<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=49&amp;advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&amp;advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=mortality+trends&amp;output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-06-09T12:12:06+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>1</pageNumber>
      <perPage>15</perPage>
      <totalResults>30</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="3790" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1761">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/6668260c8540d1f879895f3a9dc71b06.pdf</src>
        <authentication>f0ea474860bff3574a152f942225f20c</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63710">
                    <text>Item D Number

02417

Author

Apricena, Matteo

Corporate Author
RODOrt/ArtidO TItiB Typescript: Survey of Mortality in the Seveso Area:
1975-1981

Journal/Book Title
Yeer

000

°

Month/Day
Color

0

Number of Images

11

Deecnptm Notes

Friday, October 05, 2001

Page 2417 of 2422

�SURVEY OF MORTALITY BF THE SEVESO AREA

1975-1981

— Mr. Matteo Apricena (Special Department)
- Dr. Luigi Falliva (Special Department)

- Dr Rcsella Gnioldi (Special Department)
- Dr Riccardo Puntoni (Cancer Institute-Genoa)
- Dr Eraanuele Stagnaro (Cancer InstitLite—Genoa)
- Dr Marina Vercelli (Cancer Institute-Genoa)
Coordinators:
- Prof. Leonardo Santi (Cancer Institute-Genoa)
- Dr Giulio Doricotti (until 30/6/32)
- Dr Luigi Meaasa (since 30/6/82)

�STUDY OF MORTALITY IN THE SEVESO AREA (1975-1981)

In previous mortality surveys we emphasised several times the
problems arising from the characteristics of the reports presented, both positive and negative.
The first survey, done at Communal level in the period 197579, presented serious limitations in regard to use of the data
for an assessment of the damage attributable to the ICMESA
accident. This was because of the characteristics of the population under study defined only on administrative criteria:
the residents in each Commune.
In the second survey deaths were distributed between zones A, 3
and R. This study, though more concretely related to the potential risk of exposure to dioxin, presented limitations due
to the mobility of people, limitations due to the use of the
dioxin present in the soil as sole potential indicator of risk.
This version, updated to 1981, gives the data processed in a
third way, in order to arrive at further, more precise indications on the possible correlation between the accident of July
1976 and the specific mortality rates by sex, age and cause in
the following years.
This study is divided into three parts: one using as denominators the inhabitants of each of the 11 Communes; one with the
residents in zones A, B, R and one breaking down the population
into 6 belts from 31 to S6 (see figure). The definition of
these belts is at present at a preliminary stage and is based
mainly on the cases of chloracne and of acute skin lesions that
occurred in every square with a side of about ~T km in the whole
area under study. The division into belts is not at all final

�events occurring- in tlie area under study.
Tl'.e definition of tliese rislc areas is still under study and a
preliminary version should emerge by tiie end of t2ie year.
In addition to the definition of the exposed, that is the denominator necessar3/r for the calculation of rates, there "/as -the
problem of the numerators, that is the definition of the causes
of death .
For the period. 1975-1 979 all the causes (?3%v' ?/ere of course
traced ex post by ISTAT personnel in P.ome. These data have already been coded by the ISTAT personnel.
all the causes of death have been traced,
of ISTAT, at the 11 Communes. From 10 of
photostats of ISTAT form D4/D5 '.vhile from
to get only transcriptions.

Since 1 January i93C
"'ith the authorisation
them vs have obtained
one we have been able

In the case of deaths occurring outside the 11 Communes rve are
notified only of the place of death and periodically, by "/riting
to the offices of the Commune in "/hich death occurred, it has
been possible to retrieve information on the cause of death.
The information for the entire ceriod is no~* over 59/= complete.
Since January 19SC the coding of the causes of death has been
handled by our personnel 'l epidemiologist!1, "*ho codes all three
causes of death.

�Our analysis of the data yielded some differences between the
two periods, in our view to be attributed to a different criterion of definition of the cause of death first diagnosed.
These doubts are stated in the text when these criteria are
thought to have altered the trend. The causes of death have
been grouped in 55 categories as per attached list.
At this stage of the survey we were still tied to citizens'
residence and so it is not yet a cohort study but a survey of
mortality on citizens resident each year in the areas reported
(communes, zones, belts).
The next version of the survey would logically be targeted on
citizens resident on 10 July 1976, excluding immigrants and
retrieving information on emigrants.
The present study gives the crude and standardised rates in each
commune, zone and belt by cause of death, sex, age-group and
year of death. We have also calculated the expected rates on
the basis of the mortality both in the zones outside R and in
the belts considered blank (S_+Sg) for the purpose of internal
comparison.
The causes of death are stated in detail in the attached tables The population resident each year in the area has been reconstructed through the Special Department computer, which stores
the registry office data for all 220 000 residents, including
births, deaths and changes of address.
In the attached printout the population is broken down by commune, zone and belt for each year.

�Comment on the tables
INFECTIVE AND PARASITIC DISEASES (000-136, A1-A44).

There are

no significant increases through time or differences between
communes, zones or belts .

ALL TUMORS (140-239, A45-A61)(including benign). The rate ranges
from 207 cases per 100 000 inhabitants in 1978 to 246 in 1982 in
males and from 131 in 1977 to 175 cases in 1981 in females. The
general trend is upward within the limits expected for the Italian
population. There are no noteworthy differences by commune, zone
or belt.
ENDOCRINE, NUTRITIONAL AND METABOLIC DISEASES EXCLUDING DIABETES
MELLITUS (240-246, 251-279, A62-A63, A65-A66) - No noteworthy
differences.

DIABETES MELLITUS (250, A64) - There is a noteworthy increase in
the years 1980-81. In our'view, the difference is largely due to
an overestimate compared to ISTAT because from 1980 onwards the
disease codes have been applied by our epidemiologists, who have
always regarded diabetes, when present with other cardiovascular
causes, as the primary cause of death, as in fact was indicated by
the ISTAT coders. The rates from 1980 on seem to be twice the
1979 rate without difference by commune or zone. In the two belts
S1-I-S2 we find an increase in deaths since 1977 in females, constant
in time at 40 cases per 100 000 compared to•the expected 24 cases.
DISEASES OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM AND SENSORY ORGANS (370-389, A? 2A79) . The trend is constant through time and, given the small
number of deaths, there are no differences even at territorial
level.
RHEUMATIC FEVER AND CHRONIC RHEUMATIC HEART DISEASE (390-398, A8CA81) - Mothina noteworthy.

�HYPERTENSION ( 0 - 0 , AS2) - Here again, the increase noted in
4044
1980-81 is probably due to a coding overestimate. At all events
there are no important differences territorially. It should,
however, be mentioned that the mortality rate of females is
slightly higher in the belts S1+S2 and S3+S4 as from 1977 compared
to the zones rated blank.
ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE (410-414, A83) AND OTHER HEART DISEASES
(420-429, A84) - As stated earlier, there is a peak in 1976 for
females, but it does not seem to be attributable to the accidenx
as the distribution of deaths was homogeneous throughout 1976
before and after 10 July,
At territoral level there are no
significant differences. There is a slight decline through time.
CIRCULATORY DISEASES OF THE BRAIN (430-438, A 85) - The time
trend is downward with 70 deaths per 100 000 inhabitants in the
past few years compared to 100—110 in 1976.
DISEASES OF THE ARTERIES, ARTERIOLES AND CAPILLARIES ( 4 - 4 ,
4048
A86) - The time trend is constant and there are no noteworthy
differences within the territory attributable to the ICMSSA
accident.

-EMBOLISM AND VENOUS THROMBOSIS (450-453, A87) - Nothing noteworthy.
OTHER DISEASES OF THE CIRCULATORY SYSTEM (454-458, A88) - Nothing
noteworthy.
ACUTE RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTIONS, INFLUENZA OR GRIPPE AND PNEUMONIA ( 6 - 8 , A89-A92) AND BRONCHITIS, EMPHYSEMA AND ASTHMA
4046
( 9 - 9 , A93) AND OTHER DISEASES OF THE RESPIRATORY SYSTEM (5004043
519, A94-A96) - The time trend is downward.
PEPTIC ULCER (531-533, A98) - Nothing noteworthy.

�APPENDICITIS AND INTESTINAL OCCLUSION, HERNIA AND PERITONITIS
(54C-543, 550-554, 560-576-568, A100, A101, A104-0) - Nothing
noteworthy.
CIRRHOSIS OF THE LIVER AND OTHER DISEASES OF THE LIVER AND GALLBLADDER (570-573, 576, A101.1), OTHER DISEASES OF THE DIGESTIVE
TRACT (520-530, 534-537, 561-567, 569, 574, 575, 577, A97, A99,
A103, A104.2, A104.9) - The time trend is constant.

There are

no differences of any interest either between communes or between
zones A , 3 , R or betwent belts.
GENITOURINARY TRACT DISEASES (580-629, A105-A111) - Nothing significant.

The number of cases is tiny.

CONGENITAL MALFORMATIONS AND SOME CAUSES OF PERINATAL MORBIDITY
AND MORTALITY (740-749, A126-135).

The time trend is stable.

Within the territory there were 5 cases in zone B for 1980-81
•

against 1.34 expected, with a relative risk of 3.7 and in belts
S1+S2 there were 7 cases among males in 1981 against 2.55 expected,
with a relative risk of 2.75. This could, however, be a random
phenomenon, as will be explained in detail in the study on malformations now approaching completion.
ILL-DEFINED MORBID SYMPTOMS, OTHER DISEASES AND CAUSES NOT FOUND
- There is nothing noteworthy apart from, a slightly rising trend
of ill-defined symptoms for the years 1980-81, perhaps due to
differences of coding.
The number of cases is very small.
ACCIDENTS, POISONING, INJURIES (300-999, A138-A150) - The time
trend is stable.As to territorial distribution, there is nothing
noteworthy either between communes or belts. In zone A there were
5 cases in the two years 1976-1977 compared to the 0.5 expected
and the 3 deaths in 1976 from injury occurred before 10 July.

�DEATHS FROM ALL CAUSES - Tiie apparent excess in zone A in 1976
is distributed equally before and.after the accident.
TUMORS - With regard to the trend of individual tumor types, it
may be said that the situation reflects that of northern Italy,
taking into account the socioeconomic status of the area under
study. No dioxin-related differences were found either between
communes or between zones or between belts. The time trends are
very close to the nationwide trends for tumors of the stomach
and a slight increase for intestinal tumors, especially in females . There was a small increase in hepatic tumors. For respiratory tract tumors there was an increase in line with that
of industrialised areas, especially in females. Tumors of the
breast are likewise on the increase, as throughout northern Italy6
Tumors of the uterus show a decline. There is an appreciable
decline in prostatic tumors while the trend of bladder tumors is
stationary. • Nothing noteworthy for the moment for lymphomas and
leukemias.
Discussion
From the purely statistical angle the data we have reported yield
no information that suggests that the ICMESA accident appreciably
altered the specific mortality rates by sex, age and cause in the
population resident in the area monitored. This statement refers
mainly to the trend within the area under study. 3y that we mean
that with the level of sensitivity pertaining to a mortality study
based on the compulsory notification of death (ISTAT form D4/D5)
no significant clusters were observed within the area either in
space or time that could be attributed to the accident.

�To understand clearly tlie characteristics and limitations cf
•mortality survey's ~enerallv and of this one in particular, one •
needs to consider the following points. In the first place,
any study hinging on causes of, death is obviously concerned only
with, serious diseases with a high lethality rate. To be recorded
these diseases must be easily diagnosed and not confused with
more frequent causes of death. In the case of deaths from rare
or infrequent diseases, if these diseases do not present precisesigns and symptoms they may easily be missed by the physician who
completes the ISTAT form. Other problems bearing more particularly
on our study concern the controls and the definition of exposed
and nonexposed. or at any rate of more or less exposed persons.
The IT.VO aspects to some extent merge in that as soon as one decides
to make an internal comparison it is obviously important to define
the potential exposure of the area. Migration within and outside
the area further compound the problem.
In our study we have sought to define the areas in different ways
with the aim of identifying the best possible definition of the
areas at risk. Our impression at the moment is that by taking
the resident population year by year we have reached the highest
level of sensitivity attainable in a situation like the one with
which we are dealing in the Seveso area.
As stated in the report
on priority activities, the mortality survey cf residents must new
be followed by a closer investigation: on the cohort of 1C/7/7S.
"ith the data currently available such a study, which could hardly
be achieved in 1930, now becomes relatively simple.
In short, we think that the next mortality s-v.dy should be handled

�- definition of the cohort of residents as at 10 July 1976;
- better use of the indicators of exposure for the definition of
belts;
- conduct of external comparisons using the ISTAT tapes available
up to 1978;
- review of the coding system with the ISTAT operators.

�10

11

12

I
1 = VERY HIGH RISK BELT
2=

HIGH RISK BELT

3= MEDIUM-HIGH RISK BELT
= MEDIUM-LOW RISK BELT

13

14

15

16

17

18

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="28690">
              <text>095</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="28692">
              <text>2417</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="28694">
              <text>Series IV Subseries IV</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="28675">
                <text>Apricena, Matteo</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="28676">
                <text>Luigi Falliva</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="28677">
                <text>Rosella Ghioldi</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="28678">
                <text>Riccardo Puntoni</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="28680">
                <text>Emanuele Stagnaro</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="28682">
                <text>Marina Vercelli</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="28684">
                <text>Leonardo Santi</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="28686">
                <text>Giulio Dorigotti</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="28688">
                <text>Luigi Meazza</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="28693">
                <text>Typescript: Survey of Mortality in the Seveso Area: 1975-1981</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="28695">
                <text>mortality trends</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3293" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24364">
              <text>069</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24365">
              <text>1869</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24367">
              <text>Series III Subseries III</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24363">
                <text>Bender, Gerald C, Jr.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24366">
                <text>Memorandum: to Interested Persons from Gerald C. Bender, Jr., regarding Wisconsin Mortality Study, July 23, 1985</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24368">
                <text>state-funded Vietnam veterans study</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24369">
                <text>mortality trends</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24370">
                <text>cancer risk assessment</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24371">
                <text>alcohol use</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3292" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1702">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/b677371336f0a60017b46af9dd5a1d6f.pdf</src>
        <authentication>a3e56005c1947ba2597cabb4591043d8</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63651">
                    <text>Item ID Number

01868

Author

Shepard, Barclay M.

Corporate Author
ROpOTt/ArUdO TltlB Critique of West Virginia Mortality Study

Journal/Book Title
Year

1986

Month/Day

February 4

Color

a

Number of Images

36

UOSCrtytOn NOtBS

ltem inlcudes

critique, as well as attached 1) M. L.
Neighbors Diversified Maritime Services, Inc.
advertisement and 2) Vietnam-Era Veterans Mortality
Study, West Virginia Residents 1968-1983, Preliminary
Report, January 1986.

Wednesday, July 11, 2001

Page 1869 of 1870

�FEB 04 1986
Critique of West Virginia Mortality Study

The West Virginia Department of Health has recently completed a
mortality study (copy attached) of Vietnam-era veterans based on the
recipients of a state bonus. The State offered a differential bonus
to all West Virginia residents who served in the military during the
Vietnam era with a larger amount going to those who served "incountry". 41,059 in-country (Vietnam veterans) and 41,782 non-incountry (non-Vietnam) veterans received the bonus. The list of bonus
recipients was matched against state vital statistic records
resulting in 1225 male Vietnam-era veterans who had died between 1968
and 1983. For each deceased male veteran a copy of the Report of
Separation From Active Duty (DD 214) was reviewed to determine dates
and place of service. The latter was determined by receipt of at
least one of the three medals awarded for service in the Southeast
Asia theater of operations. In addition, cause of death information
was obtained on each deceased veteran. Of the 1225 deceased
veterans, 615 were in the group of Vietnam veterans and the remaining
610 were non-Vietnam veterans, i.e., veterans who served elsewhere
during the same period of time. When comparing causes of death
between all veterans in the group and non-veterans of similar age
only those classified as accidents, poisoning, and violence were
elevated among the veteran group. Deaths due to cancer were
statistically the same in both groups. Other causes of death were
lower in the veteran group, a commonly observed phenomenon known as
the "healthy veteran effect".
A stated by the authors, the study has a number of limitations which
must be kept in mind when interpreting the results:
"In spite of the intense publicity given to the bonus campaign,
it is likely that many veterans or their survivors never applied
for the bonus. Thus, those veterans who did qualify for a bonus
represent an unknown proportion of the actual number of West
Virginia males'who served in the military during the Vietnam
era. It cannot be assumed that the proportion was similar for
both [groups]. Furthermore, because the mortality tape
identified only residents of West Virginia who died during the
study period, deaths in that period among veterans who no longer
resided in West Virginia at the time of their demise would not
have been counted among the 1,225 veterans deaths ascertained.
. . With respect to a comparison between in-country and era
.
veterans, it cannot be assumed that similar proportions of the
respective candidate population qualified for the bonus or that
the death rates among in-country veterans who were no longer
West Virginia residents were similar to those among era veterans
who were no longer residents."

�There were 145 cancer deaths of which 71 were in the group of
Vietnam veterans and 74 were among the non-Vietnam veterans. In
comparing specific types of cancers between these two veteran
groups, only Hodgkin's disease, testicular cancer, and soft tissue
sarcoma were elevated in the Vietnam veteran group. In each
instance, however, the number of actual cases was small, i.e., 5
cases of Hodgkin's disease, 3 testicular cancers and 3 soft tissue
sarcomas. As the authors state: "These findings must be
interpreted cautiously ... since ... the site- specific cancer
deaths were derived from a relatively small number . . and would
.
therefore be subject to ... large random fluctuations".
In addition to the stated limitations of the study, as pointed out
by the authors, there has been no systematic review of military
personnel records, except for the DD 214 reviews as noted above, to
validate the Vietnam service status of the study subjects. Because
of the interest and concern over the relationship between soft
tissue sarcoma and exposure to the phenoxy herbicides, the authors
have now requested a review of the personnel records of the 3
veterans recorded as having this diagnosis. All.three of these were
reported to have occurred in the in-country veteran group. The
first of these is now known to have served in Thailand, not Vietnam,
and would not have been exposed to Agent Orange. This is an example
of the serious effect of misclassification especially when dealing
with small numbers of subjects. In addition, there has been no
systematic review of hospital or other clinical records to validate
cause of death information or confirm the specific cancer diagnosis.
Again, when dealing with relatively small numbers, a few errors in
diagnosis can significantly alter the conclusions.
In summary, this study appears to have been well designed and well
conducted as far as it goes. As noted by the authors, however, it
has inherent limitations and additional data are needed to validate
some of the conclusions.

BARCLAY M. SHEPARD, M.D.

Director, Agent Orange Projects Office

�«J£.

tLAet&amp;Ad&amp;Ht-

1 January 1986
ANNOUNCEMENT
M. L. NEIGHBORS, DIVERSIFIED MARITIME SERVICES, INC., announces
that it is now able to offer part time consultative service or
representation in the Washington, DC area to additional firms or
persons that are engaged or have an interest in maritime related
business ventures or business involving the disposal of chemical
waste. Such work may also be arranged for in locations other than
the Washington DC area as mutually agreed, and on either a prime or
sub-contract basis.
Among services offered are:
A. Maintaining continuous contact with federal agencies
having jurisdiction or control over maritime or chemical waste
disposal ventures, and submittal of reports on matters of client
interest. Rapid "feed-back" on specific information of more
urgent interest can also be provided.
B. Projection of U.S. chemical waste disposal requirements,
in general or with specificity.
C. Assisting in the initiation of either a maritime project
or a project involving chemical waste disposal (except services
involving the disposal of chemical waste by incineration at sea
cannot be provided until after 30 November, 1986).
CORPORATE EXPERIENCE INCLUDES:
Nineteen years involvement with Department of Defense vessel
charters and military cargo movement contracts.
Thirteen years involvement with various offices of the
Environmental Protection Agency that are responsible for
regulating chemical waste disposal. This work included interaction with other federal agencies and with commercial firms
offering alternative types of chemical waste disposal service.
Written inquiries should be addressed to M. L. Neighbors, DMS
Inc., 777 Fourteenth St., Suite 747, Washington, DC, 20005.
Further information may also be obtained from Mr. Neighbors at
phone number 564 1568 (area code 301 if calling from outside
metro area).

�WEST VIRGINIA HEALTH DEPARTMENT

�VIETNAM-ERA VETERANS MORTALITY STUDY
WEST VIRGINIA RESIDENTS

1968 - 1983

Preliminary Report

January 1986

Arch A. Moore, Jr.
Governor

David K. Heydinger, M.D.
Director, Department of Health

�Alan P. Holmes, B.S.E.E., M.B.A.
Principal Investigator

WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
VIETNAM-ERA VETERANS MORTALITY STUDY COMMITTEE

Charles Bailey
Assistant Director, Health Statistics Center
Roy C. Baron, M.D., M.P.H.
Medical Epidemiologist
Edward Bosanac, Ph.D.
Research Consultant
John Brough, Dr. P.H.
Director, Preventive Health Services
Charles Conroy, M.A.
Agent Orange Program Coordinator
Acting Director, Community Health Services
Loretta Haddy, M.A., M.S.
State Epidemiologist
Alan P. Holmes, M.B.A.
Director, Health Statistics Center

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Sandra Y. Pope, Administrative Assistant, Agent Orange Program
Eugenia Thoenen, Publications Coordinator, Health Statistics Center
Thomas N. Leonard, Programmer/Analyst, Health Statistics Center
Betty Jo Berry, Secretary, Health Statistics Center
We would also like to thank Col. John W. Moon and the staff of
, the West Virginia Department of Veterans' Affairs for their
invaluable assistance in providing data used in this study.

For further information, contact
Charles Conroy, Agent Orange Program Coordinator
1800 Washington Street, East
Charleston, WV 25305
Telephone: (304) 348-3210

�Vietnam-Era Veterans Mortality Study
West Virginia Residents 1968-1983

The Agent Orange Assistance Program, established in 1982 by
the West Virginia legislature, requested the Health Statistics
Center of the Department of Health to conduct a study of the
causes of death among state Vietnam veterans from 1968 through
1983.*

The purpose of the study was to compare the mortality

pattern among veterans with that of nonveterans

in order to

generate hypotheses regarding any differences in the causes of
death among the former. A comparison of the causes of death among
veterans who served in Vietnam with those among veterans who did
not serve in Vietnam was also undertaken in order to speculate
whether

the Vietnam

experience

might

be

associated

with a

distinct mortality pattern.

METHODS

Identification of West Virginia Veterans

West Virginia residents who served in the military during
the years of the Vietnam Conflict were identified from the list

*The Vietnam era is generally defined as extending from 1964
until 1973. For the purposes of this study, however, only those
deaths from 1968 were considered because of the small number of
deaths occurring before that year, in addition to difficulties
imposed by cause-of-death coding changes over the longer
interval.

�of applicants for a military service bonus offered by the state
Department of Veterans' Affairs in 1974.

To qualify for a bonus,

veterans had to meet the following criteria:
1) they must have rendered active service in the armed
forces at some time between August 1, 1964, and March
28, 1973, inclusive, or have been recipients of the
Vietnam armed forces expeditionary medal if they saw
active service prior to August 1;
2) they must have been residents of West Virginia for at
least six months prior to entry into active service;
3) they must have actively served for a period of at least
ninety days unless discharged because of a servicerelated disability, and
4) they must have been honorably discharged.
Efforts to notify eligible veterans or their survivors about
the bonus program included one national public awareness campaign
conducted in November 1975 and one conducted in July 1976.
Public service announcements were issued over the television
networks, and notices were posted in every major newspaper in the
country

and

organizations

on

service

advertised

networks

the

bonus

overseas.
legislation

Veterans'
in

their

publications, and some offered assistance in filing for the bonus
as a promotional device in their membership campaigns.

Three different bonuses were offered. Veterans who did not
serve in Vietnam

("out-of-country" or era veterans) were to

receive up to $300 (Type 3 bonus); Vietnam veterans ("in-country"
veterans) were

to receive

up to $400

(Type 4 bonus), and

surviving relatives of veterans who died while in the service
during the period designated by the legislature were to receive

�$500 (Type 5 bonus).

In West Virginia,

the Department

of Veterans'

reported a total of 86,247 initial applicants.

Affairs

Of those who

applied for the bonus, 83,730 veterans or survivors (97%) were
eligible (Figure 1).

Of these, 41,782 qualified for the Type 3

(Vietnam-era) bonus, 41,059 qualified for the Type 4 (Vietnam)
bonus, and 889 qualified for the Type 5 bonus.

Since this was to

be a study of mortality following discharge from the service, the
Type 5 bonus recipients were excluded from subsequent analyses.
Names of the Type 3 and Type 4 qualifiers were, entered onto a
computer tape, referred to as the "bonus tape."

Identification of Veteran and Nonveteran Deaths

A complete listing of West Virginia resident deaths from
1968 through 1983 was prepared from records maintained by the
Health Statistics Center and entered onto a "mortality tape."
The

names

on

this

list were then compared with those on the

bonus tape in order to identify veterans who died during this
period.

For deaths from 1968 through 1978, the information had

to be matched by name since social security numbers were not
included on the mortality tape for these years.

Any possible

match generated in this manner was searched by hand and confirmed
by comparing the social security number on the death certificate
with that on the veteran application.

From 1979 through 1983, it

was possible to match by social security number.

�FIGURE 1
WV VIETNAM VETERAN MORTALITY STUDY
SELECTION OF STUDY POPULATION
1968-83

Bonus Tape
83,730

1

1

1
In -Country
Vietnam
41,059

Not-in-Country
Era
41,782

No-Match
Death File
41,169

Females

Era
3

Nonwhite
Males
Era
30

MatchedDeath File
Era
613

Males
Era
610

White
Males
Era
580

No-Match
Death File
40,444

Died in
Service
889

MatchedDeath File
Vietnam
615

Females
Vietnam
0

Males
Vietnam
615

Nonwhite
Males
Vietnam
36

White
Males
Vietnam
579

�There were 1,234 initial matches between the bonus tape and
the mortality tape, 614 Vietnam-era (Type 3) veterans and 620
in-country

(Type

4) veterans.

The veterans' discharge forms

(DD-214s) were then manually checked to verify their in-country
status.*

This

review

reclassification

of

resulted

several

in

records,

the

deletion

leaving

1,228

and/or
deceased

veterans who qualified, 613 for the Type 3 bonus and 615 for the
Type 4 bonus.

Three of the deceased veterans, all Type 3 bonus

recipients, were female.

They were excluded from the final tape;

the subsequent analyses included only deceased male veterans.

Of the 1,225 male veterans who died (Table 1), 1,159 were
white and 66 were nonwhite (65 black and 1 Hawaiian).
nonwhite veterans were Type 3 (5%) and 36 were Type 4

Thirty
(6%).

Because nonwhite veterans constituted a small percentage of those
who died, the study combined the mortality patterns of white and
nonwhite veterans.

For

nonveteran males,

deaths were

identified

from the

mortality tape by deleting the records of all remaining female
deaths and those of the 1,225 male veteran deaths.
thus four groups defined for analysis:
died; (2) male

Vietnam-era-only

There were

(1) all male veterans who

(Type 3)

veterans

who

died;

*In-country status was determined by the receipt by the
veteran of one of three service medals (the Vietnam service medal,
the Vietnam campaign medal, or the Vietnam expeditionary medal) as
noted on the DD-214. These medals were awarded to military
personnel who served in the Southeast Asia theater of operations.

�TABLE 1
TYPE 3 AND TYPE 4
MATCHES BETWEEN BONUS TAPE AND MORTALITY TAPE
BY YEAR
1968-83

YEAR

VIETNAM-ERA
(Type 3)

IN-COUNTRY
(Type 4)

TOTAL

1968

4

13

17

1969

14

16

30

1970

17

22

39

1971

16

33

49

1972

26

31

57

1973

33

22

55

1974

25

29

54

1975

50

47

97

1976

47

46

93

1977

50

40

90

1978

54

35

89

1979

53

44

97

1980

58

51

109

1981

53

70

123

1982

55

59

114

1983

56

56

112

TOTAL

610

615

1,225

�(3) male in-country (Type 4) Vietnam veterans who died, and (4)
all

other West

Virginia

males

(nonveterans) who

died

from

1968-83.

DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF DECEASED VETERANS

Age Distribution

The average age at death was 35.3 for all veterans, 35.1 for
era veterans and 35.4 for in-country veterans.

Table 2 shows

that the distribution of deaths by age for Type 3 and Type 4
veterans was similar.

Tables 3 and 4 present the distributions of age at death by
race for Vietnam-era and Vietnam veterans, respectively.

Among

white Type 3 veterans, the average age at death was 35.3, among
nonwhites 31.3. For Type 4 veterans, the mean age at death for
whites was 35.5, with 33.5 that for nonwhites.

�TABLE 2
ALL VIETNAM-ERA VETERANS
Age Distribution by Type of Service

VIETNAM-ERA
(Type 3)

TOTAL

IN- COUNTRY
(Type 4)

AGE GROUP

f

%

%

*

4

I

15-19

4

0.7

1

0.2

5

0.4

20-24

82

13.4

92

14.9

174

14.2

25-29

139

22.8

125

20.3

264

21.5

30-34

137

22.4

143

23.2

280

22.9

35-39

83

13.6

61

9.9

144

11.7

40-44

42

6.9

53

8.6

95

7.7

45-49

36

5.9

60

9.8

96

7.8

50-54

40

6.6

33

5.4

73

6.0

55-59

24

3.9

32

5.2

56

4.6

60-64

12

2.0

12

2.0

24

2.0

65-69

9

1.5

3

0.5

12

1.0

70-74

2

0.3

0

0.0

2

0.2

TOTAL

610

100.0

615

100.0

1,225

100.0

Average Age
at Death

35.4

35.1

8

35.3

�TABLE 3
VIETNAM-ERA VETERANS (TYPE 3)
Age Distribution by Race

WHITE

TOTAL

NONWHITE

AGE GROUPS

%

#

%

#

%

1

19

4

0.7

0

0.0

4

0.7

20-24

77

13.3

5

16.7

82

13.4

25-29

131

22.6

8

26.7

139

22.8

30-34

127

21.9

10

33.3

137

22.4

35-39

79

13.6

4

13.3

83

13.6

40-44

42

7.2

0

0.0

42

6.9

45-49

33

5.7

3

10.0

36

5.9

50-54

40

6.8

0

0.0

40

6.6

55-59

24

4.2

0

0.0

24

3.9

60-64

12

2.1

0

0.0

12

2.0

65-69

9

1.6

0

0.0

9

1.5

70-74

2

0.3

0

0.0

2

0.3

TOTAL

580

100.0

30

100.0

610

100.0

Average Age
at Death

35.3

31.3

35.1

�TABLE 4
IN-COUNTRY VIETNAM VETERANS (TYPE 4)
Age Distribution by Race

NONWHITE

WHITE

TOTAL

AGE GROUPS

%

#

#

%

t

Z

19

0

0.0

1

2.8

1

0.2

20-24

87

15.0

5

13.8

92

14.9

25-29

114

19.7

11

30.5

125

20.3

30-34

135

23.3

8

22.2

143

23.2

35-39

59

10.2

2

5.6

61

9.9

40-44

51

8.8

2

5.6

53

8.6

45-49

59

10.2

1

2.8

60

9.8

50-54

29

5.0

4

11.1

33

5.4

55-59

30

5.2

2

5.6

32

5.2

60-64

12

2.1

0

0.0

12

2.0

65-69

3

0.5

0

0.0

3

0.5

70-74

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

TOTAL

579

100.0

36

100.0

615

100.0

Average Age
at Death

35.5

33.5

10

35.4

�Branch of Service

Review of the DD-214 forms showed that 718 (59%) of the
deceased veterans had served in the army, 210 (17%) had served in
the air force, 167* (14%) had served in the navy, and 120 (10%)
had served in the marines (Table 5).

Seventy-five percent of the

in-country veterans who died had been in either the army or the
marines, in contrast to 62% of the era veterans.

Twenty-five

percent of in-country veterans had served in either the air force
or the navy, in contrast to 37% of, the era veterans.

For 10

veterans, the branch of service was not recorded on the discharge
forms.

*Includes 3 coast guard veterans.

11

�TABLE 5
ALL VIETNAM-ERA VETERANS
Branch of Service by Type of Service
VIETNAM-ERA
(Type 3)

IN-COUNTRY
(Type 4)

TOTAL

BRANCH OF SERVICE

%

*

t

%

*

%

Army

340

55.7

378

61.5

718

58.6

Air Force

127

20.8

83

13.5

210

17.2

16.1

69

11.2

167

13.6

Navy

98*

Marines

39

6.4

81

13.2

120

9.8

Unknown

6

1.0

4

0.6

10

0.8

610

100.0

615

100.0

TOTAL

*Includes
3 coast
guard
veterans

12

1,225

100.0

�ANALYTIC METHODS

In

spite

of

the

intense publicity

given to the bonus

campaign, it is likely that many veterans or their
never

applied

for the bonus.

survivors

Thus, those veterans

who did

qualify for a bonus represent an unknown proportion of the actual
number of West Virginia males who served in the military during
the Vietnam era.

It cannot be assumed that the proportion was

similar for both Type 3 (era) and Type 4 (in-country) qualifiers.
Furthermore, because the mortality tape identified only residents
of West Virginia who died during the study period, deaths in that
period among veterans who no longer resided in West Virginia at
the time of their demise would not have been counted among the
1,225 veteran deaths ascertained.

Because of these limitations, the records provide neither
complete information about the total candidate population nor a
comprehensive

estimate

of the force

veterans who did qualify.
the

veteran

and

the

of mortality

among

the

With respect to a comparison between
nonveteran

groups,

the

data

would

underestimate the relative force of mortality among the veterans,
if such a comparison were made.

With respect to a comparison

between in-country and era veterans, it cannot be assumed that
similar

proportions

of

the

respective

candidate population

qualified for the bonus or that the death rates among in-country
veterans who were no longer West Virginia residents were similar
to those among era veterans who were no longer residents.

13

�The method of choice for a study of mortality when there is
incomplete data on the population at risk is a proportionate
mortality analysis.

In this type of study the proportion of all

deaths due to the disease(s) of interest in the study population
is

compared with

the proportion of all deaths due to the

disease(s) of interest in the comparison (referent) population.
Such proportional rates do not express the risk of dying from a
disease since the incidence is not measured against a population
base.

They simply suggest that there may be a difference worth

investigating further.

The validity of such a study rests on the

assumption that there is no association between the study factor,
i.e.,

veteran

status, and the occurrence of other diseases.

Since we cannot make this assumption, such an analysis is used to
generate hypotheses or to conduct preliminary tests of etiologic
hypotheses without collecting much additional data.

The relationship between the proportion of deaths due to a
specified cause in a study population and the proportion derived
from the referent population is expressed as a proportionate
mortality ratio (PMR).

The PMRs in this study are standardized

to adjust for selected confounding variables.

When the veteran

group and its subgroups were compared with the nonveteran group,
adjustments were made by stratifying on age at death by 5-year
intervals (15-19, 20-24, . . . etc.) and on year of death by
2-year intervals
stratum,

(1968-69, 1970-71,

expected deaths were

. . . 1982-83).

For each

calculated by determining

the

percentage the cause of death of interest contributed to all

14

�causes in the referent population and multiplying this result by
the total deaths from all causes in the study population.

The

standardized PMR statistic (sPMR) is the ratio of the number of
deaths of interest observed in the study population summed over
all strata, multiplied by 100, and then divided by the expected
values summed over all strata.

Stratification by age only and

not by year of death was done when the in-country (study) group
of veterans was compared to the era (referent) group.

This was

done in order to avoid losing data from the study group when
respective strata in the referent group had no deaths.

An sPMR

greater than 100 indicates that the cause of interest contributes
a greater percentage of all deaths in the study population than
in the referent population; an sPMR less than 100 indicates that
the cause contributes a smaller percentage of all deaths in the
study population than in the referent population, and an sPMR of
100 indicates that the cause of interest contributes the same
percentage of all deaths in both groups.
expected frequencies
against

confidence
p-value

for each cause of interest were tested

the null hypothesis, i.e.,

proportionate

mortality

interval

expressing

The observed and

structure,

around
the

each

each

exact

sPMR

by

group has the same
calculating

a

95%

and also a one-tailed

probability

of

finding

the

difference between the observed and expected frequencies.
RESULTS

In the period 1968 through 1983, there were 1,225 deaths
among males who had served in the military during the Vietnam

15

�Conflict.

Six hundred fifteen of the men served at least a

portion of their duty in Vietnam (in-country, Type 4 veterans)
and 610 had no experience in Vietnam (era, Type 3 veterans). For
both groups combined, 716 deaths (58%) were from external causes
(injury from accidents, poisoning, or violence), 237 (19%) were
from

cardiovascular

neoplasms,

48

(4%)

disease,
were

145

from

(12%)

were

nonmalignant

from
diseases

malignant
of the

gastrointestinal system, 24 (2%) were from nonmalignant diseases
of

the

respiratory

system,

5

(-=1%) were

from allergic,

metabolic, and endocrine disorders, and 50 (4%) were from all
other causes.

With nonveteran West Virginia male deaths from 1968 through
1983 as a reference, Table 6 demonstrates the number of observed
and

expected

deaths

in

each

cause-of-death category for all

veterans together and for in-country and era veterans separately.
For all veterans, the observed distribution of deaths over these
categories was significantly different from the expected (Chi
square

Goodness

of

Fit •» 50.2

with

6 degrees of

freedom,

p&lt;10~8).

Accidents,
significantly

poisoning,

greater

and

proportion

violence
of

accounted

all veteran

for

a

deaths than

expected (sPMR excess), while deaths from allergic, metabolic,
and endocrine conditions and from all other causes accounted for
significantly smaller-than-expected
deaths

(sPMR

deficits).

For

16

proportions of all veteran

cardiovascular, digestive, and

�TABLE 6
ALL CAUSES OF MORTALITY
Vietnam Veterans vs. Nonveterans
West Virginia, 1968-83
ALL VETERANS
vs.
NONVETERANS

IN- COUNTRY VETERANS
vs.
NONVETERANS

ALL CAUSES

°/.
Accidents, Poisoning,
and Violence
(80E9)
E0-99

716,
'626.74

Cardiovascular Disease
(9-5)
3049

237,
'251.5

Malignant Neoplasms
(140-209)

sPMR

(95Z CI)

°/
'E

sPMR

ERA VETERANS
vs.
NONVETERANS

(95Z CI)

°
/

sPMR

(95Z CI)

(106-130)

354,
'318.1

111*

(100-124)

'E

(106-123)

362.
'308.6

117**

94

(83-107)

114,
'129.1

88

(73-106)

123,
'122.4

100

(84-120)

145,
'142.4

102

(86-120)

71,
'73.6

96

(75-122)

74,
'88
6.

108

(85-136)

Diseases of the
Digestive System
(520-577)

48,
'56.7

85

(62-112)

29,
'29.0

100

(67-144)

19,
'27.8

68

(41-107)

Diseases of the
Respiratory System
(460-519)

24.
'29
3.

73

(47-108)

12,
'16.7

72

(37-125)

12,
'16.2

74

(38-129)

38*

(10-96)

52**

(33-77)

114**

y

Allergic, Metabolic,
and Endocrine Diseases
(240-279)
All Other Causes
(Residual)

'19
2.

50.
'29
9.

23**

(7-53)

'll.2

9**

(-=1-47)

'06
1.

54**

(40-71)

26.
'68
4.

56**

(36-81)

24,
'61
4.

Goodness of Fit X2. -50.2
odt
p- 1 '
08
*polsson p value*.05
**poisson p value£.001

�respiratory diseases, the standardized proportionate mortality
ratios were less than unity when all veterans were compared with
nonveterans,

but

the

observed

numbers

of

deaths

in these

categories were not significantly lower than the expected.
proportion of veteran

The

deaths due to malignant neoplasms was

similar to that of nonveterans.

The pattern

of death

for

in-country

and era

veterans

evaluated separately relative to the nonveteran population was
similar in both instances to the pattern observed for the groups
combined.

In a separate contrast with era veteran deaths as the

standard (not shown), no difference was. observed in the overall
mortality pattern between in-country and era veterans (Chi square
Goodness of

Fit = 7.0 with

5 degrees

of

freedom, p - .22).

In order to evaluate more specific causes of death within
the leading categories, the contrasts were repeated to obtain
standardized proportionate category-specific mortality ratios for
external causes (injury), cardiovascular diseases, and malignant
neoplasms separately.

Table 7 shows the distribution of injury

deaths for veterans contrasted with nonveterans over five causes:
motor vehicle accidents, non-motor-vehicle accidents, suicide,
homicide, and all other external causes.

Homicide accounted for

a significantly smaller-than-expected proportion of the injury
deaths among veterans.

The standardized proportionate injury

mortality ratio for motor-vehicle-related deaths among veterans
was greater than 100 but was not a statistically significant

18

�TABLE 7
INJURY MORTALITY
Vietnam Veterans vs. Nonveterans
West Virginia, 1968-83
ALL VETERANS
vs.
NONVETERANS
°
/

sPMR

(95Z CD

315,
'9.
206

108

(97-121)

201,
'0.
293

96

(83-110)

104

(85-125)

ACCIDENTS. POISONING,
AND VIOLENCE
(E800-999)
Motor Vehicle
(E810-E825)
Ron-Motor Vehicle
(E800-E809,
E826-E949)
Suicide
(E9SO-E9S9)
HoBiclde
(E960-E969)
All Other Causes
(E970-E999)

IN-COUNTRY VETERANS
vs.
NONVETERANS

'E

111

'107.2
63.
'81.5

77*

(59-99)

26.
'74
2.

95

(62-139)

Goodness of Fit X^.--6.78

P-.15
*poisson p value-=.05

sPMR

107

(115
9-2)

100,
'105.1

95

(77-116)

111

(85-144)

sPMR

(95Z CI)

154.
'4.
105

110

(318
9-2)

101,
'0.
142

97

(79-118)

/
'54.2

96

(72-126)

35,
'14
4.

85

(59-118)

87

(45-152)

(95Z CI)

161,
'5.
101

ERA VETERANS
vs.
NONVETERANS

°'E
/

5
9

/
'53.0

28.
'02
4.
1
4

/
'13.6

70*

103

(46-101)

(56-173)

Goodness of Fit XJ^-5.43

P-.25

°'E
/

5
2

12

/
'38
1.

Goodness of Fit X2df-2.71

p-,61

�excess.

For non-motor-vehicle fatalities, suicide, and all other

causes, the expected numbers were similar to the observed.

The

overall pattern for veterans was not significantly different from
nonveterans (Chi square Goodness of Fit » 6.78 with 4 degrees of
freedom, p =.15).

Separate comparisons of the in-country and era

veteran populations

with

nonveterans

similarly

overall difference in the distribution

reflected no

of injury deaths; the

ratios in each of these contrasts were similar to those observed
for the combined veteran group.

Among the cardiovascular causes of mortality
there

were

no

veteran

deaths

from

either

(Table 8),

hypertension or

rheumatic heart disease (p-=.005), fewer-than-expected veteran
deaths from cerebrovascular disease (difference not significant),
and

more-than-expected veteran deaths due to ischemic heart

disease

(difference

standardized

not

significant).

proportionate

cardiovascular

The

individual

disease

mortality

ratios for in-country and era veterans were similar to the
corresponding mortality ratios derived for the combined group.

Proportionate cancer mortality ratios comparing veterans to
nonveterans are shown in Table 9.
veterans

and

respiratory

the
system

nonveteran

excess

contributed

population,

accounted

proportion of veteran cancer
by

In the comparison between all

for

deaths

in-country

identical to that contributed by

20

a

era

neoplasms

significantly
than

of

greater

expected.

veterans
veterans.

was

the

The

virtually

Melanoma of

�TABLE 8
CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE MORTALITY
Vietnam Veterans vs. Nonveterans
West Virginia, 1968-83
ALL VETERANS
vs.
NONVETERANS
CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
(390-459)
Ischemic Heart Disease
(410-414)

Cerebrovascular Disease
(430-438)

°/.

sPMR

(95Z CI)

158.
'141.5

112

(95-131)

18,
'50
2.

72

(43-114)

Hypertension
(400-405)

°65
'.

Rheumatic Heart Disease
(390-398)

°/5.4

All Other
Cardiovascular Diseases
(415-429, 440-459)

IN-COUNTRY VETERANS
vs.
NONVETERANS

61

'86
5.

0**

0**

104

*poisson p valuer .05
**poisson p value «.005

°/

'E

sPMR

(95Z CI)

°'E
/

sPMR

(952 CI)

/
'67.7

111

(87-139)

83,
'40
7.

112

(89-139)

73

(32-144)

10,
'40
1.

71

(34-131)

75

8

/
'09
1.

-

°/3.4

0*

-

°&gt;1.9

0

/
'30.2

103

(80-134)

ERA VETERANS
vs.
NONVETERANS

31

-

°/3.0

0*

-

°/3.5

0*

(70-146)

30

'84
2.

106

-

(71-151)

�TABLH. »
CANCER MORTALITY

Vietnam Veteran* vs. Nonveterans
West Virginia. 1968-83
IN-COUNTRY VETERANS
vs.
NONVETERANS

ALL VETERANS
vs.
NONVETERANS
MALIGNANT NEOPLASMS
(140-209)

sPHR

(951 CD

135*

(102-174)

123

(91-162)

462*

(6-9)
1897

21,
'69
2.

78

(819
4-1)

12,
'.
66

182*

(94-318)

79

(38-145)

6

128

(46-276)

7

123

(50-254)

°&gt;E

Respiratory System
"4.
'31
(160-163)
Trachea, Bronchus, 50
and Lung
'07
4.
(162)
Larynx
(161)
Digestive Organs
and Peritoneum
(150-159)

to
to

Malignant Melanoma
of the Skin
(172)
Lymphoms
(200-203, 208-209)

'13
'.

10

/
'12.7

Hodgklns Disease
(201)

/4.7

Hale Genital Organs
(185-187)
Leukemia
(204-207)

&gt;,.7

6

/13.1

3

/0.7

%

sPHR

(951 CD

131*

(87-187)

29,
'09
2.

139*

(93-199)

118

(76-174)

25.
'19.5

128

(83-189)

49
2*

(95-1349)

49
2*

(95-1349)

77

(37-142)

% 7
.

4

148

(40-378)

%9
.

205*

(89-406)

7

&gt;6.2

113

(45-233)

% 4
.

47

(10-136)

% 4
.

208

(69-497)

&gt;/2.4

42

(1-233)

4

182

(49-461)

%*
.

83

(18-254)

(17-100)

3

48

(10-139)

V.

44

(9-129)

(36-334)

2

/1.4

143

(17-508)

2

118

(5-435)

(11-102)

'41
/.

24

(-1-137)

3

51

(10-148)

250

(52-731)

% 7
.

429*

(90-1271)

200

(5-1071)

46*

129

*/10

Soft and Connective
Tissue
(171)

3

Bone
(170)

2

/K4

143

(18-531)

Urinary Organs
(188-189)

2

/5.6

36

(4-129)

/15.6

103

(59-166)

16

/
'21.2

(951 CD

10,
'13.0

Brain i Nervous System
(191-192)

All Other Halfgnancle.

25

sPNR

(911
3-4)

4

/1.2

29,
'22.2

NONVETERANS

79

Oral Cavity
(140-149)

&gt;3.1

°&gt;E

ERA VETERANS

40*

•polaaon p value*.05

11,
'14.0

/2.7

/2.2

/6.3

'05
'.

V,

'77
'.

0*

78

/1.7
/5.9

°OS
'.

V
.
2

-

(29-170)

'.
27

' ,
V

0

-

125

(3-663)

74

(10-305)

127

360-231)

�TABLE 10
CANCER MORTALITY FOR VIETNAM VETERANS

In-Country Veterans vs. Era Veterans
West Virginia, 1968-83

OBSERVED,
'EXPECTED
Respiratory System
(160-163)

(95Z CI)

93

(63-134)

NS

110

(55-197)

NS

7

280

(113-577)

0.014

5

833

(271-1945)

0.0004

222

(62-579)

NS

500

(103-1461)

0.023

(12-118)

0.066

-

-

29,
'31.0

n
Digestive Organs and Peritoneum
(150-159)
Lymphoma
(200-203. 208-209)

to

Hodgklns Disease
(201)

POISSON p VALUE
(Fisher's exact)

sPMR

/
'10.0
'2.5

'.
06

U)

Male Genital Organs
(185-187)

*!.
/.

Cancer of the Testls
(186)

V
.

Malignant Melanoma of the Skin
(172)

VT

46

Soft and Connective Tissue
(171)

\

oo

Leukerolas
(204-207)

3

Oral Cavity
(140-149)

2
/

All Others

/1.9

2.4

8

/
'12.7

158

(33-461)

NS

83

(10-301)

NS

63

(27-124)

NS

�the skin also accounted for a significantly greater-than-expected
proportion

of

cancer

deaths

among

all

veterans,

but

the

contribution of in-country veterans to this excess was trivial in
comparison with that of era veterans.

Deaths from leukemias and

malignant neoplasms of the nervous system each occurred less
frequently than expected among both veteran groups.
tissue tumors,

For soft

a significant difference between observed and

expected deaths was not found for all veterans combined.

These

tumors occurred only among in-country veterans and not among era
veterans,

however.

When

in-country

veterans

alone

were

contrasted with nonveterans, they had a significantly elevated
standardized proportionate cancer mortality .ratio for soft tissue
tumors.

The

contrast between

in-country and era veteran cancer

deaths shows the difference in the observed (3) and expected (0)
soft

tissue

tumors

for

in-country

veterans

(Table

10).

In-country veterans also have significantly elevated standardized
proportionate
contrasted

cancer

with

era

mortality

ratios

veterans.

The

for

lymphoma

difference

is

when
more

specifically attributable to Hodgkin's disease, for which there
were five deaths in this group, compared with an expected 0.6.
Finally, there was a statistically significant excess in the sPMR
from testicular cancer among the in-country veterans.
Discussion
The present study demonstrates that the mortality experience

24

�among persons who served in the military during the Vietnam
Conflict differs substantially from that of nonveterans.

It also

suggests that there may be important differences between the
veterans who served in Vietnam and those who did not with respect
to their cancer mortality experience.

Differences in the mortality experience between veteran and
nonveteran groups are influenced by a selection bias initiated at
the time of induction to the military service.
assure

that healthy

individuals

In order to

serve in the military,

the

preinduction screening process excludes persons with preexisting
conditions

such

as

diabetes and

allergies, asthma, hypertension,

have

substantially

metabolic

disorders,

rheumatic heart disease, and

clinically apparent malignancies.
veterans

other

lower

Because of this selection,
mortality

rates

than the

nonveteran population for many years following their induction.
This is known as the "healthy veteran effect."

In the present

study, this selection bias is the most plausible hypothesis to
account for the significant sPMR deficits observed among veterans
for mortality from allergic, metabolic, and endocrine disorders,
all

other causes, rheumatic heart disease, and hypertension.

Moreover, it may also have contributed to the less prominently
diminished sPMRs among veterans for cardiovascular,

digestive,

and respiratory diseases.

While

real

differences

in the mortality

rates

between

veteran and nonveteran groups for selected causes are reflected

25

�in

the

sPMRs,

proportionate

they

also

mortality

complicate the
for

other

interpretation

causes.

Since

of
the

proportionate contribution from all separate causes must sum to
100, the proportionate contributions

among "healthy" veterans

from causes that are not screened by the induction process become
artificially inflated relative to their contribution among the
"unhealthy" population.

Injury, the leading cause of death for both veterans and
nonveterans, played a significantly greater role among veterans,
accounting for 58% of their deaths as opposed to an expected 51%.
Since the study did not adjust for discrepancies in the health
status between veterans and nonveterans, part of the excess in
injury among veterans must be due to the relative absence of
deaths from conditions that would exclude persons from military
service.

While an excess of these deaths araong nonveterans

reciprocally

diminishes

the

proportion

of

their mortality

attributable to injury, there may be a real difference in life
style

and

the

propensity

veterans and nonveterans.

for

risk-taking

behavior

between

An evaluation of injury mortality

alone, performed to eliminate distortion from the healthy veteran
bias, showed only that homicide was significantly less important
as

a

cause

nonveterans.

of

injury

death

among

veterans

than

On the other hand, while not significant,

among
the

difference between the observed and expected number of veteran
deaths from motor-vehicle accidents would suggest that this is at
least one area where veterans may be at a substantially greater

26

�risk

of death than nonveterans.

This

issue, however,

and

previous assertions that veterans are at greater risk of death
from suicide cannot be adequately addressed by this analysis in
the absence of more complete data on the populations at risk.

While

malignancies

as

a

group

accounted

for

similar

proportions of veteran and nonveteran deaths, deaths from tumors
of the respiratory system were a significantly more prominent
cause of cancer death among veterans than among nonveterans.
probable

explanation

for

this

finding

would

be

A

a greater

prevalence of smoking among military as compared with nonmilitary
personnel, but this cannot be substantiated from the limited
information available on death certificates.

In general, the pattern of death among in-country veterans
from all causes, and within the subcategories of "accidents,
poisoning, and violence" and "cardiovascular diseases," were
similar to those observed for all veterans combined, and there
were no substantial differences in the mortality patterns between
in-country and era veterans for these categories.

Among cancer

deaths, however, there was strong statistical evidence to suggest
that .Hodgkin's disease, cancer of the testis, and soft tissue
tumors were more common among veterans who served in Vietnam than
among veterans who did not.
cautiously,

however,

These findings must be interpreted

since

the

expected

proportions

of

site-specific cancer deaths for in-country veterans were derived
from a relatively small number (74) of cancer deaths among era
27

�veterans and would therefore be subject to considerably large
random fluctuations.

At the same time, the difference between

the observed and expected numbers of soft tissue tumors among
in-country

veterans

supports similar

proportionate mortality

findings

study conducted

in a previous

by the Massachusetts

Department of Public Health. Neither the Wisconsin study nor the
New York study found significant differences between in-country
and era veterans in the occurrence

of soft tissue

sarcomas.

These studies, however, and the present one are limited by the
absence of precise exposure data, unknown sizes of the candidate
populations at risk, and insufficient follow-up time to account
for

latency

from

in-country veterans.

exposures

that might have been unique to

Also, by including deaths from as early as

1968, the present study may have been biased against finding an
excess occurrence of cancers with long latency periods.

This study only suggests the possibility that the risk of
death

from

soft

tissue

sarcomas,

Hodgkin's

disease,

and

testicular cancer are elevated among veterans who served in
Vietnam.

We are currently awaiting the records of the in-country

veterans who died from these tumors in order to speculate about
possible exposure histories and to generate hypotheses that may
have some biologic plausibility.

To take advantage of latency

periods, cancer-specific proportionate mortality studies could be
repeated

in several years.

Also, by excluding

deaths

that

occurred in the late-Vietnam and early post-Vietnam period, and
by improving ascertainment of exposure histories, studies can

28

�focus more sharply on etiologic hypotheses relating to possible
exposures in Vietnam.

On the other hand, since proportionate

mortality studies are more useful to explore than to confirm
hypotheses, it is recommended that more precise risk-assessment
studies of Vietnam cohorts be performed using national data to
further test the hypothesis that Hodgkin's disease, testicular
malignancies, and soft tissue tumors may be important causes of
cancer mortality among veterans who served in Vietnam.

29

�BIBLIOGRAPHY

Dienstfrey, Stephen J., and James J. Bryne.
Veterans in the
United States; A Statistical Portrait from the 1980" Gensus.
Washington, D.C.: Veterans Administration, 1985.
"Final Toll for U.S. in Indb-China."
(Sept. 24, 1973): 73.

U.S. News £ World Report

Kogan, Michael D., and Clapp, Richard W. Mortality among Vietnam
Veterans in Mas sachuse t1s, 1972-1983. Boston: Massachusetts
Department of Public Health, 1985.
Lawrence, Charles E. et al. "Mortality Patterns of New York
State Vietnam Veterans." American Journal of Public Health
75 (March 1985): 277-79.
'
Shottenfeld, David, and Joseph F. Fraumeni, Jr., Cancer
Epidemiology and Prevention.
Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders
Company, 1982.

30

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24354">
              <text>069</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24355">
              <text>1868</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24358">
              <text>Series III Subseries III</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24353">
                <text>Shepard, Barclay M.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24356">
                <text>February 4 1986</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24357">
                <text>Critique of West Virginia Mortality Study</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24359">
                <text>state-funded Vietnam veterans study</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24360">
                <text>mortality trends</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24361">
                <text>study criticism</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24362">
                <text>study protocol</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3290" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24332">
              <text>069</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24333">
              <text>1866</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24337">
              <text>Series III Subseries III</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24326">
                <text>Lawrence, Charles E.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24327">
                <text>Andrew A. Reilly</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24328">
                <text>Phillip Quickenton</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24329">
                <text>Peter Greenwald</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24330">
                <text>William F. Page</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24331">
                <text>Amy J. Kuntz</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24334">
                <text>American Journal of Public Health</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24335">
                <text>1985-03-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24336">
                <text>Mortality Patterns of New York State Vietnam Veterans</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24338">
                <text>state-funded Vietnam veterans study</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24339">
                <text>mortality trends</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24340">
                <text>cancer risk assessment</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3287" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24301">
              <text>069</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24305">
              <text>1864</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24311">
              <text>Series III Subseries III</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24297">
                <text>Greenwald, Peter</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24299">
                <text>Vito Logrillo</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24303">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;State of New York Department of Health, Office of Public Health</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24307">
                <text>1980-11-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24309">
                <text>Proportional Mortality of Vietnam Veterans, Other Veterans and Matched Controls in New York State, Exclusive of New York City</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24313">
                <text>state-funded Vietnam veterans study</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24314">
                <text>mortality trends</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24315">
                <text>cohort study</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3282" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1695">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/bc54fa583efffdef8051d9f49a71404e.pdf</src>
        <authentication>208c08c339cf33fd3b1a079fcdbc1162</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63644">
                    <text>ItomDNunber

°1861

Author

Bangert, Joseph V.

Corporate Author

Commonwealth of Massachusetts Agent Orange Progra

RdDOrt/ArtldO TltlO Health Survey of Massachusetts Vietnam Veterans,
Summary

Journal/Book Title
Year

1986

Month/Day

June

Color

0

Number of Images

12

Descrlpton Notes

Wednesday, July 11, 2001

Page 1862 of 1870

�COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
AGENT ORANGE PROGRAM
Office of the Commissioner of Veteran's Services
100 Cambridge Street
Boston, MA 02202

"Health Survey of Massachusetts Vietnam Veterans"

SUMMARY

June, 1986

�FOREWORD
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Agent Orange Program, a program of the
Office of the Commissioner of Veterans' Services, was provided funding by the
1983 Massachusetts Legislature for the purpose of conducting, "medical and
scientific testing related to the possible health effects of Agent Orange on
Massachusetts Vietnam Veterans."
In January, 1984, the Agent Orange Program, Office of the Commissioner of
Veterans' Services (OCVS) was implemented to survey programmatic, medical
and scientific options. The Agent Orange Program instituted the Agent Orange
Medical /Scientific Advisory Board to provide technical recommendations, oversight and review of proposals and implemented medical and scientific programs
and studies.
In January, 1985, the Massachusetts Agent Orange Program, in cooperation with
the Massachusetts Department of Public Health published the "Mortality Among
Massachusetts Vietnam Veterans, 1972-1983" written by Michael Kogan, M.A., and
Richard Clapp, M.P.H., as the first step in the Commonwealth's attempt to find
some answers to the complex questions surrounding the issue of Agent Orange.
This mortality study provides a stable foundation for our continued ongoing
efforts to provide scientific, technical, verifiable data regarding the effects
of Agent Orange where none had been previously available.
The Massachusetts Agent Orange Program's "Health Survey of Massachusetts
Vietnam Veterans, 1986" is the second step in our program's continuing
efforts to determine the needs of Massachusetts Vietnam Veterans and their
families. This survey utilized the "American Legion," or "Stellman questionnaire,"
with minor modifications. The survey results, contained within, are the result
of over 2,000 Massachusetts Vietnam Veterans and their families, and dependents
who took the time out to complete a rather detailed and complex form. Only
1,500 of the 2,000 questionnaires were included in the Massachusetts survey
as they were chosen on the completedness of the questionnaire, and those
filled out by Massachusetts veterans who had not been in the Vietnam theatre
were excluded.
The analysis of the data collected by the Massachsuetts Agent Orange Program
was compiled and analyzed by Mr. Frank J. Bove, M.S., an epidemiologist and
PhD candidate with Harvard University School of Public Health. We are indebted
to the hard work of this young scientist.
The Massachusetts Agent Orange Program also acknowledges the leadership role
of Governor Michael S. Dukakis of Massachusetts as well as that of Commissioner
of Veterans' Services, John Halachis in their ongoing committment to this
program and its importance for the more than 50,000 Massachusetts Vietnam
Veterans. We also acknowledge the General Court of the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts, and in particular to Senator Fran Doris, Representative Thomas
Vallely and former Representative Tom Lynch who took the leadership in bringing
the Massachusetts Agent Orange Program into being. We would be remiss if
we did not acknowledge the pioneering role of Mr. Christopher Gregory, the
former Director of the Agent Orange Program in getting the program on line.
We shall continue first and foremost to aggressively and independently survey
and test Massachusetts Vietnam Veterans who bore the brunt of battle and will
never be forgotten.

Jsefob/V. Bangert, Director
Massachusetts Agent Orange Program

r

�SUMMARY

Fifteen hundred Vietnam veterans in Massachusetts completed
health questionnaires in January 1985. The respondents were
those who filed a claim against the $180 million proposed out of
court settlement reached by attorneys' representing the seven
chemical manufacturers of Agent Orange and Vietnam veterans.
Although not a random sample of the more than 50,000 Massachusetts Vietnam veterans, the findings indicate a considerable
amount of illness among the respondents including tumors, neurobehavioral problems, reproductive difficulties and birth defects among their offspring. These findings are consistent with
the observed symptoms and disease found among those exposed to
2,4-D, 2,4,5-T and 2,3,7,8-TCDD (Dioxin) in the workplace or the
environment.

INTRODUCTION

Concern about the long-term effects of exposure to Agent
Orange is widespread among Vietnam veterans in the U.S. and Australia, as well as among the citizens of Vietnam. In southern
Vietnam, recent studies report a variety of persistent clinical
problems including recurring bouts of headaches, depression and
anxiety, asthenia, loss of libido, GI disorders and adverse reproductive outcomes. Studies of workers exposed to dioxin contaminated substances have found elevated rates of lymphomas and
soft tissue sarcomas. Neurologic and liver effects have also
been reported. Table 1 lists the findings of some of these occupational studies. Table 2 lists the findings of a Massachusetts
Departments of Public Health and Veterans Services study of mortality among Vietnam veterans. This study found elevated rates
of soft tissue sarcomas, kidney cancer, motor vehicle accidents
and suicides. Table 3 lists findings from other studies of
Vietnam veterans.
This survey of the health of Massachusetts Vietnam veterans
is part of an on-going research program that was sparked by the
findings of previous studies as well as the concerns raised by
veterans. The results of this survey are consistent with those
in the studies mentioned above.

METHODS AND SUBJECTS

In January, 1985, The Massachusetts Agent Orange Program
instituted a large-scale media campaign to alert Vietnam veterans

�of the court-imposed deadline for filing a claim against the proposed $180 million settlement reached by attorneys for the seven
manufacturers of Agent Orange and Vietnam veterans. About 2,000
veterans filed claims during a two day period at the state's
Office of Veterans Services. The American Legion health questionnaire was distributed to those filing claims. In addition,
some 300 questionnaires were mailed to veterans who phoned the
Agent Orange Program requesting to participate in the health
survey. Approximately 1800 questionnaires were returned to the
Agent Orange Program, fifteen hundred of these were selected
based on the criteria of completedness and actual service in
Vietnam.
Staff of the Agent Orange Program as well as trained volunteers, all of whom were Vietnam veterans, assisted respondents
with any questions or difficulties they encountered with the
questionnaire. Concerning the birth outcome data requested by
the questionnaire, if the veterans were not sure of the information being asked, they were provided with a self-addressed envelope and permitted to take the questionnaire home to consult with
their spouses.
RESULTS

Analysis of the questionnaire data was performed using DBASE
III.
Over a quarter of the respondents stated that they were
diagnosed with tumors (cancerous, benign, fatty or other). Nine
were diagnosed with Hodgkins Disease. Nearly 22% of the respondents indicated that one or more of their children had birth defects. Out of 1907 live births reported in the questionnaires,
462 (24%) had at least one birth defect and 160 had more than one
defect. Thirty-seven spina bifida, other brain or spine defects
were reported. Table 4 presents the data on other congenital
malformations.
Nearly one-third of the respondents indicated a decrease in
libido and 22% reported fertility difficulties (see Table 4).
Nearly two-thirds of the respondents indicated persistent problems with tiredness, over half reported persistent headaches and
difficulties with memory or concentration, and almost half reported nervous disorders (see Table 5).
Seventy-three percent of the respondents answered yes to the
question: "Have you or your family ever noticed a personality
change?". Eighty-two percent of the respondents claimed they regularly had at least one of the following problems: depression,
violent rage, anxiety and irritability. Most had more than one
problem. Two hundred and seventy-five respondents reported suffering from mental Illness or a breakdown. Symptoms of peripheral neuropathy in the lower or upper extremities were reported
in over two-thirds of the veterans. Indications of asthenia were
found in over half of the questionnaires (see Table 5).

�Many respondents reported GI disorders. Over a third stated
they had repeated nausea without flu or other sickness. Over 25%
reported repeated bouts with diarrhea. One-third indicated that
they regularly experienced loss of appetite and 20% reported
weight loss.
CONCLUSION

We reemphasize that the questionnaires were not randomly
distributed and were completed on a volunteer basis by a selfselected group of MA veterans. This means that we cannot base a
valid, scientific study on the information contained in these
questionnaires. However, the questionnaires clearly indicate
considerable disease and suffering among a relatively young group
of people (93% under age 45, 80% under age 40). The symptoms and
disease found are consistent with findings from other studies of
people exposed to dioxin, 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T.

REFERENCES

Ashe WF, Suskind RR (1949,1950)tReports on chloracne cases,
Monsanto Chemical Co., Nitro, W.VA.
Baader EW, Bauer AJ (1951):Industrial intoxication due to pentachlorophenol. Indus Med Surg 20:289-290.
Barr MM (1982) :letter to editor. ANZ J. Psych. 16: 88-89.
»

Barr MM (1983): Apparent progressive axonal dying back neuropathy
in Vietnam veterans. Neuroscience Letters, Abstracts
suppl. ll:s.29.
Dugois P, et.al. (1956): Acne chlorlque au 2,4,5-T. Lyon Med
88:446-447.
Erickson JD, et.al. (1984): Vietnam veterans1 risks for fathering
babies with birth defects. JAMA 252:903-912.
Goldman PJ (1973): Schwetst akute chlorakne, eine massenintoxikation durch 2,3,6,7-TCDD. Der Hautarzt 24:149-152.

�Moses M, et.al. (1984): Health Status of workers with past exposure to 2,3,7,8-TCDD in the manufacture of 2,4,5-T: Comparison of findings with and without chloracne. Am J Ind Med
5:161-182.
Pazderova-Vejlupkov J, et.al (1980): Chronic poisoning by
2,3,7,8-TCDD. Prac Lek 32::204-209. NIH Library Translation.
Pazderova-Vejlupkov J, et.al (1981): The development and prognosis of chronic intoxication by TCDD in men. Arch Env
Health 36:5-11.
Poland AP, et.al. (1971): Health survey of workers in a 2,4-D and
2,4,5-T plant. Arch Env Health 22:316-327.
Stellman S, Stellman J (1980): Health problems among 535 Vietnam
veterans potentially exposed to toxic herbicides. Am J Epi
112:444 (abstract).
Susklnd RR (1953): A clinical and environmental survey, Monsanto
Chemical Co., Nitro, W.VA.. Report of the Kettering Laboratory, July.
Suskind RR (1977): Chloracne and associated health problems in
the manufacture of 2,4,5-T. Report to the NIEHS/IARC Joint
Conference, Lyon, France. January.
Telegina KA, Bikbulatova LJ (1970): Affection of the folllcular
apparatus of the skin in workers employed in the production
of the butyl ester of 2,4,5-T. Vestnik Derm Ven 44:35-39.

�TABLE 1
REPORTED OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES TO DIOXIN-CONTAMINATED
SUBSTANCES RESULTING IN HUMAN ILLNESS*

Year,place &amp;
chemical(s)

Type of exposure &amp; number
of cases

Neurological
effects

Other
effects

References

1949 W.VA
TCP, 2,4,5-T

explosion
117
production
111

nervousness,
irritability,
insomnia,
personality
change,depression,
headache,pain
&amp; weakness in
lower extremities, per ipheral
neuropathy

fatigue, [Ashe &amp;
weight
Suskind,
loss,
1949,
weakness, 1950;
decreased Suskind,
libido,im - 1953;
Suskind,
potence
1977] .

1949 Germany
TCP

production,
industrial
lab 17

pain &amp; weakness,paresthesia,polyneuritis in lower
extremities

fatigue,
decreased
libido,
impotence

1952 Germany
TCP

production
31

pain &amp; weakness,paresthesia in lower
extremities,
memory &amp; concentration deficits,sleep
disturbances,
apathy,dulled
emotional response

fatigue,
[Susmyocardial kind,
damage
1977]

1953 Germany
TCP

explosion
55

hearing impairment,
peripheral
neuropathy

fatigue,
[Golddrowsiness, man,
myocardial
1973]
damage

1956 France
TCP

production
17

peripheral
neuropathy

1964 USSR
TCP 2,4,5-T

production
128

headache,memory loss,
sleeplessness

[Baader
&amp; Bauer,
1951]

[Dugois,
et.al.,
1956]
fatigue,
[Telejoint pain gina &amp;
Bikbulatova,
1970]

�TABLE 1 (continued)
Year,place &amp;
chemical(s)

Type of exposure &amp; number
of cases

Neurological
effects

Other
effects References

1965-68
Czechoslovakia
TCP 2,4,5-T

production
80

pain &amp; weakfatigue, [Pazderoness in lower
weight
va-Vejlupkov,
loss
extremities/
somnolence,
et.al.,
1980;
headache, insomnia,peri19811
pheral neuropathy, emotional
&amp; psychiatric
disorders

1969 NJ
TCP 2,4,5-T
2,4-D

production
73

weakness in
lower extremities,hypomania

*adapted from Moses/et.al.,1984

[Poland,
et.al. '
1971]

�TABLE

2

Standardized Proportional Mortality Ratios for Selected Causes of Death for
Vietnam Veterans Compared with Either Non-Vietnam-Veterans or Non-Veteran Males
ICO NO*

CAUSE OF DcATH

OBSERVES
VIETNAM
VETERAN
DEATHS

All Causes

COMPARISON GROUP
NON- VIETNAM
VETERANS
PMR
95% C.I.

NON-VETERAN
MALES
PMR
95% C.I.

840

140-239

All Neoplasms

153-154

Colo-Rectal

162

Lung, Bronchus

171

Connective Tissue

9

880

189

Kidney

9

183 (96,348)

353 (191,651)

139

88 (75,103)

87 (74,102)

28

111 (77,160)

138 (96,199)

•

129

95

(78,115)

112

(94,134)

8

113

(56,228)

85

(42,172)

98 (66,146)

102

(72,145)

25

(513,1510)

473 (262,855)

390-429 'Circulatory System
439-459 (except Cerebrovascular)
430-438 Cerebrovascular
Disease
571
Cirrhosis of the
Liver

29

94 (65,136)

90 (61,132)

•

E800-E999 All external causes

428

108 (98,119)

H3 (103,124)

E810-E825 Motor vehicle accidents

169

110 (95,127)

127 (106,152)

E950-E958 Recorded suicides

102

93 (77,112)

118 (98,143)

799.9,
Estimated suicides*1*
E850-E869,
E950-E958,

163

113 (96,132)

140 (120,163)

31

80 (56,114)

66 (46,94)'

E980-E982

E960-E969 Homicides

International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, code number.
**See reference (6) for discussion of this category. Note that there were
13 deaths in the category 799.9.

�TABLE 3
REPORTS ON THE HEALTH STATUS OF VIETNAM VETERANS

Reference

Exposed

Health Effects

Stellman &amp;

Vietnam Veterans
535

congenital malformations,
GI disturbances,pain in
joints,sleep and psychological disturbances

Barr/1982;
1983

Vietnam Veterans
Australia, 120

peripheral neuropathy,
insomnia,depress ion,
Irritability,lassitude,
memory loss,headaches,
attempted suicides

Erickson,
et.al. 1984

Vietnam Veterans
696

congenital malformations:
spina bifida,cleft lip,
impaired hearing,clubfoot

Stellman,
1980

�TABLE 4
CONGENITAL MALFORMATIONS

Total
Number

Birth Defect

Prevalence *

BDMP Incidence
Rate *

Spina Bifida,other
brain or spine defects

37

195

18.4

clubfoot

24

126

24.5

cleft lip/palate

17

89

13.4

missing, deformed or
extra toes/fingers

31

163

Down's Syndrome

11

58

7.9

hip abnormalities

21

111

27.0

heart defect

60

defect of the
digestive system

35

hearing disorders

63

cerebral palsy

27.2**

6

other skeletal defects
Condition requiring
special education or care

46

122

* per 10,000 live births
** polydactyly and syndactyly

OTHER REPRODUCTIVE PROBLEMS
Problem

Number

%

Loss of libido

487

32.4%

Infertility

330

22.0%

Infertility and saw physician

246

16.4%

low birth weight children

162

8.1%

(under 5.5 Ibs.)

�10

TABLE 5
NEUROBEHAVIORAL DYSFUNCTION

Problem

Number

%

persistent tiredness
(saw physician)

957
270

63.7%
18.0%

persistent headaches
(saw physician)

773
338

51.5%
22.5%

nervous disorders
(saw physician)

684
356

45.5%
23.7%

difficulty with memory
or concentration
(saw physician)

786
165

52.3%
11.0%

mental illness or breakdown
(receiving some disability)

275
132

18.3%
8.8%

1233
1015

82.1%
67.6%

321

21.4%

regularly depressed, get into a
violent rage, anxious or irritable
(more than one behavioral problem)
Sensory symptoms of early stage
peripheral neuropathy
asthenia (need hands to rise from
chair, can't climb stairs without
holding onto railing, unable to do
tasks requiring holding arms at
shoulder level, difficulty grasping
tools)

775

51.6%

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24255">
              <text>069</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24257">
              <text>1861</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24260">
              <text>Series III Subseries III</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24254">
                <text>Bangert, Joseph V.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24256">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;Commonwealth of Massachusetts Agent Orange Program</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24258">
                <text>1986-06-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24259">
                <text>Health Survey of Massachusetts Vietnam Veterans, Summary</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24261">
                <text>state-funded Vietnam veterans study</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24262">
                <text>mortality trends</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24263">
                <text>congenital birth defects</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24264">
                <text>industrial exposure</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3278" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1691">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/f2c540321d7fff75fbd4b41bf057c04c.pdf</src>
        <authentication>a6ba1af182f3b53496f94f69023ab06e</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63640">
                    <text>Item ID Number

01359

Author

Kogan, Michael D.

Corporate Author

Massachusetts Office of Commissioner of Veterans Ser

Ronnrt/ArtldB Tltta Mortality Among Vietnam Veterans in Massachusetts,
^
1972-1983

Journal/Book Tltte
Year

1985

MOUth/Day

January 18

Color

°

Number of Imagos

33

DBSCrlptOD NotOS

Duplicate does not include cover.

Wednesday, July 11, 2001

Page 1860 of 1870

�Mortality
among Vietnam veterans
in Massachusetts,
1972-1983
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Michael S. Dukakis, Governor
Office of the Commissioner of Veterans' Services
Agent Orange Program
January 18, 1985

�FOREWORD

The Office of the Commissioner of Veterans' Services was provided funding by
the 1983 Massachusetts Legislature for the purpose of conducting "medical and
scientific testing related to Agent Orange."
In January of 1984, the Agent Orange Program of the Office of the Commissioner of
Veterans' Services was implemented to survey programmatic, medical and scientific
options. The Agent Orange Program instituted an Agent Orange Medical Scientific
Advisory Board to provide technical recommendations, oversight and review of
proposal and implemented medical and scientific programs and studies.
As recommended by the Agent Orange Program and the Agent Orange Medical and
Scientific Advisory Board, the attached study, "Mortality Among Vietnam Veterans
in Massachusetts, 1972-1983" compiled by Michael Kogan, M.A., and Richard Clapp,
M.P.H., was contacted as the first step in the Conroonwealth's attempt to find
some answers to the complex questions surrounding the issue of Agent Orange.
This mortality study provides a stable foundation for our continued ongoing
efforts to provide scientific, technical, verifiable data regarding the effects
of Agent Orange where none has been previously available.
As highlighted in the study summary, "Deaths due to motor vehicle accidents,
suicides and kidney cancer were significantly elevated among Vietnam Veterans
compared to non-veteran males for the study period 1972-1983." As further
stated, "Elevated risk of death due to motor vehicle accidents and suicide lends
support to the hypothesis that Vietnam Veterans have had a greater incidence of
traumatic death since the end of the conflict than other non-veteran males."
This office is designing, preparing and directing this mortality study equally
emphasizing the preparation of an administrative and program response to all
study findings. Relative to the significant findings of elevated death due to
cancer and traumatic-stress related death, I feel strongly that the Office of
the Comnissioner of Veterans' Services response to the study focus primarily on
the incidence of traumatic-stress related death among Vietnam veterans. Further
study and research regarding cancer incidence and cancer death among Vietnam
Veterans will be aggressively pursued by this office.
In an attempt to appropriately respond to the traumatic-stress related deaths
highlighted by the study, it is necessary to assess the needs of those living
Vietnam Veterans who display stressed behavior. For this reason, the Office
of the Commissioner of Veterans' Services through the Agent Orange Program has
engaged McLean Hospital to provide a behavioral study of Vietnam Veterans. The
purpose of the study is to examine the possible behavioral consequences of exposure
to Agent Orange and to determine whether this exposure is responsible for any of
the symptoms that are often referred to as Post-Traumatic-Stress-Disorder.
The Office of the Commissioner of Veterans' Services feels most strongly that
the priority in dealing with the Vietnam Veterans is in researching, defining
and treating Post-Traumatic-Stress. It is my fear that Post-Traumatic-StressDisorder is the root of a host of problems facing not only the Vietnam Veteran
but also their families, spouses, children, neighbors and employers.

�ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The Massachusetts Agent Orange Program, directed by Chris Gregory, was
substantially responsible for assembling a blue ribbon Medical/Scientific
Advisory Board. The credentials of the board members are consistent with
the highest standards of medical services found in the Boston area.
Because of his sincere and unrelenting drive to seek the answers to the health
predicament caused by Agent Orange, State Representative Thomas Vallely, a
Vietnam Veteran himself, provided the board with his own personal experience
as well as the need for public awareness of the perils of exposure to Agent
Orange.
This study would not have been possible without the wisdom and commitment of
the General Court of Massachusetts, and, in particular, the dedicated efforts
of State Senator Francis D. Doris, Chairman of the Special Commission on the
Concerns of the Vietnam Veteran. The Senator's sympathetic efforts have been
the bench mark for legislative support.
The support of the Department of Public Health and its personnel under the
direction of Commissioner Bailus Walker was significant. Dr. Walker's commitment
to public issues is consistent with his concern for the potential for harm
to humans exposed to Agent Orange.
Many staff members of the Office of the Commissioner of Veterans' Services
worked diligently in the publication of the mortality study and developed a
program to generate public awareness. They are: Joe Bangert, Research Assistant
for the Agent Orange Program; Martin Burke, Public Information Specialist;
Linda Wiggins, Administrative Assistant, for the long and arduous hours of
secretarial duties; the sound counsel of Maryann Argento, and last, but not least,
Dennis O'Brien, for whatever else needed to be done.
The Office of the Commissioner of Veterans' Services will continue to work to
uncover the complexities of exposure to Agent Orange and its harmful effects
upon Veterans of Vietnam and their families in the areas of behavior, birth defects
and mortality. Expanded mortality studies to address any new hypotheses brought
by this study will be forthcoming.

�MORTALITY AMONG VIETNAM VETERANS
IN MASSACHUSETTS, 1972-1983

MICHAEL D. KOGAN, M.A.
RICHARD W. CLAPP, M.P.H.

January 18, 1985

Massachusetts Office of Commissioner of Veterans Services
Agent Orange Program
Massachusetts Department of Public Health
Division of Health Statistics and Research

�Summary
The patterns of death among Vietnam veterans, other veterans who did not
serve 1n Vietnam, and non-veteran males from Massachusetts were studied by
compiling death certificate Information.

Veteran status was based on

whether or not the decedent's name appeared on a 11st of Massachusetts
veterans who served from 1958-1973 and received a bonus.

This bonus 11st was

supplied by the Office of the Commissioner of Veterans Services.

Only those

with an honorable discharge were eligible for the bonus. Persons whose name
on the death certificate matched that on the bonus 11st were Identified as
Vietnam veterans if they received a $300 bonus, or as non-Vietnam veterans if
they received a $200 bonus.
to be a non-veteran.

If there was no match, the decedent was presumed

Analyses of the mortality patterns of Vietnam veterans

compared to non-Vietnam veterans and to other males who died during the time
period (1972-1983) of the study were conducted.
Deaths due to motor vehicle accidents, suicides, and kidney cancer were
significantly elevated among Vietnam veterans compared to non-veteran males
for the study period 1972-1983.

Deaths due to stroke and connective tissue

cancer were significantly elevated among Vietnam veterans compared to both
non-Vietnam veterans and non-veteran males.

Deaths due to circulatory system

diseases, other than stroke, were lower among the Vietnam veterans compared to
non-Vietnam veterans.

Elevated risk of death due to motor vehicle accidents

and suicide lends support to the hypothesis that Vietnam veterans have had a
greater incidence of traumatic death since the end of the conflict than other
non-veteran males.

The excess cancers of connective tissue and kidney are

based on only nine death's from each type.

More years of follow-up would be

�Introduction
The Agent Orange Program 1n the Office of the Commissioner of Veterans
Services (OCVS) requested that a mortality study be conducted comparing the
causes of death among Vietnam veterans to those of
non-veteran Massachusetts residents.

non-Vietnam veterans and

This study was motivated by a concern

that Vietnam veterans may be at increased risk of dying from violent, preventable causes, such as motor vehicle accidents, homicide, and suicide.
The list of Massachusetts veterans whose mortality experience was evaluated was supplied on computer tape by the OCVS.

In August 1984, the study

.was initiated using mortality information from the statewide data base
collected by the Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Division of Health
Statistics and Research.

Using computer-record linkage techniques and manual

matching, the study group and two comparison groups were assembled.

The pro-

portionate mortality and mortality odds ratio were chosen as the methods for
comparing the mortality experience among the three groups because information
on the number of years since Vietnam service was not available for the Vietnam
veterans on the OCVS computer tape.
were not available.

In addition, the ages of the veterans

This study is a first step in analyzing Vietnam

veterans' experience of one particular health outcome (mortality). Therefore,
it can be used only to draw very general conclusions and to develop hypotheses
for further studies.

�necessary to adequately assess these findings, and further Investigation,
using other sources of Information, 1s recommended.
These results are based on the limited Information available from death
certificates.

Information on such potential confounding factors as smoking

and drinking habits, and complete histories of occupational exposures, was
unavailable and therefore could not be controlled for 1n the analysis.
Nevertheless, the results justify Intensified efforts to reduce deaths due to
stress-related or self-destructive behavior among Vietnam veterans.

�Methods
The mortality experience of Vietnam veterans was compared to that of
Vietnam-Era veterans who did not serve In Vietnam and to the general
Massachusetts white male population during the period 1972-83.
A computerized file of Massachusetts mortality data 1s available from the
Division of Health Statistics and Research of the Massachusetts Department of
Public Health (MDPH). The mortality data for Vietnam and non-Vietnam veterans
was obtained by linking the statewide computerized mortality files with the
computerized list of veterans who applied for a military service bonus,
available from the Massachusetts Office of Veterans Services. Eligibility for
the bonus was based on the following criteria:

(1) veterans must have served

for at least six months between July 1, 1958 and April 1, 1973; (2) they must
have been Massachusetts residents for at least six months Immediately prior to
entering the service; (3) they must have applied for the bonus; and (4) they
must have been honorably discharged.

Veterans received a bonus of $300 if

they went to Vietnam, or $200 If they did not.

It has been estimated that 95%

of all eligible Massachusetts residents received the bonus.(l)
The mortality and veterans files were linked by matching social security
numbers for the years 1972-76 and 1980-83.

For the years 1977-79, social

security numbers were not entered on the MDPH computerized files, although
they continued to be recorded on death certificates. For these three years,
the computer files were linked by matching names.

The resulting output was

then verified by hand-checking social security numbers on death certificates
with those from the veterans file.

�The computer linkage provided Information on age at death, sex, race,
cause of death, year of death, and Vietnam service.
classified

Cause of death was

according to the appropriate revisions of the

International

Classification of Diseases and converted to the Ninth Revision Codes.(2)
Systematic validation procedures were used to assess the accuracy of the computerized information on cause of death and veteran status, compared to the
information from the veterans bonus applications and the death certificates.
The cause of death codes on the mortality file were found to be more than 99%
accurate when compared to death certificates, as were the veteran status codes
on the veterans file.
Because white males accounted for about 98% of the veteran decedents,
cause of death data for non-whites or female veterans would be very sparse.
This report, therefore, is restricted to an analysis of white male mortality
patterns, although information on other groups may be pursued in further
studies.1
The number of deaths from specific causes among Vietnam veterans was
compared with the expected number of deaths based upon the actual mortality
experience of both non-Vietnam veterans and all other males in Massachusetts.
Veteran deaths were not Included in the Massachusetts white male comparison
group.

These numbers were derived from calculations of time-cause-specific

proportionate mortality within 10-year age groups.

The ratios of observed to

*Appendix A lists the non-white deaths by age at death, cause of death and
year of death.

�expected numbers of deaths were summarized using the standardized proportionate mortality ratio (sPMR).(3)

The statistical significance of the dif-

ferences was assessed using the Mantel-Haenszel Chi test with one degree of
freedom.(4) For cases in which the observed number of deaths was greater than
five, but the expected number of deaths was less than five, the Poisson
distribution was used to determine statistical significance.

SPMRs were

calculated for both the entire study period (1972-83) and the last six or
eight years of the study period, depending upon which time frame offered sufficient numbers for statistical stability. Also, the last half of the study
period was analyzed separately because any significant effect in the last six
or eight years might have been diluted by looking at the whole study period
only.
For causes of death for which the sPMR was statistically significant, the
standardized mortality odds ratio (sMOR) was also calculated according to the
method described by Miettinen.(B)

The sMOR was used to confirm the results

of, and to correct for biases Inherent in, the sPMR method. The sMOR compares
the odds for the exposed population—the number of deaths from the cause of
interest

compared

with

the

number

(auxiliary) causes—with

the

expected

(nonexposed) population.(6)

of deaths
odds

from

derived

selected
from

reference

a comparison

The sMOR approach 1s essentially equivalent to

the case-control approach, in which cases are all deaths from the disease of
interest, controls are all deaths from the auxiliary causes, and the exposure
of interest is Vietnam service. (7)
The sMOR analysis was carried out using all circulatory disease, except
rheumatic heart disease (ICDA 390-459), as the auxiliary cause.

All cir-

�dilatory disease was chosen on the assumption that 1t was unrelated to the
exposure of Interest (Vietnam service).

There were sufficient numbers of

deaths due to this auxiliary cause that statistically stable results could be
calculated.
Although accidents and violent deaths comprised the largest cause of death
category (e800-e999), they were not chosen as the auxiliary causes of death
because they had previously been found to be higher for Vietnam veterans compared to other males.

Including these causes of death would have Introduced

bias Into the sMOR analysis.

The differences between the two ratios of

observed and expected deaths were assessed by using the Mantel-Haenszel Chi
test with one degree of freedom.
The standardized mortality ratio (SMR) 1s another method for calculating
the ratio of observed to expected deaths.

It 1s sometimes viewed as a pre-

ferable method to the sPMR or the sMOR because the SMR 1s calculated by taking
the ratio of the mortality rate in the exposed group to the mortality rate in
the nonexposed group for a comparable follow-up per1od.(3) However, in this
study it was not possible to calculate SMRs because neither the calendar years
of Vietnam service nor the ages of the veterans were recorded on the veterans
file.

Date of birth was available for approximately 67% of the veterans on

the veterans file.

This Information was added to the original veterans file

by the Massachusetts Registry of Motor Vehicles, which matched the veterans
files with a computerized 11st of Massachusetts driver's license holders in
1983.

An estimated death rate using only those veterans where a date of birth

was listed would have been subject to selection bias, because it would have

�8

excluded veterans who died, moved out of state, or did not hold a driver's
license.

Therefore, age-specific mortality rates for the veterans could not

be calculated from the information available on the computerized files.

�Results

The numbers of deaths that occurred during the study period (1972-83)
among both Vietnam veterans and non-Vietnam veterans are presented, by age
group and calendar year, 1n Tables 1 and 2.

The distribution of deaths

suggests that Vietnam veterans, as a group, are probably younger than the
non-Vietnam veterans.

Tables 3 and 4 present the results of the standardized

proportionate mortality ratio (sPMR) analysis comparing Vietnam veterans to
non-Vietnam veterans and to all other non-veteran Massachusetts white males
for specified causes of death.

The sPMRs and their chi values are included in

the tables, and p-values are given for all statistically significant findings
(p£.05).

Uncommon causes of death for Vietnam veterans are not presented

because statistically stable comparisons could not be made.

A minimum of

seven observed Vietnam veteran deaths was used as a criterion for calculating
an sPMR.

Two methods of accounting for suicide deaths are used. The first

method includes only those deaths that were recorded as suicides on death certificates.

However, it has been estimated that the actual suicide rate is

three times the reported rate.(8) Therefore, a second calculation, known as
an "estimated suicide rate," was used which includes all poisonings (ICDA
codes e850-e869, e980-e982), recorded suicides (ICDA codes e950-e958), and
unknown causes of death (ICDA code 799.9).(9) The analyses presented were
carried out on 766 deaths from specific causes out of the total 840 deaths in
the Vietnam veterans group.

�10

TABLE 1
DISTRIBUTION OF DEATHS BY AGE AND CALENDAR YEAR
FOR WHITE MALE VIETNAM VETERANS. 1972-1983
AGE AT
DEATH

YEAR OF DEATH
1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 TOTAL

20-29

49

40

48

48

41

22

18

17

8

1

2

0

294

30-39

6

6

8

14

8

18

22

34

57

57

52

53

335

40-49

8

8

9

15

12

4

4

9

6

13

10

8

106

50-59

1

2

5

3

4

2

8

8

11

7

12

16

79

60+

1

0

1

1

1

3

1

2

0

3

4

9

26

TOTAL

65

56

71

81

66

49

53

70

82

81

80

86

840

TABLE 2
DISTRIBUTION OF DEATHS BY AGE AND CALENDAR YEAR
FOR WHITE MALE NON-VIETNAM VETERANS, 1972-1983
AGE AT
DEATH

YEAR OF DEATH
1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1932 1983 TOTAL

20-29

52

52

42

51

60

24

14

17

20

17

7

6

362

30-39

37

68

73

83

94

52

70

59

77

66

64

67

810

40-49

19

24

24

36

40

31

26

49

75

95 105 112

636

50-59

26

22

40

39

34

30

29

37

43

38

36

46

420

60+

3

14

12

16

15

3

11

22

36

40

55

60

287

TOTAL

137 180 191 225 243 140 150 184 251 256 267 291 2515

�11
TABLE 3
OBSERVED AND EXPECTED NUMBERS, STANDARDIZED PROPORTIONATE MORTALITY RATIOS
AND CHI VALUES COMPARING VIETNAM VETERANS TO NON-VIETNAM VETERANS
BY SPECIFIC CAUSES OF DEATH FOR PERIODS 1972-83 AND 1976-83 OR 1978-83*
CAUSE OF DEATH
ANALYSIS OBSERVED EXPECTED SPMR
CHI VALUES
(ICDA CODES, 9th REV.) PERIOD
DEATHS DEATHS
ALL CAUSES

840

ALL NEOPLASMS (140-239) 1972-83

129

136.15

95

-.52

1972-83

8

7.07

113

.34

1972-83
1976-83

25
21

25.49
22.44

98
94

-.10
-.30

CONNECTIVE TISSUE (171) 1972-83

9

1.02

880

7.89 (p&lt;.0001)

KIDNEY CANCER (189)

1972-83

9

4.91

183

1.84

CIRCULATORY SYSTEM (EXCEPT CEREBROVASCULAR) 1972-83
(390-429, 439-459) - 1978-83

139
85

158.54
106.54

88
80

-1.55
-2.08

(p-.03)

CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE 1972-83
1978-83
(430-438)

28
19

25.17
11.56

111
164

.56
2.19

(p«.02)

CIRRHOSIS OF LIVER
(571)

1972-83
1976-83

29
24

30.81
19.03

94
126

-.33
1.15

ALL EXTERNAL CAUSES
(6800-6999)

1972-83
1978-83

428
202

396.09
181.51

108
111

1.60
1.52

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENTS 1972-83
(e810-e825)
1978-83

169
74

153.17
61.38

110
121

1.27
1.61

1972-83
1978-83

102
55

109.92
55.65

93
99

-.75
-.09

(ESTIMATED SUICIDES***
(799.9, e850-e869,
6950-6958, e980-e982)

1972-83
1978-83

163
94

144.75
76.01

113
124

1.51
2.06

HOMICIDE (6960-6969)

1972-83
1976-83

31
20

38.73
18.82

80
106

-1.24
.27

153-154)
LUNG, BRONCHUS (162)

RECORDED SUICIDES
( e950-e958)

(P-.03)

*SEE PAGE 6 FOR FURTHER EXPLANATION OF STUDY PERIOD ANALYSIS.
**SIGNIFICANCE BASED ON POISSON DISTRIBUTION.
***ESTIMATED SUICIDES BASED ON UNKNOWN CAUSES OF DEATH, RECORDED SUICIDES,
AND POISONINGS. (9)

�12

TABLE 4
OBSERVED AND EXPECTED NUMBERS, STANDARDIZED PROPORTIONATE MORTALITY RATIOS
AND CHI VALUES COMPARING VIETNAM VETERANS TO THE MASSACHUSETTS WHITE
MALE POPULATION BY CAUSE OF DEATH FOR PERIODS 1972-83 AND 1976-83 OR 1978-83*
CAUSE OF DEATH
ANALYSIS OBSERVED EXPECTED SPMR
CHI VALUES
(ICDA CODES, 9th REV.) PERIOD
DEATHS
DEATHS
ALL CAUSES

840

ALL NEOPLASMS (140-239) 1972-83
1976-83

129
102

115.69
87.57

112
116

1.24
1.54

COLO-RECTAL (153-154)

1972-83

8

9.38

85

-.45

LUNG, BRONCHUS (162)

1972-83
1976-83

25
21

24.44
19.79

102
106

.11
.27

CONNECTIVE TISSUE (171) 1972-83

9

1.90

473

5.14(p«.0001)**

KIDNEY CANCER (189)

1972-83

9

2.55

353

4.04 (p-.OOl)**

CIRCULATORY SYSTEM (EXCEPT CEREBROVASCULAR)
1972-83
(390-429, 439-459)
1978-83

139
85

159.98
104.43

87
81

CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE 1972-83
(430-438)
1978-83

28
19

20.25
10.95

138
174

1.72
2.43 (p».015)

CIRRHOSIS OF LIVER
(571)

1972-83
1976-83

29
24

32.07
23.61

90
102

-.54
.8
0

i ALL EXTERNAL CAUSES
\(e800-e999)

1972-83
1978-83

428
202

377.66
166.11

113
122

2.59 (p-.OlO)
2.78 (p«.005)

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENTS 1972-83
(e8 10-e825)
1978-83

169
67

133.26
50.98

127
131

3.10 (p&lt;.003)
2.24 (p-.025)

RECORDED SUICIDES
Ke950-e958)

1972-83
1978-83

102
55

86.16
41.80

118
132

1.71
2.04

(p«.041)

ESTIMATED SUICIDES***
(799.9, e850-e869,
e950-e958, e980-e982)

1972-83
1978-83

163
94

116.21
59.56

140
158

4.34
4.46

(p&lt;.001)
(p&lt;.001)

1972-83
1976-83

31
20

46.71
28.09

66
71

HOMICIDE (e960-e969)
. '. ..

-1.66
-1.90

-2.30 (p«.021)
-1.52

*SEE PAGE 6 FOR FURTHER EXPLANATION OF STUDY PERIOD ANALYSIS.
**SIGNIFICANCE BASED ON POISSON DISTRIBUTION.
***ESTIMATED SUICIDES BASED ON UNKNOWN CAUSES OF DEATH, RECORDED SUICIDES,
AND POISONINGS. (9)

�13

Table 3 focuses on the proportionate mortality experience of Vietnam
veterans compared to non-Vietnam veterans.

Although the proportion of deaths

from all neoplasms was not unusual, the sPMR for connective and other softtissue neoplasms was significantly elevated (sPMR-880). All of the nine connective tissue neoplasms were sarcomas of five different types. This finding
for this cause of death had the most significant p-value in the study.
There was significantly less circulatory system disease among Vietnam
veterans for the six years from 1978-1983 (sPMR«80) compared to non-Vietnam
veterans.

Conversely, cerebrovascular disease among Vietnam veterans was

significantly elevated during the same time period ($PMR«164). The sPNR for
estimated suicides was significantly higher than expected for the final six
years of the study period (sPMR«124).
Table 4 displays the proportionate mortality ratios of Vietnam veterans
compared to the non-veteran Massachusetts white male population.
there were no significant differences

Once again,

In the proportion of all neoplasms.

However, the sPMR for connective and other soft-tissue neoplasms was significantly elevated (sPMR«473), as was the sPMR for kidney cancer (sPMR*353).
The patterns for causes of death found 1n Table 4 are similar to those in
Table 3.

There was a greater than expected proportion of cerebrovascular

disease among Vietnam veterans compared to the state's white male population
as a whole during the second half of the study period (sPMR»174). All major
categories of violent death were significantly elevated for Vietnam veterans,
with the exception of homicides (sPMR«66).

These categories included motor

�14

vehicle accidents (sPMR*127), estimated suicides (sPMR«140), and all external
causes (sPMR-113). Recorded suicides were elevated for the final six years of
the study period (sPMR»132).
The standardized mortality odds ratio (sNOR) was computed for each cause of
death for which the sPNR was statistically significant. The sMOR results are
presented In Table 5. The sMOR for circulatory system disease was not computed
because circulatory disease was used as the auxiliary cause of death for the
sMOR analysis.
Instances.

The sMOR findings differed from the sPMR findings 1n only two

Homicide was not found to be significantly lower for Vietnam

veterans compared to the state's white males (sMOR«.82), and estimated suicide
was not significantly
(sMOR*1.46).

elevated

when

compared

to non-Vietnam

veterans

Table 6 summarizes the causes of death for which the findings

were significant using both analytic methods.

�15

TABLE 5
STANDARDIZED MORTALITY ODDS RATIOS AND CHI VALUES
COMPARING VIETNAM VETERANS TO EITHER NON-VIETNAM VETERANS OR
THE MASSACHUSETTS WHITE MALE POPULATION BY SPECIFIC CAUSES OF DEATH
FOR 1972-83 AND 1976-83 OR 1978-83*
CAUSE OF DEATH
ANALYSIS COMPARISON
SMOR
CHI VALUES
(ICDA CODES, 9th REV.)
GROUP
PERIOD
CONNECTIVE TISSUE CANCER 1972-83 NON-VIETNAM
5.16
4.18(p&lt;.001)
VETERANS
(171)
MASSACHUSETTS
WHITE MALES
MASSACHUSETTS
WHITE MALES
MASSACHUSETTS
WHITE MALES

5.87

4.98(p&lt;.001)

4.04

4.27(p&lt;.001)

1.44

2.52(p».012)

1978-83

MASSACHUSETTS
WHITE MALES

1.29

1.96(p-.05)

1972-83

MASSACHUSETTS
WHITE MALES

1.65

3.85(p&lt;.001)

1978-83

MASSACHUSETTS
WHITE MALES
MASSACHUSETTS
WHITE MALES

1.39

3.10(p-.002)

1.46

2.09(p=.037)

1.40

1.50

1972-83

MASSACHUSETTS
WHITE MALES
NON-VIETNAM
VETERANS

1.46

1.53

1978-83

NON-VIETNAM
VETERANS

1.46

1.06

1972-83

MASSACHUSETTS
WHITE MALES

1.73

3.11(p-.002)

1978-83

1.69

2.43(p-.015)

1972-83

MASSACHUSETTS
WHITE MALES
MASSACHUSETTS
WHITE MALES

1976-83

MASSACHUSETTS
WHITE MALES

1972-83
KIDNEY CANCER (189)

1972-83

ALL EXTERNAL CAUSES
(e800-e999)

1972-83

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENTS
( 6810-6825)

RECORDED SUICIDES
(e950-e958)

1972-83
1978-83

ESTIMATED SUICIDES**
(799.9, e850-e869,
6950-6958, e980-e982)

HOMICIDES
(e960-e969)

.82

-1.62

.78

-.75

*SEE PAGE 6 FOR FURTHER EXPLANATION OF STUDY PERIOD ANALYSIS.
**ESTIMATED SUICIDES BASED ON UNKNOWN CAUSES OF DEATH , RECORDED SUICIDES,
' AND POISONINGS. (9)

�16

TABLE 6
SUMMARY TABLE FOR STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT CAUSES OF DEATH FOR PERIODS
1972-83 AND 1976-83 OR 1978-83*
STANDARDIZED MORTALITY ODDS RATIOS AND STANDARDIZED PROPORTIONATE
MORTALITY RATIOS COMPARING VIETNAM VETERANS TO EITHER NON-VIETNAM VETERANS
OR THE MASSACHUSETTS WHITE MALE POPULATION
CAUSE OF DEATH
ANALYSIS COMPARISON GROUP
SMOR
SPMR
(ICDA CODES, 9th REV.)
PERIOD
(xlOO)
CONNECTIVE TISSUE CANCER 1972-83 NON-VIETNAM
516
880
VETERANS
(171)
1972-83
MASSACHUSETTS
587
473
WHITE MALES
KIDNEY CANCER
404
1972-83 MASSACHUSETTS
353
(189)
WHITE MALES
CIRCULATORY SYSTEM
1972-83 NON-VIETNAM
88
(EXCEPT CEREBROVASCUVETERANS
LAR)**( 390-429, 439-459) 1978-83 NON-VIETNAM
80
VETERANS
CEREBROVASCULAR DIS1972-83 NON-VIETNAM
111
VETERANS
EASES** (430-4 38)
164
1976-83 NON-VIETNAM
VETERANS
138
1972-83
MASSACHUSETTS
WHITE MALES
174
1976-83
MASSACHUSETTS
WHITE MALES
144
ALL EXTERNAL CAUSES
113
1972-83 MASSACHUSETTS
(e800-e999)
WHITE MALES
129
1978-83 MASSACHUSETTS
122
WHITE MALES
127
MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENTS 1972-83
165
MASSACHUSETTS
(e81 0-e999)
WHITE MALES
131
1978-83
MASSACHUSETTS
139
WHITE MALES
146
118
RECORDED SUICIDES
1972-83 MASSACHUSETTS
( e950-e958)
WHITE MALES
140
132
1978-83
MASSACHUSETTS
WHITE MALES
140
ESTIMATED SUICIDES***
1972-83 MASSACHUSETTS
173
(799.9, 6850-6869,
WHITE MALES
158
169
6950-6958, 6980-6982)
1978-83
MASSACHUSETTS
WHITE MALES
*SEE PAGE 6 FOR FURTHER EXPLANATION OF STUDY PERIOD ANALYSIS.
**SMORs NOT CALCULATED FOR CIRCULATORY DISEASE SINCE IT WAS USED AS
AUXILIARY CAUSE.
***ESTIMATED SUICIDES BASED ON UNKNOWN CAUSES OF DEATH , RECORDED
SUICIDES AND POISONING. (9)

�17

Discussion
This study was carried out using death certificates as the source of the
health outcome Information.
Information.

There are Inherent problems 1n relying on such

Other studies have assessed the accuracy of death certificate

Information by comparing the stated cause of death on the death certificate to
either clinical data or autopsy findings.(10,11) The accuracy of death certificates has generally been about 90%.
approximately 85-90% reliable

Death certificates seem to be

for the general

diagnosis

of malignant

neoplasms, although there may be underreporting of malignant neoplasms of
about 10%.(11)

This study did not attempt to confirm cause of death using

hospital or other records.

However, the effect of misclassifying cause of

death due to inaccuracies on the death certificate would most likely be one of
diluting the magnitude of the effects seen in the comparisons.
Further problems with death certificate studies Involve lack of knowledge
about other factors related to the cause of death.

For example, there is no

information on death certificates concerning potential confounding factors
such as smoking, alcohol consumption, and dietary habits. In addition, death
certificate studies may be biased due to differential access to good quality
medical care.

In this study, Vietnam veterans may not have had as good access

to medical care as the non-veteran white males to whom they were compared. On
the other hand, the non-veteran comparison group includes some individuals who
were unable to serve in the military because of health problems. This potential bias, referred to as the "healthy veteran effect," would tend to dilute
the magnitude of the associations between veterans and non-veterans.(12)

�18

The method of Identifying deceased veterans by computer file-linking
represents a potential source of bias.

The primary Unking method (social

security number) has been found 1n other mortality studies to be more than
90% accurate in Identifying deaths In a study population.(13) However, some
studies have found a 20% false negative rate (missing deaths) when matching was
done using names, as 1t was In this study for the years 1977-79.(14)
Nevertheless, there 1s no reason to suspect that there 1s any systematic bias
between the study group and the non-Vietnam

veteran

comparison

group.

However, m1sclass1f1ed social security numbers, names, or veterans who died
out of state would only reduce the magnitude of the excess mortality seen 1n
the Vietnam veterans compared to the Massachusetts male population.
Another potential source of bias Is that only honorably discharged
veterans were Included 1n the study population.
veterans were

more

non-Vietnam veterans.

likely to

It Is not known 1f Vietnam

have been dishonorably discharged than

Once again, this potential bias would tend to dilute

the magnitude of the associations between Vietnam service and specific causes
of death.
The standardized proportionate mortality ratio (sPMR) as a method of
analysis has been criticized by various authors.(3,5,15) The major criticisms
of the sPMR approach concern the summary nature of the statistic. Because the
sPMR for all causes must equal 100, the statistic cannot give any Information
about the total force of mortality.(15) Secondly, the sPMRs for two or more
causes are Interdependent, since the sum of the expected numbers must equal
the sum of the observed numbers.(3) Therefore, any sPMR greater than the null

�19

may be an underestimate If more than one specific cause of death 1s estimated.
It has also been pointed out that sPMRs tend to be more easily Interpreted for
uncommon causes of death, because they are less dependent upon how common are
the other causes, relative to the cause of Interest.(3,5)
The sMOR has certain advantages relative to the sPNR. When the auxiliary
cause(s) of death 1s unrelated to the exposure, the mortality odds ratio 1s
Interpretable as the observed-to-expected

ratio.

When standardized for age

and time, the mortality odds ratio becomes the standardized mortality odds
ratio and the observed-to-expected ratio becomes the standardized mortality
ratio.

In contrast, the sPMR can be quantitatively Interpreted as the stan-

dardized mortality ratio only when the sum of the mortality rate(s) of
Interest and the rate for the auxiliary cause(s) of death 1s the same for both
the exposed and nonexposed.(6)
In this study, the sPMR analysis Identified specific causes of death
for which there were significant differences between Vietnam veterans and the
comparison groups. The sMOR analysis was used to confirm these findings. The
results of the study are strengthened by the fact that the sMOR analysis,
using a specific auxiliary cause, differed from the sPMR analysis in only two
Instances.
In order to Interpret the meaning of the findings 1n this study, it Is
necessary to keep two other factors 1n mind.

First, the study group of

Vietnam veterans was assembled from a 11st of those who received a bonus after
they had presented proof of Vietnam service and honorable discharge.

No

�20

Information about length of service (beyond the six month required minimum),
precise location of service, or specific exposures to toxic substances, such
as Agent Orange, was available from these records. Furthermore, no correction
was made for possible social class differences between the Vietnam veterans
and the two comparison groups.

However, the Vietnam veterans findings for

three causes of death which are highly correlated with social class—lung
cancer, colo-rectal cancer, and cirrhosis of the liver—did not, 1n this
Instance, differ significantly from those of the comparison groups.
Three significant findings presented In Table 6, specifically suicides,
estimated suicides, and motor vehicle accidents, are all similar In that the
causal factor may be a behavioral one.

It may be that social stress, which

could not be directly measured 1n this study, was higher for Vietnam veterans
compared to non-Vietnam veterans and other non-veteran white males. Depression
1s a major risk factor for suicide (8),

and previous studies of Vietnam

veterans

stress disorder

have documented

post-traumatic

and

associated

depression, as well as elevated rates of suicide, among those who served in
combat.(16,17,18)

It 1s certainly plausible that the findings in this study

may be due, at least in part, to Increased stress experienced by Vietnam
veterans.
No significant differences were found between Vietnam veterans and the
two comparison groups with respect to death due to malignant neoplasms as a
whole (ICDA 140-239).

The significant elevation of connective tissue cancer

was based on only nine deaths; all of these were sarcomas of five different
types. Table 7 lists the nine cases by hlstologlcal type. Previous studies

�21

have reported that soft-tissue sarcomas were associated with exposure to phenoxyacetic

acids such

Orange.(19,20)

as 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T, the components of Agent

For all of the cases with the possible exception of case 9,

occupational exposure as obtained from the death certificate did not seem to
be significant.

A more recent study of upstate New York Vietnam veterans

reported no excess of soft-tissue sarcomas diagnosed through 1980.(21)

The

present study was not based on either adequate numbers of deaths or adequate
exposure Information to help resolve this Important Issue.

Nevertheless, the

highly significant excess of this rare malignancy in Vietnam veterans 1s
important new Information.

The latency period for soft-tissue sarcoma in

adults is probably sufficiently long that several more years of observation
will be necessary before any conclusive findings can be made.

�22

TABLE 7
CASE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR CONNECTIVE TISSUE CANCER DEATHS
AMONG VIETNAM VETERANS BY HISTOLOGIC TYPE AND OCCUPATION
YEAR
CASE AGE AT YEAR
YEAR OF HISTOLOGIC
OCCUPATION ON
DEATH INDUCTED DISCHARGED DEATH
DEATH CERTIF.
TYPE

1

30

1969

1971

1975

FIBROSARCOMA

DATA PROCESSING

2

28

1967

1970

1976

SYNOVIAL
SARCOMA

MANAGER

3

30

1965

1967

1976

LIPOSARCOMA

MENTAL HEALTH
ASSISTANT

4

32

1967

1972

1977

FIBROSARCOMA

MANAGER

5

30

1964

1967

1977

FIBROSARCOMA

ENGINEER'S AIDE

6

32

1970

1971

1978

FIBROSARCOMA

CIVIL ENGINEER

7

32

1970

1971

1982

EPITHELIOID
SARCOMA

GRAPHICS

8

29

1971

1974

1982

SARCOMA, NOS

FIREFIGHTER

9

39

1961

1966

1983

HEMANGIOPERI- PICKER
CYTOMA

Kidney cancer 1s less rare than soft-tissue sarcomas and was found to be
significantly
males.

elevated 1n Vietnam veterans compared to

non-veteran white

Possible confounding due to cigarette smoking, analgesic use or other

known risk factors among veterans should be considered, but Information on
those risk factors was unavailable In this study.

Further studies may also

shed light on this finding.
Finally, the significantly lower number of deaths among Vietnam veterans
due to circulatory system disease (excluding stroke)

for

the time period

1978-83 may be a reflection of the "healthy veteran effect."(12)

�23

Conclusions
The findings in this study support the hypothesis that white male Vietnam
veterans are at greater risk of death due to self-Inflicted or stress-related
conditions than the non-veteran white male population in Massachusetts.

The

results would support an effort to reduce early or untimely deaths among
Vietnam veterans due to suicide or motor vehicle accidents, which are largely
preventable.

Although the numbers of cancer deaths are small, the finding of

excess deaths due to connective tissue sarcoma and kidney cancer warrants
further study using the cancer incidence records from the Massachusetts Cancer
Registry, and, if available, Information on possible exposures to Agent
Orange, as reflected

in detailed military service histories, as well as

histories of other exposures to potential carcinogens.

�24

Acknow!edgements
We would like to acknowledge the following people for their Invaluable
assistance 1n various aspects of the study:
Sharon L. Rosen, Ph.D.; David N. Gute, Ph.D.; Christopher Gregory; the
Medical-Scientific

Advisory

Board

of

the

Agent

Orange

Program

(Louis

Bartoshesky, M.D.; John McCahan, M.D.; John Cutler, M.D., Ph.D.; Robert
Weiss, Ph.D.; John Constable, M.D.; Ralph Timperi, M.P.H.); Gall Grady; Lynne
Whitton; Pam English; Shelley J. Allison, M.P.H.; Linda Wiggins; Susan Mullen;
and Masahiru Takeuchi. Special thanks to George A. Lareau for word processing
the manuscript.
Drs. Harris Pastides, Letitla Davis, James Robins, Robert Dubrow and
Adrian Ostfeld reviewed or commented on drafts of the report.

�25

References
1.

Feeney R: Personal communication. Military Archivist, Massachusetts.

2.

Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Disease,
Injuries and Causes of Death, Ninth Revision. Geneva: WHO, 1975.

'3.

Monson RR: Occupational Epidemiology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1980.

4.

Mantel N, Haenszel W: Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from
retrospective studies of disease.
Journal of the National Cancer
Institute 1959; 22:719-748.

5.

Miettlnen OS, Wang J: An alternative to the proportionate mortality
ratio. American Journal of Epidemiology 1981; 114:144-148.

6.

Splegelman D, Wang J, Wegman D: Interactive electronic computing of the
mortality odds ratio.
American Journal of Epidemiology 1983;
118:599-607.

7.

Dubrow R, Wegman D:
Occupational characteristics of white male
Massachusetts state cancer victims, 1971-73. NIOSH Pub No 84-109, 1984.

8.

Healthy People: The surgeon general's report on health promotion and
disease prevention. DHEW (PHS) Publication No 79-55071, 1979.

9.

McClure GMG: Trends In suicide rates for England and Wales, 1975-80.
British Journal of Psychiatry 1984; 144:119-126.

10. Alderson MR, Meade TW: Accuracy of diagnosis on death certificates compared with that in hospital records. British Journal of Preventive and
Social Medicine 1967; 21:22-29.
11. Engel L, Strauchen J, et al: Accuracy of death certification in an
autopsied population with specific attention to malignant neoplasms and
vascular diseases. American Journal of Epidemiology 1980; 111:99-112.
12. Seltzer CC, Jablon S: Effects of selection on mortality.
Journal of Epidemiology 1974; 100:367-72.

American

13. Alvey W, Aziz F: Quality of mortality reporting in SSA linked data:
some preliminary results. Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research
Methods, American Statistical Association, Washington, DC, 1979; 275-279.
14. Roget E, Feinlelb M, et al: On the feasibility of linking census samples
to the National Death Index for epidemiologic studies:
a progress
report. American Journal of Public Health 1983; 73:1265-1269.
15. Mil ham S:
Methods in occupational mortality studies.
Occupational Medicine 1975; 17:581-585.

Journal of

�26
16.

levy C:

Spoils of War. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin, 1974.

17.

Shatan C: The grief of soldiers.
1973; 43(4).

18.

U.S. Congress, House Committee on Veteran Affairs.
Presidential review
memorandum on Vietnam-era veterans, H.R. 38, 10 October 1978.

19.

Hardell L and Sandstrom A: Case-control study: soft-tissue sarcomas and
exposure to phenoxyacetic adds on chlorophenols.
British Journal of
Cancer 1978; 39:711-717.

20.

Eriksson M, Hardell L, et al: Soft-tissue sarcomas and exposure to chemical substances: a case-referent study. British Journal of Industrial
Medicine 1981; 38:27-33.

21.

Greenwald P, Kovasznay B, et al: Sarcomas of soft tissue after Vietnam
service. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1984; 73:1107-1109.

American Journal of Ortho-psychiatry

�27
APPENDIX A
NON-WHITE VE TERAN DEATHS BY YEAR OF DEATH, VETERAN STATUS,
YEAR OF
DEATH
1972

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

VETERAN
STATUS

Vietnam
Vietnam
Non-Vietnam
Non-Vi etnam
Non-Vietnam
Non-Vi etnam
Non-Vietnam
Non-Vi etnam
Vietnam
Vietnam
Non-Vietnam
Non-Vietnam
Non-Vietnam
Non-Vietnam
Non-Vietnam
Non- Vietnam
Vietnam
Non-Vietnam
Non-Vietnam
Non-Vietnam
Non-Vietnam
Non-Vietnam
Vietnam
Vietnam
Non-Vietnam
Non- Vietnam
Non- Vietnam
Non-Vi etnam
Non-Vietnam
Non-Vietnam
Non-Vietnam
Non-Vietnam
Vietnam
Non-Vietnam
Non-Vietnam
Non-Vietnam
Non- VI etnam
Vietnam
Vietnam
Vietnam
Non-Vietnam

CAUSE OF DEATH AND AGE AT DEATH
CAUSE OF DEATH
(ICDA CODES. 9th REV.)

AGE AT DEATH

Motor vehicle collision (e812.0)
Suicide by hanging (e953.0)
Metastatic cancer without
specification (199.0)
Disease of aortic valve (395.9)
Acute myocardlal Infarction (410)
Cardlomyopathy (425)
Fall out of building (e882)
Homicide by knife (e966)
Lymphosarcoma (200.1)
Accidental drowning (e910.9)
Rectal cancer (154.1)
Myocardlal Insufficiency (428)
Cirrhosis of liver, unspecified (571 .9)
Suicide by firearms (e955.4)
Homicide by firearms (e965.4)
Homicide by firearms (e965.4)
Legal Intervention by firearms (e970 i
Sigmoid colon cancer (153.3)
Brain cancer (191)
Acute myocardlal Infarction (410)
Motor vehicle traffic accident (e815,,0)
Watercraft accident (e830.0)
Motor vehicle collision (e812.0)
Motor vehicle collision (e812.0)
Acute myocardlal infarction (410)
NoncolHslon traffic accident (e816.0)
Accident by electric current (e925.9)
Homicide by firearms (e965.4)
Stomach cancer (151.9)
Stomach cancer (151.9)
Disease of mitral valve, rheumatic (394.0)
Acute myocardial Infarction (410)
Accidental poisoning, opiates 1.853.6,
Bronchus and lung cancer (162.9)
Essential hypertension (401)
Atherosclerotic heart disease (414.0)
Subarachnoid hemorrhage (430)
Chronic nephritis (582)
Unknown and unspecified
cause of death (799.9)
Homicide by knife (e966)
Bronchus and lung cancer (162.9)

31
28
33
45
43
43
47
32
22
24
31
21
57
32
25
27
27
53
36
56
41
27
29
24

41
31
36
31
33
56
29
40
25

53
52
42
37
29
27
27

32

�28
APPENDIX A (continued)
NON-WHITE VETERAN DEATHS BY YEAR OF DEATH, VETERAN STATUS.
CAUSE OF DEATH AND AGE AT DEATH
YEAR OF VETERAN
CAUSE OF DEATH
AGE AT DEATH
DEATH
(ICDA CODES, 9th REV.)
STATUS
1979
Vietnam
Volume depletion (276.5)
52
Vietnam
Ischemic heart disease (414.9)
53
Non-Vietnam Chronic monocytic leukemia (206.1)
40
Non-Vietnam Pneumonitis due to Inhalation
54
of food (507.0)
Non-Vietnam Passenger 1n motor vehicle
collision (e812.1)
36
Vietnam
Colon cancer (153.9)
42
1980
Vietnam
36
Intracerebral hemorrhage (431)
Vietnam
Motor vehicle collision (e812.0)
36
Non-Vietnam Bronchus and lung cancer (162.9)
45
Non-Vietnam Diabetes mellltus (250.0)
66
Non-Vietnam Epilepsy (345.9)
46
Non-Vi etnam Acute myocardial Infarction (410)
45
Non-Vietnam Chronic renal failure (585)
53
Vietnam
Rectal cancer (154.1)
53
1981
Acute edema of lung (518.4)
Vietnam
38
Motor vehicle collision (e812.0)
Vietnam
32
43
Non-Vietnam Palate cancer (145.5)
Non-Vietnam Larynx cancer (161.9)
57
56
Non-Vietnam Bronchus and lung cancer (162.9)
63
Non-Vietnam Bronchus and lung cancer (162.9)
Non-Vietnam Alcohol dependence syndrome (303)
38
Non-Vietnam Acute myocardial Infarction (410)
52
37
Non-Vietnam Intracerebral hemorrhage (431)
27
Non-Vietnam Accidental drowning (e910.1)
28
Non-Vietnam Suicide due to firearms (e955.4)
Atherosclerotic heart disease (414.0)
42
1982 .- Vietnam
38
Alcohol cirrhosis of the liver (571.2)
Vietnam
Drowning, undetermined 1f
Vietnam
33
accidental (e984)
64
Non-Vietnam Bronchus and lung cancer (162.9)
45
Non-Vietnam Volume depletion (276.5)
36
Non-Vietnam Atherosclerotic heart disease (414.0)
64
Non-Vietnam Cardlomyopathy (425)
32
Non-Vietnam Acute edema of lung (518.4)
Cardiomyopathy (425)
33
Vietnam
1983
35
Myocarditis (429)
Vietnam
49
Non-Vietnam Acute myocardial infarction (410)
52
Non-Vietnam Acute myocardial Infarction (410)
52
Non-Vietnam Cerebral Infarction (434.9)
32
Non-Vietnam Suicide by firearms (e955.4)
40
Non-Vietnam Homicide by firearms (e965.4)

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24217">
              <text>069</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24219">
              <text>1859</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24222">
              <text>Series III Subseries III</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24215">
                <text>Kogan, Michael D.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24216">
                <text>Richard W. Clapp</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24218">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;Massachusetts Office of Commissioner of Veterans Services, Agent Orange Program; Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Division of Health Statistics and Research</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24220">
                <text>January 18 1985</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24221">
                <text>Mortality Among Vietnam Veterans in Massachusetts, 1972-1983</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24223">
                <text>state-funded Vietnam veterans study</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24224">
                <text>mortality trends</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="24225">
                <text>suicide</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3110" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22748">
              <text>066</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22749">
              <text>1787</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22751">
              <text>Series III Subseries III</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22750">
                <text>Form: Vietnam Veterans Newspaper Locator File</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22752">
                <text>mortality trends</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22753">
                <text>veteran health and hygiene</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3106" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1607">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/afc503475f8dac9b1e8778f4ed94b544.pdf</src>
        <authentication>b83094460edb1cb45fadfba3dadf3216</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63556">
                    <text>Item ID Number

°1786

Author

Breslin, Patricia

Corporate Author
Report/Article Title Proportionate Mortality Study of US Army and US
Marine Corps Veterans of the Vietnam War

JOlirnal/BOOk TltlB

Journal of Occupational Medicine

Year

1988

Month/Day

Ma

Color

a

Number of Images

v

8

Descriptor Notes

Monday, June 11, 2001

Page 1787 of 1793

�Proportionate Mortality Study of US Army
and US Marine Corps Veterans of the
Vietnam War
Patricia Breslin, ScD; Han K. Kong, DrPH; Yvonne Lee, MSc; Vicki Burt, ScM; and
Barclay M. Shepard, MD

The patterns of mortality among 84,835 US Army and
Marine Corps Vietnam veterans were compared with that of
86,685 non-Vietnam veterans using standardized proportional
mortality ratios. The veterans were a random sample of deceased Vietnam-era veterans identified in a Veterans Administration computerized benefit file. Military service information was obtained from military personnel records, and cause
of death information from death certificates.
Statistically significant excess deaths were observed among
Army Vietnam veterans for motor vehicle accidents, non-motor
vehicle accidents, and accidental poisonings. Similar findings
have been reported in other studies of Vietnam veterans.
Suicides were not elevated among Vietnam veterans. The
Marine Corps Vietnam veterans appeared to have an increased
mortality from lung cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Although exposure to several environmental factors may be
speculated, this study did not investigate possible etiologic
factors for these elevated malignancies.

here
concern in the United States that postTserviceismortality among Vietnam are disproportionveterans is unusually high and certain causes of death
ately elevated. Traumatic deaths such as motor vehicle
accidents, suicides, and homicides are often cited as
possible health outcomes associated with military service in Vietnam.1'6 Concern also persists that, as a result
of exposure to Agent Orange and other chemicals in
Vietnam, Vietnam veterans may be at increased risk for
soft tissue sarcomas and other cancers.7"9 ApproxiFrom the Office of Environmental Epidemiology, Veterans Administration, Washington DC 20006-3868.
Address correspondence to VA Office of Environmental Epidemiology (10B/AO8) Biddell Bldg, Rm 401, 1730 K St NW, Washington DC
80006-3868.
0096-1736/88/3006-4ia$oa.OO/0
Copyright © by American Occupational Medical Association

412

mately 2 million US military personnel served a oneyear tour in Vietnam during the Vietnam war.
Findings of mortality studies of Vietnam veterans
reported to date are not consistent with each other.1"6
Whether the variations among the studies are the result
of the relatively small number of deaths analyzed, therefore reflecting lack of adequate statistical power, or
whether they suggest an underlying difference in the
mortality experience among the different Vietnam veteran study populations is not obvious. The number of
deaths analyzed in these studies ranged from 246 to
923.
In view of the public concern about the potential
adverse health effects of military service in Vietnam
and inconsistent findings in the scientific literature, a
proportional mortality study of Vietnam veterans was
undertaken. Approximately one third of all deaths which
have occurred among the Vietnam veterans who served
in tho US Army or Marine Corps was analyzed in the
study.
Materials and Methods
Selection of Study Subjects
Study subjects were restricted to ground troops, men
who served in the US Army or Marine Corps at anytime
from July 4, 1965 through March 1, 1973. Data published by the US Department of Defense indicate that
over 80% of those who served in Vietnam were ground
troops.10 Those having served in the Air Force, Navy,
or Coast Guard were excluded because it is difficult to
determine whether personnel who were considered to
have served in the Vietnam theatre of operation were
Mortality Study of Vietnam War Veterans/Breslin et al

�ever actually "in country" Vietnam. Female veterans
were also excluded from the study.
It was determined that at least 50,000 eligible cases
would be needed for the study in order to obtain adequate statistical power. The sample size of 50,000 deceased Vietnam era veterans would provide statistical
power of over 90% for detecting a twofold increased
relative risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or lung cancer.
The study would have excellent power to detect small
increases in certain common causes of death.
Potential study subjects who were reported to be
deceased as of July 1,1982 were randomly selected from
the Veterans Administration Beneficiary Identification
and Record Locator Subsystem (BIBLS). The VA maintains the automated information retrieval system to
identify and locate records of veterans who have received any of a wide variety of veterans' benefits including death benefits to their families. A study by the
National Academy of Sciences indicates that the names
of at least 94% of all deceased Vietnam-era veterans
identified through independent means are in BIBLS.11
A subfile of 186,000 deceased Vietnam-era veterans
who served in the Army or Marine Corps and whose
service dates included the period 1964-1975 was assembled from BIBLS. If the service data (branch, service
dates) were missing in BIBLS, veterans whose birth
dates were between 1935 and 1957 (inclusive) were
selected because of the high likelihood that they may
have served during the Vietnam era. To achieve the
desired sample size of approximately 50,000 eligible
veterans, a random sample of 75,617 names was selected
from the target population. Extra names were selected
to allow for the exclusion of ineligible cases.
The military personnel records for all 75,617 potential
study subjects were requested from the National Personnel Becord Center in St. Louis, MO. Demographic
data and information on military service such as branch
of service, length of service, rank at discharge, and
military occupational specialty were abstracted. In addition, for those who served in Southeast Asia, dates of
service, principal duty, and unit addresses while in the
theatre of combat were obtained.
Of the 75,617 Vietnam-era veterans selected, 22,332
(29.5%) veterans were found to be ineligible upon reviewing their military personnel records. The ineligible
cases included duplicate names; men who did not serve
in the military from July 4, 1965 through March 1,
1973; men who served in the Navy, Coast Guard, or Air
Force; men who were killed in action or were reported
missing in action and subsequently declared dead; men
who died in service before 1974; men who died of warrelated injuries; and all women. Eligibility for the study
could not be determined for 1,032 veterans (1.4%) and
they were excluded. The final sample consisted of 52,253
men who died between July 4, 1965 and July 1, 1982
and who served in the US Army or Marine Corps during
the period July 4, 1965 through March 1, 1973.
Death certificates were available from the VA files
for about 70% of the sample; for the remaining 16,000
cases, the veteran's death certificate was requested from
the state of his last known residence. The place of the

veteran's death was identified by checking files of the
VA, Social Security Administration, Internal Bevenue
Service, and National Center for health Statistics National Death Index.
Although death certificates were the preferred source
of information, casualty reports issued by the Department of Defense were also used for active duty personnel
or reservists who died outside the country and for whom
no death certificate could be obtained. Most of these
deaths were accidents and probably little additional
information would have been obtained from the death
certificate if it were available. Death certificates were
the source of cause of death information for 96.9% of all
cases. This was equally true for both those who served
in Vietnam and those who did not. The underlying causes
of death were coded by experienced nosologists at the
National Center for Health Statistics using the International Classification of Diseases, 8th Bevision (ICDA8).ia The nosologists had no knowledge of the military
service status of the veteran.
Cause of death was ascertained for 51,421 veterans
or 98.4% of the men determined to be eligible for the
study. The cause of death for the remaining 1.6% was
not obtained for one of the following reasons: the veteran
died overseas and no certificate or cause of death information was available or the veteran's place of death had
not been identified, and therefore the death certificate
could not be located.
Of the 51,421 men for whom military service data and
cause of death information were available, 26,685 had
not served in Southeast Asia; 24,235 had served in
Vietnam. The remaining 501 were either known to have
served elsewhere in Southeast Asia or their place of
service in Southeast Asia was unknown. Analyses of
mortality data were based on 24,235 Vietnam veterans
and 26,685 non-Vietnam veterans. These procedures
used to select the subjects are outlined in the Figure.
Statistical Analyses
The deaths observed among the Vietnam veterans
were compared with expected numbers computed by
applying the age- and race-specific proportions of deaths
for each cause among the non-Vietnam veterans to the
total number of deaths in the study group. Differences
between observed and expected number of deaths for
each cause were summarized in the form of the proportional mortality ratio (SPMB) which is the ratio of the
number of deaths observed to that expected.13 The statistical significance of each ratio was tested by a xa with
1 df.14 The 95% confidence intervals for the SPMBs
were also computed.10
Proportional mortality ratios standardized for age
and race (SPMBs) were calculated separately for Army
and Marine Corps Vietnam veterans for all major causes
of death and for selected causes of death. The PMB
analysis by branch of service was performed because
these groups might have had different types of environmental exposure in Vietnam either by virtue of the

Journal of Occupational Medicine/Volume 30 No. 5/May 1988

413

�Veterans Administration Beneficiary Identification and Record
Locator Subsystem

TABLE 1
Racial Characteristics of the 50,920 Deceased Vietnam-era Veterans by
Branch and Vietnam Service
Army
Race

Service in Vietnam

Yes
(N = 19,708),

No
(N = 22,904),

Yes
(N = 4,527),

No
(N = 3,781),

78.1
19.2
2.7

79.5
17.7

83.5
13.7

82.5
14.9

2.8

2.8

2.6

White
Black
Other
Unknown
Totals

Random Sample
(75,617)

Marines

Service in Vietnam

Deceased Vietnam-era Veterans
Army Marine Corps or Branch
Unknown (186,000)

*

100

*

100

100

100

•Less than 0.1%.
Military Records
Not Found (1,032)

Qualified for Study
(52,253)

TABLE 2
Military Rank of the 50,920 Deceased Vietnam-era Veterans by Branch and
Vietnam Service
Army

Cause of Death
Unknown (832)

Served in Thailand
or Elsewhere
in Southeast Asia
(501), Excluded
from Study

Cause of Death Known
(51,421)

Served in Vietnam
(24,235)

Rank

Served Places
Other than
Southeast Asia
(26,685)

Figure. Selection process of study subjects.

location of their units or the types of duties they performed. Unlike the Army units, the Marine Corps units
were primarily located within the I Corps area of South
Vietnam. South Vietnam was divided into four tactical
combat zones, I Corps being in the northernmost part
of South Vietnam.
Results
The demographic characteristics of the sample are
given in Tables 1 and 3. More than 50% of the veterans
died at ages 25 through 34. Some died at ages less than
85 (5.5% of Vietnam and 11.7% of non-Vietnam veterans) and some died at ages older than 65 (0.74% of
Vietnam and 8.6% of non-Vietnam veterans).
There seemed to be no remarkable differences in the
major cause of death categories between the men who
served in Vietnam and their counterparts who did not
serve in Vietnam with a few exceptions (Table 3).
Deaths from external causes (ICDA codes E800-E989)
were relatively more frequent among veterans who
served in Vietnam than among those who did not. However, this excess is statistically significant only for Army
veterans (PMB, 1.03; P&lt; .01).
More than half of all the deaths in the study population were due to accidents, accidental poisonings, or
violence. Within this broad category, approximately
35% of the deaths were due to motor vehicle accidents
414

Enlisted
Warrant officer
Officer
Unknown
Totals

Marines

Service in Vietnam

Service in Vietnam

Yes
No
Yes
No
(N = 19,708), (N = 22,904), (N = 4,527), (N = 3,781),

92.8

93.4

93.6

95.8

2.1
5.1

1.0
5.5

0.9
5.5

0.3
3.9

*

100

*

100

*

100

100

•Less than 0.1%.

(Table 4). Although the magnitude of the relative excess
of motor vehicle accidents was about the same in both
branches, only the SPMR for Army veterans was statistically significant (PMR, 1.05; P&lt; .085). "Other transport accidents" were seen to be in excess primarily
among Army personnel (PMR, 1.36; P &lt; .01); 51% of
these were aircraft accidents. Of the men who died in
aircraft accidents, 88% had been helicopter pilots or
crewmen and 84% of these had served in Vietnam. Many
of these died while working as helicoptor pilots or crewmen in civilian life; others died in aircraft accidents
while still in the military after the war. The category
of "accidental poisonings" was elevated among both
Army and Marine Corps veterans who served in Vietnam. In reviewing a sample of 100 of these deaths, it
was found that 98% of these deaths were due to narcotic
overdose, mostly heroin.
Among enlisted Vietnam veterans, veterans with combat-related military occupations died from homicide significantly more frequently than veterans with non-combat-related military occupations: 9% excess for Army
veterans (P &lt; .05), 84% excess for Marine Corps veterans (P&lt; .01). It also appeared that the excess deaths
from motor vehicle accidents and accidental poisonings
were greater during the first ten-year period of observations than the later years of observation for both
Army and Marine Corps Vietnam veterans (Table 5).
Deaths coded as suicide were relatively less frequent
among those who served in Vietnam than among those
who did not serve in Vietnam for both Army and Marine
Corps veterans.
Mortality Study of Vietnam War Veterans/Breslin et al

�TABLE 3
Number of Deaths and Proportional Mortality Ratios (PMRs) Among Vietnam Veterans by Major Causes and Branch

Army*
Cause (ICDA No.)

All other causes (210-228, 290315,740-759,780-796)
Infective and parasitic diseases
(000-136)
Malignancies (140-209, 230-239)
Endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic
(240-279)
Blood and blood-forming organs
(280-289)
Nervous systems and sense organs
(320-389)
Circulatory diseases (390-458)
Respiratory diseases (460-519)
Digestive diseases (520-577)
Genitourinary diseases (580-629)
Skin and subcutaneous tissues
(680-709)
Musculoskeletal and connective tissues (71 0-738)
Accidents, poisonings, and violence
(E800-989)

Observed

Marinest
95%
Confidence
Interval

PMR

Observed

PMR

95%
Confidence
Interval

150

0.94

0.63-1.01

19

1.02

0.89-1.17

0.97
0.85

0.93-1.02
0.67-1.08

521
22

1.20
0.66

1 .0-1 .45
0.22-2.01

32

0.68

0.45-1 .03

8

3.22

0.51-20.5

167

0.95

0.77-1.18

27

0.86

0.17-4.44

0.98
0.93
0.99
0.77t
0.76

0.95-1 .01
0.69-1.25
0.94-1 .04
0.60-0.99
0.05-11.19

647
62
169
13
2

0.98
0.95
0.87
0.67
0.50

0.86-1.12
0.75-1 .21
0.70-1.08
0.33-1.35
0.06-4.18

7

0.87

0.22-3.41

2,880

1.00

709

0.91

127

0.80

2,452
135

3,578
406
1,001
80
8
29

10,984

1.55

0.8-3.0

1.03§

1.02-1.04

* Army: deaths observed = 19,708. Expected numbers are based on 22,904 deaths in Army non-Vietnam veteran comparison group,
t Marines: deaths observed = 4,527. Expected numbers are based on 3,781 deaths in Marine non-Vietnam veteran comparison group.
:(:P&lt;.05forx 2 with1cff.
§ P &lt; .01 for x2 with 1 df.
TABLE 4
Number of Deaths from Accidents, Accidental Poisonings, and Violence and Proportional Mortality Ratios (PMRs) Among Vietnam Veterans, by Branch

Army*
Cause (ICDA No.)

Motor vehicle accidents (E810E827)
Other transportation accidents
(E800-E807, E830-E845)
Accidental poisonings (E850E877)
All other accidents/injury (E880E949, E970-E989)
Suicide (E950-E959)
Homicide (E960-E969)

Marinest

Observed

PMR

95%
Confidence
Interval

Observed

PMR

95%
Confidence
Interval

3,884

1.05$

1.01-1.09

1,011

1.07

0.97-1.18

493

1.36§

1.19-1.56

117

0.75

0.56-1.01

461

1.15$

1.02-1.30

120

1.10

0.93-1.30

2,323

1.05

0.99-1.11

593

1.01

0.98-1 .04

2,003

0.93§
1.01

0.88-0.98
0.73-1.40

542
497

0.93
0.98

0.86-1.01
0.89-1 .08

1,816

* Army: deaths observed = 19,708. Expected numbers are based on 22,904 deaths in Army non-Vietnam veteran comparison group,
t Marines: deaths observed = 4,527. Expected numbers are based on 3,781 deaths in Marine non-Vietnam veteran comparison group,
t P&lt;.025 for x 2 with 1 df.
§P&lt;.01for x 2 with1df.

When all malignancies were grouped together, Vietnam veterans did not exhibit an excess of cancer when
compared to their counterparts who did not serve in
Vietnam. Differences between the services, however,
were seen for specific cancer sites among those who
served in Vietnam relative to men who did not (Table
6). The most interesting differences were the statistically significant elevation for lung cancer (PMR, 1.58;
P&lt; .025) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (PMR, S.10; P
&lt; .025) seen in the Marines who served in Vietnam
relative to Marines who served elsewhere. The risk for
soft tissue sarcoma was not elevated among Vietnam
veterans as a whole or in any subgroup of these veterans.

Discussion
For most major causes, the distribution of deaths for
veterans who served in Vietnam is not markedly different from those who did not serve in Vietnam except for
selected malignancies and "accidents, accidental poisonings, and violence." Four states have conducted mortality studies of Vietnam era veterans: Wisconsin,1 West
Virginia,8 New York,8 and Massachusetts.4 The Centers
for Disease Control also reported the postservice mortality of US Army Vietnam veterans." The results of
these studies were similar to what was seen here. They

Journal of Occupational Medicine/Volume 30 No. 5/May 1988

415

�TABLE 5
Deaths from Selected Causes Among Enlisted Vietnam Veterans Who Died Between 1965 and 1982, and Who Had Only One Tour of Duty*
Army

Marines

1965-1975

1976-1982

1965-1975

Cause (ICDA No.)

Observed

Observed

717
34

1.11f
0.65

2,053
201

1.06
1.10

167
11

77
342
212
232
89

Motor vehicle accidents
Other transport accidents
Accidental poisonings
All other accidents/injury
Suicide
Homicide
Cancers (140-209,
230-239)

PMR

PMR

1.14
1.00
1.00
0.92
0.74t

255
1,186
1,089
1,008
655

1.09
1.05
0.94
1.03
0.87f

25
82
57
68
25

1976-1982
PMR

Observed

PMR

1.18
1.04

611
48

1.01
0.82

2.26f
1.01
0.65
1.27
0.61 1

Observed

71
364
368
314
176

1.04
0.93
1.05
0.91
1.31

* PMR, proportional mortality ratio of observed to expected numbers of deaths. Expected number was generated based on deaths from nonVietnam veterans with similar characteristics.
tP&lt;.05forx 2 with1df.
TABLE 6
Number of Deaths from Malignancies Among Vietnam Veterans by Branch of Service
Army*
Cause (ICDA No.)
Observed

All other causes (000-136, 210E989)
All malignancies
Buccal (140-1 49)
Esophagus (150)
Stomach (151)
Intestines and other gastrointestinal (152-1 54, 158, 159)
Liver, bile ducts (155-1 56)
Pancreas (157)
Upper respiratory (160-161)
Lung (162)
Bone (170)
Soft tissue (171)
Melanoma of the skin (1 72)
Prostate (185)
Testis(186)
Bladder (188)
Kidney (189)
Brain (191)
Other nervous system (192)
Thyroid and endocrine (193-194)
Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (200,
202)
Hodgkin's disease (201)
Multiple myeloma (203)
Leukemia (204-207)
Other cancers (163, 173-4, 187,

PMR

17,256

0.97
0.92
1.24
1.12
0.96

34
82
29
632
27
30
145
30
90
9
55
116
43
15
108

1.04
0.87
1.14
1.03
0.82
0.99
1.02
0.92
1.12
0.56
0.87
0.97
0.558
0.59
0.81

92
18
202
281

1.16
0.77
0.88
1.03

95%
Confidence
Interval

1.00

2,452
71
46
88
209

Marinesf
Observed

PMR

95%
Confidence
Interval

4,006

0.98

0.93-1 .01
0.47-1.82
0.78-1.98
0.85-1.47
0.70-1.32

521
13
5
17
33

1.20
1.95
0.39
0.82
1.26

1.0-1.45
0.54-7.04
0.11-1.41
0.41-1.64
0.71-2.24

0.77-1.41
0.64-1.18
0.63-2.07
0.39-1.71
0.80-1.23
0.91-1.14
0.55-1.23
0.84-1.5
0.27-1.18
0.50-1.52
0.29-3.20
0.38-0.79
0.30-1.17
0.63-1.04

6
18
1
130
11
8
36
5
26
4
13
25
11
4
35

1.21
1.63
0.18
1.58*
1.38
0.71
0.94
1.29
1.29
2.41
0.89
1.07
0.93
0.57
2.10*

0.52-2.83
0.46-5.75
0.03-1.32
1 .09-2.29
0.09-21 .48
0.38-1.32
0.59-1.50
0.16-10.3
0.47-3.57
0.09-66.35
0.54-1 .46
0.16-7.14
0.49-1 .78
0.10-3.37
1.17-3.79

0.73-1.85
0.23-2.53
0.73-1 .06
0.93-1.14

22
2
42
54

1.33
0.45
1.14
1.07

0.67-2.63
0.01-17.13
0.18-7.14
0.60-1.91

190, 195-9, 208-9, 230-9)

* Army: deaths observed = 19,708. Expected numbers based on 22,904 deaths in Army non-Vietnam veteran comparison group,
t Marines: deaths observed = 4,527. Expected numbers based on 3,781 deaths in Marine non-Vietnam veteran comparison group,
t P&lt;. 025 for x2 with 1 off.
§P&lt;.01 for x 2 with 1 df.

also reported that Vietnam veterans were more likely
to die from "accidents, accidental poisonings, and violence" or from a few selected malignancies than their
counterparts who did not go to Vietnam. However,
within these two broad categories, the findings reported
by these studies were not consistent with each other or
with what was found here. It should be noted that the
data in the state reports were not strictly comparable
to the data given in this report. They differed from this

416

study in that numbers of deaths studied were much
smaller—less than 1,000-and they included Vietnamera veterans from all branches of service. They also
differed somewhat in the analytical methods and used
different types of veteran comparison populations. Furthermore, military personnel records of the state study
subjects were not reviewed to verify Vietnam service
status.
The New York,3 Massachusetts,4 and CDC8 studies
Mortality Study of Vietnam War Veterans/Breslin et al

�reported nonstatistically significant elevations of risk
for suicide when veterans with service in Vietnam were
compared with other Vietnam-era veterans. In this
study no excess of suicides was seen among the veterans
who served in Vietnam when compared with other Vietnam-era veterans. The ratio of observed to expected
deaths among the Army and Marine Corps veterans who
served in Vietnam relative to their counterparts who
did not serve in Vietnam was less than one; for veterans
who had served in the Army, the deficit was statistically
significant at P&lt; .01.
Simon16 reported an association between attempted
suicide and combat experience in World War II veterans. In our study there was no data element that indicated whether a man had been in combat. As a surrogate
measure, enlisted men whose military occupational specialties would be likely to involve combat, ie, rifleman,
artilleryman etc, were compared to the other enlisted
men who had served in Vietnam. Among the enlisted
men who served in Vietnam, those with "combat-related" occupational specialties in both branches of service had relatively fewer suicides than "non-combat"
Vietnam veterans in the same branch of service (Army:
N = 590, PMR = 0.96; Marines: N = 228, PMR = 0.83).
For the Marines, the deficit was statistically significant
atP&lt;.05.
It is known that suicides are under-reported on death
certificates but there was no reason to believe that they
were more underreported among veterans who served
in Vietnam than among those who did not. Nor was
there any reason to believe that suicide was more apt
to be underreported among those likely to have been in
combat in Vietnam than among other veterans.
Several researchers suggested that 1.6% to 5% of
motor vehicle accidents may be suicides.17'18 In our
study, motor vehicle accidents were relatively less frequent among Vietnam veterans with combat-related
occupational specialties than among those with noncombat occupations (Army: N = 1,205, PMR = 0.99;
Marines: N = 466, PMR = 0.94). Even if one assumes
that some of the motor vehicle accidents are "hidden"
suicides, it is unlikely that these could account for the
overall deficit in suicides among Vietnam veterans since
the possible "hidden" suicides among motor vehicle
accidents are reportedly relatively small.
The apparent excess of drug-related deaths attributable to heroin use among Vietnam veterans is of concern.
This observation was consistent with that of Rohrbaugh
et al,19 who found that, whereas Vietnam veterans were
no more likely than other Vietnam-era veterans to use
drugs in general, they were more likely to use opiates
than other illicit drugs. The CDC also reported that
accidental drug poisonings were substantially elevated
among Vietnam veterans.
One of the major concerns of Vietnam veterans has
been the possibility of developing cancer as a result of
exposure to Agent Orange, a mixture of two phenoxy
herbicides. Some studies have shown an association
between soft tissue sarcomas and exposure to phenoxy
herbicides.7'20'21 Although data from Wisconsin,1 West

Virginia,2 and Massachusetts4 indicated that veterans
who served in Vietnam may have an increased risk of
soft tissue sarcoma, no excess of soft tissue sarcomas
was seen among the Vietnam veterans in our study. No
association between soft tissue sarcoma and military
service in Vietnam was found by Greenwald et alsa in a
case control study of 881 men with soft tissue sarcoma
from New York State, nor was any association found
between military service in Vietnam and 234 cases of
soft tissue sarcoma occurring among Vietnam-era veterans admitted to Veterans Administration hospitals,23
or 817 soft tissue sarcoma cases referred to the Armed
Forces Institute of Pathology.84
The veterans who served in the Marine Corps in
Vietnam were seen to have a statistically significant (P
&lt; .085) excess of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma when compared with Marines who did not serve in Vietnam. West
Virginia veterans with service in Vietnam had a statistically significant excess of Hodgkin's disease when
compared with other Vietnam-era veterans.2 None of
the other state studies indicated any excess of lymphomas among veterans with service in Vietnam.1'3'*
Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has been associated with
exposure to phenoxy herbicides,8'9 arsenicals,86 dapsone,26 and certain viruses.27 The men who served in
Vietnam had the potential for exposure to all of these
agents. Agent Blue, a herbicide used in Vietnam, was
an organic arsenical compound and dapsone, a sulfone,
was used as an antimalarial drug by some of the troops
in Vietnam. Dapsone26 has been shown to cause lymphomas in laboratory animals. Dapsone was given mainly
to troops stationed in I Corps and the central highland
areas of Vietnam where falciparum malaria was prevalent. Most of the Marines in Vietnam served in I Corps.
It will be interesting to see whether the Army troops
who were stationed in I Corps also exhibit an excess of
lymphomas. The data necessary for this analysis are
now being collected.
Lung cancer was significantly elevated (PMR, 1.58;
P &lt; .085) among Marines who served in Vietnam relative to Marines who did not serve in Vietnam. The
veterans from New York3 with service in Vietnam also
had relatively more lung cancer than other Vietnamera veterans but the excess was not statistically significant.
Although tobacco is the etiologic agent most commonly associated with lung cancer, this disease has also
been associated with exposure to other substances such
as arsenic28 and phenoxy herbicides.80'29 A survey of
more than 89,000 Vietnam-era veterans in Wisconsin
indicated that they were nearly twice as likely to be
cigarette smokers as were men in the general population.1 There are no smoking histories available for the
Marines in this study. If the lung cancer deaths in this
study are associated with an increased use of tobacco
by the men who served in Vietnam, lung cancer deaths
should also be increased among Army troops in Vietnam.
They were not.
The present study has certain inherent limitations
that make it difficult to draw firm conclusions. First,

Journal of Occupational Medicine/Volume 30 No. 5/May 1988

417

�risk estimates obtained from PMR analyses can approximate the results from studies of cause-specific mortality
rates or the standardized mortality ratio (SMR).30 However, PMRs may be inflated for certain causes when the
overall mortality rate of the study group is lower than
that of the comparison population. This would have been
the case if the US general population had been chosen
for the comparison population in this study. It was shown
that the selection process for military service exerted a
profound effect on the mortality of veterans after separation from service. The number of deaths among the
World War II male Army veterans was only 83.5% of
the expected number at concurrent death rates for US
white men.31 A recent study published by the CDC
showed that the mortality among the Vietnam veteran
study population was 17% higher than the rate among
the non-Vietnam veteran comparison populations.5
These suggested that SPMRs for lung cancer and nonHodgkin's lymphoma reported in this study could have
been biased toward underestimating the risks.
Second, it is possible that, with so many comparisons
being made, the few significant elevations observed
could be interpreted as chance findings. Findings from
this study need to be replicated by other Vietnam veteran studies.
Third, no exposure data on individual veterans were
available so as to evaluate the possible etiologic factors
of the malignancies which appeared to be elevated
among Marine Vietnam veterans. Additional work needs
to be done to find characteristics that may point to
possible etiologic factors.
Fourth, the observation period in this study, a maximum of 17 years, may have been still insufficient to
observe the risk of dying from diseases with a long
latency period. A periodic monitoring of Vietnam veteran mortality patterns is warranted.
Despite the limitations described above, the present
study is the largest mortality study of Vietnam veterans
reported to date encompassing approximately one third
of all deaths which have occurred among the US Army
and Marine veterans who served in Vietnam. Having an
equally large number of non-Vietnam veterans whose
characteristics are well-defined and are similar to the
study population except for service in Vietnam should
be considered a major strength. Furthermore, unlike
other PMR studies of Vietnam veterans, in this study
military personnel records for almost all (98.6%) potential study subjects were retrieved and reviewed to determine eligibility of the veteran. Therefore, the chance
of misclassification of the most important study variable,
namely service in Vietnam, is minimal.
In summary, the study shows no significant differences in the major cause of death between Vietnam
veterans and non-Vietnam veterans with a few exceptions. Accidental and drug-related deaths were relatively more frequent among Army Vietnam veterans.
Suicides were less frequent among Vietnam veterans.
Vietnam veterans who served in the Marine Corps were
seen to have statistically significant excess of lung
cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

418

Acknowledgments
The Veterans Administration wishes to acknowledge the assistance
and support received from many individuals and agencies without
which the VA mortality study could not have been successfully completed. We are grateful to Gilbert Beebe, PhD (NIH), Chin Long
Chiang, PhD (UC Berkeley), Joseph Fleiss, PhD (Columbia University), the late Bernard Greenberg, PhD (University of North Carolina), the late Abraham Lillenfeld, MD (Johns Hopkins University),
and Richard Monson, MD (Harvard University) for their reviews of
the study protocol and the many suggestions and recommendations
made on the conduct of the study. We also would like to acknowledge
the contributions of David Peterson and Carolyn Brooks of the National
Archives Records Administration; Paul Gray, National Personnel Records Center; Richard Christian, US Army and Joint Services Environmental Support Group; Robert Bilgrad, National Center for Health
Statistics, National Death Index; and the Social Security Administration; the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; and
the Internal Revenue Service. John Ward of Westat and Elaine Kokiko
of Moshman Associates assisted us in the collection of military service
data and death certificates, respectively. The guidance provided by
William Page, PhD (National Academy of Sciences) and Alvin Young,
PhD (White House Office of Science and Technology Policy) in planning for the study is greatly appreciated.

References
1. Anderson HA, Hanrahan LP, Jensen M, et al: Wisconsin Vietnam Veteran Mortality Study, Final Report. State of Wisconsin Dept
of Health and Social Services, Division of Health, 1986.
8. Bailey C, Baron BC, Basanao E, et al: West Virginia Vietnam
Era Veterans Mortality Study. West Virginia Residents 1968-1988,
Preliminary Report. West Virginia Health Dept, 1986.
3. Lawrence CE, Reilly AA, Quickenton P, et al: Mortality patterns of New York State Vietnam veterans. Am J Public Health
1985:75:377-879.
4. Kogan MD, Clapp RW: Mortality Among Vietnam Veterans in
Massachusetts, 1978-83. Massachusetts Office of Commissioner of
Veterans Services, Agent Orange Program, Massachusetts Dept of
Public Health, Division of Health Statistics, 1985.
5. The Centers for Disease Control: Postservice mortality among
Vietnam veterans. JAMA 1987;857:790-795.
6. Hearst N, Newman TB, Hully SB: Delayed effects of the military
draft on mortality: A randomized natural experiment. N Eng-1 J Mod
1986;314:680-684.
7. Hardell L, Sandstrom A: Case control study: Soft tissue sarcoma and exposure to phenoxyacetic acids of chlorophenols. Br J
Cancer 1979;39:711-717.
8. Hardell L, Ericksson M, Lenner P, et al: Malignant lymphoma
and exposure to chemicals especially organic solvents, chlorophenols
and phenoxy acids: A case-control study. Br J Cancer 1981;43:169176.
9. Hoar SK, Blair A, Holmes FF, et al: Agricultural herbicide use
and risk of lymphoma and soft-tissue sarcoma. JAMA 1986;856:11411146.
10. Dept of Defense, Directorate for Information, Operations, and
Reports: Selected Manpower Statistics, Fiscal Year 1981.
11. National Academy of Sciences Commission on the Life Sciences
Medical Follow-up Agency: Ascertainment of Mortality in the U.S.
Vietnam Veteran Population. Report of Contract V101 (93) P-937,
Washington, DC, 1985.
18. Eighth Revision International Classification of Disease,
Adapted for Use in the United States. US Public Health Service,
Washington, DC.
13. Monson RR: Analysis of relative survival and proportional
mortality. Comp Blamed Res 1974;7:385-338.
14. Mantel N, Haenszel W: Statistical aspects of the analysis of
data from retrospective studies of disease. JNCI 1959;88:719-748.
15. Spiegelman D, Wang JD, Wegman D: Epidemiologlc programs
for computers and calculators. Am J Epidemiol 1983;118:599-607.
16. Simon W: Attempted suicide among veterans. J Nerv Ment Dls
1950;lll:451-468.

Mortality Study of Vietnam War Veterans/Breslin et al

�17. Huffine GL: Equivocal single-auto traffic fatalities. Life Threatening Behav 1971;l:83-95.
18. Schmidt QW, Shaffer JW, Zlotowitz HI, et al: Suicide by
vehicular crash. Am J Psychiatry 1977;184:176-177.
19. Rohrbaugh M, Bads O, Press S, et al: Effects of Vietnam
Experience on Subsequent drug use among servicemen. Int J Addict
1974;9:S6-40.
SO. Lynge E: A followup study of cancer incidence among workers
in manufacture of phenoxy herbicides in Denmark. Br J Cancer
1985:58:859-870.
21. Erickson M, Hardell L, Berg NO, et al: Soft tissue sarcomas
and exposure to chemical substances: A case referrant study. Br JInd
Med 1981:38:87-33.
88. Greenwald P, Kovasznay B, Collins DN, et al: Sarcoma of soft
tissues after Vietnam service. JNCI 1984;73:1107-1109.
83. Rang H, Weatherbee L, Breslin P, et al: Soft tissue sarcoma
and military service in Vietnam: A case comparison group analysis of
hospital patients. J Occup Med 1986:88:1815-1818.
34. Rang HK, Enzinger FW, Breslin P, et al: Soft tissue sarcoma
and military service in Vietnam: A case control study. JNCI

1987;79:693-«99.
85. Axelson O, Dahlgren E, Jansson CD, et al: Arsenic exposure
and mortality: A case referrent study for a Swedish copper smelter.
BrJInd Med 1978;35:8-15.
86. National Cancer Institute Carcinogenesis Technical Report;
Series No. 80: Bioassay of dapsone for possible carcinogenicity. DHEW
publication No. NIH 77-880. Washington, DC 1977.
87. Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni &lt;TF: Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders Co, 1988, pp 770-771.
88. Ott MG, Holder BB, Goldon HL, et al: Respiratory cancer and
occupational exposure to arsenicals. Arch Environ Health
1974:89:850-855.
89. Zack JA, Oaffey WR: A mortality study of workers employed
at the Monsanto Company plant in Nitro, West Virginia. Environ Sci
Res 1983:86:575-591.
30. Decoufle P, Thomas TL, Pickle LW: Comparison of the proportionate mortality ratio and standardized mortality ratio risks measures. Am JEpidemiol 1980;lll:863-869.
31. Seltzer CC, Jablon S: Effects of selection on mortality. Am J
Epidemlol 1974:100:367-378.

Journal of Occupational Medicine/Volume 30 No. 5/May 1988

419

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22718">
              <text>066</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22720">
              <text>1786</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22728">
              <text>Series III Subseries III</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22709">
                <text>Breslin, Patricia</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22710">
                <text>Han K. Kang</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22712">
                <text>Yvonne Lee</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22714">
                <text>Vicki Burt</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22716">
                <text>Barclay M. Shepard</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22722">
                <text>Journal of Occupational Medicine</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22724">
                <text>1988-05-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22726">
                <text>Proportionate Mortality Study of US Army and US Marine Corps Veterans of the Vietnam War</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22729">
                <text>VA Mortality Study</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22730">
                <text>mortality trends</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22731">
                <text>cancer risk assessment</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3105" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1605">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/df8d66e51c40779e9d002e14c30e9caf.pdf</src>
        <authentication>a7bbaebbe750a995b0af55bc3d939eb6</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63554">
                    <text>Item ID Number

01735

Author

Keller, Carl A.

Corporate Author
RODOrt/ArtlOlO TitlO Typescript: Review of Vietnam Veterans Mortality
Study, September 14,1987

Journal/Book Title
oooo
Month/Day
Color
Number of Images

n

1

Doscripton Notes

Monday, June 11, 2001

Page 1786 of 1793

�REVIEW OF VIETNAM VETERANS MORTALITY

STUDY

A study of proportionate mortality among U.S. Army and Marine veterans
who served between July 4, 1965 and March 1, 1973 and died before
March 1, 1982 was reported by the Veterans Administration. The study
included 19708 Army and 4527 Marine veterans who had served in Vietnam
and 22904 Army and 3781 Marine veterans who had not served in Southeast
Asia during tis period. The study included a random sample of about
one-third of the potentially elligible veterans who had died during this
period. The selection of study subjects and recovery of information on
them appears to have been unbiased and appropriate.
The major findings from this study included a statistically significant
excess of accidental and drug related deaths and paucity of suicides
among Army veterans who had served in Vietnam compared to those who
had not served in Southeast Asia. In addition, there was a statistically
significant excess of lung cancer and non-Hodgkins lymphoma among Marine
veterans who had served in Vietnam compared to those who had not.
Several other findings were not mentioned in either the conclusions
nor in the narrative, but are evident in the tables. These include a
statisically significant decrease in mortality due to genitourinary
diseases and cancer of the extra-cranial nervous system among Army
Vietnam veterans. In addition, there appears to have been a signifcant
decrease in cancer deaths among enlisted Army veterans with only one
tour of duty in Vietnam, and among similar Marine veterans before 1975.
There was also a significant increase in accidental poisonings among
enlisted Marine Vietnam veterans dying before 1975.
The authors computed Standardized Proportionate Mortality Ratios (SPMR)
and tested with the Chi-Square statistic (not presented in the tables).
According to the reference used to justify this procedure (ref # 13),
Professor Monson suggests using the Poisson approximation of the
variance of the expected deaths, i.e., that the expected number of
deaths approximates the variance. If this procedure is applied to the
information which can be deduced from the observed number of deaths
and the SPMR as given in the tables, several additional SPMRs appear to
be statistically significant. These include an excess of all cancer
deaths among Marine veterans who served in Vietnam, particularly single
tour enlisted Marines after 1975. Other possibly significant findings
would include a decrease in deaths due to infectious diseases and
diseases of the blood, an increase in deaths due to musculoskeletal
and connective tissue diseases, and a decrease in deaths from thyroid
cancer and non-Hodgkins lymphoma among Army Vietnam veterans.
While there is no way to determine which statistical procedures are
"correct", these results indicate that more significant findings are
available in these data than have been dicussed in the manuscript.
While this does not make it any easier to interpret the results, it
does serve to point out the selective nature of the findings which
have been emphasized in the manuscript. In particular, the inclusion
of one-seventh of the abstract and considerable dicussion in the
narrative to Agent Orange is misleading. Other possible explanations
for the findings should receive relatively more emphasis.

Carl A. Keller, Ph.D.
Epidemiologist, NIEHS

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22701">
              <text>066</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22702">
              <text>1785</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22704">
              <text>Series III Subseries III</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22700">
                <text>Keller, Carl A.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22703">
                <text>Typescript: Review of Vietnam Veterans Mortality Study, September 14, 1987</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22705">
                <text>VA Mortality Study</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22706">
                <text>mortality trends</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22707">
                <text>study criticism</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22708">
                <text>cancer risk assessment</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3085" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1598">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/5fe0008ae62b2a9f36880208141d9b06.pdf</src>
        <authentication>1f5fb5c0167e5b0bed2ddb443362fd91</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63547">
                    <text>Item ID Number

01775

Author

Breslin, Patricia

Corporate Author
Report/ArtlGlO TltlO Typescript: A Preliminary Report: The Vietnam
Veterans Mortality Study, October 1986

Journal/Book Title
000

Year

°

Month/Day
Color

n

Number of Images

10

°

Dascplpton Notes

Monday, June 11, 2001

Page 1777 of 1793

�A PRELIMINARY REPORT
THE VIETNAM VETERANS MORTALITY STUDY
Patricia Breslin, Sc.D
Yvonne Lee, M.Sc.
Han Rang, DrPH

Vicki Burt, M.Sc.
Barclay Shepard, MD

Office of Environmental Epidemiology
Veterans Administration
Washington DC 20420
October 1986

�SUMMARY

The patterns of mortality among 24,235 veterans of the Army and
Marine Corps who served in Vietnam and 26,685 Vietnam era veterans
who served in the Army and Marine Corps other than in Southeast Asia
were investigated using standardized proportional mortality ratios
(SPMRs). The study subjects were a random sample of Vietnam era
veteran deaths taken from the Veterans Administration's Beneficiary
Indentification and Record Locator Subsystem (BIRLS). Data on the
type of military service, place and dates of military service,
military occupational speciality code, principal duties, and other
demographic information were obtained from the military record. Cause
of death information came from death certificates (97%), Department
of Defense Reports of Casuality, or VA records. All cause of death
information was coded by experienced nosologists using ICDA-8.
The veterans who had served in Vietnam were seen to have died from
accidents, violence and trauma significantly more frequently than
those who did not serve in Vietnam. The excesses seem to be among
deaths from motor vehicle accidents and accidental drug poisonings.
A closer investigation revealed that the accidental drug poisonings
were predominantly heroin overdoses. Deaths coded as suicides were
not in excess among those who served in Vietnam.
The Marines who served in Vietnam appear to have an excess of
mortality from malignancies. Part of this excess seems to be lung
cancer and non-Hodgkins lymphomas (NHL). Marines with combat related
MOSCs have a greater risk for NHL than those with either direct
combat support or indirect combat support MOSCs. The excess for NHL
among Marines is also seen if general population mortality data or if
U.S. cancer mortality data are used as comparisons. Standardized
mortality odds ratios were also calculated for the NHL deaths among
Marines using all cardiovascular deaths among Marines who did not
serve in Southeast Asia as a comparison population. SMOR's were
elevated for Marines with combat related MOSCs and for Marines whose
first tour of duty was 1967-1969.
Additional data are being collected. Analyses are planned that will
investigate the relationship between the place the Veteran served in
Vietnam and the herbicide spray patterns in Air Force records.

�INTRODUCTION
In response to growing concerns about the potential adverse health
effects of military service in Vietnam, studies have been undertaken
by governments, veterans organizations and others in the United
States and Australia. To address some of these concerns, the Veterans
Administration undertook a mortality study of Vietnam veterans based
on deaths known to it. The study was designed and and the original
contracts for data collection were let by the Veterans
Administration's Office of Reports and Statistics and subsequently
transferred to the Agent Orange Projects Office to be completed. This
is a preliminary report on some of the data from the study. The
purpose of the study was to compare the mortality patterns of men who
served in Vietnam with those of men who served in the military during
the same era but who did not serve in Southeast Asia.
SOURCES OF DATA
Ideally one would like to be able to do a cohort study in which one
could assess the relative risks of death from all causes or from
specific causes for military personnel who served in Vietnam
compared to military personnel who did not serve in Vietnam.
Unfortunately, there is no complete roster of persons who served in
the military during that era. Another approach had to be taken.
The Veterans Administration maintains an automated information system
used to identify and to locate records of veterans who have received
or are receiving veterans benefits such as compensation, pensions,
loan guarantees, or education as well as records for veterans whose
beneficiaries have received a death benefit. This system is known as
the Beneficiary Identification and Record Locator Subsystem
(BIRLS)
and contains more than 38 million names. Until October 1981, the
Veterans Administration was authorized to pay a lump sum benefit for
all eligible veteran deaths. The number of eligible veterans was
large and included those who served during the Vietnam era. Although
this system does not provide a complete list of all veterans, it is
believed to be a reasonably complete source for veteran deaths.
Beebe and Simon (1) assessed the completeness of the file for World
War II veterans and found that 98% of independently ascertained
deaths were known to the VA and BIRLS has been used as a source of
data in other mortality studies of veterans. (2,3,4) This study was
undertaken with the assumption that the BIRLS file would be able to
provide a similarly complete list of Vietnam era veterans' deaths.
The National Academy of Sciences(5), under contract to the Veterans
Administration, has assessed the completeness of this file for
Vietnam era veterans. Its findings and their implications for this
study are discussed in Appendix A-l.

�If a reasonably complete roster of Vietnam era veterans' deaths could
be assembled and they could be classified as to whether or not they
served in Vietnam, they could form the data base for a proportional
mortality study (PMR analysis). Although the data in the BIRLS
record do not consistently indicate whether or not the veteran has
served in Vietnam, they do provide several advantages toward
obtaining this information. The basic BIRLS record format may contain
information such as social security number, service number, branch of
service, dates of enlistment and discharge etc. These are data items
needed to identify the veteran in the military record system.
As the name indicates, BJERLS is a file used to locate the VA claim
folder for the veteran. It is the paper record of veterans' claims
for benefits or claims made in his or her behalf. For deceased
veterans, the file contains some kind of notification of death. In
many cases this is the death certificate issued by the state or
country where the veteran died or a DD1300, a Department of Defense
form, Report of Casualty, issued in the event of death to an active
member of the armed forces or reserve. The cause of death should be
available for most veterans in these files.
Given the type of data readily available, a proportional mortality
analysis was planned using a sample of the Vietnam era veterans'
deaths found in BIRLS.
The purpose of the study was to describe the proportional mortality
patterns of men who served in the Army or Marine Corps during a
portion (1965-1973) of the Vietnam era (1965-1975). The study will
compare the mortality patterns of servicemen who served in Vietnam
with those of servicemen who did not serve in Southeast Asia.
SELECTING THE TARGET POPULATION
Proceeding under the assumption that the BIRLS system had the
potential for yielding a reasonably complete roster of Vietnam Era
veterans' deaths, it was necessary to devise strategies to select
these deaths from among all deaths recorded in BIRLS. The objectives
of the selection process were to obtain as complete a list as
possible. This list would include all the Vietnam era veterans and
would exclude veterans who had not served in the military during the
Vietnam era. In the first stage, the attempt was made to provide as
complete a list as possible. To do this, all veterans whose service
dates included the period 1964-1975 were selected. For those records
where the service dates were missing, persons whose birth dates were
given as falling between 1935 and 1957 inclusive were selected. This
yielded about 815,000 records.
Recalling the purpose of the study, to compare the mortality patterns
of men who served in Vietnam with those who did not serve in Vietnam,
additional criteria were introduced based on time of service and
branch of service.

�The Vietnam era, as defined by the Veterans Administration, was Aug.
5, 1964 to May 7, 1975. Prior to July 1965 and after January 1973
there were relatively few troops in Vietnam. If one sampled deaths
among those who served before 1965 or after Jan. 1, 1973 there would
be relatively few decedents who had served in Vietnam. Therefore,
the study population was limited to military personnel who were in
the armed forces on or after July 4, 1965 but before March 1, 1973.
Data published by the Department of Defense(6) indicate that 81% of
those who served in Vietnam were in the Army or Marine Corps. For
these branches of service duty in Vietnam meant, in most cases,
service "in country". For those in the Air Force or Navy, Vietnam
service is not so clear cut. It may be difficult to determine whether
Navy personnel who were considered to have service in the Vietnam
theatre of operations were ever actually "in country" or if Air Force
personnel who flew missions over Vietnam or to Vietnam were ever "in
country". Hence the study population was further limited to persons
serving in the Army or Marine Corps between July 4, 1965 and March 1,
1973. Since this was to be a proportional mortality study and deaths
related to combat could only occur among those with service in
Southeast Asia and not among those who did not serve in Southeast
Asia, deaths in service before the end of 1973 were excluded. The
study population as defined by these criteria consisted of 186,000
names of military personnel who served in the Army or Marine Corps or
unknown branch any time between July 4, 1965 and March 1, 1973 or
whose year of birth was between 1934 and 1957 inclusive.
SAMPLE SELECTION
Power calculations done by the Office of Reports and Statistics of
the Veterans Administration(7) suggested that at least 50,000
eligible cases would be needed for the study. It was assumed that
some of the cases selected from the target population of 186,000
would be ineligible for the study based on branch or time of service,
(these would be cases included in the target population because these
data items were not recorded in the BIRLS) therefore, 60,000 names
were selected from the target population by simple random sampling.
It was assumed that the extra 10,000 names would allow for the
ineligible and the final sample for analysis would be at least 50,000
names. A small sample of the records classified a priori as
ineligible for the study by the selection criteria was taken in order
to evaluate these criteria. The analysis of this "quality control"
sample indicated that about 1% of the deaths of eligible males may
have been excluded from the target population file because of
incomplete or erroneous data in BIRLS.
In order to spread the work load over time, the 60,000 records were
randomly divided into 4 batches to be processed at intervals of three
months. The returns for the first batch suggested that the proportion
of ineligible cases among those sampled was larger than the 16%
allowed for in the 60,000, and if 50,000 eligible cases were to be
obtained, the later batches would have to be increased in size. While
the first two batches were in process, a committee of experts

�(Appendix A-2) was convened. Because of the relative youth of the
deaths in the study, the committee suggested that deaths occurring
later in the study time frame i.e. after 1975 should be more heavily
sampled in the later batches in order to enhance the possibility of
seeing a broader spectrum of chronic diseases. Given the need to
increase the sample size, and the recommendations of the expert
committee, it was decided to select only deaths after 1975 and
increase the sample size of the last two batches. Ultimately, 75617
records were selected. Using the results of the quality control
sample and the outcome of the military records searches done on the
cases selected, it was estimated that there should have been about
144,450 deaths of men meeting the study criteria in BIRLS and that
this study included about" 36% of them.
MILITARY RECORDS
Military records for discharged veterans are kept in the National
Personnel Record Center (NPRC) in St. Louis, MO. Although the
military records are not automated, there is a computerized
"register" that can be used to locate a veteran's record. To use
this register, one needs the veteran's name, branch of service,
social security number, birth date, and if available, service
number. For most subjects this information was available in BIRLS.
A computer tape containing the requisite information was sent to the
contractor responsible for the military records searching and
abstracting. The tape was matched to the register and the file
locations for the required cases were obtained. Attempts were made to
locate records for persons not found by computer match by manually
searching other unautomated files.
Records for which a location was determined were requested from the
NPRC and abstracted by the contractor. The types of data obtained
from these records are given in appendix B-l. For some persons whose
military record could not be located or obtained at NPRC, VA records
were searched for evidence of eligibility, such as branch, time, and
place of service.
Abstracted records were returned to the VA project staff on computer
tape. The staff of the study project then 'edited* the tape as far as
possible looking for inconsistencies among military occupational
specialty codes (MOSC), branch and grade codes. For veterans who had
served in Southeast Asia, more data elements were abstracted from the
military record. Any apparent inconsistencies such as disagreement
between unit address and branch of service were resolved.
CAUSE OF DEATH INFORMATION
It had been assumed at the inception of the study that for most cases
a death certificate had been filed with the VA by the next of kin in
order to obtain some veteran's benefit or that there would be some
other form such as DD1300, Report of Casualty that would indicate the
cause of death in the veteran's VA file. To obtain this death

�information, the records selected were sorted by the location of the
record given in the BIRLS file. Lists of names with requisite
identifying information were sent to the locations of record. The
instructions issued to these offices were to locate the record,
search for a death certificate or cause of death information, and
send a copy of the death certificate or other document to the
contractor responsible for coding the cause of death information.
For about 30% of the names selected the request was returned with no
codeable cause of death information. These were cases where the file
was not found; the file had been transferred elsewhere; the file
contained no death certificate or other document showing cause of
death; the death certificate in the file did not show a cause of
death; or an incorrect certificate was returned (sometimes
certificates for other family members, marriage certificates,
baptismal certificates etc. were sent).
Every conceivable approach was taken to obtain cause of death
information for these cases. Death certificates were the preferred
source of information but Reports of Casualty issued by the military
in the event of death active duty personnel or reservists were
accepted if the death occurred out of the country and no death
certificate could be obtained. It should be noted that most of these
cases were accidents and probably little additional information would
have been obtained from the death certificate if it were available.
For cases where files had been transferred, the request was
re-submitted to the new location. If the file was missing, VA records
were researched to look for duplicate files in other locations. If
BIRLS indicated that the veteran carried insurance, death
certificates were requested from the insurance carrier. Arrangements
were made with state vital statistics registrars to obtain death
certificates from state records. For cases where a death certificate
was returned without a cause of death (cases marked "pending" further
investigation or certificates from New York City that did not include
the portion of the certificate that contained the cause of death
information) a request was made of the jurisdiction issuing the
certificate to send an amended certificate. BIRLS files were
searched for evidence of last known state of residence and requests
were directed to that state. If the year of death was 1979 or later
the name, birth date and social security number were submitted for a
National Death Index search. If the records indicated that the
veteran died while on active duty, a request was made to the
contractor abstracting military records to look for a death
certificate or DD1300 in the military record.
The predominant source of information on the cause of death for all
cases was the death certificate or an abstract of the death
certificate. This was true for both those who served in Vietnam and
those who did not.

�SOURCE OF CAUSE OF DEATH INFORMATION
Death certificates or abstracts
DD 1300
VA Forms/records

96.95%
2.13%
.92%

DEATH CERTIFICATE CODING
All information contained on the death certificate was coded for
inclusion in the data base. Demographic information, geographic
information and information on occupation and industry were coded
using standard codes. « All cause of death information was coded by
trained nosologists using the International Classification of
Diseases, 8th Revision (ICDA-8)(8) for entry into the Automated
Classification of Medical Entities (ACME)(9) system.
All certificates for selected causes of death were reviewed by a
senior staff member on the study. It was found that the cause of
death information was consistently and accurately coded. A few
questionable codes were re-submitted to the nosologist for review.
Because the version of ACME used in this study was the earliest
attempt to automate the assignment of the underlying cause of death
on death certificates, occasionally there were re-submitted to the
nosologist for review. Because the version of ACME used in this study
was the earliest attempt to automate the assignment of the underlying
cause of death on death certificates, occasionally there were codes
erroneously assigned by the computer. Many of the cases questioned by
the project staff member fell into this category. Consequently, an
experienced nosologist, knowledgeable about the ACME system and its
inadequacies, re-reviewed the cause of death coding on all
certificates.
DATA MERGING
The data tapes containing the information abstracted by the
contractors were matched to the original BIRLS data to confirm that
the cases abstracted were the cases selected. Non-matches were culled
from the tapes to be reviewed and if necessary, re-abstracted. This
merge was straight forward for the military information. The
military record abstract contained an identification number based on
the alphabetical sequence of the names in each batch and this was
known to the study staff. In the case of the death certificate
abstracts, there was no such common number available on the tape and
matches had to be attempted by social security number, name or VA
claim number. This was not as straight forward as it may seem. Nearly
18,000 cases could not be matched by these means and had to be
matched by someone looking at the data in both files and manually
entering the matching file numbers. (For 15% of the eligible cases,
there were no matching social security numbers between BIRLS and the
death certificate data.) Once it was determined that all death
certificate abstracts that could be matched to BIRLS had been
identified, the military record file and the death certificate files

�were matched. Again, checks were run looking for differences in
names,social security numbers, and birth dates. Dates of death
recorded on the death certificate abstracts were matched with dates
of death given in BIRLS. Alldiscrepancies were investigated. Most
mismatches were found in time to be researched and included in the
study; some were not and are now classified among the missing
certificates. Where demographic data from the military abstract data
did not match the BIRLS data for the case, there was no time to have
these re-abstracted. These cases are counted among the search
completed and not found cases.
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SAMPLE
The final sample consisted of 75617 names; of these 69.1% (52253)
were found to be eligible for inclusion in the study by virtue of
branch of service or time of service.
DISTRIBUTION OF SAMPLE BY ELIGIBILITY STATUS
Names Selected
Found Eligible
Found Ineligible
Not found

75617
52253
22332
1032

100.0%
69.1%
29.5%
1.4%

The ineligible count includes duplicate names; men who did not serve
in the military during the Vietnam Era; men who served in the Navy,
Coast Guard or Air Force; men who were killed in action or reported
missing in action and subsequently were declared dead; men who died
in service before 1974; men who died of war related injuries; and all
women. It should be noted that there were only 340 women identified.
No women in this had served in Southeast Asia and not all had served
during the Vietnam era.
Of the 52253 men determined to be eligible for the study, cause of
death was ascertained for 51421 or 98.4%. The remaining 832 names
(1.6%) were cases where the cause of death was pending; the veteran
died overseas and the certificate available had no cause of death;
the veteran was probably still alive; and cases where the place of
death had not been identified.
STATUS OF ELIGIBLE CASES
Eligible by branch and time of service
Cause of death known
Cause of death not found

52253
51421
832

100.0%
98.4%
1.6%

�Of the 51421 men for whom military service data and cause ofdeath
information was available, 24736 were known to have served in
Southeast Asia: 24235; were identified as having served in Vietnam;
450 were known to have served in Thailand, and for 51 the unit with
which they served is known but the place of service (i.e. Vietnam or
elsewhere in Southeast Asia) has yet to be resolved.
PLACE OF MILITARY SERVICE
No service in Southeast Asia
26685
Served in Vietnam
24235
Served in Thailand only
450
Place of service in Southeast Asia unk.
51

51.9%
47.1%
0.9%
0.1%

This report will be based on 50920 deaths, 24235 men who served in
Vietnam and 26685 men who did not serve in Southeast Asia.
METHODOLOGY
Jablon and Seltzer(2) concluded from their studies of veteran
populations that it was hazardous to compare "selected cohorts" to
the general population since these screened populations may vary
systematically or confound the interpretation of an exposure hence
there is a need to compare veterans to veterans. In this report we
have heeded this advice and will use the Vietnam Era veterans who did
not serve in Southeast Asia as a comparison group for those who
served in Vietnam.
Of the 50920 men in this report, 83.6% had served in the Army; 47.6%
had served in Vietnam (another 1% had served elsewhere in Southeast
Asia). The Marines were more apt to have served in Vietnam (54.5% of
the Marines and 46.2% of the Army had served in Vietnam). These
proportions are close to what those that can be estimated from
published data. According to Department of Defense figures(6),
8,844,000 men had served in the military between 4 Aug. 1964 and 27
Jan. 1973, Of these, 5,162,000 were in the Army or Marine Corps.
Veterans Administration (9) figures indicate that 3,169,000 Vietnam
era veterans served in Vietnam. If 81% of these were in the Army or
Marine Corps(6) then 2,535,000 Army or Marine Corps veterans were in
Vietnam. Therefore 2535/5162 or 49.1% of Army or Marine Corps
personnel during that period served in Southeast Asia.
PLACE OF SERVICE BY BRANCH
SERVED IN VIETNAM
YES
NO
Army
Marine Corps

19708
4527

TOTALS

24235

22904
3781
26685

TOTAL
42612
8308
50920

�Of the 50920 deaths used in this report, 79.6% were white, 17.7% were
black and 2.7% were of other racial groups.
Proportional mortality ratios,standardized for age, race, and branch
of service (SPMRs) were calculated for all major causes of death
among all men who served in Vietnam. To calculate a proportional
mortality ratio for a particular cause of death, the deaths were
first divided into two groups which were those who served in Vietnam
and those who did not. Within each of these groups the deaths were
then divided by branch of service and within branch of service, they
were divided by race. Within each racial group they were divided into
10 age groups (20-24, 25-29, . . . 60-64, 65+). The the proportion of
deaths from the cause of interest was calculated for each age group
in the comparison group (veterans who did not go to Vietnam). These
proportions were then multiplied by the total number of deaths in the
corresponding age-race group in the Vietnam service group to obtain
the number of deaths that would be expected to be seen
among the veterans with Vietnam service if they had the same
proportional distribution of deaths by age,race,branch and cause as
those veterans who did not go to Vietnam. These expected numbers for
a specific cause are then added to give the total number of deaths
that would be expected if the veterans who had served in Vietnam had
the same age,race,branch,specific proportional mortality as those
veterans who did not serve in Vietnam. Mathematically this process
can be expressed as :
d(i,j,k,+) X

D(i,j,k,l)

Expected(+,+,+,!)=

where d(i,j,k,+) = the number of deaths from all causes
in the ith branch, jth race and kth age group
among veterans who served in Vietnam.
D(i,j,k,l) = the number of deaths from the 1th cause
in the ith branch, jth race, and kth age
group among veterans who did not serve in
Vietnam.
D(i,j,k,+) = the number of deaths from all causes in the
ith branch, jth race, and kth age group among
The SPMR (standardized proportional mortality ratio) is obtained for
each cause by dividing the observed number of deaths from that cause
in veterans with Vietnam service by the expected number (O/E). The
O/E (observed to expected ratio) indicates whether the group of
interest has relatively more deaths (greater than 1) or relatively
fewer deaths (O/E less than 1) than expected from a specific cause.
In the tables presented here the expected numbers were rounded in
printing the table. The Mantel-Haenszel chi-square statistic (11) was
calculated for each category to indicate whether the deviation from
unity is "statistically significant", that is, whether or not such

�10

differences are likely to be seen by chance. (The 0/E ratio and SPMR
have been used interchangeably in this report.)
The disadvantages of proportionate mortality analysis are well known.
If the overall mortality in the exposed population is different from
that of the non-exposed population the SPMR will not approximate the
standardized mortality ratio (SMR). That is, if the overall
mortality rate is less among those who did not serve in Southeast
Asia the the SPMRs will under estimate the cause specific risks for
those who did go to Vietnam. A cause specific SMPR is also dependent
on the relative distribution of other causes of death. For example,
if men who served in Vietnam had a higher mortality rate for
accidents than the referent population, then the SPMR for some other
cause might be depressed.
,
All major causes of death were looked at separately among all men
with service in Vietnam and in subgroups of that population. SPMRs
were calculated separately for the men who served in the Army and
for those who served in the Marine Corps because the branches might
have had different types of "exposures" in Vietnam either by virtue
of the location of their units or the types of duties they were
assigned. For example, it is known that virtually all of the Marines
in Vietnam were stationed in I Corps (the northern provinces of
Vietnam). It is well known that mortality patterns tend to differ by
race. For this reason, SPMR's were calculated separately for whites
and non-whites. Most of the non-whites were blacks. There were too
few persons of other races to consider them separately. Rather than
excluding them from consideration, they were grouped with the blacks
for the purpose of these preliminary analyses. Conceivably, enlisted
men might have different experiences or exposures than officers.
Thus, these two groups were considered separately. Certainly one
might expect that men who were in combat might differ from those who
were not. There was no data element that would indicate whether the
man had been in combat. As a surrogate measure for combat, those with
"combat" related MOSCs were compared with those who served in Vietnam
with non-combat related MOSCs in each branch. Combat related MOSCs
were those occupations where the primary duty would involve direct
offensive and defensive action against an armed hostile force, for
example: rifleman, field artilleryman, tank crew member etc. The MOSC
groupings used here are those used in the Wisconsin study(12). They
can be found in Appendix B-2. Data from all these analyses are
presented in this report. Certainly many other subgroups might be
identified as the analyses of this data set continue.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
If one looks at the deaths by major disease groups, there would seem
to be no remarkable differences between the men who served in Vietnam
and their counterparts who did not serve in Vietnam except for
"accidents, violence, and trauma (E800-E989) which is"significantly"
in excess among those who served in Vietnam. Deaths from
"musculoskeletal and connective tissue diseases (710-730)" also

�11
can be seen to be consistently elevated across the several subgroups
but the differences are not seen to be "statistically" significant.
The only other major disease category seen in significant excess is
that of diseases of the nervous system and sense organs (380-389) in
the marines with combat related MOSCs where the SPUR is 2.28 based on
17 cases observed.
ACCIDENTS, VIOLENCE AND TRAUMA
Since over half of all the deaths in the study population are due to
accidents, violence, or trauma and because they are seen to be in
excess, they bear investigation. Within this broad category, motor
vehicle accidents account for most of the deaths and they are
significantly in excess among all the sub populations except the
Marines. A cursory investigation was carried out to see if the men
who were in Vietnam were more likely to have civilian jobs that would
put them at higher risk of having a motor vehicle accident. The
proportion of men with jobs that might require driving a motor
vehicle was the same in the two groups.
"Other transport accidents" are seen to be in excess primarily among
Army personnel who are not enlisted men. Investigation revealed that
these were occurring with greatest relative frequency among warrant
officers who had MOSCs that indicated they were helicopter pilots and
that helicopter crashes were a leading cause of death in this cause
category. It was found that many of these men were killed while at
work as helicopter pilots. These accident would not seem to be
related to their "Vietnam experience" except for the correlation of
MOSC, Vietnam service and civilian occupation. Most of the men with
an MOSC that indicated that they were helicopter pilots had served in
Vietnam.
The category of "accidental poisonings" was elevated among all
groups. They seem to be a particular problem among white, Army
enlisted personnel. A sample from all of these deaths was drawn and
the death certificates were reviewed for more information. It was
found that on 98 of 100 certificates the death was due to narcotic
overdose, mostly heroin.
The accidents coded as "other accidents and injury" suggest they
might be related to occupation but these have not been looked at in
detail.
Death by suicides is relatively less frequent in all of the sub
groups presented here except for nonwhite servicemen where the
observed number exceeds the expected number by less than 1%.
Deaths by homicide are in excess among officers and those with combat
experience. A preliminary investigation revealed that men who had
service in Vietnam were more likely to have had a civilian job such
as guard, policemen, etc., that would put them at risk of violent
death.

�12

MALIGNANCIES

The possibility of excess malignancies occurring among the men who
served in Vietnam and who may have been exposed to herbicides has
long been a concern to veterans. When all malignancies are grouped
together, Marines, non-whites, and officers who served in Vietnam
exhibit an excess of cancer when compared to their counterparts who
did not serve in Southeast Asia. The excesses are not statistically
significant but they suggest that there could be a problem in a
subgroups of these men.
SPMRs FOR ALL MALIGNANCIES
GROUP
All
All
All
All
All
All
All

OBS.

cases
Army
Marines
white servicemen
non-white servicemen
enlisted
officers

0/E

2973
2452

1.00
.97
1.20
.99
1.06
.99
1.04

521
2480
492
2566
318

The men with combat related MOSCs were not seen to have more
malignancies than those who served with non-combat related MOSCs.
SPMRs FOR ALL MALIGNANCIES AMONG COMBAT RELATED MOSCs
BRANCH
Army
Marines

OBS.

0/E

550
158

.76
.98

This might suggest that if there is an "environmental" factor
associated with military service in Vietnam that is related to the
slight excesses seen in overall malignancies, it is not confined
only to men who had a high probability of being in combat.
Differences between the services are seen for specific cancer sites
among those who served in Vietnam . The most outstanding differences
are the significant excess of deaths from lung cancer and
non-Hodgkins lymphoma seen in the Marines. The SPMRs for these
malignancies are also elevated among Army personnel although the
excess are not seen as statistically significant.

�13

SPMRs FOR SELECTED MALIGNANCIES BY BRANCH
ARMY
SITE
All sites
Lung
Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma

OBS
2452
632
92

MARINES
0/E
.97
1.03
1.16

OBS
521
130
35

O/E
1.20
1.58*
2 .10*

Soft tissue sarcomas have been of particular interest to those
studying the health or mortality of Vietnam veterans since they are a
type of tumor that has been reported to be associated with exposure
to phenoxy-herbicides by Swedish investigators(13). They are not
elevated in this population. In each group the O/E ratio is 1.00 or
less.
Some marked differences in the ratios of observed numbers of deaths
to expected numbers of deaths have been noted between the men who
served in the Army and those who served in the Marine Corps among
both those who served in Vietnam and those who did not. Cause
specific standardized proportional mortality ratios are dependent
upon the relative distribution of other causes of death. The SPMR for
the group of external causes of death (accidents, etc..) is higher
among those who went to Vietnam relative to those who did not go to
Vietnam in both those who served in the Army and those who served in
the Marine Corps. This can occur either because those who went to
Vietnam had higher relative risks of dying from external causes of
death or because they have lower overall mortality rates than their
counterparts who did not serve in Vietnam.
It might be expected that in comparison to the general population
there would be relatively fewer deaths from circulatory diseases and
certain other diseases in the military population because among these
causes of death are conditions that would make one ineligible for
military service. On the other hand the selection process for
military service can not screen out persons likely to have an
accident or to suffer from a malignancy in the future. It would be
expected that any comparison with the general population there would
be lower death rates for some diseases among those who served in the
military. Consequently, the proportional mortality ratios will be
less than 1 for these causes. Conversely, the proportional mortality
ratios for diseases occurring at approximately the same rate or
higher than in the general population will be elevated.
Standardized proportional mortality ratios were calculated for white
male veteran deaths occurring in the years 1978 to 1981 using the
1978 U.S. white male mortality data (14) for four broad groups of
causes of death: all malignancies, circulatory diseases, external
causes, and all other. As expected, the groups of causes that are
unlikely to be screened out at entry into the military service have
relatively larger observed to expected ratios than those for

�14

categories that include conditions that would lessen the likelihood
of military service.
SPMRs FOR SELECTED CAUSES OF DEATH WHITE VETERANS
No Vietnam Service
Army
Malignancies
Circulatory dis.
External causes
All other

Marines

.99
.87

.88
.78
1.10 . .1.16
.88
.66

1978-1981

Vietnam Service
Army
.98
.96
1.14
.69

Marines
1.04
.87
1.17
.60

U.S. white male mortality for 1978 were uses as a comparison.
No significance tests were done.
When compared to the U.S. white male mortality for 1978, the
proportion of deaths from external causes tends to be the same for
the Marines who went to Vietnam as for those who didn't go. There
still appears to be an excess of malignancies among Marines who went
to Vietnam when compared to the general population. The deaths among
the Marine veterans are distributed differently than those among the
Army veterans when compared to deaths among the U.S. white male
population. One explanation might be the difference in the ages of
the two populations. The mean age of death for the Army veterans was
the same for those who went to Vietnam (36.3 years) as for those who
did not go (36.2 years). The mean age of death for the Marine Corps
veterans was less than that of the Army veterans. The mean age of
death for Marines who did not serve in Vietnam was younger (30.9
years) than that of the marines who had served in Vietnam (34.4
years). Mortality rates for most causes of death are related to age.
Younger populations will die relatively more frequently from
accidents, etc. than older populations. The SPMRs were recalculated
for this same group of deaths excluding all external causes of death.
When all external causes of death were removed, there is less
difference between the distribution of the Army deaths and the Marine
deaths among both those who went to Vietnam and those who did not.
OBSERVED TO EXPECTED RATIOS FOR SELECTED CAUSES OF DEATH
WHITE VETERANS 1978-1981 EXCLUDING EXTERNAL CAUSES OF DEATH
No Vietnam Service
Army
All malignancies
Circulatory dis.
External causes
All other

Marines

Vietnam Service

Army

Marines

1.09
.93

1.15
.95

1.09
1.06

1.35
1.01

1.01

.93

.82

.76

U.S. white male mortality for 1978 used as a comparison.
No significance tests were done.

�15

One might question whether the excess mortality from non-Hodgkins
lymphoma or lung cancer might be artifacts of the apparent excess
deaths from external causes among Marine veterans who did not go to
Vietnam thereby yielding a relatively smaller proportion of expected
deaths from malignancies among these men thus increasing the 0/E
ratios in the internal comparisons presented in this report.
The expected numbers of malignancies were calculated using U.S.
mortality data and using only the distribution of specific
malignancies(15) within all malignancies.
OBSERVED AND EXPECTED NUMBERS OF DEATHS FOR SELECTED MALIGNANCIES,
WHITE MALES, 1973-1981,
ARMY
No Vietnam Service
OBS. EX1
EX2
All malignancies
Ca-colon
Ca-lung , bronchus
Hodgkins Lymphoma
Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma
Leukemia

2061

133
488
72
122
192

1964
142
446
94
113
188

154
495
91
115
184

Vietnam Service
OBS. EX1
EX2

1773
107
443
65
84
152

1753
125
410
83
101
163

128
433
79
100
157

EX1 = Expected numbers based on 1973-81 total white male mortality
EX2 = Expected numbers based on 1973-81 white male cancer mortality

OBSERVED AND EXPECTED NUMBERS OF DEATHS FOR SELECTED MALIGNANCIES,
WHITE MALES, 1973-1981
MARINES
No Vietnam Service
OBS. EX1
EX2
All malignancies
Ca-colon
Ca-lung , bronchus
Hodgkins Lymphoma
Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma
Leukemia

226
10
40
11
8
21

264
17
41
18
17
35

15
46
11
13
24

Vietnam Service
OBS. EX1
EX2
409
18
103
17
29
36

392
27
79
22
24
42

29
91
20
25
36

EX1 = Expected numbers based on 1973-81 total white male mortality
EX2 = Expected numbers based on 1973-81 white male cancer mortality

�16

When the influence of the external causes death is removed from the
standardized proportional mortality ratios by calculating the
expected numbers using only the proportional distribution within all
malignancies as a comparison, the apparent increase in lung cancer
and in NHL still exists. Since the SPMSs using the internal
comparisons were elevated for a subset of Marines, those with combat
related MOSCs, expected numbers for this population were calculated
using the U.S. mortality as in the tables above.
OBSERVED AND EXPECTED NUMBERS OF DEATHS FOR SELECTED MALIGNANCIES,
WHITE MALES, 1973-1981
MARINES WITH COMBAT MOSCs
No Vietnam Service
OBS. EX1
EX2
All malignancies
Ca-colon
Ca-lung , bronchus
Hodgkins lymphoma
Non-Hodgkins lymphoma
Leukemia

35
3
4
0
1
5

51
3
6
4
4
7

2
4
2
2
4

Vietnam Service
OBS. EX1
EX2
136
5
20
6
14
17

133
9
19
10
9
18

9
24
8
9
17

EX1 = Expected numbers based on 1973-81 total white male mortality
EX2 = Expected numbers based on 1973-81 white male cancer mortality
The observed numbers of NHL are not as different from the expected
numbers in those who did not serve in Vietnam as they are among those
who served in Vietnam. The results are similar for black males who
served in the Army. Therefore, the excess mortality from NHL seen
using the internal comparisons is probably not an artifact.
OBSERVED AND EXPECTED NUMBERS OF DEATHS FOR SELECTED MALIGNANCIES,
BLACK MALES, 1973-1981
ARMY WITH COMBAT MOSC'S
No Vietnam Service
OBS. EX1
EX2
All malignancies
Ca-colon
Ca-lung , bronchus
Hodgkins Lymphoma
Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma
Leukemia

290
37
76
5
8
21

253
18
71
9
9
21

21
60
10
10
24

Vietnam Service
OBS. EX1
EX2
344
30
48
10
18
21

281
20
86
8
9
29

24
106
9
11
23

EX1 = Expected numbers based on 1973-81 total black male mortality
EX2 = Expected numbers based on 1973-81 black male cancer mortality

�17
ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS FOR NON-HODGKIN'S LYMPHOMA

The SPMR for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in Marines who went to Vietnam
when compared to those who didn't go to Vietnam was 2.10 based on 35
observed cases. This is significantly greater than 1 using the Mantel
Haenszel(ll) chi-square statistic. Case control analyses (16) were
carried out to examine the relationship between mortality from
non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) to service in Vietnam. The controls for
these analyses were all cardiovascular deaths (ICDA-8 codes:
390.0-458.9) among Marines who did not go to Southeast Asia.
These
were chosen because in this mortality study and several others
(12,18,19,20 ) no association was found between Vietnam service and
cardiovascular mortality. Also, no biologic hypothesis exists
suggesting a relationship between service in Vietnam and
cardiovascular mortality. In case control analysis, if the exposure
of interest is not a risk factor for the selected control group the
standardized mortality odds ratio (SMOR) is equivalent to the SMR.
All SMOR analyses were standardized by age.
AGE SPECIFIC MORTALITY ODDS RATIOS FOR NON-HODGKIN'S LYMPHOMA
MARINES

Age
Group

OBS

MOR

(LCI,UCI)

20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60+
Overall

7
23
2
2
1
35

2.28
5.11
0.28
0.95
1.58
2.08

(0.64,8.18)
(1.51,17.3)*
(0.04,2.03)
(0.08,10.7)
(0.05,48.8)
(1.21,3.60)

* p-value for Mantel-Haenszel chi square &lt; .01.
(Cardiovascular deaths among Marines who did not
go to Southeast Asia are the control population.)
Marines age 30 through 39 at death had a mortality odds ratio of 5.11
with a lower 95% level of 1.51. The overall SMOR for Marines was 2.08
with a lower 95 percent confidence level of 1.21.
The data collected from the military records included information on
military occupational speciality and dates of service in Vietnam. The
most usual tour of duty in Vietnam was 13 months for the Marines. If
the difference between the date the veteran first went to Vietnam and
the date he last left Vietnam was greater than 13 months for a Marine
there is a strong possibility that the veteran served more that one
tour of duty in Vietnam. Marines thus classified as having one tour
had a significantly elevated SMOR of 2.44 for NHL.

�18

STANDARDIZED MORTALITY ODDS RATIOS FOR NON-HODGKIN'S LYMPHOMA
AMONG MARINES BY LENGTH OF SERVICE IN VIETNAM
OBS
1 tour
1+ tours

20
15

SMOR (LCI,UCI)
2.44 (1.33,4.47)
1.74 (0.93,3.27)

(Cardiovascular deaths among Marines who did not
go to Southeast Asia are the control population)
Herbicides were used in Vietnam in greatest volume in 1967 through
1969. The standardized mortality odds ratios are highest in both
groups among those who first went to Vietnam during that time
interval. The elevation is significant in the Marines but not in the
Army personnel.
STANDARDIZED MORTALITY ODDS RATIOS FOR NON-HODGKIN'S LYMPHOMA
AMONG MARINES BY FIRST YEAR IN VIETNAM
OBS
1965-66
1967-69
1970+

16
17
2

SMOR(LCI,UCI)
1.76 (1 .02, 4. 95)
2.54 (1 .22, 5. 25)
1.88 (0 .42, 8. 36)

(Cardiovascular deaths among Marines who did not go to
Southeast Asia are the control population)
Military Occupation Specialty Codes (MOSCs) were categorized as
combat troops, direct support of combat troops, and indirect support
of combat troops. A description of the categories of MOSC appear in
the Appendix B-2. Combat related MOSCs had the highest SMOR for
military occupations at 3.25. The SMOR by MOSC decreases from combat
to indirect support assignments.
STANDARDIZED MORTALITY ODDS RATIOS FOR NON-HODGKIN'S LYMPHOMA
AMONG MARINES BY MOSC GROUPS
OBS
Combat
Direct Support
Indirect Support

SMOR(LCI,UCI)

17
11
7

3.25 (1.45,7.32)
1.70 (0.89,3.23)
1.37 (0.94,2.25)

(Cardiovascular deaths among Marines who did not go
to Southeast Asia are the control population)

�19

Several studies have revealed an association between herbicide use
and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. A report of a recent population based
case control study done by the National Cancer Institute (21)
presents an odds ratio of 2.2 ( Confidence interval:1.2-4.1) for
farmers ever using phenoxyacetic acids. A matched case control study
done in Sweden (xx) of malignant lymphomas (Hodgkin's and NHL )
found a relative risk of 4.8 for those exposed to phenoxy acids.
Because agent orange and other herbicides used in Vietnam contained
phenoxyacetic acids, an attempt will be made to try to relate the
location of the units in which these men served to the known
herbicide spray patterns.
STATE VIETNAM VETERANS MORTALITY STUDIES
Wisconsin, West Virginia, New York and Massachusetts (12,18,20,17)
have done mortality studies of Vietnam Era veteran. The Air Force
"Ranch Hand Study" (19) includes a cohort mortality analysis.
Although the results of these studies are suggestive of possible
excess mortality for some causes of death, they are not strictly
comparable to the data given in this report. They differ from this
study in several ways. They included all Vietnam era veterans from
all branches of services, some used only men with service "in
country" Vietnam; other chose all who served in Southeast Asia as
service in Vietnam.
Wisconsin, New York and West Virginia used other Vietnam era
veterans, all other state veteran and non veterans as comparison
populations for SPMR analyses. Massachusetts used all other state
veterans who applied for veteran bonuses and served between 1958 and
1973 as their comparison group.
In the Ranch Hand Study, a standardized mortality ratio (SMR)
analysis was done comparing "Ranch Banders" (i.e. men who
were involved with herbicide spraying) with cargo flight crews who
did not handle herbicides.
The findings reported by the state studies are somewhat inconsistent
with each other and with what was found here. For example, Wisconsin
and Massachusetts both seen to have an excess of soft tissue sarcoma
among those who went to Vietnam when compared to all other veterans.
Since each state used somewhat different methods and populations, a
series of tables comparable to those done for the total study
population was done for each of these states using all U.S. veterans
who did not serve in Southeast Asia as a comparison group for
veterans from each state who had served in Vietnam. Only tables for
white servicemen were done to illustrate the differences one might
see when comparing more homogeneous groups and holding the comparison
group constant.

�20
SPMRs FOR SELECTED EXTERNAL CAUSES OF DEATH BY STATE
WHITE SERVICEMEN

WI

NY

OBS
All ext causes
Motor veh ace.
Ace. poison
Suicide
All malignancies
Ca-intestines
Ca-soft tissue
Ca-testes
Cirrhosis-alcholic
Cirrhosis-other

412
137
31
70
79
10
1
1
26
20

O/E

0.83
.73*
1 .65*
.64*
1 .01
1.87*
0.70
0.23
3 .17
1.95*

OBS

O/'E

214 1.04
105 1. 34*
4 0. 45
49 1. 08*
34 1.03
3 1. 31
3 5. 11*
5 2. 86*
4 1. 01
1 0.23

M[A
OBS 0/E
172
48
27
38
26
1
2
2
2
9

0.99
0.74*
3 .67*
0.98
0.82
0.44
3 .81*
1.40
0.56
2.10*

Vi'V
OBS 0/E
11 0.96
7 0.92
5 0.92
0 0.60*
30 0.92
2 0.85
1 1.95
2 1.69*
7 1.89
3 0.64

* P&lt;0.05 for chi-square with 1 degree of freedom
All U.S. veterans who did not go to Vietnam were the comparison group
Cause of death groups consistent with grouping used in other tables
In the largest category of deaths, that for accidents, suicide and
trauma, great variation is seen among the states. When some states
seem to have significant excess deaths for a particular subgroup
another may show significant deficits for the same subgroup. Similar
results can be found among other causes of death. These data are
shown for selected causes where at least one state's data indicate a
significant excess.
Whether these variations among the states are the result of sampling
error or whether they suggest an underlying difference in the
mortality experience among states is not obvious.
There were sufficient deaths from California in the study population
to permit a comparison of SPMRs one could observe using different
comparison populations. Using deaths from external causes as an
example, it can be seen that white California veterans as a group
have a different mortality experience then than of all white U.S.
servicemen in the study population.
When using all U.S. white veterans from the study population with no
service in Southeast Asia as a comparison group, the white California
veterans with no Vietnam service have significantly more deaths from
accidental poisoning (drug overdose) and relatively more suicides
than other veterans. When the California veterans with Vietnam
service are compared to Vietnam era veterans from California who did
not serve in Vietnam, these excesses diminish. Suicides are fewer
than expected and the deaths from drug overdose are only slightly
more than expected.

�21
COMPARISONS OF SPMR'S FOR SELECTED CAUSES
OF DEATH IN CALIFORNIA
DBS

All ext. causes
1232
Motor veh. ace.
446
Ace. poisoning
97
Suicides
280
All malignancies
245
Ca-intestines
11
Ca-soft tissue
18
Ca-testes
17
Cirrhosis-alcoholic
48
Cirrhosis-other
45

O/E1

1.05*
1.00
2.17*
1.07
.93
.56
.97
1.77*
. «9.14*
1.48

0/E2

1.02
0.99
1.06
0.92
.94
.42
.56
2.87*
1.14
1.06

* p&lt;0.05 for chi-square with 1 degree of freedom
0/E1 = All U.S. veteran who did not serve in Vietnam
used as a comparison group.
0/E2 = California veterans who did not serve in Vietnam
used as a comparison group.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of the preliminary analysis of some of the data from the
Vietnam Veterans Mortality Study indicate that veterans who served in
Vietnam were more likely to die from accidents, violence, or trauma
than their counterparts who did not serve in Southeast Asia. In
particular, they were more likely to die from motor vehicle accidents
or from drug overdoses. There was no evidence that there are excess
numbers of suicides among those who served in Vietnam.
The SMPRs suggest that there might be some causes of death that
should be investigated further. One of these causes, non-Hodgkins
lymphoma, was submitted to further analysis. The excess of NHL-among
Marines are seen using the U.S. mortality data as a comparison.
Standardized mortality odds ratios using cardiovascular deaths among
all Marines who did not serve in Vietnam as a control, indicate
elevated risks for Marines with combat related military occupational
speciality codes and for Marines who served in Vietnam for the first
time between 1967 and 1969.
The data collection for this study has been extended to include
veteran deaths from 1982-1984. When these data are available for
analysis they will be added to the data presented here and
re-analyzed. One such analysis will look at the location of the unit
in which a man served in Vietnam relative to the herbicide spray
patterns recorded by the Air Force.

�REFERENCES

1. Beebe, G.W. and Simon, A.H. Ascertainemnt of mortality in U.S.
veteran population. Amer. Jour, of Epid.:89:636-643.
2. Seltzer, C. C. and Jablon, S. Effects of selection on mortality.
Amer. Jour. Bpid.:100:367-370.
3. Seltzer, C. C. and Jablon, S.H. Army rank and subsequent
mortality by cause: 23 year follow-up. Amer. Jour. Epid.:
105:559-566
4. Robinette, C. D. and Fraumini, J.F. Asthma and subsequent
mortality in World War II veterans. J. Chron. Dis. :31:619-624
5. Ascertainment of Mortality in the U.S. Vietnam Veteran
Population. Report of contract V101 (93) P-937, National
Academy of Sciences Commission on the Life Sciences
Medical Follow-up Agency, Washington, DC., 1985.
6. Selected Manpower Statistics, Fiscal Year 1981, Directorate
for Information, Operations, and Reports, Department of
Defense.
7. Protocol for the Vietnam Veterans Mortality Study. Office
of Reports and Statistics, Statistical Policy and Research
Service, Veterans Administration, Washington,DC., 1983.
8. Eighth Revision International Classification of Disease,
Adapted for Use in the United States. Public Health Service
Washington, DC.
9. Instructions for Medical Classification of Death Records for
Automated Classification of Medical Entities, 1976-1978
U.S.Dept. of Health .Education and Welfare, Public Health
Service, Washington DC, 1977
10. 1979 National Survey of Veterans. Reports and Statisics
Service, Office of the Controller, Veterans Admnistration,
Washington, DC, 1980.
11. Mantel, N. and Haenszel, W. "Statistical aspects of the
analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease,"
Journal of the National Cancer Institute:28:947 (1962)
12. Wisconsin Vietnam Veteran Mortality Study, Final Report.
State of Wisconsin Department of Health and Social
Services, Division of Health, 1986.

�13. Kardell, L., et al. "Malignant Lyntphoma and exposure to
Chemicals Especially Organic Solvents, Chlorophenols and
Phenoxy Acids: A Case-Control Study". British Journal of
Cancer:43, 169-76. 1981.
14. Vital Statistics of the United States, 1978, Mortality. U.S.
Dept. Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National
Center for Health Statistics, Rockville, MD
15. SEER Program Report, Cancer Incidence and Mortality in the
United States 1973-1981. NIH Publication 85-1837, U.S. Dept.
Health and Human Services, Public Health Service ,National
Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, 1984
16. Miettinen, 0. £• and Wang, J. "An Alternative to the
Proportionate Mortality Ratio". Amer.Jour. of
Epid.:114 : 144-48, 1981.
17. Mortality Patterns Among Vietnam Veterans in Massachusetts
1972-83. Massachusetts Office of Commissioner of Veterans
Services, Agent Orange Program, Massachusetts Department of
of Public Health, Division of Health Statistics, 1985.
18. West Virginia Vietnam Bra Veterans Mortality Study. West
Virginia Residents 1968-1983, Preliminary Report. West
Virginia Health Department, 1986.
19. An Epidemiologic Investigation of Health Effects in Air Force
Personnel Following Exposure to Herbicides, Baseline Mortality
Study.The Surgeon General, United States Air Force. June 30,
1983.
20. Mortality Patterns Among Vietnam and Vietnam Era Veterans,
New Yor State Department of Health, draft report submitted
to the Veterans Administration for review, 1983.
21. Hoar, 8. K., et al. "Agricultural Herbicide Use and Risk
of Lymphoma and Soft-Tissue Sarcoma". Journal of the
American Medical Association :
1986.

�APPENDIX A

�APPENDIX A-l

The National Research Council (NRC) tested the completeness of BIRLS
as a source of Vietnam era veterans deaths by selecting a sample of
men who died in 1980 from the vital statistics records of 8 states.
The names and social security numbers of the men were matched against
the military records files at NPRC to ascertain military service;
3583 Vietnam era veterans were identified. Of these 3583, 88.8% were
found to be recorded in BIRLS as dead; 5.3% were found in BIRLS with
no death recorded and 5.9% were not found in BIRLS. The researcher
used the social security number and name given on the death
certificate to search the BIRLS file.
It was the experience of the investigators in the VA's Vietnam
Veterans Mortality Study that some veterans had more than one social
security number or the name found on the death certificate was not
the name in the BIRLS file. It was also found that some men*
particularly those who served in the Vietnam era, may have h«d more
than one BIRLS file. About the time the military switched from
assigning service number to using social security numbers as the
service number, the VA changed from assigning claims file numbers to
using social security numbers as a claim file number. As a result of
change in the VA's method of assigning claims file numbers, some
veterans were found to have a BIRLS file under a claim number and
another under a social security number. If the record filed under a
claim number did not contain the social security number the second
file might not be found by the method used by the National Research
Council. This would be a particular problem for men with common
names. Both of these two records may or may not have recorded the
death. Frequently when these cases were encountered in this
mortality study, one BIRLS record would have a death date and the
other would not. Unfortunately no record was kept of the relative
frequency of this problem.
An attempt was made to evaluate the findings of the NRC report using
materials that were available in the mortality study. All cases for
whom a death certificate was available and for whom the military
service history was known were searched for cases where: the social
security number on the death certificate did not match the social
security number in BIRLS; the name in BIRLS did not match the name on
the death certificate; the birth date on BIRLS did not match the
birth date (or age) on the death certificate. For 9.5% of all
certificates the social security number of the death certificate did
not match the social security number in BIRLS; for 51% of those with
unmatched social security numbers, the names and/or birth dates did
not match.
These data suggest that 4.8% to 9.5% of the deaths
BIRLS might not be found using the methods used by
substract these number from the 11.2% not found by
1.7% to 6.6% of Vietnam era veterans may not be in

known to be in
NRC. If we
NRC then perhaps
BIRLS.

�APPENDIX A-2
CONSULTANTS:

Gilbert W. Beebe, PH.D., Clinical Epidemiology Branch, National
Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD.
Chin Long Chaing, PH.D., Professor of Biostatistics, School of Public
Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Joseph L. Fleiss, PH.D., Professor of Biostatistics, School of Public
Health, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Bernard G. Greenberg,PH.D., Professor of Biostatistiow, School of
Public Health, University of Noeth Carolina, NC.
Abraham M. Lilienfeld, M.D. Professor of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins
School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
Richard Monson, M.D., School of Public Health, Harvard University,
Boston, MA.

�The 9.5% of deaths that night have been lost were arrayed by cause of
death and Vietnam service. No differences were seen before these two
groups. Therefore we feel that the BIRLS did provide a fairly
complete roster of Vietnam era veteran deaths for this study.

�APPENDIX B

�APPENDIX B-l
M . HlUtwy (Ueort) Soref&gt; (W10&gt;
&gt;

~14"*3

WLITMT HCCOIC M5TIUCT

Ott*i

tU

... _

"

1. Stwtfr ID »'
(1)

t*»e. 01]
[U**l
(11) (U)

I.

*«tr. ft I..J_J
(U)

J.

taurai
(II)

S

»

..

*

. U

0

4. S*i A N
(If)

6

(X0&gt;
fc

7.

•*"

LJ-J-.LJ_LJ_LJ_

Award l«c*tlani

LJ-J I..'-.'—'—'—'-.'—'—'—1 L.LJ LJ_J_LJ_J_LJ..LJ L-L.1 LLLLLLLLL
. . . . . . . .
(31)

(«0)

(M)

(91)

(«0)

UX)

I—'—l_l«.'—i—'—U-J_L. i—l—1—'—'—i—'—i—'—i-.i-.'-.i-.'^i-.1..'-.'-.i—.'

(71)

U»t. Suffix

I—'-.'—LJ_'—LJ_J.J_L-'—C'—'—1 I-.'—'—'—I—LA.'—'—'—'_'-.i—i—LJ

(101)

firtt

(1U)

». on i L. LJ_J_j_ii_J_J.J
N

(111)

D

«- »«"

T

MMlt «t N.X.

» r «

(1J»)

n. AMI

v

i

s•

(MO)

•

0

U

»» Duty
IX. Oatti !_!_ l_l_l_l_ I
(U1)
N
O
T

tJ.

fe**i
(U7)

U. &gt;Ml*nM&gt; l ^ . ^ ^ ! . . ! . l . . ^ . . ! .l— l—l—I.J
^ l . ^ ^ . ! . . .!. !.^ .
(1M)
City

L.LJ
(170) St.

UtMt tt^ntitn
19. C«t«i l_l_l_l_l_l_l
(in)
M
O
T

U.

Uuci

1 &lt; ty

•

19-19y

M. 6r«d«i
(171)

l_l__l_l

If. NBK

17. OiKhi
(W1)

1
X
9
•

tton
01«l
UNC
ITM

JO. Trttl tatl«* Ogtyt

i_u uu
WS
KB

9
•
7
f
I

we
KD
OWN
UW

L.I—1— '— '

21. toe. X*t

LJLJ

I

(TfX)

tU

S.C. MU fcrvle*

(Sti*r IB •]
(1)

t**e. OX] (Ne. •]
(•!•*]
MMI
(11) (13) (19) (U)

CO Tr »

f f*»

T«

l_l_l_l—I

NBC

i. i_i i_i I i_i_ i_«_i I LJ_LJ_L.LJ i_i_i^.i-.'
(XO) (XI) (Z2)

(»)

(J»)

(3»)

I i L.i_L.L_LJ.J.J.J_i.J I..I «wti i..^i_i—i_Ui_i—i—i_i_i—1—I i i i LJ_J
.I.
.!.
(M)

L.i_i_L.U_L-'—'_'—'_'_ U1—LJ_J_I—1—i—'—'—'-.'-.I—'—&lt;-J—'—'—i
(113)

CO

Tr «

T.

fi—
1

MOK

»• I ' '— i LJ '—' i i I I— — —'— '-.'—I LJ-J—L.'-.• "*"• °«t&gt;1 I— i '«»i_i_i_i—l_l_'_l
(ID) (XI) (XX)

(»)

1

(J»)

Of)

I LJ i I i ' I LJ 1—LJ w1"1 LLLLLLLLLLL1 i l l ' L.'—1—1—'
. . . . . . . . . . .
"
"*
(*»)
""

L-L.i_i^i_'_ i—L L L i_i
. . .
(113)

�APPENDIX B-l (continued)

CO Tr •
&gt;. I

I I

ftm

I I

1 I

I

To
I

I

I I

L.L.L-1 I

I I

I

I

LJ_J *i«. Duty. LJ_L.LJ_LJ_I

I

I I

can czri ccrr" "~"*~'~~~ ran
— OD
on
———
LJ—LJ—'—LJ—LJ—LJ—'—LJ—LJ »"« LJ—'—'—i—L.'—'—'—'—'—'—i—'—LJ—'—LJ—LJ
i i i i i i i i i i i LJ_j i i i i i i i i i i i i i t i i i
— — — — — — __
—_
——
Till;
CD Tr »

To

ftw

NBC

I I
4. (an i_i i LJ—LJ—LJ i '—'—'—L_'—' ' '—'—'—'—' ftin- **»' ' '—'—'—L-1—'—'—'—'_'
L.I
I— '— LJ_'— '_ LJ—'—'—'— LJ— '—'— ' «*"' I '— '— '— '— '—LJ—L_ '— '—LJ—1_'—'— '—.LJ—LJ

i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i LJ— '— LJ— LJ—LJ—'—LJ
—

CO

—— — — — — —— —

Tr •

rra*

To

NBC

». i i i i i I i i i I I I i I i I I t L J I .i LJ **»• &amp;*v !_i LJ-J.J_LJ-J.J_J
ran cm OD
----can r
(in — —*~
on
I

I

I

I

I

I

I I

I

I

I

I Unitt LJ—'—1—t-1—'—1—1-.1—1— '-.'—'—l—'—1-.1—'-.'_'

LJ_J_I

— — —————————

(jj)

—

i_ _ i i i — — — ' i ' LJ_— — _ _ — — — — t—1—'_i^'—— _. ' '
i — __-. i ' '
---— .'— '-.' i '-.'_' '—
- — •—.'_'
.
CO Tr »
i. I

I I

I I

I

otn cm cm"""

I_ I

I ---- I
I

To

ftm
I

I

I—I—I—I

I

I

---

I ---I

II

I

I

nr

I

I

I

—II CJDl _ l

I

I

I Ptln. Duty. LJ-.L.L.L-L-1-.'— L L I
. .

I-_ I— I—I—I Unlti (B)— I~I—I—•I—I—I
I I

(w&gt;

I

I-.I—I—I-.I I

I

l_l

I

I

I

i"•~~"~~~"~~"~"~"~ i—1— L_L_ L_ L-1-.'— '_'_'—L.LJ_J_J.J
i i i ' i i i i i
CO Tr »
rm
!•
7. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

ND5C
I I !_J_I_I

I I '«»»• Outyi LI

L.L. UI—1—1

----cso
on
i i i i i i _ _ i i _ -i_ i i i i ut«u i iLJ^i i i_i i i_L-L_'—LJ_'_J— LJ_J_L
___i i —_ i
_ ——

tan

can cm rzn-----

'__ i i ' i '_.'_i LJ.J— LJ_J_L_ '-J.J
i — .__ — — _
~iTT)
CO Tr *

frtm

T«

I I
I. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ll_l I ^ri«. *rty« LJ— '— '— '— '
nnr~ -" "" ~ -* can --- "~"~ OD
on
cnn
_ _ _ i _ _ i _ « i _ _ i i _ _ _i_i_ i i uniti i i i i i i_i i_J_J_J.. L.1— '—L-1—'_'-.L_'_i
_ i _ i _ i _ _i i
_ flao"" ~~
i i

i i i
CO T r »

iLJ_tJ
T*

ft*

1.1 1 1 flD1 rani i*~"~"i 1 1 i i LJ_J_J oo
i
LJ_L.LJ_J ***"• **»•
can 1 i
can
i— i i i i ' i i i i i i—i—'—LJ """« jjpj
LJ—'—'—'—'—'_'—'—'—&lt;—i—i—i—'—i—i—L
———————————
'—'—'—L.i—'—•—'—L.L.'—L_'—'—i—L.L,
CO Tr #

rim

To

K). I I I I I I I I I I I I I_I_UI_I—I «J—I_J—LJ tl". Duty. ll_l_l_l_l_l_l_l_l_l

ran 3T) &lt;xtr"~"~"~"

1

1

1

(an

OD

1

on

1

1

L. —'—'—'—I—'— — —L.i— —'—'—I—' """' LJ—l— —l—l—l—l—l— —l—l—l—!_'—l—i—l—l—'_l
I—I I l_l_I I l_l_l_l_l_l—I—I—I—I
CO Tr t

ftm

1

T*

"• &lt;mi C?Di fZD""i i i i i LJ— —1—1—'—' o») '—'—'—' '»*"• **»' LJ—'—'—'_'_•_'_&lt;—i—i
i i i i "~ ~" "~ ~" (an
LJ_
on
1
'— '_' '— i i— i i—i—i— LJ— '— L.L-' 'w* LJ—L.'—'—'—i—L-'—'—L-1—' ' '—»— '— »— L.L.'
'_'_' '—'—'—'~"'— i—'— '_'— '— '—LJ—«— i I— &gt;—i— '—'— I—I—i—'—i L
~™

'

�APPENDIX B-2

Explanation of MOS Codes
The Military Occcupational Speciality code at time of discharge was
obtained from the military record for all persons in the study. If a
man had served in Southeast Asia his MOS and principle duty for each
assignment in Vietnam was abstracted. The MOS coding scheme for the
Army personnel had changed during the period of service covered by
the study. Translation tables were built using materials supplied by
the U.S. Army and Joint Service Environmental Support Group. Some
codes could not be translated from the materials supplied. Some codes
were missing. The codes are more complete for those'"who served in
Vietnam because the description of the principal duties or title made
it possible to assign a MOSC at least the 2-digit level.
It was noticed during the review of these codes that for the men who
had served in Vietnam the MOS at their first assignment in Vietnam
was more descriptive of the type of duties assigned to him during his
tour of duty in Vietnam than his MOS at discharge. After consultation
with staff at the Environmental Support Group it was decided to use
the MOS of the first assignment in Vietnam to characterize the man's
duties in Vietnam.
The MOSC for the men with service in Vietnam grouped into three
categories, combat, direct support, and indirect, support based on
probability of combat. (These are the same groupings used in the
Wisconsin Vietnam veterans mortality study.)
The definitions of these groups are:
Combat: Occupations such as infantry, artillery, armor, etc., whose
primary duties and objectives involve direct offensive and defensive
actions against an armed hostile enemy force.
Direct Support: Occupations whose primary function is the direct
support of combat troops and whose duties and objectives may at times
involve limited direct and extensive indirect combat with an armed
hostile force, such as counterintelligence, logistics, engineering,
ordnance disposal, etc.
Indirect Support: Occupations such as musicians, data processing,
legal services, food services, etc., whose primary function is
indirect support of combat and direct support occupations and whose
duties and objectives do not involve direct or indirect contact with
an armed hostile force.
Three coding schemes are used for Army personnel: one for enlisted
men, one for officers, and another for warrant officers. The coding
scheme used by the Marine Corps is different from that of the Army.

�ARMY CODES

The coding schemes for both the officers and enlisted men use the
first two characters of the code to designate an occupational field
(i.e., medical,infantry, intelligence). The first three digits are
used to designate an occupational field for army warrant officers.
Army enlisted MOS codes are five characters long. The first two
characters represent a career group; the third character, which is
alpha, indicates a specialty; the fourth number is the skill level or
grade and the fifth represents special qualifications such as
"Ranger" or "Special Forces."
An example of an Army MOS and its breakdown is as follows:
MOS « 91B2s - 91 represents the medical career group.
B, the third alpha character, represents the
specialty (medical specialist).
2, the fourth character, indicates the grade
or rank.
8, the fifth character, indicates special
qualification for special forces.
The occupational codes for officers are slightly different in that a
three character code is used. For example, 11A indicates infantry
officer.
Army Enlisted MOS
Divided Into Combat, Direct Support and Indirect Support
Army Combat:
Direct Support:

11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 31, 36, 45, 54, 55, 61,
62, 63, 64, 67, 68, 90, 95, 96, 97, 98

Indirect Support: 32, 33, 34, 35, 41, 42, 43, 44, 46, 51, 52, 53, 56,
57, 65, 66, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 81, 82, 83,
84, 91, 92, 93, 94, 00, 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 09

Army Officer MOS
Divided Into Combat, Direct Support and Indirect Support
Army Combat:

10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 21, 33

Direct Support : 19, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 48, 54,
74, 75, 81, 91, 93, 94, 95
Indirect Support: 00, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 49, 51, 52, 53, 55,
56, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 70, 71, 72,
73, 82, 92, 97

�Marine Codes
The military occupational speciality codes for Marines are similar
for officers and enlisted men. They codes are based on a four-digit
system. For example:
Marine MOS 0311 .rifleman; MOS 0302 infantry
officer.
Marine Enlisted MOS
Divided Into Combat, Direct Support and Indirect Support
Combat:

03, 08, 18, 86, 87, XX

Direct Support:

02, 13, 14, 21, 23, 25, 26, 35, 57, 60, 61, 62,
63, 64, 65, 70, 72, 81, 82, 85, 99

Indirect Support: 01, 04, 11, 15, 28, 30, 31, 33, 34, 40, 41, 43, 44,
46, 55, 58, 59, 68, 73, 80, 84, 88, 89, 90, 98
Marine Officer Mos
Divided into Combat, Direct support, and Indirect Support
Combat:

03, 08, 18, 75

Direct Support:

02, 04, 13, 14, 20, 25, 28, 35, 57, 58, 59, 62, 65,
67, 71, 73, 99

Indirect Support: 01, 15, 25, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 40, 41, 43, 44
46, 49, 55, 60, 68, 70

�APPENDIX C

�A SUIXAIT OF TABLES C1-C36

CAICEI

UJOI OIGAI STSTIIS

CI1CDUT01T, IESFIIATOIT AID
DIGESTIVE STSTEIS

1CCID1HS, SUICIDE, VIOL1IC1
AID THOU

fllfBf

Our I

SIT!

OIS

0/1

SILICTED DISUSES
ACCDRS, HOLmAUIA

ion AIIY in nuns

OIS

0/1

SELECTED DISEASES

13164 -1.03 CAIDIAC U1EST

OIS

0/1

EITSIIAL CADSES

273 1.23 IIOTOI TEI ACCDRS

ion. nus ACC.
IACC. POISOIII6S

ACCDRS, IIOLWAUIA low 1.03

KOMI Til ACCDRS

ion. nus ACC.

un

IACC. NIIOIIKS

OIS

0/1

4197 1.05

6io us

511 1.14
3SI4 1.05

493 1.36

461 1.15

II1ICI
IAIIIIS

.

LU1G
lOMDUIS LYIPHOI1

130 1.51
35 2.10

_______ ____._..__.____._.._______.
KCDRS, TIOimiQIi

11074 1.02 CAIDIAC AUEST

I8ITE
IACI

loniiTi

inSCQLOKOIfECTIU TIS

14 3.i2 ALL Onn CAUlIi

2790 i.of

IKCDRS, TIOL+TUni

nn

uccom, vioLmiuu

32(( 1.02 CAIDIAC AIIIST

EILISTED IN

orricni

OTB CA

3) 1.2!

ciiDioiTOPini

UIT COI1AT IOSC

UPPE1 1SSP

11 2,35

ALL Onil CAUSES

ICOIllAT
1 STATUS
I

mill COIBiT KOSC

IIElfOOS SYS+SEISE 016

17 2.21 IirLUEHAiPIEtniOIIA

212 1.23 IIOTOI Til ACCDRS
(On. THIS ACC.
IACC. POISOIIKf

42(4 1.04
54S 1.11
4(4 1.13

3977 1.13 IIOTOI III ACCDRS
1

(32 1.11

249 1.25 IIOTOI TEI ACCDRI
IACC. POISOIIKS
IALL On ACC./IMOTT

K (.21 ion. TUII ACC.
4((4 1.02 IALL «I ACC./XWnT
IMIICIDI
IS 2.39 HOMICIDE

4757 1.06
5(1 1.15
2S15 1.05

114 i.((
7(2 1.09
(31 1.09
2I( 1.24

�APPENDIX C
DEATHS FROM CANCERS
TABLE
TABLE
TABLE
TABLE
TABLE
TABLE
TABLE
TABLE

C-l
C-2
C-3
C-4
C-5
C-6
C-8
C-9

-

ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL

CASES
ARMY
MARINES
WHITE SERVICEMEN
NON-WHITE SERVICEMEN
ENLISTED MEN
ENLISTED ARMY IN VIETNAM,COMBAT MOSC VS. NON-COMBAT MOSC
ENLISTED MARINES IN VIETNAM,COMBAT MOSC VS. NOW-COMBAT MOSC
SELECTED CAUSES OF DEATH BY ORGAN SYSTEM

TABLE
TABLE
TABLE
TABLE
TABLE
TABLE
TABLE
TABLE
TABLE

C-10
C-ll
C-12
C-13
C-l4
C-l5
C-16
C-17
C-18

-

ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL

CASES
ARMY
MARINES
WHITE SERVICEMEN
NON-WHITE SERVICEMEN
ENLISTED MEN
OFFICERS
ENLISTED ARMY IN VIETNAM, COMBAT MOSC VS. NON-COMBAT MOSC
ENLISTED MARINES IN VIETNAM, COMBAT MOSC VS. NON-COMBAT MOSC

DEATHS FROM SELECTED DISEASES OF THE CIRCULATORY,
RESPIRATORY AND DIGESTIVE SYSTEMS
TABLE
TABLE
TABLE
TABLE
TABLE
TABLE
TABLE
TABLE
TABLE

C-l9
C-20
C-21
C-22
C-23
C-24
C-25
C-26
C-27

-

ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL

CASES
ARMY
MARINES
WHITE SERVICEMEN
NON-WHITE SERVICEMEN
ENLISTED MEN
OFFICERS
ENLISTED ARMY IN VIETNAM, COMBAT MOSC VS. NON-COMBAT MOSC
ENLISTED MARINES IN VIETNAM, COMBAT MOSC VS. RON-COMBAT MOSC

�DEATHS FROM ACCIDENTS, SUICIDES AND TRAUMA
TABLE
TABLE
TABLE
TABLE
TABLE
TABLE
TABLE
TABLE
TABLE

C-28
C-29
C-30
C-31
C-32
C-33
C-34
C-35
C-36

-

ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL

CASES
ARMY
MARINES
WHITE SERVICEMEN
NON-WHITE SERVICEMEN
ENLISTED MEN
OFFICERS
ENLISTED ARMY IN VIETNAM, COMBAT MOSC VS. NON-COMBAT MOSC
ENLISTED MARINES IN VIETNAM,COMBAT MOSC VS. NON-COMBAT MOSC

�TABLE C-l
DEATHS FROM CANCERS (140-208, 230-239)
ALL CASES
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

1.00
1.00
1.02
1.06
0.99
1.06
0.95
0.97
1.09
0.93
0.91
1.00
0.96
1.16
0.74
0.87
0.98
0.60
0.59
0.96
1.19
0.72
0.92
1.03

0.239
0.009
0.114
0.306
0.000
0.144
0.342
0.000
0.660
0.131
0.157
0.175
0.134
0.780
1.545
0.389
0.001
9.697*
2.696
0.385
0.801
0.292
1.437
0.196

CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-136 , 210-228 , 240-E989)
CA - BUCCAL (140-149)
CA - ESOPHAGUS (150)
CA - STOMACH (151)
CA - INTESTINES &amp; OTHER 01 (152-154,158,159)
CA - LIVER, BILE DUCTS (155-156)
CA - PANCREAS (157)
CA - UPPER RESPIRATORY (160-161)
CA - LUNG (162)
CA - BONE (170)
CA - SOFT TISSUES (171)
CA - MELANOMA OF THE SKIN (172)
CA - PROSTATE (185)
CA - TESTIS (186)
CA - BLADDER (188)
CA - KIDNEY (189)
CA - BRAIN (191)
CA - OTHER NERVOUS SYSTEM (192)
CA - THYROID &amp; ENDOCRINE (193-194)
CA - NON-HODGKINS LYMPHOMA (200,202)
CA - HODGKINS DISEASE (201)
CA - MULTIPLE MYELOMA (203)
CA - LEUKEMIA (204-207)
OTH CA ( 163 , 173-4 ,187,190, 195-9 , 208-9 , 230-9 )

21262
84
51
105
242
40
100
30
762
38
38
181
35
116
13
68
141
54
19
143
114
20
244
335

21265
84
50
99
244
38
105
31
697
41
42
180
36
100
18
78
143
90
32
150
96
28
266
324

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED « 24235
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 26685 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

�TABLE C-2
DEATHS PROM CANCERS (140-208, 230-239)
ALL ARMY
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE

ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-136 , 210-228 , 240-E989)
CA - BUCCAL (140-149)
CA - ESOPHAOUS (150)
CA - STOMACH (151)
CA - INTESTINES &amp; OTHER 01 (152-154,158,159)
CA - LIVER, BILE DUCTS (155-156)
CA - PANCREAS (157)
CA - UPPER RESPIRATORY (160-161)
CA - LUNG (162)
CA - BONE (170)
CA - SOFT TISSUES (171)
CA - MELANOMA OF THE SKIN (172)
CA - PROSTATE (185)
CA - TESTIS (186)
CA - BLADDER (188)
CA - KIDNEY (189)
CA - BRAIN (191)
CA - OTHER NERVOUS SYSTEM (192)
CA - THYROID &amp; ENDOCRINE (193-194)
CA - NON-HOD6KINS LYMPHOMA (200,202)
CA - HODGKINS DISEASE (201)
CA - MULTIPLE MYELOMA (203)
CA - LEUKEMIA (204-207)
OTH: CA (163,173-4,187,190,195-9,208-9,230-9)

17256

17173

71
46
88
209
34
82
29
632
27
30
145
30
90
9
55
116
43
15
108
92
18
202
281

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED • 19708
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 22904 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OP FREEDOM

77
37
78
217
33
94
25
614
33
30
142
32
80
16
63
120
78
25
133
79
23
229
273

1.00

0.92
1.24
1.12
0.96
1.04
0.87
1.14
1.03
0.82
0.99
1.02
0.92
1.12
0.56
0.87
0.97
0.55
0.59
0.81
1.16
0.77
0.88
1.03

1.631
0.060
0.813
0.677
0.062
0.062
0.805
0.183
0.000
0.286
0.008
0.118
0.100
0.557
2.353
0.242
0.003
10.503*
2.312
2.761
0.388
0.188
1.809
0.319

�TABLE C-3
DEATHS FROM CANCERS (140-208, 230-239)
ALL MARINES
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

0.98
1.95
0.39
0.82
1.26
1.21
1.63
0.18
1.58
1.38
0.71
0.94
1.29
1.29
2.41
0.89
1.07
0.93
0.57
2.10
1.33
0.45
1.14
1.07

3.831
1.038
2.148
0.318
0.632
0.196
0.582
2.844
5.800*
0.051
1.160
0.067
0.059
0.239
0.268
0.210
0.005
0.050
0.384
6.116*
0.679
0.186
0.019
0.053

CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-136 , 210-228 , 240-E989 )
CA - BUCCAL (140-149)
CA - ESOPHAGUS (150)
CA - STOMACH (151)
CA - INTESTINES &amp; OTHER 01 (152-154,158,159)
CA - LIVER, BILE DUCTS (155-156)
CA - PANCREAS (157)
CA - UPPER RESPIRATORY (160-161)
CA - LUNG (162)
CA - BONE (170)
CA - SOFT TISSUES (171)
CA - MELANOMA OF THE SKIN (172)
CA - PROSTATE (185)
CA - TESTIS (186)
CA - BLADDER (188)
CA - KIDNEY (189)
CA - BRAIN (191)
CA - OTHER NERVOUS SYSTEM (192)
CA - THYROID &amp; ENDOCRINE (193-194)
CA - NON-HODGKINS LYMPHOMA (200,202)
CA - HODGKINS DISEASE (201)
CA - MULTIPLE MYELOMA (203)
CA - LEUKEMIA (204-207)
OTHI CA (163,173-4,187,190,195-9,208-9,230-9)

4006
13
5
17
33
6
18
1
130
11
8
36
5
26
4
13
25
11
4
35
22
2
42
54

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 4527
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 3781 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON OROUF
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

4092
7
13
21
26
5
11
6
83
8
11
38
4
20
2
15
23
12
7
17
17
4
37
51

�TABLE C-4
DEATHS PROM CANCERS (140-208, 230-239)
ALL WHITE SERVICEMEN
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

1.00
1.05
0.87
0.99
1.04
1.31
0.97
0.94
1.09
0.99
0.92
0.98
0.71
1.22
0.85
0.79
1.00
0.62
0.59
0.89
1.22
0.65
0.89
0.99

0.797
0.085
0.157
0.018
0.270
0.882
0.072
0.071
0.371
0.018
0.194
0.046
1.475
1.180
0.737
0.856
0.014
8.107*
1.893
1.436
1.001
0.689
1.581
0.027

CAUSE

ALL &lt;OTHER CAUSES (000-136, 210-228 , 240-E989)
CA - BUCCAL (140-149)
CA - ESOPHAGUS (150)
CA - STOMACH (151)
CA - INTESTINES &amp; OTHER GI (152-154,158,159)
CA - LIVER, BILE DUCTS (155-156)
CA - PANCREAS (157)
CA - UPPER RESPIRATORY (160-161)
CA - LUNG (162)
CA - BONE (170)
CA - SOFT TISSUES (171)
CA - MELANOMA OF THE SKIN (172)
CA - PROSTATE (185)
CA - TESTIS (186)
CA - BLADDER (188)
CA - KIDNEY (189)
CA - BRAIN (191)
CA - OTHER NERVOUS SYSTEM (192)
CA - THYROID &amp; ENDOCRINE (193-194)
CA - NON-HODGKINS LYMPHOMA (200,202)
CA - HODGKINS DISEASE (201)
CA - MULTIPLE MYELOMA (203)
CA - LEUKEMIA (204-207)
OTH CA (163,173-4,187,190,195-9,208-9,230-9)

16697

16671

64
35
75
193
29
85
25
616
34
34
176
23
110
12
55
128
50
15
120
101
16
212
272

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 19177
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 21335 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

61
40
75
185
22
87
27
565
34
37
179
33
90
14
70
128
81
25
134
83
24
238
273

�TABLE C-5
DEATHS FROM CANCERS (140-208, 230-239)
ALL NON-WHITE SERVICEMEN
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

0.99
0.87
1.65
1.27
0.84
0.70
0.84
1.16
1.11
0.60
0.87
3.36
3.21
0.61
0.29
1.59
0.86
0.44
0.58
1.50
1.03
1.24
1.13
1.25

0.723
0.103
1.917
0.755
1.008
0.512
0.764
0.389
0.383
0.419
0.007
2.582
3.441
0.528
1.383
0.351
0.215
1.755
0.820
2.117
0.015
0.408
0.004
2.133

CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-136 , 210-228 , 240-E989
CA - BUCCAL (140-149)
CA - ESOPHAGUS (150)
CA - STOMACH (151)
CA - INTESTINES &amp; OTHER 61 (152-154,158,159)
CA - LIVER, BILE DUCTS (155-156)
CA - PANCREAS (157)
CA - UPPER RESPIRATORY (160-161)
CA - LUNG (162)
CA - BONE (170)
CA - SOFT TISSUES (171)
CA - MELANOMA OF THE SKIN (172)
CA - PROSTATE (185)
CA - TESTIS (186)
CA - BLADDER (188)
CA - KIDNEY (189)
CA - BRAIN (191)
CA - OTHER NERVOUS SYSTEM (192)
CA - THYROID &amp; ENDOCRINE (193-194)
CA - NON-HODGKINS LYMPHOMA (200,202)
CA - HODGKINS DISEASE (201)
CA - MULTIPLE MYELOMA (203)
CA - LEUKEMIA (204-207)
OTH! CA (163,173-4,187,190,195-9,208-9,230-9)

4565
20
16
30
49
11
15
5
146
4
4
5
12
6
1
13
13
4
4
23
13
4
32
63

4595
23
10
24
59
16
18
4
132
7
5
1
4
10
3
8
15
9
7
15
13
3
28
50

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 5058
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 5350 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

�TABLE C-6
DEATHS FROM CANCERS (140-208, 230-239)
ALL ENLISTED MEN
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

1.00
0.95
1.00
1.08
0.96
1.00
0.89
1.24
1.10
0.89
0.99
1.00
1.30
1.16
0.70
0.81
0.97
0.49
0.46
1.00
1.20
0.55
0.91
0.99

0.957
0.136
0.150
0.392
0.122
0.029
0.953
0.689
0.785
0.327
0.001
0.113
0.564
0.932
1.612
0.911
0.105
14.323*
4.965*
0.077
0.677
1.599
1.280
0.065

CAUSE

ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-136 , 210-228 , 240-E989)
CA - BUCCAL (140-149)
CA - ESOPHAGUS (150)
CA - STOMACH (151)
CA - INTESTINES &amp; OTHER GI (152-154,158,159)
CA - LIVER, BILE DUCTS (155-156)
CA - PANCREAS (157)
CA - UPPER RESPIRATORY (160-161)
CA - LUNG (162)
CA - BONE (170)
CA - SOFT TISSUES (171)
CA - MELANOMA OF THE SKIN (172)
CA - PROSTATE (185)
CA - TESTIS (186)
CA - BLADDER (188)
CA - KIDNEY (189)
CA - BRAIN (191)
CA - OTHER NERVOUS SYSTEM (192)
CA - THYROID &amp; ENDOCRINE (193-194)
CA - NON-HODGKINS LYMPHOMA (200,202)
CA - HODGKINS DISEASE (201)
CA - MULTIPLE MYELOMA (203)
CA - LEUKEMIA (204-207)
OTH CA (163,173-4,187,190,195-9,208-9,230-9)

19962
71
40
93
206
34
80

19937
75

29
660
34
37
153
29
110
12
57
117
38
14
131
104
14
219
284

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 22528
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 25022 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

40
86
214
34
90
23
598
38
37
153
22
95
17
70
121
78
30
131
87
25
239
287

�TABLE C-7
DEATHS FROM CANCERS (140-208, 230-239)
ALL OFFICERS
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-K CHI-SQUARE

1.00
1.26
0.99
0.96
1.38
2.22
0.97
0.00
1.20
1.44
0.26
0.88
0.61
1.07
3.55
2.12
0.75
1.19
5.73
0.42
0.73
2.06
0.95
1.29

1.654
1.260
0.000
0.411
1.664
1.054
0.075
6.076*
0.606
0.335
2.314
0.003
0.817
0.035
0.085
0.712
0.002
0.220
2.120
2.345
0.252
0.632
0.013
4.492*

CAUSE

ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-136 , 210-228 , 240-E989)
CA - BUCCAL (140-149)
CA - ESOPHAGUS (150)
CA - STOMACH (151)
CA - INTESTINES &amp; OTHER 61 (152-154,158,159)
CA - LIVER, BILE DUCTS (155-156)
CA - PANCREAS (157)
CA - UPPER RESPIRATORY (160-161)
CA - LUNG (162)
CA - BONE (170)
CA - SOFT TISSUES (171)
CA - MELANOMA OF THE SKIN (172)
CA - PROSTATE (185)
CA - TESTIS (186)
CA - BLADDER (188)
CA - KIDNEY (189)
CA - BRAIN (191)
CA - OTHER NERVOUS SYSTEM (192)
CA - THYROID &amp; ENDOCRINE (193-194)
CA - NON-HODGKINS LYMPKOMA (200,202)
CA - HODGKINS DISEASE (201)
CA - MULTIPLE MYELOMA (203)
CA - LEUKEMIA (204-207)
OTH[ CA (163,173-4,187,190,195-9,208-9,230-9)

938
10
8
7
32
5
13
0
77
4
1
25
5
5
1
9
18
13
5
9
7
4
21
39

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED • 1256
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 1405 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

942
8
8
7
23
2
13
7
64
3
4
28
8
5
0
4
24
11
1
21
10
2
22
30

�TABLB C-8
DEATHS FROM CANCERS (140-208, 230-239)
ALL ARMY ENLISTED MEN IN VIETNAM, COMBAT MOSC VS. NON-COMBAT MOSC
OBSERVED
EXPECTED
0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-136 , 210-228 , 240-B989)
CA - BUCCAL (140-149)
CA - ESOPHAGUS (150)
CA - STOMACH (151)
CA - INTESTINES &amp; OTHER GI (152-154,158,159)
CA - LIVER, BILE DUCTS (155-156)
CA - PANCREAS (157)
CA - UPPER RESPIRATORY (160-161)
CA - LUNG (162)
CA - BONE (170)
CA - SOFT TISSUES (171)
CA - MELANOMA OF THE SKIN (172)
CA - PROSTATE (185)
CA - TESTIS (186)
CA - BLADDER (188)
CA - KIDNEY (189)
CA - BRAIN (191)
CA - OTHER NERVOUS SYSTEM (192)
CA - THYROID &amp; ENDOCRINE (193-194)
CA - NON-HODGKINS LYMPHOMA (200,202)
CA - HODGKINS DISEASE (201)
CA - MULTIPLE MYELOMA (203)
CA - LEUKEMIA (204-207)
OTH CA (163 , 173-4 , 187 , 190 , 195-9 , 208-9 , 230-9 )

4972
14
10
25
39
9
11
11
135
6
6
26
3
28
2
11
30
10
1
33
25
3
55
57

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 5522
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 12767 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

4947
16
8
18
49
8
17
5
122
8
10
43
5
28
2
13
29
9
4
28
28
3
54
68

1.01
0.87
1.23
1.42
0.79
1.17
0.64
2.35
1.11
0.72
0.59
0.61
0.56
1.00
1.02
0.88
1.05
1.06
0.24
1.16
0.88
1.00
1.02
0.84

0.752
0.177
0.382
2.074
1.713
0.247
1.720
4.264*
0.911
0.483
1.404
4.971*
0.763
0.004
0.012
0.050
0.065
0.083
2.144
0.507
0.174
0.008
0.012
1.409

�TABLB C-9
DEATHS FROM CANCERS (140-208, 230-239)
ALL ENLISTED MARINES IN VIETNAM, COMBAT MOSC VS. NON-COMBAT MOSC
OBSERVED
EXPECTED
0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-136 , 210-228 , 240-E989)
CA - BUCCAL (140-149)
CA - ESOPHAGUS (150)
CA - STOMACH (151)
CA - INTESTINES &amp; OTHER 61 (152-154,158,159)
CA - LIVER, BILE DUCTS (155-156)
CA - PANCREAS (157)
CA - UPPER RESPIRATORY (160-161)
CA - LUNG (162)
CA - BONE (170)
CA - SOFT TISSUES (171)
CA - MELANOMA OF THE SKIN (172)
CA - PROSTATE (185)
CA - TESTIS (186)
CA - BLADDER (188)
CA - KIDNEY (189)
CA - BRAIN (191)
CA - OTHER NERVOUS SYSTEM (192)
CA - THYROID &amp; ENDOCRINE (193-194)
CA - NON-HOD6KINS LYMPHOMA (200,202)
CA - HODGKINS DISEASE (201)
CA - MULTIPLE MYELOMA (203)
CA - LEUKEMIA (204-207)
OTH CA (163 , 173-4 , 187 , 190 , 195-9 , 208-9 , 230-9)

1743
4
2
8
6
4
4
0
23
4
0
14
1
10
0
4
9
5
1
17
8
0
18
13

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 1898
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 2341 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

1740
2
1
2
10
1
5
1
31
5
4
13
2
12
1
4
9
2
0
12
11
0
15
14

1.00
2.06
2.33
3.74
0.60
3.46
0.75
0.00
0.74
0.87
0.00
1.06
0.53
0.82
0.00
1.11
0.98
2.48
2.52
1.43
0.73
0.00
1.17
0.92

0.468
0.105
0.581
4.343*
1.806
0.670
0.306
0.857
2.270
0.047
3.900*
0.010
0.377
0.106
0.598
0.088
0.040
1.521
0.000
0.863
0.383
0.199
0.469
0.160

�TABLE C-10
SELECTED CAUSES OF DEATH BY ORGAN SYSTEM
ALL CASES
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (210-28,290-315,740-59,780-96)

859

938

0.92

1.998

INFECTIVE &amp; PARASITIC DISEASES (000-136)

146

177

0.82

2.831

2973

2971

1.00

0.252

157

193

0.81

2.256

40

50

0.81

1.835

194

207

0.94

0.256

CIRCULATORY DISEASES (390-458)

4225

4319

0.98

1.538

RESPIRATORY DISEASES (460-519)

468

500

0.94

0.350

1170

1202

0.97

0.654

GENITOURINARY DISEASES (580-629)

93

124

0.75

5.411*

SKIN &amp; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUES (680-709)

10

15

0.69

0.229

MUSCULOSKELETAL 6 CONNECTIVE TISSUES (710-738)

36

27

1.34

1.203

13864

13514

1.03

14.758*

CANCERS (140-209, 230-239)
ENDOCRINE, NUTRITIONAL &amp; METABOLIC (240-279)
BLOOD &amp; BLOOD-FORMING ORGANS (280-289)
NERVOUS SYSTEMS &amp; SENSE ORGANS (320-389)

DIGESTIVE DISEASES (520-577)

ACCIDENTS, VIOLENCE &amp; TRAUMA (E800-989)

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 24235
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 26685 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

�TABLE C-ll
SELECTED CAUSES OF DEATH BY ORGAN SYSTEM
ALL ARMY
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (210-28,290-315,740-59,780-96)

709

778

0.91

2.314

INFECTIVE &amp; PARASITIC DISEASES (000-136)

127

159

0.80

3.473

2452

2535

0.97

1.631

135

159

0.85

1.790

32

47

0.68

3.429

167

176

0.95

0.222

CIRCULATORY DISEASES (390-458)

3578

3655

0.98

1.468

RESPIRATORY DISEASES (460-519)

406

435

0.93

0.232

1001

1008

0.99

0.161

80

104

0.77

4.288*

8

11

0.76

0.040

29

19

1.55

1.694

10984

10623

1.03

18.154*

CANCERS (140-209, 230-239)
ENDOCRINE, NUTRITIONAL &amp; METABOLIC (240-279)
BLOOD &amp; BLOOD-FORMING ORGANS (280-289)
NERVOUS SYSTEMS &amp; SENSE ORGANS (320-389)

DIGESTIVE DISEASES (520-577)
GENITOURINARY DISEASES (580-629)
SKIN 6 SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUES (680-709)
MUSCULOSKELETAL &amp; CONNECTIVE TISSUES (710-738)
ACCIDENTS, VIOLENCE &amp; TRAUMA (E800-989)

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 19708
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 22904 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

�TABLE C-12
SELECTED CAUSES OF DEATH BY ORGAN SYSTEM
ALL MARINES
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE
150

160

0.94

0.000

19

19

1.02

0.080

521

436

1.20

3.688

22

33

0.66

0.527

8

2

3.22

1.538

27

31

0.86

0.034

CIRCULATORY DISEASES (390-458)

647

663

0.98

0.089

RESPIRATORY DISEASES (460-519)

62

65

0.95

0.176

169

194

0.87

1.588

13

19

0.67

1.265

SKIN &amp; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUES (680-709)

2

4

0.50

0.409

MUSCULOSKELETAL &amp; CONNECTIVE TISSUES (710-738)

7

8

0.87

0.040

2880

2891

1.00

0.057

ALL OTHER CAUSES (210-28,290-315,740-59,780-96)
INFECTIVE &amp; PARASITIC DISEASES (000-136)
CANCERS (140-209, 230-239)
ENDOCRINE, NUTRITIONAL &amp; METABOLIC (240-279)
BLOOD &amp; BLOOD-FORMING ORGANS (280-289)
NERVOUS SYSTEMS &amp; SENSE ORGANS (320-389)

DIGESTIVE DISEASES (520-577)
GENITOURINARY DISEASES (580-629)

ACCIDENTS, VIOLENCE &amp; TRAUMA (E800-989)

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 4527
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 3781 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

�TABLE C-13
SELECTED CAUSES OF DEATH BY ORGAN SYSTEM
ALL WHITE SERVICEMEN
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (210-28,290-315,740-59,780-96)

553

618

0.90

1.909

INFECTIVE &amp; PARASITIC DISEASES (000-136)

105

119

0.88

0.404

2480

2507

0.99

0.822

111

125

0.89

0.585

27

28

0.98

0.108

149

157

0.95

0.086

CIRCULATORY DISEASES (390-458)

3360

3413

0.98

0.711

RESPIRATORY DISEASES (460-519)

332

356

0.93

0.054

DIGESTIVE DISEASES (520-577)

888

859

1.03

0.166

68

86

0.79

2.497

8

10

0.80

0.004

22

23

0.96

0.014

11074

10877

1.02

6.269*

CANCERS (140-209, 230-239)
ENDOCRINE, NUTRITIONAL &amp; METABOLIC (240-279)
BLOOD &amp; BLOOD-FORMING ORGANS (280-289)
NERVOUS SYSTEMS &amp; SENSE ORGANS (320-389)

GENITOURINARY DISEASES (580-629)
SKIN &amp; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUES (680-709)
MUSCULOSKELETAL 6 CONNECTIVE TISSUES (710-738)
ACCIDENTS, VIOLENCE &amp; TRAUMA (E800-989)

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 19177
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 21335 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

�TABLE C-14
SELECTED CAUSES OF DEATH BY ORGAN SYSTEM
ALL NON-WHITE SERVICEMEN
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

O/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (210-28,290-315,740-59,780-96)

306

320

0.96

0.250

41

58

0.71

4.313*

493

463

1.06

0.723

ENDOCRINE, NUTRITIONAL &amp; METABOLIC (240-279)

46

67

0.68

2.467

BLOOD &amp; BLOOD-FORMING ORGANS (280-289)

13

22

0.59

2.995

NERVOUS SYSTEMS &amp; SENSE ORGANS (320-389)

45

50

0.90

0.263

CIRCULATORY DISEASES (390-458)

865

906

0.95

1.138

RESPIRATORY DISEASES (460-519)

136

145

0.94

0.548

DIGESTIVE DISEASES (520-577)

282

343

0.82

5.168*

25

38

0.67

3.432

2

5

0.44

0.785

14

4

3.62

4.668*

2790

2637

1.06

11.619*

INFECTIVE &amp; PARASITIC DISEASES (000-136)
CANCERS (140-209, 230-239)

GENITOURINARY DISEASES (580-629)
SKIN &amp; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUES (680-709)
MUSCULOSKELBTAL &amp; CONNECTIVE TISSUES (710-738)
ACCIDENTS, VIOLENCE &amp; TRAUMA (E800-989)

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED • 5058
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 5350 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

�TABLE C-15
SELECTED CAUSES OF DEATH BY ORGAN SYSTEM
ALL ENLISTED MEN
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (210-28,290-315,740-59,780-96)

823

884

0.93

1.082

INFECTIVE &amp; PARASITIC DISEASES (000-136)

137

166

0.83

2.404

2566

2592

0.99

0.984

145

177

0.82

1.949

36

46

0.78

2.089

178

191

0.93

0.262

CIRCULATORY DISEASES (390-458)

3738

3796

0.98

0.576

RESPIRATORY DISEASES (460-519)

444

470

0.95

0.297

1077

1100

0.98

0.435

82

117

0.70

6.726*

9

14

0.66

0.277

27

24

1.13

0.082

13266

12953

1.02

12.871*

CANCERS (140-209, 230-239)
ENDOCRINE, NUTRITIONAL &amp; METABOLIC (240-279)
BLOOD &amp; BLOOD-FORMING ORGANS (280-289)
NERVOUS SYSTEMS &amp; SENSE ORGANS (320-389)

DIGESTIVE DISEASES (520-577)
GENITOURINARY DISEASES (580-629)
SKIN &amp; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUES (680-709)
MUSCULOSKBLETAL &amp; CONNECTIVE TISSUES (710-738)
ACCIDENTS, VIOLENCE &amp; TRAUMA (E800-989)

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 22528
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 25022 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

�TABLE C-16
SELECTED CAUSES OF DEATH BY ORGAN SYSTEM
ALL OFFICERS
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE

27

37

0.74

1.823

9

8

1.15

0.031

318

307

1.04

1.654

ENDOCRINE, NUTRITIONAL &amp; METABOLIC (240-279)

7

12

0.60

1.383

BLOOD &amp; BLOOD-FORMING ORGANS (280-289)

4

4

0.98

0.002

11

9

1.16

0.028

CIRCULATORY DISEASES (390-458)

338

370

0.91

2.309

RESPIRATORY DISEASES (460-519)

19

20

0.93

0.000

DIGESTIVE DISEASES (520-577)

71

71

1.00

0.006

GENITOURINARY DISEASES (580-629)

6

5

1.23

0.032

SKIN &amp; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUES (680-709)

0

1

0.00

1.319

MUSCULOSKELETAL 6 CONNECTIVE TISSUES (710-738)

6

2

2.72

1.488

440

403

1.09

0.692

ALL OTHER CAUSES (210-28,290-315,740-59,780-96)
INFECTIVE &amp; PARASITIC DISEASES (000-136)
CANCERS (140-209, 230-239)

NERVOUS SYSTEMS &amp; SENSE ORGANS (320-389)

ACCIDENTS, VIOLENCE &amp; TRAUMA (E800-989)

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED • 1256
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 1405 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

�TABLE C-17
SELECTED CAUSES OF DEATH BY ORGAN SYSTEM
ALL ARMY ENLISTED MEN IN VIETNAM, COMBAT MOSC VS. NON-COMBAT MOSC
OBSERVED
EXPECTED
0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE

216

205

1.05

0.372

30

37

0.82

1.193

550

575

0.96

0.752

ENDOCRINE, NUTRITIONAL 6 METABOLIC (240-279)

41

32

1.29

1.378

BLOOD &amp; BLOOD-FORMING ORGANS (280-289)

10

9

1.18

0.104

NERVOUS SYSTEMS &amp; SENSE ORGANS (320-389)

47

46

1.01

0.001

CIRCULATORY DISEASES (390-458)

796

842

0.95

2.439

RESPIRATORY DISEASES (460-519)

108

107

1.01

0.067

DIGESTIVE DISEASES (520-577)

243

270

0.90

1.824

26

18

1.44

1.780

2

2

0.99

0.008

10

5

2.08

2.745

3443

3374

1.02

3.295

ALL OTHER CAUSES (210-28,290-315,740-59,780-96)
INFECTIVE &amp; PARASITIC DISEASES (000-136)
CANCERS (140-209, 230-239)

GENITOURINARY DISEASES (580-629)
SKIN &amp; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUES (680-709)
MUSCULOSKELETAL &amp; CONNECTIVE TISSUES (710-738)
ACCIDENTS, VIOLENCE &amp; TRAUMA (E800-989)

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 5522
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 12767 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

�TABLE C-18
SELECTED CAUSES OF DEATH BY ORGAN SYSTEM
ALL ENLISTED MARINES IN VIETNAM, COMBAT MOSC VS. NON-COMBAT MOSC
OBSERVED
EXPECTED
0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE

63

77

0.82

1.387

7

13

0.55

1.186

155

158

0.98

0.468

ENDOCRINE, NUTRITIONAL &amp; METABOLIC (240-279)

9

7

1.25

0.059

BLOOD &amp; BLOOD-FORMING ORGANS (280-289)

0

6

0.00

5.000*

17

7

2.28

4.479*

CIRCULATORY DISEASES (390-458)

175

193

0.91

1.376

RESPIRATORY DISEASES (460-519)

28

16

1.70

1.963

DIGESTIVE DISEASES (520-577)

67

52

1.29

2.187

GENITOURINARY DISEASES (580-629)

2

5

0.41

1.709

SKIN &amp; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUES (680-709)

1

1

1.04

0.005

4

1

3.79

1.613

1362

1.01

0.586

ALL OTHER CAUSES (210-28,290-315,740-59,780-96)
INFECTIVE &amp; PARASITIC DISEASES (000-136)
CANCERS (140-209, 230-239)

NERVOUS SYSTEMS &amp; SENSE ORGANS (320-389)

MUSCULOSKELETAL 6 CONNECTIVE TISSUES

(710-738)

ACCIDENTS, VIOLENCE &amp; TRAUMA (E800-989)

1370

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 1898
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 2341 OBSERVATIONS IK COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

�TABLE C-19
DEATHS FROM SELECTED DISEASES OF THE CIRCULATORY, RESPIRATORY AND DIGESTIVE SYSTEMS
ALL CASES
OBSERVED
EXPECTED
O/E M-H CHI-SQUARE
CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-398, 580-B989)
HYPERTENSIVE DISEASE (400-404)
ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (410)
OTHER ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE (411-414)
CARDIOMYOPATHY (425)
CARDIAC ARREST (427.2)
CERBBROVASCULAR DISEASES (430-438)
DIS OF ARTERIES, ARTBRIOLES, CAPILLARIES (440-448)
DIS OF VEINS, LYMPHATICS &amp; OTHERS (450-458)
OTH HEART DISEASES (420-424,426-427.1,427.3-429)
UPPER RESPIRATORY (460-466, 500-508)
INFLUENZA &amp; PNEUMONIA (470-486)
CHRONIC BRONCHITIS &amp; EMPHYSEMA (491-492)
OTHER RESPIRATORY (490, 493, 510-519)
DIS OF ESOPHAGUS, STOMACH, DUODENUM (530-537)
CIRRHOSIS - ALCOHOLIC (571.0)
CIRRHOSIS - OTHER/UNSPECIFIED (571.8, 571.9)
DISEASES OF PANCREAS (577)
OTH DIGESTIVE DISEASES (520-529, 540-570, 572-576)

19936

19883

61
123

77
141

1059

1116

142
273
520
142
133
196
7
254
52
95
80
424
449
80
209

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 24235
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 26685 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

126
222
518
139
127
183
10
258
56
96
70
405
480
94
235

1.00
0.80
0.87

0.95
1.13
1.23
1.00
1.02
1.05
1.07
0.68
0.98
0.93
0.99
1.15
1.05
0.94
0.85
0.89

0.222
1.284
0.716
2.088
1.820
4.805*
0.006
0.334
0.494
0.413
1.207
0.002
0.029
0.020
0.496
0.005
0.228
1.050
1.390

�TABLE C-20
DEATHS FROM SELECTED DISEASES OF THE CIRCULATORY, RESPIRATORY AND DIGESTIVE SYSTEMS
ALL ARMY
OBSERVED
EXPECTED
0/E M-H CHI-SQUARE
CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-398, 580-E989)
HYPERTENSIVE DISEASE (400-404)
ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (410)
OTHER ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE (411-414)
CARDIOMYOPATHY (425)
CARDIAC ARREST (427.2)
CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES (430-438)
DIS OF ARTERIES, ARTERIOLBS, CAPILLARIES (440-448)
DIS OF VEINS, LYMPHATICS &amp; OTHERS (450-458)
OTH HEART DISEASES (420-424,426-427.1,427.3-429)
UPPER RESPIRATORY (460-466, 500-508)
INFLUENZA &amp; PNEUMONIA (470-486)
CHRONIC BRONCHITIS &amp; EMPHYSEMA (491-492)
OTHER RESPIRATORY (490, 493, 510-519)
DIS OF ESOPHAGUS, STOMACH, DUODENUM (530-537)
CIRRHOSIS - ALCOHOLIC (571.0)
CIRRHOSIS - OTHER/UNSPECIFIED (571.8, 571.9)
DISEASES OF PANCREAS (577)
OTH DIGESTIVE DISEASES (520-529, 540-570, 572-576)

16061
50
102
877
113
229
436
126
111
170
5
227
46
82
60
374
390
67
182

16023
67
112
949
95
194
437
126
109
148
10
230
53
76
55
337
421
74
191

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 19708
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 22904 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

1.00
0.74
0.91
0.92
1.19
1.18
1.00
1.00
1.02
1.15
0.49
0.98
0.87
1.08
1.09
1.11
0.93
0.90
0.95

0.236
1.584
0.325
3.182
1.827
3.006
0.178
0.142
0.458
1.210
1.988
0.007
0.033
0.085
0.138
0.277
0.332
0.440
0.383

�TABLE C-21
DEATHS FROM SELECTED DISEASES OF THE CIRCULATORY, RESPIRATORY AND DIGESTIVE SYSTEMS
ALL MARINES
OBSERVED
EXPECTED
O/E M-H CHI-SQUARE
CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-398, 580-E989)
HYPERTENSIVE DISEASE (400-404)
ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (410)
OTHER ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE (411-414)
CARDIOMYOPATHY (425)
CARDIAC ARREST (427.2)
CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES (430-438)
DIS OF ARTERIES, ARTERIOLES, CAPILLARIES (440-448)
DIS OF VEINS, LYMPHATICS &amp; OTHERS (450-4S8)
OTH HEART DISEASES (420-424,426-427.1,427.3-429)
UPPER RESPIRATORY (460-466, 500-508)
INFLUENZA &amp; PNEUMONIA (470-486)
CHRONIC BRONCHITIS &amp; EMPHYSEMA (491-492)
OTHER RESPIRATORY (490, 493, 510-519)
DIS OF ESOPHAGUS, STOMACH, DUODENUM (530-537)
CIRRHOSIS - ALCOHOLIC (571.0)
CIRRHOSIS - OTHER/UNSPECIFIED (571.8, 571.9)
DISEASES OF PANCREAS (577)
OTH DIGESTIVE DISEASES (520-529, 540-570, 572-576)

3881
10
21
178
26
43
79
15
21
25
2
30
9
10
19
56
61
11
30

3876
10
24
162
30
28
82
11
15
30
0
33
3
18
16
74
60
13
43

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 4527
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 3781 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

1.00
1.00
0.89
1.10
0.86
1.54
0.96
1.40
1.40
0.83
0.91
2.60
0.55
1.22
0.76
1.01
0.87
0.70

0.009
0.128
0.090
1.060
0.005
1.942
0.114
1.272
0.234
0.426
0.754
0.050
0.433
1.909
0.323
1.677
0.002
0.331
2.249

�TABLE C-22
DEATHS FROM SELECTED DISEASES OF THE CIRCULATORY, RESPIRATORY AND DIGESTIVE SYSTEMS
ALL WHITE SERVICEMEN
OBSERVED
EXPECTED
0/E M-H CHI-SQUARE
CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (0-398, 580-989)
HYPERTENSIVE DISEASE (400-404)
ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (410)
OTHER ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE (411-414)
CARDIOMYOPATHY (425)
CARDIAC ARREST (427.2)
CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES (430-438)
DIS OF ARTERIES, ARTERIOLES , CAPILLARIES (440-448)
DIS OF VEINS, LYMPHATICS &amp; OTHERS (450-458)
OTH HEART DISEASES (420-424,426-427.1,427.3-429)
UPPER RESPIRATORY (460-466, 500-508)
INFLUENZA &amp; PNEUMONIA (470-486)
CHRONIC BRONCHITIS &amp; EMPHYSEMA (491-492)
OTHER RESPIRATORY (490, 493, 510-519)
DIS OF ESOPHAGUS, STOMACH, DUODENUM (530-537)
CIRRHOSIS - ALCOHOLIC (571.0)
CIRRHOSIS - OTHER/UNSPECIFIED (571.8, 571.9)
DISEASES OF PANCREAS (577)
OTH DIGESTIVE DISEASES (520-529, 540-570, 572-576)

15967
28
100
842
93
212
372
116
89
131
6
167
40
59
62
320
342
60
171

15991
40
107
885
71
173
369
110
88
132
8
177
50
60
51
287
358
52
168

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 19177
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 21335 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

1.00
0.70
0.94
0.95
1.30
1.23
1.01
1.05
1.01
0.99
0.74
0.94
0.81
0.98
1.21
1.11
0.96
1.14
1.02

0.126
1.090
0.172
2.102
2.629
4.616*
0.034
0.351
0.206
0.007
0.842
0.031
0.456
0.010
0.677
0.513
0.029
0.480
0.008

�TABLE C-23
DEATHS FROM SELECTED DISEASES OF THE CIRCULATORY, RESPIRATORY AND DIGESTIVE SYSTEMS
ALL NON-WHITE SERVICEMEN
OBSERVED
EXPECTED
0/E M-H CHI-SQUARE
CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-398, 580-E989)
HYPERTENSIVE DISEASE (400-404)
ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (410)
OTHER ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE (411-414)
CARDIOMYOPATHY (425)
CARDIAC ARREST (427.2)
CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES (430-438)
DIS OF ARTERIES, ARTERIOLES, CAPILLARIES (440-448)
DIS OF VEINS, LYMPHATICS &amp; OTHERS (450-458)
OTH HEART DISEASES (420-424,426-427.1,427.3-429)
UPPER RESPIRATORY (460-466, 500-508)
INFLUENZA &amp; PNEUMONIA (470-486)
CHRONIC BRONCHITIS &amp; EMPHYSEMA (491-492)
OTHER RESPIRATORY (490, 493, 510-519)
DIS OF ESOPHAGUS, STOMACH, DUODENUM (530-537)
CIRRHOSIS - ALCOHOLIC (571.0)
CIRRHOSIS - OTHER/UNSPECIFIED (571.8, 571.9)
DISEASES OF PANCREAS (577)
OTH DIGESTIVE DISEASES (520-529, 540-570, 572-576)

3977
38
22
212
47
61
140
26
41
63
1
87
9
37
20
105
112
18
42

3869
35
32
234
58
49
151
31
37
52
4
88
9
34
20
117
125
42
73

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED • 5058
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 5350 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

1.03
1.10
0.69
0.91
0.81
1.25
0.93
0.83
1.11
1.21
0.26
0.99
1.06
1.09
1.00
0.89
0.90
0.43
0.58

5.124*
0.011
1.463
0.312
0.104
0.452
0.861
0.083
0.227
0.891
1.772
0.004
0.011
0.001
0.025
0.745
0.334
8.649*
5.999*

�TABLE C-24
DEATHS FROM SELECTED DISEASES OF THE CIRCULATORY, RESPIRATORY AND DIGESTIVE SYSTEMS
ALL ENLISTED MEN
OBSERVED
EXPECTED
0/E M-H CHI-SQUARE
CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-398, 580-E989)
HYPERTENSIVE DISEASE (400-404)
ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (410)
OTHER ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE (411-414)
CARDIOMYOPATHY (425)
CARDIAC ARREST (427.2)
CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES (430-438)
DIS OF ARTERIES, ARTERIOLES, CAPILLARIES (440-448)
DIS OF VEINS, LYMPHATICS &amp; OTHERS (450-458)
OTH HEART DISEASES (420-424,426-427.1,427.3-429)
UPPER RESPIRATORY (460-466, 500-508)
INFLUENZA &amp; PNEUMONIA (470-486)
CHRONIC BRONCHITIS &amp; EMPHYSEMA (491-492)
OTHER RESPIRATORY (490, 493, 510-519)
DIS OF ESOPHAGUS, STOMACH, DUODENUM (530-537)
CIRRHOSIS - ALCOHOLIC (571.0)
CIRRHOSIS - OTHER/UNSPECIFIED (571.8, 571.9)
DISEASES OF PANCREAS (577)
OTK DIGESTIVE DISEASES (520-529, 540-570, 572-576)

18653
54
107
912
127
249
475
124
116
181
7
245
48
89
72
396
414
74
185

18612
71
120
969
120
200
470
119
112
171
10
239
55
91
66
372
429
89
214

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 22528
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 25022 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

1.00
0.76
0.89
0.94
1.06
1.25
1.01
1.04
1.04
1.06
0.70
1.02
0.88
0.98
1.09
1.06
0.97
0.83
0.86

0.154
1.581
0.696
2.040
0.579
4.845*
0.004
0.303
0.165
0.487
1.029
0.156
0.280
0.054
0.113
0.174
0.010
1.126
2.085

�TABLE C-25
DEATHS FROM SELECTED DISEASES OF THE CIRCULATORY, RESPIRATORY AND DIGESTIVE SYSTEMS
ALL OFFICERS
OBSERVED
EXPECTED
O/E M-H CHI-SQUARE
CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-398, 580-E989)
HYPERTENSIVE DISEASE (400-404)
ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (410)
OTHER ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE (411-414)
CARDIOMYOPATHY (425)
CARDIAC ARREST (427.2)
CBREBROVASCULAR DISEASES (430-438)
DIS OF ARTERIES, ARTERIOLES , CAPILLARIES (440-448)
DIS OF VEINS, LYMPHATICS &amp; OTHERS (450-458)
OTH HEART DISEASES (420-424,426-427.1,427.3-429)
UPPER RESPIRATORY (460-466, 500-508)
INFLUENZA &amp; PNEUMONIA (470-486)
CHRONIC BRONCHITIS &amp; EMPHYSEMA (491-492)
OTHER RESPIRATORY (490, 493, 510-519)
DIS OF ESOPHAGUS, STOMACH, DUODENUM (530-537)
CIRRHOSIS - ALCOHOLIC (571.0)
CIRRHOSIS - OTHER/UNSPECIFIED (571.8, 571.9)
DISEASES OF PANCREAS (577)
OTH DIGESTIVE DISEASES (520-529, 540-570, 572-576)

930
7
16
108
16
15
27
15
12
11
0
12
2
6
7
25
28
5
14

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 1256
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 1405 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

916
3
19
111
3
22
34
22
15
13
0
15
1
5
3
18
30
3
18

1.02
2.23
0.85
0.97
6.21
0.69
0.79
0.67
0.80
0.88
0.00
0.80
2.61
1.33
2.74
1.40
0.92
1.75
0.77

0.024
0.284
0.521
0.014
9.622*
0.511
0.575
0.293
0.277
0.247
0.079
0.278
0.198
0.060
2.123
0.409
0.079
0.270
0.159

�TABLE C-26
DEATHS FROM SELECTED DISEASES OF THE CIRCULATORY, RESPIRATORY AND DIGESTIVE SYSTEMS
ALL ARMY ENLISTED MEN IN VIETNAM, COMBAT MOSC VS. NON-COMBAT MOSC
OBSERVED
EXPECTED
0/E M-H CHI-SQUARE
CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-398, 580-E989)
HYPERTENSIVE DISEASE (400-404)
ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (410)
OTHER ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE (411-414)
CARDIOMYOPATHY (425)
CARDIAC ARREST (427.2)
CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES (430-438)
DIS OF ARTERIES, ARTERIOLES, CAPILLARIES (440-448)
DIS OF VEINS, LYMPHATICS &amp; OTHERS (450-458)
OTH HEART DISEASES (420-424,426-427.1,427.3-429)
UPPER RESPIRATORY (460-466, 500-508)
INFLUENZA &amp; PNEUMONIA (470-486)
CHRONIC BRONCHITIS &amp; EMPHYSEMA (491-492)
OTHER RESPIRATORY (490, 493, 510-519)
DIS OF ESOPHAGUS, STOMACH, DUODENUM (530-537)
CIRRHOSIS - ALCOHOLIC (571.0)
CIRRHOSIS - OTHER/UNSPECIFIED (571.8, 571.9)
DISEASES OF PANCREAS (577)
OTH DIGESTIVE DISEASES (520-529, 540-570, 572-576)

4664
11
22
179
35
52
107
36
21
41
1
61
9
24
9
108
88
18
36

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED • 5522
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 12767 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

4595
14
20
206
26
56
115
25
31
50
2
64
10
24
17
96
103
19
50

1.02
0.81
1.10
0.87
1.34
0.93
0.93
1.43
0.67
0.83
0.57
0.95
0.94
1.00
0.53
1.13
0.85
0.94
0.71

4.556*
0.405
0.204
2.436
2.067
0.391
0.599
2.950
2.512
1.199
0.260
0.130
0.017
0.096
3.029
1.470
1.814
0.025
2.874

��TABLE C-28
DEATHS FROM ACCIDENTS, SUICIDES AND TRAUMA (E800-E989)
ALL CASES
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE
10373

10734

0.97

15.535*

4897

4643

1.05

9.355*

OTH. TRANSPORT. ACC. (E800-E807 ,E830-E845)

610

517

1.18

9.730*

ACC. POISONINGS (E850-E877)

581

508

1.14

6.349*

ALL OTH ACC. /INJURY (E880-E949 , E970-E989)

2917

2788

1.05

3.313

SUICIDE (E950-E959)

2543

2735

0.93

9.851*

HOMICIDE (E960-E969)

2314

2310

1.00

0.009

ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-799)
MOTOR VEH ACCIDENTS (E810-E827)

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 24235
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 26685 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

�TABLE C-29
DEATHS FROM ACCIDENTS, SUICIDES AND TRAUMA (E800-E989)
ALL ARMY
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

O/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-799)

8728

9097

0.96

18.774*

MOTOR VER ACCIDENTS (B810-E827)

3884

3693

1.05

7.502*

OTH. TRANSPORT. ACC . (E800-E807 , E830-E845)

493

361

1.36

19.394*

ACC. POISONINGS (E850-E877)

461

399

1.15

5.068*

ALL OTH ACC. /INJURY (E880-E949 , E970-E989)

2323

2202

1.05

2.761

SUICIDE (E950-E959)

2003

2152

0.93

6.633*

HOMICIDE (E960-E969)

1816

1804

1.01

0.004

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 19708
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 22904 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

�TABLE C-30
DEATHS FROM ACCIDENTS, SUICIDES AND TRAUMA (E800-B989)
ALL MARINES
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-799)

1647

1638

1.01

0.040

MOTOR VEH ACCIDENTS

1011

948

1.07

1.778

OTH. TRANSPORT. ACC . (E800-E807 , B830-E845)

117

156

0.75

3.551

ACC. POISONINGS (E850-E877)

120

109

1.10

1.289

ALL OTH ACC. /INJURY (E880-E949 , E970-E989)

593

585

1.01

0.523

SUICIDE (E950-E959)

542

583

0.93

3.321

HOMICIDE (E960-E969)

497

507

0.98

0.163

(E810-E827)

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED • 4527
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 3781 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

�TABLE C-31
DEATHS FROM ACCIDENTS, SUICIDES AND TRAUMA (E800-E989)
ALL WHITE SERVICEMEN
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-799)

8109

8312

0.98

6.487*

MOTOR VER ACCIDENTS

4264

4107

1.04

4.169*

OTH. TRANSPORT. ACC . (E800-E807 , E830-E845)

548

463

1.18

8.333*

ACC. POISONINGS (E850-E877)

464

411

1.13

4.414*

ALL OTH ACC. /INJURY (E880-B949 , E970-E989)

2341

2253

1.04

1.745

SUICIDE (E950-E959)

2247

2442

0.92

9.974*

HOMICIDE (E960-E969)

1204

1189

1.01

0.015

(E810-E827)

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 19177
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 21335 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

�TABLE C-32
DEATHS FROM ACCIDENTS, SUICIDES AND TRAUMA (E800-E989)
ALL NON-WHITE SERVICEMEN
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE
2269

2422

0.94

11.547*

632

536

1.18

9.172*

62

54

1.15

1.446

ACC. POISONINGS (E850-E877)

117

97

1.21

2.054

ALL OTH ACC. /INJURY (E880-E949 , E970-E989)

575

536

1.07

1.936

SUICIDE (E950-E959)

295

293

1.01

0.309

1108

1120

0.99

0.112

ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-799)
MOTOR VEH ACCIDENTS (E810-E827)
OTH. TRANSPORT. ACC . (E800-E807 , E830-E845)

HOMICIDE (E960-B969)

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 5058
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 5350 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

�TABLE C-33
DEATHS FROM ACCIDENTS, SUICIDES AND TRAUMA (E800-E989)
ALL ENLISTED MEN
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

O/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-799)

9264

9586

0.97

13.473*

MOTOR VEH ACCIDENTS (E810-E827)

4757

4492

1.06

10.730*

OTH. TRANSPORT. ACC . (E800-E807 , E830-B845)

420

417

1.01

0.257

ACC. POISONINGS (E850-E877)

568

495

1.15

6.427*

ALL OTH ACC. /INJURY (E880-E949 , E970-E989)

2815

2673

1.05

4.457*

SUICIDE

2428

2586

0.94

7.965*

2276

2277

1.00

0.023

(E950-E959)

HOMICIDE (E960-E969)

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 22528
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 25022 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

�TABLE C-34
DEATHS FROM ACCIDENTS, SUICIDES AND TRAUMA (E800-E989)
ALL OFFICERS
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-799)

816

846

0.96

0.753

MOTOR VEH ACCIDENTS (E810-E827)

113

102

1.11

0.389

OTH. TRANSPORT. ACC. (E800-E807 , E830-E845)

114

69

1.66

4.156*

ACC. POISONINGS (E850-E877)

13

7

1.81

0.935

ALL OTH ACC. /INJURY (E880-K949 , B970-B989)

76

91

0.83

1.195

SUICIDE (E950-E959)

96

121

0.79

1.996

HOMICIDE (B960-E969)

28

13

2.22

3.109

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED • 1256
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 1405 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

�TABLE C-35
DEATHS FROM ACCIDENTS, SUICIDES AND TRAUMA (E800-E989)
ALL ARMY ENLISTED MEN IN VIETNAM, COMBAT MOSC VS. NON-COMBAT MOSC
OBSERVED
EXPECTED
0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-799)

2081

2151

0.97

3.433

MOTOR VEH ACCIDENTS (E810-E827)

1205

1217

0.99

0.088

93

119

0.78

4.189*

ACC. POISONINGS (E850-E877)

153

142

1.08

0.746

ALL OTH ACC. /INJURY (E880-E949 , E970-K989)

762

696

1.09

4.694*

SUICIDE (E950-E959)

590

613

0.96

0.684

HOMICIDE (E960-E969)

638

583

1.09

3.924*

OTH. TRANSPORT. ACC. (E800-E807 ,E830-E845)

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 5522
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 12767 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

�TABLE C-36
DEATHS PROM ACCIDENTS, SUICIDES AND TRAUMA (E800-E989)
ALL ENLISTED MARINES IN VIETNAM, COMBAT MOSC VS. NON-COMBAT MOSC
OBSERVED
EXPECTED
0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-799)

528

536

0.98

0.586

MOTOR VEH ACCIDENTS

466

496

0.94

0.573

OTH. TRANSPORT. ACC. (E800-E807 ,E830-B845)

34

32

1.05

0.036

ACC. POISONINGS

67

53

1.26

2.116

ALL OTH ACC. /INJURY (E880-E949 , E970-E989)

289

276

1.05

0.758

SUICIDE (E950-E959)

228

274

0.83

4.599*

HOMICIDE (E960-E969)

286

230

1.24

7.034*

(E810-E827)

(E850-E877)

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 1898
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 2341 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM

�APPENDIX D

�APPENDIX D
DEATHS IN CALIFORNIA, MASSACHUSETTS, NEW YORK, WISCONSIN AND
WEST VIRGINIA USING ALL U.S. VETERANS.AS COMPARISON GROUP
DEATHS IN CALIFORNIA
TABLE D-l: DEATHS FROM ACCIDENTS, SUICIDES AND TRAUMA
TABLE D-2: DEATHS FROM CANCERS
TABLE D-3: DEATHS FROM SELECTED DISEASES OF THE CIRCULATORY,
RESPIRATORY AND DIGESTIVE SYSTEMS
TABLE D-4: SELECTED CAUSES OF DEATH BY ORGAN SYSTEM
DEATHS IN MASSACHUSETTS
TABLE D-5: DEATHS FROM ACCIDENTS, SUICIDES AND TRAUMA
TABLE D-6: DEATHS FROM CANCERS
TABLE D-7: DEATHS FROM SELECTED DISEASES OF THE CIRCULATORY,
RESPIRATORY AND DIGESTIVE SYSTEMS
TABLE D-8: SELECTED CAUSES OF DEATH BY ORGAN SYSTEM
DEATHS IN NEW YORK
TABLE D-9 : DEATHS FROM ACCIDENTS, SUICIDES AND TRAUMA
TABLE D-10: DEATHS FROM CANCERS
TABLE D-ll: DEATHS FROM SELECTED DISEASES OF THE CIRCULATORY,
RESPIRATORY AND DIGESTIVE SYSTEMS
TABLE D-12: SELECTED CAUSES OF DEATH BY ORGAN SYSTEM
DEATHS IN WISCONSIN
TABLE D-13: DEATHS FROM ACCIDENTS, SUICIDES AND TRAUMA
TABLE D-14: DEATHS FROM CANCERS
TABLE D-l5: DEATHS FROM SELECTED DISEASES OF THE CIRCULATORY,
RESPIRATORY AND DIGESTIVE SYSTEMS
TABLE D-16: SELECTED CAUSES OF DEATH BY ORGAN SYSTEM
DEATHS IN WEST VIRGINIA
TABLE D-17: DEATHS FROM ACCIDENTS, SUICIDES AND TRAUMA
TABLE D-18: DEATHS FROM CANCERS
TABLE D-l9: DEATHS FROM SELECTED DISEASES OF THE CIRCULATORY,
RESPIRATORY AND DIGESTIVE SYSTEMS
TABLE D-20: SELECTED CAUSES OF DEATH BY ORGAN SYSTEM

�DEATHS IN CALIFORNIA USING NON-VIETNAM
SERVICE VETERANS WHO DIED IN CALIFORNIA AS COMPARISON GROUP
TABLE D-21: DEATHS FROM ACCIDENTS, SUICIDES AND TRAUMA
TABLE D-22: DEATHS FROM CANCERS
TABLE D-23: DEATHS FROM SELECTED DISEASES OF THE CIRCULATORY,
RESPIRATORY AND DIGESTIVE SYSTEMS
TABLE D-24: SELECTED CAUSES OF DEATH BY ORGAN SYSTEM

�TABLE D-l
DEATHS FROM ACCIDENTS, SUICIDES AND TRAUMA (E800-E989)
ALL WHITE SERVICEMEN WHO DIED IN CALIFORNIA
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-799)

795

851

0.93

8.622*

MOTOR VEH ACCIDENTS

446

446

1.00

0.001

OTH. TRANSPORT. ACC. (E800-E807 , E830-E845)

54

51

1.06

0.301

ACC. POISONINGS (E850-E877)

97

45

2.17

52.662*

ALL OTH ACC. /INJURY (E880-E949 , E970-E989)

197

242

0.81

9.686*

SUICIDE (E950-E959)

280

262

1.07

1.480

HOMICIDE (E960-E969)

158

130

1.22

5.518*

(E810-E827)

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 2027
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 21335 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM
ALL U.S. VETERANS WITH NO VIETNAM SERVICE USED AS COMPARISON GROUP

�TABLE D-2
DEATHS FROM CANCERS (140-208, 230-239)
ALL WHITE SERVICEMEN WHO DIED IN CALIFORNIA
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

1.01
1.33
1.01
1.22
0.56
0.97
0.98
0.60
1.16
1.01
0.67
0.97
0.00
1.72
0.62
0.68
1.00
0.26
0.60
0.66
1.11
1.69
1.05
0.62

1.623
0.135

CAUSE

ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-136 , 210-228 , 240-E989)
CA - BUCCAL (140-149)
CA - ESOPHAGUS (150)
CA - STOMACH (151)
CA - INTESTINES &amp; OTHER GI (152-154,158,159)
CA - LIVER, BILE DUCTS (155-156)
CA - PANCREAS (157)
CA - UPPER RESPIRATORY (160-161)
CA - LUNG (162)
CA - BONE (170)
CA - SOFT TISSUES (171)
CA - MELANOMA OF THE SKIN (172)
CA - PROSTATE (185)
CA - TESTIS (186)
CA - BLADDER (188)
CA - KIDNEY (189)
CA - BRAIN (191)
CA - OTHER NERVOUS SYSTEM (192)
CA - THYROID &amp; ENDOCRINE (193-194)
CA - NON-HODGKINS LYMPHOMA (200,202)
CA - HODGKINS DISEASE (201)
CA - MULTIPLE MYELOMA (203)
CA - LEUKEMIA (204-207)
OTH CA (163,173-4,187,190,195-9,208-9,230-9)

1782
7
5
10
11
2
9
2
67
4
3
18
0
17
1
5
13
2
2
9
10
5
25
18

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 2027
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 21335 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM
ALL U.S. VETERANS WITH NO VIETNAM SERVICE USED AS COMPARISON GROUP

1765
5
5
8
20
2
9
3
58
4
4
19
3
10
2
7
13
8
3
14
9
3
24
29

0.056
0.141
2.815
0.008
0.001
0.280
0.525
0.000
0.520
0.001
3.374
4.545*
0.468
0.850
0.014
4.092*
0.625
1.155
0.082
1.969
0.008
4.159*

�TABLE D-3
DEATHS FROM SELECTED DISEASES OF THE CIRCULATORY, RESPIRATORY AND DIGESTIVE SYSTEMS
ALL WHITE SERVICEMEN WHO DIED IN CALIFORNIA
OBSERVED
EXPECTED
O/E M-H CHI-SQUARE
CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-398, 580-E989)
HYPERTENSIVE DISEASE (400-404)
ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (410)
OTHER ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE (411-414)
CARDIOMYOPATHY (425)
CARDIAC ARREST (427.2)
CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES (430-438)
DIS OF ARTERIES, ARTERIOLES , CAPILLARIES (440-448)
DIS OP VEINS, LYMPHATICS &amp; OTHERS (450-458)
OTH HEART DISEASES (420-424,426-427.1,427.3-429)
UPPER RESPIRATORY (460-466, 500-508)
INFLUENZA &amp; PNEUMONIA (470-486)
CHRONIC BRONCHITIS &amp; EMPHYSEMA (491-492)
OTHER RESPIRATORY (490, 493, 510-519)
DIS OF ESOPHAGUS, STOMACH, DUODENUM (530-537)
CIRRHOSIS - ALCOHOLIC (571.0)
CIRRHOSIS - OTHER/UNSPECIFIED (571.8, 571.9)
DISEASES OF PANCREAS (577)
OTH DIGESTIVE DISEASES (520-529, 540-570, 572-576)

1684

3
5
100
12
6
36
9
6
15
2
17
6
4
5
48
45
12
12

1705
5
12

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED • 2027
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 21335 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM
ALL U.S. VETERANS WITH NO VIETNAM SERVICE USED AS COMPARISON GROUP

86
7
15
37
10
9
14
1
18
5
7
5
29
37
6
19

0.99
0.66
0.42
1.17
1.64
0.39
0.97
0.91
0.70
1.04
2.43
0.93
1.24
0.55
0.95
1.67
1.23
2.08
0.63

1.266
0.234
3.928*
1.584
2.609
5.540*
0.098
0.160
1.146
0.212
0.118
0.028
0.032
1.148
0.000
9.414*
1.482
7.322*
1.961

�TABLE D-4
DEATHS FROM DISEASES OF SELECTED ORGAN SYSTEMS
ALL WHITE SERVICEMEN WHO DIED IN CALIFORNIA
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE
59

64

0.93

0.213

3

11

0.26

6.010*

245

262

0.93

1.639

ENDOCRINE, NUTRITIONAL &amp; METABOLIC (240-279)

3

13

0.23

7.646*

BLOOD &amp; BLOOD-FORMING ORGANS (280-289)

3

3

1.09

0.023

13

16

0.82

0.303

CIRCULATORY DISEASES (390-458)

314

342

0.92

3.206

RESPIRATORY DISEASES (460-519)

32

38

0.84

0.879

116

88

1.32

8.491*

GENITOURINARY DISEASES (580-629)

4

10

0.42

2.394

SKIN &amp; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUES (680-709)

1

1

0.97

0.000

MUSCULOSKELBTAL 6 CONNECTIVE TISSUES (710-738)

2

3

0.66

0.306

1232

1177

1.05

8.307*

ALL OTHER CAUSES (210-28,290-315,740-759,780-796)
INFECTIVE &amp; PARASITIC DISEASES (000-136)
CANCERS (140-209, 230-239)

NERVOUS SYSTEMS &amp; SENSE ORGANS (320-389)

DIGESTIVE DISEASES (520-577)

ACCIDENTS, VIOLENCE &amp; TRAUMA (B800-E989)

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 2027
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 21335 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM
ALL U.S. VETERANS WITH NO VIETNAM SERVICE USED AS COMPARISON GROUP

�TABLE D-6
DEATHS FROM CANCERS (140-208, 230-239)
ALL WHITE SERVICEMEN WHO DIED IN MASSACHUSETTS
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

O/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

1.02
0.00
2.43
1.04
0.44
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.84
0.00
3.81
0.00
0.00
1.40
0.00
2.46
1.14
0.00
5.95
1.59
0.81
0.00
0.29
0.84

1.204
0.700
0.804
0.002
0.729
0.269
1.015
0.204
0.152
0.503
4.089*
2.543
0.369
0.226
0.148
1.717
0.029
1.163
7.982*
0.606
0.041
0.262
1.745
0.097

CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-136, 210-228 , 240-E989)
CA - BUCCAL (140-149)
CA - ESOPHAGUS (150)
CA - STOMACH (151)
CA - INTESTINES &amp; OTHER 01 (152-154,158,159)
CA - LIVER, BILE DUCTS (155-156)
CA - PANCREAS (157)
CA - UPPER RESPIRATORY (160-161)
CA - LUNG (162)
CA - BONE (170)
CA - SOFT TISSUES (171)
CA - MELANOMA OF THE SKIN (172)
CA - PROSTATE (185)
CA - TESTIS (186)
CA - BLADDER (188)
CA - KIDNEY (189)
CA - BRAIN (191)
CA - OTHER NERVOUS SYSTEM (192)
CA - THYROID &amp; ENDOCRINE j( 193-194)
CA - NON-HODGKINS LYMPHOMA (200,202)
CA - HODGKINS DISEASE (201)
CA - MULTIPLE MYELOMA (203)
CA - LEUKEMIA (204-207)
OTHI CA (163,173-4,187,190,195-9,208-9,230-9)

251
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
5
0
2
0
0
2
0
2
2
0
2
3
1
0
1
3

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED 277
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 21335 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM
ALL U.S. VETERANS WITH NO VIETNAM SERVICE USED AS COMPARISON GROUP

245
1
0
1
2
0
1
0
6
1
1
3
0
1
0
1
2
1
0
2
1
0
3
4

�TABLE D-7
DEATHS FROM SELECTED DISEASES OF THE CIRCULATORY, RESPIRATORY AND DIGESTIVE SYSTEMS
ALL WHITE SERVICEMEN WHO DIED IN MASSACHUSETTS
OBSERVED
EXPECTED
0/E M-H CHI-SQUARE
CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-398, 580-E989)
HYPERTENSIVE DISEASE (400-404)
ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (410)
OTHER ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE (411-414)
CARDIOMYOPATHY (425)
CARDIAC ARREST (427.2)
CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES (430-438)
DIS OF ARTERIES, ARTERIOLES, CAPILLARIES (440-448)
DIS OF VEINS, LYMPHATICS &amp; OTHERS (450-458)
OTH HEART DISEASES (420-424,426-427.1,427.3-429)
UPPER RESPIRATORY (460-466, 500-508)
INFLUENZA &amp; PNEUMONIA (470-486)
CHRONIC BRONCHITIS &amp; EMPHYSEMA (491-492)
OTHER RESPIRATORY (490, 493, 510-519)
DIS OF ESOPHAGUS, STOMACH, DUODENUM (530-537)
CIRRHOSIS - ALCOHOLIC (571.0)
CIRRHOSIS - OTHER/UNSPECIFIED (571.8, 571.9)
DISEASES OF PANCREAS (577)
OTH DIGESTIVE DISEASES (520-529, 540-570, 572-576)

227
0
2
13
0
3
5
0
0
2
0
2
0
3
1
2
9
1
7

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED 277
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 21335 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM
ALL U.S. VETERANS WITH NO VIETNAM SERVICE USED AS COMPARISON GROUP

238
0
1
10
1
2
5
1
1
2
0
2
1
1
1
4
4
1
2

0.95
0.00
1.68
1.27
0.00
1.41
1.07
0.00
0.00
1.17
0.00
0.84
0.00
3.69
1.49
0.56
2.10
1.59
3.21

3.950*
0.476
0.580
0.843
0.974
0.382
0.020
1.322
1.158
0.046
0.118
0.059
0.546
5.600*
0.156
0.669
5.086*
0.211
10.245*

�TABLE D-8
DEATHS FROM DISEASES OF SELECTED ORGAN SYSTEMS
ALL WHITE SERVICEMEN WHO DIED IN MASSACHUSETTS
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (210-28,290-315,740-59,780-96)

9

9

1.04

0.015

INFECTIVE &amp; PARASITIC DISEASES (000-136)

1

2

0.59

0.272

26

32

0.82

1.212

ENDOCRINE, NUTRITIONAL &amp; METABOLIC (240-279)

2

2

1.27

0.107

BLOOD &amp; BLOOD-FORMING ORGANS (280-289)

0

0

0.00

0.403

NERVOUS SYSTEMS &amp; SENSE ORGANS (320-389)

3

2

1.34

0.254

CIRCULATORY DISEASES (390-458)

39

41

0.95

0.119

RESPIRATORY DISEASES (460-519)

7

4

1.59

1.542

18

11

1.67

4.892*

GENITOURINARY DISEASES (580-629)

0

1

0.00

1.086

SKIN &amp; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUES (680-709)

0

0

0.00

0.150

MUSCULOSKELETAL &amp; CONNECTIVE TISSUES (710-738)

0

0

0.00

0.308

172

173

0.99

0.024

CANCERS (140-209, 230-239)

DIGESTIVE DISEASES (520-577)

ACCIDENTS, VIOLENCE &amp; TRAUMA (800-989)

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED 277
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 21335 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM
ALL U.S. VETERANS WITH NO VIETNAM SERVICE USED AS COMPARISON GROUP

�TABLE D-9
DEATHS FROM ACCIDENTS, SUICIDES AND TRAUMA (E800-E989)
ALL WHITE SERVICEMEN WHO DIED IN NEW YORK
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

O/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-799)

334

253

1.32

46.536*

MOTOR VEH ACCIDENTS

137

188

0.73

18.820*

OTH. TRANSPORT. ACC. (E800-B807 , E830-E845)

17

21

0.82

0.615

ACC. POISONINGS (E850-E877)

31

19

1.65

7.811*

106

101

1.05

0.267

SUICIDE (E950-E959)

70

109

0.64

16.492*

HOMICIDE (E960-E969)

51

55

0.94

0.272

(E810-E827)

ALL OTH ACC. /INJURY (E880-E949 , E970-E989)

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED • 746
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 21335 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM
ALL U.S. VETERANS WITH NO VIETNAM SERVICE USED AS COMPARISON GROUP

�TABLE D-10
DEATHS FROM CANCERS (140-208, 230-239)
ALL WHITE SERVICEMEN WHO DIED IN NEW YORK
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

1.00
0.00
2.79
0.87
1.87
1.71
1.38
2.16
1.23
0.00
0.70
0.15
0.00
0.23
0.00
0.63
1.21
0.00
0.00
1.37
1.60
0.00
1.26
1.14

0.007
1.395
2.215
0.042
3.865*
0.239
0.315
0.661
0.652
1.428
0.121
5.045*
0.453
2.476
0.335
0.231
0.219
3.147
0.817
0.633
1.326
0.593
0.595
0.124

CAUSE

ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-136 , 210-228 , 240-E989)
CA - BUCCAL (140-149)
CA - ESOPHAGUS (150)
CA - STOMACH (151)
CA - INTESTINES &amp; OTHER 61 (152-154,158,159)
CA - LIVER, BILE DUCTS (155-156)
CA - PANCREAS (157)
CA - UPPER RESPIRATORY (160-161)
CA - LUNG (162)
CA - BONE (170)
CA - SOFT TISSUES (171)
CA - MELANOMA OF THE SKIN (172)
CA - PROSTATE (185)
CA - TESTIS (186)
CA - BLADDER (188)
CA - KIDNEY (189)
CA - BRAIN (191)
CA - OTHER NERVOUS SYSTEM (192)
CA - THYROID &amp; ENDOCRINE (193-194)
CA - NON-HODGKINS LYMPHOMA (200,202)
CA - HODGKINS DISEASE (201)
CA - MULTIPLE MYELOMA (203)
CA - LEUKEMIA (204-207)
OTH! CA (163,173-4,187,190,195-9,208-9,230-9)

667
0
2
2
10
1
3
1
15
0
1
1
0
1
0

1

6
0
0
7
6
0
12
10

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED 746
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 21335 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM
ALL U.S. VETERANS WITH NO VIETNAM SERVICE USED AS COMPARISON GROUP

668
1
1
2
5
1
2
0
12
1
1
7
0
4
0
2
5
3
1
5
4
1
10
9

�TABLE D-ll
DEATHS FROM SELECTED DISEASES OF THE CIRCULATORY, RESPIRATORY AND DIGESTIVE SYSTEMS
ALL WHITE SERVICEMEN WHO DIED IN NEW YORK
OBSERVED
EXPECTED
0/E M-H CHI-SQUARE
CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-398, 580-E989)
HYPERTENSIVE DISEASE (400-404)
ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (410)
OTHER ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE (411-414)
CARDIOMYOPATHY (425)
CARDIAC ARREST (427.2)
CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES (430-438)
DIS OF ARTERIES, ARTERIOLES, CAPILLARIES (440-448)
DIS OF VEINS, LYMPHATICS &amp; OTHERS (450-458)
OTH HEART DISEASES (420-424,426-427.1,427.3-429)
UPPER RESPIRATORY (460-466, 500-508)
INFLUENZA &amp; PNEUMONIA (470-486)
CHRONIC BRONCHITIS &amp; EMPHYSEMA (491-492)
OTHER RESPIRATORY (490, 493, 510-519)
DIS OF ESOPHAGUS, STOMACH, DUODENUM (530-537)
CIRRHOSIS - ALCOHOLIC (571.0)
CIRRHOSIS - OTHER/UNSPECIFIED (571.8, 571.9)
DISEASES OF PANCREAS (577)
OTH DIGESTIVE DISEASES (520-529, 540-570, 572-576)

589
1
3
35
6
6
15
2
3
12
0
6
1
1
2
29
20
6
9

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED • 746
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 21335 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM
ALL U.S. VETERANS WITH NO VIETNAM SERVICE USED AS COMPARISON GROUP

652
1
2
23
3
5
12
3
3
4
0
6
1
2
2
9
10
2
6

0.90
0.91
1.26
1.54
2.37
1.21
1.23
0.68
1.11
2.68
0.00
0.99
0.98
0.46
1.16
3.17
1.95
3.20
1.63

47.769*
0.006
0.143
6.607*
4.190*
0.196
0.602
0.299
0.023
11.912*
0.309
0.000
0.000
0.607
0.052
37.872*
8.301*
7.472*
2.107

�TABLE D-12
DEATHS FROM DISEASES OF SELECTED ORGAN SYSTEMS
ALL WHITE SERVICEMEN WHO DIED IN NEW YORK
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (210-28,290-315,740-59,780-96)

54

23

2.34

39.423*

INFECTIVE &amp; PARASITIC DISEASES (000-136)

12

4

2.78

12.564*

CANCERS (140-209, 230-239)

79

78

1.01

0.006

ENDOCRINE, NUTRITIONAL &amp; METABOLIC (240-279)

3

4

0.80

0.139

BLOOD &amp; BLOOD-FORMING ORGANS (280-289)

0

1

0.00

1.209

NERVOUS SYSTEMS &amp; SENSE ORGANS (320-389)

7

6

1.18

0.185

CIRCULATORY DISEASES (390-458)

106

94

1.13

1.862

RESPIRATORY DISEASES (460-519)

7

10

0.67

1.135

64

27

2.35

46.341*

GENITOURINARY DISEASES (580-629)

1

3

0.35

1.179

SKIN &amp; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUES (680-709)

0

0

0.00

0.385

MUSCULOSKBLETAL £ CONNECTIVE TISSUES (710-738)

1

1

1.08

0.002

412

494

0.83

47.099*

DIGESTIVE DISEASES (520-577)

ACCIDENTS, VIOLENCE &amp; TRAUMA (E800-B989)

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED 746
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 21335 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM
ALL U.S. VETERANS WITH NO VIETNAM SERVICE USED AS COMPARISON GROUP

�TABLE D-13
DEATHS FROM ACCIDENTS, SUICIDES AND TRAUMA (E800-E989)
ALL WHITE SERVICEMEN WHO DIED IN WISCONSIN
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-799)

100

108

0.93

1.105

MOTOR VEH ACCIDENTS (E810-E827)

105

78

1.34

12.196*

OTH. TRANSPORT. ACC. (E800-E807 , E830-E845)

4

9

0.45

2.762

ACC. POISONINGS (E850-B877)

4

8

0.50

2.071

ALL OTH ACC. /INJURY (E880-E949 , E970-E989)

45

42

1.06

0.194

SUICIDE (E950-E959)

49

45

1.08

0.314

7

23

0.31

11.870*

HOMICIDE (E960-E969)

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED 314
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 21335 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM
ALL U.S. VETERANS WITH NO VIETNAM SERVICE USED AS COMPARISON GROUP

�TABLE D-14
DEATHS FROM CANCERS (140-208, 230-239)
ALL WHITE SERVICEMEN WHO DIED IN WISCONSIN
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

1.00
0.00
3.32
0.00
1.31
0.00
1.13
0.00
0.96
0.00
5.11
0.69
0.00
2.86
0.00
1.36
1.46
0.00
0.00
0.93
1.32
0.00
1.01
0.54

0.037

CAUSE

ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-136 , 210-228 , 240-E989)
CA - BUCCAL (140-149)
CA - ESOPHAGUS (150)
CA - STOMACH (151)
CA - INTESTINES &amp; OTHER GI (152-154,158,159)
CA - LIVER, BILE DUCTS (155-156)
CA - PANCREAS (157)
CA - UPPER RESPIRATORY (160-161)
CA - LUNG (162)
CA - BONE (170)
CA - SOFT TISSUES (171)
CA - MELANOMA OF THE SKIN (172)
CA - PROSTATE (185)
CA - TESTIS (186)
CA - BLADDER (188)
CA - KIDNEY (189)
CA - BRAIN (191)
CA - OTHER NERVOUS SYSTEM (192)
CA - THYROID &amp; ENDOCRINE (193-194)
CA - NON-HODGKINS LYMPHOMA (200,202)
CA - HODGKINS DISEASE (201)
CA - MULTIPLE MYELOMA (203)
CA - LEUKEMIA (204-207)
OTH CA (163 , 173-4 , 187 , 190 , 195-9 , 208-9 , 230-9)

280
0
1
0
3
0
1
0
5
0
3
2
0
5
0
1
3
0
0
2
2
0
4
2

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED 314
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 21335 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM
ALL U.S. VETERANS WITH NO VIETNAM SERVICE USED AS COMPARISON GROUP

281
1
0
1
2
0
1
0
5
1
1
3
0
2
0
1
2
1
0
2
2
0
4
4

0.619
1.590
0.968
0.219
0.229
0.011
0.229
0.014
0.548
9.287*
0.264
0.198
5.557*
0.131
0.092
0.422
1.338
0.336
0.012
0.154
0.276
0.000
0.789

�TABLE D-15
DEATHS FROM SELECTED DISEASES OF THE CIRCULATORY, RESPIRATORY AND DIGESTIVE SYSTEMS
ALL WHITE SERVICEMEN WHO DIED IN WISCONSIN
OBSERVED
EXPECTED
O/E M-H CHI-SQUARE
CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-398, 580-E989)
HYPERTENSIVE DISEASE (400-404)
ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (410)
OTHER ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE (411-414)
CARDIOMYOPATHY (425)
CARDIAC ARREST (427.2)
CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES (430-438)
DIS OF ARTERIES, ARTERIOLES, CAPILLARIES (440-448)
DIS OF VEINS, LYMPHATICS &amp; OTHERS (450-458)
OTH HEART DISEASES (420-424,426-427.1,427.3-429)
UPPER RESPIRATORY (460-466, 500-508)
INFLUENZA &amp; PNEUMONIA (470-486)
CHRONIC BRONCHITIS &amp; EMPHYSEMA (491-492)
OTHER RESPIRATORY (490, 493, 510-519)
DIS OF ESOPHAGUS, STOMACH, DUODENUM (530-537)
CIRRHOSIS - ALCOHOLIC (571.0)
CIRRHOSIS - OTHER/UNSPECIFIED (571.8, 571.9)
DISEASES OF PANCREAS (577)
OTH DIGESTIVE DISEASES (520-529, 540-570, 572-576)

278
0
2
6
2
3
6
3
1
2
0
1
1
2
0
4
1
0
2

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED 314
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 21335 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM
ALL U.S. VETERANS WITH NO VIETNAM SERVICE USED AS COMPARISON GROUP

274
0
1
10
1
2
5
1
1
2
0
3
0
1
1
4
4
1
2

1.02
0.00
1.78
0.61
1.81
1.42
1.16
2.41
0.86
1.02
0.00
0.39
2.29
2.19
0.00
1.01
0.23
0.00
0.85

0.599
0.452
0.677
1.603
0.727
0.350
0.133
2.450
0.024
0.000
0.132
0.956
0.650
1.272
0.807
0.001
2.612
0.784
0.051

�TABLE D-17
DEATHS FROM ACCIDENTS, SUICIDES AND TRAUMA (E800-E989)
ALL WHITE SERVICEMEN WHO DIED IN WEST VIRGINIA
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE
113

108

1.05

0.617

57

55

1.04

0.099

OTH. TRANSPORT. ACC. (E800-B807 , E830-E845)

5

6

0.81

0.217

ACC. POISONINGS (E850-E877)

5

5

0.92

0.039

ALL OTH ACC. /INJURY (E880-E949 , B970-K989)

40

30

1.33

3.713

SUICIDE (E950-E959)

20

33

0.60

6.218*

HOMICIDE (E960-E969)

14

16

0.86

0.319

ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-799)
MOTOR VEH ACCIDENTS (E810-E827)

TOTAL NUMBER OP CASES OBSERVED 254
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 21335 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM
ALL U.S. VETERANS WITH NO VIETNAM SERVICE USED AS COMPARISON GROUP

�TABLE D-18
DEATHS FROM CANCERS (140-208, 230-239)
ALL WHITE SERVICEMEN WHO DIED IN WEST VIRGINIA
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

1.01
2.62
0.00
2.17
0.85
0.00
0.00
3.47
1.13
1.95
0.00
0.00
3.17
1.69
0.00
1.07
1.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.92
0.00
0.93
1.17

0.183
1.928
0.423
1.290
0.048
0.261
1.036
1.668
0.110
0.459
0.504
2.525
1.396
0.577
0.162
0.006
0.022
1.093
0.339
1.799
0.007
0.274
0.015
0.101

CAUSE

ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-136 , 210-228 , 240-E989)
CA - BUCCAL (140-149)
CA - ESOPHAGUS (150)
CA - STOMACH (151)
CA - INTESTINES &amp; OTHER GI (152-154,158,159)
CA - LIVER, BILE DUCTS (155-156)
CA - PANCREAS (157)
CA - UPPER RESPIRATORY (160-161)
CA - LUNG (162)
CA - BONE (170)
CA - SOFT TISSUES (171)
CA - MELANOMA OF THE SKIN (172)
CA - PROSTATE (185)
CA - TESTIS (186)
CA - BLADDER (188)
CA - KIDNEY (189)
CA - BRAIN (191)
CA - OTHER NERVOUS SYSTEM (192)
CA - THYROID &amp; ENDOCRINE (193-194)
CA - NON-HODGKINS LYMPHOMA (200,202)
CA - HODGKINS DISEASE (201)
CA - MULTIPLE MYELOMA (203)
CA - LEUKEMIA (204-207)
OTH: CA (163,173-4,187,190,195-9,208-9,230-9)

224
2
0
2
2
0
0
1
8
1
0
0

1

2
0
1
2
0
0
0

1

0
3
4

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED 254
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 21335 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM
ALL U.S. VETERANS WITH NO VIETNAM SERVICE USED AS COMPARISON GROUP

222
1
0
1
2
0
1
0
7
1
1
2
0
1
0
1
2
1
0
2
1
0
3
3

�TABLE D-19
DEATHS FROM SELECTED DISEASES OF THE CIRCULATORY, RESPIRATORY AND DIGESTIVE SYSTEMS
ALL WHITE SERVICEMEN WHO DIED IN WEST VIRGINIA
OBSERVED
EXPECTED
O/E M-H CHI-SQUARE
CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-398, 580-E989)
HYPERTENSIVE DISEASE (400-404)
ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (410)
OTHER ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE (411-414)
CARDIOMYOPATHY (425)
CARDIAC ARREST (427.2)
CBREBROVASCULAR DISEASES (430-438)
DIS OF ARTERIES, ARTERIOLES, CAPILLARIES (440-448)
DIS OF VEINS, LYMPHATICS &amp; OTHERS (450-458)
OTH HEART DISEASES (420-424,426-427.1,427.3-429)
UPPER RESPIRATORY (460-466, 500-508)
INFLUENZA &amp; PNEUMONIA (470-486)
CHRONIC BRONCHITIS &amp; EMPHYSEMA (491-492)
OTHER RESPIRATORY (490, 493, 510-519)
DIS OF ESOPHAGUS, STOMACH, DUODENUM (530-537)
CIRRHOSIS - ALCOHOLIC (571.0)
CIRRHOSIS - OTHER/UNSPECIFIED (571.8, 571.9)
DISEASES OF PANCREAS (577)
OTH DIGESTIVE DISEASES (520-529, 540-570, 572-576)

204
0
0
14
2
3
13
1
1
2
0
2
0
2
0
7
3
0
0

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED 254
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 21335 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM
ALL U.S. VETERANS WITH NO VIETNAM SERVICE USED AS COMPARISON GROUP

213
1
1
11
1
2
5
1
1
2
0
2
1
1
1
4
5
1
2

0.96
0.00
0.00
1.26
2.07
1.41
2.76
0.70
0.88
1.19
0.00
0.84
0.00
2.44
0.00
1.89
0.64
0.00
0.00

2.640
0.552
1.441
0.782
1.065
0.384
14.218*
0.132
0.015
0.058
0.111
0.057
0.632
1.657
0.653
2.938
0.626
0.671
2.097

�TABLE D-20
DEATHS FROM DISEASES OF SELECTED ORGAN SYSTEMS
ALL WHITE SERVICEMEN WHO DIED IN WEST VIRGINIA
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

O/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (210-28,290-315,740-759,780-796)

6

8

0.74

0.558

INFECTIVE &amp; PARASITIC DISEASES (000-136)

0

2

0.00

1.634

30

32

0.93

0.185

ENDOCRINE, NUTRITIONAL &amp; METABOLIC (240-279)

1

2

0.61

0.242

BLOOD &amp; BLOOD-FORMING ORGANS (280-289)

0

0

0.00

0.386

NERVOUS SYSTEMS &amp; SENSE ORGANS (320-389)

2

2

0.94

0.008

CIRCULATORY DISEASES (390-458)

57

44

1.29

5.239*

RESPIRATORY DISEASES (460-519)

5

5

1.08

0.033

11

11

0.98

0.003

GENITOURINARY DISEASES (580-629)

1

1

0.85

0.025

SKIN &amp; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUES (680-709)

0

0

0.00

0.111

MUSCULOSKBLBTAL 6 CONNECTIVE TISSUES (710-738)

0

0

0.00

0.287

141

146

CANCERS (140-209, 230-239)

DIGESTIVE DISEASES (520-577)

ACCIDENTS, VIOLENCE &amp; TRAUMA (E800-989)

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED 254
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 21335 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM
ALL U.S. VETERANS WITH NO VIETNAM SERVICE USED AS COMPARISON GROUP

0.96

0.648

�TABLE D-21
DEATHS FROM ACCIDENTS, SUICIDES AND TRAUMA (E800-989)
ALL WHITE SERVICEMEN WHO DIED IN CALIFORNIA
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-799)

796

823

0.97

0.532

MOTOR VEH ACCIDENTS

446

449

0.99

0.074

OTH. TRANSPORT. ACC. (E800-807 , E830-845)

54

55

0.98

0.001

ACC. POISONINGS (E850-877)

97

91

1.06

0.485

ALL OTH ACC. /INJURY (E880-949 ,E970-989)

196

156

1.26

4.203*

SUICIDE (E950-959)

280

305

0.92

1.515

HOMICIDE (E960-969)

158

147

1.07

0.125

(E810-827)

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED • 2027
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 2080 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM
NON-VIETNAM SERVICE VETERANS WHO DIED IN CALIFORNIA USED AS COMPARISON GROUP

�TABLE D-22
DEATHS PROM CANCERS (140-208, 230-239)
ALL WHITE SERVICEMEN WHO DIED IN CALIFORNIA
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

1.01
2.15
2.73
1.72
0.42
0.71
1.12
9.00
1.38
1.32
0.56
0.70
0.00
2.87
0.48
0.63
0.78
0.76
0.24
0.52
1.43
1.62
0.85
0.74

0.966
0.740
0.634
0.435
4.141*
0.078
0.105
0.352
2.017
0.016
0.722
0.161
3.898*
5.384*
1.236
0.999
0.254
0.260
3.154
1.675
0.316
1.037
0.649
2.013

CAUSE

ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-136, 210-228 , 240-E989)
CA - BUCCAL (140-149)
CA - ESOPHAGUS (150)
CA - STOMACH (151)
CA - INTESTINES &amp; OTHER 61 (152-154,158,159)
CA - LIVER, BILE DUCTS (155-156)
CA - PANCREAS (157)
CA - UPPER RESPIRATORY (160-161)
CA - LUNG (162)
CA - BONE (170)
CA - SOFT TISSUES (171)
CA - MELANOMA OF THE SKIN (172)
CA - PROSTATE (185)
CA - TESTIS (186)
CA - BLADDER (188)
CA - KIDNEY (189)
CA - BRAIN (191)
CA - OTHER NERVOUS SYSTEM (192)
CA - THYROID &amp; ENDOCRINE (193-194)
CA - NON-HODGKINS LYMPHOMA (200,202)
CA - HODGKINS DISEASE (201)
CA - MULTIPLE MYELOMA (203)
CA - LEUKEMIA (204-207)
OTH CA ( 163 , 173-4 , 187 , 190 , 195-9 , 208-9 , 230-9)

1782
7
5
10
11
2
9
2
67
4
3
18
0
17
1
5
13
2
2
9
10
5
25
18

1767
3
2
6
26
3
8
0
49
3
5
26
5
6
2
8
17
3
8
17
7
3
29
24

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 2027
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 2080 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM
NON-VIETNAM SERVICE VETERANS WHO DIED IN CALIFORNIA USED AS COMPARISON GROUP

�TABLE D-23
DEATHS FROM SELECTED DISEASES OF THE CIRCULATORY, RESPIRATORY AND DIGESTIVE SYSTEMS
ALL WHITE SERVICEMEN WHO DIED IN CALIFORNIA
OBSERVED
EXPECTED
O/E M-H CHI-SQUARE
CAUSE
ALL OTHER CAUSES (000-398, 580-E989)
HYPERTENSIVE DISEASE (400-404)
ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (410)
OTHER ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE (411-414)
CARDIOMYOPATHY (425)
CARDIAC ARREST (427.2)
CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES (430-438)
DIS OF ARTERIES, ARTERIOLES , CAPILLARIES (440-448)
DIS OF VEINS, LYMPHATICS &amp; OTHERS (450-458)
OTH HEART DISEASES (420-424,426-427.1,427.3-429)
UPPER RESPIRATORY (460-466, 500-508)
INFLUENZA &amp; PNEUMONIA (470-486)
CHRONIC BRONCHITIS &amp; EMPHYSEMA (491-492)
OTHER RESPIRATORY (490, 493, 510-519)
DIS OF ESOPHAGUS, STOMACH, DUODENUM (530-537)
CIRRHOSIS - ALCOHOLIC (571.0)
CIRRHOSIS - OTHER/UNSPECIFIED (571.8, 571.9)
DISEASES OF PANCREAS (577)
OTH DIGESTIVE DISEASES (520-529, 540-570, 572-576)

1684

4
4
98
12
6
34
10
6
14
2
18
6
4
5
53
43
12
12

1711

6
5
100
10
3
36
8
11
10
1
17
1
4
5
46
41
3
10

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED • 2027
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 2080 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM
NON-VIETNAM SERVICE VETERANS WHO DIED IN CALIFORNIA USED AS COMPARISON GROUP

0.98
0.70
0.74
0.98
1.18
1.99
0.93
1.31
0.53
1.43
3.59
1.05
8.88
1.01
1.06
1.14
1.06
3.96
1.24

0.560
0.200
1.136
0.189
0.454
1.851
0.058
0.005
0.762
2.156
0.014
0.011
2.447
0.003
0.354
0.302
0.001
4.740*
0.014

�TABLE D-24
DEATHS FROM SELECTED ORGAN SYSTEMS
ALL WHITE SERVICEMEN WHO DIED IN CALIFORNIA
OBSERVED
EXPECTED

0/E

M-H CHI-SQUARE

CAUSE

59

50

1.19

1.097

3

18

0.17

6.259*

245

260

0.94

0.966

ENDOCRINE, NUTRITIONAL &amp; METABOLIC (240-279)

3

25

0.12

11.714*

BLOOD &amp; BLOOD-FORMING ORGANS (280-289)

3

1

2.12

0.659

13

20

0.66

0.019

(390-458)

314

304

1.03

0.135

RESPIRATORY DISEASES (460-519)

32

25

1.28

0.200

116

103

1.12

0.462

GENITOURINARY DISEASES (580-629)

4

10

0.41

0.282

SKIN &amp; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUES (680-709)

1

5

0.19

1.937

MUSCULOSKELBTAL &amp; CONNECTIVE TISSUES (710-738)

2

3

0.65

0.629

1232

1204

1.02

0.591

ALL OTHER CAUSES (210-28,290-315,740-759,780-796)
INFECTIVE &amp; PARASITIC DISEASES (000-136)
CANCERS (140-209, 230-239)

NERVOUS SYSTEMS &amp; SENSE ORGANS (320-389)
CIRCULATORY DISEASES

DIGESTIVE DISEASES (520-577)

ACCIDENTS, VIOLENCE &amp; TRAUMA (E800-989)

TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES OBSERVED - 2027
EXPECTED NUMBERS ARE BASED UPON 2080 OBSERVATIONS IN COMPARISON GROUP
* P&lt;0.05 FOR CHI-SQUARE WITH 1 DEGREE OF FREEDOM
NON-VIETNAM SERVICE VETERANS WHO DIED IN CALIFORNIA USED AS COMPARISON GROUP

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22523">
              <text>066</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22524">
              <text>1776</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22526">
              <text>Series III Subseries III</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22518">
                <text>Breslin, Patricia</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22519">
                <text>Yvonne Lee</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22520">
                <text>Han Kang</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22521">
                <text>Vicki Burt</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22522">
                <text>Barclay Shepard</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22525">
                <text>Typescript: A Preliminary Report: The Vietnam Veterans Mortality Study, October 1986</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22527">
                <text>VA Mortality Study</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22528">
                <text>mortality trends</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22529">
                <text>lymphomas</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3084" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1597">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/0b3b4e39b54c0e21e0862d51dbdd07d8.pdf</src>
        <authentication>dc7521f9bc623c1d1751220869506a01</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63546">
                    <text>Item ID Number

01775

Author

Burt vickiL

'

Office of Environmental Epidemiology, Department of Su

Roport/Artide TltlB Typescript: Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma in the Vietnam
Veterans Mortality Study, September 1986

Journal/Book Title
000

Yoar

°

Month/Day
Color

n

Number of Images

14

Dosorlpton Notes

Monday, June 11, 2001

Page 1776 of 1793

�NON-HODGKIN'S LYMPHOMA IN THE
VIETNAM VETERANS MORTALITY STUDY

Vicki L. Burt
Patricia Breslin
Han Rang
Yvonne Lee
Michael Feil

Office of Environmental Epidemiology
Department of Surgery and Medicine
Veterans Administration
Washington, D. C. 20306-6000
September, 1986

�INTRODUCTION
This paper describes the findings related to non-Hodgkin's
lymphoma(NHL) in the Vietnam Veteran Mortality Study conducted by
the Veterans Administration. This study was undertaken in
response to concerns that elements of the veterans' experience,
including herbicide exposure, may make the Vietnam veteran group
more susceptible to various diseases.
This proportionate mortality analysis is of deaths found in
the Veterans Administration Beneficiary Identification and
Records Locator Subsystem(BIRLS). This system includes all
veterans whose beneficiaries receive a death benefit. This
file contains a relatively complete roster of veterans' deaths.
The Office of Environmental Epidemiology requested an ascertainment of mortality in the United States Vietnam era veteran
population by the National Academy of Science. Results of this
study showed 97.6 percent of deaths among veterns who served in
Vietnam were recorded in BIRLS and 82.5 percent of the other
Vietnam era veterans' deaths were shown in BIRLS. Of those not
serving in Vietnam the distribtion of causes of death is not
different between the 82.5 percent present and the 17.5 percent
not found in BIRLS for cancer or other causes. See Appendix for
distribution of causes of death.
METHODS
Study Population
Proceeding under the assumption that the BIRLS system had
the potential for yielding a reasonably complete roster of
deceased Vietnam era veterans, it was necessary to devise
strategies to select these deaths from among all deaths recorded
in BIRLS. The selection process was done in several stages.
First, it was necessary to obtain as complete a list as possible
of all veterans who were likely to have served during the Vietnam
era. To do this, all veterans whose service dates included the
period 1964-1975 were selected. In addition, for those records
where the service dates were missing, veterans whose birthdates
were given as falling between 1935 and 1957 inclusive were
selected. This yielded about 815,000 records.
Recalling the purpose of the study, to compare the mortality
patterns of men who served in Vietnam with those who did not
serve in Vietnam, additional criteria were introduced based on
time of service and branch of service.
The Vietnam era as defined by the Veterans Administration,
was August 5, 1964 to May 7, 1975. Prior to July 1965 and after
January 1973 there were relatively few troops in Vietnam. Thus,
if one sampled deaths among those who served before 1965 or after
January 1, 1973, there would be relatively few decedents who had

�served in Vietnam. Thus the study population was limited to
military personnel who were in the Armed Forces on July 4, 1965
or who entered service after that date but before March 1, 1973.
Data published by the Department of Defense indicate that 81
percent of those who served in Vietnam were in the Army or Marine
Corps. For these branches of service, duty in Vietnam meant, in
most cases, service "in country". For those in the Air Force or
Navy, Vietnam service often is not so clear cut. It may be
difficult to determine whether Navy personnel who were considered
to have Vietnam service were ever actually "in country" of if Air
Force personnel who were in the Vietnam theatre of operations and
flew missions over Vietnam or to Vietnam were ever "in country".
Hence the study population was limited even furthur to persons
who served in the Army or Marine Corps between the dates given
above. Since this was to be a proportional mortality study and
deaths related to the operations of war could only occur in those
who served in Southeast Asia and not among those who served
elsewhere, deaths occuring among personnel on active duty before
the end of 1973 wre excluded. The target population as defined
by these criteria consisted of 186,000 veterans who died between
July 4, 1965 and February 1982 when the study was initiated.
In order to achieve adequate statistical power, it was
determined that the study should consist of at least 50,000
eligible cases. It was assumed that some of the cases selected
from the target population would not meet the criteria for the
study. Therefore the sample size was increased to allow for
these anticipated losses. Ultimately, 76,517 names of veterans
were randomly selected from the target population.
Military records were searched for all these names (Table
1). Records were found for all but 1032(1.4%) of the names
selected; 52,283 of the veterans whose records were found were
determined to meet the criteria of the study. That is, they had
served with the Army or Marine Corps any time between July 4,
1965 and March 1, 1973. For those men who met the criteria of
the study, dates, place of service, military occupation; type of
discharge and other demographic data were abstracted from their
military records.
Cause of death information has been obtained for 51,421
(98.4%) of the 52,283 men who were determined to be eligible for
the study(Table 2). The cause of death in all cases was coded by
trained nosologists using the International Classification of
Disease, 8th edition (ICDA-8).
All data given in this report will be based on the 51,421
veterans for whom both military service data and cause of death
information are available.
Abstracted Information
Items of information abstracted from the death certificates

�were: age at last birthday, date of death, underlying cause of
death, sex, state of death, race, and histology type if cause of
death was cancer.
From the military record the following information was
obtained: date first in service, date last in service, branch, date
of birth, sex, race, military occupation specialty codes(MOSC),
education level, and whether served in Southeast Asia or not.
For those serving in Southeast Asia additional information was
collected: date first in Southeast Asia, date last in Southeast
Asia, units served in, and countries served in.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Proportionate mortality ratios, standardized for age(SPMRs)
were calculated. Categories of age were: less than 20, 2024,...,60-64 and 65 and over. SPMRs for categories of cancer are
presented in this paper. Vietnam era veterans that did not serve
in Southeast Asia were the reference population. Of the 51,421
veterans' deaths in this study 24,736 had served in Southeast
Asia, 26,685 had not(Table 3). Southeast Asia veterans that did
not go to Vietnam were at most 1.8 percent. SPMRs were calculated for the following subgroups: all army, all marines, and
white and nonwhite for army and marines. The Mantel-Haenszel
chi-square statistic was calculated for each category to indicate
whether the deviation from unity was likely to be seen by chance.
A more detailed analysis of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma(NHL) for
Marine Corps veterans and black Army veterans is presented.
Case control analyses(Miettinen and Wang) were carried out
to examine the relationship between mortality from non-Hodgkin's
lymphoma and service in Southeast Asia. Controls for this
analysis were all cardiovascular deaths(ICDA-8 codes: 390.0458.9). These were chosen because both in this mortality study
and several others (Anderson, et al; Holmes, et al; Kogan and
Clapp; and The Surgeon General, USAF) no association was found
between Vietnam service and cardiovascular mortality. Also, no
biologic hypothesis exists suggesting a relationship between
service in Vietnam or synonymously Southeast Asia and cardiovascular mortality. All analyses were standardized by age
to control for confounding by age.
The disadvantages of the SPMR are well known. For example,
if the overall mortality rate is different in the exposed and.
non-exposed populations the SPMR will not approximate the standardized mortality ratio(SMR). That is, if the overall mortality
rate is less in other Vietnam era veterans then the cause specific SPMRs will be overestimated for the Southeast Asia veterans.
Also, the cause specific SPMR is dependent on the relative
distribution of other causes of death. For example, if Southeast
Asia veterans had a higher mortality rate for accidents than the
referrent population, then the SPMR for cancer might be
abnormally decreased. The case control analysis is not dependent
on this second factor. Also, in case control analysis, if the

�exposure of interest is not a risk factor for the selected
control group the standardized mortality odds ratio(SMOR) is
equivalent to the SMR.
Because of the relative homogeneity of several variables
(education, type of discharge, and grade) and correlation of
others, it was not felt that significant information would be
gained from a multivariate analysis.
RESULTS
The SPMRs presented in Table 4 reveal that only those for
lung cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in Marines are significantly greater that 1 using the Mantel-Haenszel chi-square statistic. The results in the following Tables refer only to NHL,
detailed analysis of lung cancer deaths in the Marine Corps wil
be presented in a separate paper. Nineteen of twenty-four nonwhite Southeast Asia veterans whose race was not white veterans
with NHL were black Army veterans, 3 were in the Marine Corps,
and 2 were Army Southeast Asia veterans with race unknown. The
SPMR of 1.53 for nonwhite Southeast Asia veterans has a chisquare statistic of 2.30 and corresponding p-value of 0.14. Because the majority are black Army veterans and despite the lack
of statistical significance for the nonwhite category, parallel
analyses of NHL were done for the subgroup, black Army veterans,
as well as for the Marine Corps. The black Marines are included
in the Marine analysis. Those with unknown race were excluded
from furthur analysis.
The comparison group for the MORs and SMORs in Tables 5-7f
are all cardiovascular deaths. Table 5 presents the age distribution of NHL deaths in these two subgroups. In Table 6 age
specific MORs are presented. Marines age 30 through 39 at death
have a mortality odds ratio of 5.07 and lower 95% level of 1.49.
An overall SMOR, 2.05, standardized for age is presented in Table
7a. The lower 95 percent confidence level is 1.81.
Tables 7b-7g present SMORs for various categories of data
collected for these individuals. Grade in service, education
level and type of discharge are not presented because of lack of
variation of these variables. Ninety-seven percent of the individuals of Table 5 were enlisted personnel, 96 percent were
honorable discharges, and more that three quarters had a high
school education with other education levels sparsely distributed. Because the values for the categories in Tables 7d and 7e
are only present for Southeast Asia veterans all other Vietnam
era veterans served as the comparison group for each category.
In Tables 7b, 7c, and 7f all veterans have recorded data for the
categories therefore the comparison group is all other Vietnam
era veterans for that specific category. In Table 7g each ICDA-8
code was compared to all cardiovascular deaths.
Military Occupation Specialty Codes(MOSCs) were categorized
as combat troops, direct support of combat troops, and indirect

�MOSCs(Table Ic) had the highest SMOR for military occupations at
6.23. A description of the categories of MOSC appear in the
Appendix.
Our data base included the dates a veteran first and last
served in Southeast Asia. If the difference between these two
dates was greater than 13 months there is a significant likelihood this veteran went to Southeast Asia more that once,
therefore this analysis is presented as a potential proxy for
more than one tour in Southeast Asia. Table 7e presents SMORs by
the first year the veteran was in Southeast Asia. Because of the
different volumes and contamination of herbicides used during the
Vietnam conflict, veterans deaths were categorized by year of
first Southeast Asia service. The overwhelming majority of
herbicides were applied in 1967 through 1969. Southeast Asia
veterans first going to Southeast Asia these years had the
highest SMORs.
Table 7f is a categorizaion of the interval between first
going in the military and final discharge. Some veterans may
have had 2 or more non-contiguous enlistments. Because this is
relatively rare the greater than 4 years category may represent
veterans that made the military a "career1. These individuals
serving more that 4 years did not have an increased SMOR.
Table 7g presents SMORs by ICDA-8 coding. The Marine Corps
SMOR for ICDA-8 code 200 is elevated. This code includes
reticulum-cell sarcoma and lymphosarcoma. In contrast, black
Army veterans have a SMOR of 3.82 for ICDA-8 code 202(giant
follicular lymphoma, mycosis fungoides, and other lymphomas).
DISCUSSION
Numerous studies have, revealed an association between
herbicide use and NHL. A recent population based case control
study(Hoar, et al) presented an odds ratio of 2.2(CI 1.2-4.1)
for farmers ever using phenoxyacetic acids. A matched case
control study(Hardell, et al) of malignant lymphomas(Hodgkin's
disease and NHL) showed a calculated relative risk of 4.8 for
exposure to phenoxy acids. In that study persons with
concommittant high-grade exposure to chlorophenols were excluded.
Because Agent Orange and other herbicides used in Vietnam contain
phenoxyacetic acids, it is essential to attempt to associate a
level of exposure to one or more of these agents to a particular
individual. Future efforts of the Office of Environmental
Epidemiology include associating location of a Southeast Asia veteran's
unit with known spraying missions. Also, an additional sample of
veterans' deaths from 1982-1984 is being prepared. From this
furthur data we hope to see if disproportionate deaths from NHL
continues to occur among veterans with Southeast Asia exposure.

�BIBLIOGRAPHY
Anderson, Henry A., et al. Wisconsin Vietnam Veteran Mortality
Study. March, 1986.
Decoufle, Pierre, Thomas, Terry L. an Pickle, Linda W. "Comparison
of the Proportionate Mortality Ratio and Standardized Mortality
Ratio Risk Measures." American Journal of Epidemiology 111:
263-69, 1980.
Directorate for Information, Operations and Reports. Department
of Defense Selected Manpower Statistics Fiscal Year 1981.
Hardell, L., et al. "Malignant Lymphoma and Exposure to
Chemicals Especialy Organic Solvents, Chlorophenols and
Phenoxy Acids: A Case-Control Study". British Journal of
Cancer 43: 169-76. 1981.
Hoar, S. K., et al. "Agricultural Herbicide Use and Risk of
Lymphoma and Soft-Tissue Sarcoma". Journal of the American Medical
Association 256: 1141-47. September 5, 1986.
Holmes, Alan P., et al. West Virginia Vietnam-Era Veterans Mortality
S tudy. January, 1986.
Kogan, Michael D. and Clapp, Richard W. Mortality Among Vietnam
Veterans in Massachusetts. 1972-1983. January 25, 1985.
Kupper, L. L., et al. "On the Utility of Proportional Mortality
Analysis." Journal of Chronic Disease 31: 15-22, 1978.
Lawrence, Charles E. et al. "Mortality Patterns Among Vietnam
and Vietnam Era Veterans." American Journal of Public
Health 75: 277-79, 1985.
Milham, Jr., Samuel. "Methods of Occupational Mortality Studies."
Journal of Occupational Medicine 17: 581-85.
Miettinen, O. S. and Wang, J. "An Alternative to the Proportionate Mortality Ratio". Amerian Journal of Epidemiology
114: 144-48. 1981.
National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council,
Commission on Life Sciences, Medical Follow-up Agency.
Ascertainment of Mortality in the U. S. Vietnam Veteran
Population. 1985.
Public Health Service. Eighth International Classification of
Diseases Adapted to the United States.
Spiegelman, D., Wang, J., and Wegman, D. "Epidemiologic Programs
for Computers and Calculators". American Journal of Epidemiology
118: 599-607. 1983.
The Surgeon General, United States Air Force. An Epidemiologic
Investigation of Health Effects in Air Force Personnel Following
Exposure to Herbicides. June 30, 1983.

APPENDIX
1. The following is a description of the Military Occupation
Service Codes. The exact codes used are identical to
those used in the Wisconsin Vietnam Veteran Mortality Study
(Anderson,et al).

�Combat. Occupations with primary duty involving direct
offensive and defensive actions against an armed hostile enemy
force. For example: rifleman, assaultman, field artillary
batteryman, or mortar man.
Direct. Occupations with
combat troops that may involve
indirect contact with an armed
electrical systems technician,
field radio operator.

primary duty involving support of
limited direct and/or extensive
hostile force. For example:
bulk fuel specialist, wireman or

Indirect. Occupations with primary duty involving indirect
support of combat and/or direct support troops that does not
involve contact with an armed hostile force. For example: cook,
aircraft ballistics computer technician, radar repairman, and
clerk.
2. The following are ICDA-8 codes associated with the
categorization of cancer mortality in Table 4.
Category
Other causes
Buccal
Esophagus
Stomach
Intestines, etc.
Liver, biliary
Pancreas
Upper resp.
Lung
Bone
Soft tissue
Melanoma
Prostate
Testis
Bladder
Kidney
Brain
Other nervous system
Thyroid and endocrine
Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
Hodgkin's
Multiple Myeloma
Leukemia
Other cancer

ICDA-8 Code
0-136,210-228,240-989
140-149
150
151
152-154,158,159
155-156
157
160-161
162
170
171
172
185
186
188
189
191
192
193-194
200,202
201
203
204-207
163,173-174,187,190,195199,208-209,230-239

�3* The following is the distribution of caus,es of death
from the National Academy of Sciences Ascertainment of Mortality
in the U. S. Vietnam Veteran Population for all veterans not •
going to Vietnam. Forty-five percent of these veterans were
Vietnam era veterans. The 'other1 category includes cardiovascular disease.
Cause
Cancer
Other
Motor Vehicle
Suicide
Homocide
Other Trauma
Unknown
Total

Found in BIRLS
No.(%)
97(9.7)
231(23.0)

Not Found in Birls
No.(%)

237(23.6)
163(16.2)
123(12.2)
42(4.2)
112(11.1)

23(9.6)
58(24.2)
52(21.7)
25(10.4)
38(15.8)
13(5.4)
31(12.9)

1005(100.0)

240(100.0)

�TABLE 1:

The Study Sample—Military Records Search.
Number

Percent

75617

100.0%

1032

1.4%

Records found, ineligible

22302

29.5%

Records found, eligible

52283

69.1%

All names selected
Records not found

Ineligibility was based on: a. wrong branch of
service, b. wrong time of service

Table 2:

Results of Death Certificate Search.
Number
52283

Coded cause of death

Table 3;

1.6%

51421

No cause of death

100.0%

862

Eligible cases

Percent

98.4%

Distribution of Eligible Deaths by Branch
of Service, Race, and Place of Service.
Army

Marines

Other
Service

Southeast
Asia

15734
1
Nonwhite 4399

18215

3943

3120

4689

760

661

20133

22904

4603

3781

Southeast
Asia
White

1 Nonwhite includes unknown race.

Other
Service

�Table 4;

Standardized Proportionate Mortality Ratios
(SPMRs) by Branch of Service and Race.

1

2

SPMR

Army

Marines

Other causes
Buccal
Esophagus
Stomach
Intestines, etc.
Liver, biliary
Pancreas
Upper resp.
Lung
Bone
Soft tissue
Melanoma
Prostate
Testis
Bladder
Kidney
Brain
Other nervous
Thyroid, endo.
Non-Hodgkin ' s
Hodgkin ' s
Multiple Myeloma
Leukemia
Other cancer

1.00
0.92
1.29
1.13
0.97

0.98
2.21
0.39
0.81
1.25
1.20
1.62
0.18
1.57*
1.35
0.70
0.93
1.29
1.26
2.39
0.95
1.05
0.92
0.56
2.08*
1.37
0.45
1.12
1.06

1.01
0.88
1.19
1.03
0.86
1.03
1.04
0.89
1.11
0.61
0.89
0.96
0.55*
0.58
0.82
1.15
0.80
0.88
1.03

White

Nonwhite

1.00
1.09
0.90
0.99
1.05
1.28
0.98
0.99
1.09
1.03
0.93
0.99
0.68
1.20
0.90
0.83
0.99
0.62*
0.58
0.89
1.22
0.68
0.89
1.00

* p-value for Mantel-Haenszel chi-square 1 degree of
freedom &lt; .05.
1 See Appendix from respective ICDA-8 codes.
2 Nonwhite includes unknown race.

0.99
0.85
1.72
1.33
0.82
0.69
0.82
1.13
1.11
0.59
1.06
3.33
3.16
0.60
0.28
1.56
0.85
0.43
0.57
1.53
1.01
1.21
1.14
1.23

�Table 5;

Age Distribution of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma.

Black Army

Marines
SE Asia
Service

Non SE Asia
Service

SE Asia
Service

Non SE Asia
Service

20-29

7

4

4

3

30-39

23

3

13

4

40-49

2

2

2

1

50-59

2

1

0-

1

60+

1

0

0

0

35

10

19

10

Total

1
Table 6:

Age Specific Mortality Odds Ratios
for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma.

Marines

Black Army
MOR(LCI,UCI)

MOR(LCI,UCI)
20-29

2.17(0.60,7.75)

3.15(0.67,14.8)

*
30-39

5.07(1.49,17.2)

2.86(0.92,8.86)

40-49

0.28(0.04,2.02)

0.53(0.07,3.85)

50-59

0.95(0.08,10.7)

60+

1.58(0.05,48.8)

**

* p-value for Mantel-Haenszel chi square &lt; .01.
** number of exposed cases is one.
1 Cardiovascular deaths are the control population.

�1
Table 7a;

Overall Standardized Mortality Odds Ratio
for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma.
Marines
SMOR(LCI,UCI)
2.05(1.81,2.30)

Black Army
SMOR(LCI,UCI)
1.78(0.93,3.42)

1 Cardiovascular deaths are the control population.

Table 7b;

1
Standardized Mortality Odds Ratio for
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma by Year of Death.
Marines
SMOR(LCI,UCI)

Black Army
SMOR(LCI,UCI)

1965-76

2.70(0.80,9.19)

0.58(0.00,280.)

1977-79

1.79(0.51,6.21)

1.79(0.64,5.06)

1980-82

2.57(0.94,7.06)

2.90(0.76,11.0)

1 Cardiovascular deaths are the control population.

Table 7c;

1
Standardized Mortality Odds Ratio for
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma by Military Occupation Specialty Code(MOSC).
Marines
SMOR(LCI,UCI)

Combat

Black Army
SMOR(LCI,UCI)

Direct

6.23(1.28,30.2)
2
0.72(
,
)

2.20(0.58,8.38)
1.35(0.58,3.15)

Indirect

2.31(0.39,13.9)

1.95(0.57,6.73)

1 Cardiovascular deaths are the control population.
2 Confidence interval not calculated.

�Table 7d:

Standardized Mortality Odds Ratio for
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma by Potential
Tours of Service in Southeast Asia.
Marines
SMOR(LCI,UCI)

Black Army
SMOR(LCI,UCI)

LE 13 MO

2.39(1.26,4.53)

1.73(0.79,3.80)

GT 13 MO

1.23(0.78,1.93)

1.92(0.91,4.05)

1 Cardiovascular deaths are the control population,

Table 7e:

Standardized Mortality Odds Ratio for
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma by First Year
in Southeast Asia.
Marines
SMOR(LCI,UCI)

Black Army
SMOR(LCI,UCI)

1965-66

1.76(1.02,3.03)

1.89(0.72,4.95)

1967-69

2.51(1.22,5.21)

1.96(0.94,4.10)

1970+

1.68(0.39,7.18)

0.73(0.11,4.81)

* Number of exposed cases is one.
1 Cardiovascular deaths are the control population.

Table 7f:

Standardized Mortality Odds Ratio for
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma by Potential
Years in Military Service.
Marines
SMOR(LCI,UCI)

Black Army
SMOR(LCI,UCI)

LE 4 YRS

3.61(1.49,8.73)

2.93(1.29,6.66)

GT 4 YRS

0.85(-

0.55(0.12,2.57)

1 Cardiovascular deaths are the control population.
2 Confidence interval not calculated.

�1
Table 7q;

Standardized Mortality Odds Ratio for
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma by ICDA-8 Code.
Marines
SMOR(LCI,UCI)

Black Army
SMOR(LCI,UCI)

Code=200

2.33(1.12,4.85)

1.12(0.65,1.92)

Code=202

1.85(0.82,4.18)

3.82(1.15,12.7)

1 Cardiovascular deaths are the control population,

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22509">
              <text>066</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22511">
              <text>1775</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22513">
              <text>Series III Subseries III</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22504">
                <text>Burt, Vicki L.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22505">
                <text>Patricia Breslin</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22506">
                <text>Han Kang</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22507">
                <text>Yvonne Lee</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22508">
                <text>Michael Feil</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22510">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;Office of Environmental Epidemiology, Department of Surgery and Medicine, VA</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22512">
                <text>Typescript: Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma in the Vietnam Veterans Mortality Study, September 1986</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22514">
                <text>VA Mortality Study</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22515">
                <text>lymphomas</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22516">
                <text>cancer risk assessment</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22517">
                <text>mortality trends</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3082" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22490">
              <text>066</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22491">
              <text>1773</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22493">
              <text>Series III Subseries III</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22489">
                <text>Carroll, Ray</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22492">
                <text>Letter: from Ray Carroll to Maurice [LeVois], August 26, 1982</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22494">
                <text>study protocol</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22495">
                <text>mortality trends</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3060" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1577">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/a2014b3553892ab52b1151ea01b44fa8.pdf</src>
        <authentication>5ec475115a2c1e9c6816c01d86c0142f</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63526">
                    <text>Item ID Number

01744

Author

Boyle, Collen A.

Corporate Author

Center for Environmental Health and Injury Control, CD

RODOrt/ArtlOlO Title Typescript: Postservice Mortality Among Vietnam
Veterans, February 1987

Journal/Book Title
Year

000

°

Month/Day
Color

'"'

Number of Images

148

Descripton Notes

CEH#86-oo76

Monday, June 11, 2001

Page 1745 of 1793

�CEH # 8 - 0 6
607

POSTSERVICE MORTALITY AMONG VIETNAM VETERANS

Coleen A. Boyle, Pierre Decoufle, Robert 7. Delaney, Frank DeStefano,
Melinda L. Flock, Martha I. Hunter, M. Riduan Joesoef, John M. Karon,
Marilyn L. Kirk, Peter M. Layde, Daniel L. McGee, Linda A. Moyer,
Daniel A. Pollock, Philip Rhodes, Mark J. Scally, Robert M. Worth.

February 1987

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE

Centers for Disease Control
Center for Environmental Health
Atlanta, Georgia 30333

�FEB l 3 1987
AGENT Utwwt rhuucuio UFFICt
(10X2)

�ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Many other individuals and organizations have provided invaluable support
to the study. These include the Agent Orange Working Group and its Science
Panel; Army Reserve Personnel Center, U.S. Army and Joint Services
Environmental Support Group, Department of Defense; National Personnel Records
Center, National Archives and Records Administration; General'Services
Administration; Veterans Administration; National Center for Health
Statistics; Social Security Administration; Internal Revenue Service;
Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences; other staff members of
the Centers for Disease Control, and outside consultants who contributed their
unique expertise.

�TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
SUMMARY
1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Ganeral Background of the Study
1.2 Previous Mortality Studies of Vietnam Veterans
1.3 Rationale and Research Questions
2. STUDY GROUP DEFINITION, DATA COLLECTION. AND FOLLOW-UP

2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5

Criteria for Inclusion
Sample Size and Power
.Selection of Veterans
Collection of Data from Military Personnel Files
Vital Status Ascertainment
2.5.1 Inservice Deaths
2.5.2 Postservice Deaths
2.6 Determination of Cause of Death
2.6.1 Death Certificates
2.6.2 Medical Review Panel - Supplementary Records
3. METHODS OF ANALYSIS

3.1 Definition of Critical Variables
3.1.1 Place of Service
3.1.2 Coyariates
3.1.3 Cause-of-Death Categorization
3.2 .Internal Comparisons
3.3 External Comparisons
4. RESULTS

4.1 Distribution of Covariates for Vietnam
and Non-Vietnam Veterans
4.2 Analysis of All-Cause Mortality
4.2.1 Crude Results
4.2.2 Consideration of Covariates
4.2.3 Influence of Inservice Deaths
4.2.4 Influence of Incomplete Follow-up
4.3 Analysis of Cause-Specific Mortality
4.3.1 Cause of Death Based on Death Certificates
4.3.2 Cause of Death Based on Medical Review
4.3.3 Consideration of Covariates
4.4 Comparison of Veteran and U.S. Death Rates
5. DISCUSSION
5.1 Strengths and Limitations

5.2 Comparison with Previous Mortality Studies
of Vietnam Veterans
5.3 Possible Interpretations and Conclusions

,

�6. REFERENCES

/

APPENDIX A:
APPENDIX B:
APPENDIX C:
APPENDIX D:
APPENDIX E:
APPENDIX F:

Detailed Distributions of Veteran Characteristics
Detailed Examination of All-Cause Mortality by Selected
Covariates
Detailed Characteristics of Men Killed in Action
Mortality from Motor Vehicle Accidents, Suicide; and
Drug-Related Causes by Selected Covariates
Details of Medical-Review-Panel Findings
Cox Regression Model

�SUMMARY

;

This report presents results of the mortality component of the Vietnam
Experience Study (VES). The VES is a historical cohort study in which the.
health of 9,324 Vietnam veterans is compared with that of 8,989 Vietnam-era
veterans who served in Korea, Germany, or the United States. Eligibility for
the study was limited to male U.S. Army veterans who first entered military
service between 1965 and 1971, served a single term of enlistment, and were
discharged in the enlisted pay grades E-l to E-5. Participants were randomly
selected from computerized lists of accession numbers of military personnel
files of Army veterans discharged during the relevant time period.
Ascertainment of deaths occurring after discharge from active duty and before
January 1, 1984 was done using several methods, ranging from computer linkages
to personal contact with next-of-kin, resulting in practically complete death
ascertainment for both cohorts. In addition to an analysis based on
death-certificate cause of death, a medical review panel independently
assigned an underlying cause of death using information from supplemental
sources, including hospital records, autopsy reports, personal physician
contacts, and coroner and law enforcement files.
Veterans of service in Vietnam were found to experience a 17% higher rate
of postservice mortality than veterans who served in Korea, Germany, or the
United States. As expected in such a study of young men, the majority of
deaths in both cohorts were due to external causes. The most noteworthy
pattern of overall mortality was the changing difference between Vietnam and
non-Vietnam veterans over time. During the first 5 years postdischarge,
mortality among Vietnam veterans was 1.45 times the death rate of non-Vietnam
veterans (95X 01=1.08-1.95). During the succeeding years, there was virtually
no difference between the two groups (RR=1.01, 95X 01=0.79-1.28). This
pattern was generally consistent across most demographic and military
subgroups of veterans. However, there was some indication 'that Vietnam
veterans with some physical impairment at entry into service, those who were
drafted into service, and those discharged before 1970 were at an especially
high risk of dying during the first 5 years after discharge compared with
their non-Vietnam counterparts. When the data were stratified by type of
military unit and military occupational specialty, the relative risks of
mortality were similar for those more or less likely to have engaged in
combat. Unlike the finding of especially high excess mortality among
Australian Vietnam veterans who served in the Engineer Corps, no excess was
found among engineers in this study.
External causes accounted for most of the increased mortality in 'the early
postservice period. Deaths due to motor vehicle accidents (MVA) were
significantly increased during this time (RR=1.93, 95X 01=1.16-3.22). A more
detailed examination of MVA deaths did not indicate any particular factor that
could explain the overall excess in Vietnam veterans. The increased risk did
not appear to be related to elevated blood alcohol levels at the time of
death, and the risk was evident regardless of the type of MVA. Drug use
information on MVA victims was limited, and the medical review panel
identified only one drug-related MVA death from available supplementary
records. Suicide and homicide showed similar increases (RRs=1.72, 95X
01=0.76-3.88 and 1.52, 95X 01=0.59-3.91, respectively) in the early follow-up
period but the rate ratios were not statistically different from 1.0.
Mortality from accidental poisoning was elevated throughout the follow-up
period, although the number of such deaths was small. Most of these involved

�the use of illicit drugs. When all drug-related deaths identified by the
medical review panel were analyzed together, there appeared to be an
increasing relative risk with number of years since discharge. The only
natural cause of death category for which the mortality rate among Vietnam
veterans differed from that among non-Vietnam veterans was circulatory system
diseases. Vietnam veterans had a surprising deficit in such deaths relative
to non-Vietnam veterans (RR=0.49, 95% 01=0.25-0.99). Statistical adjustment
for potential confounders had little effect on the results, except for suicide
where adjustment increased the RR in the early postservice period to 2.54
(death certificate data).
These results are similar to previous observations of increased mortality
from external causes among World War II and Korean War combat veterans. In
contrast, broader cross sections of World War II veterans, including combat
and noncombat groups, showed no difference, or even a deficit, in
postdischarge traumatic deaths, as did non-Vietnam veterans in this study.
Although the influence of factors specific to the Vietnam experience cannot be
completely ruled out, our findings and those of prior studies suggest that the
postservice.excess of traumatic deaths among Vietnam veterans is probably
related to unusual stresses the veterans endured while -stationed in a war
zone.
The pattern of drug-related mortality among Vietnam veterans seems to
differ from that of external causes of death. The drug-related excess is most
pronounced among draftees, among those whose jobs involved combat operations,
and among those who served in Vietnam during 1968 and 1969, the years of
heaviest combat activity. Thus, the increased death rate from drug-related
causes among Vietnam veterans may be linked to intensity of combat exposure
rather than to a general effect of the Vietnam experience.
This mortality assessment of Vietnam veterans is an incomplete evaluation
of their health experience. Additional data on the present and past health
status of living Vietnam veterans will be forthcoming from the health
interview and the medical, psychological, and laboratory evaluation components
of the VES. Furthermore, since this group of veterans has not yet reached the
age-span where chronic diseases have an important impact on mortality,
continued monitoring of mortality among VES participants may provide
additional insights.

-2-

�1.

INTRODUCTION

In response to Vietnam veterans' concerns about their health, the Centers
for Disease Control (CDC) has proposed three distinct, but related,
epideroiologic studies:
a) The Vietnam Experience Study (VES) is a historical cohort study to
ascertain whether adverse health effects are associated with service
in Vietnam.
b) The Agent Orange Study is a historical cohort study to ascertain
whether men with possible exposure to the phenoxy herbicide code-named
Agent Orange while in Vietnam, have experienced any health problems
related to that exposure.
c) The Selected Cancers Study is a concurrent, population-based
case-control study to ascertain whether Vietnam veterans are at
increased risk of particular types of cancer that occur too
infrequently to be evaluated adequately in the two cohort studies.
The first two studies include three methods of health assessment: a
mortality-assessment, health interviews of living veterans, and a clinical,
psychological, and laboratory assessment of a random sample of those who
complete the health interview. This report presents results of the mortality
component of the VES.
1.1.

GENERAL BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

Many Vietnam veterans believe that their service in Vietnam and, more
specifically, their exposure to Agent Orange have increased their risks for a
wide variety of illnesses. Health concerns include dermatologic conditions,
cancer, and congenital anomalies among their offspring. Unfortunately, little
objective evidence about the physical health of Vietnam veterans is available.
In response to these concerns and the lack of objective data, the United
States Congress passed two laws mandating that the Veterans Administration
(VA) conduct epidemiologic studies of the health of veterans of the Vietnam
conflict. Public Law 96-151 (1979) specifies the conduct of an
epidemiological study of U.S. veterans to assess the possible health effects
of exposure to herbicides and associated dioxins during the Vietnam
conflict.1 Public Law 97-72 (1981) expands this mandate to include the
study of other environmental exposures that may have occurred in Vietnam.2
In January 1983, the responsibility for the design, conduct, and analysis of
studies responsive to these laws, first assigned to the VA, was transferred by
an Interagency Agreement to CDC. In May 1983, CDC prepared a draft protocol
that underwent extensive peer review,* and in November 1983, issued a revised
protocol.^

* This included formal reviews by the Office of Technology Assessment Agent
Orange Advisory Panel, the DHHS Advisory Committee on Special Studies Relating
to Possible Long-Term Health Effects of Phenoxy Herbicides and Contaminants
("Ranch Hand Panel"), the Agent Orange Working Group Science Panel, and a
Centers for Disease Control Ad Hoc Review Panel.4

•"«*«•»

�1.2.

PREVIOUS MORTALITY STUDIES OF VIETNAM VETERANS

When tine present study was designed, little was known about the long-term
physical health consequences, including death, of military service in
Vietnam. Since that time, six mortality studies of Vietnam veterans have been
reported. Five were conducted in the United States, and the sixth dealt with
Australian military personnel who served in Vietnam.
The first of the five mortality studies of U.S. servicemen was conducted
by the U.S. Air Force.5 It was a retrospective cohort study of Air Force
personnel involved in the aerial herbicide spraying operation in Vietnam
designated "Operation Ranch Hand." Although the differences were not
statistically significant. Ranch Hand flight crews had slightly lower death
rates than other Air Force personnel of similar military rank and occupation,
and Ranch Hand ground personnel had slightly higher death rates than the
comparison group. However, since the principal concern of the Ranch Hand
Study was the adverse health effects of herbicide exposure in this unique
group of veterans, the relevance of the Ranch Hand results to our study is
questionable.
Four other mortality studies of U.S. Vietnam male veterans were conducted
by the State health departments of Massachusetts, New York, Wisconsin, and
West Virginia.6'9 All were death certificate-based proportionate mortality
studies, which are useful in detecting unusual patterns in cause-specific
deaths. However, without actual mortality rates it is difficult to determine
whether an increased frequency for one cause of death reflects a true rise in
risk for that cause or a deficit in other causes of death. In addition, the
Massachusetts and West Virginia studies are based on nonrandom samples of
deaths, and it is unclear whether some selectivity in identifying deaths
occurred.
The Massachusetts study compared causes of death among Vietnam veterans
with those'among Vietnam-era veterans who did not serve in Vietnam and among
nonveteran males from Massachusetts.6 Vietnam service was determined from a
computer-based list of veterans who had applied for a military service bonus
awarded by the Massachusetts Office of Veterans Services. The most striking
finding of the study was a markedly increased number of connective tissue
cancers in Vietnam veterans (9 observed versus 1 expected, based on the
mortality pattern of non-Vietnam veterans). No other causes of death were
significantly elevated in Vietnam veterans.
The study by the New York State Department of Health compared
.,
cause-specific mortality patterns of New York State Vietnam veteran's with
those for non-Vietnam veterans.? Vietnam service status was determined by
matching the computer-based record systems of the Defense Manpower Data Center
(Department of Defense) and the VA Beneficiary Identification and Record
Locator Subsystem (BIRLS). The strongest association with Vietnam service
involved deaths from nonmotor-vehicle injuries of transport.
The Wisconsin study examined mortality among Vietnam veterans, other
Vietnam-era veterans, veterans not of the Vietnam era, and nonveterans within
the State of Wisconsin.8 Deaths among Vietnam era veterans were identified
from a Wisconsin Department of Veteran Affairs Graves Registration File, and
Vietnam status was determined from military personnel files. Relative to
other Vietnam-era veterans, those who served in Vietnam had excess mortality
from cancer of the pancreas, diseases of the genitourinary system, and
pneumonia. An excess of connective tissue cancer was noted when Vietnam
veterans were compared with veterans not of the Vietnam era (5 deaths observed

�I versus 0.3 expected). No significant excess was noted, however, when Vietnam
veterans were compared with other Vietnam era veterans or with nonveterans (5
deaths observed versus 3 expected).
The West Virginia study examined causes of death among deceased
Vietnam-era veterans who had been given a military service bonus by the State
Department of Veterans Affairs.9 Among 615 such veterans who had served in
Vietnam there was a slightly larger proportional mortality ratio (PMR=1.11)
for suicide and for motor-vehicle accidents (PMR=1.07), using for comparison
the general male population of the same age. Non-Vietnam veterans exhibited
about the same results for motor-vehicle accidents, but their suicide
experience was not unusual. Both Vietnam and non-Vietnam veterans experienced
increased mortality from cancer of the respiratory tract, but increases in
relative frequency of death from cancer of connective tissues (3 observed
versus 0.7 expected) and Hodgkin's disease (5 observed versus 2.4 expected)
were confined to Vietnam veterans. When Vietnam veterans were compared
directly with non-Vietnam veterans, these excesses persisted, and, in
addition, there were more deaths among Vietnam veterans from testicular cancer
(3 observed versus 0.6 expected).
The study of Australian Vietnam veterans was a retrospective follow-up of
mortality from 1965 to 1981 among 19,205 Vietnam veterans and 25,677 veterans
who did not serve in Vietnam.10 Both groups had a lower overall mortality
rate than the general population of Australian men of similar age, but Vietnam
veterans had a 29% higher overall death rate than those who did not serve in
Vietnam. Interestingly, the excess was due mainly to an increased rate among
Vietnam veterans in the Engineer Corps (rate ratio=2.5). In addition to an
overall elevated death rate, Vietnam veterans had increased death rates for
digestive system diseases, diseases of the circulatory system and external
causes. The death rates from neoplasms (all types combined) were similar in
"the two groups;^
1.3.

RATIONALE AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS

Aside from the obvious importance of studying premature deaths because of
the human tragedy they represent, there are several methodologic reasons why a
detailed study of mortality is essential in a comprehensive evaluation of the
health consequences of military service in Vietnam. First, death is an
objective health outcome, not subject to some of the potential biases of1
self-reported health information. Second, the prevalence of certain health
outcomes can be assessed accurately only if deaths due to them are included in
the analysis. For example, a sizeable proportion of people with
cardiovascular diseases and certain cancers die within a short time after the
onset of the disease, as do those with very serious intentional or
unintentional injuries, thus becoming unavailable for interview or examination
in a subsequent study. This would lead to a serious underestimation of rates
for such conditions in a retrospective study, unless mortality is included.
Finally, a study of mortality may be the only feasible mechanism for continued
surveillance of the study cohort after the current VES ends. This is critical
for serious health effects which may first become manifest more than 15 years
after service in Vietnam.
At the time the VES was conceived, the research objective was simply to
examine the relationship between Vietnam service and deaths from all causes
combined as well as specific causes of death. This objective stemmed from the
rationale that the "Vietnam Experience" was a generic term for a wide range of

—5—

�health-influencing exposures operating among those who served in the military
in Vietnam. Included in the "experience" are known exposures, such as the
psychological stresses of war, possible exposure to various infectious
diseases prevalent in Vietnam, possible misuse of drugs and alcohol, and
possible exposure to the defoliant Agent Orange, as well as many unknown
exposures. These factors are unmeasured in this study; therefore, it is not
possible to examine directly their relation to mortality.. However, based on
the observed patterns of mortality, speculation on the possible influence of
one component relative to the others may be possible.
As a result of the recently reported findings from the mortality studies
of Vietnam-era veterans reviewed above, special attention will be focused on
the relationship of Vietnam service to deaths from external causes,
specifically, motor vehicle accidents, suicide and other external causes of
death. Moreover, the risk of death associated with Vietnam service will be
examined in various subgroups, particularly type of unit and military
occupational specialty. Although previous studies suggest a relationship
between service in Vietnam and several natural causes of death, for example,
soft-tissue -cancers, the numbers of these deaths expected in our cohort are
too few to address these questions adequately.

�2.

STUDY GROUP DEFINITION, DATA COLLECTION, AND FOLLOW-UP

The present study employs a historical cohort design to evaluate the risk
of death among U.S. Army veterans who served in Vietnam relative to a
comparison cohort of Army veterans who served during the same time period but
not in Vietnam. This type of study involved identifying a cohort of
Vietnam-era veterans, determining those veterans who died after discharge from
active duty, and collecting detailed information on the nature and
circumstances of each death. .
2.1.

CRITERIA FOR INCLUSION

The primary objective in defining the study and reference groups was to
obtain two cohorts that were as similar as possible with regard to major
health-influencing factors other than Vietnam service. Achieving this
objective does not result in a representative sample of all military personnel
who served in Vietnam. Comparability, however, was considered of paramount
importance to increase the likelihood that any differences between the cohorts
in mortality or morbidity after discharge was the result of service in Vietnam
rather than the result of differences in preexisting health-related factors.
To achieve this objective, only veterans meeting the following criteria were
included In the study:
a) U.S. Army veterans. The majority of military personnel who served in
Vietnam were in the Army. Air Force and Navy personnel involved in
the conflict were often stationed in various other parts of Southeast
Asia near Vietnam. Marine Corps personnel were deployed in ways very
similar to Army troops but in smaller numbers, and a very high
proportion of all Marine Corps personnel of the Vietnam era spent time
in Vietnam, thus making it difficult to find an adequately large
comparison group of Marines without experience in Vietnam.
b) Male veterans. On the basis of the sample size and selection process
described below, too few women would be included for any meaningful
conclusions to be drawn regarding the health of female Vietnam
veterans.
c) Military occupational specialty (MOS) other than "duty soldier" and
"trainee." During the early stages of the study, we found that men
with behavior or conduct problems were given the military occupational
specialty of "duty soldier" (MOS 57A10). The probability of
assignment to Vietnam for someone with this MOS may have been based
more on the personal characteristics of the individual than on his
specific training. A military occupational speciality of trainee
( 9 0 ) indicates that the individual never left basic or advanced
080
training in the United States.
d) Single term of enlistment in the Army. Veterans who reenlisted may be
very different in background characteristics from those- not choosing
to do so. Further, reenlistment carried with it more opportunity to
serve in the country of one's choice. Again, these characteristics
may be associated with subsequent health. It should be noted that
because of the method of sample selection, men who subsequently
entered another branch of the military could be included in the
cohort.
e) Minimum of 16 weeks of active service time. Army regulations stated
that servicemen could not be sent to duty stations such as Vietnam
until 11
they had completed at least 16 weeks of active service
time.

—7—

�f) Pay grade E-1 to E-5 at discharge. In many combat specialties the
vast majority of career soldiers had at least one tour of duty in
Vietnam, making it difficult to identify a comparison group of their
peers who did not have Vietnam service.
g) Entered military service for the first time between January I, 1965,
and December 31, 1971. This corresponds to the period when a
substantial number of single-term volunteer or drafted soldiers were
assigned to duty in Vietnam. Before and after this period, the
majority of servicemen in Vietnam were advisors (career enlisted men
and officers), who were few in number and who are disqualified for one
or more of the reasons given above.
h) Duty stations for men in the comparison group limited to the United
States, Germany, and Korea. On the basis of a pretest conducted by
CDC in May of 1983, the vast majority of draftees and single-term
volunteers who did not serve in Vietnam were assigned to these
locations. More importantly, it was felt that the assignment process
for other foreign countries worked differently than for the U.S.,
Germany, and Korea. Therefore, those who served elsewhere may be
quite different in their background characteristics from those who
served in Vietnam, Germany, Korea, and the United States.
2.2.

SAMPLE SIZE AND POWER

The VES was designed principally to assess morbidity associated with
service in Vietnam; mortality is being examined for the reasons described in
Section 1.3. Power computations for the health interview phase suggested that
a sample size of 6000 for each cohort was necessary to detect a relative risk
of 2.0 for conditions that occur with a prevalence of 5/1000 or greater in the
unexposed population (assuming the probabilities of Type I and Type II errors
are 0.05).* To obtain 6,000 completed interviews in both the Vietnam and
non-Vietnam groups, the starting sample size had to account for the
possibility of an estimated 15 percent non-location rate and a 15 percent
interview refusal rate. Thus, the minimum number of veterans to be selected
for each cohort was estimated to be 8300 (i.e., 8,300 x 0.85 x 0.85).
Given about 8,500 servicemen in each of the two cohorts, the minimum
detectable relative risks for overall mortality and selected causes of death
are presented in Table 1. Adequate power exists to detect as statistically
significant moderate increases in overall mortality and certain common causes
of death. For example, the study has 95 percent power to detect a relative
risk of-1.3 for overall mortality and 1.5 for deaths due to accidents. The
study has good power to detect moderate increases in risk of suicide,
circulatory disease, and malignant neoplasms. The study's power to detect
relative increases for less frequent causes of death is limited unless a large
risk is associated with Vietnam service. Additionally, the study has
reasonable power to detect differences in risk for total mortality in certain
subgroups of veterans. For example, if only 10% of veterans are in a subgroup
of interest, a minimum relative risk of 2.0 can be detected for all causes.
2.3.

SELECTION OF VETERANS

Vietnam-era veterans were randomly selected from a set of computer tapes
containing "accession numbers," each of which refers to a unique military
personnel record on file at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) in
St. Louis, Missouri. NPRC supplied CDC with a restricted range of
-8-

�approximately five million accession numbers for U.S. Army veterans whose
service records were received by NPRC between September 1964 and June 1977.
NPRC estimated that the vast majority of discharged U.S. Army Vietnam-era
veterans would be included in this set.
From a pilot test conducted in September 1983, it was estimated that
approximately 40% of Army veterans randomly selected from the NPRC files would
meet the eligibility criteria outlined above and that approximately half of
these would have served in Vietnam. Thus, to identify 16,000 to 17,000
qualified veterans, the required starting sample size was approximately 43,000
veterans.
A random number generating program was used to select the sample of
approximately 43,000 accession numbers from this universe. The sample was
split into 12 equal random samples for ease of processing. The decision to
disqualify short-term men (less than 16 weeks of active service time),
trainees, and "duty soldiers" was made after the original sample had been
drawn. In'order to make up for these losses, we added two additional random
samples of approximately 3,500 each to the list originally drawn. Personnel
records corresponding to these numbers were pulled and reviewed for the
inclusion criteria listed above.
As outlined in Figure 1, 99% (N=48,513) of the random numbers generated
corresponded to a unique accession number on the NPRC computer tapes. Of
these, 1,355 referred to records that could not be located after several
attempts. Apparently, many of these were missing because of a subsequent
reenlistment after an earlier discharge. Of the 47,158 veterans whose records
were located and reviewed, 61% were excluded because they failed to meet one
or more of the inclusion criteria outlined above, but less than 1% were
excluded because information necessary to determine study eligibility or to
categorize them with respect to critical factors, such as duty station, was
missing. Thus, 18,581 men qualified for the study (9,558 Vietnam and 9,023
non-Vietnam veterans).
2.4.

COLLECTION OF DATA FROM MILITARY PERSONNEL FILES

Each month for 14 consecutive months, lists containing 3,500 accession
numbers were sent to NPRC. NPRC located the corresponding military records
(201 files) and sent them to the Army Reserve Personnel Center, formerly known
as the Reserve Component Personnel and Administration Center (RCPAC), aLso
located in St. Louis, Missouri. Each file was reviewed there for certain
eligibility criteria, and a data abstraction form was initiated. Data
abstraction forms and files of veterans who appeared to meet the criteria for
the study were forwarded to the U.S. Army and Joint Services Environmental
Support Group (ESG) in Washington, O.C., where a second qualification process
was completed. Detailed information was then abstracted from the files of
those veterans found to be qualified for the study. A majority of the data
for the study were taken from the Department of Defense Form 214 and
Department of the Army Form 20. All data abstraction forms were then sent to
CDC for keying and editing.
Information abstracted from the personnel files can be grouped into two
types. The first type consists of data collected at time of entry into the
Army. Variables include demographics, such as date of birth, race, and
birthplace, and preservice characteristics, such as physical and mental health
as determined by the entrance physical examination, and measures of general
intelligence and aptitude.
-9-

�The second type of characteristics abstracted from the military personnel
records describes the veteran's military experience. These include the date
of entry, location and dates of each tour of duty, types of units, military
occupational specialty during each tour, total length of active military
service, indications of misconduct, date of separation from active duty, and
type of discharge (character of service). A more detailed description of
entry and military history characteristics is presented in Appendix A.
Finally, names and addresses of next-of-kin were abstracted for use in
locating living veterans for the health interview and examination phases of
the study.
Military records of veterans ascertained to have died after discharge were
.independently rereviewed to verify that duty stations had been accurately
recorded. All of them were found to have been correctly classified as
"Vietnam" or "non-Vietnam" in the initial abstraction process.
2.5.

VITAL STATUS ASCERTAINMENT

Although men were identified by date of entry into the Army, this report
examines mortality after separation from active duty. Follow-up began the day
the veteran was separated from active service and terminated on the date of
his death or December 31, 1983, whichever came first. Follow-up was
terminated at the end of 1983 because identification of deaths from the
various tracing sources after that date was not complete. Veterans who died
on active duty are excluded from the study but some data on them are given
here for completeness.
2.5.1. Inservice Deaths
Inservice deaths were identified during the review of military personnel
files to determine study eligibility. Any veteran who died during active
military service, regardless of the manner or circumstances of his death, has
a "casualty report" (Form 1300) placed in his military personnel file. This
process was necessary to remove the decedent from the active military rolls as
well as to activate payment of benefits to his survivors.
Table 2 presents the numbers of inservice deaths by the manner of death.
Overall, 234 (2.4%) of Vietnam veterans were found to have died during active
service, but only 34 ( . % of the comparison group had died in service. The
04)
possible effect of this disproportionate depletion of the cohorts on the
postservice mortality experience is examined later.
*
The narrative summary from the casualty report, which described the manner
and circumstances of death, was used to place inservice deaths in respective
categories. A "hostility-related" death is defined as one resulting from
direct or indirect contact with hostile enemy action. The "implements of
war-related" death category includes deaths not directly or indirectly related
to enemy action, but from the operations or implements of war, such as "killed
by friendly fire." Finally, an "other" category includes deaths not related
to war operations or to enemy action, such as those from motor vehicle
accidents, drownings, and natural causes.
The majority of inservice deaths among Vietnam veterans was due to
hostility-related causes. The rates of inservice deaths not due to
war-related activities are identical in the two cohorts (i.e., 3.7 deaths per
100.
,0)
Although not shown, only 3 of the 68 deaths assigned to the "other" cause
of death category were due to natural causes. All three are among Vietnam

-10-

�veterans and thair causes are malaria (ICD-9,084.0). malignant neoplasm of
connective or soft tissue (ICD-9,171.9), and unknown or unspecified cause
(ICD-9,799.9). The remaining deaths in the "other" category were due to
external causes, with a majority of these attributed to motor-vehicle
accidents (11 Vietnam and 19 non-Vietnam).
2.5.2. Postservice Deaths
Deaths occurring after separation from active duty were identified with
the assistance of several Federal agencies. Computer tapes containing the
names, social security numbers, and dates of birth of all veterans not known
to have died in service were submitted simultaneously to the following
agencies:
o Veterans Administration - Beneficiary Identification and Record
Locator Subsystem (BIRLS)
o Social Security Administration
o Internal Revenue Service (through special arrangement with the
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health)
o National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) - National Death Index
Each of these agencies receives notifications (in different degrees of
completeness) of deaths and maintains this information in computer-based
files. In addition to these, two other sources were used to identify
postservice deaths. The first is the "casualty report" described previously,
which is also filed for any veteran who dies while in reserve status, a period
of up to 4 years following date of separation from active duty for draftees
and up to 3 years for volunteers. It is also filed for those veterans who are
currently receiving military benefits at the time of death.
The second additional source of postservice deaths was the locating and
contacting procedures used for the health interview component of the VES.
Names of next-of-kin and address information obtained from military personnel
files and the various Federal agencies were used to locate veterans not
identified as deceased by other sources. Several mechanisms were used to
ascertain their present address and telephone number, including Directory
Assistance telephone tracing, credit bureau checks, local directories, and
contacts with relatives and neighbors. All tracing and follow-up activities
were done by persons who had no knowledge of the veterans' military
'
background, including countries of service. Four percent of all postservice
deaths were identified solely through these means.
As shown in Table 3, confirmation of vital status was finally established
for 93.6X of the Vietnam cohort and 91.9X of the non-Vietnam cohort. Since
the proportion of veterans with uncertain vital status was small and similar
for the two cohorts, these men were considered alive at the end of follow-up
for analytic purposes.
2.6.

DETERMINATION

OF CAUSE OF DEATH

For veterans who died during the follow-up period, a copy of their death •
certificate was obtained from the appropriate state or local vital statistics
office. Successful retrieval of death certificates was achieved for all but
nine deaths. Underlying cause and contributing causes of death were
determined from the death certificate by an experienced nosologist and,
independently, by a panel of physicians using all available supplemental
medical and law enforcement information.

-11-

�:
2.6.1 Death Certificates
Underlying causes of death were determined and coded by 'an experienced
nosologist at the National Center for Health Statistics. Causes of death were
coded to both the Eighth and Ninth revisions of the International
Classification of Diseases.12,13 jne Eighth Revision was used when the
mortality experience of Vietnam and non-Vietnam veterans was compared with
that of the U.S. general male population, and the Ninth Revision was used when
the mortality of Vietnam veterans was compared directly to that of non-Vietnam
veterans. The nosologist had no knowledge of whether the decedent had served
in Vietnam.
The reproducibility of the cause-of-death coding was examined through a
blind resubmission to the nosologist of a 10% random sample of deaths due to
external causes and a 10% sample coded to nonexternal causes. There was 98%
agreement between initial and repeat cause-of-death codes.

2.6.2. Medical Review Panel - Supplementary Records
To provide an assessment of the cause of death independent of the one
given on the death certificate, a special review was undertaken by a medical
panel consisting of two physicians and a registered nurse. The nurse used the
death certificate information to obtain pertinent medical and legal
documentation describing the nature and circumstances of each death. Sources
for record retrieval included hospitals, law enforcement agencies, coroners or
medical examiners, and private physicians. For each death, any source that
was deemed important for determining the nature and circumstance of the death,
with the exception of interviews with next-of-kin, was pursued. Next-of-kin
were contacted only when their permission was required for release of medical
records. Only deaths for which all available records were successfully
retrieved were reviewed. The nurse synthesized the available information into
a summary statement which also indicated the sources and availability of
pertinent records.
Before meetings of the medical review panel, the case summaries were
reviewed by the two physicians, and each independently assigned an underlying
cause of death. The physicians were not aware of the place of military
service and the death certificate cause of death. Significant diseases known
to be present at the time of death were listed as "other significant
conditions." For external causes of death they judged the intentionality and
manner of death (accident, suicide, homicide, undetermined).
One physician was assigned as "primary reviewer" for each death and
reported his determination of the underlying cause of death, other significant
conditions, and manner of death as well his rationale. If the other panelist
disagreed, the evidence and reasoning in support of each point of view was
presented. Additional information could be requested from the nurse, and
final resolution of the disagreement was occasionally deferred until a
subsequent medical panel meeting, held after the case had been reviewed by
outside experts in the fields of forensic pathology and nosology. A cause of
death was assigned only after a consensus was reached. All causes of death
and other significant conditions were coded according to the Ninth Revision of
the International Classification of Diseases.

-12-

�3.

METHODS OF ANALYSIS

3.1.

DEFINITION OF CRITICAL VARIABLES

3.1.1. Place of Service
To be included in the subgroup of Vietnam veterans, an individual had to
have served in Vietnam any time during his term of enlistment. Although the
normal maximum tour in Vietnam was designated by the Army as 12 months*1, no
minimum time was placed on the actual number of months a veteran had to have
served in Vietnam to be included in the study. For example, if a veteran was
wounded in Vietnam, having served only 4 months of his 12-month tour, he was
still included in the Vietnam cohort. A small number of men managed to serve
two terms of duty in Vietnam within their term of enlistment. A non-Vietnam
veteran had to have served at least one tour of duty in Germany, Korea, or the
United States and to have never served in the Army in Vietnam.
Most comparisons presented here are between veterans who served in Vietnam
and those-who served elsewhere. Analyses using veterans who served only in
the United States or in Germany or Korea as the comparison group are not
presented unless they help elucidate a particular finding observed with all
non-Vietnam veterans.
A
3.1.2. Covariates
Table 4 presents a list of all covariates considered and their
categorizations used in the analysis. All were obtained from veterans'
military personnel files. Several of the variables need an explanation:
- PULHES. The term PULHES is an acronym for six categories that
describe the physical and mental health of the veteran at entry into
the service. The categories are physical capacity or stamina, upper
extremities, lower extremities, hearing and ears, eyes and visual
acuity, and psychiatric functioning. Each category was rated on a
four-point scale, ranging from a score of one, indicating nc
impairment, to a score of four, indicating maximum impairment, which
was below Army retention standards.**
- Composite Measure of Physical/Psychological Functioning. This
represents a summary measure of the PULHES results. The veteran was
given an overall rating of physical and psychological health based
on his separate ratings in the six categories of the PULHES. Any '
impairment on one or more of the individual components would result
in a rating of some impairment on the summary measure. For analytic
purposes, the composite measure was dichotomized into "no
impairment" and anything other than no impairment. This composite
rating was used to determine eligibility for military service as
well as eligibility for specific military occupational specialties.
In controlling for preservice health, the composite index, rather
than the components of the PULHES, was used.
- Army Classification Battery. This is a series of aptitude tests
given at entry into the service to aid in assigning a military
occupational specialty. The battery consisted of five separate
tests, each measuring a different area of aptitude. The areas are
verbal ability, arithmetic reasoning, general information, general
technical, and pattern analysis. The tests were scored numerically,
and the possible range of scores was from 0 to 200. Scores on the

-13-

�various components were highly correlated. Of the five tests, the
general technical (GT) test bias considered to be the best single
test for indicating aptitude.
- Armed Forces Qualification Test (AFQT). This is an aptitude test
that served two functions: 1) to determine whether the individual
met the minimum qualification criteria for military service, and
2) if qualification criteria were met, to aid in the placing of
individuals in military occupational specialties. This test was
numerically scored with a possible range of scores from 0 to 100.
- Military Occupational Specialty CMOS). This describes the job or
jobs for which the veteran was trained or the one(s) he actually
held while in the Army. Assignment of "primary" MOS was based on an
individual's civilian education and other training and work
experience, as well as on his performance on Army aptitude
tests.15 For the purpose of this analysis all MOSs were divided
into two broad categories, "tactical" and "all others." Tactical
includes infantrymen, armored vehicle crewmen, combat engineers, and
artillery crewmen.16 (A more detailed distribution of MOS is
provided in Appendix A, Table 4.) When considering the possible
confounding effects of MOS, we used the MOS for which the veteran
was trained (Primary MOS). When the potential modifying effect of
MOS was examined, the job the veteran actually held (Duty MOS) was
used.
Potential confounders in this study are primarily variables measured
before service (entry characteristics). Characteristics measured during
service or at discharge have the potential of being part of the "Vietnam
experience", and controlling for them may alter the effect of Vietnam
service. However, certain military service characteristics examined in
this study (pay grade at discharge, type of discharge, and absence without
official leave (AWOL) or confinement time) could also be associated with
background characteristics. Since the role of these factors is unclear
and prior studies suggest that at least one of them (pay grade) is an
important predictor of mortality1^, both their possible modifying and
confounding potential were examined.
3.1.3. Cause-of-Death Categorization
Each of the 15 major subgroups of the International Classification of
Diseases, Ninth Revision was examined, with the exception of the groups
pertaining to complications of pregnancy and childbirth and to conditions
originating in the perinatal period. Neither was applicable to the study
population.
Because we anticipated that the majority of deaths would be attributed
to external causes, a more detailed breakdown of external causes of death
(shown in Table 5), was examined. The categorization includes deaths due
to motor-vehicle accident, accidental poisonings, suicides, homicide,
injury of undetermined intentionality, and a category of all other
external causes.
Because of the expected underascertainment of suicide on the basis of
death certificates and the potential for the underascertainment to be
different for Vietnam than for non-Vietnam veterans, a broader definition
was also examined. This includes accidental poisonings (E850-E869,
E929.2), recorded suicides (E950-E959), injuries of undetermined
intentionality (E980-E989), and unknown cause of death (799.9).18

-14-

�There is no comprehensive classification of alcohol or drug-related
deaths in the ICD-9 nomenclature. Rather, alcohol-specific and
drug-specific conditions are contained within various ICD-9 categories.
For example, alcohol-dependence syndrome is included in the category of
mental disorders and alcoholic liver disease, in the digestive system
category. For estimating the extent of substance abuse in this study,
special categories of alcohol- and drug-related deaths were developed.
These are shown in Tables 6 and 7.
Alcohol-related deaths encompass three categories:
(1) Nontraumatic deaths in which either the underlying cause or a
contributing cause is an alcohol-specific medical, neurologic, or
psychiatric disease.
(2) Deaths attributed to accidental poisoning by alcohol and other
accidental deaths in which a contributing cause was nondependent
abuse of alcohol or excessive blood level of alcohol. Excessive
blood level of alcohol is not defined quantitatively in the
ICD-9 manual. Although IUCH8 policy is to code as "excessive
blood alcohol" (ICD-9, 790.3) any citation on the death
.certificate of a blood alcohol concentration greater than zero,
the medical review panel definition was a blood alcohol
concentration greater than or equal to 100 mgX.
(3) Deaths due to suicide, homicide, or injury of undetermined
intentionality with a contributing cause of nondependent abuse of
alcohol or excessive blood level of alcohol.
Drug-related deaths included deaths with an underlying or contributing
cause of drug dependence or nondependent abuse of drugs other than alcohol
or tobacco, deaths due to accidental poisoning by drugs, suicide where the
mode of death was drugs, and deaths with intentionality undetermined but
where the- mode was drugs.
3.2.

INTERNAL COMPARISONS

The analysis was approached in stages. The first stage addresses the
hypotheses under study without adjustment or consideration of any
covariates. The second stage of the analysis focuses on the concept of
effect modification. This is concerned with identifying subgroups of
Vietnam veterans that are at unusually high or low risk. Of particular'
interest here, in light of the finding for Australian Vietnam veterans, is
whether the effect of Vietnam service on subsequent mortality is different
for men who served in engineering units compared with other units. The
final stage in the analysis determines whether any covariates, alone or in
combination, could explain or mask any associations between service in
Vietnam and the subsequent likelihood of dying.
The analytic approach used in stage one is a simple comparison of the
relative frequency of death among Vietnam veterans with the relative
frequency among veterans who did-not serve in Vietnam. The mortality
rates are based on person-years at risk since discharge from active duty.
In this study veterans enter follow-up at different points in time,
depending on their dates of separation from active duty. This could
potentially affect the distribution of follow-up time for the two cohorts
under study. The person-year approach takes into account these differing
lengths of follow-up. The person-year approach also assumes a constant
death rate over time. If the rate changes appreciably during the

-15-

�follow-up period, rates can be calculated separately for smaller time
intervals within which the assumption may be more reasonable. Unadjusted
rate ratios (RR) were computed from the crude death rates
(Vietnam/non-Vietnam). Ninety-five percent confidence intervals (CZ)
around the RRs were computed by using the procedures described by Laird
and Oliver.19
In stage two, the exploration of effect modification, we attempted to
identify high-risk subgroups that could provide insight into the nature of
any Vietnam service-mortality association. All covariates listed in
Table 4 were examined for their potential modifying effect by stratifying
the data by the various levels of the covariate. Homogeneity of the rate
ratios was assessed through chi-square tests for interaction derived from
multivariate regression models.19 The criteria for lack of homogeneity
of the rate ratios across the various levels of the modifying factor,
which is evidence for possible effect modification, is a chi-square
statistic with an associated p-value less than or equal to 0.05.
The objective of the third stage of the analysis is to examine
confounding. Preservice differences in health-related factors could
possibly mask or explain the association between Vietnam and mortality.
Since relatively few covariates are measured at entry into the service,
all are examined for their potential confounding effects. The influence
of a potential confounder was evaluated by fitting a multivariate model
that incorporated only that covariate and a term for Vietnam service.
The analytic tool used in stages two and three of the analysis is the
Cox regression model, which is often referred to as the proportional
hazards model.20 This technique allows for the adjustment of
confounders and the examination of the behavior of effect modifiers. It
also accounts for differing periods of follow-up by comparing, for every
death, the covariates of the deceased individual with those of individuals
who have been followed for a similar period of time. The Cox procedure
directly models the rate ratio rather than the absolute rate of mortality,
thus avoiding the need to estimate an unknown underlying hazard function.
The widely used software package PHGLM provided estimates of the
parameters,- standard errors, and likelihood ratio tests of hypotheses.21
The underlying assumption for the proportional hazards model is that
the ratio of hazard functions (death rates) for the two groups (Vietnam,
and non-Vietnam) is constant over the entire follow-up period. Serious
violations of this assumption may result in misleading estimates of the
effect of Vietnam service on mortality. For example, if the rate ratio is
greater than one at some times and less than one at other times, the
estimated parameter would be an average which may falsely indicate no
difference in the mortality experience between the two groups. This
assumption was checked (Appendix F), and if the effect of Vietnam service
on mortality appeared to vary over time, separate models were formed for
shorter time periods for which the proportionality assumption appeared
more reasonable.
All adjusted rate ratios were obtained from Cox regression models
stratified on primary MOS (tactical versus nontactical) and enlistment
status and adjusted for other potential confounders.22 Stratification,
instead of adjustment for MOS and enlistment status, is based on a priori
and empirical knowledge that these factors are important determinants of
duty location and mortality. Use of stratification, instead of

-16-

�adjustment, reduces the number of parameters to be estimated which could
be important in the cause-specific analysis where there are relatively few
deaths. The rate ratio estimated from the stratified model is a valid
summary of relative mortality in the two cohorts only if the rate ratios
in the strata are similar. The uniformity of the four stratum-specific
RRs was checked and is presented in Appendix F.
In the cause-specific analyses, a modification of the above analytic
approach was necessary because of the small number of deaths in many of
the disease categories. If a category contained less than 10 deaths
(Vietnam and non-Vietnam cohorts combined), rate ratios were not computed,
and no formal conclusions were drawn about comparative risks in the two
cohorts. In addition, a smaller set of covariates were examined for their
potential modifying or confounding effects.
Other analytic techniques used include standard chi-square statistics
for 2x2 and Rx2 tables and the t-statistic for the difference between two
means. Additionally, the "percent agreement" and kappa statistic are used
to quantify and judge the level of agreement between the medical review
cause of death and cause of death from the death certificate. The
"percent agreement" is the number of deaths assigned to a particular
cause-of-jdeath category by both the medical review panel and the death
certificate divided by the total number of deaths assigned to that
category by the death certificate. The kappa statistic is a measure of
inter-rater concordance which corrects for agreement expected by chance
alone.23 Me used the following criteria when interpreting the kappa
statistic: a kappa greater than 0.75 represents excellent agreement
beyond chance, values between 0.40 and 0.75 represent fair to good
agreement and values below 0.40 represent poor agreement.24
All references to "statistical significance" imply that a particular
ratio or difference is statistically different from the null value at the
alpha=0.05 level, assuming a two-sided test of significance.
3.3.

EXTERNAL COMPARISONS

The standardized mortality ratio (SMR) adjusted for age, race, and
calendar period was used to compare the death rates among Vietnam and
non-Vietnam veterans with the rates in the total U.S. male population.
The SMR is the ratio of observed deaths among cohort members to the
*
expected number of deaths based on the U.S. mortality experience. The
purpose of comparing the two veteran cohorts to the U.S. male general
population is to evaluate the anticipated "healthy veteran effect" for
natural causes of death.25 since all cohort members were initially
selected into Army service on the basis of a certain level of physical
fitness, one would expect their subsequent mortality from natural causes
to be less than that of the general population, which includes men who do
not meet the minimum physical requirements of the Army. This expected
deficit should be most pronounced in the time period closest to separation
from active duty and might eventually disappear with the passage of time
as the veterans age.
The SMR calculations were done by using a software package containing
U.S. death rates updated through 1980.26 Ninety-five percent confidence
limits for the SMRs were calculated with the Rothman-Boice programs.2?

-17-

�4.

RESULTS

This chapter is divided into four sections. In the first section, the
preservice and military service characteristics of the Vietnam and non-Vietnam
cohorts are examined. This provides an understanding of differences existing
at entry into the service and differences that may have developed as a result
of military service. The second section examines the all-cause mortality
experience of the Vietnam group relative to veterans who served in Germany,
Korea and the United States. Presented in the third section are results of
the cause-specific mortality analyses, including analyses based on cause of
death determined from death certificates and on medical review cause of
death. The last section contains the results of comparisons of each cohort
with the mortality of men of the same age and race in the U.S. general
population in the same time period.
4.1.

DISTRIBUTION OF COVARIATES FOR VIETNAM AND NON-VIETNAM VETERANS

Ideally, to determine the increase in mortality associated with service in
Vietnam, one would like to compare two groups of veterans who are similar with
respect to all factors that could influence mortality,, except for service in
Vietnam. Because this ideal can rarely be attained, except in experimental
situations, it is important at the outset to understand any differences in
possible health-influencing factors that may exist between Vietnam veterans
and veterans who served elsewhere. Caution needs to be exercised, however,
when interpreting the statistical significance of differences between the two
groups. The large sample sizes tend to make even small between-cohort
differences in these factors "statistically significant."
The characteristics of the two cohorts as determined at entry into the
Army and those determined during military service are summarized in Table 8.
Appendix A contains the actual distributions of all of the characteristics by
cohort, with, results of tests of statistical significance of differences for
each characteristic.
There is no difference in the racial distribution between the two cohorts,
but there are slightly fewer draftees among Vietnam veterans than among
non-Vietnam veterans (63.7% versus 65.6%) and more Vietnam veterans entered
service before 1969. Of the five physical health components measured at
entry, significant differences are noted for two: Vietnam veterans had
slightly fewer visual (25.5% versus 28.7%) and hearing (5.6% versus 6.7%)
impairments. No difference is seen for the assessment of psychiatric '
functioning. On the tests of general aptitude taken at entry, the mean scores
of Vietnam veterans were slightly but "significantly" lower for all components
of the Army Classification Battery, and Vietnam veterans also scored slightly
lower on the Armed Forces Qualification Test.
The second section of Table 8 contains the military service
characteristics, where differences between the two cohorts are greater. More
Vietnam than non-Vietnam veterans were in tactical operations jobs (34.3%
versus 27.4%), and more Vietnam veterans (26.6%) were assigned to infantry
units than were non-Vietnam veterans (14.6%).
Veterans in the Vietnam cohort tended to stay on active duty slightly
longer than other veterans (mean=26.1 months versus 25.3 months). Vietnam
veterans had fewer instances of AWOL or other "bad" time (11.6% versus 13.3%)
and fewer nonhonorable discharges (2.7% versus 8.9%); they were also less
likely to be discharged at lower grades (E1-E3) (11.5% versus 20.2%). These
differences will be considered in subsequent analyses.

-18-

�4.2.

ANALYSIS OF ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY

4.2.1 Crude Results
Table 9 presents the total numbers of deaths, crude mortality rates, and
rate ratios comparing Vietnam veterans to veterans who served in Germany,
Korea, or the United States. The mean number of years of follow-up was
similar for Vietnam (13.7 years) and non-Vietnam veterans (13.5 years). Of
the 9,324 Vietnam veterans, 246 died during follow-up, compared with 200 of
the 8,989 non-Vietnam veterans. Overall, Vietnam veterans had a 17X excess in
postservice all-cause mortality relative to veterans who did not serve in
Vietnam. This modest excess is not statistically significant.
Table 10 presents relative mortality by the number of years since
discharge from active duty. The excess in the relative death rate appears to
be limited to the first 5-year period after discharge, during which Vietnam
veterans have a 45% higher mortality rate than non-Vietnam veterans. After
the initial 5-year period, there is no difference.in the mortality experience
between the two cohorts. The test for the time-dependent effect of Vietnam
service yields borderline significance (X2=3.60, p=0.057), suggesting that
the relative mortality of Vietnam veterans in the first 5 years may be
different from that seen later.
Figure 2 displays graphically the change over time in the relative
mortality rate associated with Vietnam service. The hazard rates among
Vietnam veterans remain higher than those for non-Vietnam veterans through
year 6 of follow-up. After year 6 the hazard rates are similar.
To determine whether the time-specific increase in mortality among Vietnam
veterans is consistent across the two major subgroups of the comparison
cohort, separate analyses were done using veterans with other foreign service
(Germany or Korea) as one comparison and veterans with service only in the
United States as a second comparison. A similar pattern of excess all-cause
mortality limited to the first 5 years after discharge was found in both
comparisons (Table 11). The excess was somewhat greater with veterans who
served only in the United States used for comparison (RR=1.57) than with
veterans having other foreign service (RR=1.37).
. i '•

4.2.2. Consideration of Covariates.
Because the increased rate of mortality associated with Vietnam service
appears to be limited to the first 5 years of follow-up, all covariates are
examined with respect to two time periods, &lt;5 years and 64- years. (See
Appendix F for an examination of the proportional hazards assumption within
these two time periods.) Table 12 presents a summary of the tests for effect
modification. (Refer to Appendix B for details.) There is some suggestion
that during the first 5 years of follow-up the effect of Vietnam service is
modified by general health status at entry (p=0.08), enlistment status
(p=0.10) and year of discharge from active duty (p=.06). Among those with a
poorer composite index of health at entry, the effect of Vietnam service on
mortality is greater (RR=2.12) than among those with better health at entry
(RR=1.20). An 80% increase in relative mortality associated with service in
Vietnam is apparent among draftees, but only a 10% increase is observed among
those who volunteered for the Army. Finally, a twofold increase in mortality
was found among Vietnam veterans discharged before 1970 compared with only a
16X increase for those discharged in 1970 or later. In the later follow-up
period, pay grade was identified as an effect modifier (pa.02). Although
there is heterogeneity in the RRs across the various pay grades, no particular

-19-

�pattern appears to be associated with this heterogeneity. (See Appendix B,
Table 13.) For the total follow-up period, only pay grade at discharge was
identified as potentially modifying the effect of Vietnam service on the
subsequent rate of mortality (p=.02). There is some variation in the RRs for
Vietnam service across the various levels of the other covariates in Table 12,
but the variation does not represent a statistically significant departure
from homogeneity.
Statistical adjustment for each covariate separately has little effect on
the estimate of the RR in either postservice period (Table 13) or for the
total follow-up period with two exceptions: type of discharge and pay grade
at discharge. After adjustment for type of discharge and pay grade, the rate
ratios are increased by at least 0.10 in the initial follow-up period and for
the total follow-up period.
Confounding was further investigated by including all of the covariates
listed in Table 13 in models for the separate time periods. Because of the
strong correlation between AWOL/confinement time, type of discharge, and pay
grade at'discharge, only one was included in the model. Pay grade was chosen
because it appeared, in Table 13, to have the strongest influence of the three
on the Vietnam-mortality association. This model yielded adjusted rate ratios
of 1.53 (95X CInl.12-2.10) for the early follow-up period, 0.99 (95X
CI=0.77-1.28) for the remaining years of follow-up, and 1.18 (95X
CI=0.97-1.44) for all years of follow-up.
In addition, a reduced model was formed that incorporated a smaller set of
covariates that will be used for adjustment in the cause-specific analyses
where the numbers of deaths are considerably smaller. This model included the
following variables: age at discharge and race (both well—established
predictors of mortality), HOS and enlistment status (a priori and possibly
empirical predictors of duty location and mortality), GT score and pay grade
(empirically the strongest predictors of all-cause mortality of the remaining
covariates), and year of discharge. The RRs obtained from the reduced model
(Table 14) are roughly of the same magnitude as the unadjusted RRs. Results
from the Cox model also indicate that Vietnam service has a greater effect on
mortality among those discharged before age 21 compared to those discharged at
age 21 or older (p=0.02) and among veterans discharged before 1970 compared to
those discharged during 1970 or later (p=0.05).
4.2.3. Influence of Inservice Deaths.
&lt;
As shown in Figure 1, the rate of inservice deaths among Vietnam veterans
was more than 6 times the rate among non-Vietnam veterans. The majority of
deaths among Vietnam veterans (83X) were a result of war-related activities
(Table 2). This unusual inservice mortality experience among Vietnam veterans
may have been selective, that is, it may have eliminated either the healthiest
or the least healthy members from the cohort. Such an event might bias our
estimate of the effect of Vietnam service on postservice mortality. To
examine this possibility, we compared the entry characteristics of Vietnam
veterans who died in service as a result of hostile enemy action with
characteristics of Vietnam veterans who were alive at discharge from active
service (Table 15). There are few differences of note. The two groups are
similar in terms of race, enlistment status, the ratings on the individual
components of the PULHES profile (with the exception of visual acuity and the
composite measure of physical health), and scores on all the Army aptitude
tests. For visual acuity and the composite physical health measure, those

-20-

�killed by hostile enemy action were less likely to have any impairment on
either measure compared with those discharged alive. (See Appendix C for
detailed tables.)
To examine this further, we performed a worst case analysis by assuming
that those killed by enemy action had survived and that their postservice
mortality experience was worse than that of the remaining Vietnam group. For
example, if those killed in action had experienced twice the overall
postservice death rate of the actual Vietnam study group, the result would be
10 additional deaths in the Vietnam group, and none among non-Vietnam
veterans. However, the "new" RR would be essentially the same as the original
one (RR=1.19).
4.2.4. Influence of Incomplete Follow-up

As described in Section 2.5, the proportion of veterans with uncertain
vital status was small and similar between the two cohorts (less than 9% in
both cohorts). Because of this, we assumed that all those with uncertain
vital status were alive at close of follow-up. Our assumption would lead to
biased rate ratios if the probability of dying among Vietnam veterans with
uncertain vital status was different from that of veterans who served
elsewhere. By examining the entry and military service characteristics of men
with known and uncertain vital status (Table 16), it can be seen that although
men with uncertain vital status are very different from those with known vital
status in the same cohort, the characteristics of the "uncertain status"
groups are similar between cohorts. The characteristics associated with
uncertain vital status may be linked to a more unstable lifestyle. In
particular, men with uncertain vital status are more likely to be non-white,
have lower GT scores, and have a nonhonorable discharge and lower pay grade at
discharge. Thus, regardless of cohort status, these men may live a more
transient existence with few ties to institutions and relatives, making them
more difficult to trace. Since several of these characteristics are also
strongly related to mortality (see Appendix B), death rates may indeed be
higher among these men but, given the similarity in their characteristics
between cohorts, it seems unlikely that there would be a different effect of
Vietnam service in this group. In any case, we can estimate the possible
effect of a differential rate of mortality. For example, if Vietnam veterans
with uncertain vital status had twice the death rate of Vietnam veterans' with
known status and if the two status groups among non-Vietnam veterans had
similar rates, the RR would only increase from 1.17 to 1.22. On the other
hand, if Vietnam veterans with uncertain status had a much better survival
rate (i.e., approximately one-half the death rate of other men), the revised
RR would be 1.12. Thus, two extreme situations produce results that are not
very different from the original finding.
4.3.

ANALYSIS OF CAUSE-SPECIFIC MORTALITY

4.3.1. Cause of Death Based on Death Certificates
Of the 446 veterans identified as deceased in the time period from date of
discharge from active duty to December 31, 1983, death certificates were
obtained for 437 (98X). For five of the nine deaths for which death '
certificates were not obtained, casualty reports were available indicating the
death occurred while the veteran was on reserve status or receiving veterans
benefits. For the remaining four deaths, the location and date of death were
available and confirmed through other sources.

-21-

�Displayed in Table 17 are the numbers of deaths, crude death rates and
unadjusted rate ratios comparing Vietnam veterans with non-Vietnam veterans
for 11 major ICD-9 cause-of-death groupings. The four major groupings not
shown had no deaths assigned to them (diseases of the blood and blood-forming
organs; endocrine, metabolic, and nutritional diseases; diseases of the skin;
and diseases of the musculoskeletal system). Of the categories shown, only
four contained sufficient numbers for formal analysis. For two of these
cause-of-death categories, Vietnam veterans appear to be dying at different
rates than non-Vietnam veterans: diseases of the circulatory system (51%
decrease) and external causes of death (25X increase). In one additional
category mortality appears to be different between the two groups, that is,
deaths due to genitourinary conditions. However, it is based on only four
deaths, too few for formal analysis. Two of these deaths were attributed to
urinary tract infection, one to renal disease (unspecified), and one to renal
failure, and all were among Vietnam veterans.
Neoplasms; Table 18 shows mortality from neoplasms (all types) among Vietnam
veterans relative to non-Vietnam veterans by time since discharge. A
nonsignificant decrease in the relative rate of death is seen in both
follow-up periods. We also divided the latter time period into smaller units,
(6-10 years and 11+ years) to assess risks in the more recent years that would
correspond to a longer latent period for these diseases. Only 7 deaths from
neoplasms occurred in the 11+ year follow-up period, 2 among Vietnam veterans
and 5 among non-Vietnam veterans, suggesting a deficit among Vietnam
veterans. In examining the specific types of neoplasms (Table 19), there does
not appear to be any site-specific associations with service in Vietnam. The
three deaths among Vietnam veterans from neoplasms of uncertain behavior were
all due to brain tumors, but the one among non-Vietnam veterans was a
bronchial adenoma.
Circulatory system diseases: Table 20 shows that regardless of the time since
discharge, there is a deficit of circulatory disease deaths among Vietnam
servicemen relative to those not serving in Vietnam. In Table 21, results for
specific types of circulatory disease deaths are presented. The deficit among
Vietnam veterans does not appear to be limited to any one type of circulatory
disease but extends to all major types.
Mental disorders: Although there were too few deaths in each follow-up
interval for formal analysis, Vietnam service did not appear to be associated
with the likelihood of dying from mental disorders in either time period. All
deaths except one in this category were related to abuse of drugs or alcohol.
Drug and alcohol-related mortality will be discussed in more detail later in
this Section and also in Section 4.3.2.
External causes of death; Table 22 presents mortality from specific types of
external causes. Vietnam veterans were more likely than non-Vietnam veterans
to die in motor vehicle accidents (MVA), from accidental poisonings, and from
injuries that were undetermined whether accidentally or purposely inflicted.
Vietnam service does not appear to be associated with deaths from other
accidental causes, suicide, or homicide.
There are 13 accidental poisoning deaths among Vietnam veterans and 5 in
the non-Vietnam group. Nine Vietnam veterans died from drug intoxication
compared with four non-Vietnam veterans. Of the remaining four accidental
poisoning deaths among Vietnam veterans, three were due to carbon monoxide
poisoning and one to a work-related toxic gas exposure; the other non-Vietnam
veteran death was due to poisoning by an unspecified substance.
-22-

�Deaths undetermined whether accidentally or purposely inflicted among
Vietnam veterans include four poisonings, three deaths by shotgun wound to the
head (not stated as self-inflicted), and one in a fire. In this same
category, there is one death by drowning and another due to narcotic poisoning
among non-Vietnam veterans.
Deaths from MVAs, other accidents, suicide, and homicide contain adequate
numbers for further exploration (Table 23). Deaths due to MVAs are
significantly elevated among Vietnam veterans in the first five years after
discharge (RRsl.93). After 5 years, the excess is considerably less, although
still somewhat elevated (RR=1.16). No association is seen in either time
period for accidental deaths other than those from motor vehicles or
poisonings.
For deaths due to suicide, a 72% nonsignificant increase is seen among
Vietnam veterans in the initial 5 years of follow-up, but a deficit is seen
thereafter. Because of possible inaccuracy in the recording of suicide on
death certificates, we broadened the definition to include all accidental
poisonings (E850-E869), reported suicides (E950-E959), injuries undetermined
whether accidentally or purposely inflicted (E980-E989), and ill-defined and
unknown causes of death (799.9). The main difference between the results for
this new category and the previous one is the slight, non-significant
elevation in risk now seen in the later, follow-up period. (RR=1.12).
Finally, an early postservice excess is seen for deaths due to homicide but
the relative risk drops below 1.0 thereafter. There were no postservice
deaths due to war-related injuries.
In Appendix D, the consistency of the association between Vietnam service
and deaths due to flVAs and suicide is examined with respect to age at
separation, race, duty MOS, enlistment status, GT score, pay grade at
discharge, and year of discharge. In general, the RRs are increased in the
first 5 years postservice and are close to 1.0 thereafter. There is some
nonsignificant variation among the various subgroups, but the overall patterns
are similar to what is observed for total mortality.
Drug- and alcohol-related deaths: Twenty-one deaths meet the criteria
outlined in Section 3.1.3 for an alcohol-related death (Table 24). Over the
entire follow-up period, there is a 27% increase (nonsignificant) in
alcohol-related deaths among Vietnam veterans relative to non-Vietnam &lt;
veterans. When the rate ratios are examined by time since discharge, a 73%
nonsignificant increase is seen in the later period of follow-up. Because
information on alcohol use may not be consistently reported on death '
certificates for external causes, deaths from alcohol-related diseases are
examined separately. Alcohol-related diseases include alcoholic psychoses
(291.0-291.9), alcohol dependence syndrome (303), nondependent abuse of
alcohol (305.0), alcoholic polyneuropathy, (357.5), alcoholic cardiomyopathy
(425.5), alcoholic gastritis (535.3), alcoholic liver disease (571.0-571.3),
and excessive blood level of alcohol (790.3). Nine of the 21 alcohol-related
deaths are due to these causes; 3 occurred among Vietnam veterans and 6 in the
non-Vietnam group.
Table 24 also shows that Vietnam service appears to be strongly associated
with the likelihood of dying from a drug-related death. Overall, the rate of
drug-related deaths among Vietnam veterans is 2.1 times that for non-Vietnam
veterans. Furthermore, increased mortality among Vietnam veterans is seen not
only in the first 5 years after discharge, but also in the subsequent time
period.

-23-

�4.3.2. Cause of Death Based on Medical Review
This section presents a re-analysis of selected ICD-9 cause-of-death
categories based on review, by a panel of physicians, of available information
relevant to the cause of death beyond the death certificate. It also includes
a detailed examination of deaths associated with the use of alcohol and drugs
as determined by the panel. First, a brief examination of differences between
underlying causes of death derived from death certificates and those
determined by the medical review panel is presented. Further detail is
provided in Appendix E.
To arrive at the best judgment of underlying cause of death, we sought all
pertinent documentation that might help to determine the nature and
circumstances of the death. Information was obtained for 426 of the 446 total
deaths: 95% (n=233) of Vietnam veteran deaths and 97% (n=193) of deaths among
non-Vietnam veterans. Law enforcement records, autopsy reports, medical
examiners' reports, and hospital records were the most common sources of
information used by the medical review panel (Table 25). More supplemental
records were available for non-Vietnam veterans than for Vietnam veterans from
every source except hospitals and physicians. Significant differences in the
availability of records between the cohorts are noted for law enforcement
records, medical examiner's reports, and histopathology reports. The total
number of available records also differed somewhat by cohort (Table 26). Four
or more different types of records were obtained for 50% of non-Vietnam
veteran deaths versus 45X of Vietnam veteran deaths.
The percent agreement and kappa statistic, quantifying agreement between
the medical-review-panel cause of death and that from the death certificate,
are presented in Table 27 for major cause-of-death categories. A more .
detailed examination of the agreement between medical-review-panel assignment
of causes of death and death-certificate underlying causes is presented in
Appendix E. Overall, there is good•agreement (82%, kappa=0.79) between
death-certificate and medical-review cause of death. Exceptionally good
agreement is found for deaths due to neoplasms, MVAs, suicide, and homicide;
for both Vietnam and non-Vietnam veterans, the kappa statistics for these
causes are greater than 0.90. Poorer agreement is apparent for other causes
of death, but most kappa values are based on small numbers and, therefore, are
subject to considerable variation. All kappa values, however, are
statistically significant at the 0.01 level, indicating that although
agreement is poor in some categories, it is better than expected by chance
alone.
Table 28 presents cause-specific mortality rates by cohort as determined
by the medical review panel. For categories where formal analysis was
possible, an elevated rate ratio for Vietnam veterans is seen for deaths due
to neoplasms, mental disorders, and external causes. Additionally, a lower
death rate for Vietnam veterans is noted for circulatory diseases. None of
the differences are statistically significant.
When rate ratios based on medical review were compared with those based on
death certificates, two differences are apparent for causes with substantial
numbers of deaths. The first category is neoplasms, with the rate ratio
derived from medical review of 1.21, and a rate ratio of 0.82 from death
certificates. This difference is primarily the result of two neoplasm deaths
among non-Vietnam veterans being reclassified elsewhere and the opposite
situation occurring among Vietnam veterans. (Details are available in
Appendix E.)

-24-

�»

When examining neoplastic deaths by time since discharge (Table 29), the
rate ratio is similar in both periods'of follow-up. Furthermore, among those
followed for 11 or more years, there is no suggestion of differential,
mortality (three deaths among Vietnam veterans versus five among non-Vietnam
veterans). Examination of specific types of cancer (Table 30) shows more
deaths among Vietnam veterans from brain cancer, leukemia, and non-Hodgkin's
lymphomas, all in very small numbers. The increase in the total number of
malignant neoplasm deaths through medical review is primarily the result of
confirming the malignancy of three brain tumors, all among Vietnam veterans.
The nature of the tumor was not specified on the death certificate for any of
the three. Finally, the three non-Hodgkin's lymphoma deaths among Vietnam
veterans are the result of reclassifying two deaths among Vietnam veterans to
lymphosarcoma (ICO-9, 200). These deaths were classified by the death
certificate to cardiac arrest (ICD-9, 427.5) and acute lymphoid leukemia
(ICO-9, 204.0). Further deatils are given in Appendix E.
Mental disorders is the second cause-of-death category for which there is
a difference between the rate ratios obtained from medical review and-death
certificates. With the medical-review cause of death, a threefold risk is
evident among Vietnam veterans, but the rate ratio is close to unity according
to death-certificate causes of death. All "mental disorder" deaths, by either
classification, involved alcohol or drugs. Differences in classification of
these deaths is the result, in most cases, of a greater specificity in
terminology used by the medical review panel. For example, in two cases the
review panel cited alcoholic liver damage, unspecified (ICD-9, 571.3) as the
underlying cause, whereas the death certificate wording limited the
classification to alcohol dependence syndrome (ICD-9, 303). Alcohol- and
drug-related deaths determined from medical review are examined in more detail
below in this section.
Table 31 examines relative mortality for specific external causes of death
as determined from medical review. These results are identical to those found
from the death certificate analysis. Vietnam veterans are more likely than
non-Vietnam veterans to die in motor vehicle accidents, from accidental
poisonings and from injuries undetermined whether accidentally or purposely
inflicted. The overall rate ratios are not significantly elevated for deaths
due to suicide, homicide, and all other external causes. However, further
exploration of external causes of death by time since discharge indicates the
same pattern for MVAs, suicide, and homicide as seen in the death certificate
results; the rate ratios are elevated in the first 5 years after discharge and
are close to 1.0 for the remainder of follow-up.
Supplemental information collected for the medical review panel allowed
further exploration of MVA deaths. Daytime and nighttime motor—vehicle-crash
deaths as well as single and multiple vehicle events all occurred more
frequently among Vietnam veterans during the early postdischarge period (Table
32).
Me also examined the role of alcohol and drug use in motor vehicle
accident deaths. Drug use information on MVA deaths was limited; the medical
review panel identified only one drug-related MVA death. Blood alcohol level
information or the suspected involvement of alcohol was available for 82 (62%)
of the 132 medically reviewed MVA deaths. Table 33 shows that in the initial
follow-up period, there is a weak relationship between Vietnam service and
alcohol-related MVAs (RR=1.35) in contrast to a stronger relationship for MVAs
that are not alcohol-related (RR=2.25). The pattern of risk for MVAs with
-25-

�"unknown alcohol involvement" is similar to that for "no alcohol
involvement."
The agreement between the death certificate and medical review panel for
alcohol- and drug-related deaths is presented in Table 34. Twenty-one deaths
are defined as "alcohol-related" from death certificates and 133 from medical
review. This lack of agreement is evident regardless of the specific type of
alcohol-related death; the kappa statistic ranges from 0.11 for accidental
causes to 0.44 for alcohol-related natural causes of death. The overall
agreement for drug-related deaths is much better than that for alcohol-related
deaths, but for specific categories the agreement is poor.
Overall there is a slight excess of alcohol-related deaths among Vietnam
veterans (Table 35), due mainly to accidents. Deaths from alcohol-related
natural causes and deaths due to alcohol-related suicide, homicide and
injuries of undetermined intentionality are not associated with service in
Vietnam.
The distribution of drug-related deaths by cohort is presented in Table
36. Overall, Vietnam veterans are 1.6 times as likely to die from
drug-related deaths as non-Vietnam veterans. Suicide by drugs is a very minor
component of this excess. Moreover, as shown in Table,37, when the follow-up
interval is subdivided into three time periods, the RRs appear to increase
over time, with a substantial excess of drug-related deaths in the most recent
years of observation.
Although based on a small number of deaths, the drug-related mortality
excess appears to be limited to Vietnam veterans who were drafted into service
and those whose jobs involved tactical or combat operations (see Appendix D,
Table D-3). Additionally, there is some suggestion that those discharged
during 1970 or after had a greater excess of drug-related deaths. However,
when we examine the year in which the veteran served in Vietnam as opposed to
his date of discharge, it appears that the drug-related excess is especially
high among Vietnam veterans who were stationed in Vietnam during 1968 or 1969
(RR=4.93, 95X CI=1.14-21.34). The rate of drug-related deaths is similar
between Vietnam and non-Vietnam veterans serving before (RR=1.20) and after
(RR=0.71) that time period.
4.3.3. Consideration of Covariates
Table 38 presents adjusted rate ratios based on a Cox regression model for
cause-specific death categories with sufficient numbers of deaths for formal
analysis. Adjusted values are based on a model stratified on MOS and
enlistment status, and including age, race, GT score, pay grade at discharge
and year of discharge. Rate ratios based on death-certificate cause of death
and medical-review cause of death are both presented. In the early follow-up
period, adjustment increases the RR for suicide based on death-certificate
cause of death from 1.72 to 2.54 and, based on the medical review data, from
1.64 to 2.47. Pay grade at discharge and GT score are the covariates that
have the greatest effect on the adjusted suicide estimate. Adjustment also
had some effect on the RR for alcohol- and drug-related deaths based on the
death-certificate data. For alcohol-related deaths, the RR increased from
1.73 to 2.23 in the later follow-up period while the RR for drug-related
deaths in the initial follow-up period increased from 1.93 to 2.86.
4.4.

COMPARISON OF VETERAN AND U.S. DEATH RATES

Presented in Table 39 are the observed and expected numbers of deaths from
all causes for the two veteran cohorts stratified by the number of years since

-26-

�discharge from active military service. Over the total follow-up period, both
groups of veterans have a significantly lower mortality rate for "natural
causes" than the general U.S. male population. However, during the first 5
years after discharge, Vietnam veterans have a higher death rate from external
causes whereas non-Vietnam veterans have a lower rate relative to the general
population. In the later time period both groups of veterans show a similar
deficit in external cause mortality.
Standardized mortality ratios for major natural cause-of-death categories
are given in Table 40. Among Vietnam veterans the SMRs for most natural
causes of death are below 1.0, with the exception of deaths due to diseases of
the genitourinary system (SMR=2.53, 95X CI=0.82-5.89). For diseases of the
circulatory system, the deficit of deaths in Vietnam veterans is much greater
(52X) than for non-Vietnam veterans (13X). Both cohorts experienced
lower-than-expected mortality for diseases of the digestive system and
neoplasms.
The SMRs for specific external causes (Table 41) show an excess of deaths
among Vietnam veterans due to accidental causes, mainly from motor vehicle
accidents. Suicide mortality is at the same level as that in the general
populatign in the Vietnam cohort. Among non-Vietnam veterans, the SMRs for
specific external causes are all at or below 1.00, indicating no excess of
deaths relative to the general population experience.

-27-

�5.

DISCUSSION

The findings described here raise a number of issues related to the
interpretation of and conclusions about the postservice mortality experience
of Vietnam veterans. Among these are the strengths and limitations of the
study, findings from previous studies of Vietnam veterans, and prior
investigations of veterans of other wars. These topics are reviewed here, and
a number of summary comments are made regarding mortality risks of Vietnam
veterans.- Some of the concluding remarks are speculative, since available
data do not allow further inferences. Other comments represent our best
judgment about relationships between mortality and the Vietnam experience,
given the totality of data examined.
5.1.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

This study began with a carefully defined cohort of Vietnam-era soldiers,
and various methods were used to ascertain deaths occurring after separation
from active duty. Vietnam and non-Vietnam veterans were chosen according to a
stringent-set of criteria to ensure-maximum comparability. A comparison of
entry and military-service characteristics for the two groups of veterans has
confirmed their general similarity. Adjustment for residual differences in
background characteristics between the two groups did not appreciably alter
most relative mortality estimates. This indicates that differences in known
background characteristics do not account for the observed pattern of relative
mortality among Vietnam veterans. However, the possibility exists that other,
unmeasured differences between the two cohorts could affect the estimate of
the effect of Vietnam service on mortality.
Through the multiple overlapping sources of death ascertainment, virtually
all deaths that occurred in the U.S.A. should have been identified, but some
that occurred elsewhere may have been missed. Confirmation of death was
obtained from copies of official death certificates, which were recovered for
all but 2% of the deaths. A distinct advantage of this study is the special
attempt to locate all presumably living men for the purpose of conducting
health interviews; in most cohort mortality studies these persons are not
individually traced. This component of the study provided verification of
vital status on 94% of Vietnam veterans and 92X of those serving elsewhere.
Furthermore, background and military-service characteristics of those with
unconfirmed vital status are similar between the two cohorts, suggesting that
mortality rates in these subgroups are not likely to be very different.
Me attempted to keep misclassification of cohort status and cause of death
to a minimum.- After death certificates were coded, the correspondence between
the ICD codes and the actual medical statements on the certificates was
verified independently by two CDC staff persons. Any discrepancies were
resolved with the nosologist. An evaluation of the reproducibility of cause
of death coding by the nosologist indicated excellent agreement between the
original codes and a sample of blind repeats. To minimize misclassification
of cohort status, we verified duty location for all postservice deaths.
A special feature of this study is the special independent medical review
of causes of deaths by reference to supplemental medical and legal documents
recovered for 97% of deaths for which death certificates were obtained. This
process clarified general or vague terms on death certificates, assured that
as much information as possible was considered in cause-of-death
determinations, and permitted use of similar criteria to determine underlying
cause of death for the two cohorts. This was especially valuable for

-28-

�identifying deaths that were alcohol or drug-related. Through the medical
review effort many more alcohol-related deaths were found than were derived
from death certificates alone and half again as many drug-related deaths.
These larger numbers of "cases" produced more reliable risk estimates and the
standardization of criteria produced more valid results. Interestingly, the
number of suicide deaths derived from death certificates (n=29) was about the
same as from the medical review (n=32) and the adjusted rate ratios based on
the two sources are similar in both follow-up periods (RRs=2.54 and 2.47 in
the early interval and RRs=0.57 and 0.74 in the later interval).
Any observational study has limitations. Perhaps the most important one
here is the restricted sample size and limited number of deaths in this young
population for most major cause of death categories, and especially for
specific diseases or conditions. With the exception of the relatively common
external causes of death, this study could detect, as statistically
significant, only substantial elevations in cause-specific death rates.
Nevertheless, numbers of deaths from some causes are significant to identify
patterns' of risk that are informative. This is important in interpreting the
findings for drug-related deaths, suicide, and homicide.
The extent of underreporting in our data, in particular for deaths which
are alcohol- or drug-related, may be substantial. If alcohol- or drug-related
deaths were more or less likely to be reported among Vietnam veterans than
non-Vietnam veterans, the resulting rate ratios would reflect this reporting
bias. In our data, however, only drug-related deaths appeared in excess among
Vietnam veterans; if reporting was differential, we might expect both alcohol
and drug deaths to be in excess.
A methodologic issue of concern in the analysis of these data was the
choice of relevant covariates as possible confounders. In particular, some of
the military service variables such as "pay grade at discharge" and
"AWOL/confinement time" are measured during or after the military experience
and could be affected differentially by it in the two cohorts. If this was
the case, adjustment for that covariate could introduce a bias in the RR
estimate. Pay grade was retained in the reduced model (e.g.. Table 38) since
it is a strong determinant of mortality in these data and in prior studies of
Army veterans.17'28 The biggest shift in the relative mortality estimate
caused by including a military service covariate in the Cox model, namely pay
grade, occurred for suicide.
,
Another potential limitation of this study is the relatively short time
that has elapsed since the Vietnam conflict. If the "Vietnam experience" does
place veterans at an increased risk for certain fatal chronic diseases, the
time interval between exposure and death may be longer than our current 10-15
years of follow-up. Continued monitoring of mortality in VES participants,
therefore, may provide additional insights.
5.2.

COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUS MORTALITY STUDIES OF VIETNAM VETERANS

The present findings can be viewed against the results of five previous
mortality studies of Vietnam veterans. Four are proportional mortality
studies6'9, which may not be directly comparable to this study because of
incompleteness of data and inherent limitations of the analytic method.29
The fifth, a cohort study of Australian Vietnam veterans, is very similar in
design to our study and, thus, is a more appropriate comparison.10 The U.S.
Air Force's "Ranch Hand Study" is not discussed here, since its principal
concern is the adverse health effects of herbicide exposure in a unique group
of veterans.5

-29-

�Two of the proportional mortality studies were conducted using fairly
well-defined populations.'''® The results of one included nonsignificant
increases in suicide, homicide, accidental poisonings and nonmotor vehicle
accidents of transport among Vietnam veterans relative to other Vietnam-era
veterans. However, deaths due to MVAs were not elevated.? Time since
discharge was not considered in that study and this was critical in
elucidating the pattern of external cause mortality in our study. In the
other study, only deaths from suicide and motor-vehicle accidents were
examined, and neither occurred more frequently among Vietnam veterans.8
The two other proportional mortality studies were conducted by using
deaths occurring among veterans registered for a military service bonus in
their respective states6'9, and it is unclear what bias may have been
introduced through this selection process. In one of the studies, a
nonsignificant increase in deaths from MVAs among Vietnam veterans was
found.6
The excess in overall mortality among Australian Vietnam veterans was
mainly confined to men who had served in the Engineer Corps, a finding the
investigators could not entirely explain.*0 A similar variation in risk is
not seen in the present study, although the number of'men assigned to Engineer
units is relatively small.
The 30% excess of external-cause mortality among Australian Vietnam
veterans relative to non-Vietnam veterans is similar to what is seen in our
study. Although the Australian investigators do not examine external cause
mortality by time since discharge, there is a suggestion of a decline in
relative mortality from all causes with increasing time since discharge.
Deaths from suicide, homicide, and accidental poisoning also occur more
frequently among Australian Vietnam veterans. MVA mortality is not elevated
overall, but an excess in the youngest age group is suggested. The authors
conclude that although modest, the consistency of the results across several
external cause-specific categories may indicate that.the association is, in
fact, real.
The results of our study are in agreement with those of the Australian
study, that is, no association was found between service in Vietnam and
mortality due to neoplasms (all types combined). In several of the
proportional mortality studies, however, investigators found an increased
frequency of deaths from connective-tissue and other soft-tissue cancers among
Vietnam veterans.6'8'9 There are no such deaths in the present study, and
only two among Australian Vietnam veterans, but small sample sizes' in both
studies preclude the detection of increased risks for these rare
malignancies. For this reason, these tumors and others are being examined in
CDC's Selected Cancers Study.3
One surprising finding is the lower mortality rate from cardiovascular
disease (CVO) among Vietnam veterans. This result is evident regardless of
time since discharge and applies to several major types of circulatory
disease". The lower rate might be explained as a by-product of some kind of
selection process taking place in the final assignments to Vietnam, which
might correlate with cardiovascular fitness established during basic or
advanced training. In fact, the STIR results suggest that the CVD deficit may
be the result of an unusually high rate in the comparison group. CVO
mortality in the non-Vietnam cohort is only slightly below that of the general
population, whereas we expected it to be much lower.25 Various indices of
CVD morbidity measured in the other components of the VES may help in

-30-

�elucidating the mortality findings. Contrary to our findings for CVD,
Australian Vietnam veterans experienced a significant 90% increase in deaths
from such causes.10 The investigators speculate that this increase may have
resulted from health-influencing behaviors, such as cigarette smoking and
excess alcohol intake, which Vietnam veterans may have acquired more easily
than non-Vietnam veterans because of the stressful environment of the war zone
and/or the availability of these substances.
Australian Vietnam veterans have an excess of deaths from alcohol-related
natural causes, but no increases in deaths from alcohol-related external
causes or any type of drug-related mortality. These findings are contrary to
ours and may reflect differences in use of drugs and alcohol by American and
Australian troops. In contrast 5 to the reportedly heavy use of illicit drugs
by American troops in Vietnam,3* '31 drug use among Australian soldiers was
reported to be uncommon, while alcohol use was heavy.10
Another point that can be raised here is the relationship between the
present findings for drug-related deaths and two factors: (1) the reported
heavy use of drugs (especially narcotics) among servicemen in Vietnam in the
latter part of the conflict (1969-1971)30'31 and (2) surveys of postservice
drug use^by veterans in which no association with service in Vietnam or combat
exposure was found.31'32 With respect to the first point, our results do
not show a relationship between total mortality or any specific cause of death
and discharge from the Army in 1970 or later, a time period that would include
men who were in Vietnam in the early 1970s. On the contrary, the overall
mortality excess is greatest among Vietnam veterans discharged in the late
1960s, and drug-related deaths are most excessive among Vietnam veterans who
were in Vietnam in the late 1960s. Regarding the second point, it would
appear that the drug-related findings are at variance with findings in two
surveys of drug use among living Vietnam veterans.31'32 One possibility for
the discordant results is response bias on the part of interviewed Vietnam
veterans whereby actual drug use is concealed. Admittedly, this would have
had to operate in two independent surveys. Another consideration is the time
frame for the studies. Since the-greatest part of our excess occurs 11 or
more years after discharge, it could be a delayed response that affects a
susceptible subgroup of Vietnam veterans and is completely masked when use
habits are studied in living veterans at earlier points in time. Also,.one of
the surveys was conducted with veterans returning from Vietnam in late
197131, while the drug-related excess in our study was found among those
serving in Vietnam during the late 1960's.
5.3. POSSIBLE INTERPRETATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
The increase in early postdischarge mortality from external causes (i.e.,
MVA, suicide and homicide) among Vietnam veterans seen in this study has at
least three possible explanations:
1) It reflects a peculiarity of the process of selecting men for assignment, •
whereby those sent to Vietnam tended to have characteristics that placed
them at increased risk of dying from external causes shortly after
discharge from active duty.
2) It is a result of the psychological and physical stresses associated with
military duty in a combat zone, a set of circumstances not unique to the
Vietnam conflict.
3) It is a consequence of the uniqueness of the Vietnam conflict, some
combination of environment and experience that exerted special effects

-31-

�while men were serving there and/or after their return to an unsupportive
and sometimes hostile social climate in the U.S.A.
The first of these possibilities appears doubtful for several reasons. In
our data, no important differences were apparent in background characteristics
between Vietnam and non-Vietnam veterans (e.g., race, age, aptitude test
scores) at the time of entry into the Army. On the other hand, the
non-Vietnam group had a higher prevalence of nonhonorable discharges, lower
pay grades at discharge, and more AWOL or confinement time while in the Army,
characteristics that might be associated with risk-taking behavior.
Furthermore, if Vietnam veterans tended to have a greater predisposition (by
selection) toward traumatic events than non-Vietnam veterans, it might be
expected to manifest itself in increased relative mortality from such causes
throughout the entire period of observation, rather than being confined to the
first few years after discharge, as was observed here. Further doubt about
such selective factors is raised by a survey of high-school boys which showed
that those who subsequently served in Vietnam were similar to those who served
elsewhere-in the military with respect to family background, early academic
abilities and achievements, and adolescent personality .traits.33
The second possible explanation has some basis in the light of previous
studies of postservice mortality among U.S. veterans who served in other war
zones. Increased postdischarge mortality from external causes was observed in
two groups of World Mar II combat veterans and one group of Korean War combat
veterans, when compared with the general U.S. male population, even though
older men and officers were included.34 In contrast, broader cross sections
of World War II veterans, including both combat and noncombat groups, showed
no difference, or even a slight deficit, in postdischarge traumatic deaths,
25,34 as did non-Vietnam veterans in our study.
The third possible explanation for the present findings, the unique
elements of the Vietnam conflict, seems plausible on the surface, since the
Vietnam conflict was characterized by a number of special features. Among
these were: (1) entry to, and exit from, the war zone in a very compressed
time period, with little or no time for adjustment (the "jet-age war"
phenomenon); (2) individual replacement after predetermined 12-month tours of
duty (associated with reduced morale and cohesiveness within units);
(3) fighting an enemy that was hard to distinguish from one's allies; and
(4) fighting for "body counts" rather than for territory. On top of this,
returning Vietnam veterans encountered an indifferent and sometimes hostile
reception at home. This is in direct contrast to the experience of most World
War II and Korean War veterans who were sent overseas "for the duration" as
members of pre-formed units that trained and stayed together. Warfare was
more "conventional", and objectives could be more easily understood.
Furthermore, the World War II and Korean veterans returned to a generally more
supportive homeland. In spite of these contrasts in military experience,
however, the same pattern of excess postservice mortality due to external
causes seen in Vietnam veterans is also 'found among men returning from combat
areas in the two previous wars. Thus, increased external cause mortality seen
here among Vietnam veterans may be one of the unfortunate sequelae of unusual
stresses endured while stationed in a hostile fire zone.
Although this explanation is very suggestive, it should be noted that
certain features of our data do not support this conclusion. Namely, Vietnam
veterans who were likely to have engaged in combat did not have a higher rate
of mortality than Vietnam veterans who were less likely to have done so. We

-32-

�might expect just the opposite if the excess mortality observed here is the
result of the psychological and physical .stresses associated with military
duty in a combat zone. Also, the findings for the World War II and Korean Mar
Army veterans are not particularly enlightening for deaths due to suicide and
homicide, because of small number of such deaths and the lack of data on
suicide and homicide risks according to time period after discharge. In
addition, the influence of factors specific to the Vietnam experience in
explaining this early postservice external mortality excess cannot be
completely ruled out. Indeed, cross sectional surveys 32,33,35-37 natfa
uncovered a variety of psychosocial and economic problems among Vietnam
veterans that may be the precursors for certain types of traumatic deaths,
such as suicide.
If the MVA excess among Vietnam veterans is causally related to their
experience in a combat zone, it may be consistent with one or more
theories of young driver risk-taking behavior.38 According to these
theories, unusual risk-taking on the part of young drivers may be:
(1) an outlet for stress, aggression, hostility, or frustration.
Could service in Vietnam have created these feelings?
(2) ,a physiological need for increased arousal that makes some
people seek ways of increasing their stimulation. Could service
in Vietnam have produced a desire for sensation- or
thrill-seeking?
(3) an attempt by some persons to increase the level of perceived
driving risk to some higher target level that they find
acceptable. Could service in Vietnam have produced an
acceptance of increased risk in everyday life?
Whatever the explanation is, factors responsible for the MVA results were
operable only in the first few years after discharge. Thus, this may
have been the critical period in which those most affected by the Vietnam
experience succumbed.
The pattern of drug-related mortality among Vietnam veterans in this
study appears different from the pattern of external causes (i.e., MVAs,
suicide, homicide). Excess drug-related deaths increase with time since
discharge, and certain subgroups of Vietnam veterans seem to be at
especially high risk, namely, draftees and those whose job was in
tactical operations (i.e., combat-related activities). Examination of ,
risks in relation to the calendar year men were in Vietnam shows the
largest excess associated with 1968 and 1969, the years of heaviest •
combat. Thus, the increased death rates from drug-related causes among
Vietnam veterans may be linked to intensity of combat exposure rather
than to a general, across-the-board effect of the Vietnam experience.
The mortality assessment of Vietnam veterans presented here is an
incomplete evaluation of the health experience of this group. Additional
data on the present and past health status of living Vietnam veterans
will be forthcoming from the health interview and medical, psychological,
and laboratory evaluation components of the VES. Because this group of
veterans has not yet reached the age span where chronic diseases have an
important impact on mortality, continued monitoring of mortality among
VES participants may provide additional insights.
-33-

�REFERENCES

-34-

�»

J.
1. Veterans Health Programs Extension and Improvement Act of 1979.
Law 96-151 [H.R. 3892]; December 20, 1979, 93 STAT 1092-1098.
2.

Public

Veterans' Health Care, Training, and Small Business Loan Act of 1981.
Public Law 97-72 [H.R. 3499];November 3, 1981, 95 STAT 1047-1063.

3. Centers for Disease Control: Protocol for Epidemiologic Studies of the
Health of Vietnam Veterans. Atlanta, Centers for Disease Control,
November, 1983.
4. Centers for Disease Control: Responses to Scientific Reviews of the
Centers for Disease Control's Draft Protocols for Epidemiologic Studies
of the Health of Vietnam Veterans. Atlanta, Centers for Disease Control,
November, 1983.
5. Lathrop GO, Moynahan Pfl, Albanese RA, Wolfe WH: Project Ranch Hand II. An
Epidemiologic Investigation of Health Effects in Air Force Personnel
Following Exposure to Herbicides: Baseline Mortality Study Results. San
Antonio, Brooks Air Force Base, U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace
Medicine, 1983.
6. Kogan MD, Clapp RW: Mortality Among Vietnam Veterans in Massachusetts,
1972-1983. Boston, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, 1985.
7. Lawrence CE, Reilly AA, Quickenton P, et al: Mortality patterns of New
York State Vietnam veterans. Am J Public Health 1985;75:277-279.
8. Anderson HA, Hanrahan LP, Jensen M, et al: Wisconsin Vietnam Veteran
Mortality Study. Madison, Wisconsin Division of Health, 1985.
9. Holmes AP: West Virginia Vietnam-Era Veterans Mortality Study.
Charleston, West Virginia Health Department, 1986.
10. Fett MJ, Dunn M, Adena MA, et al: Australian Veterans Health Studies: The
Mortality Report. Part I: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Mortality Among
Australian National Servicemen of the Vietnam Conflict Era, and an
Executive Summary of the Mortality Report. Canberra, Australian
Government Publishing Service, 1984.
11. Department of the Army: U.S. Army Replacement System Overseas Service.
Assignments, Details and Transfers. AR 614-30. Washington, D.C.,
Department of the Army, September, 1967.
12. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare: International
Classification of Diseases, Adapted for Use in the United States. Eighth
Revision. PHS Publication No. 1693. Washington, D.C., U.S. Government
Printing Office, 1967.

-35-

:

�13. World Health Organization: Manual of the International Statistical
Classification of Diseases, Injuries, and Causes of Death. Ninth
Revision. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1977.
14. Department of the Army: Medical Service. Standards of Medical Fitness.
AR 40-501. Washington, D.C., Department of the Army, December, 1960.
15. Department of the Army: Enlisted Personnel Selection, Training, and
Assignment System Grades E-l Through E-9. AR 614-200. Washington, D.C.,
Department of the Army, June, 1970.
16. Department of the Army: Enlisted Military Occupational Specialities. AR
611-201. Washington, D.C., Department of the Army, January, 1967.
17. Keehn RJ: Military rank at separation and mortality. Armed Forces and
Society 1978;4:283-292.
18. McClure GMG: Trends in suicide rates for England and Wales, 1975-1980.
Br J Psych 1984;144:119-126.
19. Laird N, Oliver D: Covariance analysis of censored survival data using
log-linear analysis techniques. J Am Stat Assoc 1981;76:231-241.
20. Cox DR, Oakes D: Analysis of Survival Data. London, Chapman and Hall,
1984.
21. Harrell FE: The PHGLM Procedure. In Joyner SP (ed): SUGI Supplemental
Library User's Guide. Gary, N.C., SAS Institute, Inc, 1983.
22. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL: The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time
Data. New York, John Wiley &amp; Sons, 1980.
23. Fleiss JL: Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, Second
Edition. New York, John Wiley &amp; Sons, 1981.
24. Landis JR, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for
categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74.
25. Seltzer CC, JabIon S: Effects of selection on mortality. Am J Epidemiol
1974;100:367-372.
26. Monson RR: Analysis of relative survival and proportional mortality.
Comp Biomed Res 1974;7:325-332.
27. Rothman KJ, Boice JD: Epidemiologic Analysis with a Programmable
Calculator. Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979.
28. Seltzer CC, JabIon S: Army rank and subsequent mortality by cause:
23-year follow-up. Am J Epidemiol 1977;105:559-566.
29. Wong 0, Decoufle P: Methodological issues involving the standardized
mortality ratio and proportionate mortality ratio in occupational
studies. J Occup Med 1982;24:299-304.

-36-

�30. Ritter C, Clayton RR, Voss HL: Vietnam military .service and marijuana
use. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1985;11:119-130.
31. Robins LN, Helzer JE, Davis DH: Narcotic use in Southeast Asia and
afterward. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1975; 32:955-961.
32. Yager T, Laufer R, Gallops M: Some problems associated with war
experience in men of the Vietnam generation. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1984;
41:327-333.
33. Card JJ: Lives after Vietnam.
1983.

Lexington, Mass., D.C. Heath and Company,

34. Nefzger MO: Follow-up studies of World Mar II and Korean Mar prisoners.
I. Study plan and mortality findings. Am J Epidemiol 1970;91:123-138.
35. Fischer V, Boyle JM, Bucuvalas M, et al: Myths and Realities: A Study
of Attitudes Toward Vietnam Era Veterans. New York, Louis Harris and
Associates, Inc., 1980.
36. Helzer JE, Robins LN, Davis DH: Depressive disorders in Vietnam
returnees. J Nerv Ment Dis 1976;163:177-185.
37. Louis Harris and Associates, Inc.: A Study of the Problems Facing
Vietnam Era Veterans on Their Readjustment to Civilian Life. U.S. Senate
Committee Print No. 7. Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing
Office, 1972.
38. Johan BA: Accident risk and risk-taking behavior among young drivers.
Accid Anal &amp; Prev 1986; 18":255-271.

-37-

�FIGURE 1. Selection of Study Group.

* Excluded from study.

+ Eighty-three percent (N = 194) of active duty deaths among Vietnam
veterans were due to war-related activities.

�FIGURE 2. Mortality Rates* of Vietnam
and Non-Vietnam Cohorts
by Years Since Discharge

* Mortality rates are three-year moving averages.

�VIETNAM-ERA ARMY PERSONNEL
RECORDS FILED AT NPRC
BETWEEN SEPT 1964 AND JUNE 1977
Approx. 4,900,000

RANDOM SAMPLE
48.513

i RECORDS NOT FOUND*
1,355

QUALIFIED FOR STUDY
18.581

VIETNAM
9,558

NOT QUALIFIED
28.571

NON-VIETNAM
9.023

DIED ON ACTIVE DUTY
34

i DIED ON ACTIVE DUTY *
1
234

VIETNAM
COHORT
9,324

NON-VIETNAM
COHORT
8.989

�Smoothed Mortality Rates of Vietnam-Era Veterans
by Years Since Discharge

Figure 2

3

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

2.4

!
L
a!
1.2

i

0.6

J

L

J

1

10
Years Since Discharge

15

�TABLE 1. Smallest Relative Risks Detectable with 95% Power for
Selected Causes of Death*

Cause of death

Deaths*
/1000

Rate
ratio4"*"

All causes

35.5

1.3

Accidents

13.2

1.5

Homicide

4.6

2.0

Suicide

4.3

2.0

Diseases of heart

3.1

2.3

Malignant neoplasms

2.9

2.3

Cirrhosis of liver

1.1

3.5

Cerebrovascular diseases

0.6

4.9

* Adapted from 1983 CDC Protocol3 (Table 1, p. 43)
+ Expected deaths over 17 years (1968-1984) based on 1978 U.S.
•age-specific rates for males as applied to a hypothetical cohort
. of men aged 22 at initiation of follow-up.
&lt;H

" Vietnam cohort relative to non-Vietnam cohort, with 8500 in each
cohort. Calculated by Arc Sin approximation, alpha = 0.05
(two-sided).

�TABLE 2. Number of Deaths During Active Military Service Among Vietnam and
Non-Vietnam Veterans, by Manner of Death
Non-Vietnam

Vietnam
Manner of
death

(X)

(X)

No.

181

(77.3)

0

( 0.0)

Implements of war related

13

( 5.6)

1

( 2-9)

Other

35

(15.0)

5

( 2.1)

Hostility related

Unknown
Total

No.

234

(100.0)

33

0

34

(97.1)
( 0.0)

(100.0)

�\
TABLE 3. Vital Status of Vietnam and Non-Vietnam Veterans at End of Follow-up
(December 31, 1983)
Vital
status

Vietnam
No.
(X)

Known dead*

246

(.)
26

200

(.)
22

Known alive

8,488

(91.0)

8,067

(89.7)

590

(6.3)

722

(.)
80

9,324

(0.)
100

8,989

(0.)
100

Status uncertain
Total

Non-Vietnam
No.
()
%

* Includes 9 veterans (7 Vietnam and 2 non-Vietnam) for whom death
certificates were not recovered but for whom sufficient information was
obtained to be certain that they had died.

�TABLE 4. Covariates Considered and Associated Categorizations Employed in
the Analysis
Variable

Categories for analysis

Race

White, Nonwhite

Place of birth

Northeast, Midwest, South, West +

Enlistment status

Volunteer, Draftee

PULHES categories:
Physical capacity or stamina

No Impairment, Some Impairment

Upper extremities

No Impairment, Some Impairment

Lower extremities
*

No Impairment, Some Impairment

Hearing acuity and ears

No Impairment, Some Impairment

Eyes and visual acuity

No Impairment, Some Impairment

Psychiatric functioning

No Impairment, Some Impairment

Composite index of physical and
psychological health

No Impairment, Some Impairment

Army Classification Battery:
Verbal ability
' Arithmetic reasoning

Continuous measure range from 1-200
Continuous measure range from 1-200

Pattern analysis

Continuous measure range from 1-200

General information

Continuous measure range from 1-200

General technical (GT)

Continuous measure range from 1-200

Armed Forces Qualification Test
(AFQT)

Continuous measure range from 1-100

Military occupational specialty
(MOS)

Tactical, Other

Type of unit

Infantry, Engineer, Armor, Cavalry,
Artillery, Other

Months of active duty

0-11, 12-23, 244-

�TABLE 4.

(continued)

Variable

Categories for analysis

AWOL or confinement time

Ever, Never

Type of discharge

Honorable, Nonhonorable

Pay grade at discharge

E1-E3, E4-E5

Age at discharge from
active duty

&lt;21. 21+ years44"

Year of discharge from
active duty -

Before 1970, 1970 and later

* Unknown values excluded from analyses.
+ Foreign places of birth included with West category.
41
4
When rate ratios are adjusted for age at separation,
age is treated as a continuous variable.

�TABLE 5. External Causa-of-Death Subcategories and Associated ICD-9 Codes
Used in Mortality Analyses
Sub-category

ICD-9 codes

Specific causes

1. Motor vehicle accident

E810-825, E929.0

Motor vehicle traffic
&amp; nontraffic accidents;
Late effects of motor
vehicle accidents

2. Accidental poisoning

E850-869, E929.2

Accidental overdose of
drugs; poisoning by
solids, liquids, gases
&amp; vapors; Late effects
of accidental poisoning

3. Suicide

E950-959

4. Homicide

E960-969

5. Injury of undetermined
intentionality

E980-989

6. Other external causes

E800-807, E826-849 Railway accidents;
Recreational vehicle,
water transport and air
transport accidents
E870-879
E880-888
E890-899

E900-909
E910-915
E916-928
E929.1.
E929.3-929.9
E930-949
E970-978

Injuries undetermined
whether accidentally or
purposely inflicted

Surgical and medical
misadventures and
complications
Accidental falls
Accidental fires and
flames
Accidents from natural
&amp; environmental factors
Submersion &amp; suffocation
Other accidents
Late effects of the
above accidents
Adverse effects of drugs
in therapeutic use
Legal intervention

�TABLE 6. Alcohol-Related Deaths Based oh ICD-9 Diagnoses Cited as Either Underlying or
Contributing Causes of Death '
Disease category

Underlying cause

Medical, neurologic
and psychiatric

Alcoholic psychoses (291.0-291.9)
Alcohol dependence syndrome (303)
Nondependent abuse of alcohol (305.0)
Alcoholic polyneuropathy (357.5)
Alcoholic cardiomyopathy (425.5)
Alcoholic gastritis (535.3)
Alcoholic liver disease (571.0-571.3)
Excessive blood level of alcohol (790.3)

Accidents
(Unintended trauma)

Contributing cause

Accidental poisoning by
alcohol (E860.0-E860.9)
Any other accident

Other trauma

Nondependent abuse
of alcohol (305.0)
or Excessive blood level
of alcohol (790.3)

Suicide, homicide or
injury of undetermined
intentionality

Nondependent abuse
of alcohol (305.0)
or Excessive blood- level
of alcohol (790.3)

�TABLE 7. Drug-Related Deaths/Based on ICD-9 Diagnoses Cited as Either
Underlying or Contributing Causes of Death
Disease category
Drug dependence
and abuse

.' ;

•
,

&lt;

Accidental poisoning
by drugs

Underlying cause

Contributing cause

Drug psychoses (292.0-292.9)
Drug dependence
(304.0-304.9) or Nondependent
abuse of drugs other than
alcohol or tobacco
(305.2-305.9)
Any other natural cause
or any traumatic cause
except accidental
poisoning by a drug of
abuse*. Suicide by drugs
or poisoning by drugs of
undetermined intentionality

Drug dependence
(304.0-304.9) or
Nondependent abuse
of drugs other than
alcohol or tobacco
(305.2-305.9)

Accidental poisoning by
a drug of abuse*

Accidental poisoning by
a drug of abuse*

Suicide by drugs
Suicide by drugs
or poisoning by
(E950.0-E950.5)
drugs, intentionality or Poisoning by drugs,
undetermined
intentionality undetermined
(E980.6-E980.5)

Suicide by drugs
(E950.0-E950.5)

or Poisoning by drugs,
intentionality
undetermined
(E980.0-E980.5)

* Includes the following drug categories:
Opiates and related narcotics (E850.0)
Salicylates (E850.1)
- . Aromatic analgesics, not elsewhere classified (E850.2)
Other non-narcotic analgesics (E850.5)
Other analgesics, antipyretics and antirheumatics (850.8)
Barbiturates (E851)
Sedatives and hypnotics (E852.0-E852.9)
Tranquilizers (E853.0-E853.9)
Other psychotropic drugs (E854.0-E854.3)
Other central nervous system depressants (E855.1)
Local anesthetics (E855.2)
Glues and adhesives (E866.6)
Nitrogen oxides (E869.0)

10

�i

TABLE 8. Summary of Differences in Entry and Military-Service I
Characteristics Between Vietnam and Non-Vietnam Veterans
Characteristic

Vietnam

Non-Vietnam

Race
(X white)

86.8

86.5

Region of birth
(X ME, «w)

49.3

50.4

Year of entry
(X before 1969)

72.1

60.6

Age at entry •
(mean, in years)

20.3

20.5

Enlistment status
(X draftee)

63.7

65.6

Health status at entry
(X with some impairment)
Physical capacity

0.9

1.2

Upper extremity

0.7

0.9

Lower extremity

2.6

2.7

Hearing

5.6

6.7

25.5

Visual acuity
Psychiatric functioning

0.2

Overall physical health

32.1

28.7

0.2
36.0

General Aptitude Tests (mean scores):
Verbal ability

104.4

106.9

Arithmetic reasoning

101.5

103.8

Pattern analysis

101.7

103.5

General information

100.3

100.8

General technical

103.1

105.5

50.4

52.3

Armed Forces Qualification

11

�TABLE 8.

(continued)

Characteristic

Vietnam

Non-Vietnam

Primary MOS
(X tactical operations)

34.3

27.4

Type of unit
(X infantry)

26.6

14.6

Duration of active duty
(mean, in months)

26.1

25.3

AWOL or confinement time
:
; X with some "bad" time)
(

11.6

13.3

Type of discharge
(X nonhonorable)

2.7

11.5

Pay grade at discharge
(X E1-E3)

12

8.9
20.2

�TABLE 9. Number of Men, Deaths, Person-Years at Risk, and Crude Death
Rates/1000 Person-Years Among Vietnam and Non-Vietnam Veterans and
Rate Ratios (1965-1983)
-

Number of men
Number of deaths
Person-years ,
postdischarge
Crude death rate
Rate ratio (95X CI)

Non-Vietnam

Vietnam
9.324

8,989

246

200

127,897

121,330
1.7

1.9
1.17

(0.97-1.41)

13

1.00

�TABLE 10. Number of Deaths, Person-Years, and Crude Death Rates/1000
Person-Years Among Vietnam and Non-Vietnam Veterans and Rate
Ratios, by Time Since Discharge (1965-1983)
Years
since
discharge

Vietnam
No.
Persondeaths years

Non-Vietnam
Rate/ No.
Person- Rate/
1 0 . deaths years
00
1000

Rate
ratio

95X
CI

1.45

1.08 - 1.96

1 5

110

46,350

2.37

73

44,747

1.63

6-10

72

45,855

1.57

74

44,233

1.67

0.94

0.68 - 1.30

11+

64

35,692

1.79

53

32,350

1.64

1.09

0.76 - 1.57

246

127,897

1.92

1.65

1.17 0.97-1.41

All years

200

14

121,329

�TABLE 11. Number of Deaths, Person-Years, and Crude Death Rates/1000
Person-Years Among Vietnam Veterans, Veterans with Other Foreign
t
Service (Germany or Korea), and Veterans with No Foreign Service
and Rate Ratios, by Time Since Discharge (1965-1983)

Cohort

Years
since
No.
Persondischarge deaths years

Vietnam

&lt; 5

Rate/
1000

Rate
ratio

95% CI

—_

6-10
11+

110
72
64

46,350
45,855

All years 246

2.4
1.6
1.8

35,692
127,897

^

-

-

1.9

—

Germany/
Korea

15
6-10
11+
All years

44
47
31
122

25,485
25,210
18,381
69,076

1.7
1.9
1.7
1.8

1.37*
0.84
1.06
1.08

0.97
0.58
0.69
0.88

—
-

1.95
1.22
1.63
1.35

United
States
service
only

&lt; 5
6-10
11+
All years

29
27
22
78

19.262
19,023
13.969
52,254

1.5
1.4
1.6
1.5

1.57+
1.11
1.14
1.29

1.05
0.71
0.70
1.00

-

2.37
1.72
1.85
1.66

* Rate ratios for Vietnam veterans are relative to veterans with other
foreign service (Germany or Korea).
+

Rate ratios for Vietnam veterans are relative to veterans with U.S. service only.

15

�TABLE 12. Summary of Results of Chi-Squara Tests (p-values) for Effect
Modification of Entry and Military.Characteristics, by Time
Since Discharge (All-Cause Mortality)

Characteristic

Years since discharge
6+
All
years.
years
years

Race

0.70

0.78

0.89

Age at discharge

0.45

0.15

0.81

Duty MOS

0.84

0.37

0.54

Enlistment status

0.10

0.52

0.14

Region of birth

0.82

0.70

0.97

Composite index of health

0.08

0.38

0.60

GT score

0.92

0.50

0.60

Type of unit

0.77

0.48

0.52

Duration of active duty

0.20

0.81

0.36

AMOL/confinement time

0.14

0.63

0.18

Year of discharge

0.06

0.69

0.43

Type of discharge

0.39

0.78

0.45

Pay grade at discharge

0.78

0.02

0.02

&lt;5

16

�TABLE 13. Summary of Rate Ratios for Vietnam Service Adjusted for the
Specified Characteristic, by Time Since Discharge (All-Cause
Mortality)

Characteristic

Years since discharge
All
en15
years
years
years

(Unadjusted)

1.45*

1.01

1.17

Race

1.45*

1.00

1.17

Age at discharge

1.51*

1.01

1.19

Primary MOS

1.44*

1.00

1.16

Enlistment status

1.44*

0.99

1.15

Region of birth

1.45*

0.97

1.16

Composite index
of health

1.45*

1.00

1.16

GT score

1.42*

0.97

1.13

Type of unit

1.37*

1.00

1.13

Duration of active duty

1 . 42*

0.95

1.12

AWOL/confinement time

1.50*

1.02

1.19

Year of discharge

1.46*

1.00

1.17

Type of discharge

1.59*

1.09

1.28*

Pay grade at discharge

1.66*

1.14

1.32*

* Ninety-five percent confidence interval excludes 1.00.

17

�TABLE 14.

Regression Coefficients, Standard Errors (SE), and Associated P-Values from Reduced Cox Regression
Models*, by Time Since Discharge (All-Cause Mortality)
Years since discharge

£ 5 years
Covariate
(category)

Cohort
(Vietnam/
other)

6+ years

Coeff.(SE)RR+p-value

1.58

Coeff.

(SE)

RR

&lt;0.01

0.036

(0.127)

1.04

0.457

(0.155)

Age at
discharge
(in years)

-0.079

(0.048)

0.10

0.022

Race (white/
other)

-0 .227

(.0)
022

0.26

GT score
(in units)

08 004
-0 . 0 ( . 0 )

Pay grade
(E4-E5/
other)

-0 .740

Year of
-0.056
discharge
«1970/1970+)

p-value

Coeff.(SE)RRp-value

0.78

0.207

(.9)
008

(0.036)

0.54

-0.015

(0.029)

0.59

-0.588

(0.154)

&lt;0.0l

-0.449

(0.122)

&lt;0.01

00
.6

-0.012

(.0)
003

&lt;0.01

-0.010 ( . 0 )
003

&lt;0.01

(0.176)

&lt;0.01

-0.664

(0.147)

&lt;0.01

-0.692

(0.113)

&lt;0.01

(0.155)

0.72

-0.276

(0.137)

00
.4

-0.177

(.0)
012

00
.8

*Model stratified by MOS and enlistment status.
+RR - rate ratio.

All years

1.23

0.03

�TABLE 15. Summary of Entry and Military Service Characteristics For Vietnam
Veterans Killed in Service and Those Discharged Alive
Killed in
action*
(N=181)

Characteristic

Discharged
.alive
(AN9324)

Race ( white)
%

86.2

86.8

Enlistment status (X draftee)

64.6

63.7

Physical health (X impaired)
Overall physical capacity
Eyes and vision
;Hearing and ears

0.0
11.1
4.4

0.9
25.5
5.6

0.0

0.2

Psychological health (X impaired)
Aptitude tests:
GT score (mean)
AFQT (mean)

103.1
48.4

104.4
50.4

Duty MOS (X tactical)

86.2

34.5

Type of unit (X infantry)

70.1

26.6

* Inservice deaths from causes other than hostile enemy action are excluded.

19

�TABLE 16. Distribution of Selected Characteristics Among Vietnam and
Non-Vietnam Veterans, by Vital Status at End of Follow-Up

Characteristic

Vietnam
Status
Status
certain
uncertain
(N=590)
(N=8734)

Non-Vietnam
.Status
Status
uncertain
certain
(N=8267)
(N=722)

Race
(X nonwhite)

27.5

12.1

27.0

12.3

Enlistment status
(X draftees)

56.3

64.2

53.1

66.7

Physical health
(X with any
impairment)

29.3

32.6

31.6

36.8

GT score
(mean)

96.4

103.6

96.6

106.3

Primary MOS
(X tactical)

35.9

34.2

29.8

27.2

Discharge status
(X nonhonorable)

11.4

2.1

29.9

7.1

Age at discharge
(mean)

21.7

22.0

21.5

22.1

10.2

53.5

17.3

Pay* grade at
31.4
discharge (X E1-E3)

20

�TABLE 17. Number of Deaths by Cause (from Death Certificate) and Crude Death
Rates/100,000 Person-Years Among Vietnam and Non-Vietnam Veterans
and Unadjusted Rate Ratios (1965 - 1983)
Underlying
cause of
death
(ICD-9)*

Vietnam
No.
Rate/
deaths
1000
0.0

Infectious and
parasitic
diseases
. (001-139)
Neoplasms
(140-239)

Non-Vietnam
No.
Rate/
deaths
100,000

0.8

12

Rate
ratio+

95% CI

0.8

9.4

14

11.5

0.82

0.38-1.76

0.95

0.33-2.70

0.49

0.25-0.99

Mental disorders
(290-319)

5.5

5.8

Diseases of
nervous system
(320-389)

1.6

0.8

Diseases of
circulatory
system
(390-459)

12

9.4

23

19.0

Diseases of
respiratory
system
(460-519)

3.9

3.3

Di'seases of
digestive system
(520-579)

3.9

2.5

Diseases of
genitourinary
system
(580-611)

3.1

Congenital
anomalies
(740-759)

0.8

0.8

21

�TABLE 17.

(continued)

Underlying
cause of
death
(ICD-9)*

Vietnam
No.
Rate/
deaths 100,000

Symptoms,
signs and illdefined conditions
(780-799)
External causes
(E800-E999) -

Non-Vietnam
No.
Rate/
100,000
deaths

. 1.6

188

Rate
ratio*

95X CI

0.8

147.0

143

117.9

1.25

1.00-1.55

No death
certificate
* No deaths were categorized to diseases of blood and blood-forming
organs; endocrine, metabolic, or nutritional diseases; diseases of the
skin; or diseases of the musculoskeletal system. Therefore, these
categories are not shown.
+

If the total number of deaths for a cause-of-death category in both
groups combined was less than 10, rate ratios are not shown.

22

�TABLE 18. Number of Deaths Due to Neoplasms (from Death Certificate) and
Crude Death Rates/100,000 Person-Years Among Vietnam and
Non-Vietnam Veterans and Rate Ratios, by Time Since Discharge
(1965-1983)

Years since
discharge
15
6+

All years

No.
deaths

Vietnam
Rate
100,000

Non-Vietnam
Rate
No.
100,000
deaths

Rate
ratio

95X CI

5

10.8

6

13.4

0.81

0.25-2.64

7

8.6

8

10.4

0.82

0.30-2.27

12

9.4

14

11.5

0.81 . 0.38-1.76

23

�TABLE 19. Number of Deaths Due to Neoplasms (from Death Certificate)* Among
Vietnam and Non-Vietnam Veterans, by Type and Site of Neoplasm
(1965-1983)
Neoplasm type/site
(ICD-9)

Vietnam

Cancer of colon and rectum
(153-154)

0

Cancer of liver
(155)

1

Cancer of lung
X162)

0

Cancer of skin
(172-173)

1

Cancer of testis
(186)

2

Cancer of brain
(191)

0

Hodgkin's disease
(201)

Non-Vietnam

0

Lymphosarcoma and other malignant 1
-neoplasm of lymphoid tissue
(200, 202)
Leukemia
(204-208)

3

Malignant neoplasms of
unspecified site (199)

1

Neoplasms of uncertain
behavior or nature (235-239)

3

* Because of small numbers of deaths in all categories, rates and rate ratios
are not presented.

24

�TABLE 20. Number of Deaths Due to Circulatory System Diseases (from Death
Certificate) and Crude Death Rates/100,000 Person-Years Among Vietnam
and Non-Vietnam Veterans and Rate Ratios, by Time Since Discharge
(1965-1983)

Years since
discharge

No.
deaths

I5

0

6+

12
12

Vietnam
Rate/
1000
0,0

All years

Non-Vietnam
No.
Rate/
deaths
100,000

Rate
ratio

95X CI

5

11.2

14.7

18

23.5

0.63

0.30-1.30

9.4

23

19.0

0.49

0.25-0.99

25

�TABLE 21. Number of Deaths Due to Circulatory System Diseases (from Death
Certificate) and Crude Death Rates/100,000 Person-Years Among
Vietnam and Non-Vietnam Veterans and Rate Ratios, by Type of
Circulatory System Disease (1965-1983)
Circulatory disease
(ICD-9)

Vietnam
No.
Rate/
deaths
100,000

Non-Vietnam
Rate/
No.
deaths
100^000

Hypertensive disease
(401-405)

Rate
ratio*

95X CI

0.60

0.23-1.56

1.7

Ischemic heart disease
(410-414)

5.5

Other heart disease
(420-529)

3.1

4.1

Cerebrovascular disease
(430-438)

0.8

2.5

11

9.1

Diseases of the arteries
(440-448)

0.8

Other disorders of
circulatory system (459)

0.8

If the total number of deaths for a cause-of-death category in both groups
combined was less than 10, the rate ratio is not shown.

26

�TABLE 22. Number of Deaths Due to External Causes (from Death Certificate)
and Crude Death Rates/100,000 Person-Years Among Vietnam and
Non-Vietnam Veterans and Rate Ratios, by Specific Cause (1965-1983)

External
cause
(ICD-9)
Motor-vehicle
accidents
(E810-E825)

Vietnam
No.
Rate/
deaths
100,000

Rate
ratio

95% CI

63.3

81

Accidental
13
poisonings
•
CE850-E869)

Non-Vietnam
No.
Rate/
deaths
1000
0,0

.

52

42.9

1.48

1.04- 2.09

10.2

5

4.1

2.47

0.88- 6.92

24.2

31

25.6

0.95

0.58- 1.56

Other
accidents*

31

Suicide

29

22 . 7

28

23.1

0.98

0.58- 1.65

26

20.3

25

20.6

0.99

0.57- 1.71

8

6.3

2

1.6

3.79

0.81-17.87

•

(E950-E959)

Homicide
(E960-E969)

Undetermined
(E980-E989)

* Includes accidental deaths other than motor vehicle accidents and accidental
poisonings.

27

�TABLE 23. Numbers of Deaths From External Causes (from Death Certificate)
Among Vietnam and Non-Vietnam Veterans Combined and Unadjusted Rate
Ratios, by Specific Cause and Time Since Discharge (1965-1983)
External
cause

&lt;_ 5 years
No. Rate
deaths ratio

Years since discharge
6+ years

95% CI

No. Rate 951 CI
deaths ratio

Motor vehicle
accident

66

1.93 1.16-3.22

67

1.16 0.72-1.87

Other
accidents*

23

1.05 0.46-2.39

39

0.89 0.48-1.67

25

1.72 0.76-3.88

32

0.64 0.32-1.30

Suicide**

39

1.72 0.90-3.32

46

1.12 0.63-2.00

Homicide

18

1.52 0.59-3.91

33

0.78 0.39-1.55

Suicide

*

* Number of deaths and RRs for "All years" of follow-up are presented in
Table 27.
* Includes accidental deaths other than motor vehicle accidents and
'accidental poisonings.
•^.Includes: accidental poisonings (E850-869), suicides (E950-959), injury
undetermined whether accidentally or purposefully inflicted (E980-989) and
ill-defined or unknown cause of death (799.9).

28

�TABLE 24. Number of Deaths Among Vietnam and Non-Vietnam Veterans Combined and
Unadjusted Rate Ratios* for Drug- and Alcohol-Related Causes (from Death
Certificate), by Time Since Discharge (1965-1983)
Years since discharge
6+ years

&lt;. 5 years
Cause*

No. Rate
deaths ratio

Alcoholrelated

4

Drugrelated

15

-

1.93

95% CI

No. Rate
deaths ratio

95X CI

All years
No. Rate
deaths ratio

95% CI

-

17

1.73

06-.6
.446

21

1.27

05-.0
.230

0.66-5.64

11

2.50

0.66-9.44

26

2.13

0.93-4.91

If the total number of deaths for a cause-of-death category in both groups combined
was less than 10, the rate ratio is not shown.
See Section 3.1.3 for definitions of alcohol- and drug-related causes of death.

29

�TABLE 25. Information Sources Used by Medical Review Panel to Determine Cause
of Death, by Place of Service
Source of
information

Vietnam
No.
(X of all
deaths
deaths)

Non-Vietnam
No.
(X of all
deaths
deaths)

Law enforcement record*

124

(53.2)

121

(62.7)

Autopsy report

125

(53.7)

114

(59.1)

Alcohol level

126

(54.1)

108

(60
5.)

Medical examiner's report*

117

(02
5.)

115

(59.6)

Hospital record

109

(46.8)

85

(40
4.)

Toxicologic report

78

(33.5)

76

(39.4)

Coroner's repor't

81

(34.8)

69

(35.8)

Histopathology report*

9

( 3.9)

17

( 8.8)

Physician's. record

3

( 1.3)

2

( 1.0)

Other*

5

( 2.2)

2

( 1.0)

* p&lt;0.05 (difference between percents for Vietnam and non-Vietnam veterans)
+

Cther sources of information were records obtained from the U.S. Bureau of
Indian Affairs, the U.S. Bureau of Prisons, the National Personnel Records
Center of the National Archives and Records Administration, local fire
departments, funeral homes, and a single unsolicited verbal report from a next
of kin who was contacted by telephone for permission to obtain medical
records.

30

�TABLE 26. Number of Information Sources Available to Medical Review Panel, by
Place of Service
Number of
sources*

Vietnam

Non-Vietnam
No.
deaths

No.
deaths

X

1

39

16.7

20

10.4

2

43

18.5

41

21.2

3

47

20.2

35

18.1

4

41

17.6

19

9.8

5

36

15.5

46

23.8

6

22

9.4

28

14.5

7

5

2.2

4

2.1

Total

233

100.0

193

X

100.0

* The number of information sources available to the medical review panel
differed significantly between cohorts (xg = 14.41, p = 0 0 )
.2.

31

�TABLE 27. Percent Agreement and Kappa Statistic Between Death-Certificate and MecH
MedicalReview-Panel Cause of Death, by Selected Cause-of-Death Category and P/lace
of Service
Vietnam
Percent
kappa*
agreement

Non-Vietnam
kappa*
Percent
agreement

Cause of death
(ICD-9)

No.
deaths
DC MR*

Neoplasms (140-239)

12

14

100.0

0.92

13

11

84.6

0.91

7

12

28.6

0. 18

7

4

28.6

0.35

19

78.3

0.84

Mental disorders

No.
deaths
DC MR*

(290-319)

Circulatory
diseases (390-459)

11

10

81.8

0.85

Respiratory diseases
(460-519)

5

2

20.0

0.28

50.0

0.66

Digestive diseases
(520-579)

5

6

40.0

0.35

100.0

0.49

Motor-vehicle
78
accidents (E810-E825)

80

98.7

0.96

52

52

96.2

0.95

46.2

0.43

5

5

60.0

0.59

23

Accidental poisonings
(E850-E869) .

13 13

Surcide (E950-E959)

28

32

100.0

0.92

26

28

100.0

0.96

Homicide (E960-E969)

26

24

88.5

0.91

25

25

96.0

0.95

Undetermined inten8
tionality (E980-E989)

6

12.5

0.12

2

3

50.0

'0.39

40

34

65.0

0.65

34

38

85.3

0.76

Other causes

* DC = number of deaths determined from death certificate; MR = number of deaths
determined by medical review panel.
+ All kappa values are statistically significant (p&lt;0.01).

32

�TABLE 28. Number of Deaths .and Crude Death Rates/100,000 Person-Years Among
Vietnam and Non-Vietnam Veterans, by Cause of Death (From Medical
Review) (1965-1983)
Cause of
death*
(ICD-9)

Vietnam
No.
Rate/
deaths 100,000

Infectious diseases
(001-139)
Neoplasms
(140-239)

Non-Vietnam
No.
Rate/
deaths 100,000

0.8

14

10.9

11

Endocrine,
nutritional, and
metabolic
disorders
(240-279)
Mental disorders
(290-319)

9.1

1.21

0.55-2.66

2.85

0.92-8.82

0.50

0.23-1.07

0.95

0.31-2.94

0.8

10

9.4

3.3

0.8

12

Diseases of
nervous system
(320-389)
Diseases of
circulatory
system
(390-459)

Rate 95% CI
ratio*

2.5

19

7.8

15.7

Diseases of
respiratory
system
(460-519)

1.6

1.6

Diseases of
digestive system
(520-579)

4.7

4.9

Diseases of
genitourinary
system
(580-611)

2.3

0.8

33

�TABLE 28.

(continued)

Cause of
death*
(ICD-9)

Vietnam
No.
Rate/
deaths 1 0 0 0
0,0

Diseases of musculoskeletal system
(710-739)

1.6

Rate
95% CI
ratio*

0.8

Symptoms, signs
and ill-defined
conditions
(780-799)

Non-Vietnam _
No.
Rate/
deaths 1 0 0 0
0,0

External causes
(E800-E999)

181

1.6

141.5

144

118.7

1.19

0.96-1.48

Cause-of-death categories that have no deaths assigned to them are not
listed above.
If total number of deaths for a cause-of-death category in both groups
combined was less than 10, the rate ratio is not shown.

34

�:
TABLE 29. Number of Deaths Due to Neoplasms (From Medical Review) and
rom
Crude Death Rates/100,000 Person-Years Among Vietnam and
Non-Vietnam Veterans and Rate Ratios, by Time Since Discharge
(1965-1983)

Years since
discharge

No.
deaths

Vietnam
Rate/
100,000

Non-Vietnam
No.
Rate/
deaths
100,000

Rate
ratio*

95X CI

&lt;S

5

10.8

4

8.9

-

6+

9

11.0

7

9.1

1.21

0.45-3.24

14

10.9

11

9.1

1.21

0.55-2.66

All years

-

* If total number of deaths for a cause-of-death category in both groups combined
was less than 10, the rate ratio is not shown.

35

�TABLE 30. Number of Neoplastic Deaths (From Medical Review Panel) Among
Vietnam and Non-Vietnam Veterans, by Specific Type (1965-1983)
Neoplasm type*
(ICD-9)

Vietnam

Non-Vietnam

Cancer of liver
(155)

1

0

Cancer of lung
(162)

0

2

Cancer of skin
(172)

1

2

Cancer of testis
(186)
»
Cancer of brain
(191)

2

2

3

1

Cancer of ill-defined site
(195)

1

0

Cancer of unspecified
site
(199)

0

1

Lympho sarcoma
(0)
20

3

1

Hodgkin's disease
(201)

0

1

Leukemia
(204-208)

2

1

Neoplasms of uncertain
behavior
(235-238)

1

0

*

.

Because of the small numbers of deaths in all categories, rates and
rate ratios are not presented.

36

�TABLE 31. Number of Deaths from External Causes (From Medical Review) and
Crude Death Rates/100,000 Person-Years Among Vietnam and
Non-Vietnam Veterans and Rate Ratios, by Specific External Cause
(1965-1983)
External
cause
(ICD-9)

Vietnam
No.
Rate/
deaths
100,000

Non-Vietnam
No.
Rate/
deaths
100,000

Rate
ratio*

95% CI

Motor vehicle
accidents
(E810-E825)

80

62.6

52

42.9

1.46

1.03-2.07

Accidental
poisonings
(E850-E869)

13

10.2

5

4.1

2.47

0.88-6.92

Other
accidents

26

20.3

31

25.6

0.80

0.47-1.34

Suicide
(E950-E959)

32

25.0

28

23.1

1.08

0.65-1.80

Homicide
(E960-E969)

24

18.8

25

20.6

0.91

0.52-1.59

Injuries of
6
undetermined
intentionality
(E-980-E989)

4.7

3

2.5

* if total number.of deaths for a cause-of-death category in both groups
combined was less than 10, the rate ratio is not shown.

37

�TABLE 32. Number of Motor-Vehicle-Accident (MVA) Deaths (From
Medical Review) Among Vietnam and Non-Vietnam Veterans
and Unadjusted Rate Ratios, by Type of MVA and Time Since
Discharge (1965-1983)

Type of
MVA death

&lt;_ 5 years

Years since discharge
6+ years

No. Rate 95% CI
deaths ratio

No. Rate 95% CI
deaths ratio

Daytime*

16

2.90 0.93-8 .98

24

1 .11

Nighttime*

24

1.93

0.83-4 .51

29

1 .16 0.56-2 . 0
4

Single
vehicle"*"*"

27

2.76

1. 17-6 .52

34

1 .19

Multiple
vehicles**

14

2.41

0.76-7 .70

19

1 .04 0.42-2 .57

* MVAs occurring between 6:00 a.m. and 8:59 p.m.
+ MVAs occurring between 9:00 p.m. and 5:59 a.m.
++ ICD-9. E815.0, E815.2, E816.0, and E816.2.
** ICD-9, E811.0, E811.2, E812.0, E812.2, E813.0, and E813.2.

38

0.50-2 .48

0.60-2 .34

�TABLE 33. Number of Motor-Vehicle-Accident (MVA) Deaths (From
'
Medical Review ) Among Vietnam and Non-Vietnam Veterans
and Unadjusted Rate Ratios, by Alcohol Involvement and Time
Since Discharge (1965-1983)

Alcohol
involvement

Years since discharge
6+ years

£ 5 years

No. Rate
deaths ratio

95X CI

No. Rate
deaths ratio

95X CI

All years
No. Rate
deaths ratio

95X CI

Yes*

24

1.35

0
0.60-3 . 4

29

1.16

4
0.56-2 . 0

53

1.23

0.72-2.13

NQ+

10

2.25

0.58-8 .71

19

1.04

0.42-2 .57

29

1.34

0.64-2.81

Unknown-H-

31

2.36

1.08-5 .13

19

1.29

0.52-3 .21

50

1.84

1.03-3.31

*

MVA deaths (ICD-9, E810-E825, E929.0) for which either nondependent abuse
of alcohol (ICD-9, 305.0) is cited as a contributing cause of death or for
which there is a recorded blood alcohol level of at least 100 mgX.

+

MVA deaths for which alcohol abuse is not cited as a contributing cause of
death and for which there is a recorded blood alcohol level of less than
100 mgX.

4+ MVA deaths for which alcohol abuse is not cited as a contributing cause of
death and for which there is no recorded blood alcohol level.

39

�TABLE 34. Number and Type of Alcohol- and Drug-Associated Deaths
Based on Death Certificates and Medical Review, with
Associated Percent Agreement and Kappa Statistic
No. deaths
Death
Medical
certificate
review

Cause of
death*

Percent
agreement

Kappa
statistic

Alcohol-associated
Natural causes

9

30

100.0

0.44

Accidents

8

65

62.5

0.11

Suicide, homicide.
injury of
undetermined
intentionality

4

38

75.0

0.13

21

133

85.7

0.16

Total

-

Drug-as soc iated
Drug dependence
and abuse
Accidental poisoning
by drugs

•

8

28

62.5

0.26

10

10

50.0

0.49

12.5

0.19

92.3

0.71

SUicide or poisoning
8
by drugs, intentionality
undetermined
Total

*

26

40

See Section 3.1.3 for definitions of alcohol- and drug-associated deaths.

40

�TABLE 35. Number and Type of Alcohol-Associated Deaths (From Medical
Review) and Crude Death Rates/100,000 Person-Years Among
Vietnam and Non-Vietnam Veterans and Rate Ratios (1965-1983)
Type
of
death*

Vietnam
No.
Rate/
deaths
100,000

Non-Vietnam
Rate/
No.
deaths
1000
0,0

Rate
ratio

951 CI

Natural
causes

16

12.5

14

11.5

1.08

0.53-2.22

Accidents

37

28.9

28

23.1

1.25

07-.5
.720

19
Suicide,
homicide, and
injury of
undetermined
intentionality

14.9

19

15.7

0.95

0.50-1.79

72

56.3

61

50.3

1.12

0.80-1.57

Total
#

See Section 3.1.3 for definitions of alcohol-associated deaths.

41

�TABLE 36. Number and Type of Drug-Associated Deaths (From Medical
Review) and Crude Death Rates/100,000 Person-Years Among
Vietnam and Non-Vietnam Veterans and Rate Ratios (1965-1983)

Type of
death*

No.
deaths

Vietnam
Rate/
100,000

Non-Vietnam
No.
Rate/
deaths
100,000

Dependence
and abuse

17

13.3

11

Accidental
poisoning
by drugs

6

4.7

Suicide or
poisonings
by drugs,
undetermined
intentionality

2

1.6

25

19.5

Total drugassociated
deaths

Rate
ratio

95X CI

9.1

1.47

0.69-3.13

4

3.3

1.42

04-.4
.050

0

-

-

-

1.58

0.83-3.00

15

12.4

See Section 3..1.3 for definitions of drug-related deaths.

42

�TABLE 37. Number of Drug-Associated Deaths* (From Medical Review)
and Crude Death Rates/100,000 Person-Years Among Vietnam and
Non-Vietnam Veterans and Rate Ratios, by Time Since Discharge
(1965-1983)

Years
since
discharge

No.
deaths

Vietnam
Rate/
100,000

Non-Vietnam
No.
Rate/
deaths
100,000

Rate
ratio"1"

95% CI

10

21.6

8

17.9

1.21

04-.6
.830

6-10

8

17.4

5

11.3

1.54

0.50-4.71

11+

7

19.6

2

6.2

-

25

19.5

15

12.4

£5

All years

1.58

0.83-3.00

* See Section 3.1.3 for definition of drug-associated deaths.
+ If the total number of deaths for a cause-of-death category in both
groups combined was less than 10, the rate ratio is not shown.

43

�TABLE 38.

Unadjusted and Adjusted* Rate Ratios Based on Death Certificate and Medical Review
Cause of Death, by Selected Cause of Death and Time Since Discharge (1965-1983)

Death Certificate

Medical Review

&lt;5 years

6+ years

Unadjusted Adjusted
RR
RR

Unadjusted Adjusted
RR
RR

Cause of
death*

Neoplasms

&lt;5 years

6+ years

Unadjusted Adjusted Unadjusted Adjusted
RR
RR
RR
RR

0.83

Circulatory
diseases

0.82

0.68

1.21

1.07

06
.0

0.81

0.60

0.56

0.51

Motor vehicle
accidents

1.93

1.98

1.16

1.22

1.89

1.96

1.16

1.22

Suicide

1.72

2. 54

0.64

0.57

1.64

2.47

0.78

0.74

Homicide

1 .52

1. 6
4

0.78

0.85

1.38

1.35

0.73

0.82

1.73

2.23

1.42

1.67

0.99

0.97

2.50

2.99

1.21

1.56

2.02

2.57

Alcoholrelated
Drugrelated

*

1.93

2.86

Adjusted values are from a Cox Proportional Hazards Model, stratified on MOS and
enlistment status, and controlled for age, race, GT score, year of discharge, and pay grade
at discharge.

i

"*"

If the total number of deaths for a cause-of-death category in' both groups combined
was less than 10, the rate ratio is not shown.

�TABLE 39. Observed and Expected Numbers of Deaths by Cause (From Death
Certificate) Among Vietnam and Non-Vietnam Veterans and
Standardized Mortality Ratios, by Time Since Discharge
(1965-1983)
*
Years
since
Cause of death**
discharge
(ICDA-8)
&lt;5

Vietnam

Non-Vietnam

All natural
causes
(0-9)
0076

Observed
Expected4*
SMR"1"195% CI

13
24.2
0.54
0.29-0.92

16
23.4
0.68
0.39-1.11

External
causes
(E800-E999)
•

Observed
Expected
SMR
95% CI

92
72.5
1.27
1.02-1.56

55
69.4
0.79
0.60-1.03

All natural
causes
(000-796)

Observed
Expected
SMR
95% CI

External
causes
(E800-E999)

Observed
Expected
SMR
95% CI

96
102.7
0.93
0.76-1.14

88
96.6
0.91
0.73-1.12

All
All natural
years causes
(0-9)
0076

Observed
Expected
SMR
95% CI

51
90.0
0.57
0.42-0.75

55
86.8
0.63
0.48-0.82

Observed
Expected
SMR
95% CI

188
175.2
1.07
0.93-1.24

143
166.0
0.86
0.73-1.01

6+

External
causes
(E800-E999)

38
65.8
0.58
0.41-0.79

39
63.4
0.62
0.44-0.84

*

Excludes 9 deaths (7 Vietnam, 2 non-Vietnam) for which death
certificates were not recovered.

+

Expected number is based on the mortality rates among U.S. males,
standardized for age, calendar year, and race.

**"*" SMR=Observed deaths/expected deaths

45

,

�TABLE 40. Observed and Expected Deaths by Specific Natural Cause (From Death
Certificate) Among Vietnam and Non-Vietnam Veterans and Standardized
Mortality Ratios (1965-1983)
Cause of
death*
(ICDA-8)

Observed
deaths

Infectious
diseases
(000-136)

1

Neoplasms
(140-239)

12

Vietnam
Expected*
deaths

SMR++
(95X CI)

2.3

21.0

Observed
deaths

Non-Vietnam
Expected
deaths

SMR
(95% CI)

1

2.2

0.57
(.010)
03-.0

14

20.1

07
.0
(0.38-1.17)

0.87
(.920)
02-.5

8

5.4

1.49
(0.64-2.91)

1

4.2

Mental disorders
(290-315)

5

5.7

Diseases of
nervous system
(320-389)

2

4.4

Diseases of circulatory system
(390-458)

12

24.8

0.48
(0.25-O.85)

21

24.0

Diseases of respiratory system
(460-519)

5

..
60

0.84
(.719)
02-.6

4

5.7

6

10.8

0.56
(0.20-1.21)

3

10.3

2.0

2.53
(0.82-5.79)

1

1.9

1

-

—

—

Diseases of
digestive system
(520-577)
Diseases of genito"urinary system
(580-611)

5

Congenital
anomalies
(740-759)

1

46

0.87
(0.54-1.34)

•• -

-

�TABLE 40.

(continued)

Cause of
death*
(ICDA-8)
Symptoms, signs
and ill-defined
conditions
(780-796)

Observed
deaths

Vietnam
Expected*
deaths
6.7

SMR++
( 5 CI)
9%

Observed
deaths

Non-Vietnam
Expected
SMR
(95X CI)
deaths
6.3

*

Because causes of death are coded to the Eighth Revision of the International
Classification of Diseases, the numbers of deaths for certain causes may not agree
with the numbers coded according to the Ninth Revision (see Section 4.3.1).
Categories not listed had no deaths assigned to them.

+

Expected number based on the mortality rates among U.S. males and standardized for
age, calendar year, and race.

++

SMR = Observed deaths/expected deaths.
fewer than five observed deaths.

47

SMRs are not computed for categories with

�TABLE 41. Observed and Expected Numbers of Deaths (From Death Certificate)
for Specific External Causes Among Vietnam and Non-Vietnam
Veterans and Standardized Mortality Ratios (1965-1983)
External
cause
(ICDA-8)

Observed
deaths

Vietnam
Expected*
deaths

SMR+
(95% CI)

Observed
deaths

Non-Vietnam
Expected
deaths

SMR
(95% CI)

All accidents
(E800-E949)

125

103.8

1.20
.00-1.43)
(1

88

98.2

0.90
72-1.10)
(.
0

Motor vehicle
accidents
(E810-E827)

81

63.2

1.28
.02-1.59)
(1

52

59 . 8

0.87
( .65-1.14)
0

.44

40.6

1.08
( .79-1.46)
0

36

38.4

0.94
( .66-1.30)
0

Suicide
(E950-E959)

29

29.3

0.99
( .66-1.42)
0

28

27.8

1.01
( .67-1.45)
0

Homicide and
all other
external causes
(E960-E999)

34

42.3

0.80
( .55-1.12)
0

27

40.2

0.67
( .44-0.98)
0

Other
accidents

*
+

Expected number based on the mortality rates among U.S. males and standardized
• for age, calendar year and race.
SMR = Observed deaths/expected deaths.

48

�APPENDIX A

Detailed Distributions of Veteran Characteristics

�TABLE A-l. Descriptive Characteristics of Vietnam Experience Study Veterans at Time of Entry Into U.S. Army, by
Duty Location

Characteristic
Total
Race:
White
Black
Other
Unknown
Place of birth:
Northeast
Midwest
South
West
Foreign
Unknown

Vietnam
No.
9324
8097
1156
63
8

%

100.0
86.8
12.4
0.7
0.1

Total Non-Vietnam
X
No.

Germany /Korea
No.
%

8989

100.0

5120

7776
1123
85
5

86.5
12.5
. 0.9
0.1

4403
666
49
2

100.0
86.0
13.0
1.0
00
.

United States Only
%
No.
3869

100.0

3373
457
36
3

87.2
11.8
09
.
0.1

(X2- 4.22, p-0.12)

1769
2827
2205
2193
312
18

19.0
30.3
23.6
23.5
3.3
0.2

(X2- 4.62, p-0.10)

(X2- 3.17, p-0.21)

1781
2751
2047
1988
393
29

1006
1607
1188
1147
160
12

775
1144
859
841
233
17

C ^
.

19.8
30.6
22.8
22.1
4.4
0.3
V

m*J

* «•

19.6
31.4
23.2
22.4
3.1
0.2
V P «
.

*«

20.0
29.6
22.2
21.7
60
.
0.4

V • -w

(X2-21.28, p&lt;0.001)

(X2- 7.42, p-0.19)

(X2-55.81, p&lt;0.001)

3201
62.5
1919
37.5
(X2- 2.11, p-0.15)

2698
69.7
1171
30.3
(X2-43.49, p&lt;0.001)

Enlistment status:
Draftee
5943
Volunteer
3381

63.7
36.3

5899
65.6
3090
34.4
(X2- 7.12, p-0.01)

Age at entry:
17
18
19
20
21+

4.8
10.5
37.1
23.7
24.0

590
748
1967
2001
t.U&lt;JJ
2683

443
979
3459
2200
2235

66
.
8.3
33.0
22.3
£.7*7
29.9

(X2-134.39, p&lt;0.001)

7.6
357
9.1
465
34.7
1777
21.9
1174
26.3
U-»»
1347
f.\l»J
(X2-49.38, p&lt;0.001)

233
6.0
283
7.3
1190
30.8
827
.21.4
1336
34.5
(X2-187.80, p&lt;0.001)

�TABLE A-l. (Continued)
Characteristic
Year of entry:
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971

Vietnam
No.

1112
1997
1659
1953
1702
650
208

Total Non-Vietnam

Z

11.9
21.4
17.8
21.0
18.3
7.4
2.2

No.

1271
1925
983
1318
1357
1227
953

Z

14.1
21.4
10.4
14.7
15.1
13.7
10.6

(X2-995 .06, p&lt;0.001)

Germany /Korea
No.
Z

673
1151
632
790
729
650
495

13.1
22.5
12.3
15.4
14.2
12.7
9.7

(X2-626 .24, p&lt;0.001)

United States Only
No.
Z

598
774
306
528
628
577
458

15.5
20.0
7.9
13.7
16.2
14.9
11.8

(X2-950 .91, p&lt;0.001

�TABLE A-2. Physical and Mental Profile of Vietnam Experience Study Veterans At Time of Entry
into U.S. Army, by Duty Location
Characteristic
Total

Total Non-Vietnam
No.
X

Vietnam
No.
9324

100.0

8989

100.0

Germany/Korea
No.
%

5120

100.0

United States Only
No.
%
3869

100.0

Physical Capacity
or Stamina: •
No impairment
9230
Mild-significant
85
Unknown
9

99.0
0.9
0.1

8877
106
6

98.8
1.2
0.1
3.17, p-0.06)

5053
98.7
63
1.2
4
0.1
(X2- 3.31, p-0.07)

3824
98.8
43
1.1
2
0.1
(X2- 1.13, p-0.29)

Upper Extremities:
No impairment
9247
Mild-significant
68
Unknown
9

99.2
0.7
0.1

8904
79
6

99.1
0.9
0.1
.28, p-0.26)

5073
99.1
43
0.8
4
0.1
(X2- 0.53, p-0.47)

3831
99.0
36
0.9
2
0.1
(X2- 1.41, p-0.24)

Lower Extremities:
No impairment
9075
Mild-significant 240
Unknown
9

97.3
2.6
0.1

8743
97.3
240
2.7
6
0.1
(X2- 0.16, p-0.69)

4982
97.3
134
2.6
4
0.1
(X2- 0.02, p-0.88)

3761
97.2
106
2.7
2
0.1
(X2- 0.29, p-0.59)

Hearing Acuity
and Ears:
No impairment
8794
Mild-significant 521
Unknown
9

94.3
5.6
0.1

8378
93.2
605
6.7
6
0.1
(X2-10.32, p-0.001)

4763
93.0
353
6.9
4
0.1
(X2- 9.91, p-0.002)

3615
93.4
252
6.5
2
0.1
(X2- 4.22, p-0.04)

Eyes and
Visual Acuity:
No impairment
6934
Mild-significant 2381
Unknown
9

74.4
25.5
0.1

6404
71.2
2579
28.7
6
0.1
(X2-22.95, p&lt;0.001)

3677
1439

71.8
28.1
4
0.1
1.18, p&lt;0.001)

2727
70.5
1140
29.5
2
0.1
(X2-21.44, p&lt;0.001)

�TABLE A-2. (Continued)
Characteristic

Vietnam
No.

Z

Total Non-Vietnam
No.
%
'

Germany/Korea
No.
Z

United States Only
No.
Z

*

Psychiatric
Functioning:
No impairment
9300
Mild-significant
IS
Unknown
•
9

99.7
0.2
0.1

8962
99.7
0.2
21
6
0.1
(X2- 1 .23, p-0.27)

5105
99.7
11
0.2
4
0.1
(X2- 0.54, p-0.46)

3857
99.7
10
0.3
2
0.1
&lt;X2- 1 .37, p-0.24)

Composite Index
of Health:
No impairment
6297
Mild-significant 2990
Other than minor
26
Unknown
11

67.5
32.1
0.3
0.1

5712
63.5
3232
36.0 .
36
0.4
9
0.1
(X2-33 .47, p&lt;0.001)

3270
63.9
1823
35.6
20
0.4
7
0.1
(X2-20 .43, p&lt;0.001)

2442
63.1
1409
36.4
16
04
.
2
0.1
(X2-25 .13, p&lt;0.001)

�TABLE A-3. Mean Scores of Vietnam Experience Study Veterans on Aptitude Tests Given as Part of the Entrance
Examination for the U.S. Army, by Duty Location

No.

Vietnam
Mean

SD

Verbal ability

9136

104.4

21.9

8863
1 6 9 22.1
0.
(t— 7.55, p&lt;0.001)

5067 105.2 22.1
(t— 2.17, p-0.03)

3796
1 9 0 21.9
0.
(t— 11.00, p&lt;0.001)

Arithmetic
reasoning

9135

101.5

21.5

8865
103.8 22.1
(t— 7.26, p&lt;0.001)

5068 102.3 21.8
(t— 2.13, p-0.03)

3797
105.9 22.3
(t— 10.6, p&lt;0.001)

Pattern
analysis

9136

101.7

22.5

8864
103.5 22.3
(t— 5.42, p&lt;0.001)

5068 102.8 2 .
20
(t— 2.66, p-0.008)

3796
1 4 6 22.7
0.
(t— 6.52, p&lt;0.001)

General
information

9117

100.3

18.4

8844
1 0 8 18.5
0.
(t— 1.85, p-0.07)

5060 1 0 2 18.3
0.
(t- 0.30, p-0.77)

3784
101.6 18.9
(t— 3.68, p&lt;0.001)

General
technical

9200

103.1

19.9

8914
105.5 2 .
04
(t— 8.08, p&lt;0.001)

5087 1 4 0 2 .
0.
02
(t— 2.52, p-0.01)

3827
107.6 2 .
06
(t— 11.5, p&lt;0.001)

9280

50.4

25.5

8950
52.3 26.0
(t—5.06, p&lt;0.001)

5102
50.8
25.7
(t—0.97 p-0.33)

3848
54.3 26.3
(t—7.94, p&lt;0.001)

Aptitude Test

Total Non-Vietnam
No.

Mean

SD

Germany/Korea
No.
Mean
SD

United States Only
No.

Mean

SD

Army Classification
Battery:

Armed Forces
Qualification
Test

�TABLE A-4. Military-Service Characteristics of

Characteristic

Vietnam
Z
No.

Total

9324

Military Occupational
Specialty*:
Tactical
Missile and
fire control
electronic
maintenance
General
electronics
maintenance
Precision
maintenance
Auxiliary
services
Motors
Clerical
Graphics
General
technical
Special
assignment

Vietnam Experience Study Veterans, by Duty Location

Total Non-Vietnam
Z
No.

100.0

Germany/Korea
No.
Z

100.0

8989

5120 *

100.0

United States Only
No.
Z
3869

100.0

3196
48

34.3
0.5

2462
166

27.4
1.6

1577
116

30.8
2.3

885
50

22.9
1.3

591

6.3

621

6.9

431

84
.

190

49
.

147

1.6

162

1.8

93

1.8

69

1.8

441

4.7

333

3.7

199

3.9

134

3.5

1776
1763
106
1002

19.1
18.9
1.1
10.8

1223
1907
170
1579

13.6
21.2
1.9
17.6

761
992
82
685

14.9
19.4
1.6
13.4

462
915
88
894

11.9
23.7
2.3
23.1

254

2.7

366

4.1

184

36
.

182

4.7

A

(X2-442.5, p&lt;0.001)

**

M

�TABLE A-4. (Continued)
Characteristic
Type of Unit:
Infantry
Engineer
Armor
Cavalry
Artillery
Other
Unknown

Vietnam
Z
No.

Total Non-Vietnam

No.

Z

Germany/Korea
No.
Z

United States Only
No.
Z

•
906
14.6
17.7
6.0
368
7.2
5.7
376
7.3
2.3
127
2.5
16.3
1061
20.7
2264
54.8
44.2
04
.
18
0.4
p&lt;0.001) (X2-892 .3 ,, p&lt;0.001)

2477
911
123
792
1021
3920
80

26.6
9.8
1.3
8.5
11.0
42.0
09
.

1313
542
508
203
1462
4926
35
(X2-1223.2,
,

Number of Months of
Active Duty:
484
1-12
13-24
6208
2632
25-36
0
37+

5.1
66.6
28.2
00
.

445
5.0
70.3
6315
1946
21.6
283
3.1
(X2-436.0, p&lt;0.001)

*Job specialty for which the man was trained.

62
1.2
3560
69.5
1367
26.7
131
2.6
(X2-19.8, p-0.003)

407
174
132
76
401
2662
17
(X2-1045 .2,

10.5
4.5
3.4
2.0
10.4
68.8
0.4
p&lt;0.001)

383
9.9
2755
71.2
579
15.0
152
3.9
(X2-1070.9 , p&lt;0.001)

�TABLE A-5. Military Characteristics of Vietnam Experience Study Veterans at Discharge from Active Duty, by Duty
Location
Total Non-Vietnam
No.
Z

Vietnam
Characteristic
Total

*

Ever AUOL or
Confinement -Time:
No
Yes
Unknown

No.
9324

100
0.

8989

100.0

8163
1081
80

87.5
11.6
0.9

7744
1197

86.2
13.3

48

0.5

(X2-11.9, p&lt;0.001)
Type of Discharge:
Honorable
Other
Unknown

9067
249
8

97.2
2.7
0.1

Pay Grade at Discharge:
E-l
249
E-2
212
E-3
614
E-4
4608
E-5
3641

2.7
2.3
6.6
4.
94
39.1

Age at Discharge:
&lt;19

19
20
21

11
173
841
3421

22
23
24
25+

2374
1094
632
778

0.1
1.9
9.0
36.7
25.5
11.7
6.8
8.3

8183

91.0

802

89
.

4
0.1
(X2-333.6, p&lt;0.001)

649
499
668

7.2
5.6
7.4

4278
47.6
32.2
2895
(X2-387.7, p&lt;0.001)

172
320
774

1.9
3.6
86
.

2776
2032
1145

3.
09
22.6
12.7

755

84
.

1015
11.3
(X2-319.3, p&lt;0.001)

Germany/Korea
No.
Z

5120

100
0.

4668
91.2
422
8.2
30
0.6
(X2-40.5, p&lt;0.001)

4866
9.
50
252
4.9
2
0.1
(X2-51.0, p&lt;0.001)

185
3.6
180
3.5
362
7.1
2642
51.6
1751
34.2
(X2-53.7, p&lt;0.001)

68
152
421
1704
1268
661
378
468
(X2-128.5,

1.3
3.0
8.2
33.3
2.
48
12.9
74
.
9.1
p&lt;0.001)

United States Only
No.
Z
3869

100
0.

3076
775
18
(X2-158.8,

79.5
2.
00
0.5
p&lt;0.001)

3317
85.7
550
14.2
2
0.1
( 2 6 0 8 p&lt;0.001)
X- 4 . ,

464
319
306

12.0

8.3
7.9

1636
42.3
1144
29.6
(X2-786.0, p&lt;0.001)

104
168
353

2.7
4.3
9.1

1072

27.7
19.8
12.5

764
484
377
547

9.7

14.1
(X2-499.2, p&lt;0.001)

�TABLE A-5.

(Continued)

Characteristic
Year of Discharge:
1965-1966
1967-1968
1969-1970
1971-1972
1973-1974
1975-1977

Vietnam
Z
No.

Total Non-Vietnam
No.
Z

Germany /Korea
No.
Z

United States Only
No.
Z

•
21
2482
4011
2571
234
5

0.2
26.6
43.0
27.6
2.5
0.1

94
2787
2395
2811
856
46
(X2-864.4,

1.1
31.0
26.6
31.3
9.5
0.5
p&lt; 0.001)

22
1516
1565
1521
488
8
(X2-483.2,

04
.
29.6
30.6
29.7
9.5
0.2
p&lt;0.001)

72
1.9
1271
32.9
830
21.5
1290
33.3
368
9.5
38
1.0
(X2-884.9, p&lt;0.001)

�VIETNAM EXPERIENCE STUDY —

Mortality

APPENDIX B

Detailed Examination of All-Cause
Mortality by Selected Covariates

11

�In this section, we present a detailed examination of factors that
might modify the effect of Vietnam service on mortality. Because the
increased rate of mortality associated with service in Vietnam appears to
be limited to the first 5 years of follow-up, and because covariates
potentially can have different effects in different time periods, all
covariates are examined with respect to time since discharge.
1. Entry Characteristics
Race (Table B-l): The effect of Vietnam service on mortality in the
early postservice period is slightly higher for whites (RR=1.50) than for
persons of races other than white (RR=1.30) but the test for effect
modification is not significant. After the first 5 years of follow-up,
there is little or no effect of Vietnam service on mortality in whites or
in nonwhites.
Region of birth (Table B-2): Although the rate ratios appear to vary
somewhat among the various regions of birth, the variation is not
statistically significant. In general, regardless of where they were
born, Vietnam veterans were more likely to die within the first 5 years
after discharge than non-Vietnam veterans. After 5 years, again
regardless of region of birth, little increase in the relative rate of
mortality among Vietnam veterans is seen.
GT score (Table B-3): Overall, level of performance on the GT test
does not appear to modify the effect of Vietnam service on mortality.
Although not shown, similar conclusions can be drawn from an examination
of the potential modifying effect of the other components of the Army
Classification Battery and the Armed Forces Qualification Test.
Physical health profile (Table B-4): In the first 5 years after
discharge, the rate ratios associated with service in Vietnam appear to
differ somewhat among those with and without physical impairment. Among
those with some type of- physical impairment, over a twofold increase in
the rate of mortality was found for those who served in Vietnam relative
to those who had not. In contrast, there is only a 20% increase among
veterans with no impairment in functioning. This departure from
homogeneity is of borderline significance (X^S.10, p = 0.08). After
the initial 5 years, the rate ratios are 1.1 for veterans with no
impairment and 0.9 for those with any impairment. Although not shown, the
patterns for the individual physical components mirror those seen with the
summary measure.
»
Enlistment status (Table B-5): The rate ratios in the first 5 years
after discharge differ somewhat among those who volunteered for military
service compared to those who were drafted. Vietnam veterans who were
drafted into service were 1.8 times more likely to die in the first five
years postservice, but Vietnam veterans who volunteered were only 1.1
times more likely. The test of effect modification is of borderline
significance (p=0.09). After the first 5 years, both rate ratios are at
or below 1.0, indicating no association between Vietnam service and
likelihood of dying in that time period for either volunteers or
draftees.
2. Military and Discharge Characteristics
Military occupational speciality (Table B-6): The categorization of
MOS into "tactical" and "nontactical" jobs is a rough surrogate for combat
exposure; Vietnam veterans assigned a tactical MOS are more likely to have
experienced combat tharv those with nontactical MOSs. In general, service

12

�in a tactical MOS does not appear to influence the effect of Vietnam
service on likelihood of dying. In the intial follow-up period, service
in Vietnam has a slightly greater effect on mortality among those with a
nontactical MOS. The opposite pattern is apparent after five years.
Neither difference is statistically significant.
Type of unit (Table B-7): In the first 5 years after discharge, the
death rate is increased among Vietnam veterans who served in each type of
unit except engineering units. The rate ratios are especially high among
those in the infantry (RR=2.02) and armor (RR=2.07). The overall test for
effect modification is, however, not statistically significant. In
addition, Vietnam veterans assigned to engineering units do not appear to
be at greater risk of dying than Vietnam veterans in other units. Only
23% of men in engineering units, however, had an MOS that could be
classified as an actual engineering occupation. When the analysis was
restricted to such veterans, similar results were found.
flWOL or confinement time (Table B-8): In the first five years after
discharge.the rate ratio associated with service in Vietnam is higher
among those who never had AWOL or confinement time than for those who had
been AWOL or had served confinement time, but this difference is not
statistically significant. After 5 years both rate ratios are close to
unity.
Duration of active duty (Table B-9): Vietnam veterans who served less
than 12 months of active duty in the Army had an appreciably higher
relative death rate than those serving more than 12 months. Although
further exploration was not possible because of the small numbers, this
departure from homogeneity is not statistically significant.
Age at discharge (Table B-10): The effect of Vietnam service on
mortality is somewhat stronger among those who were less than 21 years at
the time of.discharge than among those 21 years or older. The reverse is
true in the later follow-up period. This finding may be the result of
chance fluctuation, since the tests for effect modification in both
follow-up periods are nonsignificant.
Year of discharge (Table B-ll): A modifying effect of borderline
significance (p=0.06) is seen for year of discharge during the initial
follow-up period. For those discharged before 1970, and who therefore
served sometime between 1965 and 1969, the death rate among Vietnam
veterans is more than twice that of veterans who did not serve in
,
Vietnam. In contrast, the increase for those discharged in 1970 and after
is only 16%. There is no difference in the rate ratios for those
discharged before and after 1970 in the 6-plus-year follow-up period, both
ratios being about 1.00. The results in the first 5 years after discharge
may be due to differences in the characteristics of Vietnam veterans who
served before 1970 compared with those who served later. For example,
those serving earlier were younger at discharge and more likely to have
been drafted than those serving later. When these and other factors are
controlled, the excess risk in Vietnam veterans discharged before 1970 is
still apparent.
Type of discharge (Table B-12): There is no significant difference in
the relative rate of mortality associated with Vietnam service between
honorably or nonhonorably discharged veterans in either follow-up
interval, although, in the initial postservice period, Vietnam veterans
with honorable discharges had higher relative mortality than Vietnam

13

'

�veterans with nonhonorable discharges. These estimates, however, are
based on small numbers of deaths and, therefore, are unstable.
Pay grade at discharge (Table B-13): In the earlier follow-up
interval, all rate ratios are greater than 1.0. Although a lower pay
grade is associated with a higher rate of mortality, this effect is seen
among both Vietnam and non-Vietnam veterans. Consequently, a test of
interaction comparing the relative rates among the five categories in the
first 5-year period is not statistically significant. Although there does
not appear to be any consistent pattern across categories, the chi-square
test indicates a lack of homogeneity among the five pay grade categories
in the later and total follow-up period.

14

�TABLE B-l. Number of Deaths, Crude Rates/1000 Person-Years, and Rate Ratios, by
Cohort Status, Race, and Time Since Discharge (1965-1983)

Years since
discharge

Race

£5

White
Nonwhite

6+

White

Vietnam
Non-Vietnam
No.
Rate/ No.
Rate/
deaths 1000 deaths
1000
89
21

99

2.2
3.5

Rate . 95% CI
ratio

57

1.5

1.50

1.08-2.09

16

2.7

1.30

0.68-2.50

1.4

94

1.4

0.99

0.74-1.31

Nonwhite

3.6

33

3.3

1.07

0.67-1.71

White

188

1.7

151

1.4

1.18

0.95-1.46

Nonwhite

All years &lt;

37

58

3.5

49

3.1

1.15

0.78-1.68

Tests for effect modification of race:

&lt;5 years:
6+ years :
All years:

15

X2 = 0.15, p = 0.70
X2 s 0.08, p = 0.78
X2 = 0.02, p = 0.89

�TABLE B-2. Number of Deaths, Crude Rates/1000 Person-Years and Rate Ratios, by
Cohort Status, Region of Birth, and Time Since Discharge (1965-1983)
Vietnam
Non-Vietnam
Rate/ No .
Rate/ Rate
No.
deaths 1000 deaths 1000 ratio .

Years since
discharge

Region
of birth*

£5

Northeast

16

1.8

15

1.7

1.07

0.53 - 2.17

Midwest

37

2.6

23

1.7

1.57

0.93 -2.64

South

25

2.3

16

1.6

1.45

0.78 -2.72

West

32

2.6

19

1.6

1.60

0.91 -2.83

Northeast

25

1.6

18

1.2

1.37

0.75 - 2.51

Midwest

36

1.5

34

1.5

1.00

0.62 -1.59

South

39

2.0

37

2.1

0.96

0.61 -1.50

West

36

1.7

38

1.9

0.87

0.55 - 1.38

41

1.7

33

1.4

1.23

0.78 -1.95

Midwest

73

1.9

57

1.5

1.22

0.86 -1.73

South

64

2.1

53

1.9

1.11

0.77

West

68

2.0

57

1.8

1.11

0.78 -1.58

6+

All years Northeast

95% CI

-1.59

"Foreign places of birth grouped with West category.
Tests for effect modification of region of birth: &lt;5 years:
6+- years:
All years:

16

X2 = 0.91, p = 0.82
X2 = 1.42, p = 0.70
X2 = 0.27| p = 0.97

�TABLE B-3. Number of Deaths, Crude Rates/1000 Person-Years and Rate Ratios, by Cohort
Status, General Technical Test (GT) Score, and Time Since Discharge
(1965-1983)

Years since
discharge

GT
score

Vietnam
Non-Vietnam
No.
Rate/ No.
Rate/
deaths 1 0
0 0 deaths 1 0
00

Rate 95% CI
ratio

&lt;100

3.0

37

2.1

1.41 0.93-2. 12

48

1.8

35

1.3

1.43

&lt;100

73

2.1

68

2.3

0.90 0.64-1.25

100+

61

1.3

58

1.2

1.07 0.75-1.53

&lt;100

133

2.4

105

2.3

1.07

0.83-1.39

1004-

6+

60

100+

£5

109

1.5

93

1.2

1.20

0.91-1.58

0.92-2.20

A

All years

Tests for effect modification of GT score: &lt;_5 years:
6+ years:
All years:

17

X2 = 0.004, p = 0 .95
X2 = 0.53, p = 0.47
X2 = 0.33, p = 0.57

�TABLE B-4. Number of Deaths, Crude Rates/1000 Person-Years and Rate Ratios, by
Cohort Status, Composite Index of Health, and Time Since Discharge (1965-1983)

Years since
discharge

Composite
index of
health

Vietnam
Non-Vietnam
No. Rate/
No. Rate/
deaths 1000 deaths 1000

Rate
ratio

95%
CI

All years

69

2.2

52

1.8

1 .20

0.84 - 1.73

41

2.7

21

1 .3

2.12

1. 25 - 3.59

No impairment 100

1 .8

82

1 .7

1 .08

0.80 - 1.44

Some
impairment

6+

No impairment
Some
impairment

£5

36

1 .4

45

1 .6

0.85

0.55 - 1.32

No impairment 169

2.0

134

1 .7

1 .12

0.90 - 1.41

77

1 .9

66

1 .5

1 .25

0.90 - 1.74

Some
impairment

Tests for effect modification of composite index of health:
&lt;5 years: X2 = 3.10, p = 0.08
6+ years: X2"= 0.78, p = 0.38
All years: X2 = 0.27, p = 0.60

18

�TABLE B-5. Number of Deaths, Crude Rates/1000 Person-Years and Rate Ratios, by Cohort
Status, Enlistment Status and Time Since Discharge (1965-1983)
Vietnam
Non-Vietnam
No.
Rate/ No.
Rate/ Rate
deaths 1000 deaths 1000 ratio

95% CI

2.6

36

2.4

1.09

0.70 - 1.70

67

2.3

37

1 .3

1. 80

1 .21 - 2.69

Volunteers

57

2.1

54

2.3

0.91

0.63 - 1.32

Draftees

79

1.5

73

1.4

1.06

0.77 - 1.45

Volunteers

100

2.3

90

2.3

0.98

0.74 - 1.30

Draftees

146

1 .8

110

1 .3

1. 31

1 .02 -

Years since
discharge

Enlistment
status

i5

Volunteers

43

Draftees
6+

All years

Tests for effect modification of enlistment status: &lt;5 years:
6+ years:
All years:

19

1.67

X2 = 2.72, p = 0.09
X2 = 0.34, p = 0.55
X2 = 2.20, p = 0.14

�TABLE B-6. Number of Deaths, Crude Rates/1000 Person-Years and Rate Ratios,
by Cohort Status, Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) Category
and Time Since Discharge (1965-1983)
Vietnam
No. Rate/
deaths 1000

Non-Vietnam
No. Rate/
deaths 1000

Years since
discharge

MOS*
category

15

Tactical

39

2.4

24

Nontactical

71

2.3

Tactical

53

Nontactical
Tactical

6+

All years

Nontactical

Rate
ratio

95X CI

2.0

1.19

0.71-1.97

49

1.5

1.58

1 . 10-2 . 27

1.8

36

1.8

1.04

0.68-1.59

83

1.6

91

1.6

0.97

0.72-1.30

92

2.1

60

1.9

1.10

0.79-1.52

154

1.8

140

1.6

1.18

0.94-1.48

*Based on MOS assignment held while on active duty.
Tests for effect modification of MOS: &lt;.5 years: X2
6+ years: X2
All years: X2

20

0.81, p = 0.37
0.08, p = 0.78
0.12, p = 0.73

�TABLE B-7. Number of Deaths, Crude Rates/1000 Person-Years and Rate Ratios, by Cohort
Status, Type of Unit and Time Since Discharge (1965-1983)
Years since
discharge

Type of
unit

Non-Vietnam
Vietnam
No. Rate/
No. Rate/
deaths 1000 deaths 1000

Rate
ratio

95X CI

Infantry

10

1 .5

2.02 1.01 - 4.06

Engineer

8

1 .8

5

1 .9

0.95 0.31 - 2.90

2

3 .3

4

1 .6

2.07 0.38 - 11.3

Cavalry

13

3 .3

2

2.0

1. 68 0.38 - 7.43

Artillery

14

2 .8

17

2.3

1. 18 0.58 - 2.39

Other

33

1 .7

35

1 .4

1. 18 0.74 - 1.91

Infantry

37

1 .7

20

1 .8

0.94 0.55 _ |
63

Engineer

13

1 .6

10

2.2

0.74 0.32 - 1.68

2

1 .9

7

1 .6

1. 19

0.25 - 5.74

Cavalry

15

2.2

3

1 .8

1. 23

0.36 - 4.26

Artillery

22

2.4

18

1 .4

1. 72 0.92 - 3.20

Other

46

1 .3

67

1 .6

0.84 " 0.58 - 1.22

Infantry

75

2.2

30

1 .7

1. 30

0.85 - 1.98

Engineer

21

1 .7

15

2.1

0.81

0.42 - 1.56

4

2.4

11

1 .6

1. 51

0.48 - 4.75

Cavalry

28

2.6

5

1 .9

1. 40

0.54 - 3.64

Artillery

36

2.5

35

1 .8

1.46

0.91 - 2.32

Other

6+

3 .1

Armor

£5

38

79

1 .5

102

1 .5

0.96 0.71 - 1.28

Armor

All years

Armor

Tests for effect modification of type of unit: £5 years:
6+ years:
All years:

21

X2 = 2.5, p = 0.77
X2 = 4.5, p = 0.48
X2 = 4.2, p = 0.52

�TABLE B-8. Number of Deaths, Crude Rates/1000 Person-Years and Rate Ratios, by Cohort Status,
Presence of AWOL or Confinement Time, and Time Since Discharge (1965-1983)

Years since
discharge

Vietnam
Non-Vietnam
AWOL or
No.
confinement No. Rate/
Rate/
deaths 1000 deaths
1000
time

Rate
ratio

.95% CI

3.6

21

3.5

1.00

0.54 - 1.86

91

2.2

51

1.3

1.70

1.20 -2.39

Ever

30

3.5

34

3.7

0.92

0.56 - 1.51

106

1.5

93

1.4

1.06

0.80 - 1.40

Ever

49

3.5

55

3.7

0.95

0.65 - 1.40

Never

All years

19

Never

6+

Ever
Never

&lt;5

197

1.8

144

1.4

1.28

1.03 -1.59

Tests for effect modification of AWOL or confinement time:

&lt;5 years:
6+ years:
All years:

X2 - 2.13, p - 0.14
X2 - 0.23, p - 0.63
X2 - 1.76, p - 0.18

�TABLE B-9. Number of Deaths, Crude Rates/1000 Person-Years and Rate Ratios, by
Cohort Status, Duration of Active Duty, and Time Since Discharge
(1965-1983)

Years since Duration of
discharge active duty
(in months)

Vietnam
No. Rate/
deaths 1000

Non-Vietnam
No. Rate/
deaths 1000

Rate
ratio

95Z CI

9.2

3

1.5

6.17

1.03 - 36.86

66

2.2

42

1.4

1.59

1.08 - 2.34

24+

42

2.6

28

2.3

1.16

0.72 - 1.86

&lt;12

1

2.5

6

1.6

1.57

0.19 - 13.07

12-23

72

1.3

77

1.4

0.92

0.67 - 1.27

24+

63

2.4

44

2.3

1.04

0.71 - 1.53

3

4.9

9

1.6

3.13

0.85 - 11.54

12-23

138

1.6

119

1.4

1.15

0.90 - 1.47

24+

6+

2

12-23

&lt;5

105

2.5

72

2.3

1.08

0.80 - 1.46

&lt;12

All years &lt;12

Tests for effect modification of duration of active duty: &lt;5 years:
6+ years:

X2 - 3.20, p - 0.20
X2 - 0.41. p - 0.81

All years:

- 2.02, p - 0.36

�TABLE B-10. Number of Deaths, Crude Rates/1000 Person-Years and Rate Ratios, by Cohort Status,
Age at Discharge and Time Since Discharge (1965-1983)

Years since
discharge

Age at
discharge

&lt;5

Vietnam
Non-Vietnam
No. Rate/
No.
Rate/
deaths 100&amp; ' deaths 1000

Rate
ratio

95% CI

28

All years

21+

3.0

1.83

1.02 - 3.27

82

2.0

54

1.4

1.41

1.00 - 1.99

1.8

27

2.7

0.67

0.36 - 1.26

121

1.7

100

1.5

1.10

0.84 - 1.43

43

21+

19

15

21+

5.5

3.2

46

2.8

1.14

0.75 - 1.73

203

1.8

154

1.5

1.21

0.98 - 1.49

Tests for effect modification of age at discharge: &lt;5 years: X2
6+ years: X2
All years: X2

0.56, p - 0.45
2.09, p - 0.15
0.06, p - 0.81

�TABLE B-ll. Number of Deaths, Crude Rates/1000 Person-Years and Rate Ratios, by Cohort
Status, Year of Discharge and Time Since Discharge (1965-1983)

Years since
Year of
discharge
discharge

Vietnam
No. Rate/
deaths 1000

Non-Vietnam
No.
Rate/
deaths
1000

Rate
ratio

95X CI

2.5

24

1.2

2.05

1.27 - 3.32

55

2.3

49

2.0

1.16

0.79 - 1.70

Before 1970

62

1.4

60

1.5

0.96

0.67 - 1.36

74

2.0

67

2.0

1.06

0.76 - 1.47

Before 1970

117

1.7

84

1.4

1.27

0.96 - 1.6~9

1970+

All years

55

1970+

6+

Before 1970
1970+

£5

129

2.1

116

2.0

1.10

0.85 - 1.41

Tests for effect modification of year of discharge:

25

&lt;5 years:
6+ years:
All years:

X2 = 3.42, p = 0.06
X2 = 0.16, p = 0.69
X2 = 0.62, p =0.43

�TABLE B-12. Number of Deaths, Crude Rates/1000 Person-Years and Rate Ratios, by
Cohort Status, Type of Discharge, and Time Since Discharge (1965-1983)

Years since
discharge

Type of
discharge

Vietnam
No. Rate/
deaths 1000

&lt;5

Honorable

104

2.3

56

1.4

1.68 1.21 - 2.32

5

4.1

17

4.3

0.94 0.35 - 2.55

128

1.6

102

1.4

1.11 0.86 - 1.45

8

4.4

25

4.3

1.02 0.46 - 2.25

232

1.9

158

1.4

1.31 1.07 - 1.61

13

4.2

42

4.3

0.99 0.53-1.84

Other
6+

Honorable
Other

All years

Honorable
Other

Non-Vietnam
No. Rate/ Rate
deaths 1000
ratio

95% CI

Tests for effect modification of type of discharge: £5 years: X2 = 0.73, p = 0.39
6+ years: X2 = 0.08, p = 0.78All years: X2 = 0.56, p = 0.45

26

�TABLE B-13. Number of Deaths, Crude Rates/1000 Person-Years and Rate Ratios,
by Cohort Status, Pay Grade at Discharge and Time Since Discharge
(1965-1983)
Vietnam
Years since Pay grade at No. Rate/
discharge
discharge
deaths 1000

Non-Vietnam
No.
Rate/
deaths
1000

Rate
ratio

95X CI

El

3.4

1.42

0.52 - 3.84

6

5.8

5

2.0

2.86

0.87 - 9.36

19

6.3

11

3.3

1.89

0.90 - 3.98

52

2.3

29

1.4

1.67

1.06 - 2.63

E5

27

1.5

17

1.2

1.26

0.69 - 2.32

El

5

2.6

24

5.2

0.51

0.20 - 1.34

E2

12

7.2

7

1.6

4.40

1..73 - 11.17

E3

16

3.0

16

2.9

1.06

0.53 - 2.12

' E4

68

1.7

50

1.4

1.20

0.84 - 1.73

E5

35

1.1

30

1.2

0.95

0.58 - 1.54

El

11

3.5

35

4.5

0.79

0.40 - 1.56

E2

18

6.6

12

1.8

3.74

1.80 - 7.77

E3

35

4.2

27

3.0

1.39

0.84 - 2.30

E4

120

1.9

79

1.4

1.37

1.03 - 1.82

E5

All years

11

E4

*

4.9

E3

6+

6

E2

&lt;5

62

1.2

47

1.2

1.06

0.73 - 1.55

Tests for effect modification of pay grade at discharge: £5 years: X2 = 1.77, p = 0.78
6+ years: X2 = 12.22, p = 0.02
All years: X2 = 11.75, p = 0.02

27

�VIETNAM EXPERIENCE STUDY

—

Mortality

APPENDIX C

Detailed Characteristics of Men killed in Action

28

�TABLE C-l. Descriptive Characteristics of Vietnam Veterans, by Vital Status
at Discharge from Active Duty

Characteristic
Total
Race:
White
Black
Other
Unknown
Place of Birth:
Northeast
Midwest
South
West
Other
Unknown
Enlistment Status:
Draftee
Volunteer

Killed in Action*
No.
X

Discharged Alive
No.
X

181

100.0

9324

100.0

156
23
2
0

86.2
12.7

8097
1156

86.8
12.4

1.1
0.0

63
8

0.7
0.1

24
52
38
57
7
3

13.3
28.7
21.0
31.5

1769
2827
2205
2193

3.9
1.7

312
18

117
64

64.6
35.4

5943
3381

X2+
(p-value)

19.0
30.3

0.50
(.8
07)

8.75
(.7
00)

23.7
23.5

3.3
0.2
63.7
36.3

0.06
(.0
08)

"Deaths in service from causes other than hostile enemy action are excluded.
"'The chi-square statistic tests the similarity of the distributions of each
characteristic between those killed in action and those discharged
alive, after the unknown category has been excluded.

29

�\
TABLE C-2. Physical Profile of Vietnam Veterans, by Vital Status at Discharge
from Active Duty
/

Characteristic
Total
Physical Capacity
or Stamina:
No impairment
Mild-significant
impairment
Unknown
Upper Extremities:
No impairment
Mild-significant
impairment
Unknown
Lower Extremities:
No impairment
Mild-significant
impairment
Unknown
Hearing and Ears :
' No impairment
Mild-significant
impairment
Unknown

Killed in fiction*
No.
X

Discharged Alive
No.
X

181

100.0

9324

100.0

181
0

100.0

9230
85

99.0

9

X2+
(p-value)

0.1

0

0.0
0.0 '

0.9

181
0

100
0.

9247

0.0

68

99.2
0.7

0

0.0

9
9075
240

97.3
2.6

0.0

9

0.1

4.4

8794
521

94.3
5.6

0.0

9

0.1

1.33
(.5
02)

0.1

0.5

1.67
(.0
02)

180
1

0
173
8

0

99.5

95.6

30

2.94
(.9
00)

0.47
.05)
(.0

�TABLE C-2. (continued)

Characteristic
Eyes and Visual
Acuity:
No impairment
Mild-significant
impairment
Unknown
Psychological
Functioning:
No impairment
Mild-significant
impairment
Unknown
Composite Measure
of Physical Health:
No impairment
Minor impairment
Other than'minor
impairment
Unknown

Killed in Action*
No.
%

Discharged Alive
No.
X

161
20

89.0
11.1

6934
2381

0

0.0

181
0

100.0
0.0

0

0.0

153
28
0

84.5
15.5
0.0

6297
2990

67.5

26

0.3

0

0.0

11

(p-value)

0.1

74.4
25.5

19.79
(&lt;0.001)

0.1

9300
15

99.7
0.2

0.29
(.9
05)

0.1

32.1

23.44
(&lt;0.001)

*Deaths in service from causes other than hositle enemy action are excluded.
"*" The chi-square statistic tests the similarity of the distributions of each
characteristic between those killed in action and those discharged alive,
after the unknown category has been excluded.

31

�TABLE C-3. Aptitude Test Scores of Vietnam Veterans, by Vital Status
at Discharge from Active Duty

Aptitude Test
Army Classification
Battery :
Verbal Ability
Arithmetic
Reasoning
Pattern
Analysis
General
Information
General
Technical
Armed Forces
Qualification
Test

Killed in Action*
No.+ Mean
SO

Discharged Alive
No.+ Mean
SD

177 103. 1

22. 1

9136

104.4

177 100. 3

20. 1

9135

101.5 21 .5

21 .9

177 101. 7

20.6

9136

101.7

22 .5

99.6

19. 6

9117

100.3

18 .4

179 101. 6

19.5

9200

103.1

19 .9

180

26. 3

9280

50.4

25 .5

175

48. 4

t-statstic4"*
(p-value)

0.79
( .43)
0
0.71
( .47)
0
0
0. 0
.00)
0.48
( .63)
0
0.98
( .33)
0

(1

1 .05
( .29)
0

"Deaths in service from causes other than hostile enemy action are excluded.
•(-Number of veterans for whom test scores were available.
•"The t-statistic tests the differences between the mean scores of those killed in action
and those discharged alive.

32

�TABLE C-4. Military Service Characteristics of Vietnam Veterans, by Vital Status
at Discharge from Active Duty

Characteristic
Total
Military Occupational
Specialty:
Tactical
operations
Other and
unknown
Type of Unit:
Infantry
Engineer
Armor
Cavalry
Artillery
Other
Unknown

Killed in Action*
No.
X

Discharged Alive
No.
X

181

100.0

9324

100.0

156

86.2

3217

34.5

25

13.8

6107

65.5

127

70.2

2477

2
2

1.1

911

26.6
9.8

23
7
19

1.1
12.7
3.9
10.5

792
1021

1

0.6

X2+
(p- value)

123

3920
80

1.3
8.5
11.0
42.0

0.9

Deaths in service from causes other than hostile enemy action are excluded.
The chi-square statistic tests the similarity of the distributions of each
characteristic between those killed in action and those discharged alive,
after the unknown category has been excluded.

33

207.21
(&lt;0.001)

192.54
(&lt;0.001)

�I
VIETNAM EXPERIENCE STUDY
I

—

Mortality

APPENDIX D

Mortality from Motor Vehicle Accidents,
Suicide and Drug-Related Causes by Selected

Covariates

34

�1

TABLE 0-1. Number of Deaths Due to Motor Vehicle Accidents (as Determined
by Death Certificate) Among Vietnam and Non-Vietnam Veterans
and Rate Ratios, by Time Since Discharge and Selected
Characteristics (1965-1983).

Characteristic

Time Since Discharge
&lt;. 5 years
6+ years
No. Rate 95% CI
deaths ratio

No. Rate 95% CI
deaths ratio

Race:
White
Other

57
9

1.92 1.11-3.35
1.98 0.49-7.91

60
7

1.31 0.78-2.19
0.38 0.07-1.96

GT score:
&lt;100
100+

33
33

2.00 0.95-4.21
1.82 0.89-3.71

35
32

0.79 0.41-1.53
1.70 0.83-3.48

Enlistment status:
Draftee
Volunteer

42
24

2.22 1.15-4.27
1.52 0.67-3.48

41
26

1.52 0.81-2.86
0.74 0.34-1.60

Duty MOS:
Tactical
Other

28
38

1.39 0.64-3.01
2.31 1.16-4.58

22
45

1.08 0.46-2.53
1.18 0.66-2.13

Age at discharge:
&lt;21 years
21+ years

9
57

1.55 0.42-5.78
2.02 1.16-3.53

13
54

1.03 0.35-3.07
1.22 0.71-2.10

Year of discharge:
&lt;1970
1970+

37
29

2.79
1.26

1.31-5.90
0.61-2.64

32
35

1.54 0.75-3.15
0.90 0.47-1.75

Pay grade at discharge:
E1-E3
E4-E5

17
49

3.12 1.16-8.43
1.80 0.99-3.26

18
49

0.63 0.23-1.77
1.60 0.89-2.89

35

�TABLE D-2. Number of Deaths Due to Suicide (as Determined by Death
Certificate) Among Vietnam and Non-Vietnam Veterans
and Rate Ratios, by Time Since Discharge and Selected
Characteristics (1965-1983).

Characteristic

Time Since Discharge
&lt;. 5 years
No.
deaths

Race:
White
Other

Rate
ratio*

95X CI

No.
deaths

6+ years
Rate
95X CI
ratio*

GT score:
&lt;100
100+

2.06

0.84-5.05

30

0.62

0 .30-1.30

—

22
3

—

2

8
17

1.48

0.57-3.91

18

0.63
0.65

0 .22-1.81
0 .25-1.68

Enlistment status .
14
Draftee
Volunteer
11

1.79
1.60

0.60-5.35
0.47-5.46

13
19

1.14
0.40

0 .38-3.39
0 .15-1.05

Duty MOS
Tactical
Other

5
20

1.98

0.79-4.97

9
23

0.80

0.35-1.82

Age at discharge:
&lt;21 years
4
21+ years
21

2.33

09-.0
.060

10
22

0.13
1.09

0 .02-1.06
0 . 47-2 . 52

16

0.55
0.74

0 .20-1.53
0. 8 2 0
2-.0

Year of discharge
&lt;1970
1970+

9
16

Pay grade at
discharge:
E1-E3
E4-E5

8
17

14

1.32

0.49-3.56

16

_

7

2.09

0.74-5.93

25

0.67

0 .30-1.48

*RRs are not computed for categories with less than 10 deaths among Vietnam
and non-Vietnam veterans combined.

36

�TABLE D-3. Number of Drug-Associated Deaths (as Determined by Medical Review)
Among Vietnam and Non-Vietnam Veterans and Rate Ratios, by
Selected Characteristics (1965-1983).

Characteristic

Number of Deaths
Vietnam
Non-Vietnam

Rate
ratio*

95% CI

Race:
White
Other

18
7

10
5

1.70
1.35

0.79-3.69
0.43-4.26

GT score:
&lt;100
100+

13
12

11
4

1.00
3.09

0.45-2.24
1.00-9.57

11
14

1
14

10.81
0.88

Duty MOS:
Tactical
Other

8
17

1
14

—
1.27

—
0.63-2.58

Age at discharge:
&lt;21 years
21+ years

8
17

10
5

0.97
3.12

0.38-2.47
1.15-8.45

Year of discharge:
&lt;1970
1970+

5
20

4
11

—
1.79

—
0.86-3.74

Pay grade at discharge:
E1-E3
E4-E5

10
15

11
4

1.52
3.22

0.64-3.57
1.07-9.71

Enlistment status:
Draftee *
Volunteer

1.39-83.79
0.42-1.85

*RRs are not computed for categories with less than 10 deaths among Vietnam
and non-Vietnam veterans combined.

37

�VIETNAM EXPERIENCE STUDY

—

Mortality

APPENDIX £

Details of Medical-Review-Panel Findings

38

�The following is a description of medical review panel findings for
all deaths in which cause of death via medical review differed from cause
as determined by death certificate (see Table E-l and £-2 for the
cross-classification of death certificate and medical review cause of
death).
1. Infectious diseases. The two deaths attributed to infectious
diseases by the death certificates were both classified elsewhere by the
panel. In one case, an alcoholic man died as an immediate consequence of
an overwhelming infection. The death certificate underlying cause of
death was septiciemia due to other gram-negative organisms (ICD-9,
038.4). The panel attributed the fatal infection to impaired host
defense mechanisms associated with the decedent's alcoholism and cited
alcohol dependence syndrome as the underlying cause of death (ICD-9,
303). In the other case, an intravenous drug abuser with acquired
immunodeficiency disorder died as a result of pneumocystis carinii
pneumonia. The death certificate diagnosis was pneumocystosis (ICD-9,
136.3), while the panel attributed the death to deficiency of
cell-mediated immunity (ICD-9, 279.1).
2. Neoplasms. The panel recategorized 2 of the 25 deaths that had
been attributed to neoplasm according to the death certificate (see Table
E-3). The'panel determined that both deaths were caused by operative
misadventures on the basis of hospital records and autopsy findings. In
one case, the panel attributed the death to an accidental cut during a •
surgical operation (ICD-9, E870.0). The cut, to the mesenteric vein,
complicated an operation to remove a colon cancer. Further complications
led to additional bowel resections. "Short bowel syndrome" developed,
and the veteran eventually died as a consequence of severe dehydration
and malabsorption. At autospy, no metastatic lesions were detected. In
the other case, the veteran had previously undergone an operation to
remove a bronchial adenoma. During a subsequent operation to repair a
bonchopleural fistula, the endotracheal tube was not correctly placed,
and he had a cardiac arrest (ICD-9, E876.3). The pathologist who
performed the autopsy attributed the death to "respiratory insufficiency"
and noted that "the death of this patient is not related to the tumor
itself."
The panel cited a neoplasm as the underlying cause of two deaths
attributed to nonneoplastic causes according to the death certificates
(see Table E-3). One is discussed below in section "16. Other external
cause." The panel determined that a pineal gland neoplasm was the cause
of death, but the death certificate determination was "head trauma,"
coded as an accident of unspecified cause. The other death is discussed
below in section "5. Circulatory diseases." The panel attributed the
death to Burkitt's tumor (ICD-9. 200.2); the death certificate attributed
it to "cardiopulmonary arrest" (ICD-9, 427.5).
In 23 cases both the panel and death certificate determinations
resulted in deaths being coded as neoplasms, but in 11 the.determinations
did not agree to the fourth digit of the ICD-9 code (see Table E-3). In
each of the 11 cases, the lack of complete agreement can be attributed to
statements on the death certificate that lack precision or do not contain
available diagnostic information.
The major features of a tumor, according to the ICD-9 classification
system, are its anatomic location, whether it is benign or malignant, and

39

�whether it is a primary or secondary lesion. The underlying cause of
death on three death certificates was "brain tumor," and each was
appropriately coded as neoplasm of unspecified nature (ICD-9, 239.6). On
the basis of its review of hospital records pertaining to these cases,
the panel included the specific cerebral site and the malignant nature of
the three tumors in its cause-of-death determinations (see Table E-3).
Two other deaths were due to malignant neoplasm, unspecified site (ICD-9,
199.1), according to the death certificates; the panel localized one to
the bronchus and lung (ICD-9, 162.9), and the other to the head, neck,
and face (ICD-9, 195.0). The panel, on the basis of medical records,
localized a death attributed to malignant melanoma, site unspecified
(ICD-9, 172.9) according to the death certificate to the scalp and neck
(ICD-9, 172.4). The panel, using hospital records and an Autopsy report,
described a malignant testicular tumor as affecting an undescended
testicle (ICD-9, 186.0), but the affected testicle was not specified as
to its descent on the death certificate (ICD-9, 186.9). Another death
was due to metastatic carcinoma of unknown primary site, which
secondarily involved the liver. The death certificate described the
cause of death simply as "liver cancer," which resulted in the
appropriate code for malignant neoplasm of the liver, not specified as
primary or secondary (ICD-9, 155.2). If the death certificate had
mentioned that the "liver cancer" was secondary, then the death would
have been coded differently by ICD-9 rules. The panel, on the basis of
hospital records and histopathology reports, correctly attributed the
death to malignant neoplasm of unspecified primary site (ICD-9, 199.1).
In three cases of malignant neoplasms of lymphatic and hematopoietic
tissue, the tumor histology, which was available from medical records,
allowed the panel to arrive at more accurate or specific diagnoses than
did the original certifiers (see Table E-3). In one instance, "leukemia"
was listed as the cause of death on the certificate, and this resulted in.
the appropriate code for leukemia of unspecified cell type (ICD-9,
208.9). The panel had access to the decedent's hospital record, which
documented acute myeloid leukemia (ICD-9, 205.0) on several bone marrow
aspirates. In a second case, the underlying cause on the death
certificate was "terminal Hodgkin's disease," which was appropriately
coded to Hodgkin's disease unspecified (ICD-9, 201.9). Antemortem lymph
node biopsy findings allowed the panel to specify the Hodgkin's disease -»
as nodular sclerosis type (ICD-9, 201.5). In the third case, the
decedent had a lymphoblastic lymphoma which was subsequently complicated
by leukemia. The decedent died in the hospital, and the diagnosis was
"lymphoblastic lymphoma with leukemia." The death certificate
cause-of-death statement mentions only the lymphoblastic leukemia which
was appropriately coded as acute lymphoid leukemia (ICD-9, 2 4 0 . On
0.)
the basis of the medical record, the panel cited lymphoblastic lymphoma
(ICD-9, 200.1) as the underlying cause of death.
3. Mental disorders. Fourteen deaths were attributed to mental
disorders as a result of death certificate findings, and the panel
categorized 10 elsewhere (see Table E-4). In one of the cases, the death
certificate was improperly completed and the coded cause of death, simple
schizophrenia (ICD-9, 295.0), was the first diagnosis in ft continuous
statement which contained a total of five diagnoses. The last listed
cause of death, "episodes of G.I. bleeding," which could not be coded as

40

�the underlying cause according to ICD-9 rules, was similar to the panel's
determination, hemorrhage of gastrointestinal tract, unspecified (ICD-9,
578.9).
In the remaining nine recategorized cases, death was due to either
substance dependence or abuse according to the coded death certificates.
In all nine cases the panel's determinations included diagnoses
pertaining to misuse of drugs or alcohol, but the diagnostic reasoning or
descriptive terms differed significantly from those used on the death
certificates. Consequently, the underlying cause of death the panel
assigned is categorically different from that assigned on the basis of
the death certificate.
The ICD-9 rules governing selection of the underlying cause of death
give preference to diagnostic terms that provide the most specificity
regarding the site or nature of the fatal condition. For example,
alcoholic liver disease (ICD-9, 571.0-571.3) is preferred to alcohol
dependence syndrome (ICD-9, 303). In two cases, the panel cited
alcoholic.liver damage, unspecified (ICD-9, 571.3), whereas the death
certificate findings were coded as alcohol dependence syndrome (ICD-9,
303). In another case, the panel cited alcoholic fatty liver (ICD-9,
571.0), whereas the certificate was coded as nondependent abuse of
alcohol (ICD-9, 305.0).
In two additional cases, both coded to alcohol dependence syndrome
(ICD-9, 303) on the basis of death certificates, the panel cited alcohol
dependence as contributing to death, but specified compression of the
brain stem (ICD-9, 348.4) and pneumococcal pneumonia (ICD-9, 481.0) as
the underlying causes of death. In the first case, hospital records
indicate that the decedent's rapid neurological deterioration was due to
a "cerebral abscess/neoplasm 'or infarction," with no clear causal
connection with alcoholism.' In the second case, the panel determined
that an alcoholic man died as a direct result of pneumococcal pneumonia.
In this case the panel was mistaken; the priority placed on alcohol
dependence on the death certificate is more reasonable, because the
infection that the veteran did not survive was probably secondary to
impaired host defense mechanisms associated with alcoholism.
The original death certifiers attributed the other 4 recategorized
deaths in the mental disorder category to either drug dependence or drug
abuse. The ICD-9 manual defines drug dependence as a "compulsion to take
a drug on a continuous or periodic basis in order to experience its
psychic effects, and sometimes to avoid the discomfort of its absence.'.'
The manual also states that the diagnosis of nondependent abuse of drugs
(ICD-9, 305.0-305.9) is only appropriate "when no other diagnosis is
possible." A drug abuse code should not be selected as the underlying
cause of death if either drug dependence or drug poisoning is a possible
cause of death. The panel adhered to the ICD-9 drug-related definitions
and diagnostic preferences, which accounts for the recategorization of
these 4 deaths.
In 3 deaths attributed to drug dependence on the basis of death
certificates, the corresponding panel diagnoses were accidental
poisonings, because the panel had no information to document compulsion
to use drugs at the time of death. The coded death certificate cause of
death in one instance was other drug dependence (ICD-9, 304.6) and in the
other two cases it was unspecified drug dependence (ICD-9, 304.9). The

41

�corresponding panel determinations were accidental poisoning by glue
(ICD-9, E866.6), accidental poisoning by other drugs (ICD-9, E858.8), and
accidental poisoning by unspecified drugs (ICD-9, E858.9).
Finally, the original death certifier attributed a death to
unspecified nondependent drug abuse (ICD-9, 305.9), but the panel, which
adhered to the ICD-9 preference for the accidental poisoning diagnosis,
classified it as an accidental poisoning by opiates and narcotics (ICD-9,
E850.0).
In addition to the 10 recategorized deaths described above, the panel
attributed to mental disorders 12 deaths that were placed in other
disease categories on the basis of the death certificates (see Table
E-4). These 12 deaths are discussed in detail in the following sections:
1. Infectious diseases, 6. Respiratory diseases, 7. Digestive diseases,
12. Accidental poisonings, and 15. Injury of undetermined
intentionality. In most of the 12 cases, both the death certificate and
panel diagnoses pertained to misuse of drugs or alcohol, but the specific
ICD-9 codes were categorically different.
*• Diseases of the nervous system and sense organs. The panel
disagreed wit'h the original death certifier on one of the three deaths
attributed to neurologic disorders. The decedent was a previously
healthy man who had overwhelming speticemia and meningitis due to
Haemophilus influenzae. There was no recognizable primary source of
infection and no obvious defect in host-defense mechanisms. The
pathologist who performed the autopsy described the primary diagnosis as
"overwhelming speticemia and meningitis'with Haemophilus influenzae, type
B." The physician who completed the death certificate cited "Haemophilus
influenzae meningitis" as the underlying cause, appropriately coded to
ICD-9, 320.0. In view of the absence of a primary source of infection,
the panel attributed the death to septicemia due to other gram-negative
organisms (ICD-9, 038.4), which placed the death in the infectious
disease category.
5. Circulatory diseases. The panel categorized elsewhere 7 of the 34
deaths coded on the basis of death certificates to circulatory disease. •
In four, the panel's findings differed from the diagnosis of either
cardiac arrest (ICD-9, 427.5) or myocardial infarction (ICD-9, 410) cited
on the death certificates. In one case, described briefly in section "2.
Neoplasm," the panel determined that Burkitt's tumor (ICD-9, 200.2) was .«
the cause of death. The veteran had had several antemortmem bone marrow
biopsies that established the diagnosis of Burkitt's lymphoma. He
received two courses of chemotherapy and subsequently died as a direct
consequence of an intracerebral hemorrhage. At autopsy, no tumor was
found, and the death certifier stated that the death was due to
"cardiopulmonary arrest," although she mentioned "probably Burkits1 (sic)
lymphoma" as a nonunderlying cause of death. The panel attributed the
absence of tumor at postmortem examination either to an incomplete
dissection or to the effects of chemotherapy. In view of the poor
prognosis associated with disseminated Burkitt's lymphoma, the panel
cited the neoplasm as the underlying cause of death.
In another death described as "cardiopulmonary arrest" on the death
certificate, the panel diagnosis was sudden death within 24 hours of
onset of symptoms &lt;ICD-9, 798.2). An emergency room record stated that

42

�the decedent had gone to bed complaining of "epigastric discomfort and
nausea" and that his mother found him dead 3 hours later. No autopsy was
done.
In the case of both recategorized myocardial infarctions (ICD-9,
410.0), the coroners who completed the death certificates stated that the
deaths were due to a "heart attack." Both veterans had died at home and
in neither instance was an autopsy performed. In each case, the panel
based its diagnosis, sudden death within 24 hours of onset of symptoms
(ICD-9, 798.2), on the medical history contained in the coroner's records.
The remaining three circulatory disease deaths, for which the panel
and death certificate determinations differ, were originally attributed
to hypertensive renal disease, not specified as benign or malignant
(ICD-9, 403.9); cardiovascular disease, unspecified with mention of
arterioslclerosis (ICD-9, 429.2); and compression of the superior vena
cava (ICD-9, 459.2). In the first death, the only information available
to the panel was an emergency room record indicating that the decedent
had a cardiac arrest as a result of chronic renal failure. The record
contained no information on the etiology of the kidney disease, so the
panel determination was renal failure, unspecified (ICD-9, 586.0), which
placed the death in the genitourinary disease category. The original
death cert^fier apparently was aware that the renal disease had been
attributed to hypertension, and this causal sequence is indicated on the
death record. In the second death, the medical examiner apparently cited
"arteriosclerotic heart disease" as the cause of death on the basis of
the decedent's past medical history. The panel attributed the death to a
hemorrhage of the gastrointestinal tract, unspecified (ICD-9, 578.9).
The police records show- that the decedent was found at home, with "a
great deal of blood on his facial area, and also in the bathroom sink."
There was no evidence for a traumatic death. The panel inferred that
gastrointestinal hemorrhage was the most likely cause of death on the
basis of the medical examiner's report that the decedent was an
- alcoholic.' No autopsy was performed. The third death, which the
original death certifier attributed to superior vena cava syndrome,
resulted from a crush injury that occurred when the automobile the
veteran was repairing fell on his chest. The panel listed struck by
falling object (ICD-9, E916) as the cause of death, in accordance with
ICD-9 underlying cause selection rules, which give preference to the
circumstances that resulted in injury rather than to the anatomic
•
location of the injury.
6. Respiratory diseases. The panel recategorized 6 of the 9 deaths
originally attributed to respiratory disease. In 4 cases, the death
certificate findings were bronchopneumonia, organism unspecified (ICD-9,
485). The corresponding panel-determined causes of death were:
glomerulonephritis, not otherwise specified (ICD-9, 583.9), systemic
lupus erythematosus (ICD-9, 710.0). passenger on a motorcycle involved in
a collision with another motor vehicle (ICD-9, 812.3), and accidental
poisoning by other drugs (ICD-9, E858.8). In the first case, the medical
record documented that at the time of his death the veteran was receiving
hemodialysis for end-stage renal disease due to glomerulonephritis of
undetermined etiology. The panel attributed his fatal pneumonia to
impaired host defenses associated with severe chronic renal failure. In
the second case, the veteran was found on autopsy to have systemic lupus

43

�erythematosus with renal and central nervous system involvement, and the
panel determined that lupus was responsible for susceptibility to the
fatal infection. In the third case, the death certificate was improperly
completed and did not reflect the coroner's autopsy-determined cause of
death, "accidental-motorcycle fatality." In the fourth case, the
decedent was admitted to a hospital following an "overdose with
cardiopulmonary arrest." He died 7 days later in the hospital, following
a hospital course complicated by pneumonia. The panel attributed the
death to poisoning by a mixture of drugs.
In another recategorized respiratory disease death, the death
certificate determination was acute edema of the lung, unspecified
(ICD-9, 518.4). while the panel diagnosis was morphine-type drug
dependence (ICD-9, 304.0). The decedent had many prior hospitalizations
for medical problems due to heroin dependency. He was found dead at
home, and autopsy findings included evidence of a recent intravenous
injection and pulmonary edema. The toxicologic analysis of body fluids
showed no evidence of morphine but the panel, on the basis of the medical
history and autopsy findings, attributed the death to drug dependence.
In the final recategorized case, the death certificate determination
of "hemorrhagic interstitial pneumonitis," appropriately coded as other
alveolar and parietoalveolar pneumopathy (ICD-9, 516.8), omitted
available diagnostic information. The veteran had received an antemortem
diagnosis of Goodpasture's syndrome, a disorder which affects both the
kidneys and the lungs, and the diagnosis was confirmed at autospsy. The
panel attributed the death to hypersensitivity angiitis (ICD-9, 446.2),
an entity classified as a circulatory disease and the correct ICD-9 code
for Goodpasture's syndrome.
7. Digestive diseases. The death certificates attributed seven
deaths to digestive diseases, but the panel attributed three of the seven
to alcohol dependence syndrome (ICD-9, 303). In the first case, the
death certificate citation was "alcoholic hepatitis," appropriately coded
to acute alcoholic hepatitis (ICD-9, 571.1). The panel, on the basis of
the hospital record and autopsy report, determined that the decedent, at
the time of his death, had many complications of alcoholism, but the
panel did not attribute the death to a particular alcohol-related
disease. The panel listed alcohol dependence syndrome as the underlying
cause of death, which placed the case in the mental disorder category. «
The second and third cases were both coded as acute pancreatitis (ICD-9, ,
577.0) on the basis of the death certificates, neither one of which
mentioned that the decedents were dependent on alcohol. The panel used
available medical records to establish that in both cases, pancreatitis
was a direct sequel of alcohol dependence, and classified the deaths
accordingly.
8. Genitourinary diseases. The panel, using the available diagnostic
information, recategorized three of the four deaths that the original
death certifiers had attributed to genitourinary diseases. In one case,
the underlying cause on the death certificate was coded as renal failure,
unspecified (ICD-9, 586), but the panel's determination was coded as
alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver (ICD-9, 571.2). The panel had access to
the record of the hospitalization during which the veteran died, and the
record indicated that both renal failure and coma were secondary to liver
disease. The pathologist who performed the autopsy attributed the death

44

�to "cirrhosis of the liver, advanced (history of ethanol use)." The .
second recategorized death was coded as a urinary tract infection, site
unspecified (ICD-9, 599) on the basis of the death certificate, but the
panel diagnosis was late effects of motor vehicle accident (ICD-9,
E929.0). The decedent was quadraplegic and incontinent of urine after a
motor vehicle accident that occurred 4 years before his death. The panel
attributed the immediate cause of death, urinary tract infection, to his
traumatic neurologic impairment. The third recategorized death was also
coded as a urinary tract infection, site unspecified (ICD-9, 599) on the
basis of the death certificate. The certificate did not contain the
primary discharge diagnosis listed on the hospital record, "suicidal drug
overdose with cardiac and subsequent respiratory arrest." The panel used
the medical history of a self-inflicted mixed drug poisoning to describe
the death as suicide by other specified drugs (ICD-9, E950.2).
9. Congenital anomalies. The panel, on the basis of autopsy
findings, categorized elsewhere two deaths attributed to congenital
disorders, on the death certificates. Before death, one veteran had had a
diagnosis of and surgical treatment for a congenital cerebral
arteriovenous malformation. His death was preceded by rupture of the
aneurysm and rapid neurological deterioration. The nosologist coded the
underlying cause of death as congenital anomaly of cerebral vessels
(ICD-9, 747.8) on the basis of the death certificate statement that the
decedent was "status post removal right frontal arteriovenous
malformation." The postmortem examination records, which were available
to the panel, indicated that the fatal cerebrovascular event began prior
to the decedent's operation, and the panel cited the appropriate cause of
death, subarachnoid hemorrhage (ICD-9, 430). In the other death, the
coded death certificate cause was coarctation of the aorta (ICD-9,
747.1). At autopsy the death was shown to be due to rupture of a
surgically implanted aortic graft. The postmortem findings are reflected
in the panel's determination of the underlying cause, late complication
of aortic graft placement (ICD-9, E878.1).
10. Symptoms, signs and ill-defined conditions. Autopsy results
account for the diagnostic disagreement in one of the two deaths placed
in the signs, symptoms and ill-defined conditions category on the basis
of the death certificates. The death certificate shows "pending further
study" as the underlying cause, which was coded to other unknown and
«
unspecified cause of mortality (ICD-9, 799.9). No revised death
certificate was available. The panel based its determination, alcoholic
cirrhosis of the liver (ICD-9, 571.2), on the autopsy report.
11. Motor vehicle accidents. The panel recategorized three motor
vehicle traffic deaths. In two instances, the panel assigned the deaths
to suicide by crashing of a motor vehicle (ICD-9, E958.5). In one,
police records indicated that the veteran repeatedly drove his car into
the path of oncoming traffic and made no effort to avoid a collision with
an oncoming truck. In the other, police records contained a report of a
distress call from the veteran's spouse following a domestic quarrel.
The spouse was concerned about his self-destructive intentions. The
panel recategorized the third motor vehicle death as a homicide on the
basis of a coroner's report. The decedent, a pedestrian, had
"confronted" the driver of a motor vehicle immediately before he was
struck by the vehicle and dragged for "about six blocks." The death

45

�certificate listed "auto-pedestrian" as the underlying cause and
"homicide" as the manner of death. The certificate did not contain a
statement of intentionality in either the "cause of death" or the
"circumstances of injury" sections, and, as a result, the nosologist
coded the fatality as a motor vehicle accident, in accordance with the
coding practices of the National Center for Health Statistics.
12. Accidental poisoning. The panel categorized elsewhere 9 of the
18 deaths attributed to accidental poisoning according to the death
certificates. In 4 cases of heroin or morphine-type drug poisoning, the
panel recategorized the deaths to chronic morphine dependence (ICD-9,
304.0) on the basis of historical and postmortem evidence of drug
dependence. In two instances of accidental poisoning by motor vehicle
exhaust gas (ICD-9, E868.2), law enforcement records were not available,
and the panel could not characterize the decedents' intentions.
Consequently, the panel's underlying cause of death for both was
poisoning by motor vehicle gas, undetermined whether accidentally or
purposely inflicted (ICD-9, £982.0). The causes of death on the death
certificates in two other accidental poisoning fatalities were "apparent
accidental drug overdose" and "intoxication of unknown origin," which the
nosologist coded as accidental poisoning by unspecified drugs (ICD-9,
E858.9) and accidental poisoning by unspecified substance (ICD-9, 866.9),
respectively. In the first case, the panel attributed the death to drug
dependence, unspecified (ICD-9, 304.9) on the basis of hospital records.
In the second case, an autopsy showed that the decedent aspirated gastric
material, a finding that warranted toxicologic investigation, according
to the pathologist. Mo toxicologic results were available to the panel,
and it determined that the cause of death was inhalation of food causing
obstruction of the respiratory tract (ICD-9, E911).
In the ninth recategorized accidental poisoning, the death
certificate cited "synergistic action of alcohol and diazepam" as the
underlying cause of death, which was coded as accidental poisoning by
benzodiazepine-based tranquilizer (ICD-9, E853.1). The panel had access
to the medical history, autopsy results, and toxicologic analysis—all of
which indicated that death resulted from aspiration of gastric contents
as a consequence of alcohol intoxication (ICD-9, 305.0).
13
• Suicide. The panel categorized all 54 of the suicides listed on
the death certificates as suicides. The panel identified an additional »
six suicides, which are discussed in sections 8. Genitourinary diseases, *
11. Motor vehicle accidents, and 16. Other external causes.
14
• Homicide. For 47 homicides, the panel agreed with the
categorization based on the death certificates. In four deaths,
disagreements between the certificates arid panel occurred. In one case,
the veteran was shot in the head by a "friend" while the two men were
"fooling around." The "friend" was charged with involuntary
manslaughter, and the death certificate lists "homicide" as the manner of
death. The panel attributed the death to an accident caused by a handgun
(ICD-9, 922.0). In three other recategorized deaths, the certificates
cite homicide as the underlying cause but do not mention that the
decedents were killed by law enforcement agents. Consequently, the death
certificate codings, each of which was assault by unspecified firearm
(ICD-9, E965.4), differ from the panel's codings, each of which was
injury due to legal intervention by firearms (ICD-9, E970.0).

46

�15. Injury of undetermined intentionality. The panel assigned to
other categories 8 of the 10 deaths coded as injuries of undetermined
intentionality according to the death certificates. In five deaths, drug
poisoning was listed on the certificate as the underlying cause of death
and "undetermined" as the manner of death. The panel recategorized all
five. It determined that three of the deaths were accidental drug
poisonings on the basis of either medical examiner interviews with family
and friends, which indicated the absence of suicidal intent, or law
enforcement investigations, which documented that recreational drugs were
being used at the death scene. The panel recategorized the other two
deaths to natural causes. In one case, police records included reports
of a scene investigation and an interview with the decedent's brother
that provided sufficient evidence for the panel to cite morphine-type
drug dependence (ICD-9, 304.0) as the underlying cause of death. In the
other case, "acute multiple drug intoxication" was cited as the
underlying cause on the death certificate. The panel, on the basis of a
review of the hospital record and autopsy findings, attributed the death
to renal failure due to acute tubular necrosis (ICD-9, 584.5). There was
no historical or laboratory evidence to support a toxic .etiology.
In a sixth case, "ethanol poisoning" was cited as the underlying
cause on the death certificate, and "undetermined" was listed as the
manner of death. The veteran had been drinking alcohol with two friends,
who had been "teasing" him into drinking to excess according to police
records. The decedent died at home and was found to have a lethal blood
alcohol level. Criminal charges were not filed against the friends, and
the panel attributed the death to accidental poisoning by alcoholic
beverages (ICD-9, E860.0).
In two other deaths, injury by firearm and injury by fire were listed
as causes on the certificate. In the firearm injury death, despite a
coroner's jury finding that the victim was shot by his wife, the
certificate specifies that the manner of death was "undetermined." The
• panel attributed the death to assault by an unspecified firearm (ICD-9,
£965.4). Similarly, in the fire injury death, the coroner's autopsy
report describes the death as an "accident," but the manner was
"undetermined" according to the death certificate. In the absence of any
evidence to suggest either homicide or suicide, the panel attributed the
death to accident caused by smoke and fumes from a conflagration (ICD-9,
E890.2).
16. Other external causes. The panel recategorized 14 of 61 deaths
that had been placed in the other external cause group on the basis of
death certificate determinations. Of the 14, the panel attributed 11 to
the specific external cause categories discussed above and 3 to natural
causes.
The panel categorized as suicides three deaths that the original
death certifiers had categorized as accidents. In one case, involving a
drowning, medical examiner's records describe the decedent as a newlywed
in "extreme financial difficulty" who "walked off his job without notice"
and was found drowned in a lake 3 days later. The panel inferred
self-destructive intent from the victim's life circumstances, and cited
suicide by drowning (ICD-9, E954) as the underlying cause of death. In
the second case, in which the veteran was crushed by a train, the panel
based the diagnosis of suicide on eyewitness accounts that the the

47

�decedent "ran out from buses and laid on the tracks in front of (a)
train." In the third case, a death from a self-inflicted gunshot wound,
the death certificate apparently was not amended after the medical
examiner's determination of suicide.
For five other death certificate-determined causes in this category,
the panel could not rule out either suicide or homicide, and it placed
these deaths in the accident of undetermined intentionality category.
Law enforcement records raised the possiblity that two of the five deaths
might have been suicides. In one case, a gun hobbyist cleaning a
revolver sustained a lethal head injury, and the trajectory of the bullet
was consistent with either an intended or unintended injury. In the
other case, the fatal self-inflicted gunshot wound occurred immediately
after a domestic quarrel that reportedly involved the issue of the
paternity of one of the decedent's children. A third death involved an
alcohol dependent man who was observed to be lying on the railroad tracks
before being crushed by a train. The panel could not rule out suicidal
intent and listed the underlying cause of death as injury by lying before
moving object, intentionality undetermined (ICD-9, E988.0). In the
fourth case, -the original death certifier attributed the death to an
accident caused by fire. The coroner subsequently reported that he could
not rule out "foul play," and the panel cited injury by fire,
intentionality undetermined (ICD-9, E988.1) as the underlying cause of
death. The fifth case was that of a veteran who drowned, and the panel
had no information other than an emergency room report that the decedent
was dead on arrival as a result of drowning. The panel could not exclude
self-inflicted injury, so it attributed the death to drowning,
intentionality undetermined (ICD-9, E984).
The panel considered three other deaths to be motor vehicle
accidents. In two, the anatomic sites of the injury, but not the
circumstances of injury, were stated on the death certificate. The
panel, on the basis of medical records, assigned these two deaths to the
- motor vehicle accident category. In the third, a fatal accident
involving the driver of a "skidder" was coded to accident caused by
lifting machine and appliance (ICD-9, E919.2) on the basis of medical
statements in the death certificate. The panel coded it to motor vehicle
traffic accident due to loss of control without collision on the highway
(ICD-9, E816.0).
As stated earlier, the panel recategorized 3 of these deaths to
natural causes. Two had been coded to an accidental fall (ICD-9, E888)
on the basis of the death certificates, but the panel, on the basis of
medical documentation of antecedent seizure activity, coded them to other
categories. In one case, the decedent injured his head during an
observed alcohol withdrawal seizure; the panel therefore attributed the
death to alcohol dependence syndrome (IC&amp;-9, 303). In the other case,
the decedent, known to have epilepsy, sustained a fatal head injury
during an observed seizure; the panel therefore diagnosed generalized
convulsive epilepsy (ICD-9, 345.1). The third death, attributed to "head
trauma" on the death certificate, had been coded to unspecified accident
(ICD-9, E928.9). The panel, on the basis of the autopsy report, coded it
to pineal gland neoplasm (ICD-9, 237.1); The pathologist who performed
the autopsy concluded that the onset of the decedent's head trauma was a

48

�coincidence. The post-mortmem examination showed "no signs of traumatic
injury to the skull or brain."

49

�TABLE E-l.

Comparison of Death Certificate and Medical Review Panel Results by Major Cause of Death Category*

Death
certificate

Medical review panel
Infec- Neotious plasm

Endocrine

Mental NerDls. vous

Circu- Respir- Diges- Genito- Muscu- 111Exterlatory atory
Total
tive
urinary loskel. defined nal

Infectious
Diseases

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

Neoplasms

0

23

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

25

Mental
Disorders

0

0

0

4

1

0

4

0

0

0

4

14

Nervous System

1

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

3

Circulatory
System

0

1

0

0

0

27

0

1

1

0

3

1

34

Respiratory
System

0

0

0

1

0

1

3

0

1

1

0

2

9

Digestive
System

0

0

0

3

0

0

0

4

0

0

0

0

7

Genitourinary

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

2

4

Congenital

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

2

Ill-Defined

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

1

0

2

External
Causes

0

1

0

7

1

0

0

1

1

0

0

313

324

Total

1

16

4

29

4

12

4

1

4

325

426

1

0

1

25

1

*Categories not shown have no deaths assigned to them.

�TABLE E-2. Comparison of Death Certificate and Medical Review Panel Results for Major
External-Cause-of-Death Categories
Death
certificate
MVA

Medical review panel
Accidental Other
poisoning ace.
Suicide Homicide

Undetermined

Total

Motor-vehicle
127
accidents (MVA)

0

0

2

1

0

130

Accidental
poisoning

0

9

1

0

0

2

12

Other accidents

3

0

47

3

0

5

58

Suicide

0

0

0

54

0

0

54

Homicide

0

0

4

0

47

0

51

Undetermined

0

4

1

0

1

2

8

130

13

53

59

49

9

313

Total

51

�TABLE E-3.

Case

Deaths Due to Neoplasms in Which the Death Certificate and Medical
Review Panel Determinations Disagree

ICD-9

Death certificate cause

ICD-9

153.6

Malignant neoplasm of
ascending colon

E870.0 Accidental cut during
surgical operation

235.7

Neoplasm of uncertain
behavior, respiratory
tract

E876.3 Endotracheal tube wrongly
placed during anesthesia

Medical review cause

E928.9 Unspecified accident

237.1

Neoplasm of uncertain
behavior of pineal gland

4

427.5

Cardiac arrest

200.2

Burkitt's tumor

5

239.6

Neoplasm of unspecified
nature, brain

191.2

Malignant neoplasm of
brain, temporal lobe

6

239.6

Neoplasm of unspecified
nature, brain

191.2

Malignant neoplasm of
brain, unspecified

7

239.6

Neoplasm of unspecified
nature, brain

191.1

Malignant neoplasm of
brain, frontal lobe

8

199.1

Malignant neoplasm,
unspecified site

162.9

Malignant neoplasm of
bronchus and lung

9

199.1

Malignant neoplasm
unspecified site

195.0

Malignant neoplasm of
head, face and neck

10

172.9

Malignant melanoma

172.4

Malignant melanoma of
scalp and neck

11

186.9

Malignant neoplasm of
testes, unspecified

186.0

Malignant neoplasm of
testes, undescended

12

208.9

Leukemia of unspecified
cell type

205.0

Acute myeloid leukemia

13

204.0

Acute lymphoid leukemia

200.1

Lymphosarcoma

14

155.2

Malignant neoplasm of
liver, unspecified origin

199.1

Malignant neoplasm,
unspecified site

15

201.9

Hodgkin's disease,
unspecified

201.5

Hodgkin's disease,
nodular sclerosis

52

�TABLE E-4. Deaths Due to Mental Disorders in Which the Death Certificate and
Medical Review Panel Determinations Disagree
Case

ICD-9

Death certificate cause

ICD-9

Medical review cause

295.0

Simple schizophrenia

578.9

Gastrointestinal tract
hemorrhage, unspecified

303

Alcohol dependence

571.3

Alcoholic liver damage,
unspecified

303

Alcohol dependence

571.3

Alcoholic liver damage,
unspecified

4

303

Alcohol dependence

348.4

Compression of brain

5

303

Alcohol dependence

481.0

Pneumococcal pneumonia

6

305.0

Nondependent abuse of

571.0

Alcoholic fatty liver
alcohol

304.6

Other drug dependence

E866.6 Accidental poisoning by
glue

304.9

Unspecified drug
dependence

E858.8 Accidental poisoning by
other drugs

304.9

Unspecified drug
dependence

E858.9 Accidental poisoning by
other drugs, unspecified

10

305.9

Nondependent abuse of
drugs

E850.0 Accidental poisoning by
opiates

11

038.4

Septicemia due to other
gram negative organisms

303

Alcohol dependence

12

518.4

Acute edema of lung,
unspecified

304.0

Morphine type drug
dependence

13

571.1

Acute alcoholic hepatitis

303

Alcohol dependence

53

�TABLE E-4.

(continued)

Case

ICD-9

Death certificate cause

ICD-9

Medical review cause

14

577.0

Acute pancreatitis

303

Alcohol dependence

15

577.0

Acute pancreatitis

303

Alcohol dependence

16

E850.0 Accidental poisoning by
opiates

304.0

Morphine type drug
dependence

17

E850.0 Accidental poisoning by
opiates

304.0

Morphine type drug
dependence

18

E850.8 Accidental poisoning by
other analgesics

304.0

Morphine type drug
dependence

19

E850.8 Accidental poisoning by
other analgesics

304.0

Morphine type drug
dependence

20

E853.2 Accidental poisoning by
benzodiazepine tranquilizer

305.0

Nondependent abuse of
alcohol

21

E858.9 Accidental poisoning by
unspecified drugs

304.9

Unspecified drug
dependence

22

E980

304.0

Morphine type drug
dependence

Poisoning by analgesics,
intentionality undetermined

54

�VIETNAM'EXPERIENCE STUDY —

Mortality

APPENDIX F

The Cox Regression Model

55

�The Cox proportional hazards regression procedure models the risk of death
and, correspondingly, the risk ratio when comparing two cohorts. The model/
assumes that the risk ratio is constant during the period of follow-up
modeled. The model contains an underlying risk function, which may depend on
time. This function is assumed to be modified by various covariates under
consideration, such as in this study, Vietnam status, age, and race. When
there are several groups defined by potential confounders, a stratified
analysis can be done to allow different underlying risk functions in the
different groups. With a stratified analysis, the proportional hazards
assumption (that of a constant risk ratio) must hold in each group (stratum).
If the intent is to estimate a •common risk ratio over the strata, the risk
ratio for the various strata should be similar.
Let
XQ&lt; X}, ..., Xp be the covariates of interest
b0, bj, ..., bp be unknown regression coefficients, to be estimated.
In particular, let XQ be 1 if an individual served in Vietnam and 0
otherwise. Then the Cox model estimates the rate ratio for an individual with
covariates XQ, ..., Xp relative to one with covariates YQ, ..., Yp as
log (RR) = bo(Xo-Yo) + ... + bp(Xp-Yp)
The risk ratio for service in Vietnam is estimated as exp(bo). The SAS
program PHGLf|2 was used to provide estimates of the parameters, their
standard errors, and likelihood ratio statistics for tests of hypotheses. The
program also computes a statistic to test the proportional hazards
assumption^. This statistic has a distribution which is approximately that
of a standard normal variable.
Table F-l contains values of the test statistic for the proportional
hazards assumption for the simple model with cohort (service in Vietnam) -as
the only covariate. The values of this statistic for the model including the
covariates age, race, GT score, year of discharge, and pay grade at discharge
were very similar. The assumption appears reasonable within each time period
and stratum, with a departure of marginal significance only for the first five
* years of follow-up for volunteers with a tactical MOS (2=2.02, p=.04). The
proportional hazards assumption does seem reasonable during this period for
the model with the four strata combined (Z=1.35, p=.18). For the remaining
period of follow-up, the assumption seems very well satisfied. If there is a
modest departure from uniformity in the first time period, the estimate
obtained from the model will be an average measure over this interval. ,
The validity of the proportionality assumption was also checked for the
cause-specific analyses. There was substantial evidence for
non-proportionality only for deaths due to homicide, according to the clinical
review, in the later time period (2=2,7).
Table F-2 contains the estimates of the regression coefficients for .cohort
(service in Vietnam) and their standard errors. The standard errors are
interpreted as those from a standard normal distribution. There is some
variability among strata in the rate ratio for the first five years of
follow-up. In particular, the rate ratio is less than 1 for one of the four
strata, that of volunteers with a tactical MOS. However, this is the smallest
stratum, with less than half the number of men and about half the number of
deaths as the next smallest stratum. In addition, this rate ratio is not
significantly less than 1, and the difference between the largest and smallest
coefficients is not particularly large compared to their standard errors.
Therefore, it is reasonable to use the estimate from the stratified model as a
summary estimate, regarding it as an average of the effects in the four
strata. Relatively small numbers of deaths in many strata makes this
homogeneity check unreliable for the cause-specific analyses.

56

�REFERENCES

/

1.

Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL: The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time
Data. New York, John Wiley &amp; Sons, 1980.

2. Harrell FE: The PHGLM Procedure.

IN:

Joyner SP, ed, SUGI Supplemental

Library User's Guide. Gary, N.C., SAS Institute, Inc., 1983.

3. Harrell FE, Lee KL: Verifying Assumptions of the Cox Proportional Hazards
Model.

IN:

Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual SAS Users Group

International Conference, Atlanta, GA, February 9-12, 1986, 823-828.
Gary, N.C., SAS Institute, Inc., 1986.

57

�TABLE F-l. .Test Statistics* for Validity of Proportionality Assumption
for Cox Regression Model Stratified on Enlistment Status and
MOS, by Time Since Discharge.

Stratum

Years since discharge
&lt;_ 5 years
6+ years

All years

Tactical
Draftee

0.5

0.2

-0.9

Volunteer

2.0

-0.4

1.2

-0.1

-1.4

0.8

-0.1

-1.0

1.4

-0.1

-1.4

•
Nontactical
Draftee
Volunteer

All strata

-0.1

~ *Test statistic has approximately a standard normal distribution. Results
shown are for a model that includes place of service but no covariates.

58

�TABLE F-2. Uniformity of Vietnam Effect Over Strata for Cox Regression
Models Stratified on Enlistment Status and MOS, by Time Since
Discharge (All-Cause Mortality)

Stratum

Years since discharge
&lt;5 years

Beta

6+ years

SE

Beta

All years

SE

Beta

SE

Vietnam service only:
Tactical
Draftee.
Volunteer

0.77
-0.22

0.36
0.42

0.16
0.29

0.27
0.40

0.40
0.05

0.22
0.29

Nontactical
Draftee „
Volunteer

0.48
0.23

0.25
0.27

-0.03
-0.22

0.21
0.22

0.17
0.04

0.16
0.17

All strata

0.37

0.15

-0.02

0.12

0.14

0.10

Vietnam service plus covariates:*
Tactical
Draftee
Volunteer

0.86
-0.39

0.37
0.45

0.25
0.10

0.28
0.42

0.49
-0.13

0.22
0.31

Nontactical
Draftee
Volunteer

0.49
0.47

0.26
0.28

0.00
-0.13

0.21
0.23

0.20
0.11

0.16
0.18

All strata

0.45

0.16

0.03

0.13

0.20

0.10

^Covariates include age at discharge, race, General Technical test score
and pay grade.

59

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22254">
              <text>064</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22256">
              <text>1744</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22258">
              <text>Series III Subseries III</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22238">
                <text>Boyle, Collen A.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22239">
                <text>Pierre Decoufle</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22240">
                <text>Robert J. Delaney</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22241">
                <text>Frank DeStefano</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22242">
                <text>Melinda L. Flock</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22243">
                <text>Martha I. Hunter</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22244">
                <text>M.Riduan Joesoef</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22245">
                <text>John M. Karon</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22246">
                <text>Marilyn L. Kirk</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22247">
                <text>Peter M. Layde</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22248">
                <text>Daniel L. McGee</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22249">
                <text>Linda A. Moyer</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22250">
                <text>Daniel A. Pollock</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22251">
                <text>Philip Rhodes</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22252">
                <text>Mark J. Scally</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22253">
                <text>Robert Worth</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22255">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;Center for Environmental Health and Injury Control, CDC, Public Health Service, DDHS, Atlanta</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22257">
                <text>Typescript: Postservice Mortality Among Vietnam Veterans, February 1987</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22259">
                <text>Vietnam Experience Study</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22260">
                <text>mortality trends</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22261">
                <text>study protocol</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3058" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1575">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/eda1ab0ba8cd79035b18e79b26b04f62.pdf</src>
        <authentication>cd6d46a606e7b3f8913bfe99ef4a1cbc</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63524">
                    <text>Item ID Number

01742

Author
Corporate Author
RopOrt/ArtiClB TitlO Postservice Mortality Among Vietnam Veterans: The
Centers for Disease Control Vietnam Experience Study

Journal/Book Titlo

JAMA

Year

1987

Month/Day

February 13

Color

n

Number of ImaDBS

28

DOSCTiptOn NOtOS

Includes an undated, pre-publication typescript of the
article.

Monday, June 11, 2001

Page 1743 of 1793

�Reprinted from the JAMA" Journal of the American Medical Association
February 13, 1987, Volume 257
Copyright 1987, American Medical Associatbn

Postservice Mortality Among
Vietnam Veterans
The Centers for Disease Control Vietnam Experience Study

The postservice mortality (through December 1983) of a cohort of 9324 US Army
veterans who served in Vietnam was compared with that of 8989 Vietnam-era
Army veterans who served in Korea, Germany, or the United States. Over the
entire follow-up period, total mortality in Vietnam veterans was 17% higher than
for other veterans. The excess mortality occurred mainly in the first five years
after discharge from active duty (rate ratio, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.08 to
1.96) and involved motor vehicle accidents, suicide, homicide, and accidental
poisonings. Thereafter, mortality among Vietnam veterans was similar to that of
other Vietnam-era veterans, except for drug-related deaths, which continued to
be elevated. An unexpected finding was a deficit in deaths from diseases of the
circulatory system among Vietnam veterans. The excess in postservice mortality
due to external causes among Vietnam veterans is similar to that found among
men returning from combat areas after World War II and the Korean War.
(JAMA 1987;257:790-795)

MANY Vietnam veterans have been
concerned that their health, and that of
their children, has been affected by
their service in Southeast Asia and possible exposure to the herbicide Agent
Orange. To address these concerns, the
US Congress directed that appropriate
epidemiologic studies be conducted.1'2
The Centers for Disease Control
(CDC) has proposed three complementary efforts to assess the health of Vietnam veterans: the Agent Orange Study,
the Selected Cancers Study, and the
Vietnam Experience Study (VES).3 The
VES is a historical cohort study designed to identify the possible adverse
health effects of having served in the
military in Vietnam. It has three components: (1) an assessment of postservice mortality, (2} a detailed health interview, and (3) a comprehensive
medical, psychological, and laboratory
evaluation. Although Agent Orange is
among the many factors that could have
From the Center for Environmental Health. Centers
for Disease Control, Atlanta.
Reprint requests to Centers for Disease Control, 1600
Cliflon Rd (C-25), Atlanta, GA 30333 (Coloon A. Boyle,
PhD).
790

JAMA, Feb 13,1987—Vol 257, No. 6

adversely affected those who served in
Vietnam, it is not the main focus of this
study. This report is an abbreviated
version of the results of the postservice
mortality component, published in detail elsewhere.4
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
Study Participants
Participation was restricted to men
who served in the US Army. To increase
comparability between those who
served in Vietnam and those who served
elsewhere, we selected only veterans
who (1) entered military service for the
first time between January 1965 and
December 1971, (2) served only one
term of enlistment, (3) had at least 16
weeks of active service time, (4) earned
a military occupational specialty (MOS)
other than "trainee" or "duty soldier,"
and (5) had a pay grade no higher than
E5 on discharge from active duty. To be
eligible for the Vietnam cohort, a veteran had to have served at least one tour
of duty in Vietnam. For the comparison
cohort, tours of duty were limited to the
United States, Germany, or Korea.
The VES was designed principally to
assess morbidity associated with ser-

vice in Vietnam; mortality was examined for completeness. Thus, the
sample size for the VES, about 9000
Vietnam and 9000 non-Vietnam veterans, was based on statistical power requirements for the morbidity components.3 Nevertheless, this sample size
provides statistical power of 90% for
detecting a 30% relative increase in allcause mortality, but more limited power
for detecting cause-specific increases,
particularly for deaths due to natural
causes, which in this age group are
rare.'1
Potential participants were randomly
selected from almost 5 million US Army
veterans whose service records were
received by the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) between September 1964 and June 1977. Personnel of the
NPRC believe that this group includes
the vast majority of US Army Vietnamera veterans who fulfill the study criterion of a single term of enlistment. The
Figure outlines the process of participant selection. To achieve the desired
sample size of 18 000 veterans with the
above study criteria (proportion estimated from a pretest), we randomly
selected 48 513 service records. Of the
47158 records located and reviewed,
60.6% were excluded during the qualification process; these included less than
200 records that did not contain critical
data needed to determine eligibility.
Characteristics of eligible men as of
entry into service and details of their
military experience were abstracted
from the records. Altogether, 9558
Vietnam and 9023 non-Vietnam veterans qualified for the study. The 234
Vietnam and 34 non-Vietnam veterans
who had died during active duty were
excluded.
Vital Status Ascertainment
Follow-up began the day the veteran
was discharged alive from active duty

CDC Vietnam Experience Study—Postservice Mortality

�Vietnam-Era Army Personnel Records
Filed at NPRC, Sept 1964-June 1977
(About 4.9 Million)

I

I Random Sample (48 513)

[Records Not Found'(1355)j [ Qualified for Study (18581)]

Vietnam (9558) I

Not Qualified (28577)

[Non-Vietnam (9023)[

I Died on Active Duty (34)

Died on Active Dutyt (234) I
34)]

Vietnam Cohort
(9324)

[

I

Non-Vietnam Cohort
(8989)

Selection of study group. NPRC indicates National Personnel Records Center; asterisk, excluded from
study; and dagger, 83% (N = 194) of active-duty deaths among Vietnam veterans were due to war-related
activities.

ratio (RR) was formed by dividing the
crude mortality rate among Vietnam
veterans by that for non-Vietnam veterans. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs)
for the RRs were computed using procedures described by Laird and Oliver.7
The Cox proportional hazards regression model8 was used to consider possible effect modification and confounding
by selected covariates. Adjusted RRs
were obtained from Cox models stratified on primary MOS and enlistment
status (volunteer or draftee), and adjusted for other selected covariates.
Two MOS categories were used in the
model and can be described roughly as
"tactical" (infantry, armor, artillery, and
combat engineers) and "other" (all other
specialties). Additional covariates considered in the Cox models, chosen on
the basis of their associations with mortality in the univariate analyses," included race, age at discharge, Army
General Technical Test score (a general
aptitude test taken at entry into the
service), pay grade at discharge, and
year of discharge.
Comparisons were also made between the mortality experience of each
veteran cohort and that of the US male
population utilizing Monson's software
package.9 Results are expressed as a
standardized mortality ratio (SMR) adjusted for age, race, and calendar year.
RESULTS

and ended on the date of his death or
Dec 31, 1983, whichever came first. To
identify those who had died after discharge, we checked files of the US
Army, Veterans Administration (Beneficiary Identification and Record Locator Subsystem), Social Security Administration, Internal Revenue Service,
and National Center for Health Statistics (National Death Index).
For the interview component of the
VES, an attempt was made to locate
and contact all veterans not identified as
deceased by the above sources.
Through this method, vital status was
confirmed for 93.6% of Vietnam veterans and 91.9% of those who served elsewhere. Entry and military service characteristics of Vietnam veterans whose
vital status was uncertain were similar
to those of non-Vietnam veterans with
uncertain vital status. All men with
uncertain vital status were assumed to
be alive at the end of 1983. For all but
nine of the 446 men reported to have
died after discharge, copies of official
death certificates were obtained. The
other nine deaths were confirmed
through other sources. Underlying
causes of death were coded according to
both the eighth and ninth revisions6'6 of
the International Classification of DisJAMA, Feb 13,1987—Vol 257, No. 6

eases (ICD) by an experienced
nosologist at the National Center for
Health Statistics who had no knowledge
of whether the decedent had served in
Vietnam.
Medical Review Panel

To address limitations of death certificate-based diagnoses, a review panel of
two physicians determined the underlying cause of death, using pertinent medical and legal documents describing the
nature and circumstances of each of 426
deaths for which additional information
could be obtained. Sources included
hospitals, law enforcement agencies,
coroners or medical examiners, and private physicians. All causes of death and
other significant conditions were coded
by the medical review panel according
to the Ninth Revision of the ICD. To
estimate the influence of substance
abuse on mortality in this study, special
categories of alcohol- and drug-related
deaths were developed, and deaths
were so classified by the review panel
when appropriate.
Analyses

Crude death rates were based on
person-years at risk since discharge
from active duty. An unadjusted rate

There were some differences in both
preinduction and military service characteristics between the Vietnam and
non-Vietnam cohorts (Table 1). In general, however, the preinduction differences were small. Differences in some of
the military service characteristics,
such as a greater percentage of Vietnam
veterans with tactical MOS classifications and infantry unit assignments,
reflect war-related military requirements in Vietnam.
All-Cause Mortality

Over the entire follow-up period, the
mortality among Vietnam veterans was
17% higher than the rate among nonVietnam veterans (Table 2). Most of this
excess, however, was due to higher mortality among Vietnam veterans during
the first five years of follow-up (RR,
1.45; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.96). By the sixth
year, the two cohorts had similar mortality rates that remained so through
the end of follow-up (RR, 1.01; 95% CI,
0.79 to 1.28). Because of the variation in
relative mortality with time, time-specific results will be presented when appropriate.
To determine whether the association
between Vietnam service and mortality
was uniform or varied across different

CDC Vietnam Experience Study—Postservice Mortality

791

�Table 1.—Differences in Selected Characteristics
Between Vietnam and Non-Vietnam Veterans at
Entry Into Service and During Military Service

Table 3.—Number of Deaths Among Vietnam and
Non-Vietnam Veterans and Unadjusted Rate Ratios
(RRs), by Selected Characteristics and Years Since
Discharge From Active Duty, 1965 Through 1983

Vietnam
(N=9324)

At entry into service
Race,* % white
Age at entry
(mean)
Enlistment status,*
% draftee
Year of entry into
service,
% before 1969

Non-Vietnam
(N=8989)

86.8

86.5

20.3

Characteristic

20.5

Characteristic*

65.6

Race
White

63.7

Years Since Discharge
From Active Duty
s5

Nonwhite
72.1

Army General
Technical Test
score (mean,
scaled to 100)
During military service
Primary military
occupational
specialty, t
% tactical
operations

60.6

105.5

Type of discharge,
% honorable

34.3

27.4

26.6

Type of unit,
% infantry

97.2

91.0

88.5

79.8

Year of discharge,
% before 1970

48.1

44.6

*Race and enlistment status were the only two characteristics that were not significantly different (P&gt;.05)
between the Vietnam and the non-Vietnam groups.
tThe job specialty for which the man was trained in
the Army.

No.

RR

No.

RR

79 1.09 111 0.91 190 0.98
104 1.80 152 1.06 256 1.31

GT test scoref
97 1.42 141 0.90 238 1.08

&lt;100

100 +
83 1.43 119 1.07 202 1.20
Duty MOSt
63 1.19
Tactical
89 1.04 152 1.10
Other
120 1.58 174 0.97 294 1.18
Age at discharge
&lt;21
47 1.83 42 0.67
89 1.14

14.6

Pay grade at
discharge,
% E4 or E5

RR

All Years

146 1.50 193 0.99 339 1.18
37 1.30 70 1.07 107 1.14

Enlistment status
Volunteer
Draftee

103.1

No.

6+

21 +

136 1.41 221 1.10 357 1.21

Pay grade
at discharge
E4-E5

125 1.50 183 1.10 308 1.24

E1-E3
58 1.95 80 1.16 138 1.44
Year of discharge
79 2.05 122 0.96 201 1.27
&lt;1970
104 1.16 141 1.06 245 1.10
1970 +
"There was no evidence of statistically significant
effect modification for any of these characteristics
(P&gt;.OS).
tArmy General Technical Test (GT) scores were
missing for six veterans.
^Determined from principal military occupational specialty (MOS) held while on tour of duty.

Table 2.—Number of Deaths, Person-Years, and Death Rates Among Vietnam and Non-Vietnam Veterans
and Unadjusted RRs by Years Since Discharge From Active Duty, 1965-1983*
Non-Vietnam

Vietnam

==5

No. of
Deaths

PersonYears

Ratef

No. Of
Deaths

PersonYears

95% Cl

46350

2.4

73

44747

Ratef
1.6

RR

110

Years Since
Discharge

1.45

1.08-1.96

6+

136

81547

1.7

127

76582

1.7

1.01

0.79-1.28

All years

246

127897

1.9

200

121 329

1.7

1.17

0.97-1.41

*RR indicates rate ratio; Cl, confidence interval.
tCrude death rate per 1000 person-years.

subgroups of veterans, separate analyses were done within these groups (Table 3). Although the results indicated a
consistent pattern of elevated mortality
associated with Vietnam service limited
to the first five years after discharge,
there was some variation in the RR
among various subgroups of veterans. Tests for effect modification, however, were not statistically significant
(P&gt;.05).
Possible confounding by selected
covariates (age at discharge, race,
Army General Technical Test score, pay
grade at discharge, and year of discharge) was assessed by including them
in stratified Cox models. In the first five
years after discharge, adjustment for
these characteristics increased the RR
to 1.58 (95% Cl, 1.16 to 2.14). In the later
792

JAMA, Feb 13,1987—Vol 257, No. 6

follow-up period, adjustment changed
the RR to 1.04 (95% Cl, 0.81 to 1.33).
Results from the Cox model also indicated that Vietnam service had a
greater effect on mortality among those
who were discharged before age 21
years than those discharged at age 21
years or older (P = .02) and among veterans discharged before 1970 compared
with those discharged during 1970 or
later (P = . 05).
Cause-Specific Mortality

Death Certificates.—Only four major cause-of-death categories contained
sufficient numbers of deaths for formal
analysis (Table 4). Rates for Vietnam
veterans appeared to differ from rates
for non-Vietnam veterans in two of
these categories: diseases of the circu-

latory system (51% decrease in the
death rate) and external causes of death
(25% increase in the death rate). The
deficit in circulatory disease deaths was
evident regardless of time since discharge and type of circulatory disease.
There were no differences in mortality
from mental disorders or neoplasms.
Deaths from specific types of neoplasms
were too few for meaningful comparisons.
The excess in external causes of death
is examined further in Table 5. Vietnam
veterans had significantly higher mortality from motor vehicle accidents
(MVAs) (RR, 1.48; P = .03) than nonVietnam veterans. The excess was most
pronounced in the first five years after
discharge from active duty (RR, 1.93;
P = .01). After that period, MVA rates
were similar in the two cohorts (RR,
1.16). The RRs for suicide and homicide
were somewhat increased in the early
postdischarge period but not in the later
years of follow-up. Accidental poisoning deaths (mostly by drugs) were substantially more common among Vietnam veterans than other veterans over
the entire follow-up period (RR, 2.47;
P = .08). No postservice deaths were
attributed to war injuries (ICD-9,
E990-E999).
Adjustment for selected covariates
did not materially alter the pattern of
cause-specific mortality, except for suicide in the earlier follow-up period,
where the adjusted RR was 2.59 (95%
Cl, 1.09 to 6.17).
Medical Review Panel.—The medical review analysis was based on 233
(95%) of Vietnam veteran deaths and 193
(97%) of deaths among non-Vietnam
veterans. On average, slightly fewer
supplemental medical and legal records
were recovered for each Vietnam veteran death (mean, 3.3 records) than for
each non-Vietnam veteran death (mean,
3.7 records). Overall agreement between the medical review panel diagnoses and death certificate diagnoses,
however, was good (82%; K = 0.79) and
did not differ significantly between the
two veteran cohorts.
The medical review analyses indicated differences in only two ICD-9
categories that were not evident from
the death certificate analysis. The RR
for mental disorders from the medical
review panel analysis was 2.85 (95% Cl,
0.92 to 8.82) compared with 0.95 from
the death certificate analysis. Most
mental disorder deaths were related to
alcohol or drugs and are examined in
more detail in Table 6. The RR for
neoplasms based on medical review
panel diagnoses was 1.21 (95% Cl, 0.55
to 2.66) compared with 0.82 based on
death certificates. This difference was

CDC Vietnam Experience Study—Postservice Mortality

�Table 4.—Number of Deaths by Cause (From Death Certificate), Death Rates Among Vietnam and NonVietnam Veterans, and Unadjusted RRs, 1965 Through 1983*
Vietnam
Underyllng Cause of
Death (/CD-9)t

Non-Vietnam

No.

Rate*

Infectious and parasitic
diseases (001 -139)

No.

95% Cl

RR§

Rate*

1

0.8

1

0.8

12

9.4

14

11.5

0.82

0.38-1 .76

Mental disorders (290-31 9)

7

5.5

7

5.8

0.95

0.33-2.70

Diseases of nervous
system (320-389)

0.49

0.25-0.99

Neoplasms (140-239)

2

1.6

1

0.8

Diseases of circulatory
system (390-459)

12

9.4

23

19.0

Diseases of respiratory
system (460-51 9)

5

3.9

4

3.3

Diseases of digestive
system (520-579)

5

3.9

3

2.5

Diseases of genitourinary
system (580-611)

4

3.1

0

Congenital anomalies
(740-759)

1

0.8

1

0.8

Symptoms, signs, and
ill-defined conditions
(780-799)

2

1.6

1

0.8

188

147.0

143

117.9

External causes (E800-E999)

General Population Comparison
1 .25

1 .00-1 .55

2

7

No death certificate

*RR indicates rate ratio; Cl, confidence interval.
f/CD-9 indicates International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision. No deaths were categorized to diseases of
blood and blood-forming organs; endocrine, metabolic or nutritional diseases; diseases of the skin; or diseases of the
musculoskeletal system. Therefore, these categories are not shown.
tCrude death rate per 100000 person-years.
§lf the total number of deaths for a cause-of-death category in both groups combined was less than ten, RRs are not
shown.
Table 5.—Number of Deaths From Specific External Causes (From Death Certificate) Among Vietnam and
Non-Vietnam Veterans and Unadjusted RRs, by Years Since Discharge From Active Duty, 1965 Through
1983*
Years Since Discharge From Active Dutyt
All Years

64-

External Cause of
Death (/CD-9)

No.

RR

95% Cl

Motor vehicle accident
(E810-E825, E929.0)

66

1.93

1.16-3.22

further refinement of the later follow-up
period suggests the upward trend in
drug-related mortality continues into
the most recent years. Further, Vietnam service seems to be associated with
an especially high rate of drug-related
mortality among those drafted into service, those whose jobs were in tactical
or combat operations, and those who
served during 1969.
Again, as in the death certificate results, adjustment for selected covariates increased the RR for suicide in the
early follow-up period to 2.56 (95% Cl,
1.11 to 5.87). No other RR presented in
the medical review results was materially altered by adjustment.

No.

RR

95% Cl

No.

RR

95% Cl

67

1.16

0.72-1.87

133

1.48

1.04-2.09

Both groups of veterans had a significantly lower overall mortality rate for
"natural causes" than the general US
male population (Table 7). During the
first five years after discharge, Vietnam
veterans had a higher death rate from
external causes, whereas non-Vietnam
veterans have a lower rate relative to
the general population. In the later time
period both groups of veterans showed a
similar deficit in external cause mortality. Although these data are not presented in Table 7, over the entire followup period, Vietnam veterans had a
striking deficit of circulatory disease
deaths (SMR, 0.48; 95% Cl, 0.25 to
0.85), whereas non-Vietnam veterans
had only a slight deficit (SMR, 0.87; 95%
Cl, 0.54 to 1.34).

Accidental poisoning
(E850-E869, E929.2)

11

1.69

0.49-5.77

7

...

...

18

2.47

0.88-6.92

COMMENT

Other accidents*

23

1.05

0.46-2.37

39

0.89

0.48-1.67

62

0.95

0.58-1 .56

Suicide (E950-E959)

25

1.72

0.76-3.88

32

0.64

0.32-1.30

57

0.98

0.58-1.65

Homicide (E960-E969)

18

1.52

0.59-3.91

33

0.78

0.39-1.55

51

0.99

0.57-1.71

10

3.79

0.81-17.87

The intent of this study was to assess
the effect of military service in Vietnam
on subsequent mortality. The "Vietnam
experience" includes a wide variety of
possible health-influencing factors such
as psychological stresses associated
with war, infectious diseases prevalent
in Vietnam, and exposure to the herbicide Agent Orange.
The modest excess of deaths among
Vietnam veterans was concentrated in
the first five years after discharge,
where all-cause mortality was 45%
higher than in the non-Vietnam group.
External causes accounted for most of
this increase, with the largest elevation
in relative mortality due to MVAs.
A more detailed examination of MVA
deaths did not indicate any particular
factor that could explain the overall
excess in Vietnam veterans. The increased risk did not appear to be related
to elevated blood alcohol levels at the
time of death, and the excess was apparent across various types of MVAs.
Drug-use information on MVA victims
was limited; the medical review panel

Undetermined
intentlonality
(E980-E989)

4

6

*RR indicates rate ratio; Cl, confidence interval; /CD-9, International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision.
tTime-specific RRs are not presented for categories with less than ten deaths in both Vietnam and non-Vietnam
groups combined.
^Includes /CD-9 categories E800 to E807, E826 to E849, E870 to E928, E929.1, E929.3 to E929.9, E930 to E949,
E970 to E978, and E990 to E999.

primarily the result of two deaths from
neoplasms among non-Vietnam veterans being reclassified elsewhere by the
medical review panel and the opposite
occurrence among Vietnam veterans.
There was no particular type of neoplasm in excess in the Vietnam cohort.
Supplemental information collected
for the medical review allowed further
exploration of MVA deaths. Single- and
multiple-vehicle crash deaths as well as
daytime and nighttime events all occurred more frequently among Vietnam
veterans during the early postdischarge
period. Vietnam veterans had a modest
excess of alcohol-related MVA deaths
JAMA, Feb 13,1987—Vol 257, No. 6

during this period (RR, 1.35; 95% Cl,
0.60 to 3.04).
Alcohol-related natural causes of
death were too few for formal analysis in
the early postdischarge period, but the
RR in the later period showed no difference between the two groups (Table 6).
A modest elevation in alcohol-related
traumatic deaths among Vietnam veterans was limited to the first five years
after discharge. For drug-related
deaths, the RR was slightly elevated
during the early postdischarge period
and more elevated during the later follow-up period. Although the number of
deaths is too small for formal analysis,

CDC Vietnam Experience Study—Postservice Mortality

793

�Table 6.—Number of Deaths From Alcohol and Drug-Related Causes (From Medical Review) Among
Vietnam and Non-Vietnam Veterans and Unadjusted RRs, by Years Since Discharge From Active Duty, 1965
Through 1983*
Years Since Discharge From Active Duty
s5

Cause of Death
Alcohol-related
natural causesf
Alcohol-related
traumatic causes:):
Drug-related
causes§

No.

All Years

6+

RR

95% Cl

No.

95% Cl

No.

RR

95% Cl

25

5

RR
0.87

0.40-1.90

30

1.08

0.53-2.22

42

1.29

0.70-2.37

61

1.04

0.63-1.71

103

1.13

0.77-1 .67

18

1.21

0.48-3.06

22

2.01

0.82-4.94

40

1.58

0.83-3.00

'RR indicates rate ratio; Cl, confidence interval.
tincludes the following diagnoses determined to be the underlying or contributing cause of death: alcoholic
psychoses (291.0 to 291.9); alcohol dependence syndrome (303); nondependent alcohol abuse (305.0); alcoholic
polyneuropathy (357.5); alcoholic cardiomyopathy (425.5); alcoholic gastritis (535.3); alcoholic liver disease (571.0 to
571.3); and excessive blood level of alcohol (790.3).
^Includes deaths in which the underlying cause is accidental poisoning by alcohol (E860.0 to E860.9) or any
traumatic death (E800 to E989) in which either nondependent abuse of alcohol (305.0) or excessive blood level of
alcohol (790.3) is a contributing cause of death.
§Deaths for which one of the following drug-specific diagnoses is the underlying or contributing cause of death: drug
psychoses (292.0 to 292.9); drug dependence (304.0 to 304.9); nondependent abuse of drugs (305.2 to 305.9);
accidental poisoning by drugs (E850.0 to E850.2, E850.5, E850.8, E851-E854, E855.1 to E855.2, E866.6, and
E869.0); suicide by drugs (E950.0 to E950.5); and poisoning by drugs, intentionality undetermined (E980.0 to
E980.5).
Table 7.—Observed and Expected Numbers of Deaths by Cause Among Vietnam and Non-Vietnam
Veterans and SMRs, by Years Since Discharge From Active Duty, 1965 Through 1983*
Years Since
Discharge
-~5

Cause of Deathf
(ICDA-8)
All natural causes
(000-796)

External causes
(E800-E999)

6+

All natural causes
(000-796)

External causes
(E800-E999)

All years

All natural causes
(000-796)

External causes
(E800-E999)

Observed
Expected^
SMR
95% Cl
Observed
Expected
SMR
95% Cl
Observed
Expected
SMR
95% Cl
Observed
Expected
SMR
95% Cl
Observed
Expected
SMR
95% Cl
Observed
Expected
SMR
95% Cl

Vietnam
13

Non- Vietnam

24.2

23.4

0.54

0.29-0.92

16
0.68

0.39-1.11

92

55

72.5

69.4

1.27

1.02-1.56

0.79

0.60-1.03

38

39

65.8

63.4

0.58

0.41-0.79
96
102.7
0.93

0.76-1.14

0.62

0.44-0.84
88
96.6
0.91

0.73-1.12

51

55

90.0

86.8

0.57

0.42-0.75

0.63

0.48-0.82

188

143

175.2

166.0

1.07

0.93-1.24

0.86

0.73-1.01

*SMR indicates standardized mortality ratio; Cl, confidence interval; and ICDA-8, International Classification of
Diseases, Adapted for Use in the United States, eighth revision.
•(•Excludes nine deaths (seven Vietnam, two non-Vietnam) for which death certificates were not recovered.
^Expected number is based on the mortality rates among US men, standardized for age, calendar year, and race.

identified only one drug-related MVA
death.
Suicide and homicide also occurred
somewhat more frequently among Vietnam veterans during the early postdischarge period. Accidental poisoning
deaths (mainly by drugs) were elevated
throughout the entire follow-up period,
although the number of such deaths was
small.
By the sixth year after discharge,
794

JAMA, Feb 13,1987—Vol 257, No. 6

both all-cause and external-cause mortality among Vietnam veterans had
fallen to levels found in the non-Vietnam
group, except for deaths due to drug
abuse, where the rate was actually
higher in the more recent follow-up period.
These findings are unlikely to be the
result of a serious flaw in study design or
execution. The study groups were selected in a manner that minimized dif-

ferences in their preservice characteristics; vital status was verified for 93% of
all participants; death certificates were
recovered for 98% of deaths; and supplemental medical and legal documents,
which allowed an independent assessment of cause of death by standardized
criteria, were obtained for 96% of
deaths. Moreover, the pattern of excess
deaths was remarkably consistent
across various subgroups of Vietnam
veterans and appears not to be an artifact of confounding. It should be
noted, however, that sample size constraints limited our ability to detect
excesses in mortality in subgroups of
veterans and for the less frequent
causes of death in this relatively young
group.
Our findings can be viewed against
the results of five previous mortality
studies of Vietnam veterans. Four10'13
are proportional mortality studies,
which may not be directly comparable
with this study because of incompleteness of data and inherent limitations of
this analytic method.14 The fifth, a cohort study of Australian Vietnam veterans, is very similar in design to our
study and thus is a more appropriate
comparison.16 The US Air Force "Ranch
Hand" study is not discussed here, since
its principal concern is the adverse
health effects of herbicide exposure in a
unique group of veterans.16
The 30% excess of external-cause
mortality among Australian Vietnam
veterans relative to non-Vietnam veterans is similar to what is seen here.16
Although the Australian investigators
did not examine external cause mortality by time since discharge, there
was a suggestion of a decline in relative
mortality with increasing time since
discharge in their all-cause mortality
results. Deaths from suicide, homicide,
and accidental poisoning also occurred
more frequently among their Vietnam
veterans. Mortality from MVA was not
elevated overall, but an excess in the
youngest age group was suggested.
Findings for external-cause mortality
from the four proportional mortality
studies are not consistent with our results. A nonsignificant increase in
deaths from MVA among Vietnam veterans relative to other veterans was
present in only one of the studies.12 The
relative frequencies of suicide and homicide were not unusual, although there
was one instance of a nonsignificant
increase in both of these causes." Accidental poisonings were analyzed in only
one of the studies, and the result was a
small, nonsignificant elevation among
Vietnam veterans.11
Australian Vietnam veterans had an
excess of deaths from alcohol-related

CDC Vietnam Experience Study—Postservice Mortality

�natural causes, but no increases in
deaths from alcohol-related external
causes or drug-related mortality. These
discordant findings may reflect differences in in-service use of drugs and
alcohol by American and Australian
troops. In contrast to the reportedly
heavy use of illicit drugs by American
troops in Vietnam,17'18 drug use among
Australian soldiers was reported to be
uncommon and alcohol use, heavy.15 Our
finding of increased mortality from
drug-related causes in the later followup period was not consistent with surveys indicating little or no influence of
Vietnam service or combat exposure on
postdischarge drug use.18'19
The lower mortality from cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) among Vietnam
veterans is surprising. The lower rate
might be explained as a by-product of
some kind of selection process taking
place in the final assignments to Vietnam, which might correlate with cardiovascular fitness established during
basic or advanced training. Indeed, the
SMR results suggest that the CVD
deficit may be the result of an unusually
high rate in the comparison group; CVD
mortality in the non-Vietnam cohort
was only slightly below that of the general population, whereas we expected it
to be much lower.20 A completely opposite result was found in the Australian study, where CVD mortality
was 90% higher among Vietnam veterans than non-Vietnam veterans.15 Various indexes, of CVD morbidity measured in the other components of the
VES may help in further elucidating the
mortality findings.
In the Australian study most of the
excess in all-cause mortality among
Vietnam veterans was confined to members of the Engineer Corps.15 This pattern was not found in the present study,

but the number of men assigned to
engineer units was relatively small.
Furthermore, possible differences between US and Australian engineering
units in training and composition may
make this comparison inappropriate.
The excess in postservicc externalcause mortality among Vietnam veterans seen here could be due to some
peculiarity in the assignment of men to
Vietnam whereby those who were sent
tended to have characteristics that
placed them at increased risk of dying
from external causes after discharge
from active duty. This explanation appears doubtful for several reasons. Most
importantly, if Vietnam veterans
tended to have an inherent predisposition to traumatic events, it might be
expected to manifest itself in increased
mortality from such causes throughout
the period of observation, not just in the
first few years, as observed here.
Alternatively, our findings may reflect consequences of the unique environment and experience of serving in
Vietnam and returning to an unsupportive and sometimes hostile climate in
the United States. This explanation
might seem plausible given the unique
military and social environment of the
Vietnam conflict. However, the present
results are similar to previous observations of postservice mortality in Army
veterans. Indeed, increased mortality
from external causes has been seen in
two groups of World War II combat
veterans and one group of Korean War
combat veterans, when compared with
the general US male population, even
though older men and officers were included.21 In contrast, broader cross-sections of World War II veterans, including combat and noncombat groups,
showed no difference or even a deficit in
postdischarge traumatic deaths,20'21 as

did non-Vietnam veterans in our study.
Although the influence of factors specific to the Vietnam experience cannot
be completely ruled out, our findings
and previous studies suggest that the
postservice excess of traumatic deaths
among Vietnam veterans is probably
due to unusual stresses endured while
stationed in a hostile fire zone.
The mortality assessment of Vietnam
veterans presented here is an incomplete evaluation of the health experience of this group. Additional data on
the present and past health status of
living Vietnam veterans will be forthcoming from the health interview and
medical, psychological, and laboratory
evaluation components of the VES. Because this group of veterans has not yet
reached the age where chronic diseases
have an important impact on mortality,
continued monitoring of mortality
among VES participants may provide
additional insights.
The VES Mortality Study Staff consisted of
Coleen A. Boyle, PhD, Pierre Decoufle, ScD,
Robert J. Delaney, Frank DeStefono, MD, Melinda
L. Flock, MSPH, Martha I. Hunter, M. Riduan
Joesoef, MD, PhD, John M. Karon, PhD, Marilyn
L. Kirk, Peter M. Layde, MD, Daniel L. McGee,
PhD, Linda A. Moyer, RN, Daniel A. Pollock, MD,
Philip Rhodes, MS, and Robert M. Worth, MD,
PhD.
Many other individuals and organizations provided invaluable support to the study. These include The Agent Orange Working Group and its
Science Panel; Army Reserve Personnel Center,
US Army and Joint Services Environmental Support Group, Department of Defense; NPRC, National Archives and Records Administration;
General Services Administration; Veterans Administration; National Center for Health Statistics;
Social Security Administration; Internal Revenue
Service; National Academy of Sciences; other staff
members of the CDC; and outside consultants who
contributed their unique expertise.
A more comprehensive report of the findings
from this study has been published in the form of a
monograph by the CDC. Copies can be obtained
from the CDC, Atlanta, GA 30333.

References
1. Veterans Health Programs Extension and Improvement Act of 1979, Public Law 96-151 (HR
3892), Dec 20, 1979, 93 STAT 1092-1098.
2. Veterans' Health Care, Training, and Small
Business Loan Act of 1981, Public Law 97-72 (HR
3499), Nov 3, 1981, 95 STAT 1047-1063.
3. Protocol for Epidemiologic Studies of the
Health of Vietnam Veterans. Atlanta, Centers for
Disease Control, November 1983.
4. Post-service Mortality Among Vietnam Veterans. Atlanta, Centers for Disease Control, 1987.
5. International Classification of Diseases,
Adapted for Use in the United States, rev 8, PHS
publication 1693. US Dept of Health, Education,
and Welfare, 1967.
6. Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries, and Causes of Death,
rev 9. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1977.
7. Laird N, Oliver D: Covariance analysis of censored survival data using log-linear analysis techniques. JAmStatAssoc 1981;76:231-241.
8. Cox DR, Oakes D: Analysis of Survival Data.
London, Chapman &amp; Hall, 1984.
9. Monson RR: Analysis of relative survival and
proportional mortality. Comp Biomed Res 1974;7:
JAMA, Feb 13,1987—Vol 257, No. 6

325-332.
10. Anderson IIA, Hanrahan LP, Jensen M, et al:
Wisconsin Vietnam Veteran Mortality Study.
Madison, Wis, Wisconsin Division of Health, 1985.
11. Lawrence CE, Reilly AA, Quickenton P, et al:
Mortality patterns of New York State Vietnam
veterans. Am J Public Health 1985;75:277-279.
12. Kogan MI), Clapp RW: Mortality Among Vietnam Veterans in Massachusetts, 1972-1983.
Boston, Massachusetts Dept of Public Health,
1985.
13. Holmes AP: West Virginia Vietnam-Era Veterans Mortality Study. Charleston, WVa, West Virginia Health Dept, 1986.
14. Wong 0, Decoufle P: Methodological issues
involving the standardized mortality ratio and proportionate mortality ratio in occupational studies.
J Occup Med 1982;24:299-304.
15. Fott MJ, Dunn M, Adena MA, et al: Australian
Veterans Health Studies: The Mortality Report:
Part I. A Retrospective Cohort Study of Mortality
Among Australian National Servicemen of the
Vietnam Conflict Era, and an Executive Summary of the Mortality Report. Canberra, Australia, Australian Government Publishing Service,

1984.
16. Lathrop GD, Moynahan PM, Albanese RA, et
al: Project Ranch Hand II. An Epidemiologic
Investigation of Health Effects in Air Force Personnel Following Exposure to Herbicides: Baseline Mortality Study Results. San Antonio, Tex,
Brooks Air Force Base, US Air Force School of
Aerospace Medicine, 1983.
17. Ritter C, Clayton RR, Voss HL: Vietnam
military service and marijuana use. Am J Drug
Alcohol Abuse 1985;11:119-130.
18. Robins LN, Helzer JE, Davis DH: Narcotic
use in Southeast Asia and afterward. Arch Gen
Psychiatry 1975;32:955-961.
19. Yager T, Laufer R, Gallops M: Some problems
associated with war experience in men of the
Vietnam generation. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1984;
41:327-333.
20. Seltzer CC, Jablon S: Effects of selection on
mortality. Am J Epidemiol 1974;100:367-372.
21. Nefzger MD: Follow-up studies of World War II
and Korean War prisoners: I. Study plan and
mortality findings. Am J Epidemiol 1970;91:
123-138.

CDC Vietnam Experience Sludy— Postsorvice Mortality
Printed and Published in the United States of America

795

�Postservice Mortality Among Vietnam Veterans

The Centers for Disease Control
Vietnam Experience Study

Published in February 13, 1987 issue of The Journal of the American Medical
Association.

�ABSTRACT

The postservice mortality (through December 1.983) of a cohort of 932.4 US Army
veterans who served in Vietnam was compared with that of 0989 Vietnam-era Army
veterans who served in Korea, Germany, or the United States. Over the entire
follow-up period, total mortality in Vietnam veterans was 17% higher than for
other veterans. The excess mortality occurred mainly in the first five years
after discharge from active duty (rate ratio,.1.45; 95% confidence interval,
1.08 to 1.96) and involved motor vehicle accidents, suicide, homicide, and
accidental poisonings. Thereafter, mortality among Vietnam veterans was
similar to that of other Vietnam-era veterans, except for drug-related deaths,
which continued to be elevated. An unexpected finding was a deficit in deaths
from diseases of the circulatory system among Vietnam veterans. The excess in
postservice mortality due to external causes among Vietnam veterans is similar
to that found among men returning from combat areas after World War II and the
Korean War.

�INTRODUCTION

Many Vietnam veterans have been concerned that their health, and that of their
children, has been affected by their service in Southeast Asia and possible
exposure to the herbicide Agent Orange. To address these concerns, the US
Congress directed that appropriate epidemiologic studies be conducted.1'^
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has proposed three complementary efforts
to assess the health of Vietnam veterans: the Agent Orange Study, the Selected
Cancers Study, and the Vietnam Experience Study (VES).^ The VES is a
historical cohort study designed to identify the possible adverse health
effects of having served in the military in Vietnam. It has three components:
1) an assessment of postservice mortality, 2) a detailed health interview, and
3) a comprehensive medical, psychological, arid laboratory evaluation.
Although Agent Orange is among the many factors that could have adversely
affected those who served in Vietnam, it is not the main focus of this study.
This report is an abbreviated version of the results of the postservice
mortality component, published in detail elsewhere"./l

�SUBJECTS AMD METHODS

Participation was restricted to men who served in the US Army. To increase
comparability between those who served in Vietnam and those who served
elsewhere, we selected only veterans who 1) entered military service for the
first time between January 1965 and December 1971, 2) served only one term of
enlistment, 3) had at least 16 weeks of active service time, 4) earned a
military occupational specialty (MOS) other than "trainee" or "duty soldier,"
and 5) had a pay grade no higher than E5 on discharge from active duty. To be
eligible for the Vietnam cohort, a veteran had to have served at least one
tour of duty in Vietnam. For the comparison cohort, tours of duty were
limited to the United States, Germany, or Korea.
The VES was designed principally to assess morbidity associated with service
in Vietnam; mortality was examined for completeness. Thus, the sample size
for the VES, about 9000 Vietnam and 9000 non-Vietnam veterans, was based on
statistical power requirements for the morbidity components. 3 Nevertheless,
this sample size provides statistical power of 90% for detecting a 30%
relative increase in all-cause mortality, but more limited power for detecting
cause-specific increases, particularly for deaths due to natural causes, which
in this age group are
Potential participants were randomly selected from almost 5 million US Army
veterans whose service records were received by the National Personnel Records
Center (IMPRC) between September 1964 and June 1977. Personnel of the WPRC
believe that this group includes the vast majority of US Army Vietnam-era
veterans who fulfill the study criterion of a single term of enlistment.
The figure outlines the process of participant selection. To achieve the
desired sample size of 18000 veterans with the above study criteria
(proportion estimated from a pretest), we randomly selected 48513 service
records. Of the 47158 records located and reviewed, 60.6% were excluded
during the qualification process; these included less than 200 records that
did not contain critical data needed to determine eligibility.
Characteristics of eligible men as of entry into service and details of their
military experience were abstracted from the records. Altogether, 9558
Vietnam arid 9023 non-Vietnam veterans qualified for the study. The 234
Vietnam and 34 non-Vietnam veterans who had died during active duty were
excluded .

Follow-up began the day the veteran was discharged alive from active duty and
ended on the date of his death or Dec 31, 1983, whichever came first. To
identify those who had died after discharge, we checked files of the US Army,
Veterans Administration (Beneficiary Identification and Record Locator
Subsystem), Social Security Administration, Internal Revenue Service, and
National Center for Health Statistics (National Death Index).
For the interview component of the VES, an attempt was made to locate arid
contact all veterans not identified as deceased by the above sources. Through
this method, vital status was confirmed for 93.6% of Vietnam veterans arid
91.9% of those who served elsewhere. Entry and military service

�characteristics of Vietnam veterans whose vital status was uncertain were
similar to those of non-Vietnam veterans with uncertain vital status. All men
with uncertain vital status were assumed to be alive at the end of 1983. For
all but nine of the 446 men reported to have died after discharge, copies of
official death certificates were obtained. The other nine deaths were
confirmed through other sources. Underlying causes of death were coded
according to both the Eighth and Ninth Revisions'1"-1' ^ of the I.nJ;£mat_i_onal
Q.3^As..ific.ati_qn......of.....Diseases ....ID1 by an experienced nosologist at the National
...(C.
Center for Health Statistics who had no knowledge of whether the decedent had
served in Vietnam.

To address limitations of death certificate-based diagnoses, a review panel of
two -physicians determined the underlying cause of death, using pertinent
medical and legal documents describing the nature and circumstances of each of
426 deaths for which additional information could be obtained. Sources
included hospitals, law enforcement agencies, coroners or medical examiners,
and private physicians. All causes of death and other significant conditions
were coded by the medical review panel according to the Ninth Revision of the
I.QQ' T° estimate the influence of substance abuse on mortality in this study,
special categories of alcohol- and drug-related deaths were developed, and
deaths were so classified by the review panel when appropriate.
Analyses
Crude death rates were based on person-years at risk since discharge from
active duty. An unadjusted rate ratio (RR) was formed by dividing the crude
mortality rate among Vietnam veterans by that for non.....Vietnam veterans. The
95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each RRs were computed usiricj the procedures
described by Laird and Oliver.''' The Cox proportional hazards regression
model8 was used to consider possible effect modification and confounding by
selected covariates. Adjusted RRs were obtained from Cox models stratified on
primary MOS and enlistment status (volunteer or draftee), arid adjusted for
other selected covariates. Two MOS categories were used in the model and can
be described roughly as "tactical" (infantry, armor, artillery, arid combat
engineers) arid "other" (all other specialties). Additional covariates
considered in the Cox models, chosen on the basis of their associations with
mortality in the univariate analyses, ^ included race, age at discharge, Army
General Technical Test score (a general aptitude test taken at entry into the
service), pay grade at discharge, and year of discharge.
Comparisons were also made between the mortality experience of each veteran
cohort and that of the US male population utilizing Morisori's software
package.9 Results are expressed as a standardized mortality ratio (SMR)
adjusted for age, race, and calendar year.

�RESULTS

There were some differences in both pre induction and military service
characteristics between the Vietnam and non-Vietnam cohorts (Table 1). In
general, however, the preinduction differences were small, Differences in
some of the military service characteristics, such as a greater percentage of
Vietnam veterans with tactical MOS classifications arid infantry unit
assignments, reflect wai— related military requirements in Vietnam.

Over the entire follow-up period, the mortality among Vietnam veterans was 17%
higher than the rate among non-Vietnam veterans (Table 2). Most of this
excess, however, was due to higher mortality among Vietnam veterans during the
first five years of follow.....up (RR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.96). By the sixth
year, the two cohorts had similar mortality rates that remained so through the
end of follow-up (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.28). Because of the variation
in relative mortality with time, time— specif ic results will be presented when
appropriate .
To determine whether the association between Vietnam service and mortality was
uniform or varied across different subgroups of veterans, separate analyses
were done within these groups (Table 3). Although the results indicated a
consistent pattern of elevated mortality associated with Vietnam service
limited to the first five years after discharge, there was some variation in
the RR among various subgroups of veterans. Tests for effect modification,
however, were not statistically significant (P&gt;.05).
Possible confounding by selected covariates (age at discharge, race, Army
General Technical Test score, pay grade at discharge, and year of discharge)
was assessed by including them in stratified Cox models. In the first five
years after discharge, adjustment for these characteristics increased the RR
to 1.58 ( . % CI, 1.16 to 2.14). In the later follow-up period, adjustment
95
changed the RR to 1.04 (95% CI, 0.81 to 1.33). Results from the Cox model
also indicated that Vietnam service had a greater effect on mortality among
those who were discharged before age 2.1. years than to those discharged at age
21 years or older (P=.02) and among veterans discharged before 1970 compared
with those discharged during 1970 or later (P=.05).

Death Certificates. -• Only four major cause— of-death categories contained
sufficient numbers of deaths for formal analysis (Table 4). Rates for Vietnam
veterans appeared to differ from rates for non-Vietnam veterans in two of
these categories: diseases of the circulatory system (51% decrease in the
death rate) and external causes of death (25% increase in the death rate). The
deficit in circulatory disease deaths was evident regardless of time since
discharge and type of circulatory disease. There were no differences in
mortality from mental disorders or neoplasms. Deaths from specific types of
neoplasms were too few for meaningful comparisons.
The excess in external causes of death is examined further in Table 5.
Vietnam veterans had significantly higher mortality from motor vehicle
accidents (MVAs) (RR, 1.48; P=.03) than non-Vietnam veterans. The excess was
most pronounced in the first five years after discharge from active duty

�(RR, 1,93; P-.Ol). After that period, MVA rates were similar in the two
cohorts (RR, 1.16). The RRs for suicide and homicide were somewhat increased
in the early postdischarge period but not in the later years of follow-up.
Accidental poisoning deaths (mostly by drugs) were substantially more common
among Vietnam veterans than other veterans over the entire follow up period
(RR, 2.47; P-.08). No postservice deaths were attributed to war injuries
(ICD-9, E990-E999).
Adjustment for selected covariates did riot materially alter the pattern of
cause-specific mortality, except for suicide in the earlier follow-up period,
where the adjusted RR was 2.59 (95% CI, 1.09 to 6.17).
Medical Review Panel, ••••• The medical review analysis was based on 233 (95%) of
Vietnam veteran deaths and 193 (97%) of deaths among non Vietnam veterans. On
average, slightly fewer supplemental medical and legal records were recovered
for each Vietnam veteran death (mean, 3.3 records) than for each non-Vietnam
veteran death (mean, 3,7 records). Overall agreement between the medical
review panel diagnoses and death certificate diagnoses, however, was good
(82%; kappa = 0.79) and did not differ significantly between the two veteran
cohorts.
The medical review analyses indicated differences in only two ICID 9 categories
that were not evident from the death certificate analysis. The RR for mental
disorders from the medical review panel analysis was 2.85 (95% CI, 0.92 to
8.82) compared with 0.95 from the death certificate analysis. Most mental
disorder deaths were related to alcohol or drugs and are examined in more
detail in Table 6. The RR for neoplasms based on medical review panel
diagnoses was 1,21 (95% CI, 0.55 to 2.66) compared with 0.82 based on death
certificates. This difference was primarily the result of two deaths from
neoplasms among non Vietnam veterans being reclassified elsewhere by the
medical review panel and the opposite occurrence among Vietnam veterans.
There was no particular type of neoplasm in excess in the Vietnam cohort.
Supplemental information collected for the medical review allowed further
exploration of MVA deaths. Single- and multiple-vehicle crash deaths as well
as daytime and nighttime events all occurred more frequently among Vietnam
veterans during the early postdischarge period. Vietnam veterans had a modest
excess of which were alcohol-related MVA deaths during this period (RR, 1.35;
95% CI, 0,60 to 3.04).
Alcohol-related natural causes of death were too few for formal analysis in
the early postdischarge period, but the RR in the later period showed no
difference between the two groups (Table 6). A modest elevation in
alcohol-related traumatic deaths among Vietnam veterans was limited to the
first five years after discharge. For drug-related deaths, the RR was
slightly elevated during the early postdischarge period and more elevated
during the later follow up period. Although the number of deaths is too small
for formal analysis, further refinement of the later follow-up period suggests
the upward trend in drug related mortality continues into the most recent
years. Further, Vietnam service seems to be associated with an especially
high rate of drug-related mortality among those drafted into service, those
whose jobs were in tactical or combat operations, and those who served during
1969.

�Again, as in the death certi Ficate results, adjustment for selected covariates
increased the RR for suicide in the early follow-up period to 2.56 (95% CI,
1.11 to 5,87), No other RR presented in the medical review results was
materially altered by adjustment.
Gener.aJ
Both groups of veterans had a significantly lower overall mortality rate for
"natural causes" than the general US male population (Table 7). During the
first five years after discharge, Vietnam veterans had a higher death rate
from external causes, whereas non-Vietnam veterans have a lower rate relative
to the general, population. In the later time period both groups of veterans
showed a similar deficit in external cause mortality. Although these data are
not presented in Table 7, over the entire follow.....up period, Vietnam veterans
had a striking deficit of circulatory disease deaths (SMR, 0,48; 95% CI, 0.25
to 0.85), whereas non.....Vietnam veterans had only a slight deficit (SMR, 0.87;
95% CI, 0.54 to 1.34).

�COMMENT

The intent of our study was to assess the effect of military service in
Vietnam on subsequent mortality. The "Vietnam experience" includes a wide
range of possible health influencing factors such as psychological stresses
associated with war, infectious diseases prevalent in Vietnam and exposure to
the herbicide Agent Orange.
The modest excess of deaths among Vietnam veterans was concentrated in the
first five years after discharge, where all-cause mortality was 45% higher
than in the non-Vietnam group, External causes accounted for most of this
increase, with the largest elevation in relative mortality due to MVAs.
A more detailed examination of MVA deaths did not indicate any particularfactor that could explain the overall excess in Vietnam veterans. The
increased risk did not appear to be related to elevated blood alcohol levels
at the time of death, and the excess was apparent across various types of
MVAs. Drug-use information on MVA victims was limited; the medical review
panel identified only one drug-related MVA death.
Suicide and homicide also occurred somewhat more frequently among Vietnam
veterans during the early postdischarge period. Accidental poisoning deaths
(mainly by drugs) were elevated throughout the entire follow-up period,
although the number of such deaths was small.
By the sixth year after discharge, both all-cause and external-cause mortality
among Vietnam veterans had fallen to levels found in the non-Vietnam group,
except for deaths due to drug abuse, where the rate was actually higher in the
more recent follow-up period.
These findings are unlikely to be the result of a serious flaw in study design
or execution. The study groups were selected in a manner that minimized
differences in their preservice characteristics; vital status was verified for
93% of all participants; death certificates were recovered for 98% of deaths;
and supplemental medical and legal documents, which allowed an independent
assessment of cause of death by standardized criteria, were obtained for 96%
of deaths. Moreover, the pattern of excess deaths was remarkably consistent
across various subgroups of Vietnam veterans and appears not to be an artifact
of confounding. It should be noted, however, that sample size constraints
limited our ability to detect excesses in mortality in subgroups of veterans
and for the less frequent causes of death in this relatively young group.
Our findings can be viewed against the results of five previous mortality
studies of Vietnam veterans. Four10""1^ are proportional mortality studies,
which may not be directly comparable with this study because of incompleteness
of data and inherent limitations of this analytic method. 1 ^ The fifth, a
cohort study of Australian Vietnam veterans, is very similar in design to our
study and thus is a more appropriate comparison.^ The US Air Force "Ranch
Hand" study is not discussed here, since its principal concern is the adverse
health effects of herbicide exposure in a unique group of veterans.16
The 30% excess of external cause mortality among Australian Vietnam veterans
relative to non-Vietnam veterans is similar to what is seen here.^
Although the Australian investigators did riot examine external cause mortality
by time since discharge, there was a suggestion of a decline in relative

�mortality with increasing time since discharge in their all-cause mortality
results. Deaths from suicide, homicide, and accidental poisoning also occur
more frequently among their Vietnam veterans, Mortality from MVA was not
elevated overall, but an excess in the youngest age group was suggested.
Findings for external-cause mortality from the four proportional mortality
studies are not consistent with our results. A nonsignificant increase in
deaths from MVA among Vietnam veterans relative to other veterans was present
in only one of the studies.^ The relative frequencies of suicide and
homicide were not unusual, although there was one instance of a nonsignificant
increase in both of these causes .•*••'• Accidental poisonings were analyzed in
only one of the studies, and the result was a small, nonsignificant elevation
among Vietnam veterans.^
Australian Vietnam veterans had an excess of deaths from al.cohol--reJ.ated
natural causes, but no increases in deaths from alcohol related external
causes or drug-related mortality. These discordant findings may reflect
differences in in-service use of drugs and alcohol by American arid Australian
troops. In contrast to the reportedly heavy use of illicit drugs by American
troops in Vietnam, I'7'-'-^ drug use among Australian soldiers was reported to
be uncommon and alcohol use, heavy.^ Our finding of increased mortality
from drug-related causes in the later follow-up period was not consistent with
surveys indicating little or no influence of Vietnam service on postdischarge
drug use. ^ ^
'
The lower mortality from cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) among Vietnam veterans
is surprising. The lower rate might be explained as a by-product of some kind
of selection process taking place in the final assignments to Vietnam, which
might correlate with cardiovascular fitness established during basic or
advanced training. Indeed, the SMR results suggest that the CVD deficit may
be the result of an unusually high rate in the comparison group; CVD mortality
in the non-Vietnam cohort was only slightly below that of the general
population, whereas we expected it to be much lower.20 A completely
opposite result was found in the Australian study, where CVD mortality was 90%
higher among Vietnam veterans than non-Vietnam veterans.^ Various indexes
of CVD morbidity measured in the other components of the VES may help in
further elucidating the mortality findings.
In the Australian study most of the excess in all-cause mortality among
Vietnam veterans was confined to members of the Engineer Corps.^ This
pattern was not found in the present study, but the number of men assigned to
engineer units was relatively small. Furthermore, possible differences
between US and Australian engineering units in training and composition may
make this comparison inappropriate.
The excess in postservice external-cause mortality among Vietnam veterans seen
here could be due to some peculiarity in the assignment of men to Vietnam
whereby those who were sent tended to have characteristics that placed them at
increased risk of dying from external causes after discharge from active
duty. This explanation appears doubtful for several reasons. Most
importantly, if Vietnam veterans tended to have an inherent predisposition to
traumatic events, it might be expected to manifest itself in increased
mortality from such causes throughout the period of observation, not just in
the first few years, as observed here.

�10

Alternatively, our findings may reflect consequences of the unique environment
arid experience of serving in Vietnam and returning to an unsupportive and
sometimes hostile climate in the United States. This explanation might seem
plausible given the unique military and social environment of the Vietnam
conflict. However, the present results are similar to previous observations
of postservice mortality in Army veterans. Indeed, increased mortality from
external causes has been seen in two groups of World War II combat veterans
and one group of Korean War combat veterans, when compared with the general
US male population, even though older men and officers were included. 21 In
contrast, broader cross-sections of World War II veterans, including combat
and noncombat groups, showed no difference or even a deficit in postdischarge
traumatic deaths,20,21 as (-j-jd non-Vietnam veterans in our study. Although
the influence of factors specific to the Vietnam experience cannot be
completely ruled out, our findings and previous studies suggest that the
postservice excess of traumatic deaths among Vietnam veterans is probably due
to unusual stresses endured while stationed in a hostile fire zone.
The mortality assessment of Vietnam veterans presented here is an incomplete
evaluation of the health experience of this group. Additional data on the
present and past health status of living Vietnam veterans will be forthcoming
from the health interview and medical, psychological, and laboratory
evaluation components of the VES. Because this group of veterans has not yet
reached the age where chronic diseases have an important impact on mortality,
continued monitoring of mortality among VES participants may provide
ad d i t i o na1 i n s i g h t s .

�11
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The VES Mortality Study Staff consisted of Coleen A. Boyle, PhD, Pierre
Decoufle, ScD, Robert J. Delaney, Frank DeStefano, MD, Melinda L. Flock, MSPII,
Martha I. Hunter, M. Riduan Joesoef, MD, PhD, John M. Karon, PhD, Marilyn L.
Kirk, Peter M. Layde, MD, Daniel L. McGee, PhD, Linda A. Moyer, RIM, Daniel A.
Pollock, MD, Philip Rhodes, MS, and Robert M. Worth, MD, PhD.
Many other individuals and organizations provided invaluable support to the
study. These include The Agent Orange Working Group and its Science Panel;
Army Reserve Personnel Center, US Army and Joint Services Environmental
Support Group, Department of Defense; MPRC, National Archives and Records
Administration; General Services Administration; Veterans Administration;
National Center for Health Statistics; Social Security Administration;
Internal Revenue Service; National Academy of Sciences; other staff members of
the CDC, and outside consultants who contributed their unique expertise.
A more comprehensive report of the findings from this study has been published
in the form of a monograph by the CDC, Copies can be obtained from the CDC,
Atlanta, GA 30333.

�12.

REFERENCES
H e . a lt-h !^t.99.ra!M .il^Grision and Improvement Act of 1979,
Law96-~15'l.......( M R......3li?2)"......6e"c~20"........1979",.......93......STAT
......
~
2.

Public

Veterans' Health _......___......_^ , and . _ Business _ _ Act of 1981,
„ . . _.....— —.......Care,, Tra i n i rig....._......._Small ......„_....... Loan . ..........
_..
„
. _ _

3 , [r°.t..9I t°L iEMi!M£l9&lt;3.ic Studies of the Health of Vinetnam yc|tejrans .
!...-9£..
Atlanta, Centers for Disease Control, November i.983.

.

... ..

c3
r

Disease Control, 1987,

States, rev 8,
Welfare, 1967.

PUS publication .1.693.

i.ec! for Use in_..the Unitecl
US Dept of Health, Education, and

..9f ..i...l0t r n a t i o n a 1 S t a t i s ti. c a 1 C la s s if i c a t i o n o f D i s e as e s ,
... ..be,...e
_.a!.ldjl§.y.?..§A...9f P.?a.th, rev 9. Geneva, World Health Organization,

97..................................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "
7.

Laird l\l, Oliver D; Covariance analysis of censored survival data using
log-linear analysis techniques . .J_Am Stat Ass_oc 1981; 76 : 231.....2.41 .

8.

Cox DR, Oakes D: Ajlollisi.s_.....9.f. itlC.y,i.V..al Q.a.t.a.- London, Chapman and Hall, 1984.

9.

Monson RR: Analysis of relative survival and proportional mortality.
s. 1974; 7: 325-3 32.

Qomg

10. Anderson HA, l-lanrahan LP, Jensen M, et al: W..ij.conj_ij;i^V]i^^nami Veteran
Mortality/ S.ty_dy . Madison, Wise, Wisconsin Division of Health, 1985.
11. Lawrence CE, Reilly AA, Quickenton P, et al: Mortality patterns of l\lew
York State Vietnam veterans, Am_J.....PubllS.......Health 1985; 75 : 277-2.79 .
12. Kogan MD, Clapp RW: Mortality Amoj'ig Vietnam yeterans; in..Massiacjui]Sj3t1;;_si,
l Z 2 i 9 3 . Bos ton , M ! a h s ! t
l.r.8
a7TVe:^
.......
•——••-

1 3 . HO ime s AP :
Charleston, W VA, West Virginia Health Department, 1986.
14. Wong 0, Decoufle P: Methodological issues involving the standardized
mortality ratio and proportionate mortality ratio in occupational studies.
1 9 8 2. ; 2 4 : 2, 9 9.....3 04 ,
15. Fett MJ, Dunn M, Aderia MA, et al:
.CL^
...^

Ay.st;ra_l.ian_ Vete_ra_ri_3......Health......S_tyd_i_e_sj:......The
. . . . . ^ St_u_(iy_ of
Q9b9C
a
a a
e

-

6

L t b ? ! ! . . £ s . . t Re po r; t . Canberra, A u s t ra 1 i a ,
. . . . !!9L&lt;.i.l
Australian Government Publishing Service, 1984.

�13

16. Lathrop GD, Moynahan PM, Alfoanese RA, et al: £roj.ectRanch Hand II. An
! [ i i . 5 i . 9 i I D 5 ! ^ l : i . i £ °f...ii?!.l?.i.tb...JLffl;i!.£i5 illD...LCQiCS.® E§lisonnej.
iE^!!.9l£c ..i..l.3^iD
Foil owing Ex.J2£l^ureto..JJ..Ii-^rM.9..M£.?....;. !3&lt;as£l.ine.!J£!r.^£il.tl......S..t.y..dj/ !l§..s.y.lt_s. San
Antonio, Tex, Brooks Air Force Base, US Air Force School of Aerospace
Medicine, 1983.
17. Ritter C, Clayton RR, Voss ML: Vietnam military service and marijuana use,
Am J D.ru_g_Alcoh£ 1__Abuse 1985; 11: 119•-130.
18. Robins l...l\l, Helzer JE, Davis DH: Narcotic use in Southeast Asia and
afterward . .Arch .Gen Psychiatry 1975; 32 : 955 961.
19. Yager "I", Laufer R, Gallops M: Some problems associated with war experience
in men of the Vietnam generation. A.r_cJ;i__Gen Psjf£hia_t_r\f 1984; 41:327-333 .
2.0. Seltzer CC, Jablon S: Effects of selection on mortality. Am J Epjidemio1
1974;!00:36 7-372.
21. Wefzger MD: Follow up studies of World War II and Korean War prisoners. I.
Study plan and mortality findings. Am J_.E£_ideipi_o_l 1970; 91: 123-138 .

�VIETNAM-ERA ARMY PERSONNEL
R E C O R D S FILED AT NPRC
BETWEEN SEPT 1964 AND JUNE 1977
Approx. 4,900,000

RANDOM SAMPLE
48,513

QUALIFIED FOR STUDY
18,581

RECORDS NOT FOUND
1,355

Ll

NOT Q U A L I F I E D
28,577

NON-VIETNAM
9,023

DIED ON ACTIVE OUT
234

DIED ON ACTIVE DUTY
34

VIETNAM
COHORT

9,324

NON-VIETNAM
COHORT

8,989

Selection of s t u d y g r o u p , NPRC indicates N a t i o n a l Personnel Records
Center; a s t e r i s k , excluded f r o m s t u d y ; and dagger, eighty-three percent
(N=194) of a c t i v e d u t y deaths among V i e t n a m veterans were due to
war-related activities.

�fable 1. Differences in Selected Characteristics Between
Vietnam and Won Vietnam Veterans at Entry Into Service
and During Military Service

Character:!, stic

Vietnam
(N=9324)

Won-Vietnam
(N=8989)

_Ate_ntry_...into service
Race/' (% white)

86.8

86.5

Age at entry, (mean)

20.3

20.5

Enlistment status/' ( draftee)
%

63.7

65.6

Year of entry into service,
(% before 1969)

72.1

60.6

103.1

105.5

Army General Technical Test
score (mean, scaled to 100)

During military service
Primary mi 1 itary occupational
specialty"1"
% tactical operations

34 .3

27,
,4

Type of unit, % infantry

26..6

14,.6

Type of discharge, % honorable

97, 2
,

91, 0

Pay grade at discharge, % E4 or E5

88,,5

79,
,8

Year of discharge, % before 1970

,1
48,

44. 6

Race and enlistment status were the only two characteristics that
were not significantly different (P&gt;.05) between the Vietnam
and the non-Vietnam groups,
+

The job specialty for which the man was trained in the Army.

�Table 2,

Years
Since
Discharge

Number of Deaths, Person-Years, and Death Rates Among Vietnam
and Won Vietnam Veterans and Unadjusted RRs by Years Since
Discharge From Active Duty, 1965--1983'x'

6-1-

All
years

V i §t na m
Person-years

110

&lt;5

l\lo. of
deaths

_

46,350

2.4

73

44,747

1.6

1.45

1.08 1.96

136

81,547

1.7

127

76,582

1.7

1.01

0.79-1.28

246

127,897

1.9

200

121,32.9

1.7

1.17

0.97-1.41

Rate'1"

l\lo.
deaths

_N o n;-V let n am.
Person-years
Rate4'

RR indicates rate ratio; CI, conPidence interval.
"'"

Crude death rate per 1000 person years.

RR

95% CI

�Table 3,

Number of Deaths Among Vietnam and Won Vietnam Veterans
and Unadjusted Rate Ratios (RRs), by Selected
Characteristics and Years Since Discharge from
Active Duty, 1965-1903

Y e a r s S i nee D i s c h a r &lt; From Active Duty
30
&lt;5
All years
6-1-

Characteristic 'K'

No.

RR

No.

RR

No.

RR

Race
White
Won white

146
37

1 .50
1 .30

193
70

0.99
1 .07

339
107

1 .18
1 .14

Enlistment status
Volunteer
Draftee

79
104

1 .09
1 .80

11 1
152

0 .91
1 .06

190
256

0 .98
1 .31

97
83

1 .42
l .43

141
1:1.9

0.90
1 .07

238
202

1 .08
1 ,2.0

63
120

l .'19
l ,58

89
174

1 .04
0,97

152
294

1 . 10
1. 1 8

47
136

l .83
l ,41

42
221

0.67
1 , 10

89
357

1 .14
1 .2.1

125
58

l .50
l . 95

183
80

1 .10
1 .16

308
138

1 .24
1 .44

79

2.05

122

0.96

201

1.27

104

1.16

141

1 .06

2.45

1. 10

GT test score"'"
&lt; .1.00
100+

Duty MOS +
Tactical
Other
Age at discharge

21+
Pay grade
at discharge
E4 - E5
El - E3

Year of discharge
&lt;1970
1970-1-

There was no evidence of statistically significant effect modification
for any of these characteristics

(P&gt;0.05).

Army General Technical Test (GT) scores were missing for six veterans.
+

Determined from principal military occupational specialty (MOS) held
while on tour of duty.

�Table 4.

Number oP Deaths by Cause (from Death Cerlif'icato),
Death Rates Among Vietnam and Won Vietnam Veterans,
and Unadjusted RRs, 1965 190;i'K

Underlying
cause of
death
(ICD 9)+
Infectious and
parasitic
diseases
(001 139)

Vietnam
No.

Won Vietnam
Rate?

No.

Rate +

RR§

95% CI

1

0.8

1

0.8

12

9.4

14

11.5

0.82

0.38-1.76

Mental disorders
(290-319)

7

5.5

7

5.8

0.95

0.3 3 --2. 70

Diseases of
nervous system
(320 389)

2

1.6

J.

Diseases of
circulatory
sy s tern
(390 459)

12

9,4

23

19.0

0.49

0.25--0.99

Diseases of
respiratory
system
' (460 519)

5

3.9

4

3.3

Neoplasms
(140 239)

Diseases of
digestive system
(520-579)

3.9

Diseases of
genitourinary
system
(580-611)

0.8

ri ft

\J , O

3.1

Congenital
anomalies
(740-759)

!

2.5

0.8

�Table 4.

Number of Deaths by Cause (From Death Certificate),
Death Rates ftrnong Vietnam and Won.....Vietnam Veterans,
and Unadjusted R R s , 1965.....1903* (continued)

Symptoms,
signs, and :i. 1 !-•d e f i ne d c o n d i t i o n s
(780.....799)
External causes
(E800-E999)

0.8

1.6
188

147.0

143

117.9

1.25

1.00.....1.55

l\lo death
certificate
\f.

RR indicates rate ratio; CI, confidence interval,

+

ICD 9 indicates International Classification of Diseases, ninth
revision. l\lo deaths were categorized to diseases of blood and blood-forming
organs; endocrine, metabolic or nutritional diseases; diseases of the
skin; or diseases of the rnusculoskeletal system. Therefore, these
categories are not shown.

T

Crude death rate per 100,000 person-years.

§

If the total number of deaths for a cause-of-death category in both
groups combined was less than ten, RRs are not shown.

�Table 5.

Number of Deaths From Specific External Cause:; (K'rom Death
Certificate) Among Vietnam and Won Vietnam Veterans and Unadjusted
RRs, by Years Since Discharge From Active Duty, .1.96.5-1983*'

External
cause of
d
e

&lt;5
a

t

Years Since Q_i_3charge From Acti ye Duty+
6+
h

~

~

Motor vehicle
accident
(E810--E825,
E929.0)

66

1.93

1.16--3.22

67

Accidental
poisoning
(E8SO-E869,
E92.9.2)

11

1.69

0.49 5.77

Other
,
accidents+

23

1.05

Suicide
(E950 E959)

25

Homicide
(E960 E969)

18

Undetermined
intentional:!, ty
(E980 E989)

4

All Years

1.16

0.72-1.87

133

1.48

1.04 2.09

7

-

-

18

2.47

0.88 6.92

0.46 2.37

39

0.89

0.48 1.67

62

0.95

0.58 1.56

1.72

0.76-3.88

32

0.64

0.32 1.30

57

0.98

0.58 1.65

1.52

0.59 3.91

33

0.78

0.39-1.55

51

0.99

0.57-1.71

-

6

-

10 3.79

0.81-17.87

*' RR indicates rate ratio; CI, confidence interval; ICO-9, International
Classification of Diseases, ninth revision.
"'"

Time-specific RRs are not presented for categories with less
than 10 deaths in both Vietnam and non-Vietnam groups combined.

£ Includes ICD-9 categories E800 to E807, E826 to E849, E870 to E928, E92.9.1,
E929.3 to E929.9, E930 to E949, E970 to £978, and E990 to E999.

�"fable 6.

Number of Deaths From Alcohol and .Drug-Related Causes (From Medical Review)
Among Vietnam and Mori-Vie tnam
Veterans and Unadjusted RRs, by Years
Since Discharge From Active Duty, 1965.....1983*
............... Years_ S.ln£g_P_i^_chair3_e From Active Duty
&lt;5
6-1fill Years

Cause
of
death

o

Alcohol.....related
natural
causes"1"

5

.....

Alcohol.....related
traumatic
causes t

42

1,29

Drug
related
causes§

18

1.2.1.

*
+

~

•••••

"

25

0.87

0.40.....1.90

30

0.70-2.37

61

1.04

0.63-1.71

103

0.48 3.06

22

2.01

0.82-4.94

40

1.08

0.53-2.22

1.13 0.77.....1.67

1.58

0.83-3.00

RR indicates rate ratio; C.I, confidence interval.
Includes the following diagnoses determined to be the underlying or
contributing cause of death:
alcoholic psychoses (291.0 to 291,9); alcohol dependence syndrome (303);
nondependent alcohol abuse (305.0); alcoholic polyneuropathy (357.5);
alcoholic cardiomyopathy (42.5.5); alcoholic gastritis (535.3);
alcoholic liver disease (571.0 to 571.3); and excessive blood level of alcohol
(790.3).

+ Includes deaths in which the underlying cause is accidental poisoning by
alcohol (E860.0 to E860.9) or any traumatic death (E800--E989) in which either
nondependent abuse of alcohol (305.0) or excessive blood level of alcohol
(790.3) is a contributing cause of death.
§

Deaths for which one of the following drug-specific diagnoses is the,
underlying or contributing cause of death;
drug psychoses (292.0 to 292.9);
drug dependence (304.0 to 304.9);
nondependent abuse of drugs (305.2 to 305.9);
accidental poisoning by drugs (E850.0 to E850.2, E8S0.5, E850.8, E851-E8S4,
E855.1 to E855.2, E866.6 and E869.0);
suicide by drugs (E950.0 to E950.5); and
poisoning by drugs, intentionality undetermined (E980.0 to E980.5).

�Table 7.

Years
since
discharge

Observed and Expected Numbers of Deaths by Cause Among Vietnam
and Mori Vietnam Veterans and SMRs,
y
by Years Since Discharge From Active Duty, 1965--1983

Cause of De ath+
(ICOA--8)

Vietnam

Won Vietnam
16
23 . 4
0.68
0.39-1. 11

13
24 . 2
0 . 54
0.29 0.92

Observed
Expected
SMR
95% CI

92
72.5
1 . 2.7
1.02-1.56

55
69.4
0.79
0.60 1.03

All natural
causes
(000 796)

Observed
Expected
SMR
95% CI

38
65.8
0.58
0.41-0.79

39
63.4
0.62
0.44-0.84

Observed
Expected
SMR
95% CI

96
.1.02 . 7
0.93
0.76-1.14

88
96.6
0,91
0.73-1.12

All natural
causes
(000 796)

Observed
Expected
SMR
95% CI

51
90.0
0,57
0.42 0.75

55
86.8
0.63
0.48 0.82

External
causes
(E800-E999)

All
years

Observed
Expected IJI
SMR
95% CI

External
causes
(E800--E999)

6+

All natural
causes
(000 796)
External
causes
(E800 E999)

&lt;5

Observed
Expected
SMR
95% CI

188
175.2
1 . 07
0,93-1.24

143
166.0
0.86
0.73-1.01

SMR indicates standardized mortality ratio; CI, confidence
interval; and ICDA 8, International Classification of Diseases,
Adapted for Use in the United States, eighth revision.
"'"

Excludes nine deaths (seven Vietnam, two non Vietnam) for which
death certificates were not recovered.

T

Expected number is based on the mortality rates among US men,
standardized for age, calendar year, and race.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22220">
              <text>064</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22221">
              <text>1742</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22225">
              <text>Series III Subseries III</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22222">
                <text>JAMA</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22223">
                <text>February 13 1987</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22224">
                <text>Postservice Mortality Among Vietnam Veterans: The Centers for Disease Control Vietnam Experience Study</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22226">
                <text>Vietnam Experience Study</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22227">
                <text>mortality trends</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22228">
                <text>veteran psychological health</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
