able to .survey all of the reported births from village,
districts, and provincial facilities in Tay Ninh for some recent months and
in this way try and weigh appropriately the importance of the provincial
hospital as a reporting agency.
Tay Ninh City provincial hospital has shown a remarkable
monthly uniformity in births since 1967 with annual totals something under
3,000.

Records have also bo&lt;&gt;n faily consistent from the two larger of the
Year
1967 (9 utos./
1968
1969
1970 (7 n.os.)

Livebirths
1,818
2,765
2,361
1,688

'As recorded by C u t t i n g . Original data book unavailable to HAG.
four district dispensaries in lh o province. The largest, Heiu Thien, with
1,000 births per year approximates a provincial hospital as a facility. For
four months in 1970 essentially complete figures are available from all of
the districts and villages in Tay Ninh province as well as the provincial hospitals. These include all medical facilities reporting to the Ministry of
Health and are said by their otficials to include over seventy percent of
total births in the district. They show that during this period, February
through June 1970 (excluding April for which reports were incomplete) 2,281
births with 20 stillbirths (i.o., 8.8 per thousand Uvebirths) were reported

�34

from the districts and villages with the village dispensaries accounting for
about two-thirds of this number, while during the same period, Tay Ninh
City Provincial Hospital reported one-half as many births, 1,028, v/ith 89
stillbirths (i.e., 95 per thousand livebirths), more than ten times that of
the outlying districts. Clearly, therefore, the birth statistics from Tay
Ninh City Provincial Hospital, with a stillbirth rate of 95 per thousand,
are quite different from those from all of Tay Ninh Province including
villages and districts which reported a combined total of 3,309 births with
109 stillbirths or a rate of 34 per 1,000 livebirths. Although specific determinations were not made in other provinces, except partially in the Rung
Sat, it is expected that differing degrees of variations of this sort will be found in
all provincial capital hospital statistics as compared to complete provinces.
It is noted that if the districts and villages were able to reduce their stillbirth rate by one-half, by referral, this v/ould not be sufficient to fully
explain the discrepancy in stillbirth rates. Better than fifty percent prenatal
diagnosis of impending stillbirth is unlikely to be consistently possible. We
do not know the reason for this striking difference in Tay Ninh. We note that
all districts surveyed by Cutting in various parts of Vietnam also showed very
low stillbirth rates.
An incidental study was made of the prevalence of twinning at
Tay Ninh City Hospital. For the period July 1968 to July 1970 (excluding
the two months in 1970 for which no figures are available) 79 multiple
births occurred, including one set of triplets, out of a total of 7,010; or
approximately 11.2 per 1,000, almost exactly the same figure as reported
by Drs. Oliver and Hong tor Saigon in 1952 to 1962.

�35

Rung Sat.

A similar, less extensive survey, of the RSSZ

area was carried out. Dispensaries at Can Gio and Quang Xuyen closely
bordering the defoliated mangrove forest annually reported several hundred
births with very low rates of stillbirths and no deformities recorded. We
were definitely informed that any patient with impending stillbirth or evidence
of obstetrical complications was referred to Vung Tau. Although Vung Tau
serves as the provincial hospital for this area, it is not in fact the provincial
capital but an independent city. Vung Tau Hospital with a monthly birth rate
very close to that of Tay Minn showed a strikingly lower rate of stillbirths;
26 per 1,000 in 1968 and 30 per 1,000 in 1969 (9 months) and 22 per thousand
in 1970 (7 months).

The rate of twinning was 8.9 per 1,000 (54 out of 6,198).

It is of interest that among this large number of births only one mole is
recorded. This patient was transferred to Tu Du in Saigon. During the same
period, a total of 6,198 births were reported with no congenital abnormalities
recorded.
Although Vung Tau includes in its referral area a zone of intensive
defoliation of mangroves, most of its patients may be supposed to have had
minimal herbicide exposure either directly or possibly through the food
chain. They apparently do not regularly eat fish from streams emanating
from sprayed forests as do the inhabitants of Tay Ninh.

*The actual figures were 2,569 births and 67 stillbirths in 1968; 2,179 births
and 64 stillbirths in nine months of 1969; and 1,450 births and 31 stillbirths
in seven months of 1970.

�36

.Conclusions. For the proper comparison of provincial birth
statistics it is essential that total provincial figures including district
and village dispensaries and allowance for referral out of the province
be obtained. This has been done by the HAC for Tay Ninh. Other total
provincial figures not being in hand for comparison, the fact nonetheless
remains that Tay Ninh City Provincial Hospital, serving a heavily defoliated
province, showed an average stillbirth rate in 1968 and 1969 of 68 per 1,000
livebirths. During this same time, the Tu Du rate v/as 27.5 per 1,000 and
that of the Army sample of the entire country 31.2 per 1,000. The rate of 68
per 1,000 is higher than any reported from any provincial hospital by Cutting.
Changes in the Prevalence of Common Congenital Anomalies:
Saigon Childrens Hospital. In attempting to analyze the frequency of
different congenital abnormalities in Vietnam, in contrast to their absolute
frequency, we are very fortunate to have the elaborate study of all of the
abnormalities seen at the Saigon Childrens Hospital prepared by Dr. Le Anh,
an analysis of the 4,002 cases of congenital abnormality seen for the period
1959 to 1968. Her study is complete in that every case is evaluated and
there are no "miscellaneous" or "other" categories as is characteristic of
almost one-half ot the malformations reported by the few maternity hospitals
that do, in fact, report any significant number of deformities. Dr. Le Anh
is well aware of sophisticated methods of describing and subdividing anomalies
and of recent etiological considerations. Whereas, most other Vietnamese

�37

hospitals would not distinguish cleft lip from cleft palate, if reporting the
deformity at all, Dr . Le Anh carefully distinguishes them.
The annual admission rate for congenital anomalies at the Saigon
Childrens Hospital has been almost the same for the years 1964 to 1968 (618,

565, 650, 667, and 554).
Saigon Childrens Hospital is the only special childrens hospital in
Saigon, or in fact in Vietnam, and during these years would have received most
children that could be referred for possible surgical correction of congenital
anomalies. Recently the establishment of the CMRI Unit at Cho Ray has added
another facility. This unit started in July of 1968. The CMRI has tended to
draw patients from the provinces even more than has the Saigon Childrens Hospital, arid their activity may account for the slight decrease in Saigon Childrens
Hospital congenital anomalies admitted in the last year. Nonetheless, the vast
majority of types of anomalies treated by the Saigon Childrens Hospital are
never seen at CMRI. The CMRI from July 30, 1968 to February 1970 repaired
no less than 381 cases of cleft lip and 180 cases of cleft palate.
Saigon Childrens Hospital—types of^cases. Saigon Childrens
Hospital does not have an obstetrical unit and they accept only cases for which
surgery might be indicated and only children that survive long enough for transfer
to be accomplished. Their statistics, therefore, represent a very selected
group of congenital anomalies but among these their statistics should reflect
any relative change of frequency.
Saigon Childrens Hospital—sources of patients. Although
Dr. Le Anh's report does not analyze the individual provincial origin of each
of the 4,002 anomalies, there is an analysis of provincial origin of all cases
over the years. Of 4,002 admissions, 1,57'z came from Saigon and Cho Lon,

�38

910 from Gia Dinh, 293 from Long An, 164 Dinh Tuong, 162 from Bien Hoa,
all of these being rather near the capital. Eight other provinces sent in
fifty or more cases during the decade and each of the other provinces
of South Viet Nam supplied a few cases. The Saigon Childrens Hospital
series, therefore, predominately represents material from the capital and
surrounding areas but all of the country is represented.
Saigon ^Chilfo
Numbers J?reaJ:ej:^

Relation to
In the years 1964 to 1968 Tu Du reported

about one-quarter of all Saigon deliveries including a total of 680 malformations,
approximately one-half of which survived. During the same period, the
Saigon Childrens Hospital admitted 3,054 case's of which about 1,900 were
from Saigon. Even if every one of the surviving anomalies from Tu Du (340)
were, in fact, admitted to the Saigon Childrens Hospital and these represented
a quarter of all of those born in. Saigon, then at the most only something just
over half of all malformations occuring were being reported by the capital area
maternities. It would appear that completeness of recording by maternities
is very different for different types of congenital anomalies. Some obvious
anomalies such as cleft lip would appear to be fairly accurately reported.
During these same years, Tu Du reported 132 surviving patients with cleft
lips. During this time, Saigon Childrens Hospital admitted 408 cleft lips, 55
cleft palates and 83 combined cleft lip and palates or a total of 546 cleft
lips of all types of which about 380 originated in Saigon. If all of the

�39

children with cleft lips were in fact referred to the Saigon Childrens Hospital
and if Tu Du was reporting one-quarter of those born in Saigon these figures
would be consistent with reasonably accurate reporting by Tu Du.
Other deformities are grossly incorrectly reported and one of the
most interesting of these is imperforate anus. This, except in the very rare
forms where the obstruction is not at the anal orifice itself, is very easy to
recognize, has been known fora long time, is subject to surgical repair and
although requiring correction is not immediately fatal so would not result in
the victim's being reported as a stillbirth.

The Saigon Childrens Hospital

figures show that this is one of the commonest abnormalities admitted there
with 453 cases being admitted in ten years. In 1964, 1965 and 1966, Tu Du
reported only eight surviving cases of imperforate anus. During the same
period, Saigon Childrens Hospital admitted 139 cases, about .120 coming from
Saigon. It is of some interest that Cutting in his list of all reported malformations among 480,087 live births reports only six cases of imperforate anus
from all maternities when very many more would have been expected. As
another example, the Saigon Childrens Hospital reports 44 cases of spina
Bifida during the decade with Tu Du reporting only 3 cases during most of this
period and Cutting reporting only 8 cases out of 480,087 live births in the
same period.
Chang e sin Cert a in Ano ma]:',e s. The figures from Saigon Childrens
Hospital show no

apparent

change in the relative frequency

�40

of any anomalies aside from the three exceptions detailed below.

Year

Total Cases

Club Foot

Cleft Palate

1959
1960
1961

61
214
196
335
142
618

3
2
1
0
0
2
1
1
8
2

0
1
1
1
0
5
2
12
23
13

- 1962
-&lt; M963
' '1964
'1965
J966
1967
1968

«a
usi
3111
^V.
^53
1««*
'Wi

565
650

651
554
'/"\ *•*

Spina Bifida
n,f.
I
2
1
3
73
£2
^3
/&lt;? 4
T
7 1
4
&lt;*"66 1
' 13
n!2

x1!1 1 ^ ry\v\

Cleft Lip*
2
40
17
48
17
102
60
69
110
67

+ *~\&gt; ns\ rv\v» T^I **•{ r* ^^*^
**

The number of club feet reported is so small, and so small a percentage of
those born are referred to the Saigon Childrens Hospital, that these figures
are recorded for completeness only. Great caution is necessary in any
interpretation of these figures. Although the total cases seen at Saigon
Childrens Hospital of both spina bifida and cleft palate have shown significant increase the relative rates (to total admission for congenital defects)
were fairly high in the period 1959-1963. During this time the hospital was
subject to severe vicissitudes—political and other—and it may well be that
serious anomalies absolutely requiring treatment such as most cases of
spina bifida but not cleft palate would relatively increase, but this is only
a supposition. The increase in spina bifida in 1967 and 1968 may be
because of better recognition by x-ray but Dr. Le Anh in noting this rathe*

3^ striking increase, did not consider this possibility and Dr. Tran Ngoc Ninh,
y

chief of the Saigon Childrens Hospital, could offer no explanation for the

�41

increase. The change in cleft palate frequency may, of course, reflect
better examinations with the patient's mouth being open. Recent enthusiasm
and availability of cleft lip repair has increased the search for these cases—
often by American soldiers—and some pure cleft palate may have been
incidentally brought to treatment. The repair in 1968-1970 of .180 cleft
palates at CMRI is of interest but we have not determined how many of
these were pure cleft palates without associated cleft lip as is true of the
Saigon Childrens Hospital series. Careful studies are certainly indicated
as to the nature, provincial origin and future frequency of these cases.
Conclusions. Most surgically correctable congenital anomalies
treated by the Saigon Childrens Hospital have shown no major change in
their relative frequency of occurrence during the last decade. There are
two notable exceptions to this. The occurrence of spina bifida and pure
cleft palate (withoutassociated cleft lip) have both shown unexplained increases during the last three years but as noted many factors may have caused
this numerical increase at Saigon Childrens Hospital.
The Occurrence of Rare Striking Anomalies. Three principle
sources of information are available to try and determine whether any striking visible unusual anomaly has occurred in Vietnam in recent years. It is
to be remembered that any anomaly that resulted in a stillbirth is unlikely
to be noted. Autopsies are not being performed and the nature of monsters
is not being recorded. Only an easily detectable non-fatal anomaly would

�.'

'

I

,'

3

'

42

be observed. It is the belief of the IIAC that such changes have, in fact,
probably not occurred on the basis of three principal sources of information.
1.

The Saigon Childrens Hospital report which shows no listing
of a new or striking abnormality. Saigon Childrens Hospital
might not have been aware of an anomaly that was not appropriate for surgery. On the other hand, the author of this study
is fully familiar with, for example, thalidomide induced phocomelia, and no suggestive anomalies appear on the total list.

2.

Another source of information is the Minister of Health,
Dr. Tran Minn Tung, who felt confident that even a single
case of any striking phocomelia type abnormality born anywhere within the government system would be reported to him
within a short time and who was unaware of any such changes in
spite of a certain number of suggestive articles in the Vietnamese
press.

3.

Perhaps the best source is Father Lichtenberger, Professor of
Genetics at the Faculty of Saigon, geneticist to Tu Du Hospital
and the best known expert on chromosome abnormalities in
Vietnam. He has lived in Vietnam for many years and has seen
many of the interesting monsters of one sort or another occurring
in Saigon and some of the other parts of the country. He has not
been aware of any suggestive changes.

�43

Changes in the Indicence of Specific Abnormalities Related to
Laboratory Experiments.

Laboratory experiments in animals with 2 , 4 / 5 - T

indicates toxicity to the gastro-intestinal tract with hemorrhage and other
changes. Cystic kidneys have been demonstrated as well as a few cases
of cleft palate in the offspring of exposed pregnant animals.
Specific search has not been made among the exposed Vietnamese
population for gastro-intestinal tract or urinary tract changes that might be
present. It must be remembered that only a very small percentage of congenital abnormalities and malformations are visible and easily detected. Many
biochemical and other occult abnormalities, although with significant effects
on life expectancy, only can be demonstrated with laboratory study generally
unavailable in Vietnam.
Conclusion: Laboratory study would indicate that possible
teratogenic effects of 2,4,5-T may be of a nature very difficult to identify
in Vietnam.
Ovcra 1.1 Conclus ion s:

Studies of changing rates of stillbirths,

particularly as reported by the government maternity system are subject to
great errors of interpretation even when they are made somewhat more valid
by the inclusion of total provincial figures. Although the reported rate of
stillbirths in Tay Ninh province, extensive areas of which were treated by
2,4/5-T, are higher than the highest provincial hospital rates reported by
Cutting, this type of evidence is not sufficient to draw any firm etiological
conclusion. The same must be said of the sharp upward trend in stillbirths

�'»&lt;&gt;•&gt;*

44

recorded by Cutting for areas outside of the capital. Even more difficult
is any estimate of tits rate of congenital malformations, the variations in
the reporting by different maternities making the figures useless for statistical comparison.
There has been a considerable increase in the cases of spina
bifidei and cleft palate (without cleft lip) reported at the Saigon Childrens
.Hospital. Otherwise, the HAG is fairly confident

in reporting that there

has been no significant change in frequency of any of the relatively common
congenital anomalies consistent with life that might appear at a childrens
uobpital among those patients presenting themselves for treatment in the
GVN health system.

The HAC found no evidence of any new striking\bnor-

mality of a congenital type and consistent with life occurring in Vietnam ir
recent years but this statement1 is made with the recognition that much of
the directly exposed population is unavailable for study at this time.
Future Direction of Studies. The following areas would seem to
require more exhaustive investigation along the lines of thought of the
preceeding chapter.
1.

With the aid of local Vietnamese authorities and, it is to be
hoped, with the complete spray data available from the U. S.
Department of Defense, the Vietnamese population exposed to
2,4,5-T could be much more precisely identified and isolated
and tl&gt;e individuals studied for possible effects of the agent.

�45

This would particularly include very careful studies of
gastro-intestinal tract, urological tract and biochemical
changes of children born after exposure.
2.

In specially selected defoliated areas of the country, more
careful autopsy of monsters and other stillborns arid neonatal
deaths with congenital abnormalities should be carried out.

3.

Further study is certainly indicated of the incidence of spina
befida and cleft palate in Vietnam with particular study of the
provincial origin and possible herbicide exposure of the patients
involved.

4.

Further careful provincial studies of rates of stillbirths with
efforts to accumulate data from all of a number of provinces both
sprayed and unsprayed for comparison should be done.

5.

Those children with defects should have careful studies as to
their origin and possible exposure to 2,4,5-T.

6.

Notes should be further taken of reported ill effects of 2,4,5-T
by both GVN and NLF, including chromosome changes reported
by the latter, and study made seeking for these effects
specifically among the Orange exposed population.

�46

Figure Legend
Figure 1:

Incidence of Stillbirths per One Thousand Livebirths, 1960-1969. Data are from the U. S.
Army—ON Ministry of Health study by Cutting,
et al.

The anomalously high stillbirth rate for

1960 for births outside the Capital is
based on relatively few reports.

Total
0

Total minus Capital Area (Saigon-Bien Hoa)

�47
n

»

*

5

i
i

V'v.,? &gt;. ''•• ..

r

f *

"n^rr- ••'"'.

" ,*

.,?

r

(i

....' «

u r

ii U

j)

j

,T

o

j

&lt; ..'.' 'j

:

V

.

;*

&gt;&gt;

i. ~....^'

ft »

-\ '
&gt;i C

'j

V.J&gt; ..„•

---

i)

ou
0

9

/\

vxC

! \
45 _

/?

0

1

, •. Sr

\

^
o

J

\

**j^

«_«,-/?*,
«

\

/

^

\

1

V .. ^
.^

o^

§

^ 30 —

1

//

\

e 35

\

1

aV

40

\

"

^

o
\
\
\
\

\

^

/
/
1
/
/

\tf

20

^

L
I960

i™m. ! , „, i , !
62

L

64

Year

1
66

•

1
68

i

�y ,•' t
« ' &gt;

The preceding has been printed in "War Related Civilian Problems
in Indochina, Part I: Vietnam. Hearings before the Subcommittee to Investigate
Problems Connected with Refugees and Escapees. Committee on the Judiciary.
U.S. Senate, 92nd Congress, 1st Session, 21 April 1971."

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="12032">
              <text>040</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="12034">
              <text>0900</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="12038">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12029">
                <text>Meselson, Matthew S.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="12030">
                <text>Arthur H. Westing</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="12031">
                <text>John D. Constable</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12033">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;Herbicide Assessment Commission of the American Association for the Advancement of Science</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12035">
                <text>War Related Civilian Problems in Indochina, Part 1: Vietnam. Hearings before the Subcommittee to investigate Problems Connected with Refugees and Escapees. Committee on the Judiciary. U. S. Senate, 92nd Congress, 1st Session, 21 April 1971.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12036">
                <text>1971</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12037">
                <text>Hearing: Background Material Relevant to Presentations at the 1970 Annual Meeting of the AAAS</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12039">
                <text>Southeast Asia</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="12040">
                <text>herbicide toxicology</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="12041">
                <text>legislation</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="12042">
                <text>veteran health and hygiene</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1900" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="11487">
              <text>038</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="11488">
              <text>0847</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="11492">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="11485">
                <text>Lacey, Pamela</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="11486">
                <text>Vincent A. Lacey</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="11489">
                <text>The Journal of Legal Medicine</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="11490">
                <text>1982</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="11491">
                <text>Agent Orange: Government Responsibility for the Military Use of Phenoxy Herbicides</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="11493">
                <text>Ranch Hand</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="11494">
                <text>dioxin</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="11495">
                <text>legislation</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="11496">
                <text>litigation</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1681" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="9252">
              <text>033</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="9253">
              <text>0628</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="9257">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9251">
                <text>Epstein, Samuel S.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9254">
                <text>Trial</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9255">
                <text>1983-11-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9256">
                <text>Problems of Causality, Burdens of Proof and Restitution: Agent Orange Diseases</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9258">
                <text>dioxin</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="9259">
                <text>health effects</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="9260">
                <text>legislation</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="9261">
                <text>litigation</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1677" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="9215">
              <text>033</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="9216">
              <text>0624</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="9220">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9214">
                <text>Ember, Lois R.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9217">
                <text>Chemical and Engineering News</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9218">
                <text>March 28 1983</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9219">
                <text>Legal Remedies for Toxics Victims Begin Taking Shape</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9221">
                <text>dioxin</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="9222">
                <text>Missouri</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="9223">
                <text>New York</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="9224">
                <text>legislation</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1642" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1259">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/bcc6c17157f0a97a565050a554e38d09.pdf</src>
        <authentication>5eb7456a98e018827f84bdc312ff1a75</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63208">
                    <text>Item ID Number

°0589

Author

Davis, Miriam

Corporate Author

Tne Llbrar

y of Congress Congressional Research Servic

Report/Article TltlO Agent Orange: Veterans' Complaints and Studies of
Health Effects, Issue Brief Number IB83043

Journal/Book Title
Yeer
Month/Day
Color

March 3

n

Number of Images

19

DeSCrlptOU NOtOS

Alvin L. Young filed this item under the category
"Human Exposure to Phenoxy Herbicides and TCDD"

Tuesday, February 20, 2001

Page 589 of 680

��AGENT ORANGE:

VETERANS' COMPLAINTS AND STUDIES OF HEALTH EFFECTS
ISSUE BRIEF NUMBER IB83043

AUTHOR:
Miriam

Davis

Environmental Health Fellow
Michael Simpson
Science Policy Research

Division

THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH

SERVICE

MAJOR ISSUES SYSTEM

DATE ORIGINATED 03/03/83
DATE UPDATED 03/03/83

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CALL 287-5700
0304

�CRS- 1

IB83043

UPDATE-03/03/83
I

ISSUE DEFINITION
From 1962 to 1971 the United States Air Force
(USAF) sprayed various
herbicides (chemicals that kill plants) in South Vietnam. The purpose of the
spraying was to defoliate jungle growth and to destroy enemy crops. The most
extensively used of these herbicide mixtures was known as Agent Orange, which
is an equal mix of two common herbicides called 2,4,5-T and
2,4-D
(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid).
A
contaminating chemical present in the mixture in small amounts was TCDD
(2 , 3 , 7 , 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-para-dioxin) , or simply "dioxin." Dioxin is a
contaminant produ-ced in the manufacture of 2,4,5-T.
Its toxic effects to
some laboratory animals are well known, yet its effects on humans are not
fully understood.
Since 1977, veterans have attributed a number of illnesses to Agent Orange
exposure, including skin conditions, cancer, fatigue, nervousness, numbness
in the extremities, vision and hearing impairments, birth defects in
children, and other
ailments.
Veterans
have
urged
the
Veterans
Administration (VA) to provide for medical treatment of these disorders and
many have filed for disability compensation.
Under P.L. 97-72, the Veterans' Health Care, Training, and Small Business
Loan Act of 1981, Congress directed the VA to furnish medical care to Vietnam
veterans, irrespective of age and financial status, for any condition which
might possibly have resulted from exposure to Agent Orange.
However,
disability compensation for the veterans' illnesses has been denied unless it
can be shown that the disabling condition began during the period of service.
This criterion of "service connection" effectively denies claims
for any
latent disorder arising from military service. Until a rigorous scientific
link between Agent Orange exposure and the health problems of the veterans
can be established, the Veterans Administration will probably continue to
deny the majority of veterans' requests for disability compensation.
The VA and other Federal agencies are sponsoring a variety of research
efforts to investigate the connection between Agent Orange and veterans'
health problems. Recent congressional interest has focused on the transfer
of responsibility from the VA to the Centers for Disease Control
for the
legislatively mandated epidemiology study of Vietnam veterans'
health
problems.
The following questions continue to surround the debate
effects of exposure to Agent Orange:

over

-- What are the adverse health effects of Agent Orange,
and what studies are being conducted to answer this
question?
-- How much and what kind of scientific evidence is
required to prove the right to disability compensation
for _the veterans?
-- On whom does the burden of proof lie to establish the
link between Agent Orange exposure and adverse health
effects?

the

health

�CRS- 2
—

IB83043

UPDATE-03/03/83'

What constitutes fair treatment of the veteran until
the scientific studies are concluded?

BACKGROUND AND POLICY ANALYSIS
History
The USAF operated its herbicide spraying program in South Vietnam until
the late 1960s when the National Cancer
Institute released animal
studies
which showed that the herbicide 2,4,5-T caused birth defects in mice. At the
same time, newspapers in Vietnam began to report health problems, including
birth defects, in rural populations which had been exposed to herbicides.
As the USAF was winding down its herbicide spraying program, it was also
recognized that the military supplies of 2,4,5,-T contained amounts of dioxin
suspected of being hazardous. The dioxin, which occurs as'a contaminant in
the manufacture of 2,4,5-T, has been found to be highly toxic to animals. In
fact, the birth defects previously attributed to 2,4,5-T exposure are now
thought possibly to be related to the contaminating dioxins. The average
levels of dioxin in the military Agent Orange were about 2 ppm.
There were
even greater concentrations of dioxin in other military herbicides less
frequently used in South Vietnam: approximately 32.8 ppm in Agent Purple, and
65.6 ppm in Agents Pink and Green.
In October 1969, the Air Force first restricted the use of Agent Orange to
areas remote from populations; then it stopped all airplane spraying of Agent
Orange in early 1970'and all helicopter spraying of Agent Orange by
1971.
All remaining Agent Orange stocks were gathered and stored at naval
facilities in either Gulfport, Mississippi, or Johnston Island in the Pacific
until they were incinerated at sea in 1977 during the PACER HO project.
The total amount of herbicides sprayed in South Vietnam from January
1962
to February 1971 was about 107 million pounds, according to a USAF report.
Approximately 276,000 gallons of Agents Green, Pink, and Purple were sprayed
in South Vietnam prior to 1965 when they were replaced by Agent Orange.
Approximately 11 million gallons of Agent Orange were then sprayed in South
Vietnam -- making it the most widely used herbicide of the war.
Ninety
percent of Agent Orange was sprayed on 2.9 million acres of inland
forests
and mangrove forests for defoliation, 8% was sprayed on enemy crops for crop
destruction, and the remaining 2% was sprayed around base perimeters, cache
sites, waterways, and communication lines.
The Department of Defense initially maintained that only a limited number
of U.S. military personnel could be positively identified as having been
exposed to Agent Orange i'n South Vietnam (i.e., the crews of aircraft that
were used to spray herbicides). However, following the publication of a 1979
General Accounting Office (GAO) report documenting ground troop exposure, the
DoD has acknowledged that greater numbers of ground troops were exposed to
Agent Orange through the USAF spraying program. Most recently, the DoD has
attempted to arrive at an exposure index for individual ground troops.
The American Medical Association has reported that about -2.4 million
Vietnam veterans may have been exposed to herbicides. This figure includes
ground troops, 1,200 flight crewmen who were responsible for the spraying
under Operation RANCH HAND, and 200 U.S civilians who were involved in
destroying the excess quantities of Agent Orange at sea. Details about U.S.
personnel exposures are presented in the following section.

�CRS- 3

IB83043

UPDATE-03/03/83

V

Following reports of various health problems in some 'Vietnam ^veterans
widespread concern about the possible health effects of Agent Orange was
expressed. Many veterans have filed claims for disability compensation with
the VA, basing their claims on Agent Orange effects. In 1979,
a group of
veterans initiated a class action suit against herbicide manufacturers for
negligence and product liability.
The manufacturers include Dow Chemical,
Monsanto, Hercules, Diamond Shamrock, and Thompson-Hayward. This litigation
is still in progress depending, in part, on the outcome of federally
sponsored studies of the health effects of Agent
Orange.
Chemical
manufacturers filed a third-party suit in 1980 against the U.S.
Government
that was later dismissed by a New York Federal District Court.
Personnel Exposed to Herbicides. The early trials that were conducted in
South Vietnam to improve aircraft spray systems were performed by the USAF
Special Aerial Spray Flight Division at Langley Air Force Base, Virginia.
During late 1962 and early 1963, the Crops Division at Fort" Detrick and the
USAF Armament Laboratory at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, were also involved
in efforts to improve spray system components in support of Operation RANCH
HAND.
Most of the personnel involved in the actual handling of herbicide drums
were Vietnamese.
However, a USAF flight mechanic or crew chief was
responsible for ensuring that each aircraft was properly loaded and that the
spray systems were functional.
Each herbicide aircrew consisted of a pilot
and copilot, a flight mechanic, and a spray unit.
The aircrews were
frequently joined by South Vietnamese and U.S. observers.
As noted in a USAF
report: "within the aircraft, it was not uncommon to have herbicide leakage
from around the numerous hose connections joining the spray tank and pumps
with the wing and aft spray booms.
In hot weather, the odor of herbicide
within the aircraft was decidedly noticeable" (Young et ai., 1978: 1-18). It
.is also suspected that, due to destruction of the tanks by enemy fire, crew
members were acutely exposed to herbicides.
In an effort to determine which ground units were'exposed to Agent Orange
after it had been deposited on the ground, the Army Agent Orange Task Force
and the American Cancer Society are attempting independently to correlate
ground unit location with the location of aerial spraying missions. The USAF
has data on 6,542 herbicide spraying missions that took place between August
1965 and February 1971 on its HERBS computer tape. These data were compiled
on a mission-by-mission basis from reports and files in various offices in
the U.S. and South Vietnam. After evaluating
the HERBS data in a
1974
report, the National Academy of Sciences
(NAS)
concluded
that the data
accounted for approximately 86% of all herbicide operations in South Vietnam,
and that "despite certain recognized deficiencies," the HERBS tape is "areliable source for an assessment of the major part of the herbicide
operation in South Vietnam" and "is the best and in fact the only
available
comprehensive computation of the major
part of the herbicide operations
conducted in the Vietnam war."
Since this NAS evaluation,
the Army Agent
Orange Task Force has been in the process of expanding the scope of the HERBS
data to incorporate other herbicide sprays -- including perimeter base
spraying and any unplanned dumping of herbicides from U.S.
aircraft' that
were under enemy attack.
Despite this relative confidence in the location of the aerial and some
ground spraying missions, it is difficult to determine
which particular
ground troops in. a given location were actually exposed and to what extent
they were exposed.
Although aerial
spraying apparatus
was' designed to

�CRS- 4

IB83043

UPDATE-03/03/83

deliver the herbicide in a specified manner to reduce dispersion, no such
standardized equipment was used for perimeter base spraying or other
non-aerial delivery modes. Furthermore, additional
troops may have been
exposed in areas for which military records are incomplete. For example, not
all information is available on helicopter operations flown by the Vietnamese
Air Force before 1968.
Thus, attempts to model the conditions of exposure in
order to determine individual or group exposure levels are jeopardized by the
lack of verifiable exposure information.
When the DoD suspended all use of Agent Orange in South Vietnam, the USAF
was 'left with an inventory of 2.22
million gallons in two locations, in
Vietnam and in Gulfport, Mississippi.
In April 1972,
the stocks in South
Vietnam were transported to Johnston Island in the Pacific
for
storage.
Problems began to arise in both U.S and Pacific locations concerning
leakage
from the drums. After exploring a number of options, the USAF decided to
dispose of the Agent Orange by burning it at high temperatures at sea.
This
operation was performed in 1977 with permission from the EP'A. About 110 USAF
personnel from the Air Force Logistics
command and about 100 civilian
employees hired by a contractor were involved in the destruction process.
Environmental monitoring of the transfer operations was performed by members
of the USAF Occupational and Environmental Health Laboratory.
Extensive
environmental monitoring of the test incineration procedures was performed.
Certain physical parameters of the actual incineration
process
were
monitored.
Physical' examinations
of personnel involved in the actual
incineration procedures, administered both before and after these procedures,
revealed no adverse health effects.
Health Effects of Dioxin and Phenoxyherbicides
There are as yet no conclusive scientific studies on the long-term human
health effects of Agent Orange exposure. In their absence, an understanding
of health effects must rely on animal and/or human occupational
exposure
studies of dioxin and phenoxyherbicides. The following paragraph
summarizes
what is known about the health effects of these constituents of Agent Orange.
Workers exposed to high concentrations of dioxin and/or 2,4,5-T
(as well
as other chemicals) are commonly found to have a painful skin condition known
as chloracne. Chloracne can appear weeks to months after initial exposure
and in some cases persists up to many years after exposure.
Chloracne,
however, can result from exposure to other chlorinated
compounds besides
2,4,5-T. Studies of exposed workers have indicated a variety of other health
problems; yet, there is not enough information at this time to establish a
cause and effect relationship between phenoxyherbicides and these disorders.
Soft-tissue sarcoma, a form of 'cance.r/ has been reported among Swedish
workers who were exposed to phenoxyherbicides. Reports from a variety of
sources associate
dioxin and herbicide exposure with stomach
cancer,
neuromuscular weakness, liver enlargement, and liver enzyme abnormalities.
Birth defects were first reported in South Vietnamese refugees living in
North Vietnam, but, due to the difficulty of conducting studies in a war-torn
country, the research on these reports was widely believed to be improperly
executed. In animal studies, only certain strains of pregnant mice exposed
to dioxin show fetotoxicity and birth defects in offspring.
Exposed male
mice do not have deformed offspring.
Current Use. The EPA has registered 2,4-D for widespread domestic use on
such crops as corn, grain, and sugar cane, as well as on non-crop areas;
2,4,5-T
is currently used on rangelands, rice fields, and industrial
vegetation sites, whereas approval for its other domestic uses -- forests,

�CRS- 5

IB83043

UPDATE-03/03/83

rights-of-way, pastures' -- was suspended by the EPA in 1978.
registered use of '2,4,5-T depends on negotiations that began in 1979
Dow Chemical and the EPA.

Future
between

Herbicides 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D are commercially available either alone or in
combination.
The combination mixture (under Dow's Trademark, Esteron)
differs from Agent Orange primarily in the level of dioxin.
Existing Dow
inventories of 2,4,5-T contain less than 0.1 parts per million (ppm) dioxin,
whereas previous formulations of 2,4,5-T used in Agent Orange contained about
2 ppm dioxin. Although standards for dioxin levels in 2,4,5-T have not been
officially set by the EPA, the EPA's Science Advisory Committee recommended
in 1971 a level of 0.1 ppm.
Veterans' Complaints and Veterans Administration Efforts
Veterans who believe they have been exposed to Agent Orange have
complained of a variety of illnesses for which they seek 'medical treatment
and disability compensation.
These illnesses include:
skin conditions,
cancers, nervousness, numbness in extremities, vision
and/or
hearing
impairments, birth defects in their offspring, and reduced libido.
Veterans
have also complained about the paucity of scientific information available on
the health effects of Agent Orange and about the sluggishness with which the
VA has responded to their concerns.
Specifically, the General Accounting
Office (GAO) has recently reported that over half of the veterans responding
to their questionnaire were dissatisfied with the amount of information they
had received from the VA about Agent Orange.
To fill the perceived
information gap, various State 'governments, including New York and New
Jersey, have attempted to disseminate information on Agent Orange to State
veterans.
&lt;

The VA maintains that it
outset by initiating health
exposed and by implementing
description of the research

has responded
to veterans' concerns from the
programs to identify veterans who may have been
research projects on health effects. A detailed
projects is provided later in this brief.

Since 1978 the VA has provided a physical examination for Vietnam veterans
who thought they were exposed to Agent Orange. The VA maintains a registry
of all the veterans who have come to VA hospitals and health care facilities
for the exam. The registry also contains information collected
during the
examination.
As of Dec. 1, 1982, 101,721 veterans had received the initial
exam, and about 80% of the records had been coded into the computer.
The
idea behind the registry is to determine whether veterans have a higher
incidence of particular diseases.
GAO auditors have investigated
the effectiveness of the v Agent Orange
examination program. The findings are summarized in an October 1982
report,
"The V A ' s Agent Orange Examination
Program: Actions Needed
To
More
Effectively Address Veterans' Health Concerns." The report is 'critical of the
exam for being incomplete, poorly designed, and for being administered by
physicians who were not familiar with the reported health effects of Agent
Orange. In an appendix to the report, the VA challenges these findings by
citing improvements that 'have taken place since the evaluation; however, the
GAO disagrees with the VA rebuttal in the same appendix. The GAO report is
also critical of the registry because it cannot
be used to determine the
incidence of specific illnesses among veterans -- a major purpose for which
the registry was supposedly designed.
Medical Treatment: P.L. 97-72.

Before the enactment

of

P.L.

97-72

in

�CRS- 6

IB83043

UPDATE-03/03./83

1981, 'veterans who complained of Agent Orange-related illnesses were in a
ranking of the lowest priority for medical treatment at VA hospitals.
This
is because these illnesses were defined as not being "service-connected." To
have qualified at all for this treatment at this low-priority level, the
veteran had to be destitute. The "Veterans' Health Care, Training, and Small
Business Loan Act of 1981" (P.L. 97-72) elevated Vietnam veterans' priority
status for treatment at VA hospitals for any Agent Orange-related problem.
Veterans who complain of such problems are now considered for treatment
irrespective of age or finances with the same priority
status as former
prisoners of war and ahead of veterans with "non-service
connected"
conditions.
The Vietnam veterans' contention of exposure is acceptable in
the absence of evidence to the contrary. It is the duty of a '"responsible
staff physician (to) make a determination as to whether the condition
resulted from a cause other than the specified exposure." To aid the staff
physician, the VA has developed guidelines which identify conditions that are
not considered to be related to Agent Orange exposure (Federal Register, Nov.
17, 1982).
The VA contends that P.L.
97-72
is
being
implemented
successfully, yet veterans' advocates and State Agent Orange commissions
allege that veterans are uninformed about the new legislation and that
treatment is still difficult to obtain at certain VA medical centers. The VA
has initiated a new system to monitor the impact of P.L.
97-72 on Vietnam
veterans' medical treatment.
P.L. 97-72 also extended the readjustment counseling program for Vietnam
veterans for another three years.
The counseling programs are currently
located in "Vet Centers," which are distinct from VA medical facilities.
Disability Compensation. As of Jan. 3, 1983, veterans had filed 16,102
disability claims with the VA for disorders they attribute to Agent Orange
exposure. The vast majority of these claims have been denied because they
are not considered as being "service connected." The policy of the VA is
that a disability is considered "service-connected" if it arises during or is
aggravated by military service.
"Service-connection"
establishes temporal
correspondence with military service, not causation, as the determinant for
disability payments. Chronic conditions arising before discharge or within
one year after discharge are presumed to be "service-connected."
The policy implies that for a veteran to receive disability payments for
ailments possibly related to Agent Orange exposure, it must be proved that
the condition first appeared during the service or within a year of
discharge.
This precludes disability
for
latent
disorders
because
"service-connection" criteria cannot be met.
The VA acknowledges that the skin disorder, chloracne, is causally related
to Agent Orange exposure. On Apr. 15, 1980, in a statement before the House
Veterans.1 Affairs Subcommittee on Medical Facilities and Benefits, former VA
administrator Max Cleland said that "the relationship between
accidental
human exposure to Agent Orange constituents and the development of long-term
illnesses other than chloracne remains speculative at present." Even though
the VA does view chloracne as an immediate effect
(acute effect) of Agent
Orange exposure, the basis for awarding disability stems from the occurrence
of chloracne during the service. Temporal coincidence with active duty is
the major criterion, irrespective of cause, for chloracne or any other
veteran complaint.
The total of 1237 (15.3%) claims which were granted were awarded primarily
for skin conditions (94%)
and for cancer, psychiatric, and neurological
conditions (6%), among others.

�CRS- 7

IB83043

UPDATE-03/03/83

The VA denied 6,824 claims after there was a confirmed diagnosis of the
disease for which the veteran had filed a claim. The denied claims fall into
the following categories: 4091
for various skin conditions; 2432 for
nervousness and headache, or fatigue; 907 for paralysis or numbness; 791 for
gastrointestinal or genito-urinary conditions; 487 for malignancies which
include leukemia, lymphoma, melanoma, and Hodgkin's disease; 359 for impaired
sexual activity; 463 for eye, ear, nose, a-nd throat pathology; 289 for lung
conditions; 247 for cardiovascular conditions, and 146 claims denied for
miscellaneous conditions.
(Since each claim could fall into a variety of
different categories, the category figures do not equal 6,824.)
The VA policy is that the resolution of disability claims
for conditions
that are now defined as "non-service connected" (and therefore denied) will
depend on the results of scientific studies which are described below. Since
it is expected that these studies will take years to complete, the Chief
Medical Director of the VA, Dr. Donald Custis, has testified at a hearing of
the House Veterans Affairs Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight on
Sept. 15, 1982, that "It may well be that the Congress cannot wait for
scientific answers in the short term, in which case it may well be that the
sociopolitical aspect of this problem will have to be addressed."
Current...._or. Proposed Studies of ^Health Effects
Many branches of the Federal Government are conducting research on the
health effects of Agent Orange and phenoxyherbicides. Research efforts range
from large-scale epidemiology studies of Vietnam veterans to studies of
cancer among Kansas
residents exposed to herbicides.
The
following
paragraphs provide an overview of research efforts at the Department of
Defense, the Veterans Administration, and the Department of Health and Human
Services.
The impact of the following studies on VA disability policy is not
clear; the VA has not established any formal criteria for how their
policies
might be altered by scientific findings.
Due to the recent transfer of the legislatively mandated
epidemiology
study of Vietnam veterans and to the interest which this study has generated
all along, it will be discussed first.
E p i de m i o 1 o g y Study. The large epidemiology study of Vietnam veterans
exposed to Agent Orange, mandated by P.L. 96-151 in December 1981,
has been
the focus of much of the debate over the health effects of Agent Orange.
P.L. 96-151 directed the VA to perform the study of long-term health
effects
among veterans using' a protocol that was subject to approval by the
congressional Office of Technology Assessment (OTA); in addition, the OTA
director was given the task of monitoring the progress of the study.
The
protocol was reviewed by the OTA, the VA advisory group on the health-related
effects of herbicides, the science panel of the Agent Orange Working Group,
and the National
Academy of Sciences.
P.L.
97-72 allowed for future
expansion of the scope of the study.
The implementation of the study was delayed until October 1982,
at which
time the responsibility for conducting the study was transferred from the VA
to the Centers for Disease Control
(CDC).
The transfer was accomplished
following letters to the VA from the Veterans Affairs Committees of the House
and the Senate. The letters expressed concern over the lack of progress on
the study and concern over the VA's credibility
with the
veterans;
consequently, the VA was urged to relinquish the. study to an independent
research body. While the VA acceded to this request, former VA Administrator

�CRS- 8
Nimmo'attributed the delay of the
protocol review process.

study

IB83043
to

legal

UPDATE-03/03/83

challenges

and

to

the

On Jan. 18, 1983, the CDC formally accepted responsibility for the study
in a written agreement with the VA.
Under the agreement, the VA is to
provide the CDC with $3 million to fund the study, yet the CDC is assured of
autonomy in its design and implementation. The project will actually consist
of two studies, one on the health effects of Agent Orange and the other on
the health effects of the Vietnam experience. The study' designs are expected
to be ready for OTA review in April 1983.
Preliminary reports suggest that
the veterans under study will be divided into three groups (cohorts)
—
one
group made up of those who were likely to have been exposed to Agent Orange,
another group constituting those who were unlikely to have been exposed, and
a final group of veterans who did not serve in Vietnam and who were not
likely to have been exposed. The DoD'is assisting the CDC in establishing
criteria for assigning an individual veteran to a particular
group.
The
selection process will depend on the use of DoD records ' of ground troop
movements relative to herbicide spraying.
Completion of the study is
expected by the end of 1987.
Department of Defense. The Air Force is conducting "The Ranch Hand
Study," an epidemiological study of personnel exposed to herbicides during
the Air Force's aerial spraying program in Vietnam (Operation Ranch Hand).
These personnel were members of flight crews involved in the handling and/or
spraying of herbicides, and they were presumed to have been heavily exposed.
This study population of 1,260 personnel is being compared to a control
population consisting of unexposed flight crew members.
The purpose of the study is to determine whether Ranch Hand flight crews
suffered adverse health effects compared to the control
population.
The
study consists of three parts: a mortality study; a morbidity (disease) study
which includes birth defects in offspring; and a follow-up period of physical
examinations at specific intervals (up to 20 years) from the onset of the
study. Information for the morbidity and follow-up portions is collected by
questionnaires administered in the homes of the participants and by extensive
physical and psychological tests.
These data are collected
by
the
independent contractors Louis Harris and Associates and Kelsey-Seybold
Clinic, respectively. Before data collection began in 1980, the entire study
protocol had been reviewed by the University of Texas
School of Public
Health, the U.S Air Force 'Science Advisory Board, the Armed
Forces
Epidemiological Board and the National Academy of Sciences.
The initial phases of mortality and morbidity data collection
were
completed in December 1982.
For the morbidity study, participation
in the
questionnaire and physical examination has been very high (greater than
95%)
and an interim report is expected by the summer of 1983.
The findings of the
mortality study (due to be released early in 1983) suggest that there are no
differences in the number of deaths between the Ranch Handers and controls.
Periodic reassessment of the mortality findings are planned throughout the
20-year study by the Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine.
While the Ranch Hand Study is expected to provide some
valuable
information about the population of herbicide sprayers, the applicability of
the Ranch Hand Study to the experience of ground troops has been questioned.
For example, the herbicide exposure conditions are thought to differ between
the two groups. The Ranch Handers were heavily exposed at sporadic intervals
(repeated acute exposures) and the exposure was through the skin, through
inhalation, and through ingestion. After the missions, the flight crews were

�CRS- 9

IB83043

UPDATE-03/03/83

required to shower. While the extent and mode of ground troop exposure are
less certain, it is likely that the mode of ground troop exposure was
primarily due to skin contact and to inhalation.
The duration of ground
troop exposure was likely to be for longer periods due to operational
movements through contaminated areas. Thus, because the exposure conditions
of Ranch Hand personnel did not mimic those of ground troops, the general
relevance of the Ranch Hand study is not certain.
One of the criticisms
raised by the National Academy of Sciences in their May 1980
review of the
Ranch Hand protocol was that adverse health effects were not likely to be
found because the sample size was too small and the follow-up period was too
short. In response, the Air Force did extend the follow-up period to 20
years; nevertheless, the problem of sample size makes it unlikely that the
study will detect certain cancers that are relatively rare.
The impact of
Agent Orange exposure on the incidence of these rare cancers
(e.g.,
soft-tissue sarcoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma), may be most appropriately
determined by the case control sutdies in New York State and at.the National
Cancer Institute.
V e t e r ans Adm i n i s t rat ion. The Veterans Administration intends to spend
$6.7 million of the total 1983 medical research budget of $163 million for
projects on the health effects of herbicide exposure and, more generally, the
health effects of combat duty in Vietnam. The majority of these research
dollars ($4.2 million) is destined for the epidemiology study of Vietnam
veterans, a mortality study, and an identical twin sibling study.
Due to
congressional pressure, responsibility for the conduct of the epidemiology
study has been transferred
from the VA to the CDC.
Funding for the
epidemiology study, however, will continue to be provided by the VA.
Both the mortality and the twin study address the impact of the Vietnam
experience rather than Agent Orange in particular.
The purpose of the
mortality study is to examine
the cause-of-death
and the death rate in
Vietnam veterans by comparison to veterans who did not serve in Vietnam. The
idea is to determine whether military service in Vietnam has resulted in
different death profiles since the end 'of the war.
Computer records will
provide the information, and this information will be collected and coded by
contractors for the VA. The project is expected to be finished by 1985.
The Identical Twin Study, -also sponsored by the VA, is designed to
determine whether the current psychological and physical health of Vietnam
veterans has been adversely affected by their service.
In this study, a
group of VA researchers in St. Louis is attempting to study 450 pairs of
identical twins; one twin served in Vietnam during the period of herbicide
exposure, whereas the other twin was not stationed in Southeast Asia.
Initial findings of this study are expected by October 1984.
The VA has also established the Chloracne r Task Force to identify veterans
with skin conditions and then to see if . there are bona fide cases of
Chloracne within this group. Thus far, a dermatologist who is serving as a
consultant at the Washington VA office has found 12 tentative cases of
Chloracne which require further investigation.
Another VA research activity is a study of dioxin in the fat tissues of
veterans. In conjunction with the EPA, the VA intends to find out whether
Vietnam veterans have higher levels of dioxin in their fatty tissues than
non-Vietnam veterans.
Background levels of dioxin in the U.S.
male
population are also to be analyzed. To detect dioxin concentrations in the
fat, tissue is removed surgically from the abdomen and the sample .is analyzed
on gas chromatography/high resolution mass spectrometry instruments.

�CRS-10

IB83043

UPDATE-03/03./83

l

Department of Health and_
Human
Services:
Centers
for
Disease
C o n tr o1/B irth Def e_c t Stu dy. An ambitious epidemiology study is underway in
Atlanta to find out if Vietnam veterans show an increased risk of having
children with birth defects. Using the case-control method, CDC researchers
are interviewing 7000 parents of children with birth-defects and 3000 parents
whose children are normal. The interview process is used to establish the
military history of the parents.
This information will be analyzed
to
determine wheth'er parents who served in Vietnam are at greater risk of
producing children with birth defects. Already one-half
of the interviews
has taken place, with initial findings expected by September 1983.
Sponsors
of the study are DHHS, VA, and DoD.
DHHS:
National Cancer^ I n s t i t u t e / Can c e r Study.
Epidemiologists
are
investigating a Kansas population for the relationship between herbicide
exposure and various cancers. The research question is: do such cancers as
soft tissue sarcoma and various lymphomas result from herbicide exposure?
Kansas residents are considered a good population for studying herbicide
exposure because in this wheat-growing State herbicides are used much more
often than insecticides. In other States, herbicides are frequently used in
combination with insecticides, which are also implicated in producing cancer.
Insecticide exposure would confound the results of such a cancer
study.
Preliminary results of this study are anticipated by the'fall of 1983.
DHHS; National Institute of^Occupational Safety and Health/Dioxin
Worker
Registry.
NIOSH is compiling a ' registry of workers involved in the
manufacture "of 2,4,5-T and related compounds because these compounds
contain
dioxin as a contaminant. Worker exposure records on 3000-5000 individuals,
compiled from all 12 U.S. sites of production, will go back
to the 1940s.
T'he purpose of the registry is to establish whether the mortality
rates
are
higher in this,population of exposed workers than in a comparable
group in
the U.S.population.
The protocol
has been reviewed by an independent
university-affiliated group of scientists, and the analysis of the findings
is due by 1985.
Role of State Commissions or Advisory Groups
Several States have established their own agencies in response to
veterans' complaints of Federal inactivity
on the Agent Orange
question.
Although these organizations
vary in structure, their
functions
are
essentially similar:
to identify State Vietnam veterans and to provide and
coordinate various social services for these veterans. For example, various
State commissions disseminate information on Agent Orange and assist in
scheduling Agent Orange examinations at VA medical centers.
Those States
which have commissions or programs on Agent Orange are as
follows:
California, Connecticut,
Georgia,
Hawaii,
Illinois,
Kansas,
Maine,
Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oklahoma, Ohio, Pennsylvania,
Texas and West Virginia.
(Wisconsin's program has been discontinued.)
Some .of these States are funding their own research programs aimed at
answering questions on the health effects of Agent Orange. In the "spring of
1983, New York is due to release findings of a study on the incidence of
soft-tissue sarcoma among State veterans relative to other State inhabitants.
Soft-tissue sarcoma has been implicated as a possible long-term health effect
of herbicide exposure. New York State has also undertaken a mortality study
to see if death rates are higher among Vietnam veterans than other State
residents of the same age group.

�'

I

CRS-11

IB83043

UPDATE-03/03/83

The New Jersey State Commission on Agent Orange has a variety of pro-jects
underway. One task has been to assemble information on a bacterial infection
called Melioidosis, which may have afflicted veterans who were exposed to the
bacterium while in Vietnam.
The Commission is beginning a project to
determine whether blood tests can be reliably used to measure dioxin levels.
Blood tests would obviate the need for more expensive and painful surgical
procedures now performed for this purpose.
In addition, the New Jersey
Commission on Agent Orange distributes pamphlets on how to fill out VA
disability claims forms.
The role of the State commissions is growing to include advocacy for State
veterans. State representatives have testified at congressional hearings and
at the VA advisory committee meetings to bring attention to veterans'
complaints. At the Nov. 30, 1982, meeting of the VA advisory committee on
the health-related effects of herbicides, the spokesperson for State agencies
endorsed legislation
that
would
establish
the
presumption
of
a
"service-connection" for chloracne and soft tissue sarcoma "so that veterans'
disability claims for these disorders would be awarded.
Because of the lack of State funds, some of the State commissions are no
longer active and others are i.n jeopardy. State commissions have requested
Federal funds on the grounds that they assist in the administration of VA
programs such as the scheduling of Agent Orange examinations and informing
State veterans about Agent Orange exposure.
Previous Congressional Ac^tipn
As previously discussed, two major pieces of legislation have been enacted
in the 96th and 97th Congresses- to provide for Vietnam veterans' medical care
and to mandate studies of the health effects of Agent Orange:
P.L. 96-151,
The Veterans' Health Programs Extension and Improvement Act of 1979; and P.L.
97-72, Veterans' Health Care, Training and Small Business Loan Act of 1981.
The 'legislative proposals of the 96th and 97th Congresses were generally
directed to the status of disability claims that are now denied by the VA
because they are not considered as "service-connected." In Representative
Daschle's proposed 97th Congress bills, H.R.
7146
and H.R. 7110,
the
presumption of service connection would have been legislatively established N
for soft-tissue sarcoma and chloracne, respectively.
The presumption of
service connection would have permitted veterans with these disorders to
collect disability payments because the conditions were presumed to have
arisen during the service. Two other 97th Congress
bills, H.R. 523
(Rep.
Roe) and H.R. 2297 (Rep. Downey), were designed to provide a presumption of
service connection for all chronic conditions specifically related to Agent
Orange exposure which appear later than one year, after discharge.
Existing
law requires that disabling conditions only appearing before discharge or
within one year after discharge are presumed to have arisen during the
service. Finally, a number of bills were introduced to transfer the conduct
of the epidemiology study from the VA to the Department of Health and Human
Services. This was accomplished -- although non-legislatively -- with the
transfer of responsibility to the Centers for Disease Control in the DHHS.
LEGISLATION
H.R. 209 (Long)
Requires the Secretary of Health and Human

Services

to

arrange

for

an

�CRS-12

IB83043

UPDATE-03/03/83

independent epidemiological study of persons exposed to the chemical dioxin,
used in the h.erbicide known as Agent Orange.
Introduced Jan.
3,
1983;
referred to Committee on Energy and Commerce.
H.R. 212 (Long)
Amends Title 38, United States Code, to waive the one-year limitation on
claims for compensation "frojn the Veterans Administration for disabilities and
diseases incurred in or aggravated by military service in the case of claims
by veterans who served in Southeast Asia during the Vietnam era for
compensation for disabilities resulting from exposure to the phenoxyherbicide
known as Agent Orange or other phenoxy herbicides.
Introduced Jan.3,
1983;
referred to Committee on Veterans Affairs.

H.R. 331

(Roe)

Amends Title 38, United States Code, to waive the one-year
limitation on
claims for compensation from the Veterans Administration for disabilities and
diseases incurred in or aggravated by military service in the case of claims
by veterans who served in Southeast Asia during the Vietnam era for
compensation for disabilities resulting from exposure to the
phenoxy
herbicide known as "Agent Orange" or other phenoxy herbicides. Introduced
Jan. 3, 1983; referred to Committee of Veterans Affairs.
H.R. 462

(Applegate)

Amends Title 38, United States Code, to waive the one-year
limitation on
claims for compensation from the Veterans Administration for disabilities and
diseases incurred in or aggravated by military service in the case of claims
by veterans who served in Southeast Asia during the Vietnam era for
compensation for disabilities resulting from exposure to the phenoxyherbicide
known as Agent Orange, or other phenoxy herbicides.
Introduced Jan. 6, 1983;
referred to Committee on Veterans Affairs.
H.R. 509 (Hammerschmidt)
Amends Title 38 of the United States Code to provide that progressive
muscular atrophy or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis developing a 10 per centum
or more degree of disability within seven years after separation from active
service during a period of war shall be presumed to be service connected.
Introduced Jan. 6, 1983; referred to Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
H.R. 1135

(Downey)

Amends Title 38, United States Code, to waive the one-year
limitation on
claims for compensation from the Veterans Administration for disabilities and
diseases incurred in or aggravated by military service in the case of claims
by veterans who served in Southeast Asia during the Vietnam era for
compensation for disabilities
resulting from exposure to the
phenoxy
herbicide known as Agent Orange, or other phenoxy herbicides.
Introduced
Feb. 1, 1983; referred to Committee on Veterans Affairs.
H.R. 1382 (Downey)
Provides that any award by the Veterans' Administration of compensation
for a disease or disability in a veteran resulting from exposure
to Agent
Orange shall be retroactive to the date the veteran first applied to the
Veterans' Administration for compensation for such disease or disability.
I n t r o d u c e d _ F e b . 10, 1983; referred to Committee on Veterans' Affairs.

�CRS-13

IB83043

UPDATE-03/03/83

'*.

i

S. 374

(Specter)

A m e n d s Title 38, United States Code, to provide a presumption of service
connection for the occurrence of certain diseases in veterans who were
exposed to phenoxy herbicides while serving in the Armed Services in
Southeast Asia during the Vietnam era.
Introduced Feb. 2, 1983; referred to
Committee on Veterans Affairs.
HEARINGS
U.S.

Congress. House. Committee on Interstate and Foreign
Commerce. Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.
Agent Orange:
exposure of Vietnam veterans. Hearing,
96th Congress, 2d session.
Sept. 25, 1980.
249 p.
Involuntary exposure to Agent Orange and other toxic
spraying. Hearings, 96th Congress, 1st session. June 26
and 27, 1979.
256 p.

U.S.

Congress. House. Committee on veterans' Affairs. Ad
Hoc Subcommittee on Hospitals and Health Care. Legislation
to improve medical programs administered by the Veterans
Administration (H.R. 2157, H.R. 2953, and H.R. 2999).
Hearing, 97th Congress, 1st session.
Apr. 28, 1981.
54 p.

U.S.

Congress.
House. Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Subcommittee on Medical Facilities and Benefits. Herbicide
"Agent Orange."
Hearing, 95th Congress, 2d session.
Oct. 11, 1978.
62 p.
Oversight hearing to receive testimony on Agent Orange.
Hearing, 96th Congress, 2d session.
Feb. 25, 1980.
121 p.

._

_, oversight hearing to receive testimony on Agent Orange.
Hearing, 96th Congress, 2d session. July 22, 1980.
459 p.
Scientific community report on Agent Orange. Hearing,
96th Congress, 2d session.
Sept. 16, 1980.
145 p.

U.S.

Congress. House. Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations. Current
status of Agent Orange studies. Hearing, 97th Congress,
1st session. May 6, 1981.
385 p.
Federal Agent Orange activities and the vet center program.
Hearing, 97th Congress, 2d session.
Sept. 15, 1982.
164 p.

U.S.

Congress. Senate. Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Agent
Orange update and appendix: Agent Orange activities (part
II) . Hearing, 96th Congress, 2d session.
Sept. 10, 1980.
1368 p.
Oversight on issues related to Agent Orange and other
herbicides. Hearing, 97th Congress, 1st session.
Nov. 18,
1981.
500 p.

�CRS-14

IB83043

UPDATE-03/03,/83

VA health resources and program extensions and appendix:
Agent Orange activities. Hearing, 96th Congress, 1st
session, on S. 741 and S. 196.
Apr. 10, 1979.
462 p.
Veterans' Programs Extension and Improvement Act of 1981.
Hearing, 97th 'Congress, 1st session, on S. 26 (titles II
and III, only), S. 380, S. 458, S. 636, S. 689, S. 872,
S. 914, S. 921, and related bills. Apr. 30, 1981.
685 p.
Vietnam veterans' readjustment. Hearings, 96th Congress,
2d session. - F e b . 21, Mar. 4, and May 21, 1980.
Part 2.
595-2082 p.

i
ADDITIONAL REFERENCE SOURCES
American Medical Association. Council on Scientific Affairs.
Health effects of "Agent Orange" and dioxin contaminants.
1981.
37 p.
Boffey, Philip. Agent Orange: Despite spate of studies, slim
hope for answers. New York Times, 1982.
24 p.
Cookson, Clive. "Emergency" ban on 2,4,5-T herbicide in U.S.
Nature, v. 278, Mar. 8, 1979:
108-110.
Galston, Arthur W. Herbicides:
V. 29, Feb. 1979:
85-90.

a mixed blessing.

Bioscience,

International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC monographs
on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals
to man: 2,5,5-T, v. 15, Aug. 1977.
JRB Associates. Review of literature on herbicides, including
phenoxy herbicides and associated dioxins. Washington,
Veterans Administration, 1981.
2v.
National Research Council. The effects 1 of herbivcides in South
Vietnam: Part A. Summary and conclusions.
Washington,
National Academy of Sciences, 1974.
AD-774-749. 398 p.
National Research Council. The effects of exposure to Agent
Orange on ground troops in.Vietnam. Washington, National
Academy of Sciences, 1982.
24 p.
New Jersey State Commission on Agent Orange.
1982.
54 p.

Legislative Report.

Reggiani, G. Toxicology of TCDD: short review of its formation,
occurrence, toxicology and kinetics, discussing human health
effects, safety measures and disposal. Regulatory Toxicology
and Pharmacology, v. 1, 1981:
211-243.
Rosenblatt, Jean. Compensating victims of toxic substances.
Editorial Research Reports. v. 11, Oct. 1982:
759-772.
Tung, T.T., T.K. Anh, B.Q. Tuyen, D.X. Tra, and N.X. Hugen (1971).
Clinical effects of massive and continuous utilization of

�'V*
1

CRS-15

-*

».
U.S.

IB83043
.

defoliants on civilians.

.

.

.

Vietnamese Studies, 29:

.

UPDATE-03/03/83
.

53-81.

General Accounting Office. U.S. ground troops in South
Vietnam were in areas sprayed with herbicide orange. Nov.
16, 1979.
FPCD-80-23.
VA's Agent Orange examination program: auctions needed to
more effectively address veterans' health concerns. Oct. 25,
1981.
HRD-83-6.

Young, Alvin et al. The toxicology, environmental fate and human
risk of herbicide orange and its associated dioxin.
The
Surgeon General, U.S. Air Force, Washington, D.C.
Oct. 1978.

�APPENDIX
A LISTING OF
FEDERAL ORGANIZATIONS ON AGENT ORANGE
January, 1983
I. Cabinet Council on Human Resources
Agent Orange Working Group (AOWG)
Chairman: James Stockdale (HHS) Alternate: Bart Kull
Members: HHS, VA, DoD, Dept. Agriculture, Dept. Labor, EPA, ACTION
Agency, OMB, OSTP, Council of Economic Advisors, Dept. State
(OTA- Observer Status)
Activities: Moniter and coordinate Federal Research activities on
health effects of Agent Orange.
Science Panel: Dr. Vernon Houk (CDC)
II. Veterans Administration
Advisory Committee on Health Related Effects of Herbicides
Chairman: Dr. Barclay Shephard (VA)
Members: VA, Veterans Groups, FDA, CDC, EPA, Army Medical Corps,
Dept. Agriculture, NIH, private universiites
Activities: Advise Administrator of VA on health effects of Agent Orange
Agent Orange Projects Office
Acting Director: Dr. Barclay Shephard (VA)
Members: In-house administrative and research staff, Dept. of Medicine
and Surgery, VA
Activities: Coordinate and moniter epidemiology projects at VA on
Agent Orange and related research effortsAgent Orange Policy Coordinating Committee
Chairman: Everett Alvarez, Jr. (VA)
Members: In-house staff involved in medical information and medical
claims.
Activities: Review VA policy to make recommendations on Agent Orange
issues to the administrator of the VA.
III. Department of Defense
Army Agent Orange Task Force (AAOTF)
Chief: Richard Christian (Army)
Members: Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, and civilian staff
Activities: Provide VA with information from military records
for the research projects on Agent Orange.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8856">
              <text>032</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8858">
              <text>0589</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8861">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8854">
                <text>Davis, Miriam</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="8855">
                <text>Michael Simpson</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8857">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;The Library of Congress Congressional Research Service, Major Issues System</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8859">
                <text>March 3 1983</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8860">
                <text>Agent Orange: Veterans' Complaints and Studies of Health Effects, Issue Brief Number IB83043</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="8862">
                <text>VA</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="8863">
                <text>health studies</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="8864">
                <text>legislation</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1524" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="7610">
              <text>029</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="7612">
              <text>0471</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="7615">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7609">
                <text>Batten, C. R.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7611">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;California Forest Protective Association, Sacramento, California</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7613">
                <text>June 30 1978</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7614">
                <text>The Phenoxy Herbicides in California: A History of Conflict</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7616">
                <text>dioxin</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="7617">
                <text>legislation</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1388" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="6362">
              <text>019</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="6364">
              <text>0280</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="6366">
              <text>Series II</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6363">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;Arkansas State Plant Board, Feeds, Fertilizers, and Pesticides Division, Little Rock, Arkansas</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6365">
                <text>Typescripts with attached letter: Agricultural Application Service Act and Economic Poisons Act and Regulations, 1965 &amp; 1966</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6367">
                <text>legislation</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6368">
                <text>herbicide regulation</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
