<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=49&amp;advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&amp;advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=pesticide+toxicology&amp;page=1&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CTitle&amp;sort_dir=d&amp;output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-03-17T16:14:29+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>1</pageNumber>
      <perPage>15</perPage>
      <totalResults>40</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="2848" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="20343">
              <text>077</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="20344">
              <text>1980</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="20347">
              <text>Series III Subseries IV</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20345">
                <text>January 26 1984</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20346">
                <text>Transcript of Proceedings: Royal Commission on the Use and Effects of Chemical Agents on Australian Personnel in Vietnam, 26 January 1984</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20348">
                <text>Australian Royal Commission Hearings</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="20349">
                <text>herbicide toxicology</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="20350">
                <text>pesticide toxicology</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="20351">
                <text>dioxin</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2241" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1296">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/705d330b601bd6f010265578c4d03efa.pdf</src>
        <authentication>b4e95d1fe9cf25954eae9a55134fb242</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63245">
                    <text>Item ID Number

ones
Bababunmi, Enitan A.

Corporate Author
Report/Article TltlB Toxins and Carcinogens in the Environment: An
Observation in the Tropics

JOUmal/BoOk TltlO

Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health

Year
Month/Day
Color

D

Number of Images

9

DOSCrlptOn NotOS

^'vin ^- Young filed this item under the category
"DDT/Human Toxicology and Environmental Fate"

Wednesday, April 11, 2001

Page 1188 of 1242

�TOXINS AND CARCINOGENS IN THE ENVIRONMENT:
AN OBSERVATION IN THE TROPICS

Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine,
University of Ibadari, Ibadan, Nigeria

The incidence of primary liver cancer in the countries of tropical Africa is the highest in
the world. There, is a growing belief that the relatively high prevalence of hepatocellular
carcinoma in Niyeria may have a multiple chemical factor etiology in such forms as food
contaminants, herbal leas, and environmental chemicals. Major chemical toxins and
carcinogens that have been identified so far in the tropical environment include
supotoxin, cycasin, mushroom toxin, capsaicin, oxalic acid, prussic acid, fluotooleic acid,
N-nitroso compounds, aflatoxin, palmotoxin, pyrrolizidine alkaloids, quinine, DOT, and
eye/ornate.

INTRODUCTION
During the past two decades, there has been an increasing awareness of
the hazards to human and animal health from various chemical substances
Jthat occur in the tropical environment. There is evidence to indicate that
azarious health problems, including some forms of cancer, have their origin
in the presence of toxic chemicals in medicines, herbal residues, pesticides,
foods, and drinks. Some of these problems are common to countries
throughout the world, while others are peculiar to Africans who live in the
tropics. For example, altogether the incidence of primary liver cancer in
adult males is • the highest in the world in African countries such as
Nigeria, Uganda, and Mo/ambique (IARC, 1971).
The primary objective of the present review is to focus attention on
the presence of toxic chemicals in foods and in the environment of
tropical African countries, particularly Nigeria, which is the most populous
country in Africa. Some of these toxins have been shown to possess
carcinogenic (or mutagenic) properties in various biological systems.
However; in a large number of cases, adverse effects of some of these
toxic substances on human health are not known. It is hoped that this
paper will have the important effects of stimulating more research into the
special toxicological problems that arc of concern to people living in the
tropics.
This article was written during the author's tenure as an ICRCTT Fellow of UICC (1977) at
the Department of Biochemistry and King's College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, [England.
Requests for reprints should he sent to fcnitan A. Bababunmi, Department of Biochemistry,
School'of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
691

journal oi Toxicology and Environmental Health, 4:691-699,1978
Copyright © 1978 by Hemisphere Publishing Corporation

0098-4108/78/040691-09$2.25

�692

E. A. BABABUNMI

ENDOGENOUS FOOD TOXINS
Endogenous food toxicily is widespread in tropical Africa. Nicholls ct
al. (1961) dealt with the various types.of tropical foods that carry toxins.
The review of Crampton and Charlcsworth (1975) adequately covers the
occurrence of food toxins in the nontropical world.
Hypoglycin
This toxin is contained in the unripe fruit of the food plant, Blighia
sapida. In Nigeria the fruit is called isin, whereas it is commonly known as
ak.ee in Jamaica. There are two types of this toxin, A and B. Although
both types are biologically active, the A type (/J-mcthylenecyclopropylalaninej is the more toxic. Very little work has been done on the chemistry
and the biological function of the B type.
Dioscorine
This toxic chemical is sometimes referred to simply as dioscorea toxin;
it is an alkaloid that is present in Dioscorea hispida. The main toxic
species of these tropical yams of West Africa are D. hispida, D.
dumctorum, D. sansibarensis, and D. bulbifem. Since the isolation and
identification of the related alkaloid dehydrodioscorine by Bevan and H.rst
(1958), scientists have not looked into the existence of these or other
structures in the other species of the wild yams.

Sapotoxin
Some tropical foodstuffs such as soybean, breadfruit, tomato, melon,
orange, and groundnut contain some sapotoxin, which, at high concentrations, has drastic effects on humans. The toxin can cause gastroenteritis
and produce paralysis of the nerve centers. Sapotoxin is a nitrogen-free
glycosidc.
Cycasin
Cycasin occurs in plants of the family Cycadaceae, which are indigenous to tropical and subtropical regions (IARC, 1972). The biologically
active moiety of cycasin is the aglycone melhyla/oxymelhanol. Cycad
seeds are used as medicine in some parts of Africa, Indochina, and India.
Feeding of a cycad diet has been shown to induce malignant tumors of
the liver in the rat, mouse, hamster, fish, and guinea pig (IARC, 1972).
Mushroom Toxin
A large number of mushroom species are edible, but certain species
that arc eaten in the tropics are poisonous. Examples of toxins elaborated
by these species are agaritine (Ayaric'us bisporus toxin) and champigeon
(A. hortemis toxin). Muscarine and Amanita phalloictes toxin have been
reported to be toxic by Nicholls el al. (1961).

�TOXINS AND CARCINOGENS IN THE TROPICS

693

Names for different species of mushrooms are descriptive in many
pails of I he tropics. In the western state of Nigeria, these names give an
indication either of the habitat, morphology, and texture or of the growth
habitat of the fungi (Oso, 1975). Corprinus ephemerus, a fungus that
grows on dunghills, appears at night or early in the morning, and within a
very short time the pilcus is fully expanded. However, it deliquesces in the
sun. It is considered poisonous by the Yoruba people of Nigeria, and local
doctors use it in the preparation of some (harms. (Extracts of the fungus
should be tested for mutagenicity.
Capsaicin (Red Pepper Toxin)

The substance is the active principle of the plants Capsicum annum
and C. frutescens. It is a powerful irritant and a skin blister. Although
these plants are rich in vitamin C, excessive feeding on them can be
dangerous. Species of pepper such as Piper nigrum contain alkaloids and
volatile oils that are toxic to both animals and humans.
Halogeton Toxin (Oxalic Acid)
Plant species such as Halogelon ylomeritus, Celosia argentae,
Amaranthus candatus, Celosia laxa, and Talinum are used as food in
tropical Africa, especially on the west coast. These vegetables contain
significant levels of oxalic acid (Oke, 1967). There are conflicting data on
the lethal dose for humans. However, Oke showed that an average healthy
Nigerian would consume about 6 g of oxalic acid daily, on the basis that
50 g of fresh vegetables could be consumed at a meal.
Cyanogen (Prussic Acid)

Tropical plants, cassava, mai/ie, and sugar cane are good sources of
cyanogenetic glycosides such as linamarin and dhurrin. Cassava (manioc;
Man/hot ulilissima} is the most widely grown of all tropical root crops. It
is mainly a carbohydrate food with a very low protein content. In West
Africa, manioc flour (gari). has become a major diet. In the West Indies the
dried flour is called farina. All over the tropics it is used as food for the
young and adults in one form or another.
The en/yme linasc liberates prussic acid (HCN) from linamarin. HCN is
toxic to many species of animals, including humans. The production of
HCN varies with the variety of the plant and the conditions of cultivation
(Osuntokun et a!., 1969).
Although significant amounts of HCN arc said to occur only in the
bitter variety of cassava, there is in fact no clear differentiation between
the sweet and hitler strains. The fact that the cortex of the root contains
the highest concentrations of the toxin provides biological protection for
the plant against invading insects. Chronic cyanide intoxication by laboratory animals has resulted in neural damage in the guinea pig, rabbit, sheep,
and cat.

�694

E. A. BABABUNMI

Fluoruoleic Acid
The seeds of the West African plant Dichapctalum toxicarum contain
fluoroeleic acid and some minute amounts of shorter-chained fluoro acids.
These fluoro compounds arc toxic.'Local, doctors in the countries of West:
Africa often administer the seed extracts in an attempt to produce loss of
motor activity, loss of sensation, and sometimes death (Peters el al.,
I960). Free oleic acid uncouples oxidative phosphorylation (Pressman and
Lardy, 1956).
/V-Nitroso Compounds
.Dimclhylnilrosaminc (DMN) and diethylnilrosamine (DEN) have been
detected in measurable quantities in several alcoholic beverages in Nigeria
(joaquim, 1973). Bababunmi et al. (1977) reviewed the extent of contamination of these drinks by the two carcinogens. There is some evidence
that the formation of these nil.rosamines involves bacterial action.

FUNGAL TOXIC CONTAMINANTS
Fungus-infected foodstuffs are the cause of many types of food
poisoning (see Kadis et al., 1972). In the tropics, a Variety of fungal
species have been reported to be involved in some toxicity syndromes.
Notable examples are Asperyi/lus, Penicil/ium, Stachybotrys, Trichoderma,
f-'usarium, Pseudomonas, and .Helminthosporiurn species. The most
ubiquitous in Nigeria are Aspergillus and Pcnicillium. Many strains of each
of these fungi are toxigenic. Among the common toxic metabolites of the
aspergilli arc aspergillic acid, flavacol, j3-nilropropionic acid, kojic acid,
sterigrnatocystin, ochratoxin, aspet toxin, aflaloxin, and palmotoxin.
Penicillium elaborates the mycotoxins patulin, islandiloxjn, lutcoskyrin,
rugulosin, cifrinin, frcquentic acid (citreomycctin), gliotoxin, costaclavine,
and citreviridin. Of these, aflatoxin has been studied most extensively,
mainly because of its potent carcinogenic properties. A comctabolile of
aflaloxin, palmotoxin, has been the subject of investigation for some years
in this laboratory. Many other naturally occurring toxins (Table 1) that
are known should be tested for carcinogenictty.
Aflatoxin
The literature on the biochemistry, toxicity, carcinogenicity, and
mutagenicity of aflatoxin is enormous (Goldblatt, 1969; Wogan, 1975a,
1975b; IRAC, 1976), The discovery of aflatoxin in the tropics (Asplin and
Carnagnan, 1961) as a contaminant of human and animal foodstuffs
(groundnuts) aroused the interest of scientists all over the world because
of i t . health ha/aids and possible economic effects on the producers of
these foods. Nigeria is one .of the world's major exporters of groundnuts.
Other tropical foods that arc vectors of aflatoxin are beans, corn, rice,
cocoa, and wheat.

�TOXINS AND CARCINQGtNS IN lilt. TROPICS

695

TABLE 1. Sonic Known Naturally Occurring Toxins

Toxic sulislance

Occurrence in

l-'usaric acid

Fiisariuni oxysp oiium

Pcriconin
T toxin
llclminthosporo'sidc
Tabtoxin
Javanicin

Pcriconia circ'inatu
1 lei min tli ospvrium may dis
Hvlniitithosporium sqcchari
Pseudomonus coronal aciens
f-'usarium solan!

Possible human
exposure through
Tomato, sorghum,
maize
Sorghum
Maize
Sugarcane
Tobacco
Maize

Aspergillus flavus, the main source of aflatoxin, is common in air and
soil, It will grow on agricultural products and food materials in a favorable
environment with a relative humidity of 70-90% and a minimum temperature of about 10°C. In general, the growth of A. flavus can be correlated
with the production of aflatoxin except at high temperatures, 40-50°C.
!n different regions of Muranga in Kenya (Hast Africa), mean aflaloxin
levels of about 0.25 ppm in food and 0.1 mg/l in beer have been detected
(IARC, 1972). When common food preparations of Nigeria's principal
food crops were sampled from local market stalls and assessed for aflatoxin
contamination by conventional techniques, the aflatoxin content was not
less than 0.5 ppm in any of the foods (Bababunmi, 1976). Several
industrialized countries such as the United States, Denmark, Britain, and
Italy consider a level of aflatoxin of the order of 0.25 ppm as dangerous
and the contaminated food as unconsumable.
Although the proportional contribution of agriculture to the Nigerian
economy continues to fall, it will continue to be the single most
important sector in the economy for a long time (Aboyadc, 1971). The
export value of cocoa ranks second to that of oil in Nigeria. In 1974,
Nigeria's foreign trade was $3.462 billion. If oil accounted for 80% of the
export value in the 1974-1975 fiscal year, other export products such as
cocoa, groundnuts, and palm products should account for about $700
million. Therefore, if aflatoxin contamination in this class of export
commodities is not eliminated, Nigeria's foreign reserves may diminish
continuously.
Palmotoxin
Isolation of two additional fluorescent toxins from cultures of A.
flavus on unfcrmcnled palm sap (a common West African wine) obtained
from a variety of Elacis yuineensis was reported by Bassir and Adekunle
(1968). Toxicity titrations of pal rnolox iris B 0 and G0 on 6-d-old White
Rock chick embryos indicated that B 0 is as toxic as aflatoxin B t . Recent
results of Uwaifo ct al. (1977) suggest that the structures of the
palmotoxins could be hetetocyclic and may be similar to those of the
aflatoxin family (Asao et al., 1965). Comparative mulagenicily studies by

�696

E. A. BABABUNMI

Uwaifo el v.al. (1978) show that palrnotoxin B() induces microlesions thai
consist of point mutations, in Ames' tester strains of Salmonella
typhimurium. However, the ratio of the mutagcnicity of aflatoxin fi, to
that of palmotoxin B0 is about 6:1.
In Nigeria and several developing African countries, several facilities
and preservation techniques for agricultural products are quite inadequate.
The combination of this unfortunate situation, the natural warm and
moist weather, a dirty environment, human error, and ignorance is
conducive to the growth of A. f/avus and consequently to the elaboration
of mycotoxins (such as aflatoxin and palrnotoxin) on agricultural commodities. It seems to me, therefore, that the problems associated with
mycotoxin contamination of food and agricultural products will remain in
the developing tropical regions of the world for some time, at least.in the
foreseeable future, unless very drastic control measures a' - c initialed.
HERBAL RESIDUES
For years, herbalists and local doctors in tropical Africa have used
herbs and their concoctions to treat various human diseases (Dal/.iel,
1948). In modern times, countries such as Nigeria and Ghana have
intensified their search for authentic medicinal plants ;ind their active
principles. Apart from their use as local medicines, many toxic plant
species are used as food in many parts of West Africa.
Many chemical compounds have been isolated from useful plants of
West Africa and characteri/cd in their pure forms. In this respect,
scientists in the Department of Chemistry of the University of Ibadan have
contributed immensely to the knowledge of the chemistry of active
principles in plants. Toxicological and other biological studies of these
chemicals are, however, scanty. Miller and Miller (1976) staled that the
plant genera Crotolaria, Senecio, Laburnum, and Heliotropium have long
been known to contain carcinogenic substances (IARC, 1976), some of
which arc pyrroli/idine alkaloids.
•; •
FOREIGN TOXIC CHEMICALS
Environmental toxins of this class exist in such forms as medicines,
pesticides, and food additives. With the gradual emergence of some
tropical African countries (for example, Nigeria) from the underdeveloped
to the developing slate, environmental pollution and the presence of
industrial materials such as those used in the processing and packaging of
foods are potential sources of toxins. Common examples in this calegory
are ioni/ing radiation, plastici/ers, adhesives, paraffins, printing inks, and
irea'cd papers. Well-rccogni/.cd environmental toxic (or carcinogenic)
chei lical substances in this tropical area of the world include quinine
(antirnalarial drug), DDT (insecticide), and cyclarnate (food additive).

�TOXINS AND CARCINOGENS IN THt TROPICS

697

Quinine
Malaria is a disease that occurs throughout the tropical and subtropical
countries. It is actually a group of diseases characterized by recurrent
attacks of fever, anemia, and enlargement of the spleen. Malaria can also
occur in temperate climates if the environmental temperature is right for
the protozoan species (e.g., Plasmodium falciparum) to complete their life
cycle in the female Anopheles mosquitoes. The parasite lives in the red
blood cells. There are three forms of the malaria parasite in humans
corresponding to malignant tertian, benign tertian, and quartan malaria. In
the tropics the most common malaria is the malignant tertian, although
the other two varieties have been identified in a very few cases.
Chloroquinc, mcpacrine, and quinine arc drugs that are very effective
in rapidly destroying the parasite in the blood. Chloroquinc (Nivaquine) is
the most widely used antimalarial drug and has been reported to be the
safest. Mcpacrine (Atebrin) can be given only intramuscularly and is not
often used.
Quinine is the oldest of all the antimalarial medicines. It is also the
quickest acting. For many years quinine was the only drug available for
the treatment of malaria. Although quinine has some toxic side effects, it
is still used, especially for cases that are resistant to other drugs. Quinine
was the first alkaloid isolated from the bark of the Cinchona tree. A single
oral dose of about 8 g is regarded as fatal for an adult man. Quinine
poisoning usually results in nausea, headache, visual disturbances, nervous
system and cardiovascular system disorders, and respiratory arrest.

DDT
The insecticidal properties of DDT are well known (IARC, 1974). This
compound has been extensively used as an insecticide and produced
commercially for this purpose since 1943, when a low-cost production
technique was developed. It has been widely used for the control of
numerous insect pests—for example, as a mosquito larvicide and as a
residual spray for eradicating malaria in the tropics. DDT is distributed by
the World Health Organi/ation throughout the world for the prevention of
yellow fever, sleeping sickness, and malaria. Apart from these uses,
quantities of DDT are used for the treatment of peppers, onions,
soybeans, groundnuts, cowpeas, and sweet potatoes, in storage.
Tropical countries such as the Upper Volta and Ghana use at least 500
kg of DDT annually for agricultural purposes. In 1973, research on the
environmental effects of pesticides in the tropics was carried out at the
International Institute for Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan. The study
was concerned with the effects of DDT (used as a crop protector) on the
fertility of agricultural soil. Cowpca (Vigna unyuiculata var. Prima), which
is a high-yielding legume, was selected in the IITA study because it
requires regular pesticide applications and also because of its growing

�698

C. A. BABABUNMI

importance in tropical agriculture. Since 1970, DDT has been restricted to
uses other than on human and animal foodstuffs in the more advanced
countries. The hepatocarcinogenicity of DDT on oral administration has
been amply demonstrated in several strains of mice. Liver cell tumors were
produced in both male and female mice, and an increased tumor incidence
was reported in some other organs. The most frequent tumor types were
leukemia, rcticulum cell sarcoma, carcinoma of the lungs, and hemangioendothclioma (IARC, 1974).
Cyclamate
Calcium cyclamate (cyclohexylsulfamic acid calcium salt) is still used
as a nonnutritivc sweetener in a large number of soft drinks in many
African countries. The use of cyclamic acid as a sweetener has been
banned in several industrialized' countries because the compound was
suspected of being a bladder carcinogen in the rat.
CONCLUSION
Apart from foods, beverages, and medicines, there are other sources of
potential toxins and carcinogens that are introduced by humans into the
tropical environment, especially in the cities, in such forms as narcotics
and atmospheric pollutants. With the arrival of various industries in big
African cities, inhalation of dust, vapors, and exhausts presents a new
form of danger. Epidemiologic appraisal of these factors is lacking. There
is a need to estimate the total load of toxins and carcinogens in the
tropical environment.

REFERENCES
Aboyadc, O. 1971. Nigeria's economy. In Africa South of the Sahara, 1st ed., pp. 558-563.
London: Luropa.
Asao, T., Buchi, G., Abdel-Kader, M. M., Chang, S. 13., Wick, E. I . and Wogan, G. N. 1965. The
.,
structures of aflaloxins B and G,. ]. Am. Chum. Soi: 87:882-886.
Asplin, [-". D. and Carnaghan, K. 13. A. 1961. The toxicity o\ certain groundnut meals for poultry
with special reference to their effect on ducklings and chickens. Vet. Kec. 73:1215-1219.
Bababunrni, Li. A. 1976. Excretion of af'latoxin in the urine of normal individuals and patients with
liver diseases in Ibadan (Nigeria). In Di'tuclifin and 1'revcnt/on of Cancer, ed. H. E. Nieburgs.
New York: Ueker.
Babdbunni, L:. A., Uwaifo, A. O., and Bassir, O. 1977. Hepatocarcinogeris in Nigerian foodstuffs.
World Rev. Nutr. Did 28: article 44.
Bassir, O. and Adckunle, A. A. 1968. Two new metabolites of Aspcnjillus lluvus (Link). FF.BS Lett.
2:23-25.
Bevan, C, W. 1.. and Hirst, ). 1958. A convulsuil alkaloid of Dioscoreu dunu'torurn.' Chcm. Ind, 4:
103.
.
Crampton, K. l:. and Charlesworlh, I . A. 1975. Occurrence of natural toxins in food. Or. Mvd.
B II. 31:209-213.
Dal/:iel J. M. 1948. Useful plants of west tropical Africa. In i-loia of West Tropical Africa, cds. J.
hutchinson and J. M. Dal/iel. London: Crown Agents for the Colonies.

�TOXINS AND CARCINOGENS IN Tilt TROPICS

699

Goldblalt, L A. 1969. Allatoxln. New Yoik: Academic Press.
IARC. 1971. Liver Cancer. Sci. I'ubl. no. I. l.yon: International Agency for Research on Cancer.
IARC. 1972. Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man, vol. 1. Lyon: International
Agency for Research on Cancer.
IARC. 1974. Chemical Carcinogencsis l.'ssays. Sci. Publ, no. 10. Lyon; International Agency for
Research on Cancer.
IARC. 1976. Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk of Chemical* to Man, vol. 10. Lyon: International
Agency lor Research on Cancer.
Joaquim, K. .1973. Nilrosamine contamination of some Nigerian beverages. Ph.D. thesis, Ibadan
University.
Kadis, $., Ciegler, A., and Ajl, S. J. 1972. In Microbkil Toxins: A Comprehensive Treatise, vol. 8,
Fungal Toxins. New York: Academic Press.
Miller, j. A. and Miller, !"..• C. 1976. Carcinogens occurring naturally in foods. Fed. Proc.
35:1316-1321.
Nicholls, L., Sinclair, H. M., and Jelliffe, D. B. 1961. Tropical Nutrition and Dietetics. London:
Bailliere, Tindall &amp; Cox.
Oke, O. L. 1967. Oxalic acid in plants and in nutrition. World Rev. Nutr. Diet. 8:262-303.
Oso, B. A. 1975. Mushrooms and the Yoruba people of Nigeria. Mycologia 67:311-319.
Osuntokun, B. O., Monekosso, G. L., and Wilson, J. 1969. Cassava diet and a chronic degenerative
neuropathy. An epidemiological study. Niger, j. Sci. 3:3-15.
Peters, R. A., Hall, R. J., Ward, P. l:. V., and Sheppard, N. 1960. The chemical nature of the toxic
compounds containing fluorine in the seeds of Dkhapelalum toxicarium. Biochcm. J.
77:17-23,
Pressman, B. C. and Lardy, II. A. 1956. Effect of surface active agents on the latent ATP-asc of
mitochondria. Biochim. B/ophys. Ada 21:458-466.
Uwaifo, A. O., Emcrolu, C. O., and Bassir, O. 1977. Comparative study of the fluorescent
characteristics ol solutions of aflatoxins and palmotoxins in chloroform. /. Agric. Food Chem.
25:1218-1220.
Uwaifo, A. O., Emcrolc, G. O., Bababunrni, E. A., and Bassir, O. 1978. Comparative rnutagcnicity
of palmotoxin U0 and aflatoxin B,. In press.
Wogan, G. N. I975a. Mycotoxins. Annii. Rev. Pliarmacol. 15:437-451.
Wogan, G. N. 1975b. Dietary lactors and special epidemiological situations of. liver cancer in
Thailand and Africa. Cancer Rex. 35:3499-3502.
Received March 12, 1978
Accepted April 3, 1978

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="15038">
              <text>047</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="15039">
              <text>1188</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="15043">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15037">
                <text>Bababunmi, Enitan A.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15040">
                <text>Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15041">
                <text>1978</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15042">
                <text>Toxins and Carcinogens in the Environment: An Observation in the Tropics</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15044">
                <text>heath effects</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="15045">
                <text>pesticide toxicology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1853" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="11025">
              <text>037</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="11026">
              <text>0800</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="11030">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="11024">
                <text>Kay, Kingsley</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="11027">
                <text>Environmental Research</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="11028">
                <text>1973</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="11029">
                <text>Toxicology of Pesticides: Recent Advances</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="11031">
                <text>pesticide toxicology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1864" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="11140">
              <text>037</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="11141">
              <text>0811</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="11145">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="11139">
                <text>Kimbrough, Renate D.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="11142">
                <text>Archives of Environmental Health</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="11143">
                <text>1972-08-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="11144">
                <text>Toxicity of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons and Related Compounds</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="11146">
                <text>pesticide toxicology</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="11147">
                <text>animal testing</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="11148">
                <text>chloracne</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1863" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="11130">
              <text>037</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="11131">
              <text>0810</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="11135">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="11129">
                <text>Kimbrough, Renate D.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="11132">
                <text>CRC Critical Reviews in Toxicology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="11133">
                <text>1974-01-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="11134">
                <text>The Toxicity of Polychlorinated Polycyclic Compounds and Related Chemicals</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="11136">
                <text>pesticide toxicology</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="11137">
                <text>pesticide properties</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="11138">
                <text>animal testing</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1310" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1150">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/a43524e853447ff25b9c6cdce1df9cc7.pdf</src>
        <authentication>eac9e207abbff5e41591d8b44990dc3b</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63099">
                    <text>00172
Author
CorporatG Author

Kotchmar, George S,, Jr.
Flame, Incendiary, and Explosives Division, Air Force
Armament Laboratory, Eglin AFB, Florida
Metabolism of High Concentrations of the Organophosphorus Insecticide
Phorate Applied Foliariy to Selected Plant Species

Journal/Book Title
Year
MOIltll/Day

Color

February
n

54
Project No. 5066

Friday, January 05, 2001

Page 172 of 194

�AFATL-TR-71-22
THE METABOLISM
OF HIGH CONCENTRATIONS
OF THE O R G A N O P H O S P H O R U S INSECTICIDE
PHORATE APPLIED FOLIARLY
TO SELECTED PLANT SPECIES

PYROTECHNICS BRANCH
FLAME INCENDIARY, AND EXPLOSIVES DIVISION

TECHNICAL

REPORT AFATL-TR-71-22

F E B R U A R Y 1971

Approved for public release; distribution unlimited,

AIR FORCE ARMAMENT LABORATORY
AIR FOtCE SYSTIMS COMMAND • UNITED STATES AIM FORCE

EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA

�The Metabolism
of High Concentrations
of the Organophosphorus Insecticide
Phorate Applied Foliarly
to Selected Plant Species

George S. K o t c h m a r , Jr., Capt, U S A F
Billy C. W o l v e r t o r t
E l i z a b e t h I. Soothe
Sandra M. L e f s t a d

Approved for public release; distribution unlimited,

�FOREWORD

The active Air Force project directly related to the information
discussed in this report is Exploratory Development Project 5066. Requests
for further detailed information or any comments on this report may be
referred to Air Force Armament Laboratory (DLI), Eglin Air Force Base,
Florida 32542.
Statistical analyses were performed by Booz-Allen Applied Research.
The use of trade names is for identification purposes only and does
not constitute endorsement by the United States Air Force.
This report has been reviewed and is approved.

r ^ ^ { t^ —~z—/- te
FRANKIN C. p M E S w i o n e l , USAF
KLI
Chief, Flame, Incendiary and
Explosives Division

�ABSTRACT

Gas chromatographic and enzymatic analyses (cholinesterase-inhibition
SthSr«re used to monitor the metabolism of the organophosphorus
insect dde 0,0-diethyl S-[(ethylthio)methyl] phosphorod thioate (Pforate)
Ippfied fofiarly to three economically important plants (Homestead tomato,
Siley sorg m" and Honey sorghum). The resulting data provided guide ines
in predicting toxicity and persistence of metabo ite residues £r high

^binr^r^ei^i^

Ice d'on ass plates located adjacent to treated Plants, indicated the
formation of toxic phorate metabolites was without the influence of
biological substrates within the plants. There were no statisticaljy
s gnificant differences with respect to the rate of increase of cholinesterl e- n ibition percentage values between the sorghum and glass plates,
the rate of formation of anticholinesterase oxidized metabolites was
predominantly through chemical oxidation on the leaf surface and not by
K enzymecatalysis, or at least, the oxidation occurred at_such a
ratfas tfmask the enzyme catalysis. The large droplet size in the
application^ phorate resulted in higher toxic residue values, especially
on the surface of the plant, than would normally be expected.

Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.

m
(The reverse of this page is blank)

��TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section

I
II

Title

Page

INTRODUCTION

1

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

4

MATERIALS AND METHODS

4

STATISTICAL ANALYSES

9

III

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

12

IV

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

40

REFERENCES

43

�LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
1

Title

Page

Plant Metabolism Pathway of Phorate (Based on Reference
5)

2

Horse Serum Cholinesterase Inhibition Versus Concentration
of 0,0-Diethyl S-[Ethylsulfinyl)methyl] Phosphorothiolate..

8

3

Cholinesterase Inhibition of Homestead Tomato.....

13

4

Cholinesterase Inhibition of Wiley Sorghum

14

5

Cholinesterase Inhibition of Honev Sorqhum (Phorate Applied
in May)
15

6

Comparison of Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition for Three
Varieties of Plants.

17

7

Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition, Homestead Tomato

19

8

Effects of Passage of Time upon Percent Cholinesterase
Inhibition, Homestead Tomato

20

2

9

Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition, Wiley Sorghum

10

Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition, Honey Sorghum..

11

Percent Chlinesterase Inhibition, Wiley and Honey Sorghum.. 23

12

Effects of Passage of Time Upon Percent Cholinesterase
Inhibition, Wiley Sorghum(March) and Honey Sorghum(April).. 24

13

Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition, Wiley and Honey
Sorghum (May)

26

Effects of Passage of Time Upon Percent Cholinesterase
Inhibition, Wiley and Honey Sorghum (May)

27

14

21
22

15

Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition, Glass Plates

16

Comparison of Percentage Cholinesterase Inhibition for
Glass Plates and Wiley Sorghum

33

Comparison of Percentage Cholinesterase Inhibition for
Gl ass PI ates and Honey Sorghum

34

17

VI

32

�LIST OF TABLES
Table
I

II
III

Title

Page

Plant Parameters Employed With High Concentrations of
Phorate.

5

Efficiency of Extraction Technique for Phorate With Tomato
and Sorghum
6
Measurement Days by Species and Experiment.

10

IV

Gas Chromatographic Analysis for Phorate From Tomato
and Sorghum.

,,.

V

Average Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition, Homestead
Tomato

12

VI
VII
VIII
IX

Average Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition, Wiley
Sorghum (March) and Honey Sorghum (April).
Average Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition, Wiley
and Honey Sorghum (May).
Gas Chromatographic Analysis for Phorate from Glass
Plates and Sorghum.

"
?R

^

*'

Persistence of Phorate Oxygen Analog Sulfoxide Equivalent

in Sorghum.

™

vii
(The reverse of this page is blank)

��SECTION I
INTRODUCTION

The research reported in this study constitutes part of a program to
elucidate toxicological and ecological hazards associated with repetitive
aerial applications and spills of organophosphorus insecticides. Toxicological hazards may exist in plant foliage even after environmental
persistence studies determine the absence or safe level of the parent
insecticide. These hazards result from the conversion of the parent
insecticide to toxic oxidized metabolites. The rate of this conversion
determines the nature and magnitude of the toxic residues in the plant
tissues.
The use of organophosphorus insecticides is increasing because of their
wide spectrum of effectiveness (comparable to the chlorinated hydrocarbons)
and their short residual action in water, soils, and plants. Any accident
involving ultra-low-volume formulations of insecticides could result in
a per-unit-area concentration that would be detrimental to agronomic plants
because of unacceptable residue levels. For this reason, data relating
the tolerance of agronomic plants to repetitive aerial applications of
ultra-low-volume formulations of organophosphorus insecticides are of
interest to military pest control programs.
Guidelines were desired for predicting toxicity and persistence of
metabolite residues in plants after application of high concentrations of
the insecticide. Insecticides in or under considerations for the Air Force
inventory include malathion (dithiophosphoric derivative), naled (phosphoric
acid derivative), fenthion (thiophosphoric acid derivative with sulfide
linkage), and Dursban^(thiophosphoric acid derivative).
Phorate, 0,0-diethyl S-[(ethylthio) methyl] phosphorodithioate, was the
insecticide selected because it is a model compound containing oxidation
sites analogous to those found in sulfur-containing organophosphorus
insecticides. Its toxicity, expressed as an oral 105^ value,
is more tnan 100 times as great as the most toxic insecticide presently
used by the militaryO). Thus, persistence data on toxic metabloties
of phorate should provide a model system of maximum toxic residues on
foliage wnich should be unapproachable for insecticides presently used
by the military wnen applied at the same concentration. Furthermore,
previous studies^' ^» "&gt; ^J have elucidated the plant metabolism
pathway (Figure 1) of the insecticide along with solvent-partitioning
functions of phorate and its metabolites(2, 4).
Conclusive research data are not available concerning insecticide
pnytotoxicity; however, it is known tnat plant species exhibit a wide
range of tolerance to applications of organophosphorus insecticides ^»'t.

1

�(CH3CH20)PSCH2SCH2CH3

S

0

(CH3CH20)2PSCH2SCH2CH3

0
^^
II
I
*r
(CH3CH20)2PSCH2SCH2CH3

N.
0 0
X
11
*
(CH3CH20)2PSCH2SCH2CH3

(CH3CH20)2PSCH2SCH2CH3

Figure 1.

Plant Metabolism Pathway of Phorate
(Based on Reference 5}

The basis for this phytotoxic resistance or susceptibility is not clear.
The experimental procedure used in this study allowed an investigation
into the role performed by individual plant chemistries in metabolizing
organophosphorus insecticides.
Studies of the morphological effects caused by highly concentrated
foliar applications of mevinphos and methyl demeton on selected plant
species indicated that, in general, brpadleaf plants were more susceptible
to the insecticides than were grasses^ 7 /. Severe morphological injuries
were observed on soybean, cotton, and tomato plants one day after foliar
treatment, w h i l e seven days were required before comparable injuries were
noted on corn and sorghum. Coleman and Dean^°' found that resistance of
sorghum to methyl parathion was genetically controlled in their studies
with a resistant and a susceptible variety, Wiley and Honey, respectively.
Thus, differential phytotoxicity to organophosphorus insecticides can be
expected between plant species as well as w i t h i n a given species. Differences do occur in the rates of metabolism of insecticides in different
plant species. A study^) of the plant metabolism of Di-Syston® (dithioSystoxdD) and phorate indicated that the rates of a reaction may vary
slightly from one plant species to another and according to the stage of
growth, but the data obtained may be used as a guide to the relative
proportions of the metabolites present at intervals after application. In

�another study w y the effects of temperature and plant species upon the
rates of metabolism of systemically applied Di-Syston®were considered,
and s i m i l a r results were obtained. Phorate differs from Di-Syston® due
to the presence of an ethylene rather than a methylene group in its side
chain. Thus, this study attempted to relate the metabolism of the insecticide to phytotoxic damage among plant species and within a plant species.
Oxidation can increase both the water solubility and the anticholinesterase activity of organophosphorus insecticides^"'. The logical
approach for monitoring anticholinesterase compounds (toxic phosphorus
esters) formed during the metabolism of phorate was a cholinesterasei n h i b i t i o n method. Phorate alone is too weak an inhibitor to be detected
in micro amounts, but when applied to plants, it is very rapidly converted
to potent anticholinesterase agents. The final unhydrolyzed metabolite
(phorate oxygen analog sulfone) in the oxidation series (Figure 1) is
the most active i n h i b i t o r ' ^ ' . The 150 value (molarity of i n h i b i t o r which
results in 50 percent of the activity of the control) of phorate is
approximately 250 times that of the phorate oxygen analog s u l f o n e ' ^ ) .
One day after the application of phorate to corn, the residue of phorate
sulfoxide, which has an 159 value approximately 1/100 that of phorate,
was more than three times that of phorate^.

�SECTION II
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
1. MATERIALS AND METHODS
a. Apparatus. A Son/all Omni-mixer^ was used for macerating plants.
A gas chromotograph equipped with a flame photometric phosphorus detector
and a digital integrator was employed in the phorate analyses. A
recording pH stat was used to determine cholinesterase activity.
b. Reagents and Solvents. Standards, supplied by the American
Cyanamid Company, were technical grade phorate (Thimet® ) of 90-percent
purity, analytical grade phorate of 97.8-percent purity, and 94-percent
phorate oxygen analog sulfoxide containing 6-percent phorated oxygen
analog sulfone.
Reagents were anhydrous sodium sulfate, certified A . C . S . ;
acetylcholine perchlorate (a "rare and fine" chemical from K and K
Laboratories, Inc.); sterile filtered horse serum (Colorado Serum Co.);
sodium chloride (crystals), analytical reagent grade; sodium chloride
(granular), U.S.P. grade; sodium hydroxide pellets, analytical reagent
grade; and potassium hydrogen phthalate, certified A.C.S. acidimetric
standard.
Solvents were certified A.C.S, acetone, certified A.C.S. hexanes,
and vegetable oil.
c. Plant Parameters. The representative broadleaf plant selected
was Lycopersicon esculenturn mill, var. Homestead 24 (tomato), and the
grasses were Sorghum vulgare Pers. var. Wiley (sorghum), and Sorghum
vulgare Pers. var. Honey (sorghum). The two varieties of sorghum were
selected to represent a variety (Wiley) that was resistant to an organophosphorus insecticide and one (Honey) that was susceptible. The plants
were grown in a clear glass greenhouse with a minimum night temperature
of 60° to 65°F and a maximum day temperature of 95° to 100°F. Seeds were
planted in a soil consisting of a 7:3:1 mixture of sandy loam, peatmoss,
and perlite with four pounds of dolomitic limestone and one pound of
superphosphate added per cubic yard of soil. The pH of the soil was 6.5.
Each tomato plant was transplanted to an individual four-inch plastic pot
at the age of four weeks. The sorghum experimental unit consisted of 10
plants per four-inch plastic pot. A 15-15-15 liquid fertilizer was applied
bi-weekly.
A 2 percent or 1 percent solution of phorate (0.2 milliliter or 0.1
milliliter of technical grade phorate dissolved in 10 mi Hi liters of
vegetable oil medium) was applied foliarly as 0.01 milliliter droplets
with microsyringe to the tomato and sorghum at the concentrations shown
in Table I. This procedure allowed a uniform and exact application to all

�TABLE I. PLANT PARAMETERS EMPLOYED WITH HIGH CONCENTRATIONS OF PHORATE

Species

Age, Weeks

Homestead Tomato

Date of
Application
8 August1969
19 November 1969

Phorate, Concentration,
pprrr

lb/Ab

19,839
16,630

2.19
1.84

Wiley Sorghum

4
3

2 March 1970
20 May 1970

8,753
(c)

1.26
(c)

Honey Sorghum

4
3

8 April 1970
20 May 1970

8,461
(d)

1.22
(d)

Concentration of phorate solution based on gas chromatographic analysis
with analytical grade phorate.
"Concentration applied to plant based on leaf area (pounds of active
ingredient per acre).
c
Same concentration applied as 2 March 1970, but no gas chromatographic
analysis.
"Same concentration applied as 8 April 1970, but no gas chromatographic
analysis.
the plants. The levels of phorate applied were adjusted to the maximum amount
that would result in minimal visible damage. To insure similarity in
plant size at each application, the phorate was applied after three to
six weeks of initial plant growth. The varying lengths of time between
planting and insecticide application were to compensate for seasonal
variation in plant growth. Table I shows the age of the plants with the
date of application of phorate. During the March (Wiley sorghum) and April
(Honey sorghum) portions of the experiment, the phorate in the vegetable
oil medium was applied to glass plates located adjacent to the treated
and control plants.
d. Extraction Technique. The plants to be sampled were severed at
soil level, sectioned, and rinsed in a 400-milliliter beaker containing
25 mi 11 iliters of hexanes and 25 mi Hi liters of acetone in distilled
water (60 percent by volume) to remove any residues remaining on the
plant surface. The solvent mixture, followed with the plant material,
was poured into a cup for the Sorvall Omni-mixer®. The beaker was rinsed
with 5 mi 11iliters of hexanes and then by 5 mi 11iliters of acetone in
distilled water (60 percent by volume). After the plant material was
thoroughly macerated, the macerate was filtered through three layers of
5

�cheesecloth into a separatory funnel. The cup which had contained the
macerate was rinsed with 10 milliliters of hexanes and then by 10 millilitars
of acetone in distilled water (60 percent by volume). The rinsings were
added to the separatory funnel followed by 15 milliliters of a saturated
sodium chloride solution which aided in separating the organic and aqueous
phases.
Acetone was removed from the aqueous layer by use of a rotary evaporator attached to a water aspirator. Complete removal of the acetone
was essential because of its ability to inhibit cholinesterase. The
aqueous layer was filtered (to remove minute pieces of plant material)
through Whatman No. 2 paper into a 50-mi Hi liter volumetric flask and
brought to volume with distilled water. The organic phase was placed over
10 grams of anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered into a 50-mi11iliter
volumetric flask, and brought to volume with hexanes. If the samples
could not be analyzed immediately, they were stored at 5°C.
The aqueous layer was analyzed for cholinesterase-inhibiting metabolites and breakdown products. Gas chromatographic analysis of the
organic phase for phorate allowed monitoring of the rapidity of breakdown and oxidation. The efficiency of the extraction technique, based
on the recovery of phorate in the organic phase, is shown in Table II.
TABLE II.

EFFICIENCY OF EXTRACTION TECHNIQUE FOR PHORATE WITH TOMATO
AND SORGHUM

Species

Date of
Experiment

Homestead Tomato

August
November

Wiley Sorghum

March

Honey Sorghum

Apri 1

Efficiency of Extraction, Percent
Controls3 Insecticide-Treated Plants^
3
3

66.2
87.7

32.4
63.2

63.3)
[ Qla ss
75.9) pla tesc

46.7

51 .7

^Concentration of phorate applied to plant placed through extraction scheme.
b
Phorate-treated plants from day 0 placed through extraction scheme.
c
Glass surface residues from day 0 placed through extraction scheme.
e. Cholinesterase-Inhibition Method. The advantages of using
cholinesterase-inhibition methods for determining organophosphorus residues
are that (a) the sensitivity is far greater than for chemical methods and
(b) the method is particularly suitable when the insecticide undergoes
6

�changes in the plant to produce metabolites with a high inhibitory
activity(10,11}_ One of the disadvantages is the lack of specificity
or inability to distinguish among different types of cholinesterase
inhibitors found within the plant.
The persistency of toxic metabolites and breakdown products in the
respective plant species was monitored using an automated pH stat method(12)
to determine cholinesterase activity. The cholinesterase inhibition for
each species and glass plate sample was measured immediately after the
application of the insecticide and on various succeeding days for one
month. Control plants were treated with only the corresponding amounts of
vegetable oil and were similarly measured. The experiment was repeated
for each species.
The cholinesterase activity of the prepared water sample was
recorded with a recording pH stat. A sample (0.2 milliliter tomato or
0.4 milliliter sorghum sample) was placed in a microbeaker containing
5 milliliters of a 0.154-molar saline solution (9.000 grams of analytical
reagent grade sodium chloride in 1000 mi Hi liters distilled water) and
0.5 milliliter horse serum. The microbeaker solution was heated to
37.5°C and adjusted to pH 8.0 prior to addition of 0.3 milliliter of the
cholinesterase enzyme substrate, 0.110-molar acetylcholine perch!orate
(0.675 grams crystalline substrate in 10 milliliters distilled water).
The titrant, 0.0100N sodium hydroxide.was standardized with 0.0100N
potassium acid phthalate (0.20423 grams acid in 1000 milliliters
distilled water).
Normal-activity curves (no samples added) and control-activity
curves (aqueous samples from control plants) were obtained prior to
measuring cholinesterase activity for the aqueous samples from phoratetreated plants. Cholinesterase inhibition of the phorate metabolites and
breakdown products was expressed as a percentage value obtained from a
ratio of cholinesterase activity (expressed in units of micromoles of
acetylcholine hydrolyzed per minute per milliliter of horse serum) of
the samples from the phorate-treated plants to samples from the control
plants. A second percentage of cholinesterase inhibition was calculated
using the normal activity value as the base.
f. Calibration Curve. To equate the percentage of cholinesterase
inhibition to the concentration of the metabolite extract, a log-linear
plot was made of the phorate oxygen analog sulfoxide equivalent, in
parts per million (ppm) of 0,0-diethyl S-[(ethylsulfinyl) methyl]
phosphorothiolate, versus the percentage of cholinesterase inhibition.
Figure 2 contains the calibration curve based on 0.4 milliliter samples of
the standard parts-per-million solutions of the phorate oxygen analog
sulfoxide. Sample sizes of 0.2 milliliter gave cholinesterase inhibition
percentages that were approximately half the values shown in Figure 2.

�109

a

76
5

4
uu
Ci
I—I
X
o
u.

2-

co
.9-

uu

1

!?•
.6.5.4-

.3.2-

JO-

20

Figure 2.

30

50

60

HORSE SERUM CHOIIMESTERASE INHIBITION (PERCENT)
Horse Serum Cholinesterase Inhibition Versus Concentration of
0,0»Diethyl S-[(Ethylsulfinyl)methyl] Phosphorothiolate

�g. Gas Chromatographic Analysis. Gas chromatography was used to
detect unaltered phorate in the organic phase from the plant extracts.
A gas chromatograph equipped with a flame photometric phosphorus detector
was employed. A six foot by one-fourth inch stainless steel column
containing Chromport X X X , 80/90 mesh, coated with 3 percent SE-30, and
conditioned for 24 hours at 220°C, was used for the phorate analysis of
the August tomato extracts. A retention time of 105 seconds was recorded
with the inlet temperature set at 250°C, the column-oven temperature at
200°C, and the detector temperature at 235°C. Gas flow rates in cubic
centimeters per minute were nitrogen 80, hydrogen 150, air 20, and oxygen
20.
A six foot by one-fourth inch glass column containing Chromosorb id ,
80/90 mesh, coated with 3 percent QV-1 and conditioned for 24 hours at
210°C was used for the phorate analysis of the November tomato extracts,
March Wiley sorghum extracts, April Honey sorghum extracts, and glass
plates. A retention time of 130 seconds was recorded with the inlet
temperature set at 245°C, the column-oven temperature at 190°C, and the
detector temperature at 185°C.
Injection sample sizes 1 for August tomato extracts were 5 microliters,
and all others were 2.7 microliters. Concentrations of phorate present
in the August analysis were determined by integration of peak area by a
digital integrator. Concentrations of all other analyses were determined
by peak height. All determinations were expressed in parts per million
based on standard curves.
2.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES.

Before any of the data were analyzed, all of the cholinesterase inhibition percentages were transformed using the arc sine formula:
8 = 2 arcsin P
where 6 is the new variable to be analyzed
and P is the percent of cholinesterase inhibition divided by 100.
Tnis transformation minimized and stabilized the variation of the
data and created the homogeneity of variance that was essential to the
use of the analysis of variance technique, and the other statistical
procedures used for the analysis of these experiments. The results were
stated in percentage notations for presentation throughout the report.
It was not possiole to analyze all of the cholinesterase inhibition
percentages on an experiment-wide basis because the measurements of the
three experimental species were taken on various and differing days

�during the month following application of the insecticide. To make comparisons that were valid and meaningful, it was necessary to select those
days on which all species under consideration were measured. Table III
shows the days of measurement for each species. During the first week
TABLE III. HEASUREMENT DAYS BY SPECIES AND EXPERIMENT

Days After
Application

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
25
26
27

Homestead Tomato
August November

X
X
X
X
X
X

Wiley Sorghum
March May

Honey Sorghum
April May

X
X
X

X
X
X

X

X

X

X

X
X

X

X

X
X

X
X

X

X

X
X

X
X

X

X

X
X

X
X

X
X

X

X
X

X
X

X

X

X
X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X
X
X
X

X

X

X
X

X

X

X

X

X
X

X
X
X
X

following application of the insecticide, only those measurements that
were made on the same day were compared; during the next three weeks,
measurements that were made on contiguous days were also included in the
comparison.

10

�Only one measurement of cholinesterase inhibition was made on each of
the days for the Homestead tomato experiments and for the March and April
Wiley and Honey sorghum experiments. It was not possible, therefore, to
test for significance of the interaction between seasonal effects and the
number of days following application. Since this interaction would have
been used to test the seasonal and time-passage effects individually, an
unduly large interaction would have masked significance of the main effects,
Paired t-tests with the same or contiguous days' results were used to
circumvent this possibility. When nonsignificance of the paired values
was determined, an analysis-of-variance technique was used to test for
significance of the passage of time upon the cholinesterase-inhibition
percentage. In those cases in which these results were significant,
Duncan's new multiple range test was used to identify where the differences
did, in fact, exist. In the absence of significance, means were computed,
and the effects of the passage of time upon the cholinesterase inhibition
were studied. Two replicates of measurements were made for the May Wiley
and Honey sorghum plants, and it was, therefore, possible to use the
analysis of variance technique when only these data were involved in
comparisons.
Initially, all testing was conducted at the 95-percent probability
level (significant). When this proved significant, subsequent testing
was conducted at the 99-percent probability level (highly significant).

11

�SECTION

III

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Ultra-low-volume formulations of insecticides used by the military
involve the aerial application of a low-volume concentrate (0.75 to 10
ounces per acre, undiluted). Phorate is applied with normal formulations
at rates of 0.5 to 3 pounds of active ingredient per acre. Table I
presents the application rates within this range. However, the defined,
directed application of phorate to the leaf surface without spraying
resulted in a maximum interface between insecticide droplet (10 microliters)
and leaf area. This large droplet size represented the application of
high concentrations of phorate; the droplet contained more phorate (0.25
milligram) and is larger than that ordinarily found following routine
application of insecticides. The optimum3 diameter for insecticide spray
droplets is in the range of 20 microns'' '.
The percentages representing the efficiency of the extraction technique
employed (Table II) are minimum values because of the volatility of
phorate. Phorate is lost from the soil by volatilization and about 25
percent of the loss occurs in the first hour after treatment^'^/. Similar
results would be expected on the leaf surface, therefore, the length of
time between treatment and initial extraction of the plant would result
in a value of phorate present that is slightly less than that which was
applied. The time before initial extraction was approximately the same
in all cases; however, the extraction of the August tomato after application of phorate during the late morning heat probably accounts to some
degree for the lower value in extraction efficiency. Phorate was applied
to the other plants in the early morning.
A comparison of the percentage of cholinesterase inhibition obtained
using the normal-activity value and the percentage obtained using the
control-activity value as a base is shown in Figures 3 and 4 for Homestead
tomatoes and for Wiley sorghum for each of the two applications of
insecticide. A comparison for Honey sorghum is shown in Figure 5 for
the May application; however, the April control plants were not usable due
to contamination. The results of paired t-tests in analyzing the differences between percentages for each species allowed the use of all the
cholinesterase-inhibition percentages based on the normal activity value.
Cholinesterase-inhibition values obtained showed no correlation with
plant weight.
A comparison of the percentages of cholinesterase inhibition during
the month following application of the insecticide for each of the three
plants, using the analysis of variance technique, indicated that the
average for the Homestead tomato was significantly lower than those for

12

�/D
fe
CJ

50 -

uj

ex.
O
t~~t
K
h~,

—
UJ
-J
&lt;

nr
.?
j
(

fc

to o

t~t GO

2:. uj
t ^ —c
&gt; ---*

rf
t,^

»/

'• .• " «

•

'

lc

b

UJ CO

'-=C CJ
fti K
UJ •&lt;
r™"- ••——

•

0
U

o^

UJ

-5

• CONTROL

25

§

O NORMAL
1
I
I

§
o
1
0

I

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

4

6

S

10

12

14

U

U

20

22

1

1

24

26

21

TIME FROM APPLICATION WS)

a.

_

Phorate Applied in August

75

iUj

|

— 50

C±-

8

r^

0

ft

S^ A«s
UJ
UJ S

oo t-i

S^
uu o

0

8

•

&gt;-~&lt; UJ

m

°

8

8

0

8

—

h- Oi

c/) -&lt;

UJ •—•

3:
o

j.

-25

• CONTROL

1
0.

I

I

I

I

1

1

1

2

4

6

6

10

12

14

U

O NORMAL
I
1
1
18

20

22

1

I

24

26

TIME FROM APPLICATION [VMS]
b. Phorate Applied _in November

Figure 3. Cholinesterase Inhibition of Homestead Tomato
13

2B

�/p

s-

§ •

A

UJ
CJ

c*

50

UJ

O UJ

»—1 —1

-

»

§

•

8

»

o

8

25

e

CO V)
^—

1 1 1

?5 t—&lt;
CO
UJ

5ur§
5t

CO CJ

tf &lt;c

UJ —

n
U

to
UJ
t—1
—1

• CONTROL

-5 —
O NORMAL

o
CJ

1

1

1

1

1

1

f

I

6

-25

i

1

1

1

1

«
/O
12 14 16 H 20
TIME FROM APPLICATION (PAKS)

22

24

26

28

1
26

21

a. Phorate Applied in March

/5

* 8i
|

0-

O UJ
t—t —J

\~ •&lt;

50

8
•
8

* ' o •

881$
8

» 8

UJ

o
e*
UJ

25

t-i CJ
CO CO

b-&lt; 1—t
UJ
W "&lt;t
UJ •—

1-

UJ
t—&lt;

—1

o

5 —

'.r

• CONTROL

-5(

3:
o

O NORMAL

i

^c

0

i

2

4

i
6

1
B

1
10

1
12

1
14

1
16

1
U

1
20

1
22

1
24

TIME FROM APPLICATION

b. Phorate Applied in May
Figure 4. Cholinesterase Inhibition of Wiley Sorghum
14

�72

!s
UJ

75

^*

o

CM
UJ
(X
"~"

50

—

25

i ii
o

S 8 *
•
^k

^k

^

^fc.

- 8

O
t—1 —

PQ •&lt;

8

8

•t
^2

"»
8
^h

t—t CJ
(-1 UJ

UJ *-&lt;
C/) C/)

5

-

So
UJ CM

UJ
t—t
—4
O
-C

o

0

_

1

* CONTROL
O WORMAL

I

1

1

i

I

t

I

i

I

i

t

i

I

g

10

12

J4

76

JS

20

22

24

26

28

TIME FROM APPLICATIOW (PA^S)

Figure 5. Cholinesterase Inhibition of Honey Sorghum (Phorate Applied in May)

15

�the two varieties of sorghum. Figure 6 shows the inhibition percentage
values for each of the three plants; the lower level for the tomato
plants is evident. Therefore, for statistical purposes, data from the
tomato plant experiments were analyzed independent of the sorghum data.
Gas chromatographic analysis of the hexanes phase after extraction from
tomato and sorghum indicated less than one ppm phorate present by the sixth
day (Table IV). A determination of residues of-phorate and five of its netab-

TABLE IV. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS FOR PHORATE FROM TOMATO AND SORGHUM

Day

Tomato
August November

Concentration of Phorate, ppm
Sorq lum
March (Wiley) April (Honey)

0

128

42

16

18

1

140

34

9-12

9

28

6-7

5-6

9

&lt;3

1

2
3

23

4

&lt;1

5

4

6

1

&lt;1

elites from various parts of corn plants (treated with one pound of the.insecticide per acre) indicated that phorate was essentially gone in 14 days(4).
During this determination, phorate was recovered from fortified samples with
96 percent efficiency using a Soxhlet apparatus in an eight-hour extraction
technique. The higher values of phorate in the August tomato samples, as
compared to the November samples, were due to the concentration of the sample
to 10 milliliters instead of the 50-milliliter final volume of all other
samples. Small differences in the data are probably due to the slight variations in extraction efficiencies for each plant. The disappearance of phorate
proceeds at approximately the same rate in each plant variety.

16

�75

A

D

A

A

9

50

—

O
9

•

o

A

D

nc
'--'

O

g

«-&lt; o
_ =5 °°

0

•

*

A
|

&gt; •

UjS
C/) CO
UJ CM

^

A

H

*

•

o

00 —

D

A

UJ
(X

*vl S UJ

Q

A

UJ

PuJ
t—&lt; —J
CO •&lt;

n

A

1
P

*

(*

^9

r

5

0

o

o

—1
o

o

0 -

HOMESTEAD TOMATO

,
0

1
2

i

1
4

i

|
6

i

1
8

O.VO I/EMBER

WILE/ SORGHUM

I3

•AUGUST
* MARCH

^ MA/

HO/JE/ SORGHUM
i
1 i
1
i
10
12

• APRIL
1
i
1
14
16

D MA/
t
1
20

i

1
IS

i

TIME FROM APPLICATIO/V (3A/S)

Figure 6. Comparison of Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition
for Three Varieties of Plants

1
22

i

|
24

I
2&lt;

�The results of a cholinesterase-inhibition analysis for the Homestead
tomato plants for all of the days measured for the August and November
applications of insecticide are shown in Figure 7. An analysis of
comparable daily measurements in August and November indicated no significant differences between the two application dates or by the number of
days after application. The average percentages of cholinesterase inhibition for the days used in the comparison are given in Table V and Figure 8
and are not significantly different at the 95 percent probability level.
TABLE V.

AVERAGE PERCENT CHOLINESTERASE INHIBITION, HOMESTEAD TOMATO

Days After Application

Cholinesterase Inhibition, Percent

21,22

27.1

6

24.4

12,13

23.9

4

21.4

9,10

15.9

1

12.4

0

11.3

Figures 9 and 10 show the percentages of cholinesterase inhibition
for Wiley and Honey sorghum, respectively. Analyses of the possible
daily comparisons for each variety indicated significant differences
between the March and May data for the Wiley sorghum and highly significant differences between the April and May data for the Honey sorghum.
Similar analyses of those cholinesterase-inhibition percentages which
were obtained on the same or contiguous days for Wiley sorghum in March
and Honey sorghum in April indicated no significant differences between
the two varieties for those two months (Figure 11). An analysis of the
differences in cholinesterase-inhibition percentages with respect to the
number of days after application of phorate to sorghum during March and
April indicated highly significant differences. Table VI shows average
daily percentages. In Figure 12, the average values with associated
letters are shown graphically. The cholinesterase-inhibition percentage
peak was reached by the ninth day following application of phorate, and an

18

�14J

C_&gt;

{*
U-i

o

« I4J

CO O
*-» CO

U3 2 UU

UJ •&lt;
CO

UJ

o
o

AUGUST APPLICATIOM
WOI/&amp;MBER APPLICATION

70

72

74

16

18

TIME FROM APPLICATION (VAVS)
Figure 7. Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition, Homestead Tomato

O

�75

UJ
UJ
PL.

\~ UJ
CO
t—
t\3

25

UJ

O

)—&lt;
UJ CO
•&lt;C C_&gt;

UJ •&lt;

UJ

a:
«—&lt;
—i
o

»

-5
10

n

TIME FROM APPLICATION

Figure 8.

H

14

(VMS)

20

Effects of Passage of Time Upon Percent Cholinesterase
Inhibition, Homestead Tomato

24

26

�uj
UJ

h- UJ

t~&gt; —J

CQ •
&lt;
t~&lt; O
UJ

V)

uj
»oo

O

UJ

MARCH APPLICATION •
APPLICATIOW

JO
72
H
16
TIME FROM APPLICATION (VAVS]
Figure 9, Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition, Wiley Sorqhum

O

�fe
UJ

o
Be:
UJ
R-

CQ

™ UJ2

APRIL APPLICATIOW
MAV APPLICATION

Figure 10.

O

TIME FROM APPLICATION {DAYS}
Percent Cholinesterase I n h i b i t i o n , Honey Sorghum

�95

WILEV SORGHUM
MARCH APPLICATION
HOWE/ SORGHUM
APRIL APPLICATION O

-25
10

72

14

U

TIME FROM APPLICATION (PA/S)
Figure 11. Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition, Wiley and Honey Sorghum

�Cxi
UJ
R-

1- UJ

1-1 •—I
CO •&lt;
l-« CJ

K CJ
UJ C*
V- &lt;

TIME FROM APPLICATION
Figure 12. Effects of Passage of Time Upon Percent Cholinesterase
Inhibition, Wiley Sorghum (March) and Honey Sorghum (April)

�average peak level of 63.9 percent Inhibition was maintained until the
eighteenth to twenty-first day, when it began decreasing. By the twentythird to twenty-fifth day it had decreased to 31.5 percent.
TABLE VI.

Days
After
Application

AVERAGE PERCENT CHOLINESTERASE INHIBITION, WILEY SORGHUM
(MARCH) AND HONEY SORGHUM (APRIL)

Cholinesterase
Inhibition ,
Percent

Remarks (Common letter
indicates no significant
difference at 99-percent
Probability Level)

11

67.9

a

16,18

62.5

ab

9

61.1

ab

14

51.0

be

4

49.1

be

7

49.0

be

21,20

42.1

c

25,23

31.5

d

2

18.5

e

0

10.2

e

1

9.8

e

Figure 13 shows the percentages of cholinesterase inhibition for
Wiley and Honey sorghum on various days during May. The analysis
indicated highly significant differences only with respect to the
number of days after application; neither the species of sorghum nor
the species/day interaction yielded results which indicated any significant effect. The average percentages for the various days after application are shown in Table VII. All averages that are not significantly
different at the 99 percent probability level have a common letter.
In Figure 14, the average values with associated letters are shown
graphically. May Wiley and Honey sorghum plants reached a peak percentage

25

�o
H- Uj
CQ &lt;

5: &lt;s&gt;

2:
t-t UU
li? Lu a:
Ol
l-t

UU

o

WILE/ SORGHUM
O WNEV SORGHUM

n

u

TIME FROM APPLICATION

Figure 13. Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition, Wiley and Honey
Sorghum (May)

�UJ
(X

o
l— ul
t-i ~j
B3 •
&lt;
»—* O

r\&gt;

i60
&gt;-' ty
uj Si
UU Oi

h- •&lt;
o
o

-5

1 I

I

1

I

1 1

1 1

1

1 1

n

1

1

1

1

n

1

1

1 i

20

1

1

1

1
24

TIME FROM APPLICATION (PAW)

Figure 14. Effects of Passage of Time Upon Percent Cholinesterase
Inhibition, Wiley and Honey Sorghum (May)

1

1
26

1

�of cholinesterase inhibition by the fourth day and maintained an average
peak level of 64.5 percent for the remainder of the month.
TABLE VII. AVERAGE PERCENT CHOLINESTERASE INHIBITION, WILEY AND HONEY
SORGHUM (MAY)

Days
After
Application

Cholinesterase
Inhibition,
Percent

Remarks (Common letter
indicates no significant
difference at 99-percent
Probability Level )

14

68.8

a

12

68.7

a

8

65.2

a

7

65.1

a

19

64.5

a

4

64.0

a

5

63.1

a

16

60.6

a

21

60.4

a

2

28.9

b

0

-1.5

c

With no significant differences existing between the two varieties of
sorghum in May or during continuous experiments in March and April, it
appeared that the metabolism of high concentrations of phorate proceeded
at the same rate in each variety; however, distinct visible differences
occurred between the two plant varieties.
Despite slight initial visible damage, both sorghum and tomato
recovered from insecticide damage within 30 days of treatment. The
preliminary data did show, however, that neither variety of sorghum
recovered from insecticide damage when exposed to the same concentration
of phorate as was used on the tomato plants. This is indicative of the
28

�effects of a high concentration of phorate due to the large droplet size,
since any visible damage at the rates used in this experiment would not
be expected. With the tomato, minor c u r l i n g of the leaves was observed
and many plants had a loss of apical dominance indicating that possibly,
at the concentrations of phorate used, there was a change in the auxin
content or hormonal distribution w i t h i n the plant. The first injury
symptoms for both sorghum varieties were characterized by a localized
bleaching of the blade pigments ( i . e . , chlorophyll) to a yellow-green
coloration with a s l i g h t l y flaccid condition. These necrotic blotches
were more distinct with Honey sorghum as they acquired a red-brown
coloration. This characteristic color difference was apparent in the
aqueous samples, as Honey samples were much darker than those of Wiley.
The flaccid condition was more evident with Honey sorghum. The more
v i s i b l e damage to sorghum compared to tomato in preliminary experiments,
with both exposed to the same concentration of phorate, may appear to
contradict the research reported in Reference 7. However, that report
notes that (a) conclusions regarding the possible effects of organophosphorus insecticides, except mevinphos and methyl demeton, could not be
made since the experiment was a fixed-effects model and not a random
selection of possible organophosphorus insecticides; and (b) differences
in plant response (susceptibility or resistance) could be accounted for
by a postulation that differences may be related to leaf area interception
of the insecticide.
The reason for existing differences between March/April and May
sorghum can only be postulated. Peak percentages of cholinesterase i n h i bition by the fourth day (64.5 percent) in May versus the n i n t h day
(63.9 percent) in March/April indicate a more rapid oxidation of phorate
to anticholinesterase metabolites. A s i g n i f i c a n t factor may be the
relatively higher mean temperatures in May. In an evaluation of the
effects of environmental temperature on Di-Syston©systemically applied
to cotton leaves, the oxidation of the s u l f i d e , Di-Syston®, to the
sulfoxide occurred so rapidly at temperatures above 70°F that only traces
could be detected, even at intervals as short as one hour after treatment'**)
The major^component in the leaves during the one-week experiment was the
Di-Syston®sulfoxide. The rate of disappearance of sulfoxide was increased
approximately 1.86 times for each 10°C rise in temperature (energy of
activation of 10 kcal/mole). The i n i t i a l oxidation of phorate in cotton
leaves was less rapid than the oxidation of Di-Syston®with traces of
phorate found up to three days, although these never.exceeded 5 percent
of the total radioactivity in the labeled experiment'^). It was also
noted^ that the rate of oxidation of the sulfoxides in the oxidation
series (Figure 1) was measurably slower for phorate than for Di-Syston®
The sum of the rate constants for the disappearance of phorate sulfoxide
due to oxidation is h a l f that of Di-Syston®sulfoxide. This indicates
that phorate sulfoxide was probably the major metabolite during the first
two weeks of this investigation. Also, when a l f a l f a seed was treated with
29

�treated with phorate or Di-Systorr% the effectiveness for aphid control
varied by as much as several weeks depending on the rate of plant grow
The rate of metabolism is slower in cooler weather, and the slower the
plant growth, the longer the persistence of toxic residues.
Tomato behaved similarly to the May sorghum. Tomato maintained a mean
percentage value of 19.5 throughout the experiment; sorghum maintained
a constant mean value throughout the month after, the third day.
Thus, the results indicated that the metabolism of high concentrations
of phorate proceeded at approximately the same rate in each species and
between plant varieties. These results were not in complete harmony with
those from earlier experiments. In previous metabolism studies of phorate
and Di-Syston®on various plants such as cotton, alfalfa, lemon, and bean,
it was found that the rates of reaction may be expected to vary slightly
among pjant species and according to the stage of growth^). Later,,
studies\°' specifically oriented toward the metabolism of Di-Syston^in a *
variety of plant species, indicated that at 70°F, the metabolism of Di-Syston
sulfoxide and hydrolytic decomposition of the toxic products occurred two
to three times faster in tomato leaves than in cotton leaves.
Differences in results and insecticide application parameters indicated
the experimental data resulted from the chemical nature of phorate on
the plant surface without the influence of biological substrates. Application methods^ 5 &gt; included topical application of 5 to 25 microliters of
insecticide to the base of a young plant or placement of isolated leaves
in a water dispersion (0.1 percent solution) of the insecticide to permit
the study of the rates of metabolism uncomplicated by the continual
accumulation of translocated material. The method of application used in
this work was foliar with a definite quantity of phorate aoplied as larae
droplets to each intact plant.
An earlier study' '^/ with Systox^(similar to phorate in structure)
showed that the chemical nature of the surface washes from fruit treated
with thiono- and thiolo-isomers changed rapidly upon exposure to light
and air. Exposure of the isomers to light and air under controlled conditions on glass plates, uncomplicated by biological substrates, resulted
in a surprisingly rapid conversion of the Systox®isomers into compounds
which appeared to be chromatographically similar to those found within
the plant tissues. Another study'''' showed that the action of air and
sunlight on surface residues of Systox®isomers has a rapid effect and
appears to promote their oxidation in the same sequence as found in vitro
with hydrogen peroxide and in plant tissues. Thin films of phorate
exposed to ultraviolet light or sunlight and air gave similar
results^» ^8, 19, 20) ^ Exposure to sunlight on paper, glass, and leaf
surfaces indicated that the initial stable residues of phorate may not be
the original compound or its simple oxidation products; prolonged exposure
resulted in the formation of more polar compounds^' 0 '. Results of ultra-

30

�violet irradiation of phorate on the surface of a liquid suggested that
the oxidation products are the sulfoxide and sulfone of the parent
compound, with the sulfone showing greater persistency and the s p]foxide
being in greater quantity during the early stages of irradiation''^» ^0).
To substantiate the concept that the experimental results in these
investigations were without the influence of biological substrates within
the plants, the same concentrations of phorate were applied to glass
plates as were applied to the treated plants. The glass plates were
located on the greenhouse bench adjacent to the control and treated plants.
This was done with Wiley and Honey sorghum, in March and April, respectively,
Table VIII shows a comparison of the gas chromatographic data for the
plants and glass plates. Within 48 hours, phorate could no longer be
detected on the glass plates; the same rapid disappearance was noted with
the plants—approximately one ppm detected after 96 hours.

TABLE VIII. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS FOR PHORATE FROM GLASS PLATES
AND SORGHUM

Day

Phorate Concentration, ppm
March
Aoril
Wiley Sorghum
Glass Plates
Honey Sorghum Glass Plates

0

16

22

18

26

1

9-12

5-6

9

5

2

6-7

5-6

4

&lt;3

1
&lt;1

6

The cholinesterase-inhibition percentages obtained from the glass
plates for the March and April experiments (Figure 15) were compared with
the values obtained for the treated plants (Figure 11). The plots are
very similar, with the glass plate cholinesterase-inhibition values being
significantly higher on all days considered. However, most noteworthy
is that the data through the twentieth day following application exhibited
logarithmically linear trends (99 percent probability level) with no
quadratic tendencies for both the sorghum and glass plates in March and
April. The best-fitting straight lines have been plotted (Figures 16 and
17), and the equations for each of the lines are:
31

�99. Sr

hUJ
O

R3 •&lt;

UJ

(A)

ro

CO
UJ

CJ

I

UJ

o
CJ

25

O

*
Figure 15.

n

APRIL APPLICATION

u

TIME FROM APPLICATION (PAKS)
Percent Cholinesterase Inhibition. Glass Plates

�99.5

UJ
CJ

c*:

o •—
l~&gt; UJ
co

to
t"-t

3=

&lt;Z

50

*—»
UJ

CJ

SORGHUM, MARCH APPLICATION
O GLASS PLATES, MARCH APPLICATION

2

7
TIME FROM APPLICATION (PAVS)
(LOGARITHMIC SCALE)

Figure 16. Comparison of Percentage Cholinesterase Inhibition for
Glass Plates and Wiley Sorghum

I
24

29

�99.5

UJ
UJ
UJ
_J

t—1

I—

•&lt;
uj

II
UJ

kV)
UJ

o

• HONEV SORGHUM, APRIL APPLICATION
OGLASS PLATES, APRIL APPLICATION

I

I

I

I

4
7
3
TIME FROM APPLICATION (VMS)

(LOGARITHMIC SCALE)

Figure 17. Comparison of Percentage Cholinesterase Inhibition
for Glass Plates and Honey Sorghum

79

24

29

�Wiley sorghum, March

Y = 0.597 + 0.484 log (X + 1)

Glass plate, March

Y = 0.922 + 0.626 log (X + 1)

Honey sorghum, April

Y = 0.489 + 0.480 log (X + 1)

Glass plate, April

Y = 0.917 + 0.621 log (X + 1)

where Y is the arc sine transformation of the percent cholinesterase
inhibition
and X is the number of days after the application of phorate in vegetable
oil.
An analysis of comparison of the linear plots gave significant results.
The percentage of cholinesterase inhibition increased at the same rate
for both varieties of sorghum. The percentages of cholinesterase inhibition for Wiley and Honey sorghum increased at the same rate as did
those for the glass plates. The percent of variation explained by the
linear trend is as follows:

Wiley Sorghum

78.6

Glass Plate, March

89.3

Honey Sorghum

88.2

Glass Plate, April

92.4

The rate of formation of cholinesterase-inhibiting compounds appeared
the same between the glass plates and sorghum plants. It appeared that,
at least at high concentrations of phorate, formation of anticholinesterase
oxidized metabolites was predominantly through a chemical oxidation on the
leaf surface, and not plant enzyme catalysis. This took place at least
at such a rate as to mask enzyme catalysis. With low concentrations of
phorate within sorghum blades, methods similar to those described in
References 5 and 8 could distinguish any difference in the rates of
metabolism between the two varieties of sorghum.
The higher cholinesterase inhibition values for the glass plates,
(Figure 15) in comparison with the sorghum (Figure 11), can be attributed
to the higher extraction efficiency with the glass plates. However, the
phorate plant residue analysis by gas chromatography indicated the presence
of phorate 48 hours after it could no longer be detected in samples from

35

�the glass plates. Although the cholinesterase-inhibition analysis Indicates
the same rapid oxidation of phorate on leaf and glass plate, phorate could
be present witnin certain portions of the leaf, e.g., within stomatal pores,
and hence, within a potentially low-oxygen environment. This could explain
the gas chromatographic data. An examination of roots resulted in no
detectable cholinesterase inhibitors. Metabolism studies with lemon leaves
showed the presence of large amounts of intact Di-Syston® accompanied by
very slow conversion to other oxidative products(8). This suggested that
the oil-soluble esters were being protected from aqueous hydrolysis by the
oil content of the leaves. This was confirmed bv a radioautograph which
showed nearly all of the radioactivity from P^2 Di-Syston® translocated
into a lemon leaf is confined to the oil glands. A similar radioautograph
of Systox®-thiol-isomer translocated into lemon leaves showed that, most of
the radioactivity was located in the aqueous tissues of the plants^''.
These differences were correlated with the relative water solubilities of
the compounds, i.e., Di-Syston® 66 ppm and Systox®thipl-isonner 3900 ppm.
The water solubility of phorate was recorded as 85
With the rate of formation of cholinesterase inhibitors the same en
glass plates and sorghum leaf surfaces, the lower cholinesterase-inhibition
percentage values for tomato (Figure 6) are difficult to explain. The
values are lower than expected with tomato having received a concentration
of phorate double that received by sorghum. Since the gas chromatographic
data for tomato and sorghum agree, the distinct differences in cholinesteraseinhibition percentage values could have resulted from poorer efficiency in
recovering oxidized metabolites from tomato compared to sorghum. The
similarities in graphic plots for May sorghum (Figure 14) and tomato (Figure
8) would support this rationale.
Evaluation of the cholinesterase-inhibition percentage values with
the calibration curve resulted in values relating the concentration of
toxic residues present in and on the plant foliage. Fourteen days after
application of phorate to Honey sorghum in April, sample preparation of a
foliar rinse of the surface of the plant accounted for approximately 50
percent of the total cholinesterase inhibition of the plant. A lack of
detection of phorate within seven days indicated that residues of the
oxidized metabolites in sorghum occurred to a very large degree via
oxidation of phorate on the leaf surface, absorption within the leaf, and
possible translocation within the plant. This is not in agreement with
the previous studies presented in References 5 and 9. Other researchers have
postulated(S) that the relative rates of absorption and translocation of
phorate and Di-Syston® increased as the experiment proceeded because of the
formation of more water-soluble oxidative metabolites in the subcuticular
layers of olant tissue around the region of application. In Reference 9,
the postulation is that the parent compounds were fairly persistent on the
surface of the leaves but were metabolized rapidly once they had penetrated.

�These variations can be explained by the differences in application method
and in insecticide concentration: i.e., a 5 microliter topical application
to the base of the stem of a cotton plant versus a 0.2 milliliter application of a 2 percent solution of phorate in vegetable oil to the blades of
sorghum.
It must be remembered that as the toxic metabolites are forming, they
are concurrently being hydrolyzed to nontoxic phosphoric or thiophosphoric
acids. Though the oxygen-analogs of phorate can inhibit cholinesterase
activity more than their thionpohosphate precursors, they appear to have
a higher degree of instability'^' ^'• The phosphorus is considerably more
electrophilic in the P=0 compounds, thus weakening the P-S ester bond and
facilitating hydrolysis and accelerating phosphorylation of the enzyme'^).
Consequently, the presence of relatively large amounts of a highly oxidized
metabolite in a plant would result in higher cholinesterase inhibition and
higher apparent residue values than would an equivalent amount of a metabolite with less cholinesterase activity in another plant. The higher
cholinesterase-inhibition values mean the presence of metabolites which
are easily hydrolyzed, resulting in an overall faster rate of metabolic
detoxification.
The concentrations of phorate metabolites in tomato and sorghum were
expressed in parts per million (ppn.) as phorate oxygen analog sulfoxide
equivalent via a cholinesterase-inhibition method of analysis. The calibration curve for the residue method is given in Figure 2. It is independent of plant material analyzed and of the sample preparation technique.
It reflects none of the losses that may occur in the various steps of
sample preparation. A sample calculation follows the formula:
.v = parts per million of phorate oxygen analog sulfoxide equivalent
in sample analyzed.
Where w is the phorate oxygen analog sulfoxide equivalent obtained in the
analyses, micrograms.
v is the aqueous extract in the determination, mi Hi liters.
V is the total solvent in sample extraction, milliliters.
W is the sample extracted, grams (fresh weight).
The toxic residues present in tomato foliage were based .on the average
weight of tomato plants initially after application of phorate (six weeks)
and at the conclusion of the experiment (nine weeks), 6 grams and 28 grams,
respectively. Thus, residues in the tomato foliage ranged from 1.1 to 5.3
ppm phorate oxygen analog sulfoxide equivalent.

37

�Residue persistence in sorghum (Table X) was higher. The May sorghum
had concentrations with a range of 0 to 20.2 ppm. The average residue value
after the second day was 17.9 ppm. The March/April sorghum had concentrations with a range of 2.4 to 18.5 ppm. The fourfold increase in residues
by the ninth day is comparable to that found by Bowman and Casida'^' in
considering the persistence of phorate-P 2 and its metabolites in vegetable
crops. The total anticholinesterase activity of greenhouse pea plants,
sprayed with phorate at one pound per acre, increased for about the firslv
four days and then declined, but inhibitors persisted for 20 to 30
^ '
Foliage application of 0,0-diethyl S-[(isopropylthio) methyl] phosphorodithioate to pea plants resulted in the appearance of anticholinesterase
metabolites within one day and persistence of such metabolites in high
concentration for at least nine days with detectable amounts present for
21 days^'. The results of this investigation were comparable: the main
difference was higher residue levels.
In crops treated with phorate., the ultimate toxic residues are present
in a fractional part per million'". When applied to corn at a rate of one
pound per acre, phorate was essentially gone in 14 days, while very low
levels of its sulfoxide and sulfone (0.1 ppm or less) persisted through the
28-day experimental interval. At harvest time, the plant was essentially
4
free of insecticide, less than 0.01
'
The concentration of phorate metabolite residues present, though high,
would probably be at a safe level by harvest time. The ultimate toxic
metabolites present in harvest time residues are dependent upon both the
interval between application and harvest and the method of application.
Older plants having phorate applied at high rates would definitely have to
be monitored for toxic residues.
The lower residue values for tomato foliage are due in part to a
larger daily plant weight—approximately threefold that of sorghum. The
result could be a more rapid metabolism and hydrolysis and provides another
possibility for the cholinesterase-inhibition percentage values being lower
for tomato than for sorghum.
Generally, oxidation. in plants never increases the toxicity of an
application significantly^"'. However, the large residue values obtained
in this study indicate that the toxicity is increased considerably on the
surface of the plant when high concentrations are involved. A number of
researchers, in speculating upon potential residue problems after various
methods of treatment with systemic insecticides, have concluded that persistence curves should be 8
established on different crops grow under different
environmental conditions' '. Military application of insecticides at normal
rates results in residues which can be monitored with guidance from available
literature. Residue breakdown of these organophosphorus insecticides is
usually rapid with no persistency problems. However, the result of repetitive

38

�aerial application or spillage of insecticides in cropland areas may
result in concentrations higher than usual. This study indicates exposure
studies of the respective insecticides on glass plates alone under different
environmental conditions would serve as a guide in predicting residues from
high concentrations of insecticides.
TABLE IX.

PERSISTENCE OF PHORATE OXYGEN ANALOG SULFOXIDE EQUIVALENT IN
SORGHUM

Time From Application,
Day

0
1
2
4
5
7
8
9
11
12
14
16
18
19
20
21
23
25
a

Concentration, ppm
March /April 3
2.4-5.3
2.4-5.3
2.4-5.3
10.3-14.5
10.3-14.5

Mayu

0
8.3
17.1
19.7
18.7
18.5

12.6-18.5
16.0-18.5
10.3-14.5
12.6-18.5
12.6-18.5

16.6
20.2
18.0
15.3

10.3-11.9
10.3-11.9
6.9-7.9
6.9-7.9

17.0

Concentration range is the result of considering the standard deviation
for the average plant weight for the entire experimental period in May;
this is due to the lack of plant weight values for March/April. Results
are averages of two samples, three replications each.

3

Results are averages of four samples, three replications each.

39

�SECTION IV
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

Data on the metabolism of foliar applications of high concentrations
of the organophosphorus insecticide phorate on Homestead tomato and Wiley
and Honey sorghum are reported. The investigation of phorate metabolism,
monitored by gas chromatographic and enzymatic analysis, produced the
following results:
1. The cholinesterase activity values obtained showed no correlation
with plant weight.
2. The disappearance of phorate appeared to proceed at the same rate
in each plant species and variety; phorate disappeared more quickly from
glass plates than from March/April sorghum under the same experimental
parameters.
3. No significant differences were apparent between the two varieties
of sorghum in May or during continuous experiments in March and April.
It appeared that the formation of anticholinesterase metabolites, after
high foliar applications of phorate, proceeded at the same rate in each
variety although distinct visible differences occurred between the Wiley
and Honey sorghum.
4. The peak percentages of cholinesterase inhibition from sorghum
samples by the fourth day in May versus the ninth day in March/April
indicated more rapid oxidation of phorate to anticholinesterase metabolites
at higher temperatures.
5. The phorate metabolism in tomato was similar to metabolism in the
May sorghum; however, actual comparison of percentage values of cholinesterase inhibition during the month for each of the three plants indicated
that the average for the Homestead tomato was significantly lower than
those for the two varieties of sorghum.
6. The percentage values of cholinesterase inhibition for the Wiley
and Honey sorghum increased at the same rate as for the glass plates,
indicating that the rate of formation of anticholinesterase-oxidized
metabolites was predominantly through chemical oxidation on the leaf
surface and not by plant enzyme catalysis; this surface oxidation took
place at least at such a rate as to mask enzyme catalysis.
7. The larger droplet size in application technique resulted in
higher toxic-residue values for phorate metabolites, especially on the
surface of the plant, than would normally be expected.

40

�This study was initiated to find a basis for predicting toxicity and
persistence of metabolite residues in plants after application of high
concentrations of sulfur-containing oraanophosphorus insecticides during
military spray operations. The results indicate that exposure studies of
high concentrations of insecticides on glass plates alone, under different
environmental conditions, would serve as a guide in predicting residues
from repetitive aerial application or spillage of insecticides used by
the military in cropland areas. Such studies with a controlled environment
would yield toxic-residue-persistence data under various conditions for
high concentrations of insecticides.

41
(The reverse of this page is blank)

��REFERENCES

1.

Thomson, W.T. Agricultural Chemicals, Book I. Insecticides,
Acaricides, and Ovicides. Thomson Publications, Davis,
California, 1967.

2.

Bowman, J.S. and J.E. Casida. Metabolism of the Systemic
Insecticide 0,0-Diethyl S-Ethylthiomethyl Phosphorodithioate
(Thimet) in Plants. J. Agr. Food Chem. 5: 192-197, 1957.

3.

Bowman, J.S. and J.E. Casida. Further Studies on the Metabolism
of Thimet by Plants, Insects, and Hammals. J. Econ. Entomol.
51:838-843, 1958.

4.

Bowman, M.C., M. Beroza, and J.A. Harding. Determination of Phorate
and Five of Its Metabolites in Corn. J. Agr. Food Chem.
17:138-142, 1969.

5.

Metcalf, R.I., T.R. Fukuto, and R.B. March. Plant Metabolism of
Dithio-Systox and Thimet. J. Econ. Entomol. 50:338-345, 1957.

6.

Coleman, O.H. and J.L. Dean. Inheritance of Resistance to Methyl
Parathion in Sorgo. Crop Sci. 4:371-372, 1964.

7.

Wolverton, B.C., W.J. Wallace, A.L. Young, and D.D. Harrison.
Studies on the Systemic Uptake of Toxic Phosphorus Esters by Plants.
Morphological Effects of Foliar Applications of the Organophosphate
Insecticides Mevinphos and Methyl Demeton on Selected Plant Species.
Air Force Armament Laboratory Technical Report AFATL-TR-69-116,
Eg!in Air Force Base, Florida, September, 1969.

8.

Metcalf, R.L., H.T. Reynolds, M. Winton, and T.R. Fukuto.
Effects of Temperature and Plant Species upon the Rates of Metabolism
of Systemically Applied Di-Syston. J. Econ. Entomol. 52:435-439,
1959.

9.

Heath, D.F. Metabolism in Plants and Soils. Jm Organophosphorus
Poisons, Anticholinesterases and Related Compounds edited by
D.F. Heath. Pergamon Press, Mew York, 1961.

10. Archer, T.E. Enzymatic Methods. Jm Analytical Methods for
Pesticides, Plant Growth Regulators, and Food Additives, Volume I
edited by G. Zweig. Academic Press, New York, 1963.
11. Sutherland, G.L., P.A. Giang, and T.E. Archer. Thimet. I_n
Analytical Methods for Pesticides, Plant Growth Regulators, and
Food Additives , Volume II edited by G. Zweig. Academic Press,
New York, 1964.
43

�12. Nabb, D.P. and Florence Whitfield. Determination of Cholinesterase
by an Automated pH Stat Method. Arch. Environ. Health. 15:147-154,
1967.
13. Himel, C.M. The Optimum Size for Insecticide Spray Droplets.
J. Econ. Entomol. 62:919-925, 1969.
14. Young, A.L. and B.C. Wolverton. Military Herbicides and Insecticides. Air Force Armament Laboratory Technical Note
AFATL-TN-70-1, Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, January, 1970.
15. Reynolds, H.T., T.R. Fukuto, R.L. Metcalf, and R.B. March.
Seed Treatment of Field Crops with Systemic Insecticides.
J. Econ. Entomol. 50:527-539, 1957.
16. Metcalf, R.L., R.B. March, T.R. Fukuto, and M.G. Maxon. The
Nature and Significance of Systox Residues in Plant Materials.
J. Econ. Entomol. 48:364-369, 1955.
17. Fukuto, T.R., R.L. Metcalf, R.B. March, and M.G. Maxon. Chemical
Behavior of Systox in Biological Systems. J. Econ. Entomol.
48:347-354, 1955.
18. Cook, J.W. and R. Ottes. Note on the Conversion of Some
Organophosphate Pesticides to Less Polar Compounds by Ultraviolet
Light. J. Assoc. Offie . Agr. Chemists. 42:211-212, 1959.
19. Mitchell, T.H., J.H. Ruzicka, J. Thomson, and B.B. Wheals.
The Chromatographic Determination of Organophosphorus Pesticides.
Part III. The Effect of Irradiation on the Parent Compounds.
J. Chromatog. 32:17-23, 1968.
20. Ruzicka, J.H., J. Thomson, and B.B. Wheals. The Gas Chromatographic
Examination of Organophosphorus Pesticides and Their Oxidation
Products. J. Chromatog. 30:92-99, 1967.
21. Metcalf, R.L., R.B. March, T.R. Fukuto, and M.G. Maxon. The
Behavior of Systox-isomers in Bean and Citrus Plants. J. Econ.
Entomol. 47:1045-1055, 1954.

44

�DISTRIBUTION LIST
AFSC (DLSW)
(SDWM)
(SGP)
ARPA (TECH INFO)
DDR&amp;E (CHEM TECH)
(TECH LIB)
SAAMA (SFQT)

2
3
3
1
1
5
5

AIR UNIVERSITY LIB
HQ DA OACSFOR (FOR CM SR)
OPERATIONS RSCH GRP
EDGEWOOD ARSENAL
(SMUEA-TD-S)
(SMUEA-RPRE (2))
(SMUEA-CC)
(SMUEA-QS)
(SMUEA-CCCR)
(SMUEA-TSTI-L)
(SMUEA-D)
(SMUEA-TS-CF)

1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1

(WPNS DEV &amp; ENGR LABS)
ENGR R&amp;D LABS (TECH DOC CTR)
ABERDEEN PRV GD (TECH LIB)
DESERET TEST CENTER (TECH LIB)
CBR AGENCY (CSGSB-ST)
USA CHEMICAL SCHOOL (AJMCL-A)
NAV AIR SYS COMD (AIR-532G)
USN WEAPONS LAB

2
2
1
4
1
1
2
2

USN RESEARCH LAB (CODE 6140)
4525 FTR WPN UG (FWOA)
6570TH AMRL (HEF)
DDC
12AF (DMEME)
DL
DLIP
SSLT
TAWC (DOD)
(DIM)
SOC (DFS)
HQ USAF (AFRDPA)
TAC (DOO-S)
SOF-DOR
319SOS-DM
TAWC-CB
USAFETAC
USAF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LAB
(Kelly AFB TX)

1
1
1
12
1
1
50
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1

45

�DISTRIBUTION LIST (Concluded)
USAF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LAB
(McClellan AFB CA)

1

USAFEL
AFWL (DEE)
USAFA (DFLS)
DUGWAY PROVING GROUND (TECH LIB)
ONR (CODE 440)
HQ USACDC (NBC BRANCH)
ASD (ENYS)
DLOS
CDCLNO

1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
2

46

�UNCLASSIFIED
Security Classification
DOCUMENT CONTROL DATA - R &amp; D
(Security classification of title, body of abstract and indexing annotation must be entered when the overall report is
ORIGINATING A C T I V I T Y (Corporate author)

Flame, Incendiary, and Explosives Division
Air Force Armament Laboratory
Eqlin Air Force Base, Florida
3

classified)

. REPORT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

UNCLASSIFIED
26. GROUP*

REPORT TITL.E

THE METABOLISM OF HIGH CONCENTRATIONS OF THE ORGANOPHOSPHORUS INSECTICIDE
PHORATE APPLIED FOLIARLY TO SELECTED PLANT SPECIES
D E S C R I P T I V E NOTES (Type- ot report and inclusive dates)

Final Report (May - December 1970)
5 AUTHORCSI (First name, middle initial, Imxt name)

George S. Kotchmar, Jr., Capt, USAF3 Billy C. Wolverton, Elizabeth.E. Boothe,
Sandra M. Lefstad
6

REPORT D A T E

7«. T O T A L NO. OF PAGES

February 1971
8«- C O N T R A C T OR G R A N T NO.

&amp;. PROJECT NO.

5066

53

\7t. NO. OF REFS

1

21

9a. ORIGINATOR*^ REPORT NJUMBERfSt

AFATL-TR-71-22
9b. OTHER REPORT NO (si (Any other numbers that may oe assigned
this report)

C.

d.

1O. DISTRIBUTION S T A T E M E N T

Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.

M- S U P P L E M E N T A R Y NOTES

Available in DDC

12- SPONSORING M I L I T A R Y A C T I V I T Y

Air Force Armament Lauoratory
Air Force Systers Command
Eglin Air Force Base, Florida 32542

ABSTRACT

Gas chromatographic and enzymatic analyses (cholinesterase-inhibition method)
were used to monitor the metabolism of the organophosphorus insecticide 0,0diethyl S-[(ethylthio)methyl] phosphorodithioate (phorate) applied foliarly
to three economically important plants (Homestead tomato, Wiley sorghum, and
Honey sorghum). The resulting data provided guidelines in predicting toxicity
and persistence of metabolite residues for high concentrations of insecticides
employed by the military. An attempt was also made to relate the metabolism
of the insecticide to phytotoxic damage among and within plant species. The
data indicated that no plant-variety-dependent distinction exists in the
formation of toxic phorate metabolites as shown by in vitro anticholinesterase
activity recorded over a four-week period. Further investigation, with the
same high concentrations of phorate placed on glass plates located adjacent
to treated plants, indicated the formation of toxic phorate metabolites was
without the influence of biological substrates within the plants. There were
no statistically significant differences with respect to the rate of increase
of cholinesterase-inhibition percentage values between the sorghum and glass
plates; the rate of formation of anticholinesterase oxidized metabolites was
predominantly through chemical oxidation on the leaf surface and not by
plant enzyme catalysis, or at least, the oxidation occurred at such a rate
as to mask the enzyme catalysis. The large droplet size in the application
of phorate resulted in higher toxic residue values, especially on the surface
of the plant, than would normally be expected^

DD

FORM
1 NOV 65

1473

UNCLASSIFIED
Security Classification

�UNCLASSIFIED
Security Classification
1

14.

K EY

LINK A

LINKS

LINK' C

WORDS
ROLE

WT

ROLE

WT

Phorate
0,0-diethyl S-[(ethylthio)methyl] phosphorodithioate
Organophosphorus Insecticides
Plants
Insecticide Residues
Insecticide Metabolism

UNCLASSIFIED
Security Classification

ROL E

W T

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="5707">
              <text>016</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="5709">
              <text>0172</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="5712">
              <text>Series II</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5703">
                <text>Kotchmar, George S., Jr.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5704">
                <text>Billy C. Wolverton</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5705">
                <text>Elizabeth E. Boothe</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5706">
                <text>Sandra M. Lefstad</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5708">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;Flame, Incendiary, and Explosives Division, Air Force Armament Laboratory, Eglin AFB, Florida</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5710">
                <text>1971-02-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5711">
                <text>The Metabolism of High Concentrations of the Organophosphorus Insecticide Phorate Applied Foliarly to Selected Plant Species</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5713">
                <text>pesticide testing</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5714">
                <text>pesticide toxicology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2550" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="17995">
              <text>056</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="17996">
              <text>1512</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="18000">
              <text>Series III Subseries II</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17994">
                <text>Wilson, James G.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17997">
                <text>Down to Earth</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17998">
                <text>1973</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="17999">
                <text>Teratological Potential of 2, 4, 5 -T</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18001">
                <text>pesticide toxicology</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="18002">
                <text>congenital birth defects</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="18003">
                <text>animal testing</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="18004">
                <text>TCDD</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2238" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1293">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/3115a0b0721d97ce1ccc804a998ccf6d.pdf</src>
        <authentication>38777d4fb47a0a6bdbd237f831c9d4c0</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63242">
                    <text>Item ID Number

°1185

Author

Anonymous

Corporate Author
Report/Article Tltlfl Technology Notes

JOUrnal/BOOk TitlB

World Review of Pest Control

Year

1969

Month/Day
Color

n

Number of bnages

1

DeSOriptOU Notes

Alvin L Youn

9 f'led tnis item under the category
"DDT/Human Toxicology and Environmental Fate"

Wednesday, April 11, 2001

Page 1185 of 1242

�or

Technology noted
W.VIN t. YOUNG

DDT and man's health

It is a strange fact that, in their consideration of the long'
term hazards to man of exposure to the chlorinated hydrocarbons, the Advisory Committee on Poisonous Substances
used in Agriculture and Food Storage, made no mention
of the men subject to high and continuous exposure in the
manufacture of these compounds. Dr Hayes, in his contribution to the Royal Society discussion of the toxicity of
pesticides to man,1 concluded that real assurance about
the possible long-term effects of small repeated doses may
be gained by studying the effects of larger doses given over
a briefer period. Hence the results of a clinical and
chemical study of men with an intensive occupational
exposure to DDT, carried out by Laws, Curley and Biros,"
arc of high interest.
This study was made on thirty-five men with eleven to
nineteen years of work in a factory that has produced DDT
continuously and exclusively since 1947, now producing
an average of six million pounds per month. The content
of DDT, its isomcrs and metabolic products, in the men's
fat ranged from 38 to 647 ppm; the average for the general
population of this area is 8 ppm. From these figures and
the excretion of DDA in the urine, it was estimated that
the mean daily intake of DDT by the twenty men with high
occupational exposure was 17-5 to 18 mg per man per day;
the average for the general population was 0-04 mg per
man per day.
Neither medical history, physical examination, routine
clinical tests nor chest x-ray revealed any ill effects attributable to this massive exposure to DDT.
1 Hayes, W. J. Jr, 1967, Proc. R. Soc. B., 187, 101.
2 Laws, E. R., Curley, A. and Biros, F. J., 1967, Arch, environ.
Health, 16, 766.

International Congress of Plant Protection
The Seventh International Congress of Plant Protection
will be held in Paris from September 21st to 25th, 1970.
The objectives of the Congress are those of previous Congresses, the sixth of which was held in Vienna in 1967,
though the seventh Congress will not be concerned with
the chemistry of pesticides, but rather their general
characteristics.
Section A, dealing with economic studies, will include
the significance of crop losses due to pests, the economic
aspects of pest control, the implementing of crop protection measures and methods of investigation. Section B
comprises: (I) prophylactic methods including sanitation,
the use of resistant varieties, regulatory methods; (2)
mechanical and physical methods such as thermal therapy,
irradiation, etc; (3) chemical methods such as the use of
pesticides, chemosterilants, attractants, repellents and inhibitors; (4) biological methods; (5) integrated control,
prognosis and warnings. Section C is for the study of the
consequences of pest control including the risk of residues
and their effects on wild life and the problems of pesticide
resistance. Section D is concerned with general procedures
for the application of control measures.
The Congress is sponsored by the Socie'te' Francaise de
Phytiatrie et de Phytopharmacie, from whom further particulars may be obtained, the address being 57, Boulevard
Lannes, 75-Paris XVP, France.
Technological economics of pest control and crop
protection

The Symposium arranged under the above title by the
Pesticides Group of the Society of Chemical Industry was
mentioned in an earlier Technology Note (Spring 1968,
p. 5); further details are now available.
The symposium will open, on the evening of September

77

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="15005">
              <text>047</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="15006">
              <text>1185</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="15010">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15007">
                <text>World Review of Pest Control</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15008">
                <text>1969</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15009">
                <text>Technology Notes</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15011">
                <text>DDT</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="15012">
                <text>pesticide toxicology</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="15013">
                <text>health effects</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2288" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="15548">
              <text>048</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="15550">
              <text>1235</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="15553">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15547">
                <text>Witter, Robert F.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15549">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;Technical Development Laboratories, Technology Branch, Communicable Disease Center, Bureau of State Services, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15551">
                <text>1959</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15552">
                <text>Reprint: Protection of Shade Trees with DDT and Its Relation to Human Health</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15554">
                <text>CDC</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="15555">
                <text>agricultural exposure</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="15556">
                <text>human testing</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="15557">
                <text>pesticide toxicology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2243" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1298">
        <src>https://www.nal.usda.gov/exhibits/speccoll/files/original/e787c6e13e415c42d0bd84b559613312.pdf</src>
        <authentication>9fce70516f1fe3304a9e588fd0c482b5</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="60">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="63247">
                    <text>Item ID Number

01190

Author
Corporate Author

U. s - ArlT|y Medlcal Bioengmeenng Research and Devel

RBDOrt/ArtidO Tltto Report: Problem Definition Studies on Potential
Environmental Pollutants, VII. Physical, Chemical,
lexicological, and Biological Properties of DDT and Its
Derivatives
'

Journal/Book Title
Year

1979

Month/Day
Color

rj

Number of Images

^

DQSCrlptQn NDtQ8

Alvin Li

Young filed this item under the category
"DDT/Human Toxicology and Environmental Fate"
Technical Report 7906

Wednesday, April 11, 2001

.

Page 1190 of 1242

�Technical Report 7906 .
/

•o* CO

PROBLEM DEFINIT70N STUDIES ON POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS
VII. PHYSICAL, CHEMICAL, TOXICOLOGICAL, AND BIOLOGICAL
PROPERTIES OF DDT AND ITS DERIVATIVES

JUNE 1979

O

Prepared for the OFFICE of the PROJECT MANAGER
for CHEMICAL DEMILITARIZATION and INSTALLATION RESTORATION
by

US ARSSY MEDICAL BIOENGINEERING RESEARCH and DEVELOPMENT LABORATORY
ForlDfitrlck
Frederick, BSD 21701
Edited by
_W.. .JQickinson Burrows , _Ph . D .
David R ,-Gogley , -Ph . D .
Ph.D.

Jack C. Dacre, Ph.D.
jGeoffrey Woo4ard, Ph^

APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE;
DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED

US ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH and DEVELOPMENT COMMAND
FortDetr&amp;k
Frottertok, RSD217C1

81 1

28 00*

�NOTICE
Disclaimer
The findings in this report are not to be construed as an official
Department of the Army position unless so designated by other authorized
documents.
*»

Disposition
Destroy this report when it is no longer needed.
to the originator.

Do not return it

�Unclassified
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION Of THIS I*ACE
READ INSTRUCTIONS
BEFORE COMPLETING FORM

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE
1. REPORT NUMBER

(fc

2. COVT ACCESSION NO.

3. R E S I E N T ' S CATALOG NUMBER

Technical Report 7906 •, V
J^ROBLEM DEFINITION STUDIES ONJPOTENTIAL

j

JNVIRONME^TAL POLLUTANTS, vii/PHYSICAL, ^CJBEMICAL,:
^JXiqOLOGICAL.AKD JIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF DDJ
'ID ITS DERIVATIVES^ ;
~~".

-

«. PERFORMING ORG. REPORT t^MBER
8. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBERf»;

Dickinson/Burrows
/T fw. Dick:
I /OS David R./Cogley
R
r
^~f William G./Light r~"

Jack C/ Dacre
Geoffrey/Woodard 1
NAME AND ADDRESS

O. PROGRAM ELEMENT. PROJECJ^T ASK
AREA « WORK UNIT N U M B S ^ ^

U.S. Army Medical Bioengineering Research and
Development Laboratory, ATTN: 'SGRD-UBG,
Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD 21701
H. CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME AND ADDRESS

U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Comtnan^
ATTN: SGRD-RMS
Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD 21701
*i"*"tv- »

L L

^^^- L j-^IP. ,

IIU

J.J. / VJX

14. MONITORING AGENCY NAME 6 AOORESSfl/ dlltettnt trom Controlling Olllce)

IS. SECURITY CLASS, fof Hit* rcporQ

UNCLASSIFIED
I5«. OECLASSIUCATION/OOWNGRADING
16. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (at thlt Rtpott)

Approved for public release; distribution unlimited

17. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (ol th* mbtli-tst nnterfd In Block 30, It dlllorent from Rupert)

18. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

19. KEY WORDS (Contlnu* on rmvtrl* ila* It ne«»*»«iy and Identity by block number)

Amphibians
Analytical Methods
Bioconcentration
Biotransformation

Birds
Carcinogenesis
DDD
DDE

DDT •
Fish
Invertebrates
Mammals

Man
Metabolism
Microorganisms

iV\A BSTH ACT fCoaUaa* *a »»v»r»» •£&lt;*. H n&lt;KnH*JU]r nod Idmlllr fcr Wocfc numfcwj

This report is a data base of physical, chemical, toxicological, and
biological properties of DDT. Sufficient data are presented to allow a
preliminary assessment of the human health impacts and ecological impacts
of DDT at sites within the United States where DDT is found. Thia report
is intended to be used with chemical analysis data of DDT concentrations
in water, sediments, soils, and biota at particular sites of interest to
develop a qualitative assessment of potential hazard.
DD , KK. W3

EO moHo F , M o V «,so OSO L E T E

unclassifed
SeCOmTY CLASS! FICATtOH Of THIS PAGE (Mrm D*if £nf»»»d)

�ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The contributions of David R. Cogley and William G. Light to this report
were per f ormedyndfir U.~^~7trmjtsMedical Research and Development Command
Contract No. 4SAMD17~77-C-705o't^ Walden Division of Abcor, Inc., Wilmington,
MA. The human TWltrorrog JTlection of the manuscrilpt was reviewed by Dr.
Marcus Mason (Walden consultant) of Shrewsbury, MA. Guidance for the
.::
ecological impacts section was provided by Professor Charles F. Wurster
(Walden" consultant.) of the State University of New York at Stony Brook.
Geoffrey Woodard ^s consultant to the Environmental Protection Research
Division, U.S. Army Medical Bioengineering Research and Development
Laboratory.
.
Editorial assistance was provided by Franklin Research Center under
Contract No. DAMD17-79-C-9129, Marsha Hall, principal editor.

-1-

�TABLE OP CONTENTS
.

.

• •

-..:-...-•

-

Page

ACKNOWLEDGMENT . .. . . ., . . . . . . . . .... . .. . . . , , . . . 1
..
...
LIST OF FIGURES . .."...
3
LIST OF TABLES .. . . . ... . . .:v."V". . ... . . . i . "4
I.

INTRODUCTION . . •

5

Requirement for Report.
Format ..........'.........
.
Scope
..
Objective ................. . . . . . . . .
"
II. ALTERNATIVE NAMES
III.

..

7

PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES . . .

8

Composition of Technical DDT
Analysis

10
10

^
. MAMMALIAN TOXICOLOGY

10

Human Exposure
Laboratory Animals
V.

»•

VI.

STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR DDT

Air .......
Drinking Water and Food
Water for Aquatic Life
VII.

EFFECTS OF DDT ON A MODEL ECOSYSTEM

Manufacturing Practices . . .
Composite Hypothetical Site
Observed DDT Concentrations
Predicted Effects
Decontamination Objectives
VIII.

10
13

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS

Behavior in Soil, Water, and Air ...'
Degradation
Bioaccumulation and the Food Chain
Effects on Terrestrial Animals.
Effects on Aquatic Organisms
Effects on Microorganisms

REFERENCES .

5
5
6
7

15

....

15
18
19
21
25
41
41

..... 41
41
42
42

...... 42
43
43
47
52
53

�LIST OF FIGURES

IV-1

Biodegradation of DDT. ...

IV-2

Further Degradation Products of DDT and DDE

V-l

Examples of DDT Bioaccumulation. .

V-2

Models of Bioaccumulation Pathways ..........

23

V-3

Effects of DDT on Frog Tadpoles

35

VII-1

Map of Model DDT Plant Site. ........... . . 44

VII-2

Biological Effects of Dietary DDT for Typical
Receptors
.......................

-3-

.....

......

.....

. . 16

......

17

.....

22

............

50

�LIST OF TABLES

1-1

Pollutants at Pine Bluff Arsenal

1II-1

Selected Physicochemical Properties of
Components of Technical DDT
.........

11

IV-1

Toxicity of DDT to Man

12

IV-2

Acute Oral Toxicity of DDT for Animals ;

V-l

Acute Toxicity of DDT to Birds

V-2

.

13

..

24

Concentrations of DDE in Bird Eggs Resulting
in 10% Reduction in Normal Shell Thickness ......

26

Acute Toxicity of p,p'-DDT to Fishes by
Static Bioassay

27

V-4

Sac-Fry Mortality for Various Fish Species

31

V-5

Acute Toxicity of p,p'-TDE to Fishes

33

V-6

Toxicity of DDT to Tadpoles. . .

34

V-7

Behavior and Morphological Abnormalities
of Tadpoles Exposed to DDT

36

V-8

Toxicicy of p.p'-DDT to Arthropods

37

V-9

Toxicity of DDT Isomers to Mosquito Larvae

39

V-10

Toxicity of p,p'-TDE to Arthropods

40

VII-1

Area and Wildlife Contamination Levels for
Various Sites

45

Environmental Concentrations of DDT at the
Model Site

48

lexicological Effects of DDT on Typical Wildlife as a Function of Concentrations of DDT in
Water, the Diet, and Tissues

49

Predicted Effects on Wildlife. .

51

V-3

VII-2
VII-3

VII-4

-4-

�I. INTRODUCTION
Requirement for Report
The U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency (USATHAMA), formerly
the Office of the Project Manager for Chemical Demilitarization and
Installation Restoration, has identified an initial list of substances
requiring assessment because of their actual or potential presence in the
environment outside the boundaries of Pine Bluff Arsenal (PBA), Arkansas
(Table I-l).1 The U.S. Army Medical Bioengineering Research and
Development Laboratory (USAMBRDL) has divided the list into logical units
for problem definition studies. Substances used in pyrotechnic devices are
treated in two reports.*»' Thiodiglycol and elemental phosphorus have
been assessed previously in reports by Rosenblatt e_t_ al_.*»* and Dacre
and Rosenblatt;* a separate report on these substances specific to PBA has
been deferred indefinitely. DDT is considered separately here because (a)
it is neither military-unique nor installation-unique; (b) there is an
overwhelming amount of information available in the published literature;
and (c) most pertinent data have been suiwnarized in review articles. The
present report deals exclusively with DDT, its isomers and metabolites.

The format of this report departs from that of previous reports in this
series2"*'7»' because it incorporates both the data base and site-specific
TABLE I-l. POLLUTANTS AT PINE BLUFF APSENAL8
*"

DDT

Thiodiglycol
Phosphorus (white)
Auramine
Benzanthrone
1,4-Di-p-toluidinoanthraquinone
1,4-Diamino-2,3-dihydroanthraquinone
1-Methylaminoanthraquinone
a. As provided in Reference 1.

-5-

�considerations for a hypothetical installation. There are two reasons, for
this approach. First, Redstone Arsenal (RSA) also has major DDT contamination, and USATHAMA personnel have indicated that RSA data are as important
to their mission as PBA data. Second, contamination surveys and corrective
measures were initiated at both PBA and RSA while this report was in preparation. Thus, in view of the continuous output of new data, it appeared
neither practical nor useful to analyze site data for either installation.
Instead, a hypothetical site has been created (Section VII) to
illustrate the qualitative relationships of DDT levels in water, sediment,
and biota to effects of DDT on health and the environment. Quantitative
considerations for this site are derived from fragmentary data available for
PBA and RSA at the time this study was initiated. This section may be used
to estimate the potential ecological effects of DDT waste disposal relative
to past known or postulated declines in wildlife populations as well as to
the lower DDT concentrations in soil and water resulting from cleanup
operations. An important caveat must be given here. Concentrations of DDT
in soil, sediment, water, and biota, and the toxic effects predicted
therefrom, have been derived using concentration factors, i.e., the ratio of
DDT in sediment to DDT in water, DDT in biota to DDT in water, etc. To do
so is strictly valid only if these concentration factors represent true
equilibrium or steady state values. In very few cases are data sufficient
to make such a distinction, and for this reason, soil, sediment, water, or
food chain concentrations predicted to lead to a particular toxic effect may
be in error by an order of magnitude.

This report is ecologically oriented. Mammalian toxicology and human
health effects of DDT have been exhaustively reviewed in a 1979 document of
the World Health Organization (WHO).' Some representative data are
included in the present report, but investigators concerned with human
health aspects of DDT (and the tradeoff between health benefits and hazards)
should refer to the WHO text.
The volume of data on environmental effects of DDT has obliged USAMBRDL
to exercise considerable and arbitrary selectivity in choice of material to
review. For the most part, data relevant to the environments of south
central Arkansas and northern Alabama have been collected. The ecological
literature has been surveyed systematically through mid-1976 and selectively
thereafter. Because of the availability of many definitive reviews, efforts
concentrated on surveying the literature of the last ten years, and few
references published prior to 1970 were retrieved. In the case of aquatic
organisms, a search was conducted not only for DDT, but also for the seven
isomers and metabolites detected in the soil of PBA—p»p'-, o,p'-, and
m,p'-DDT; p,p'- and o,p'-TDE (ODD); and p,p'- and o,p'-DDE—and for
in,p'-TDE, m,p'-DDE, DDMU, and DDMS, metabolites not detected at PBA but
judged likely to be present (see Fig. IV-1 for structures). Throughout this
report, DDT (unprefixed) refers to the technical product, sometimes
designated DDTR in the literature.

-6-

�Objective
The objective of this report is to provide, to those charged with
assessment and amelioration of DDT contamination at Army installations,
guidance on the health and environmental hazards of DDT and the ecological
consequences of various actions.
II. ALTERNATIVE NAMES
DDT is the name approved by the International St&amp;iviards Organization for
the technical product of which p,p'-DDT is the predominant component. As
used in the present report, DDT refers to the technical product or any of
ten isomers or degradation products listed below.
DDT trade names: Anofex, Arkotine, Chlorophenothane, Dicophane, Estonate,
Gesarol, Guesarol, Neocid, Zerdane.
p,p'-DDT: 1 , l'-(2,2,2-trichloroe&lt;.-.hylidene)bis[4-chloro]benzene; o,o-bis(pchlorophenyl)-B,8,0-trichlorethane; 2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)-!,!,1trichloroethane; 4,4'-dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane; l,l,l-trichloro-2,2bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethane.
o,p'-DDT: l-chloro-2[2,2,2-trichloro-l-(4-chlorophenyl)ethyl]benzene;
1,1,1-trichloro~2-(o-chlorophenyl)-2-(p-chlorophenyl.)ethane.
m,p'-DDT: l-chloro-3[2,2,2-trichloro-l-(4~chlorQphenyl)ethyl]benzene;
1,1,1-trichloro-2-(m-chlorophenyl)-2-(p-chlorophenyl)ethane.
p,p'-DDD: l,l'-(2,2-dichloroethylidene)bis[4-chloro]benzene;
l,l-dichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethane; p,p'-TDE.
o,p'-DDD: l-chloro-2l2,2-dichloro-l-(4-chlorophenyl)ethyl]benzene;
l,l-dichloro-2-(o-chlorophenyl)-2-(p-chlorophenyl)ethane; mitotane;
o,p'-TDE.
m,p'-DDD: l-chloro-3[2,2-dichloro-l-(4-chlorophenyl)ethyl]benzene;
l,l-dichlorq-2-(m-chlorophenyl)-2-(p-chlorophenyl)ethane; n,p'-TDE.
p,p'-DDE: l,l'-(2,2-dichloroethenylidene)bis[4-chloro]benzene;
l,l-dichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethylene.
o,p'-DDE: l-chloro-2[2,2-dichloro-l-l(4-chlorophenyl)ethenyl]benzene;
1,l-dichloro-2-(o-chlorophenyl)-2-(p-chlorophenyl)ethylene.
DDMU: l,l'-(2-chloroethenylidene)bisl4-chloro}benzene; l-chloro-2,2-bi8(p-chlorophenyl)ethylene.
DDMS: l,l'-(2-chloroethylidene)bis[4-chloro]benzene; 2-chloro-l,l-bis(pchlorophenyDethane,

-7-

�PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES1*

III.
p,p'-DDT:

Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number: 50-29-3
Toxic Substances List: KJ33250
Wiswesser Line Notation: GXGG YR DG&amp;R DG
Molecular Weight:

354.48

Molecular Formula:
Structural Formula:
CC1.

o.p'-DDT:
Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number:
Toxic Substances List:

KH7910000

*" Wiswesser Line Notation: GXGG YR BG&amp;RDG
Molecular Weight: 354.48
Empirical Formula:
Structural Formula:

-K

789-02-6

�p,p'-TDE (DDD):

.

Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number:

72-54-8

Toxic Substances List: KI0700000
Wiswessor Line Notation:
Molecular Weignt:

GYGYR DG&amp;R DG

320.0

Empirical Formula:
Structural Formula:
.CHC1.

p,p'-DDE
Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number:
Toxic Substances Lint: KV9450000
Wiswesser Line Notation: GYGUYR DG&amp;R DG
Molecular Weight: 318.0
Empirical Formula:
Structural Formula:
CCL

/"*~~~\

ci—(\

/V-c-

-9-

72-55-9

�Composition of Technical DDT
DDT is the name approved by the International Standards Organization for
the technical product of which p,p'-DDT is the predominant component.
Pure p,p'-DDT is a colorless crystalline solid, whereas the technical
material takes the form of a white or cream-colored waxy solid or amorphous
powder.
Technical DDT is a mixture of isomers containing 65 to 80% p,p'-DDT and
up to 14 other components. The major impurities are o,p'~DDT (15 to 21%);
p,p'-TDE (&gt;4%; l-(p-chlorophenyl)-2,2,2-trichloroethanol (&gt;1.5%); traces
of o,o'-DDT and m,p'-DDT; and traces of bis(p-chlorophenyl)sulfone. On
exposure to sunlight or alkaline conditions, p,p'-DDT is converted to stable
p,p'-DDE, which may constitute a significant fraction of any environmental
sample.
Physicochemical properties of the pure substances comprising technical
DDT are summarized in Table III-l.
Analysis
No attempt has been made to review analytical methods for DDT. Approved
methods for detection and estimation of DDT and its derivatives in
environmental samples (soil, sediment, water, and tissues) have been
compiled by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and are subject to
frequent revision. l ; »l *
IV. MAMMALIAN TOXICOLOGY
Human Exposure
was introduced in 1945 for t^e control of malaria mosquitoes. It is
a highly potent contact poison of the nervous system in insects. It is very
stable, so it persists, offering continuous protection for many months after
a single application. During World War II, DDT was widely used to prevent
insect vector-borne disease among troops, prisoners, and refugees. DDT vas
.applied directly to the skin and clothing in concentrations as high as 25%
in powder form. Despite these massive exposures, very few, if any,
authentic cases of human poisoning have been observed as a result.1* DDT
is moderately toxic to man by oral administration; Table IV-1 gives dosages
and expected or observed effects in man.
Laws £t £l. "» ls conducted extensive tests on 35 individuals
employed in the manufacture of DDT who had been exposed from 16 to 25 years
(21 years median) to amounts up to 18 mg per person per day. Phyi ical
examinations, medical histories, and liver function tests failed to reveal
any evidence of an untoward effect on human health. Experimental work on
human volunteers has not produced convincing evidence that DDT is harmful to
man at exposure levels 100 times those likely to be encountered in the
workplace or environment.1""1*
Despite extensive studies over the past 30 years, the exact mechanism of
DDT1 s toxic action in man is still uncertain. Based upon studies primarily
-10-

�TABLE tlt-l.

SELECTED PtnrSICOCHEHICAL PROPERTIES OF COMPONENTS OF TECHNICAL DDT

Pure Substance! Comprising Technical DDT
Property
Description
Melting point
Boilidg point
Solubility

Molecular .sight
Molecular formula
Volatility
Chenical
. reactivity
and atability

p,p'-DDT

o,p'-DDT

White, crystalline solid
Colorless crystal*
74.2*C
108.5*C
185*
Practically insoluble in water
Water, 0.085 ng/1 at
(1 vg/1), moderately soluble in
25'C; soluble in fat
hydroxylie and polar solvent!, readily and most organic solvents
soluble in most aromatic and
chlorinated solvents
354.5
354.5
Vapor pressure • 1.9 x 10"' Torr
at 20*C
Dehydrochlorinated at temperatures
Stable in concentrated
above its melting point into
sulfuric acid
ethylene derivative (DDE), a
reaction catalyzed by ferric and
aluminum chloride and by UV light.
In solution, it is readily
dehydtochlorinated by alkalis or
organic bases; otherwise it is stable
being unattccked by acid and alkaline
permanganate and by aqueous acids and
alkalis. With technical DDT.-dehydrochlorination may proceed at temperatures »« low as 50*C

p,p'-TDE (ODD)

p.p'-DDE

Colorless crystals
109'-110*C

White, crystalline solid
88.4*0

Similar to p,p'-DDT

Hater, 0.12 mg/1 at 25*C;
soluble in fat snd most
organic solvents

320.0

318.0

Similar to p.p'-DDT,
but it is more slowly
hydrolyzed by alkalis

Stable in concentrated
sulEuric acid. It may be
oxidized to p.p'-di'-Morobenzophenone•, a r« ction
catalyzed by UV radiation

�in laboratory animals, using relatively massive doses, it has been
speculated that DDT affects the metabolism of some of the biogenic
substances in the central nervous system and some of the carbohydratemetabolizing enzymes in the uterus, kidney cortex, and liver. The microsomal enzyme systems in the liver and possibly other tissues are increased
when exposure levels become sufficiently high.17 The occurrence of enzyme
induction in man at current environmental exposure levels has not been
established.
Human exposure to DDT has resulted in no reported cases of cancer or
other neoplasms, although carcinogenesis has been demonstrated in some
laboratory animal species. Feeding DDT to men for nearly 2 years did not
result in tumors,18 and no tumors were found in men whose occupation w&amp;s
the manufacturej formulation, or application of DDT." (However, the
latency period for appearance of cancer in humans may exceed the 35 years
since DDT was introduced.) The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency*' has
estimated an upper-limit lifetime cancer risk of 1 in 10^ for males
consuming 7.3 x 1CT* tng/day (10 ng/kg/day) of DDT. This estimate is
derived from the observation that Jewish males in Israel have higher fat
levels of DDT than males in New York State (16.S3 versus 9.04 ppra) and that
the lifetime incidence of nervous system cancer is correspondingly higher
(1.1 versus 0.5%). It is based on the assumption that cancer resulting from
DDT it^estion will be expressed in humans solely in the nervous system and
on tie admittedly unsupported corollary that the excess incidence of .nervous
system cancer results solely from excess DDT consumption.
TABLE IV-1.

TOXICITY OF DDT TO MANa

Dosage
(mg/kg/day)

mg
70-kg person

Remarks

Unknown''

—

Fatal

16-286b

1,100-20,000

Vomiting at higher doses, convulsions
in some

6-10b

400-700

Moderate poisoning in some

0.5

35

Tolerated. Periods lasted 21 months
with volunteers, 6.5 years with
workers

0.25 (inhalation ?) 18

Tolerated by workers for 19 years

a. Adapted from Jukes.1*
b. Precise dosage unknown.

-12-

�Laboratory Animals
Acute Toxicity.' Data on the acute toxicity of DDT to mammals are
summarized in Table IV-2.*1 These data indicate that the short-term
toxicity to mammals is moderate to high, depending on the mode of ingestion,
and that DDT i • generally more efficiently absorbed from the gastrointestinal
tract when dissolved in an oil vehicle.
TABLE IV-2.

ACUTE ORAL TOXICITY OF DDT FOR ANIMALS8

» tug/kg
Species

Water Suspension
or Powder

Oil Solution

Rat

500-2,500

113-450

Mouse

300-1,600

100-800

Guinea pig
Rabbit

2,000
275

250-560
300-1,770

Cat

100-410

Dog

&gt;300

From Hayes.*1

Careinogenicity. Carcinogenesis experiments have been performed in
which rodents were fed DDT at concentrations ranging from 2 to 1,650 pptn.**"'1
There appear to be wide ranges in susceptibility to DDT-induced carcinogenesis for different mammalian species and strains. Other studies have
found that no increase in tumors was induced by feeding DDT to golden
hamsters,11 and no tumors vere induced in a small number of dogs and
monkeys.1* DDT, TOE, and DDE were tested in the National Cancer Institute
Bioassay Program. The summary of their results follows.11

-13-

�"Bioajsays of technical-grade DDT, TDE, and p,p'-DDE for possible
carcinogenicity were conducted using Osborne-Mendel rats and B6C3F1
mice. Each compound was administered in the feed, at either of two
concentrations, to groups of 50 male and 50 female animals of each
species. Twenty animals of each species and sex were placed on test as
controls for the bioassay of each compound. The time-weighted average
high and low dietary concentrations of DDT were, respectively, 642 and
321 ppm for male rats, 420 and 210 ppm for female rats, 44 and 22 ppm
for male mice, and 175 and 87 ppm for female mice. The time-weighted
average high and low dietary concentrations of TDE were, respectively,
3294 and 1647 ppm for male rats, 1700 and 850 ppm for female rats, and
822 and 411 ppm for male and female mice. The time-weighted average
high and low dietary concentrations of DDE were, respectively, 839 and
437 ppm for male rats, 462 and 242 ppm for female rats, and 261 and 148
ppm for male and female mice. After the 78-week dosing period there was
an additional observation period of up to 35 weeks for rats and 15 weeks
for mice.
"There were significant positive associations between increased
chemical concentration and accelerated mortality in female mice closed
with DDT and in both sexes of rats and in female mice dosed with DDE.
This association was not demonstrated in other groups. There wr.s,
however, poor survival among control and dosed male mice used in th.5
bioassays of DDT and DDE. In all car.es adequate numbers of animals in
all groups survived sufficiently long to be at risk from late-developf • •}
tumors.
"When those male rats receiving TDE and their controls were combined
within each group so that the numerators of the tumor incidences
represented those animals with either a follicular-cell carcinoma or a
follicular-cell adenoma of the thyroid, the incidence in the low dose
group was significantly higher than that in the control. There was a
significant positive association between the concentration of DDE
administered and the incidences of hepatocellular carcinomas in male and
female mice.. Among dosed rats and mice no other neoplasms occurred in
statistically significant incidences when compared to their respective
control groups.
"Under the conditions of these bioassays there was no evidence for
the carcinogenicity of DDT in Osborne-Mendel rats or B6C3F1 mice, of TDE
in female Osborne-Mendel rats or B6C3F1 mice of either sex, or of
p,p'-DDE in Osborne-Mendel rats, although p,p'-DDE was hepatotoxic in
Osborne-Mendel rats. The findings suggest a possible carcinogenic
effect of TDE in male Osborne-Mendel rats, based on the induction of
combined follicular-cell carcinomas and follicular-cell adenomas or the
thyroid. Because of the variation of these tumors in control male rats
in this study, the evidence does not permit a more conclusive
interpretation of these lesions. p,p'-DDE was carcinogenic in B6C3F1
mice, causing hepatocellullar carcinomas in both sexes."

-14-

�Mutagenicity. The fact that DDE is tnutagenic in mammalian cells" and
DDT is not suggests that the proximate carcinogen is DDE, a metabolite of
DDT. It has been shown that chlorinated hydrocarbon carcinogens, such as
carbon tetrachloride and dieldrin, are negative in the standard Ames test.
These materials presumably require metabolic activation, possibly dehalogenation, for mutagenic activity. Because the Ames test includes only metabolic
activation mediated by the liver microsomal system and dehalogenation is not
so mediated, it is reasonable that pure DDT is negative in the Ames test.
Metabolism. The principal pathways for DDT metabolism are depicted in
Fig. IV-1, with lesser pathways presented in Fig. IV-2. It is important to
note that DDD and DDE arise by independent mechanisms and that DDE is
relatively inert. Hence, environmental DDT samples will show increasing
percentages of DDE with time where use of DDT has been discontinued.
Equivalent metabolites arising from the o,p'-DDT isomer in technical DDT
also appear in residues. The biological transformation of DDT is further
discussed in the following section of this report.
V. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
The literature on the toxicology, ecology, environmental fate, and
bioaccumulation of DDT is extensive and has been comprehensively reviewed
elsewhere, notably by Brown,'* Edwards,** Matsumura," Tahori,*7
White-Stevens," and Wurster and coworkers."'112 Information on the
environmental fate of DDT and the bioaccumulation of DDT in the food chain
is summarized in the following subsections.
Behavior in Soil, Water, and Air
To summarize, factors affecting the behavior of DDT in soil, water, and
air include low water solubility, ease of adsorption on soil, chemical
reactivity (p,p'-DDT conversion to p,p'-DDE), low vapor pressure, and ease
of uptake by plants and animals. When present in soil, DDT tends to remain
for years, acting as a long-lived reservoir for gradual release to surface
waters and biota. When present in surface waters, DDT is assimilated
rapidly by aquatic organisms and i,;. accumulated in the food chain.
Evaporation into the atmosphere also occurs. Atmospheric transport leads to
low (background) concentrations over wide geographic areas. Worldwide,
rainwater DDT levels fall in the range from 0.018 to 0.066 ppb.'
Although practically insoluble in water, DDT readily adsorbs to
particulate material in aquatic systems. In addition to accumulation
through the food chain, DDT may be incorporated into aquatic organisms by
direct contact with DDT-containing water or through ingestion of particulate
matter containing DDT.
DDT may enter an aquatic ecosystem by physical, chemical, or biological
transport. Atmospheric transport and erosion of contaminated solids appear
to be the most frequent routes. Eventually, the DDT tends to reach the

-15-

�DDE
R-C-R
(1

cc.i

t

R— CH

p __* R-CH-R —-»-R—C— R
.

1

1

CCI,

CHCIj

DDT

DDD

-

»^ R— CH — R

a R—C— R
»~

II
CHCI

1
CH2C!

II
CH,

DDMU

DDMS

DDNU

R-CH-R —-*- R— CH— R —-^- R^CHj— R —-»- R— CH— R CH2OH

COZH

DDOH

DDA

OH

DPM

DBH

Fig. IV-1. Biodegradation of DDT (R=C,H4CI)

-*•"-§-'
O
DBP

�R—CH—R
I
CC1,
DDT

OH
t
-R-C-R
I
CGI,

and

Kelthane

R-CH—R
I
CN
DDCN

CCb

OCli

DDE

Fig. tV-2. Further Degradation Products of DDT and DDE (R-C.H«CI)

CCI,

�water surface where it can co-distill with water and reenter the atmospheric
cycle. As noted earlier, DDT is converted to DDE by sunlight. Various
organisms also convert p,p'-DDT to p,p'-TDE and p,p'-DDE, the latter being
the most abundant DDT compound in the environment. For the purpose of this
review, the three compounds are considered collectively, unless specified
otherwise.
The amount of DDT that runs off into water bodies depends on the degree
of slope of the ground, the fineness of the ao'j.. ind th«» degree of vegetation cover.*8 Water transport of DDT depe: v. on .•rision runoff because DDT
is strongly adsorbed to soil particles. Dv. SVfo.uiMjs so tightly bound to
soil particles that it does not rea-'ily le.;ci LM'JV groundwater.** Nonpolar
compounds such as DDT either reach Che aqt-.-r,/r sink adsorbed onto soil
particles in the runoff or, when directly .ip\&gt;!Leil '&lt;.c water, become adsorbed
onto the suspended matter.
When a pond was treated with DDT at 0.02 '. vi, an Tfective concentration
for mosquito control, the DDT disappeared from the water after 3 weeks and
was found in the mud for 8 weeks after the treatment.** Greater amounts
of DDT reach the bottom of a water body when the sedimenting material is
composed of fine particles.*5
The stability of DDT in soil has been studied by Guenzi and Beard, who
have also reviewed the subject.**'** The rates and products of degradation
are dependent on temperature, oxidation-reduction potential, and moisture
content of the soil. In aerobic soils, DDT is converted to DDE by a
predominantly chemical process.** In anaerobic soils, the products are
TDE and its transformation products.***** In dry aerobic soils, DDT
is stable; loss is very slow by either degradation or volatilization.*'**7
Degradation
Reviews by.Fries** and Rhead51 summarize much of our knowledge
concerning the natural degradation of p,p'-DDT. A proposed scheme for
partial biodegradation of DDT is presented in Fig. IV-1. Although the
metabolites have all been identified, the pathway depicted must be considered only representative because no single organism has been found to
produce all the metabolites (with the possible exception of Aerobacter
aerogenes'*), and it is likely that different organisms emphasize
different pathways. TDE is by far the most prevalent metabolite of bacteria
and fungi, whereas phytoplankton species produce small amounts of DDE only.
Only TDE has been isolated from the intestinal microflora of the northern
anchovy (Engraulis mordax).* * Two other minor products of microbiai
degradation of DDT are Kelthane and DDCN (Fig. IV-2), although the latter
may result in part from chemical degradation. It should be emphasized
that complete biodegradation of DDT proceeding via a series of hydrodechlorination steps, as in Fig. IV-1, requires both anaerobic and aerobic
conditions.

-Itt-

�Fish that have received DDT by intravenous injection,** feeding,**
cr uptake from water produce TDE and DDE in various proportions in addition
to some DDMU. Brook trout receiving intramuscular DDT are reported to
produce only DDE.*' -DDT administered to lobsters (Homerus americanus) by
intravascular or oral routes is converted to TDE, DDE, and DDA.*7
Sheridan has shown that DDT concentrated from the water is converted to TDE
and DDE in the hepatopancreas of the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus.**
Lower aquatic invertebrates convert DDT to TDE, DDE, and other metabolites,
but daphnids are reported to produce only DDE.** Zinck and Addition have
noted that p,p*-DDE is probably a metabolic dead end.*' However, ringhydroxylated metabolites of DDE, shown in Fig. IV-2, have been isolated from
the fat of the guillemot (Uria algae) and grey seal (Halichoerus grypus).* *
Fries has reviewed data indicating that o,p'-DDT is degraded to o,p'-TDE
by mechanisms and rates similar to those for p,p'-DDT.*° It is likely
that the degradation pathways presented in Fig. 1V-1 are followed.
DDT may also undergo chemical degradation. Photolysis is reported to
convert DDT to TDE, DDE, DBF, and p,p'-dichlorobiphenyl, and heat also
converts DDT to TDE and DDE. DDT is unchanged after 8 weeks in river
water.'1
Bioaccumulation and the Food Chain
%
The direct accumulation of DDT from water may, in certain cases, make
the additional uptake from food insignificant. The algae and bacteria in
water are very efficient concentrators of DDT; their small size, and
consequently high surface-to-mass ratio, results in rapid and thorough
adsorption.** For example, bacteria concentrated DDT from 1 ppb in water
to 1,140 to 3,400 times that within 30 minutes,'* and freshwater algae
concentrated DDT from 1 ppm in water to 130 to 270 ppm in their cells within
1 week.'8 When exposed to DDT in water at concentrations between 50 and
100 ppt for 3 days, aquatic arthropods achieved increases in concentration
ranging from 3,000 to 114,000 times.'* When exposed to DDT in salt water
for 2 weeks, the Atlantic croaker concentrated 0.1 ppb by 40,000 times.'*
Brown trout exposed to 2.3 ppb and given DDT-free food for 3 weeks
concentrated the DDT in their tissues by 3,000 times."
DDT, applied onca at the rate of 1 Ib/acre (1.12 kg/ha), persisted in
the soil of Maine forests with little change throughout a 9-year period.'*
Robins li"v .- in the forest had higher DDT levels than those in surrounding
areas, indicating a period of continuous availability of residues through
the food chain, as shown in the following table:

-19-

�Robin Body DDT
Concentration (ppm)

Time of Analysis

13.53
4.50
3.55
0.47

1 year after treatment
3 years after treatment
9 yearn after treatment
Untreated areas

DDT applied to a forested area in Montana at the rate of 0.5 Ib/acre
(0.56 kg/ha) resulted in the following concentrations in the blue grouse.**

Concentration
in Fat (ppm)

Time of Analysis

80
22
18

Within 1 week of spraying
1 year after spraying
2 years after spraying

Predatory or fish-eating birds usually have higher DDT residues than
seed-eaters. Alaskan peregrine falcons, which feed primarily on birds,
contained far higher residues than the small birds in their area.i?«**
Scaup, which feed more heavily upon animal material than mallards,
accumulated residues that were 2 to 4 times as great when both were placed
on a DDT-treated marsh for the same periods of time.'*
Various small mammals were collected in Maine forests after a single
application of DDT at the rate of 1 Ib/acre (1.12 kg/ha).'* In the year
of treatment, shrews, mice, and voles contained an average of 15.6, 1.1, and
1.1 ppm, respectively. The relative differences between shrews and the mice
and voles prevailed throughout the years after treatment. In the same
areas, mink, which are carnivorous feeders like the shrews, accumulated
higher totcl DDT residues (8.5 ppm) in the first year of treatment than
hares (0.08 ppm). For areas treated seasonally with DDT, residues in small
mammals increased and decreased seasonally in relation to the treatment
times.
Food Chain. The bioaccumulation of DDT in the food chain is primarily a
consequence of its stability and high fat solubility. In the food chain,
energy is transferred from one trophic level to another. In general terms,

-20-

�only about IOZ of the energy in one troph.lc level will be transferred to the
next level, and the rest will be respired or released as wastes.•'
Chemicals that are preferentially taken up by living organisms and stored
for extended periods, svh as DDT and its derivatives, tend to be
concentrated in the foou chain. Examples of DDT bioaccunulation in the food
chain**"71 are displayed graphically in Fig. V-l.
A review of the extensive literature on aquatic and terrestrial food
chains is given by Brown.** These studies are based on measurements of
the DDT content in the environment (e.g., soil and water) as well as
measurements of the DDT content in tissues of various wildlife species. It
would be advantageous and would simplify an environmental assessment if it
were possible to relate the concentrations of DDT in the environment (viz.,
in soil and water) to the toxicological impact on wildlife by using
established factors for DDT bioaccumulation and translocation through the
food chain. Once the bioaccumulation factors were determined, it vould be
possible to relate toxicological effects at dietary concentrations to soil
and water concentrations. This relation could be represented by bioaccumulation pathway models, such as those shown in Fig. V-2, The bioaccumulation
factors given in Fig. V-2 were estimated from limited actual data for the
purpose of demonstration and should be considered hypothetical.
Although attempts have been made to predict mathematically the behavior
of DDT introduced into the environment,7* the predictive capacity and
utility of these models suffer from the enormous complexity of the
environment. Due to the many concomitant variables (e.g., environmental
site differences, species and strain differences, wide ranges in DDT base
concentrations, and different lipid/water partition coefficients and
equilibrium factors), it is not possible to establish categorically DDT
bioaccumulation factors that have a reasonable level of significance for all
ecosystems of the world. It is important to consider each environmental
setting individually.
Effects on Terrestrial Animals
Mammals. No information was retrieved concerning the effects of DDT on
mammalian wildlife. As noted in Section IV, acute toxicity for mammals is
low in terms of likely environmental concentrations. Data from laboratory
studies of mice indicate that teratogenesis and carcinogenesis could result
in mammalian wildlife exposed to DDT, but this has not been confirmed by
field studies. Likewise, there is no field evidence to indicate DDTassociated reproductive failure in mammals.
The high fat solubility of DDT may pose a threat to hibernating
insectivores and other mammals that are exposed to high levels of dietary
DDT and that release large amounts of DDT to the bloodstream from body fat
during periods of high activity and scant food supply. Such DDT releases
have been observed for bats containing certain chlorinated hydrocarbon
insecticides in their tissues and might also occur for mammalian carnivores.

-21-

�sea water
(0.1 ppb)

sea water
(0.1 ppb) '
sea water
(1 ppb)

40 days

oyster
(7ppm)

"7555

hooked mussel
(0.126 ppm)

1.260X

hard shell clam
(0 6ppm)

600X

'

sea water
ppb)

11 fish species
"(12-20 ppm)
phytoplankton

estuarlne waters
dppb)

2QOX

tidal marsh
surface water
(0.3 ppm)

lake sediments
(0.014 ppm)
pond
(0.02 ppm)
water
(1 ppm)

... .
»_ d'tcn

30X

3.4 ppm

drywt.

«^.. Insects
^..Insects
(0.41 ppm)
(0.41 ppm)

22QX

fish
(is ppm)

&lt;AV
&lt;ftY
10X

22X

75 ppm

drywt.

-

porpoise
(100 ppm)

^. 4 species of algae
(220 ppm)

Fig. V-1. Examples of DDT Bioaccumulation

-22-

4-89 ppm

wetwt

j^. risn
_»^__»""»
g^flsh
j^.8""8
(3.8-5.8 ppm) ?xx (90 ppm, muscl
(3.8-5.8 ppm) 2OTV (9°. ppm. muscle
^' 2,411 ppm, fat)

^ rainbow trout (4.15 ppm)
black bullhead (3.11 ppm)
crayfish (1.47 ppm)

150X
ay

1Q-100X

...
»». sediment __^ vegetation _^. J«J •

v

(4ppm)

13X

birds

�Amphibians (tadpoles)

w»t«r

?l

"S.

200X

'\

A—

~_k»&gt; tarlnolrti

fla

if

7"

sediments

—'

Fish and Birds

yf plants

-*«-

birds

»*.

fish

water
sediments
soil

300X

10X

—£^ birds {predatory)

20X

worms

Land-Dwelling Mammals (herblvoi es and ctrnlvores)

soil ,

20X

*~ plants

25X

mammals (herbivore)
j mammals Carnivore)

Insects
worms

SOX

birds

/^"

Fig. V-2. Models of Bloaccumulatlon Pathways

-23-

�Birds. DDT and its metabolites are universally distributed so that
exposure is essentially continuous, and few, if any, birds are free from
these compounds. Although the acute toxicity of DDT to birds is low, direct
toxic effects occur due to bioaccumulation of DDT in birds and in their
food. The most serious hazard of DDT to birds is that of decreasing their
reproductive capacity through eggshell thinning. It is estimated that as
little as 67 ppb of DDE (the proximate agent) in the diet can cause a
substantial increase in embryo mortality due to eggshell failure. The many
instances of bird kills in woodlands sprayed with DDT are believed to be due
to secondary poisoning by the oral route and not to contact poisoning.**-••
However, the direct lethal toxicities of DDT to birds are low, as indicated
in Table V-l.
TABLE V-l.

ACUTE TOXICITY OF DDT TO BIRDS7 »

Speoies

Dosage Route

Toxic Effects

Mallard
Pheasants
Coturnix
Sandhill cranes

Oral , capsule
Oral , capsule
Oral , capsule
Oral, capsule

LD5Q &gt; 2,240 mg/kg
LD5Q a 1,296 mg/kg
LDso s 841 mg/kg
LD50 &gt; 1,200 mg/kg

Mallard
Pheasants
Bobwhites
Coturnix

Oral, 5
Oral , 5
Oral , 5
Oral , 5

LC50
LCso
LCso
LCso

Pheasants

p,p'-DDT, oral
Technical DDT, oral

days
days
days
days

» 850-1,200 ppm
* 300-700 ppm
» 600-1,000 ppm
• 400-600 ppm

LC5Q - 550 ppm
LCso * 935 PPm

The direct toxic effects of DDT to birds accompany bioaccumulation in
the birds' food. Although bioaccumulation is most pronounced for precatory
birds, it also can be significant for birds lower on the food chain. i?or
example, soil contaminated with 5 to 10 ppm DDT is sufficient for earthworms
to pick up 50 to 200 ppm, which could result in a lethal dose for a robin
(ca. 3 rag)."* High residues of DDT in bird fat and other tissues can be
mobilised to become lethal if the birds are starved or hyperactive."*
These processes reduce the adipose fat and release DDT into the body
circulation to concentrate in the nervous system. House sparrows with DDT
residues of 800 ppm in body fat displayed no adverse physiological signs if
well fed, but died if not well fed; the DDT mobilization engendered tremors
that further reduced fat and sent lethal concentrations into nerve and
brain.•*&gt;•* The minimum content of DDT in the brain at which death
occurs is 50 ppm for American robins and 60 ppm for house sparrows,'1
while it is 14 ppm for female ring-necked pheasants."

-24-

�Concerning reproductive e f f e c t s , a 30% decline in breeding pairs'of the
fish-eating osprey on the coast jf Connecticut in 1963 was found to be
associated with a high body content of DDT residues, especially DDE, 111 ***
The reproductive failure was later related to a reduction of the eggshell'
thickness due to contamination of the eggs by DDT and its metabolites.
Feeding experiments with mallards showed that 40 ppm of DDE in the diet
resulted in frequent shell cracking, leading to 40% embryo mortality and 75%
reduction in duckling production.* 5 A concentration of 20 ppm of DDT in
the diet of mallards resulted in 20% reduction in eggshell thickness.** A
concentration of 10 ppm of DDE in the diet caused 25% shell thinning in the
American sparrow hawk, 8 7 13% in the screech owl,'* and 18 to 29% in the
black duck." DDT in the diet of pheasants had little or no effect on egg
production or fertility, but hatchability and chick survival were reduced at
concentrations of 100 ppm or more." In bobwhite quail on a diet containing 100 ppm, egg production was normal, but fertility and hatchability were
reduced, and chick survival was eventually zero.*' In addition, high
dietary doses of DDT have reduced sperm production in cockerels'* and the
bald eagle. 9 *
It is generally accepted that DDE is the major shell-thinning factor,
because a linear inverse relationship between shell thickness and DDE content
of the egg has been demonstrated for the prairie falcon, herring gull,
doublt crested cormorant, brown pelican, and peregrine falcon.'**** In
general, whenever the residues induced eggshell thinning more than 10% below
the normal thickness, that bird population would decline.'* Concentrations of DDE that elicit this effect in various species of birds are
listed in Table V-2. The bird prey for one population of peregrine falcons
have whole body residues of 0.3 to 6*0 ppm DDE, whereas the f.it and eggs of
the falcons contain 560 and 15 ppm DDE, respectively.* 7 This concentration
factor of 2.5 to 50 for eggs, combined with an observed concentration of 8
ppm in peregrine falcon eggs for onset of reproductive failure (Table V-2).
corresponds to a dietary limit of 0.16 to 3.2 ppm. If the same concentration
factor is arbitrarily assumed for other birds, then the dietary threshold
for reproductive failure would fall in the range of 1.6 to 32 ppm for the
great blue heron, 0.05 to 1.0 for the osprey, and 0,02 to 0.4 for the brown
pelican. Based on the latter two birds being fish-eaters, it appears that
substantially lower levels of DDE (and hence DDT) in fish may be required to
assure the survival of these birds than to protect human health.
Effects on Aquatic Organisms
Because the proportions of the various isomers and metabolites of DDT in
different environmental samples are quite distinct, and because the
toxicological data base for aquatic organisms is large, every effort has
been made to identify the toxic effects associated with each specific isomer
or metabolite throughout this section.

-25-

�TABLE V-2.

CONCENTRATIONS OF DDE TN BIRD EGGS RESULTING IN 10%
' REDUCTION IN NORMAL SHELL Tl'.iCKNESS

Bird Species

DDE Concentration in Eggs
(ppm wet weight)

Double-crested cormorant

Reference

20

95

Prairie falcon

7

96

Brown pelican

1

97

t r e a t b l u e heron

80

71

Herring gull

70

71

A t l a n t i c gannet

25

71

White pel lean

10

71

Fish-eating osprey

2.4

99

Alaskan peregrine f a l c o n

8

68

Fish. The acute toxicity of p,p'-DDT to fishes has bee.i reviewed by
Pimentel71 and others. 18C ~ I •* Some representative data are presented
in Table V-3, which shows that the 96-hr LC50 for most fishes falls between
1 and 20 wg/1. Fish and Wildlife Service investigators at the Fish-Pesticide
Research Laboratory in Columbia, Missouri, report 96-hr LCs^'s in this
range for 18 common freshwater fishes.110 They also report that p,p'-DDT
is roughly three times as toxic to bluegills (Lepotnis macrochirus) at 7°C as
at 24°C. Macek notes that for most common formulations containing DDT and
other pesticides, acute toxicities to bluegills are additive.11* The low
LC5Q valiies may be due to the rapid uptake and concentration of DDT in
fish. For example, brown trout exposed to 2 ppb DDT can concentrate it
about 500 times in the gill tissues and about 3,000 times in the
muscle.*' The gills of 2-lb brown trout pass about 700 liters of water
per day. 11 * In addition, certain fish, such as catfish, appear to be
fairly tolerant to DDT under laboratory conditions, whereas in a natural
setting they may succumb through bottom-feeding at the sediment level.
Sublethal concentrations of DDT to adult fish may lower their
reproductive success because DDT accumulates in egg yolk and kills the fry
shortly after they hatch from contaminated eggs.'*»102 The DDT is passed
into the egg yolk, the embryo develops and hatches, and at the stage of

-26-

�TABLE V-3. ACUTE TCXICITY OF p,p'-DDT TO FISHES BY STATIC BIOASSAY

Temp.
Species
Rainbow trout
Salmo gairdneri

Exposure
Time
(hr) LCso (ug/O

7 (5-10)a
3.8 (3.4-4.3)
1.72 (1.42--2.09)
28
0.26

Reference

104
105
106
107
108

13
16
12.9

96
96
96
96
360

Brown trout
Salmo trutta

13

96

2 U-3)

104

Brook trout
Salvelinus fontinalis

13

96

7.4-11.9

106

Cutthroat trout
Salmo clarki

13

96

0.85-1.37

106

13
9-11
13

96
96
96

13

96

0.68

110

18
24
23

96
96
96

8 (6-10)
2.2 ( . - . )
1826
7

104
105
111

Redear sun fish
Lepomis nticrplophus

18 .

96

5 (3.9)

104

Largemouth bass
Micropterus salmoides

18

96

2 (1-3)

104

18
24

96
96
96

Coho salmon
Oncorhynchus kisutch

Chinook salmon
Oncorhynchus tshawytschak &gt; c
Bliiegill
Lepomis macrochirus

Goldfish
Carassius auratus
Carassius carassius

-27-

11.3-18.5
13
4 (3-6)

21 (14-30)
9.8 (7.3-13.2)
25

106
109
104

104
105
107

�TABLE V-3. (Cont.)
Exposure
Time
(hr) LC50 (ug/D

Species

Temp,
CO

Carp
Cyprinufl carpio

18

96

10 (7-13)

104

Fathead minnow
Pimephales promelas

18

96

19 (13-27)

104

18
24
26

96
96
24

16 (9-28)
13.5 (9-20)

104
105
111

Black bullhead
Ictalurus me las

18

96

5 (3-7)

,
104

Yellow perch
Perca flavescens

18

96

9 (7-11)

104

Channel catfish
Ictalurus punctatus

Mosquitofish
Gambusia af finis

34

Reference

96
96

20
27

112
111

Guppy
Poecilia reticulata

96

3

112

Mozambique mouthbreeder
Tilapia mossambica

96

7

112

Aholehole
Kuhlia sandvicensis^

96

3.9

112

Nehu
Stolephorus purpureus^

12

1.0

112

96

0.53 ( . 8 0 8 )
03-.4
0.9

1.13
110

Striped bass
Roccus (Morone) saxatilis^

Roccus (Morone) saxatilis^

17

96

-28-

�TABLE V-3. (Cont.)

Temp.
Species
Shiner perch
Cymatogaster aggregate

Exposure
Time
(hr)
LC5Q (wg/O

Re f erence

13
17

96
96

7.6
0.45

114
110

Dwarf perch
Micrometrus minimus^
Micrometrus minimus'' » c

13
18

96
96

4.6
0.26

114
110

White seaperch
Phanerodon furcatus^« c

19

96

0.74

110

English sole
Parophrys vetulus^* 0

16

96

0.91

110

Pacific staghorn sculpin
Leptocottus armatus"*0

19

96

0.98

110

Rubberlip seaperch
Rhacochilus toxotes^« c

19

96

1.01

110

Goby
Acinthrogobius flavimanusb» c

19

96

2.40

110

19
19
19
19
19

24
48
96
120
144

Speckled sanddab
C i th ar i ch t h y s 8tigmaeus^» c

a.
b.
c.
d.

•

10.0
7.2
3.7
1.7
0.9

Numbers in parentheses are 95% confidence interval.
Seawater.
Dynamic bioassay.
Brackish water.

-29-

110
110
110
110
110

�final yolk sac adsorption after hatching, the fry will die if the DDT concentration in the yolk is sufficiently high. 11T » l l i This phenomenon
was first observed in the lake trout of Lake George, New York; 1 1 ' and
later at Ja-jper, Alberta; 1 4 * Lake Taupo, New Zealand; 121 Lake
Michigan; 1 * 2 Sebago Lake, Maine; 111 and other locations.'* Data for
studies in these areas are listed in Table V-4 and indicate that DDT
concentrations in water a» low as 0.004 ppb can cause a significant increase
in sac-fry mortality.
No reports were recovered describing systematic studies of the chronic
effects of DDT on life stages of fishes. A DDT concentration of 5 mg/1 has
been shown to result in 4(!% mortality of carp embryos reared j.n vitro.' 2 *
Exposure of Atlantic salmon (Salmp sf.lar) eggs to 50 pg/1 of DDT at
gastrulation retards behavioral development in the newly hatched
alevins. 1 2 * The coughing frequency in juvenile coho salmon was found to
be enhanced significantly after 4 days' exposure at a sublethal concentration
of 5 ug/1. 1 ** High sublethal (0.3 to 3 ug/1) levels of DDT have been
found to result in loss of glycogen and other pathological changes in the
liver of 7 zebrafish (Br^chydanio rgrio) and, to a much lesser extent, of
guppy. 1 2 Interrupted exposure of salmon;d fishes to high sublethal
concentrations of DDT is reported to raise the lower lethal temperatures,
alter the temperature selectivity,12diminish learning ability, and affect the
central nervous system in general. ** 1 ** Continuous exposure to 110
Mg/^? for 4 days is said to alter the exploratory1'1 and locomotor *2
behavior of goldfish (Carassius auratus).
Desaiah e_t al. have presented evidence for 50? or greater inhibition of
activity of mitochondrial Mg2+ ATPase, an important energy-linked enzyme,
in brain homogenates of fathead 1
minnows chronically exposed to DDT at a
level of 0.5 ug/1 for 266 days. " There is also a substantial, although
lesser, drop in gill Na-K-ATPase activity. The latter enzyme functions in
osmoregulation in marine fishes, and in this regard, Leadem e£ ajU have
found that seawater-acclimated rainbow trout receiving 2.75 tng/kg DDT/48 hr
in their diet exhibit 1 impaired osmoregulation as well as inhibition of gill
Na-K-ATPase activity. '* Kinter £t al. have reported similar disruption
of osmoregulation in two marine species, mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus)
and American eel (Angui11a rostrata), at lethal DDT concentrations. 111
Weisbart and Feiner report that goldfish (C. auratus) exposed to DDT at a
level of 17.5 to 35 wg/1 exhibited no clear" evidence for impaired
osmoregulation. 1 " This agrees with the observation of Leadem e£^l_. that
osmoregulation is unimpaired by DDT in the diet of the freshwater rainbow
trout.
•

The 90-dose (30-day) oral LD5Q for juvenile coho and chinook
(Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) 7 salmon have been reported as 64 and 27.5
ing/kg/day, respectively. 1 ^ Sublethal 1oral doses may result in loss of
light discrimination in rainbow trout. '*

-30-

�TABLE V-4. SAC-FRY MORTALITY FOR VARIOUS FISH SPECIES

Fish
Species

DDT Cone.
in Eggs
(ppm)

Effect

Estimated
DDT Cone.
in Water*
(ppb)

Reference

Lake trout

3-355

Fry containing more
than 3 ppm died at
the time of final
adsorption of the
yolk sac

0.03

119

Brook, rainbow,
and cutthroat
trout

&gt;0.4

30 to 90% sac-fry
mortality

&gt;0.004

120

Rainbow trout

5

45% sac-fry mortality

0.05

121

Coho salmon

1.1-2.8

15 to 75% sac-fry
0.011-0.028
mortality, respectively

122

The DDT concentrations in water were estimated using a concentration factor
of 100,000. The factor was based on data from a study with fathead minnows
reared in 2 ppb DDT for a 9-month period. DDT concentrated in their eggs
to more than 100,000 times the water concentration.1** This is the only
long-term study giving both egg and water concentrations that could be
found in the literature.

Fragmentary evidence indicates that o,p'-DDT is less toxic to fish than
p,p'-DDT. The 96-hr LC5Q for goldfish (C. auratus) t as measured by
Ginsburg, 1 ** is 1.0 mg/1 for o,p'-ODT, compared with about 0.06 mg/1 for
the p,p'-isomer. Gardner reports that brook trout fingerlings are unharmed
by 24-hr exposure to o,p'-DDT at a concentration of 0.05 mg/1, although
there is a noticeable effect on temperature selection at 0*02 mg/1, i.e.,
cooler water is preferred by exposed fish. 1 ** According to Alabaster, the
24-hr LC5Q for harlequin fish (Rasbora heteromo_rj)ha) ie 30 ug/1 for
o,p'-DDT, compared with 13 jig/1 for the~p,p"'-"Isomer.l* * No information
was retrieved for m,p'-DDT.

-31-

�Toxicity data for p,p'-TDE (ODD) have been reviewed by McKee and
Wolfe. 1 " Fragmentary evidence, presented in Table V-5, indicates that TDK
is highly toxic to fishes, although perhaps a half ovder of magnitude less
toxic than p,p'-DDT. Gardner has demonstrated that high sublethal levels of
TDE affect temperature selection by fingerling brook trout. 12 ' He further
reports that brook trout are unharmed by 24-hr exposure to o,p'-TDE at a
concentration of 50 yg/1, although there is some effect on temperature
selection at 10 pg/1. 1 ** No information was retrieved for m,p'~TDE.
Gardner has found that brook tr&lt; u; •".•..-• 'mharmed by exposure to 50 -;g/l
of p,p'-DDE for 24 hours and that there la almost no effect on temperature
selection. 1 ** Applegate et_ al_. re &gt;orc' Chat v^inbow trout, bluegills, and
the larvae of sea lampreys -(Pt£: y .;&gt;I • *},"',.*•'.&gt;• "£ arc ""affected by 24-hr
;
exposure to DDE at 5 mg/1 and 5:
' " o t h t j . s " report 96-hr LC^Q'B of 10
to 100 ng/1 for bluegills and rai'•);-w trout at 24° and 13°C, respectively. 11 *
No information was retrieved for m,p'-DDE.
Reptiles. No quantitative toxicity data were recovered, but Stickel has
stated that the box turtle population of a Maryland forest was not noticeably
affected by DDT applied at a dosage of 2 Ib/acre (2.2 kg/ha). 1 **
Evidence both for and against loss of reptiles through land application of DDT
is summarized by McKee and Wolfe. 1 ** Direct treatment of ponds at DDT
concentrations of 2 ppm or more has killed water snakes and turtles. 1 ** In
the Brazos River floodplain of Texas, where cottonfields had been heavily
treated with DDT, the average residues in the fat bodies of aquatic snakes
were DDE, 510 ppm; TDE, 1.5 ppm; and DDT, 16.0 ppm. 1 * Tine DDT residues in
the brain did not exceed 1.5 ppm, and fat-body residues in terrestrial snakes
were much lower than in aquatic snakes.1**
In vitro treatment of cellular fractions from various tissues of six
species of terrestrial turtles resulted in negligible to substantial
inhibition of Mg2*-, (Na + , K*)-, and (Na+, K + , Mg2+)-dependent ATPase
at DDT levels of 2 to 76 mg/l. 1 *** 1 ** Similarly, in vitro treatment of
cellular fractions from various tissues of the red-eared turtle, Chrysemys
scripta elegans, resulted in negligible to substantial inhibition of ATPase
at TDE or DDE levels of 2 to 76 mg/1. 1 **
Amphibians. For tadpoles of Fowler's toad (Bufo woodhousii fowleri) and
the chorus frog (Pseudacris triseriata), Sanders reports 24-hr LC5Q
habitat water values of 2.4 and 1.4 mg/1, respectively, 1 * 7 whereas a 96-hr
LC5Q of 0.27 mg/1 for bullfrog tadpoles is reported by Carter and
Graves. 1 1 1 Another reference gives a 96-hr LC$Q of 0.8 mg/1 for
5-week-old tadpoles of P. triseriata and 0.74, 1.0, 0.1, and 0.03811
mg/1 for
B. woodhoasii tadpoles of 1, 4 to 5, 6, and 7 weeks, respectively. *
These data are summarized in Table V-6. A lethal concentration of 0.15 mg/1
is given for Bufo bufo tadpoles. 1 ** Some relative and highly ambiguous
toxicity assessments based on DDT application data have been provided by
Pimentel 71 and Cooke. 1 **

-32-

�TABLE V-5.

Species

ACUTE TOXICITY OF p,p'-TDE (DDD) TO FISHES

Temp.
CO

Exposure
Time
(hr&gt; LC50 (pg/1)

Goldfish3

Reference

1,000

100

&lt;2,600
15,000

100
110

Channel catfish8

20
18

96
96

Bluegill*

24

96

Striped bassc
Morone saxatilis

17

96

Brook trout
Salvelinus fontinalis

10

24

45

128

Rainbow trout 3

13

96

43-93

110

Fathead minnow3

18

96

1,000-10,000

110

largetnouth bassa

18

96

39

110

Walleye 3

18

96

10-100

110

a.
b.
c.
d.

30b
&gt;10

2.5 &lt;1.6-4)d

100
110

113

Species not given.
Toxicity threshold.
Bioassay in saline water.
Numbers in parentheses are 95Z confidence interval.

Field studies showed that 0.1 kg DDT/ha applied as an emulsion did not
kill tadpoles, but 1.0 kg DDT/ha achieved 80% mortality in two days.1**
The toxic effects on frog and toad tadpoles o_ DDT sprayed in the field at
0.4 to 0.5 kg/ha is given by Cooke.1*' The DDT was sprayed on the water
surface,.as would be appropriate to kill mosquito larvae. Five water sites
were monitored. DDT concentrations in surface water and in water at a depth
of 20 cm decreased as the size of the water body increased, to the extent
that DDT was not detected (&lt;0.02 ppb) in water from the two larger sites.
The DDT residue concentrations and the behavioral and morphological
abnormalities of the tadpoles for the three smaller sites are summarized in
Table V-7. The residues were measured one day after spraying. It is
important to note that virtually all of the DDT sprayed was taken ui&gt; by
algae or incorporated elsewhere within only 3 days. Hence, the increases in

-33-

�the DDT levels in the tadpoles after the third day may be due to direct
ingeoiion of DDT-contaminated algae. A schematic diagram of behavioral
abnormalities versus time after spraying DDT is given in Fig. V-3. Average
DDT concentrations are derived from data of Table V-7 assuming that there is
a linear gradient of concentration with depth.
TABLE V-6.

:
Species

TOXICITY OF DDT TO TADPOLES

Exposure Time
(hr)

LC5Q (tng/1)

Reference

Bullfrog

96

0.27

111

Chorus frog

24
96

1.4
0.8

147
110

Fowler's toad

24

2.4

147

(1 week)
(4-5 weeks)
(6 weeks)
(7 weeks)

96
96
96
96

0.74
1.0
0.1
0.038

110
110
110
110

For tadpoles of Pseudacris triseriata and Bufo exposed to p,p'-TDE, 96-hr
LC50's of 100 to 1,000 and 18 jig/1, respectively, have been reported. 11 '
No other information concerning isomers or metabolites was retrieved.
Invertebrates. For the most part, only references dealing with nontarget
species were retrieved. Toxicity data for arthropods, taken from Pimentel's
review, 71 Malina's review, 1 " and some recent papers, are summarized in
Table V-8, which shows that marine and freshwater species demonstrate about
the same order of acute sensitivity to DDT as fishes, although ostracods
appear to be more resistant. There is also evidence for impaired reproductive
capability in ostracods, 15 ' brine shrimp, 1 ** and Daphnia at sublethal
levels. 1 ** Ingested DDT has been shown to be harmful to crayfish
(Procambarus clarkii), blue crabs (Callinec tes sapiduii), *» T »*"
and fiddler crabs (Uca pugnax),'* * but the reported data are not readily
quantified. Larvae of two caddisflies (Hydropsyche pellucidula and H.
instabilis) have been found to construct irregular webs when exposed to DDT at
sublethal levels (2.5 jig/1). 1 '* In field studies, it was found that when
an unprotected stream was sprayed directly with 1 Ib/acre (1.1 kg/ha), nymphs
of all species of mayflies were exterminated and larvae of every species o
caddisfly were affected to some extent. 1 *
.

-34-

�Normal

k /"
Estimated Average DDT Concentrations
In the Water
17.5 ppb

£

2.26 ppb
——• 0.57 ppb

Reslgnet

Dead

4

6
8
1 0
Days After Spraying DDT

Fig. V-3. Effects of DDT on Frog Tadpoles

-35-

12

14

�TABLE V-7.
Total Water Residues
One Day After
Spraying3
(ng/1)
20 cm below
Surface

BEHAVIOR AND MORPHOLOGICAL ABNORMALITIES OF TADPOLES EXPOSED TO DDT

DDT Levels in Tadpoles
(vg/g)

Behavioral and Morphological Abnormalities
Day 1

Small
Ditch

36.2

Day 14°

7.90

6.52

None left

Franticc

None

3.27

None left

Frantic

None

0.70

0.77

0.24

Some normal,
Some frantic

None

0.64

0.38

Frantic

None

1.16
0.83

0.52
1.23

1.07
1.97

Frantic
Frantic

None
None

Behavior

Day 14

Day 3

Day 2

0.99

Surface

Day 1

1.21

Site

Abnormalities

Behavioral

Abnormalities

Behavior

Abnormalities
__

Larger 10.5

17.5

4.9

Bitch

Fool

2.7

1.9

Resigned

All survivors-abnormal No survivors
snouts, 4/8 dead tadpoles had tails
laterally curled to
left
Some frantic, All survivors-abnormal No survivors
some resigned snouts
4 normal,
Few normal, None
1 moribund
most frantic,
few resigned
13 normal.
Most frantic, 2 dead tadpoles with
3 moribund
upturned tails
few resigned
Frantic
Frantic

None
None

Normal
Mormal

a. Other than the 0.19 wg/1 from below-surface sample of small ditch taken on Day 3, no residues were detected in water samples on
Days 3 and 14, ...cone. &lt;0.02 wg/1; spraying was uneven; two large sites had no detectable (&lt;0.02 vg/1) DDT in water.
b. Increases probably due to eating DDT-contaminated algae.
c. ?raittic • hyperactivity, greatly excited, frencied
Resigned » passive, submissive
Progressive stages of abnormal behavior.
Moribund - dying.
/
(All showed slow rite of metamorphosis.)

—
1 downcurved in
body and tail

1 with abnomial
snout ,
2 dovncurved
None
None

�TABLE V-8. TOXICITY OF p,p'-DDT TO ARTHROPODS

Species

Exposure
Time
(hr)

EC50 or LC50
(wg/l)

Reference

Sand shrimp

24

3

71

Seed shrimp
Cypridopsis vidua

48

54

151

Glass shrimp
Palaemonetes kadiakensis
Grase shrimp
Stonefly
Pteronarcella badia
Classenia sabulosa
Pteronarcys californica

,
Acroneuria pacifica
Waterflea
Daphnia pule*
Daphnia magr. a
Simocephalus serrulatus

4.2
2.3

48
96

12

24

151
110
71
•/

12
1.9
16
10
3.5
41
19
100
7.0
180

24
96
24
96
96
24
48
96
96
96

0.36-3.6
4
1
0.67
0.4

48
48
96
366
48

71
110
71
150
110
71
71
150
110
150
71
151
150
152
71

Os traced
Cyprinotus incongruena
Cypridopsia vidua

48
48

l,300a
230a

153
153

Brine shrimp
Artemia selina

48

46a

154

-37-

�TABLE V-8 (Cont.)
Exposure
Time
(hr)

Species
Crayfish
Procambarus acutas
Orconectes nais
(10-week)

Reference

48
96
96

•**
Gammarus fasciatus

22.5
1.0

151
110

4.7
4.0

151
110

24
48
96
48
96

Am phi pod
Gammarus lacustris

155
108
110

48
96

Sowbug
Asellus brevicaudus

3(7. 2)c
0.24
30

48
96

Damseifly
Ishnui-a verticalis

Hermit crab3

EC50 or LCjo
(pg/D

4.7
2.1
1.0
3.6
3.2

71
71
110
151
110
71

7
1.85

110

96

Purple shore crab
Hemigrapsus nudus
*-•
Market crab
Cancer magister'""

24
96

'

4.6

110

48

3.3-10

156

»
*
•

Brown shrimp
Crangon crangon

a. Species not given.
b. Extrapolated from author's data.
c. Value in parentheses for crayfish acclimated to natural, DDT-contarainated
water of an unspecified concentration.

-38-

�Although mollusks are not so readily killed by DDT, the growth of
eastern oysters is reported to be reduced significantly (and reversibly) at
a level of 0.1 wg/1, 7 1 and survival of the larvae of the American oyster
(Cr88803trea virginica) is diminished by 202 at a level of 25 yg/1. 1 ' 1
Annelids are so insensitive to DDT intoxication as to present a dietary
hazard to predator organisms. The 96-hr 1050 for the buffalo leach
(Hirudinari manillgnsis) exceeds 100 mg/l, 1 '* and tubeficid worms
(Branchiura sowerbv_i"&gt; are said to exhibit no mortality after 72 hours at a
level of 4 mg/l and 21°C, although they are completely destroyed when
exposed to the same concentration at 4.4° and 32.2°C. l f l The extrapolated
96-hr LC5o for a planarian (Polycel.is felina) is 1.26 mg/l at-6.5°C."*
Earlier data for invertebrates have been reviewed by McKee and Wolfe, 1 1 *
and some additional toxicity data are contained in Reference 108.
Fragmentary evidence, presented in Table V-9, indicates that o,p'- and
m,p'-DDT may be less acutely toxic to mosquito larvae than the p.p'-isomer.
No information concerning nontarget species was retrieved.
TABLE V-9. TOXICITY OF DDT ISOMERS TO MOSQUITO LARVAE

Anopheles quadrimaculatus* » • » » » • •

Isomer
p,p'-DDT

24-hr LC50
(Mg/D

48-hr LC50
(Wg/l)

Aedes aegypti'**

96-hr LCso
(wg/1)

&lt; 2.5

2.5

11

350

o,p'-DDT

15

10

ra,p'-DDT

15

&lt;10

a. 4th instar.
Data relating the acute toxicity of p,p'-TDE to arthropods are
summarized in Table V-10. Comparison of Tables V-8 and V-10 reveals that
for many arthropods TDE is equal to or greater in tox;city than DDT. McKee
and Wolfe have reviewed pesticide application data and note that the larvae
of Chaoborus (phantom midge) and gnats are "controlled" at 13 tc 14 vg/l
and chironomid (midge) larvae are temporarily eliminated.1** With a 96-hr
LCso of 740 vg/1, TDE is slightly more toxic to the freshwater planarian
Polycelis felina than DDT.1**

-39-

�The 96-hr LC50 of p,p'-DDE to the freshwater planarian Polycelis
felina is 1.23 mg/1, only slightly more than the corresponding value for
DDT."* No further information was retrieved concerning isomers or
metabolites.
TABLE V-10. ACUTE TOXICITY OF p.p'-TDE (ODD) TO ARTHROPODS

Species

Exposure
Time
(hr)

EC50 or LC50
(ug/D

Reference

Amphipod
Gammarus lacustris
Gammarus fasciatus

96
96

Sowbug
Asellus brevicaudus

96

Water flea
Paphnia magna
Daphnia pulex
Simocephalus nerrulatus

72
48
AS

0.1«
3.2
4.5

167
108
108

96
72

0.68
O.la

108
167

Mosquito (4th instar)
Anopheles quadrimaculatus

24

2

168

Stonefly
Pteronarcys californica

96

380

1C8

Glass shrimp
Palaemonetes kadiakensis

0.64
0.86
10

a. Sublethal effects.

-40-

108
108
108

�Effects on Microorganisms
Luard has reviewed, in part, the literature on DDT toxicity to
freshwater and marine phytoplankton, and notes evidence for a wide range of
sensitivities. 1 *' Other data are contained in Reference 108. A few
marine species exhibit inhibition of photosynthesis at 1 to 10 yg/1, but
in general there is no e f f e c t on growth at levels below 100 ug/1 (see also
Pimentel 7 1 ). A recent study shows an even higher level of resisti.--** in
Euglena.' 7 *
Bacteria also appear to be resistant to DDT. The growth of Bacillus
megaterium in nutrient medis is unaffected by 100 mg/1 of DDT, although the
death rate of resting cells is measurably enhanced at 1 mg/1. 1 ** Growth
of Azotobacter^ chrooc occum is said to be unchanged in the presence of 400
mg/1. l7z The growth rated of Pseudomonas fluorcscens and Staphylococcug
aureus, but not Escherichia coli, are noticeably inhibited at 50 mg/1. 1 ''
It is probably safe to assume that microorganisms will be unaffected by
p,p'-DDT at levels selected to protect fish and invertebrates.
The chernolithotrophic nitrofier, Nitrobactor agilis, is completely v
inhibited by TDE at a concentration of 10 tng/l and measurably inhibited at
0.1 mg/1. 17 *
% DDE (as well as DDT) at a concentration of 10~6 to 10~5 M (0.35 to
3.5 mg/1) is said to inhibit photosynthetic electron transport in the green
algae Codium fragile and Chaetomorpha area^ and in isolated chloroplasts. 1 **
DDE is reported to be more toxic than DDT to the marine dinoflagellate
Exuviella baltica, causing significant growth inhibition at levels as low as
0.1 u g / 1 . 1 7 3 N o other information concerning isomers or metabolites was
retrieved.
*"

VI.

STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOB DDT

Air

Threshold limit values for the workroom environment: 17 *
Time-weighted average: 1
Short-term exposure limit:

3

ink in g Water and Food
Allowable daily intake:* 0.005 mg/kg/day
Maxiuium concentration in fish and agricultural products for interstate
commerce: 177 5 ppra

�Water f or Aquat ic Lif e

-

EPA recommended criterion:20 0.00023 l»g/l (24-hr average) and
0.00041 (not to be exceeded at any time)
VII.

EFFECTS OF DDT ON A MODEL ECOSYSTEM

A model ecosystem is used here to illustrate the effects of DDT waste
product disposal at U.S. manufacturing sites operated from the mid-1940's to
the late 1960's. Data that would accurately and completely define the
extent of the hazards resulting from DDT contamination at particular sites
are not available. Thus, a hypothetical site was created to demonstrate an
approach for relating toxicological and ecological data to levels of
contamination and to demonstrate the types of data required for establishing
such a relation. The model site was developed from limited data available
from actual contaminated sites*7*""1*11 and from hypothetical circumstances
(such as geology and hydrology) offered for the purpose of demonstration.
The following topics are considered: manufacturing practices, composite
hypothetical site, observed DDT concentrations, predicted effects, and
decontamination objectives.
Manufacturing Practices
The contaminated areas of primary concern are those in the vicinity of
sites previously used for the manufacture of DDT, typically following World
War II until the late 1960's. As a result of manufacturing, handling, and
disposal practices prevalent then, large quantities of DDT and its isomers
and analogs were conveyed by surface water runoff through drainage ways into
traversing E-treams that empty into lakes and major rivers. Depending on the
manufacturing site, the methods of DDT handling and storage, and the time
manufacturing ceased, theie are wide ranges of possible levels of site
contamination. During the manufacturing period, it is possible that tons of
DDT in th« form of blocks were present on the ground surface, readily
accessible to leaching. After the plants were closed, massive quantities of
DDT were either disposed of in burial sites and landfills, destroyed by
incineration, or simply left on the ground surface.
The DDT residues in areas surrounding manufacturing sites built up over
the years as process water containing DDT was discharged to settling ponds
or ditches. Analyses of soil, sediment, water, and biological samples
showed that undegraded DDT at some sites was being leached to surrounding
areas. For example, fish caught in a major river about one mile from a
contaminated site contained as much as 500 ppm DDT, two orders of magnitude
greater than the maximum concentration allowable for interstate commerce.
Biological surveys of the streams in contaminated areas indicated that
species diversity is adversely affected in these areas."*

-42-

�Due to DDT's low solubility in water, the most highly contaminated areas
other than DDT storage or burial sites are streambed sludges. This is
because the waterways leading from a plant act primarily as carriers for
suspended DDT, which settles out in the streambeds. In addition, areas that
are not vegetated pose a particular problem since erosion by wind and rain
can carry land contaminants into surface waters. Similarly, open du.nps of
waste DDT can be constantly errded by surface runoff.
Composite Hypothetical Site
A map of a composite hypothetical site is given in Fig. VII-1. In later
sections of this report, the effects (approximate) of the site configuration
on the environmental impacts of various DDT concentrations are considered.
The features of the composite hypothetical site are:
1. the DDT manufacturing site discharging to a large drainage ditch
2. a train of shallow lakes and wetlands containing food fish and
surrounded by natural areas
3.

ipring flooding, periodically causing redistribution of sediments

4. ultimate drainage of DDT-containing waters into the river, which
is open to boating and fishing
5.

the possibility of free movement of fish and other wildlife from
lakes to and from the river.

Thus, there are wetland areas where DDT in sediments can persist over
many years. There are also physical and biological mechanisms for the
periodic redistribution of DDT in the environment. Finally, DDT can
enter wildlife and human food chains in many ways.
Observed DDT Concentrations
Concentrations of DDT in soil, sediment, and various water bodies as
well as in various wildlife species are listed in Table VII-1 as a
function of the downstream distance from the DDT plant. For simplification, it is assumed that the waste DDT that is buried or landfilled is
located at distance zero and, because the principal carrier of DDT is
water, that concentrations of DDT in water and underlying sediment are
indicative of the level of contamination at each downstream distance.
(The referenced data are those for actual areas surrounding DDT plants.
Some of these data, however, correspond to samples collected and analyzed
more than; 15 years ago and, thus, may not be representative of present
conditions in the areas. These data, possibly out of date, are included

-43-

�1 1

^(^••••ftTijr^WJtWR*.**-*^"'* "' "*-'^'^

/'nv.f~'"in''

Drainage
Ditch

Direction of
Spring Floods

^ X

\
\

Flp. VIM. Map of Model DDT Plant Site

-44-

�TABU! VII-1. AREA AHD WILDLIFE COOTAHTHAT1OH LEVELS FOR VARIOUS SITES

Approximate
Distance
from Plant
Site (*ilea)
0

Approximate
Location
Ground surface of
abandoned production
' area

Median
Sampled
in Area

Reference

Concentration
of DOT in
Area*

Open dumps of
vaste TOT, 100 Ib

Reference

Concentration of OOT°
&lt;PP»)
Huscle
Fat

1001

1002

0

Baseoent of abandoned
buildings

Blocks of DDT
covered vith
clay, 3 tont

0
*
;

Wildlife
Species
Stapled

Domsatic »ever in
plant

Water

181

6.0 ppb

0

Drainage ditch

Water

181

2.7 ppb

005
-.

Drainage ditch

Sediscnt

181

7 , 0 ppa
000

O.I

Clo«*d drainage ditch

Topsoil

181

110 p!»

1

Cloaed drainage ditch

Top*oil

181

0.1 pp*

1

Strea* A

Water
Sedinent

181

2.3 ppb
1 0 0 pp»
.0

2

Lake

Water
Sedinent

1 ppb
100 pp»

Crow
Rabbit
Oposaim
Fox
Fish
Fish
Birds
Fish
Deer
Birds Oterbivores)
Birds (carnivores)
Fish

179
179
179
179
183
184
184
182
183

40
1
23
27
314
20-200
10
300
0.2

2
20
200

750
17
240
SO

800-2.817

50
500
100
,0

�TABLE VTt-1.

Approximate
Distance
from Plant
Sice (niles)

Approximate
Location

Kediim
Sampled
in Area

Reference

(Coot.)

Concentration
of DDT in
Area*

Wildlife
Species
Sampled

Reference

Mannals
3

JS-

3

Lake
Bayou

Water
Sediaent

180
180

Creek6

Water
Sediwent

3

River

Water
Sediment

0.1 ppb
5 PP"
181

0.03 ppb
1 ppo

Shad
Carp
Bass
Catfish
Ban

SunfUh
Bluettill
Fish
Birds (herbivores)
Birds (carnivores)
Mamuls
a. Wf solubility in water • 1.2 F

50

0.5 ppb
IS ppa

4

b. FDA tolerance for fish • 5 p»»«
. e. Hypothetical data.

5

0.5 ppb
6 ppra

Water
Sediscnt

Concentration of DDTb
&lt;PP»&gt;
Muscle
Fat

182
182
182
184
ISA
184
184
178

71
29
6
112
112
7

35
412

O.OJ
1.0
0.5

1
10
S

�here to demonstrate an approach for relating toxicological and ecological
effects to levels of DDT contamination.)
The concentrations of DDT in wildlife at various distances downstream from the hypothetical site are listed in Table VI1-2, along with the
concentrations of DDT in water bodies and sediments at these distances. It
can be seen that the high concentrations in water and sediment at the
shorter distances are reflected in high concentrations in the tissues of the
species sampled. Conversely, the concentrations at a distance o£' 5 miles
approach the average levels in t.he United States. For these data, the
differences between concentrations found in muscle and fat were estimated
from actual measurements.
Predicted Effects
The ultimate objective of this analysis is to predict potential
site-specific environmental impacts of DDT contamination. The predictions,
in their simplest form, relate environmental impacts to concentrations of
DDT in soil and water. With such information and analyses of DDT in soil
(sediment) and water samples, one can estimate impacts of environmental
contamination and the benefits of cleaning up the soil and water to known
levels. Preceding sections of this report provide evidence that currently
available literature data are sufficient to relate environmental impacts to
four types of exposure information: DDT concentrations in an affected
organism, dietary DDT levels, acute or chronic; doses of DDT, and the DDT
concentration in water (for aquatic species). If these four types of
information can be related to soil and water concentration data, the
objective will be met.
USAMBRDL has devised a procedure for estimating safe exposure levels,
called preliminary pollutant limit values (PPLVs), from laboratory or field
dat/» to protect the health of humans and other animals." &gt;"7 This
procedure assumes an equilibrium (or steady state) relationship for a
pollutant distributed among soil or sediment, water, and biota. However, as
is evident in Tables VII-1 and VII-2, sediment:water and fish:water ratios
vary with distance from the model site. Apparently, the PPLV algebra fails
.for DDT concentrations that approach the water solubility limit. Thus, an
alternative procedufe is required to relate health effects to environmental
contaminant levels. For the model site, field data on concentrations of DDT
in soil, water, and biota are adequate to predict health and environmental
effects in qualitative terms.
Data presented earlier on the toxicological effects of DDT on wildlife
are summarized in Fig. VII-2 and Table VI1-3. Predicted impacts of DDT
contamination at the model site are summarized in Table VII-4, which was
derived from data presented in Tables VII-2 and VII-3. Acute toxicity is
predicted to be a problem for predatory and fish-eating birds, sensitive
fish species, and sensitive amphibian species at distances up to 2 miles
from the DDT plant. Very sensitive fish species might be affected over the
next few miles. No animal species are predicted to suffer acute toxicity
symptoms at greater distances.

-47-

�TABIS VII-2.

EWIROWBEOTA1. COHCENTRATIONS OF DDT AT THE HODEt SITE (pp»)

Distance fro* Plant Site (ailes)
Suple
Water

Reference
181

1

2

5

0.001

0.00003

i, 090(440 )«

100(100)

1(33)

2(2)

Sediasnt

0.0023

Average
U.S.
Levels
0.000008-0.000144

Reference
16

0.05(1.7)

0.17

Kuicle Ti*s«e
Birdt
Predatory end
fish-eating
Son- predatory
OB

179,184

Pith

182-184,186

KaBMU

179,184

179.184

750(330)

25(11)
20(20)

1(33)

300(130)

200(200)

100(3,300)

13(5.7)

5(5)

0.5(17)

50(50)

1(33)

500(500)

10(330)

F«t

Birds
Predatory «nd
fish eating
Non-predator*
Fi»h

182-184,186

1,800(780)

1,000(1,000)

500(16.000)

Maaoals

179,184

130(57)

50(50)

5(170)

a. Values in parentheses are non-steady state concentration factors tines 10~3.

2.3

It

�TABLE VII-3. TOXICOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF DDT ON TYPICAL WILDLIFE AS A
. FUNCTION OF CONCENTRATIONS OF DDT IN WATER, THE DIET, AND TISSUES

Medium
Water

Diet

Tissues

Approximate
Concentration

Species

0.01 ppb
1-20 ppb
5 ppb

Fish
Fish
Amphibians

Lethal to sac-fry
Lethal
Lethal

Birds
Mammals
Birds
Mammals

Eggshell thinning
Possible carcinogenic effects
Lethal
Lethal

Fish
Birds

Lethal to sac-fry
Eggshell thinning

0.15 ppm
2 ppm
600 ppm
200 mg/kg
1-5 ppm (eggs)
1 ,&gt;pm (egga)

Effect

Reproductive failure is expected for predatory and fish-eating birds
and for fish at distances up to 5 miles and more from the DDT plant
site. Repopulation of the model site with these species is to be
expected only for those species with some accessible breeding populations
at distances sufficient to avoid DDT-associated reproductive failure. In
other words, fish and predatory birds may be found at the model site, but
it is unlikely that sensitive species hatched within 5 miles of the DDT
plant.
Mammals are generally much more resistant to DDT than birds or
fishes. Even so, it is not improbable that fish-eating mammals, e.g.,
otters, could ingest toxic quantities of DDT, considering the high
dietary levels (Table VII-1). Their intake might, for example, exceed
the 20 ppm DDT reported to cause teratogenic or embryotoxic effects in
mice. Lower levels could conceivably induce cancer, but this would not
be ecologically significant because cancer from a weak carcinogen, such
as DDT, would be expected to afflict only senescent individuals. Fish
taken for human food within 5 miles of the site are virtually certain to
exceed the 5 mg/kg limit established by the Food and Drug Administration.
For average daily consumption of 18.7 g of such fish, tVie associated
lifetime cancer risk, by the EPA's method,2' exceeds 1 in 1,000. For
consumption of fish containing 50 mg DDT/kg, the associated risk would
exceed 1 in 100. (Note, however., that EPA considers the cancer risk from
DDT ingestion derived from epidemiological data to represent an upper
bound. The actual risk may be substantially lower.)

-49-

�LC» (short-term)

s

LCw (long-term) _

*c

Not lethal

-

Chromosome
abnormalities
&lt;D
«

?

Teratogenic
;
or embryotoxlc effects

c
£

Eggshell thinning,
increased embryo mortality

i

O
©
A
D

5
Possible
carcinogenic
effects

_L
0.1

0.4

1.0

4.0

Amphibians
Fish
Birds
Land-dwelling
mammals

I
10

40

100

I
400

1,000

Concentration of DDT in Diet (ppm)

Fig. VII-2. Biological Effects of Dietary DDT Typical Receptors

4,000

�TAiLE VII-4. PREDICTED EFFECTS ON WILDLIFE
Distance from DDT plant Site (miles)
i,
t-«
i

Effect
.

0-2

2-5
;

Acute toxicity for

Predatory and fish-eating
birds, sensitive fish,
sensitive amphibians

Very sensitive fish

Reproductive failure
due to

Eggshell thinning in
predatory and fish-eating
birds, dc»th of fish sac-fry

Eggshell thinning in
predatory &amp;id fisheatv.tg birds, death
of fish sac-fry

Eggshell thinning in
predatory and fisheating birds, death
of fish sac-fry

�\

Decontamina t ion Ob j ect i ves
In lieu of PPLV's, maximum environmental DDT levels for protection of
wildlife have been calculated directly from model site data (Table
VII-1). These are 0.1 ppb in water and 4 ppb in sediment for predatory
and fish-eating birds and 0.05 ppb in water and 2 ppb in sediment for
fish.
The critical effect for birds is eggshell thinning leading to
reproductive failure. Available data suggest that for sensitive birds,
such as the brown pelican, DDT concentrations greater than 1 ppm in the
egg can cause a significant decline in reproductive success. Other
studies suggest that DDT levels in bird fat are approximately 40 time«
the levels in bird eggs. Table VII-2 shows that the ratio of DDT in fat
of predatory birds to DDT in water is approximately constant and falls in
the ranjje of 300,000 to 500,000. Assuming a ratio of 400,000, it is
calculated that a DDT level in water not to exceed 0.1 j t&gt; will provide a
safe litnit of 40 ppm in fat and 1 ppm in eggs. This corv spends to a
sediment concentration of about 4 ppb. For less sensitive species, safe
concentration limits will be higher. (It should be emphasized th«t these
calculations assume that measured DDT concentrations are equilibrium or
7* steady-state levels. If not, derived values could be in error by an
order of magnitude or greater.)
For fish, the critical effect is mortality of sac-fry, which c*n
occur at DDT concentt-i.tions of about 1 ppm in fish eggs (Table V-4) and
estimated corresponding 'concentrations of 0.01 ppb in water and 0.4 ppb
in sediment (assuming a sediment-to-water ratio of 4 ) Data of Table
0.
VII-1 indicate that reproductive success could be expected at di»t«nct«
^greater than 5 miles from the model marufacturing site.
To establish engineering goals for cleanup efforts, benefitt to
wildlife and humans are predicted to occur for any degree of cleanup from
present levels uown to 2 ppb in sediments (0.05 ppb in water). These
concentrations are so low, and the area of dispersal so great, that it
may be better to focus on cleanup efforts giving the greatest reduction
of total mass of DDT, accepting the fact that decreases to ppb levels in
sediment will have to come through biodegradation. Regular monitoring of
DDT levels in fish and waterfowl will provide a measure of restoration.

-52-

�VIII. REFERENCES
1.

Letter, AMCPM-DRR, Subject: Installation Restoration Directed
Actions (December 1, 1975).

2.

Dacre, J.C., W.D. Burrows, C.W.R. Wade, A.F. Hegyeli, T.A. Miller,
and D.R. Cogley (eds.), "Problem Definition Studies on Potential
Environmental Pollutants: V. Physical, chemical, lexicological,
and Biological Properties of Seven Chemicals Used in Pyrotechnic
Compositions," TR 7704, U.S. Army Medical Bioengineering Research
and Development Laboratory, Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD (October
1979, in press).

3.

Burrows, W.D., J.C. Dacre, and D.R. Cogley (eds.), "Problem
Definition Studies on Potential Environmental Pollutants: VI.
Preliminary Assessment of Environmental Effects of Seven Substances
Used in Pyrotechnic Compositions at Pine Bluff Arsenal," MR 28-79,
U.S. Army Medical Bioengineeririg Research and Development
Laboratory, Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD (November 1979).

4.

Rosenblatt, D.H., T.A. Miller, J.C. Dacre, I. Muul, and D.R. Cogley
(eds.), "Problem Definition Studies on Potential Environmental
Pollutants: I. Toxicology and Ecological Hazards of 16 Substances
at Rocky Mountain Arsenal," TR 7508, U.S. Army Medical
Bioengineering Research and Development Laboratory, Fort Detrick,
Frederick, MD, AD B039661 (December 1975.),

5.

Rosenblatt, D.H., T.A. Miller, J.C. Dacre, I. Muul, and D.R. Cogley
, (eds.), "Problem Definition Studies on Potential Environmental
Pollutants: II. Physical, Chemical, Toxicological, and Biological
Properties of 16 Substances," TR 7509, U.S. Army Medical
Bioengineering Research and Development Laboratory, Fott Detrick,
Frederick, MD, AD A030428 (December 1975).

6.

Dacre, J.C. and D.H. Rosenblatt, "Mammalian Toxicology and Toxicity
to Aquatic Organisms of Four Important Types of Waterborne Munitions
Pollutants - An Extensive Literature Evaluation," TR 7403, U.S. Army
Medical Bioengineering Research and Development Laobratory, Aberdeen
Proving Ground, AD 778725 (March 1974).

7.

Miller, T.A., D.H. Rosenblatt, J.C. Dacre, D.R. Cogley, and J.L.
Welch, "Problem Definition Studies on Potential Environmental
Pollutants. III. Toxicology and Ecological Hazards of Benzene;
Toluene; Xylenes; and p-Chlorophenyl Methyl Sulfide, Sulfoxide, and
Sulfone at Rocky Mountain Arsenal," TR 7604, U.P. Army Medical
Bioengineering Research and Development Laboratory, Fort Detrick,
Frederick, MD, AD B039662 (June 1976).

-53-

�8. Miller, T.A. , D.H. Rosenblatt, J.C. Dacre, J.G. Pearson, R.K.
Kulktirni, J.L. Welch, D.R. Cogley, and G. Woodard, "Problem
Definition Studies on Potential Environmental Pollutants. IV.
Physical, Chemical, Toxicological, and Biological Properties of
Benzene; Toluene; Xylenes; and p-Chlorophtnyl Methyl Sulfide,
Sulfoxide, and Sulfone," TR 7605, U.S. Array Medical Bioengineering
Research and Development Laboratory, Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD,
AD A040435 (June 1976).
9. World Health Organization, Environmental Health Criteria 9; DDT
and Its Derivatives, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

_

10. DDT and Associated Substances, IARC Monograph No. 5 (1974).
11. Thompson, J.F. (ed.), Analysis of Pesticide Residues in Human and
Environmental Samples, A^Cqmpilat ion of Methods Selected for Use in
Pesticide Monitoring Programs , U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Health Effects Research Laboratory, Environmental Toxicology
Division, Research Triangle Park, NC, June 1977.
12. Bontoyan, W.R. , Chairman of Editorial Committee, Manual of Chemical
Methods for Pesticides and Devices, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Toxic Substances Division, Building 306, Room 101,
Beltsville, MD (no date).
13. Laws, E.R., Jr., W.C. Maddrey, A. Cur ley, and V.W. Burse, "Long
T&lt;irm Occupational Exposure to DDT," Arch. Environ. Health
27:318-321 (1973).
14. Jukes, T.H., "Insecticides in Health, Agriculture and the
Environment," Naturwissenschaften 61:6-16 (1974).
15. Laws, E.R. , Jr., A. Curley, and F.J. Biros, "Men With Intensive
Occupational Exposure to DDT," Arch . Environ. Health 15:766-775
U967).
16. Metcalf, R.L. and J.J. McKelvey, Jr. (eds.), "The Future for
Insecticides: Needs and Prospects," Advan . Environ ._ Sc i . Techno! .
6 (1976).
17. Hdrina, P.D., R.L. Singhal, and G.M. Ling, "DDT and Related
Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Insecticides: Pharmacological Basis of
Their Toxicity in Maeuaals," Adv. Pharmacol. Chemother. 12:?l-88
(1975).
—
18. Hayes, V.J., E.D. Dale, and C.I. Pirkle, "Evidence of Safety of
Long-Term High Oral Doseo of DDT for Man," Arch. Environ. Health
22:119 (1971).

-54-

�19. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, DDT; A Review of__Scient:ifi(!
and Economic^AspectB of the Decision to Ban Its Use as a Peatxcidj,
Document EPA-540/1-75-022, WashingtonT DC (1975).
20. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 44 FR 56649, pp. 56649-56651
(October 1979).
21. Hayes, W.J., Jr., "Pharmacology and Toxicology of DDT," in Muller,
P. (ed.), DDT; The Insecticide Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane *nd_
Its Significance, Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland, Vol. 2,
pp. 9-247 (19597.
22. Innes, J.R.M., "Bioassay of Pesticides and Industrial Chemicals for
Tumorigenicity in Mice. A Preliminary Note," J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
42:1101 (1969).
23. Powers, M.B., R.W. Voelker, W.A. Olson, and W.M. Weatherholty,
"Bioassays of DDT, TDE, and p,p'-DDE for Possible Carciriogenicity,"
National Cancer Institute, Carcinogenesis Technical Report Series,
No. 131 (1978).
24. Rossi, L., M. Ravera, F. Repetti, and L. Santi, "Long-Terra
Administration of DDT or Phenobarbital-NA in Wistar Rats," Int. J.
Cancer 19:179 (1977).
25. Shabad, L.M., T.S. Kolesnichenko, and T.V. Nikonova,
"Transplacental and Combined Long-Term Effect of DDT in Five
Generations of A-Strain Mice," Int. J. Cancer 11:688 (1973).
26. - Tarjan, R. and T. Kemeny, "Multi-Generation Studies on DDT in
Mice," Food Cosaiet. Toxicol. 7:215 (1969).
27. Terracini, B., R.J. Cabral, and M.C. Testa, "The Effects of
Long-Term Feeding of DDT to BALB/c Mice," Int. J. Cancer 11:747
(1973).
28. Thorpe, E. and A.I.T. Walker, "The Toxicology of Dieldrin (HEOO):
II. Comparative Long-Term Oral Toxicology Studies in Mice with
Dieldrin, DDT, Phenobarbitone, B-B4C and -BHC," Food Cosmet.
Toxicol. 11:433 (1973).
29. Tomatis, L., V. Turusso, R.T. Charles, and M. Biocchi, "The Effect
of Long-Term Exposure to DDE and DDD on CF-1 Mice," J. Natl. Cancer
Inst. 52:883 (1974).
30. Tomatis, 1,., V. Turusso, N. Day, and R.T. Charles, "The Effect of
Long-Term Exposure to DDT on CF-1 Mice," Int^ J. Cancer 10:489
(1972).

-55-

�31. Turusov, V.S., N.E. Day, L. Tomatis, E. Gati, and R.T. Charles,
"Tumors in CF-1 Mice Expooed for 6 Consecutive Generations to DDT,"
J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 51:983 (1973).
32. Agthe, C., H. Garcia, P. Shubik, L. Tomatio, and E. Wenyon, "Sr.udy
of the Potential Carcinogenicity of DDT in Syrian Golden Hamsters,"
Proc...'Soc. Ejcp. Biol. Med. 134:113 (1970).
33. McCann, J., E. Choi, E. Yamasaki, and B.N. Ames, "Detection of
Carcinogens as Mutagens in the Salmonella/Microsome Test: Assay of
300 Chemicals," Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 72:5135 (1975).
34. Brown, A.W.A., Ecology of Pesticides, John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York
(1978).
35. Edwards, C.A. (ed.), Environmental Pollution by peatAcides, Plenum
Press, London, (1973).
36. Matsumura, F«, "Effects of Pesticides on Wildlife," in Toxicology
of Insecticidea, plenum Press, New York, pp. 355-401 (1975).
37. Tahori, A.S. (ed.), Fate of Pesticides in Environment, Gordon and
Breach Science Publishers, New York (1971).
38. White-Stevens, R. (ed.), Pest i c id e sin the Env ironment, Vol. 1,
Parts I and II, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York (1971).
39. Woodwell, G.M., C.F. Wurster, and P.A. Isaacson, "DDT Residues in
an East Coast Estuary: A Case of Biological Concentration of a
Persistent Insecticide," Science 156:821 (1967).
40. Wurster, C.F., "Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Insecticides and the World
Ecosystem," Biol. Conserv. I(2):123 (1969).
41. Wurster, C.F., "DDT Proved Neither Essential Nor Safe," BioScience
23:105 (1973).
42. Wurster, C.F., "Effects of Insecticides," in Polunin, N. (ed.), The
Environmental Future, MacMillan Press, Ltd., New York (1972).
43. Pionke, H.B. and G. Cheaters, "Pesticide-Sediment-Water
Interactions," J. Environ. Qual. 2:29-45 (1973).
44. Bridges, W.R., B.J. Kallman, and A.K. Andrews, "Persistence of DDT
and Its Metabolics in a Farm Pond," Trans. Am. Fish Soc. 92:421-427
(1963).
45. Bailey, T.E. and J.R. Hannum, "Distribution of Pesticides in
California," J. Sanit._ F.ng. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 93:27-43
(1967).

-56-

�46. Guenzi, W.D. and W.E. Beard, "Anaerobic Conversion of DDT to DDD
and Aerobic Stability of DDT in Soil," Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.
32(4):522-524 (1968).
47. Guenzi, W.D. and W.E. Beard, "Volatilisation of Lindaue and DDT
From Soils," Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 34(3):443-447 (1970).
48. Guenzi, W.D. and W.E. Beard, "The Effects of Temperature and Soil
Water on Conversion of DDT to DDE in Soil," J. Environ. Qua!.
5(3):243-246 (1976).
49. Guenzi, W.D. and W.E. Beard, "Degradation in Flooded Soil as
Related to Temperature," J. Environ. Qual. 5(4):391-394 (1976).
50. Fries, G.F., "Degradation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons Under
Anaerobic Conditions," Advan. Chera. Ser. 111:256-270 (1972).
51. Rhead, M.M., "Fate of DDT and PCB's (Polychlorinated Biphenyls) in
the Marine Environment," Environ. Chem. 1:137-159 (1975).
52. Wedemeyer, G., "Dechlorination of l,l,l-Trichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyDethane by Aerpbacte£ aerogenes. I. Metabolic Products,"
Appl. Microbiol. l5(3):569-574 (1967).
53. Malone, T.C., "In Vitro Conversion of DDT to DDD by the Intestinal
• Microflora of the Northern Anchovy, Engraulis mordax," Nature
227:848-849 (1970).
54. Pritchard, J.B., A.M. Guarino, and W.B. Kintner, "Distribution,
Metabolism, and Excretion of DDT and Mirex by a Marine Teleost, the
Winter Flounder," Environ. Hea1th Perspect. June:45-54 (1973).
55. Young, R.G., L. St. John, and D.J. Lisk, "Degradation of DDT by
Goldfish," Bui1. Environ. Contain.Toxicol. 6:351-354 (1971).
56. Zinck, M.E. and R.F. Addison, "The Effect of Temperature on the
Rate of Conversion of p,p'-DDT to p,p'-DDE in Brook Trout
(Salvelinus fontinalis)," Can. J. Biocheia. 53:636-639 (1975).
57. Guarino, A.M., J. B. Pritchard, J.B. Anderson, and D.P. Rail,
"Tissue Distribution of 114C]DDT in the Lobster After
Administration via Intravascular or Oral Routes or After Exposure
from Ambient Sea Water," Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 29:277-288
(1974).
58. Sheridan, P.F., "Uptake, Metabolism, and Distribution of DDT in
Organs of the Blue Crab, Callinectes sapidus," Chesapeake Sci.
16:20-26(1975).

-57-

�59. Neudorf, S. and M.A.Q. Khan, "Pick-up and Metabolism of DDT,
Dieldrin and Photodieldrin by a Fresh Water Alga (Ank is t rodesmua
amalloxdes) and a Microcrustacean (Daphnia pulex)," Bull. Environ.
Contarn. Toxicol, 13:443-450 (1975).
60. Sundstrom, G., B. Jennson, and S. Jensen, "Structure of Phenolic
Metabolites of p.p'-DDE in Rat, Wild Seal and Guillemot," Nature
255:627-628 (1975).
61. Eichelberger, J.W. and J.J. Lichtenberg, "Persistence of Pesticides
in River Water," Environ. Sci. Techno1. 5:541-544 (1971).
62. Johnson, B.T. and J.O. Kennedy, "Biomagnification of p,p'-DDT and
Methoxychlor by Bacteria," Appl. Microbiol. 26:66-71 (1973).
63. Vance, B.D. and W. Drummond, "Concentration of Pesticide by Algae,"
J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 61:360-362 (1969).
64. Johnson, B.T., C.R. Saunders, H.O. Sanders, and R.S. Campbell,
"Biological Magnification and Degradation of DDT and Aldrin by
Freshwater Invertebrates," J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 28:705-709
(1971).
65. Hansen, D.J., Annual Report of the Gulf Breeze Biological
Laboratory, 1965, U.S. Bur. Cotnm. Fish Circ. 247, pp. 10-11 (1966).
66. Holden, A.V., "A Study of the Absorption of C14-labelled DDT From
Water by Fish," Ann. Appl. Biol. 50:466-477 (1962).
67. Cade, T.J., C.M. White, and J.R. Haugh, "Peregrines and Pesticides
in Alaska," Condor 70:170-178 (1968).
••

68. Cade, T.J., J.L. Lincer, C.M. White, D.G. Roseneau, and L.G.
Schwartz, "DDE Residues and Eggshell Changes in Alaska Falcons and
Hawks," Science 172:955-957 (1971).
69. U.S. Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare, Report of the
Secretary's Commission on Pesticides and Their Relationship to
Environmental Health, U.S. Dept. HEW, Washington, DC (December
1969).
70. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Criteria Document - DDT (DDD,
DDE), Washington, DC, EPA-440/9-76-010 (1976).
71. Pimentel, *)., Ecological Effects of Pesticides on Non-Target
Species, Office of Science and Technology, U.S. Government Printing
Office, W.shington, DC, No. 4106-0029 (June 197i).

-58-

�72. Gillett, J.W., J. Hill, A.V. Jarvinen, and W.P. Schoor, A
Conceptual Model foir_the Movement of Pesticides Through the
Environment,. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC,
EPA-660/3-74-024 (December 1974).
73. Barker, R.J., "Notes on Some Ecological Effects of DDT Sprayed on
Elras
« "J^Wildl. Manage. 22:269-274 (1958).
74. Cottara, C. and E. Higgins, "DOT: Its Effect on Fish and Wildlife,"
J. Econ. Entomol. 39:44-52 (1946).
75. Hickey, J.J. and L.B. Hunt, "Initial Songbird Mortality Following a
Dutch Elm Disease Control Program," J. Hildl. Manage. 24:259-265
(1960).
76. Hotchkiss, N. and R.H. Pough, "Effect on Forest Birds of DDT Used
for Gypsy Moth Control in Pennsylvania," J. Wildl. Manage.
10:202-207 (1946).
77. Hunt, L.B., "Song Bird Breeding Populations in DDT-sprayed Dutch
Elm Disease Communities," J. Wildl. Manage. 24:139-146 (1960).
78. Hunt, L.B., "Kinetics of Pesticide Poisoning in Dutch Elm Disease
Control,1' U.S. Fish Wildl. gerv. Circ. 226:12-13 (1965).
79. Robbins, C.S. and R.E. Stewart, "Effects of DDT on Bird population
of Scrub Forest," J. Wildl. Manage. 13:11-18 (1949).
80. Wallace, G.J., W.P. Nickell, and R.F. Bernard, "Bird Mortality in
th6 Dutch Elm Disease Program in Michigan," Cranbrook Inst. Sci.
Bull. 41 (1961).
81. Bernard, R.F., "Studies on the Effect of DDT on Birds," Publ. Mus.
Mich. State Univ. Biol. Ser. 2:155-191 (1963).
82. Bernard, R.F., "DDT Residues in Avian Tissues," J. Appl. Ecol.
3(Suppl.):193-198 (1966).
83. Hunt, E.G., "Studies of Pheasant-Insecticide Relationships," J.
Appl. Ecol. 3(Suppl.):113-123 (1966).
84. Ames, P.L., "DDT Residues in the Eggs of the Osprey in the
Northeastern United States and Their Relation to Nesting Success,"
J. Appl. Ecol. 3(Suppl.):87-97 (1966).
85. Heath, E.G., J.W. Spanna, and J.F. Kreitzer, "Marked DDE Impairment
of Mallard Reproduction in Controlled Studies," Nature 224:47-48
(1969).

-59-

�86* Davison, K.L. and J.L. Sell, "DDT Thins Shells of Eggs From Mallard
Ducks Maintained on Ad Libitum or Control-Feeding Regimens," Arch.
Environ. Contam. Tpxicol. 2:222-223 (1974).
87. Peakall, D.B., J.L. Lincer, R.W. Risebrough, J.B. Pritchard, and
W.B. Kinter, "DDE-Induced Eggshell Thinning: Structural and
Physiological Effects in Three Species," Comp. Gen. Pharmaco1.
4:305-313 (1973).
88. McLane, M.A.R. and L.C. Hall, "DDE Thins Screech Owl Eggshells,"
Bull^Environ. Contam. Tpxicol. 8:65-68 (1972).
89. Longcore, J.R., F.B. Samson, and T.W. Whittendale, "DDE Thins
Eggshells and Lowers Reproductive Success of Captive Black Ducks,"
Bui 1. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 6:485-490 (1971).
90. Azevedo, J.A., E.G. Hunt, and L.A. Woods, "Physiological Effects of
DDT on Pheasants," Calif. Fish Game 51:276-293 (1965).
91. DeWitt, J.B., "Chronic Toxicity to Quail and Pheasants of Some
Chlorinated Insecticides," J. Agr ic. Food Chem. 4:863-866 (1956).
92. Albert, T.F., "The Effects of DDT on the Sperm Production of the
Domestic Fowl," Auk 79:104-107 (1962).
93. Locke, L.N., N.J. Chura, and P.A. Stewart, "Spcrmatogenesis in Bald
Eagles Experimentally Fed a Diet Containing DDT," Condor 68:497-502
(1966).
94. Hickey, J.J. and D.W. Anderson, "Chlorinated Hydrocarbons and
Eggshell Changes in Raptorial and Fish-eating Birds," Science
162:271-273 (1968).
95. Anderson, D.W., J.J. Hickey, R.W. Risebrough, D.F. Hughes, and R.E.
Christensen, "Significance of Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Residues to
Breeding Pelicans and Cormorants," Can. Field Nat. 83:91-112 ( 9 9 .
16)
96. Fyfe, R.W., J. Campbell, B. Hayson, and K. Hodson, "Regional
Population Declines and Organochlorine Insecticides in Canadian
Prairie Falcons," Can. Field Na^. 83:191-200 (1969).
97. Bins, L.J., A.A. Belisle, and R.M. Prouty, "Relations of the Brown
Pelicans to Certain Environmental Pollutants," PCStic. Monit. J.
7:181-194 (1974).
98. Keith, J.A. and I.M. Gruchy, "Residue Levels of Chemical Pollutants
in North American Birdlife," Proc. 15th Int. Ornithol. Congr.t The
Hague, The Netherlands, pp. 437-454""(1972)'.

-60-

�99. Wiemeyer, S.N., P.R. Spitzer, W.C. Krantz, T.G. Lament, and E.
Cromartie, "Effects of Environmental Pollutants on Connecticut and
Maryland Oapreys;" J. Wild I. Manage. 39:124-139 (1975).
100.

McKee, J.E. and H.W. Wolfe, Water Quality^Criteria, 2nd edition,
State Water Quality Control Board, Sacramento, CA (1963).

101. Katz, M., R.S. LaGore, D. Weitkamp, J.M. Cuunings, D. Anderson, and
D.R. May, "Effects on Freshwater Fish," J. Water Pollut. Control
Fed. 44:1226-1250 (1972).
102.

Johnson, D.W., "Pesticides and Fishes - A Review of Selected
Literature," Trans, /u.. Fish Soc. 97:398-424 (1968).

103.

McKim, J.M., G.M. Chriotensen, J.H. Tucker, D.A. Benoit, and M.J.
Lewis, "Effects of Pollution on Freshwater Fish," J. j/ater Pollut.
Control Fed. 46:1540 ff (1974).

104.

Macek, K.J. and W.A. McAllister, "Insecticide Susceptibility of
Some Common Fish Family Representatives," Trans.Am. Fish Soc.
99:20-27 (1970).

105.
e^

Ingham, B. and M.A. Gallo, "Effect of Asulam in Wildlife Species:
Acute Toxicity to Birds and Fish," Bull. Environ. Contarn. Toxicol.
13:194-199 (197S).

106.

Post, G. and T.R. Schroeder, "The Toxicity. of Four Insecticides to
Four Salmonid Species," Bull. Environ... Contain. Toxicol. 6:144-156
(1971).

107.

Bathe, R., L. Ultnann, and K. Sachsse, "Determination of Pesticide
Toxicity to Fish," Schrifteher. Ver. Wasser Boden Lufthyg. Berlin*" Pah1em 37:241-256 (1973).

108. Committee on Water Quality Criteria, HAS-NAE, Water Quality
Criteria 1972, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, No.
5501-00520 (1972).
109. Schaumberg, F.D., T.E. Howard, and C.C. Walden, "A Method to
Evaluate the Effects of Water Pollutants on Fish Respiration,"
Water Res. 1:731-737 (1967).
110.

Julin, A.M., Fish-Pesticide Research Laboratory, Columbia, MO,
letter to E. Bender, Ecological Research Office, Biomedical
Laboratory, Edgewood Arsenal, MD (August 5, 1975).

111. Carter, F.L. and J.B. Graves, "Measuring Effects of Insecticides on
Aquatic Animals," La. Agric. 16:14-15 (1972-3).

�112.

Nunogawa, J.N., N.C. Burbank, and R.H.F. Young, "The Relative
Toxicities of Selected Chemicals to Several Speciej of Tropical
Fish," Adyan. Water Pollut. Res. Proc. Int. Conf. 5th 2:HA14, 1-14
(1970).

113. Korn, S. and R. Earnest, "Acute Toxicity of Twenty Insecticides to
Striped Bass, Morone saxatilis," Calif. Fish Game 60:128-131 (1974).
114. Earnest, R«D« and P.E. Benville, Jr., "Acute Toxicity of Four
Organochlorine Insecticides toTwo Species of Surf Perch," Calif.
Fish Game 58:127-132 (1972).
115. Macek, K.J., "Acute Toxicity of Pesticide Mixtures to Bluegills,"
Bui 1. Env iron. Cont&amp;~. Toxicol. 14:648-652 (1975).
116.

Holden, A.V., "Organochlorine Residues in Salraonid Fish," J. Appl.
Ecol. 3(Suppl.):45-53 (1966).

117. Macek, K.J., "Reproduction in Brook Trout (_S_a.ly_elinuft font inalis)
Fed Sublethal Concentrations of DDT," J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada
25:1787-1796 (1968).
118.

Macek, K.J., "Growth and Resistance to Stress in Brook Trout Fed
Sublethal Levels of DDT," J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 25:2443-2451
(1968).

119.

Burdick, G.E., E.J. Harris, J.H. Dean, T.M. Walker, J. Ske'd, and D.
Colby, "The Accumulation of DDT in Lake Trout and the Effect on
Reproduction," Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 93:127-136 (1964).

120.

Cuerrier, J., A. Keith, and E. Stone, "Problems with DDT in Fish
Culture Operations," NaU Can. 94:315-320 (1967).

121.

Dacre, J.C. and D. Scott, "Possible DDT Mortality in Young Rainbow
Trout," N.Z.J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 5:58-65 (1971).

122.

Johnson, H.E. and C. Pecor, "Coho Salmon Mortality and DDT in Lake
Michigan." N. Am. Wildl. Nat. Res. Conf. Trans. 34:159-166 (1969).

123.

Anderson, R.B. and W.H. Everhart, "Concentration of DDT in
Landlocked Salmon in Sebago Lake, Maine," Trans. Am. Fish Soc. .
95:160-164 (1966).

124.

Jarvinen, A.W., M.J. Hoffmann, and T.W. Thorslund, Significance to
Fathead Minnows of Food and Water Exposure to DDT, Environmental
Protection Agency, Duluth Laboratory Project No. 16AAK, Task A 010,
Program Element 1BA021 (1974).

125.

Malone, C.R. and E.G. Blaylock, "Toxicity of Insecticide
Formulations to Carp Embryos Reared In Vitro," J. Wildl. Manage.
34:4v'-0-463 (1970).

-62-

�126. Dill P. A. and R.C. Saunders, "Retarded Behavioral Development and
ftt^tired Balance in Atlantic Salmon (Salroo salar) Alevins Hatched
iron Gastrulae Exposed to DDT," J_» Fish. Rea_. Board Can.
3:1936-1938 (1974).
127.

Wei*, P., "Ultrastructural Changes Induced by Low Concentrations in
tto* Livers of the Zebra fish and the Guppy," Chem. Biol. Interactions
S J25-30 (1974).

128. Gardner, D.R. , "The Effect of Some DDT and Methoxychlor Analogs on
Tenperature Selection and Lethality in Brook Trout Fingerlings,"
Pet tic . Biochem. Phy a iol . 2:437-446 (1973).
129.

Aaderaon, J.M. , "Sublethal Effects and Changes in Ecosystems.
Assessment of the Effects of Pollutants on Physiology and
," Proc. Roy. Soc. Londcn Ser. B. 111:307-320 (1971).

130. AsyJereon, J. M. and M.R. Peterson, "DL/T: Sublethal Effects on
Breolc Trout Nervous Systems," Science 164:477-478 (1969).
131.

De'/y, F.B., H. Kleerekoper, and J.H. Matis, "Effects of Exposure to
Su&amp;lethal DDT on the Exploratory Behavior of Goldfish (Carassius
," Water Re sour. Res. 2:900-905 (1973).

132.

D«vy, F.B., H. Kleerekoper, and P. Gensler, "Effects of Exposure to
£ijj&gt; lethal DDT on the Locomotor Behavior of the Goldfish (Carassius
•unit us.).," J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 29:1333-1336 (1972).

133.

E&gt;e*«iah, D. , L.K. Cutkomp, R.B. Koch, and A. Jarvinen, "DDT:
Effect of Contir".ious Exposure on ATPase Activity J.n Fish, Pimephales
pr&amp;welas," Arch .Environ. Contain. Toxicol . 3:132-141 (1975T^

134. iitedem, T.P., R.I&gt;. Cambell, and D.W. Johnson, "Osmoregulatory
E«*ponse to DPT and Varying Salinites in jjalnio gairdneri. I. Gill
Jto-K-ATPase,:i Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 49A:197-205 (1974).
135.

Kmter, W.B., L.S. Merkens, R.H. Janicki, and A.M. Guarino,
"Studies on the Mechanism of Toxicity of DDT and Polychlorinated
Bip-henyls (PCBs): Disruption of Osmoregulation in Marine Fish,"
Epyiron.Jealth Perapect. 1:169-173 (1972).

136. Wfisbart, M. and D. Feiner, "Subl?thal Effect of DDT on Osmotic and
Ionic Regulation by the Goldfish Carassius auratus," Can. J. Zool.
52;739-744 (1974).
137. B'Jilet, D.R., M.E. Rasmusson, and W.E. Shanks, "Chronic Oral DDT
Twxicity in Juvenile Coho and Chinook Salmon," Toxicol. Appl.
pfesrmacol. 14:535-555 (1969).

-63-

�138. McNicholl, G. and W.C. Mackay, "Effect of DDT on Discriminating
Ability of Rainbow Trout (Salmo gairdneri)," J. Fish. Res. Board
Can. 32:785-788 (1975).
139. Ginsburg, J.M., "Comparative Toxicity of DDT Isomers and Related
Compounds to Mosquito Lsrvae and Fish," Science 105:233-234 ( 9 7 .
14)
140.

Alabaster, J.S., "Survival of Fish in 164 Herbicides, Insecticides,
Fungicides, Wetting Agents rrvd Miscellaneous Substances," Int. Pest
Control March/Apr?.l:29-35 (1969).

141. Applegate, V.C., J.H. Howell, A.E. Hall, Jr., and M.A. Smith,
"Toxicity of 4,346 Chemicals to Larval Lampreys and Fishes," U.S.
Fish Wildl. Serv. Spec. Sci. Rep. Fish. No. 207 (1957).
142.

Stickel, L.F., "Wood Mouse and Box Turtle Populations in the Area
Treated Annually with DDT for Pi"- i««ra," J. Wild!. Manage.
15:161-164 (1951). From Ref. 71.

143.

Brown, A.W.A., "Insecticides and the Balance of Animal
Populations," in Insect Control by Chemicals, John Wiley &amp; Sons,
New York, pp. 720-780 (1951).

14%

Fleet, R.R., D.R. Clark, and F.W, Plapp, "Residues of DDT and
Dieldrin in Snakeo from Two Texas Agro-ecosystems," BioScience
22:664-665 (1972).

145.

Phillips, J.B. and M.R. Wells, "Adenosine 'Triphosphataae Activity
in Liver, Intestinal Mucosa, Cloacal Bladder, and Kidney Tissue of
Five Turtle Species Following In Vitro Treatment with
l,l,l-Ti-ichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethane (DDT)," J. Agr. Food
Chem. 22:404-407 (1974).
»" "
146. Witherspoon, F.G., Jr. and M.R. Wells, "Adenosine Triphosphatase
Activity in Brain, Intestinal Kucosa, Kidney, and Liver Cellular
Fractions of the Red-Eared Turtle Following In Vitro Treatment with
DDT, DDD and DDE," Bull. Environ. Contain. ToxicoU 14:537-544
(1975).
147.

Sanders, H.O., "Pesticide Toxicities to Tadpoles of the Western
Chorus Frog, Pseudacris triserlata, and Fowler's Toad, Bufo
woodhousii fowleri," Copeia 2:246-251 (1970). Quoted in Ref. 71.

148.

Ludemanh, D. and H. Neumann, "The Effect of Modern Insecticides on
Freshwater Organisms," Anz. Schaedlingskd. 35:5-9 (1962).

149.

Cooke, A.S., "The Effects of DOT, When Used as a Mosquito
Larvicide, on Tadpoles of the Frog, Rana temporaria," Environ.
Pollut. 5:259-273 (1973).

-64-

�150.

Malina, J.F., Jr., "Toxicity of Petrochemicals in the Aquatic
Environmenty" Water Sewage Works 10:456-460 ( 9 4 .
16)

151. Macek, K.J. and H.O. Sanders, "Biological Variation in the
Susceptibility of Fish and Aquatic Invertebrates tf&gt; DDT," Trans.
Am. Fish. Soc. #9:89-90 (1970).
152.

Maki, A.W. and H.E. Johnson, "Effects of PCB (Aroclor 1254) and
p,p'-DDT on Production and Survival of Daphnia magna Strauss,"
Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 13:412-416 (1975).

153.

Khudairi, S.Y.A-D. and E. Ruber, "Survival and Reproduction of
Ostracods as Affected by Pesticides and Temperature," J. Econ.
Entomol. 67:22-24 (1974).

154.

Grosch, D.S., "Poisoning with DDT: Effect on Reproductive
Performai.ce of Artetnia," Science 151:592-593 (1967).

155.

Albaugh, D.W., "Insecticide Tolerances of Two Crayfish Populations
(Procambarus acutuB) in South-Central Texas," Bull. Environ.
Contam. Toxi~col. 8:334-338 (1972).
'

156. Hann, R.W., Jr. and P.A. Jansen, "Water Quality Characteristics of
Hazardous Materials," Environmental Engineering Division, Texas A&amp;M
University, College Station, TX (no date).
157. Leffler, C.W., "Effects of Ingested Mirex and DDT on Juvenile
Callinectes sapidu^ Rathburn," Environ. Iollut. 8:283-300 (1975).
158.

Koenig, C.C., R.J. Livingston, and C.R. Gripe, "Blue Crab Mortality:
Interaction of Temperature and DDT Residues," Arch. Environ. Contam.
Toxicol. 4:119-128 (1976).

159.

Odum, W.E., G.M. Woodwell, and C.F. Wurster, "DDT Residues Absorbed
from Organic Detritus by Fiddler Crabs," Science 16« 576-577 (1969).

160.

Decamps, H., K.W. Besch, and H. Vobis, "Effect of Toxic products on
the Construction of Webs by Hydropsyche (Insecta, Trichoptera),"
C^.R. Acad. Sci. Ser. D 276:375-378 (1973).

161.

Davis, B.C. and H. Hidu, "Effects of Pesticides on Embryonic
Development of Clams and Oysters and on Survival and Growth of the
Larvae," U.S. Fish. yildl.Serv. Fish. Bull. 67(2)-.393-404 (1969).

162.

Kimura, T., H.L. Keegan, and T. Haberkorn, "Dehydrochlorination of
DDT by Asian Blood-sucking Leeches," Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.
16:688-690 (1967).

163. Naqvi, S.M.Z., "Toxicity of Twenty-three Insecticides to a
Tubeficid Worm Branchiura sowerbyi from the Mississippi Delta," ,r._
Econ. Entomol. 66:70-74 (1973).

-65-

�164.

Kouyoumjian, H.H. and R.F. Uglow, "Some Aspects of the Toxicity of
p,p'-DDT, p,p'-DDE and p,p'-DDD to the Freshwater Planarian
Pplycelis feUna (Tricladida)," Environ. Pollut. 7:103-109 (1974).

165. Haller, H.L., "Wartime Development of Insecticides," Ind. Eng. Chem.
39:467-473 (1947).
166. Cristol, S.J., H.L. Haller, and A.W. Lindquist, "Toxicity of DDT
Isoraers to Some Insects Affecting Man," Science 104:343-344 ( 9 6 .
14)
167. Kemp, H.T., R.L. Little, V.L. Holoman, and R.L. Darby, Water
Quality Criteria Data Book; Vol. 5, Effects of Chemicals on Aquatic
Life, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 13050-HLA
09/73 (1973).
168.

Deontier, C.C. and H.A. Jones, "TDE, l,l-Dichloro-2»2-bis(pchlorophenyl)ethane, as an Anopheline Larvicide," Science 103:13-14
(1946).,

169.

Luard, E.J., "Sensitivity of Dunaliella an*' Pcenedesmus (Chlorophyceae) to Chlorinated Hydrocarbons," Phycologia 12:29-33 (1973).

170.

Poorman, A.E., "Effects of Pesticides on Eiiglena gracilis. I.
Growth Studies," Bull. Environ. Contain. Toxicol. 10:25-28 (1973).

171.

Hicks, G.F., Jr. and T.R, Corner, "Location and Consequences of
l,l,l-TrichlorO"2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethane Uptake by Bacillus
me^aterium," A_ppl._M_icrobipl. 25:381-387 (1973).

172. Gil, I., J. Morales, A. Martin, C. Ruano, and F. Argones, "Effects
of Some Pesticides on Azotobacter," Microbiol. Esp. 23:271-277
(1970); Chero. Abs. 75, 34405z (1971).
173.

Collins, J.A. and B.E. Langlois, "Effect of DDT, Dieldrin and
Heptachlor on the Growth of Selected Bacteria," Appl. Microbiol.
16:799-800 (1968).

174.

Garretson, A.L. and C.L. San Clamente, "Inhibitory of Nitrifying
Chemolithotropic Bacteria by Several Insecticides," J. Econ.
Entomol. 61:285-288 (1968).

175.

Powers, C.D., R.G. Rowland, R.R. Michaels, N.S. Fisher, and C.F.
Wurster, "The Toxicity of DDE to a Marine Dinoflagellate," Environ.
Pollut. 9:253-262 (1975).

176.

American Conference .of Governmental Industrial Hygienists,
Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and physical Agents
in tha Workroom Environment with Intended Changes for 1978,
Cincinnati, OH, p. 14 (1978).

-66-

�177.

Food and Drug Administration, "Action Levels for Poisonous or
Deleterious Substances in Human Food and Animal Peed," Industrial
Guidance Branch, Bureau of Foods (HFF-342), 200 C St. S.W.,
Washington, DC, p. 5 (June 1968).

178.

"DDT Contamination Found in Tests," The Rocket ? 3 2 ) 9 (October 5,
.(0!
1977).

179.

Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, "DDT Analyses by Colorimetric
Methods of Muscle and Fat Tissue from Wildlife Near Huntsville
Spring Branch, Wheeler National Wildlife Refuge, Alabama," Patuxent
Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD (February 14-24, 1964).

180.

Pearson, J.G., E.S. Bender, D.H. Taormina, K.L. Manuel, P.P.
Robinson, anri A.E. Asaki, "Effects of Elemental Phosphorus on the
Biota of Yellow Lake, Pine Bluff Arsenal, Arkansas, March
1974-Ja»v:jry 1975," U.S. Army TR EO-TR-76077, Edgewood Arsenal, MD
(December 1976).
/.
181. Ward, F.P., C.F.A. pinkham, and J.G. Pearson, "Redstone Arsenal,
Alabama, Installation Environmental Assessment Statement,"
Ecological Research Unit, Biomedical Laboratory, Edgewood Arsenal,
MD (August 1972).
182.

State of Alabama, Dept. of Conservation, Game and Fish Division,
Water Pollution Report (February 5, 1971).

183. State of Alabama, Dept. of Conservation, Utilities Division,
Utilities Lab Control (March 5, 1971).
184.

U.S. Army Environmental Hygiene Agency, "Analytical Results of
Biological Samples," Report No. 3, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD
(October 14, 1977).

185.

Manuel, K.L., E.S. Bender, and J.G. Pearson, "Results of Aquatic
Surveys at Pine Bluff Arsenal, Arkansas, September 1973-October
1974," U.S. Army TR EB-TR-76038, Edgewood Arsenal, MD (April 1976).

186.

"DDT Residue Tests Ordered at Redstone," Huntsville Times, Evening
Edition (July 25, 1977).

187.

Cogley, D.R., J.C. Dacre, D.H. Rosenblatt, and W.D. Bvrrows,
"Prioritiiation of Research Efforts on Environmental Chemicals: A
Rationale for the Calculation of Preliminary Pollutant Limit Values
for Soil and Water," presented at the 1979 National Conference on
Hazardous Material Risk Assessment, Disposal and Management, Miami
Beach, FL (April 25-27, 1979).

-67-

�DISTRIBUTION LIST
Project No. 3E16272QA835/OQ/137
do, of
Copies
5

12

•;

... ' . : • ' . , . • . ..,' ." :/.•-'..:. . •..

,,

• . ' • - """"•"%.-.;'

US Army Medical Research and Development Command
ATT,&lt;: SGRD-RMS
Fort Detrick
Frederick, MO Zl.701
Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)
ATTtt: QTICrDUA
Cameron Station
Alexandria, VA 22314

1

Conmandant
Academy of Health Sciences* US Army
ATTrt: AHS-COM
Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234

2

USAHBROL Technical Library

68

�m

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="15059">
              <text>047</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="15061">
              <text>1190</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="15064">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15060">
                <text>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Author: &lt;/strong&gt;U. S. Army Medical Bioengineering Research and Development Laboratory</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15062">
                <text>1979-06-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15063">
                <text>Report: Problem Definition Studies on Potential Environmental Pollutants, VII. Physical, Chemical, Toxicological, and Biological Properties of DDT and Its Derivatives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15065">
                <text>aquatic animals</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="15066">
                <text>health effects</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="15067">
                <text>pesticide toxicology</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="15068">
                <text>ecological impact</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2788" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="19851">
              <text>074</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="19852">
              <text>1933</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="19855">
              <text>Series III Subseries IV</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="19850">
                <text>Sinclair, Ian</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="19853">
                <text>1982-12-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="19854">
                <text>Report on the Use of Herbicides, Insecticides, and Other Chemicals by the Australian Army in South Vietnam</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="19856">
                <text>herbicide testing</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="19857">
                <text>herbicide disposal</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="19858">
                <text>human exposure</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="19859">
                <text>pesticide toxicology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3035" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22003">
              <text>084</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22005">
              <text>2108</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="22009">
              <text>Series III Subseries IV</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22007">
                <text>Report missing title page: Contents relate to pesticide exposure in Vietnam and Australia</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="22011">
                <text>Australia</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22013">
                <text>pesticide toxicology</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22015">
                <text>human exposure</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="22017">
                <text>Southeast Asia</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2284" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="15499">
              <text>048</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="15500">
              <text>1231</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="15504">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15498">
                <text>Stadelman, W. J.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15501">
                <text>BioScience</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15502">
                <text>1973-07-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15503">
                <text>Record of Some Chemical Residues in Poultry Products</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="15505">
                <text>agricultural exposure</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="15506">
                <text>animal testing</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="15507">
                <text>pesticide toxicology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="1966" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="12165">
              <text>040</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="12166">
              <text>0913</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="12170">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12164">
                <text>Moses, Marion</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12167">
                <text>Environmental and Occupational Medicine</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12168">
                <text>1983</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12169">
                <text>Pesticides</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12171">
                <text>industrial exposure</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="12172">
                <text>pesticide properties</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="12173">
                <text>pesticide toxicology</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="12174">
                <text>agricultural exposure</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2072" public="1" featured="0">
    <collection collectionId="30">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4687">
                  <text>Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="49809">
                  <text>&lt;p style="margin-top: -1em; line-height: 1.2em;"&gt;The Alvin L. Young Collection on Agent Orange comprises 120 linear feet and spans the late 1800s to 2005; however, the bulk of the coverage is from the 1960s to the 1980s and there are many undated items. The collection was donated to Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library in 1985 by Dr. Alvin L. Young (1942- ). Dr. Young developed the collection as he conducted extensive research on the military defoliant Agent Orange. The collection is in good condition and includes letters, memoranda, books, reports, press releases, journal and newspaper clippings, field logs and notebooks, newsletters, maps, booklets and pamphlets, photographs, memorabilia, and audiotapes of an interview with Dr. Young.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;For more about this collection, &lt;a href="/exhibits/speccoll/exhibits/show/alvin-l--young-collection-on-a"&gt;view the Agent Orange Exhibit.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="52">
          <name>Box</name>
          <description>The box containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="13287">
              <text>043</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="53">
          <name>Folder</name>
          <description>The folder containing the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="13288">
              <text>1019</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="54">
          <name>Series</name>
          <description>The series number of the original item.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="13292">
              <text>Series III Subseries I</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13283">
                <text>Robson, Alan M.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="13284">
                <text>J. M. Kissane</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="13285">
                <text>N. H. Elvick</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="13286">
                <text>L. Pundavela</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13289">
                <text>Journal of Pediatrics</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13290">
                <text>1969-08-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13291">
                <text>Pentachlorophenol Poisoning in a Nursery for Newborn Infants: I. Clinical Features and Treatment</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13293">
                <text>pesticide poisoning</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="13294">
                <text>pesticide toxicology</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="13295">
                <text>human exposure</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>ao_seriesIII</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
